Skip to main content
Elsevier - PMC COVID-19 Collection logoLink to Elsevier - PMC COVID-19 Collection
letter
. 2022 Feb 12;101(4):825–826. doi: 10.1016/j.kint.2022.01.017

A fourth SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccine in strictly seronegative kidney transplant recipients

Christophe Masset 1,2,, Ilies Benotmane 3, Jacques Dantal 1,2, Claire Garandeau 1, Gabriella Gauthier-Vargas 3, Diego Cantarovich 1, Aurélie Meurette 1, Magali Giral 1,2, Sophie Caillard 3, Gilles Blancho 1,2
PMCID: PMC8839796  PMID: 35167873

To the editor:

Solid organ transplant recipients have demonstrated a lower humoral immune response to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) mRNA vaccination, leading transplant physicians to perform a third vaccine injection.1 However, despite this early booster, about 35% of patients remained seronegative and, thus, inadequately protected against coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19).2 Recently, a fourth mRNA injection has become available in France, as well as the possibility of monthly preventive preexposure monoclonal antibody therapy in low-responder or nonresponder patients.3 , 4 On the basis of physicians’ expertise and patients’ choice, kidney transplant recipients from 2 French university hospitals with a strictly negative serologic assessment (i.e., binding antibody unit [BAU] <1/ml) 1 month after the third injection were proposed to receive a fourth mRNA vaccine as an alternative to preexposure monoclonal antibody prophylaxis.

We retrospectively evaluated 49 nonresponder kidney transplant recipients with a serologic assessment following a fourth mRNA vaccine (Table 1 ). The mean age was 63 years, and 47% were men. None of them had a history of COVID-19 infection nor anti-nucleocapsid IgG. Maintenance therapy consisted of calcineurin inhibitors in 77%, antiproliferative drugs in 83%, and steroids in 57%. All of them had a strictly negative serology after the third injection (BAU, <1/ml, evaluated in different laboratories by ECLIA Roche, Architect Abbott, or Diasorin). Serologic screening was assessed in a median of 35 days following the fourth injection, and anti-spike IgG titers were expressed in BAU/ml after conversion, depending on the laboratory test. A total of 21 of 49 patients (42.8%) seroconverted (i.e., positive serology considered by laboratory thresholds) following the fourth injection, with a mean BAU titer of 82/ml (Figure 1 ). Of note, 4 of them had a high BAU titer (>264/ml), which can be considered as neutralizing,5 and 3 patients without seroconversion had a slight increase in anti-spike IgG. SARS-CoV-2 infection occurred in 1 patient, who previously developed a low humoral response following 4 injections (BAU, 14.2/ml), presenting with mild symptoms and not requiring oxygen supportive care. Although no statistical differences were found between responders and nonresponders because of the small analyzed cohort, we noted lower steroid use (47% vs. 64%), less lymphopenia (62% vs. 75%), longer time between the third and fourth dose (93 vs. 82 days), and a larger utilization of the BNT162b vaccine (86% vs. 68%) in patients who developed a humoral response after the fourth injection. History of biopsy-proven acute rejection seemed more frequent in seronegative patients, but the clinical significance of these data may be hard to assess as most cases in this group (4 of 6) occurred >5 years ago.

Table 1.

Characteristics of kidney transplant recipients strictly negative after 3 mRNA vaccines having received a fourth mRNA vaccine

Characteristic Negative (n = 28)
Positive (n = 21)
P value
NA No. % NA No. %
Male recipient 0 15 53.6 0 8 38.1 0.38
Transplant rank ≥2 0 4 14.3 0 2 9.5 0.68
Calcineurin inhibitor treatment 0 20 71.4 0 18 85.7 0.31
mTOR inhibitor treatment 0 0 0 0 1 4.7 0.43
Antimetabolite treatment 0 23 82.1 0 18 85.7 1
Steroid treatment 0 18 64.2 0 10 47.6 0.26
Belatacept treatment 0 0 0 0 1 4.7 0.43
BNT162b (Pfizer) mRNA vaccine 0 19 67.8 0 18 85.7 0.19
Lymphocytes <1500/mm3 0 21 75.0 0 13 61.9 0.36
CMV seropositive status 0 17 60.7 1 8 40.0 0.15
Presence of donor-specific antibody 0 5 17.8 0 3 14.3 0.77
History of biopsy-proven acute rejection
0
6
21.4
0
1
4.8
0.21

NA
Mean
SD
NA
Mean
SD
P value
Age, yr 0 63.4 11.1 0 62.4 12.8 0.87
Time from transplantation, yr 0 8.0 7.2 0 7.1 6.5 0.76
Time between third and fourth vaccine, d 0 82.6 25.7 0 93.4 31.7 0.30
Anti-spike IgG titer, BAU/ml 0 0.3 1.0 0 81.4 93.7 < 0.001
Allograft function by MDRD, ml/min 0 43.2 18.8 0 40.1 13.5 0.73

BAU, binding antibody unit; CMV, cytomegalovirus; MDRD, Modification of Diet in Renal Disease; NA, not available.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

(a) Anti-spike IgG titers (binding antibody unit [BAU]/ml) following the third and fourth mRNA injection in kidney transplant recipients. (b) Evolution of IgG anti-spike titers in strictly seronegative patients after 3 injections, having received a fourth mRNA vaccine. ∗∗∗P < 0.001.

Our report highlights the results of a fourth mRNA vaccine in strictly nonresponder kidney transplant recipients, resulting in seroconversion in 43% of them. Only 4 patients developed a strong humoral response that can be considered as protective from SARS-CoV-2 infection; other patients may benefit from another booster dose to improve their antibody titer.6 Further studies are required to clearly determine risk factors of nonresponse after a fourth mRNA vaccine in this selected population. A fourth mRNA vaccine in strictly nonresponder kidney transplant recipients induced a humoral response in 43%; however, this response remained globally weak and was probably not protective enough against COVID-19. Monoclonal antibody provides a quicker and higher protection for these patients, and thus may be considered, especially during a high-incidence SARS-CoV-2 infection period when risk of contamination is higher.

References

  • 1.Hall V.G., Ferreira V.H., Ku T., et al. Randomized trial of a third dose of mRNA-1273 vaccine in transplant recipients. N Engl J Med. 2021;385:1244–1246. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc2111462. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Qin C.X., Moore L.W., Anjan S., et al. Risk of breakthrough SARS-CoV-2 infections in adult transplant recipients. Transplantation. 2021;105:e265–e266. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000003907. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.O’Brien M.P., Forleo-Neto E., Musser B.J., et al. Subcutaneous REGEN-COV antibody combination to prevent Covid-19. N Engl J Med. 2021;385:1184–1195. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2109682. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Caillard S., Thaunat O. COVID-19 vaccination in kidney transplant recipients. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2021;17:785–787. doi: 10.1038/s41581-021-00491-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Feng S., Phillips D.J., White T., et al. Correlates of protection against symptomatic and asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection. Nat Med. 2021;27:2032–2040. doi: 10.1038/s41591-021-01540-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Caillard S., Thaunat O., Benotmane I., et al. Antibody response to a fourth messenger RNA COVID-19 vaccine dose in kidney transplant recipients: a case series. Ann Intern Med. https://doi.org/10.7326/L21-0598 Published online January 11, 2022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]

Articles from Kidney International are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES