Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Frontiers in Physiology logoLink to Frontiers in Physiology
. 2022 Feb 7;13:834180. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2022.834180

Spotlight on the Binding Affinity of Ion Channels for Phosphoinositides: From the Study of Sperm Flagellum

Takafumi Kawai 1,*, Yasushi Okamura 1,2
PMCID: PMC8859416  PMID: 35197868

Abstract

The previous studies revealed that many types of ion channels have sensitivity to PtdIns(4,5)P2, which has been mainly shown using heterologous expression system. On the other hand, there remains few evidence showing that PtdIns(4,5)P2 natively regulate the ion channel activities in physiological context. Our group recently discovered that a sperm specific K+ channel, Slo3, is natively regulated by PtdIns(4,5)P2 in sperm flagellum. Very interestingly, a principal piece, to which Slo3 specifically localized, had extremely low density of PtdIns(4,5)P2 compared to the regular cell plasma membrane. Furthermore, our studies and the previous ones also revealed that Slo3 had much stronger PtdIns(4,5)P2 affinity than KCNQ2/3 channels, which are widely regulated by endogenous PtdIns(4,5)P2 in neurons. Thus, the high-PtdIns(4,5)P2 affinity of Slo3 is well-adapted to the specialized PtdIns(4,5)P2 environment in the principal piece. This study sheds light on the relationship between PtdIns(4,5)P2-affinity of ion channels and their PtdIns(4,5)P2 environment in native cells. We discuss the current understanding about PtdIns(4,5)P2 affinity of diverse ion channels and their possible regulatory mechanism in native cellular environment.

Keywords: phosphoinositides, ion channel, voltage-sensing phosphatase, sperm flagellum, Slo3, KCNQ

Introduction

Phosphoinositides (PIPs) comprise a minor proportion of the lipid membrane, but they play important roles in a variety of physiological processes, including signal transduction, regulation of cytoskeleton, exocytosis, and endocytosis (Balla, 2013). Specifically, PtdIns(4,5)P2, one class of PIPs, mainly exists in the inner leaflet of the plasma membrane. Accumulating evidence suggest that PtdIns(4,5)P2 also regulates the property of diverse ion channels in many aspects (Suh and Hille, 2005, 2008; Okamura et al., 2018). For example, PtdIns(4,5)P2 is required for the basal activities of all five members of voltage-gated potassium KCNQ/Kv7 channels (Kv7.1-7.5 or KCNQ1-5) (Zhang et al., 2003). Currently, more than 50 ion channel molecules are identified as the targets of PtdIns(4,5)P2 regulation from the electrophysiological studies using heterologous expression system (Suh and Hille, 2008; Okamura et al., 2018). In these studies, the PtdIdns(4,5)P2 dependency of ion channels are examined using application of soluble short chain PtdIdns(4,5)P2, activation of voltage-sensing phosphatase (VSP), or Gq-couple receptors activation. In contrast to the plenty of knowledge about ion channel regulation by PtdIns(4,5)P2 from these experiments, the number of reports about these regulatory mechanisms is quite limited in native physiological condition. The evidence of its physiological importance originates in the study of M-current in sympathetic neurons (Brown and Adams, 1980), which is now widely observed in various types of neurons. The M-current is evoked by the stimulation of muscarinic acetylcholine receptors (mAchRs), which activates GPCR/Gq signaling cascade and reduces the PtdIns(4,5)P2 level in plasma membrane. The reduced PtdIns(4,5)P2 level causes the suppression of KCNQ2/3 channel activities, inducing the depolarization of neurons. The observation of M-current in native neurons indicates that KCNQ channels is constitutively activated by PtdIns(4,5)P2 in normal condition, and the change of PtdIns(4,5)P2 level is also physiologically important for the neural function. Our group recently reported that Slo3, a sperm specific K+ channel, is natively regulated by PtdIns(4,5)P2 in sperm flagellum (Kawai et al., 2019). We analyzed the function of VSP, which dephosphorylates PtdIns(4,5)P2 into PtdIns(4)P, in a mouse spermatozoa. We found that the amount of PtdIns(4,5)P2 was significantly and highly upregulated in a VSP-deficient spermatozoa, thereby the activity of Slo3 was significantly increased (Figure 1A; Kawai et al., 2019), which is consistent with the previous report that Slo3 is sensitive to PtdIns(4,5)P2 (Tang et al., 2010). Importantly, we observed that the principal piece, to which Slo3 specifically localizes, showed extremely low density of PtdIns(4,5)P2 compared with the previously reported regular plasma membrane (Kawai et al., 2019). The Slo3 has strong binding affinity for PtdIns(4,5)P2 and the low level of PtdIns(4,5)P2 appears to adjust to the high-affinity of Slo3 for proper regulation (Figure 1B). The previous reports indicate that Slo3 has more than 10-fold higher affinity for PtdIns(4,5)P2 than KCNQ2/3 channels and that the PtdIns(4,5)P2 level in principal piece is also less than one-tenth of the regular plasma membrane as reported in fibroblast (Fujita et al., 2009). Thus, the study sheds light on the importance of focusing on the relationship between PtdIns(4,5)P2-affinity of ion channels and the native PtdIns(4,5)P2 level. Nevertheless, we sometimes discuss the PtdIns(4,5)P2-sensitivity of ion channels in an all-or-none manner, and the affinity of PtdIns(4,5)P2 is not so importantly discussed. In the present mini-review, we describe how the PtdIns(4,5)P2 sensitivity or affinity of ion channels has been examined in heterologous expression system at first. Then, we introduce the list of PtdIns(4,5)P2-sensitive ion channels with their affinity as described. Finally, we discuss the possibility that different PtdIns(4,5)P2-affinity of ion channels are regulated in different PtdIns(4,5)P2 environment of specialized subcellular compartments.

FIGURE 1.

FIGURE 1

Open in a new tab

Possible relationship between PtdIns(4,5)P2 concentration and its affinity for ion channels. (A) Voltage-sensing phosphatase (VSP) reduces the PtdIns(4,5)P2 levels in sperm flagellum, regulating Slo3 activity. The figure is illustrated based on the finding in our previous report (Kawai et al., 2019). The PtdIns(4,5)P2 is detected by freeze-fracture electron microscopy. The VSP changes the distribution of PtdIns(4,5)P2 levels and regulates Slo3 activity. The Slo3 activity was measured by perforated patch clamp recording (Kawai et al., 2019). (B) Diagram showing the different PtdIns(4,5)P2 dependency among different ion channels.

Quantifying the Affinity of Ion Channels for PtdIns(4,5)P2 Using Heterologous Expression System

The PtdIns(4,5)P2-sensitivity of ion channels is also mostly examined by electrophysiology. The ion channel of interest is heterologously expressed in Xenopus oocyte or other cell lines such as Human Embryonic Kidney cells 293 (HEK-293) or Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells. There are several techniques to manipulate plasma membrane PtdIns(4,5)P2 levels so that the change in ion channel activities is monitored. For example, heterologous expression of Gq-couple receptors such as muscarinic acetylcholine receptor M1 is widely used for this purpose. The agonist stimulation cleaves PtdIns(4,5)P2 to reduce its level on the plasma membrane. Furthermore, a rapamycin-inducible phosphatase, Pseudojanin, strongly depletes PtdIns(4,5)P2, as well as PtdIns(4)P (Hammond et al., 2012). Although these chemical techniques are important molecular tools to manipulate the PtdIns(4,5)P2, it may not be suited for estimating PtdIns(4,5)P2-affinity of ion channel due to the difficulty in precisely manipulating the PtdIns(4,5)P2 levels.

The most quantitative method to analyze PtdIns(4,5)P2–affinity is performed by directly applying a soluble short acyl chain PtdIns(4,5)P2 to the inner leaflet of plasma membrane in an inside-out configuration. This method allows to describe a dose-response curve and to calculate the Kd-value, suited for discussing the PtdIns(4,5)P2-affinity of ion channels. On the other hand, because this technique uses short acyl chain PtdIns(4,5)P2 instead of native long acyl chain lipids, it may show some artificial effects on ion channel properties. Indeed, although the PtdIns(4,5)P2 sensitivity of several K+ channels has been already reported by perfusing soluble PtdIns(4,5)P2, the sensitivity has not been reproduced using other techniques to deplete PtdIns(4,5)P2 (Kruse et al., 2012). A possible alternative way to estimate PtdIns(4,5)P2–affinity is using VSP, which dephosphorylates PtdIns(4,5)P2 in response to the depolarization (Murata et al., 2005). Because VSP depletes the endogenous PtdIns(4,5)P2 by its enzyme activity, it can examine the importance of the regulation by PtdIns(4,5)P2 in a more physiological aspect. Although the quantitativity of VSP for PtdIns(4,5)P2–affinity is not more precise than that of soluble PtdIns(4,5)P2 perfusion, the strength of VSP activity can be easily controlled by changing the amplitude, duration, and/or number of the depolarization pulses, conferring a certain level of quantitativity to it. Ideally, it should be the best way to quantify the PtdIns(4,5)P2-affinity of ion channels by soluble PtdIns(4,5)P2 perfusion and confirm the result using VSP experiments.

Difference in the PtdIns(4,5)P2 –Affinity Among Ion Channels

As described above, more than 50 ion channel molecules have already been shown to be PtdIns(4,5)P2 -sensitive (Suh and Hille, 2005, 2008; Okamura et al., 2018), including K+ channels, Ca2+ channels, TRP channels, P2X receptors, NMDA receptors, and so on. Some studies also performed the detailed experiments and estimated the Kd value of PtdIns(4,5)P2–affinity by perfusing a short acyl chain PtdIns(4,5)P2. We listed the representative examples of the PtdIns(4,5)P2 affinity of ion channels (Table 1). As shown in Table 1, the Kd value for PtdIns(4,5)P2 sensitivity of ion channels has large variation, ranging from 100 nM to 100 μM. The PtdIns(4,5)P2-affinities of ion channels themselves may also change depending on the states of channel activity. For example, TRPM8, which is activated by both cold and menthol, changes their apparent PtdIns(4,5)P2 affinity in response to the agonistic stimuli; cold and menthol (Rohacs et al., 2005). Similarly, BK, Ca2+ activated-K+ channels (Tang et al., 2014), and TMEM16A, Ca2+ activated-Cl– channels, also show different affinity to PtdIns(4,5)P2 depending on the intracellular Ca2+ concentration (Le et al., 2019).

TABLE 1.

The PtdIns(4,5)P2 affinity of individual ion channels.

Name of the ion channel Kd (μM) References
Kv7.2/Kv7.3 ∼87 Zhang et al., 2003; Li et al., 2005
Kir2.1 ∼5 Lopes et al., 2002; Du et al., 2004
Kir2.3 ∼29 Du et al., 2004; Ha et al., 2018
Kir3.4 17.7 ± 1.0 Jin et al., 2002
TREK-1 0.125 Chemin et al., 2005
Slo3 2.4 ± 0.3 Tang et al., 2010
BK ∼14 (0 [Ca2+]i) ∼6 (100 μM [Ca2+]i) Tang et al., 2014
SK2 1.9 ± 0.22 Zhang et al., 2015
TRPV1 0.60 ± 0.2 Ufret-Vincenty et al., 2011
TRPV6 78.9 ± 6.5 Velisetty et al., 2016
TRPM2 11.9 ± 1.1 Barth et al., 2021
TRPM8 80.7 (25°C) 38.2 (17°C) 4.69 (17°C with 500 μM menthol) Rohacs et al., 2005
TMEM16A 1.95 (0.5 μM [Ca2+]i) Le et al., 2019
TMEM16F 5.8 ± 0.5 Ye et al., 2018
P2X7 20–30 Zhao et al., 2007
HCN 10.9 Pian et al., 2006
Open in a new tab

