Skip to main content
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology logoLink to Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
. 2022 Feb 3;10:800393. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2022.800393

Advances in cGAS-STING Signaling Pathway and Diseases

Yuting Yang 1, Yiming Huang 1, Zhenguo Zeng 1,*
PMCID: PMC8851069  PMID: 35186921

Abstract

Pathogens can produce conserved pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) after invading the body, which can be specifically recognized by host pattern recognition receptors (PRRs). In recent years, it has been found that cytoplasmic DNA receptors recognize exogenous DNA inducing activation of interferon 1 (IFN1), which is a rapid advance in various research areas. The cyclic GMP–AMP synthase (cGAS) stimulator of interferon gene (STING) signaling pathway is a critical natural immune pathway in cells. Early studies revealed that it plays a crucial regulatory role in pathogen infection and tumor, and it is associated with various human autoimmune diseases. Recently studies have found that activation of cGAS-STING signaling pathway is related to different organ injuries. The present review elaborates on the regulation of the cGAS-STING signaling pathway and its role in various diseases, aiming to provide a theoretical basis for immunotherapy targeting this pathway.

Keywords: cGAS-STING, regulation, innate immunity, inflammation, disease

Introduction

As the most vital human defense system, the immune system exerts strength in safeguarding the body against damage from three aspects—immune defense, immune surveillance, and immune homeostasis. It is generally divided into two branches: one is adaptive immunity, which plays a role by binding B cells or T cell with receptors in a slow but specific manner; and the other is innate immunity, which plays a crucial role in not only preventing pathogen infection as the first line but also activating the adaptive immune response. When the body encounters the stimulation of exogenous microbes or danger signals, pattern recognition receptors (PRRs) encoded by germlines recognize pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) and damage-associated molecular patterens (DAMPs), furthermore initiate the process of innate immunity. PRRs were traditionally divided into several categories: Cytosolic DNA sensors, Toll-like receptors (TLRs), NOD-like receptors (NLRs), C-type lectin receptors (CLRs), and RIG-I-like receptors (RLRs) (Pandey et al., 2014). The PAMPs (e.g., microbial nucleic acids, lipoproteins, surface glycoproteins, and membrane components) from pathogens bind to the domains of receptors and transmit the extracellular signal into the cytosol and endosome, resulting in the activation of intracellular signal and regulation of gene expression (Tang et al., 2012). These reactions will activate inflammatory and immune responses (Chen Q et al., 2016). In addition, various endogenous substances (e.g., high mobility group protein B1[HMGB1], S100 proteins, heat shock proteins, hyaluronic acid, ATP, mitochondrial DNA [mtDNA]) released by cells after injury can combine with PRRs and make synergistic effects with PAMP molecules, resulting in further tissue damage.

Over the past few decades, it has become a key factor for innate immunity in mammalian cells that senses microbial pathogens by recognizing their nucleic acids as foreigners, like single-stranded and double-stranded RNAs or DNAs, RNA–DNA hybrids, and cyclic dinucleotides (Janeway, 1989; Mankan et al., 2014; Chen Q et al., 2016; Tan et al., 2018). Even though there are three kinds of sensors identifying intracellular pathogen-derived nucleic acids: TLRs, cytosolic microbial RNA sensors, and cytosolic DNA sensors. The cyclic GMP-AMP synthase (cGAS) can efficiently interact with cytosolic DNA, leading to activating downstream factors (Tan et al., 2018). Most recently, the cGAS-STING signaling pathway has been extensively investigated in various pathological settings. The function of the cGAS-STING signaling on cancers has been reviewed in many literatures (Bose, 2017; Ng et al., 2018; Li A et al., 2019). In the present review, we mainly focus on reviewing the functional roles of the cGAS-STING pathway in diseases and different organ injuries. We also discuss how to activate cytoplasmic cGAS receptors and detail the numerous regulatory mechanisms that control this pathway.

cGAS-STING Signaling Pathway

cGAS

cGAS-STING signaling can sense and respond to foreign DNA and RNA in cytoplasm (Figure 1). cGAS is a STING-dependent cytoplasmic DNA receptor and a well-documented example of PRR, which recognizes and responds to pathogen DNA and RNA as well as self-DNA. Previous study supports that cGAS exists only in the cytoplasm, thus separated with self-DNA located in the nucleus and mitochondria, but now more evidence shows that cGAS also appears in the nucleus and is closely integrated with the nucleosome. Nuclei cGAS has high binding affinity with the nucleosome, which inhibits cGAS binding to double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) to maintain it in an inactive format (Gentili et al., 2019; Volkman et al., 2019; Zhao et al., 2020). Through electrostatic interaction, the positive-charged cGAS combined with the sugar phosphate skeleton on DNA to form hydrogen bonds (Civril et al., 2013). cGAS can sense the amino-terminal domain of dsDNA, but not the DNA sequence, which facilitates the synthesis of cyclic GMP-AMP (cGAMP) by GTP and ATP (Sun et al., 2013; Chen Q et al., 2016). Recently studies have reported that single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) forms a specific Y-type and activates cGAS with an unknown activation mechanism (Chen Q et al., 2016). A recent report demonstrated that mitochondrial transcription factor A (TFAM) and HMGB1/2 have abilities to adjust the structure of DNA in advance, benefiting from forming DNA U turns and enhancing the effective DNA binding with cGAS. TFAM is located in the mitochondria and can be liberated into the cytosol when mitochondrial stress occurs, which promotes cGAS to identify mtDNA. HMGB1 protein can move back and forth between the nucleus and the cytoplasm, promoting the identification of cytoplasmic DNA (Andreeva et al., 2017).

FIGURE 1.

FIGURE 1

The activation of cGAS-STING signaling pathway. Foreign DNA and RNA in cytoplasm could be sensed by cGAS, which sub-sequently facilitates the synthesis of cyclic GMP-AMP (cGAMP) by binding with GTP and ATP. The integration of cGAMP and STING induces STING activation. STING is then switched from the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) to perinuclear endosomes assisted by the Golgi apparatus. STING signaling can sense and response to foreign DNA and RNA in cytoplasm. The STIGN-TBK1 compound triggers innate immune response via phosphorylating IRF3 or NF-kB.

There is a highly conserved activation loop in cGAS. The activation loop can insert into the first big groove of B-DNA and the prominent outer loop then moves inward, leading to a conformational change and the formation of a new positive patch to allow the next DNA binding. The activation loop is constantly moved inward to rearrange the active sites to catalyze the formation of cGAMP. Although both dsRNA and A-DNA can bind cGAS, they cannot push the activation loop inward, which results in cGAS and subsequent reactions cannot be activated (Andreeva et al., 2017).

cGAS has a catalytic domain for ATP and GTP binding (Kuchta et al., 2009) and a unique “zinc-thumb” structure site for B-DNA binding (Pandey et al., 2014). cGAS binds with DNA in a homologous dimerization and forms a 2:2 complex that changes its conformation. Catalytic domain in cGAS binds with ATP and GTP and catalyzes the production of cGAMP (Cai et al., 2014). Although cGAS dimerization may occur without cytoplasmic DNA, its DNA binding capacities rely on the target DNA length. cGAS efficiently recognizes dsDNA with a length greater than or equal to 36 bp along with downstream STING activation (Kumar, 2019). As a unique endogenous synthesis method in mammals, cGAMP synthesized by cGAS is named as atypical cyclic dinucleotides (CDNs) owing to its two unique phosphodiester bonds, which can activate STING (Pandey et al., 2014).

STING

DNA binding induces conformational changes in cGAS with catalyzing cGAMP production. cGAMP, as a second messenger, recruits its downstream effector protein STING, a membrane-spanning protein. STING is composed of four transmembrane domains (TM1∼4) and cytoplasmic c-terminal domain (CTD) structure. Shang et al. show that a dimeric format can be formed through the interaction of the transmembrane and cytoplasmic regions of STING. Ligand-binding domain of STING can be closed in the presence of cGAMP, resulting in the structural changes of the ligand-binding domain. The conformational change will produce the STING tetramer (Shang et al., 2019), which induces STING activation. Subsequently, STING is switched from the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) to perinuclear endosomes assisted by the Golgi apparatus. A complex can be formed by STING and TANK-binding kinase 1 (TBK1). TBK1 has capacity to phosphorylate various transcription factors, such as nuclear factor κ-light-chain-enhancer of activated B cells (NF-kB) and interferon regulatory transcription factor 3 (IRF3). The transcription of innate immunity-related genes, like type I IFNs, can be initiated by the formation of STING-TBK1 complex (Ishikawa and Barber, 2008; Saitoh et al., 2009; Tanaka and Chen, 2012; Mukai et al., 2016). Therefore, activation of cGAS-STING signaling pathway induces upregulation of inflammatory genes and turns on the downstream signaling.

Regulation of cGAS-STING Signaling Pathway

Regulation of DNA Level

The main source of spontaneous DNA double strand rupture is derived from DNA replication in proliferating cells. Factors affecting the replication process may cause abnormal DNA damage response and cytoplasmic DNA accumulation. Kreienkamp et al. demonstrated that progesterone, a critical factor in progeria, participates in the replication stress process through generating replication fork disruption and nuclease-mediated degradation in the stalled forks. The process is the main sources of DNA damage in HGPS animal models and cells (Kreienkamp et al., 2018).

It is well known that BRCA2 tumor suppressor takes part in promoting DNA replication and DNA double-strand break repair. Recent studies have shown that BRCA2 mutation caused sustained DNA damage and abnormal chromosome separation by creating replication fork instability and nucleolysis degradation, thereby activating cGAS-dependent innate immune responses (Zimmer et al., 2016; Lai et al., 2017; Reisländer et al., 2019). Reisländer’s group has found that there are dual responses to BRCA2 depletion. The early acute response is composed of downregulation of genes, which are related to the cell cycle, DNA replication, and repair, along with cell cycle arrest in G1. However, the late chronic response is predominantly consisted of upregulation of interferon-stimulated genes (Reisländer et al., 2019).

TREXl, an Aicardi syndrome gene, mainly codes for mammalian 3 ′→5′ DNA nucleic acid exonuclease, whose function is to degrade or unchain DNA. It has been reported that TREX1 expression is required to prevent DNA accumulation in the dead cells, which might cause an autoimmune response (Tao et al., 2019). DNase2 is an endonuclease mainly located in the phagolysosomal compartment that degrades excess DNA in lysosomes. DNase2 and TREX1 (DNase3) target dsDNA and ssDNA for degradation in normal healthy cells, respectively, which prevents free DNA accumulation in cytosol (Stetson et al., 2008; Geijtenbeek, 2010; Lan et al., 2014). In the case of enzyme dysfunction or decline, or DNA specific resistance, abnormal DNA accumulates in the cytoplasm, resulting in excessive activation of the cGAS-STING pathway. It has been found that TFAM is a crucial protein to maintain mtDNA functional stability (Campbell et al., 2012). A recent study has found that the deletion of TFAM caused the abnormal mtDNA accumulation in the cytosol (West et al., 2015; Chung et al., 2019). Fat specificity of disulfide bond sample—a redox enzyme protein disulfide-bond-A oxidoreductase-like protein (DsbA-L)—was initially identified as a partner in the mitochondrial protein amyloid. Few studies have proved that DsbA-L is a key to maintain the integrity and stable mitochondria function. Lacking DsbA-L leads to mitochondrial dysfunction and mtDNA release, which activates cGAS-cGAMP-STING pathway and triggers inflammatory responses (Bai et al., 2017). Barrier-to-autointegration factor 1 (Banf1) has abilities to recognize exogenous DNA and inhibit chromosomal integration (Ma et al., 2020) or genome replication (Ibrahim et al., 2011). Ma et al. showed that Banf1 could modulate basal cell-intrinsic immunity using a CRISPR-Cas9 screening strategy. Mutation of Banf1 leads to a large amount of cytosolic accumulation of dsDNA, which induces IFN-stimulated gene expression through cGAS-STING-IRF3 signaling pathway activation (Ma et al., 2020). Collectively, abnormal levels of DNA in nuclei and cytoplasm will result in activation of cGAS-STING signaling under various pathological conditions.

Regulations of cGAS

Previous studies proved that cGAS is predominantly located in the cytoplasm. However, there is now new evidence showing that cGAS can also be in the nucleus and bind to chromatin under certain conditions. Yang et al. labeled cGAS with GFP in fibroblast cells (MEF) from cGAS mutant mice and tested cells in different growth densities by immunofluorescence. Surprisingly, they found that cGAS was associated with DNA and mainly existed in the nucleus in the rapidly dividing cells. In contrast, cGAS primarily existed in cytosol in the nondividing cells (Yang et al., 2017). Recent studies confirm that the endogenous inactivated cGAS is a nucleoprotein which closely connects with the nuclear membrane by a salt-resistant interaction no matter what cell cycle phase or activation states. NTase domain of cGAS and intact nuclear chromatin are essential to maintain tight nuclear tethering. This mechanism differs from the activated cGAS recognizing abnormal DNA within cytoplasm, restrained cGAS cannot play its catalytic activity (Volkman et al., 2019).

It is found that the regulation of cGAS is mainly through the post-translational modification in its enzyme activity and protein expression (Chen Q et al., 2016; Motwani et al., 2019). The types of post-translational modification include phosphorylation, acetylation, monoglutamylation, polyglutamylation, ubiquitination, and SUMOylation. For example, phosphorylation of the kinase Akt26 at Ser305 or Ser291 sites of cGAS and glutamylation of the enzymes TTLL4 at glu302 and TTLL6 at glu272 inhibit cGAS activity, while glutamylation of carboxypeptidases CCP5 and CCP6 activates cGAS. ER ubiquitin ligase ring finger protein 185 (RNF185) enhances cGAS’s catalytic ability (Wang et al., 2017). It is known that the tripartite motif-containing protein 38 (TRIM38), an E3 ubiquitin ligase, is able to inhibit innate immune and inflammatory responses induced by viral RNA, lipopolysaccharide (LPS), and tumor necrosis factor α (TNF-α) (Hu et al., 2014; Hu et al., 2015). In addition, Hu et al. reported that TRIM38 can catalyze SUMOylation of murine cGAS at K217 to enhance the stability of cGAS in the early stage of viral exposure to prevent cGAS degradation. TRIM38 induces K48-linked polyubiquitination of cGAS at K464 in the late stage of infection to promote the innate immune response. cGAS is desumoylated by SUMO-specific protease2 and subsequently degraded via proteasome. cGAS can be cleaved by inflammation and apoptotic caspases. cGAS activation is limited by gasdermin D (GASMD) (Hu et al., 2016). Thus, the activity of cGAS is regulated by many factors.

