Abstract
Varicella caused by the primary infection of varicella-zoster virus (VZV) exerts a considerable disease burden globally. Current varicella vaccines consisting of the live-attenuated vOka strain of VZV are generally safe and effective. However, vOka retains full neurovirulence and can establish latency and reactivate to cause herpes zoster in vaccine recipients, raising safety concerns. Here, we rationally design a live-attenuated varicella vaccine candidate, v7D. This virus replicates like wild-type virus in MRC-5 fibroblasts and human PBMCs, the carrier for VZV dissemination, but is severely impaired for infection of human skin and neuronal cells. Meanwhile, v7D shows immunogenicity comparable to vOka both in vitro and in multiple small animal species. Finally, v7D is proven well-tolerated and immunogenic in nonhuman primates. Our preclinical data suggest that v7D is a promising candidate as a safer live varicella vaccine with reduced risk of vaccine-related complications, and could inform the design of other herpes virus vaccines.
Subject terms: Live attenuated vaccines, Herpes virus
Current varicella vaccines retain neurovirulence and can establish latency and reactivate. Here, the authors present preclinical results of a rationally-designed, skin- and neuro-attenuated varicella vaccine candidate, v7D, showing its attenuation in human skin and neuronal cells and its immunogenicity in small animal models and nonhuman primates
Introduction
Varicella, caused by primary infection with varicella-zoster virus (VZV), is a common disease in infancy and childhood. It was estimated that a minimum of 140 million varicella cases, 4.2 million severe varicella complications leading to hospitalization, and 4200 varicella-related deaths occur globally each year1. Although generally self-limiting, varicella can be associated with a variety of severe and life-threatening complications in both immunocompetent and immunocompromised individuals2,3. Moreover, after primary varicella infection, VZV establishes latency in the nerve ganglia and may reactivate to cause herpes zoster (HZ)4. The reactivation is sometimes complicated by post-herpetic neuralgia (PHN), a severe pain that can persist for years and substantially affect patients’ quality of life4.
The varicella vaccine was first approved for use in routine vaccination for children in the USA in 1995 and has been subsequently introduced into childhood immunization programs in many other countries5. In recent decades, the current varicella vaccine has proven to be generally well-tolerated and highly effective in preventing varicella-related morbidity and mortality6–8. WHO recommends that varicella vaccination be introduced into routine immunization programs in countries where varicella poses a significant public health burden, and the vaccine coverage should be maintained above 80%1.
The most widely used varicella vaccines consist of the Oka strain of live-attenuated VZV (vOka). Takahashi’s group developed the vOka strain in the 1970s by serially passaging the wild-type parent Oka (pOka) strain of VZV in human and guinea pig cell lines. However, the original vOka virus stock was never sub-cloned, and thus the current vOka vaccine is a mixture of haplotypes with its attenuation mechanism remaining ill-defined9,10. Concerns have been raised about the use of live vOka varicella vaccines. Firstly, vOka-mediated adverse events, a particularly varicella-like rash with a potential of environmental release, have been reported in up to 5% of vaccinated healthy children11. Furthermore, vOka retains wild-type neurovirulence and can establish latency in some vaccine recipients and reactivate to cause HZ and neurological complications like meningitis6,7,12–19. By deep sequencing, several wild-type single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the genomes of vOka viruses have been found to be linked with vaccine-associated varicella and HZ, indicating the existence of less attenuated vOka haplotypes in skin- and neuro-tropism10. No one vOka haplotype has been confirmed responsible for vaccine-associated diseases to date10,20. However, dormant vOka viruses in human neurons could pose one of the potential risk factors for HZ. Although recent studies have reported lower HZ incidences in vaccinated children than in unvaccinated ones (<18 years old)14,21,22, it will be decades before evidence accrues to show whether the vOka varicella vaccination would lead to an increase in the incidence of vOka-mediated HZ as vaccine recipients age and their immunity declines. In addition, there is a growing concern that life-long latency and reactivation of herpesviruses in human neurons may contribute to diseases affecting memory and cognitive functions23–26. Therefore, a safer next-generation varicella vaccine without or with low pathogenic potential is desirable to improve the acceptance of vaccination against varicella and reduce vaccine hesitancy.
Current advances in molecular virology and the development of reverse genetic systems have led to the identification of many viral genes associated with virulence and tissue tropism of VZV, thus providing a sound basis for the rational design of novel live-attenuated VZV vaccine candidate27–35. Notably, the ORF7 gene is the only full-length VZV gene identified to date that is required for virulence in both human skin and neuronal cells, besides being non-essential for viral replication in various cell cultures30–32. Thus, a pure and genetically defined VZV mutant that is defective in ORF7 expression could be both skin- and neuro-attenuated, while retaining its potency to induce protective immunity in children. Here, we reported the construction and characterization of an ORF7-deficient, pOka-derived vaccine strain of VZV, described hereafter as v7D (vaccine strain VZV-7D). The findings from this study have paved the way for a first-in-human clinical trial of v7D vaccine candidate in China (ChiCTR1900022284).
Results
Construction of the v7D vaccine candidate
VZV wild-type pOka strain was used as the parent virus to construct an infectious bacterial artificial chromosome (BAC; b) clone of a recombinant Oka virus (rOka) expressing green fluorescent protein (GFP), designated as brOka-GFP, as described previously36. This clone was then modified by mutating the 11-bp region downstream of the ATG start codon of ORF7 into a three-frame stop-codon cassette to create an ORF7-deficient VZV-BAC clone, b7D-GFP (Supplementary Fig. 1a, b). The loxP-flanked BAC vector containing the GFP expression cassette was excised from the viral genomes by co-transfecting b7D-GFP with a Cre expression vector into MRC-5 human embryonic lung fibroblasts (Supplementary Fig. 1c, d), thus reconstituting the ORF7-deficient candidate vaccine virus, v7D. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) analysis was performed on whole-genome sequences of v7D at passage (P) 12, P15, P16, and P25 to determine its genetic stability. Compared with the genomic sequence of VZV-pOka, there was no difference in the sequences of coding regions except for the stop-codon mutation in ORF7 though some mutations were found in non-coding regions of the genomes of v7D from different passages (Supplementary Table 1), suggesting that v7D genome is highly stable. To further prove that the stop-codon mutation, rather than possible mutations in the viral genome, was responsible for any growth defect of the ORF7-deficient VZV mutant, a BAC-derived ORF7-rescued VZV clone, b7R-GFP, was also constructed (Supplementary Fig. 1a, b). The rescue virus 7R and the wild-type virus rOka were recovered from their respective BAC clone and used as controls in subsequent experiments.
Characterization of v7D replication in cell culture
At a multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 0.01, the growth kinetics of v7D were comparable to those of rOka, 7R, and the vOka vaccine strain in MRC-5 cells (Fig. 1a). The levels of 12 VZV structural proteins, including capsid proteins (pORF23 and pORF40), tegument proteins (pORF7, pORF9, pORF47, pORF62, and pORF63), and glycoproteins (gE, gB, gH, gI, and gN) were examined by western blotting at two and four days post-infection (dpi) among different infections. While in the absence of ORF7, v7D yielded abundant viral proteins similar to those yielded by rOka, 7R, and vOka in the infected MRC-5 cells (Fig. 1b and Supplementary Fig. 2) and could thus provide key viral antigens as a vaccine candidate.
The replication of v7D was also tested in differentiated SH-SY5Y human neuroblastoma cells (dSY5Y; MOI = 0.01), primary human dermal fibroblasts (HDFs; MOI = 0.01) and primary human embryonic keratinocytes (HEKs; less susceptible to VZV infection;37,38 infected at an MOI of 0.2 as previously reported37). In contrast to the results obtained with rOka, 7R, and vOka, the infectious progeny virus production and viral translation of v7D were markedly impaired in the human skin and neuronal cells (Fig. 1a, b and Supplementary Fig. 2). These correlated with signs of cell damage, including the cleavage of caspase-3 and poly (adenosine diphosphate-ribose) polymerase (PARP), as well as decreases in cell viability in the infected cells (Fig. 1b, c). Therefore, v7D induced little cytopathic effect on these cells compared to those infected with rOka, 7R, and vOka, suggesting that v7D was severely attenuated in human skin and neuronal cells in vitro.
In addition, since human peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) are preferential targets of VZV infection that play a critical role in disseminating the virus throughout the host to produce clinical diseases and stimulate immune responses39, v7D infection in PBMCs was evaluated. PBMCs obtained from healthy donors (n = 6) were infected with cell-free viruses of rOka, v7D, and vOka (MOI = 0.01), respectively, and analyzed at 3 dpi for viral gene expression and genome replication. First, using flow cytometry analysis, PBMCs infected with v7D showed similar cell-surface expression levels of VZV gE compared with those infected with rOka and vOka (Fig. 2a, b). Meanwhile, using immunofluorescence assay, all VZV-infected PBMCs expressed nuclear pORF62, and perinuclear pORF7 staining was only positive in rOka- and vOka-infected PBMCs but not in v7D-infected ones (Fig. 2c). Next, the viral genome synthesis and gene transcripts (ORF31 and ORF62) were investigated in the infected PBMCs and found to be comparable among rOka, v7D, and vOka infections (Fig. 2d, e). These data suggest that v7D retained the tropism for human PBMCs of wild-type VZV, which could make it competent to be a live-attenuated vaccine in humans.
In vivo assessment of v7D attenuation in animal models of VZV infection
VZV is a highly human-specific virus that has little to no capacity of infecting other species, and to date, no natural animal model of VZV infection is available27. Early attempts to establish VZV infection in guinea pigs and cotton rats by experimental inoculation have resulted in the detection of VZV DNA and RNA in the ganglia, which resemble those seen in latently infected human ganglia40. Therefore, firstly, the neuro-tropism of v7D in the guinea pig and cotton rat models was evaluated according to the previous reports. Animals (n = 6 per group for both guinea pigs and cotton rats) were inoculated intramuscularly along both sides of the thoracic and lumbar spine with 3 × 105 plaque-forming units (PFU) of cell-associated viruses of v7D, rOka, and vOka, respectively. After 1 month, animals were euthanized and dorsal root ganglia (DRG) were examined for VZV DNA and RNA by quantitative PCR using probes for ORF31 and ORF62. The results showed that VZV DNA genome and gene transcripts were detectable in ganglia specimens from 2 to 4 of the six animals in groups inoculated with rOka and vOka (Supplementary Fig. 3). In contrast, ganglia from the v7D-inoculated and control animals were negative for VZV DNA and gene transcripts (Supplementary Fig. 3), suggesting the relative impairment in v7D’s ability to establish neuronal latency in guinea pigs and cotton rats.
To further confirm the attenuation of v7D in human skin and neuronal cells in a more physiologically relevant system, the previously established SCID-hu mouse models carrying xenografts of human skin or DRG were used as previously reported by the Arvin’s lab with certain modifications41,42. Experiments were conducted using fetal skin and DRG tissues obtained from healthy donors (n = 3). Different from the guinea pig and cotton rat models, the virus inoculum is directly injected into the human tissues most sensitive to VZV infection in the SCID-hu mouse models. Thus, cell-free viruses instead of cell-associated viruses were used to minimize the influence of pre-existing viral nucleic acids and proteins on experimental outcomes.
First, for the SCID-hu skin mouse model, skin xenografts (~1 cm width × 1 cm length) were inoculated with cell-free viruses of 1 × 104 PFU (100 μL, 27-gauge needle) of rOka, v7D, 7R, and vOka, respectively. The results showed that inoculation with rOka and 7R caused large cutaneous lesions with disruption of the keratinized layer of the skin and virus spreading into the dermis by day 21, while vOka infection progressed more slowly and resulted in smaller lesions. In contrast, v7D exhibited a severely skin-attenuated phenotype with no lesions found in all inoculated skin xenografts (Fig. 3a). When the infectious virus yields from skin xenografts were compared at 10 and 21 dpi, the mean titers of vOka were lower than those of rOka and 7R at both time points (Fig. 3b). The identity of the recovered vOka viruses was verified by a previously established PCR–RFLP assay43, compared with wild-type rOka (Supplementary Fig. 4a). As expected from our previous study30, no infectious virus was recovered from any v7D-inoculated skin xenograft (Fig. 3b).
Second, for the SCID-hu DRG mouse model, DRG xenografts (~1 mm3) were inoculated with cell-free viruses of 1 × 103 PFU (10 μL, 30-gauge needle) of each virus. When the infectious virus production from DRG xenografts was assessed, infectious virus was recovered from 5/5, 3/5 and 3/5 DRG xenografts inoculated with rOka, 7R, and vOka, respectively, at 14 dpi. The identity of the recovered vOka viruses was verified by PCR–RFLP as above (Supplementary Fig. 4b). No infectious virus was recovered from any of the DRG xenografts inoculated with rOka, 7R, or vOka at 28 and 56 dpi, and v7D did not yield infectious virus in DRG xenografts at any time point. Using immunohistologic analysis, by day 14, rOka-, 7R-, and vOka-inoculated DRG xenografts exhibited abundant viral protein expression (exemplified by gE) and disruption in tissue architecture, whereas no viral translation and cytopathic changes were observed in v7D-inoculated DRG xenografts (Fig. 3a). The viral genome synthesis and gene transcripts (ORF31 and ORF62) in the inoculated DRGs were also compared at 14, 28, and 56 dpi as described previously41. The results showed that rOka-, 7R-, and vOka-inoculated DRGs developed high VZV genome copy numbers and high levels of ORF31 and ORF62 transcripts at 14 dpi, which markedly declined at 28 and 56 dpi as expected (Fig. 3c, d). In contrast, v7D-inoculated DRGs collected at different time points showed undetectable VZV genome copy numbers and gene transcripts (Fig. 3c, d). These data suggest that v7D failed to establish an initial lytic infection and virus persistence in DRGs in vivo, compared with rOka, 7R, and vOka.
Immunogenicity evaluation of v7D using human dendritic cell-based assays
Dendritic cells (DCs) are essential antigen-presenting cells (APCs) that act at the first step in initiating adaptive immune responses against pathogens following vaccination or natural infection44,45. Therefore, prior to animal testing, the immunogenicity of v7D was compared to that of vOka using human DC-based in vitro assays. First, v7D or vOka was incubated with human CD14+ monocyte-derived immature DCs (iDCs) (MOI = 0.01) over a period of five days, and DC activation phenotypes were assessed using flow cytometry and multiplex cytokine/chemokine array analysis. The results showed that DCs were permissive to VZV infection (Fig. 4a, b) and exposure to both v7D and vOka (3 dpi) significantly increased the percentage of DCs expressing CD40, CD80, CD83, and CD86 costimulatory markers, indicating DC maturation (Fig. 4c and Supplementary Fig. 5). Furthermore, interactions of DCs with both v7D and vOka induced sustained production of similar levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines, including TNF-α and IL-6, as well as chemokines IP-10, MΙP-1β, MCP-1, and RANTES without causing cell lysis (Fig. 4d, e), which could aid in DC functions.
Second, to further test the downstream effects of v7D- and vOka-induced DC activation, v7D- or vOka-pulsed iDCs (5 dpi) were co-incubated with autologous CD4+ or CD8+ T cells. Over a 5-day co-culture period, T cells were harvested for proliferative assays and an interferon-γ (IFN-γ) enzyme-linked immunosorbent spot (ELISPOT) assay, and the culture supernatants were also collected for analysis of cytokine/chemokine production. The results showed that co-culture with v7D- and vOka-pulsed iDCs induced comparable proliferative responses (Fig. 4f–h) and secretion of similar levels of Th1/Th2 cytokines (TNF-α, IFN-γ, IL-2, IL-4, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, IL-13, etc.) and chemokines (IP-10, MΙP-1β, MCP-1, and RANTES) (Fig. 4i and Supplementary Fig. 6) in both CD4+ and CD8+ T cells. Together, compared with vOka, these findings define a similar ability of v7D in mediating DC functional activation, which could facilitate subsequent priming of adaptive immunities against VZV infection.
Immunogenicity evaluation of v7D in small animals
There is still a lack of ideal animal models that recapitulate the immune response to VZV in humans due to its strict human specificity. In this context, we used small animals most commonly used in preclinical vaccine studies, including mice, rats, rabbits, and guinea pigs, to test the in vivo immunogenicity of v7D in comparison to that of vOka. Animals were immunized subcutaneously with v7D or vOka (500 PFU/dose for mice; 1000 PFU/dose for rats; 1000 PFU/dose for guinea pigs; 2000 PFU/dose for rabbits) at weeks 0, 3, and 6. First, serum samples were collected at 3-week intervals over a 42-week period for evaluation of antibody responses. The titers of anti-VZV IgG antibodies were determined by indirect enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), and the neutralizing antibody titers were determined by plaque reduction neutralization test in MRC-5 cells. The results showed that v7D and vOka at the same doses induced comparable kinetics of anti-VZV IgG and neutralizing antibodies in these animals (Fig. 5a, b). The geometric mean titers (GMTs) peaked 3 weeks after the third vaccination and pairwise comparisons revealed no significant difference between v7D and vOka. In addition, the IgG subclasses distributions were evaluated by ELISA in sera of mice and rats 3 weeks after the first (week 3) and third immunization (week 9). The results showed that v7D and vOka induced similar IgG subclass distributions (Fig. 5c, d). In mice, IgG1 was predominant, with slightly elevated IgG2a and IgG2b titers, while in rats, IgG2a and IgG2b were the major subclasses, with slightly elevated IgG1 and IgG2c titers. According to previous studies on IgG subclasses46–49, the elevated VZV-specific IgG subclasses indicated that both v7D and vOka induced a mixed Th1/Th2 response with Th2 dominance in mice and rats.
Second, to characterize the cell-mediated immune responses to v7D and vOka, splenocytes were collected from immunized mice and rats 3 weeks after final immunization (week 9) for in vitro cytokine stimulation assays. In response to rOka virus stimulation, a subset of cytokines representing Th1 (TNF-α, IFN-γ, and IL-2), Th2 (IL-4, IL-5, IL-6, IL-10, IL-13, etc.) and Th17 (IL-17) responses, as well as chemokines (IP-10, MΙP-1β, MCP-1, RANTES, etc.) was significantly upregulated at similar levels in splenocytes from the v7D- and vOka-immunized groups (Fig. 5e, f and Supplementary Fig. 7–8). Compared with the mock controls, many of these cytokine/chemokine responses were virus-specific. Furthermore, the cell immune responses sustained at similar levels in both splenocytes and PBMCs from the v7D- and vOka-immunized groups until the termination of this study (week 42) (Supplementary Fig. 9–12). In addition, immunization with v7D and vOka viruses elicited comparable cellular immune responses (characterized by TNF-α production by PBMCs) to VZV antigens in guinea pigs and rabbits (Supplementary Fig. 13). Together, these findings suggest that v7D was as immunogenic as vOka in different small animals.
Toxicity and immunogenicity evaluation of v7D in nonhuman primates
To further translate the v7D vaccine candidate to clinical application, the preclinical toxicity evaluations of v7D were completed in nonhuman primates. First, for neurovirulence testing of v7D (experiment schedule shown in Fig. 6a), a treatment group of macaques (n = 10) was inoculated once intrathalamically on both sides with a total of 3 × 105 PFU of v7D, and the control group (n = 2) received equal volume of normal saline. Then, macaques were monitored daily for 3 weeks. All animals survived the intrathalamic challenge. Although a decreased range of motion in the thoracic limbs was observed in four of the ten animals at 2–4 days post v7D inoculation, this also occurred in the control animals and is not likely due to treatment with v7D. This reduction in limb movement soon recovered and all animals showed no signs of central nervous system symptoms or other abnormal reactions throughout the experiment. Febrility and weight loss were not observed in any animal (Fig. 6b, c), and anti-VZV antibodies were negative in serum samples collected before and after the observation period. Following euthanasia on day 21, neurohistological analysis of different brain regions was conducted (Fig. 6d), and the needle track at or near injection sites were identified in all animals. Needle track lesions were characterized by astrogliosis, microgliosis, macrophage accumulation, etc., in all ten v7D-treated animals with nine of the animals showing mild perivascular lymphocytic cuffing near the injection site. These cellular reactions could be due to antigenic stimulation produced by the v7D inoculum or active brain infection by this vaccine virus, since astrogliosis has been reported as a hallmark of host immune responses to VZV infection in the human brain50. Nonetheless, there was no evidence of the expansion of neuronal necrosis and no staining for VZV gE and pORF62 that might signify virus spread into other brain regions from the injection site. Together, these results indicate that v7D lacked neurovirulence in macaques.
Second, for toxicity evaluation of repeated subcutaneous administration of v7D (experiment schedule shown in Fig. 7a), two treatment groups of macaques (n = 10 per group) were inoculated subcutaneously with 1 × 104 PFU (group 1) and 5 × 104 PFU (group 2) of the v7D virus, respectively, for three times at 3-week intervals. The control group (n = 10) received an equal volume of normal saline. After the final injection, macaques were followed up for another 6-week period. During the course of the experiments, all animals showed no signs of drug-related illness, and no death was observed. Moreover, there were no significant differences between groups in terms of body weight, body temperature, electrocardiogram or coagulation parameters, lymphocyte subsets, blood cell count, and blood biochemistry (Fig. 7b–e). Euthanasia was carried out for six animals per group three days after the final injection (day 45) and for the rest of animals at the end of the experiments (day 84). Histopathological analysis of major organs showed no evidence of systemic toxicity related to v7D administration in all animals (Fig. 7f). Further evaluation of viral tissue distribution in v7D-inoculated animals showed positive detection of VZV DNA only in the tissues at or near the injection sites but not in the tissues of major organs (Supplementary Table 2). These data indicate that repeated subcutaneous injection of v7D was tolerated well with no side effects in macaques.
In addition, during the repeated subcutaneous dose toxicity study, serum samples were collected from the macaques before and at 3-week intervals after vaccination until study termination (day 84), and anti-VZV antibody responses and serum IFN-γ levels were evaluated. The results show that v7D inoculation induced anti-VZV IgG and neutralizing antibodies in all treated animals (Fig. 7g, h). The peak GMTs of anti-VZV IgG and neutralizing antibodies for group 1 and group 2 were 6400 and 25,600, and 128 and 128, respectively. Meanwhile, serum IFN-γ levels elevated significantly to similar levels in both v7D-treated groups (Fig. 7i). Both antibody titers and serum IFN-γ levels sustained until at least day 84. These data indicated that v7D was not only well-tolerated but immunogenic in non-human primates.
Discussion
The vOka vaccine has low virulence while inducing adequate immune responses for protection against varicella, and has been used in several countries5,20. However, safety concerns regarding the nervous system have been raised due to the full ability of vOka to cause cytopathogenicity, establish latency in human neurons, and reactivate to cause HZ, which poses a not-negligible risk for vaccine-associated adverse effects6,7,12–14,20,41. Also, the skin tropism of vOka strain contributes to the common adverse event of varicella-like rash post-immunization7,10,11. Given these risks, the vOka varicella vaccine is usually contraindicated for immunocompromised individuals who are at high risk for severe varicella-related diseases7,18. Thus, a safer vaccine should aid in establishing worldwide herd immunity against varicella together with vOka. Herein, using vOka-induced immune signatures as a benchmark, we developed a rationally-designed skin- and neuro-dual attenuated live varicella vaccine candidate, v7D, with immunogenic properties closely similar to those of vOka but cut-down on the pathogenic concerns.
Compared with vOka, a mixture of at least eight genetically distinct haplotypes5, v7D was a pure and genetically defined VZV vaccine strain, in which ORF7 was abrogated by a stop-codon mutation and was generated from a wild-type pOka strain. VZV ORF7 encodes a tegument protein that is conserved across human α-herpesviruses. This gene product pORF7 has the following characteristics in common with its homologs: (a) Golgi localization, (b) similar protein size (~29 kDa), (c) a conserved cysteine at position 9, a potential Golgi targeting signal, and a conserved YXXL motif at the N-terminus, (d) implicated in the secondary envelopment and virus egress, and deletion mutants produce lower titers and smaller plaques than wild-type viruses in certain cell types31,51,52. However, to date, it has not been reported whether deletion of UL51, the homolog of VZV ORF7, affects the skin- and neuro-tropism of other human α-herpesviruses, including herpes simplex virus (HSV) types 1 and 2. In contrast to v7D, the UL51 deletion mutant of pseudorabies virus (PrV), a porcine α-herpesvirus, has no defect in neuroinvasion and neurovirulence in a mouse model in vivo51. This striking difference between VZV ORF7 and its counterpart UL51 in PrV raises the question, what specific role of ORF7 play in VZV replication? Firstly, VZV ORF7 is 65% similar and 47% identical in sequence to HSV-1 UL51 and 78% similar and 63% identical to PrV-1 UL51, which may account for differences in their ability to support virus infection of neuronal cells. Actually, VZV have a divergent requirement for other tegument proteins and glycoproteins compared to homologs in HSV and PrV53–55, which should contribute to differences in their viral replication capacity and pathogenicity. Secondly, unique among α-herpesviruses, VZV is highly cell-associated and favors cell-to-cell spread, leading to the hallmark syncytia formation, which is crucial for VZV replication in skin and nerve tissues56–58. Since ORF7 is implicated in the distinctive cell-to-cell fusion process and syncytia formation during VZV infection31, severely impaired viral spreading of v7D within skin or nerve tissues could be due to the incapacity of the virus to fuse skin cells or fuse satellite cells with sensory neurons. Thirdly, despite having similar functions as its homologs in virion cytoplasmic envelopment, VZV ORF7 is, to our knowledge, the only one of its kind that has been extensively evaluated in target cells/tissues of the natural host. Therefore, the observed severe defect in VZV virion packaging caused by ORF7 deficiency in human target cells/tissues should constitute one mechanism contributing to v7D attenuation and be presented as a solid evidence supporting the safety of v7D for clinical use.
Although the lack of skin- and neurovirulence of v7D is expected according to our previous work30–32, we do not yet understand whether v7D would establish neuronal latency. To date, the latent state of VZV remains debatable59,60. For the SCID-hu DRG xenograft model, infection of ganglia neurons with wild-type virus or vOka was reported to be characterized by an initial lytic replication, followed by a transition to cessation of virion assembly, repression of viral gene expression and persistency of viral genomes at low levels, which was interpreted as a state of latent and/or abortive infection41. We obtained similar results for rOka and vOka in this study (Fig. 3). However, v7D did not establish the initial lytic infection, and thus there was an absence of not only viral gene expression (exemplified by transcription of ORF31 and ORF62 and gE expression) but also detectable levels of viral DNA in v7D-infected DRG xenografts (Fig. 3), which may suggest its severely impaired ability to establish latency in human neurons. Most recently, a VZV latency-associated transcript (VLT) that lies antisense to ORF61, together with ORF63 transcripts and a set of VLT-ORF63 fusion transcripts, has been identified in latently infected human trigeminal ganglia61,62. The role of these transcripts in VZV latency and reactivation has not yet been determined. However, it will be interesting to examine the expression of VLT and ORF63 transcripts when further testing v7D in in vitro models of VZV latency and in the SCID-hu DRG xenograft model.
Besides the dual-attenuation phenotype in human skin and neuronal cells, v7D grows like wild-type virus in human diploid MRC-5 cells (Fig. 1), thus permitting the production of high titers of v7D for use as live vaccines. Furthermore, v7D retains the full ability, as compared with rOka and vOka, to productively infect human immune cells, including DCs and PBMCs, in which the virus replicates its genome and viral genes are expressed without causing obvious cell damage (Figs. 2 and 4). VZV infection of human DCs and PBMCs is an essential step in virus dissemination to the internal organs and skin, facilitating virus replication within the host to cause clinical diseases39,63. As for the live-attenuated vaccine viruses, such as vOka and v7D, their lymphotropism that helps viral replication and dissemination could provide continuous antigenic stimulations that confer long-lasting protective immune responses against VZV infection in vaccine recipients. Meanwhile, compared to vOka, v7D showed a similar ability to functionally activate human DCs, including costimulatory molecule expression, cytokine production, antigen processing and presentation, and T-cell stimulation in vitro (Fig. 4). These processes could facilitate the priming of anti-VZV adaptive immunities and constitute a working mechanism of the v7D vaccine.
Although animal models are useful in evaluating vaccines and therapeutics against fellow α-herpesviruses like HSV and PrV, VZV is a highly human-specific virus and does not infect nor cause disease in other species27. Therefore, a limitation of VZV studies in general is the need to use existing animal models and in vitro systems, which lack the complexity of virus-natural host interactions, and thus only provide indirect clues as to the efficacy of v7D-induced anti-VZV immunity in humans. In this study, small animal models including mice, rats, guinea pigs and rabbits were used. Three subcutaneous immunizations of v7D elicited similar long-lasting VZV-specific antibody and cellular immune responses compared with vOka (Fig. 5 and Supplementary Figs. 7–13). Therefore, the immunogenicity of v7D was non-inferior to vOka under the same doses for both humoral and cellular immunities in these animals. The favorable outcomes from our preclinical study in nonhuman primates also strongly support the clinical translation of v7D as a live-attenuated vaccine (Figs. 6 and 7). Based on these preclinical data, v7D vaccine has advanced to a phase I clinical trial in China (ChiCTR1900022284). Compared to current vOka-based varicella vaccines, v7D vaccine is expected to demonstrate several clinical advantages through future clinical observations: (1) lower frequency of varicella-like rashes; (2) lower frequency of vaccine-strain-mediated HZ cases; (3) a possible longer protective window contributed by the higher permitted vaccine dose as a result of a deeper-attenuated vaccine strain (illustrated with a hypothetical model in Supplementary Fig. 14). However, to fully confirm the long-term safety of v7D vaccine in humans, it will require decades of observation for possible wild-type reversion, recombination events, as well as latency and reactivation of the vaccine virus, and to reveal all adverse events after vaccination.
In summary, here we report on the preclinical toxicity and immunogenicity evaluation of a skin- and neuro-attenuated live varicella vaccine v7D. Compared to vOka, v7D presents a low risk for pathogenic infection in humans and showed similar immunogenic properties in multiple animal models, inducing desired antibody and cell-mediated responses to VZV. v7D is therefore a promising vaccine candidate against varicella transmission. Further investigations on the molecular interactions of ORF7 with viral or host factors could provide more insights into its tissue-specific regulatory role in VZV pathogenesis, which could help guide the future use of v7D in prophylactic and possible therapeutic settings.
Methods
Construction of the recombinant viruses
The full-length genome of the VZV wild-type pOka strain (GenBank Accession No. AB097933) was used to construct the infectious BAC clone, brOka-GFP, in our previous work36. This VZV BAC was maintained and propagated in E. coli strain SW102, and BAC modifications were carried out using galK positive/negative selection protocols64. Briefly, the ORF7-deleted VZV BAC was created by electroporating the PCR amplified galk expression cassette flanked with homology arms to the ORF7 gene into the VZV-BAC-containing SW102. The correct colonies were selected on minimal medium plates containing glycerol as a carbon source as well as leucine, biotin and 2-deoxy-galactose (DOG; Sigma) for selection against galK. Then, the ORF7-deficient VZV-7D BAC, b7D-GFP, was made by replacing the galk gene in the ORF7-deleted VZV BACs with a mutated ORF7 gene, in which an 11-bp region downstream of the ATG start codon was changed into a three-frame stop-codon cassette. The revertant VZV BAC, b7R-GFP, was made by rescuing the full-length, wild-type ORF7 back into the ORF7-deleted VZV BAC. BAC DNA of b7D-GFP, brOka-GFP or b7R-GFP was isolated from E. coli and co-transfected into MRC-5 cells using X-tremeGENE HP (Roche) with a Cre expression vector to reconstitute recombinant viruses of v7D, rOka, and 7R with a 34-bp LoxP site as the only heterologous sequence in their viral genomes (Supplementary Fig. 1). Sequences of PCR primers used for the construction of the recombinant viruses are listed in Supplementary Tables 4 and 5, and all primers were designed based upon the wild-type pOka strain.
The Oka vaccine strain of VZV
The Oka vaccine strain of VZV, vOka, was obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC, VR-795). The identity of this vaccine virus was confirmed by a previously established PCR–RFLP assay43 based on specific mutations in ORF62 before use in this study.
Cell lines and virus preparation
MRC-5 (ATCC, CCL-171) was grown in modified minimum essential medium (MEM) with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) and penicillin–streptomycin (50 U/mL and 50 μg/mL) (All from Gibco). SH-SY5Y (ATCC, CRL-2266) cells were maintained in DMEM-F12 with 10% FBS and penicillin–streptomycin. To differentiate SH-SY5Y cells toward neurons (designated dSY5Y), cells were treated with 50 μM retinoic acid for 5 days, followed by treatment with 100 nM nerve growth factor (NGF) and 50 nM brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) (all from Prospec) for 7 days. Primary human dermal fibroblasts (HDFs, 2310) and human epidermal keratinocytes (HEKs, 2100) were purchased from ScienCell Research Laboratories (CA, USA) and maintained according to the supplier’s recommendations.
rOka, v7D, 7R, and vOka were prepared as cell-associated viruses or a lyophilized powder of cell-free viruses. For the preparation of cell-free viruses, VZV-infected MRC-5 cells were harvested when they showed a >90% cytopathic effect (CPE). After collection, cells were resuspended in cryoprotective solution (Beijing Wantai Co., LTD) and stored at −80 °C. The cell suspension was then slowly thawed at room temperature with vigorous shaking. Next, the obtained viral samples were frozen for 2 h at −40 °C, lyophilized for 16 h at −25 °C, brought to 25 °C at a speed of 10 °C per hour, and dried at room temperature for 6 h. The obtained lyophilized powder of cell-free viruses was dissolved in sterile phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) or normal saline and stored in aliquots at −80 °C before use. Lysates of uninfected MRC-5 cells were prepared in the same way as lyophilized powders and were used as negative controls.
Viral growth kinetics in cell culture
MRC-5 cells, dSY5Y cells, HDFs, and HEKs were mock-infected (isovolumetric solution of uninfected MRC-5 cell lysates) or infected in six-well cell culture plates with cell-free viruses of rOka, v7D, 7R, or vOka (MOI = 0.2 for HEKs, less susceptible to VZV infection37; MOI = 0.01 for the others). The cells were incubated at 4 °C for 2 h for viral entry synchronization prior to incubation at 37 °C/5% CO2 for a period of 1 week. Infected cells were trypsinized daily, and titers were determined on six-well plates seeded with MRC-5 cells by plaque assay to generate growth curves.
In vitro cell viability assay
MRC-5 cells, dSY5Y cells, HDFs, and HEKs were seeded in 96-well plates and then infected with cell-free viruses of rOka, v7D, 7R, or vOka (MOI = 0.2 for HEKs, and MOI = 0.01 for the others). Cell viability was assessed daily over an incubation period of 1 week using a Cell Counting Kit-8 (CCK-8) assay according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Beyotime Institute of Biotechnology, China).
Infection of PBMCs
PBMCs from healthy donors of age 20–50 years were obtained commercially from Hemacare (Van Nuys, CA, USA, PB009C). The healthy donors were screened for infectious diseases and found negative for hepatitis B virus (HBV) surface antigen, HBV core antibody, hepatitis C virus (HCV) antibody, human immunodeficiency virus −1/2 (HIV-1/2) antibody, HIV-1/HCV/HBV nucleic acid testing, and syphilis. Informed consent was obtained by the source company from all adult subjects providing PBMCs, and samples were de-identified by the company prior to our receipt. The use of human PBMCs in this study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of Xiamen University (Approval NO. SPH-XMU2016006).
For virus infection, PBMCs were seeded in 6-well plates at a density of 1 × 106 cells per well and incubated with cell-free viruses of rOka, v7D or vOka (MOI = 0.01), or mock-infected MRC-5 cell lysate as a negative control, at 37 °C/5% CO2 for a period of three days. Then, infected PBMCs were collected for the analysis of viral gene expression and genome replication.
Infection of guinea pigs and cotton rats
Guinea pigs and cotton rats were purchased from Shanghai SLAC Laboratory Animal Co. Ltd. and Bioray Laboratories Inc., respectively. All animals were maintained under specific pathogen-free (SPF) conditions with constant temperature (23 ± 2 °C), humidity (60 ± 10%) and 12 h dark/light cycles, and handled in accordance with standard use protocols and animal welfare regulations of Xiamen University Laboratory Animal Center. The guinea pig or cotton rat model of VZV infection was established as previously reported with certain modifications65,66. Briefly, groups of 7-week-old guinea pigs and cotton rats were injected intramuscularly along both sides of the thoracic and lumbar spine with infected MRC-5 cells containing 3 × 105 PFU of VZV-rOka. The animals were sacrificed one month after inoculation, and DNA/RNA was isolated from pooled thoracic and lumbar dorsal root ganglia for subsequent quantitative real-time PCR analysis.
