Abstract
Two European cohort studies have suggested that Graves’ disease is associated with the development of Parkinson’s disease, although the results were limited and controversial. We evaluated whether patients with Graves’ disease had an increased risk of developing Parkinson’s disease according to treatment modality. We included 65 380 Graves’ disease patients and 326 900 healthy controls matched according to age and sex, using the Korean National Health Insurance database. The primary outcome was the incidences of Parkinson’s disease amongst Graves’ disease patients and controls. Subgroup analyses of Graves’ disease patients were performed according to anti-thyroid drug treatment, radioactive iodine therapy and surgery. The cumulative dose and duration values of anti-thyroid drug were calculated for each patient and categorized into highest, middle and lowest tertiles. Amongst 65 380 Graves’ disease patients, 301 Parkinson’s disease cases were diagnosed during 453 654 person-years of follow-up. Relative to the controls, and regardless of age, sex or comorbidities, the Graves’ disease patients had a 33% higher risk of developing Parkinson’s disease (hazard ratio: 1.33, 95% confidence interval: 1.17–1.51). Most Graves’ disease patients (96%) had received medical therapy, and increased risks of Parkinson’s disease were observed in the various subgroups for cumulative dose and treatment duration. This study revealed that Graves’ disease was an independent risk factor for developing Parkinson’s disease, and that the risk remained elevated regardless of demographic factors or treatment duration/dosage of the anti-thyroid drug. Clinicians should be aware that Graves’ disease patients have an increased risk of developing Parkinson’s disease, even though Graves’ disease patients are often relatively young.
Keywords: Graves’ disease, Parkinson’s disease, population-based study, Korea
The dopaminergic system interacts with thyroid hormones, however, evidence regarding Graves’ disease and Parkinson’s disease is scarce. This is the first epidemiological study on the effect of Graves’ disease on incident Parkinson’s disease and Kim et al. demonstrate that Graves’ disease is an independent risk factor for developing Parkinson’s disease.
Graphical Abstract
Graphical Abstract.
Introduction
After Alzheimer’s disease, Parkinson’s disease is the second most common neurodegenerative disease. The incidence of Parkinson’s disease increases with age, affecting 1% of people who are >60 years old.1 This disease is characterized by progressive motor dysfunction, which can involve bradykinesia, resting tremors, rigidity and postural instability, as well as non-motor symptoms, such as sleep disturbance, depression, constipation and dysautonomic symptoms.2 Early-stage Parkinson’s disease leads to degeneration of dopaminergic neurons in the pars compacta of the substantia nigra, and loss of dopaminergic neurons is the most common post-mortem finding in brains that are affected by Parkinson’s disease.3
The dopaminergic system interacts with the hypothalamic–pituitary–thyroid (HPT) axis, with dopamine stimulating the production of thyrotropin-releasing hormone (TRH) and inhibiting the production of thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) and thyroid hormone. The HPT axis also regulates dopamine release. There is epidemiological evidence that thyroid diseases are associated with Parkinson’s disease,4–6 and similar genes contribute to both diseases,7–10 which may suggest that they share a common pathophysiological mechanism. Graves’ disease is an autoimmune thyroid disease that can lead to disturbances in dopamine transmission and the loss of dopaminergic neurons.11,12 However, we are only aware of two studies that have investigated the association between Graves’ disease and the subsequent development of Parkinson’s disease. Li et al.5 evaluated a Swedish nationwide database and reported that, relative to the healthy population, patients with Graves’ disease had an increased risk of developing Parkinson’s disease [standardized incidence ratio (SIR): 1.63, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.39–1.90]. Furthermore, an even higher risk of developing Parkinson’s disease was observed amongst patients with Graves’ disease who were <65 years old (SIR: 1.72, 95% CI: 1.02–2.73), although the risk of Parkinson’s disease was not significantly increased at 5 years after the Graves’ disease diagnosis. Rugbjerg et al.6 performed a Danish population-based case–control study and reported that women with Graves’ disease had an increased risk of Parkinson’s disease (odds ratio [OR]: 2.1, 95% CI: 1.3–3.5), although the development of Parkinson’s disease was not associated with any other autoimmune diseases. However, both of these European cohort studies5,6 investigated the relationship between >30 autoimmune diseases and subsequent Parkinson’s disease, and could not support a detailed analysis of the association between Graves’ disease and Parkinson’s disease. Therefore, the present study evaluated whether Korean patients with Graves’ disease had an increased risk of developing Parkinson’s disease, using nationally representative data from the National Health Information Database (NHID), as well as whether the risk of developing Parkinson’s disease was associated with the Graves’ disease treatment modality and/or the cumulative dose and duration of anti-thyroid drug (ATD) treatment.
Methods
Data source
Data were retrieved from the Korean NHID, which is maintained by the National Health Insurance Service (NHIS). The NHIS is the only public medical insurance system in Korea and covers ∼97% of the Korean population, with the other 3% being covered by Medicaid. The NHID contains nationally representative data regarding healthcare utilization, health screening, sociodemographic variables and mortality, with healthcare utilization and drug prescriptions linked to International Classification of Diseases, 10th revision (ICD-10) diagnostic codes.13
Study population
We identified 103 932 individuals who were diagnosed with Graves’ disease between January 2009 and December 2014 using the ICD-10 code for hyperthyroidism (E05). Patients with Graves’ disease were grouped according to whether they had received ATDs for ≥60 consecutive days (the ATD group), had undergone radioactive iodine therapy (the RAIT group) or had undergone thyroid surgery (the surgery group). Patients who underwent RAIT or surgery for Graves’ disease were assigned to the RAIT group or surgery group, regardless of whether they had received ATDs. The definition for detecting Graves’ disease cases used in this study has been used in the previous epidemiologic studies for Graves’ disease in Korea.14,15 Patients with thyroid carcinoma were excluded (ICD-10 code: C73.9). To exclude pre-existing Graves’ disease or Parkinson’s disease, a washout period was applied from January 2006 to study enrolment. Furthermore, as Parkinson’s disease is uncommon amongst individuals who are <40 years old,16 we excluded patients who were <40 years old, patients who were diagnosed with Parkinson’s disease during the washout period, or patients with missing data. Thus, the analysis included 65 380 Graves’ disease cases, who were matched with 326 900 controls (1:5 ratio) according to age and sex. The study period ended in December 2018.
The retrospective study protocol was approved by the Samsung Medical Center’s institutional review board (2019-01-034). The requirement for informed patient consent was waived based on the use of publicly available and de-identified patient data. All procedures for this study complied with the relevant patient confidentiality guidelines.
Clinical variables
Comorbidities, including diabetes, hypertension and dyslipidaemia, were defined based on ICD-10 codes for diagnoses and drug prescriptions. Household income was classified into quartiles (Q1–Q4) and absolute poverty. The cumulative ATD dose was determined for each patient and classified as <4953 mg (lowest tertile), 4953–18 700 mg (middle tertile) and >18 700 mg (highest tertile). The ATD treatment duration was also determined for each patient and classified as <12 months (lowest tertile), 12–35 months (middle tertile) and >35 months (highest tertile).
Identification of new Parkinson’s disease cases
The NHIS includes a registration programme for rare intractable diseases (RIDs), which include Parkinson’s disease. This programme was launched in 2006 and offers a copayment rate reduction of up to 10% (versus 20–30% for other common diseases). The patient is eligible for this RID programme after their physician submits a diagnosis certification. For cases of Parkinson’s disease, the certification is generally written by neurologists or primary care physicians who have examined the patient. New Parkinson’s disease onset was defined as a claim with the ICD-10 code for Parkinson’s disease (G20) and with a special RID registration code that indicates Parkinson’s disease (V124). This definition has been used in previous Korean epidemiological studies of Parkinson’s disease.16–19
Statistical analysis
Categorical baseline characteristics were compared using the χ2 test. Conventional Cox proportional hazard regression analyses were performed to evaluate the association between Graves’ disease and incident Parkinson’s disease. The incidence rate (IR) was not adjusted in Model 1, whilst Model 2 was adjusted for age, sex, household income and comorbidities. The P-values for the interaction were calculated according to age, sex and comorbidities, which included diabetes, hypertension and dyslipidaemia. All statistical analyses were performed using SAS software (version 9.4; SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA).
Data availability
The datasets generated and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Results
Demographic characteristics
The study included 65 380 Graves’ disease patients and 326 900 matched healthy controls. The mean age was 54 years, most subjects (83%) were <65 years old and 29% of subjects in both groups were men (Table 1). The Graves’ disease patients had higher prevalences of diabetes, hypertension and dyslipidaemia. In Graves’ disease patients, the majority of patients (95.8%) were treated with ATDs, followed by RAIT (3.4%) and surgery (0.8%). The RAIT group had a higher percentage of male, younger age and lower prevalences of diabetes and dyslipidaemia, compared to those of the ATD and surgery groups. The mean follow-up periods were 7.1 years in groups of Graves’ disease patients and controls.
Table 1.
Baseline demographics of patients with Graves’ disease and controls
Variables | Controls (n = 326 900) | Graves’ disease (n = 65 380) | P-value | ATD (n = 62 615) | RAIT (n = 2237) | Surgery (n = 528) | P-value* |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Male sex | 95 175 (29%) | 19 035 (29%) | 1 | 18 148 (29%) | 766 (34%) | 121 (23%) | <0.0001 |
Mean age, years | 54.2 ± 10.1 | 54.2 ± 10.1 | 1 | 54.3 ± 10.1 | 53.0 ± 9.8 | 54.0 ± 10.2 | <0.0001 |
Age of ≥65 years | 55 135 (17%) | 11 027 (17%) | 1 | 10 614 (17%) | 320 (14%) | 93 (18%) | 0.004 |
Household income | <0.0001 | 0.009 | |||||
Absolute poverty | 19 615 (6%) | 4226 (6%) | 4045 (6%) | 133 (6%) | 48 (9%) | ||
First quartile | 61 810 (19%) | 11 932 (19%) | 11 459 (18%) | 389 (17%) | 84 (16%) | ||
Second quartile | 61 620 (19%) | 11 689 (18%) | 11 194 (18%) | 384 (17%) | 111 (21%) | ||
Third quartile | 74 678 (23%) | 14 700 (22%) | 14 065 (23%) | 506 (23%) | 129 (24%) | ||
Fourth quartile | 109 177 (33%) | 22 833 (35%) | 21 852 (35%) | 825 (37%) | 156 (30%) | ||
Diabetes | 26 117 (8%) | 8291 (13%) | <0.0001 | 7978 (13%) | 234 (10%) | 79 (15%) | 0.002 |
Hypertension | 78 202 (24%) | 24 139 (37%) | <0.0001 | 22 932 (37%) | 963 (43%) | 244 (46%) | <0.0001 |
Dyslipidaemia | 44 564 (14%) | 10 518 (16%) | <0.0001 | 10 157 (16%) | 273 (12%) | 88 (17%) | <0.0001 |
ATD, anti-thyroid drug; RAIT, radioactive iodine therapy.
P-value was calculated amongst three groups according to the treatment modality.
Association of Graves’ disease and incident Parkinson’s disease
Amongst the 65 380 Graves’ disease patients, 301 cases of incident Parkinson’s disease were diagnosed during 453 654 person-years (PYs) of follow-up. Relative to the controls, the Graves’ disease patients had a 37% higher risk of developing Parkinson’s disease [hazard ratio (HR): 1.37, 95% CI: 1.21–1.56]. Furthermore, the Graves’ disease patients still had an increased risk of developing Parkinson’s disease after adjusting for age, sex, household income and comorbidities (HR: 1.33, 95% CI: 1.17–1.51) (Fig. 1).
Figure 1.
Cumulative incidence of Parkinson’s disease amongst patients with Graves’ disease and controls. Cox proportional hazard regression analyses were conducted and results were adjusted for age, sex, household income, diabetes, hypertension and dyslipidaemia.
Subgroup analyses were performed according to age, sex and comorbidities, which generally revealed significantly higher risks of Parkinson’s disease amongst patients with Graves’ disease. However, non-significantly higher risks of Parkinson’s disease development were observed amongst Graves’ disease patients with diabetes (HR: 1.10, 95% CI: 0.83–1.46) and Graves’ disease patients without hypertension (HR: 1.20, 95% CI: 0.97–1.47) (Table 2).
Table 2.
Subgroup analyses of Parkinson’s disease risk amongst patients with Graves’ disease and controls
Subgroup | Graves’ disease | n | Parkinson’s disease | PYs | IR per 1000 PYs | Hazard ratio (95% CI)a | P for interaction |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
40–64 years | No | 271 765 | 417 | 1 911 919 | 0.22 | Reference | 0.92 |
Yes | 54 353 | 115 | 382 998 | 0.30 | 1.33 (1.08–1.64) | ||
≥65 years | No | 55 135 | 680 | 354 584 | 1.92 | Reference | |
Yes | 11 027 | 186 | 70 655 | 2.63 | 1.34 (1.13–1.57) | ||
Male | No | 95 175 | 285 | 653 355 | 0.44 | Reference | 0.53 |
Yes | 19 035 | 84 | 131 059 | 0.64 | 1.43 (1.12–1.83) | ||
Female | No | 231 725 | 812 | 1 613 148 | 0.50 | Reference | |
Yes | 46 345 | 217 | 322 594 | 0.67 | 1.29 (1.11–1.50) | ||
No diabetes | No | 300 783 | 897 | 2 095 931 | 0.43 | Reference | 0.15 |
Yes | 57 089 | 236 | 398 425 | 0.59 | 1.40 (1.21–1.61) | ||
Diabetes | No | 26 117 | 200 | 170 572 | 1.17 | Reference | |
Yes | 8291 | 65 | 55 229 | 1.18 | 1.10 (0.83–1.46) | ||
No hypertension | No | 248 698 | 582 | 1 741 618 | 0.33 | Reference | 0.18 |
Yes | 41 241 | 107 | 288 571 | 0.37 | 1.20 (0.97–1.47) | ||
Hypertension | No | 78 202 | 515 | 524 885 | 0.98 | Reference | |
Yes | 24 139 | 194 | 165 083 | 1.18 | 1.41 (1.19–1.67) | ||
No dyslipidaemia | No | 282 336 | 803 | 1 972 689 | 0.41 | Reference | 0.15 |
Yes | 54 862 | 193 | 384 279 | 0.50 | 1.22 (1.04–1.43) | ||
Dyslipidaemia | No | 44 564 | 294 | 293 814 | 1.00 | Reference | |
Yes | 10 518 | 108 | 69 375 | 1.56 | 1.55 (1.24–1.93) |
PYs, person-years; IR, incidence rate.
Adjusted for age, sex, household income, diabetes, hypertension and dyslipidaemia.
Association between Graves’ disease and incident Parkinson’s disease according to treatment modality
Relative to the controls, the ATD group had a 31% higher risk of developing Parkinson’s disease (HR: 1.31, 95% CI: 1.15–1.50) and the surgery group had a 208% higher risk of developing Parkinson’s disease (HR: 3.08, 95% CI: 1.28–7.43). However, the RAIT group did not have a significantly higher risk of developing Parkinson’s disease (HR: 1.34, 95% CI: 0.70–2.59) (Table 3). The risk of developing Parkinson’s disease did not vary according to whether the patients achieved Graves’ disease remission after undergoing RAIT (data not shown).
Table 3.
Risks of Parkinson’s disease amongst patients with Graves’ disease according to treatment modality
n | Parkinson’s disease | PYs | IR per 1000 PYs | Model 1a | Model 2b | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Controls | 326 900 | 1097 | 2 266 503 | 0.48 | Reference | Reference |
Graves’ disease | 65 380 | 301 | 463 654 | 0.66 | 1.37 (1.21–1.56) | 1.33 (1.17–1.51) |
Treatment modality | ||||||
ATD | 62 615 | 287 | 434 451 | 0.66 | 1.37 (1.20–1.55) | 1.31 (1.15–1.50) |
RAIT | 2237 | 9 | 15 634 | 0.58 | 1.19 (0.62–2.29) | 1.34 (0.70–2.59) |
Surgery | 528 | 5 | 3569 | 1.40 | 2.91 (1.21–6.99) | 3.08 (1.28–7.43) |
PYs, person-years; IR, incidence rate; ATD, anti-thyroid drug; RAIT, radioactive iodine therapy.
Not adjusted.
Adjusted for age, sex, household income, diabetes, hypertension and dyslipidaemia.
Subgroup analyses of associations between Graves’ disease treatment modalities and incident Parkinson’s disease
Subgroup analyses were performed according to age, sex, comorbidities and treatments for Graves’ disease. Most subgroups of Graves’ disease patients had similar risks of developing Parkinson’s disease, regardless of demographic characteristics or treatment modality (non-significant P-values for interaction). In particular, Graves’ disease patients who were 40–64 years old (n = 54 353, 83% of the Graves’ disease population) had increased risks of developing Parkinson’s disease, regardless of whether their treatment had involved ATDs (HR: 1.27, 95% CI: 1.03–1.58), RAIT (HR: 2.47, 95% CI: 1.17–5.21) or surgery (HR: 4.34, 95% CI: 1.39–13.51) (Table 4). Moreover, subgroup analyses according to cumulative ATD dose and treatment duration revealed relatively consistent increased risks of developing Parkinson’s disease, relative to the controls. The one exception was a non-significant difference in the group with the longest ATD treatment duration (HR: 1.03, 95% CI: 0.82–1.29) (Table 5).
Table 4.
Subgroup analyses of Parkinson’s disease risk amongst patients with Graves’ disease and controls according to treatment modality
Subgroup | Treatment | n | Parkinson’s disease | PYs | IR per 1000 PYs | Hazard ratio (95% CI)a | P for interaction |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
40–64 years | Controls | 271 765 | 417 | 1 911 919 | 0.22 | Reference | 0.20 |
ATD | 52 001 | 105 | 366 430 | 0.29 | 1.27 (1.03–1.58) | ||
RAIT | 1917 | 7 | 13 566 | 0.52 | 2.47 (1.17–5.21) | ||
Surgery | 435 | 3 | 3002 | 0.99 | 4.34 (1.39–13.51) | ||
≥65 years | Controls | 55 135 | 680 | 354 584 | 1.92 | Reference | |
ATD | 10 614 | 182 | 68 021 | 2.68 | 1.35 (1.15–1.60) | ||
RAIT | 320 | 2 | 2067 | 0.97 | 0.51 (0.13–2.05) | ||
Surgery | 93 | 2 | 567 | 3.53 | 1.85 (0.49–7.86) | ||
Male sex | Controls | 95 175 | 285 | 653 355 | 0.44 | Reference | 0.51 |
ATD | 18 148 | 81 | 124 883 | 0.65 | 1.43 (1.12–1.84) | ||
RAIT | 766 | 1 | 5368 | 0.19 | 0.58 (0.08–4.15) | ||
Surgery | 121 | 2 | 808 | 2.48 | 5.25 (1.31–21.12) | ||
Female sex | Controls | 231 725 | 812 | 1 613 148 | 0.50 | Reference | |
ATD | 44 467 | 206 | 309 567 | 0.67 | 1.27 (1.09–1.48) | ||
RAIT | 1471 | 8 | 10 266 | 0.78 | 1.62 (0.81–3.26) | ||
Surgery | 407 | 3 | 2761 | 1.09 | 2.38 (0.77–7.39) | ||
No diabetes | Controls | 300 783 | 897 | 2 095 931 | 0.43 | Reference | 0.64 |
ATD | 54 637 | 224 | 381 315 | 0.59 | 1.38 (1.19–1.60) | ||
RAIT | 2003 | 7 | 14 036 | 0.50 | 1.39 (0.66–2.90) | ||
Surgery | 449 | 5 | 3074 | 1.63 | 4.20 (1.74–10.12) | ||
Diabetes | Controls | 26 117 | 200 | 170 572 | 1.17 | Reference | |
ATD | 7978 | 63 | 53 136 | 1.19 | 1.11 (0.83–1.47) | ||
RAIT | 234 | 2 | 1597 | 1.25 | 1.23 (0.31–4.96) | ||
Surgery | 79 | 0 | 495 | 0 | – | ||
No hypertension | Controls | 248 698 | 582 | 1 741 618 | 0.33 | Reference | 0.28 |
ATD | 39 683 | 102 | 277 662 | 0.37 | 1.18 (0.96–1.46) | ||
RAIT | 1274 | 2 | 8964 | 0.22 | 0.82 (0.20–3.28) | ||
Surgery | 284 | 3 | 1944 | 1.54 | 5.20 (1.68–16.16) | ||
Hypertension | Controls | 78 202 | 515 | 524 885 | 0.98 | Reference | |
ATD | 22 932 | 185 | 156 789 | 1.18 | 1.40 (1.19–1.66) | ||
RAIT | 963 | 7 | 6669 | 1.05 | 1.60 (0.76–3.38) | ||
Surgery | 224 | 2 | 1624 | 1.23 | 1.86 (0.46–7.46) | ||
No dyslipidaemia | Controls | 282 336 | 803 | 1 972 689 | 0.41 | Reference | 0.37 |
ATD | 52 458 | 182 | 367 414 | 0.50 | 1.20 (1.02–1.41) | ||
RAIT | 1964 | 7 | 13 859 | 0.51 | 1.40 (0.67–2.95) | ||
Surgery | 440 | 4 | 3005 | 1.33 | 3.62 (1.35–9.66) | ||
Dyslipidaemia | Controls | 44 564 | 294 | 293 814 | 1.00 | Reference | |
ATD | 10 157 | 105 | 67 037 | 1.57 | 1.56 (1.25–1.95) | ||
RAIT | 273 | 2 | 1775 | 1.13 | 1.11 (0.28–4.45) | ||
Surgery | 88 | 1 | 563 | 1.77 | 1.97 (0.28–14.06) |
PYs, person-years; IR, incidence rate; ATD, anti-thyroid drug; RAIT, radioactive iodine therapy.
