Skip to main content
Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine logoLink to Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine
. 2022 Jan 9;26(4):990–999. doi: 10.1111/jcmm.17174

The role of fibroblast growth factor 8 in cartilage development and disease

Haoran Chen 1, Yujia Cui 1, Demao Zhang 1, Jing Xie 1,, Xuedong Zhou 1,2,
PMCID: PMC8831980  PMID: 35001536

Abstract

Fibroblast growth factor 8 (FGF‐8), also known as androgen‐induced growth factor (AIGF), is presumed to be a potent mitogenic cytokine that plays important roles in early embryonic development, brain formation and limb development. In the bone environment, FGF‐8 produced or received by chondrocyte precursor cells binds to fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR), causing different levels of activation of downstream signalling pathways, such as phospholipase C gamma (PLCγ)/Ca2+, RAS/mitogen‐activated protein kinase‐extracellular regulated protein kinases (RAS/MAPK‐MEK‐ERK), and Wnt‐β‐catenin‐Axin2 signalling, and ultimately controlling chondrocyte proliferation, differentiation, cell survival and migration. However, the molecular mechanism of FGF‐8 in normal or pathological cartilage remains unclear, and thus, FGF‐8 represents a novel exploratory target for studies of chondrocyte development and cartilage disease progression. In this review, studies assessing the relationship between FGF‐8 and chondrocytes that have been published in the past 5 years are systematically summarized to determine the probable mechanism and physiological effect of FGF‐8 on chondrocytes. Based on the existing research results, a therapeutic regimen targeting FGF‐8 is proposed to explore the possibility of treating chondrocyte‐related diseases.

Keywords: cartilage, chondrocyte, FGF‐8, osteoarthritis, skeletal system

1. INTRODUCTION

Healthy cartilage is the basis of joint development and physiological movement. The normal formation and maturation of cartilage require the coordination of a variety of signalling, including bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs), transforming growth factor β (TGF‐β), parathyroid signalling, hedgehog (Hh) signalling, wingless‐type MMTV integration site (Wnt) signalling and fibroblast growth factor (FGF) signalling. 1 , 2 , 3  Most of them have been well known, but FGF is not. Current reports have indicated that FGF signalling plays an indispensable role in maintaining joint health and functional homeostasis by regulating the cell behaviours of articular chondrocytes and peripheral synoviocytes and osteoblasts. 4 , 5  Moreover, abnormality of FGF signalling during development leads to cartilage atrophy. 6 In the progress of cartilage diseases, FGF protein family is also recognized to play a potential role. 7 However, at present, there is still lack of sufficient experimental or pathological evidence to explain the importance of FGF family in cartilage development and diseases.

Human FGF subfamily is a kind of cytokines that play important roles in cell growth, development, metabolism and tissue disease. 8  There are 22 members in the FGF family (FGF‐1‐23 in human, lacking FGF‐15, because FGF‐15 is a mouse homologous gene of human FGF‐19 9 ), which can be divided into two categories: paracrine and endocrine. According to the similarity and specificity of its protein structure, FGF family is divided into seven subfamilies, namely FGF‐1, FGF‐4, FGF‐7, FGF‐8, FGF‐9, FGF‐11 and FGF‐19 subfamilies. Among them, FGF‐1 subfamily (including FGF‐1 and FGF‐2), FGF‐4 subfamily (including FGF‐4, FGF‐5 and FGF‐6), FGF‐7 subfamily (including FGF‐3, FGF‐7, FGF‐10 and FGF‐22), FGF‐8 subfamily (including FGF‐8, FGF‐17 and FGF‐18), FGF‐9 subfamily (including FGF‐9, FGF‐16 and FGF‐20) and FGF‐11 subfamily (including FGF‐11–14) belong to paracrine class, while FGF‐19 subfamily (including FGF‐19, FGF‐21 and FGF‐23) belong to the endocrine category. 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 Current studies have shown that FGF members, such as FGF‐2, FGF‐9, FGF‐18 and FGF‐19, have been closely implicated into the physiology and pathology of cartilage and they can promote the development of cartilage and bone, 1 , 9 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 but the specific role of FGF‐8 subfamily in the growth and development of cartilage and cartilage disease progression remains partially known. The FGF‐8 subfamily consists of three proteins: FGF‐8, FGF‐17 and FGF‐18. 9 , 12 Among them, FGF‐17 plays a vital role in brain development, 17 while FGF‐18 and FGF‐8 play important roles in chondrogenesis and osteogenesis. 12 , 18 , 19 Considering the limited understandings of FGF‐18 in cartilage formation and repair, 1 , 8 we can deduce the importance of FGF‐8 in the physiology and pathology of cartilage. Thus, in this review, we summarize the background of FGF‐8 and its receptors (FGFRs) in articular cartilage development, homeostasis and related cartilage diseases, discuss the current research of OA and cartilage injury based on FGF‐8, and emphasize the future challenges in this field.

The FGF‐8 protein was originally identified in a mouse model of androgen‐dependent breast cancer by Tanaka in 1992, and thus, FGF‐8 protein is also recognized as androgen‐induced growth factor (AIGF). 20 , 21  The FGF‐8 is involved in the activation of physiological cellular activities such as cell proliferation and differentiation, cell migration and the survival of early embryonic cells in the human body, 22 and this partially determines its role in the morphological development of human embryos, limb maturation, differentiation and evolution of the nervous system, adolescent hormone regulation in postnatal development. 5 , 23 , 24  The human FGF‐8 protein includes the isoforms FGF‐8A, FGF‐8B, FGF‐8E and FGF‐8F, among which FGF‐8B is considered to have the strongest ability to recognize and bind FGFR (Figure 1). FGF‐8, especially FGF‐8B, exerts different biological effects on humans by binding to different FGFR isoforms. 20 FGF‐8 family members show a unique binding affinity for FGF receptors and tissue distribution patterns. 12 , 22 , 25 In normal physiology, FGFR consists mainly of 4 members, FGFR1, FGFR2, FGFR3 and FGFR4, with corresponding subclasses of FGFR2 and FGFR3. 8 , 26 FGF‐8 mutual recognition and binding to FGFR results in varying degrees of activation of downstream signalling pathways, such as the RAS/MAPK, MEK‐ERK, Wnt‐β‐catenin and PLC‐γ/Ca2+ pathways, activating downstream factors such as MSX‐1, BMP4 and Wnt‐β‐catenin to promote corresponding physiological activities such as angiogenesis and hormonal regulation (Figure 2). 13 , 20 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 FGF‐8 can promote angiogenesis and there is angiogenesis in joint inflammation such as osteoarthritis, so we speculated that when FGF‐8, especially FGF‐8B, is overexpressed, it may potentially promote the occurrence and development of joint inflammation. 20 , 31 , 32 All current researches indicate that in‐depth insights into the molecular mechanism of the FGF‐8 signalling pathway are urgently needed to provide a better understanding of FGF‐8 in human growth, inflammatory process and even the potential personalized therapy.

FIGURE 1.

FIGURE 1

Structure of FGF‐8. (A) The FGF‐8 gene is a six‐part segment on chromosome 10, of which 1A, 1B, 1D and 3 are composed of two smaller segments. (B) FGF‐8a, FGF‐8b, FGF‐8e and FGF‐8f in humans are all encoded by FGF gene fragments 1B, 2 and 3, and the difference is in the composition of the 1C and 1D segments

FIGURE 2.

FIGURE 2

FGF‐8‐related signalling pathway. (A) The binding of FGF‐8 molecules to FGFR activates a series of signalling pathways, such as PI3K/AKT, PLCγ/Ca2+, RAS/MAPK, MEK‐ERK and Wnt‐β‐catenin‐Axin2. (B) The MAPK‐ERK‐MEK pathway and Wnt signalling pathway induced by FGF‐8 signalling exert both promoting and inhibitory effects and jointly coordinate angiogenesis, tissue development and hormone regulation in the body. (C) The Wnt signalling pathway and JNK signalling pathway also interact through the activation of FGF‐8 signalling pathway

2. OVERVIEW OF FGF‐8 IN NORMAL CARTILAGE

2.1. The cartilage tissue

Cartilage tissue is composed of scattered low‐density single chondrocytes and abundant cartilage matrix, which contains no blood vessels, lymphoid tissue or nerves. 33 , 34 Cartilage is a supportive cellular connective tissue with a tough texture. According to the difference in cartilage matrix, cartilage is divided into three types: hyaline, elastic and fibrous. Among them, hyaline cartilage is widely studied because of its ability to secrete extracellular matrix (ECM). 35 Accumulated evidence has shown that FGF signalling pathways play an important role in cartilage production, maturation and development of subchondral bone. 36 , 37 Among them, fibroblast growth factor 2 and 19 (FGF‐2 and FGF‐19) have been studied extensively, but FGF‐8 interacted with chondrocytes is not completely understood. Therefore, the molecular mechanism of FGF‐8 in cartilage tissue has been extensively investigated experimentally in recent years to determine the interaction between FGF‐8 and cartilage tissue.

2.2. The importance of FGF‐8 in cartilage physiology

The roles of FGF‐8 and FGFR in the development of normal cartilage tissue are manifested in the interaction in the dynamic balance of catabolism and anabolism. 5 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 In different stages of the growth and development of limbs and joints, different types of FGFRs successively bind to FGF‐8 to activate downstream signalling pathways with different intensities. 8 , 41  The complex biological effects of all signalling pathways are cumulative and manifest as the ultimate result of limb and joint development. At the same time, FGF‐8 and FGFR are maintained in long‐term dynamic balance in normal mature cartilage tissue to ensure the normal motor function of the joints and limbs of the body (Figure 3). 23 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 In the early stages of joint and limb development, mesenchymal cells from the trunk and head neural crest (TNC and HNC), which are induced by FGF‐8 (especially FGF‐8B which has been shown to induce differentiation of mesenchymal cells into chondrocytes recently 46 ), sonic hedgehog (SHH) and FGFR1, migrate and condense to form growth plates, showing a strong potential to differentiate into cartilage and bone.. 10 , 23 , 47 , 48 FGF‐8 is involved in the process of cartilage generation, which is mediated by the interaction between FGF‐8 and FGFR, especially FGFR1 and FGFR3. The effect is determined to the difference in signalling pathway strength; FGFR1 mainly regulates catabolism, while FGFR3 mainly regulates anabolism. 5 , 8 , 49 , 50 , 51 FGFR3 is expressed in proliferating chondrocytes. FGFR2 is expressed slightly later than FGFR3 and functions similarly to FGFR3, while FGFR1 is expressed at higher levels in hypertrophic chondrocytes. 41 Recent studies have found that FGF‐8 can cooperate with BMP2 in inducing the growth and development of trunk and articular cartilage, firstly upregulating SOX9 gene and type II collagenase A1 (Col2A1) to promote chondrogenesis. And in embryos with abnormal function and mutation, FGF‐8 can rescue RNA transcription so that indirectly regulates cartilage and osteogenic differentiation and rescues craniofacial and articular defects. 30 , 32 , 52 , 53 , 54  These two factors are considered markers of cartilage production, which promote chondrocyte differentiation and produce type II collagen fibres necessary for the formation of chondrocyte extracellular matrix. 10 , 52 , 55 , 56 FGF‐8 binds to FGFR3 and FGFR1, which play a role in early chondrocyte proliferation, and activates the MAPK, MEK‐ERK, JNK and PI3K/Akt pathways and corresponding downstream molecules such as BMP‐7, GP130, MSX‐1 and VGEF, to induce the proliferation of immature chondrocytes and facilitate a repair on cartilage. 49 , 57 , 58 , 59 Activation of these molecules increases the migration of chondrocytes and promotes the secretion of aggrecan and chondroitin sulphate, which increase the proliferation of chondrocytes and form positive feedback. 13 , 28 , 57 , 60 , 61 , 62 In addition, FGF‐8 also promotes chondrocyte differentiation by activating the Smad4 and BMP4‐TGF‐β signalling pathways at an early stage. 22 , 28 , 54 , 63 , 64 , 65 As the cartilage in the growth plate continues to proliferate and differentiate, the chondrocytes gradually form four layers. FGFR1 is expressed in the lowest layer of hypertrophic chondrocytes and in prehypertrophic chondrocytes to produce type 10 collagen fibres, while FGFR3 continues to be expressed in the proliferative first layer of chondrocytes. 4 , 36 , 41 , 66 In normal chondrocytes, FGF‐8 is not expressed at high levels, and the proliferation and hypertrophy of chondrocytes are well controlled, 67 potentially due to the dynamic balance of proliferation and apoptosis between the upper proliferative layer and the lower hypertrophic layer of chondrocytes. 45  When FGF‐8 interacts with an FGFR3 mutant, ectopic cartilage and osteophytes are generated, resulting in Kashin‐Beck disease or abnormal cartilage and bone. 68 , 69 Simultaneously, overexpression of FGF‐8 in combination with FGFR causes abnormal cartilage proliferation and promotes a cartilage fate in normal tissues rather than osteogenesis. 70 , 71 Based on these findings, FGF‐8 and FGFR should exert a negative regulatory effect on the proliferation and differentiation of chondrocytes in normal cartilage tissue. At the late stage of chondrocyte proliferation, FGF‐8‐bound FGFR3 activates P38/P53 through the MAPK‐ERK signalling pathway and upregulates STAT1 to inhibit chondrocyte proliferation, differentiation and extracellular matrix synthesis by inducing the rapid loss of proteoglycan ECM in chondrocytes through the inhibition of matrix synthesis and activation of proteolytic degradation. 30 , 60 , 72 , 73 , 74 , 75 , 76 At the same time, Caspase‐3/9 are upregulated to induce apoptosis of chondrocytes. 7 , 24 , 77 After SOCS3 was appeared to reduce the duration and amplitude of the MAPK pathway, FGFR3 reduced the inhibition of premature proliferation of chondrocytes. 72 , 75 Additionally, the FGF signalling also inhibits chondrocyte proliferation through the STAT1 pathway. 78  These experimental results indicate that in normal cartilage, the interaction between FGF‐8 and FGFR3 could promote and inhibit the proliferation and differentiation of chondrocytes. Other studies have shown that the interrelationship between the Wnt signalling pathway and FGF signalling pathway plays an important role in chondrogenesis. 79 , 80  The FGF signalling pathway activates the Wnt/β‐catenin pathway in the chondrocyte, resulting in a loss of extracellular matrix, the expression of genes typical of mineralized tissues and changes in cell morphology. 7 , 39 , 43 , 67 , 79 , 80 , 81 , 82  These results suggest that the classical Wnt signalling pathway exerts a negative feedback effect on regulating the proliferation and differentiation of FGF‐8‐stimulated chondrocytes. Wnt‐mTOR and NF‐κβ also produce acid‐sensing ion channels 1A (ASIC1A) under acidic conditions to promote the apoptosis of chondrocytes. 49 , 50 , 83 , 84  The expression of β‐catenin and Wnt3A is detected when FGF‐8 is expressed in cartilage tissue, and these molecules have been indicated to induce the expression of osteorix, an ossifying factor. Runx2 and Twist2 are produced, thereby limiting cartilage differentiation. 37 , 42 , 54 , 85 , 86 , 87 However, the lack of osteorix and β‐catenin leads to abnormal chondrogenic differentiation, and FGF‐8 upregulates Wnt5a and Wnt9a. 23 , 54 , 88 , 89 , 90 Overexpression of FGF‐8 increases cartilage formation and disrupts the normal cartilage to bone ratio, while a reduction in the expression of Wnt‐Axin2 genes partially inhibits bone loss due to excessive cartilage formation, 70  suggesting that a balance of positive and negative effects exists between the Wnt signalling pathway and FGF‐8‐guided FGFR pathway. In conclusion, during the development of normal cartilage tissue, cartilage tissue maintains a dynamic balance of anabolism and catabolism, and the molecular mechanism is based on the binding of FGF‐8 to FGFR receptors (mainly FGFR1 and FGFR3) and the subsequent activation of downstream MAPK signalling. The mechanism underlying the interaction between the MEK‐ERK and PI3K‐Akt signalling pathways and the Wnt signalling pathway in chondrocytes is complex. Cartilage eventually differentiates, grows healthily and becomes stable, which is closely related to the cooperation between all the aforementioned signalling pathways. Finally, cartilage tissue avoids abnormal proliferation and differentiation and maintains the normal metabolic state in the joint through strict regulation in the body.

FIGURE 3.

FIGURE 3

Role of FGF‐8 in normal cartilage. (A) In the initial stage of chondrogenesis, mesenchymal cells from the neural crest migrate towards the articular site through the actions of FGF‐8, SHH and FGFR1, and differentiate into chondrogenic precursors. Chondrocytes then undergo early cell proliferation through mechanisms mediated by FGF‐8, FGFR3 and FGFR1. (B) Four layers of chondrocytes have been identified, among which FGFR1 is mainly expressed in mature chondrocytes and hypertrophic chondrocytes, while FGFR3 is expressed at higher levels in surface chondrocytes with more active proliferation. (C) In the process of cartilage development, FGFR3 both promotes and inhibits cartilage formation. In the early stage of chondrogenesis, the interaction of FGFR3 and FGF‐8 induces the expression of SOX9, COL2A1 and other chondrocyte markers and promotes the proliferation and differentiation of chondrocytes and the construction of extracellular matrix. FGF‐8 and FGFR3 induce the expression of osteoblastic markers such as Runx2 and Twist2, degrade aggrecan, and inhibit the synthesis of extracellular matrix by chondrocytes. Moreover, FGF‐8 and FGFR3 promote the apoptosis of chondrocytes by activating caspase3/9. These processes result in a dynamic balance of cartilage production and degradation in normal mature articular cartilage

3. THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN FGF‐8 AND CHONDROCYTES IN CARTILAGE DISEASES

Chondrocytes undergo many processes in developing into mature cartilage tissue, such as cell proliferation, cell differentiation, maturation and hypertrophy, and cartilage stromal cell aggregation. 5 , 66  There is only a single low‐density chondrocyte and extracellular matrix in cartilage tissue. Pathological cartilage formation or the progression of chondrocyte diseases may be related to the abnormal state of chondrocytes and chondrocyte matrix. At present, the relationship between FGF‐8 and cartilage diseases has been lucubrated, aiming to provide potential guidance for the diagnosis and treatment of cartilage diseases in future.

3.1. Osteoarthritis (OA)

The expression of FGF‐8 is low in mature cartilage tissue. However, in the rabbit osteoarthritis model constructed by Uchii et al. through meniscectomy in 2008, the level of FGF‐8 expression in synovial cells of cartilage was significantly increased, suggesting the potential pathological role of FGF‐8 in osteoarthritis. They also established an osteoarthritis model through an intracavitary injection of FGF‐8 or monoiodoacetate into the knee joint of rabbits. They found that injection of FGF‐8 into the knee joint of rats can cause ECM degradation, and its degradation can be inhibited by anti‐FGF‐8 antibody. In a monoiodoacetic acid‐induced osteoarthritis model, anti‐FGF‐8 antibodies reduced ECM release to the synovium, suggesting that the FGF‐8 may promote the degradation of ECM and damage cartilage structure in osteoarthritis (Figure 4). 91 , 92  The early stages of osteoarthritis are characterized by the loss of the extracellular matrix. 58 In the normal articular cartilage matrix, the most important components are type II collagen fibres and aggrecans, and the synthesis and catabolism of type II collagen fibres and aggrecans maintain the dynamic balance and normal joint activities. 38 , 65 According to experimental results, syndecan‐4 gene (SDC4), which encodes syndecan‐4, is overexpressed in the cartilage of subjects with osteoarthritis, resulting in the overexpression of its downstream putative factor matrix metalloproteinase‐3 (MMP‐3). 85  MMP‐3 causes progressive damage to the matrix of articular cartilage due to the degradation of type II collagen and aggrecan, 93 with restrictions of the proliferation of chondromesenchymal cells mediated by endogenous inhibitors, tissue inhibitors of metalloproteinases 3 (TIMP‐3) and TIMP‐1 or factor CD34, 39 , 94 , 95 thus resulting in damage to chondrocytes. Meanwhile, other factors, such as chondrocyte ageing, oxidative stress or inflammation, also inhibit the synthesis of glucosaminoglycans and type II collagen fibres and upregulate the expression of type I collagen, MMP‐3 and proinflammatory cytokines by activating the MAPK/ERK signalling pathways. Eventually, cartilage homeostasis shifts towards cartilage degradation. 58 , 77 , 84 , 96  When FGF‐8 is applied in combination with interleukin‐1 in vivo, the degradation of cartilage matrix in the inflammatory joints is enhanced because interleukin‐1 activates the JNK‐2 signalling pathway to induce aggrecan degradation on chondrocytes. 5 , 61 , 97 In cell coculture experiments, FGF‐8‐induced chondrocytes to produce MMP‐3 and prostaglandin E2 (PGE2), two proteins that promote extracellular matrix degradation and increase the breakdown of type II collagen fibres. 92 , 93 Antibodies against FGF‐8, such as SU5402, were used to reduce the degradation of ECM and its release into synovial tissue. 5 , 84 , 91 Based on these results, FGF‐8 may be involved in the aggravation of osteoarthritis, mainly in catabolism.. 37 , 68 Recent studies have shown that the progression of osteoarthritis is related to the disorder of cellular metabolism, and FGF‐8 is involved in cartilage catabolic metabolism, which can be regarded as a potential therapeutic target for osteoarthritis. 84 However, the specific molecular mechanisms, including the downstream signal transduction pathways activated by FGF‐8 in the progression of osteoarthritis and the specific binding of FGF receptor proteins, still require further investigation.

