Skip to main content
Microbiology Resource Announcements logoLink to Microbiology Resource Announcements
. 2022 Feb 17;11(2):e01232-21. doi: 10.1128/mra.01232-21

Draft Genome Sequencing of Three Glutaraldehyde-Tolerant Bacteria from Produced Water from Hydraulic Fracturing

Stephen M Techtmann a,, Andrew L Baldwin a, Dotun Aluko a, Justin Andersen a, Cole Becker a, Grace Chandler a, Steve Forgrave a, Madelyn Jones a, Ina Klasner a, Jared Martini a, Noah Mason a, Ryleigh Parsons a, Nick Peterson a, Erik Reynolds a, Lydia Schroeder a
Editor: Frank J Stewartb
PMCID: PMC8852310  PMID: 35175117

ABSTRACT

Here, we report the draft genome sequence of three glutaraldehyde-resistant isolates from produced water from hydraulic fracturing operations. The three strains were identified as Marinobacter sp. strain G11, Halomonas sp. strain G15, and Bacillus sp. strain G16. The genome sequences of these isolates will provide insights into biocide resistance in hydraulic fracturing operations.

ANNOUNCEMENT

These three strains were isolated from produced water collected from hydraulic fracturing operations in the Permian basin of West Texas, USA. Hydraulic fracturing—also known as unconventional oil and gas production (UOG)—is the process of injecting water, sand, and other chemicals into oil -and gas-harboring shale formations (1). This process allows for recovery of oil and gas from previously difficult to access hydrocarbon basins. One of the chemical types commonly used in UOG operations is biocides (2). Biocides are antimicrobial chemicals used to control microbial growth in diverse settings. Glutaraldehyde is one of the most commonly used biocides in UOG operations (1, 2). There is concern about the potential for biocide use in UOG operations to lead to development of antimicrobial-resistant bacteria in the formation as well as in adjacent streams (3).

To better understand the diversity of biocide-resistant bacteria in the produced water, we isolated glutaraldehyde-tolerant strains of bacteria. Water samples were treated with 100 ppm of glutaraldehyde and incubated for 1 h. The samples were plated on nutrient agar and incubated at 30°C for 2 days. Colonies were picked and streaked three times to obtain isolates. The bacteria were routinely grown either in nutrient agar or nutrient broth. DNA was extracted using the Quick-DNA fungal/bacterial kits (Zymo Research). The 16S rRNA gene was sequenced using the primers 27F and 1492R to identify taxonomy (4). The resulting gene sequences were compared to the 16S rRNA sequence database at NCBI using blastn. Three isolates were selected for genomic analysis. The 16S rRNA gene from strains G11, G15, and G16 were all greater than 99% identical to Marinobacter vinifirmus strain FB1, Halomonas alimentaria strain YKJ-16, and Bacillus subtilis strain IAM 12118, respectively. These isolates were Marinobacter sp. strain G11, Halomonas sp. strain G15, and Bacillus sp. strain G16. Whole-genome libraries were constructed using the Nextera XT kit (Illumina) and sequenced on the Illumina MiSeq instrument using the MiSeq v3 600-cycle kit using a 2 × 300-bp paired-end sequencing run. All sequencing libraries were pooled and sequenced on the same MiSeq run.

Default parameters were used for all sequence analysis programs unless otherwise noted. Raw sequencing reads were quality controlled using Trimmomatic version 0.39 (5). Nextera adapters were trimmed from the reads. The leading and trailing 3 bp were trimmed, and the reads were quality filtered using sliding window trimming with a window size of 4 and quality cutoff phred score of 15. Any reads of less than 36 bp after quality filtering were removed. For G11, 412,903 paired reads survived trimming. For G15, 432,284 paired reads survived trimming. For G16, 816,767 reads survived trimming. The trimmed reads were then assembled using SPAdes version 3.15.3 (6) with kmer sizes of 21, 51, 71, 91, 111, and 127. The quality of the assembly was determined using QUAST version 5.0.2 (7). Annotation of the genomes was performed using Prokka version 1.14.6 (8). Table 1 details the statistics for the genome assemblies and annotation. Antibiotic resistance genes were annotated using the CARD database (9).

TABLE 1.

Quality information and features of the de novo assembled strains

Feature Marinobacter sp. G11 Halomonas sp. G15 Bacillus sp. G16
GC content (%) 57.9 65.6 43.9
Assembly length (bp) 4,040,679 3,811,422 4,258,983
Length of longest contig (bp) 288,494 318,971 411,992
No. of contigs 126 106 68
N50 (bp) 109,800 84,931 259,571
L 50 12 15 7
No. of CDSa 3,791 3,538 4145
No. of rRNAs 8 6 13
No. of tRNAs 48 71 84
a

CDS, coding DNA sequences.

The genome annotation revealed three resistance nodulation cell division (RND)-type efflux pumps in Marinobacter sp. G11 (two adeF and one rsmA). One RND-type efflux pump was identified in Halomonas sp. G15 (one rsmA). Two antibiotic inactivation genes and two RND-type efflux pumps were identified in Bacillus sp. G16. Previous studies have shown that the efflux pumps are important for resistance to glutaraldehyde (10). This finding suggests that efflux may be a mechanism allowing these bacteria to tolerate glutaraldehyde.

Data availability.

The genome sequences are deposited at GenBank under accession numbers JAJSOZ000000000, JAJSPA000000000, and JAJSPB000000000, BioProject number PRJNA786782, BioSample numbers SAMN23721435, SAMN23721436, and SAMN23721437, and SRA accession numbers SRR17223254, SRR17223255, and SRR17223256.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This work was funded by National Science Foundation CBET award 1804685 (Michigan Technological University) and the Michigan Tech Biological Sciences Department. This work was performed as part of the Principles of Computational Biology course (BL2700).

S.M.T. designed the experiment, analyzed the data, and wrote the announcement. A.L.B. isolated the strains and assisted in sequencing of the genomes. All other authors contributed to the genome analysis and are listed in alphabetical order by last name.

Contributor Information

Stephen M. Techtmann, Email: smtechtm@mtu.edu.

Frank J. Stewart, Montana State University

REFERENCES

  • 1.Campa MF, Techtmann SM, Gibson CM, Zhu X, Patterson M, Garcia de Matos Amaral A, Ulrich N, Campagna SR, Grant CJ, Lamendella R, Hazen TC. 2018. Impacts of glutaraldehyde on microbial community structure and degradation potential in streams impacted by hydraulic fracturing. Environ Sci Technol 52:5989–5999. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.8b00239. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Kahrilas GA, Blotevogel J, Stewart PS, Borch T. 2015. Biocides in hydraulic fracturing fluids: a critical review of their usage, mobility, degradation, and toxicity. Environ Sci Technol 49:16–32. doi: 10.1021/es503724k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Campa MF, Wolfe AK, Techtmann SM, Harik AM, Hazen TC. 2019. Unconventional oil and gas energy systems: an unidentified hotspot of antimicrobial resistance? Front Microbiol 10:2392. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.02392. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Frank JA, Reich CI, Sharma S, Weisbaum JS, Wilson BA, Olsen GJ. 2008. Critical evaluation of two primers commonly used for amplification of bacterial 16S rRNA genes. Appl Environ Microbiol 74:2461–2470. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02272-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Bolger AM, Lohse M, Usadel B. 2014. Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics 30:2114–2120. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu170. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Bankevich A, Nurk S, Antipov D, Gurevich AA, Dvorkin M, Kulikov AS, Lesin VM, Nikolenko SI, Pham S, Prjibelski AD, Pyshkin AV, Sirotkin AV, Vyahhi N, Tesler G, Alekseyev MA, Pevzner PA. 2012. SPAdes: a new genome assembly algorithm and its applications to single-cell sequencing. J Comput Biol 19:455–477. doi: 10.1089/cmb.2012.0021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Gurevich A, Saveliev V, Vyahhi N, Tesler G. 2013. QUAST: quality assessment tool for genome assemblies. Bioinformatics 29:1072–1075. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt086. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Seemann T. 2014. Prokka: rapid prokaryotic genome annotation. Bioinformatics 30:2068–2069. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu153. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Alcock BP, Raphenya AR, Lau TTY, Tsang KK, Bouchard M, Edalatmand A, Huynh W, Nguyen A-LV, Cheng AA, Liu S, Min SY, Miroshnichenko A, Tran H-K, Werfalli RE, Nasir JA, Oloni M, Speicher DJ, Florescu A, Singh B, Faltyn M, Hernandez-Koutoucheva A, Sharma AN, Bordeleau E, Pawlowski AC, Zubyk HL, Dooley D, Griffiths E, Maguire F, Winsor GL, Beiko RG, Brinkman FSL, Hsiao WWL, Domselaar GV, McArthur AG. 2020. CARD 2020: antibiotic resistome surveillance with the Comprehensive Antibiotic Resistance Database. Nucleic Acids Res 48:D517–D525. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkz935. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Vikram A, Bomberger JM, Bibby KJ. 2015. Efflux as a glutaraldehyde resistance mechanism in Pseudomonas fluorescens and Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 59:3433–3440. doi: 10.1128/AAC.05152-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The genome sequences are deposited at GenBank under accession numbers JAJSOZ000000000, JAJSPA000000000, and JAJSPB000000000, BioProject number PRJNA786782, BioSample numbers SAMN23721435, SAMN23721436, and SAMN23721437, and SRA accession numbers SRR17223254, SRR17223255, and SRR17223256.


Articles from Microbiology Resource Announcements are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES