Skip to main content
PMC home page
Molecular Genetics & Genomic Medicine logoLink to Molecular Genetics & Genomic Medicine
. 2022 Jan 3;10(2):e1864. doi: 10.1002/mgg3.1864

Distribution of RET proto‐oncogene variants in children with appendicitis

Jurek Schultz 1,✉, Ines Freibothe 1, Michael Haase 1, Patrick Glatte 1, Gustavo Barreton 2, Andreas Ziegler 3,4,5, Heike Görgens 6, Guido Fitze 1
PMCID: PMC8830807  PMID: 34981673

Abstract

Background

In addition to patient‐related systemic factors directing the immune response, the pathomechanisms of appendicitis (AP) might also include insufficient drainage leading to inflammation caused by decreased peristalsis. Genetic predisposition accounts for 30%–50% of AP. M. Hirschsprung (HSCR), also characterized by disturbed peristalsis, is associated with variants in the RET proto‐oncogene. We thus hypothesized that RET variants contribute to the etiology of AP.

Methods

DNA from paraffin‐embedded appendices and clinical data of 264 children were analyzed for the RET c.135A>G variant (rs1800858, NC_000010.11:g.43100520A>G). In 46 patients with gangrenous or perforated AP (GAP), peripheral blood DNA was used for RET sequencing.

Results

Germline mutations were found in 13% of GAP, whereas no RET mutations were found in controls besides the benign variant p.Tyr791Phe (NC_000010.11:g.43118460A>T). In GAP, the polymorphic G‐allele in rs2435352 (NC_000010.11:g.43105241A>G) in intron 4 was underrepresented (p = 0.0317).

Conclusion

Our results suggest an impact of the RET proto‐oncogene in the etiology of AP. Mutations were similar to patients with HSCR but no clinical features of HSCR were observed. The pathological phenotypes in both populations might thus represent a multigenic etiology including RET germline mutations with phenotypic heterogeneity and incomplete penetrance.

Keywords: appendicitis, general surgery, genetic association studies, pediatrics, proto‐oncogene protein ret

In a case–control study, we found germline variants in 13% of gangrenous appendicitis, and the polymorphic G‐allele in rs2435352 (NC_000010.11:g.43105241A>G) in intron 4 was underrepresented (p = 0.0317). Like in Hirschsprung's disease, the RET germline variants in acute appendicitis might represent a multigenic etiology with phenotypic heterogeneity and incomplete penetrance.

graphic file with name MGG3-10-e1864-g001.jpg

1. INTRODUCTION

Appendectomy is among the most frequently performed operations, with incidences peaking around the 10th year of life (Addiss et al., 1990; Anderson et al., 2012). The etiology of appendicitis (AP) is multifactorial. Cumulative evidence from epidemiological studies (Andersson, 2007), cytokine profiles (Rubér et al., 2010), and gene expression studies (Kiss et al., 2021) suggest systemic factors determining the course of AP. However, long‐standing good evidence also points to insufficient drainage leading to increased intraluminal pressure and invasive infection as a pathogenic sequence (Bhangu et al., 2015; Khan et al., 2019; Wangensteen & Dennis, 1939). This insufficient drainage might be caused by decreased peristalsis of the appendix that otherwise freely evacuates into the cecal lumen, as it can be observed on oral contrast studies or barium enemas (Maglinte et al., 1981; Tang et al., 2019).

A rare childhood disorder characterized by absent peristalsis due to altered enteric innervation is Hirschsprung disease (HSCR [MIM: 142623]). HSCR is a dysgenetic neurocristopathy characterized by a congenital absence of the intramural ganglia in the hindgut causing intestinal obstruction in newborns. Besides germline mutations in other genes (EDNRB, EDN3, GDNF, NTN, SOX10, ECE1, SIP1, and NRG1) and other linked genetic loci (3p12, 19q, and 9q31), the RET (OMIM 164761) gene locus at 10q11.2 is the major gene locus for HSCR. RET germline mutations, which are primarily point mutations scattered throughout the extracellular domain and within the intracellular tyrosine kinase domain, have been detected in up to 20% of sporadic and in 50% of familial cases (Amiel et al., 2008; Bolk et al., 2000). Furthermore, RET variants that are acting by modulation of the gene expression are strongly associated with the HSCR phenotype. These observations support the concept of synergistic heterozygosity for HSCR, which considers the disease phenotype as a result of cumulative effects of at least two mutations or variants in different genes (Amiel et al., 2008; Borrego et al., 1999; Emison et al., 2005; Fitze, Cramer, et al., 2003; Fitze et al., 1999).

Similar to the HSCR, a familial occurrence of AP has been observed (Baker, 1937; Li et al., 2018). Today, around 20%–50% of AP are considered to have an underlying genetic cause (Basta et al., 1990; Duffy et al., 1990; Ergul, 2007; Oldmeadow et al., 2009; Sadr Azodi et al., 2009; Simó Alari et al., 2017). Recently, genome‐wide association studies (GWAS) found strong association of appendectomies with a SNP near PITX2 (Kristjansson et al., 2017), a gene also involved in intestinal development that has been shown to be significantly less expressed in appendectomy specimen (Orlova et al., 2019). Recent studies also showed an irregular distribution of ganglia in the wall of inflamed appendices, suggesting a possible role of ganglia cell distribution and functioning in the pathogenesis of AP similar to HSCR (Kubikova et al., 2015).

According to this notion, we hypothesized that mutations of the RET proto‐oncogene may contribute to the etiology of AP in children.

2. PATIENTS, MATERIALS, AND METHODS

Within three consecutive years, 264 children (133 boys and 131 girls) underwent an appendectomy in our department. Together with our pathologists, we classified appendix specimen in gangrenous and perforated appendicitis (GAP) or non‐GAP, which includes all less inflamed stages. We collected their clinical data and isolated DNA from the paraffin‐embedded appendices. Family history was available in 185 patients. The c.135A>G variant that is in linkage disequilibrium with a functional variant in the RET promoter (NC_000010.11:g.42787315G>A, rs10900269) as well as with a variant in the RET intron 1 (NC_000010.11:g.43086608T>C, rs2435357) (Emison et al., 2005; Fitze, Appelt, et al., 2003) was analyzed. For these analyses, 131 anonymous healthy blood donors (HBD control) from Germany served as controls.

In addition, we collected DNA samples from peripheral blood leucocytes within a subpopulation (46 out of the 264 patients; 25 boys and 21 girls) with a histologically confirmed gangrenous or perforated appendicitis (GAP). In this population, the complete coding region of the RET proto‐oncogene was sequenced. Forty‐seven individuals >20 years of age which had not undergone appendectomy (NA controls) served as second control. Both control populations were matched for sex and Caucasian ethnicity. In six of seven patients with a detected RET germline mutation, we collected clinical data of their families and sequenced the RET proto‐oncogene in their relatives.

We isolated DNA from leukocytes of peripheral blood and from paraffin‐embedded tissues according to standard protocols. The coding regions of all 21 exons including the adjacent intronic regions of the RET proto‐oncogene were amplified from genomic DNA with subsequent sequence analysis by a direct DNA sequencing approach using the primers and methodology described previously (Fitze et al., 2002). MLPA analysis was performed on genomic DNA isolated from peripheral blood leukocytes to assess genomic rearrangements in the RET proto‐oncogene using the MLPA test kit P169 lot 0106 (MRC‐Holland, Amsterdam, The Netherlands) according to the supplied protocol and as described previously (Serra et al., 2010). The association between the genotypes of the c.135A>G variant and the histological evaluation of the appendix was analyzed using the Jonckheere‐Terpstra‐Test.

To evaluate deviation from the Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium, observed and expected genotype frequencies were compared by an exact goodness of fit test separately in cases and controls. Odds ratios and exact 95% confidence intervals from logistic regression for comparing genotype frequencies with additive genotype coding are presented together with exact p‐values. The global significance level was set to 0.05, and no adjustments were made for multiple testing.

NC_000010.11 and NM_020975.6 were used as reference genomes.

3. RESULTS

3.1. Genotype analysis of the c.135A>G variant in exon 2

The analysis of the c.135A>G variant (rs1800858) as a marker for the HSCR‐associated haplotype revealed no deviation of the genotype frequencies within the population of 122 patients with a non‐GAP out of 264 appendectomized patients compared with those of the control population (Table 1). In contrast, the homozygous c.135AA genotype is slightly overrepresented in patients with GAP and perforated GAP in comparison to the control population, as well as compared to the non‐GAP population, without reaching statistical significance (p = 0.3246).

TABLE 1.

Distribution of c.135A>G genotypes among the different histopathological types of appendicitis in comparison with normal controls

Exon 2 c.135 Histopathological evaluation Normal controls (n = 131)
Non‐gangrenous (n = 122) Gangrenous (n = 115) Perforated (n = 27) Total (n = 264)
GG 67 (54.9%) 58 (50.4%) 15 (55.6%) 140 (53.0%) 69 (52.7%)
GA 50 (41.0%) 46 (40.0%) 7 (25.9%) 103 (39.0%) 55 (42.0%)
AA 5 (4.1%) 11 (9.6%) 5 (18.5%) 21 (8.0%) 7 (5.3%)
Open in a new tab

Furthermore, homozygous c.135AA genotype is overrepresented in patients with a family history of the disease (Table 2). However, these data do not show statistical significance (p = 0.1291).

TABLE 2.

Distribution of c.135A>G genotypes among the different histopathological types of appendicitis in relation to the family history for appendicitis

Histopathology Familial history for appendectomy and c.135G>A genotypes
Positive (n = 110) Negative (n = 75)
GG GA AA ∑ GG GA AA ∑
Non‐GAP 22 17 2 37.3% 20 16 0 49.3%
GAP 23 28 6 51.8% 20 8 3 40.0%
Perforated 7 3 2 10.9% 5 1 2 10.7%
47.3% 43.6% 9.1% 60.0% 33.3% 6.7%
Open in a new tab

3.2. Sequence analyses of RET proto‐oncogene

In 46 of the 264 appendectomy samples with GAP or perforated GAP, we analyzed the complete coding region of the RET proto‐oncogene from peripheral leukocyte samples. Of these 46 patients, 6 (13%) carried RET germline mutations (Table 3). Because of this unexpected finding, we decided to analyze the complete coding region of the RET proto‐oncogene in 47 healthy individuals older than 20 years who have not had an appendectomy (NA) as control. In contrast to the GAP population, no RET germline mutations were found in NA controls besides two NA controls who carried the p.Tyr791Phe variant. We detected this NC_000010.11:g.43118460A>T variant in exon 13 not only in two NA controls but also in one GAP patient. In the past, this mutation has been considered a disease causing mutation in MEN2 (Berndt et al., 1998b), but none of these three individuals showed any MEN2 symptoms.

TABLE 3.

Characterization of six RET germline mutations identified in 46 patients with GAP (aminoacid change according to NP_066124.1), transmission of these mutations, the family history for appendicitis, and the analysis which c.135G>A allele harbors the mutation

No. Exon Mutation Nucleotide change (NC_000010.11) Type of mutation Histological evaluation of appendix Family history for appendicitis Transmission of the mutation Mutated c.135G>A allele
1 3

Arg

163

Trp

CGG → TGG

g.43102491C>T

(rs371153966)

 Missense Gangrenous Positive (father) Paternal A
2 7

Pro

476

Thr

CCC → ACC

g.43111369C>A

 Missense Gangrenous Father, mother, brother De novo G
3 11

Ser

649

Leu

TCG → TTG

g.43114546C>T

(rs148935214)

 Missense Gangrenous n.d. n.d. n.d.
4 13

Asn

777

Ser

AAC → AGC

g.43118418A>G

(rs377767415)

 Missense Gangrenous 2 Sisters Maternal A
5 18

Pro

996

=

CCG → CCA

g.43124931G>A

(rs145798106)

 Silent Gangrenous Negative Paternal A
6 19

Arg

1050

*

CGA → TGA

g.43126683C>T

(rs767479170 but only C>G recorded so far)

 Nonsense (>STOP) Perforated Father Maternal A
Open in a new tab

Abbreviation: n.d., not defined.

In five of six patients who carried RET germline mutations, we could perform DNA sequencing in first‐degree relatives. In four of these families, the mutation was inherited from the parents (two paternal and two maternal) but only in family 1 the mutation co‐segregated with appendectomy (Table 3). We identified a de novo mutation in the patient of family 2. In family 3, the analysis was incomplete due to an unknown father. In family 2 with the de novo mutation in the patient, three family members had an appendicitis, in family 5 there was no appendicitis in family members, and in family 6 the mutation was inherited maternally and the father has had an appendicitis (Table 3). Furthermore, none of the investigated mutation carriers showed any clinical symptoms of HSCR, particularly no chronic constipation. Finally, haplotype reconstruction was possible in five of the six families in which a RET germline mutation was detected. In four families the c.135A allele carried the RET mutation and only in one family the mutation was located on the c.135G allele (Table 3).

Similar to the variants found in the 264 appendectomized patients, in 46 patients who had undergone sequence analysis of RET, we found an overrepresentation of the homozygous c.135AA genotype of the exon 2 variant compared with the NA controls (Table 4). Except for the intron 4 variant NC_000010.11:g.43105241A>G (rs2435352) that shows a significant overrepresentation of the wild‐type allele in the patient population compared with the NA controls, the genotype distribution of none of the analyzed variants deviated significantly from the patient population (Tables 4 and 5).

TABLE 4.

Genotype distribution (percentages in parenthesis) of eight exonic RET proto‐oncogene variants of 46 GAP patients compared to the control population (positions according to reference genome NM_020975.6)

SNP‐position Genotype Patients (n = 46) Controls (n = 47) Cochran–Armitage trend test
OR CI ex. p‐value
c.135A>G GG 21 (45.70%) 25 (53.20%)
rs1800858 GA 18 (39.10%) 20 (42.60%) 0.6512 0.325–1.271
AA 7 (15.20%) 2 (4.30%) 0.4241 0.106–1.615 0.2104
c.375C>A CC 43 (93.50%) 46 (97.90%)
rs1800859 CA 3 (6.50%) 1 (2.10%) 0.3152 0.006–4.097
AA 0 (0.00%) 0 (0.00%) 0.3613
c.1296A>G GG 23 (50.00%) 16 (34.00%)
rs1800860 GA 17 (37.00%) 26 (55.30%) 1.353 0.704–2.649
AA 6 (13.00%) 5 (10.60%) 1.831 0.495–7.018 0.3576
c.2071G>A GG 27 (58.70%) 28 (59.60%)
rs1799939 GA 18 (39.10%) 16 (34.00%) 1.104 0.514–2.388
AA 1 (2.20%) 3 (6.40%) 1.219 0.265–5.703 0.8591
c.2307G>T TT) 23 (50.00%) 27 (57.40%)
rs1800861 TG 21 (45.70%) 16 (34.00%) 0.9177 0.447–1.874
GG 2 (4.30%) 4 (8.50%) 0.8421 0.200–3.513 0.8675
c.2508C>T CC 43 (93.50%) 45 (95.70%)
rs1800862 CT 3 (6.50%) 2 (4.30%) 0.6401 0.051–5.873
TT 0 (0.00%) 0 (0.00%) 0.6771
c.2712C>G CC 26 (56.50%) 28 (59.60%)
rs1800863 CG 19 (41.30%) 16 (34.00%) 1.035 0.482–2.228
GG 1 (2.20%) 3 (6.40%) 1.071 0.232–4.965 1
c.2944C>T CC 45 (97.80%) 42 (89.40%)
rs17158558 CT 1 (2.20%) 5 (10.60%) 5.275 0.557–258.9
TT 0 (0.00%) 0 (0.00%) 0.2035
Open in a new tab

TABLE 5.

Genotype distribution (percentages in parenthesis) of seven intronic RET proto‐oncogene variants of 46 GAP patients compared to the control population (nucleotide positions according to NC_000010.11)

SNP position Genotype Patients (n = 46) Controls (n = 47) Cochran–Armitage trend test
OR CI ex. p‐value
g.43100731 GG 30 (65.20%) 22 (46.80%)
GA 15 (32.60%) 22 (46.80%) 1.992 0.913–4.548
AA 1 (2.20%) 2 (6.40%) 3.969 0.833–20.69 0.0745
g.43105241 AA 24 (52.20%) 13 (27.70%)
AG 16 (34.80%) 24 (51.10%) 1.91 1.026–3.689
GG 6 (13.00%) 10 (21.30%) 3.65 1.052–13.61 0.0317
g.43116778 CC 21 (45.70%) 27 (57.40%)
C>T CT 22 (47.80%) 18 (38.30%) 0.6739 0.314–1.412
rs760466 TT 3 (6.50%) 2 (4.30%) 0.4541 0.098–1.993 0.301
g.43120057 GG 34 (73.90%) 30 (63.80%)
G>A GA 11 (23.90%) 15 (31.90%) 1.525 0.666–3.643
rs2472737 AA 1 (2.20%) 2 (4.30%) 2.325 0.443–13.27 0.34
g.43126769 CC 27 (58.70%) 28 (59.60%)
C>T CT 17 (37.00%) 17 (36.20%) 0.9716 0.451–2.090
rs2075912 TT 2 (4.30%) 2 (4.30%) 0.944 0.204–4.368 1
g.43128364 CC 3411 (73.90%) 29 (61.70%)
C>T CT 1 (23.90%) 16 (34.00%) 1.636 0.715–3.921
rs17028 TT −2.20%) 2 (4.30%) 2.678 0.512–15.38 0.2542
g.43129775 AA 26 (56.50%) 27 (57.40%)
A>G AG 17 (37.00%) 18 (38.30%) 0.9154 0.436–1.912
rs2742241 GG 3 (6.50%) 2 (4.30%) 0.837 0.190–3.656 0.8639
Open in a new tab

