Skip to main content
Indian Journal of Critical Care Medicine : Peer-reviewed, Official Publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine logoLink to Indian Journal of Critical Care Medicine : Peer-reviewed, Official Publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine
letter
. 2022 Feb;26(2):246–247. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-24114

Novel Use of Catheter Mount as an Alternative to T-piece

Abhijeet Anand 1,, Rajesh Panda 2, Saiteja Kodamanchili 3, Saurabh Saigal 4, Gowthaman TB 5, Krishnkant Bhardwaj 6
PMCID: PMC8857724  PMID: 35712728

ABSTRACT

Catheter mounts with swivel connectors are used to attach the endotracheal tube to the ventilator circuit, dampening jerks and drags and increasing patient comfort. We suggest a unique application of catheter mount as T-piece for weaning, eliminating the need for a single inventory purchase and repurposing a previously used item for a new use, lowering the financial burden on patients. In our ICU, catheter mounts are being used as an alternative to T-piece for 30-minute weaning trials following successful SBT trials to evaluate patients’ response to Zero PEEP (ZEEP) and therefore the probable occurrence of alveolar derecruitment to decrease extubation failure.

How to cite this article

Anand A, Panda R, Kodamanchili S, Saigal S, Gowthaman TB, Bhardwaj K. Novel Use of Catheter Mount as an Alternative to T-piece. Indian J Crit Care Med 2022;26(2):246–247.

Keywords: Catheter mount, Spontaneous breathing trial, T-piece, Weaning from mechanical ventilation


The T-piece spontaneous breathing trial (SBT) is still used in mechanical ventilation weaning as a rigorous assessment technique for determining readiness to extubate.1 The T-piece used in intensive care units (ICUs) is a modified form of Ayre's T-piece, which offers a low-resistance open circuit with corrugated reservoir tubing and fresh gas supply at diagonally opposite ends, with the patient connection perpendicular to both.2 Weaning on T-piece produces near-normal stress for any patient since it lacks positive end expiratory pressure (PEEP) and pressure support and so increases the work of breathing as compared to weaning on pressure support ventilation (PSV). T-piece, being a more strenuous exercise, increases the rate of weaning trial failure and hence delays extubation; nevertheless, weaning on PSV has a higher incidence of extubation failure.3 Reintubation, in and of itself, increases morbidity and mortality.4

Catheter mounts with swivel connectors are used to attach the endotracheal tube to the ventilator circuit, dampening jerks and drags and increasing the patient comfort. We propose a novel usage of a catheter mount as a T-piece for weaning, which removes the need to purchase the original T-piece as inventory by reusing a previously used item for a new function, hence reducing the cost burden on patients. In our ICU, catheter mounts are being used as an alternative to T-piece for 30 minute weaning trials following successful SBTs to evaluate patients’ response to zero peep zero end expiratory pressure (ZEEP) and therefore the probable occurrence of alveolar derecruitment to decrease extubation failure.

After removing the cap, the flowmeter's oxygen flow is connected to the catheter mount's suction port as shown in Figure 1. Like a T-piece, the corrugated tubing serves as a reservoir. Because the catheter mount diameter is greater than the diameter of the endotracheal tubes used, the resistance of the circuit is largely determined by the narrowest portion, which happens to be the endotracheal tube itself. As the relationship is direct and linear according to the Hagen–Poiseuille equation, the resistance owing to the length of the catheter mount is also low. In resource-constrained settings, employing a catheter mount instead of T-piece achieves the same goal at a lower cost.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

(1) Oxygen from flowmeter; (2) Suction port with the cap removed attached to oxygen supply; (3) Endotracheal tube with 15 mm connector; and (4) Catheter mount with corrugated tubing

Footnotes

Source of support: Nil

Conflict of interest: None

ORCID

Abhijeet Anand https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6498-5388

Rajesh Panda https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7123-876X

Saiteja Kodamanchili https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1033-0321

Saurabh Saigal https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2364-2271

Gowthaman TB https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0301-3793

Krishnkant Bhardwaj https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2207-0654

REFERENCES

  • 1.Burns KEA, Soliman I, Adhikari NKJ, Zwein A, Wong JTY, Gomez-Builes C, et al. Trials directly comparing alternative spontaneous breathing trial techniques: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Crit Care. 2017;21(1):127. doi: 10.1186/s13054-017-1698-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Harrison GA. Ayre's T-piece: a review of its modifications. Br J Anaesth. 1964;36(2):115–120. doi: 10.1093/bja/36.2.115. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Sklar MC, Burns K, Rittayamai N, Lanys A, Rauseo M, Chen L, et al. Effort to breathe with various spontaneous breathing trial techniques. A physiologic meta-analysis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2017;195(11):1477–1485. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201607-1338OC. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Epstein SK, Ciubotaru RL. Independent effects of etiology of failure and time to reintubation on outcome for patients failing extubation. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1998;158(2):489–493. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.158.2.9711045. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Indian Journal of Critical Care Medicine : Peer-reviewed, Official Publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine are provided here courtesy of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine

RESOURCES