In most cases, PtdIns(4,5)P2 electrostatically interacts with positive charge residues, such as lysine and arginine, through its negative charge on the hydrophilic head group. However, the regulatory mechanism of ion channel activity by PtdIns(4,5)P2 is sometimes complicated and involves multiple sites of the ion channels. In KCNQ2/3, which is one of the most investigated ion channels about PtdIns(4,5)P2 regulation, the studies suggest that there are multiple interacting sites with PtdIns(4,5)P2; the interface of voltage sensor domain and pore-gate domain, the helix A-B linker site, and the distal C-terminus site (Zaydman and Cui, 2014). Recent cryo-EM structures of KCNQ channels with PtdIns(4,5)P2 also support the idea that PtdIns(4,5)P2 interacts with voltage sensor and pore-gate domains (Sun and Mackinnon, 2017, 2020; Zheng et al., 2021). On the other hand, in Kir2.2, it is proposed that PtdIns(4,5)P2 binds at an interface between the transmembrane and the cytoplasmic domains, opening the inner helix gate (Hansen et al., 2011). The full-length protein structure of Slo3 has not been resolved so far, but the previous mutation analysis indicates that PtdIns(4,5)P2 binds to positive charge residues located at the linker region between pore-gate domain and cytosolic RCK1 domain (Tang et al., 2010). Thus, the regulatory mechanism by PtdIns(4,5)P2 of ion channels are diverse and sometimes so complicated, making it difficult to predict which residue is responsible for PtdIns(4,5)P2 sensitivity only from the 3D structure information. Such diverse regulatory mechanism of by PtdIns(4,5)P2 may partially explain the reason why the PtdIns(4,5)P2 affinities are totally different among different types of ion channels.

Relationship Between PtdIns(4,5)P2 –Affinity of Ion Channels and the PtdIns(4,5)P2 Environment

How is such PtdIns(4,5)P2 affinity important for the regulation of native ion channel activities? In spite of many reports about PtdIns(4,5)P2 sensitivity in ion channels described above, there are only a few examples showing that the native ion channel activities are regulated by change of PtdIns(4,5)P2 level in physiological condition. The most representative example is the regulation of KCNQ2/3 activity by mAchR activation, which is known as M-current. Because KCNQ2/3 is constitutively activated by endogenous PtdIns(4,5)P2, the reduction of PtdIns(4,5)P2 closes the KCNQ2/3, inducing the depolarization of the cell. Another example was recently reported from our group (Kawai et al., 2019). We found that a sperm specific K+ channel, Slo3, which is also PtdIns(4,5)P2-sensitive (Tang et al., 2010), is regulated by VSP activity.

To understand the mechanism of ion channel regulation by native PtdIns(4,5)P2, it is important to consider the relationship between PtdIns(4,5)P2-affinity and membrane PtdIns(4,5)P2 concentration (Figure 1B). The affinity of KCNQ2/3 for PtdIns(4,5)P2 is reported to be rather low among PtdIns(4,5)P2-sensitive ion channels (Table 1). Importantly, the Kd value of KCNQ2/3 (∼87 μM) is supposed to be similar to the plasma membrane’s PtdIns(4,5)P2 level in regular cells (Figure 1B). On the other hand, the affinity of Slo3 for PtdIns(4,5)P2 (Kd = ∼2.5 μM) is more than 10-fold higher than that of KCNQ2/3 (Figure 1B). Interestingly, VSP generates biased distribution of PtdIns(4,5)P2 in sperm flagellum, optimizing the flagellar PtdIns(4,5)P2 environment for regulating a high-affinity Slo3 channel activity. Collectively, PtdIns(4,5)P2-affinity of ion channels must be in the range of physiological change for dynamic regulation of activity.

As shown in Table 1, a large proportion of ion channels have much stronger affinity for PtdIns(4,5)P2 than KCNQ2/3. This fact appears to indicate that only a minor population of PtdIns(4,5)P2-sensitive ion channels would be natively regulated by the change of PtdIns(4,5)P2 level in plasma membrane of regular cells. However, it is noteworthy that the distribution of PtdIns(4,5)P2 in plasma membrane is sometimes heterogeneous. The previous reports showed that PtdIns(4,5)P2 is concentrated at the rim of caveolae, a subset type of lipid raft, in cultured fibroblasts and smooth muscle cells of a mouse using freeze-fracture replica method (Fujita et al., 2009). Furthermore, it has been recently shown that there is compartmentalization of PtdIns(4,5)P2 metabolism; PtdIns(4,5)P2 break-down by G protein/PLC pathway is more rapid in cholesterol-rich domain (raft domain) than in cholesterol-poor domains (non-raft domain) of the plasma membrane (Myeong et al., 2021). These lines of evidence may suggest that lipid raft structure is more suited for regulating ion channel activities for PtdIns(4,5)P2 low-affinity ion channels due to the abundant PtdIns(4,5)P2 level.

The level of PtdIns(4,5)P2 can also be a variable depending on the subcellular compartments. For example, PtdIns(4,5)P2 is enriched in dendritic spines of cultured hippocampal neurons (Horne and Dell’acqua, 2007). The specialized structures such as flagellum or cilia can also have different PtdIns(4,5)P2 environment. As described above, we discovered that sperm flagellum show extremely low level of PtdIns(4,5)P2 due to VSP activity. Furthermore, several reports revealed that primary cilia, a non-motile single sensory organelle, show extremely low level of PtdIns(4,5)P2 due to accumulation of Inpp5e, a phosphoinositide 5-phosphatase (Chavez et al., 2015; Garcia-Gonzalo et al., 2015). Interestingly, this PtdIns(4,5)P2 level can also be dynamically regulated by the depletion of Inpp5e during cell-division cycle (Phua et al., 2017). Therefore, the activity of high PtdIns(4,5)P2 affinity ion channels, if there is any in primary cilia, could be regulated during the cell division cycles.

Overall, the different PtdIns(4,5)P2-affinity among ion channels may implicate that their regulation by PtdIns(4,5)P2 is dependent on the individual PtdIns(4,5)P2 environment, although it is also possible that PtdIns(4,5)P2-affinity have the other significance than regulation of ion channel activity, such as localization and trafficking of ion channels (Van Den Bogaart et al., 2011). In any case, it is important to focus on the PtdIns(4,5)P2-affinity, as well as the spatial information, to precisely examine the ion channel function in the future.

Author Contributions

TK and YO wrote the draft of the manuscript and approved the submitted version.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s Note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Funding

This work was supported by Grants-in-Aid from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) (19H03401 to YO and 20K07274 to TK), the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology (MEXT) (15H05901 to YO).

References

  1. Balla T. (2013). Phosphoinositides: tiny lipids with giant impact on cell regulation. Physiol. Rev. 93 1019–1137. 10.1152/physrev.00028.2012 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Barth D., Luckhoff A., Kuhn F. J. P. (2021). Species-Specific Regulation of TRPM2 by PI(4,5)P2 via the Membrane Interfacial Cavity. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 22:4637. 10.3390/ijms22094637 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Brown D. A., Adams P. R. (1980). Muscarinic suppression of a novel voltage-sensitive K+ current in a vertebrate neurone. Nature 283 673–676. 10.1038/283673a0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Chavez M., Ena S., Van Sande J., De Kerchove D’exaerde A., Schurmans S., Schiffmann S. N. (2015). Modulation of Ciliary Phosphoinositide Content Regulates Trafficking and Sonic Hedgehog Signaling Output. Dev. Cell 34 338–350. 10.1016/j.devcel.2015.06.016 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Chemin J., Patel A. J., Duprat F., Lauritzen I., Lazdunski M., Honore E. (2005). A phospholipid sensor controls mechanogating of the K+ channel TREK-1. EMBO J. 24 44–53. 10.1038/sj.emboj.7600494 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Du X., Zhang H., Lopes C., Mirshahi T., Rohacs T., Logothetis D. E. (2004). Characteristic interactions with phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate determine regulation of kir channels by diverse modulators. J. Biol. Chem. 279 37271–37281. 10.1074/jbc.M403413200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Fujita A., Cheng J., Tauchi-Sato K., Takenawa T., Fujimoto T. (2009). A distinct pool of phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate in caveolae revealed by a nanoscale labeling technique. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 106 9256–9261. 10.1073/pnas.0900216106 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Garcia-Gonzalo F. R., Phua S. C., Roberson E. C., Garcia G., III, Abedin M., Schurmans S., et al. (2015). Phosphoinositides Regulate Ciliary Protein Trafficking to Modulate Hedgehog Signaling. Dev. Cell 34 400–409. 10.1016/j.devcel.2015.08.001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Ha J., Xu Y., Kawano T., Hendon T., Baki L., Garai S., et al. (2018). Hydrogen sulfide inhibits Kir2 and Kir3 channels by decreasing sensitivity to the phospholipid phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate (PIP2). J. Biol. Chem. 293 3546–3561. 10.1074/jbc.RA117.001679 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Hammond G. R., Fischer M. J., Anderson K. E., Holdich J., Koteci A., Balla T., et al. (2012). PI4P and PI(4,5)P2 are essential but independent lipid determinants of membrane identity. Science 337 727–730. 10.1126/science.1222483 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Hansen S. B., Tao X., Mackinnon R. (2011). Structural basis of PIP2 activation of the classical inward rectifier K+ channel Kir2.2. Nature 477 495–498. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Horne E. A., Dell’acqua M. L. (2007). Phospholipase C is required for changes in postsynaptic structure and function associated with NMDA receptor-dependent long-term depression. J. Neurosci. 27 3523–3534. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4340-06.2007 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Jin T., Peng L., Mirshahi T., Rohacs T., Chan K. W., Sanchez R., et al. (2002). The (beta)gamma subunits of G proteins gate a K(+) channel by pivoted bending of a transmembrane segment. Mol. Cell. 10 469–481. 10.1016/s1097-2765(02)00659-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Kawai T., Miyata H., Nakanishi H., Sakata S., Morioka S., Sasaki J., et al. (2019). Polarized PtdIns(4,5)P2 distribution mediated by a voltage-sensing phosphatase (VSP) regulates sperm motility. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 116 26020–26028. 10.1073/pnas.1916867116 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Kruse M., Hammond G. R. V., Hille B. (2012). Regulation of voltage-gated potassium channels by PI(4,5)P2. J. Gen. Physiol. 140 189–205. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Le S. C., Jia Z., Chen J., Yang H. (2019). Molecular basis of PIP2-dependent regulation of the Ca(2+)-activated chloride channel TMEM16A. Nat. Commun. 10:3769. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Li Y., Gamper N., Hilgemann D. W., Shapiro M. S. (2005). Regulation of Kv7 (KCNQ) K+ channel open probability by phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate. J. Neurosci. 25 9825–9835. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2597-05.2005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Lopes C. M., Zhang H., Rohacs T., Jin T., Yang J., Logothetis D. E. (2002). Alterations in conserved Kir channel-PIP2 interactions underlie channelopathies. Neuron 34 933–944. 10.1016/s0896-6273(02)00725-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Murata Y., Iwasaki H., Sasaki M., Inaba K., Okamura Y. (2005). Phosphoinositide phosphatase activity coupled to an intrinsic voltage sensor. Nature 435 1239–1243. 10.1038/nature03650 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Myeong J., Park C. G., Suh B. C., Hille B. (2021). Compartmentalization of phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate metabolism into plasma membrane liquid-ordered/raft domains. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 118:e2025343118. 10.1073/pnas.2025343118 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Okamura Y., Kawanabe A., Kawai T. (2018). Voltage-Sensing Phosphatases: Biophysics, Physiology, and Molecular Engineering. Physiol. Rev. 98 2097–2131. 10.1152/physrev.00056.2017 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Phua S. C., Chiba S., Suzuki M., Su E., Roberson E. C., Pusapati G. V., et al. (2017). Dynamic Remodeling of Membrane Composition Drives Cell Cycle through Primary Cilia Excision. Cell 168 264–279.e15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Pian P., Bucchi A., Robinson R. B., Siegelbaum S. A. (2006). Regulation of gating and rundown of HCN hyperpolarization-activated channels by exogenous and endogenous PIP2. J. Gen. Physiol. 128 593–604. 10.1085/jgp.200609648 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Rohacs T., Lopes C. M., Michailidis I., Logothetis D. E. (2005). PI(4,5)P2 regulates the activation and desensitization of TRPM8 channels through the TRP domain. Nat. Neurosci. 8 626–634. 10.1038/nn1451 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Suh B. C., Hille B. (2005). Regulation of ion channels by phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 15 370–378. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Suh B. C., Hille B. (2008). PIP2 is a necessary cofactor for ion channel function: how and why? Annu. Rev. Biophys. 37 175–195. 10.1146/annurev.biophys.37.032807.125859 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Sun J., Mackinnon R. (2017). Cryo-EM Structure of a KCNQ1/CaM Complex Reveals Insights into Congenital Long QT Syndrome. Cell 169 1042–1050.e9. 10.1016/j.cell.2017.05.019 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Sun J., Mackinnon R. (2020). Structural Basis of Human KCNQ1 Modulation and Gating. Cell 180 340–347.e9. 10.1016/j.cell.2019.12.003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Tang Q. Y., Zhang Z., Meng X. Y., Cui M., Logothetis D. E. (2014). Structural determinants of phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate (PIP2) regulation of BK channel activity through the RCK1 Ca2+ coordination site. J. Biol. Chem. 289 18860–18872. 10.1074/jbc.M113.538033 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Tang Q. Y., Zhang Z., Xia J., Ren D., Logothetis D. E. (2010). Phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate activates Slo3 currents and its hydrolysis underlies the epidermal growth factor-induced current inhibition. J. Biol. Chem. 285 19259–19266. 10.1074/jbc.M109.100156 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Ufret-Vincenty C. A., Klein R. M., Hua L., Angueyra J., Gordon S. E. (2011). Localization of the PIP2 sensor of TRPV1 ion channels. J. Biol. Chem. 286 9688–9698. 10.1074/jbc.M110.192526 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Van Den Bogaart G., Meyenberg K., Risselada H. J., Amin H., Willig K. I., Hubrich B. E., et al. (2011). Membrane protein sequestering by ionic protein-lipid interactions. Nature 479 552–555. 10.1038/nature10545 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Velisetty P., Borbiro I., Kasimova M. A., Liu L., Badheka D., Carnevale V., et al. (2016). A molecular determinant of phosphoinositide affinity in mammalian TRPV channels. Sci. Rep. 6:27652. 10.1038/srep27652 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Ye W., Han T. W., Nassar L. M., Zubia M., Jan Y. N., Jan L. Y. (2018). Phosphatidylinositol-(4, 5)-bisphosphate regulates calcium gating of small-conductance cation channel TMEM16F. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 115 E1667–E1674. 10.1073/pnas.1718728115 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Zaydman M. A., Cui J. (2014). PIP2 regulation of KCNQ channels: biophysical and molecular mechanisms for lipid modulation of voltage-dependent gating. Front. Physiol. 5:195. 10.3389/fphys.2014.00195 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Zhang H., Craciun L. C., Mirshahi T., Rohacs T., Lopes C. M., Jin T., et al. (2003). PIP2 activates KCNQ channels, and its hydrolysis underlies receptor-mediated inhibition of M currents. Neuron 37 963–975. 10.1016/s0896-6273(03)00125-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Zhang M., Meng X. Y., Zhang J. F., Cui M., Logothetis D. E. (2015). Molecular overlap in the regulation of SK channels by small molecules and phosphoinositides. Sci. Adv. 1:e1500008. 10.1126/sciadv.1500008 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Zhao Q., Yang M., Ting A. T., Logothetis D. E. (2007). PIP2 regulates the ionic current of P2X receptors and P2X7 receptor-mediated cell death. Channels (Austin) 1 46–55. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Zheng Y., Liu H., Chen Y., Dong S., Wang F., Wang S., et al. (2021). Structural insights into the lipid and ligand regulation of a human neuronal KCNQ channel. Neuron S0896–6273, 844–848. 10.1016/j.neuron.2021.10.029 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Frontiers in Physiology are provided here courtesy of Frontiers Media SA

RESOURCES