Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2022 Feb 17;12:2742. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-06615-8

Association of L-type amino acid transporter 1 (LAT1) with the immune system and prognosis in invasive breast cancer

Sasagu Kurozumi 1,2,✉, Kyoichi Kaira 3, Hiroshi Matsumoto 4, Masafumi Kurosumi 5, Takehiko Yokobori 6, Yoshikatsu Kanai 7, Chikako Sekine 1, Chikako Honda 2, Ayaka Katayama 8, Mio Furuya 8, Sho Shiino 9, Takaya Makiguchi 10, Nigel P Mongan 11, Emad A Rakha 9, Tetsunari Oyama 8, Takaaki Fujii 2, Ken Shirabe 2, Jun Horiguchi 1
PMCID: PMC8854643  PMID: 35177712

Abstract

L-type amino acid transporter 1 (LAT1), also referred to as SLC7A5, is believed to regulate tumor metabolism and be associated with tumor proliferation. In invasive breast cancer, we clinicopathologically investigated the utility of LAT1 expression. LAT1 expression was evaluated via immunohistochemistry analyses in 250 breast cancer patients undergoing long-term follow-up. We assessed the relationships between LAT1 expression and patient outcomes and clinicopathological factors. Breast cancer-specific survival stratified by LAT1 expression was assessed. Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive patients with metastasis received trastuzumab therapy. The density of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) was evaluated according to the International Working Group guidelines. In the current study, high LAT1 expression was significantly correlated with estrogen receptor (ER) negativity, progesterone receptor negativity, high histological grade, increased TILs, and programmed death ligand 1 positivity. Among the ER-positive and HER2-negative patients, high LAT1 was an independent indicator of poor outcomes (hazard ratio (HR) = 2.97; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.16–7.62; p = 0.023). Moreover, high LAT1 expression was an independent poor prognostic factor in luminal B-like breast cancer with aggressive features (HR = 3.39; 95% CI 1.35–8.52; p = 0.0094). In conclusion, high LAT1 expression could be used to identify a subgroup of invasive breast cancer characterized by aggressive behavior and high tumor immunoreaction. Our findings suggest that LAT1 might be a candidate therapeutic target for breast cancer patients, particularly those with luminal B-like type breast cancer.

Subject terms: Breast cancer, Prognostic markers

Introduction

The survival of patients with breast cancer (BCa) has been improved by recent advances in treatment. However, approximately 20% of BCa patients have a poor prognosis with recurrence and metastasis1. Characterizing the factors associated with tumor progression may lead to the identification of new molecular therapeutic targets. Uncontrolled proliferation alters the metabolism and progression of BCa cells and depends on the uptake of sugars and amino acids2. Amino acids, including glutamine, are known to play a particularly important role in cell proliferation via the mTOR pathway3. The L-type amino acid transporter (LAT) enables the transport of large neutral essential amino acids into cells4,5. Interestingly, LAT1, encoded by the SLC7A5 gene, is generally overexpressed in malignant cells6–15. High LAT1 expression is closely related to the proliferation of tumor cells and angiogenesis in various types of cancer, such as melanoma16, lung cancer17, pancreatic cancer18, gastrointestinal cancer19,20, and triple-negative BCa (TNBC)21. LAT1 overexpression is also associated with lymphovascular invasion, lymphatic metastasis, and advanced stages of cancer22 and contributes to the development of therapeutic resistance in cancer cells. A previous large BCa study by El Ansari et al.23 reported that a high LAT1 expression level was associated with high proliferation potential, as indicated by the high Nottingham prognostic index and Ki67 labeling index; moreover, high LAT1 expression level was a poor prognostic factor in luminal B-like type breast tumors.

The immune system affects all phases of tumor growth from initiation to progression and dissemination. In addition, previous studies confirmed that tumor immunity-associated biomarkers, such as tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) and programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1), are related to the treatment response and prognosis of BCa24–27. Recently, El Ansari et al.28 reported that LAT1 expression was associated with the expressions of PD-L1, PD1, FOXP3, CD68 and CD20 in the breast tumor microenvironment.

In this study, we attempted to validate the relationship between LAT1 expression and patient outcome. We also confirmed the correlation between LAT1 protein expression and key clinicopathological factors, including TILs and PD-L1, in BCa patients.

Results

Association of LAT1 with clinicopathological factors

High LAT1 expression was present in 124 BCa patients (49.6%), whereas 126 patients (50.4%) had low LAT1 expression. Across the entire cohort, high LAT1 expression was significantly correlated with estrogen receptor (ER) negativity (p < 0.0001), progesterone receptor (PgR) negativity (p < 0.0001), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) positivity (p < 0.0001), large tumor size (p = 0.016), and high histological grade (p < 0.0001) (Table 1). In The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) cohort, SLC7A5 mRNA overexpression was associated with ER negativity (p < 0.0001), PgR negativity (p < 0.0001), large tumor size (p = 0.047), high histological grade (p < 0.0001), high Myc mRNA expression (p < 0.0001), high VEGFA mRNA expression (p < 0.0001) and high VEGFC (p < 0.0001) mRNA expression (Supplementary Table 1).

Table 1.

Association of LAT1 expression with clinicopathological factors in all patients.

Factors Expression of LAT1 Significance
Low High Total p-value
ER
Positive 115 (68.0%) 54 (32.0%) 169  < 0.0001
Negative 11 (13.6%) 70 (86.4%) 81
PgR
Positive 98 (67.6%) 47 (32.4%) 145  < 0.0001
Negative 28 (26.7%) 77 (73.3%) 105
HER2
Positive 9 (20.9%) 34 (79.1%) 43  < 0.0001
Negative 117 (56.5%) 90 (43.5%) 207
Tumor size
pT2-4 51 (42.1%) 70 (57.9%) 121 0.016
pT1 75 (58.1%) 54 (41.9%) 129
Nodal status
Positive 55 (48.7%) 58 (51.3%) 113 0.70
Negative 71 (51.8%) 66 (48.2%) 137
Histological grade
Grade 3 47 (32.4%) 98 (67.6%) 145  < 0.0001
Grade 1, 2 79 (75.2%) 26 (24.8%) 105
TILs
High 6 (19.4%) 25 (80.6%) 31  < 0.0001
Intermediate 14 (34.1%) 27 (65.9%) 41
Low 106 (59.6%) 72 (40.4%) 178
PD-L1
Positive 2 (10.0%) 18 (90.0%) 20 0.00024
Negative 122 (53.5%) 106 (46.5%) 228
Open in a new tab

LAT1 L-type amino acid transporter 1, ER estrogen receptor, PgR progesterone receptor, HER2 human epidermal growth factor receptor 2, TIL tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes.

For the relationships between LAT1 expression and tumor immunity-related biomarkers, high LAT1 expression was significantly associated with high TILs (p < 0.0001) and PD-L1 positivity (p = 0.00024) (Table 1). Twenty-five (20.2%) patients with high LAT1 were included in the high TIL group, and 18 (14.5%) patients with high LAT1 had PD-L1 positivity. Survival curves stratified by LAT1/TIL and LAT1/PD-L1 levels are shown in Supplementary Fig. 1.

Outcome analyses

BCa-specific survival (BCSS) differed significantly between the high and low LAT1 expression groups in the univariable analyses (hazard ratio (HR) = 1.97; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.14–3.42; p = 0.015; Fig. 1a). Univariable analysis also identified large tumor size (HR = 2.05; 95% CI 1.18–3.55; p = 0.011), positive nodal status (HR = 3.80; 95% CI 1.74–2.44; p < 0.0001), negative ER status (HR = 2.13; 95% CI 1.26–3.62; p = 0.0051) and negative PgR status (HR = 2.34; 95% CI 1.36–4.01; p = 0.0021) as poor prognostic factors. Positive nodal status was an independent poor prognostic factor in multivariable analysis (HR = 3.47; 95% CI 1.88–6.39; p < 0.0001; Supplementary Table 2). The prognosis of the high SLC7A5 mRNA expression group was significantly worse than that of the low SLC7A5 mRNA expression group in the TCGA cohort (HR = 2.10; 95% CI 1.34–3.29; p = 0.0012; Fig. 1b).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

(a) Breast cancer-specific survival stratified by L-type amino acid transporter 1 (LAT1) protein expression, (b) overall survival stratified by LAT1 mRNA expression.

Prognostic analysis of SLC7A5 mRNA based on ER status

To obtain insight into how LAT1 might be linked to survival, we evaluated the prognostic utility of SLC7A5 mRNA expression according to ER status using the TCGA database. Among patients with ER-positive cancer, those with high SLC7A5-expressing tumors had a significantly lower BCSS than those with low SLC7A5-expressing tumors (HR = 2.13; 95% CI 1.22–3.71; p = 0.0075). In contrast, SLC7A5 expression was not a prognostic factor among patients with ER-negative cancer (Supplementary Fig. 2). At the protein level, high LAT1 expression was a significant prognostic marker in the ER-positive type (HR = 2.22; 95% CI 1.07–4.59; p = 0.032) but not in the ER-negative type (Supplementary Fig. 2). Moreover, LAT1 expression was not a significant prognostic marker in the HER2-positive type (Supplementary Fig. 3).

Prognostic utility of LAT1 expression in ER-positive and HER2-negative BCa

In the 142 ER-positive and HER2-negative tumors, we investigated which factors were associated with LAT1 staining. The frequency of high LAT1 expression was 39.4% in luminal-like tumors. Among luminal-like tumors, high LAT1 expression was significantly correlated with tumor size (p = 0.018), high Ki67 labeling index (p = 0.0017), and high histological grade (p = 0.018) (Table 2). In patients with luminal-like cancer, those with high LAT1-expressing tumors had a significantly lower BCSS than those with low LAT1-expressing tumors (HR = 2.86; 95% CI 1.26–6.48; p = 0.012; Fig. 2a).

Table 2.

Relationship between LAT1 expression and clinicopathological factors in ER-positive/HER2-negative breast cancer.

Factors Expression of LAT1 Significance
Low High Total p-value
Ki67
≥ 30% 14 (46.7%) 16 (53.3%) 30 0.0017
> 10 and < 30% 56 (70.9%) 23 (29.1%) 79
≤ 10% 29 (87.9%) 4 (12.1%) 33
PgR
Positive 64 (71.9%) 25 (28.1%) 89 0.57
Negative 35 (66.0%) 18 (34.0%) 53
Tumor size
pT2-4 36 (59.0%) 25 (41.0%) 61 0.018
pT1 63 (77.8%) 18 (22.2%) 81
Nodal status
Positive 46 (74.2%) 16 (25.8%) 62 0.36
Negative 53 (66.3%) 27 (33.8%) 80
Histological grade
Grade 3 38 (59.4%) 26 (40.6%) 64 0.018
Grade 1, 2 61 (78.2%) 17 (21.8%) 78
Open in a new tab

LAT1 L-type amino acid transporter 1, ER estrogen receptor, PgR progesterone receptor, HER2 human epidermal growth factor receptor 2.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

Breast cancer-specific survival stratified by L-type amino acid transporter 1 (LAT1) expression (a) in ER-positive and HER2-negative patients and (b) in luminal B-like patients.

In addition to high LAT1 expression, univariable analysis showed that negative PgR expression (HR = 5.37; 95% CI 2.12–13.63; p = 0.00041) and positive nodal status (HR = 4.12; 95% CI 1.64–10.57; p = 0.0027) were predictive of reduced survival (Table 3). Multivariable analysis with a Cox proportional hazards regression model identified that LAT1 expression was an independent poor prognostic factor in patients with ER-positive and HER2-negative BCa (HR = 2.97; 95% CI 1.16–7.62; p = 0.023; Table 3). Moreover, among luminal B-like type cancer (the aggressive phenotype), high LAT1 expression was an independent poor prognostic factor in univariable (HR = 2.58; 95% CI 1.14–5.86; p = 0.023; Fig. 2b) and multivariable (HR = 3.39; 95% CI 1.35–8.52; p = 0.0094; Supplementary Table 3) analyses.

Table 3.

Survival analysis based on clinicopathological factors, including LAT1 protein expression, in ER-positive/HER2-negative patients.

Factors Univariable analysis Multivariable analysis
Hazard ratio 95% CI p-value Hazard ratio 95% CI p-value
LAT1 expression
Low Reference Reference
High 2.86 1.26–6.48 0.012 2.97 1.16–7.62 0.023
Ki67
< 10% Reference Reference
≥ 10% 3.26 0.76–13.90 0.11 2.01 0.41–9.76 0.39
PgR
Positive Reference Reference
Negative 5.37 2.12–13.63 0.00041 4.62 1.80–11.82 0.0014
Tumor size
pT1 Reference Reference
pT2-4 1.80 0.79–4.10 0.16 0.89 0.36–2.24 0.81
Nodal status
Negative Reference Reference
Positive 4.12 1.64–10.57 0.0027 4.32 1.58–11.79 0.0043
Histological grade
Grade 1–2 Reference Reference
Grade 3 1.57 0.69–3.59 0.28 0.86 0.34–2.16 0.75
Open in a new tab

LAT1 L-type amino acid transporter 1, ER estrogen receptor, PgR progesterone receptor, HER2 human epidermal growth factor receptor 2.

Discussion

The current study demonstrates that high LAT1 expression can be used to identify a subgroup of invasive BCa with aggressive behavior and high tumor immune reaction (PD-L1 positivity and TIL upregulation). The present study indicated that high LAT1 expression was an independent poor prognostic factor in luminal B-like BCa with long term follow-up.

The indications for chemotherapy in ER-positive/HER2-negative breast cancer patients have been debated for many years29–31. At the St. Gallen consensus conference32, Ki67 and PgR expression levels were suggested to be important factors to consider for postoperative chemotherapy. The St. Gallen consensus meeting recommended that hormone receptor-positive/HER2-negative breast cancer should be divided into the luminal A-like type (high ER/PgR and clearly low Ki67) and the luminal B-like type (low ER/PgR and clearly high Ki67)32. Adjuvant chemotherapy combined with endocrine treatment was recommended for luminal B-like type tumors. Recently, cyclin dependent kinase inhibitors have been suggested to be effective in ER-positive/HER2-negative BCa with a high risk of recurrence33. However, effective molecular targets for luminal B-like type tumors have not yet been fully identified as alternatives to chemotherapy. In this study, LAT1 expression was related to the expression of Myc and the VEGF family. VEGF and Myc may be related to proliferation in luminal B-like BCa34. LAT1 contributes to angiogenesis in cancer in the presence of VEGF35. Moreover, Myc asserts its oncogenic functions partially through its control of LAT1 expression36. The results of this study suggest that the molecular pathways involving LAT1 are related to the proliferation or metastasis abilities of luminal B-like BCa. It may be possible to support the development of new drugs targeted against luminal B-like BCa by conducting a more detailed functional analysis of the genes related to this molecular pathway.

El Ansari et al.28 clarified that glutamine transporters, including LAT1, are associated with the expression of CD68-positive macrophages and PD1-positive lymphocytes in tumors. Moreover, they used TNBC cell lines to demonstrate that the inhibition of LAT1 reduced the expression of PD-L1. HIF1α is known to activate tumor-associated CD68-positive macrophages37. Thus, LAT1 may be involved in the function of tumor-associated macrophages because it enhances the function of mTORC1 by controlling the HIF pathway38. The molecular pathway related to mTOR plays an essential role in the progression of BCa39. Although an mTOR inhibitor is used to treat metastatic ER-positive BCa in clinical practice40, its effectiveness in early-stage BCa remains to be elucidated. Recent investigations have observed an antitumor effect of using a LAT1 inhibitor because it suppresses the phosphoric acid of mTOR in tumor cells, inhibits its downstream cell proliferation signals, and elicits G1 arrest and apoptosis41. The mTOR pathway suppresses Treg cells and promotes the differentiation of CD8-positive T cells42,43. There are ongoing clinical trials for the combination of PI3K and PD-L1 inhibitors in TNBC44. To determine how LAT1 works in antitumor immune reactions, additional functional studies are necessary.

The present study revealed that high LAT1 expression was significantly associated with PD-L1 positivity at the protein level but not at the mRNA level. In recent years, with the rapid development and widespread use of comprehensive genomic analysis methods using microarrays and next-generation high-speed sequencing, candidate factors that may play a role in the prognosis and drug efficacy of BCa have been discovered from the analysis of vast amounts of genomic and transcriptomic information. However, although genomic and transcriptomic information is excellent for assessing the expression intensity of targets as continuous variables, it is difficult to determine how the factors are localized in the cells. The expression of PD-L1 in tumor cells is heterogeneous. It may bind not only to PD-L1-positive cancer cells but also to PD-L1-positive lymphocytes. In a recent study, PD-L1 expression on tumor cells was associated with high-risk clinicopathological parameters and poor prognosis, while PD-L1 expression on TILs was associated with favorable survival outcomes45. Further studies are needed to clarify the relationship between PD-L1 expression in tumor cells and lymphocytes and LAT1 expression in tumor cells.

In conclusion, LAT1 expression was associated with immune-related biomarkers, such as TILs and PD-L1, and was strongly correlated with poorly differentiated tumors. We evaluated TILs grade based on the guidelines of the International Working Group. Moreover, we examined the relationship of TILs and PD-L1 with LAT1 using the recent clinical breast cancer samples. These findings indicate that LAT1 may play important roles in antitumor immunity and may promote BCa progression and metastasis, particularly in ER-positive and HER2-negative BCa. This study has several limitations. First, the number of enrolled patients was small. Second, this study was a retrospective trial. Further biological research regarding the ability of this new agent to inhibit LAT1 expression is warranted9. Moreover, concomitant treatment using LAT1 inhibitors and immune checkpoint inhibitors46 is expected to become an innovative therapeutic target in the luminal B-like type of BCa.

Materials and methods

Patient characteristics

This study was ethically assessed by the Institutional Review Board of the Saitama Cancer Center (reference number 738). BCa patients (n = 250) who underwent breast surgery at the Saitama Cancer Center were included in this study. None of the patients included in this study received neoadjuvant treatment. In total, 199 (79.6%) patients underwent breast-conserving surgery, and 119 (47.6%) underwent axillary lymph node dissection. Of the 250 patients, 48.4% had pathological T2–4 tumors, and 45.2% were pathological lymph node metastasis-positive cases. All HER2-positive breast cancer patients did not receive adjuvant trastuzumab treatment, while patients with metastatic recurrent HER2-positive breast cancer received trastuzumab treatment after recurrence.

