Skip to main content
JTCVS Techniques logoLink to JTCVS Techniques
editorial
. 2021 Oct 29;11:36. doi: 10.1016/j.xjtc.2021.10.054

Commentary: From little things big things grow

Yaroslav Ivanov a,b, Edward Buratto a,b,c, Antonia Schulz a,b, Igor E Konstantinov a,b,c,d,
PMCID: PMC8828921  PMID: 35169730

graphic file with name fx1.jpg

Antonia Schulz, MD, Igor E. Konstantinov, MD, PhD, FRACS, Edward Buratto, MBBS, PhD, FRACS, and Yaroslav Ivanov, MD, PhD

Central Message.

Inferior vena cava stenosis following transvenous leads placement, although avoidable, may require a complex surgical approach.

See Article page 31.

The rate of implantation of the transvenous automated implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (AICDs) and pacemakers is ever increasing due to the relative simplicity of the implantation and high efficacy.1 However, percutaneous implantable devices are not without their shortcomings.1, 2, 3, 4 As their delivery route is the superior vena cava (SVC) system, not surprisingly most of the complications occur within the deep veins of the upper extremity.2 Both venous thrombosis1 and stenosis may occur, leading to occlusion.2 Most strikingly, the overall prevalence of asymptomatic vein occlusion from a recent meta-analysis study is 8.6%.1 Interestingly, even with complete occlusion of SVC, patients may remain free of symptoms, suggesting that a gradual occlusion may allow collaterals to develop.

In the current issue of the Journal, Smith and colleagues5 described a patient with complete occlusion of SVC and severely stenotic inferior vena cava (IVC) many years after the AICD implantation. The patient developed the portal hypertension and ascites. The almost-complete occlusion of IVC was treated surgically with IVC patching after other therapeutic and endovascular variants were exhausted. Interestingly, even with complete removal of the AICD system the SVC occlusion remained, yet the patient had complete resolution of the symptoms due to well-developed collaterals. Surgical management of cardiac lesions located at the right atrium to IVC junction is not always straightforward.6 Ironically, this avoidable complication could have been easily prevented by proper placement of the transvenous leads. The best way to deal with complications is to prevent them!

Footnotes

Disclosures: The authors reported no conflicts of interest.

The Journal policy requires editors and reviewers to disclose conflicts of interest and to decline handling or reviewing manuscripts for which they may have a conflict of interest. The editors and reviewers of this article have no conflicts of interest.

References

  • 1.Duijzer D., de Winter M.A., Nijkeuter M., Tuinenburg A.E., Westerink J. Upper extremity deep vein thrombosis and asymptomatic vein occlusion in patients with transvenous leads: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2021;8:698336. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2021.698336. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Haghjoo M., Nikoo M.H., Fazelifar A.F., Alizadeh A., Emkanjoo Z., Sadr-Ameli M.A. Predictors of venous obstruction following pacemaker or implantable cardioverter-defibrillator implantation: a contrast venographic study on 100 patients admitted for generator change, lead revision, or device upgrade. EP Europace. 2007;9:328–332. doi: 10.1093/europace/eum019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Pavia S., Wilkoff B. The management of surgical complications of pacemaker and implantable cardioverter-defibrillators. Curr Opin Cardiol. 2001;16:66–71. doi: 10.1097/00001573-200101000-00010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Rozmus G., Daubert J.P., Huang D.T., Rosero S., Hall B., Francis C. Venous thrombosis and stenosis after implantation of pacemakers and defibrillators. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2005;13:9–19. doi: 10.1007/s10840-005-1140-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Smith P.S., Van Essen G.G., Zivin A.H., Hayes P.G., Ong E.S., Lehr E.J. Inferior vena cava–right atrial junction stenosis requiring a multidisciplinary approach to resection and reconstruction. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Tech. 2022;11:31–33. doi: 10.1016/j.xjtc.2021.10.041. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Ivanov Y.Y., Konstantinov I.E. Commentary: a rare intracaval mass with intracardiac extension: a value of frozen section revisited? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2019;158:e103–e104. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2019.05.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from JTCVS Techniques are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES