Table 2.
Criteria | Met criteria (3) | Somewhat met criteria (2) | Did not meet criteria (1) |
---|---|---|---|
1. Was there a clear statement of the aims of the research? | 48 | 11 | 1 |
2. Is a qualitative methodology appropriate? | 60 | 0 | 0 |
3. Was the research design appropriate to address the aims of the research? | 41 | 18 | 1 |
4. Was the recruitment strategy appropriate to the aims of the research? | 21 | 26 | 13 |
5. Were the data collected in a way that addressed the research issue? | 41 | 18 | 1 |
6. Has the relationship between researcher and participants been adequately considered? | 7 | 15 | 38 |
7. Have ethical issues been taken into consideration? | 44 | 14 | 2 |
8. Was the data analysis sufficiently rigorous? | 46 | 9 | 5 |
9. Is there a clear statement of findings? | 49 | 10 | 1 |
10. How valuable is the research? | 53 | 4 | 3 |
Note: CASP = Critical Appraisal Skills Programme.