Skip to main content
Molecular Cancer logoLink to Molecular Cancer
. 2022 Feb 18;21:55. doi: 10.1186/s12943-022-01533-9

NCAPG promotes the oncogenesis and progression of non-small cell lung cancer cells through upregulating LGALS1 expression

Huanhuan Sun 1,2,#, Hong Zhang 3,#, Yan Yan 2,#, Yushi Li 2, Gang Che 2, Cuiling Zhou 2, Christophe Nicot 4,, Haiqing Ma 1,2,3,
PMCID: PMC8855584  PMID: 35180865

Abstract

Background

Numerous common oncogenic driver events have been confirmed in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Although targeted therapy has revolutionized NSCLC treatment, some patients still do not respond. NCAPG, also known as non-SMC condensin I complex subunit G, was positively associated with proliferation and migration in several tumor types.

Methods

We used transcriptional sequencing and TCGA database analysis to identify NCAPG as a new therapeutic target for NSCLC. The oncogenic roles of NCAPG in NSCLC tumor growth and metastasis were detected in vitro and in vivo. Ncapg+/+ or Ncapg+/− mice with urethane treatment were analyzed for oncogenesis of NSCLC.

Results

We investigated NCAPG as a new oncogenic driver which promoted NSCLC tumorigenesis and progression. We used transcriptome sequencing and the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database analysis to screen and found that NCAPG was negatively correlated with NSCLC survival. Using immunohistochemistry, we demonstrated that NCAPG overexpression was an independent risk factor for NSCLC survival. Functionally, NCAPG knockdown inhibited proliferation, migration, and invasion of NSCLC cells in vitro and in vivo. We exposed wildtype or Ncapg+/− mice to urethane and discovered that urethane-induced lung tumors were reduced in Ncapg+/− mice. Mechanistically, the function of NCAPG in promoting initiation and progression of NSCLC was closely related to LGALS1, which was also upregulated in NSCLC and might interact directly with NCAPG.

Conclusions

This study indicates that NCAPG is one of the essential factors for NSCLC oncogenesis and progression, providing a new target for prognosis prediction and treatment of NSCLC.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12943-022-01533-9.

Keywords: NSCLC, NCAPG, LGALS1, Oncogenesis, Progression

Introduction

The discovery of actionable oncogenic drivers includes epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) [1], anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) [2], mesenchymal-epithelial transition factor (MET) [3], Kirsten rat sarcoma 2 viral oncogene homolog (KRAS) [4], serine/threonine-protein kinase b-raf (BRAF) [5], and ROS1 proto-oncogene receptor tyrosine kinase (ROS1) [6], which have revolutionized the molecular targeted therapy of NSCLC. However, these specially targeted inhibitors only provide clinical benefits to patients with related driver gene mutations, and these patients still have a challenge with acquired drug resistance. Discovering new potential biomarkers is urgently needed for NSCLC treatment.

To identify new therapeutic targets for NSCLC, we used transcriptional sequencing and TCGA database analysis and found that NCAPG might be involved in NSCLC development regulation. The non-SMC subunits are responsible for ATP-dependent DNA supercoiling and chromosome segregation [7]. NCAPG, also known as non-SMC condensin I complex subunit G, was first isolated from HeLa cell nuclei and demonstrated to regulate the location of DNA on chromosomes [8]. Oncogenic NCAPG is positively associated with S phase cell cycle arrest, proliferation and migration in several tumor types, including gastric cancer [9], breast cancer [10], hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) [11], and etc. Meanwhile, the clinical importance of NCAPG’s biology is that its overexpression was associated with poor prognosis in HCC [12] and renal cell carcinoma [13]. However, the role of NCAPG in NSCLC and its related mechanisms require elucidation.

Here, we demonstrated the ability of NCAPG to promote the proliferation, migration, invasion, and metastasis in NSCLC. By analyzing the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database and clinical samples of NSCLC, we found that NCAPG was the only differentially expressed gene that negatively correlated with the survival of NSCLC patients. Additionally, we investigated the function of NCAPG on tumorigenesis of NSCLC by knocking it out in a murine lung cancer model. Furthermore, LGALS1 was identified to be interacted with NCAPG to participate in NSCLC progression. As a result, we hypothesized that NCAPG could be a potential biomarker and therapeutic target in NSCLC.

Materials and methods

TCGA and GEO database analyses

Between 1991 and 2013, data on 999 adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma NSCLC cases were extracted from the TCGA database (https://cancergenome.nih.gov/). These data were used to analyze differential expression, correlation, and patient survival. Table S1 contains clinical data on the 999 cases. The data of GSE102287 were obtained from Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gds/). These data were analyzed by differential expression analysis.

Cell lines and cultures

NSCLC cell lines including HCC827, H460, H1299, H1975, A549, and PC9 were purchased from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC). H460, H1299, H1975, and HCC827 were cultured in ATCC-formulated RPMI-1640 medium. PC9 cells were cultured in high-glucose Dulbecco’s modified eagle medium (DMEM). A549 cells were cultured in an ATCC formulated F-12 K medium. Each medium contained 10% FBS and 100 U/mL penicillin. These cells were cultured at 37 °C and in a humidified incubator at 5% CO2.

NSCLC specimens

Between February 2010 and November 2014, 156 pairs of NSCLC tumor and adjacent normal tissue specimens were obtained from patients who underwent surgeries at the Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University and Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center. Table 2 lists the clinicopathological characteristics of 156 patients. None of these patients received radiotherapy or chemotherapy before surgery, and all received standard therapy following surgery. The histologic types were determined following the criteria set by the World Health Organization (WHO). All procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation (institutional and national) and the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2000. All patients provided informed consent to participate in the study.

Table 2.

Patients’ characteristics and their association with NCAPG expression

Characteristic
NCAPG expression
Negative (N = 72), Positive (N = 84), P -value
n (%) n (%)
Gender 0.014
 Male 34 (38) 56 (62)
 Female 38 (58) 28 (42)
Age 0.020
  < 60 46 (55) 38 (45)
  ≥ 60 26 (36) 46 (64)
Tumor stage 0.523
 pT1 12 (39) 19 (61)
 pT2 38 (53) 34 (47)
 pT3 14 (56) 11 (44)
 pT4 2 (50) 2 (50)
Node metastasis 0.235
 pN0 47 (54) 40 (46)
 pN1/ pN2 18 (43) 24 (57)
TNM stage 0.537
 I / II 48 (48) 52 (52)
 III / IV 24 (43) 32 (57)
Histological type 0.006
 Adenocarcinoma 49 (53) 43 (47)
 Squamous cell carcinoma 12(28) 31 (72)
Differentiated degree 0.881
 Poorly differentiated 13 (43) 17 (57)
 Moderately differentiated 43 (43) 58 (57)
 Highly differentiated 5 (50) 5 (50)

Proximity ligation assays (PLA)

PLA was carried out with Duolink Detection Kit (Sigma, DUO92101-1KTT) according to manufacturer’s instructions. Briefly, fixed and permeabilized cells were incubated for 30 min at 37 °C in a blocking solution. The cells were incubated with primary antibodies diluted in Duolink antibody diluents overnight at 4 °C. After washes, the cells were incubated for 60 min at 37 °C with appropriate PLA probes. Following washes, circularization and ligation of appropriate oligonucleotides were performed in ligase-containing solution for 30 min at 37 °C. The cells were then rinsed briefly and incubated for 100 min at 37 °C with an amplification solution. After PBS washes, coverslips were mounted with Duolink in Situ Mounting Medium with DAPI. Samples were analyzed using a laser-scanning confocal microscope and multispectral imaging flow cytometry. These experiments were repeated at least three times.

5-ethynyl-2′-deoxyuridine assay

A549 and H1299 cells were transfected with NCAPG shRNA and/or LGALS1 overexpression vectors. And the cells were cultured in medium contained 5-ethynyl-2′-deoxyuridine (EdU) (30 μM) (Cell Light EdU DNA imaging Kit, Guangzhou RiboBio, China) for 2 h. The levels of EdU were detected by flow cytometry according to the manufacturer's protocol.

Animal experiments

All animals were purchased from Sun Yat-sen University Animal Center. All animal experiments were approved by the Ethics Committees of Guangdong Provincial People’s Hospital and the Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University. This study was performed following the ethical standards of the Declaration of Helsinki. Additionally, all institutional and national guidelines for the care and use of laboratory animals were followed. To evaluate the role of NCAPG in the growth of NSCLC, 20 BALB/c nude female mice (8 weeks old) were randomly divided into two groups (n = 10 per group). A549 (5 × 106) and H1299 (2 × 106) cells transfected with either LV-shNCAPG or LV-shCtrl were injected subcutaneously into each axilla of mice separately. Tumor volumes were measured every four days and calculated with the formula: volume = 0.5 × length × width2. The mice were sacrificed after 4–5 weeks, and the tumors were weighed.

For the in vivo pulmonary metastasis murine model, ten NOD/SCID mice (6 weeks old) were injected through the tail vein with H1299 (1 × 106) cells transfected with either LV-shNCAPG or LV-shCtrl. The mice were sacrificed after 31 days and the lungs were harvested and analyzed for the presence of metastatic tumors.

Heterozygous Ncapg mice were generated by Cyagen Biosciences Inc. (Suzhou, China) in order to intercross for homozygotes. Exons 2, 3, 4 and 5 of mouse Ncapg were knockout by the CRISPR Cas9 system. The following mouse Ncapg sgRNA sequences were used: sgRNA F: GTGTGTCGAGTGTAGCGGCGGGG; sgRNA R: GAGAGGGTGGGGCATTATACTGG. Genetic deletion analysis for Ncapg was examined by multiplex genomic DNA PCR according to the manufacturer’s protocol (Cyagen Biosciences Inc). Primer sequences were as follows: F1: 5′-AGTGACTTGTTGATCTGCGCAG-3′; R1: 5′-GCCAAACTCCTACATCACCTATG-3′; R2: 5′-CTCTCAACGCCTTTGGATTATCG-3′. However, no homozygous Ncapg knockout mice have ever been born. A urethane-induced lung tumor model was used to investigate the role of Ncapg in NSCLC initiation. A total of 20 Ncapg+/− mice and 20 Ncapg+/+ C57BL/6 mice were intraperitoneally injected with urethane (1.0 mg/g body weight) once per week for six weeks. The mice were sacrificed 12 weeks after urethane treatment, and the lungs were harvested and further analyzed. Genotype results of mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs) from offspring mice embryos are provided in Table S2.

Immunoprecipitation-MS

Previous studies demonstrated the use of immunoprecipitation-MS to detect NCAPG- interacting proteins [14, 15].

Statistical analysis

A paired-samples t-test was used to compare mRNA and protein expression of NCAPG and LGALS1 in NSCLC tumors and the paired adjacent normal tissue samples. The χ2 test was used to analyze the relationship between NCAPG expression and various clinicopathologic characteristics. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to calculate the survival curves, and the log-rank test was used to compare them. For univariate and multivariate analyses, Cox proportional hazard regression model was used to determine the effect of clinicopathologic variables and NCAPG expression on survival. All statistical analyses were conducted using SPSS 16.0 software (SPSS, Chicago, IL), and a p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant [16]. In addition, the remaining methods are presented in Supplementary Methods, Figures and Tables.

Results

NCAPG is upregulated in NSCLC

To identify new therapeutic targets of NSCLC, we performed transcriptome sequencing on three assembled paired tumor tissue samples and adjacent normal tissues. We identified 415 downregulated genes and 158 upregulated genes (Fig. 1A, log2FC > 1 or < − 1, false discovery rate (FDR) <  0.05). GO analysis revealed that 39 upregulated genes were frequently involved in four biological processes including cell cycle, mitotic nuclear division, cell division, and mitotic cell cycle (Fig. 1B, C). Surprisingly, 13 genes were simultaneously involved in these four biological processes (Fig. 1C). Moreover, TCGA data analysis showed that the 13 genes were overexpressed in NSCLC tumor tissues (Fig. 1D, log2FC > 2, p < 0.001), but only NCAPG was significantly correlated with NSCLC patient survival (Fig. 1E, Fig. S1, n = 500, high expression cases = 250, low expression cases = 250, p = 0.001). Consistent with TCGA data analysis results (Fig. 1F), GEO data analysis also showed that NCAPG were highly expressed in NSCLC tumor tissues (Fig. 1G, p < 0.001). Furthermore, NCAPG expression was significantly correlated with TNM stage (n = 970, p < 0.001), T stage (n = 970, p < 0.001), and N stage (n = 970, p < 0.001) in NSCLC patients (Table 1). The above results suggest that NCAPG expression is positively related to NSCLC.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Identification of NCAPG expression in NSCLC. A Gene sequencing volcano plots of NSCLC tumor tissues and adjacent normal tissues (blue indicates downregulated genes; red indicates upregulated genes). B GO-BP analysis of upregulated genes in tumor tissues. C Heatmaps of all 39 upregulated genes involved in cell cycle, mitotic division, cell division, and mitotic cell cycle. D The 13 upregulated genes highly expressed in NSCLC tumor tissues from the TCGA database. E The relationship between NCAPG expression and survival in NSCLC from the TCGA database. F, G NCAPG expression level in the TCGA and GEO databases. (*** p < 0.001)

Table 1.

NSCLC stage and their correlation with NCAPG expression in TCGA database

Characteristic NCAPG expression p-value r
Negative n (%) Positive n (%)
Tumor stage
 pT1 175 (63.6) 100 (36.4) < 0.001 0.17
 pT2 249 (45.9) 294 (54.1)
 pT3 44 (39.3) 68 (60.7)
 pT4 17 (42.5) 23 (57.5)
Node metastasis
 pN0 343 (54.2) 290 (45.8) < 0.001 0.127
 pN1/ pN2/pN3 142 (42.1) 195 (57.9)
TNM stage
 I 290 (58.0) 210 (42.0) < 0.001 0.198
 II 115 (41.4) 163 (58.6)
 III 67 (40.9) 97 (59.1)
 IV 13 (46.4) 15 (53.6)

To further investigate the expression and prognostic value of NCAPG, IHC was performed to assess NCAPG expression in NSCLC tumor tissues (Fig. 2A). Our study demonstrated that the expression level of NCAPG was correlated with gender, age, and histopathologic type (Table 2). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed that NCAPG expression was negatively correlated with survival in NSCLC patients (Fig. 2B, n = 156, p = 0.003), particularly in elderly patients (≥ 60 years old) (Fig. 2C, n = 84, p = 0.0022), adenocarcinoma (Fig. 2D, n = 92, p = 0.0239), and squamous cell carcinoma (Fig. 2E, n = 43, p = 0.0296). Cox regression analysis further demonstrated that NCAPG expression was an independent risk factor for NSCLC patient survival (Table 3, p = 0.022). Importantly, both RT-qPCR and Western blot analyses showed that NCAPG expression was significantly increased in tumor tissues when compared with adjacent normal tissues (Fig. 2F, G). In addition, NCAPG was notably overexpressed in six NSCLC cell lines, with the highest expression in A549 cells (Fig. 2H, I).

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Overexpression of NCAPG in NSCLC tissues and cell lines. A NCAPG expression in NSCLC tumor tissues by IHC. Left: negative; middle & right: positive; top: adenocarcinoma; bottom: squamous cell carcinoma. B The relationship between NCAPG expression and survival in NSCLC patients. C-E This negative correlation between NCAPG expression and survival was identified in elderly patients (≥ 60 years old) (n = 84, p = 0.0022), adenocarcinoma (n = 92, p = 0.0239), and squamous cell carcinoma (n = 43, p = 0.0296). F, G NCAPG mRNA (F) and protein expression (G) in NSCLC tumor tissues (n =21) (T: tumor tissues, N: matched adjacent normal tissues). H, I NCAPG mRNA (N: Average NCAPG mRNA expression in adjacent normal tissues (n = 21)) and protein (N: Representative protein level of NCAPG in adjacent normal tissues) expression in NSCLC cell lines

Table 3.

Summary data for Cox proportional hazards regression analysis of the effect of clinicopathological characteristics and NCAPG expression on overall survival

subtype Univariate analysis Multivariate analysis
Hazard ratio(95% CI) P -value Hazard ratio(95% CI) P -value
Gender
 Female 1 1
 Male 2.048 (1.167–3.594) 0.012 1.587 (0.888–2.836) 0.119
Age
  < 60 1
  ≥ 60 1.150 (0.679–1.947) 0.603
TNM Stage
 I / II 1 1
 III / IV 3.033 (1.784–5.155) < 0.0001 2.770 (1.620–4.738) < 0.0001
Tumor stage
 pT1 1
 pT2 2.145 (0.889–5.172) 0.089
 pT3 3.436 (1.301–9.077) 0.013
Node metastasis
 pN0 1
 pN1 / pN2 1.114 (0.579–2.141) 0.747
Histological type
 Adenocarcinoma 1
 Squamous cell carcinoma Differentiated degree 1.424 (0.772–2.625) 0.258
 Poorly differentiated 1
 Moderately differentiated 1.093 (0.539–2.215) 0.806
 Highly differentiated NCAPG expression 0.816 (0.255–2.610) 0.732
 Negative 1 1
 Positive 2.353 (1.296–4.272) 0.005 2.022 (1.1.06–3.696) 0.022

CI confidence interval

Depletion of NCAPG inhibits proliferation, migration, and invasion of NSCLC cells

A549 cells transfected with either a control shRNA or shRNAs specifically against NCAPG were detected by Western blot, and the NCAPG inhibitor shRNA3 was the most effective inhibitor of NCAPG and was chosen to treat NSCLC cells (Fig. 3A). Both mRNA and protein expression levels of NCAPG were significantly decreased following NCAPG knockdown in A549 (Fig. 3B, p < 0.001) and H1299 cells (Fig. 2S E, F, p < 0.05). In addition, NCAPG knockdown significantly inhibited cell proliferation, migration, and invasion (Fig. 3C-E, p < 0.001; Fig. 2S G-I, p < 0.0001). Furthermore, we also have used shRNA2 to transfect NSCLC cells, and achieved similar results that NCAPG knockdown inhibited cell proliferation, migration, and invasion (data not shown).