AIM2 inflammasome, a PRR that recognizes intracellular or cytoplasmic dsDNA, is induced by IFN and belongs to the hin-200 (ifi-200/hin-200) protein family. The AIM2 complex is composed of AIM2, apoptosis-associated speck protein, and caspase-1. Several studies have shown that AIM2 inflammasome inhibits endogenous cGAMP production by promoting caspase-1-dependent cell death (Corrales et al., 2016; Kumar, 2019).

Autophagy can transport cytoplasmic substrates into the lysosomes to form autophagosome, which is a double membrane-bound vesicle. The autophagy procedure often attends the protective immune response in homeostasis. Beclin1 (BECN1), an autophagy protein, inhibits cGAMP synthesis through interacting with cGAS, thereby halting the production of type 1 IFN when exposed to cytoplasmic dsDNA or HSV1 infection. The presence of BECN1 protein can increase autophagy-mediated cytoplasmic DNA degradation by inhibiting cGAS-STING signaling pathway (Ishikawa and Barber, 2008). Increasing autophagic activity through p62 upregulation causes cGAS degradation by K48-linked cGAS ubiquitination. TRIM14 expression, an interferon-activated gene, was increased during DNA virus infection. Deubiquitinating enzyme USP14, recruited by TRIM14, can degrade cGAS (Chen M et al., 2016).

G3BP1 participates in a formation of stress particles which are composed of a variety of proteins and mRNAs. G3BP1 has a nucleic acid helicase activity that can partly dissociate double-stranded DNA, double-stranded RNA, and DNA:RNA hybridization chain. In recent years, it has been identified that G3BP1 is a cGAS auxiliary protein. G3BP1 not only promotes the combination of cGAS and DNA, but also directly affects the enzyme activity of cGAS (Liu ZS et al., 2019). Mutation of G3BP1 blocks intracellular cGAS condensation and reduces cGAMP synthesis induced by DNA stimulation, which will inhibit interferon responses to intracellular DNA and viral infection (Liu ZS et al., 2019). Another protein having synergistic effect during cGAS sensing DNA is CCHC-type zinc-finger protein ZCCHC3. In vitro/vivo experiments have proved that ZCCHC3-deficiency negatively affects cGAS recognizing cytoplasmic abnormal DNA, thus impairing the subsequent inflammation. In addition to directly interacting with cGAS to modulate cGAS oligomerization, ZCCHC3 itself can also combine with a variety of dsDNA (B-DNA, Z-DNA, and virus-DNA) but not ssDNA to promote cGAS activation (Lian et al., 2018).

Regulations of cGAMP

cGAS, ATP, GTP, and DNA are indispensable in the process of cGAMP production catalyzed by cGAS (Civril et al., 2013; Sun et al., 2013; Kato et al., 2017). Two special phosphate bonds, the 2 ′,5′ phosphate bond and the 3 ′,5′ phosphate bond, are contained in the cGAMP. Both phosphate bonds are linked by the 3 ′,5′ phosphate bond (Ablasser et al., 2013). The 2 ′,5′cGAMP is a strong ligand of human STING, which produces a higher level of INF-β (Ablasser et al., 2013; Li et al., 2013).

Phosphodiesterase, such as ecto-nucleotide pyrophosphatase/phosphodiesterase family member 1 (ENPP1), inhibits bone mineralization. Phosphodiesterase can also hydrolyze extracellular ATP in mineralizing cells. It has been found that ENPP1 can hydrolyze the 2′,5′ phosphodiester bond and 3′,5′ phosphodiester bond of 2′,3′ cGAMP in turn to reduce the level of cGAMP (Li et al., 2014; Kato et al., 2018) and inhibit cGAS-STING activation.

Regulations of STING

STING, a nucleic acid receptor adaptation protein, acts on multiple intracellular signaling pathways. Except cGAS, other cytoplasmic receptors, such as DDX41 and IFI16, have abilities to sense DNA or CDNs and activate STING (Beutler et al., 2006; Parvatiyar et al., 2012).

Various post-translational modifications are important regulatory approaches to maintain the stability of the STING protein (Motwani et al., 2019; Lee et al., 2020). The phosphorylation and ubiquitination of STING are important for the regulation of its activity. TBK1 leads to phosphorylation of STING at Ser358 and 366, which activates STING (Zhong et al., 2008). STING can be targeted by the ER-associated E3 ubiquitin ligase RING finger protein, which is involved in K48-linked poly-ubiquitination at K150 and proteasome-mediated degradation of cGAS (Zhong et al., 2009). Other E3 ubiquitin ligases, such as TRIM29 and TRIM30α, promote STING degradation by poly-ubiquitination (Wang et al., 2015; Li et al., 2018). Both insulin-induced gene 1 protein and E3 ubiquitin ligase complex of AMFR can recruit TBK1, leading to polyubiquitination and degradation of STING (Wang et al., 2014). Dimerization of STING can be enhanced by ZDHHC1, an ER-associated palmitoyltransferase (Zhou et al., 2014). STING interacts with sterol regulatory element-binding protein cleavage-activating protein (SCAP), facilitating IRF3 recruitment. Additionally, K48-linked ubiquitin chains can be removed by the deubiquitinase enzyme CYLD to stabilize STING protein (Chen W et al., 2016). A recent study has found that SUMOylation of STING at K337 induced by TRIM38 can impede STING degradation. The modification facilitates STING activation and IRF3 recruitment (Hu et al., 2016).

During viral infection, nitro fatty acids can covalently modify STING through nitroalkylation and further inhibit STING palmitoylation (Hansen et al., 2018). Immediate-early 2 gene product (IE86) promotes STING degradation by using its amino acid position 136–289, which significantly reduced the STING-induced IFN-promoter activity (Zhong et al., 2009). Under the activation of cGAMP, STING is transported from ER to the position of the parietal/Golgi body and endoplasmic sites, and act as a scaffold protein to recruit TBK1 and IRF3. NLR family CARD-containing 3 (NLRC3) inflammatory protein inhibits STING signaling by directly binding its CARD domain with STING and TBK1. This interaction involves the C-terminal soluble tail and residues 81–111 of STING and the N terminus of TBK1, which have the kinase-domain (Zhang et al., 2014; Nascimento et al., 2019).

The Function of cGAS-STING Pathway on Diseases

The Function of cGAS-STING Pathway in Acute Injury

It is well known that neutrophils, the first line of defense against foreign pathogen invasion, play a vital role in the innate immune system (Silvestre-Roig et al., 2019). In addition to phagocytosis of pathogenic microorganisms, production and secretion of granular antibacterial molecules can also produce neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) under inflammatory conditions (Castanheira and Kubes, 2019). NETs is a network of fibers with nuclear or mtDNA as the skeleton, decorated with spherical protein domains of different sizes. Among them, the fibrous network structure is the main functional substance of NETs, including deconcentrated chromatin and histone, antimicrobial peptides, and cell-specific protease (Allam et al., 2014; Nascimento et al., 2019). NETs is a double-edged sword for the host. Although NETs can play a defensive role in the inflammatory state by capturing and killing microbes (Bruns et al., 2010; McDonald et al., 2012), excessive NETs can aggravate the acute (Tanaka et al., 2014; Jiménez-Alcázar et al., 2017) or chronic injury of the organization (Grabcanovic-Musija et al., 2015; Sollberger et al., 2018). In addition to various pathogens, sterile inflammation is not a neglectable source of NETs (Wong and Wagner, 2018; Sorvillo et al., 2019).

Early studies thought that the nucleic acid of NETs may come from the nucleus (Brinkmann et al., 2004). Researchers are more inclined to support that the release of nuclear DNA (nDNA) is a result of neutrophils necrosis, which did not participate in the composition of NETs. mtDNA is indeed involved in the process of NETs formation (Yousefi et al., 2009; Lood et al., 2016; Yousefi and Simon, 2016). Besides, mtDNA also plays a central role in the induction of NETs, especially in trauma and surgery settings (McIlroy et al., 2014; Itagaki et al., 2015). Lood et al. stimulated normal neutrophils with PMA or ribonucleoprotein-containing immune complexes (RNP ICs). They confirmed that the NETs were mainly composed of oxidized mitochondrial DNA. The induction of NETs was dependent on cGAS or STING (Lood et al., 2016). The phenomenon of mtDNA and oxidized mtDNA-inducd NETs formation was also discovered in tissue trauma and injury models established by Lui et al.

By intravenous injection of mitochondrial DNA into mice, the generation of NETs was weakened in the lungs of STING−/- mice and TLR9−/− mice. Extracellular regulated protein kinases (ERK)1/2 and p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) inhibitors could significantly reduce NETs-associated protein expression. Taken together, we conclude that mtDNA induces NET formation, which is mediated by the activation of STING, TLR9, the ERK1/2, and p38 MAPK during injury and trauma, subsequently inducing aseptic inflammation (Liu L et al., 2019) (Figure 2). The degradation of NETs relies on DNase I and macrophages (Farrera and Fadeel, 2013). Targeting inhibition of STING or TLR9 might alleviate the NETs-induced inflammation. Thus, the formation of the NETs is the key to cause tissue damage, indicating that adjusting the level of the NETs may be the target in the clinical treatment of tissue trauma.

FIGURE 2.

FIGURE 2

mtDNA released into cytoplasm in acute tissue injury induced by trauma and triggered the activation of cGAS-STING and TLR9-MyD88. Stress signaling was transferred into the nucleus through activated cGAS-STING and TLR9-MyD88 pathways, which mediate the activation of the p38 MAPK and ERK1/2 signaling and the formation of neutrophil extracellular trap.

In the ischemic stroke mice model, the NETs induced by activation of cGAS-STING and the subsequent type 1 interferon response contribute to tissue plasminogen activator (tPA)-associated hemorrhage, resulting in increased loss of cerebrovascular integrity and amplified blood–brain barrier damage. Ranran Wang et al. discovered that the treatment with DNase I or PAD4 deficiency could restore cerebrovascular complications of tPA from two patterns: directly reducing the level of the NETs or indirectly regulating NETs via reversed tPA-mediated upregulation of cGAS (Wang et al., 2021). Therefore, inhibition of NETs or cGAS will provide a new avenue to block tPA thrombolysis upon ischemic stroke pathological condition.

The Function of cGAS-STING Pathway in Pneumonopathy

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a severe chronic inflammatory disease. COPD causes lung functional loss with chronic lung inflammation, which leads to lung tissue destruction. This inflammation involves multiple innate and adaptive immune responses, like activation of epithelial cells and inflammatory cells (e.g., macrophages, neutrophils, lymphocytes, dendritic cells), release of varieties of inflammatory mediators (e.g., lipid, cytokines, NLRP3 inflammasomes), and oxidative stress which seems like a major driving factor (Barnes, 2016). The production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) under oxidative stress leads to activation of phosphoinositide 3-kinase, NF-kB (Kafoury and Kelley, 2005), and histone acetyltransferase activity (Tomita et al., 2003). ROS increases mitochondrial damage with overproduction of ROS in lungs (Wiegman et al., 2015). The vicious cycle causes numerous abnormal nuclear and mtDNA release to cytoplasm (Juan et al., 2021).

Smoking, as a main cause of COPD, also induces DNA damage and cell death with lung inflammation which mainly depends on ROS production (Loukides et al., 2011; Kirkham and Barnes, 2013; Barnes, 2016). Many signaling pathways refer to smoking-induced COPD, including Wingless/integrase-1 (WNT) signaling (Heijink et al., 2016), PINK (PTEN-induce putative kinase1)-PARK2 pathway (Ito et al., 2015), and NF-kB signaling (Yuan et al., 2018). Nascimento et al. discovered that cGAS-STING signaling also contributed to the mice COPD model under acute cigarette smoke (CS) exposure. dsDNA within broncho-alveolar space, caused by different mechanisms (damaged cells, defective repair of DNA damage, or ROS), promotes NETs formation and can be sensed by cGAS but not TLR9, inducing type I IFNs expression (Figure 3). By using genetic knockout mice, it was found that lung inflammation was alleviated in the absence of cGAS or STING, which means that the pathway might be a potential therapeutic target for controlling lung inflammation resulting from cigarette smoking (Nascimento et al., 2019).

FIGURE 3.

FIGURE 3

Stimulations from various sources induce pulmonary inflammation through the cGAS-STING pathway. Cigarette smoke mediates lung inflammation by the activation of cGAS-STING-IFN1 and the formation of NETs. With simulations of LPS, macrophage could release mtDNA, which was sensed by cGAS-STING and induced NLRP3-mediated pyroptosis as well as lung inflammation. Silica exposure to bronchus leads to different forms of STING-dependent cell death including apoptosis, necroptosis, and pyroptosis. The dsDNA from the dead cells triggers lung inflammation via STING-IRF3 signaling.

In CS-induced and adenovirus-associated COPD acute exacerbation (AECOPD) mice experiments, recombinant adenovirus vectors (rAdVs) could activate STING-IFN-β pathway by sensing DNA of Ads. However, the expression of STING was significantly reduced 12 weeks after CS exposure. The activation of STING-IFN-β pathway exerts the protective effects via promoting clearance of rAdVs DNA while STING deficiency leads to amplifying inflammation and aggravating alveolar destruction (Qin et al., 2019). Among bacterial infection-induced by AECOPD, the most common bacteria is nontypeable Hemophilus influenzae (NTHI) (Sethi and Murphy, 2008). Previous work has confirmed the effects of TLR4 (Pang et al., 2008) or NF-κB signaling pathway (Shuto et al., 2001) in NTHI infection. Lu, Zhang et al. established a mimic COPD murine model via intrabronchial infection of LPS for a period of 4 weeks. They discovered that NTHI DNA could upregulate STING expression, which triggers I-IFN responses in a TBK1-dependent manner. Additionally, the overproduction of STING-related cytokines largely depends on cGAS activation under NTHI and NTHI DNA stimulation (Lu et al., 2018). The diverse effects of STING in different periods of COPD deserve further investigation to explore the therapeutic application.

Silica exposure is known to cause lung inflammation and is an important cause of interstitial lung disease (ILD) (Leung et al., 2012). Through the analysis of pneumonectomy samples from ILD patients with lung transplantation, Benmerzoug et al. showed that dsDNA and CXCL levels were increased in the sputum of silicosis patients and ILD patients with cGAS-STING-IRF1 activation. Mice exposed to silica showed that release of nDNA and mtDNA result from different forms of cell death including apoptosis, pyroptosis, and necroptosis. Subsequently, this endogenous dsDNA was sensed by cGAS resulting in activated STING-mediated type I IFN response. It is worth observing that whether early or late phases of silica exposure, STING drives lung inflammation, whereas the sensing effect of cGAS was not prominent early after silica exposure. Silica exposure not only promotes the development of lung inflammation by cGAS-STING-IRF1, but also induces inflammatory cell death depending on cGAS/STING signaling (Figure 3). Interestingly, they also found that different DNA sensors activated STING in dendritic cells and macrophages. Dendritic cells rely on cGAS to activate STING, while macrophages rely on other DNA sensors (Benmerzoug et al., 2018).

In the clinic, thermal trauma is one of the common risk factors of severe lung dysfunction. Deep skin damage often is accompanied by extensive cell death, which releases pro-inflammatory DAMPs including mtDNA (Liu R et al., 2017; Liu R et al., 2019). Additionally, in mice subjected to burn injury, mtDNA damage appeared in the lungs at the earliest and had the most serious effect. The mitochondrial dysfunction induced by thermal injury was marked time-dependent (Szczesny et al., 2015). Comish and his colleagues demonstrated that plasma mtDNA was increased after thermal trauma in burn-induced acute lung injury (ALI) of rats. mtDNA in lung tissues was reduced 24–72 h following injury, which may be because of sustained mitochondrial DNA damage within the lung and oxidative cell damage (Comish et al., 2021). Given that TLR9 expression is downregulated after burns (Shen et al., 2012), they demonstrated that the cGAS-STING pathway activation is involved in burn-induced ALI. However, the pathological role of the pathway is still unclear.

The cGAS-STING pathway not only plays a role in non-bacterial inflammation but also has effects on LPS-induced ALI. Cytosolic LPS could induce mtDNA release into the cytosol in endothelial cells, which is mediated by mitochondrial pores with activating the pore forming protein GASDMD, resulting in impaired endothelial cell proliferation and aggravated inflammatory injury by downregulating cGAS-YAP1 signaling. The regenerative ability of endothelial cells was restored when cGAS was deficient in mice under acute inflammatory lung injury (Huang et al., 2020). mtDNA can be recognized by cGAS under LPS stimulation, enhancing STING phosphorylation in macrophages. This will subsequently trigger NLRP3-mediated pyroptosis (Figure 3). LPS could raise the macrophagic pyroptosis by means of heightening the transcriptional activation of STING via c-Myc (Ning et al., 2020). Therefore, the cGAS-STING pathway-mediated inflammation plays a crucial role in ALI.

The Function of cGAS-STING Pathway in Kidney Disease

It is well accepted that the kidney is an important organ for maintaining water, electrolyte and acid-base balance, which is mainly achieved by 99% of glomerular reabsorption. Therefore, mitochondria, which provides huge energy for this energy-consuming process, plays an important role in renal homeostasis (Ishimoto and Inagi, 2016). Ischemia-reperfusion injury, sepsis, and nephrotoxins can be observed in acute kidney injury (AKI). A total of 7–25% of AKI are derived from drug-induced adverse effects (Nash et al., 2002; Bentley et al., 2010) and are featured with excessive inflammation and tubular injury (Mulay et al., 2016).

It has been found that the use of cisplatin can cause dose-dependent renal toxicity in patients with malignant tumors. The induction of renal toxicity is closely related to mitochondrial damage and inflammation (Pabla and Dong, 2008; Miller et al., 2010). TLR9 can recognize mtDNA, contributing to AKI (Tsuji et al., 2016). Maekawa et al. conducted immunohistochemical analysis on kidney specimens of non-AKI patients and AKI patients, finding that STING and P65 were highly expressed in the kidney of AKI patients. It was observed that mtDNA leaking into the cytoplasm of renal tubule cells in the cisplatin-induced mouse AKI model. Cytoplasmic DNA was released from mitochondria through the macropore BCL-2-like protein 4(BAX) (McArthur et al., 2018; Maekawa et al., 2019). The BAK/BAX macropores have been confirmed to allow mtDNA to be exposed to the cytoplasm by making the herniated inner membrane an outlet (McArthur et al., 2018). Subsequently, the abnormal mtDNA in cytosol could be sensed by cGAS, resulting in STING-dependent inflammation and renal injury. However, only TBK1 and p65 phosphorylation were found in primary culture renal proximal tubular epithelial cells treated with cisplatin without IRF3 phosphorylation. These data indicate that cisplatin-induced renal inflammation may activate non-classical cGAS-STING signaling pathway in renal tubule cells (Figure 4). The tubular inflammation induced by cisplatin was significantly reduced under the circumstance of STING gene mutation or application of STING inhibitor C-176 (Maekawa et al., 2019), further indicating there is the pro-inflammatory effect of the cGAS-STING pathway in AKI.

FIGURE 4.

FIGURE 4

mtDNA leakage plays a key role in cisplatin-induced kidney inflammation. The damaged mitochondria can result in cGAS-STINF-NF-kB pathway activation in the renal tubules. The absence of TFAM leads to mitochondrial damage and the release of mtDNA, which mainly activates the cGAS-STING-NF-κB pathway to induce inflammatory response.

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is also a serious worldwide health problem, and atherosclerosis is a prominent mortality risk factor for patients with CKD (Jha et al., 2013). Vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMCs) are known to have vital effects in sustaining plaque stability of atherosclerosis. In the CKD mice model with polipoprotein E-deficient (ApoE−/−), it was observed that VSMCs could sense mitochondrial damage resulting from oxidative stress via the activation of the cGAS-STING pathway. The subsequently triggered IFN-I response facilitates plaque vulnerability on account of inducing VSMCs premature senescence and phenotypic switching. In contrast, pretreatment of hVSMCs with H-151(STING inhibitors) or ruxolitinib (JAK-STAT inhibitor) significantly alleviates IFN-I response, premature senescence, and phenotypic switching in VSMCs induced by CKD serum (Bi et al., 2021).

It has been known that depletion of TFAM can lead to severe mitochondrial defects, which is an important way to release mtDNA into the cytoplasm (West et al., 2015; Chung et al., 2019). Chung et al. demonstrated that TFAM was lost in renal tubular cells derived from patients with fibrosis and animal models. Their data indicate that the loss of TFAM directly activates the cGAS-STING pathway through mtDNA cytoplasmic ectopia, triggering subsequent inflammatory responses (Figure 4). In agreement with this finding, abnormal mtDNA in TFAM depletion model has been reported promoting cGAS-STING-dependent IRF3 activation, which is along with increased levels of antiviral innate immune responses (West et al., 2015). However, no significant IRF3 activation was observed in TFAM mutant mice, and the STING-dependent NF-kB inflammatory signaling seems to play a promoting role in TFAM-deficiency-induced kidney failure and fibrosis. The deficiency of STING dramatically ameliorates fibrosis in mouse CKD model induced by folic acid further suggest the deleterious role of hyper-active STING signaling (Chung et al., 2019).

Variants of the apolipoprotein L1 (APOL1) gene, G1 and G2 make African-Americans prone to lupus nephritis-associated end-stage renal disease (Genovese et al., 2010). Although there is an abundance of blood-circulating nucleosome-associated double-stranded DNA fragments (nsDNA) in lupus patients (Mortensen et al., 2008), TLR9 is activated in podocytes from patients with active lupus nephritis (Machida et al., 2010). Davis et al. discovered that APOL1 expression induced by nsDNA in normal kidney podocytes involves the activation of the STING-TBK1-IRF3 pathway through transfecting nsDNA into human immortalized AB8/13 podocytes and human urine-derived MMC111.3 podocytes. In addition, cGAS cooperating with IFI16 was confirmed to be the major sensing manner of cytosolic nsDNA that mediates APOL1 expression in AB8/13 podocytes. Interestingly, blocking of IFNβ-dependent (for instance, with JAK inhibitors) and independent (with STING inhibitors) pathways could suppress APOL1 expression (Davis et al., 2019). Collectively, these results reveal that activation of the cGAS‒STING pathway facilitates kidney injury, meaning that some drugs inhibiting the pathway may be potential new therapeutic directions for preventing the progression of AKI and CKD.

The Function of cGAS-STING Pathway in Liver Disease

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), the fifth most common cancer, is the third leading cause of cancer-related death (Feng and Ben-Josef, 2011; Jemal et al., 2011). Surgical resection is an important technique in the treatment of HCC, but not all patients can undergo surgery treatment. Radiation therapy (RT) has became an important support for treatment of these patients. But radiation therapy has serious and deadly complications, such as radiation-induced liver damage (RILD). RILD, a major factor limiting radiation dose, occurs in any period of radiation therapy including a late response months or years after RT (Kim and Jung, 2017). Therefore, RILD can be divided into “classic” and “non-classic” ones. Patients with classic RILD usually have some symptoms, like fatigue, abdominal pain, increased abdominal girth, hepatomegaly, and anicteric ascites 1 to 3 months after liver radiation therapy. Additionally, the level of alkaline phosphatase (ALP) increases by more than twofold that of normal levels. The normal levels can be found for transaminase and bilirubin (Kim and Jung, 2017). Non-classic RILD patients usually have chronic hepatic diseases, such as cirrhosis and viral hepatitis. These patients have dysregulated hepatic functions with remarkably elevated serum transaminases, but not ALP (Kim and Jung, 2017). Although the RILD has been studied for many years, the understanding of its exact mechanism remains elusive. Previous studies have found that TNF-α production plays a promoting role in the development of RILD (Malik et al., 2019). In addition to the inflammatory factor of damage, mitochondrial dysfunction and oxidative stress are also important factors in inducing RILD.

During radiation treatment on tumors, X rays and gamma rays can induce tumor cell DNA damage and mutation, leading to tumor cell death. DNA damage activates DNA sensors, triggering a subsequent inflammation. It was found that lower serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) were detected in cGAS−/− mouse and STING−/− mouse when compared to wild type mouse. Liver parenchyma cells under radiation release a large amount of dsDNA in the hepatic sinus. This extracellular DNA can then be identified by cGAS in non-parenchymal cells (NPCs) of the liver (Du et al., 2020). Although cGAS-STING activation increases type Ι IFNs through IRF3 and pro-inflammatory responses mediated by nuclear factor (NF)-κB (Barber, 2015), type 1 IFNs released by NPCs are the main cause of RILD in liver cells. It has been found that IFN1 has a promoting role in the development of RILD in the study of normal liver tissue adjacent to tumors of HCC patients who received RT (Figure 5) (Du et al., 2020).

FIGURE 5.

FIGURE 5

The diverse effects of cGAS doses on liver under different stimulations. The activation of cGAS-STING-IFN1 pathway induced by X rays/γ rays promotes development of RILD. Under the circumstance of ischemia-reperfusion, activated cGAS plays protective roles via regulating autophage in a STING-independent manner.

The autophagic process plays an important role during degradation of damaged intracellular organelles through lysosomes. Autophagic activation can protect cells against pathological condition-induced damage (Mizushima et al., 2002; Nakai et al., 2007). Under starvation and aging conditions, autophagy can maintain cellular homeostasis to minimize tissue damage (Levine and Kroemer, 2008; Mizushima et al., 2008). Although cGAS-STING-IRF3 inflammatory reaction pathway is involved in liver injury after radiation, oxidative stress has caused many mtDNA and nuclear DNA released into the cytoplasm, leading to activation of various DNA sensors upon liver ischemia-reperfusion injury. Further studies showed that cGAS plays a protective role in liver ischemia-reperfusion injury by hepatocytes autophagy, thus reducing the cellular apoptosis and death (Figure 5). It is worth noting that the beneficial effect made by cGAS in ischemia-reperfusion injury is STING-independent (Lei et al., 2018). The decrease of cGAMP synthesis via suppressing the NTase activity of cGAS leads to amelioration of the IFN response. Activation of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase class III induces autophagy, which facilitates the clearness of the cytosolic pathogen DNA (Liang et al., 2014). However, the concrete mechanism of cGAS regulating autophagy in ischemia-reperfusion injury is still unclear.

Viral hepatitis has long been a focus for its high morbidity and mortality. Infection of hepatitis B virus (HB-V) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) are the most common cause of death in patients with viral hepatitis. Recently, researchers found that naked relaxed-circular HBV DNA could be sensed by cGAS in hepatoma cell lines and primary human hepatocytes thereby exerting antiviral activity through activation of STING-TBK1. However, the impaired sensing during HBV infection means the occurrence of HBV evading (Verrier et al., 2018). In infected hepatocytes, the evading mechanism involves the ability of HBV to generate non-immunostimulatory RNAs or avoid sensing of its DNAs by cGAS/STING without active inhibition of the pathway (Lauterbach-Rivière et al., 2020).