ER, PgR, HER2, and Ki67 labeling index were assessed as detailed in our previous studies29,31. The ER positivity (≥ 1%) rate was 67.6%; 58.0% of the patients were PgR-positive (≥ 20%), and 17.2% were HER2-positive. The cohort was classified according to the intrinsic molecular subtypes (luminal A-like, luminal B-like, HER2-positive, and triple-negative types). The luminal A-like type was defined as patients who are PgR-positive and display low Ki67 staining (labeling index of ≤ 10%) in ER-positive and HER2-negative breast cancer, whereas other ER-positive and HER2-negative tumors were classified as the luminal B-like type.

The density of stromal TILs was evaluated according to the International Working Group guidelines24,47. Cytoplasmic and/or membranous PD-L1 expression was assessed by immunohistochemistry (SP142; Roche, Switzerland; diluted 1:50), and the PD-L1 positivity cutoff value was determined to be 1%. Detailed assessments of these biomarkers have been described in our previous paper25.

LAT1 immunohistochemistry

LAT1 expression was assessed by immunohistochemistry using an affinity-purified polyclonal rabbit anti-human LAT1 antibody6 diluted to 1:5000. LAT1 protein expression was evaluated for cytoplasmic and membrane-associated staining in full-face slides obtained from 250 patients. For clinicopathological and prognostic analyses, the 250 samples were stratified into high- and low-LAT1 expression groups based on staining intensity.

The staining intensity of LAT1 expression on cancer cells was scored as follows: 0 (no staining or staining of < 10% of tumor cells), 1 (weak staining of ≥ 10% of tumor cells), 2 (moderate staining of ≥ 10% of tumor cells), and 3 (strong staining of ≥ 10% of tumor cells). In addition, tumors with a score of 2 or 3 were assigned to the high LAT1 expression group, whereas tumors with a score of 0 or 1 were assigned to the low LAT1 expression group (Fig. 3a-d: intensity score 0–3).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Open in a new tab

Immunohistochemical findings of L-type amino acid transporter 1 (LAT1) expression in breast cancer. (a) No staining (score 0), (b) weak staining (score 1), (c) moderate staining (score 2), and (d) strong staining (score 3) for LAT1 expression was detected in the cytoplasm of cancer cells.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS statistical software v24.0 (IBM, Armonk, NY, USA). The relationships between LAT1 expression and several clinicopathological factors were evaluated using the chi-square test and Fisher’s exact test. BCSS was used to evaluate the prognostic utility of LAT1 expression. For the univariable and multivariable prognostic assessments of several clinicopathologically important parameters (LAT1, tumor size, nodal status, histological grade, Ki67 labeling index, ER, PgR, HER2, and TILs), the Cox proportional hazards regression model was used to calculate HRs and 95% CIs. The prognostic value of LAT1 mRNA (SLC7A5) expression was further evaluated using the TCGA BRCA dataset as an external validation cohort. In brief, the datasets of mRNA expression from RNA-Seq V2 were accessed along with deidentified clinical information for several clinicopathological factors and outcomes48,49. The median value of SLC7A5 expression was defined as the cutoff point.

Ethical approval and informed consent

This study was approved by the Saitama Cancer Center Institutional Review Board (reference number 738). All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were conducted in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. Informed consent was obtained from the participants included in this study.

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Information 1. (2.3MB, tif)
Supplementary Information 2. (3MB, tif)
Supplementary Information 3. (1.5MB, tif)
Supplementary Information 4. (20.1KB, docx)
Supplementary Information 5. (19.6KB, docx)
Supplementary Information 6. (18.2KB, docx)

Acknowledgements

We gratefully acknowledge the work of our research technicians (Kei Masuda and Kumiko Sudo). This work was supported by Gunma University and International University of Health and Welfare.

Author contributions

All the authors participated in the design of the study. S.K. and K.K. mainly performed image acquisition and statistical analyses. M.K. and S.K. performed histological examinations. H.M. assisted in collecting the clinical information. T.Y., Y.K., C.S., C.H., A.K., M.F., S.S., T.M., N.P.M., E.A.R., T.O., T.F., K.S. and J.H. contributed to the theoretical organization of the manuscript. All the authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

Data availability

The datasets generated and/or analyzed during the current study are not publicly available due to the regulation of the Institutional Review Board of the Saitama Cancer Center but are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Competing interests

SK has received honoraria from Chugai Pharmaceutical, Ltd., Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd., Taiho Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Eli Lilly and Company, MSD K.K., AstraZeneca K.K., and Novartis Japan. KK has received research grants from and is a speaker honorarium for Ono Pharmaceutical Company, Chugai Pharmaceutical, Taiho Pharmaceutical, and AstraZeneca. TY has received research grants from Ono Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., CHUGAI Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., and Memolead Co. KS has received research grants from CHUGAI Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., and Ono Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. The other authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Footnotes

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41598-022-06615-8.

References

  • 1.Early Breast Cancer Trialists’ Collaborative Group (EBCTCG) Effects of chemotherapy and hormonal therapy for early breast cancer on recurrence and 15-year survival: An overview of the randomized trials. Lancet. 2015;365:1687–1717. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)66544-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Lieu EL, Nguyen T, Rhyne S, Kim J. Amino acids in cancer. Exp. Mol. Med. 2020;52:15–30. doi: 10.1038/s12276-020-0375-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Mossmann D, Park S, Hall MN. mTOR signalling and cellular metabolism are mutual determinants in cancer. Nat. Rev. Cancer. 2018;18:744–757. doi: 10.1038/s41568-018-0074-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Zhao Y, Wang L, Pan J. The role of L-type amino acid transporter 1 in human tumors. Intractable Rare Dis. Res. 2015;4:165–169. doi: 10.5582/irdr.2015.01024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Pineda M, Fernández E, Torrents D, Estévez R, López C, Camps M, et al. Identification of a membrane protein, LAT-2, that Co-expresses with 4F2 heavy chain, an L-type amino acid transport activity with broad specificity for small and large zwitterionic amino acids. J. Biol. Chem. 1999;274:19738–19744. doi: 10.1074/jbc.274.28.19738. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Yanagida O, Kanai Y, Chairoungdua A, Kim DK, Segawa H, Nii T, et al. Human L-type amino acid transporter 1 (LAT1): Characterization of function and expression in tumor cell lines. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 2001;1514:291–302. doi: 10.1016/s0005-2736(01)00384-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Kobayashi H, Ishii Y, Takayama T. Expression of L-type amino acid transporter 1 (LAT1) in esophageal carcinoma. J. Surg. Oncol. 2005;90:233–238. doi: 10.1002/jso.20257. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Ichinoe M, Mikami T, Yoshida T, Igawa I, Tsuruta T, Nakada N, et al. High expression of L-type amino-acid transporter 1 (LAT1) in gastric carcinomas: comparison with non-cancerous lesions. Pathol. Int. 2001;61:281–289. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1827.2011.02650.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Nawashiro H, Otani N, Shinomiya N, Fukui S, Ooigawa H, Shima K, et al. L-type amino acid transporter 1 as a potential molecular target in human astrocytic tumors. Int. J. Cancer. 2006;119:484–492. doi: 10.1002/ijc.21866. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Sakata T, Ferdous G, Tsuruta T, Satoh T, Baba S, Muto T, et al. L-type amino-acid transporter 1 as a novel biomarker for high-grade malignancy in prostate cancer. Pathol. Int. 2009;59:7–18. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1827.2008.02319.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Kaira K, Oriuchi N, Imai H, Shimizu K, Yanagitani N, Sunaga N, et al. Prognostic significance of L-type amino acid transporter 1 expression in resectable stage I-III nonsmall cell lung cancer. Br. J. Cancer. 2008;98:742–748. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6604235. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Nakanishi K, Ogata S, Matsuo H, Kanai Y, Endou H, Hiroi S, et al. Expression of LAT1 predicts risk of progression of transitional cell carcinoma of the upper urinary tract. Virchows Arch. 2007;451:681–690. doi: 10.1007/s00428-007-0457-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Kaira K, Sunose Y, Arakawa K, Ogawa T, Sunaga N, Shimizu K, et al. Prognostic significance of L-type amino-acid transporter 1 expression in surgically resected pancreatic cancer. Br. J. Cancer. 2012;107:632–638. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2012.310. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Kaira K, Sunose Y, Ohshima Y, Ishioka NS, Arakawa K, Ogawa T, et al. Clinical significance of L-type amino acid transporter 1 expression as a prognostic marker and potential of new targeting therapy in biliary tract cancer. BMC Cancer. 2013;13:482. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-13-482. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Toyoda M, Kaira K, Ohshima Y, Ishioka NS, Shino M, Sakakura K, et al. Prognostic significance of amino-acid transporter expression (LAT1, ASCT2, and xCT) in surgically resected tongue cancer. Br. J. Cancer. 2014;110:2506–2513. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2014.178. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Shimizu A, Kaira K, Kato M, Yasuda M, Takahashi A, Tominaga H, et al. Prognostic significance of L-type amino acid transporter 1 (LAT1) expression in cutaneous melanoma. Melanoma Res. 2015;25:399–405. doi: 10.1097/CMR.0000000000000181. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Kaira K, Kawashima O, Endoh H, Imaizumi K, Goto Y, Kamiyoshihara M, et al. Expression of amino acid transporter (LAT1 and 4F2hc) in pulmonary pleomorphic carcinoma. Hum. Pathol. 2019;84:142–149. doi: 10.1016/j.humpath.2018.09.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Altan B, Kaira K, Watanabe A, Kubo N, Bao P, Dolgormaa G, et al. Relationship between LAT1 expression and resistance to chemotherapy in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Cancer Chemother. Pharmacol. 2018;81:141–153. doi: 10.1007/s00280-017-3477-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Ohshima Y, Kaira K, Yamaguchi A, Oriuchi N, Tominaga H, Nagamori S, et al. Efficacy of system l amino acid transporter 1 inhibition as a therapeutic target in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Cancer Sci. 2016;107:1499–1505. doi: 10.1111/cas.13021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Ogawa H, Kaira K, Motegi Y, Yokobori T, Takada T, Katoh R, et al. Role of amino acid transporter expression as a prognostic marker in patients with surgically resected colorectal cancer. Anticancer Res. 2019;39:2535–2543. doi: 10.21873/anticanres.13375. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Furuya M, Horiguchi J, Nakajima H, Kanai Y, Oyama T. Correlation of L-type amino acid transporter 1 and CD98 expression with triple negative breast cancer prognosis. Cancer Sci. 2012;103:382–389. doi: 10.1111/j.1349-7006.2011.02151.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Yazawa T, Shimizu K, Kaira K, Nagashima T, Ohtaki Y, Atsumi J, et al. Clinical significance of coexpression of L-type amino acid transporter 1 (LAT1) and ASC amino acid transporter 2 (ASCT2) in lung adenocarcinoma. Am. J. Transl. Res. 2015;7:1126–1139. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.El Ansari R, Craze ML, Miligy I, Diez-Rodriguez M, Nolan CC, Ellis IO, et al. The amino acid transporter SLC7A5 confers a poor prognosis in the highly proliferative breast cancer subtypes and is a key therapeutic target in luminal B tumours. Breast Cancer Res. 2018;20:21. doi: 10.1186/s13058-018-0946-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Kurozumi S, Matsumoto H, Kurosumi M, Inoue K, Fujii T, Horiguchi J, et al. Prognostic significance of tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes for oestrogen receptor-negative breast cancer without lymph node metastasis. Oncol. Lett. 2019;17:2647–2656. doi: 10.3892/ol.2019.9938. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Kurozumi S, Inoue K, Matsumoto H, Fujii T, Horiguchi J, Oyama T, et al. Clinicopathological values of PD-L1 expression in HER2-positive breast cancer. Sci. Rep. 2019;9:16662. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-52944-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Denkert C, von Minckwitz G, Brase JC, Sinn BV, Gade S, Kronenwett R, et al. Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes and response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy with or without carboplatin in human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive and triple-negative primary breast cancers. J. Clin. Oncol. 2015;33:983–991. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2014.58.1967. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Denkert C, von Minckwitz G, Darb-Esfahani S, Lederer B, Heppner BI, Weber KE, et al. Tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes and prognosis in different subtypes of breast cancer: A pooled analysis of 3771 patients treated with neoadjuvant therapy. Lancet. Oncol. 2018;19:40–50. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(17)30904-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Ansari RE, Craze ML, Althobiti M, Alfarsi L, Ellis IO, Rakha EA, et al. Enhanced glutamine uptake influences composition of immune cell infiltrates in breast cancer. Br. J. Cancer. 2020;122:94–101. doi: 10.1038/s41416-019-0626-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Kurozumi S, Matsumoto H, Hayashi Y, Tozuka K, Inoue K, Horiguchi J, et al. Power of PgR expression as a prognostic factor for ER-positive/HER2-negative breast cancer patients at intermediate risk classified by the Ki67 labeling index. BMC Cancer. 2017;17:354. doi: 10.1186/s12885-017-3331-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Kurozumi S, Yamaguchi Y, Hayashi S, Hiyoshi H, Suda T, Gohno T, et al. Prognostic value of the ubiquitin ligase carboxyl terminus of the Hsc70-interacting protein in postmenopausal breast cancer. Cancer Med. 2016;5:1873–1882. doi: 10.1002/cam4.780. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Kurozumi S, Matsumoto H, Inoue K, Tozuka K, Hayashi Y, Kurosumi M, et al. Impact of combining the progesterone receptor and preoperative endocrine prognostic index (PEPI) as a prognostic factor after neoadjuvant endocrine therapy using aromatase inhibitors in postmenopausal ER positive and HER2 negative breast cancer. PLoS ONE. 2018;13:1846. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0201846. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Burstein HJ, Curigliano G, Loibl S, Dubsky P, Gnant M, Poortmans P, et al. Estimating the benefits of therapy for early-stage breast cancer: The St. Gallen International Consensus Guidelines for the primary therapy of early breast cancer 2019. Ann. Oncol. 2019;30:1541–1557. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdz235. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Johnston SRD, Harbeck N, Hegg R, Toi M, Martin M, Shao ZM, et al. Abemaciclib combined with endocrine therapy for the adjuvant treatment of HR+, HER2-, node-positive, high-risk, early breast cancer (monarchE) J. Clin. Oncol. 2020;38:3987–3998. doi: 10.1200/JCO.20.02514. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Dadiani M, Seger D, Kreizman T, Badikhi D, Margalit R, Eilam R, et al. Estrogen regulation of vascular endothelial growth factor in breast cancer in vitro and in vivo: The role of estrogen receptor alpha and c-Myc. Endocr. Relat. Cancer. 2009;16:819–834. doi: 10.1677/ERC-08-0249. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Kaira K, Oriuchi N, Imai H, Shimizu K, Yanagitani N, Sunaga N, et al. l-type amino acid transporter 1 and CD98 expression in primary and metastatic sites of human neoplasms. Cancer Sci. 2008;99:2380–2386. doi: 10.1111/j.1349-7006.2008.00969.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Hayashi K, Jutabha P, Endou H, Anzai N. c-Myc is crucial for the expression of LAT1 in MIA Paca-2 human pancreatic cancer cells. Oncol. Rep. 2012;28:862–866. doi: 10.3892/or.2012.1878. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Li N, Li Y, Li Z, Huang C, Yang Y, Lang M, et al. Hypoxia inducible factor 1 (HIF-1) recruits macrophage to activate pancreatic stellate cells in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2016;17:E799. doi: 10.3390/ijms17060799. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Land SC, Tee AR. Hypoxia-inducible factor 1alpha is regulated by the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) via an mTOR signaling motif. J. Biol. Chem. 2007;282:20534–20543. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M611782200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Hare SH, Harvey AJ. mTOR function and therapeutic targeting in breast cancer. Am. J. Cancer Res. 2017;7:383–404. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Baselga J, Campone M, Piccart M, Burris HA, 3rd, Rugo HS, Sahmoud T, et al. Everolimus in postmenopausal hormone-receptor-positive advanced breast cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 2012;366:520–529. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1109653. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Hayashi K, Anzai N. Novel therapeutic approaches targeting L-type amino acid transporters for cancer treatment. World J. Gastrointest. Oncol. 2017;9:21–29. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v9.i1.21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Araki K, Turner AP, Shaffer VO, Gangappa S, Keller SA, Bachmann MF, et al. mTOR regulates memory CD8 T-cell differentiation. Nature. 2009;460:108–112. doi: 10.1038/nature08155. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Sun IH, Oh MH, Zhao L, Patel CH, Arwood ML, Xu W, et al. mTOR complex 1 signaling regulates the generation and function of central and effector Foxp3+ regulatory T cells. J. Immunol. 2018;201:481–492. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1701477. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Page DB, Bear H, Prabhakaran S, Gatti-Mays ME, Thomas A, Cobain E, et al. Two may be better than one: PD-1/PD-L1 blockade combination approaches in metastatic breast cancer. NPJ Breast Cancer. 2019;5:34. doi: 10.1038/s41523-019-0130-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Tang F, Zheng P. Tumor cells versus host immune cells: whose PD-L1 contributes to PD-1/PD-L1 blockade mediated cancer immunotherapy? Cell Biosci. 2018;8:34. doi: 10.1186/s13578-018-0232-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Schmid P, et al. Atezolizumab and nab-paclitaxel in advanced triple-negative breast cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 2018;379:2108–2121. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1809615. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Salgado R, Denkert C, Demaria S, Sirtaine N, Klauschen F, Pruneri G, et al. The evaluation of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) in breast cancer: Recommendations by an International TILs Working Group 2014. Ann. Oncol. 2015;26:259–271. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdu450. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Ciriello G, Gatza ML, Beck AH, Wilkerson MD, Rhie SK, Pastore A, et al. Comprehensive molecular portraits of invasive lobular breast cancer. Cell. 2015;163:506–519. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2015.09.033. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Kurozumi S, Joseph C, Sonbul S, Gorringe KL, Pigera M, Aleskandarany MA, et al. Clinical and biological roles of Kelch-like family member 7 in breast cancer: A marker of poor prognosis. Breast Cancer Res. Treat. 2018;170:525–533. doi: 10.1007/s10549-018-4777-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Information 1. (2.3MB, tif)
Supplementary Information 2. (3MB, tif)
Supplementary Information 3. (1.5MB, tif)
Supplementary Information 4. (20.1KB, docx)
Supplementary Information 5. (19.6KB, docx)
Supplementary Information 6. (18.2KB, docx)

Data Availability Statement

The datasets generated and/or analyzed during the current study are not publicly available due to the regulation of the Institutional Review Board of the Saitama Cancer Center but are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES