Skip to main content
Infection and Immunity logoLink to Infection and Immunity
. 2022 Feb 17;90(2):e00328-21. doi: 10.1128/iai.00328-21

Host Defense Mechanisms Induce Genome Instability Leading to Rapid Evolution in an Opportunistic Fungal Pathogen

Amanda C Smith a,, Levi T Morran b, Meleah A Hickman a,b
Editor: Mairi C Noverrc
PMCID: PMC8853687  PMID: 34898249

ABSTRACT

The ability to generate genetic variation facilitates rapid adaptation in stressful environments. The opportunistic fungal pathogen Candida albicans frequently undergoes large-scale genomic changes, including aneuploidy and loss of heterozygosity (LOH), following exposure to host environments. However, the specific host factors inducing C. albicans genome instability remain largely unknown. Here, we leveraged the genetic tractability of nematode hosts to investigate whether innate immune components, including antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) and reactive oxygen species (ROS), induced host-associated C. albicans genome instability. C. albicans associated with immunocompetent hosts carried multiple large-scale genomic changes, including LOH and whole-chromosomal and segmental aneuploidies. In contrast, C. albicans associated with immunocompromised hosts deficient in AMPs or ROS production had reduced LOH frequencies and fewer, if any, additional genomic changes. To evaluate whether extensive host-induced genomic changes had long-term consequences for C. albicans adaptation, we experimentally evolved C. albicans in either immunocompetent or immunocompromised hosts and selected for increased virulence. C. albicans evolved in immunocompetent hosts rapidly increased virulence, but C. albicans evolved in immunocompromised hosts did not. Taken together, this work suggests that host-produced ROS and AMPs induces genotypic plasticity in C. albicans which facilitates rapid evolution.

KEYWORDS: Candida albicans, Caenorhabditis elegans, fungal genomics, innate immunity, reactive oxygen species, genetics

INTRODUCTION

The opportunistic fungal pathogen Candida albicans is typically commensal and a component of the human microbiome (1). However, C. albicans is a leading cause of fungal bloodstream infections and 40% of these infections result in mortality (2). In addition to bloodstream infections, C. albicans causes nonlethal mucosal infections, including vaginal and oral candidiasis (2). C. albicans infection is highly dependent on the host context, including high estrogen levels (3), chronic stress (4), antibiotic use (57), uncontrolled diabetes (8, 9), and immunosuppression (10, 11). In the absence of proper immune recognition, fungal proliferation is uncontrolled, leading to infection. However, healthy individuals, despite having a fully functioning immune system, also experience C. albicans infections. Infections primarily result from the commensal isolates becoming pathogenic rather than an infection acquired from outside sources (12). The transition from commensal to pathogenic may be facilitated by C. albicans phenotypic and genotypic heterogeneity. C. albicans genetic diversity within and among individuals is very high and often includes numerous single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and loss of heterozygosity (LOH) events (13). This genetic variation may be a direct consequence of the stressors C. albicans encounters in the host, which include immune stressors and other microbes. Recent work has demonstrated that the host environment elevates C. albicans genome instability similarly to in vitro stressors (1418). However, the specific host components that generate this instability are largely unknown.

Genomic variation is quite common in clinical C. albicans isolates (13, 19) and includes polymorphisms, copy number variation, loss of heterozygosity (LOH), and partial or whole-chromosomal aneuploidies (19). This genomic variation indicates that host environments either induce or maintain genetic variation in C. albicans. Studies of murine infection models have found that when exposed to different host niches, C. albicans has a greater-than-10-fold increase in LOH and frequent aneuploidy compared to that in vitro (1416). Following host exposure, genomic changes generated in the murine environment often resulted in a more commensal-like phenotype and higher fitness inside the host (15, 16, 18, 20). However, the long-term genotypic and phenotypic consequences have not yet been extensively studied. Caenorhabditis elegans has also been used as a host model to assess C. albicans genome stability. C. albicans genome instability following C. elegans host association was detected across multiple C. albicans strains, and it resulted in changes to virulence (17). Together, murine and C. elegans models clearly demonstrate that host environments drive genetic diversity in C. albicans, which causes phenotypic changes. However, it is remains unclear which specific host components contribute to C. albicans genome instability and how host-induced genome instability contributes to the long-term adaptability of C. albicans.

C. albicans encounters many different stressors within the host environment, including the immune system, which is designed to control and remove pathogens. The immune system recognizes C. albicans and other pathogens through pathogen recognition receptors (PRRs) that detect specific microbial chemical signatures called pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) (21). Recognition of pathogens like C. albicans triggers production of antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) which recruit phagocytic immune cells to the site of infection. Phagocytic immune cells produce reactive oxygen species (ROS) and reactive nitrogen species to control pathogen proliferation (22). Similar to humans, C. elegans produces ROS and AMPs in response to pathogens. AMPs inhibit microbial growth through a variety of methods, including disrupting the cell membrane and halting DNA, RNA, and protein synthesis (23). C. elegans AMP production is activated through a mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signaling cascade (24, 25) and includes SEK-1 (MAPKK), which is homologous to the mammalian MKK3/6 and MKK4 MAPKKs (26). Mutations in C. elegans SEK-1 increase host susceptibility to C. albicans and other microbial pathogens (2629). Another conserved host defense mechanism is ROS production. Mammals produce ROS via five NADPH oxidases and two dual oxidases (30, 31) while C. elegans ROS production is mediated by a single dual oxidase BLI-3 in response to bacterial and fungal pathogens (29, 3234). BLI-3 mutant hosts are more susceptible to C. albicans infection (35). ROS causes cellular toxicity through structural changes to the DNA (36) and generates double-strand breaks in C. albicans (30). Together, host-produced AMPs and ROS act in various ways in order to inhibit C. albicans growth.

Here, we investigated if host-produced AMPs and ROS induce C. albicans genome instability, using the model host C. elegans. We infected wild-type and two different immunocompromised hosts, with mutations in either sek-1 (AMP production) or bli-3 (ROS production), with C. albicans and measured the frequency and types of genome changes in C. albicans. Wild-type hosts elevate genome instability and generate greater genetic diversity in C. albicans compared to immunocompromised hosts. To evaluate the impact of greater genetic diversity in C. albicans driven by the host immune response, we evolved C. albicans virulence in both immunocompetent and immunocompromised hosts for 10 passages. Within this relatively short in vivo experimental evolution, C. albicans rapidly increased virulence when evolved in immunocompetent hosts but did not when evolved in immunocompromised hosts. Taken together, our results suggest that host innate immune pathways are a source of genome instability in C. albicans and facilitate C. albicans adaptation.

RESULTS

Host defense pathways elevate C. albicans genome instability.

We and others have shown that nematode and murine host environments induce C. albicans genome instability compared to in vitro conditions (1418), yet the specific host attributes which drive genome instability have not been elucidated. Here, we tested whether components of host innate immune function drive host-associated genome instability by comparing C. albicans LOH between yeast extracted from immunocompetent and immunocompromised hosts (Fig. 1A). We used two different immunocompromised host genotypes: one carried a sek-1 deletion and could not produce AMPs (31), while the second carried a bli-3 deletion and could not produce ROS (29, 34). C. albicans LOH frequency was significantly reduced in yeast extracted from sek-1 and bli-3 hosts compared to that in yeast extracted from wild-type (N2) hosts (Fig. 1B, Fig. S1A and B in the supplemental material) which implicates both the sek-1 and bli-3 immune pathways as sources of pathogen genome instability.

FIG 1.

FIG 1

Host immunity impacts C. albicans genome stability. (A) Experimental overview of in vivo experiments. (B) Laboratory C. albicans LOH frequency following host association relative to C. albicans no-host control LOH frequency for N2 (wild type, gray, n = 8), sek-1 (green, n = 9), and bli-3 (blue, n = 8). (C) Bloodstream C. albicans LOH frequency following host association relative to C. albicans no-host control LOH frequency for N2 (gray, n = 11), sek-1 (green, n =11), and bli-3 (blue, n = 8). Means and standard deviation (SD) are plotted. Asterisks indicate significant differences (****, P < 0.0001; **, P < 0.01; ns, not significant; Kruskal-Wallis with post hoc Dunn’s multiple test).

Since C. albicans genetic background impacts mutation rates (16, 17), we also measured host-induced LOH frequency in a clinical C. albicans strain (37). Similar to the laboratory C. albicans strain, the clinical strain had a significantly reduced LOH frequency when extracted from bli-3 hosts than it did when extracted from wild-type hosts (Fig. 1C). Yet, the clinical C. albicans LOH frequency extracted from sek-1 and wild-type hosts was not statistically different. However, C. albicans LOH frequency was notably higher in wild-type hosts compared to sek-1 hosts. Together, these data suggest that the bli-3 pathway induces C. albicans genome instability regardless of pathogen genetic background, and that the sek-1 pathway may only contribute to genome instability in a strain-dependent manner.

In vitro and in vivo ROS elevate genome instability in cap1Δ/Δ C. albicans.

In response to bacterial and fungal pathogens, C. elegans produces ROS via the BLI-3 dual oxidase (35). However, C. albicans has several mechanisms to combat ROS, including the activation of antioxidant genes that detoxify ROS, whose expression is regulated by the Cap1p transcription factor (38, 39). To directly test whether CAP1 protects C. albicans from ROS-induced genome instability, we compared in vitro LOH frequencies of wild-type and cap1Δ/Δ C. albicans strains exposed to 5 mM H2O2. Exposure to H2O2 elevated the LOH frequency in both wild-type and cap1Δ/Δ C. albicans strains. However, the increase in LOH was significantly higher in cap1Δ/Δ, which had a 40-fold increase, compared to the wild type which had a 15-fold increase (Fig. 2A and Fig. S2A). To assess whether CAP1 mitigates C. albicans genome instability from host-produced ROS, we compared LOH frequencies between wild-type and cap1Δ/Δ C. albicans associated with immunocompetent and immunocompromised hosts. If host-produced ROS induces C. albicans genome instability, then cap1Δ/Δ C. albicans will have increased LOH in wild-type and sek-1 hosts which can produce ROS, but not in bli-3 hosts which cannot. Compared to in vitro, all host environments increased cap1Δ/Δ LOH (Fig. S2B). Host-extracted cap1Δ/Δ LOH frequencies were higher than those of wild-type C. albicans for both wild-type and sek-1 hosts, but not for bli-3 hosts (Fig. 2B). Together, these data demonstrate that host-produced ROS elevates C. albicans genome instability. Additionally, Cap1p-mediated ROS detoxification is important for mitigating ROS-induced C. albicans genome instability both in vitro and in vivo.

FIG 2.

FIG 2

C. albicans cap1 Δ/Δ strain is more susceptible to in vitro and in vivo ROS. (A) LOH frequencies of C. albicans exposed to 5 mM H2O2 for 24 h relative to the frequencies of LOH of C. albicans without stress exposure. Means and SD for both wild-type (WT) (gray, n = 12) and cap1Δ/Δ (orange, n = 19) are plotted. Each data point represents an individual measurement. (B) LOH frequencies of C. albicans exposed to each host environment relative to the no-host frequency of LOH. Means and SD are plotted. (C) C. albicans LOH frequency following host exposure relative to no-host LOH frequency, with (gray: N2, n = 9; sek-1, n = 9; bli-3, n = 9) and without (black: N2, n = 10; sek-1, n = 9; bli-3, n = 11) 25 μM α-lipoic acid. Each data point represents an individual measurement. Means and SD are plotted. Asterisks indicate significant differences (****, P < 0.0001; ***, P < 0.005; **, P < 0.01; *, P < 0.05; ns, not significant; Mann-Whitney U test).

Endogenous and exogenous antioxidants break down ROS through a variety of mechanisms. We next wanted to determine whether antioxidants mitigate the C. albicans genome instability which results from host-produced ROS. We compared host-associated C. albicans LOH in the presence or absence of 25 μM lipoic acid, an antioxidant involved in the breakdown of ROS (34). In the presence of lipoic acid, host-associated C. albicans LOH was significantly reduced when extracted from wild-type and sek-1 hosts (Fig. 2C and Fig. S2C). In contrast, lipoic acid did not decrease C. albicans LOH when extracted from bli-3 hosts, (Fig. 2C and Fig. S2C). This suggests that antioxidants are effective in reducing C. albicans genome instability in ROS-producing hosts. Together, these data suggest that both in vitro and in vivo ROS elevate genome instability in a cap1Δ/Δ mutant, and that C. albicans genome instability caused by host-produced ROS can be alleviated with the addition of antioxidants.

Host-produced AMPs and ROS cause aneuploidy and abundant LOH events in C. albicans.