FIGURE 4.

FIGURE 4

Role of FGF‐8 in osteoarthritis cartilage. (A) SDC4, which encodes Syndecan‐4, is overexpressed in cartilage from subjects with osteoarthritis, leading to the overexpression of its downstream putative factor MMP‐3. MMP‐3 degrades type II collagen and aggrecan in articular cartilage, leading to progressive cartilage damage. Meanwhile, tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases 3 (TIMP‐3) and TIMP‐1, which limit MMP‐3, is downregulated, leading to chondrocyte damage. (B) Other factors, such as chondrocyte ageing, oxidative stress or inflammation, also inhibit the synthesis of glucosaminoglycans and type II collagen fibres and upregulate the expression of type I collagen, matrix metalloproteinase‐3 and proinflammatory cytokines through the activation of mitogen‐activated protein kinase (MAPK) and MAPK/ERK signalling pathways. (C) In the osteoarthritis model, the degradation of chondrocyte extracellular matrix and the release of the degraded matrix into synovial tissue, as well as the formation of inflammatory blood vessels, are the main causes of disease progression

3.2. Kashin‐Beck disease

Kashin‐Beck disease is a comprehensive cartilage disease characterized by necrosis of the deep cells of the bone plate cartilage and articular cartilage, accompanied by secondary proliferation and changes in the repair of cartilage tissue, which is considered a unique type of osteoarthritis. 84 According to the study by P. I. Milner, the pathological mechanism of Keshin‐Beck disease is that free radicals induce chondrocyte apoptosis through cytokines associated with cartilage and participate in the regulation of chondrocyte differentiation. 68 , 97  The expression levels of FGF‐8 and FGFR3 are significantly increased in the articular cartilage of patients with Kashin‐Beck disease. In cell‐based experiments, hypertrophic chondrocytes treated with the free radical donor 3‐morpholinosydnonimine (SIN‐1) exhibited significantly increased levels of the FGF‐8 and FGFR3 mRNAs and proteins. Thus, hypertrophic chondrocytes upregulate the FGF‐8 and FGFR3 under oxidative conditions, resulting in abnormal chondrocyte terminal differentiation and degradation of chondrocyte extracellular matrix and inducing the formation of abnormal bone segments. 78 , 92 , 98 Considering that oxidative stress leads to abnormal expression of differentiation factors FGF‐8 and FGFR3, which leads to chondrogenic differentiation, FGF‐8 and FGFR3 may be potential targets for the treatment of Keshin‐Beck disease, but further experimental and clinical studies are needed.

3.3. FGF‐18 and osteoarthritis

Considering the structural homology of FGF‐18 and FGF‐8, understanding the role of FGF‐18 in cartilage diseases may provide some instructions for us to better understand FGF‐8. FGF‐18 in osteoarthritis is different from FGF‐8 because it mainly protects cartilage. 2 , 90 FGF‐18, a high‐affinity ligand for FGFR3, is the only FGF‐based drug currently used in clinical trials for osteoarthritis. 4 , 8 , 99 FGF‐18 can significantly enhance anabolism during articular cartilage repair by activating the MEK‐ERK pathway to induce chondrocyte proliferation. 14 , 81 FGF‐18 binds to FGFR3 and inhibits cartilage hypertrophy‐related factors and precursor inflammatory cytokines. Moreover, it inhibits the formation of MMPs, inhibits the release and consumption of glucosaminoglycans in cartilage and promotes the synthesis of extracellular matrix by upregulating TIMP‐1. Eventually, FGF‐18 can stimulate the type Ⅱ collagen's production, proteoglycan accumulation and chondrocyte proliferation. 100 , 101 , 102  Therefore, FGF‐18 may be considered as a molecule that can protect against articular cartilage degeneration. The difference between FGF‐18 and FGF‐8 in the progression of cartilage disease suggests that the FGF‐8 family has a dual role in the progression of cartilage disease, which may contribute to our complete understanding of the molecular mechanism of FGF‐8 in cartilage diseases.

4. CONCLUSIONS AND PERSPECTIVES

Cartilage tissue supports normal body movement and bone formation so the development of cartilage tissue is important for human growth and development. And it has been proved that FGF‐8 signalling pathway is considered a vital pathway to regulate early physiological activities in the cartilage formation, including but not limited to promoting migration of mesenchymal stem cells, differentiation into chondrocytes and proliferation of chondrocytes. Considering FGF‐8 remains low level at the normal cartilage, and the normal cartilage tissue is manifested in the interaction in the dynamic balance of catabolism and anabolism, the role that FGF‐8 plays in chondrogenesis and cartilage stabilization is different. In different stages of the growth and development of limbs and joints, different types of FGFRs (especially FGFR3 and FGFR1) successively bind to FGF‐8 to activate downstream signalling pathways such as MAPK‐MEK‐ERK, PI3K‐AKT and BMP with different intensities. The complex biological effects of all signalling pathways are cumulative and manifest as the ultimate result of limb and joint development. At the same time, FGF‐8 and FGFR are maintained in long‐term dynamic balance in normal mature cartilage tissue to ensure the normal motor function of the joints and limbs of the body.

In the osteoarthritis model, FGF‐8 mainly binds to FGFR1 and activates downstream MAPK‐ERK signalling, resulting in the production of MMP‐3 and PGE2, the degradation of type II collagen fibres in the extracellular matrix and a decrease in the aggrecan content. Levels of endogenous inhibitors, such as tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases 3 (TIMP‐3) and TIMP‐1, are also reduced, resulting in damage to chondrocytes and chondro‐environments. At the same time, the decomposed extracellular matrix is released into synovial fluid of the joint, aggravating cartilage tissue destruction. Eventually, cartilage homeostasis shifts towards cartilage degradation. When FGF‐8 is applied in combination with interleukin‐1, the degradation of cartilage matrix in the inflammatory joints is more active. The use of anti‐FGF‐8 antibodies significantly inhibits cartilage destruction and extracellular matrix decomposition. Besides, according to the study by P. I. Milner, the pathological mechanism of Kashin‐Beck disease, another type of osteoarthritis, is that free radicals induce chondrocyte apoptosis through cytokines associated with cartilage and participate in the regulation of oxidative chondrogenic differentiation. The expression of FGF‐8 and FGFR3 is significantly increased in the articular cartilage of patients with Kashin‐Beck disease. Therefore, FGF‐8 may be a potential therapeutic target for patients with osteoarthritis.

At present, the research on FGF‐8 and chondrocytes mainly focuses on the changes of downstream signal pathways in chondrocytes stimulated by FGF‐8. However, the relationship between the changes of these complex pathways has not been clear. After chondrocytes are stimulated by FGF‐8, it is necessary to design and carry out cell experiments through the action of specific pathway inhibitors to explore the pathways involved in response and regulation in chondrocytes after FGF‐8 stimulation. At the same time, considering that the dynamic balance of cartilage tissue is the result of the joint action of four layers of cells in cartilage, adding or deleting FGF‐8 in the four cells to judge the role of FGF‐8 in different stages of cartilage development may become a direction to explore the mechanism of FGF‐8 promoting cartilage dynamic balance in normal cartilage tissue. In future animal experiments, designing knockdown of FGF‐8 in articular cartilage of mice at different ages may also help to verify the role of FGF‐8 in cartilage tissue.

Besides, in osteoarthritis, cartilage is characterized by destruction of cartilage matrix and lysis of chondrocytes. Existing studies have shown that the progress of OA is mainly the disorder of chondrocyte metabolism. Therefore, if we want to determine the specific role of FGF‐8 in osteoarthritis chondrocytes, it may be a feasible scheme to detect related proteins from the metabolism of pathological chondrocytes such as energy metabolism, glucose metabolism and lipid metabolism in future. Considering that FGF‐8 can induce chondrogenesis of mesenchymal cells. And FGF‐18, a homologous family factor of FGF‐8, has been proved to have a restorative effect in OA. The repair effect of FGF‐8 on cartilage can be speculated to a certain extent. In future, stem cell tissue engineering induced by FGF‐8 will have a very broad prospect for the repair of damaged cartilage.

In conclusion, we have reason to believe that FGF‐8 plays an important role in cartilage and can be regarded as a target for the treatment of osteoarthritis in future. However, a large number of experiments are still needed to explore its role in different stages of chondrocytes and pathological cartilage, as well as its application in the repair of damaged cartilage in future.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

Haoran Chen: Data curation (lead); Writing – original draft (lead); Writing – review & editing (equal). Yujia Cui: Conceptualization (supporting); Data curation (supporting); Formal analysis (supporting); Investigation (supporting); Methodology (supporting); Resources (supporting); Validation (supporting); Writing – review & editing (supporting). Demao Zhang: Investigation (supporting); Methodology (supporting); Resources (supporting); Software (supporting); Supervision (supporting); Validation (supporting); Visualization (supporting). jing xie: Conceptualization (lead); Methodology (lead); Project administration (lead); Resources (lead); Software (lead); Supervision (lead); Writing – original draft (lead); Writing – review & editing (lead). XUE ZHOU: Conceptualization (lead); Data curation (lead); Funding acquisition (lead); Project administration (lead); Supervision (lead); Validation (lead); Visualization (lead); Writing – original draft (lead); Writing – review & editing (lead).

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We acknowledged funding support by the National Nature Science Foundation of China (81771047 to Jing Xie, 81371136, 81430011, 81670978 and 81870754 to Xuedong Zhou).

Chen H, Cui Y, Zhang D, Xie J, Zhou X. The role of fibroblast growth factor 8 in cartilage development and disease. J Cell Mol Med. 2022;26:990–999. doi: 10.1111/jcmm.17174

Haoran Chen and Yujia Cui contribute equally to this work.

Contributor Information

Jing Xie, Email: xiejing2012@scu.edu.cn.

Xuedong Zhou, Email: zhouxd@scu.edu.cn.

DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT

Any data involving this study are available from the corresponding author on request.

REFERENCES

  • 1. Chijimatsu R, Saito T. Mechanisms of synovial joint and articular cartilage development. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2019;76(20):3939‐3952. 10.1007/s00018-019-03191-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Chen TM, Chen YH, Sun HS, et al. Fibroblast growth factors: potential novel targets for regenerative therapy of osteoarthritis. Chin J Physiol. 2019;62(1):2‐10. 10.4103/CJP.CJP_11_19 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Duan M, Wang Q, Liu Y, Xie J. The role of TGF‐beta2 in cartilage development and diseases. Bone Joint Res. 2021;10(8):474‐487. 10.1302/2046-3758.108.BJR-2021-0086 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Xie YL, Zinkle A, Chen L, Mohammadi M. Fibroblast growth factor signalling in osteoarthritis and cartilage repair. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2020;16(10):547‐564. 10.1038/s41584-020-0469-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Ellman MB, Yan D, Ahmadinia K, Chen D, An HS, Im HJ. Fibroblast growth factor control of cartilage homeostasis. J Cell Biochem. 2013;114(4):735‐742. 10.1002/jcb.24418 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Su N, Jin M, Chen L. Role of FGF/FGFR signaling in skeletal development and homeostasis: learning from mouse models. Bone Res. 2014;2:14003. 10.1038/boneres.2014.3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Ornitz DM, Marie PJ. Fibroblast growth factor signaling in skeletal development and disease. Genes Dev. 2015;29(14):1463‐1486. 10.1101/gad.266551.115 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Beenken A, Mohammadi M. The FGF family: biology, pathophysiology and therapy. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2009;8(3):235‐253. 10.1038/nrd2792 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Chen H, Li JZ, Zhang DM, Zhou XD, Xie J. Role of the fibroblast growth factor 19 in the skeletal system. Life Sci. 2021;265:118804. 10.1016/j.lfs.2020.118804 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Pu J, Wang R, Zhang G, Wang J. FGF‐7 facilitates the process of psoriasis by inducing TNF‐alpha expression in HaCaT cells. Acta Biochim Biophys Sin (Shanghai). 2019;51(10):1056‐1063. 10.1093/abbs/gmz095 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Zhu S, Ma L, Wu Y, et al. FGF21 treatment ameliorates alcoholic fatty liver through activation of AMPK‐SIRT1 pathway. Acta Biochim Biophys Sin (Shanghai). 2014;46(12):1041‐1048. 10.1093/abbs/gmu097 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Boylan M, Anderson M, Ornitz DM, Lewandoski M. The Fgf8 subfamily (Fgf8, Fgf17 and Fgf18) is required for closure of the embryonic ventral body wall. Development. 2020;147(21):dev189506. 10.1242/dev.189506 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Becic T, Kero D, Vukojevic K, Mardesic S, Saraga‐Babic M. Growth factors FGF8 and FGF2 and their receptor FGFR1, transcriptional factors Msx‐1 and MSX‐2, and apoptotic factors p19 and RIP5 participate in the early human limb development. Acta Histochem. 2018;120(3):205‐214. 10.1016/j.acthis.2018.01.008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Hung HI, Schoenwolf GC, Lewandoski M, Ornitz DM. A combined series of Fgf9 and Fgf18 mutant alleles identifies unique and redundant roles in skeletal development. Dev Biol. 2016;411(1):72‐84. 10.1016/j.ydbio.2016.01.008 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Li X, Ellman MB, Kroin JS, et al. Species‐specific biological effects of FGF‐2 in articular cartilage: implication for distinct roles within the FGF receptor family. J Cell Biochem. 2012;113(7):2532‐2542. 10.1002/jcb.24129 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Vincent TL, McLean CJ, Full LE, Peston D, Saklatvala J. FGF‐2 is bound to perlecan in the pericellular matrix of articular cartilage, where it acts as a chondrocyte mechanotransducer. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2007;15(7):752‐763. 10.1016/j.joca.2007.01.021 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Scearce‐Levie K, Roberson ED, Gerstein H, et al. Abnormal social behaviors in mice lacking Fgf17. Genes Brain Behav. 2008;7(3):344‐354. 10.1111/j.1601-183X.2007.00357-x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Liu ZH, Lavine KJ, Hung IH, Ornitz DM. FGF18 is required for early chondrocyte proliferation, hypertrophy and vascular invasion of the growth plate. Dev Biol. 2007;302(1):80‐91. 10.1016/j.ydbio.2006.08.071 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Liu ZH, Xu JS, Colvin JS, Ornitz DM. Coordination of chondrogenesis and osteogenesis by fibroblast growth factor 18. Genes Dev. 2002;16(7):859‐869. 10.1101/gad.965602 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Xiao WJ, Zhang GM, Ye DW. Functional interaction of fibroblast growth factor 8b and androgen in prostate cancer cell proliferation. Tumour Biol. 2017;39(3):1010428317695969. 10.1177/1010428317695969 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Tanaka A, Miyamoto K, Minamino N, et al. Cloning and characterization of an androgen‐induced growth factor essential for the androgen‐dependent growth of mouse mammary carcinoma cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1992;89(19):8928‐8932. 10.1073/pnas.89.19.8928 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Hao YL, Tang SY, Yuan Y, Liu R, Chen QM. Roles of FGF8 subfamily in embryogenesis and oral‐maxillofacial diseases (Review). Int J Oncol. 2019;54(3):797‐806. 10.3892/ijo.2019.4677 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. da Costa MC, Trentin AG, Calloni GW. FGF8 and Shh promote the survival and maintenance of multipotent neural crest progenitors. Mech Dev. 2018;154:251‐258. 10.1016/j.mod.2018.07.012 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Singla RD, Wang J, Singla DK. Fibroblast growth factor‐8 inhibits oxidative stress‐induced apoptosis in H9c2 cells. Mol Cell Biochem. 2016;425(1‐2):77‐84. 10.1007/s11010-016-2863-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Gemel J, Gorry M, Ehrlich GD, MacArthur CA. Structure and sequence of human FGF8. Genomics. 1996;35(1):253‐257. 10.1006/geno.1996.0349 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Teven CM, Farina EM, Rivas J, Reid RR. Fibroblast growth factor (FGF) signaling in development and skeletal diseases. Genes Dis. 2014;1(2):199‐213. 10.1016/j.gendis.2014.09.005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Blunt AG, Lawshe A, Cunningham ML, et al. Overlapping expression and redundant activation of mesenchymal fibroblast growth factor (FGF) receptors by alternatively spliced FGF‐8 ligands. J Biol Chem. 1997;272(6):3733‐3738. 10.1074/jbc.272.6.3733 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Vieira WA, Wells KM, Raymond MJ, et al. FGF, BMP, and RA signaling are sufficient for the induction of complete limb regeneration from non‐regenerating wounds on Ambystoma mexicanum limbs. Dev Biol. 2019;451(2):146‐157. 10.1016/j.ydbio.2019.04.008 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Falardeau J, Chung WCJ, Beenken A, et al. Decreased FGF8 signaling causes deficiency of gonadotropin‐releasing hormone in humans and mice. J Clin Invest. 2008;118(8):2822‐2831. 10.1172/JCI34538 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Gebuijs IGE, Raterman ST, Metz JR, et al. Fgf8a mutation affects craniofacial development and skeletal gene expression in zebrafish larvae. Biol Open. 2019;8(9):bio039834. 10.1242/bio.039834 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Schwertfeger KL. Fibroblast growth factors in development and cancer: insights from the mammary and prostate glands. Curr Drug Targets. 2009;10(7):632‐644. 10.2174/138945009788680419 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Mattila MM, Harkönen PL. Role of fibroblast growth factor 8 in growth and progression of hormonal cancer. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 2007;18(3‐4):257‐266. 10.1016/j.cytogfr.2007.04.010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Yang Y, Wei J, Li J, Cui Y, Zhou X, Xie J. Lipid metabolism in cartilage and its diseases: a concise review of the research progress. Acta Biochim Biophys Sin (Shanghai). 2021;53(5):517‐527. 10.1093/abbs/gmab021 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Zhou C, Wang Q, Zhang D, Cai L, Du W, Xie J. Compliant substratum modulates vinculin expression in focal adhesion plaques in skeletal cells. Int J Oral Sci. 2019;11(2):18. 10.1038/s41368-019-0052-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Li JZ, Chen H, Zhang DM, Xie J, Zhou XD. The role of stromal cell‐derived factor 1 on cartilage development and disease. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2021;29(3):313‐322. 10.1016/j.joca.2020.10.010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Huh SH, Ha L, Jang HS. Nephron progenitor maintenance is controlled through fibroblast growth factors and sprouty1 interaction. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2020;31(11):2559‐2572. 10.1681/ASN.2020040401 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Chen L, Xie YL, Xu M, Chen HG. FGF signaling in cartilage development and disease. Encyclopedia Bone Biol. 2020;560‐574. 10.1016/B978-0-12-801238-3.11186-9 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. McClurg O, Tinson R, Troeberg L. Targeting cartilage degradation in osteoarthritis. Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2021;14(2):126. 10.3390/ph14020126 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Zhai W, Lu H, Dong S, Fang J, Yu Z. Identification of potential key genes and key pathways related to clear cell renal cell carcinoma through bioinformatics analysis. Acta Biochim Biophys Sin (Shanghai). 2020;52(8):853‐863. 10.1093/abbs/gmaa068 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Jiang ZL, Guerrero‐Netro HM, Juengel JL, Price CA. Divergence of intracellular signaling pathways and early response genes of two closely related fibroblast growth factors, FGF8 and FGF18, in bovine ovarian granulosa cells. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2013;375(1–2):97‐105. 10.1016/j.mce.2013.05.017 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Horton WA, Degnin CR. FGFs in endochondral skeletal development. Trends Endocrinol Meta. 2009;20(7):341‐348. 10.1016/j.tem.2009.04.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Nacu E, Gromberg E, Oliveira CR, Drechsel D, Tanaka EM. FGF8 and SHH substitute for anterior–posterior tissue interactions to induce limb regeneration. Nature. 2016;533(7603):407‐410. 10.1038/nature17972 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Ornitz DM, Itoh N. The Fibroblast Growth Factor signaling pathway. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Dev Biol. 2015;4(3):215‐266. 10.1002/wdev.176 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Boulet AM, Moon AM, Arenkiel BR, Capecchi MR. The roles of Fgf4 and Fgf8 in limb bud initiation and outgrowth. Dev Biol. 2004;273(2):361‐372. 10.1016/j.ydbio.2004.06.012 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Bobick BE, Thornhill TM, Kulyk WM. Fibroblast growth factors 2, 4, and 8 exert both negative and positive effects on limb, frontonasal, and mandibular chondrogenesis via MEK‐ERK activation. J Cell Physiol. 2007;211(1):233‐243. 10.1002/jcp.20923 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46. Otsuka T, Mengsteab PY, Laurencin CT. (2021) Control of mesenchymal cell fate via application of FGF‐8b in vitro. Stem Cell Res. 2021;51:102155. 10.1016/j.scr.2021.102155 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47. Dunkel H, Chaverra M, Bradley R, Lefcort F. FGF signaling is required for chemokinesis and ventral migration of trunk neural crest cells. Dev Dyn. 2020;249(9):1077‐1097. 10.1002/dvdy.190 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48. Valve E, Penttilä TL, Paranko J, Härkönen P. FGF‐8 is expressed during specific phases of rodent oocyte and spermatogonium development. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1997;232(1):173‐177. 10.1006/bbrc.1997.6256 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49. Hao YL, Xiao YX, Liao XY, et al. FGF8 induces epithelial‐mesenchymal transition and promotes metastasis in oral squamous cell carcinoma. Int J Oral Sci. 2021;13(1):6. 10.1038/s41368-021-00111-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50. Berenguer M, Duester G. Role of retinoic acid signaling, FGF signaling and meis genes in control of limb development. Biomolecules. 2021;11(1):80. 10.3390/biom11010080 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51. Yan DY, Chen D, Cool SM, et al. Fibroblast growth factor receptor 1 is principally responsible for fibroblast growth factor 2‐induced catabolic activities in human articular chondrocytes. Arthritis Res Ther. 2011;13(4):R130. 10.1186/ar3441 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] [Retracted]
  • 52. Bi W, Deng JM, Zhang Z, Behringer RR, de Crombrugghe B. Sox9 is required for cartilage formation. Nat Genet. 1999;22(1):85‐89. 10.1038/8792 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53. Dash S, Trainor PA. Nucleolin loss‐of‐function leads to aberrant FGF signaling and craniofacial anomalies. BioRxiv preprint. 2021:460382: 10.1101/2021.09.14.460382 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 54. Ornitz DM, Marie PJ. FGF signaling pathways in endochondral and intramembranous bone development and human genetic disease. Genes Dev. 2002;16(12):1446‐1465. 10.1101/gad.990702 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55. Akiyama H, Chaboissier MC, Martin JF, Schedl A, de Crombrugghe B. The transcription factor Sox9 has essential roles in successive steps of the chondrocyte differentiation pathway and is required for expression of Sox5 and Sox6. Genes Dev. 2002;16(21):2813‐2828. 10.1101/gad.1017802 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56. Duan WP, Zhao Y, Ren XC, et al. Combination of chondrocytes and chondrons improves extracellular matrix production to promote the repairs of defective knee cartilage in rabbits. J Orthop Translat. 2021;28:47‐54. 10.1016/j.jot.2021.01.004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57. Coryell PR, Diekman BO, Loeser RF. Mechanisms and therapeutic implications of cellular senescence in osteoarthritis. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2021;17(1):47‐57. 10.1038/s41584-020-00533-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58. Liu Y, Duan M, Guo D, et al. PDGF‐AA promotes cell‐to‐cell communication in osteocytes through PI3K/Akt signaling pathway. Acta Biochim Biophys Sin (Shanghai). 2021;53(12):1640‐1649. 10.1093/abbs/gmab136 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59. Linscott ML, Chung WCJ. TET1 regulates fibroblast growth factor 8 transcription in gonadotropin releasing hormone neurons. PLoS One. 2019;14(7):e0220530. 10.1371/journal.pone.0220530 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60. Ismail HM, Yamamoto K, Vincent TL, Nagase H, Troeberg L, Saklatvala J. Interleukin‐1 acts via the JNK‐2 Signaling pathway to induce aggrecan degradation by human chondrocytes. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2015;67(7):1826‐1836. 10.1002/art.39099 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61. Kawata M, Taniguchi Y, Mori D, et al. Different regulation of limb development by p63 transcript variants. PLoS One. 2017;12(3):e0174122. 10.1371/journal.pone.0174122 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62. Xu J, Huang Z, Wang W, et al. FGF8 signaling alters the osteogenic cell fate in the hard palate. J Dent Res. 2018;97(5):589‐596. 10.1177/0022034517750141 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63. Cho GS, Park DS, Choi SC, Han JK. Tbx2 regulates anterior neural specification by repressing FGF signaling pathway. Dev Biol. 2017;421(2):183‐193. 10.1016/j.ydbio.2016.11.020 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64. Ohta K, Aoyama E, Ahmad SAI, et al. CCN2/CTGF binds the small leucine rich proteoglycan protein Tsukushi. J Cell Commun Signal. 2019;13(1):113‐118. 10.1007/s12079-018-0487-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65. Teng YQ, Kanasaki K, Bardeesy N, Sugimoto H, Kalluri R. Deletion of Smad4 in fibroblasts leads to defective chondrocyte maturation and cartilage production in a TGFβ type II receptor independent manner. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2011;407(4):633‐639. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2011.02.142 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66. Sun Y, Zhou L, Lv D, Liu H, He T, Wang X. Poly(ADP‐ribose) polymerase 1 inhibition prevents interleukin‐1beta‐induced inflammation in human osteoarthritic chondrocytes. Acta Biochim Biophys Sin (Shanghai). 2015;47(6):422‐430. 10.1093/abbs/gmv033 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67. Wu WJ, Gu SP, Sun C, et al. Altered FGF signaling pathways impair cell proliferation and elevation of palate shelves. PLoS One. 2015;10(9):e0136951. 10.1371/journal.pone.0136951 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68. Liu HZ, Fang Q, Wang MY, et al. FGF8 and FGFR3 are up‐regulated in hypertrophic chondrocytes: association with chondrocyte death in deep zone of Kashin‐Beck disease. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2018;500(2):184‐190. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2018.04.023 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69. Chen L, Adar R, Yang X, et al. Gly369Cys mutation in mouse FGFR3 causes achondroplasia by affecting both chondrogenesis and osteogenesis. J Clin Invest. 1999;104(11):1517‐1525. 10.1172/JCI6690 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70. Schmidt L, Taiyab A, Melvin VS, Jones KL, Williams T. Increased FGF8 signaling promotes chondrogenic rather than osteogenic development in the embryonic skull. Dis Model Mech. 2018;11(6):dmm031526. 10.1242/dmm.031526 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71. Xu J, Wang LY, Huang Z, Chen YP, Shao MY. Exogenous FGF8 signaling in osteocytes leads to mandibular hypoplasia in mice. Oral Dis. 2020;26(3):590‐596. 10.1111/odi.13262 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72. Liu X, D'Cruz AA, Hansen J, et al. Deleting suppressor of cytokine signaling‐3 in chondrocytes reduces bone growth by disrupting mitogen‐activated protein kinase signaling. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2019;27(10):1557‐1563. 10.1016/j.joca.2019.05.018 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73. Valta MP, Teuvo H, Qiang Q, et al. Regulation of osteoblast differentiation: a novel function for fibroblast growth factor 8. Endocrinology. 2006;147(5):2171‐2182. 10.1210/en.2005-1502 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74. Ornitz DM. FGF signaling in the developing endochondral skeleton. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 2005;16(2):205‐213. 10.1101/gad.965602 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75. Krejci P, Prochazkova J, Smutny J, et al. FGFR3 signaling induces a reversible senescence phenotype in chondrocytes similar to oncogene‐induced premature senescence. Bone. 2010;41(7):102‐110. 10.1016/j.bone.2010.03.021 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76. Krejci P, Prochazkova J, Bryja V, et al. Fibroblast growth factor inhibits interferon γ‐STAT1 and interleukin 6‐STAT3 signaling in chondrocytes. Cell Signal. 2009;21(1):151‐160. 10.1016/j.cellsig.2008.10.006 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77. Ansari MY, Ahmad N, Haqqi TM. Oxidative stress and inflammation in osteoarthritis pathogenesis: role of polyphenols. Biomed Pharmacother. 2020;129:110452. 10.1016/j.biopha.2020.110452 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78. Sahni M, Ambrosetti DC, Mansukhani A, Gertner R, Levy D, Basilico C. FGF signaling inhibits chondrocyte proliferation and regulates bone development through the STAT‐1 pathway. Genes Dev. 1999;13(11):1361‐1366. 10.1101/gad.13.11.1361 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79. Aurrekoetxea M, Irastorza I, García‐Gallastegui P, et al. Wnt/β‐Catenin regulates the activity of epiprofin/Sp6, SHH, FGF, and BMP to coordinate the stages of odontogenesis. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2016;4:25. 10.3389/fcell.2016.00025 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80. Buchtova M, Oralova V, Aklian A, et al. Fibroblast growth factor and canonical WNT/β‐catenin signaling cooperate in suppression of chondrocyte differentiation in experimental models of FGFR signaling in cartilage. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2015;1852(5):839‐850. 10.1016/j.bbadis.2014.12.020 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81. Bradley EW, Carpio LR, Newton AC, Westendorf JJ. Deletion of the PH‐domain and leucine‐rich repeat protein phosphatase 1 (Phlpp1) increases fibroblast growth factor (Fgf) 18 expression and promotes chondrocyte proliferation. J Biol Chem. 2015;190(26):16272‐16280. 10.1074/jbc.M114.612937 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82. Kapadia RM, Guntur AR, Reinhold MI, Naski MC. Glycogen synthase kinase 3 controls endochondral bone development: contribution of fibroblast growth factor 18. Dev Biol. 2005;285(2):496‐507. 10.1016/j.ydbio.2005.07.029 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83. Wei X, Sun C, Zhou RP, et al. Nerve growth factor promotes ASIC1a expression via the NF‐κB pathway and enhances acid‐induced chondrocyte apoptosis. Int Immunopharmacol. 2020;82:106340. 10.1016/j.intimp.2020.106340 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84. Zheng LL, Zhang ZJ, Sheng PY, Mobasheri A. The role of metabolism in chondrocyte dysfunction and the progression of osteoarthritis. Ageing Res Rev. 2021;66:101249. 10.1016/j.arr.2020.101249 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85. Xie J, Zhang D, Lin Y, Yuan Q, Zhou X. Anterior cruciate ligament transection‐induced cellular and extracellular events in menisci: implications for osteoarthritis. Am J Sports Med. 2018;46(5):1185‐1198. 10.1177/0363546518756087 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86. Marashi FA, Torabi A, Beaudry F. Granulosa cells exposed to fibroblast growth factor 8 and 18 reveal early onset of cell growth and survival. Int J Reprod Biomed. 2019;17(6):435‐442. 10.18502/ijrm.v17i6.4815 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87. Lai WT, Krishnappa V, Phinney DG. Fibroblast growth factor 2 (Fgf2) inhibits differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells by inducing twist2 and spry4, blocking extracellular regulated kinase activation, and altering Fgf receptor expression Levels. Stem Cells. 2011;29(7):1102‐1111. 10.1002/stem.661 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88. Weng MJ, Chen ZX, Xiao Q, Li RM, Chen ZQ. A review of FGF signaling in palate development. Biomed Pharmacother. 2018;103:240‐247. 10.1016/j.biopha.2018.04.026 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89. Yang T, Bassuk AG, Fritzsch B. Prickle1 stunts limb growth through alteration of cell polarity and gene expression. Dev Dyn. 2013;242(11):1293‐1306. 10.1002/dvdy.24025 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90. Rockel JS, Yu CY, Whetstone H, et al. Hedgehog inhibits β‐catenin activity in synovial joint development and osteoarthritis. J Clin Invest. 2016;126(5):1649‐1663. 10.1172/JCI80205 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91. Uchii M, Tamura T, Suda T, Kakuni M, Tanaka A, Miki I. Role of fibroblast growth factor 8 (FGF8) in animal models of osteoarthritis. Arthritis Res Ther. 2008;10(4):R90. 10.1186/ar2474 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92. Wang JC, Liu SZ, Li JY, Yi Z. The role of the fibroblast growth factor family in bone‐related diseases. Chem Biol Drug Des. 2019;94(4):1740‐1749. 10.1111/cbdd.13588 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93. Billinghurst RC, Dahlberg L, Ionescu M, et al. Enhanced cleavage of type II collagen by collagenases in osteoarthritic articular cartilage. J Clin Invest. 1997;99(7):1534‐1545. 10.1172/JCI119316 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94. Morris KJ, Cs‐Szabo G, Cole A. Characterization of TIMP‐3 in human articular talar cartilage. Connect Tissue Res. 2010;51(6):478‐490. 10.3109/03008201003686958 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95. Siemerink MJ, Klaassen I, Vogels IMC, Griffioen AW, Van Noorden CJF, Schlingemann RO. CD34 marks angiogenic tip cells in human vascular endothelial cell cultures. Angiogenesis. 2012;15(1):151‐163. 10.1007/s10456-011-9251-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96. Rieder B, Weihs AM, Weidinger A, et al. Hydrostatic pressure‐generated reactive oxygen species induce osteoarthritic conditions in cartilage pellet cultures. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):17010. 10.1038/s41598-018-34718-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97. Guan F, Li SY, Wang ZL, et al. Histopathology of chondronecrosis development in knee articular cartilage in a rat model of Kashin‐Beck disease using T‐2 toxin and selenium deficiency conditions. Rheumatol Int. 2013;33(1):157‐166. 10.1007/s00296-011-2335-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98. Morita K, Miyamoto T, Fujita N, et al. Reactive oxygen species induce chondrocyte hypertrophy in endochondral ossification. J Exp Med. 2007;204(7):1613‐1623. 10.1084/jem.20062525 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99. Dahlberg LE, Aydemir A, Muurahainen N, et al. A first‐in‐human, double‐blind, randomised, placebo‐controlled, dose ascending study of intra‐articular rhFGF18 (sprifermin) in patients with advanced knee osteoarthritis. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2016;34(3):445‐450. PMID: 27050139. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100. Tachmazidou I, Hatzikotoulas K, Southam L, et al. Identification of new therapeutic targets for osteoarthritis through genome‐wide analyses of UK Biobank data. Nat Genet. 2019;51(2):230‐236. 10.1038/s41588-018-0327-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101. Mori Y, Saito T, Chang SH, et al. Identification of fibroblast growth factor‐18 as a molecule to protect adult articular cartilage by gene expression profiling. J Biol Chem. 2014;289(14):10192‐10200. 10.1074/jbc.M113.524090 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102. Moore EE, Bendele AM, Thompson DL, et al. Fibroblast growth factor‐18 stimulates chondrogenesis and cartilage repair in a rat model of injury‐induced osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2005;13(7):623‐631. 10.1016/j.joca.2005.03.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

Any data involving this study are available from the corresponding author on request.


Articles from Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine are provided here courtesy of Blackwell Publishing

RESOURCES