Assessment of Radiofrequency Ablation for Papillary Microcarcinoma of the Thyroid

Key Points

Question

What is the role of radiofrequency ablation in the treatment of low-risk papillary microcarcinoma of the thyroid?

Findings

In this systematic review and meta-analysis that included 15 studies comprising 1770 patients with 1822 tumors treated with radiofrequency ablation, the pooled proportion of complete tumor disappearance was 79%.

Meaning

This study suggests that radiofrequency ablation is a safe and efficient method to treat selected low-risk papillary microcarcinoma of the thyroid.

Abstract

Importance

Papillary microcarcinomas of the thyroid (mPTCs) account for an increasing proportion of thyroid cancers in past decades. The use of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) has been investigated as an alternative to surgery. The effectiveness and safety of RFA has yet to be determined.

Objective

To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of RFA for low-risk mPTC.

Data Sources

Embase, MEDLINE via Ovid, Web of Science Core Collection, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and the top 100 references of Google Scholar were searched from inception to May 28, 2021.

Study Selection

Articles reporting on adult patients with mPTC treated with RFA were included. Studies that involved patients with pre-ablation lymph node or distant metastases, recurrence of disease, or extrathyroidal extension were excluded. Final article selection was conducted by multiple reviewers based on consensus. The proportion of eligible articles was 1%.

Data Extraction and Synthesis

This meta-analysis was conducted in accordance with the MOOSE guidelines. Random and fixed-effect models were applied to obtain pooled proportions and 95% CIs.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary outcome was the complete disappearance rate of mPTC. Secondary outcomes were tumor progression and complications.

Results

Fifteen studies were included in this meta-analysis. A total of 1770 patients (1379 women [77.9%]; mean [SD] age, 45.4 [11.4] years; age range, 42.5-66.0 years) with 1822 tumors were treated with RFA; 49 tumors underwent 1 additional RFA session and 1 tumor underwent 2 additional RFA sessions. Mean (SD) follow-up time was 33.0 (11.4) months (range, 6-131 months). The pooled complete disappearance rate at the end of follow-up was 79% (95% CI, 65%-94%). The overall tumor progression rate was 1.5% (n = 26 patients), local residual mPTC in the ablation area was found in 7 tumors (0.4%), new mPTC in the thyroid was found in 15 patients (0.9%), and 4 patients (0.2%) developed lymph node metastases during follow-up. No distant metastases were detected. Three major complications occurred (2 voice changes lasting >2 months and 1 cardiac arrhythmia). Minor complications were described in 45 patients.

Conclusions and Relevance

The findings of this systematic review and meta-analysis suggest that RFA is a safe and efficient method to treat selected low-risk mPTCs. Radiofrequency ablation could be envisioned as step-up treatment after local tumor growth under active surveillance for an mPTC or initial treatment in patients with mPTCs with anxiety about active surveillance.

This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluates the effectiveness and safety of radiofrequency ablation for low-risk papillary microcarcinoma of the thyroid.

Introduction

Papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) is the most common subtype of thyroid malignant neoplasm, accounting for approximately 85% of thyroid cancers.¹ Papillary thyroid carcinomas measuring 10 mm or less were first defined by the World Health Organization as papillary thyroid microcarcinomas (mPTCs).² Papillary thyroid microcarcinomas account for an increasing proportion of thyroid cancers; in some countries, almost half of all PTCs are classified as an mPTC.^3,4,5 Patients with a diagnosis of mPTC have a disease-specific survival of more than 99% after 10 years of follow-up.^6,7

Most guidelines concerning thyroid cancer care recommend a lobectomy as the first-line treatment strategy for low-risk unifocal mPTC.^8,9 However, thyroid surgery comes with significant costs and morbidity rates caused by iatrogenic hypothyroidism and recurrent laryngeal nerve damage, resulting in poor quality of life.^{10,11,12,13,14,15} To de-escalate the treatment of mPTC and reduce surgery-related morbidity, less-aggressive treatment strategies such as active surveillance¹⁶ and thermal ablation¹⁷ for patients with low-risk mPTC have been proposed.

Thermal ablation primarily includes 3 techniques: microwave ablation, laser ablation, and radiofrequency ablation (RFA). Radiofrequency ablation is a nonsurgical, minimally invasive technique that relies on alternating electromagnetic current to cause molecular frictional heating to control tissue mass.¹⁸ Although RFA is currently used mostly in patients with benign nodules, recurrent PTC, and inoperable disease,^19,20,21,22 recent evidence suggests that RFA could be an efficient treatment for patients with low-risk mPTC and has been shown to be more effective than microwave ablation or laser ablation.¹⁷ In this systematic review and meta-analysis of current literature, the primary goal is to analyze the effectiveness and safety of RFA for low-risk mPTC in a large number of patients.

Methods

Literature Search and Patient Selection

A systematic literature search was performed using the databases Embase, MEDLINE via Ovid, Web of Science Core Collection, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and the top 100 references of Google Scholar. The search strategy is illustrated in the eTable in the Supplement. The search strategy was created by a qualified librarian of the University Medical Center Rotterdam (S.T.G.G.). Two reviewers (S.P.J.v.D. and H.I.C.) independently screened titles and abstracts of articles published until May 28, 2021. In cases of disagreement in the selection of articles, a third reviewer (T.M.v.G.) was consulted to make the final decision. Studies were included if they involved patients who had a primary mPTC and were treated with RFA for the first time. Exclusion criteria were: (1) case reports, case series of less than 5 patients, letters, conference abstracts, (systematic) reviews, meta-analyses, guidelines, study protocols, statements, or non-English articles; (2) patients with preablation lymph node or distant metastases, recurrence, or extrathyroidal extension; and (3) patients treated with other thermal ablation techniques such as laser, ethanol, or microwave ablation. This meta-analysis of scientific literature was conducted in accordance with the Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) reporting guideline.²³

Data Extraction and Outcomes

The following data were extracted: author names, year of publication, type of study, study period, total number of patients, total number of tumors, patient age, patient sex, total and mean number of RFA sessions, largest tumor diameter, volume of tumor, volume reduction rate, complications, and tumor progression. The primary outcome of this meta-analysis was the complete disappearance rate of mPTCs. Secondary outcomes were tumor progression and complications. Complete disappearance rate was defined by the percentage of patients with a completely absorbed tumor volume on results of ultrasonography after RFA. Incomplete ablation was defined as incompletely absorbed tumor volume on results of ultrasonography after RFA with benign fine-needle aspiration (FNA) results. Tumor progression was defined as cytologically or histologically confirmed residual mPTC in the ablation area, newly found mPTC elsewhere in the thyroid, or lymph node or distant metastases.

Complications were assessed using the reporting standards of the Society of Interventional Radiology.²⁴ Cardiac events and/or arrhythmias, surgical intervention owing to bleeding after RFA, and voice changes (lasting >1 month) were considered major complications. Pain, hematoma, skin burn, temporary voice changes (lasting ≤1 month), hypoparathyroidism, fever, and neck swelling were considered minor complications. Volume reduction rate was calculated and defined in the included studies as following: volume reduction rate (%) = (initial volume – final volume)/initial volume ×100%.

Statistical Analysis

Descriptive statistics were presented as counts (numbers and percentages) and means with SDs. Medians were used as approximations of the mean in case of skewed variables. Meta-analysis of proportions and means was performed with 95% CIs. Between-study heterogeneity was calculated by the Higgins inconsistency index I². If there was no statistical proof for heterogeneity (P ≥ .05), the assumption of homogeneity was deemed valid and a fixed-effect model was applied. Otherwise, a random-effect model was used. The risk of publication bias of the included studies was analyzed by using visual checking of symmetry in funnel plots and the Egger regression test. Meta-analysis was performed using metafor for R, version 4.0.3 (R Group for Statistical Computing) and Comprehensive Meta-Analysis, version 3.3.070 (Biostat Inc).

Results

Systematic Literature Search

The literature search was performed on May 28, 2021. A total of 1045 articles were found in the updated search through May 28, 2021. After removal of duplicates, 667 articles were screened and 63 full-text articles were assessed for eligibility. After careful selection of the articles, 15 studies were eligible for the final synthesis and were included in this review (eFigure 1 in the Supplement). Eleven articles potentially used overlapping patient cohorts based on author names, time period of patient inclusion, and affiliations.^{25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35}

Study Characteristics and Quality Assessment

Twelve studies were case series (11 retrospective and 1 prospective),^{25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,36,37,38} which are generally considered to have a high risk of bias and low certainty.^39,40 Three studies were retrospective cohort studies.^34,35,41 All included studies originated from China (n = 11) or Korea (n = 4) and were published after 2016.

Clinical Characteristics

A total of 1770 patients (1379 women [77.9%] and 391 men [22.1%]; mean [SD] age, 45.4 [11.4] years; age range, 42.5-66.0 years) with 1822 tumors were treated with 1872 RFA sessions. All patients had mPTC confirmed by ultrasonography and FNA or core needle biopsy without signs of lymph node metastases or extrathyroidal extension on ultrasonography before RFA. Seven articles including 1069 patients reported on the exclusion of aggressive histologic variants of mPTC. In total, 49 tumors received 1 additional RFA session and 1 tumor received 2 additional RFA sessions. The mean (SD) follow-up (reported in all 15 studies) was 33.0 (11.4) months (range, 6-131 months). Further baseline characteristics of the included studies can be seen in Table 1^{25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,41} and Table 2.^{25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,41}

Table 1. Characteristics of Included Studies.

Source	Affiliation	Study period	Study design	Patients, No.	Tumors, No.	RFA sessions, No.	Age, mean (SD), y	Sex ratio (female:male)	Follow-up, mean (SD or range), mo	Initial tumor diameter, mean (SD), mm	Initial tumor volume, mean (SD), mm3	Presence of other treatment group
Zhang et al,26 2016, China	PLA Bejing	9/2013-10/2014	Prospectivea	92	98	98	45 (11)	69:23	8 (3)	6 (2)	119 (107)	No
Jeong et al,36 2018, Korea	University of Ulsan College of Medicine	3/2011-4/2016	Retrospectivea	6	7	7	64 (17)	3:3	19 (4)	7 (1)	160 (80)	No
Lim et al,30 2019, Korea	Haeundae Hospital	5/2008-1/2017	Retrospectivea	133	152	167	46 (12)	114:19	39 (25)	4 (1)	300 (400)	No
Ding et al,37 2019, China	Renji Hospital, Shanghai	9/2014-12/2017	Retrospectivea	37	38	38	45 (13)	29:8	6	7 (4)	120 (100)	No
Zhang et al,33 2019, China	PLA Bejing	2/2013-3/2017	NSa	60	60	60	43 (9)	48:12	NS	NS	110 (170)	No
Zhang et al,35 2020, China	PLA Bejing	1/2013-11/2013	Retrospectiveb	94	94	94	45 (11)	70:24	64 (3)	6 (3)	176 (228)	Surgery (n = 80)
Cho et al,32 2020, Korea	Haeundae Hospital	9/2008-1/2017	Retrospectivea	74	84	98	46 (12)	66:8	72 (18)	4 (2)	20	No
Wu et al,28 2020, China	PLA Bejing	2/2014-8/2016	Retrospectivea	198	204	205	43 (10)	141:57	26 (5)	6 (2)	99 (84)	No
Yan et al,25 2020, China	PLA Bejing	6/2016-11/2018	Retrospectivea	202	211	214	43 (10)	152:50	24 (9)	5 (2)	102 (94)	No
Yan et al,27 2021, China	PLA Bejing	6/2014-12/2017	Retrospectivea	414	414	428	44 (10)	323:91	42 (12)	5 (2)	93 (83)	No
Seo,38 2021, Korea	Kangwon National University	11/2006-12/2009	Retrospectivea	5	5	7	NS	5:0	131 (121-159)	5	NS	No
Song et al,29 2021, China	PLA Bejing	5/2014-4/2018	Retrospective	112	112	112	45 (11)	94:18	30 (14)	7 (2)	182	No
Song et al,34 2021, China	PLA Bejing	5/2014-5/2018	Retrospectiveb	115	NS	115	45 (10)	97:18	26 (11-60)	7 (2)	182 (157)	Surgery (n = 103)
He et al,31 2021, China	PLA Bejing	6/2014-1/2019	Retrospectivea	95	95	96	66 (4)	71:24	37 (17)	6 (2)	107 (99)	No
Zhang et al,41 2021, China	Zhejiang University Hangzhou	11/2017-3/2020	Retrospectiveb	133	133	133	46 (10)	97:36	6 (5)	5 (2)	58 (53)	Surgery (n = 133)

Abbreviations: NS, not specified; PLA, People’s Liberation Army; RFA, radiofrequency ablation.

^a Case series.

^b Cohort studies.

Table 2. Effectiveness and Safety of RFA in Patients With mPTC.

Source	Complete disappearance rate, No./No. (%)		VRR, %		Tumor volume reduction, mean (SD), mm3	No. (%)
	After 12 mo	At end of follow-up	After 12 mo	At end of follow-up		Overall tumor progression	mPTC residue in ablation area	Newly discovered mPTCa	Lymph node metastases	Major complications	Minor complications
Zhang et al,26 2016	NS	NS	96	100	110 (70)	0	0	0	0	0	4/92 (4)
Jeong et al,36 2018	NS	3/6 (50)	NS	48	90 (40)	0	0	0	0	0	0
Lim et al,30 2019	108/152 (71)	139/152 (91)	−16	100	109 (87)	0	0	0	0	1/133 (1)	3/133 (2)
Ding et al,37 2019	NS	37/38 (97)	99	99	NS	0	0	0	0	0	0
Zhang et al,33 2019	49/60 (82)	60/60 (100)	NS	100	104 (170)	0	0	0	0	0	4/60 (7)
Zhang et al,35 2020	NS	NS	NS	NS	NS	1/94 (1)	0	1/94 (1)	0	0	0
Cho et al,32 2020	62/84 (74)	84/84 (100)	54	100	NS	3/74 (4)	0	3/74 (4)	0	1/74 (1)	3/74 (4)
Wu et al,28 2020	NS	NS	99	99	86 (24)	1/198 (1)	1/198 (1)	0	0	0	9/198 (5)
Yan et al,25 2020	110/211 (52)	139/211 (66)	84	99	101	3/211 (2)	3/211 (2)	0	0	0	0
Yan et al,27 2021	NS	366/414 (88)	87	99	82 (57)	15/414 (4)	1/414 (0.2)	10/414 (2)	4/414 (1)	0	16/414 (4)
Seo,38 2021	3/5 (60)	3/5 (60)	NS	NS	NS	0	0	0	0	0	0
Song et al,29 2021	102/112 (91)	112/112 (100)	NS	NS	NS	1/112 (1)	1/112 (1)	0	0	0	0
Song et al,34 2021	104/115 (90)	115/115 (100)	99	100	NS	1/115 (1)	0	1/115 (1)	0	0	2/115 (2)
He et al,31 2021	44/95 (46)	44/95 (46)	78	99	107	1/95 (1)	1/95 (1)	0	0	1/95 (1)	1/95 (1)
Zhang et al,41 2021	37/133 (28)	39/133 (29)	99	99	58	0	0	0	0	0	3/133 (3)

Abbreviations: mPTC, papillary microcarcinoma of the thyroid; NS, not specified; RFA, radiofrequency ablation; VRR, volume reduction rate.

^a Found in other place than ablated area.

Effectiveness

Complete Disappearance Rates

Twelve studies reported on complete disappearance rates of tumor tissue on results of ultrasonography after RFA, with a mean (SD) follow-up of 34.0 (20.8) months.^{25,27,29,30,31,32,33,34,36,37,38,41} The frequency of complete disappearance after 12 months ranged between 27.8% and 91.0%, whereas the complete disappearance rate at the end of follow-up ranged between 29.3% and 100%. The pooled proportion of the complete disappearance rate at 12 months was 66% (95% CI, 52%-81%) and at the end of follow-up was 79% (95% CI, 65%-94%) (Table 3, Figure, A). There was high heterogeneity between the studies (I² = 96.8% at 12 months; P < .001 and I² = 99.7% at the end of follow-up; P < .001). In 3 studies^30,32,38 a small number of patients whose mPTC was incompletely ablated without pathologically confirmed mPTC after initial ablation received a second ablation instead of follow-up (n = 24).