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

The effects of NCAPG knockdown in vitro and in vivo. A, B The decreased mRNA and protein expression of NCAPG in A549 cells following NCAPG knockdown were analyzed using RT-qPCR and Western blot. C-E The inhibited abilities of proliferation (C), migration (D), and invasion (E) of A549 cells after NCAPG knockdown were shown. (*** p < 0.001). F Tumors dissected from subcutaneous axilla of mice injected with LV-shNCAPG H1299 cells and LV-shCtrl H1299 cells, and the expression of NCAPG, SPARC, and Ki-67 of tumors was tested using immunohistochemistry. G, H Tumor volumes (G) and tumor weights (H) of xenografts in LV-shNCAPG and LV-shCtrl group. I The photograph of pulmonary tumors formed by injecting LV-shNCAPG or LV-shCtrl H1299 cells into caudal vein. J The number of metastatic lung tumors in LV-shNCAPG and LV-shCtrl group

To explore whether NCAPG could influence NSCLC tumor growth in vivo, we performed xenograft experiments on BALB/c nude mice by subcutaneous injection of H1299 cells transfected with either LV-shNCAPG or LV-shCtrl. Immunohistochemistry of xenograft tumor tissues showed that Ki-67 expression was reduced in the LV-shNCAPG tumors (Fig. 3F). These results showed that NCAPG knockdown significantly suppressed tumor growth, and that volume and weight of the LV-shNCAPG xenografts were notably decreased compared with that of the LV-shCtrl tumors (Fig. 3F-H, p < 0.01). These data were independently confirmed using A549 xenografts transfected with LV-shNCAPG plasmid (Fig. S2 A-D, p < 0.05).

In addition, SPARC, a protein regulating the epithelial-mesenchymal-paracrine signaling [17], was also significantly suppressed (Fig. 3F). We suspect that NCAPG might play a role in tumor metastasis. To assess the relationship between NCAPG and NSCLC tumor metastasis in vivo, we established a pulmonary metastasis tumor model in nonobese diabetic/severe (NOD/SCID) mice, and observed that silencing NCAPG in H1299 cells suppressed lung metastases (Fig. 3I, J), indicating that the metastasis ability of tumor is significantly inhibited following NCAPG knockdown. However, whether NCAPG promotes NSCLC tumor metastasis through SPARC should be further studied.

Ncapg deficiency suppresses urethane-induced lung cancer in vivo

To further investigate the role of Ncapg in urethane-induced lung cancer, urethane was administered to Ncapg-deficient mice. We generated Ncapg gene knockout constructs and crossed heterozygous targeted mice to generate Ncapg−/− mice. Due to the embryonic lethality after Ncapg knockout (Fig. S3 A, B), only Ncapg+/− and Ncapg+/+ mice could be detected using PCR and agarose gel electrophoresis to test mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs) at embryonic day 9 (Fig. S3 C, D). It has established that consistently repeated urethane exposure results in pulmonary adenoma and adenocarcinoma formation [18]. Therefore, Ncapg+/− and wide type C57BL/6 mice were all injected intraperitoneally with urethane to induce lung tumor (Fig. 4A). We confirmed that the mRNA expression of NCAPG in organs of Ncapg+/− mouse was attenuated (Fig. 4B). The results indicated that the number of tumor nodules formed in Ncapg+/− mouse lung tissues was significantly less than that of wide type group (Fig. 4C-E). These data indicate that NCAPG plays a significant role in lung tumorigenesis.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

Urethane-induced lung tumor in Ncapg+/+ and Ncapg+/− mice. A The strategy of spontaneous lung tumor induced by urethane. B NCAPG mRNA expression analysis of the main organs in Ncapg+/+ and Ncapg+/− mice. C The photograph of urethane-induced lung tumor and representative images of hematoxylin-eosin staining in Ncapg+/+ and Ncapg+/− mice. D, E Number (D) and Volume (E) of lung tumors induced by urethane in Ncapg+/+ and Ncapg+/−mice. (* p < 0.05)

LGALS1 interacts with NCAPG to mediate tumor progression in NSCLC cells

To elucidate the mechanism by which NCAPG promotes cell proliferation, migration, and invasion in NSCLC, we precipitated and analyzed NCAPG-interacting proteins in A549 cells using Co-Immunoprecipitation (Co-IP) and Liquid Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry (LC-MS), respectively (Fig. 5A). NCAPG-interacting protein networks were scored based on their correlation with DNA replication, recombination, repair, and metabolism functions. LGALS1 (Galectin-1), a β-galactoside binding mammalian lectin, is overexpressed in NSCLC and is associated with cancer progression and immune disorders. We used INGENUITY® database analysis and functional enrichment analysis to identify that LGALS1 was co-precipitated with NCAPG in A549 cells (Fig. 5B, C). Furthermore, we detected a clear positive signal showing the interaction of NCAPG and LGALS1 in A549 cells by PLA coupled with immunofluorescence assays (Fig. 5D, E) and flow cytometer (Fig. 5F). Similarly, the effect of LGALS1 knockdown also inhibited cell proliferation, migration, and invasion in A549 and H1299 cells (Fig. 5G-M).

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5

LGALS1 was identified as an important NCAPG-interacting protein. A The SDS-PAGE image with Coomassie Blue Staining before mass spectrometry identified NCAPG-interacting proteins in A549 cells. B The highest score of NCAPG-interacting protein network was measured with biological function enrichment analysis. C LGALS1 was co-precipitated by NCAPG in A549 cells. D For each panel, the images from left to right showed PLA signal in A549 cells (red), cell nuclei stained by DAPI (blue), and overlays of the two images. Scale bar 20 μm. E The histogram displays the relative fluorescent value of PLA punctuates and nuclei. F PLA signal of A549 cells for different conditions by flow cytometer. G Western blot analysis for LGALS1 protein after LGALS1 knockdown in A549 cells. H-M The abilities of proliferation, migration, and invasion were decreased after LGALS1-knockdown in H1299 and A549 cells. Scale bar 50 μm. (** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001)

To confirm whether NCAPG induced NSCLC cells proliferation and metastasis through LGALS1, Western blot were performed to show that NCAPG inhibition remarkably suppressed LGALS1 and SPARC protein levels, while downregulation of SPARC was reversed in LGALS1 overexpression cells (Fig. 6A). MTT, flow cytometry, and transwell analysis were used to detect the proliferation, migration, and invasion of H1299 and A549 cells with NCAPG reduction and/or LGALS1 forced overexpression (Fig. 6B-K). These data showed the functions of proliferation, migration, and invasion in NSCLC cells might partially depend on NCAPG/LGALS1/SPARC axis.

Fig. 6.

Fig. 6

The proliferation and metastasis of NSCLC cells depended on NCAPG/LGALS1/SPARC axis. A Western blot was performed in A549 and H1299 cells with NCAPG knockdown and/or LGALS1 overexpression. B, C CCK8 analysis was used to detect the proliferation of A549 and H1299 cells. D-F The proliferation of A549 and H1299 cells was tested by flow cytometer. G-K The abilities of migration and invasion were measured through transwell analysis with NCAPG knockdown and/or LGALS1 overexpression. Scale bar 50 μm. (** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001)

Discussion

NCAPG has been demonstrated to regulate DNA location on chromosomes during mitotic chromosome condensation regulated by the condensin I complex in mitosis process, as a potential candidate target for medicine development. This study discovered that NCAPG expression was negatively associated with NSCLC survival and played a major role in the initiation and progression of NSCLC in vitro and in vivo. Our study suggests the important role of NCAPG in NSCLC and its potential value in diagnosis and prognosis, suggesting that NCAPG represent a promising target for NSCLC treatment. It is critical to identify novel biomarkers and targets for improving NSCLC patients’ clinical outcomes. Using comprehensive analyses of NSCLC cases from the TCGA and the GEO databases, we found that NCAPG was significantly overexpressed in NSCLC tumor tissues and negatively correlated with overall patient survival. Consistent with our findings, previous studies suggest that NCAPG functions as oncogene in cancer cells [9], whose overexpression could promote epithelial-mesenchymal transition, proliferation, and apoptosis suppression in tumor cells [19, 20] . We next investigated the underlying mechanism of NCAPG-mediated proliferation and metastasis in NSCLC cells. Our data revealed that NCAPG interacts with LGALS1 protein resulting in increased cell proliferation, invasion, and migration in vitro and in vivo. The galectin family members of glycan-binding proteins are known for their role in regulating cancer development and progression [21]. LGALS1, a glycan-binding protein, regulates tumor cell proliferation, invasion, and metastasis in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma [22]. As a result of our findings, we suggest that NCAPG interacts with LGALS1 to promote proliferation, invasion, and migration in NSCLC cells. Since SPARC overexpression enhances tumor-initiated permeability and vascular leakiness, which finally induces lung metastasis [17], and our study found that NCAPG knockdown could suppress SPARC expression. We speculate that NCAPG might interact with LGALS1 to upregulate SPARC, leading to activate EMT signaling and augment tumor-derived vascular permeability.

With the rapid development of NSCLC treatments over the last two decades, a widespread use has been limited by the fact that targeted therapies require specific genetic background and resistance often occurs. Hence, development of new therapeutic targets is needed. Urethane can combine with DNA to form DNA etheno adducts and is used to artificially develop pulmonary adenomas in neonatal mice [23]. We found that NCAPG played a significant role in lung tumorigenesis of a urethane-induced murine lung cancer model. Since NCAPG has been proposed as therapeutic target to overcome trastuzumab resistance in breast cancer [10], our results indicate that NCAPG is not only an important oncogenic driver but may also serve as a new target for treating NSCLC. Future work is warranted to elucidate the mechanisms by which NCAPG knockout induces embryonic lethality.

In conclusion, NCAPG is required for tumorigenesis and progression of NSCLC. NCAPG represents a promising biomarker for NSCLC early diagnosis, prognosis prediction, and drug development. Inhibition of the NCAPG/LGALS1 axis may be a new strategy for NSCLC treatment.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1. (566.9KB, docx)

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Abbreviations

ACN

Acrylonitrile Acn

ALK

Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase

ATCC

American Type Culture Collection

BRAF

B-Rapidly Accelerated Fibrosarcoma

CI

Confidence Interval

Co-IP

Co-Immunoprecipitation

EDTA

Ethylene Diamine Tetraacetic Acid

EGFR

Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor

DMEM

Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium

FBS

Fetal Bovine Serum

FC

Fold Change

FDR

False Discovery Rate

GO

Gene Ontology

HRP

Horseradish Peroxidase

IHC

Immunohistochemistry

KEGG

Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes

KM

KaplanMeier

KRAS

Kirsten Rat Sarcoma Viral Oncogene

LC-MS

Liquid Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry

MEFs

Mouse Embryonic Fibroblasts

MET

MNNG HOS Transforming Gene

NCAPG

Non-SMC Condensin I Complex Subunit G

NOD/SCID

Non-Obese Diabetes/Server Combined Immune-Deficiency

NSCLC

Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

ROS

Reactive Oxygen Species

RPMI

Roswell Park Memorial Institute Medium

RT-qPCR

Realtime Quantitative PCR

SDS-PAGE

Sodium Dodecyl Sulfate Polyacrylamide Gel Electrophoresis

siRNA

Small Interfering RNA

shRNA

Short Hairpin Interfering RNA

TCGA

The Cancer Genome Atlas

TFA

Trifluoroacetic Acid

TNM

Tumor-node-metastasis

WB

Western Blot

Authors’ contributions

Haiqing Ma and Christophe Nicot contributed to the overall study design. Huanhuan Sun, Hong Zhang, Yushi Li, Yan Yan, and Cuiling Zhou performed experiments in vitro and in vivo. Gang Che performed the statistical analyses. Huanhuan Sun, Hong Zhang, Haiqing Ma, and Christophe Nicot wrote and revised the paper. All authors contributed to data interpretation and commented on the manuscript. The author(s) read and approved the final manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81872308, 82072719) and the Natural Science Foundation of the Guangdong Province (2021A15150100790).

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.

Declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

In this study, ethics approval was provided by Guangdong Provincial People’s Hospital and the Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University (KY-Z-2021–299-01, KY-Z-2021-061, L030-1). This study was performed following the ethical standards of the Declaration of Helsinki.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

All authors consented to publication in its present form.

Footnotes

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Huanhuan Sun, Hong Zhang and Yan Yan contributed equally to this work.

Contributor Information

Christophe Nicot, Email: cnicot@kumc.edu.

Haiqing Ma, Email: mahaiqing@gdph.org.cn.

References

  • 1.Remon J, Steuer CE, Ramalingam SS, Felip E. Osimertinib and other third-generation EGFR TKI in EGFR-mutant NSCLC patients. Ann Oncol. 2018;29(suppl_1):i20–ii7. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdx704. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Shaw AT, Solomon BJ, Besse B, Bauer TM, Lin CC, Soo RA, et al. ALK resistance mutations and efficacy of Lorlatinib in advanced anaplastic lymphoma kinase-positive non-small-cell lung Cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2019;37(16):1370–1379. doi: 10.1200/JCO.18.02236. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Zhuo M, Liang Z, Yi Y, Wu N, Yang X, Zhong J, et al. Analysis of MET kinase domain rearrangement in NSCLC. Lung Cancer. 2020;145:140–143. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2020.04.040. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Ferrer I, Zugazagoitia J, Herbertz S, John W, Paz-Ares L, Schmid-Bindert G. KRAS-mutant non-small cell lung cancer: from biology to therapy. Lung Cancer. 2018;124:53–64. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2018.07.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Planchard D, Smit EF, Groen HJM, Mazieres J, Besse B, Helland A, et al. Dabrafenib plus trametinib in patients with previously untreated BRAF(V600E)-mutant metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer: an open-label, phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2017;18(10):1307–1316. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(17)30679-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Drilon A, Siena S, Dziadziuszko R, Barlesi F, Krebs MG, Shaw AT, et al. Entrectinib in ROS1 fusion-positive non-small-cell lung cancer: integrated analysis of three phase 1-2 trials. Lancet Oncol. 2020;21(2):261–270. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(19)30690-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Eberlein A, Takasuga A, Setoguchi K, Pfuhl R, Flisikowski K, Fries R, et al. Dissection of genetic factors modulating fetal growth in cattle indicates a substantial role of the non-SMC condensin I complex, subunit G (NCAPG) gene. Genetics. 2009;183(3):951–964. doi: 10.1534/genetics.109.106476. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Kimura K, Cuvier O, Hirano T. Chromosome condensation by a human condensin complex in Xenopus egg extracts. J Biol Chem. 2001;276(8):5417–5420. doi: 10.1074/jbc.C000873200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Sun DP, Lin CC, Hung ST, Kuang YY, Hseu YC, Fang CL, et al. Aberrant expression of NCAPG is associated with prognosis and progression of gastric Cancer. Cancer Manag Res. 2020;12:7837–7846. doi: 10.2147/CMAR.S248318. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Jiang L, Ren L, Chen H, Pan J, Zhang Z, Kuang X, et al. NCAPG confers trastuzumab resistance via activating SRC/STAT3 signaling pathway in HER2-positive breast cancer. Cell Death Dis. 2020;11(7):547. doi: 10.1038/s41419-020-02753-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Liu W, Liang B, Liu H, Huang Y, Yin X, Zhou F, et al. Overexpression of nonSMC condensin I complex subunit G serves as a promising prognostic marker and therapeutic target for hepatocellular carcinoma. Int J Mol Med. 2017;40(3):731–738. doi: 10.3892/ijmm.2017.3079. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Liu ZK, Zhang RY, Yong YL, Zhang ZY, Li C, Chen ZN, et al. Identification of crucial genes based on expression profiles of hepatocellular carcinomas by bioinformatics analysis. PeerJ. 2019;7:e7436. doi: 10.7717/peerj.7436. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Wei W, Lv Y, Gan Z, Zhang Y, Han X, Xu Z. Identification of key genes involved in the metastasis of clear cell renal cell carcinoma. Oncol Lett. 2019;17(5):4321–4328. doi: 10.3892/ol.2019.10130. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Wang H, Yao H, Li C, Shi H, Lan J, Li Z, et al. HIP1R targets PD-L1 to lysosomal degradation to alter T cell-mediated cytotoxicity. Nat Chem Biol. 2019;15(1):42–50. doi: 10.1038/s41589-018-0161-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Mackey-Cushman SL, Gao J, Holmes DA, Nunoya JI, Wang R, Unutmaz D, et al. FoxP3 interacts with linker histone H1.5 to modulate gene expression and program Treg cell activity. Genes Immun. 2011;12(7):559–567. doi: 10.1038/gene.2011.31. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Ma H, Liang X, Chen Y, Pan K, Sun J, Wang H, et al. Decreased expression of BATF2 is associated with a poor prognosis in hepatocellular carcinoma. Int J Cancer. 2011;128(4):771–777. doi: 10.1002/ijc.25407. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Tichet M, Prod'Homme V, Fenouille N, Ambrosetti D, Mallavialle A, Cerezo M, et al. Tumour-derived SPARC drives vascular permeability and extravasation through endothelial VCAM1 signalling to promote metastasis. Nat Commun. 2015;6:6993. doi: 10.1038/ncomms7993. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Shimkin MB, Polissar MJ. Some quantitative observations on the induction and growth of primary pulmonary tumors in strain a mice receiving urethan. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1955;16(1):75–97. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Gong C, Ai J, Fan Y, Gao J, Liu W, Feng Q, et al. NCAPG promotes the proliferation of hepatocellular carcinoma through PI3K/AKT signaling. Onco Targets Ther. 2019;12:8537–8552. doi: 10.2147/OTT.S217916. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Zhang X, Zhu M, Wang H, Song Z, Zhan D, Cao W, et al. Overexpression of NCAPG inhibits cardia adenocarcinoma apoptosis and promotes epithelial-mesenchymal transition through the Wnt/beta-catenin signaling pathway. Gene. 2021;766:145163. doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2020.145163. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Wu H, Song S, Yan A, Guo X, Chang L, Xu L, et al. RACK1 promotes the invasive activities and lymph node metastasis of cervical cancer via galectin-1. Cancer Lett. 2020;469:287–300. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2019.11.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Orozco CA, Martinez-Bosch N, Guerrero PE, Vinaixa J, Dalotto-Moreno T, Iglesias M, et al. Targeting galectin-1 inhibits pancreatic cancer progression by modulating tumor-stroma crosstalk. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018;115(16):E3769–E3E78. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1722434115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Barbin A. Etheno-adduct-forming chemicals: from mutagenicity testing to tumor mutation spectra. Mutat Res. 2000;462(2–3):55–69. doi: 10.1016/S1383-5742(00)00014-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Additional file 1. (566.9KB, docx)

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.


Articles from Molecular Cancer are provided here courtesy of BMC

RESOURCES