The Function of cGAS-STING Pathway in Cardiovascular Disease

In spite of rapid progress in the field of cardiovascular research and treatment strategy, the morbidity and mortality rates of ischemic heart disease are still rising, which seriously threatens human health (Kaski et al., 2018). Prolonged ischemia leads to myocardial energy metabolic disorders, falling systolic function, and ventricular remodeling, causing myocardial damage and myocardial infarction (MI) (Topol and Yadav, 2000). The MI can release numbers of DAMPs, which subsequently activate inflammatory mediators along with PRRs (Schaefer, 2014). DNA, as an important DAMPs, could be sensed by cGAS and activates cGAS-STING-IRF7 pathway during MI of mouse and human heart failure. Although the activation of this inflammatory pathway does not affect expression of major inflammatory cytokines (such as interleukin 1β, TNFα, and interleukin 6), it can govern macrophage transformation (Cao et al., 2018). M2-subtype macrophage is named as a reparative macrophage for its character of producing fibronectin (Murray et al., 2014). Compared to WT mice, myocardial repair after infarction is markedly improved in cGAS-null mice (Cao et al., 2018).

Apart from ischemia, pressure overload is also a pathogenic factor of cardiomyocyte death and mitochondrial injury (Bugger et al., 2010). Like the myocardial ischemia, cGAS-STING pathway is activated during transverse aortic constriction mouse model. It has been reported that cGAS inhibition not only ameliorates pressure overload-induced cardiac apoptosis, but also alleviates early inflammatory cell infiltration and inflammatory cytokine expression. Under different risk factors, the disparate cGAS reactions to inflammatory medium are worth our further probe into its specific mechanism.

The inflammatory factors play a critical role in cerebrovascular and neurodegenerative diseases. Not only can it appear in the moment of ischemic stroke (De Meyer et al., 2016), but also it exists in long periods after ischemia (Fu et al., 2015). Li et al. used a middle cerebral artery occlusion model to show that the cGAS-STING pathway played a certain role during stroke (Li et al., 2020). They found that A151 was able to block activation of cytosolic nucleic acid-sensing cGAS and AIM2 inflammasome (Steinhagen et al., 2018), which significantly reduced neutrophils as well as other pro-inflammatory factors to protect against brain damage via prompting neurological functional recovery and decreasing cell death.

In the model of LPS-induced cardiac dysfunction in mice, STING-NLRP3 signaling was activated. STING deficiency alleviates cardiac dysfunction, inflammation, apoptosis, and pyroptosis. LPS plays some role in the NLRP3 exportation from the nucleus to the cytoplasm by inducing ROS generation in cardiomyocytes in a STING-independent manner (Li N et al., 2019). The importance of cGAS-STING signaling has been proven that the cGAS inhibitor RU.521 accelerated the recovery of sepsis-induced cardiac dysfunction via intraperitoneal LPS (Xu et al., 2020).

The Function of cGAS-STING Pathway in Cellular Senescence

Senescent cells are in a status of cell cycle arrest, which prevents proliferation of damaged cells along with reducing the risk of cancer. During cancer therapy, therapeutic-induced cellular senescence might be one of the main tumor suppression mechanisms (Campisi, 2013). Existing DNA damage and senescence related secretion phenotype (SASP) are key features of senescent cells. SASP is composed of various inflammatory mediators, including diversified cytokines, chemokines, extracellular matrix proteins, and growth factors (Coppé et al., 2010; Tchkonia et al., 2013). Interleukin 6 (IL6) and IL8, two key components of SASP, enhance senescent growth arrest in adjacent cells (Acosta et al., 2008; Kuilman et al., 2008).

Although there are many stresses that induce senescence, various stress-induced DNA damage plays a major role in the induction and maintenance of senescence (Salama et al., 2014). It has been reported that the integrity of the nuclear membrane is damaged and chromatin fragments are divided into cytoplasm to become cytoplasmic chromatin fragments (CCF) due to Lamin B1 degradation in aged cells (Ivanov et al., 2013; Dou et al., 2017). Lamin B1 degradation and the emergence of CCF are vital characteristics of senescent cells (Freund et al., 2012; Ivanov et al., 2013). There is Lamin B1 degradation in senescent cells. Decreased levels of Lamin B1 results in the leakage of chromatin into the cytoplasm. Interestingly, cells with downregulation of laminin B1 have increased interferon-stimulated gene responses, which depend on cGAS sensing CCF (Figure 6). Activation of cGAS is needed to produce SASP in senescent cells (Dou et al., 2017; Glück et al., 2017; Yang et al., 2017). The absence of cGAS affects senescence induction, leading to the subsequent oncogene-activated cell clearance by immune cells (Glück et al., 2017). Existing studies have proven that DNA damage response causes abnormal accumulation of cytoplasmic DNA from the nucleus and induces abnormal activation of the cGAS-STING-IRF3 pathway along with the release of SASP (Gao et al., 2015; Gray et al., 2015; Takahashi et al., 2018). Previous studies have demonstrated the role of IFN1 in promoting aging, but the current study emphasizes the role of SASP in promoting aging in vivo. Therefore, it may be the combined action of several mediators that promote cGAS-dependent aging (Glück et al., 2017).

FIGURE 6.

FIGURE 6

cGAS-STING signaling pathway and senescence. In senescent cells, degraded LaminB1 leads to nuclear membrane damage and chromatin fragments leaking into cytoplasm, which induces the release of SASP by activation of cGAS-STING-IFN pathway. TREX1 and Dnase2 enzymes are down-regulated in senescent cells, contributing to the accumulation of nuclear DNA in cytosol.

By culturing primary cells and induction of cellular senescence, Takahashi et al. showed that the expression of DNase2 and TREX1 were significantly decreased in senescence cells. They further demonstrated that the expression of both nucleases in senescence cells was downregulated at the mRNA levels. In pre-senescent cells, the decreased transcriptional activity of E2F results in accumulation of nuclear DNA in cytosol (Takahashi et al., 2018) (Figure 6).

The level of the long-interspersed element-1 (LINE-1), a retro-transposable element, was significantly increased in senescent cells (De Cecco et al., 2019). LINE-1 can transcribe mRNA to cDNA in the cytoplasm (Beck et al., 2010). Therefore, upregulation of LINE-1 in senescent cells promotes cDNA accumulation in cytosol, leading to cGAS-STING signaling activation with overproduction of SASP factors (Loo et al., 2020).

It has been reported that senescent cells secrete extracellular vesicles (like exosome) except inflammatory proteins (Takahashi et al., 2017; Takasugi et al., 2017). cGAMP can be derived from tumor cells via anti-folate transporter 1 (SLC19A1), which can activate the cGAS-STING pathway in cells (Luteijn et al., 2019; Ritchie et al., 2019). Secreting cGAMP via SLC19A1, a reverse transporter, helps cells to ingest folic acid by excreting organic phosphoric acid. This might be a new way for senescent cells to promote the paracrine immune response.

Conclusion

Overall, the current literatures have demonstrated that cGAS-cGAMP-STING pathway play a critical role in different diseases relating to inflammation. In view of the different effects of the signaling contributing to diseases under various conditions, exacerbation or amelioration are possible. The identification of further mechanisms involved in cGAS-cGAMP-STING pathway will supply critical information on how to provide an attractive targeting therapy. Recent years have witnessed the rapid advances in the development inhibitors or agonists targeting cGAS‒STING‒TBK1. Although most drugs are used in the treatment of tumors, they can be used as reference for our treatment of other inflammatory diseases. 2′,3′ -cGAMP, as a natural CDN, conducts its anti-tumor effect via notably boosting the expression of STING and IRF3 (Li et al., 2016). Some synthetic CDNs, like ADU-S100 (ML RR-S2 CDA) (Corrales et al., 2015), a series of cAIMP analogues, (Lioux et al., 2016), are reported to dramatically activate the STING-dependent type I IFNs signaling pathways. Besides, there are other small molecule agonists specific to STING which could induce the expression of type I IFNs, including dispiro diketopiperazine (Liu B et al., 2017), benzo[b][1,4]thiazine-6-carboxamide 1 (G10), a-mangostin (Zhang et al., 2018), benzamide and its analogues (Zhang et al., 2019), dimeric amidobenzimidazoles (Ramanjulu et al., 2018), and benzothiophene derivatives. Despite pharmaceutical companies have developed numerous modulators targeting for cGAS-STING, very few drugs were qualified for clinic treatment owing to some unsolved problems involving drug-related, disease-related, and host-related obstacles (Vanpouille-Box et al., 2019).

Interaction between signaling pathways may offer some new strategies for targeted therapy. Autophagy, as an evolutionarily conserved process, is necessary to maintain cellular homeostasis for all eukaryotic cells. ABT-737, an anti-apoptotic Bcl-2 family inhibitor, can inhibit type I IFN secretion (Lindqvist et al., 2018). In vivo and in vitro experimental data showed that mammary carcinoma cells were sensitive to irradiation in case of autophagy pathway inhibition. Depletion of autophagic protein accelerates secretion of type I IFN, it can be inhibited by cGAS or STING mutation (Yamazaki et al., 2020).

Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP), the major isoform of a family of ADP-ribosylating enzymes, has been indicated in regulating a variety of biological processes including DNA repair, gene transcription, and cell death (Sachdev et al., 2019; Eisemann and Pascal, 2020). The PARP inhibitors (e.g., Olaparib and talazoparib) are known to have promising therapeutic efficacy in BRCA-associated breast cancers (Robson et al., 2017; Litton et al., 2018). Besides, the beneficial pharmacological effects of PARP inhibitors were observed on inflammatory diseases, such as liver inflammation and fibrosis (Mukhopadhyay et al., 2014), asthma (Zaffini et al., 2018), and acute and chronic mice lung injury (Szabo et al., 2020). Recently, Pantelidou et al. revealed that interaction of PARP inhibition and STING/TBK1/IRF3 pathway activation regulates T cell recruitment and anti-tumor efficacy in cancer cells (Pantelidou et al., 2019). This achievement provides a new therapeutic pattern of targeting the cGAS-STING pathway.

Although cGAS (Bode et al., 2016) and TLR9 (Gilliet et al., 2008) mediated IFN production via sensing nucleic acids in plasmacytoid dendritic cells, they did not create synergies. Pre-stimulation of cGAS–STING in plasmacytoid dendritic cells promotes expression of SOCS1 and SOCS3, which subsequently hinders TLR9-mediated IFN production (Deb et al., 2020). This may be the protective mechanism that the body uses to prevent interferon over-expression induced autoimmune disorders.

Researchers have elaborated that Akt and AMPK play critical roles in pathological changes in the heart of obesity patients (Xu et al., 2013; Slámová et al., 2016). In Akt2-AMPK double knockout mice, inhibition of cGAS and STING could notably attenuate high fat diet induced cardiac anomalies. These results shed light on the role of Akt2-AMPK correlating with cGAS-STING signaling on autophagy/mitophagy, mitochondrial integrity, and cardiac homeostasis (Gong et al., 2020).

cGAS-cGAMP-STING mediated interferon1 signaling pathway is an important discovery in the field of natural immunity. In different tissues and organs, innate immunity plays a crucial role as the first line of defense. The study of the signal pathway will help deepen the recognition of interferon1 activation mechanisms induced by DNA virus infection, providing the theoretical foundation of drug design for autoimmune diseases and immune mediated organ damage.

Acknowledgments

We gratefully acknowledge Lijian Shao (Nanchang University, China) who provided helpful suggestions on the section of the function of cGAS-STING pathway on diseases.

Author Contributions

YY and YH contributed to the paper writing. YY designed the figures. ZZ wrote and edited the review. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.

Funding

The study was partially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 81460015, 81760351).

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s Note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors, and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Glossary

PAMPs

pathogen-associated molecular patterns

PRRs

pattern recognition receptors

IFN

interferon

cGAS

cyclic GMP–AMP synthase

STING

stimulator of interferon genes

DAMPs

damage-related pattern molecules

TLRs

Toll-like receptors

NLRs

NOD-like receptors

CLRs

C-type lectin receptors

RLRs

RIG-I-like receptors

HMGB

high mobility group protein

mtDNA

mitochondria DNA

dsDNA

double stranded DNA

cGAMP

cyclic GMP-AMP

ssDNA

single-stranded DNA

TFAM

mitochondrial transcription factor A

CDNs

Cyclic dinucleotides

CTD

C-terminal domain

ER

endoplasmic reticulum

TBK1

TANK-binding kinase 1

NF-κB

nuclear factor κ-light-chain-enhancer of activated B cells

IRF3

interferon regulatory transcription factor 3

DsbA -L

disulfide-bond-A oxidoreductase-like protein

Banf1

Barrier-to-autointegration factor 1

MEF

mice fibroblast cells

TRIM

tripartite motif-containing protein

RNF

ring finger protein

LPS

lipopolysaccharide

TNFα

tumor necrosis factor α

GASMD

gasdermin D

BECN1

Beclin1

ENPP1

ecto-nucleotide pyrophosphatase/phosphodiesterase family member 1

SCAP

sterol regulatory element-binding protein cleavage-activating protein

NLRC3

NLR family CARD-containing 3

NETs

neutrophil extracellular traps

nDNA

nuclear DNA

ERK

extracellular regulated protein kinases

MAPK

mitogen-activated protein kinase

TPA

tissue plasminogen activator

COPD

chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

ROS

reactive oxygen species

WNT

wingless/integrase-1

PINK

PTEN-induce putative kinase

CS

cigarette smoke

AECOPD

adenovirus-associated COPD acute exacerbation

rAdVs

recombinant adenovirus vectors

NTHI

nontypeable Hemophilus influenzae

ILD

interstitial lung disease

ALI

acute lung injury

AKI

acute kidney injury

BAX

BCL-2-like protein 4

CKD

chronic kidney disease

VSMCs

vascular smooth muscle cells

APOL1

apolipoprotein L1

nsDNA

nucleosome-associated double-stranded DNA fragments

HCC

hepatocellular carcinoma

RT

radiation therapy

RILD

radiation-induced liver damage

ALP

alkaline phosphatase

ALT

alanine aminotransferase

AST

aspartate aminotransferase

NPCs

non-parenchymal cells

HBV

hepatitis B virus

HCV

hepatitis C virus

MI

myocardial infarction

IL

interleukin

SASP

senescence related secretion phenotype

CCF

cytoplasmic chromatin fragments

LINE-1

long-interspersed element-1

SLC19A1

anti-folate transporter 1

PARP

poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase.

References

  1. Ablasser A., Goldeck M., Cavlar T., Deimling T., Witte G., Röhl I., et al. (2013). cGAS Produces a 2′-5′-linked Cyclic Dinucleotide Second Messenger that Activates STING. Nature 498 (7454), 380–384. 10.1038/nature12306 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Acosta J. C., O'Loghlen A., Banito A., Guijarro M. V., Augert A., Raguz S., et al. (2008). Chemokine Signaling via the CXCR2 Receptor Reinforces Senescence. Cell 133 (6), 1006–1018. 10.1016/j.cell.2008.03.038 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Allam R., Kumar S. V. R., Darisipudi M. N., Anders H.-J. (2014). Extracellular Histones in Tissue Injury and Inflammation. J. Mol. Med. 92 (5), 465–472. 10.1007/s00109-014-1148-z [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Andreeva L., Hiller B., Kostrewa D., Lässig C., de Oliveira Mann C. C., Jan Drexler D., et al. (2017). cGAS Senses Long and HMGB/TFAM-bound U-Turn DNA by Forming Protein-DNA Ladders. Nature 549 (7672), 394–398. 10.1038/nature23890 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bai J., Cervantes C., Liu J., He S., Zhou H., Zhang B., et al. (2017). DsbA-L Prevents Obesity-Induced Inflammation and Insulin Resistance by Suppressing the mtDNA Release-Activated cGAS-cGAMP-STING Pathway. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 114 (46), 12196–12201. 10.1073/pnas.1708744114 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Barber G. N. (2015). STING: Infection, Inflammation and Cancer. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 15 (12), 760–770. 10.1038/nri3921 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Barnes P. J. (2016). Inflammatory Mechanisms in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 138 (1), 16–27. 10.1016/j.jaci.2016.05.011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Beck C. R., Collier P., Macfarlane C., Malig M., Kidd J. M., Eichler E. E., et al. (2010). LINE-1 Retrotransposition Activity in Human Genomes. Cell 141 (7), 1159–1170. 10.1016/j.cell.2010.05.021 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Benmerzoug S., Rose S., Bounab B., Gosset D., Duneau L., Chenuet P., et al. (2018). STING-dependent Sensing of Self-DNA Drives Silica-Induced Lung Inflammation. Nat. Commun. 9 (1), 5226. 10.1038/s41467-018-07425-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Bentley M. L., Corwin H. L., Dasta J. (2010). Drug-induced Acute Kidney Injury in the Critically Ill Adult: Recognition and Prevention Strategies. Crit. Care Med. 38 (6 Suppl. l), S169–S174. 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181de0c60 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Beutler B., Jiang Z., Georgel P., Crozat K., Croker B., Rutschmann S., et al. (2006). Genetic Analysis of Host Resistance: Toll-like Receptor Signaling and Immunity at Large. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 24, 353–389. 10.1146/annurev.immunol.24.021605.090552 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Bi X., Du C., Wang X., Wang X. Y., Han W., Wang Y., et al. (2021). Mitochondrial Damage‐Induced Innate Immune Activation in Vascular Smooth Muscle Cells Promotes Chronic Kidney Disease‐Associated Plaque Vulnerability. Adv. Sci. 8 (5), 2002738. 10.1002/advs.202002738 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Bode C., Fox M., Tewary P., Steinhagen A., Ellerkmann R. K., Klinman D., et al. (2016). Human Plasmacytoid Dendritic Cells Elicit a Type I Interferon Response by Sensing DNA via the cGAS-STING Signaling Pathway. Eur. J. Immunol. 46 (7), 1615–1621. 10.1002/eji.201546113 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Bose D. (2017). cGAS/STING Pathway in Cancer: Jekyll and Hyde Story of Cancer Immune Response. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 18 (11), 2456. 10.3390/ijms18112456 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Brinkmann V., Reichard U., Goosmann C., Fauler B., Uhlemann Y., Weiss D. S., et al. (2004). Neutrophil Extracellular Traps Kill Bacteria. Science 303 (5663), 1532–1535. 10.1126/science.1092385 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Bruns S., Kniemeyer O., Hasenberg M., Aimanianda V., Nietzsche S., Thywissen A., et al. (2010). Production of Extracellular Traps against Aspergillus fumigatus In Vitro and in Infected Lung Tissue Is Dependent on Invading Neutrophils and Influenced by Hydrophobin RodA. Plos Pathog. 6 (4), e1000873. 10.1371/journal.ppat.1000873 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Bugger H., Schwarzer M., Chen D., Schrepper A., Amorim P. A., Schoepe M., et al. (2010). Proteomic Remodelling of Mitochondrial Oxidative Pathways in Pressure Overload-Induced Heart Failure. Cardiovasc. Res. 85 (2), 376–384. 10.1093/cvr/cvp344 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Cai X., Chiu Y.-H., Chen Z. J. (2014). The cGAS-cGAMP-STING Pathway of Cytosolic DNA Sensing and Signaling. Mol. Cel 54 (2), 289–296. 10.1016/j.molcel.2014.03.040 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Campbell C. T., Kolesar J. E., Kaufman B. A. (2012). Mitochondrial Transcription Factor A Regulates Mitochondrial Transcription Initiation, DNA Packaging, and Genome Copy Number. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Gene Regul. Mech. 1819 (9-10), 921–929. 10.1016/j.bbagrm.2012.03.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Campisi J. (2013). Aging, Cellular Senescence, and Cancer. Annu. Rev. Physiol. 75, 685–705. 10.1146/annurev-physiol-030212-183653 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Cao D. J., Schiattarella G. G., Villalobos E., Jiang N., May H. I., Li T., et al. (2018). Cytosolic DNA Sensing Promotes Macrophage Transformation and Governs Myocardial Ischemic Injury. Circulation 137 (24), 2613–2634. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.031046 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Castanheira F. V. S., Kubes P. (2019). Neutrophils and NETs in Modulating Acute and Chronic Inflammation. Blood 133 (20), 2178–2185. 10.1182/blood-2018-11-844530 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Chen M M., Meng Q., Qin Y., Liang P., Tan P., He L., et al. (2016). TRIM14 Inhibits cGAS Degradation Mediated by Selective Autophagy Receptor P62 to Promote Innate Immune Responses. Mol. Cel 64 (1), 105–119. 10.1016/j.molcel.2016.08.025 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Chen Q Q., Sun L., Chen Z. J. (2016). Regulation and Function of the cGAS-STING Pathway of Cytosolic DNA Sensing. Nat. Immunol. 17 (10), 1142–1149. 10.1038/ni.3558 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Chen W W., Li S., Yu H., Liu X., Huang L., Wang Q., et al. (2016). ER Adaptor SCAP Translocates and Recruits IRF3 to Perinuclear Microsome Induced by Cytosolic Microbial DNAs. Plos Pathog. 12 (2), e1005462. 10.1371/journal.ppat.1005462 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Chung K. W., Dhillon P., Huang S., Sheng X., Shrestha R., Qiu C., et al. (2019). Mitochondrial Damage and Activation of the STING Pathway Lead to Renal Inflammation and Fibrosis. Cel Metab. 30 (4), 784–799. 10.1016/j.cmet.2019.08.003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Civril F., Deimling T., de Oliveira Mann C. C., Ablasser A., Moldt M., Witte G., et al. (2013). Structural Mechanism of Cytosolic DNA Sensing by cGAS. Nature 498 (7454), 332–337. 10.1038/nature12305 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Comish P. B., Liu M.-M., Huebinger R., Carlson D., Kang R., Tang D. (2021). The cGAS-STING Pathway Connects Mitochondrial Damage to Inflammation in Burn-Induced Acute Lung Injury in Rat. Burns 48 (1), 168–175. 10.1016/j.burns.2021.04.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Coppé J.-P., Desprez P.-Y., Krtolica A., Campisi J. (2010). The Senescence-Associated Secretory Phenotype: the Dark Side of Tumor Suppression. Annu. Rev. Pathol. Mech. Dis. 5, 99–118. 10.1146/annurev-pathol-121808-102144 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Corrales L., Glickman L. H., McWhirter S. M., Kanne D. B., Sivick K. E., Katibah G. E., et al. (2015). Direct Activation of STING in the Tumor Microenvironment Leads to Potent and Systemic Tumor Regression and Immunity. Cel Rep. 11 (7), 1018–1030. 10.1016/j.celrep.2015.04.031 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Corrales L., Woo S.-R., Williams J. B., McWhirter S. M., Dubensky T. W., Jr., Gajewski T. F. (2016). Antagonism of the STING Pathway via Activation of the AIM2 Inflammasome by Intracellular DNA. J. Immunol. 196 (7), 3191–3198. 10.4049/jimmunol.1502538 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Davis S. E., Khatua A. K., Popik W. (2019). Nucleosomal dsDNA Stimulates APOL1 Expression in Human Cultured Podocytes by Activating the cGAS/IFI16-STING Signaling Pathway. Sci. Rep. 9 (1), 15485. 10.1038/s41598-019-51998-w [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. De Cecco M., Ito T., Petrashen A. P., Elias A. E., Skvir N. J., Criscione S. W., et al. (2019). L1 Drives IFN in Senescent Cells and Promotes Age-Associated Inflammation. Nature 566 (7742), 73–78. 10.1038/s41586-018-0784-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. De Meyer S. F., Denorme F., Langhauser F., Geuss E., Fluri F., Kleinschnitz C. (2016). Thromboinflammation in Stroke Brain Damage. Stroke 47 (4), 1165–1172. 10.1161/strokeaha.115.011238 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Deb P., Dai J., Singh S., Kalyoussef E., Fitzgerald-Bocarsly P. (2020). Triggering of the cGAS-STING Pathway in Human Plasmacytoid Dendritic Cells Inhibits TLR9-Mediated IFN Production. J. Immunol. 205 (1), 223–236. 10.4049/jimmunol.1800933 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Dou Z., Ghosh K., Vizioli M. G., Zhu J., Sen P., Wangensteen K. J., et al. (2017). Cytoplasmic Chromatin Triggers Inflammation in Senescence and Cancer. Nature 550 (7676), 402–406. 10.1038/nature24050 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Du S., Chen G., Yuan B., Hu Y., Yang P., Chen Y., et al. (2020). DNA Sensing and Associated Type 1 Interferon Signaling Contributes to Progression of Radiation-Induced Liver Injury. Cell Mol. Immunol. 18, 1718–1728. 10.1038/s41423-020-0395-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Eisemann T., Pascal J. M. (2020). Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Enzymes and the Maintenance of Genome Integrity. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 77 (1), 19–33. 10.1007/s00018-019-03366-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Farrera C., Fadeel B. (2013). Macrophage Clearance of Neutrophil Extracellular Traps Is a Silent Process. J. Immunol. 191 (5), 2647–2656. 10.4049/jimmunol.1300436 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Feng M., Ben-Josef E. (2011). Radiation Therapy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Semin. Radiat. Oncol. 21 (4), 271–277. 10.1016/j.semradonc.2011.05.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Freund A., Laberge R.-M., Demaria M., Campisi J. (2012). Lamin B1 Loss Is a Senescence-Associated Biomarker. MBoC 23 (11), 2066–2075. 10.1091/mbc.E11-10-0884 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Fu Y., Liu Q., Anrather J., Shi F.-D. (2015). Immune Interventions in Stroke. Nat. Rev. Neurol. 11 (9), 524–535. 10.1038/nrneurol.2015.144 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Gao D., Li T., Li X.-D., Chen X., Li Q.-Z., Wight-Carter M., et al. (2015). Activation of Cyclic GMP-AMP Synthase by Self-DNA Causes Autoimmune Diseases. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 112 (42), E5699–E5705. 10.1073/pnas.1516465112 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Geijtenbeek T. B. H. (2010). Host DNase TREX1 Hides HIV from DNA Sensors. Nat. Immunol. 11 (11), 979–980. 10.1038/ni1110-979 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Genovese G., Friedman D. J., Ross M. D., Lecordier L., Uzureau P., Freedman B. I., et al. (2010). Association of Trypanolytic ApoL1 Variants with Kidney Disease in African Americans. Science 329 (5993), 841–845. 10.1126/science.1193032 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Gentili M., Lahaye X., Nadalin F., Nader G. P. F., Puig Lombardi E., Herve S., et al. (2019). The N-Terminal Domain of cGAS Determines Preferential Association with Centromeric DNA and Innate Immune Activation in the Nucleus. Cel Rep. 26 (9), 2377–2393. 10.1016/j.celrep.2019.01.105 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Gilliet M., Cao W., Liu Y.-J. (2008). Plasmacytoid Dendritic Cells: Sensing Nucleic Acids in Viral Infection and Autoimmune Diseases. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 8 (8), 594–606. 10.1038/nri2358 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Glück S., Guey B., Gulen M. F., Wolter K., Kang T.-W., Schmacke N. A., et al. (2017). Innate Immune Sensing of Cytosolic Chromatin Fragments through cGAS Promotes Senescence. Nat. Cel Biol. 19 (9), 1061–1070. 10.1038/ncb3586 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Gong Y., Li G., Tao J., Wu N. N., Kandadi M. R., Bi Y., et al. (2020). Double Knockout of Akt2 and AMPK Accentuates High Fat Diet-Induced Cardiac Anomalies through a cGAS-STING-Mediated Mechanism. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Mol. Basis Dis. 1866 (10), 165855. 10.1016/j.bbadis.2020.165855 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Grabcanovic-Musija F., Obermayer A., Stoiber W., Krautgartner W.-D., Steinbacher P., Winterberg N., et al. (2015). Neutrophil Extracellular Trap (NET) Formation Characterises Stable and Exacerbated COPD and Correlates with Airflow Limitation. Respir. Res. 16 (1), 59. 10.1186/s12931-015-0221-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Gray E. E., Treuting P. M., Woodward J. J., Stetson D. B. (2015). Cutting Edge: cGAS Is Required for Lethal Autoimmune Disease in the Trex1-Deficient Mouse Model of Aicardi-Goutières Syndrome. J. Immunol. 195 (5), 1939–1943. 10.4049/jimmunol.1500969 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Hansen A. L., Buchan G. J., Rühl M., Mukai K., Salvatore S. R., Ogawa E., et al. (2018). Nitro-fatty Acids Are Formed in Response to Virus Infection and Are Potent Inhibitors of STING Palmitoylation and Signaling. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 115 (33), E7768–E7775. 10.1073/pnas.1806239115 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Heijink I. H., de Bruin H. G., Dennebos R., Jonker M. R., Noordhoek J. A., Brandsma C.-A., et al. (2016). Cigarette Smoke-Induced Epithelial Expression of WNT-5B: Implications for COPD. Eur. Respir. J. 48 (2), 504–515. 10.1183/13993003.01541-2015 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Hu M.-M., Yang Q., Zhang J., Liu S.-M., Zhang Y., Lin H., et al. (2014). TRIM38 Inhibits TNF - and IL-1 -triggered NF- B Activation by Mediating Lysosome-dependent Degradation of TAB2/3. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 111 (4), 1509–1514. 10.1073/pnas.1318227111 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Hu M.-M., Xie X.-Q., Yang Q., Liao C.-Y., Ye W., Lin H., et al. (2015). TRIM38 Negatively Regulates TLR3/4-Mediated Innate Immune and Inflammatory Responses by Two Sequential and Distinct Mechanisms. J. Immunol. 195 (9), 4415–4425. 10.4049/jimmunol.1500859 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Hu M.-M., Yang Q., Xie X.-Q., Liao C.-Y., Lin H., Liu T.-T., et al. (2016). Sumoylation Promotes the Stability of the DNA Sensor cGAS and the Adaptor STING to Regulate the Kinetics of Response to DNA Virus. Immunity 45 (3), 555–569. 10.1016/j.immuni.2016.08.014 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Huang L. S., Hong Z., Wu W., Xiong S., Zhong M., Gao X., et al. (2020). mtDNA Activates cGAS Signaling and Suppresses the YAP-Mediated Endothelial Cell Proliferation Program to Promote Inflammatory Injury. Immunity 52 (3), 475–486. 10.1016/j.immuni.2020.02.002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Ibrahim N., Wicklund A., Wiebe M. S. (2011). Molecular Characterization of the Host Defense Activity of the Barrier to Autointegration Factor against Vaccinia Virus. J. Virol. 85 (22), 11588–11600. 10.1128/jvi.00641-11 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Ishikawa H., Barber G. N. (2008). STING Is an Endoplasmic Reticulum Adaptor that Facilitates Innate Immune Signalling. Nature 455 (7213), 674–678. 10.1038/nature07317 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Ishimoto Y., Inagi R. (2016). Mitochondria: a Therapeutic Target in Acute Kidney Injury. Nephrol. Dial. Transpl. 31 (7), 1062–1069. 10.1093/ndt/gfv317 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Itagaki K., Kaczmarek E., Lee Y. T., Tang I. T., Isal B., Adibnia Y., et al. (2015). Mitochondrial DNA Released by Trauma Induces Neutrophil Extracellular Traps. PLoS One 10 (3), e0120549. 10.1371/journal.pone.0120549 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Ito S., Araya J., Kurita Y., Kobayashi K., Takasaka N., Yoshida M., et al. (2015). PARK2-mediated Mitophagy Is Involved in Regulation of HBEC Senescence in COPD Pathogenesis. Autophagy 11 (3), 547–559. 10.1080/15548627.2015.1017190 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Ivanov A., Pawlikowski J., Manoharan I., van Tuyn J., Nelson D. M., Rai T. S., et al. (2013). Lysosome-mediated Processing of Chromatin in Senescence. J. Cel Biol. 202 (1), 129–143. 10.1083/jcb.201212110 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Janeway C. A., Jr. (1989). Approaching the Asymptote? Evolution and Revolution in Immunology. Cold Spring Harb. Symp. Quant. Biol. 54 (Pt 1), 1–13. 10.1101/sqb.1989.054.01.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Jemal A., Bray F., Center M. M., Ferlay J., Ward E., Forman D. (2011). Global Cancer Statistics. CA Cancer J. Clin. 61 (2), 69–90. 10.3322/caac.20107 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Jha V., Garcia-Garcia G., Iseki K., Li Z., Naicker S., Plattner B., et al. (2013). Chronic Kidney Disease: Global Dimension and Perspectives. Lancet 382 (9888), 260–272. 10.1016/s0140-6736(13)60687-x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Jiménez-Alcázar M., Rangaswamy C., Panda R., Bitterling J., Simsek Y. J., Long A. T., et al. (2017). Host DNases Prevent Vascular Occlusion by Neutrophil Extracellular Traps. Science 358 (6367), 1202–1206. 10.1126/science.aam8897 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Juan C. A., Pérez de la Lastra J. M., Plou F. J., Pérez-Lebeña E. (2021). The Chemistry of Reactive Oxygen Species (ROS) Revisited: Outlining Their Role in Biological Macromolecules (DNA, Lipids and Proteins) and Induced Pathologies. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 22 (9), 4642. 10.3390/ijms22094642 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Kafoury R., Kelley J. (2005). Ozone Enhances Diesel Exhaust Particles (DEP)-Induced Interleukin-8 (IL-8) Gene Expression in Human Airway Epithelial Cells through Activation of Nuclear Factors- κB (NF-κB) and IL-6 (NF-IL6). Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2 (3-4), 403–410. 10.3390/ijerph2005030004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. Kaski J.-C., Crea F., Gersh B. J., Camici P. G. (2018). Reappraisal of Ischemic Heart Disease. Circulation 138 (14), 1463–1480. 10.1161/circulationaha.118.031373 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  71. Kato K., Omura H., Ishitani R., Nureki O. (2017). Cyclic GMP-AMP as an Endogenous Second Messenger in Innate Immune Signaling by Cytosolic DNA. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 86, 541–566. 10.1146/annurev-biochem-061516-044813 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  72. Kato K., Nishimasu H., Oikawa D., Hirano S., Hirano H., Kasuya G., et al. (2018). Structural Insights into cGAMP Degradation by Ecto-Nucleotide Pyrophosphatase Phosphodiesterase 1. Nat. Commun. 9 (1), 4424. 10.1038/s41467-018-06922-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  73. Kim J., Jung Y. (2017). Radiation-induced Liver Disease: Current Understanding and Future Perspectives. Exp. Mol. Med. 49 (7), e359. 10.1038/emm.2017.85 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  74. Kirkham P. A., Barnes P. J. (2013). Oxidative Stress in COPD. Chest 144 (1), 266–273. 10.1378/chest.12-2664 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  75. Kreienkamp R., Graziano S., Coll-Bonfill N., Bedia-Diaz G., Cybulla E., Vindigni A., et al. (2018). A Cell-Intrinsic Interferon-like Response Links Replication Stress to Cellular Aging Caused by Progerin. Cel Rep. 22 (8), 2006–2015. 10.1016/j.celrep.2018.01.090 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  76. Kuchta K., Knizewski L., Wyrwicz L. S., Rychlewski L., Ginalski K. (2009). Comprehensive Classification of Nucleotidyltransferase Fold Proteins: Identification of Novel Families and Their Representatives in Human. Nucleic Acids Res. 37 (22), 7701–7714. 10.1093/nar/gkp854 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  77. Kuilman T., Michaloglou C., Vredeveld L. C. W., Douma S., van Doorn R., Desmet C. J., et al. (2008). Oncogene-induced Senescence Relayed by an Interleukin-dependent Inflammatory Network. Cell 133 (6), 1019–1031. 10.1016/j.cell.2008.03.039 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  78. Kumar V. (2019). A STING to Inflammation and Autoimmunity. J. Leukoc. Biol. 106 (1), 171–185. 10.1002/jlb.4mir1018-397rr [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  79. Lai X., Broderick R., Bergoglio V., Zimmer J., Badie S., Niedzwiedz W., et al. (2017). MUS81 Nuclease Activity Is Essential for Replication Stress Tolerance and Chromosome Segregation in BRCA2-Deficient Cells. Nat. Commun. 8, 15983. 10.1038/ncomms15983 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  80. Lan Y. Y., Londoño D., Bouley R., Rooney M. S., Hacohen N. (2014). Dnase2a Deficiency Uncovers Lysosomal Clearance of Damaged Nuclear DNA via Autophagy. Cel Rep. 9 (1), 180–192. 10.1016/j.celrep.2014.08.074 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  81. Lauterbach-Rivière L., Bergez M., Mönch S., Qu B., Riess M., Vondran F. W. R., et al. (2020). Hepatitis B Virus DNA Is a Substrate for the cGAS/STING Pathway but Is Not Sensed in Infected Hepatocytes. Viruses 12 (6), 592. 10.3390/v12060592 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  82. Lee J.-K., Kim J.-E., Park B. J., Song Y.-J. (2020). Human Cytomegalovirus IE86 Protein Aa 136-289 Mediates STING Degradation and Blocks the cGAS-STING Pathway. J. Microbiol. 58 (1), 54–60. 10.1007/s12275-020-9577-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  83. Lei Z., Deng M., Yi Z., Sun Q., Shapiro R. A., Xu H., et al. (2018). cGAS-mediated Autophagy Protects the Liver from Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury Independently of STING. Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol. 314 (6), G655–G667. 10.1152/ajpgi.00326.2017 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  84. Leung C. C., Yu I. T. S., Chen W. (2012). Silicosis. Lancet 379 (9830), 2008–2018. 10.1016/s0140-6736(12)60235-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  85. Levine B., Kroemer G. (2008). Autophagy in the Pathogenesis of Disease. Cell 132 (1), 27–42. 10.1016/j.cell.2007.12.018 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  86. Li X., Shu C., Yi G., Chaton C. T., Shelton C. L., Diao J., et al. (2013). Cyclic GMP-AMP Synthase Is Activated by Double-Stranded DNA-Induced Oligomerization. Immunity 39 (6), 1019–1031. 10.1016/j.immuni.2013.10.019 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  87. Li L., Yin Q., Kuss P., Maliga Z., Millán J. L., Wu H., et al. (2014). Hydrolysis of 2′3′-cGAMP by ENPP1 and Design of Nonhydrolyzable Analogs. Nat. Chem. Biol. 10 (12), 1043–1048. 10.1038/nchembio.1661 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  88. Li T., Cheng H., Yuan H., Xu Q., Shu C., Zhang Y., et al. (2016). Antitumor Activity of cGAMP via Stimulation of cGAS-cGAMP-STING-IRF3 Mediated Innate Immune Response. Sci. Rep. 6, 19049. 10.1038/srep19049 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  89. Li Q., Lin L., Tong Y., Liu Y., Mou J., Wang X., et al. (2018). TRIM29 Negatively Controls Antiviral Immune Response through Targeting STING for Degradation. Cell Discov. 4, 13. 10.1038/s41421-018-0010-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  90. Li A A., Yi M., Qin S., Song Y., Chu Q., Wu K. (2019). Activating cGAS-STING Pathway for the Optimal Effect of Cancer Immunotherapy. J. Hematol. Oncol. 12 (1), 35. 10.1186/s13045-019-0721-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  91. Li N N., Zhou H., Wu H., Wu Q., Duan M., Deng W., et al. (2019). STING-IRF3 Contributes to Lipopolysaccharide-Induced Cardiac Dysfunction, Inflammation, Apoptosis and Pyroptosis by Activating NLRP3. Redox Biol. 24, 101215. 10.1016/j.redox.2019.101215 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  92. Li Q., Cao Y., Dang C., Han B., Han R., Ma H., et al. (2020). Inhibition of Double‐strand DNA‐sensing cGAS Ameliorates Brain Injury after Ischemic Stroke. EMBO Mol. Med. 12 (4), e11002. 10.15252/emmm.201911002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  93. Lian H., Wei J., Zang R., Ye W., Yang Q., Zhang X.-N., et al. (2018). ZCCHC3 Is a Co-sensor of cGAS for dsDNA Recognition in Innate Immune Response. Nat. Commun. 9 (1), 3349. 10.1038/s41467-018-05559-w [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  94. Liang Q., Seo G. J., Choi Y. J., Kwak M.-J., Ge J., Rodgers M. A., et al. (2014). Crosstalk between the cGAS DNA Sensor and Beclin-1 Autophagy Protein Shapes Innate Antimicrobial Immune Responses. Cell Host Microbe 15 (2), 228–238. 10.1016/j.chom.2014.01.009 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  95. Lindqvist L. M., Frank D., McArthur K., Dite T. A., Lazarou M., Oakhill J. S., et al. (2018). Autophagy Induced during Apoptosis Degrades Mitochondria and Inhibits Type I Interferon Secretion. Cell Death Differ. 25 (4), 784–796. 10.1038/s41418-017-0017-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  96. Lioux T., Mauny M.-A., Lamoureux A., Bascoul N., Hays M., Vernejoul F., et al. (2016). Design, Synthesis, and Biological Evaluation of Novel Cyclic Adenosine-Inosine Monophosphate (cAIMP) Analogs that Activate Stimulator of Interferon Genes (STING). J. Med. Chem. 59 (22), 10253–10267. 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.6b01300 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  97. Litton J. K., Rugo H. S., Ettl J., Hurvitz S. A., Gonçalves A., Lee K.-H., et al. (2018). Talazoparib in Patients with Advanced Breast Cancer and a Germline BRCA Mutation. N. Engl. J. Med. 379 (8), 753–763. 10.1056/NEJMoa1802905 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  98. Liu B B., Tang L., Zhang X., Ma J., Sehgal M., Cheng J., et al. (2017). A Cell-Based High Throughput Screening Assay for the Discovery of cGAS-STING Pathway Agonists. Antiviral Res. 147, 37–46. 10.1016/j.antiviral.2017.10.001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  99. Liu R R., Xu F., Si S., Zhao X., Bi S., Cen Y. (2017). Mitochondrial DNA-Induced Inflammatory Responses and Lung Injury in Thermal Injury Rat Model. J. Burn Care Res. 38 (5), 304–311. 10.1097/bcr.0000000000000501 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  100. Liu L L., Mao Y., Xu B., Zhang X., Fang C., Ma Y., et al. (2019). Induction of Neutrophil Extracellular Traps during Tissue Injury: Involvement of STING and Toll‐like Receptor 9 Pathways. Cell Prolif. 52 (3), e12579. 10.1111/cpr.12579 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  101. Liu R R., Xu F., Bi S., Zhao X., Jia B., Cen Y. (2019). Mitochondrial DNA-Induced Inflammatory Responses and Lung Injury in Thermal Injury Murine Model: Protective Effect of Cyclosporine-A. J. Burn Care Res. 40 (3), 355–360. 10.1093/jbcr/irz029 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  102. Liu ZS Z.-S., Cai H., Xue W., Wang M., Xia T., Li W.-J., et al. (2019). G3BP1 Promotes DNA Binding and Activation of cGAS. Nat. Immunol. 20 (1), 18–28. 10.1038/s41590-018-0262-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  103. Loo T. M., Miyata K., Tanaka Y., Takahashi A. (2020). Cellular Senescence and Senescence‐associated Secretory Phenotype via the cGAS‐STING Signaling Pathway in Cancer. Cancer Sci. 111 (2), 304–311. 10.1111/cas.14266 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  104. Lood C., Blanco L. P., Purmalek M. M., Carmona-Rivera C., De Ravin S. S., Smith C. K., et al. (2016). Neutrophil Extracellular Traps Enriched in Oxidized Mitochondrial DNA Are Interferogenic and Contribute to Lupus-like Disease. Nat. Med. 22 (2), 146–153. 10.1038/nm.4027 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  105. Loukides S., Bakakos P., Kostikas K. (2011). Oxidative Stress in Patients with COPD. Curr. Drug Targets 12 (4), 469–477. 10.2174/138945011794751573 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  106. Lu C., Zhang X., Ma C., Xu W., Gan L., Cui J., et al. (2018). Nontypeable Haemophilus Influenzae DNA Stimulates Type I Interferon Expression via STING Signaling Pathway. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Mol. Cel Res. 1865 (4), 665–673. 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2018.01.011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  107. Luteijn R. D., Zaver S. A., Gowen B. G., Wyman S. K., Garelis N. E., Onia L., et al. (2019). SLC19A1 Transports Immunoreactive Cyclic Dinucleotides. Nature 573 (7774), 434–438. 10.1038/s41586-019-1553-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  108. Ma H., Qian W., Bambouskova M., Collins P. L., Porter S. I., Byrum A. K., et al. (2020). Barrier-to-Autointegration Factor 1 Protects against a Basal cGAS-STING Response. mBio 11 (2), e00136-20. 10.1128/mBio.00136-20 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  109. Machida H., Ito S., Hirose T., Takeshita F., Oshiro H., Nakamura T., et al. (2010). Expression of Toll-like Receptor 9 in Renal Podocytes in Childhood-Onset Active and Inactive Lupus Nephritis. Nephrol. Dial. Transplant. 25 (8), 2430–2537. 10.1093/ndt/gfq058 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  110. Maekawa H., Inoue T., Ouchi H., Jao T.-M., Inoue R., Nishi H., et al. (2019). Mitochondrial Damage Causes Inflammation via cGAS-STING Signaling in Acute Kidney Injury. Cel Rep. 29 (5), 1261–1273. 10.1016/j.celrep.2019.09.050 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  111. Malik G., Wilting J., Hess C. F., Ramadori G., Malik I. A. (2019). PECAM ‐1 Modulates Liver Damage Induced by Synergistic Effects of TNF ‐α and Irradiation. J. Cel Mol. Med. 23 (5), 3336–3344. 10.1111/jcmm.14224 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  112. Mankan A. K., Schmidt T., Chauhan D., Goldeck M., Höning K., Gaidt M., et al. (2014). Cytosolic RNA:DNA Hybrids Activate the cGAS -STING axis. Embo J 33 (24), 2937–2946. 10.15252/embj.201488726 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  113. McArthur K., Whitehead L. W., Heddleston J. M., Li L., Padman B. S., Oorschot V., et al. (2018). BAK/BAX Macropores Facilitate Mitochondrial Herniation and mtDNA Efflux during Apoptosis. Science 359 (6378), eaao6047. 10.1126/science.aao6047 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  114. McDonald B., Urrutia R., Yipp B. G., Jenne C. N., Kubes P. (2012). Intravascular Neutrophil Extracellular Traps Capture Bacteria from the Bloodstream during Sepsis. Cell Host Microbe 12 (3), 324–333. 10.1016/j.chom.2012.06.011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  115. McIlroy D. J., Jarnicki A. G., Au G. G., Lott N., Smith D. W., Hansbro P. M., et al. (2014). Mitochondrial DNA Neutrophil Extracellular Traps Are Formed after Trauma and Subsequent Surgery. J. Crit. Care 29 (6), e1–e11331135. 10.1016/j.jcrc.2014.07.013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  116. Miller R. P., Tadagavadi R. K., Ramesh G., Reeves W. B. (2010). Mechanisms of Cisplatin Nephrotoxicity. Toxins 2 (11), 2490–2518. 10.3390/toxins2112490 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  117. Mizushima N., Ohsumi Y., Yoshimori T. (2002). Autophagosome Formation in Mammalian Cells. Cell Struct. Funct. 27 (6), 421–429. 10.1247/csf.27.421 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  118. Mizushima N., Levine B., Cuervo A. M., Klionsky D. J. (2008). Autophagy Fights Disease through Cellular Self-Digestion. Nature 451 (7182), 1069–1075. 10.1038/nature06639 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  119. Mortensen E. S., Fenton K. A., Rekvig O. P. (2008). Lupus Nephritis. Am. J. Pathol. 172 (2), 275–283. 10.2353/ajpath.2008.070563 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  120. Motwani M., Pesiridis S., Fitzgerald K. A. (2019). DNA Sensing by the cGAS-STING Pathway in Health and Disease. Nat. Rev. Genet. 20 (11), 657–674. 10.1038/s41576-019-0151-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  121. Mukai K., Konno H., Akiba T., Uemura T., Waguri S., Kobayashi T., et al. (2016). Activation of STING Requires Palmitoylation at the Golgi. Nat. Commun. 7, 11932. 10.1038/ncomms11932 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  122. Mukhopadhyay P., Rajesh M., Cao Z., Horváth B., Park O., Wang H., et al. (2014). Poly (ADP-Ribose) Polymerase-1 Is a Key Mediator of Liver Inflammation and Fibrosis. Hepatology 59 (5), 1998–2009. 10.1002/hep.26763 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  123. Mulay S. R., Linkermann A., Anders H.-J. (2016). Necroinflammation in Kidney Disease. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 27 (1), 27–39. 10.1681/asn.2015040405 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  124. Murray P. J., Allen J. E., Biswas S. K., Fisher E. A., Gilroy D. W., Goerdt S., et al. (2014). Macrophage Activation and Polarization: Nomenclature and Experimental Guidelines. Immunity 41 (1), 14–20. 10.1016/j.immuni.2014.06.008 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  125. Nakai A., Yamaguchi O., Takeda T., Higuchi Y., Hikoso S., Taniike M., et al. (2007). The Role of Autophagy in Cardiomyocytes in the Basal State and in Response to Hemodynamic Stress. Nat. Med. 13 (5), 619–624. 10.1038/nm1574 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  126. Nascimento M., Gombault A., Lacerda-Queiroz N., Panek C., Savigny F., Sbeity M., et al. (2019). Self-DNA Release and STING-dependent Sensing Drives Inflammation to Cigarette Smoke in Mice. Sci. Rep. 9 (1), 14848. 10.1038/s41598-019-51427-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  127. Nash K., Hafeez A., Hou S. (2002). Hospital-acquired Renal Insufficiency. Am. J. Kidney Dis. 39 (5), 930–936. 10.1053/ajkd.2002.32766 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  128. Ng K. W., Marshall E. A., Bell J. C., Lam W. L. (2018). cGAS-STING and Cancer: Dichotomous Roles in Tumor Immunity and Development. Trends Immunol. 39 (1), 44–54. 10.1016/j.it.2017.07.013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  129. Ning L., Wei W., Wenyang J., Rui X., Qing G. (2020). Cytosolic DNA‐STING‐NLRP3 axis Is Involved in Murine Acute Lung Injury Induced by Lipopolysaccharide. Clin. Transl. Med. 10 (7), e228. 10.1002/ctm2.228 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  130. Pabla N., Dong Z. (2008). Cisplatin Nephrotoxicity: Mechanisms and Renoprotective Strategies. Kidney Int. 73 (9), 994–1007. 10.1038/sj.ki.5002786 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  131. Pandey S., Kawai T., Akira S. (2014). Microbial Sensing by Toll-like Receptors and Intracellular Nucleic Acid Sensors. Cold Spring Harb Perspect. Biol. 7 (1), a016246. 10.1101/cshperspect.a016246 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  132. Pang B., Winn D., Johnson R., Hong W., West-Barnette S., Kock N., et al. (2008). Lipooligosaccharides Containing Phosphorylcholine Delay Pulmonary Clearance of Nontypeable Haemophilus Influenzae. Infect. Immun. 76 (5), 2037–2043. 10.1128/iai.01716-07 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  133. Pantelidou C., Sonzogni O., De Oliveria Taveira M., Mehta A. K., Kothari A., Wang D., et al. (2019). PARP Inhibitor Efficacy Depends on CD8+ T-Cell Recruitment via Intratumoral STING Pathway Activation in BRCA-Deficient Models of Triple-Negative Breast Cancer. Cancer Discov. 9 (6), 722–737. 10.1158/2159-8290.Cd-18-1218 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  134. Parvatiyar K., Zhang Z., Teles R. M., Ouyang S., Jiang Y., Iyer S. S., et al. (2012). The Helicase DDX41 Recognizes the Bacterial Secondary Messengers Cyclic Di-GMP and Cyclic Di-AMP to Activate a Type I Interferon Immune Response. Nat. Immunol. 13 (12), 1155–1161. 10.1038/ni.2460 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  135. Qin H., Huang G., Gao F., Huang B., Wang D., Hu X., et al. (2019). Diminished Stimulator of Interferon Genes Production with Cigarette Smoke-Exposure Contributes to Weakened Anti-adenovirus Vectors Response and Destruction of Lung in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Model. Exp. Cel Res. 384 (1), 111545. 10.1016/j.yexcr.2019.111545 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  136. Ramanjulu J. M., Pesiridis G. S., Yang J., Concha N., Singhaus R., Zhang S.-Y., et al. (2018). Design of Amidobenzimidazole STING Receptor Agonists with Systemic Activity. Nature 564 (7736), 439–443. 10.1038/s41586-018-0705-y [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  137. Reisländer T., Lombardi E. P., Groelly F. J., Miar A., Porru M., Di Vito S., et al. (2019). BRCA2 Abrogation Triggers Innate Immune Responses Potentiated by Treatment with PARP Inhibitors. Nat. Commun. 10 (1), 3143. 10.1038/s41467-019-11048-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  138. Ritchie C., Cordova A. F., Hess G. T., Bassik M. C., Li L. (2019). SLC19A1 Is an Importer of the Immunotransmitter cGAMP. Mol. Cel 75 (2), 372–381. 10.1016/j.molcel.2019.05.006 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  139. Robson M., Im S.-A., Senkus E., Xu B., Domchek S. M., Masuda N., et al. (2017). Olaparib for Metastatic Breast Cancer in Patients with a Germline BRCA Mutation. N. Engl. J. Med. 377 (6), 523–533. 10.1056/NEJMoa1706450 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  140. Sachdev E., Tabatabai R., Roy V., Rimel B. J., Mita M. M. (2019). PARP Inhibition in Cancer: An Update on Clinical Development. Targ Oncol. 14 (6), 657–679. 10.1007/s11523-019-00680-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  141. Saitoh T., Fujita N., Hayashi T., Takahara K., Satoh T., Lee H., et al. (2009). Atg9a Controls dsDNA-Driven Dynamic Translocation of STING and the Innate Immune Response. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 106 (49), 20842–20846. 10.1073/pnas.0911267106 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  142. Salama R., Sadaie M., Hoare M., Narita M. (2014). Cellular Senescence and its Effector Programs. Genes Dev. 28 (2), 99–114. 10.1101/gad.235184.113 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  143. Schaefer L. (2014). Complexity of Danger: the Diverse Nature of Damage-Associated Molecular Patterns. J. Biol. Chem. 289 (51), 35237–35245. 10.1074/jbc.R114.619304 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  144. Sethi S., Murphy T. F. (2008). Infection in the Pathogenesis and Course of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. N. Engl. J. Med. 359 (22), 2355–2365. 10.1056/NEJMra0800353 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  145. Shang G., Zhang C., Chen Z. J., Bai X.-c., Zhang X. (2019). Cryo-EM Structures of STING Reveal its Mechanism of Activation by Cyclic GMP-AMP. Nature 567 (7748), 389–393. 10.1038/s41586-019-0998-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  146. Shen H., de Almeida P. E., Kang K. H., Yao P., Chan C. W. (2012). Burn Injury Triggered Dysfunction in Dendritic Cell Response to TLR9 Activation and Resulted in Skewed T Cell Functions. PLoS One 7 (11), e50238. 10.1371/journal.pone.0050238 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  147. Shuto T., Xu H., Wang B., Han J., Kai H., Gu X.-X., et al. (2001). Activation of NF- B by Nontypeable Hemophilus Influenzae Is Mediated by Toll-like Receptor 2-TAK1-dependent NIK-IKK/-I B and MKK3/6-P38 MAP Kinase Signaling Pathways in Epithelial Cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 98 (15), 8774–8779. 10.1073/pnas.151236098 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  148. Silvestre-Roig C., Fridlender Z. G., Glogauer M., Scapini P. (2019). Neutrophil Diversity in Health and Disease. Trends Immunol. 40 (7), 565–583. 10.1016/j.it.2019.04.012 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  149. Slámová K., Papoušek F., Janovská P., Kopecký J., Kolář F. (2016). Adverse Effects of AMP-Activated Protein Kinase α2-Subunit Deletion and High-Fat Diet on Heart Function and Ischemic Tolerance in Aged Female Mice. Physiol. Res. 65 (1), 33–42. 10.33549/physiolres.932979 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  150. Sollberger G., Tilley D. O., Zychlinsky A. (2018). Neutrophil Extracellular Traps: The Biology of Chromatin Externalization. Develop. Cel 44 (5), 542–553. 10.1016/j.devcel.2018.01.019 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  151. Sorvillo N., Cherpokova D., Martinod K., Wagner D. D. (2019). Extracellular DNA NET-Works with Dire Consequences for Health. Circ. Res. 125 (4), 470–488. 10.1161/circresaha.119.314581 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  152. Steinhagen F., Zillinger T., Peukert K., Fox M., Thudium M., Barchet W., et al. (2018). Suppressive Oligodeoxynucleotides Containing TTAGGG Motifs Inhibit cGAS Activation in Human Monocytes. Eur. J. Immunol. 48 (4), 605–611. 10.1002/eji.201747338 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  153. Stetson D. B., Ko J. S., Heidmann T., Medzhitov R. (2008). Trex1 Prevents Cell-Intrinsic Initiation of Autoimmunity. Cell 134 (4), 587–598. 10.1016/j.cell.2008.06.032 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  154. Sun L., Wu J., Du F., Chen X., Chen Z. J. (2013). Cyclic GMP-AMP Synthase Is a Cytosolic DNA Sensor that Activates the Type I Interferon Pathway. Science 339 (6121), 786–791. 10.1126/science.1232458 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  155. Szabo C., Martins V., Liaudet L. (2020). Poly(ADP-Ribose) Polymerase Inhibition in Acute Lung Injury. A Reemerging Concept. Am. J. Respir. Cel Mol. Biol. 63 (5), 571–590. 10.1165/rcmb.2020-0188TR [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  156. Szczesny B., Brunyánszki A., Ahmad A., Oláh G., Porter C., Toliver-Kinsky T., et al. (2015). Time-Dependent and Organ-specific Changes in Mitochondrial Function, Mitochondrial DNA Integrity, Oxidative Stress and Mononuclear Cell Infiltration in a Mouse Model of Burn Injury. PLoS One 10 (12), e0143730. 10.1371/journal.pone.0143730 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  157. Takahashi A., Okada R., Nagao K., Kawamata Y., Hanyu A., Yoshimoto S., et al. (2017). Exosomes Maintain Cellular Homeostasis by Excreting Harmful DNA from Cells. Nat. Commun. 8, 15287. 10.1038/ncomms15287 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  158. Takahashi A., Loo T. M., Okada R., Kamachi F., Watanabe Y., Wakita M., et al. (2018). Downregulation of Cytoplasmic DNases Is Implicated in Cytoplasmic DNA Accumulation and SASP in Senescent Cells. Nat. Commun. 9 (1), 1249. 10.1038/s41467-018-03555-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  159. Takasugi M., Okada R., Takahashi A., Virya Chen D., Watanabe S., Hara E. (2017). Small Extracellular Vesicles Secreted from Senescent Cells Promote Cancer Cell Proliferation through EphA2. Nat. Commun. 8, 15729. 10.1038/ncomms15728 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  160. Tan X., Sun L., Chen J., Chen Z. J. (2018). Detection of Microbial Infections through Innate Immune Sensing of Nucleic Acids. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 72, 447–478. 10.1146/annurev-micro-102215-095605 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  161. Tanaka Y., Chen Z. J. (2012). STING Specifies IRF3 Phosphorylation by TBK1 in the Cytosolic DNA Signaling Pathway. Sci. Signal. 5 (214), ra20. 10.1126/scisignal.2002521 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  162. Tanaka K., Koike Y., Shimura T., Okigami M., Ide S., Toiyama Y., et al. (2014). In Vivo characterization of Neutrophil Extracellular Traps in Various Organs of a Murine Sepsis Model. PLoS One 9 (11), e111888. 10.1371/journal.pone.0111888 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  163. Tang D., Kang R., Coyne C. B., Zeh H. J., Lotze M. T. (2012). PAMPs and DAMPs: Signal 0s that spur Autophagy and Immunity. Immunol. Rev. 249 (1), 158–175. 10.1111/j.1600-065X.2012.01146.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  164. Tao S.-S., Wu G.-C., Zhang Q., Zhang T.-P., Leng R.-X., Pan H.-F., et al. (2019). TREX1 as a Potential Therapeutic Target for Autoimmune and Inflammatory Diseases. Curr. Pharm. Des. 25 (30), 3239–3247. 10.2174/1381612825666190902113218 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  165. Tchkonia T., Zhu Y., van Deursen J., Campisi J., Kirkland J. L. (2013). Cellular Senescence and the Senescent Secretory Phenotype: Therapeutic Opportunities. J. Clin. Invest. 123 (3), 966–972. 10.1172/jci64098 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  166. Tomita K., Barnes P. J., Adcock I. M. (2003). The Effect of Oxidative Stress on Histone Acetylation and IL-8 Release. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 301 (2), 572–577. 10.1016/s0006-291x(02)03029-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  167. Topol E. J., Yadav J. S. (2000). Recognition of the Importance of Embolization in Atherosclerotic Vascular Disease. Circulation 101 (5), 570–580. 10.1161/01.cir.101.5.570 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  168. Tsuji N., Tsuji T., Ohashi N., Kato A., Fujigaki Y., Yasuda H. (2016). Role of Mitochondrial DNA in Septic AKI via Toll-like Receptor 9. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 27 (7), 2009–2020. 10.1681/asn.2015040376 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  169. Vanpouille-Box C., Hoffmann J. A., Galluzzi L. (2019). Pharmacological Modulation of Nucleic Acid Sensors - Therapeutic Potential and Persisting Obstacles. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 18 (11), 845–867. 10.1038/s41573-019-0043-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  170. Verrier E. R., Yim S. A., Heydmann L., El Saghire H., Bach C., Turon‐Lagot V., et al. (2018). Hepatitis B Virus Evasion from Cyclic Guanosine Monophosphate-Adenosine Monophosphate Synthase Sensing in Human Hepatocytes. Hepatology 68 (5), 1695–1709. 10.1002/hep.30054 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  171. Volkman H. E., Cambier S., Gray E. E., Stetson D. B. (2019). Tight Nuclear Tethering of cGAS Is Essential for Preventing Autoreactivity. Elife 8, e47491. 10.7554/eLife.47491 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  172. Wang Q., Liu X., Cui Y., Tang Y., Chen W., Li S., et al. (2014). The E3 Ubiquitin Ligase AMFR and INSIG1 Bridge the Activation of TBK1 Kinase by Modifying the Adaptor STING. Immunity 41 (6), 919–933. 10.1016/j.immuni.2014.11.011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  173. Wang Y., Lian Q., Yang B., Yan S., Zhou H., He L., et al. (2015). TRIM30α Is a Negative-Feedback Regulator of the Intracellular DNA and DNA Virus-Triggered Response by Targeting STING. Plos Pathog. 11 (6), e1005012. 10.1371/journal.ppat.1005012 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  174. Wang Q., Huang L., Hong Z., Lv Z., Mao Z., Tang Y., et al. (2017). The E3 Ubiquitin Ligase RNF185 Facilitates the cGAS-Mediated Innate Immune Response. Plos Pathog. 13 (3), e1006264. 10.1371/journal.ppat.1006264 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  175. Wang R., Zhu Y., Liu Z., Chang L., Bai X., Kang L., et al. (2021). Neutrophil Extracellular Traps Promote tPA-Induced Brain Hemorrhage via cGAS in Mice with Stroke. Blood 138 (1), 91–103. 10.1182/blood.2020008913 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  176. West A. P., Khoury-Hanold W., Staron M., Tal M. C., Pineda C. M., Lang S. M., et al. (2015). Mitochondrial DNA Stress Primes the Antiviral Innate Immune Response. Nature 520 (7548), 553–557. 10.1038/nature14156 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  177. Wiegman C. H., Michaeloudes C., Haji G., Narang P., Clarke C. J., Russell K. E., et al. (2015). Oxidative Stress-Induced Mitochondrial Dysfunction Drives Inflammation and Airway Smooth Muscle Remodeling in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 136 (3), 769–780. 10.1016/j.jaci.2015.01.046 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  178. Wong S. L., Wagner D. D. (2018). Peptidylarginine Deiminase 4: a Nuclear Button Triggering Neutrophil Extracellular Traps in Inflammatory Diseases and Aging. FASEB J. 32 (12), 6258–6370. 10.1096/fj.201800691R [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  179. Xu X., Hua Y., Sreejayan N., Zhang Y., Ren J. (2013). Akt2 Knockout Preserves Cardiac Function in High-Fat Diet-Induced Obesity by Rescuing Cardiac Autophagosome Maturation. J. Mol. Cel Biol. 5 (1), 61–63. 10.1093/jmcb/mjs055 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  180. Xu Q., Xiong H., Zhu W., Liu Y., Du Y. (2020). Small Molecule Inhibition of Cyclic GMP-AMP Synthase Ameliorates Sepsis-Induced Cardiac Dysfunction in Mice. Life Sci. 260, 118315. 10.1016/j.lfs.2020.118315 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  181. Yamazaki T., Kirchmair A., Sato A., Buqué A., Rybstein M., Petroni G., et al. (2020). Mitochondrial DNA Drives Abscopal Responses to Radiation that Are Inhibited by Autophagy. Nat. Immunol. 21 (10), 1160–1171. 10.1038/s41590-020-0751-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  182. Yang H., Wang H., Ren J., Chen Q., Chen Z. J. (2017). cGAS Is Essential for Cellular Senescence. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 114 (23), E4612–E4620. 10.1073/pnas.1705499114 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  183. Yousefi S., Simon H.-U. (2016). NETosis - Does it Really Represent Nature's "Suicide Bomber"? Front. Immunol. 7, 328. 10.3389/fimmu.2016.00328 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  184. Yousefi S., Mihalache C., Kozlowski E., Schmid I., Simon H. U. (2009). Viable Neutrophils Release Mitochondrial DNA to Form Neutrophil Extracellular Traps. Cel Death Differ. 16 (11), 1438–1444. 10.1038/cdd.2009.96 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  185. Yuan J., Liu R., Ma Y., Zhang Z., Xie Z. (2018). Curcumin Attenuates Airway Inflammation and Airway Remolding by Inhibiting NF-κB Signaling and COX-2 in Cigarette Smoke-Induced COPD Mice. Inflammation 41 (5), 1804–1814. 10.1007/s10753-018-0823-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  186. Zaffini R., Gotte G., Menegazzi M. (2018). Asthma and poly(ADP-Ribose) Polymerase Inhibition: a New Therapeutic Approach. Drug Des. Devel. Ther. 12, 281–293. 10.2147/dddt.S150846 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  187. Zhang L., Mo J., Swanson K. V., Wen H., Petrucelli A., Gregory S. M., et al. (2014). NLRC3, a Member of the NLR Family of Proteins, Is a Negative Regulator of Innate Immune Signaling Induced by the DNA Sensor STING. Immunity 40 (3), 329–341. 10.1016/j.immuni.2014.01.010 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  188. Zhang Y., Sun Z., Pei J., Luo Q., Zeng X., Li Q., et al. (2018). Identification of α-Mangostin as an Agonist of Human STING. ChemMedChem 13 (19), 2057–2064. 10.1002/cmdc.201800481 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  189. Zhang X., Liu B., Tang L., Su Q., Hwang N., Sehgal M., et al. (2019). Discovery and Mechanistic Study of a Novel Human-Stimulator-Of-Interferon-Genes Agonist. ACS Infect. Dis. 5 (7), 1139–1149. 10.1021/acsinfecdis.9b00010 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  190. Zhao B., Xu P., Rowlett C. M., Jing T., Shinde O., Lei Y., et al. (2020). The Molecular Basis of Tight Nuclear Tethering and Inactivation of cGAS. Nature 587 (7835), 673–677. 10.1038/s41586-020-2749-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  191. Zhong B., Yang Y., Li S., Wang Y.-Y., Li Y., Diao F., et al. (2008). The Adaptor Protein MITA Links Virus-Sensing Receptors to IRF3 Transcription Factor Activation. Immunity 29 (4), 538–550. 10.1016/j.immuni.2008.09.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  192. Zhong B., Zhang L., Lei C., Li Y., Mao A.-P., Yang Y., et al. (2009). The Ubiquitin Ligase RNF5 Regulates Antiviral Responses by Mediating Degradation of the Adaptor Protein MITA. Immunity 30 (3), 397–407. 10.1016/j.immuni.2009.01.008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  193. Zhou Q., Lin H., Wang S., Wang S., Ran Y., Liu Y., et al. (2014). The ER-Associated Protein ZDHHC1 Is a Positive Regulator of DNA Virus-Triggered, MITA/STING-dependent Innate Immune Signaling. Cell Host Microbe 16 (4), 450–461. 10.1016/j.chom.2014.09.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  194. Zimmer J., Tacconi E. M. C., Folio C., Badie S., Porru M., Klare K., et al. (2016). Targeting BRCA1 and BRCA2 Deficiencies with G-Quadruplex-Interacting Compounds. Mol. Cel 61 (3), 449–460. 10.1016/j.molcel.2015.12.004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology are provided here courtesy of Frontiers Media SA

RESOURCES