Skip to main content
Clinical and Experimental Vaccine Research logoLink to Clinical and Experimental Vaccine Research
. 2022 Jan 31;11(1):89–95. doi: 10.7774/cevr.2022.11.1.89

Factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccine in Indonesia

Johan Wibowo 1, Rivaldo Steven Heriyanto 1, Felix Wijovi 1, Devina Adella Halim 1, Claudia Claudia 1, Elizabeth Marcella 1, Billy Susanto 1, Michele Indrawan 1, Nadia Khoirunnisa Heryadi 1, Michelle Imanuelly 1, Jonathan Juniard Anurantha 1, Timotius Ivan Hariyanto 1, Chintya Marcellin 1, Terry Devita Sinaga 1, Saraswati Anindita Rizki 1, Novia Sieto 1, Jeremia Immanuel Siregar 2, Nata Pratama Hardjo Lugito 2, Andree Kurniawan 2,
PMCID: PMC8844667  PMID: 35223669

Abstract

Purpose

As coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) continues to spread rapidly causing approximately 186 million confirmed cases around the world, the urgency to reach herd immunity through vaccination is increasing. However, vaccine safety is a top priority to limit the occurrence of adverse events. Henceforth, this study aims to recognize and perceive COVID-19 vaccine safety in Indonesia during the pandemic.

Materials and Methods

This is a cross-sectional study and was conducted in Indonesia during the COVID-19 pandemic using an online survey of demographic information and a qualitative questionnaire. Responses were recorded and the association between demographic characteristics from survey questions was tested using chi-square with a risk estimate and 95% confidence interval.

Results

A total of 311 participants from 33 out of 34 provinces in Indonesia participated in this study. Recorded responses showed multiple side effects of the COVID-19 vaccine both short- and long-term experienced by the participants. Significant associations were found between demographic factors and COVID-19 vaccine side effects such as female gender with short-term puncture site (odds ratio [OR], 0.463; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.263–0.816) and short-term other reactions (OR, 0.463; 95% CI, 0.263–0.816), domicile outside Java island with long-term puncture site (OR, 4.219; 95% CI, 1.401–12.701) and immune reactions (OR, 3.375; 95% CI, 1.356–8.398), also between married marital status and long-term vagal reaction (OR, 4.655; 95% CI, 1.321–16.409).

Conclusion

Gender, domicile and marital status factors were associated with COVID-19 vaccine side effects in Indonesian people.

Keywords: COVID-19, Vaccination, Vaccines, Side effect

Introduction

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is an infectious and highly contagious disease caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), targeting the respiratory system of the human body [1]. Globally, as of 13 July 2021, there have been approximately 186 million confirmed cases of people infected by COVID-19 with more than 4 million deaths since the first identified case of COVID-19 in Wuhan, China in December 2019 [2,3]. Among Southeast Asia countries, Indonesia has been reported the highest confirmed cases of COVID-19 and the second highest in mortality rate following the Philippines [4]. As of now, the COVID-19 pandemic continues to affect Indonesia with more than 20,000 daily confirmed cases to this day [5]. As chaos rises due to deaths caused by COVID-19 and no certain definitive treatment yet to be discovered, the importance of herd immunity through an effective and secured vaccination is crucial to break the virus transmission and improve social and economic burdens caused by COVID-19 [6].

As of now, about 3.4 billion doses of the COVID-19 vaccine have been administered globally with approximately 29 million doses being administered each day [7]. With the benefits of the vaccine, which is to help protect from the virus, vaccines may also have some side effects which is a normal sign for the human body of building immune protection [8]. The World Health Organization (WHO) reported COVID-19 vaccines can cause mild, short-term side effects, for instance, low-grade fever, pain on the body, redness at the injection site, and other rare side effects [9]. Alongside the various amount of vaccine side effects, vaccine safety is a top priority to ensure the efficacy and effectiveness of the vaccine [10]. Although COVID-19 vaccine side effects are quite common, COVID-19 vaccines are continually monitored for as long as they are in use to detect adverse events and apply approaches to ensure their occurrence limitation [9].

Several studies reported adverse events caused by the COVID-19 vaccine to establish the safety of the vaccine, yet there are very few studies regarding the investigation of COVID-19 side effects in Indonesia [11]. Henceforth, this study was conducted to recognize and perceive the COVID-19 vaccine safety in Indonesia during the pandemic.