4. DISCUSSION

Although the etiology of AP is multifactorial, heredity is a significant factor in pediatric patients. Already in 1937, Baker (1937) described a family in which 50% of members had undergone appendectomy. Gauderer et al. (2001) found that children with AP are twice as likely to have a positive family history compared to patients with right lower quadrant pain without AP. Ergul (2007) revealed in a representative retrospective study on 2670 patients that a positive family history increases the relative risk of an AP 3.15 times. In our own population, 110 (60%) out of 185 patients with available family history had a family history for AP supporting the etiological importance of heritability. Analyzing the Swedish twin register, Sadr Azodi et al. (2009) described larger genetic and non‐shared environmental factors in females, and stronger shared environmental effects in males in the underlying etiology of AP. For males and females combined, genetic effects explained 30% of the variation in AP risk. Complex segregation analysis supported the genetic component of the disease (Basta et al., 1990). A genome‐wide linkage analysis of a large Australian twin dataset identified linkage of AP to chromosome 1p34.3. Other supportive regions of interest were located on chromosomes 11 and 14 (Oldmeadow et al., 2009). Investigations into the nature of AP showed that it may be a result of an inappropriate immune response which may have a genetic basis (Rivera‐Chavez et al., 2004). This corresponds with an association of NOD2/CARD15 variants with AP in a large Danish study with 43.600 individuals (Yazdanyar & Nordestgaard, 2010) and with recent data on the differential expression of immune factors long after progressive GAP or often self‐limiting non‐GAP had been diagnosed (Kiss et al., 2021; Rubér et al., 2010).

In parallel to HSCR, an altered distribution of intramural ganglia has been found in the appendices of AA patients (Kubikova et al., 2015). Furthermore, up to 50% of HSCR patients are suffering from a recurrent colitis that also persists after resection of the aganglionic colon segment in about half of these patients. Interestingly, an association of this HSCR related colitis with the mentioned NOD2/CARD15 variants was excluded recently (Lacher et al., 2010). Because the RET proto‐oncogene is the major susceptibility gene for HSCR we have hypothesized that this gene could have an etiological effect in AP, as well.

In line with previous data that have shown the wild‐type allele in NC_000010.11:g.43105241A>G (rs2435352) to be strongly associated with HSCR (Fitze, Cramer, et al., 2003), the wild‐type A‐allele was significantly overrepresented in our GAP‐populations, as well. Similarly, the G‐allele in NM_020975.6:c.135A>G (rs1800585) in RET exon 2 and the C‐allele in c.2944C>T (rs17158558) in RET exon 18 which are associated with HSCR (Fitze, Appelt, et al., 2003; Luzón‐Toro et al., 2012; Zhang et al., 2017) were overrepresented in our GAP populations, however, without reaching statistical significance. Although not statistically significant either, the distribution of NC_000010.11:g.43100731 G>A (rs2345351) was also similar to frequencies that were previously found to be strongly associated with HSCR (Fitze, Schierz, et al., 2003).

Interestingly, germline mutations of the RET proto‐oncogene were found in 13% (6 of 46) of the patients with GAP, which further emphasizes a possible impact of the RET proto‐oncogene in the etiology of the disease. Besides the frequency of RET mutations, the distribution of mutations scattered throughout the whole gene and the types of mutations comprising missense, nonsense and silent mutations are similar to that found in patients with HSCR (Amiel et al., 2008; Auricchio et al., 1999; Fitze, Appelt, et al., 2003). We excluded the occurrence of these mutations in a control population of healthy controls (NA controls) comprising 47 patients >20 years of age without appendectomy and without a history for HSCR or MTC. The p.Arg163Trp‐variant (rs371153966) inherited in family 1 from the father, who had been appendectomized at age 16 for AP to the affected daughter who was appendectomized at age 13 for GAP, lies in exon 3 of the extracellular RET‐domain. This exchange of a basic and hydrophilic amino acid with the neutral and hydrophobic tryptophan has so far only been reported as a variant in clinical testing. The p.Pro476Thr‐de novo mutation in family 2 has not been reported before. However, the p.Ser649Leu‐mutation (rs148935214) in the trans‐membrane domain in exon 11 did not result in MTC, even though it has been described in patients with elevated serum calcitonin and hereditary MTC (Colombo‐Benkmann et al., 2008; Vierhapper et al., 2004; Wei et al., 2016). European guidelines even recommend total thyroidectomy before age of 10 depending on serum calcitonin levels in patients carrying this mutation (Niederle et al., 2014). However, in view of functional in vitro studies that showed only moderately elevated kinase‐activity of the p.Ser649Leu‐mutant protein (Colombo‐Benkmann et al., 2008), these guidelines have to be carefully interpreted. Similarly, the p.Asn777Ser‐missense‐mutation in exon 13 within the intracellular domain has been associated with low‐penetrance nonaggressive familial MTC (D’Aloiso et al., 2006). Recently updated American guidelines recommend prophylactic thyroidectomy or yearly screenings including basal and stimulated serum calcitonin and neck ultrasound in carriers of this level A pathogenic variant p.Asn777Ser (Eng, 1993–2021). Neither our patient nor the mutation‐carriers in his family (mother and two sisters) suffered from MTC. The silent p.Pro996 = variant (AAC to AGC) was inherited in family 5 from the unaffected father to the appendectomized son as well as to the healthy daughter. The p.Arg1050* (CGA to CCA) nonsense mutation that inserts a STOP‐codon in the intracellular domain found in family 6 was inherited from the healthy mother to her two sons, one of them healthy the other one appendectomized at age 3 with a perforated GAP. This variant has not been reported before. While having negative histories and negative family histories for HSCR and MTC in all detected mutation carriers, we did not measure neither Calcitonin nor Pentagastrin‐provoced Calcitonin levels.

Except for the p.Tyr791Phe variant that we have found twice in the controls and once in the GAP population, this analysis did not identify any RET germline mutation in our specific NA control population. The p.Tyr791Phe mutation has been first described in HSCR patients (Fitze et al., 2002; Seri et al., 1997) and later associated with MEN2A syndrome (Berndt et al., 1998a). Since then, this mutation was described in patients with congenital central hypoventilation syndrome (Fitze, Appelt, et al., 2003), gastric and pancreatic cancer as well as glioblastoma, pheochromocytoma, and neuroblastoma (Rückert et al., 2011; Toledo et al., 2010). The RET receptor‐tyrosine kinase is activated by dimerization of two receptor protein chains and a possible pathomechanism for RET activation by the p.Tyr791Phe mutation due to a ligand‐independent activated monomeric protein was proposed (Menacho et al., 2005).

Even though the p.Tyr791Phe variant was inherited within the families analyzed in this study, the phenotypes associated with this mutation appear as sporadic diseases and show no genotype–phenotype correlation. In view with recent clinical data as well as recent mutational studies in mice (Høxbroe Michaelsen et al., 2019; Nakatani et al., 2020; Toledo et al., 2015), we consider the p.Tyr791Phe variant rather a non‐functional RET variant than a specific disease associated mutation. Thus, the lack of specific RET germline mutations in our specific control population substantiates the possible role of RET mutations for the development of AP.

Four of our six RET mutation carriers have a positive family history for AP. In four of six families, the mutation was inherited—twice paternally and twice maternally. However, only in one paternally inherited mutation we have observed evidence for a co‐segregation of the mutation with AP. This lack of a genotype–phenotype correlation may be caused by an incomplete penetrance of the appendicitis phenotype similar to the situation in HSCR (Amiel et al., 2008).

It could be suspected that these RET mutation carriers—particularly the patient with the nonsense mutation—were suffering from Hirschsprung disease. However, in these six families we have neither a history nor any clinical features of HCSR that would justify a rectal biopsy. Therefore, we have no explicit information about the intramural ganglia in our patients, but lack of intramural ganglia without any clinical features is unlikely. This observation could be explained only by a cumulative effect of germline mutations in several genes comprising the identified RET mutations as one component of a synergistic heterozygosity (Bolk et al., 2000). Generally, the occurrence of a RET germline mutation is significantly associated with a long‐segment HSCR. Previously, we have shown that RET haplotypes harboring a mutation in cis‐position could modify the HSCR phenotype. Whereas the combination of the RET c.135G haplotype with a germline mutation on the same RET allele is associated with a long‐segment HSCR phenotype, the combination of the RET c.135A haplotype with a mutation at the same allele shows a short‐segment HSCR with a low penetrance in the families (Fitze et al., 2002). In this study, all inherited RET germline mutations (four of six) in patients with GAP are located on RET c.135A alleles which could be one reason for a missing HSCR phenotype in these families.

Here, we identify germline mutations in 13% of patients with GAP as a possible genetic background of AP in childhood. Previously, we demonstrated RET germline mutations in 23% of HSCR patients (Fitze et al., 2002). Since no clinical features of HSCR were observed in our GAP patients, RET germline mutations should be considered to result in a phenotypical heterogeneity with incomplete penetrance similar to HSCR. Generally, these findings support the idea of a polygenic inheritance for both, HSCR and GAP. In the future, we need more extensive studies that include the histological appearance of ganglia in appendectomy specimens and the sequencing data of AP patients and relatives, as well as functional assessments of identified variants to elicit the genetic background and pathomechanisms of AP. In addition, we should extend sequencing to genes known to modulate the immune response and supplement cytokine profiles to detect genetic synergies in the GAP phenotype.

CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

The authors have declared no conflict of interest.

ETHICAL COMPLIANCE

All patients and parents in case of minors gave written informed consent to participate in the study. The ethics committee of the University of Technology of Dresden approved the study protocol (EK470498).

CONSENT TO PARTICIPATE

All patients and parents in case of minors gave written informed consent to participate in the study.

CONSENT FOR PUBLICATION

All patients and parents in case of minors gave written informed consent to the publication of this study.

Schultz, J. , Freibothe, I. , Haase, M. , Glatte, P. , Barreton, G. , Ziegler, A. , Görgens, H. , & Fitze, G. (2022). Distribution of RET proto‐oncogene variants in children with appendicitis. Molecular Genetics & Genomic Medicine, 10, e1864. 10.1002/mgg3.1864

DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT

All relevant data are included in this text, tables, and figures. Primary sequencing results are available upon request anytime. Newly discovered variants have been reported to ClinVar (accession numbers: SCV001469008, SCV001469009, SCV001469010, SCV001469011, and SCV001469012).

REFERENCES

  1. Addiss, D. G. , Shaffer, N. , Fowler, B. S. , & Tauxe, R. V. (1990). The epidemiology of appendicitis and appendectomy in the United States. American Journal of Epidemiology, 132(5), 910–925. 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a115734 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Amiel, J. , Sproat‐Emison, E. , Garcia‐Barcelo, M. , Lantieri, F. , Burzynski, G. , Borrego, S. , Pelet, A. , Arnold, S. , Miao, X. , Griseri, P. , Brooks, A. s , Antinolo, G. , de Pontual, L. , Clement‐Ziza, M. , Munnich, A. , Kashuk, C. , West, K. , Wong, K. K‐Y. , Lyonnet, S. , Chakravarti, A. , Tam, P. K‐H. , Ceccherini, I. , Hofstra, R. M. W. , & Fernandez, R. (2007). Hirschsprung disease, associated syndromes and genetics: a review. Journal of Medical Genetics, 45(1), 1–14. 10.1136/jmg.2007.053959 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Anderson, J. E. , Bickler, S. W. , Chang, D. C. , & Talamini, M. A. (2012). Examining a common disease with unknown etiology: Trends in epidemiology and surgical management of appendicitis in California, 1995–2009. World Journal of Surgery, 36(12), 2787–2794. 10.1007/s00268-012-1749-z [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Andersson, R. E. (2007). The natural history and traditional management of appendicitis revisited: spontaneous resolution and predominance of prehospital perforations imply that a correct diagnosis is more important than an early diagnosis. World Journal of Surgery, 31(1), 86–92. 10.1007/S00268-006-0056-Y [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Auricchio, Alberto , Griseri, Paola , Carpentieri, Maria Luisa , Betsos, Nicola , Staiano, Annamaria , Tozzi, Arturo , Priolo, Manuela , Thompson, Helen , Bocciardi, Renata , Romeo, Giovanni , Ballabio, Andrea , & Ceccherini, Isabella (1999). Double Heterozygosity for a RET substitution interfering with splicing and an EDNRB missense mutation in hirschsprung disease. The American Journal of Human Genetics, 64(4), 1216–1221. 10.1086/302329 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Baker, E. G. S. (1937). A family pedigree of appendicitis. Journal of Heredity, 28(6), 187–191. 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jhered.a104852 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  7. Basta, M. , Morton, N. E. , Mulvihill, J. J. , Radovanovic, Z. , Radojicic, C. , & Marinkovic, D. (1990). Inheritance of acute appendictis: Familial aggregation and evidence of polygenic transmission. American Journal of Human Genetics, 46(2), 377–382. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Berndt, I. , Reuter, M. , Saller, B. , Frank‐Raue, K. , Groth, P. , Grußendorf, M. , Raue, F. , Ritter, M. M. , & Höppner, W. (1998a). A new hot spot for mutations in the ret protooncogene causing familial medullary thyroid carcinoma and multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2A 1. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, 83(3), 770–774. 10.1210/jcem.83.3.4619 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Berndt, I. , Reuter, M. , Saller, B. , Frank‐Raue, K. , Groth, P. , Grußendorf, M. , Raue, F. , Ritter, M. M. , & Höppner, W. (1998b). A new hot spot for mutations in the ret protooncogene causing familial medullary thyroid carcinoma and multiple endocrine neoplasia Type 2A. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, 83(3), 770–774. 10.1210/jcem.83.3.4619 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Bhangu, A. , Søreide, K. , Di Saverio, S. , Assarsson, J. H. , & Drake, F. T. (2015). Acute appendicitis: modern understanding of pathogenesis, diagnosis, and management. The Lancet, 386(10000), 1278–1287. 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00275-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Bolk, S. , Pelet, A. , Hofstra, R. M. W. , Angrist, M. , Salomon, R. , Croaker, D. , Buys, C. H. C. M. , Lyonnet, S. , & Chakravarti, A. (2000). A human model for multigenic inheritance: Phenotypic expression in Hirschsprung disease requires both the RET gene and a new 9q31 locus. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 97(1), 268–273. 10.1073/pnas.97.1.268 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Borrego, S. , Sáez, M. E. , Ruiz, A. , Gimm, O. , López‐Alonso, M. , Antiñolo, G. , & Eng, C. (1999). Specific polymorphisms in the RET proto‐oncogene are over‐represented in patients with Hirschsprung disease and may represent loci modifying phenotypic expression. Journal of Medical Genetics, 36(10), 771–774. 10.1136/jmg.36.10.771 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Colombo‐Benkmann, M. , Li, Z. , Riemann, B. , Hengst, K. , Herbst, H. , Keuser, R. , Groß, U. , Rondot, S. , Raue, F. , Senninger, N. , Pützer, B. M. , & Frank‐Raue, K. (2008). Characterization of the RET protooncogene transmembrane domain mutation S649L associated with nonaggressive medullary thyroid carcinoma. European Journal of Endocrinology, 158(6), 811–816. 10.1530/EJE-07-0817 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. D’Aloiso, L. , Carlomagno, F. , Bisceglia, M. , Anaganti, S. , Ferretti, E. , Verrienti, A. , Arturi, F. , Scarpelli, D. , Russo, D. , Santoro, M. , & Filetti, S. (2006). In vivo and in vitro characterization of a novel germline RET mutation associated with low‐penetrant nonaggressive familial medullary thyroid carcinoma. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism, 91(3), 754–759. 10.1210/jc.2005-2338 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Duffy, D. L. , Martin, N. G. , & Mathews, J. D. (1990). Appendectomy in Australian twins. American Journal of Human Genetics, 47(3), 590–592. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Emison, E. S. , McCallion, A. S. , Kashuk, C. S. , Bush, R. T. , Grice, E. , Lin, S. , Portnoy, M. E. , Culler, D. J. , Green, E. D. , & Chakravarti, A. (2005). A common sex‐dependent mutation in a RET enhancer underlies Hirschsprung disease risk. Nature, 434(7035), 857–863. 10.1038/nature03467 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Eng, C. (1993–2021). Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2. In Adam M. P., Ardinger H. H., Pagon R. A., Wallace S. E., Bean L. J. H., Gripp K. W., Mirzaa G. M., & Amemiya A. (Eds.), GeneReviews® [Internet]. University of Washington, Seattle. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Ergul, E. (2007). Heredity and familial tendency of acute appendicitis. Scandinavian Journal of Surgery, 96(4), 290–292. 10.1177/145749690709600405 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Fitze, G. , Appelt, H. , König, I. R. , Stein, U. , Walther, W. , Gossen, M. , Schreiber, M. , Ziegler, A. , Roesner, D. , & Schackert, H. K. (2003). Functional haplotypes of the RET proto‐oncogene promoter are associated with Hirschsprung disease (HSCR). Human Molecular Genetics, 12(24), 3207–3214. 10.1093/hmg/ddg354 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Fitze, G. , Cramer, J. , Serra, A. , Schreiber, M. , Roesner, D. , & Schackert, H. K. (2003). Within‐gene interaction between c.135 G/A genotypes and RET proto‐oncogene germline mutations in HSCR families. European Journal of Pediatric Surgery, 13(3), 152–157. 10.1055/s-2003-41270 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Fitze, G. , Cramer, J. , Ziegler, A. , Schierz, M. , Schreiber, M. , Kuhlisch, E. , Roesner, D. , & Schackert, H. K. (2002). Association between c135G/A genotype and RET proto‐oncogene germline mutations and phenotype of Hirschsprung’s disease. Lancet, 359(9313), 1200–1205. 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)08218-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Fitze, G. , Schierz, M. , Kuhlisch, E. , Schreiber, M. , Ziegler, A. , Roesner, D. , & Schackert, H. K. (2003). Novel intronic polymorphisms in the RET proto‐oncogene and their association with Hirschsprung disease. Human Mutation, 22(2), 177. 10.1002/humu.9161 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Fitze, G. , Schreiber, M. , Kuhlisch, E. , Schackert, H. K. , & Roesner, D. (1999). Association of RET protooncogene codon 45 polymorphism with hirschsprung disease. The American Journal of Human Genetics, 65(5), 1469–1473. 10.1086/302618 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Gauderer, M. W. L. , Crane, M. M. , Green, J. A. , DeCou, J. M. , & Abrams, R. S. (2001). Acute appendicitis in children: the importance of family history. Journal of Pediatric Surgery, 36(8), 1214–1217. 10.1053/jpsu.2001.25765 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Høxbroe Michaelsen, S. , Ornstrup, M. J. , Poulsen, M. M. , Bennedbæk, F. N. , Gaustadnes, M. , Rossing, M. , Darling, P. , Vestergaard, P. , & Mathiesen, J. S. (2019). Long‐term follow‐up of RET Y791F carriers in Denmark 1994–2017: A National Cohort Study. Journal of Surgical Oncology, 119(6), 687–693. 10.1002/jso.25371 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Khan, M. S. , Chaudhry, M. B. H. , Shahzad, N. , Khan, M. S. , Wajid, M. , Memon, W. A. , & Alvi, R. (2019). The characteristics of appendicoliths associated with acute appendicitis. Cureus, 11(8), e5322. 10.7759/cureus.5322 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Kiss, N. , Minderjahn, M. , Reismann, J. , Svensson, J. , Wester, T. , Hauptmann, K. , Schad, M. , Kallarackal, J. , von Bernuth, H. , & Reismann, M. (2021). Use of gene expression profiling to identify candidate genes for pretherapeutic patient classification in acute appendicitis. BJS Open, 5(1), zraa045. 10.1093/BJSOPEN/ZRAA045 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Kristjansson, R. P. , Benonisdottir, S. , Oddsson, A. , Galesloot, T. E. , Thorleifsson, G. , Aben, K. K. , Davidsson, O. B. , Jonsson, S. , Arnadottir, G. A. , Jensson, B. O. , Walters, G. B. , Sigurdsson, J. K. , Sigurdsson, S. , Holm, H. , Arnar, D. O. , Thorgeirsson, G. , Alexiusdottir, K. , Jonsdottir, I. , Thorsteinsdottir, U. , … Stefansson, K. (2017). Sequence variant at 4q25 near PITX2 associates with appendicitis. Scientific Reports, 7(1), 3119. 10.1038/s41598-017-03353-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Kubikova, E. , Sivakova, I. , Perzelova, A. , & El Falougy, H. (2015). Biological aspects of appendix pathology: Irregular distribution of myenteric ganglia in human appendiceal wall. Bratislava Medical Journal, 116(12), 726–728. 10.4149/BLL_2015_138 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Lacher, M. , Fitze, G. , Helmbrecht, J. , Schroepf, S. , Berger, M. , Lohse, P. , Koletzko, S. , Ballauff, A. , Grote, V. , Goedeke, J. , Von Schweinitz, D. , & Kappler, R. (2010). Hirschsprung‐associated enterocolitis develops independently of NOD2 variants. Journal of Pediatric Surgery, 45(9), 1826–1831. 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2010.02.039 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Li, H. M. , Yeh, L. R. , Huang, Y. K. , Hsieh, M. Y. , Yu, K. H. , & Kuo, C. F. (2018). Familial risk of appendicitis: A nationwide population study. Journal of Pediatrics, 203, 330–335.e3. 10.1016/j.jpeds.2018.07.071 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Luzón‐Toro, B. , Espino‐Paisán, L. , Fernández, R. M. , Martín‐Sánchez, M. , Antiñolo, G. , & Borrego, S. (2012). Next‐generation‐based targeted sequencing as an efficient tool for the study of the genetic background in Hirschsprung patients. BMC Medical Genetics, 16(1), 89. 10.1186/s12881-015-0235-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Maglinte, D. D. , Bush, M. L. , Aruta, E. V. , & Bullington, G. E. (1981). Retained barium n the appendix: diagnostic and clinical significance. American Journal of Roentgenology, 137(3), 529–533. 10.2214/ajr.137.3.529 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Menacho, I. P. , Koster, R. , Van Der Sloot, A. M. , Quax, W. J. , Osinga, J. , Van Der Sluis, T. , Hollema, H. , Burzynski, G. M. , Gimm, O. , Buys, C. H. C. M. , Eggen, B. J. L. , & Hofstra, R. M. W. (2005). RET‐familial medullary thyroid carcinoma mutants Y791F and S891A activate a Src/JAK/STAT3 pathway, independent of glial cell line‐derived neurotrophic factor. Cancer Research, 65(5), 1729–1737. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-04-2363 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Nakatani, T. , Iwasaki, M. , Yamamichi, A. , Yoshioka, Y. , Uesaka, T. , Bitoh, Y. , Maeda, K. , Fukumoto, T. , Takemoto, T. , & Enomoto, H. (2020). Point mutagenesis in mouse reveals contrasting pathogenetic effects between MEN2B‐ and Hirschsprung disease‐associated missense mutations of the RET gene. Development Growth and Differentiation, 62(4), 214–222. 10.1111/dgd.12664 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Niederle, B. , Sebag, F. , & Brauckhoff, M. (2014). Timing and extent of thyroid surgery for gene carriers of hereditary C cell disease – A consensus statement of the European Society of Endocrine Surgeons (ESES). In Langenbeck’s Archives of Surgery (Vol. 399, Issue 2, pp. 185–197). Springer Verlag. 10.1007/s00423-013-1139-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Oldmeadow, C. , Mengersen, K. , Martin, N. , & Duffy, D. L. (2009). Heritability and linkage analysis of appendicitis utilizing age at onset. Twin Research and Human Genetics, 12(2), 150–157. 10.1375/twin.12.2.150 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Orlova, E. , Yeh, A. , Shi, M. , Firek, B. , Ranganathan, S. , Whitcomb, D. C. , Finegold, D. N. , Ferrell, R. E. , Barmada, M. M. , Marazita, M. L. , Hinds, D. A. , Shaffer, J. R. , & Morowitz, M. J. (2019). Genetic association and differential expression of PITX2 with acute appendicitis. Human Genetics, 138(1), 37–47. 10.1007/s00439-018-1956-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Rivera‐Chavez, F. A. , Peters‐Hybki, D. L. , Barber, R. C. , Lindberg, G. M. , Jialal, I. , Munford, R. S. , & O’Keefe, G. E. (2004). Innate immunity genes influence the severity of acute appendicitis. Annals of Surgery, 240(2), 269–277. 10.1097/01.sla.0000133184.10676.26 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Rubér, M. , Andersson, M. , Petersson, B. F. , Olaison, G. , Andersson, R. E. , & Ekerfelt, C. (2010). Systemic Th17‐like cytokine pattern in gangrenous appendicitis but not in phlegmonous appendicitis. Surgery, 147(3), 366–372. 10.1016/J.SURG.2009.09.039 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Rückert, F. , Görgens, H. , Richter, I. , Krex, D. , Schackert, G. , Kuhlisch, E. , Fitze, G. , Saeger, H. D. , Pilarsky, C. , Grützmann, R. , & Schackert, H. K. (2011). RET‐protooncogene variants in patients with sporadic neoplasms of the digestive tract and the central nervous system. International Journal of Colorectal Disease, 26(7), 835–840. 10.1007/s00384-011-1150-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Sadr Azodi, O. , Andrén‐Sandberg, Å. , & Larsson, H. (2009). Genetic and environmental influences on the risk of acute appendicitis in twins. British Journal of Surgery, 96(11), 1336–1340. 10.1002/bjs.6736 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Seri, M. , Yin, L. , Barone, V. , Bolino, A. , Celli, I. , Bocciardi, R. , Pasini, B. , Ceccherini, I. , Lerone, M. , Kristoffersson, U. , Larsson, L. T. , Casasa, J. M. , Cass, D. T. , Abramowicz, M. J. , Vanderwinden, J. M. , Kravčenkiene, I. , Baric, I. , Silengo, M. , Martucciello, G. , & Romeo, G. (1997). Frequency of Ret mutations in long‐ and short‐segment Hirschsprung disease. Human Mutation, 9(3), 243–249. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Serra, A. , Görgens, H. , Alhadad, K. , Fitze, G. , & Schackert, H. K. (2010). Analysis of RET, ZEB2, EDN3 and GDNF genomic rearrangements in central congenital hyperventilation syndrome patients by multiplex ligation‐dependent probe amplification. Annals of Human Genetics, 74(4), 369–374. 10.1111/j.1469-1809.2010.00577.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Simó Alari, F. , Gutierrez, I. , & Gimenéz Pérez, J. (2017). Familial history aggregation on acute appendicitis. BMJ Case Reports, 2017, bcr‐2016‐218838. https://doi.org/ 10.1136/bcr-2016-218838 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  46. Tang, S. J. , Pickhardt, P. J. , Kim, D. U. , & Pooler, B. D. (2019). Positive Oral Contrast Solution at MDCT for Suspected Acute Appendicitis in Adults: Rate of Appendiceal Luminal Filling of Normal and Inflamed Appendixes. American Journal of Roentgenology, 213(5), W211–W217. 10.2214/AJR.18.21019 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Toledo, R. A. , Hatakana, R. , Lourenço, D. M. , Lindsey, S. C. , Camacho, C. P. , Almeida, M. , Lima, J. V. , Sekiya, T. , Garralda, E. , Naslavsky, M. S. , Yamamoto, G. L. , Lazar, M. , Meirelles, O. , Sobreira, T. J. P. , Lebrao, M. L. , Duarte, Y. A. O. , Blangero, J. , Zatz, M. , Cerutti, J. M. , … Toledo, S. P. A. (2015). Comprehensive assessment of the disputed RET Y791F variant shows no association with medullary thyroid carcinoma susceptibility. Endocrine‐Related Cancer, 22(1), 65–76. 10.1530/ERC-14-0491 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Toledo, R. A. , Wagner, S. M. , Coutinho, F. L. , Lourenço, D. M. , Azevedo, J. A. , Longuini, V. C. , Reis, M. T. A. , Siqueira, S. A. C. , Lucon, A. M. , Tavares, M. R. , Fragoso, M. C. B. V. , Pereira, A. A. , Dahia, P. L. M. , Mulligan, L. M. , & Toledo, S. P. A. (2010). High penetrance of pheochromocytoma associated with the novel C634Y/Y791F double germline mutation in the RET protooncogene. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism, 95(3), 1318–1327. 10.1210/jc.2009-1355 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Vierhapper, H. , Bieglmayer, C. , Heinze, G. , & Baumgartner‐Parzer, S. (2004). Frequency of RET proto‐oncogene mutations in patients with normal and with moderately elevated pentagastrin‐stimulated serum concentrations of calcitonin. Thyroid, 14(8), 580–583. 10.1089/1050725041692990 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Wangensteen, O. H. , & Dennis, C. (1939). Experimental Proof of the Obstructive Origin of Appendicitis in Man. Annals of Surgery, 110(4), 629–647. 10.1097/00000658-193910000-00011 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Wei, S. , LiVolsi, V. A. , Montone, K. T. , Morrissette, J. J. D. , & Baloch, Z. W. (2016). Detection of Molecular Alterations in Medullary Thyroid Carcinoma Using Next‐Generation Sequencing: an Institutional Experience. Endocrine Pathology, 27(4), 359–362. 10.1007/s12022-016-9446-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Yazdanyar, S. , & Nordestgaard, B. G. (2010). NOD2/CARD15 genotype and common gastrointestinal diseases in 43 600 individuals. Journal of Internal Medicine, 267(2), 228–236. 10.1111/j.1365-2796.2009.02137.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Zhang, Y. , He, Q. , Zhang, R. , Zhang, H. , Zhong, W. , & Xia, H. (2017). Large‐scale replication study identified multiple independent SNPs in RET synergistically associated with Hirschsprung disease in Southern Chinese population. Aging, 9(9), 1996–2009. https://doi.org/ 10.18632/aging.101294. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

All relevant data are included in this text, tables, and figures. Primary sequencing results are available upon request anytime. Newly discovered variants have been reported to ClinVar (accession numbers: SCV001469008, SCV001469009, SCV001469010, SCV001469011, and SCV001469012).

Articles from Molecular Genetics & Genomic Medicine are provided here courtesy of Blackwell Publishing

RESOURCES