Adjusted for age, sex, household income, diabetes, hypertension and dyslipidaemia.
Table 5.
Risks of Parkinson’s disease amongst patients with Graves’ disease according to cumulative ATD dose and treatment duration
n | Parkinson’s disease | PYs | IR per 1000 PYs | Model 1a | Model 2b | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Controls | 326 900 | 1097 | 2 266 503 | 0.48 | Reference | Reference |
ATD | 62 615 | 287 | 434 451 | 0.66 | 1.37 (1.20–1.55) | 1.31 (1.15–1.50) |
Cumulative dose | ||||||
Lowest | 20 871 | 96 | 136 217 | 0.70 | 1.48 (1.20–1.83) | 1.33 (1.08–1.60) |
Middle | 20 875 | 91 | 142 299 | 0.64 | 1.33 (1.07–1.65) | 1.31 (1.06–1.62) |
Highest | 20 869 | 100 | 155 935 | 0.64 | 1.30 (1.06–1.60) | 1.31 (1.06–1.61) |
Cumulative duration | ||||||
Lowest | 20 889 | 109 | 142 228 | 0.77 | 1.59 (1.30–1.93) | 1.49 (1.23–1.82) |
Middle | 20 857 | 95 | 143 451 | 0.66 | 1.37 (1.11–1.69) | 1.46 (1.19–1.81) |
Highest | 20 869 | 83 | 148 772 | 0.56 | 1.15 (0.92–1.43) | 1.03 (0.82–1.29) |
PYs, person-years; IR, incidence rate; ATD, anti-thyroid drug.
Cumulative ATD doses were <4953 mg (lowest), 4953–18 700 mg (middle) and >18 700 mg (highest).
Cumulative ATD treatment durations were <12 months (lowest), 12–35 months (middle) and >35 months (highest).
Not adjusted.
Adjusted for age, sex, household income, diabetes, hypertension and dyslipidaemia.
Discussion
The present study revealed that Korean Graves’ disease patients had a 33% higher risk of developing Parkinson’s disease, relative to age- and sex-matched healthy controls, based on nationally representative population-based data. During 453 654 PYs of follow-up for 65 380 Graves’ disease patients, a total of 301 incident Parkinson’s disease cases were identified, which corresponded to an IR of 0.66 cases per 1000 PYs (versus 0.48 cases per 1000 PYs amongst the healthy controls). Furthermore, the increased risk of developing Parkinson’s disease amongst Graves’ disease patients remained consistent in various subgroups that were created according to age, sex or comorbidities. Moreover, the Graves’ disease treatment modality, except RAIT and clinical courses did not appear to influence the risk of developing Parkinson’s disease, which suggests that Graves’ disease itself is a risk factor for Parkinson’s disease.
The most important role of dopamine involves the inhibition of prolactin synthesis, whilst TRH stimulates prolactin synthesis in the absence of dopamine.20 However, the dopaminergic system and HPT axis are also interconnected outside the pituitary gland. For example, dopamine and D2 dopamine receptors mediate the direct stimulation of TRH in the striatum. Dopamine and TRH also upregulate each other, whilst dopamine inhibits the production of TSH and thyroid hormones. Furthermore, imbalances in thyroid hormones lead to dopamine degradation, downregulation of dopamine hydroxylase and alterations in dopaminergic receptor sensitivity.12 Dopamine signalling and the HPT axis are linked with sleep.21,22 Dopamine promotes sleep and dopamine deficiency leads to the increase in TSH and thyroid hormone secretion.21,22 A hypothalamic imbalance between neuro-excitatory thyroid hormones and neuro-inhibitory dopamine secretion has been proposed to be the causative mechanism of restless leg syndrome.12 Oxidative stress provides important contributions to dopamine neuron loss and Parkinson’s disease progression23 and thyroid dysregulation affects oxidative stress because thyroid hormones affect both oxidant and anti-oxidant activities.24 As the common environmental factor, vitamin D deficiency has been suggested as a possible risk factor for both Graves’ disease and Parkinson’s disease25–27; however, there are controversies for the causal relationship between vitamin D deficiency and Graves’ disease. In addition, there is evidence regarding common abnormalities that increase susceptibility to both Parkinson’s disease and thyroid disease, which may involve RASD2,7 WSB1,8 MAPT10 and NOX/DUOX.9
Two European cohort studies have provided epidemiological evidence that Graves’ disease may be associated with an increased risk of developing Parkinson’s disease. Li et al.5 evaluated 34 735 Graves’ disease/hyperthyroidism patients and reported a 63% higher risk of developing Parkinson’s disease, which was maintained when they excluded the first year after the Graves’ disease diagnosis (SIR: 1.42, 95% CI: 1.19–1.68). However, the risk of Parkinson’s disease was not significantly increased at 5 years after the index date (SIR: 1.17, 95% CI: 0.94–1.44), which the authors attributed to lead-time bias and earlier diagnosis of Parkinson’s disease during the first few years after the Graves’ disease diagnosis. In contrast, the present study revealed that the cumulative incidence of Parkinson’s disease increased steadily, even at 5 years after the Graves’ disease diagnosis (Fig. 1). This result is likely reliable, as the diagnosis of Parkinson’s disease is registered and supervised under the Korean RID programme, which ensures that the diagnoses are accurate.16,17 In addition, we used age- and sex-matched controls, with correction for comorbidities and household income, which ensures a clearer analysis of the association between two diseases, relative to the SIR values that were reported by Li et al.5 Rugbjerg et al.6 also reported that Graves’ disease patients had an increased risk of Parkinson’s disease (OR: 2.1), although they did not further evaluate the association between Graves’ disease and Parkinson’s disease. Whilst those studies of Swedish and Danish cohorts5,6 were well designed and used validated data, they evaluated a broad range of >30 autoimmune diseases and were not sufficiently powered to specifically analyze the association between Graves’ disease and Parkinson’s disease.
Older age and a family history of Parkinson’s disease are the most important risk factors for developing Parkinson’s disease,28 although there is controversy regarding other risk factors. We found that the incidence of Parkinson’s disease was high amongst Graves’ disease patients who were ≥65 years old (IR: 2.63 per 1000 PYs), even amongst the healthy controls (IR: 1.92 per 1000 PYs), relative to amongst controls who were 40–64 years old (IR: 0.22 per 1000 PYs), as with the fact that older age is a most critical risk factor for developing Parkinson’s disease. Of note, elderly people (≥65 years old) with Graves’ disease had a 34% higher risk of Parkinson’s disease, even after statistical correction for their comorbidities that might be contributing factors for Parkinson’s disease. In this elderly Graves’ disease population, only ATD group showed the elevated risk (HR: 1.35, 95% CI: 1.15–1.60) for Parkinson’s disease, whereas the RAIT (HR: 0.51, 95% CI: 0.13–2.05) and surgery groups (HR: 1.85, 95% CI: 0.49–7.86) did not. However, non-significant results may be derived from the small number of Parkinson’s disease events in the RAIT (two Parkinson’s disease events in 320 patients) and surgery groups (two Parkinson’s disease events in 93 patients); thus, it is cautious to conclude that RAIT and surgical treatment are better than medical treatment for preventing incident Parkinson’s disease in this elderly Graves’ disease population.
Most of the Graves’ disease patients (83%) were <65 years old and had an increased risk of Parkinson’s disease (HR: 1.33), although the absolute increase was not large (IR: 0.3 per 1000 PYs), which agrees with the SIR of 1.72 reported by Li et al.5 amongst patients who were <65 years old. Furthermore, control subjects with comorbidities (diabetes, hypertension or dyslipidaemia) tended to have a higher incidence of Parkinson’s disease, relative to control subjects without comorbidities (Table 2). This also agrees with a previous report that the risk of Parkinson’s disease is elevated amongst patients with diabetes.17,29 Nevertheless, the Graves’ disease patients had elevated risks of Parkinson’s disease, regardless of their age, sex or comorbidities, which suggests that Graves’ disease may be an independent risk factor for developing Parkinson’s disease.
To the best of our knowledge, ours is the first study to evaluate whether the risk of Parkinson’s disease was related to the modality used to treat Graves’ disease. Treatment groups with ATD and surgery had increased risks of developing Parkinson’s disease, whereas, the risk was not elevated in the RAIT group. Interestingly, although <1% of the Graves’ disease patients had undergone surgery, they had a substantially higher risk of developing Parkinson’s disease (versus the ATD group), although we do not have a clear explanation for this finding. One assumption is that baseline demographics, including a higher percentage of female, absolute property, diabetes and hypertension in the surgery group (Table 1) might be linked with the higher risk for incident Parkinson’s disease, compared to other two groups, in spite of the statistical correction. In contrast, the RAIT group had a relatively low female incidence, younger mean age, the better economic status, lower rates of diabetes and dyslipidaemia compared to those of the ATD and surgery groups, which might be favourable factors for incident Parkinson’s disease. Although there has been no evidence regarding incident Parkinson’s disease by treatment modality for Graves’ disease, some literatures have reported that Graves’ disease patients achieving remission after RAIT had the lower risk of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality.30,31 Based on our results, RAIT might be a better treatment option for Graves’ disease regarding the incident risk of Parkinson’s disease, although further research with the larger population for RAIT is needed.
It is also interesting that the risks of Parkinson’s disease were similar between the subgroups that were classified according to cumulative ATD dose or ATD treatment duration, despite the fact that a higher cumulative dose or prolonged treatment would suggest the cases involved obstinate Graves’ disease. Therefore, although we had limited information regarding whether the Graves’ disease was persistent or in remission, it appears that Graves’ disease itself may be a potential risk factor for Parkinson’s disease.
The present study has several limitations. First, the diagnosis of hyperthyroidism was based on ICD-10 codes and information regarding the aetiology of hyperthyroidism was lacking. To exclude transient thyrotoxicosis, the definition of consecutive ATD prescription was also used for the ATD group. The aetiology of hyperthyroidism in an iodine-sufficient area, including Korea is known as Graves’ disease, and toxic adenoma accounts for <1% of the aetiology of hyperthyroidism in Korea.32 Therefore, the present results may be interpreted as the results of Graves’ disease. Second, we identified Parkinson’s disease cases using the RID database. An epidemiologic study for the incidence of Parkinson’s disease in Korea using the NHIS-RID database16 reported the gradual increase in the incidence of Parkinson’s disease from 23.2 to 27.8 per 100 000 (2010–15) in Korean population (male, 18.9–23.3 per 100 000 and female, 27.4–32.2 per 100 000). In our population, the incidence of Parkinson’s disease was 48 per 100 000 in controls and the incidence was somewhat higher than that of the study by Park et al.’s,16 although the direct comparison of the incidence of Parkinson’s disease between our study and the previous study by Park et al. seems to be inappropriate because controls in this study were matched with Graves’ disease population by age and sex. Female predominance and elderly population excluding individuals <40 years old in this study might affect the incidence of Parkinson’s disease. Third, the NHID does not include data regarding relevant clinical parameters, such as thyroid function or autoantibody titres (e.g. antibodies to TSH receptor), which precluded related analyses. Fourth, the mechanisms underlying the increased risk of Parkinson’s disease that is associated with Graves’ disease remain unclear. Fifth, ∼96% of the Korean Graves’ disease patients had received ATDs, which is substantially higher than the proportion of American patients that receive ATDs (∼60%).33 Thus, our findings might be influenced by the large proportion of patients who received medical treatment for Graves’ disease, and the findings might not be replicated in larger studies of patients who underwent RAIT or surgery for Graves’ disease. Nevertheless, the prevalences of Graves’ disease and Parkinson’s disease are both <1% in the general population, and a population-based database is likely needed to evaluate the relationship between Graves’ disease and Parkinson’s disease, despite the innate limitations of the NHID.
Conclusions
The present study revealed that Korean patients with Graves’ disease had an increased risk of developing Parkinson’s disease, even at relatively young ages. Furthermore, the risk of Parkinson’s disease did not substantially change in subgroup analyses according to demographic characteristics or treatment duration/dosage of ATDs. Therefore, although the absolute incidence is low, we suggest that clinicians should remain aware of the possibility that Graves’ disease patients may develop Parkinson’s disease, even at relatively young ages.
Abbreviations
- ATD =
anti-thyroid drug
- CI =
confidence interval
- HPT =
hypothalamic–pituitary–thyroid
- HR =
hazard ratio
- ICD-10 =
International Classification of Diseases, 10th revision
- IR =
incidence rate
- PYs =
person-years
- NHID =
the National Health Information Database
- NHIS =
the National Health Insurance Service
- RAIT =
radioactive iodine therapy
- RIDs =
rare intractable diseases
- SIR =
standardized incidence ratio
- TRH =
thyrotropin-releasing hormone
- TSH =
thyroid-stimulating hormone
Contributor Information
Yoon Young Cho, Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Department of Medicine, Soonchunhyang University Bucheon Hospital, Bucheon, Korea.
Bongseong Kim, Department of Statistics and Actuarial Science, Soongsil University, Seoul, Korea.
Dong Wook Shin, Supportive Care Center/Department of Family Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea; Department of Clinical Research Design & Evaluation, Samsung Advanced Institute for Health Science & Technology, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, Korea.
Jinyoung Youn, Department of Neurology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea; Neuroscience Center, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.
Ji Oh Mok, Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Department of Medicine, Soonchunhyang University Bucheon Hospital, Bucheon, Korea.
Chul-Hee Kim, Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Department of Medicine, Soonchunhyang University Bucheon Hospital, Bucheon, Korea.
Sun Wook Kim, Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Department of Medicine, Thyroid Center, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Jae Hoon Chung, Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Department of Medicine, Thyroid Center, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Kyungdo Han, Department of Statistics and Actuarial Science, Soongsil University, Seoul, Korea.
Tae Hyuk Kim, Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Department of Medicine, Thyroid Center, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Funding
This work was partly supported by the Soonchunhyang University Research Fund.
Competing interests
The authors report no competing interests.
References
- 1. Pringsheim T, Jette N, Frolkis A, Steeves TD. The prevalence of Parkinson’s disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Mov Disord. 2014;29(13):1583–1590. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Antony PMA, Diederich NJ, Krüger R, Balling R. The hallmarks of Parkinson’s disease. FEBS J. 2013;280(23):5981–5993. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Sanjari Moghaddam H, Zare-Shahabadi A, Rahmani F, Rezaei N. Neurotransmission systems in Parkinson’s disease. Rev Neurosci. 2017;28(5):509–536. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Choi S-M, Kim B-C, Choi K-H, et al. Thyroid status and cognitive function in euthyroid patients with early Parkinson’s disease. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2014;38(3–4):178–185. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Li X, Sundquist J, Sundquist K. Subsequent risks of Parkinson disease in patients with autoimmune and related disorders: A nationwide epidemiological study from Sweden. Neurodegener Dis. 2012;10(1–4):277–284. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Rugbjerg K, Friis S, Ritz B, Schernhammer ES, Korbo L, Olsen JH. Autoimmune disease and risk for Parkinson disease: A population-based case–control study. Neurology. 2009;73(18):1462–1468. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Napolitano F, D’Angelo L, de Girolamo P, Avallone L, de Lange P, Usiello A. The thyroid hormone-target gene Rhes a novel crossroad for neurological and psychiatric disorders: New insights from animal models. Neuroscience. 2018;384:419–428. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Haque M, Kendal JK, MacIsaac RM, Demetrick DJ. WSB1: From homeostasis to hypoxia. J Biomed Sci. 2016;23(1):61. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Lambeth JD, Krause KH, Clark RA. NOX enzymes as novel targets for drug development. Semin Immunopathol. 2008;30(3):339–363. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Cuadrado A, García-Fernández LF, Imai T, Okano H, Muñoz A. Regulation of tau RNA maturation by thyroid hormone is mediated by the neural RNA-binding protein musashi-1. Mol Cell Neurosci. 2002;20(2):198–210. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Daimon CM, Chirdon P, Maudsley S, Martin B. The role of thyrotropin releasing hormone in aging and neurodegenerative diseases. Am J Alzheimers Dis (Columbia). 2013;1(1): 10.7726/ajad.2013.1003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Mohammadi S, Dolatshahi M, Rahmani F. Shedding light on thyroid hormone disorders and Parkinson disease pathology: Mechanisms and risk factors. J Endocrinol Invest. 2021;44:1–13. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Shin DW, Cho B, Guallar E. Korean National Health Insurance Database. JAMA Intern Med. 2016;176(1):138. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Kwon H, Jung JH, Han KD, et al. Prevalence and annual incidence of thyroid disease in Korea from 2006 to 2015: A nationwide population-based cohort study. Endocrinol Metab (Seoul). 2018;33(2):260–267. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Seo GH, Kim SW, Chung JH. Incidence & prevalence of hyperthyroidism and preference for therapeutic modalities in Korea. J Korean Thyroid Assoc. 2013;6(1):56–63. [Google Scholar]
- 16. Park J-H, Kim D-H, Kwon D-Y, et al. Trends in the incidence and prevalence of Parkinson’s disease in Korea: A nationwide, population-based study. BMC Geriatr. 2019;19(1):320. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Rhee SY, Han KD, Kwon H, et al. Association between glycemic status and the risk of Parkinson disease: A nationwide population-based study. Diabetes Care. 2020; 43:2169–2175. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Yoo JE, Jang W, Shin DW, et al. Timed up and go test and the risk of Parkinson’s disease: A nation-wide retrospective cohort study. Mov Disord. 2020;35(7):1263–1267. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Yoo JE, Shin DW, Jang W, et al. Female reproductive factors and the risk of Parkinson’s disease: A nationwide cohort study. Eur J Epidemiol. 2020;35:871–878. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Ben-Jonathan N. Dopamine: A prolactin-inhibiting hormone. Endocr Rev. 1985;6(4):564–589. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Shekhar S, Hall JE, Klubo-Gwiezdzinska J. The hypothalamic–pituitary–thyroid axis and sleep. Curr Opin Endocr Metab Res. 2021;17:8–14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Stefani A, Högl B. Sleep in Parkinson’s disease. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2020;45(1):121–128. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Blesa J, Trigo-Damas I, Quiroga-Varela A, Jackson-Lewis VR. Oxidative stress and Parkinson’s disease. Front Neuroanat. 2015;9:91. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Mancini A, Di Segni C, Raimondo S, et al. Thyroid hormones, oxidative stress, and inflammation. Mediators Inflamm. 2016;2016:6757154. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Lv Z, Qi H, Wang L, et al. Vitamin D status and Parkinson’s disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Neurol Sci. 2014;35(11):1723–1730. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Shrestha S, Lutsey PL, Alonso A, Huang X, Mosley TH Jr, Chen H. Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentrations in Mid-adulthood and Parkinson’s disease risk. Mov Disord. 2016;31(7):972–978. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Taheriniya S, Arab A, Hadi A, Fadel A, Askari G. Vitamin D and thyroid disorders: A systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. BMC Endocr Disord. 2021;21(1):171. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Noyce AJ, Bestwick JP, Silveira-Moriyama L, et al. Meta-analysis of early nonmotor features and risk factors for Parkinson disease. Ann Neurol. 2012;72(6):893–901. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Jeong S-M, Han K, Kim D, Rhee SY, Jang W, Shin DW. Body mass index, diabetes, and the risk of Parkinson’s disease. Mov Disord. 2020;35(2):236–244. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Lillevang-Johansen M, Abrahamsen B, Jørgensen HL, Brix TH, Hegedüs L. Duration of hyperthyroidism and lack of sufficient treatment are associated with increased cardiovascular risk. Thyroid. 2019;29(3):332–340. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Okosieme OE, Taylor PN, Evans C, et al. Primary therapy of Graves’ disease and cardiovascular morbidity and mortality: A linked-record cohort study. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2019;7(4):278–287. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Moon JH, Yi KH. The diagnosis and management of hyperthyroidism in Korea: Consensus report of the Korean thyroid association. Endocrinol Metab (Seoul). 2013;28(4):275–279. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Brito JP, Payne S, Singh Ospina N, et al. Patterns of use, efficacy, and safety of treatment options for patients with Graves’ disease: A nationwide population-based study. Thyroid. 2020;30(3):357–364. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
The datasets generated and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.