Skip to main content
African Health Sciences logoLink to African Health Sciences
. 2021 Sep;21(3):1124–1140. doi: 10.4314/ahs.v21i3.21

Insecticide resistance of Dengue vectors in South East Asia: a systematic review

Mohd Rohaizat Hassan 1, Noor Atika Azit 1, Suhaiza Mohd Fadzil 1, Siti Rasidah Abd Ghani 1, Norfazilah Ahmad 1, Azmawati Mohammed Nawi 1
PMCID: PMC8843301  PMID: 35222575

Abstract

Background

The insecticides used widely has led to resistance in the vector and impose a challenge to vector control operation.

Objectives

This review aims to analyse the distribution of insecticide resistance of dengue vectors in South East Asia and to describe the mechanism of insecticide resistance.

Methods

Literature search for articles published on 2015 to 2019 from PubMed, Scopus and ProQuest was performed. Total of 37 studies included in the final review from the initial 420 studies.

Results

Pyrethroid resistance was concentrated on the west coast of Peninsular Malaysia and Northern Thailand and scattered at Java Island, Indonesia while organophosphate resistance was seen across the Java Island (Indonesia), West Sumatera and North Peninsular Malaysia. Organochlorine resistance was seen in Sabah, Malaysia and scattered distribution in Nusa Tenggara, Indonesia. V1016G, S989P, F1269C gene mutation in Aedes Aegypti were associated with Pyrethroid resistance in Singapore and Indonesia. In Malaysia, over-expressed with monooxygenase P450 genes (CYP9J27, CYP6CB1, CYP9J26 and CYP9M4) Glutathione S-transferases, carboxylesterases commonly associated with pyrethroids resistance in Aedes Aegypti and CYP612 overexpressed in Aedes Albopictus. The genetic mutation in A302S in Aedes Albopictus was associated with organochlorine resistance in Malaysia.

Conclusions

Rotation of insecticide, integration with synergist and routine assessment of resistance profile are recommended strategies in insecticide resistance management.

Keywords: Insecticide resistance, vector management, Aedes, pyrethroid, mortality

Introduction

Aedes mosquito is an essential vector for many vector-borne infections. Aedes mosquito species mainly Aedes aegypti is the primary vector, and Aedes albopictus is the vector responsible for transmitting the dengue virus between people. There is four known dengue virus serotype circulating in Asia, Africa and America designated as DENV-1, DENV-2, DENV-3 and DENV-4 transmitted by the Aedes mosquito1. Infection to one serotype will produce lifelong immunity to that serotype virus and cross-protection to other serotypes for a few months1. Secondary infection with other serotypes will lead to severe infection1.

Aedes mosquito species found between latitude 45° North and 35° South in tropics and subtropical countries which closely related to human habitat in urban area2. It breeds mostly in a man-made container such as used tyres, plastic container, tin container, and even a small cup can attract the female Aedes mosquito to breed. Aedes mosquito takes about 8 to 10 days to complete the life cycle from eggs to adult3. Female adult Aedes mosquito has a strong affinity for human blood and prefers to bite human during dusk and dawn period. Due to its limited flying capacity, it is found mostly inside or outside home or buildings close to human 3.

In 1998 Aedes mosquito was found throughout all continents including North America and Europe, and as the result of expanding geographical distribution, half of the world's population are at risk of dengue infection4. Before the 1970s only nine countries reporting severe dengue epidemics, however since the last five decades dengue fever is endemic in more than 125 countries with the western Pacific region, South-East Asia and America are the most affected countries5. It estimated that about 390 million dengue infection occur every year throughout the world with 20 000 dengue-related death that is resulting in dengue considered as worsening public health problem5. Most countries in South East Asia has a high burden of dengue infection with 3 to 5 years cyclical episodes of epidemics 6. In 2010, 354 009 cases from WHO Western Pacific Region of South East Asian countries which include Cambodia, Lao, Malaysia, Singapore, Philippines and Vietnam with 1075 deaths were reported to World Health Organization (WHO)6,7. Together with other South-East Asian countries, it contributes to 75% of disease burden6.

Environmental change, urbanisation, increase population density, travel and trade activities that allowing movement of the vectors and virus via modern transportation, the emergence of these viruses from their sylvatic reservoirs, has been recognised to contribute to the emergence and re-emergence of dengue in South Asia8. Aedes mosquito has a high vectorial capacity and undergone adaptive changes to achieve longevity and to survive in cooler climates2. Unplanned urbanisation and weak environmental management cause increase in potential breeding site for Aedes mosquito. High-density population in the capital city and travel activity further increased the dengue epidemic in South Asian countries.

Till date, there is no specific treatment for dengue infection and Dengvaxia vaccine is not widely used9. Source reduction, clean-up campaign and larviciding have been promoted widely; however, it was not very successful. Prevention and control of Aedes nowadays are based mainly on integrated vector management which includes integrated use of insecticide by space spraying to reduce the adult mosquito density, larviciding and environmental management10. Space-spraying using aerial and truck-mounted ultra-low volume (ULV) is now not recommended because of the low impact on mosquito density reduction and less cost-effective to implement it as a routine intervention 11. There are four significant insecticides commonly used, namely pyrethroid, organophosphate, carbamate and organochlorine. Long term and extensively used of these insecticides in dengue control has led to the development of resistance in the vector, and this will impose a challenge to vector control operation9. Resistance defined as the ability in a strain of some organism to tolerate doses of a toxicant that would prove lethal to majority of individuals in a normal population of the same species owing to physiological or behavioural adaptation12. Insecticides resistance will often be led to the more frequent use of insecticide, higher dose and can harm the environment. Worldwide, insecticide resistance has been reported. For Aedes Aegypti, there is consistently high deltamethrin resistance in Brazil and French Guiana while scattered deltamethrin resistance of Aedes Aegypti was found not only in South East Asia, but also in the Middle Eastern region (Saudi Arabia) 9,13. Temephos resistance has been reported in Brazil, French Guiana and the Caribbean whereas lower resistance in some parts of Africa9. While resistance to all four groups of insecticide for Aedes Albopictus in South East Asia9. Particular mechanism of insecticides resistance of the vector has pointed out. This includes reduced penetration of insecticide into the vector, metabolic resistance where there is enhanced enzymatic activity for biodegradation and sequestration of insecticides, a non-synonymous mutation affecting the proteins targeted by insecticides14,15 and behavioural resistance12.

There is no recent published report on insecticide resistance of dengue vector that covers multiple types of insecticide specific to South East Asia. Some studies only report on pyrethroid resistance16, and others only study on resistant to insecticide at either larva or adult stage. More studies have done focussing on insecticides resistance for malaria vector compared to Aedes. Understanding of the current distribution of insecticide resistance, mechanism of resistance and alternative method to overcome the resistance will allow the implementer of vector control to make an appropriate decision on the appropriate choice of insecticide for the dengue control program. The findings also provide input for conducting surveillance and monitoring of insecticide resistance as well as to evaluate the effectiveness of vector management. Therefore, this systematic review will provide an analysis of the distribution of insecticide resistance of Aedes mosquito in South East Asia, to describe the mechanism of insecticide resistance of Aedes mosquito in South Asia as well as to identify the possible insecticidresistance management plan.

Material & Methods

Search strategy and study selection

A comprehensive search of literature from PubMed, Scopus and ProQuest was performed on the 1st of April 2019 to search for relevant studies. PRISMA checklist used for the workflow of publications search. The text keywords used are “South East Asia” OR Malaysia OR Thailand OR Singapore OR Brunei OR Myanmar OR Cambodia OR Laos OR Philippines OR Indonesia OR “East Timo” OR Vietnam AND Aedes OR dengue OR aegypti OR albopictus AND pesticides OR insecticide OR “dengue control” OR fogging OR organophosphate OR pyrethroid OR larvicide OR temephos OR diphenylmethane AND resistance OR knockdown OR kdr OR mutation with year limit from 2014 to 2019. Articles retrieved from the database and compiled using Mendeley Desktop version 1.19.4 duplicates with 100% matched were removed by the software automatically. Next, the title of each article read by all authors and agreement obtained to exclude articles that did not match with the keywords. If there was any doubt, the abstract was retrieved and read to justify the decision. The abstracts of the articles distributed among the authors for assessment of inclusion and exclusion criteria. Then, selected full articles were retrieved and distributed to the authors. Two independent authors were responsible for examining and extracting the data for each article. At the disagreement point, the third author was consulted.

PubMed, Scopus and ProQuest searches identified 420 articles. Thirty-three duplicates were removed. By screening and reviewing for title and abstract, 55 potentially relevant articles were identified and retrieved for more detailed evaluation. Out of these 55 articles, 37 articles fulfilled all the inclusion and exclusion criteria, and subsequently, 18 articles excluded with reasons. There were three articles rejected because of reviewed articles, six articles not related to insecticide resistance, two articles are studies on human, two articles with no full text available, three not involve insecticides, and two articles did not examine on Aedes Aegypti or Aedes Albopictus species. The detail PRISMA flow diagram illustrated in Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Process of Study Selection

Data Extraction and Data Synthesis

Data extraction was done by the authors independently using a predetermined data collection form. The data will then have crossed checked by all authors to minimise errors. Resistance data obtained from all the included articles. In order to find the geographical location of the study sites, the latitude and longitude extracted from the reported article. If the data is not available, the latitude and the longitude of the study site generated using latlong.net (Latlong coordinates reference for World Geodetic System WGS84 standard), based on the study location's name specified in the articles. In this study, the insecticide resistance status categorised based on the latest WHO recommendation17, which are more than 98% 24 hours mortality is categorised as “susceptible”, less than 98% 24 hours mortality suggest “resistance”.

The spatial data analysed with QGis software version 3.6. The resistance status was mapped according to the class of insecticide, which are pyrethroid, organophosphate and organochlorine. The data were plotted against the latitude and the longitude to obtain the spatial distribution of insecticide resistance.

Results

Descriptive Analysis

Thirty-seven (37) studies selected in this review, published from the year 2015 to 2019. Thirteen (12) articles were from Malaysia, twelve (12) from Indonesia, six (6) from Thailand, one (1) from Laos, one (1) from Vietnam, three (3) from Singapore, one (1) from Cambodia, one (1) includes Asian countries.

The insecticides studied from pyrethroid, organophosphate, organochlorine and carbamate classes. The type of insecticides was varied from one study to another, and with different concentration. The main resistance measurement was a percentage of 24 hours mortality, Knocked Down Time for 50% (KT50) or Knocked Down Time for 95% (KT95), and specific gene mutation. In term of the year study conducted, the earliest year stated in the articles was in 2006. However, not all articles mentioned the year of the resistance studies were conducted. However, the authors estimated the studies should be on average less than years from the publication date18. There is the variability of the dosage for specific pesticides tested for the resistance across the study. Most of the studies using the baseline dosage stated by the World Health Organization (WHO)17; however, some studies examined the resistance with an escalated dosage of the pesticides. In term of Aedes population, adult or larvae or both were tested. Besides, the studies were specific to either Aedes Albopictus or Aedes Aegypti or both. Table 1 summarises the general information of the included studies.

Table 1.

Summary of the Characteristics of Included Studies

Subject Description
Countries Malaysia (12), Indonesia (12), Thailand
(6), Laos (1), Vietnam (1), Singapore (3),
Cambodia (1), Asian (1)
Insecticide studied Pyrethroid, organophosphate,
organochlorine, carbamate
Resistance
measurement
% mortality (majority), KT50 or KT95,
Gene mutation (16)
Ranges of the year
of study
Earliest 2006–2017(estimated)
Dosage
comparison
Various, majority studied baseline
dosage provided by who or self-determined
based on diagnostic dose calculation
Aedes population Adult or larvae, or both, species-specific

Mapping the Distribution of Resistance Status

Figure 2 illustrates the distribution of overall insecticide resistance irrespective of the class of the pesticides. Majority of the study used discriminating concentrations of the relevant insecticide from WHO bioassay16,17,6, while some were self determinedself-determined based on diagnostic dose calculation. The distribution of the resistance status represented with the percentage of 24 hours mortality of the mosquitoes. The 98% mortality indicates susceptibility, whereby 90% to 97% mortality means the resistance is suggested and need further confirmation. For below 90% mortality, resistance is indicated and did not need further confirmation test.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

The Distribution of 24 Hours Mortality of Insecticide Resitance, Irrespective of the Class of the Pesticide

The insecticide resistance was distributed in a concentrated form at the Peninsular Malaysia and Sumatera Barat region. There is a mixed pattern (susceptibility and resistance) on Java Island and Northern Thailand. Meanwhile, some studies showed susceptibility towards insecticides in West Malaysia, Vietnam and Laos. However, this data was solely on the published data. This means that it displays the presence of the status but did not describe the overall situation of each locality.

The pyrethroid resistance illustrated in Figure 3 and concentrated on the west coast of Peninsular Malaysia, as well as Northern Thailand. None of the published data on resistance in Vietnam and only one location in Laos. There is scattered distribution throughout Java Island, Indonesia. While for organophosphate, resistance represented by clustered distribution in Sumatera Barat, Indonesia and Sabah, East of Malaysia (Figure 4). Similar pattern as pyrethroid resistance seen across Java Island (Indonesia), for Organophosphate Resistance. Besides, study sites at Sumatera Barat and Northern part of Peninsular Malaysia showed similar resistance to pyrethroid and organophosphate, which suggest the possibility of cross-resistance. Clustered distribution in Sabah, East of Malaysia. Scattered distribution in Nusa Tenggara Barat, Indonesia. However, there is no data on Organochlorine resistance published from Laos, Vietnam and Thailand (Figure 5). Table 2 is the summary of the included studies in this review.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

The Distribution of Pyrethroids Resistance Published from 2015 to 2019

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Organophosphate Resistance Based on Published Data from 2015 to 2019

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Organochlorine Resistance Based on Published Data from 2015 to 2019

Author, year Location/
strains
Sample Insecticides Findings
1 (Ameliayap,
Chen,
Sofian-Azirun, Lau
et al.
2018) 16
Indonesia Ae. aegypti adult pyrethroid-based mosquito
coils containing
KT between d-allethrin and transfluthrin, d-allethrin
and metofluthrin, as well
as transfluthrin and metofluthrin displayed
significant associations, portraying the presence
of cross-resistance within pyrethroid
insecticides
2 (Boyer et al.
2018)19
Cambodia Ae. aegypti adult
and larvae
Temephos (0.2, 0.05, 0.03,
0.02, 0.01, 0.004 mg/L)
Larvae- lower mortality rate to temephos.

Adult- highly resistant to permethrin
(pyrethroid)
3 (Chen et al.
2018)20
Malaysia Aedes albopictus Pyrethroid -All strains of Ae. albopictus were most
susceptible to metofluthrin, with mortality rates
>80%.

Mortality rates ranging from 5.0 to 100% were
observed from all populations exposed to d-trans
allethrin, d-allethrin, and prallethrin
4 (Chin et al.
2017)21
Malaysia
(11 states)
Ae. Aegypti metofluthrin 0.01% w/w
(Fumakilla)

d-allethrin 0.20% w/w (Fish
A)

d-trans allethrin 0.15% w/w
(Shieldtox)

prallethrin 0.04% w/w
(Ridsect)
-Significant associations were detected between
the knockdown rates of metofluthrin and d-allethrin,
and between metofluthrin and d-trans
allethrin, suggesting the occurrence of cross-resistance
within pyrethroid insecticides
5 (Elia-Amira
et al.
2018)22
Malaysia,
Sabah
Ae. albopictus (Skuse) Bromophos,

malathion (0.125 mg/L)

fenthion (0.025 mg/L)

fenitrothion (0.02 mg/L)

temephos (0.012 mg/L)

chlorpyrifos (0.012 mg/L)

dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane
(DDT, 0.012 mg/L)

dieldrin (0.050 mg/L)
resistant (mortality < 90%) towards
malathion, temephos, and DDT.

exhibited a wide range of susceptibilities
against bromophos, with mortality ranged from
49.33 to 93.33%.
6 (P H Hamid
et al.
2018)23
Indonesia Ae. aegypti 5% malathion

0.05% deltamethrin

0.75% permethrin

0.05% cyhalothrin

0.1% bendiocarb

0.15% cyfluthrin
Association in V1016G of Aedes with
resistance to permethrin but not F1534C
7 (Penny Hum
aidah Hamid,
Prastowo,
Widyasari et
al. 2017)24
Indonesia Ae. aegypti 5% malathion

0.05% deltamethrin

0.75% permethrin

0.05% λ-cyhalothrin

0.1% bendiocarb

0.15% cyflothrin
Kdr analysis of voltage-gated sodium channel
(Vgsc) gene showed significant association to
S989P and V1016G mutations linked to
resistance phenotypes against 0.75%
permethrin.

Ae. aegypti F1534C gene mutation did not
result in any significant correlation to resistance
development.
8 (Hasmiwati,
Rusjdi & No
fita 2018)25
Indonesia Ae. aegypti larvae Temephos pestanal 250 mg
97.5% with 0.02 mg/L
Detection of Ace-1 gene (Genotype variation of
T506T location in Ace-I gene)
9 (Hasmiwati,
& Supargiyo
no 2018)26
Indonesia Ae. aegypti larvae Temephos postanal 250 mg
97.5%, with 0.02 mg/L
populations have point mutations in the VGSC
gene corresponding to S989P and V1016G
amino acid substitutions.

Genes study- to design allele-specific primers to
detect the kdr allele mutations.
10 (Haziqah-
Rashid et al.
2019)27
Indonesia Aedes aegypti larvae bromophos (0.050 mg/liter)

chlopyrifos (0.002 mg/liter)

fenitrothion (0.020 mg/liter)

fenthion (0.025 mg/liter)

malathion (0.125 mg/liter)

temephos (0.012 mg/liter)

DDT (0.012 mg/liter)

dieldrin (0.025 mg/liter)
All field-collected Ae. aegypti larvae were
resistant against diagnostic doses of
chlorpyrifos, malathion, temephos, and DDT
with mortality rates ranging from 0 to 74.67%.
11 (Ishak et al.
2015)28
Malaysia Aedes
aegypti and Aedes
albopictus 2–5-day-old
F2
Temephos (1 g/L for larvae

0.75% Permethrin (Type I
pyrethroid)

0.05% Deltamethrin (Type
II pyrethroid), 4% DDT
(organochlorine), 0.1%
Bendiocarb (Carbamate)
and 5% Malathion
(organophosphate) for adult
Knockdown resistance (kdr)

Synergist assays with PBO (permethrin,
deltamethrin, DDT or bendiocarb) the 24 hours
mortality is measured
12 (Ishak et al.
2017)29
Malaysia Aedes aegypti Permethrin 0.75%

DDT 4%
% mortality after 24 hours exposure

204 genes were commonly over-expressed with
monooxygenase P450 genes (CYP9J27,
CYP6CB1, CYP9J26 and
CYP9M4) Glutathione S-transferases,
carboxylesterases and other gene families
commonly associated with insecticide
resistance were also over-expressed
13 (Ishak et al.
2016)30
Malaysia Aedes albopictus pyrethroid Metabolic resistance (cytochrome P450 upregulation)
and possibly a reduced penetration
mechanism (consistent over-expression of
cuticular protein genes) were associated with
pyrethroid resistance

CYP6P12 over-expression was strongly
associated with pyrethroid resistance

CYP6N3 was over-expressed across carbamate
and DDT resistant populations
14 (Kasai et al.
2019)31
Asia,
Europe
and South
America
Aedes albopictus permethrin 5.87 ng/female,
and 58.7 ng
Genotyping studies detected a knockdown
resistance (kdr) allele V1016G in Vssc. F1534C
and F1534S, were also detected
15 (Kongmee et
al. 2019)32
Thailand Ae. Aegypti, 3–5-day-old
female
deltamethrin 0.05%

+/- piperonylbutoxide
(PBO) 4%
Mortality after 24 hours exposure- PBO
increase mortality %
16 (Lau et al.
2015)33
12 states
in
Malaysia
F1 larvae of Ae.
aegypti and Ae.
albopictus
pyriproxyfen 0.5%,
Methoprene 1.3%,
diflubenzuron
25%, cyromazine 75%,
novaluron 10%,
Resistance ratio Insect growth regulators (IGRs;
Insecticide for larva stage: - low resistance was
detected
17. (Leong et al.
2018)34
Selangor,
Malaysia
five – seven days old
adult females Aedes
Aegypti
organochlorine
DDT
(98%); carbamate:
propoxur
(99.8%); organophosphate:
malathion
(98.7%), temephos (97.5%);

pyrethroids: cyfluthrin
(99.8%), deltamethrin
(99.6%), etofenprox
(97.7%), lambdacyhalothrin
(97.8%) and

permethrin (98.1%)
Synergists ethacrynic acid, S.S.S.-
tributylphosphorotrithioate and piperonyl butox
ide increased the toxicity of insecticides but
failed in certain population

Enzyme elevated a-esterase, B -
asterase, glutahion, monoxygenase
18 (Low et al.
2015)35
Malaysia Aedes
albopictus (Skuse)
dieldrin Presence of the A302S mutation
19 (Marcombe
et al. 2018)36
Lao PDR F1, F2 larvae of Aedes
aegypti
Bacillus
thuringiensis israelensis (Bti),
diflubenzuron,
pyriproxyfen
and spinosad diflubenzuron
and temephos
Insecticide susceptibility of Ae. aegypti against

Bacillus thuringiensis israelensis (Bti),
diflubenzuron, pyriproxyfen and spinosad
20. (Mohiddin et
al. 2016)37
Penang,
Malaysia
Aedes

Albopictus larvae
Temephos 0.012 mg/L
(diagnostic dose), 1mg/L
(operational dose) and
Bacillus thuringiensis
subsp. israelensis (Bti) 6000
to 24000 international toxic
unit/L
Higher lethal time and resistance ratio were
detected from Flat Sri Hamna (a dengue hotspot
area
21. (Mulyanings
ih et al.
2017)38
Indonesia Ae. albopictus larvae organophosphates Resistance status of Ae. albopictus larvae
to organophosphates
22. (Pang et al.
2015)39
Singapore Ae. aegypti. delthamethrin-treated net mortality rate

at amino acid residue of alleles V1016G of
DIIS6 or F1269C of DIIIS6 was detected in
93% of field strains of Ae.
23. (Plernsub, et
al. 2016) 40
Thailand Aedes aegypti deltamethrin Susceptibility of knockdown resistance
mutations, S989P, V1016G and F1534C,
in a heterozygous genotype to deltamethrin
24. (Plernsub, S
aingamsook,
Yanola, Lu
mjuan, Tipp
awangkosol,
Walton, et
al. 2016)41
Chiang
Mai city
Aedes aegypti pyrethroids, deltamethrin Temporal frequencies of F1534C and
V1016G in Ae. aegypti populations

The impact of the mutations on the efficacy of
thermal fogging with the pyrethroid
deltamethrin
25 (Rahim,
201742
Penang,
Malaysia
Aedes Alb adult Permethrin

Deltamethrin

Malathion

2.4%

DDT

4%
This study may assist the health authorities to
improve future chemical-based vector control
operations in dengue-endemic areas
26 Rahim
201643
Malaysia Aedes Albopictus larva Thermophos

Malathion
The revised and established lethal diagnostic
dose findings from the current work are crucial
to elaborate on the variation in susceptibility
of Ae. albopictus in future resistance monitoring
programs in Malaysia.
27 Rasli 201844 Malaysia Aedes Aegypti Permethrin (synthetic
pyrethroid)

deltamethrin and cyfluthrin

lambda-cyhalothrin

malathion
kdr gene and the detoxification of the oxidase
enzyme play a major role in the development of
a pyrethroid resistance in A. aegypti.

Recommend

Rotational planning of insecticide uses by
substituting pyrethroids with organophosphates
is highly recommended in localities where A.
aegypti is reportedly highly resistant to
pyrethroids but still susceptible to
organophosphate.

The usage of synergists such
as piperonyl butoxide (PBO) could be
considered in order to overcome the resistance
due to oxidases.

Proactive monitoring of the kdr gene
throughout all dengue-endemic area in
Malaysia is highly suggested as well.
28 Sayono 201
645
Indonesia Aedes Aegypti Pyrethroid These findings strongly suggest the need for an
appropriate integrated use of insecticides in the
region. The 989P, 1016G and 1534C
polymorphisms in the AaNaV gene are
potentially valuable molecular markers for
pyrethroid insecticide resistance monitoring.
29 Smith
201746
Singapore Aedes aegypti Pyrethroid Two mutations S989P + V1016G, commonly
occur together in parts of Asia. These results
provide useful information for resistance
management and for better understanding
pyrethroid interactions with VSSC.
30 Smith
201847
Singapore Aedes Aegypti Pyrethrod Genetic Cytochrome P450 monooxygenase
(CYP)-mediated detoxification is one of the
primary mechanisms of pyrethroid resistance.
31 Sun-on P et
al 201848
Chiang ma
i, Thailand
Kdr strain -Aedes
aegypti

(allele frequency of
S989P+V1016G
mutation)

-DDT, permethrin and
deltamethrin
Pyrethroid -0.05%
deltamethrin-impregnated
papers
-effect of relaxation of deltamethrin selection
pressure on the level of mixed-function
oxidases (MFO)

-aids in the development of new control
chemicals, provides information on potential
environmental modulators of resistance, and
allows for the detection of resistance markers
before resistance becomes fixed in the
population

This study indicates that there was a significant
but small reduction in the activity levels of
MFOs when pyrethroid selection pressure is
relaxed in this kdr strain of Ae. aegypti.
32 Susilowati 201849 Tangerang Ae. aegypti Pyrethroid Conclusion is Ae. aegypti from three districts in
Tangerang city have various resistance levels to
pyrethroid
33 Tangena 201850 Lao,
Vientiane
Capital
and Luang
Prabang
Aedes albopictus DDT, malathion,
permethrin, deltamethrin
and, temephos
Multiple-insecticide resistance was
found. Aedes albopictus control efforts in
villages need to expand to include secondary
forests and rubber plantations, with larval
source management and limited use of
insecticides.
34 Thanispong
K 201551
Thailand
Rayong,
Koh
Chang,
and Pong
Nom Ron
Aedes albopictus (0.026% deltamethrin,
1.024% permethrin, 0.570%
bifenthrin, 0.237%
cypermethrin, and 0.035%
α-cypermethrin)
Routine assessment of these baseline results
should guide future resistance monitoring to
pyrethroid insecticides in Ae. albopictus in
Thailand.
35 Thongwat 201552 Phitsanulok
Province,
Thailand
Aedes Aegypti temephos, permethrin and
deltamethrin
LC50 and mortality rate
36 Widjanarko
201753
Wonosobo
subdistrict,
Indonesia
Aedes sp in identified that vectors have
already developed resistant
to organophosphate
insecticide, as many as 50%
out of the total sample
tested
It is important to use another type of insecticide
such as pyrethroid.
37 Wuliandri 201554 Yogjakarta,
Indonesia
Aedes Aegypti Pyrethroid -1023G allele is associated with resistance to
type I and type II pyrethroids

-A resistance advantage conferred to V1023G
homozygotes through addition of the S996P
allele in the homozygous form

Discussion

Chemical insecticide use is one of the critical components in the Aedes control activity. An insecticide is used to control Aedes species through space spraying, insecticide-treated materials, larvicide and residual spraying55. Without proper management, the mosquitoes can develop resistance which can affect the dengue control program. Insecticide resistance had become an essential challenge faced in many dengue-endemic countries, particularly in South East Asia56. The World Health Organization (WHO) had recommended the insecticide resistance to be included as a part of integrated entomological surveillance to optimise dengue control activities17. Unfortunately, not all resistances information was published by the vector control agencies across the SEA countries. The scarce of published information on the resisance studies causes a comprehensive analysis of the regional threat of insecticide resistance is not possible.

Nevertheless, the reporting trend on insecticide resistance on dengue vectors had enriched since the last 10 years from the last published review by Ranson et al. in 200857. Furthermore, the methodology used were more standardized, based on the WHO recommendation for the later publications. Based on the available data, the mapping of the resistance status showed the abundance of resistance issues in most of the study sites. Insecticide resistance is indeed a burden to the control programs because it will increase the time and the cost for vector management, especially during the outbreak56. Furthermore, agricultural sectors will also be affected by the unplanned usage of pesticides in dengue control. Subsequently, the accumulative burden of dengue transmission, agricultural lost and environmental risk may impact the socioeconomic impact of a population and the country.

Besides, the published data also showed there is a possibility of cross-resistance across the study sites, particularly in Indonesia and Malaysia. Cross-resistance occurs when the resistance to one insecticide confers resistance to another type of insecticide58. This is due to the probability of sharing a similar mode of action between the insecticides, or the vector develops mechanism, which is resistance to several types of insecticides. For instance, the cross-resistance between Pyrethroid and DDT, which highlighted in the previous studies59. As the consequences, this situation will limit the choices of effective insecticide for vector control. Therefore, effective entomological surveillance is necessary as one of the strategies for effective vector control55.

Pyrethroid Resistance

The most common pyrethroid used is Metofluthrin, Permethrin, Deltamerin and d-Allethrin. Over time, the unplanned and frequent use of insecticides has led to the development of resistance against insecticides in mosquitoes. Based on this review, different levels of resistance seemed to the numerous populations despite there is geographical variation in the level of resistance found. This is might due to the intensive use of the chemical with inadequate insecticide management plan60. The widespread of the resistance will reduce vector control efficacy and enhanced disease transmission.

The mechanisms of pyrethroid resistance include the mutations in the voltage-sensitive sodium channel gene (target-site resistance) and metabolic-mediated insecticide resistance. The Voltage-sensitive sodium channel (Vssc) gene comprises four homologous domains, and each of them contains six hydrophobic subunits. Mutations occur in the Vssc gene have a linked to knockdown resistance (kdr) in many insect diseases vectors in selected studies. Based on available data, there are three mutations have been detected in Southeast Asia (Indonesia, Thailand, Singapore) which are S989P, V101G and F1534C in Aedes aegypti mosquitoes. The detection of these mutations was affirmed to confer sodium channel resistance to pyrethroids, and other associated mutations are still yet to be inspected because the emergence of new kdr is possible when pyrethroid insecticides remained to be the first-line defence in the control of Aedes Aegypti.

Metabolic resistance is caused by elevated activity through overexpression or conformational change of enzymes that are involved in the processes of insecticide metabolism, sequestration, and excretion 9. The metabolic enzymes involved belong to large gene families who are cytochrome P450 monooxygenases (P450), glutathione S-transferases (GST), and carboxyl/cholinesterase (CCE). Cytochrome P450 monooxygenase (CYP)-mediated detoxification is one of the primary mechanisms of pyrethroid resistance61. Based on available data, only Malaysia and Singapore reported on Cytochrome P450s (P450s) involved in insecticide resistance reduce the efficacy of insecticide-based vector control by rendering vector control ineffective. The CYP9 and CYP6 family play an essential role in insecticide resistance in Aedes Aegypti28, 61.

Strategies to Overcome Insecticide Resistance

The insecticide resistance has become a global issue, and there are few strategies to reduce the development of insecticide resistance. The strategies include the insecticides of unrelated classes with different modes of action should be sprayed in rotation, ideally two times per year (WHO 2016). Rotational planning of insecticide uses by substituting pyrethroids with organophosphates is highly recommended in localities where Aedes aegypti is reportedly highly resistant to pyrethroids but still susceptible to organophosphate44.

The combination of insecticide with a suitable synergist may help to counter the insecticide resistance and maximise the effectiveness of adulticide operations. The usage of Piperonyl Butoxide (PBO) as synergists could be considered in order to overcome the resistance due to oxidases. For example, the use of Deltamethrin combined with a synergist was effective against resistant populations of Aedes aegypti, the synergistic effect of PBO enhanced knockdown and mortality more rapid by regress the resistance allele and blocked the enzymatic activities that help in detoxification of insecticides32. Besides that, the indoor thermal fogging of Deltacide containing S-bioallethrin (a knockdown agent) and Deltamethrin (a killing agent) has a strong adulticidal effect, and these formulated mixtures have shown to be effective against both adult and larval Aedes species62.

Public health local agencies may also consider a combination of biological and nonbiological strategies in controlling these vectors. The use of natural enemies in biological control such as the larvivorous fish Poecilia reticulata as a food source for mosquito 63, the entomopathogenic bacteria Bacillus thuringiensis israelensis to destroy the gut lining of mosquito larvae64,65 and the release of Aedes aegypti infected with Wolbachia that cause sterility via cytoplasmic incompatibility 64. In nonbiological, Petroselinum crispum can be used with other chemicals or measures in integrated mosquito management for controlling the vectors, particularly in localities with high levels of pyrethroid resistance 66.

Last but not least, in order to delay or prevent the development of insecticide resistance in vector populations, integrated vector management programs should include a resistance management component 55. Timely, effective entomological assessment and proper data management provided essential information for the management of vector control, and in order to successfully develop and implement of resistance management strategies, knowledge of the mode of action or chemical class of the available insecticide products is crucial17.

In Southeast Asia, dengue appears to be endemic. The resistance towards insecticide is geographically varied, which is associated with the practice of insecticide usage. Besides, the existence of cross-resistance also shoud be identified, and the role of genetic mutation and mechanism of resistance are among the strategies to optimise vector control management. Among the management strategies are rotation, combination, integration with synergist and routine assessment of resistance profile. Therefore, surveillance on the insecticide resistance should be conducted according to the best practice recommendations. Lastly, the implementation of successful resistance management strategies against both species is urgently needed. Failure of recognition of this issue will lead to poor control of the disease and will escalate the resources needed to control the vector.

Conflict of interest

None declared.

References

  • 1.World Health Organization, author. Comprehensive Guidelines for Prevention and Control of Dengue and Dengue Haemorrhagic Fever. 2011. [June 29, 2019]. http://apps.searo.who.int/pds_docs/B4751.pdf .
  • 2.Bhatia R, Dash A, Sunyoto T. Changing epidemiology of dengue in South-East Asia. WHO South-East Asia J Public Heal. 2013;2(1):23. doi: 10.4103/2224-3151.115830. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Worrld Health Organization, author. Dengue and Severe Dengue. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Kraemer MUG, Sinka ME, Duda KA, et al. The global distribution of the arbovirus vectors Aedes aegypti and Ae. albopictus. Elife. 2015;4 doi: 10.7554/eLife.08347. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.World Health Organization (Western Pacific Region), author Dengue Prevention and Control Program. 2017. https://www.doh.gov.ph/national-dengue-prevention-and-control-program .
  • 6.Wilder-Smith A, Murray MB, Quam M. Epidemiology of dengue: past, present and future prospects. Clin Epidemiol. 2013;5:299. doi: 10.2147/CLEP.S34440. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Ferreira GLC. Global dengue epidemiology trends. Rev Inst Med Trop Sao Paulo. 2012;54(suppl 18):5–6. doi: 10.1590/S0036-46652012000700003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Liang G, Gao X, Gould EA. Factors responsible for the emergence of arboviruses; strategies, challenges and limitations for their control. Emerg Microbes Infect. 2015;4(3):e18. doi: 10.1038/emi.2015.18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Moyes CL, Vontas J, Martins AJ, et al. Contemporary status of insecticide resistance in the major Aedes vectors of arboviruses infecting humans. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2017;11(7) doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0005625. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.World Health Organization, author. Vector Control. 2017. [June 29, 2019]. https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/258546/sea-rc70-0.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y .
  • 11.Achee NL, Gould F, Perkins TA, et al. A Critical Assessment of Vector Control for Dengue Prevention. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2015;9(5) doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0003655. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Health Organization W, author. Global Report on Insecticide Resistance in Malaria Vectors: 2010–2016 Global Malaria Programme. 2017. [June 29, 2019]. https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/272533/9789241514057-eng.pdf?ua=1 .
  • 13.Al Nazawi AM, Aqili J, Alzahrani M, et al. Combined target site (kdr) mutations play a primary role in highly pyrethroid resistant phenotypes of Aedes aegypti from Saudi Arabia. Parasites Vectors. 2017;10:161. doi: 10.1186/s13071-017-2096-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.David J-P, Ismail HM, Chandor-Proust A, Paine MJI. Role of cytochrome P450s in insecticide resistance: impact on the control of mosquito-borne diseases and use of insecticides on Earth. Philos Trans R Soc B Biol Sci. 2013;368(1612):20120429–20120429. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2012.0429. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Hemingway J, Hawkes NJ, McCarroll L, Ranson H. The molecular basis of insecticide resistance in mosquitoes. Insect Biochem Mol Biol. 2004;34(7):653–665. doi: 10.1016/j.ibmb.2004.03.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Amelia-Yap ZH, Chen CD, Sofian-Azirun M, et al. Efficacy of Mosquito Coils: Cross-resistance to Pyrethroids in Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae) from Indonesia. J Econ Entomol. 2018;111(6):2854–2860. doi: 10.1093/jee/toy296. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.WHO, author. Monitoring and managing insecticide resistance in Aedes mosquito populations. 10665. Vol. 16. Who; 2016. [May 30, 2019]. p. 7. www.who.int . [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Coleman M, Hemingway J, Gleave KA, Wiebe A, Gething PW, Moyes CL. Developing global maps of insecticide resistance risk to improve vector control. Malar J. 2017;16(1):86. doi: 10.1186/s12936-017-1733-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Boyer S, Lopes S, Prasetyo D, et al. Resistance of Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae) Populations to Deltamethrin, Permethrin, and Temephos in Cambodia. Asia-Pacific J Public Heal. 2018;30(2):158–166. doi: 10.1177/1010539517753876. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Amelia-Yap ZH, Chen CD, Sofian-Azirun M, Low VL. Pyrethroid resistance in the dengue vector Aedes aegypti in Southeast Asia: present situation and prospects for management. Parasit Vectors. 2018;11(1):332. doi: 10.1186/s13071-018-2899-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Chin AC, Chen CD, Low VL, et al. Comparative Efficacy of Commercial Mosquito Coils Against Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae) in Malaysia: A Nationwide Report. J Econ Entomol. 2017;110(5):2247–2251. doi: 10.1093/jee/tox183. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Elia-Amira NMR, Chen CD, Lau KW, et al. Organophosphate and organochlorine resistance in larval stage of aedes albopictus (Diptera: Culicidae) in Sabah, Malaysia. J Econ Entomol. 2018;111(5):2488–2492. doi: 10.1093/jee/toy184. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Hamid PH, Ninditya VI, Prastowo J, Haryanto A, Taubert A, Hermosilla C. Current Status of Aedes aegypti Insecticide Resistance Development from Banjarmasin, Kalimantan, Indonesia. Biomed Res Int. 2018;2018 doi: 10.1155/2018/1735358. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Hamid PH, Prastowo J, Widyasari A, Taubert A, Hermosilla C. Knockdown resistance (kdr) of the voltage-gated sodium channel gene of Aedes aegypti population in Denpasar, Bali, Indonesia. Parasit Vectors. 2017;10 doi: 10.1186/s13071-017-2215-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Hasmiwati, Rusjdi SR, Nofita E. Detection of ace-1 gene with insecticides resistance in aedes aegypti populations from DHF-endemic areas in Padang, Indonesia. Biodiversitas. 2018;19(1):31–36. doi: 10.13057/biodiv/d190105. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Hasmiwati Supargiyono. Short Communication: Genotyping of kdr allele in insecticide resistant-aedes aegypti populations from West Sumatra, Indonesia. Biodiversitas. 2018;19(2):502–508. doi: 10.13057/biodiv/d190225. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Haziqah-Rashid A, Chen CD, Lau KW, et al. Monitoring Insecticide Resistance Profiles of Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae) in the Sunda Islands of Indonesia Based on Diagnostic Doses of Larvicides. J Med Entomol. 2019;56(2):514–518. doi: 10.1093/jme/tjy208. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Ishak IH, Jaal Z, Ranson H, Wondji CS. Contrasting patterns of insecticide resistance and knockdown resistance (kdr) in the dengue vectors Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus from Malaysia. Parasit Vectors. 2015;8 doi: 10.1186/s13071-015-0797-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Ishak IH, Kamgang B, Ibrahim SS, Riveron JM, Irving H, Wondji CS. Pyrethroid Resistance in Malaysian Populations of Dengue Vector Aedes aegypti Is Mediated by CYP9 Family of Cytochrome P450 Genes. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2017;11(1) doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0005302. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Ishak IH, Riveron JM, Ibrahim SS, et al. The Cytochrome P450 gene CYP6P12 confers pyrethroid resistance in kdr-free Malaysian populations of the dengue vector Aedes albopictus. Sci Rep. 2016;6 doi: 10.1038/srep24707. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Kasai S, Caputo B, Tsunoda T, et al. First detection of a Vssc allele V1016G conferring a high level of insecticide resistance in Aedes albopictus collected from Europe (Italy) and Asia (Vietnam), 2016: a new emerging threat to controlling arboviral diseases. Euro Surveill. 2019;24(5) doi: 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2019.24.5.1700847. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Kongmee M, Thanispong K, Sathantriphop S, Sukkanon C, Bangs MJ, Chareonviriyaphap T. Enhanced mortality in deltamethrin-resistant Aedes aegypti in Thailand using a piperonyl butoxide synergist Monthathip. Acta Trop. 2018 doi: 10.1016/j.actatropica.2018.09.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Lau KW, Chen CD, Lee HL, Norma-Rashid Y, Sofian-Azirun M. Evaluation of insect growth regulators against field-collected aedes aegypti and aedes albopictus (Diptera: Culicidae) from Malaysia. J Med Entomol. 2015;52(2):199–206. doi: 10.1093/jme/tju019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Leong CS, Vythilingam I, Wong ML, Wan Sulaiman W-Y, Lau YL. Aedes aegypti(Linnaeus) larvae from dengue outbreak areas in Selangor showing resistance to pyrethroids but susceptible to organophosphates. Acta Trop. 2018;185:115–126. doi: 10.1016/j.actatropica.2018.05.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Low VL, Vinnie-Siow WY, Lim YAL, et al. First molecular genotyping of A302S mutation in the gamma aminobutyric acid (GABA) receptor in Aedes albopictus from Malaysia. Trop Biomed. 2015;32(3):554–556. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84946909308&partner-ID=40&md5=52dce71b7477c9426297c863622dcc4f . [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Marcombe S, Chonephetsarath S, Thammavong P, Brey PT. Alternative insecticides for larval control of the dengue vector Aedes aegypti in Lao PDR: insecticide resistance and semi-field trial study. Parasit Vectors. 2018;11 doi: 10.1186/s13071-018-3187-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Mohiddin A, Lasim AM, Zuharah WF. Susceptibility of Aedes albopictus from dengue outbreak areas to temephos and Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. israelensis. Asian Pac J Trop Biomed. 2016;6(4):295–300. doi: 10.1016/j.apjtb.2016.01.006. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Mulyaningsih B, Umniyati SR, Hadianto T. Detection of nonspecific esterase activity in organophosphate resistant strain of aedes albopictus skuse (Diptera: Culicidae) larvae in Yogyakarta, Indonesia. SouthEast Asian J Trop Med Public Health. 2017;48(3):552–560. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85041095456&partnerID=40&md5=ed421753770893d0ac93df9ca7b0e34b . [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Pang SC, Chiang LP, Tan CH, Vythilingam I, Lam-Phua SG, Ng LC. Low efficacy of delthamethrin-treated net against singapore aedes aegypti is associated with kdr-type resistance. Trop Biomed. 2015;32(1):140–150. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84924282264&partnerID=40&md5=-de63fb7c7b344ba4d16d9466bc359c5b . [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Plernsub S, Saingamsook J, Yanola J, et al. Temporal frequency of knockdown resistance mutations, F1534C and V1016G, in Aedes aegypti in Chiang Mai city, Thailand and the impact of the mutations on the efficiency of thermal fogging spray with pyrethroids. Acta Trop. 2016;162:125–132. doi: 10.1016/j.actatropica.2016.06.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Plernsub S, Saingamsook J, Yanola J, et al. Additive effect of knockdown resistance mutations, S989P, V1016G and F1534C, in a heterozygous genotype conferring pyrethroid resistance in Aedes aegypti in Thailand. Parasit Vectors. 2016;9 doi: 10.1186/s13071-016-1713-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Rahim J, Ahmad AH, Ahmad H, Ishak IH, Rus AC, Maimusa HA. Adulticidal Susceptibility Evaluation of Aedes albopictus Using New Diagnostic Doses in Penang Island, Malaysia. J Am Mosq Control Assoc. 2017;33(3):200–208. doi: 10.2987/16-6607R.1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Rahim J, Ahmad AH, Kassim NFA, et al. Revised discriminating lethal doses for resistance monitoring program on aedes albopictus against temephos and malathion in Penang island, Malaysia. J Am Mosq Control Assoc. 2016;32(3):210–216. doi: 10.2987/16-6556.1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Rasli R, Lee HL, Wasi Ahmad N, et al. Susceptibility Status and Resistance Mechanisms in Permethrin-Selected, Laboratory Susceptible and Field-Collected Aedes aegypti from Malaysia. Insects. 2018;9(2) doi: 10.3390/insects9020043. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Sayono S, Hidayati APN, Fahri S, et al. Distribution of voltage-gated sodium channel (NAV) alleles among the aedes aegypti populations in central Java province and its aociation with resistance to pyrethroid insecticides. PLoS One. 2016;11(3) doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0150577. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Smith EA. Evolutionary and Population Genetics of Mosquito Disease Vectors. ProQuest Diss Theses. 2017 https://search.proquest.com/docview/1976942588?accountid=27931 . [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Smith LB, Tyagi R, Kasai S, Scott JG. CYP-mediated permethrin resistance in Aedes aegypti and evidence for trans-regulation. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2018;12(11) doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0006933. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Son-Un P, Choovattanapakorn N, Saingamsook J, et al. Effect of relaxation of deltamethrin pressure on metabolic resistance in a pyrethroid-resistant Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae) strain harboring fixed P989P and G1016G kdr alleles. J Med Entomol. 2018;55(4):975–981. doi: 10.1093/jme/tjy037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Susilowati RP, Sari MP, Far IOF. Bioassay test of the insecticide synthetic pyrethroid against Aedes aegypti mosquito resistance in three districts of Tangerang city. Vol. 2021. Jakarta, Indonesia: American Institute of Physics Inc.; 2018. In: C. K, R. A, M.A. P, Y.D. J, A. S, eds. Departement of Biology, Faculty of Medicine, Krida Wacana Christian University. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Tangena J-AA, Marcombe S, Thammavong P, et al. Bionomics and insecticide resistance of the arboviral vector Aedes albopictus in northern Lao PDR. PLoS One. 2018;13(10) doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0206387. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Thanispong K, Sathantriphop S, Malaithong N, Bangs MJ, Chareonviriyaphap T. Establishment of Diagnostic Doses of Five Pyrethroids for Monitoring Physiological Resistance in Aedes Albopictus in Thailand. J Am Mosq Control Assoc. 2015;31(4):346–352. doi: 10.2987/moco-31-04-346-352.1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Thongwat D, Bunchu N. Susceptibility to temephos, permethrin and deltamethrin of Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae) from Muang district, Phitsanulok Province, Thailand. Asian Pac J Trop Med. 2015;8(1):14–18. doi: 10.1016/S1995-7645(14)60180-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Widjanarko B, Martini M, Hestiningsih R. Resistance status of aedes sp strain from high land in Central Java, Indonesia, as an indicator of increasing vector's capacity of dengue hemorrhagic fever. Ann Trop Med Public Heal. 2017;10(1):71–75. doi: 10.4103/ATMPH.ATMPH_78_17. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Rochmijati Wuliandari J, Lee SF, White VL, Tantowijoyo W, Hoffmann AA, Endersby-Harshman NM. Association between Three Mutations, F1565C, V1023G and S996P, in the Voltage-Sensitive Sodium Channel Gene and Knockdown Resistance in Aedes aegypti from Yogyakarta, Indonesia. Insects. 2015;6(3):658–685. doi: 10.3390/insects6030658. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Roiz D, Wilson AL, Scott TW, et al. Integrated Aedes management for the control of Aedes-borne diseases, Horstick O, ed. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2018;12(12):e0006845. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0006845. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Amelia-Yap ZH, Chen CD, Sofian-Azirun M, Low VL. Pyrethroid resistance in the dengue vector Aedes aegypti in Southeast Asia: present situation and prospects for management. Parasit Vectors. 2018;11 doi: 10.1186/s13071-018-2899-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Ranson H, Burhani J, Lumjuan N, Black WC. Review Insecticide resistance in dengue vectors. 2010. [June 29, 2019]. http://journal.tropika.net .
  • 58.Insecticide Resistance Action Comittee, author. Resistance. [June 29, 2019]. https://www.irac-online.org/about/resistance/
  • 59.Flores-Suarez AE, Ponce-Garcia G, Lopez-Monroy B, et al. Insecticides Resistance. InTech. 2016. Current Status of the Insecticide Resistance in Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae) from Mexico. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Kasai S, Komagata O, Itokawa K, et al. Mechanisms of Pyrethroid Resistance in the Dengue Mosquito Vector, Aedes aegypti: Target Site Insensitivity, Penetration, and Metabolism. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2014;8(6) doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0002948. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Smith B, Tyagi R, Kasai S, Id JGS. CYP-mediated permethrin resistance in Aedes aegypti and evidence for trans -regulation. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2018;12(11):1–13. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0006933. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Mani TR, Arunachalam N, Rajendran R, Satyanarayana K, Dash AP. Efficacy of thermal fog application of deltacide, a synergized mixture of pyrethroids, against Aedes aegypti, the vector of dengue. 2005;10(12):1298–1304. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3156.2005.01522.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Moh C, Setha T, Nealon J, et al. Community-based use of the larvivorous fish Poecilia reticulata to control the dengue vector Aedes aegypti in domestic water storage containers in rural Cambodia Community-based use of the larvivorous fish Poecilia reticulata to control the dengue vector. J Vector Ecol. 2008;33(1):139–144. doi: 10.3376/1081-1710(2008)33[139:cuotlf]2.0.co;2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Fraser JE, Bruyne JT De, Iturbe-ormaetxe I, et al. Novel Wolbachia -transinfected Aedes aegypti mosquitoes possess diverse fitness and vector competence phenotypes. PLoS Pathog. 2017;13(12):1–19. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1006751. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Setha T, Chantha N, Benjamin S, Socheat D. Bacterial Larvicide, Bacillus thuringiensis israelensis Strain AM 65-52 Water Dispersible Granule Formulation Impacts Both Dengue Vector, Aedes aegypti (L.) Population Density and Disease Transmission in Cambodia. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2016;10(9) doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0004973. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Intirach J, Junkum A, Lumjuan N, Chaithong U, Jitpakdi A, Riyong D. Antimosquito property of Petroselinum crispum (Umbellifereae) against the pyrethroid resistant and susceptible strains of Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae) Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2016 doi: 10.1007/s11356-016-7651-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from African Health Sciences are provided here courtesy of Makerere University Medical School

RESOURCES