LOH assays are an easy, useful, and established way to measure C. albicans genome instability (40, 41), however, they are limited to measuring a heterozygous marker at a single genomic location. To characterize whether host immunity drives other genomic alterations, we performed whole-genome sequencing of single colony isolates associated with wild-type, sek-1, and bli-3 hosts that were isolated either on media that selected for LOH events (2-DOG; Fig. 3) or on media that did not select for LOH events (YPD; Fig. S3). Among LOH-selected isolates extracted from wild-type hosts, GAL1 LOH on Chr1 was mediated via break-induced recombination (4/6) or via whole chromosome loss and reduplication (1/6). For the break-induced recombination LOH events, there was no evidence for a common breakpoint or recombination hot spot mediating host-induced GAL1 LOH. Additional large-tract LOH events (42, 43), homozygous from the site of the DNA break to the end of the chromosome, and whole-chromosomal and segmental aneuploidies were identified in 5/6 LOH-selected isolates from wild-type hosts (Fig. 3). However, no aneuploidy was detected in C. albicans from immunocompromised host backgrounds (Fig. 3). Four isolates carried a long-tract LOH or segmental aneuploidy on Chr2 with breakpoints ranging between positions 1,795,723 and 2,155,170; four carried a 170 kb LOH tract or segmental aneuploidy on Chr6, whose breakpoint corresponds with position 861,044, the beginning of a major repeat sequence (MRS). One isolate was trisomic for Chr7 and tetrasomic for Chr6. Even among non-LOH selected isolates associated with wild-type hosts, 50% had undergone whole-chromosome LOH on Chr2 (Fig. S3). However, no large-scale genomic changes were detected in non-LOH selected isolates associated with sek-1 hosts (Fig. S3, second row). Thus, immune components in wild-type hosts induced large-scale genomic changes in C. albicans.

FIG 3.

FIG 3

Genome-wide changes following host association. YMAPs of C. albicans following 4-day exposure to N2 (WT), sek-1, and bli-3 hosts with GAL1 LOH selection. Reference strain with the location of GAL1 on chromosome 1 (indicated with a red line) is displayed at the top. The y axis on each chromosome indicates the chromosomal copy number. Chromosomal color indicates allelic ratio (gray = heterozygous, cyan/pink = homozygous, darker blue/purple = heterozygous with >2 alleles).

C. albicans evolves rapidly in immunocompetent hosts, but not in immunocompromised hosts.

Thus far, our results support a model wherein innate immunity generates C. albicans genetic variation by inducing genome instability. Because genetic variation is a fundamental requirement for a response to natural selection, we hypothesized that C. albicans would evolve more rapidly in immunocompetent hosts than in immunocompromised hosts. To test this hypothesis, were performed in vivo experimental evolution utilizing immunocompetent and immunocompromised hosts and selected for increased C. albicans virulence. Given that exposure to both bli-3 and sek-1 hosts reduced genome-wide genetic diversity in C. albicans (Fig. 3), we selected AU-37 (glp-4; sek-1) as our immunocompromised hosts for logistical purposes (see Materials and Methods). We infected six parallel populations of 50 hosts for both the immunocompetent and immunocompromised host groups. When a host population reached 50% mortality, we extracted C. albicans from the dead hosts to infect a new host population, selecting for C. albicans associated with early host death (Fig. 4A). We evolved C. albicans in this manner for a total of 10 passages (Fig. 4A). After five passages in immunocompetent hosts, the average time to 50% mortality was ∼8 days, which was significantly lower than the initial passage with an average of 12 days (Fig. 4B), indicating increased virulence in C. albicans. This increased virulence was subsequently maintained throughout the remainder of the evolution experiment (Fig. 4B). In contrast, there was no change in the average time to 50% mortality in immunocompromised hosts throughout 10 passages, despite them being more susceptible initially to C. albicans infection compared to the immunocompetent hosts (Fig. 4C). Therefore, C. albicans did not respond to selection for increased virulence in the immunocompromised hosts within 10 passages. Together, these results support our hypothesis that host immunity-induced genomic changes generated in C. albicans populations facilitated a strong response to this selection regime.

FIG 4.

FIG 4

C. albicans evolves rapidly in immunocompetent hosts. )A) Experimental schematic. (B) Time to 50% mortality for 10 passages in healthy, immunocompetent (glp-4) hosts. Mean (n = 6) and SD for each passage infected with C. albicans are plotted. (C) Time to 50% mortality for 10 passages in immunocompromised (glp-4; sek-1) hosts infected with C. albicans. Mean (n = 6) and SD for each passage are plotted. Asterisks represent significant differences compared to the initial (P0) time point (****, P < 0.0001; *** P < 0.005, ** P < 0.01; *, P < 0.05; Kruskal-Wallis with post hoc Dunn’s multiple test). (D) Time to 50% mortality for immunocompetent and immunocompromised hosts infected with C. albicans from the initial passage (Host P0), C. albicans evolved for 10 generations in the absence of hosts (No-host P10), and C. albicans evolved in the host environment for 10 generations (Host P10). Asterisks represent significant differences compared to the initial (P0) time point (***, P < 0.005; ns, not significant; Kruskal-Wallis with post hoc Dunn’s multiple test).

To validate that the increased virulence observed from immunocompetent hosts was a direct result of our selection pressure and not the passaging itself, we passaged C. albicans in parallel experimental conditions but in the absence of hosts. We then infected immunocompetent and immunocompromised hosts with the ‘no-host’ evolved (gray, P10) C. albicans and found that ‘no-host’ evolved C. albicans did not exhibit changes in virulence relative to the ancestral (P0) state, regardless of host immune status (Fig. 4D). Thus, selection for virulence was responsible for the increase in virulence in C. albicans evolved in immunocompetent hosts.