Table 3. Meta-analysis of RFA in Patients With mPTC.

Characteristic	No.		Follow-up, mean (SD), mo	Pooled proportion (95% CI)	Heterogeneity test		Publication bias (Egger test)
	Studies	Patients			I2, %	P value	z Score	P value
Complete disappearance
After 12 mo	9	929	12	0.66 (0.52-0.81)	96.8	<.001	−0.39	.69
At end of follow-up	12	1386	34 (21)	0.79 (0.65-0.94)	99.7	<.001	−1.87	.06
Volume reduction rate after 12 mo	7	1025	12	0.92 (0.85-0.99)	99.8	<.001	−5.17	<.001
Mean volume reduction, mm3	6	937	30 (18)	95 (83-107)	87.7	<.001	0.26	.79
Tumor progression rate	15	1770	33 (11)	0.01 (0.00-0.01)	4.9	.38	2.22	.03
Total complications	15	1770	33 (11)	0.02 (0.01-0.03)	60.9	<.001	4.21	<.001
Major complications	15	1770	33 (11)	0.00 (0.00-0.01)	0.00	.99	4.21	<.001

Abbreviations: mPTC, papillary microcarcinoma of the thyroid; RFA, radiofrequency ablation.

Figure. Pooled Proportion of Complete Disappearance and Tumor Progression.

Tumor Progression

All 15 studies reported on the possible occurrence of tumor progression.^{25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,41} The overall tumor progression rate was 1.5% (n = 26 patients), residual mPTC in the ablation area was found in 7 patients (0.4%), new mPTC in the thyroid was found in 15 patients (0.9%), and 4 patients (0.2%) developed lymph node metastases during follow-up. No distant metastases were detected. Yan et al²⁷ reported the highest rate of tumor progression (3.6% [15 of 414]), whereas 7 studies reported no tumor progression in patients with mPTC treated with RFA.^{26,30,33,36,37,38,41} The pooled proportion of tumor progression was 1% (95% CI, 0%-1%) (Figure, B). There was no evidence of between-study heterogeneity (I² = 4.9%; P = .38). Patients with tumor progression were treated with additional RFA sessions (n = 25) or active surveillance was initiated (n = 1).

Safety

Complications were evaluated in all 15 studies and 9 studies^{26,27,28,30,31,32,33,34,41} reported complications. Three major complications occurred: 2 patients experienced voice changes, which spontaneously resolved after 2 months, and 1 patient experienced temporary cardiac arrhythmias during the RFA procedure. In addition, 45 minor complications occurred (2.5%), which included 20 patients with postoperative pain, 14 patients with transient voice changes that resolved within 1 month, 5 patients with skin burns, 4 patients with hematomas, 1 patient with transient hypoparathyroidism, and 1 patient with fever. The pooled proportion of total complication rate was 2% (95% CI, 1%-3%), with evidence of moderate heterogeneity between studies (I² = 60.9%; P < .001). The pooled proportion of major complication rate was 0% (95% CI, 0%-1%), without evidence of heterogeneity between studies (I² = 0.00%; P = .99). Forest plots of the studies can be seen in eFigure 2 in the Supplement.

Other Effect Measures

Volume Reduction Ratio

The volume reduction rate after 12 months was reported by 10 studies.^{25,26,27,28,30,31,32,34,37,41} The pooled proportion of the mean tumor volume reduction ratio after 12 months was 92.1% (95% CI, 85.0%-99.2%). There was high heterogeneity between the studies (I² = 99.8%; P < .001). Twelve studies reported on the volume reduction rate at the end of follow-up.^{25,26,27,28,30,31,32,33,34,36,37,41} In 11 of those 12 studies, the volume reduction rate was higher than 98.0%.^{25,26,27,28,30,31,32,33,34,37,41}

Mean Volume Tumor Reduction

Nine studies reported on the absolute volume reduction of the mPTC after RFA.^{25,26,27,28,30,31,33,36,41} In most studies, tumor volume increased immediately after ablation and decreased gradually between 1 and 6 months of follow-up. Tumor volume reduction over time can be seen in eFigure 3 in the Supplement. The weighted pooled proportion of the mean tumor volume reduction was 95.0 mm³ (95% CI, 83.2-106.8 mm³), with evidence of high heterogeneity between the studies (I² = 87.7%; P < .001). The mean (SD) follow-up was 29.8 (17.7) months.

Publication Bias

Asymmetrical distribution in the funnel plots, suggestive of publication bias, was found for overall tumor progression, major complications, and total complications. Evidence of publication bias was found by the Egger test (Table 3) for volume reduction ratio (z score, –5.17; P < .001), overall tumor progression rates (z score, 2.22; P = .03), total complications (z score, 42.1; P < .001), and major complications (z score, 42.1; P < .001). Funnel plots can be found in eFigure 4 in the Supplement.

Discussion

In this study, the effectiveness and safety of RFA as a treatment for mPTC in 1770 patients was analyzed. This study demonstrates that 79% of all patients with mPTC who underwent RFA had complete disappearance of tumor tissue on results of ultrasonography after RFA. Although complete disappearance of the tumor was not achieved in 21% of the patients undergoing RFA, only 7 patients (0.4%) received a diagnosis of FNA-confirmed residual mPTC cells. This finding emphasizes that the assessment of tumor response in patients with mPTC after RFA is complicated. Most studies applied ultrasonography and FNA of the residual tumor volume and, if no cancer cells were seen on cytologic examination, patients generally received follow-up. The diagnostic accuracy of FNA after RFA has shown to be reduced because of insufficient cellularity in the ablation area.^42,43 Core needle biopsy is thought to have a higher diagnostic accuracy for detecting residual cancer cells and could be valuable in increasing the certainty of “complete mPTC disappearance” in case of residual tumor volume on ultrasonography after RFA.²⁵ To assess the oncologic acceptability of RFA as a treatment option, complete tumor response after RFA has to be clearly defined, as no criterion standard exists yet.

The overall complication rate due to RFA was low (48 [2.7%]) and 3 (0.2%) major complications occurred. All complications, minor and major, resolved spontaneously within 3 months. Twenty-two patients (1.2%) experienced FNA-confirmed residual mPTC or new mPTC, which all were permanently removed by additional ablations. Surgical complications such as permanent hypothyroidism and recurrent laryngeal nerve damage occur in 30% and 1% to 2% of patients, respectively, after unilateral thyroid lobectomy.^12,44,45 In the current study, less-severe complications in patients treated with RFA, such as pain, hematoma, skin burn, and temporary voice hoarseness, occurred in 2.5% of patients.

All included studies were conducted in China and Korea, where thyroid cancer guidelines differ significantly from guidelines in Europe. Although North American and European guidelines focus mainly on reducing overdiagnosis of mPTC by applying restrictive diagnostic workup strategies,^8,46,47 Asian guidelines often aim to reduce overtreatment using active surveillance and thermal ablation techniques.^48,49,50 Active surveillance instead of immediate surgery has proven to be a safe and viable treatment option for patients with low-risk mPTC.^51,52,53 However, this treatment strategy has also been shown to have low potential in countries in which restrictive diagnostic workup strategies are applied.⁵⁴ In these countries, the number of patients with mPTC are limited and, when encountered, the mPTC is often further progressed (ie, lymph node metastases or extrathyroidal extension), resulting in a high level of reluctance among thyroid specialists to use active surveillance.⁵⁴ The effectiveness and safety of RFA in a population with a restrictive diagnostic workup strategy is unknown. With a 79% complete disappearance rate of tumor tissue, RFA could also be a valuable treatment option for patients with low-risk mPTC in these countries. The question whether RFA can aid in preventing lymph node metastases remains to be investigated.

Although this study suggests that RFA is a safe and efficient method to treat low-risk mPTCs, there is no evidence that treatment of low-risk mPTC is associated with any clinical benefit. Especially in populations with less-restrictive diagnostic workup protocols, patients with low-risk mPTC should generally receive active surveillance. However, in case of local tumor growth under active surveillance or in case of patient anxiety about active surveillance, RFA could be a valuable minimally invasive strategy in the management of low-risk mPTC. Different studied treatment options for mPTC and its advantages and disadvantages are described in Table 4.^{52,55,56,57,58}

Table 4. Different Studied mPTC Treatment Options With Advantages and Disadvantages.

Characteristic	Surgerya	RFA	Active surveillance
Complete disappearance of mPTC, %	100	80	0
Progression of disease, %b	355	Unknown	752
Overall complications (eg, infection, bleeding, transient voice problems, or hypoparathyroidism), %	3-856,57	2	0
Advantages	Complete removal of mPTC Relatively short follow-up time after surgery No cancer in situ	Minimally invasive procedure 80% Complete disappearance after ablation No thyroid hormone replacement therapy needed	In most cases no surgery needed No thyroid hormone replacement therapy needed
Disadvantages	Risk of complications; permanent voice change in 1%-3% of patients Potential need for thyroid hormone replacement therapy after surgery (20%-30% for lobectomy58)	Long-term oncologic results are vastly unknown, especially in populations with restrictive diagnostic protocols	Long-term results are vastly unknown, especially in populations with restrictive diagnostic protocols Lifelong (?) follow-up Anxiety owing to cancer in situ

Abbreviations: mPTC, papillary thyroid microcarcinoma; RFA, radiofrequency ablation.

^a Lobectomy.

^b Surgery: recurrence of disease more than 5 years after initial treatment (in other thyroid lobe or nodal metastasis); RFA: recurrence of disease more than 5 years after initial treatment (in ablation area, other thyroid lobe, or nodal metastasis); active surveillance: progression of disease more than 5 years after start of active surveillance (tumor growth, new mPTC in other lobe, or nodal metastasis).

Limitations

This study has some limitations, the most important of which is the inclusion of mostly retrospective case series with small sample sizes that use several RFA techniques (eg, ablation energy, time of ablation, electrode tip diameter) and follow-up schedules. These studies have a higher risk of bias and low certainty.^39,40 In addition, the likelihood of patient selection bias is increased in the included studies (eg, smaller tumors, healthier patients). There were 11 studies with potential overlapping patient cohorts based on author names, inclusion periods, and affiliations. Finally, owing to the only recent developments in the field of thermal ablation techniques for patients with mPTC, follow-up periods of the patients included in the analyzed studies were relatively short (mean [SD], 33.0 [11.4] months). Despite these limitations, this review managed to illustrate the available evidence on the effectiveness and safety of RFA in patients with mPTC.

The results in the current study suggest that RFA could function as a useful alternative treatment strategy in which patients are treated minimally invasively with curative intentions. Future studies may focus on improving complete disappearance rates of the tumor volume, possibly with more advanced or longer RFA procedures. To properly assess and compare oncologic outcomes with surgery and/or active surveillance in populations with restrictive diagnostic workup strategies, prospective trials or registration studies with long-term follow-up should be conducted. Although 3 Chinese studies showed that RFA was less expensive than surgery in patients with mPTC,^34,35,41 future research may also focus on evaluating the long-term cost-effectiveness of RFA in other national health care environments.

Conclusions

The findings of this systematic review and meta-analysis suggest that RFA is a safe and efficient method to treat low-risk mPTC, with 79% complete disappearance rates of tumor tissue. Future research may focus on determining what role RFA could play in the treatment of mPTC, especially in countries with restrictive diagnostic workup protocols. Radiofrequency ablation could be envisioned as step-up treatment after local tumor growth under active surveillance or initial treatment in patients with anxiety about active surveillance and wishing to avoid surgery.

Supplement.

eTable. Terms Used to Search the Databases Until May 28, 2021

eFigure 1. PRISMA Flowchart of the Inclusion Process

eFigure 2. Forest Plots of the Efficacy and Safety of RFA in Patients With mPTC

eFigure 3. Change in Mean mPTC Volume Postablation

eFigure 4. Funnel Plots of the Included Studies