Infection of human xenografts in the SCID-hu mouse models
Human fetal skin and DRG tissues (18–23 weeks gestational age) were purchased from Advance Biosciences Resources (Alameda, USA). The use of the human tissues in this study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of Xiamen University (Approval NO. SPH-XMU2016006). Animal experiments were carried out under SPF conditions and in strict accordance with the approved animal use protocols of Xiamen University Laboratory Animal Center (Approval NO. XMULAC20160050). All surgery was performed under isoflurane anesthesia, and all efforts were made to minimize animal suffering. Animals were group housed in IVCs under SPF conditions, with constant temperature (23 ± 2 °C), humidity (60 ± 10%), and 12 h dark/light cycles.
The SCID-hu skin and DRG xenograft models were established and used as previously reported by the Arvin’s lab with certain modifications41,42. For the SCID-hu skin mouse model, fetal skin tissues (~1 cm width × 1 cm length) were implanted on each side under the flank skin of 4- to 6-week-old male CB-17 SCID mice (Beijing Vital River Laboratory Animal Technology Co., Ltd, Beijing, China). At 3 weeks post-transplantation, the implants were surgically exposed and inoculated with ~1 × 104 PFU (100 μL, 27-gauge needle) of rOka, v7D, 7R, or vOka. Mock-infected controls were inoculated with equal amounts of uninfected MRC-5 cell lysate. Infected-skin xenografts were harvested at 10 and 21 dpi and were then cut into pieces and homogenized with a Dounce tissue grinder (Sigma) in ice-cold MEM containing 2% FBS to release the infectious virus. After removal of the cell debris by low-speed centrifugation (200 × g, 10 min, 4 °C), the obtained supernatants were used for titration by plaque assay in MRC-5 cells. The infected-skin xenografts at 21 dpi were also examined by immunohistochemistry (IHC).
For the SCID-hu DRG mouse model, human DRG tissues (~1 mm3) were implanted under the kidney capsule of SCID mice. At 4–10 weeks post-transplantation, the DRG xenografts were surgically exposed and mock-infected or infected with ~1 × 103 PFU (10 μL, 30-gauge needle) of rOka, v7D, 7R or vOka. Infected DRG xenografts were harvested at 14, 28, and 56 dpi and finely minced with a razor blade in ice-cold MEM for infectious virus assay and DNA/RNA extraction. The infected DRG xenografts at 14 dpi were also harvested for IHC analysis.
Virus titration by plaque assay
Cell-free viruses, supernatants of skin tissue homogenates, or minced DRG tissue lysates were fivefold serially diluted in MEM containing 2% FBS and 500 μL/well was inoculated onto 6-well plates with a confluent monolayer of MRC-5 cells in triplicates. After 2 h of absorption at 37 °C, the inoculum in each well was aspirated and replaced with 2 mL fresh MEM with 2% FBS. The plates were incubated for seven days at 37 °C in 5% CO2, and 1 mL/well of fresh MEM with 2% FBS was added on day 3. After aspiration of the supernatants, plaques were visualized by crystal violet staining and counted under an inverted microscope. The average virus titers were determined as PFU/mL.
Western blot analysis
Lysates prepared from infected cells were subjected to 10% SDS–PAGE, and the proteins were transferred to nitrocellulose membranes (Whatman). After blocking in 5% skim milk in PBS for 1 h at room temperature, membranes were incubate at 37 °C for 1 h with primary mouse monoclonal antibodies of anti-pORF7 (clone 8H331,32, dilution 1:1000), anti-pORF9 (clone 8H668, dilution 1:1000), anti-pORF23 (clone 9A1, dilution 1:1000), anti-pORF40 (clone 10A2, dilution 1:1000), anti-pORF47 (clone 11H4, dilution 1:1000), anti-pORF62 (clone 1B7, dilution 1:1000), anti-pORF63 (clone 1B1, dilution 1:1000), anti-gE (clone 4A232,67, dilution 1:1000), anti-gB (clone 10E1068, dilution 1:1000), anti-gH (clone 10F5, dilution 1:1000), anti-gN (clone 12E1068, dilution 1:1000) (all made in our lab), anti-gI (Abcam, ab52552, dilution 1:1000) or anti-GAPDH (Proteintech, 60004-1-Ig, dilution 1:1000), or with primary rabbit antibodies of anti-cleaved PARP (Cell Signaling Technology, 9541 S, dilution 1:500) and anti-cleaved caspase-3 (Cell Signaling Technology, 9664S, dilution 1:500). Then, membranes were incubated with horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated goat anti-mouse (Thermo Fisher Scientific, 31430, dilution 1:5000) or anti-rabbit IgG secondary antibodies (Thermo Fisher Scientific, 31460, dilution 1:5000). Finally, protein bands were visualized by chemiluminescence (SuperSignal™ West Femto Maximum Sensitivity Substrate; Thermo Fisher Scientific).
Immunohistochemistry
Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded sections (5-μm thick) of mock-infected and VZV-infected human or macaque tissues were deparaffinized and rehydrated through xylene and graded alcohols. After heat-induced antigen retrieval in 10 mM citrate buffer (pH 6.0), sections were treated with 3% hydrogen peroxide to remove endogenous peroxidase and washed in PBS. Then, sections were blocked with 10% normal goat serum and incubated with mouse monoclonal antibodies of anti-pORF62 (clone 1B7, dilution 1:5000) and/or anti-gE (clone 4A2, dilution 1:2000). Next, immunohistochemical staining was performed using an Ultrasensitive TMS-P kit (Fuzhou Maixin Biotechnology Development Co., Ltd., China) and a DAB detection kit (streptavidin-biotin; Fuzhou Maixin Biotechnology Development Co., Ltd., China) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Finally, sections were counterstained with hematoxylin, dehydrated, and coverslipped.
Quantitative real-time DNA PCR and RNA PCR
Infected cells or tissues were processed for extraction of DNA and RNA using the DNA/RNA Isolation Kit (Qiagen) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. RNA was reverse transcribed using the PrimeScipt® RT Master Mix Perfect Real-Time Kit (TaKaRa). VZV genome copies and transcript levels were determined in the presence of dually labeled internally annealing probes [6-carboxyfluorescein (FAM) and 6-carboxytetramethyl-rhodamine (TAMRA) at the 5′ and 3′ ends, respectively] for both ORF31 and ORF62 (two copies in the VZV genome) using a real-time thermocycler (Bio-Rad). Primer sequences are provided in Supplementary Tables 6 and 7. The cycling conditions consisted of a preliminary cycle at 95 °C for 30 s and 40 cycles of 95 °C for 5 s and 60 °C for 30 s. Standard curves for the quantification of DNA and cDNA amounts were generated from tenfold serial dilutions of plasmids containing ORF31 and ORF62, respectively, with detection limits of about 100 copies/mL. Samples were considered negative if no cycle threshold (Ct) value was obtained after 40 cycles in the presence of appropriate run control results.
Generation of DCs
CD14+ monocytes were isolated from PBMCs (Hemacare) with positive selection using Dynabeads™ FlowComp™ Human CD14 Kit according to manufacturer’s instructions (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Then, monocytes were seeded in six-well plates at a density of 2 × 106 cells per well and cultured at 37 °C/5% CO2 for 6 days in complete RPMI 1640 medium containing 10% FBS, 100 ng/mL GM-CSF (R&D system), and 40 ng/mL IL-4 (R&D system) to generate monocyte-derived immature DCs (iDCs). To generate v7D- or vOka-pulsed DCs, iDCs were seeded in 6-well plates at a density of 5 × 105 cells per well and incubated with cell-free viruses of v7D or vOka (MOI = 0.01), or mock-infected MRC-5 cell lysate as a negative control, at 37 °C/5% CO2 over a period of 5 days. LDH release (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and cytokines/chemokine analysis (Millipore, MILLIPLEX MAP Human Cytokine/Chemokine Magnetic Bead Panel) in the supernatants during co-incubation were performed daily per the manufacturer’s instructions. GM-CSF and IL-4 were maintained in a culture medium during all DC experiments.
In vitro stimulation of T cells by virus-pulsed DCs
The v7D-, vOka-, or mock-cell-lysate-pulsed DCs were co-cultured with autologous CD4+ or CD8+ T cells, isolated using Dynabeads™ FlowComp™ Human CD4/CD8 Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific) from autologous PBMCs, at a ratio of 1:10. The T-cell concentration was 2 × 105/mL. The stimulations were done in complete RPMI 1640 medium with 10% FBS over a period of 5 days. T-cell proliferation was examined daily using the 5-bromo-2′-deoxyuridine (BrdU) ELISA assay (Sigma) and by carboxyfluorescein diacetate succinimidyl ester (CFSE) labeling (Thermo Fisher Scientific) after five days of co-culture. The IFN-γ ELISPOT assay (Mabtech) was performed on day 5 after co-culture per the manufacturer’s instructions. Cytokines/chemokine production in the DC-T-cell co-culture supernatants was determined after 5 days of co-culture using the Millipore MILLIPLEX MAP Human Cytokine/Chemokine Magnetic Bead Panel.
Flow cytometry
For analysis of VZV infection of PBMCs and DCs, cells were stained with a mouse monoclonal antibody against VZV gE (clone 4A2, dilution 1:200). For DC phenotype analysis, DCs were stained with the following antibodies: CD40 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, CD4004, dilution 1:20), CD80 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, MA1-19590, dilution 1:20), CD83 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, MHCD8304, dilution 1:20), and CD86 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, MA1-10296, dilution 1:20). Antibodies against CD4 (BD Biosciences, 561843, dilution 1:20), CD8 (BD Biosciences, 561949, dilution 1:20), and CD14 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, MHCD1401, dilution 1:1000) were used to confirm the isolation purities of monocytes and T cells or to examine DC differentiation. Irrelevant antibodies of the same IgG isotype were used to control for nonspecific antibody binding. The acquisition was performed on >2 × 104 events using a FACSAria flow cytometer, and data were analyzed using the FACSDiva software and FlowJo software (BD Biosciences).
Immunofluorescence assay
PBMCs were seeded on glass coverslips pre-treated with poly-lysine and then infected with rOka, v7D, and vOka (MOI = 0.01). After incubation at 37 °C in 5% CO2 for 3 days, cells were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde for 30 min, followed by permeabilization with Triton X-100 (0.3%) for 10 min and blocked in normal goat serum. Cells were then incubated with a rabbit polyclonal antibody against pORF7 (7M68, dilution 1:500) and a mouse monoclonal antibody against pORF62 (clone 1B7, dilution 1:2000) for 1 h, followed by incubation with both goat anti-rabbit-fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC) (Sigma, F9887, dilution 1:500) and goat anti-mouse-tetramethylrhodamine B isothiocyanate (TRITC)-labeled (Sigma, T5393, dilution 1:200) secondary antibodies for another 30 min. Cell nuclei were counterstained with 4′, 6-diamidino-2-phenylindole, dihydrochloride (DAPI; Invitrogen), and cells on the cover glasses were observed using a Zeiss LSM 780 confocal microscope (Zeiss, Germany). Images were processed using the Zen software (Zeiss, Germany).
Immunization in small animals
The mice, rats, rabbits, and guinea pigs used in this study were purchased from Shanghai SLAC Laboratory Animal Co. Ltd. All animals were maintained under SPF conditions with controlled illumination (12 h dark/light cycles, 7:00 am to 7:00 pm), humidity (60 ± 10%), and temperature (23 ± 2 °C), and handled in accordance with standard use protocols and animal welfare regulations of Xiamen University Laboratory Animal Center.
The immunization route and schedule in these animals are described as follows:
Groups of 4–6-week-old female BALB/c mice were immunized subcutaneously at weeks 0, 3, and 6 with 500 PFU of v7D or vOka.
Groups of 6–8-week-old female Sprague-Dawley (SD) rats were immunized subcutaneously at weeks 0, 3, and 6 with 1000 PFU of v7D or vOka.
Groups of 12–14-week-old female New Zealand White rabbits were immunized subcutaneously at weeks 0, 3, and 6 with 2000 PFU of v7D or vOka.
Groups of 10–12-week-old female Hartley guinea pigs were immunized subcutaneously at weeks 0, 3, and 6 with 1000 PFU of v7D or vOka.
Serum samples were collected before and at 3-week intervals after vaccination until study termination (week 42) and were evaluated for antibody titers and neutralizing activities against VZV as well as IgG subclass analysis. Splenocytes and/or PBMCs were collected at week 9 (3 weeks after the final vaccination) and week 42 to determine VZV-specific cellular immune responses.
Toxicity and preliminary immunogenicity evaluations in nonhuman primates
Rhesus macaques and cynomolgus macaques were purchased from Beijing Prima Biotechnology Inc. (Beijing, China) and Deheng Biological Science & Technology Co., Ltd. (Nanning, China), respectively, and were maintained at the animal facility of Joinn Laboratories (China) Co. Ltd (Beijing, China). The nonhuman primate study protocol and all the experimental procedures were reviewed and approved by the local Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (NO. ACU16-040 and ACU15-999).
For the intrathalamical acute toxicity study of v7D, 12 2.5- to 3-year-old rhesus macaques were randomly divided into two groups. A group of ten rhesus macaques, comprising five males and five females, were inoculated intrathalamically on both sides with a total of 3 × 105 PFU of v7D in 0.5 mL normal saline per animal. Another group of two animals, comprising one male and one female, were treated in the same way with the same amounts of sterile normal saline as negative controls. This procedure was performed under anesthesia with intravenous sodium pentobarbital (1 mL/kg and 30 mg/mL), and all efforts were made to minimize animal suffering. Macaques were monitored daily by facility veterinary technicians and animal caretakers for potential changes in body weight and temperature as well as clinical signs of disease (drowsiness, coma, convulsion, epilepsy, ataxia, nystagmus, hemiplegia, paralysis, chills, vomiting, or other neurological disorders) over a period of 3 weeks. Following gross anatomical observation after euthanasia, nerve tissues, including cerebral cortex frontal lobe, parietal lobe, temporal lobe, occipital lobe, hippocampus, thalamus, mesencephalon, pons, cerebellum, medulla oblongata, and spinal cord were collected and histopathologically examined by veterinary pathologists.
For the repeated-dose subcutaneous toxicity study of v7D, 30 2- to 5-year-old cynomolgus macaques were randomly divided into three groups with five male and five female animals in each group: the low-dose group (group 1), the high-dose group (group 2), and the negative control group (group 3). The low- and high-dose groups were given v7D subcutaneously at doses of 1 × 104 PFU and 5 × 104 PFU, respectively, in 2.5 mL normal saline per animal three times at 3-week intervals. The negative control group was treated with the same amounts of sterile normal saline. Toxicity was assessed by evaluating injection site reactions, clinical signs of adverse reactions, as well as changes in body weight, body temperature, electrocardiogram and ophthalmology, hematology, clinical chemistry, and urinalysis. Blood samples were also collected before and at 3-week intervals after vaccination until study termination and were analyzed for serum anti-VZV antibody responses and IFN-γ.
Determination of IgG antibody titers
VZV-specific antibody responses in different animal models were determined by an indirect ELISA based on VZV glycoproteins (gps) extract, namely gp-ELISA, as previously described69 with slight modifications. Briefly, purified VZV gps were bound to 96-well polystyrene microtiter plates for 2 h at 37 °C and then blocked with a 200 µl/well of blocking buffer (2% bovine serum albumin in PBS). After washing, serial ten fold dilutions of the serum samples were prepared and 100 μL of each dilution was incubated on the VZV-gp-coated plates. HRP-conjugated goat anti-mouse total IgG (Thermo Fisher Scientific, 31430, dilution 1:5000), IgG1 (Abcam, ab98693, dilution 1:10,000), IgG2a (Abcam, ab98698, dilution 1:10,000), IgG2b (Abcam, ab97250, dilution 1:10,000) and IgG2c (Thermo Fisher Scientific, PA1-29288, dilution 1:10,000) secondary antibodies, goat anti-rat total IgG (Thermo Fisher Scientific, 31470, dilution 1:5000), IgG1 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, PA1-84708, dilution 1:10,000), IgG2a (Thermo Fisher Scientific, PA1-84709, dilution 1:10,000), IgG2b (Thermo Fisher Scientific, PA1-84710, dilution 1:10,000) and IgG2c (Thermo Fisher Scientific, PA1-84711, dilution 1:10,000) secondary antibodies, as well as goat anti-rabbit total IgG (Thermo Fisher Scientific, 31460, dilution 1:5000), goat anti-guinea pig total IgG (Abcam, ab6908, dilution 1:100,000) and goat anti-monkey total IgG (Abcam, ab112767, dilution 1:5000) secondary antibodies were used to detect specific antibody isotypes in different animal models. Endpoint antibody titers were expressed as the reciprocal of the highest serum dilution producing an OD450 greater than the cutoff value, which was defined as the average OD450 for the negative control sera.
Plaque reduction neutralization test (PRNT)
Heat-inactivated serum samples (at 56 °C for 30 min) were diluted twofold (1:8 to 1:4096) with MEM containing 2% FBS, mixed with equal volumes of cell-free virus suspension of VZV-rOka-GFP diluted to give ~100 PFU/well and incubated for 30 min in a 37 °C water bath. This serum–virus mixture (200 μL) was inoculated in duplicate onto MRC-5 cell monolayers in 24-well plates for 1 h at 37 °C/5% CO2. Media containing viruses were replaced by 1 mL/well of fresh MEM with 2% FBS, and plates were incubated at 37 °C/5% CO2 for seven days. Viral plaques with GFP expression were directly counted under an inverted fluorescence microscope (IX71, Olympus, Japan), and the highest dilutions of sera that resulted in 50% or more reduction in plaque counts were defined as the endpoint neutralization titers and expressed as their reciprocal values.
Cytokine profile analysis in immunized small animals
Splenocytes and/or PBMCs (2 × 106 cells per well) from immunized animals were incubated with cell-free wild-type rOka virus (1000 PFU for mice; 2000 PFU for rats, rabbits, and guinea pigs), or with MRC-5 cell lysates as a negative control. After incubation for 2 days, the culture supernatants of splenocytes and/or PBMCs of immunized mice/rats were collected for cytokine detection using commercial multiplex bead array assays specific for mouse/rat cytokines (Millipore, MILLIPLEX MAP Mouse/Rat Cytokine/Chemokine Magnetic Bead Panel) per the manufacturer’s instructions. For rabbits and guinea pigs, after incubation for 3 days, TNF-α in the culture supernatants of PBMCs was determined using commercial ELISA kits (R&D Systems) per the manufacturer’s instructions.
ELISA to detect serum IFN-γ
PBMCs (1 × 106 cells) from cynomolgus macaques challenged with v7D subcutaneously were incubated with 2000 PFU of cell-free rOka virus, or MRC-5 cell lysates as a negative control, along with 20 U/mL human IL-2 (R&D Systems). Half of the medium was changed every two days, and on day 5, quantitation of IFN-γ concentrations in the culture supernatants was performed with a commercial ELISA kit (Mabtech) specific for nonhuman primate IFN-γ per the manufacturer’s instructions.
Histopathological analysis
Paraffin-embedded sections (5-μm thick) of various organs from v7D-challenged macaques were deparaffinized in xylene and rehydrated in graded alcohols. Then, sections were stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E), dehydrated in graded alcohol, and coverslipped. All the histopathological analysis was performed by veterinary pathologists who were blinded to treatment groups.
Statistical analysis
Data are presented as means ± SD, and statistical significance was determined by one-way or two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Tukey’s multiple comparison test at an overall significance level of 0.05 (P < 0.05) when three or more groups were compared to each other. Statistical analysis was conducted using GraphPad Prism version 7. Specific tests were performed as described in the figure legends.
Reporting summary
Further information on research design is available in the Nature Research Reporting Summary linked to this article.
Supplementary information
Acknowledgements
This research was supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 81871648, 82171833, and 81601762), the National Science and Technology Major Projects for Major New Drugs Innovation and Development (No. 2018ZX09711003-005-003), and the National Science and Technology Major Project of Infectious Diseases (No. 2017ZX10304402). The funders had no role in the study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Source data
Author contributions
The project was conceptualized and designed by H.Z., T.C., X.Y., Y.L., Q.Z., T.W., J.Z., and N.X. Vaccine viruses were constructed by A.S., L.Y., J.L., J.H., J.J., and X.Y. Virological properties were characterized by W.W., D.P., W.F., Y.Z., Y.Q., C.L., and J.Y. Vaccine immunogenicity was evaluated by W.W., D.P., W.F., L.Y., R.Z., J.J., J.H., and X.Y. The manuscript was written by W.W. and T.C. and edited by J.Z., H.Z., and N.X. Data were analyzed and interpreted by all authors.
Peer review
Peer review information
Nature Communications thanks Jennifer Moffat and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Peer reviewer reports are available.
Data availability
All data associated with this study are present in the paper or the Supplementary Information. Source data are provided with this paper.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
These authors contributed equally: Wei Wang, Dequan Pan, Wenkun Fu, Xiangzhong Ye.
Contributor Information
Jun Zhang, Email: zhangj@xmu.edu.cn.
Tong Cheng, Email: tcheng@xmu.edu.cn.
Hua Zhu, Email: zhuhu@njms.rutgers.edu.
Ningshao Xia, Email: nsxia@xmu.edu.cn.
Supplementary information
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41467-022-28329-1.
References
- 1.World Health Organization. Varicella and herpes zoster vaccines: WHO position paper, June 2014. Wkly Epidemiol. Rec.89, 265–287 (2014). [PubMed]
- 2.Gnann JW., Jr. Varicella-zoster virus: atypical presentations and unusual complications. J. Infect. Dis. 2002;186:S91–S98. doi: 10.1086/342963. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Bozzola E, Bozzola M. Varicella complications and universal immunization. J. Pediatr. (Rio J.) 2016;92:328–330. doi: 10.1016/j.jped.2016.05.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Gilden DH, Kleinschmidt-DeMasters BK, LaGuardia JJ, Mahalingam R, Cohrs RJ. Neurologic complications of the reactivation of varicella-zoster virus. N. Engl. J. Med. 2000;342:635–645. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200003023420906. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Quinlivan M, Breuer J. Clinical and molecular aspects of the live attenuated Oka varicella vaccine. Rev. Med Virol. 2014;24:254–273. doi: 10.1002/rmv.1789. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Chaves SS, et al. Safety of varicella vaccine after licensure in the United States: experience from reports to the vaccine adverse event reporting system, 1995-2005. J. Infect. Dis. 2008;197(Suppl 2):S170–S177. doi: 10.1086/522161. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Galea SA, et al. The safety profile of varicella vaccine: a 10-year review. J. Infect. Dis. 2008;197:S165–S169. doi: 10.1086/522125. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Morino S, et al. Descriptive epidemiology of varicella based on national surveillance data before and after the introduction of routine varicella vaccination with two doses in Japan, 2000–2017. Vaccine. 2018;36:5977–5982. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2018.08.048. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Depledge DP, Yamanishi K, Gomi Y, Gershon AA, Breuer J. Deep sequencing of distinct preparations of the live attenuated varicella-zoster virus vaccine reveals a conserved core of attenuating single-nucleotide polymorphisms. J. Virol. 2016;90:8698–8704. doi: 10.1128/JVI.00998-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Depledge DP, et al. Deep sequencing of viral genomes provides insight into the evolution and pathogenesis of varicella zoster virus and its vaccine in humans. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2014;31:397–409. doi: 10.1093/molbev/mst210. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Quinlivan ML, Gershon AA, Steinberg SP, Breuer J. Rashes occurring after immunization with a mixture of viruses in the Oka vaccine are derived from single clones of virus. J. Infect. Dis. 2004;190:793–796. doi: 10.1086/423210. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Goulleret N, Mauvisseau E, Essevaz-Roulet M, Quinlivan M, Breuer J. Safety profile of live varicella virus vaccine (Oka/Merck): five-year results of the European Varicella Zoster Virus Identification Program (EU VZVIP) Vaccine. 2010;28:5878–5882. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2010.06.056. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Yoshikawa T, Ando Y, Nakagawa T, Gomi Y. Safety profile of the varicella vaccine (Oka vaccine strain) based on reported cases from 2005 to 2015 in Japan. Vaccine. 2016;34:4943–4947. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2016.08.044. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Weinmann S, et al. Incidence and clinical characteristics of herpes zoster among children in the varicella vaccine era, 2005-2009. J. Infect. Dis. 2013;208:1859–1868. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jit405. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Chun C, et al. Laboratory characteristics of suspected herpes zoster in vaccinated children. Pediatr. Infect. Dis. J. 2011;30:719–721. doi: 10.1097/INF.0b013e3182137e35. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Leung J, Harpaz R, Molinari NA, Jumaan A, Zhou F. Herpes zoster incidence among insured persons in the United States, 1993-2006: evaluation of impact of varicella vaccination. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2011;52:332–340. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciq077. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Wise RP, et al. Postlicensure safety surveillance for varicella vaccine. J. Am. Med. Assoc. 2000;284:1271–1279. doi: 10.1001/jama.284.10.1271. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Sharrar RG, et al. The postmarketing safety profile of varicella vaccine. Vaccine. 2000;19:916–923. doi: 10.1016/s0264-410x(00)00297-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Heusel EH, Grose C. Twelve children with varicella vaccine meningitis: neuropathogenesis of reactivated live attenuated varicella vaccine virus. Viruses. 2020;12:1048. doi: 10.3390/v12101078. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Sadaoka T, Mori Y. Vaccine development for varicella-zoster virus. Adv. Exp. Med Biol. 2018;1045:123–142. doi: 10.1007/978-981-10-7230-7_7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Civen R, et al. The incidence and clinical characteristics of herpes zoster among children and adolescents after implementation of varicella vaccination. Pediatr. Infect. Dis. J. 2009;28:954–959. doi: 10.1097/INF.0b013e3181a90b16. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Weinmann S, et al. Incidence of herpes zoster among children: 2003-2014. Pediatrics. 2019;144:e20182917. doi: 10.1542/peds.2018-2917. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Bubak AN, et al. Varicella zoster virus infection of primary human spinal astrocytes produces intracellular amylin, amyloid-beta, and an amyloidogenic extracellular environment. J. Infect. Dis. 2019;221:1088–1097. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiz560. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Readhead B, et al. Multiscale analysis of independent Alzheimer’s cohorts finds disruption of molecular, genetic, and clinical networks by human herpesvirus. Neuron. 2018;99:64–82.e67. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2018.05.023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Eimer WA, et al. Alzheimer’s disease-associated beta-amyloid is rapidly seeded by herpesviridae to protect against brain infection. Neuron. 2018;100:1527–1532. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2018.11.043. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Chen VC, et al. Herpes zoster and dementia: a nationwide population-based cohort study. J. Clin. Psychiatry. 2018;79:16m11312. doi: 10.4088/JCP.16m11312. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Zerboni L, Sen N, Oliver SL, Arvin AM. Molecular mechanisms of varicella zoster virus pathogenesis. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2014;12:197–210. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro3215. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Zerboni L, et al. Aberrant infection and persistence of varicella-zoster virus in human dorsal root ganglia in vivo in the absence of glycoprotein I. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2007;104:14086–14091. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0706023104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Moffat JF, et al. Attenuation of the vaccine Oka strain of varicella-zoster virus and role of glycoprotein C in alphaherpesvirus virulence demonstrated in the SCID-hu mouse. J. Virol. 1998;72:965–974. doi: 10.1128/jvi.72.2.965-974.1998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Zhang Z, et al. Genome-wide mutagenesis reveals that ORF7 is a novel VZV skin-tropic factor. PLoS Pathog. 2010;6:e1000971. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1000971. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Selariu A, et al. ORF7 of varicella-zoster virus is a neurotropic factor. J. Virol. 2012;86:8614–8624. doi: 10.1128/JVI.00128-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Jiang HF, et al. ORF7 of varicella-zoster virus is required for viral cytoplasmic envelopment in differentiated neuronal cells. J. Virol. 2017;91:e00127–00117. doi: 10.1128/JVI.00127-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Moffat JF, et al. The ORF47 and ORF66 putative protein kinases of varicella-zoster virus determine tropism for human T cells and skin in the SCID-hu mouse. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 1998;95:11969–11974. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.20.11969. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Moffat J, Ito H, Sommer M, Taylor S, Arvin AM. Glycoprotein I of varicella-zoster virus is required for viral replication in skin and T cells. J. Virol. 2002;76:8468–8471. doi: 10.1128/JVI.76.16.8468-8471.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Che X, Zerboni L, Sommer MH, Arvin AM. Varicella-zoster virus open reading frame 10 is a virulence determinant in skin cells but not in T cells in vivo. J. Virol. 2006;80:3238–3248. doi: 10.1128/JVI.80.7.3238-3248.2006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Zhang Z, et al. Genetic analysis of varicella-zoster virus ORF0 to ORF4 by use of a novel luciferase bacterial artificial chromosome system. J. Virol. 2007;81:9024–9033. doi: 10.1128/JVI.02666-06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Jones M, et al. RNA-seq analysis of host and viral gene expression highlights interaction between varicella zoster virus and keratinocyte differentiation. PLoS Pathog. 2014;10:e1003896. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1003896. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Sexton CJ, Navsaria HA, Leigh IM, Powell K. Replication of varicella zoster virus in primary human keratinocytes. J. Med Virol. 1992;38:260–264. doi: 10.1002/jmv.1890380406. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Jones D, et al. Varicella zoster virus productively infects human peripheral blood mononuclear cells to modulate expression of immunoinhibitory proteins and blocking PD-L1 enhances virus-specific CD8(+) T cell effector function. Plos Pathog. 2019;15:e1007650. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1007650. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Mahalingam, R. et al. Current in vivo models of varicella-zoster virus neurotropism. Viruses11, 502 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 41.Zerboni L, Ku CC, Jones CD, Zehnder JL, Arvin AM. Varicella-zoster virus infection of human dorsal root ganglia in vivo. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2005;102:6490–6495. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0501045102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Moffat JF, Stein MD, Kaneshima H, Arvin AM. Tropism of varicella-zoster virus for human CD4+ and CD8+ T lymphocytes and epidermal cells in SCID-hu mice. J. Virol. 1995;69:5236–5242. doi: 10.1128/jvi.69.9.5236-5242.1995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Loparev VN, Argaw T, Krause PR, Takayama M, Schmid DS. Improved identification and differentiation of varicella-zoster virus (VZV) wild-type strains and an attenuated varicella vaccine strain using a VZV open reading frame 62-based PCR. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2000;38:3156–3160. doi: 10.1128/jcm.38.9.3156-3160.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Mellman I, Steinman RM. Dendritic cells: specialized and regulated antigen processing machines. Cell. 2001;106:255–258. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(01)00449-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Reis e Sousa C. Dendritic cells as sensors of infection. Immunity. 2001;14:495–498. doi: 10.1016/s1074-7613(01)00136-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Binder J, et al. Downregulation of intragraft IFN-gamma expression correlates with increased IgG1 alloantibody response following intrathymic immunomodulation of sensitized rat recipients. Transplantation. 1995;60:1516–1524. doi: 10.1097/00007890-199560120-00025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Germann T, et al. Interleukin-12 profoundly up-regulates the synthesis of antigen-specific complement-fixing IgG2a, IgG2b and IgG3 antibody subclasses in vivo. Eur. J. Immunol. 1995;25:823–829. doi: 10.1002/eji.1830250329. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Gracie JA, Bradley JA. Interleukin-12 induces interferon-gamma-dependent switching of IgG alloantibody subclass. Eur. J. Immunol. 1996;26:1217–1221. doi: 10.1002/eji.1830260605. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Cetre C, et al. Profiles of Th1 and Th2 cytokines after primary and secondary infection by Schistosoma mansoni in the semipermissive rat host. Infect. Immun. 1999;67:2713–2719. doi: 10.1128/iai.67.6.2713-2719.1999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Carpenter JE, et al. Defensive perimeter in the central nervous system: predominance of astrocytes and astrogliosis during recovery from varicella-zoster virus encephalitis. J. Virol. 2016;90:379–391. doi: 10.1128/JVI.02389-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Klupp BG, et al. Functional analysis of the pseudorabies virus UL51 protein. J. Virol. 2005;79:3831–3840. doi: 10.1128/JVI.79.6.3831-3840.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Nozawa N, et al. Subcellular localization of herpes simplex virus type 1 UL51 protein and role of palmitoylation in Golgi apparatus targeting. J. Virol. 2003;77:3204–3216. doi: 10.1128/JVI.77.5.3204-3216.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.del Rio T, Werner HC, Enquist LW. The pseudorabies virus VP22 homologue (UL49) is dispensable for virus growth in vitro and has no effect on virulence and neuronal spread in rodents. J. Virol. 2002;76:774–782. doi: 10.1128/JVI.76.2.774-782.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Duffy C, et al. Characterization of a UL49-null mutant: VP22 of herpes simplex virus type 1 facilitates viral spread in cultured cells and the mouse cornea. J. Virol. 2006;80:8664–8675. doi: 10.1128/JVI.00498-06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Dingwell KS, Doering LC, Johnson DC. Glycoproteins E and I facilitate neuron-to-neuron spread of herpes simplex virus. J. Virol. 1995;69:7087–7098. doi: 10.1128/jvi.69.11.7087-7098.1995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Wang W, et al. Outer nuclear membrane fusion of adjacent nuclei in varicella-zoster virus-induced syncytia. Virology. 2017;512:34–38. doi: 10.1016/j.virol.2017.09.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Yang E, Arvin AM, Oliver SL. The cytoplasmic domain of varicella-zoster virus glycoprotein H regulates syncytia formation and skin pathogenesis. PLoS Pathog. 2014;10:e1004173. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1004173. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Reichelt M, Zerboni L, Arvin AM. Mechanisms of varicella-zoster virus neuropathogenesis in human dorsal root ganglia. J. Virol. 2008;82:3971–3983. doi: 10.1128/JVI.02592-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Baird, N. L., Zhu, S., Pearce, C. M. & Viejo-Borbolla, A. Current in vitro models to study varicella zoster virus latency and reactivation. Viruses11, 103 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 60.Laemmle L, Goldstein RS, Kinchington PR. Modeling varicella zoster virus persistence and reactivation—closer to resolving a perplexing persistent state. Front. Microbiol. 2019;10:1634. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.01634. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Depledge DP, et al. A spliced latency-associated VZV transcript maps antisense to the viral transactivator gene 61. Nat. Commun. 2018;9:1167. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-03569-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Ouwendijk WJD, et al. Varicella-zoster virus VLT-ORF63 fusion transcript induces broad viral gene expression during reactivation from neuronal latency. Nat. Commun. 2020;11:6324. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-20031-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Abendroth A, Morrow G, Cunningham AL, Slobedman B. Varicella-zoster virus infection of human dendritic cells and transmission to T cells: Implications for virus dissemination in the host. J. Virol. 2001;75:6183–6192. doi: 10.1128/JVI.75.13.6183-6192.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Warming S, Costantino N, Court DL, Jenkins NA, Copeland NG. Simple and highly efficient BAC recombineering using galK selection. Nucleic Acids Res. 2005;33:e36. doi: 10.1093/nar/gni035. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Sato H, Pesnicak L, Cohen JI. Varicella-zoster virus open reading frame 2 encodes a membrane phosphoprotein that is dispensable for viral replication and for establishment of latency. J. Virol. 2002;76:3575–3578. doi: 10.1128/JVI.76.7.3575-3578.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Lowry PW, et al. Investigation of the pathogenesis of varicella-zoster virus infection in guinea pigs by using polymerase chain reaction. J. Infect. Dis. 1993;167:78–83. doi: 10.1093/infdis/167.1.78. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Liu J, et al. Serological evaluation of immunity to the varicella-zoster virus based on a novel competitive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Sci. Rep. 2016;6:20577. doi: 10.1038/srep20577. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Wang W, et al. Varicella-zoster virus ORF7 interacts with ORF53 and plays a role in its trans-Golgi network localization. Virol. Sin. 2017;32:387–395. doi: 10.1007/s12250-017-4048-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Liu J, et al. Evaluation of immunity to varicella zoster virus with a novel double antigen sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2016;100:9321–9329. doi: 10.1007/s00253-016-7821-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
All data associated with this study are present in the paper or the Supplementary Information. Source data are provided with this paper.