Correction to: Genome Med 11, 69 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13073-019-0685-z
Following publication of the original article [1], two errors were identified in the Results section.
1. The sentence currently reads:
“For IPAH, we observed significant associations for BMPR2 (p = 1.0E − 7, FDR = 9.0E− 04), KLK1 (p = 1.0E− 7, FDR = 9.0E− 04), and GGCX (p = 5.0E− 07, FDR = 0.002) (see Fig. 4).
The sentence should read
“For IPAH, we observed significant associations for BMPR2 (p = 1.0E − 7, FDR = 9.0E− 04), KLK1 (p = 1.0E− 7, FDR = 9.0E− 04), and GGCX (p = 1.9E-06, FDR = 0.013).
Further down in the text:
2. The sentence currently reads:
“Likewise, while the association signal for GDF2 fell below the cutoff (p = 3.0E−07, FDR = 0.002), we clearly provide confirmation of this new PAH risk gene”.
The sentence should read:
“Likewise, while the association signal for GDF2 fell below the cutoff (p = 3.2E-06, FDR = 0.016), we clearly provide confirmation of this new PAH risk gene”.
The original article [1] has been corrected.
Footnotes
Na Zhu, Michael W. Pauciulo, Carrie L. Welch, Yufeng Shen, Wendy K. Chung and William C. Nichols contributed equally to this work.
Reference
- 1.Zhu, et al. Genome Med. 2019;11:69. doi: 10.1186/s13073-019-0685-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]