Materials and Methods

Study sampling and procedure

This cross-sectional study was conducted from early February to May in Indonesia during the COVID-19 pandemic. The survey made with Google Forms was distributed through online platforms and social media. Particularly all Indonesian citizens across the country who already get vaccinated with COVID-19 vaccines were eligible to participate in this study.

Screening instruments

Sociodemographic information such as age, gender (male or female), domicile (within or outside Java Island), marital status (single or married), education levels, occupation (healthcare workers or non-healthcare workers), and previous vaccination status (unvaccinated, unsure, partial, or completed) were asked in this survey. Questions about the COVID-19 vaccine including dosage (first or second) and type of COVID-19 vaccine that were administered (Sinovac or other than Sinovac) were also in this survey. COVID-19 vaccine side effects (short-term and long-term) questions were put together with multiple choice answers in this study. Other questions made up of COVID-19 screening, comorbidity, disease history, treatment of symptoms appearance, and health protocol after getting vaccinated were also compiled in this survey.

Data analysis

Recorded data were analyzed using IBM SPSS ver. 25.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). The sociodemographic data were presented descriptively and variables were tested using chi-square with a risk estimate and 95% confidence interval.

Ethical consideration

The Ethics Committee of the Faculty of Medicine, Pelita Harapan University has approved the protocol for this study. The approval letter was issued with the number 085/K-LJK/ETIK/II/2021. This study was carried out in accordance with The Code of Ethics of the World Medical Association (Declaration of Helsinki) for experiments involving humans. All of the informed consent were obtained from the participants of this study.

Results

A total of 311 participants from 33 out of 34 provinces in Indonesia were included in this study. Table 1 shows the demographic characteristics of all the participants who have filled the questionnaire. The median age was 25 years (participant age between 19–71 years) and 69.7% were ≤24 years old. The majority of the participants were female (67.5%), marital status was single (89.4%), educational level as undergraduates (94.9%), previously fully vaccinated (84%), work as health workers (89.4%), and live within Java Island (92.0%).

Table 1. Demographic characteristics of participants.

Characteristic No. of participants (%)
Age (yr)
≤24 211 (67.8)
>24 100 (32.2)
Domicile
Within Java Island 286 (92.0)
Outside Java Island 25 (8.0)
Gender
Male 101 (32.5)
Female 210 (67.5)
Marital status
Single 278 (89.4)
Married 33 (10.6)
Occupation
Healthcare 278 (89.4)
Non-healthcare 33 (10.6)
Vaccination status
Unvaccinated, partially vaccinated, unsure 49 (15.8)
Fully vaccinated 262 (84.2)
Education level
Less than university, college 16 (5.1)
University, college graduates 295 (94.9)

Participants’ responses showed mostly have been administered with Sinovac (98.7%) as their COVID-19 vaccine with the majority having received the first dose (60.8%). Responses were shown with particularly few who had disease history (4.2%) and comorbidity (2.9%); moreover, participants were mostly got vaccinated in hospitals (84.2%). Healthcare workers who participated were taking rapid and swab COVID-19 antigen test (54.7%) as their usual screening test, and merely a few had a positive result (1.3%).

Survey results showed participants experienced the short-term side effects of the COVID-19 vaccine (42.4%) more than the long-term (29.3%). The short-term side effects of the vaccine were furthermore categorized, 15.4% showed puncture site reaction (pain, redness, and swelling), 17.0% gave immune reaction (mild fever and pain on the muscles and joints), about 3.2% showed vagal reaction (confusion, shortness of breath, and syncope) and as much as 29.9% felt otherwise (drowsiness, headache, polyphagia, numbness, and nausea). Additionally, the long-term side effects were also further categorized and the results showed 6.8% experienced puncture site reaction, 13.8% felt immune reaction, 3.9% showed a vagal reaction, and about 18.0% for the other reactions. There were no data results regarding the allergic reaction to the vaccine as there were no participants who experienced both short-term and long-term side effects. Data results regarding the side effects of the COVID-19 vaccine are shown in Fig. 1.

Fig. 1. Sample answers of experiencing coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) side effects: short-term (A–D) and long-term (E–H) COVID-19 vaccine side effects.

Fig. 1

Bivariate analysis of the short-term COVID-19 vaccine side effects was done with the demographic characteristics of the participants (Table 2). There were significant relationships between gender factor with both puncture site reaction (odds ratio [OR], 0.366; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.164–0.814) and other reaction (OR, 0.463; 95% CI, 0.263–0.816) of COVID-19 side effects. Furthermore, bivariate analysis of the long-term COVID-19 vaccine side effects was also done (Table 3). Association was found between domicile factor with puncture site reaction (OR, 4.219; 95% CI, 1.401–12.701) and immune reaction (OR, 3.375; 95% CI, 1.356–8.398) of COVID-19 vaccine adverse effects. Additionally, there was also an association between marital status and vagal reaction (OR, 4.655; 95% CI, 1.321–16.409) side effects. There were no results regarding allergic reactions from COVID-19 vaccine side effects as there were no samples of it in the population.

Table 2. Bivariate analysis between sociodemographic characteristics of participants and short-term coronavirus disease 2019 vaccine side effects.

Variable Puncture site reaction OR (95% CI) p-value Immune reaction OR (95% CI) p-value Vagal reaction OR (95% CI) p-value Other reaction OR (95% CI) p-value
None Yes None Yes None Yes None Yes
Age group (yr) 1.634 (0.869–3.071) 0.172 0.568 (0.283–1.131) 0.143 0.227 (0.028–1.815) 0.238 1.007 (0.599–1.693) 1.000
≤24 183 (86.7) 28 (13.3) 170 (80.6) 41 (19.4) 202 (95.7) 9 (4.3) 148 (70.1) 63 (29.9)
>24 80 (80.0) 20 (20.0) 88 (88.0) 12 (12.0) 99 (99.0) 1 (1.0) 70 (70.0) 30 (30.0)
Domicile 1.835 (0.692–4.861) 0.343 2.029 (0.802–5.134) 0.214 1.282 (0.156–10.553) 1.000 1.955 (0.852–4.484) 0.168
Within Java Island 244 (85.3) 42 (14.7) 240 (83.9) 46 (16.1) 277 (96.9) 9 (3.1) 204 (71.3) 82 (28.7)
Outside Java Island 19 (76.0) 6 (24.0) 18 (72.0) 7 (28.0) 24 (96.0) 1 (4.0) 14 (56.0) 11 (44.0)
Gender 0.366 (0.164–0.814) 0.018 0.489 (0.240–0.996) 0.066 0.510 (0.106–2.447) 0.608 0.463 (0.263–0.816) 0.010
Male 93 (92.1) 8 (7.9) 90 (89.1) 11 (10.9) 99 (98.0) 2 (2.0) 81 (80.2) 20 (19.8)
Female 170 (81.0) 40 (19.0) 168 (80.0) 42 (20.0) 202 (96.2) 8 (3.8) 137 (65.2) 73 (34.8)
Marital status 0.518 (0.151–1.770) 0.417 0.456 (0.134–1.553) 0.298 0.934 (0.115–7.614) 1.000 0.601 (0.251–1.438) 0.341
Single 233 (83.8) 45 (16.2) 228 (82.0) 50 (18.0) 269 (96.8) 9 (3.2) 192 (69.1) 86 (30.9)
Married 30 (90.9) 3 (9.1) 30 (90.9) 3 (9.1) 32 (97.0) 1 (3.0) 26 (78.8) 7 (21.2)
Occupation 1.904 (0.803–4.516) 0.220 0.456 (0.134–1.553) 0.298 0.964 (0.942–0.986) 0.558 0.601 (0.251–1.438) 0.341
Healthcare 238 (85.6) 40 (14.4) 228 (82.0) 50 (18.0) 268 (96.4) 10 (3.6) 192 (69.1) 86 (30.9)
Non-healthcare 25 (75.8) 8 (24.2) 30 (90.9) 3 (9.1) 33 (100.0) 0 26 (78.8) 7 (21.2)
Vaccination status 0.898 (0.378–2.137) 0.978 0.507 (0.191–1.345) 0.238 1.351 (0.278–6.562) 1.000 0.553 (0.263–1.161) 0.158
Unvaccinated, partially vaccinated, unsure 42 (85.7) 7 (14.3) 44 (89.8) 5 (10.2) 47 (95.9) 2 (4.1) 39 (79.6) 10 (20.4)
Fully vaccinated 221 (84.4) 41 (15.6) 214 (81.7) 48 (18.3) 254 (96.9) 8 (3.1) 179 (68.3) 83 (31.7)
Education level 1.902 (0.587–6.164) 0.464 0.312 (0.040–2.411) 0.402 0.966 (0.946–0.987) 0.983 0.526 (0.146–1.890) 0.471
Less than university, college 12 (75.0) 4 (25.0) 15 (93.8) 1 (6.3) 16 (100.0) 0 13 (81.3) 3 (18.8)
University, college graduates 251 (85.1) 44 (14.9) 243 (82.4) 52 (17.6) 285 (96.6) 10 (3.4) 205 (69.5) 90 (30.5)

Values are presented as mean±standard deviation or number (%) or OR (95% CI), unless otherwise stated. Statistically significant results are marked in bold.

OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval.

Table 3. Bivariate analysis between sociodemographic characteristics of participants and long-term coronavirus disease 2019 vaccine side effects.

Variable Puncture site reaction OR (95% CI) p-value Immune reaction OR (95% CI) p-value Vagal reaction OR (95% CI) p-value Other reaction OR (95% CI) p-value
None Yes None Yes None Yes None Yes
Age group (yr) 1.324 (0.531–3.306) 0.718 0.691 (0.333–1.436) 0.413 3.101 (0.959–10.026) 0.096 0.814 (0.431–1.538) 0.634
≤24 198 (93.8) 13 (6.2) 179 (84.8) 32 (15.2) 206 (97.6) 5 (2.4) 171 (81.0) 40 (19.0)
>24 92 (92.0) 8 (8.0) 89 (89.0) 11 (11.0) 93 (93.0) 7 (7.0) 84 (84.0) 16 (16.0)
Domicile 4.219 (1.401–12.701) 0.019 3.375 (1.356–8.398) 0.015 4.197 (1.059–16.631) 0.096 1.152 (0.413–3.213) 1.000
Within Java Island 270 (94.4) 16 (5.6) 251 (87.8) 35 (12.2) 277 (96.9) 9 (3.1) 235 (82.2) 51 (17.8)
Outside Java Island 20 (80.0) 5 (20.0) 17 (68.0) 8 (32.0) 22 (88.0) 3 (12.0) 20 (80.0) 5 (20.0)
Gender 1.614 (0.657–3.966) 0.418 0.779 (0.382–1.589) 0.607 0.181 (0.023–1.421) 0.132 0.982 (0.529–1.823) 1.000
Male 92 (91.1) 9 (8.9) 89 (88.1) 12 (11.9) 100 (99.0) 1 (1.0) 83 (82.2) 18 (17.8)
Female 198 (94.3) 12 (5.7) 179 (85.2) 31 (14.8) 199 (94.8) 11 (5.2) 172 (81.9) 38 (18.1)
Marital status 2.118 (0.667–6.720) 0.351 1.128 (0.410–3.100) 1.000 4.655 (1.321–16.409) 0.033 1.258 (0.517–3.063) 0.789
Single 261 (93.9) 17 (6.1) 240 (86.3) 38 (13.7) 270 (97.1) 8 (2.9) 229 (82.4) 49 (17.6)
Married 29 (87.9) 4 (12.1) 28 (84.8) 5 (15.2) 29 (87.9) 4 (12.1) 26 (78.8) 7 (21.2)
Occupation 1.444 (0.402–5.192) 0.842 0.373 (0.086–1.618) 0.271 0.957 (0.933–0.981) 0.460 1.258 (0.517–3.063) 0.789
Healthcare 260 (93.5) 18 (6.5) 237 (85.3) 41 (14.7) 266 (95.7) 12 (4.3) 229 (82.4) 49 (17.6)
Non-healthcare 30 (90.9) 3 (9.1) 31 (93.9) 2 (6.1) 33 (100.0) 0 26 (78.8) 7 (21.2)
Vaccination status 0.252 (0.033–1.923) 0.262 0.508 (0.173–1.493) 0.305 0.475 (0.060–3.768) 0.752 0.724 (0.307–1.709) 0.592
Unvaccinated, partially vaccinated, unsure 48 (98.0) 1 (2.0) 45 (91.8) 4 (8.2) 48 (98.0) 1 (2.0) 42 (85.7) 7 (14.3)
Fully vaccinated 242 (92.4) 20 (7.6) 223 (85.1) 39 (14.9) 251 (95.8) 11 (4.2) 213 (81.3) 49 (18.7)
Education level 0.917 (0.115–7.297) 1.000 0.402 (0.052–3.121) 0.596 0.959 (0.937–0.982) 0.876 0.291 (0.038–2.249) 0.356
Less than university, college 15 (93.8) 1 (6.3) 15 (93.8) 1 (6.3) 16 (100.0) 0 15 (93.8) 1 (6.3)
University, college graduates 275 (93.2) 20 (6.8) 253 (85.8) 42 (14.2) 283 (95.9) 12 (4.1) 240 (81.4) 55 (18.6)

Values are presented as mean±standard deviation or number (%) or OR (95% CI), unless otherwise stated. Statistically significant results are marked in bold.

OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval.

Further results of the survey showed that approximately 18.0% of participants who experienced side effects have taken action (went to healthcare workers or bought drugs) while the rest have done nothing to take care of the side effects. Most participants (94.5%) continued to do a complete health protocol (keep distance, wear a mask, and hand hygiene) after getting vaccinated. Additionally, there were no participants diagnosed COVID-19 positive after being vaccinated.

Discussion

The core of this study is to determine factors associated with COVID-19 vaccine side effects among Indonesian people.

The result data obtained from this study indicated several factors regarding COVID-19 vaccine side effects such as gender, domicile, and marital status. The female gender was more likely to experience short-term side effects of the COVID-19 vaccine, such as puncture site reaction (19.0%) and other reactions (34.8%). Results also showed that Indonesian who lived outside Java Island were more likely to get puncture site reaction (20.0%) and immune reaction (32.0%) as their COVID-19 vaccine side effects after getting vaccinated. Additionally, married marital status was also associated with vagal reaction (12.1%) side effects.

In addition to factors affecting COVID-19 vaccine side effects, data results showed most participants experienced other reaction side effects (drowsiness, headache, polyphagia, numbness, and nausea) more commonly than others. In contrast, the vagal reaction was the least type of side effect of the COVID-19 vaccine that has been experienced by the participants in both the short- and long-term. Furthermore, the results showed short-term COVID-19 vaccine side effects were more common than long-term side effects.

Based on the data samples, many healthcare workers were still taking rapid and swab COVID-19 antigen test as their screening test after getting vaccinated; however, WHO still recommends polymerase chain reaction (PCR) as the gold standard test for SARS-CoV-2. This finding may explain the complementation and acceleration of overall testing capacity, although it is preferred to use PCR rather than rapid tests [12].

Adella Halim et al. [13] found that young people of Indonesia are aware of the COVID-19 pandemic yet have inadequate knowledge about preventive measures. However, the opposite was found in this study where it is shown that overall the participants continued to follow a complete health protocol despite after getting vaccinated (94.5%) where it is also consistently what the federal government requires [14]. These contrast findings may be due to the majority of healthcare workers as an occupation in the population sample. This finding was also supported by a study conducted by Rizki et al. [15] where it is stated that most Indonesian healthcare workers have a good understanding of preventing COVID-19 transmission.

The strength of this study is that it was conducted in early February 2021 when the initial phase of COVID-19 vaccination was administered on priority groups such as healthcare workers and government officers. Throughout the time, there were minimal studies discussing factors associated with COVID-19 vaccine side effects. However, we acknowledge several limitations in this study, such as potential selection bias caused by online surveys resulting in failure to round up extensive data on the various social level and populations in the rural area. Furthermore, the population in this study tends to be greater for the female sex, ≤24 years old age group, education of university or college graduates, domicile in Java Island, single marital status, healthcare workers as occupation, and complete previous vaccination status. Small population samples were also a lack of this study where it is not sufficient to represent the Indonesian population adequately. However, there are minimum studies discussing COVID-19 vaccine side effects especially in Indonesia; therefore, this study may benefit in monitoring and understanding further COVID-19 vaccine safety.

In conclusion, there were demographic factors associated with COVID-19 vaccine side effects such as gender, domicile, and marital status in the population of Indonesian people. Further research is needed to continue monitoring COVID-19 vaccine side effects to ensure its safety.

Footnotes

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

References


Articles from Clinical and Experimental Vaccine Research are provided here courtesy of Korean Vaccine Society

RESOURCES