DISCUSSION

We previously reported that healthy, immunocompetent hosts induce C. albicans genome instability. We followed this up by investigating whether host innate immune pathways drive pathogen genome instability (17). By using a wild-type host and two immunocompromised hosts deficient for AMP production (sek-1) and ROS production (bli-3), we compared the differences in host-associated C. albicans genome stability and mutational landscape. C. albicans associated with either of the immunocompromised hosts had reduced relative LOH frequencies compared to those associated with wild-type hosts (Fig. 1). Similar to several other host-passaging experiments and whole-genome sequencing results from clinical isolates (14, 16, 19), many of our isolates extracted from wild-type hosts contained large-scale genomic changes, including whole and segmental chromosomal aneuploidy and/or additional LOH events (Fig. 3). We detected the presence of an extra copy of Chr6 following host exposure, consistent with previous observations of host-induced genomic alterations which used a murine OPC infection model (14). The aforementioned study suggested that Chr6 aneuploidy produces more commensal-like phenotypes inside the host environment. Whether this occurred in our isolate with Chr6 aneuploidy following host exposure has yet to be investigated. We also detected an extra copy of Chr7 in one isolate following wild-type host exposure. In a gastrointestinal (GI) murine model of candidiasis, Chr7 trisomy results in higher C. albicans fitness within the GI tract compared to the euploid strain (16). Therefore, specific aneuploidies may enable host adaptation. Following immunocompromised (sek-1 or bli-3) host association, C. albicans isolates did not carry any detectable aneuploidy and only a small number (2/8) had an LOH event that was not selected for (Fig. 2). These results suggest that both AMPs and ROS act as stressors on C. albicans that enable the generation of genetic variation, which might lead to phenotypic changes that create a more commensal host-pathogen relationship.

The host has a variety of mechanisms capable of controlling microbial growth. Because C. albicans is normally commensal, it must strike a delicate balance with the host to evade detection. Overgrowth of C. albicans initiates an immune response that initially includes the production of AMPs. AMPs then recruit phagocytes to the site of infection, which produce ROS (22). We found that the removal of host-produced AMPs and ROS decrease LOH frequency and overall genomic changes in C. albicans compared to that in C. albicans extracted from wild-type hosts (Fig. 1 and 3). We only found a significant decrease in the relative LOH frequency in both the laboratory and bloodstream C. albicans extracted from bli-3 hosts compared to wild-type hosts. However, we did not detect a significant decrease in relative LOH frequency in the bloodstream strain extracted from sek-1 hosts (Fig. 1B and C). This suggests that host-produced ROS generates genome instability regardless of pathogen background. However, the sek-1 pathway may only produce AMPs in response to certain strains of C. albicans. We propose that the differences observed in genome instability between different strains of C. albicans is potentially due to recognition of different PAMPs by host PRR which can trigger different immune responses (44).

Because host-produced ROS represented a conserved source of genome instability across two different strains of C. albicans, we further investigated the role of host-produced ROS in generating genome instability. C. albicans has several mechanisms to detoxify ROS, one of which is regulated by the transcription factor Cap1p. Cap1Δ/Δ mutants are more susceptible to in vitro killing by ROS (38, 45). Here, we show that cap1Δ/Δ C. albicans genome instability was increased compared to that of wild-type C. albicans in hosts capable of producing ROS (N2 and sek-1), but not in bli-3 hosts incapable of producing ROS (Fig. 2B). These findings suggest that host-produced ROS, through the bli-3 dual-oxidase, induces genome instability in C. albicans, and that Cap1p is important for detoxification of host-produced ROS. Recent work in E. coli demonstrated that when exposed to low levels of ROS, E. coli exhibits a priming response, where evolution in ROS occurs faster and cells develop greater resistance as opposed to non-primed cells (46). Our results suggest that host-produced ROS might be priming C. albicans, allowing for tolerance of greater stress.

Although counterintuitive, LOH increases genetic diversity by unmasking recessive alleles, leading to phenotypic changes (43). For example, LOH of drug-resistant alleles of ERG11, TAC1, or MRR1 increases antifungal drug resistance (4749). Similarly, aneuploidy offers a short-term solution that organisms use during adaptation (5052) and have been shown to be advantageous under certain conditions, including in the host environment (1416). Because we detected large-scale LOH events and aneuploidy in isolates exposed to immunocompetent hosts, we suggest that these genetic changes facilitate rapid adaptation to the host. Through experimental evolution in immunocompetent and immunocompromised C. elegans hosts, we found that C. albicans evolved increased virulence rapidly in immunocompetent hosts, but not in immunocompromised hosts (Fig. 4). Our work identifies AMPs and ROS as important conserved innate immune responses that generate genome instability in the fungal pathogen C. albicans. We propose that the generation of genetic variation in response to host-produced ROS and AMPs represents a way in which C. albicans can quickly respond to host stressors, thus further tolerating these stressors or avoiding further immune attack. Finally, we demonstrate that immunocompetent hosts facilitate rapid evolution under selection for increased virulence. We hypothesize this is a result from the combination of strong selective pressure and the greater genetic variation generated in C. albicans by the innate immune response. Therefore, the host environment can significantly alter the evolutionary trajectories of C. albicans populations. While many factors may contribute to the shift from commensal to pathogen in C. albicans populations, it is clear that the host immune system can determine the level of genetic variation available for a response to selection. Thus, identifying the selective pressures that drive the shift from commensal to pathogen is critical for understanding C. albicans evolution within hosts.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Strains and maintenance.

C. albicans and C. elegans strains for this study are listed in Table S1 in the supplemental material. Yeast strains (5355) were stored at −80°C and maintained on YPD (yeast peptone dextrose; 1% yeast extract, 2% bactopeptone, 2% glucose, 0.004% adenine, 0.008% uridine) at 30°C. Strains were initially struck onto YPD agar plates from frozen glycerol stocks and incubated at 30°C for 48 h, and single colonies were used as the “parental strain” in subsequent in vivo experiments. Nematode populations were maintained on plates containing nematode growth media (NGM) with E. coli (OP50) for a food source. C. elegans were transferred to a new plate containing freshly seeded E. coli every 3 to 4 days. For genome stability assays, treatment plates were seeded with both C. albicans and E. coli and supplemented with 0.2 g/L streptomycin to inhibit overgrowth of E. coli. For fecundity and genome stability assays, NGM was supplemented with 0.08g/L of uridine and 0.08g/L of histidine to facilitate growth of auxotrophic C. albicans strains.

Host-associated C. albicans genome stability.

Host preparation: NGM plates were seeded with a mixture of E. coli and C. albicans 24 h prior to host preparation. To seed plates, single colonies of C. albicans were inoculated into 3 mL YPD and incubated overnight at 30°C. Cultures were adjusted with double-distilled water (ddH2O) to a final concentration of 3.0 OD600 per mL. Simultaneously, a single colony of E. coli was inoculated into 50 mL LB and incubated for 24 to 48 h at 30°C. The E. coli culture was pelleted and washed twice with 1 mL ddH2O. The pellet was weighed and diluted to a final concentration of 200 mg/mL. For in vitro treatments, 250 μL C. albicans was spread onto NGM + streptomycin agar plates and incubated overnight at 30°C. For in vivo treatment plates, 6.25 μL C. albicans and 31.25 μL E. coli were brought to a final volume of 250 μL with ddH2O, spread onto NGM + streptomycin agar plates, and incubated overnight at 30°C. For experimental evolution experiments, C. albicans treatment plates had 1.25 μL C. albicans and 6.25 μL E. coli, and were brought to a final volume of 50 μL. The final 50-μL volume was spotted onto the center of a 35-mm-diameter NGM-plus-streptomycin agar plate followed by incubation at room temperature overnight before the addition of eggs or transferred nematodes.

To synchronize C. elegans populations, nematodes and eggs were washed off plates with M9 buffer, transferred to 15-mL conical tubes, and pelleted via centrifugation (2 min at 1,200 rpm). The pellet was resuspended in 2 mL of 25% bleach, mixed via inversion for 2 min, and centrifuged for 2 min at 1,200 rpm. The pellet was washed twice with 3 mL ddH2O and resuspended with 1 mL ddH2O. To determine the concentration of eggs, 10 μL was pipetted onto a concave slide, eggs were visualized under a microscope and counted, and the suspension was adjusted to a concentration of ∼100 eggs per 100 μL with M9.

Host-associated yeast extractions: Yeast extractions were performed as described previously (17). Hosts exposed to C. albicans were washed from plates with 3 mL M9 and pelleted via centrifugation (2 min at 2,000 RPM). The supernatant was removed, and the pellet was resuspended with 1 mL 3% bleach, transferred to a microcentrifuge tube, incubated for 3 min, and subsequently centrifuged for 1 min at 12,000 rpm. The supernatant was removed, washed with 1 mL of M9, and centrifuged for 1 min at 12,000 rpm. The wash was repeated two more times to ensure all bleach was removed. Next, 100-μL aliquots of nematode suspension were transferred to 0.6-mL clear microtubes for manual disruption with a motorized pestle. After 1 min of manual disruption, the worm intestine solution was then diluted accordingly with an M9 buffer and plated on YPD + 0.034 mg/L chloramphenicol to prevent any bacterial colonies from arising.

GAL1 Loss of Heterozygosity assay.

In vitro: Single colonies of C. albicans were inoculated in 3 mL YPD grown overnight at 30°C and subsequently diluted to 3 OD in ddH2O. A volume of 250 μL was plated and spread onto NGM + streptomycin plates, incubated overnight at 30°C, and transferred to 20°C for 4 days to mimic the conditions of the in vivo LOH assay. On day 4, yeast cells were washed off with ddH2O, harvested by centrifugation, washed once with ddH2O, resuspended in 1 mL of ddH2Om and serially diluted for single colony growth. To determine the total cell viability, 100 μL of 10−6 dilution was plated onto YPD and grown for 48 h at 30°C. To identify cells that lost GAL1, 100 μL of 10−2 and 10−3 dilution was plated onto 2-deoxygalactose (2-DOG; 0.17% yeast nitrogen base without amino acids, 0.5% ammonium sulfate, 0.0004% uridine, 0.0004% histidine, 0.1% 2-deoxygalacose, 3% glycerol) and CFU was counted following 72 h incubation at 30°C. LOH assays with α-lipoic acid were performed as described above, but α-lipoic acid (Sigma-Aldrich cat. no. 1077-28-7) was dissolved in 100% ethanol and added to NGM media containing 0.2 g/L streptomycin sulfate to a final concentration of 25 μM.

In vivo: The approach was similar to the in vitro LOH assay described above, with the following changes. A population of ∼100 nematodes was plated on each treatment plate containing both C. albicans and E. coli. On day 4, yeast was extracted as described in the previous section. A dilution of 10−1 and 10−2 was plated on YPD + chloramphenicol to enumerate total growth, and undiluted cells were plated on 2-DOG to select for the loss of GAL1. Three technical replicates were used for each C. albicans strain for both in vitro and in vivo experiments. At least three biological replicates were used for each genome stability assay.

Hydrogen peroxide exposure and genome stability.

Six single colonies of C. albicans were inoculated in either 2 mL of YPD or 2 mL of YPD containing 5 mM H2O2, and were grown for 20 h at 30°C. Cultures were centrifuged at 2,000 rpm for 2 min. The supernatant was removed, and the pellet was washed once with 1 mL ddH2O. Cultures were serially diluted for single colony growth. Loss-of-heterozygosity assays were performed to determine the frequency of LOH.

Whole-genome sequencing and analysis.

Genomic DNA was isolated with phenol chloroform as described previously (56). Whole-genome sequencing was performed through the Microbial Genome Sequencing Center using a single library preparation method based on the Illumina Nextera kit. Libraries were sequencing using paired-end (2 × 150 bp) reads on the NextSeq 550 platform. Adaptor sequences and low-quality reads were trimmed using Trimmomatic (v0.39 LEADING:3 TRAILING: 3 SLIDINGWINDOW: 4:15 MINLEN: 36 TOPHRED33) (57). All reads were mapped to the phased C. albicans reference genome using the haplotypo python script ‘mapping.py’. This tool uses the Burrows-Wheeler Aligner MEM (BWA v0.1.19) algorithm to align the sequencing reads to the reference genome, followed by Samtools (v0.1.19) to sort, mark duplicates, and create a BAM file. The average coverage and read depth for each isolate were calculated using samtools ‘coverage’ (see Supplemental File 2). Variant files were created using the haplotypo python script ‘var_calling.py’ using the BCFtools calling method with a minimum coverage of 30. Variants were filtered using the following parameters “DP≤30 ‖ QD < 2.0 ‖ MQ < 40.0 ‖ FS > 60.0 ‖ MQRankSum < −12.5 ‖ ReadPosRankSum < −8.0”. Identification of aneuploidy, CNVs, and LOH were conducted using whole-genome sequencing data and the Yeast Mapping Analysis Pipeline (YMAP). BAM files were uploaded to YMAP and plotted using the Candida albicans reference genome (A21-s02smo8-r09) with corrections for chromosome end bias and GC content (58).

Experimental evolution.

Wild-type SC5314 C. albicans was evolved in immunocompetent (glp-4) and immunocompromised (glp-4; sek-1) nematode host backgrounds. We chose to use the glp-4 background because of the temperature sensitive sterility mutation. At 25°C, the glp-4 nematodes are unable to reproduce, allowing us to track the survival of a single generation of nematodes (59). Additionally, we chose to use the sek-1 background for our immunocompromised host because of the availability of sek-1 and glp-4 mutations in the same background. This allowed for complete control over tracking the same population of 50 worms for each passage, which was required for our selection regime. For each host background, experimental evolution was performed with six replicate evolved lines. NGM plates were seeded with C. albicans and E. coli 24 h prior to the start of the evolution. On day 1, nematodes were synchronized and incubated at 25°C for 48 h. On day 3, 50 L4 nematodes were transferred to a newly seeded NGM plate containing both C. albicans and E. coli. Every day the host population was monitored for survival and dead nematodes were transferred to a 1.5-mL microcentrifuge tube containing 500 μL of M9 buffer. Every other day, the remaining live nematodes were transferred to newly seeded plates to replenish their food supply. Once the host population reached 50% mortality, C. albicans was extracted from only the 25 dead nematodes by centrifuging the 1.5-mL microcentrifuge tube for 30 s at maximum speed. The supernatant was removed, 500 uL of 3% bleach was added for 2 min to kill any microbes on the nematode surfaces, and it was then centrifuged for 30s at maximum speed. The supernatant was removed and the nematode pellet was washed three times with 500 uL M9. The nematodes were manually disrupted using a motorized pestle for 1 min and all the intestinal extracts were inoculated into 2 mL YPD containing 0.034 mg/L chloramphenicol to prevent any bacterial growth. This inoculum was used to seed a new population of 50 hosts in the subsequent passage.

Statistical analysis.

Statistical analysis was performed using GraphPad Prism 8 software. Data sets were tested for normality using the D’Agnostino-Pearson omnibus normality test.

Data availability.

All supplemental files and relevant data will be posted on the Dryad Digital Repository, pending manuscript acceptance. Raw sequencing reads will be deposited NCBI sequence read archive pending manuscript acceptance.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS/AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

We thank Eduardo Scopel Ferreira Da Costa (University of Georgia), Abdul-Rhanman Adamu Bukari (University of Manitoba), and Venkat Talla (Emory University) for helpful discussions regarding sequencing analysis. We also thank Ognenka Avramovska for thoughtful conversations and critical reading of the manuscript.

This research is supported by NSF DEB-1943415 (M.A.H.), NSF DEB-1750553 (L.T.M.), and Emory University startup funds (M.A.H.).

A.C.S. and M.A.H. designed the study. A.C.S. conducted all of the experiments. A.C.S. and M.A.H. analyzed the data. A.C.S., L.T.M., and M.A.H. wrote, reviewed, and edited the manuscript.

Footnotes

Supplemental material is available online only.

Supplemental file 2
Supplemental material. Download iai.00328-21-s0001.xlsx, XLSX file, 0.03 MB (28.3KB, xlsx)
Supplemental file 1
Supplemental material. Download iai.00328-21-s0002.pdf, PDF file, 1.7 MB (1.7MB, pdf)

Contributor Information

Amanda C. Smith, Email: ashurzi@emory.edu.

Mairi C. Noverr, Tulane School of Medicine

REFERENCES

  • 1.Perlroth J, Choi B, Spellberg B. 2007. Nosocomial fungal infections: epidemiology, diagnosis, and treatment. Med Mycol 45:321–346. 10.1080/13693780701218689. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Pfaller MA, Diekema DJ. 2007. Epidemiology of invasive candidiasis: a persistent public health problem. Clin Microbiol Rev 20:133–163. 10.1128/CMR.00029-06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Sobel JD. 2007. Vulvovaginal candidosis. Lancet 369:1961–1971. 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60917-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Akimoto-Gunther L, de Bonfim-Mendonça PS, Takahachi G, Irie MMT, Miyamoto S, Consolaro MEL, Svidzinsk TIE. 2016. Highlights regarding host predisposing factors to recurrent vulvovaginal candidiasis: chronic stress and reduced antioxidant capacity. PLoS One 11:e0158870. 10.1371/journal.pone.0158870. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Ahmad A, Khan AU. 2009. Prevalence of Candida species and potential risk factors for vulvovaginal candidiasis in Aligarh, India. Eur J Obstet Gyn R B 144:68–71. 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2008.12.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Grigoriou O, Baka S, Makrakis E, Hassiakos D, Kapparos G, Kouskouni E. 2006. Prevalence of clinical vaginal candidiasis in a university hospital and possible risk factors. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 126:121–125. 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2005.09.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Gonçalves B, Ferreira C, Alves CT, Henriques M, Azeredo J, Silva S. 2015. Vulvovaginal candidiasis: epidemiology, microbiology and risk factors. Crit Rev Microbiol 42:1–23. 10.3109/1040841X.2015.1091805. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Gunther LSA, Martins HPR, Gimenes F, de Abreu ALP, Consolaro MEL, Svidzinski TIE. 2014. Prevalence of Candida albicans and non-albicans isolates from vaginal secretions: comparative evaluation of colonization, vaginal candidiasis and recurrent vaginal candidiasis in diabetic and non-diabetic women. Sao Paulo Med J 132:116–120. 10.1590/1516-3180.2014.1322640. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.de Leon EM, Jacober SJ, Sobel JD, Foxman B. 2002. Prevalence and risk factors for vaginal Candida colonization in women with type 1 and type 2 diabetes. BMC Infect Dis 2:1. 10.1186/1471-2334-2-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Iliev ID, Leonardi I. 2017. Fungal dysbiosis: immunity and interactions at mucosal barriers. Nat Rev Immunol 17:635–646. 10.1038/nri.2017.55. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Underhill DM, Iliev ID. 2014. The mycobiota: interactions between commensal fungi and the host immune system. Nat Rev Immunol 14:405–416. 10.1038/nri3684. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Nucci M, Anaissie E. 2001. Revisiting the source of candidemia: skin or gut? Clin Infect Dis 33:1959–1967. 10.1086/323759. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Sitterlé E, Maufrais C, Sertour N, Palayret M, d'Enfert C, Bougnoux M-E. 2019. Within-host genomic diversity of Candida albicans in healthy carriers. Sci Rep 9:2563. 10.1038/s41598-019-38768-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Forche A, Cromie G, Gerstein AC, Solis NV, Pisithkul T, Srifa W, Jeffery E, Abbey D, Filler SG, Dudley AM, Berman J. 2018. Rapid phenotypic and genotypic diversification after exposure to the oral host niche in Candida albicans. Genetics 209:725–741. 10.1534/genetics.118.301019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Forche A, Solis NV, Swidergall M, Thomas R, Guyer A, Beach A, Cromie GA, Le GT, Lowell E, Pavelka N, Berman J, Dudley AM, Selmecki A, Filler SG. 2019. Selection of Candida albicans trisomy during oropharyngeal infection results in a commensal-like phenotype. PLoS Genet 15:e1008137. 10.1371/journal.pgen.1008137. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Ene IV, Farrer RA, Hirakawa MP, Agwamba K, Cuomo CA, Bennett RJ. 2018. Global analysis of mutations driving microevolution of a heterozygous diploid fungal pathogen. Proc National Acad Sci 115:E8688–E8697. 10.1073/pnas.1806002115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Smith AC, Hickman MA. 2020. Host-induced genome instability rapidly generates phenotypic variation across Candida albicans strains and ploidy states. mSphere 5:e00433-20. 10.1128/mSphere.00433-20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Forche A, Magee PT, Selmecki A, Berman J, May G. 2009. Evolution in Candida albicans populations during a single passage through a mouse host. Genetics 182:799–811. 10.1534/genetics.109.103325. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Hirakawa MP, Martinez DA, Sakthikumar S, Anderson MZ, Berlin A, Gujja S, Zeng Q, Zisson E, Wang JM, Greenberg JM, Berman J, Bennett RJ, Cuomo CA. 2015. Genetic and phenotypic intra-species variation in Candida albicans. Genome Res 25:413–425. 10.1101/gr.174623.114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Tso GHW, Reales-Calderon JA, Tan ASM, Sem X, Le GTT, Tan TG, Lai GC, Srinivasan KG, Yurieva M, Liao W, Poidinger M, Zolezzi F, Rancati G, Pavelka N. 2018. Experimental evolution of a fungal pathogen into a gut symbiont. Science 362:589–595. 10.1126/science.aat0537. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Akira S, Uematsu S, Takeuchi O. 2006. Pathogen recognition and innate immunity. Cell 124:783–801. 10.1016/j.cell.2006.02.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Netea MG, Brown GD, Kullberg BJ, Gow NAR. 2008. An integrated model of the recognition of Candida albicans by the innate immune system. Nat Rev Microbiol 6:67–78. 10.1038/nrmicro1815. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Shai Y. 2002. Mode of action of membrane active antimicrobial peptides. Peptide Sci 66:236–248. 10.1002/bip.10260. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Kim DH, Ausubel FM. 2005. Evolutionary perspectives on innate immunity from the study of Caenorhabditis elegans. Curr Opin Immunol 17:4–10. 10.1016/j.coi.2004.11.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Kim DH, Feinbaum R, Alloing G, Emerson FE, Garsin DA, Inoue H, Tanaka-Hino M, Hisamoto N, Matsumoto K, Tan M-W, Ausubel FM. 2002. A conserved p38 MAP kinase pathway in Caenorhabditis elegans innate immunity. Science 297:623–626. 10.1126/science.1073759. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Tanaka‐Hino M, Sagasti A, Hisamoto N, Kawasaki M, Nakano S, Ninomiya‐Tsuji J, Bargmann CI, Matsumoto K. 2002. SEK‐1 MAPKK mediates Ca2+ signaling to determine neuronal asymmetric development in Caenorhabditis elegans. EMBO Rep 3:56–62. 10.1093/embo-reports/kvf001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Feistel DJ, Elmostafa R, Nguyen N, Penley M, Morran L, Hickman MA. 2019. A novel virulence phenotype rapidly assesses Candida fungal pathogenesis in healthy and immunocompromised Caenorhabditis elegans hosts. mSphere 4:e00697-18. 10.1128/mSphere.00697-18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Feistel DJ, Elmostafa R, Hickman MA. 2020. Virulence phenotypes result from interactions between pathogen ploidy and genetic background. Ecol Evol 10:9326–9338. 10.1002/ece3.6619. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.van der Hoeven R, McCallum KC, Cruz MR, Garsin DA. 2011. Ce-Duox1/BLI-3 generated reactive oxygen species trigger protective SKN-1 activity via p38 MAPK signaling during infection in C. elegans. PLoS Pathog 7:e1002453. 10.1371/journal.ppat.1002453. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Thomson GJ, Hernon C, Austriaco N, Shapiro RS, Belenky P, Bennett RJ. 2019. Metabolism-induced oxidative stress and DNA damage selectively trigger genome instability in polyploid fungal cells. EMBO J 38:e101597. 10.15252/embj.2019101597. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Irazoqui JE, Urbach JM, Ausubel FM. 2010. Evolution of host innate defence: insights from Caenorhabditis elegans and primitive invertebrates. Nat Rev Immunol 10:47–58. 10.1038/nri2689. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Moribe H, Konakawa R, Koga D, Ushiki T, Nakamura K, Mekada E. 2012. Tetraspanin is required for generation of reactive oxygen species by the dual oxidase system in Caenorhabditis elegans. PLoS Genet 8:e1002957. 10.1371/journal.pgen.1002957. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.van der Hoeven R, Cruz MR, Chávez V, Garsin DA. 2015. Localization of the dual oxidase BLI-3 and characterization of its NADPH oxidase domain during infection of Caenorhabditis elegans. PLoS One 10:e0124091. 10.1371/journal.pone.0124091. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Chávez V, Mohri-Shiomi A, Garsin DA. 2009. Ce-Duox1/BLI-3 generates reactive oxygen species as a protective innate immune mechanism in Caenorhabditis elegans. Infect Immun 77:4983–4989. 10.1128/IAI.00627-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Jain C, Pastor K, Gonzalez AY, Lorenz MC, Rao RP. 2013. The role of Candida albicans AP-1 protein against host derived ROS in in vivo models of infection. Virulence 4:67–76. 10.4161/viru.22700. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Jena NR. 2012. DNA damage by reactive species: mechanisms, mutation and repair. J Biosci 37:503–517. 10.1007/s12038-012-9218-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Marr KA, White TC, van Burik JH, Bowden RA. 1997. Development of fluconazole resistance in Candida albicans causing disseminated infection in a patient undergoing marrow transplantation. Clin Infect Dis 25:908–910. 10.1086/515553. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Alarco A-M, Raymond M. 1999. The bZip transcription factor Cap1p is involved in multidrug resistance and oxidative stress response in Candida albicans. J Bacteriol 181:700–708. 10.1128/JB.181.3.700-708.1999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.da Dantas AS, Day A, Ikeh M, Kos I, Achan B, Quinn J. 2015. Oxidative stress responses in the human fungal pathogen, Candida albicans. Biomol 5:142–165. 10.3390/biom5010142. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Forche A, May G, Magee PT. 2005. Demonstration of loss of heterozygosity by single-nucleotide polymorphism microarray analysis and alterations in strain morphology in Candida albicans strains during infection. Eukaryot Cell 4:156–165. 10.1128/EC.4.1.156-165.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Forche A, Abbey D, Pisithkul T, Weinzierl MA, Ringstrom T, Bruck D, Petersen K, Berman J. 2011. Stress alters rates and types of loss of heterozygosity in Candida albicans. mBio 2:e00129-11. 10.1128/mBio.00129-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Llorente B, Smith CE, Symington LS. 2008. Break-induced replication: what is it and what is it for? Cell Cycle 7:859–864. 10.4161/cc.7.7.5613. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Feri A, Loll-Krippleber R, Commere P-H, Maufrais C, Sertour N, Schwartz K, Sherlock G, Bougnoux M-E, d’Enfert C, Legrand M. 2016. Analysis of repair mechanisms following an induced double-strand break uncovers recessive deleterious alleles in the Candida albicans diploid genome. mBio 7:e01109-16. 10.1128/mBio.01109-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Zheng N-X, Wang Y, Hu D-D, Yan L, Jiang Y-Y. 2015. The role of pattern recognition receptors in the innate recognition of Candida albicans. Virulence 6:347–361. 10.1080/21505594.2015.1014270. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Enjalbert B, Smith DA, Cornell MJ, Alam I, Nicholls S, Brown AJP, Quinn J. 2006. Role of the Hog1 stress-activated protein kinase in the global transcriptional response to stress in the fungal pathogen Candida albicans. Mol Biol Cell 17:1018–1032. 10.1091/mbc.e05-06-0501. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Rodríguez-Rojas A, Kim JJ, Johnston P, Makarova O, Eravci M, Weise C, Hengge R, Rolff J. 2020. Non-lethal exposure to H2O2 boosts bacterial survival and evolvability against oxidative stress. PLoS Genet 16:e1008649. 10.1371/journal.pgen.1008649. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.White TC. 1997. The presence of an R467K amino acid substitution and loss of allelic variation correlate with an azole-resistant lanosterol 14alpha demethylase in Candida albicans. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 41:1488–1494. 10.1128/AAC.41.7.1488. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Dunkel N, Blass J, Rogers PD, Morschhäuser J. 2008. Mutations in the multi‐drug resistance regulator MRR1, followed by loss of heterozygosity, are the main cause of MDR1 overexpression in fluconazole‐resistant Candida albicans strains. Mol Microbiol 69:827–840. 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2008.06309.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Coste A, Turner V, Ischer F, Morschhäuser J, Forche A, Selmecki A, Berman J, Bille J, Sanglard D. 2006. A mutation in Tac1p, a transcription factor regulating CDR1 and CDR2, is coupled with loss of heterozygosity at chromosome 5 to mediate antifungal resistance in Candida albicans. Genetics 172:2139–2156. 10.1534/genetics.105.054767. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Rancati G, Pavelka N, Fleharty B, Noll A, Trimble R, Walton K, Perera A, Staehling-Hampton K, Seidel CW, Li R. 2008. Aneuploidy underlies rapid adaptive evolution of yeast cells deprived of a conserved cytokinesis motor. Cell 135:879–893. 10.1016/j.cell.2008.09.039. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Yona AH, Manor YS, Herbst RH, Romano GH, Mitchell A, Kupiec M, Pilpel Y, Dahan O. 2012. Chromosomal duplication is a transient evolutionary solution to stress. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 109:21010–21015. 10.1073/pnas.1211150109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Pavelka N, Rancati G, Zhu J, Bradford WD, Saraf A, Florens L, Sanderson BW, Hattem GL, Li R. 2010. Aneuploidy confers quantitative proteome changes and phenotypic variation in budding yeast. Nature 468:321–325. 10.1038/nature09529. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Gillum AM, Tsay EYH, Kirsch DR. 1984. Isolation of the Candida albicans gene for orotidine-5′-phosphate decarboxylase by complementation of S. cerevisiae ura3 and E. coli pyrF mutations. Mol Gen Genet 198:179–182. 10.1007/BF00328721. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Hickman MA, Zeng G, Forche A, Hirakawa MP, Abbey D, Harrison BD, Wang Y-M, Su C, Bennett RJ, Wang Y, Berman J. 2013. The ‘obligate diploid’ Candida albicans forms mating-competent haploids. Nature 494:55–59. 10.1038/nature11865. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Noble SM, French S, Kohn LA, Chen V, Johnson AD. 2010. Systematic screens of a Candida albicans homozygous deletion library decouple morphogenetic switching and pathogenicity. Nat Genet 42:590–598. 10.1038/ng.605. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Selmecki A, Forche A, Berman J. 2006. Aneuploidy and isochromosome formation in drug-resistant Candida albicans. Science 313:367–370. 10.1126/science.1128242. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Bolger AM, Lohse M, Usadel B. 2014. Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics 30:2114–2120. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu170. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Abbey DA, Funt J, Lurie-Weinberger MN, Thompson DA, Regev A, Myers CL, Berman J. 2014. YMAP: a pipeline for visualization of copy number variation and loss of heterozygosity in eukaryotic pathogens. Genome Med 6:100. 10.1186/s13073-014-0100-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Rastogi S, Borgo B, Pazdernik N, Fox P, Mardis ER, Kohara Y, Havranek J, Schedl T. 2015. Caenorhabditis elegans glp-4 encodes a calyl aminoacyl tRNA synthetase. G3 (Bethesda) 5:2719–2728. 10.1534/g3.115.021899. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplemental file 2

Supplemental material. Download iai.00328-21-s0001.xlsx, XLSX file, 0.03 MB (28.3KB, xlsx)

Supplemental file 1

Supplemental material. Download iai.00328-21-s0002.pdf, PDF file, 1.7 MB (1.7MB, pdf)

Data Availability Statement

All supplemental files and relevant data will be posted on the Dryad Digital Repository, pending manuscript acceptance. Raw sequencing reads will be deposited NCBI sequence read archive pending manuscript acceptance.


Articles from Infection and Immunity are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES