Abstract
The pinewood nematode (PWN), Bursaphelenchus xylophilus, one of the most serious forest pests worldwide, is considered the causal agent of the pine wilt disease (PWD). The main host species belong to the genus Pinus, and a variation in the susceptibility of several pine species to PWN infection is well-known. It is also recognized that there is variation in the virulence among B. xylophilus isolates. In the present study, we applied a quantitative mass spectrometry-based proteomics approach to perform a deep characterization of proteomic changes across two B. xylophilus isolates with different virulence from different hosts and geographical origins. A total of 1,456 proteins were quantified and compared in the two isolates secretomes, and a total of 2,741 proteins were quantified and compared in the nematode proteomes in pine tree extract and fungus stimuli conditions. From the proteomic analyses, a group of proteins was selected and identified as potential virulence biomarkers and shed light on putative most pathogenic proteins of this plant-parasitic nematode. Proteomic data are available via ProteomeXchange with identifier PXD029377.
Keywords: pinewood nematode, pine trees, pine wilt disease, plant–nematode interactions, proteomics, secretome, virulence
Introduction
The pinewood nematode (PWN), Bursaphelenchus xylophilus, is the causal agent of the pine wilt disease (PWD), one of the most serious forest pests in the world and responsible for high economic and ecological losses. It is vectored by insects mainly belonging to the genus Monochamus and has, as main host species, trees of the genus Pinus. Native from North America, at the beginning of the 20th century, PWN was introduced in Japan, which became responsible for massive mortality of native pine trees, and then spread to neighboring East Asian countries (China, Taiwan, South Korea) during the 1980s (Futai, 2013). Probably, with a Japanese origin (Mallez et al., 2021), PWN was first reported in Europe, in continental Portugal, in 1999 (Mota et al., 1999) and spread to Spain (Abelleira et al., 2011; Robertson et al., 2011) and Madeira Island (Fonseca et al., 2012). Listed by the European and Mediterranean Plant Protection Organization (EPPO) as an A2 quarantine pest (EPPO, 2021), it represents a huge threat to forest ecosystems worldwide.
Bursaphelenchus xylophilus is a migratory endoparasitic nematode that is able to feed on parenchyma cells of live pine trees, migrating and spreading throughout the xylem tissues, causing cell destruction, and also to feed on fungi colonizing the dead or dying trees. During the last 20 years, advances have been made for understanding the molecular bases of these PWN-host interactions and pathogenic mechanisms. Main advances emerged from transcriptomic and genomic studies on B. xylophilus (Kikuchi et al., 2007, 2011; Kang et al., 2009; Figueiredo et al., 2013; Espada et al., 2016; Tsai et al., 2016), which revealed some special features of B. xylophilus such as the possession of cell wall-degrading enzymes, its evolutionary origin, and also constituted fundamental data that allowed the development of postgenomic studies (Shinya et al., 2013a).
Proteins are the final product of gene regulation and provide the final evidence of the function of a gene. Therefore, proteomic studies are fundamental to find out what proteins are produced and clarify which molecules are directly involved in the parasite-host interaction. From these, the secreted proteins have been of particular interest as they are directly involved in this interaction. The first complete profile of B. xylophilus secretome was achieved by Shinya et al. (2013b) that identified several secreted proteins potentially associated with B. xylophilus pathogenicity. In another study, a quantitative and comparative proteomic analysis of the secretome of B. xylophilus with the secretome of the closely related but non-pathogenic nematode, B. mucronatus, was performed, and proteins associated with peptidase activity, glycosyl hydrolase activity, and with peptidase inhibitor activity were found increased in B. xylophilus secretome (Cardoso et al., 2016). Additionally, the secretomes of B. xylophilus under the stimuli of pine species with different kinds of susceptibility to PWN were also compared, and differences detected in these secretomes highlighted diverse responses from the nematode to overcome host defenses with different susceptibilities (Silva et al., 2021).
Besides the variation in PWN host susceptibility, the nematodes themselves present a variation in their virulence level among isolates (Aikawa et al., 2003a). Several studies reported that the virulence level is usually correlated with the ability of the pathogen to multiply within the host, varies among isolates, and can be related with the geographical isolation, host trees, and environmental stresses (Kiyohara and Bolla, 1990; Aikawa et al., 2003a; Wang et al., 2005; Aikawa and Kikuchi, 2007; Shinya et al., 2012; Filipiak, 2015). Differences in gene expression patterns and genetic diversity between virulent and avirulent isolates have been reported and showed that the most significant variation between the two forms was observed in growth, reproduction, and oxidoreductase activities (Ding et al., 2016). Furthermore, some genes affected by genomic variation had potential roles in pathogenesis, such as putative effectors or digestive peptidases, which could lead avirulent isolates to display low ingestion of nutrients and provoke a delay in development (Palomares-Rius et al., 2015; Filipiak et al., 2021). Recently, in a semi-quantitative proteomic study, the comparative secretome analysis among four B. xylophilus isolates with different levels of virulence has been carried out and four candidate virulence determinants identified: one lipase, two cysteine peptidases, and glycoside hydrolase family 30 (Shinya et al., 2021).
In this study, a short-GeLC approach, in combination with the Sequential Window Acquisition of All Theoretical Mass Spectra (SWATH-MS) acquisition method, was used to perform a deep characterization of proteomic changes across two B. xylophilus isolates with different virulence and in different conditions, pine extract (PE), and fungus stimuli to discover virulence biomarkers and shed light on the most pathogenic proteins of this plant-parasitic nematode.
Materials and Methods
Nematode Cultures and Reproductive Ability Assays
Nematodes from the Portuguese virulent isolate BxPt17AS (BxV) originally isolated from P. pinaster and the avirulent Japanese isolate C14-5 (BxAv) originally isolated from the insect vector M. alternatus emerged from P. densiflora (Aikawa et al., 2003b; Aikawa and Kikuchi, 2007) were maintained in culture plates of the fungus Botrytis cinerea grown on Malt Extract Agar medium at 25°C. The BxPt17AS was used in previous studies as a virulent isolate (Cardoso et al., 2016, 2019, 2020; Silva et al., 2021) and the C14-5 as an avirulent isolate (Mota et al., 2006; Aikawa and Kikuchi, 2007; Filipiak, 2015).
To confirm the virulence status of each isolate, the reproductive ability in the fungus B. cinerea and in P. pinaster seedlings was determined. In the case of the fungus, 10 adult females and 10 adult males/isolate were individually separated under stereomicroscope, hand-picked, and placed in individual plates colonized with B. cinerea (10 plates/isolate). Twenty-one days after inoculation, nematodes were collected with sterile water (SW) from the fungus plates. The resulting nematode suspension was then sieved through a 20-μm sieve and quantified.
In the case of the P. pinaster seedlings, nematodes of each isolate were collected from fungus plates, used for maintenance of the isolates, and washed with SW. The resulting nematode suspension was sieved through a 20-μm sieve and used to inoculate 2-3-year-old P. pinaster seedlings. Approximately 3,000 nematodes (mixed developmental stages) were inoculated/seedling (5 seedlings/isolate). As control, 5 seedlings were inoculated with SW. The inoculation procedure was performed as described in Pimentel et al. (2017). Pinewood nematode inoculated and control seedlings were kept in a greenhouse at a temperature range of 20–25°C, randomly distributed, and watered two times/week. The development of the symptomatology (yellowing/browning of the leaves) was examined and registered weekly. The reproductive ability of each isolate in P. pinaster was assessed 32 days after inoculation. The seedlings were cut at the soil surface level, and the aerial part (main stem and branches) and roots were separated. Nematodes were extracted from the entire seedlings (aerial part and roots) using the Whitehead and Hemming tray method (Whitehead and Hemming, 1965; EPPO, 2013) and quantified.
Statistical analyses on the reproductive ability of BxPt17As and C14-5 isolates in the fungus B. cinerea and in P. pinaster seedlings were performed independently, using ANOVA (significance level p < 0.05). To achieve homogeneity of variance, a Log10 transformation was done. Statistical analyses were conducted using software IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, version 28.0 (IBM Corp).
Pine Extract Stimuli Assay
Pine extracts were prepared from 2-year-old P. pinaster seedlings as previously described (Cardoso et al., 2016), and the obtained solution was used as a pine stimulus. Mixed developmental nematode stages of each isolate (BxPt17As and C14-5) were collected from fungal cultures as described above and washed with SW. About 106 nematodes/replicate were resuspended with 5 ml of PE previously prepared and incubated overnight at 25°C in 10-cm Petri dishes. Six replicates/stimulus were performed. Nematodes were then sedimented by centrifugation and separated from the supernatant containing the secreted proteins (± 5 ml). Samples having the secreted proteins and samples with the nematodes were stored at –80°C until the proteomic analysis of the secreted proteins (secretome) and whole nematode proteins (proteome), respectively. Nematodes from each isolate collected from fungus cultures and not exposed to PE were also stored at –80°C for analysis of the whole nematode proteins (proteome) under fungus conditions.
Sample Preparation for Proteomic Analysis
For the preparation of secreted proteins, an internal standard [(IS) – the recombinant protein maltose-binding protein fused with green fluorescent protein (MBP-GFP)] was added in equal amounts (1 μg of recombinant protein) to each sample (Anjo et al., 2019), and the supernatants with the secreted proteins were completely dried under a vacuum using a Speedvac Concentrator Plus (Eppendorf). The resulting pellets were resuspended in an SDS-Sample buffer, aided by steps of ultrasonication (using a 750W Ultrasonic processor) and denaturation at 95°C. In addition to the individual replicates (6 in the case of the BxAv isolates and 4 replicates of the BxV), two pooled samples were created for protein identification and library creation by combining one-sixth of each replicate.
For preparation of whole nematode proteome, nematode pellets were lysed in 1-mM Tris-HCl pH 7.4 as described in Anjo et al. (2017), followed by protein precipitation using TCA-Acetone (Anjo et al., 2016). Protein pellets were resuspended as described above, and 50 μg of total protein/sample (6 replicates/condition) was used for SWATH-MS. Four pooled samples were also created for protein identification/library creation by combining 15 μg of each replicate. All samples were spiked with equal amounts of internal standard (1 μg of MBP-GFP) prior to protein digestion.
Samples were then digested as previously described (Anjo et al., 2015; Cardoso et al., 2016).
Protein Quantification by Sequential Windowed Acquisition of All Theoretical Mass Spectra
All samples were analyzed on a NanoLC™ 425 System coupled to a Triple TOF™ 6600 mass spectrometer (Sciex®) using two acquisition modes: (i) the pooled samples were analyzed by information-dependent acquisition (IDA), and (ii) the individual samples by the SWATH-MS mode. The ionization source was the OptiFlow® Turbo V Ion Source equipped with the SteadySpray™ Micro Electrode (1–50 μL). The chromatographic separation was carried out on a YMC-Triart C18 Capillary Column 1/32″ (12 nm, S-3 μm, 150 mm × 0.3 mm) and using a YMC-Triart C18 Capillary Guard Column (0.5 μm × 5 mm, 3 μm, 12 nm) at 50°C. The flow rate was set to 5 μl min–1, and mobile phases A and B were 5% DMSO plus 0.1% formic acid in water or acetonitrile, respectively. The LC program was performed as follows: 5–35% of B (0–40 min), 35–90% of B (40–41 min), 90% of B (41–45 min), 90–5% of B (45–46 min), and 5% of B (46–50 min). The ionization source was operated in the positive mode set to an ion spray voltage of 4,500 V, 10 psi for nebulizer gas 1 (GS1), 15 psi for nebulizer gas 2 (GS2), 25 psi for the curtain gas (CUR), and source temperature (TEM) at 100°C.
For IDA experiments, the mass spectrometer was set to scanning full spectra (m/z 350–1,250) for 250 ms, followed by up to 100 MS/MS scans (m/z 100–1,500) per cycle, in order to maintain a cycle time of 3.298 s. The accumulation time of each MS/MS scan was adjusted in accordance with the precursor intensity (minimum of 30 ms for a precursor above the intensity threshold of 1,000). Candidate ions with a charge state between + 1 and + 5 and counts above a minimum threshold of 10 counts/s were isolated for fragmentation, and one MS/MS spectrum was collected before adding those ions to the exclusion list for 15 s (a mass spectrometer operated by Analyst® TF 1.7, Sciex). The rolling collision was used with a collision energy spread (CES) of 5. For SWATH experiments, the mass spectrometer was operated in a looped product ion mode (Gillet et al., 2012) and specifically tuned to a set of 90 overlapping windows, covering the precursor mass range of 350–1,250 m/z. A 50 ms survey scan (350–1,250 m/z) was acquired at the beginning of each cycle, and SWATH-MS/MS spectra were collected from 100 to 1,800 m/z for 35 ms, resulting in a cycle time of 3.251 s. The collision energy for each window was determined according to the calculation for a charge +2 ion centered upon the window with variable CES according to the window.
Peptide identification and library generation were accomplished by searching all the IDA samples using the ProteinPilot™ software (v5.1, ABSciex®) with the following parameters: (i) search against the annotated B. xylophilus protein database obtained from Wormbase Parasite derived from BioProject PRJEA64437 (Kikuchi et al., 2011) and MBP-GFP (IS); (ii) acrylamide alkylated cysteines as fixed modification; and (iii) trypsin as digestion type. An independent False Discovery Rate (FDR) analysis using the target-decoy approach provided with Protein Pilot software was used to assess the quality of the identifications, and positive identifications were considered when identified proteins and peptides reached 5% local FDR (Tang et al., 2008).
Quantitative data processing was conducted using SWATH™ processing plug-in for PeakView™ (v2.0.01, ABSciex®) (Lambert et al., 2013). After retention time adjustment using the MBP-GFP peptides, up to 15 peptides, with up to five fragments each, were chosen/protein, and quantitation was attempted for all proteins in the library file that were identified from ProteinPilot™ search. Only proteins with at least one confidence peptide (FDR < 0.01) in no less than three of the four/six replicates condition and with at least three transitions were considered. Peak areas of the target fragment ions (transitions) of the retained peptides were extracted across the experiments using an extracted-ion chromatogram (XIC) window of 3 min with 100 ppm XIC width.
The proteins’ levels were estimated by summing all the transitions from all the peptides for a given protein that met the criteria described above (an adaptation of Collins et al., 2013) and normalized to the levels of the internal standard or total intensity of each replicate, in the case of secretome or proteome samples, respectively.
For the analysis of the protein results and identification of the differentially regulated proteins, two non-parametric statistical tests were employed, considering the number of comparisons. A Mann-Whitney U test performed in InfernoRDN (version 1.1.5581.33355) (Polpitiya et al., 2008) was used in the case of the secretome samples. For the proteome analysis, a Kruskal–Wallis test was made to select the proteins, which were statistically different between all the comparisons, followed by the Dunn’s test of Multiple Comparisons, with Benjamini–Hochberg p-value adjustment, to determine in which comparisons statistical differences were found. All the analyses were completed using the normalized protein levels, and a p-value of 0.05 was defined as a cut-off.
The heatmaps from the quantified proteins were performed in Morpheus (2021), and each row corresponds to a different protein, with its normalized protein levels.
Mass spectrometry proteomics data have been deposited to the ProteomeXChangeConsorsium through the PRIDE (Perez-Riverol et al., 2019) partner repository with the data set identifier PXD029377.
Functional Annotation
The Gene Ontology (GO) annotations were achieved with OmicsBox (2019) based on the BLAST against the non-redundant protein database NCBI and the InterPro database using the default settings in each step. The GO analysis was done in three categories: (i) molecular function, which defines molecular activities of gene products; (ii) a cellular component, which describes where gene products are active; and (iii) the biological process, which clarifies the pathways and larger processes made up of the activities of multiple gene products. Gene ontology enrichment analysis was conducted for the proteins increased in a condition against the total of quantified proteins. It was performed in OmixBox using statistical Fisher’s Exact Test associated and a p-value of 0.05 as a cut-off (Götz et al., 2008). Functional annotation of selected proteins was complemented with Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway analysis (Kanehisa and Goto, 2000) using OmixBox.
Results
Bursaphelenchus xylophilus Isolates Reproductive Ability on Fungus and on Pinus pinaster
The number of nematodes, recovered from B. cinerea cultures of BxPt17AS isolate, was higher than the number of nematodes from C14-5 isolate. Additionally, the number of nematodes/g, extracted from the entire P. pinaster seedlings with C14-5 isolate, was significantly lower than from BxPt17AS-inoculated seedlings (Table 1). These results reflect the higher reproductive ability of Bx17AS (BxV) over C14-5 (BxAv) in both fungus and P. pinaster.
TABLE 1.
Conditions |
Bursaphelenchus xylophilus isolates |
|
BxPt17AS (BxV) | C14-5 (BxAv) | |
Botrytis cinerea | 2,656.4 ± 1042.4a | 22.7 ± 12.8 b |
Pinus pinaster seedlings | 405.1 ± 239.11 | 128.3 ± 48.62 |
Statistical analysis based on ANOVA for the average number of B. xylophilus (± standard deviation) recovered from one plate of fungus (different letters for p < 0.05) and per gram of pine seedling (different numbers for p < 0.05).
Differentially Secreted Proteins
From the SWATH-MS analysis of the secreted proteins, a total of 1,456 proteins were quantified and compared between BxV and BxAv secretomes (Supplementary Table 1). From these, 669 were differentially expressed (p < 0.05), 656 increased in BxAv secretome (Sec_BxAv), and 13 in BxV secretome (Sec_BxV) (Figure 1).
From the 13 proteins found increased in BxV secretome, five were associated with peptidase activity, belonging to three groups: serine, aspartic, and cysteine peptidases. One cellulase, two proteins with lipase activity, and a venom allergen-like protein were also found increased in BxV secretome. Additionally, a γ-interferon-inducible lysosomal thiol reductase (GILT) was identified. Three of the 13 proteins could not be identified (Table 2).
TABLE 2.
Activity | Description | Protein ID |
Peptidase | Serine peptidase | BXY_0963700.1 |
Serine peptidase | BXY_1121700.1 | |
Serine peptidase | BXY_1703500.1 | |
Aspartic peptidase | BXY_0579700.1 | |
Cysteine peptidase | BXY_0101000.1 | |
Glycoside hydrolase | Cellulase (GH45) | BXY_1261000.1 |
Hydrolase | Lipase | BXY_0707300.1 |
Lipase | BXY_0824600.1 | |
Unknown | Venomallergen-likeprotein | BXY_1378500.1 |
Oxidoreductase | γ-interferon-inducible lysosomal thiol reductase (GILT) | BXY_0504300.1 |
Putative proteins with no description | BXY_0927300.1 | |
BXY_0174200.1 | ||
BXY_0073000.1 |
After KEGG analysis, three of these proteins were associated with five metabolic pathways: the GILT BXY_BXY_0504300.1 associated with antigen processing and the presentation pathway (Ko4612); the cellulase BXY_1261000.1 with starch and sucrose metabolism (Ko00500); and (iii) the lipase BXY_0707300.1 with lysosome (Ko04142), cholesterol metabolism (Ko04979), and steroid biosynthesis (Ko00100).
In order to find which group of proteins are overrepresented in the 656 increased proteins in BxAv secretome, a GO enrichment analysis was done against the 1,456 quantified proteins. This analysis revealed an enrichment of proteins associated with peptidase activity, peptidase inhibitor activity, oxidoreductase activity, and binding activity, among others (Figure 2) with GO terms associated with endopeptidase activity and endopeptidase inhibitor activity being significantly more enriched (Supplementary Table 2).
Proteome Differentially Expressed Proteins
From the SWATH-MS analysis of whole nematode proteins, a total of 2,741 proteins were quantified and compared between the nematode proteomes in different conditions: two isolates (BxV and BxAv) under fungal (fungus) or under PE stimulus (Supplementary Table 3). From these 2,741 proteins, 1,892 were differentially expressed (p < 0.05), considering all conditions. In pairwise comparisons, a higher number of differentially expressed protein was found between different isolates and then those of the same isolate under different condition (Figure 3).
When comparing both isolates under fungal condition, a higher number of proteins (959) were found increased in BxAv_Fungus than the proteins found increased (532) in BxV_Fungus. From GO enrichment analysis, differences were noticed mainly associated with a cellular component in the increased BxAv_Fungus proteins and associated with cellular and metabolic processes and catalytic and binding activity GO terms in increased BxV_Fungus proteins (Figure 4).
Comparing the proteomes of these two isolates under PE stimuli, 571 proteins were increased in BxAv_PE and 473 increased in BxV_PE (Figure 5). From GO enrichment analysis, an enrichment of proteins mainly associated with a cellular component in the increased BxAv_PE proteins and associated with cellular and metabolic processes and catalytic and binding activities in increased BxV_PE proteins was found (Figure 5). Overall differences in the distribution of enriched GO terms between the two isolates were similar under the two stimuli.
A comparison of increased proteins between isolates for each pair of conditions (BxV_PE/BxAv_PE and BxV_Fungus/BxAv_Fungus) revealed that most of the increased proteins of one isolate is common in both conditions, fungus, and PE (Figure 6). Moreover, the 146 proteins that were found increased in BxV proteome compared to BxAv under PE stimuli and were not increased in this isolate compared to BxAv under fungal condition were further explored as their increase could be associated with virulence status of each isolate under PE condition.
Quantitative differences on these 146 proteins among the four conditions revealed that most of the proteins are present in higher levels in BxV_PE (Figure 7A). Thirty of these proteins are statistically increased in BxV_PE compared to BxV_Fungus condition (Figure 7B). The GO analysis of these proteins showed that they were mainly proteins associated with cellular and metabolic processes on biological process GO terms, binding and catalytic activities on molecular function GO terms and a cellular anatomical entity and protein-containing complex on cellular component GO terms (Figure 7C). From the proteins associated with catalytic activity, there were four with peptidase activity, two aspartic peptidases (BXY_1580100.1, BXY_0718400.1), and two cysteine peptidases (BXY_1052500.1, BXY_1408300.1); one protein with cellulase activity (BXY_0433800.1); and one cytochrome P450 with oxidoreductase activity (BXY_0110800.1).
After KEGG analysis, aspartic peptidase BXY_1580100.1 was found associated with autophagy (ko04140, ko04138), protein digestion and absorption (ko04974), sphingolipid signaling pathway (ko04071), lysosome (ko04142), and apoptosis (ko04210). The cysteine peptidase BXY_1052500.1 associated with plant-pathogen interaction (ko04626) and the lysosome (ko04142) and apoptosis (ko04210) pathways. The cellulase BXY_0433800.1 associated with starch and sucrose metabolism (ko00500).
Discussion
Significant differences in the reproductive ability of BxV (Bx17AS) and BxAv (C14-5) isolates in both fungus cultures and pine seedlings were registered, indicating the higher virulence of the isolate Bx17AS, confirmed as a virulent isolate, over the isolate C14-5. However, the isolate C14-5, described as a reference avirulent isolate, was able to reproduce in P. pinaster seedlings. The reproductive ability of this isolate and its avirulent status were already described on the fungus B. cinerea and P. thunberggi seedlings (Mota et al., 2006; Aikawa and Kikuchi, 2007) and also on P. sylvestris (Filipiak, 2015), and very low or no reproduction in both fungus and pine seedlings was reported. The reproduction of C14-5 isolate in P. pinaster seedlings observed in this study and not reported in other hosts could be due to the conditions of the seedlings, environmental conditions, or due to the susceptibility of the host. Avirulent isolates are known to cause the death of pine seedlings when these are exposed to stresses like low light conditions (Ikeda, 1996).
Nevertheless, differences in the level of virulence of these two B. xylophilus isolates in P. pinaster were demonstrated, and how this is reflected at the proteomic level was further explored. A highly sensitive quantitative and comparative proteomic approach was applied to analyze the secretomes and proteomes of these two B. xylophilus isolates with different virulence and in different conditions.
From the 1,456 proteins quantified in BxV and BxAv secretomes, 787 were secreted in similar amounts by both isolates, 656 increased in BxAv secretome, and only 13 increased in BxV secretome. Interestingly, a much higher number of proteins was secreted in larger amounts by the avirulent isolate in comparison to the virulent one. Gene ontology enrichment analysis of these increased proteins in an avirulent isolate revealed that there was an enrichment of several GO categories and terms with those more significantly enriched being associated with molecular functions such as endopeptidase activity and endopeptidase inhibitor activity. A significantly more enriched number of GO categories and terms of avirulent isolates compared to virulent ones has been previously reported compared to genomes of virulent and avirulent B. xylophilus isolates (Filipiak et al., 2021). Also, in accordance with our results, Filipiak et al. (2021) reported that in avirulent isolates most highly represented GO terms in molecular function category were related to endopeptidases and other peptidases. Earlier studies on genomic variations among different B. xylophilus isolates reported that avirulent isolates share SNPs that introduce frame shift or stop codon mutations affecting protein structures and functions (Palomares-Rius et al., 2015). This same study suggested that in avirulent isolates several proteins related to proteolysis such as endopeptidases would display loss of function, and that could lead avirulent isolates to display low ingestion of nutrients and provoke a delay in development. So, the lack of function of some of these proteins in an avirulent isolate may serve as a stimulus for overexpression of that kind of proteins and consequent increased in these protein levels but, at the same time, be responsible for nematodes’ lower capacity of feeding activity and consequent lower virulence.
From the 13 proteins that were significantly increased in the secretome of the virulent isolate, five were associated with peptidase activity. Peptidases are known to be expanded in B. xylophilus secretome in comparison to other nematode secretomes (Shinya et al., 2013b; Cardoso et al., 2016), and 30 proteins with peptidase activity were increased in the secretome of B. xylophilus in comparison to B. mucronatus, a related but non-pathogenic nematode (Cardoso et al., 2016). In addition, five proteins also with peptidase activity were found increased in the secretome of B. xylophilus under P. pinaster stimuli in comparison to the B. xylophilus secretome under the stimuli of P. pinea, a less susceptible pine species (Silva et al., 2021). Our results support these findings, and the importance of these groups of proteins in the virulence of B. xylophilus, with five of the proteins increased in the secretome of the virulent isolate being associated with peptidase activity. Moreover, from the proteome analysis of both isolates in fungus and in pine extract, other four proteins with peptidase activity were found increased among the 30 proteins selected in the BxV proteome as putatively related to its virulence, two cysteine peptidases (BXY_1052500.1, BXY_1408300.1) and two aspartic peptidases (BXY_1580100.1, BXY_0718400.1). Shinya et al. (2021) reported two cysteine peptidases, Bx-CAT1 (corresponding to BXY_1052500.1) and BxCAT-2 (BXY_06188000.1), identified as potential virulent determinants and suggested their involvement in food digestion and reproductive ability. In the present study, aspartic peptidase BXY_1580100.1 was associated with several KEGG pathways, such as autophagy, protein digestion and absorption, sphingolipid signaling pathway, lysosome, and apoptosis. Autophagy is essential for feeding, fecundity, egg hatching, and survival of B. xylophilus under oxidative stress, contributing to its resistance to the oxidative stress induced by pine ROS metabolism, thus promoting virulence (Liu et al., 2020). As the autophagy, the programmed cell death (apoptosis) is also an important cellular mechanism in host-parasites interaction. To survive within their hosts, parasites demonstrated an ability to modulate host apoptosis pathways to their own advantage, preventing apoptosis in host cells that are inhabited by parasites and promoting apoptosis in host immune cells programmed to attack them (James and Green, 2004). The cysteine peptidase BXY_1052500.1 was reported associated with the apoptosis pathways and also with plant-pathogen interaction, lysosome, highlighting the multifunctional role of these peptidases and their potential involvement in nematode pathogenesis.
A comparative genomic study between B. xylophilus virulent and avirulent isolates suggested the influence of digestive proteases in the virulence of the isolates (Palomares-Rius et al., 2015). To better know the characteristics of these important proteins, a group of cysteine peptidases and aspartic peptidases secreted by B. xylophilus were previously characterized (Cardoso et al., 2018, 2019). From these, the cysteine peptidase BxCP11 (BXY_1052500) and the aspartic peptidase BxASP102 (BXY_0579700) were also found increased in B. xylophilus virulent isolate in comparison to the avirulent isolate, reinforcing their role on the pathogenicity and their potential as a possible target for the nematode control. The ability of disrupting peptidases for plant-nematode control via the expression of peptidase inhibitors in transgenic plants has been mentioned (Fuller et al., 2008) and should be further explored for the development of new control strategies for this important forest pathogen.
Cellulases belonging to glycoside hydrolase family 45 (GH45) degrade cellulose, one of the main constituents of the plant cell walls, and are characteristic of B. xylophilus, as other cellulases in plant-parasitic nematodes, such as Meloidogyne, Globodera, Heterodera, or Pratylenchus, belong to the GH5 family (Kikuchi et al., 2011; Fanelli et al., 2014). In our study, two cellulases (GH45) have been found as putative virulent biomarkers as they are increased in the secretome (BXY_1261000.1) and proteome (BXY_0433800.1) of the virulent isolate. Several B. xylophilus cellulases have been characterized and are suggested to have putative parasitic secretory functions that facilitate the feeding and migration processes within the pine tree (Kikuchi et al., 2004; Shibuya and Kikuchi, 2008; Cheng et al., 2010; Ma et al., 2011). The increase of these cell wall-degrading enzymes in the virulent isolate may reflect the higher capacity of this isolate to feed on plant cells and cause destruction.
Two lipases (BXY_0707300.1, BXY_0824600.1) were also found as putative virulent biomarkers as they were increased in BxV secretome. Another lipase called Bx-lip1 and corresponding to BXY_0630900.1 was identified as a potential virulent determinant by Shinya et al. (2021). Additionally, a lipase corresponding to BXY_1125700.1 was increased in B. xylophilus secretome under P. pinaster stimuli in comparison to the secretome under stimuli of P. pinea (Silva et al., 2021). Lipids are the main constituents of cell membranes and are known to influence pathogenesis and resistance mechanisms associated with plant-microbe interactions (Shah, 2005). Lipases can hydrolyze long-chain acyl-triglycerides into di- and monoglycerides, glycerol, and free fatty acids in many important biological processes, such as routine metabolism of dietary triglycerides to cell signaling and inflammation (Pascoal et al., 2018). The extracellular lipases of some plant pathogens such as Fusarium graminearum and others from the genus Phytophthora have been proposed as potential virulence factors (Voigt et al., 2005; Pascoal et al., 2018). In parasitic nematode species, their precise function remains to be recognized, and further functional investigations need to be implemented to investigate their ability to use the host lipids as substrate and act as virulent factors.
Another putative virulence biomarker detected in the present study was a venom allergen-like protein (BXY_1378500.1), increased in BxV secretome. These proteins are known as putative effectors involved in B. xylophilus migration, probably by suppressing the pine tree defense mechanism (Kang et al., 2012). A γ-interferon-inducible lysosomal thiol reductase (GILT) (BXY_0504300.1) was also found increased in the secretome of the virulent isolate and as thioredoxin-related oxidoreductase would also be associated with the detoxification against the plant defense response.
Moreover, one cytochrome P450 (BXY_0110800.1) was selected from the increased proteins in B. xylophilus virulent isolate proteome. These proteins are known to play important roles during the biotransformation of secondary metabolites (Urlacher and Girhard, 2012) and B. xylophilus can use these as a defense reaction to the secondary metabolites, such as terpenoids and cyclic aromatics, produced by the pine trees to prevent the nematode invasion (Santos et al., 2012). Some cytochrome P450 genes were overexpressed in B. xylophilus-infecting trees (Qiu et al., 2013) and were associated with vitality, dispersal ability, reproduction, pathogenicity, and pesticide metabolism (Xu et al., 2015).
The identification of B. xylophilus putative virulence proteins presented here provides a better understanding of the mechanisms that underlie the nematode infection of pine trees; however, with the lack of effective functional analysis in B. xylophilus, the molecular mode of action of many of these putative effectors remains to be clarified. Nevertheless, virulence biomarkers constitute key nematode targets that should be further explored for the development of new control strategies for this important forest pathogen.
Data Availability Statement
Mass spectrometry proteomics data have been deposited to the ProteomeXChange Consortium through the PRIDE partner repository with the data set identifier PXD029377 (https://www.ebi.ac.uk/pride/archive/projects/PXD029377).
Author Contributions
JC, SA, BM, IA, KN, and LF conceived and designed the experiments and revised and edited the manuscript. HS, SA, and JC performed the experiments and analyzed the data. JC wrote the original draft. All the authors have read and approved the final version of the manuscript.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher’s Note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank the Forestry and Forest Products Research Institute (FFPRI), National Research and Development, Japan, for providing the B. xylophilus C14-5 isolate used in this study.
Funding
This research was supported by Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology (FCT) through national funds and the co-funding by FEDER, PT2020, and COMPETE 2020 under the projects POINTERS- PTDC/ASP-SIL/31999/2017 (POCI-01-145-FEDER-031999), UIDB/04004/2020 and UIDB/04539/2020; Project ReNATURE – Valorization of the Natural Endogenous Resources of the Centro Region (Centro 2020, Centro-01-0145-FEDER-000007), Instituto do Ambiente, Tecnologia e Vida, and the National Mass Spectrometry Network (RNEM) under contract POCI-01-0145-FEDER-402-022125 (Ref. ROTEIRO/0028/2013).
Supplementary Material
The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpls.2021.822289/full#supplementary-material
References
- Abelleira A., Picoaga A., Mansilla J. P., Aguin O. (2011). Detection of Bursaphelenchus xylophilus, causal agent of pine wilt disease on Pinus pinaster in Northwestern Spain. Plant Dis. 95 776–777. 10.1094/PDIS-12-10-0902 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Aikawa T., Kikuchi T. (2007). Estimation of virulence of Bursaphelenchus xylophilus (Nematoda: Aphelenchoididae) based on its reproductive ability. Nematology 9 371–377. [Google Scholar]
- Aikawa T., Kikuchi T., Kosaka H. (2003a). Demonstration of interbreeding between virulent and avirulent populations of Bursaphelenchus xylophilus (Nematoda: Aphelenchoididae) by {PCR-RFLP} method. Appl. Entomol. Zool. 38 565–569. 10.1303/aez.2003.565 33922110 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Aikawa T., Togashi K., Kosaka H. (2003b). Different developmental responses of virulent and avirulent isolates of the pinewood nematode, Bursaphelenchus xylophilus (Nematoda: Aphelenchoididae), to the insect vector, Monochamus alternatus (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae). Environ. Entomol. 32 96–102. [Google Scholar]
- Anjo S. I., Lourenço A. S., Melo M. N., Santa C., Manadas B. (2016). “Unraveling mesenchymal stem cells’ dynamic secretome through nontargeted proteomics profiling,” in Mesenchymal Stem Cells: Methods and Protocols, Vol. 1416 ed. Gnecchi M. (New York, NY: Human Press; ), 521–549. 10.1007/978-1-4939-3584-0_32 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Anjo S. I., Santa C., Manadas B. (2015). Short GeLC-SWATH: A fast and reliable quantitative approach for proteomic screenings. Proteomics 15 757–762. 10.1002/pmic.201400221 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Anjo S. I., Santa C., Saraiva S. C., Freitas K., Barah F., Carreira B., et al. (2017). “Neuroproteomics using short GeLC-SWATH: from the evaluation of proteome changes to the clarification of protein function,” in Current Proteomic Approaches Applied to Brain Function, Vol. 127 eds Santamaría E., Fernández-Irigoyen J. (New York, NY: Human Press; ), 107–138. 10.1007/978-1-4939-7119-0_8 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Anjo S. I., Simões I., Castanheira P., Grãos M., Manadas B. (2019). Use of recombinant proteins as a simple and robust normalization method for untargeted proteomics screening: exhaustive performance assessment. Talanta 205:120163. 10.1016/j.talanta.2019.120163 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cardoso J. M. S., Anjo S. I., Fonseca L., Egas C., Manadas B., Abrantes I. (2016). Bursaphelenchus xylophilus and B. mucronatus secretomes: a comparative proteomic analysis. Sci. Rep. 6:39007. 10.1038/srep39007 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cardoso J. M. S., Fonseca L., Abrantes I. (2019). Aspartic peptidases of the pinewood nematode Bursaphelenchus xylophilus: Molecular characterization and in silico structural analysis. For. Pathol. 49:e12545. 10.1111/efp.12545 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Cardoso J. M. S., Fonseca L., Abrantes I. (2020). α-L-Fucosidases from Bursaphelenchus xylophilus secretome-molecular characterization and their possible role in breaking down plant cell walls. Forests 11:265. 10.3390/f11030265 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Cardoso J. M. S., Fonseca L., Egas C., Abrantes I. (2018). Cysteine proteases secreted by the pinewood nematode, Bursaphelenchus xylophilus: in silico analysis. Comput. Biol. Chem. 77 291–296. 10.1016/J.COMPBIOLCHEM.2018.10.011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cheng X.-Y., Dai S. M., Xiau L., Xie B.-Y. (2010). Influence of cellulase gene knockdown by dsRNA interference on the development and reproduction of the pine wood nematode, Bursaphelenchus xylophilus. Nematology 12 225–233. [Google Scholar]
- Collins B. C., Gillet L. C., Rosenberger G., Rost H. L., Vichalkovski A., Gstaiger M., et al. (2013). Quantifying protein interaction dynamics by SWATH mass spectrometry: application to the 14-3-3 system. Nat. Methods 10 1246–1253. 10.1038/nmeth.2703 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ding X., Ye J., Lin S., Wu X., Li D., Nian B. (2016). Deciphering the molecular variations of pine wood nematode Bursaphelenchus xylophilus with different virulence. PLoS One 11:e0156040. 10.1371/journal.pone.0156040 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- EPPO (2013). PM 7/4 (3) Bursaphelenchus xylophilus. EPPO Bull. 43 105–118. 10.1111/epp.12024 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- EPPO (2021). Bursaphelenchus xylophilus. EPPO Datasheets on pests Recommended for Regulation. Available online at: https://gd.eppo.int (accessed November 3, 2021). [Google Scholar]
- Espada M., Silva A. C., Eves van den Akker S., Cock P. J. A., Mota M., Jones J. T. (2016). Identification and characterization of parasitism genes from the pinewood nematode Bursaphelenchus xylophilus reveals a multilayered detoxification strategy. Mol. Plant Pathol. 17 286–295. 10.1111/mpp.12280 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fanelli E., Troccoli A., Picardi E., Pousis C., De Luca F. (2014). Molecular characterization and functional analysis of four β -1,4-endoglucanases from the root-lesion nematode Pratylenchus vulnus. Plant Pathol. 63 1436–1445. 10.1111/ppa.12222 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Figueiredo J., Simões M. J., Gomes P., Barroso C., Pinho D., Conceição L., et al. (2013). Assessment of the geographic origins of pinewood nematode isolates via single nucleotide polymorphism in effector genes. PLoS One 8:e83542. 10.1371/journal.pone.0083542 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Filipiak A. (2015). Pathogenicity of selected isolates of the quarantine pinewood nematode Bursaphelenchus xylophilus to Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.). J. Plant Prot. Res. 55 378–382. 10.1515/jppr-2015-0050 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Filipiak A., Malewski T., Matczyńska E., Tomalak M. (2021). Molecular variation among virulent and avirulent strains of the quarantine nematode Bursaphelenchus xylophilus. Mol. Genet. Genomics 296 259–269. 10.1007/s00438-020-01739-w [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fonseca L., Cardoso J. M. S., Lopes A., Pestana M., Abreu F., Nunes N., et al. (2012). The pinewood nematode, Bursaphelenchus xylophilus, in Madeira Island. Helminthologia 49 96–103. 10.2478/s11687-012-0020-3 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Fuller V. L., Lilley C. J., Urwin P. E. (2008). Nematode resistance. New Phytol. 180 27–44. 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2008.02508.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Futai K. (2013). Pine wood nematode, Bursaphelenchus xylophilus. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 51 61–83. 10.1146/annurev-phyto-081211-172910 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gillet L. C., Navarro P., Tate S., Rost H., Selevsek N., Reiter L., et al. (2012). Targeted data extraction of the MS/MS spectra generated by data-independent acquisition: a new concept for consistent and accurate proteome analysis. Mol. Cell Proteomics 11:O111.016717. 10.1074/mcp.O111.016717 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Götz S., García-Gómez J. M., Terol J., Williams T. D., Nagaraj S. H., Nueda M. J., et al. (2008). High-throughput functional annotation and data mining with the Blast2GO suite. Nucleic Acids Res. 36 3420–3435. 10.1093/nar/gkn176 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ikeda T. (1996). Responses of water-stressed Pinus thunbergii to inoculation with avirulent pine wood nematode (Bursaphelenchus xylophilus): water relations and xylem histology. J. For. Res. 1 223–226. 10.1007/BF02348329 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- James E. R., Green D. R. (2004). Manipulation of apoptosis in the host–parasite interaction. Trends Parasitol. 20 280–287. 10.1016/j.pt.2004.04.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kanehisa M., Goto S. (2000). KEGG: kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 28 27–30. 10.1093/nar/28.1.27 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kang J. S., Koh Y. H., Moon Y. S., Lee S. H. (2012). Molecular properties of a venom allergen-like protein suggest a parasitic function in the pinewood nematode Bursaphelenchus xylophilus. Int. J. Parasitol. 42 63–70. 10.1016/j.ijpara.2011.10.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kang J. S., Lee H., Moon I. S., Lee Y., Koh Y. H., Je Y. H., et al. (2009). Construction and characterization of subtractive stage-specific expressed sequence tag (EST) libraries of the pinewood nematode Bursaphelenchus xylophilus. Genomics 94 70–77. 10.1016/j.ygeno.2009.03.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kikuchi T., Aikawa T., Kosaka H., Pritchard L., Ogura N., Jones J. T. (2007). Expressed sequence tag (EST) analysis of the pine wood nematode Bursaphelenchus xylophilus and B. mucronatus. Mol. Biochem. Parasitol. 155 9–17. 10.1016/j.molbiopara.2007.05.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kikuchi T., Cotton J. A., Dalzell J. J., Hasegawa K., Kanzaki N., McVeigh P., et al. (2011). Genomic insights into the origin of parasitism in the emerging plant pathogen Bursaphelenchus xylophilus. PLoS Pathog. 7:e1002219. 10.1371/journal.ppat.1002219 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kikuchi T., Jones J. T., Aikawa T., Kosaka H., Ogura N. (2004). A family of glycosyl hydrolase family 45 cellulases from the pine wood nematode Bursaphelenchus xylophilus. FEBS Lett. 572 201–205. 10.1016/j.febslet.2004.07.039 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kiyohara T., Bolla R. I. (1990). Pathogenic variability among populations of the pinewood nematode, Bursaphelenchus xylophilus. For. Sci. 36 1061–1076. 10.1093/forestscience/36.4.1061 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Lambert J.-P., Ivosev G., Couzens A. L., Larsen B., Taipale M., Lin Z.-Y., et al. (2013). Mapping differential interactomes by affinity purification coupled with data-independent mass spectrometry acquisition. Nat. Methods 10 1239–1245. 10.1038/nmeth.2702 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Liu H. B., Rui L., Feng Y. Q., Wu X. Q. (2020). Autophagy contributes to resistance to the oxidative stress induced by pine reactive oxygen species metabolism, promoting infection by Bursaphelenchus xylophilus. Pest Manag. Sci. 76 2755–2767. 10.1002/ps.5823 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ma H. B., Lu Q., Liang J., Zhang X. Y. (2011). Functional analysis of the cellulose gene of the pine wood nematode, Bursaphelenchus xylophilus, using RNA interference. Genet. Mol. Res. 10 1931–1941. 10.4238/vol10-3gmr1367 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mallez S., Castagnone C., Lombaert E., Castagnone-Sereno P., Guillemaud T. (2021). Inference of the worldwide invasion routes of the pinewood nematode Bursaphelenchus xylophilus using approximate Bayesian computation analysis. bioRxiv [Preprint]. 10.1101/452326v4.full [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Morpheus (2021). Versatile Matrix Visualization and Analysis Software. Available online at: https://software.broadinstitute.org/morpheus (accessed November 30, 2021). [Google Scholar]
- Mota M. M., Takemoto S., Takeuchi Y., Hara N., Futai K. (2006). Comparative studies between Portuguese and Japanese isolates of the pinewood nematode, Bursaphelenchus xylophilus. J. Nematol. 38 429–433. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mota M., Braasch H., Bravo M. A., Penas A. C., Burgermeister W., Metge K., et al. (1999). First report of Bursaphelenchus xylophilus in Portugal and in Europe. Nematology 1 727–734. 10.1163/156854199508757 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- OmicsBox (2019). Bioinformatics Made Easy, BioBam Bioinformatics. Available online at: https://www.biobam.com/omicsbox (accessed October 8, 2021). [Google Scholar]
- Palomares-Rius J. E., Tsai I. J., Karim N., Akiba M., Kato T., Maruyama H., et al. (2015). Genome-wide variation in the pinewood nematode Bursaphelenchus xylophilus and its relationship with pathogenic traits. BMC Genomics 16:845. 10.1186/s12864-015-2085-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pascoal A., Estevinho L. M., Martins I. M., Choupina A. B. (2018). REVIEW: novel sources and functions of microbial lipases and their role in the infection mechanisms. Physiol. Mol. Plant Pathol. 104 119–126. 10.1016/j.pmpp.2018.08.003 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Perez-Riverol Y., Csordas A., Bai J., Bernal-Llinares M., Hewapathirana S., Kundu D. J., et al. (2019). The PRIDE database and related tools and resources in 2019: improving support for quantification data. Nucleic Acids Res. 47 D442–D450. 10.1093/nar/gky1106 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pimentel C. S., Gonçalves E. V., Firmino P. N., Calvão T., Fonseca L., Abrantes I., et al. (2017). Differences in constitutive and inducible defences in pine species determining susceptibility to pinewood nematode. Plant Pathol. 66 131–139. 10.1111/ppa.12548 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Polpitiya A. D., Qian W. J., Jaitly N., Petyuk V. A., Adkins J. N., Camp D. G., et al. (2008). DAnTE: A statistical tool for quantitative analysis of -omics data. Bioinformatics 24 1556–1558. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btn217 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Qiu X., Wu X., Huang L., Tian M., Ye J. (2013). Specifically expressed genes of the nematode Bursaphelenchus xylophilus involved with early interactions with pine trees. PLoS One 8:e78063. 10.1371/journal.pone.0078063 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Robertson L., Escuer M., Abelleira A., Santiago Merino R., Cobacho Arcos S., Navas A., et al. (2011). Incidence of the pinewood nematode Bursaphelenchus xylophlius Steiner & Buhrer, 1934 (Nickle, 1970) in Spain. Nematology 13 755–757. 10.1163/138855411X578888 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Santos C. S., Pinheiro M., Silva A. I., Egas C., Vasconcelos M. W. (2012). Searching for resistance genes to Bursaphelenchus xylophilus using high throughput screening. BMC Genomics 13:599. 10.1186/1471-2164-13-599 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Shah J. (2005). Lipids, lipases, and lipid-modifying enzymes in plant disease resistance. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 43 229–260. 10.1146/annurev.phyto.43.040204.135951 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Shibuya H., Kikuchi T. (2008). Purification and characterization of recombinant endoglucanases from the pine wood nematode Bursaphelenchus xylophilus. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 72 1325–1332. 10.1271/bbb.70819 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Shinya R., Kirino H., Morisaka H., Takeuchi-Kaneko Y., Futai K., Ueda M. (2021). Comparative secretome and functional analyses reveal glycoside hydrolase family 30 and cysteine peptidase as virulence determinants in the pinewood nematode Bursaphelenchus xylophilus. Front. Plant Sci. 12:640459. 10.3389/fpls.2021.640459 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Shinya R., Morisaka H., Kikuchi T., Takeuchi Y., Ueda M., Futai K. (2013b). Secretome analysis of the pine wood nematode Bursaphelenchus xylophilus reveals the tangled roots of parasitism and its potential for molecular mimicry. PLoS One 8:e67377. 10.1371/journal.pone.0067377 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Shinya R., Morisaka H., Takeuchi Y., Futai K., Ueda M. (2013a). Making headway in understanding pine wilt disease: What do we perceive in the postgenomic era? J. Biosci. Bioeng. 116 1–8. 10.1016/j.jbiosc.2013.01.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Shinya R., Takeuchi Y., Ichimura K., Takemoto S., Futai K. (2012). Establishment of a set of inbred strains of the pine wood nematode, Bursaphelenchus xylophilus (Aphelenchida: Aphelenchoididae), and evidence of their varying levels of virulence. Appl. Entomol. Zool. 47 341–350. 10.1007/s13355-012-0124-8 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Silva H., Anjo S. I., Manadas B., Abrantes I., Fonseca L., Cardoso J. M. S. (2021). Comparative analysis of Bursaphelenchus xylophilus secretome under Pinus pinaster and P. pinea stimuli. Front. Plant Sci. 12:668064. 10.3389/fpls.2021.668064 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tang W. H., Shilov I. V., Seymour S. L. (2008). Nonlinear fitting method for determining local false discovery rates from decoy database searches. J. Proteome Res. 7 3661–3667. 10.1021/pr070492f [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tsai I. J., Tanaka R., Kanzaki N., Akiba M., Yokoi T., Espada M., et al. (2016). Transcriptional and morphological changes in the transition from mycetophagous to phytophagous phase in the plant-parasitic nematode Bursaphelenchus xylophilus. Mol. Plant Pathol. 17 77–83. 10.1111/mpp.12261 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Urlacher V. B., Girhard M. (2012). Cytochrome P450 monooxygenases: an update on perspectives for synthetic application. Trends Biotechnol. 30 26–36. 10.1016/j.tibtech.2011.06.012 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Voigt C. A., Schäfer W., Salomon S. (2005). A secreted lipase of Fusarium graminearum is a virulence factor required for infection of cereals. Plant J. 42 364–375. 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2005.02377.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wang Y., Yamada T., Sakaue D., Suzuki K. (2005). Variations in life history parameters and their influence on rate of population increase of different pathogenic isolates of the pine wood nematode, Bursaphelenchus xylophilus. Nematology 7 459–467. 10.1163/156854105774355545 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Whitehead A. G., Hemming J. R. (1965). A comparison of some quantitative methods of extracting small vermiform nematodes from soil. Ann. Appl. Biol. 55 25–38. 10.1111/j.1744-7348.1965.tb07864.x [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Xu X.-L., Wu X.-Q., Ye J.-R., Huang L. (2015). Molecular characterization and functional analysis of three pathogenesis-related cytochrome P450 genes from Bursaphelenchus xylophilus (Tylenchida: Aphelenchoidoidea). Int. J. Mol. Sci. 16 5216–5234. 10.3390/ijms16035216 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
Mass spectrometry proteomics data have been deposited to the ProteomeXChange Consortium through the PRIDE partner repository with the data set identifier PXD029377 (https://www.ebi.ac.uk/pride/archive/projects/PXD029377).