Sympatric occurrence of Ixodes ricinus with Dermacentor reticulatus and Haemaphysalis concinna and the associated tick-borne pathogens near the German Baltic coast

Abstract

Background

Ixodid ticks from the Northern Hemisphere have registered a northward expansion in recent years, and Dermacentor reticulatus is such an example in Europe, its expansion being considered a result of climate change alongside other factors. The aim of this study was to identify the composition of questing tick species and the associated pathogens at different sites near the German Baltic coast.

Methods

Questing ticks were collected monthly at four sites (May–November, 2020), mainly grasslands, and in October and November 2020 at a fifth site. Molecular screening of ticks for pathogens included RT-qPCR for the tick-borne encephalitis virus (TBEV), qPCR for Anaplasma phagocytophilum, PCR for Babesia species and Rickettsia species, and nested PCR for Borrelia species.

Results

Altogether 1174 questing ticks were collected: 760 Ixodes ricinus, 326 D. reticulatus and 88 Haemaphysalis concinna. The highest activity peak of I. ricinus and D. reticulatus was in May, in June for H. concinna while a second peak was observed only for I. ricinus and D. reticulatus in September and October, respectively. All samples tested negative for TBEV. For A. phagocytophilum, 1.5% of I. ricinus adults tested positive while the minimum infection rate (MIR) in nymphs was 1.3%. This pathogen was found in 0.6% of D. reticulatus. Babesia spp. were detected in I. ricinus (18.2% adults, 2.1% MIR in nymphs) and H. concinna (13.3% adults, 9.7% MIR in nymphs). Borrelia spp. were present only in I. ricinus (49.1% adults, 11.9% MIR in nymphs), while Rickettsia spp. were detected in I. ricinus (14% adults, 8.9% MIR in nymphs) and D. reticulatus (82%). Co-detection of pathogens was observed in 26.6% and 54.8% of positive I. ricinus adults and nymph pools, respectively, while one D. reticulatus tested positive for A. phagocytophilum and Rickettsia spp. The most common co-infection in I. ricinus adults was Babesia microti and Borrelia afzelii (12.3% of positive ticks).

Conclusions

The results of this study confirm the northern expansion of D. reticulatus and H. concinna in Germany. The detailed data of the infection levels at each location could be useful in assessing the risk of pathogen acquisition following a tick bite.

Graphical Abstract

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13071-022-05173-2.

Background

The ixodid tick fauna in Germany is represented by a total of 19 species [1]. In addition to these, two tick species of the exotic Hyalomma genus (Hyalomma marginatum and Hyalomma rufipes) have been recently reported in Germany alongside their ability to develop from nymphs to adults under the local climatic conditions [2]. Another imported species in Germany, Rhipicephalus sanguineus sensu lato (s.l.) was found on dogs after travellers returned from regions with a tropical or subtropical climate. Additionally, it is considered that this tick species can survive indoors during the winter [1].

The geographic range of Ixodes ricinus extends on longitude from 10° W (Ireland) to 45° E (Ural Mountains, Russia) and on latitude from 60° N (Sweden) to 30° N (Egypt) [3]. It is the most common tick species in Germany, and is present in all 16 federal states [1]. One of the main characteristics supporting the wide geographic distribution of this tick species is the low host specificity. More than 300 vertebrate species are described as feeding hosts for I. ricinus ([4] after Bowmann and Nuttall, 2008). It is an exophilic tick species with three different developmental stages, each stage feeding on different hosts to continue the life cycle. Ixodes ricinus is mainly found in deciduous and mixed forests and shrubs but also in urban and peri-urban habitat types [4]. It can transmit a broad spectrum of pathogens to both animals and humans, with the tick-borne encephalitis virus (TBEV) and Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato (s.l.). being among the most relevant disease agents in Europe for public health. Ixodes ricinus is considered the best studied tick species in Germany, and various reports have confirmed its ability to carry multiple pathogens (bacteria, viruses or parasites) [1, 5–10].

Dermacentor reticulatus is the second most commonly encountered tick species in Central Europe after I. ricinus, having a distribution that extends from 9° W (Portugal) to 88° E (western Siberia) and within the latitude range of 34–60° N [11]. The geographic range of this species in Germany indicates that it is widespread in the eastern federal states of Brandenburg, Saxonia, Saxonia-Anhalt and Berlin [1]. The northern location of D. reticulatus in Germany is represented by a site at the Baltic Sea coast in the port of Rostock [11] and there are also indications needing confirmation that its range extends further north, a citizen science project reporting the presence of D. reticulatus on the island of Sylt [12]. Similar to I. ricinus, it is a three-host tick species, and while adults are exophilic ticks, feeding on large mammals (dogs, sheep, goats, horses, cattle, occasionally humans), the larvae and nymphs of D. reticulatus are nidicolous, feed mostly on rodents and are rarely collected by flagging [13, 14]. The preferred habitats of this tick species are deciduous and mixed forests, meadows and pastures, requiring moderate humidity levels [14]. Dermacentor reticulatus is a competent vector for several pathogens such as Babesia canis (responsible for canine babesiosis in Europe), Babesia caballi (causing equine babesiosis) [15], Rickettsia raoultii (causative agent of tick-borne lymphadenopathy) or Francisella tularensis (tularaemia) and Coxiella burnetii (Q fever agent) [13]. The TBEV has also been detected in D. reticulatus from Germany and this tick species is considered to act as a vector for the virus [16].

The west–east distribution of Haemaphysalis concinna extends from the Spanish Atlantic coast to Kamchatka (Russia) while the latitude range is 28–64° N [17]. The northern limit of H. concinna in Europe is reported from Germany at 53.30° N latitude [18]. In connected water landscapes from Central Europe (such as the Mecklenburg lake plateau in the north-east of Germany or alongside the Danube and Morava rivers), it is considered the third most encountered tick species after I. ricinus and D. reticulatus [17]. The occurrence of H. concinna in Germany is patchy and a total of 24 known locations have been described [1].

The life cycle of H. concinna requires three different hosts (small or medium-sized mammals, birds or reptiles). It is an exophilic tick species that completes its developmental cycle within 3 years [19, 20], and it can be found in different habitat types such as deciduous and mixed forests, river valleys, or in close proximity to lakes, in habitats of forest steppes and wet steppes [17, 19]. A broad variety of known tick-borne pathogens have been detected in this tick species such as B. burgdorferi s.l. (causative agent of Lyme borreliosis), C. burnetii, F. tularensis, Babesia divergens (responsible for bovine babesiosis), B. canis, or Anaplasma phagocytophilum (human granulocytic anaplasmosis and tick-borne fever of ruminants) (reviewed by [17]).

The northern distribution limit of I. ricinus has been advancing northwards in Sweden since the climate began to change significantly in the late 1980s [21]. In addition, the expansion of D. reticulatus in Europe is considered a result of climate change alongside other factors such as the increase of deer abundance and the availability of more fallow land due to the EU agricultural policies [22]. It is essential to conduct active monitoring for an accurate determination of the geographic distribution of ticks in order to rightly assess the risk posed by these ectoparasites in different regions. In this study, a collection of questing ticks was conducted to identify the composition of tick species and the associated pathogens at different sites near the German Baltic coast, north-east of Germany.

Methods

Collection of ticks and species identification

Questing ticks were collected from five different locations in Western Pomerania, Germany (Fig. 1). Ticks were collected once a month from May until November 2020 by flagging method [23] between 09:00 am and 02:00 pm at four sites represented mainly by grassland and meadows located in the proximity of lakes or forest: Torgelow (TG; 53.643406, 14.034056), Ueckermünde (UM; 53.733800, 14.043847), Holländerei (HN; 53.680698, 14.046079), and Hohe Düne (HD; 54.188678, 12.135170). These locations were selected after they were evaluated as suitable for encountering D. reticulatus, which was the target species to collect in this study. One additional site was included (Putzar-PZ; 53.711169, 13.664667) due to the high tick infestation of a dog reported by the owner, and it was visited in October and November 2020. Ticks were further identified to species and developmental stages using morphological keys [24]. After identification, the samples were stored at −80 °C until further processing.

Fig. 1.

Sites in north-east of Germany from which questing ticks were collected. HD, Hohe Düne; UM, Ueckermünde; HN, Holländerei; TG, Torgelow; PZ, Putzar. Orange circle: sites where Ixodes ricinus and Dermacentor reticulatus were found; red circle: sites where I. ricinus and Haemaphysalis concinna were observed; green circle: site where I. ricinus, D. reticulatus and H. concinna were observed. The map is copyright free and it was built using Map Explorer version 2.0^® 2010, FLI, Wusterhausen

Molecular screening

DNA and RNA extraction

Adult ticks were processed individually while larvae and nymphs were pooled at a maximum of 10 ticks per pool. One pool consisted of ticks from the same tick species, location and date. Homogenization of ticks was done as previously described [25] while DNA and RNA extractions were performed from 100 μl aliquots by using NucleoMag^® VET kit (Macherey–Nagel, Düren, Germany) and the KingFisher^® Flex purification system (Thermo Fisher, Darmstadt, Germany), following the manufacturer’s instructions. Total DNA and RNA were eluted in 100 μl of elution buffer and stored at −80 °C until further use.

Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and nested PCR for tick species identification and pathogen detection

A total of 59 ticks morphologically identified as I. ricinus (n = 40, representing 7.4% of females, 7.6% of males and 11.4% of the pool of nymphs), H. concinna (n = 8) and D. reticulatus (n = 11) were included in a PCR for genetic confirmation of the tick species based on a part of the cytochrome c oxidase subunit I (COX1) gene. PCR was also conducted for all tick samples to detect Babesia/Theileria spp. 18S rRNA gene and Rickettsia spp. gltA gene, while a nested PCR was done to detect Borrelia spp. 16S–23S rRNA intergenic spacer (IGS). PCR for the Rickettsia ompA gene and nested PCR for Rickettsia ompB gene were done only for a part of the samples that tested positive after Rickettsia gltA PCR in the attempt to identify the Rickettsia species: 43 D. reticulatus samples tested for Rickettsia ompA, 57 I. ricinus and 43 D. reticulatus samples tested for Rickettsia ompB. The reactions were performed using the GoTaq^® Flexi DNA Polymerase Kit (Promega, Walldorf, Germany) and a C1000 thermal cycler (Bio-Rad Laboratories Inc., Feldkirchen, Germany). The amplification conditions and primer concentrations were followed as stated in the available publications for each target (Table 1). Each reaction included a positive control (DNA from ticks) and a negative control (molecular-grade water). The PCR products were separated on a 1.5% agarose gel stained with ROTI^®-GelStain Red (Carl Roth GmbH, Karlsruhe, Germany), then visualized using the ChemiDoc™ MP Imaging System (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA, USA).

Table 1.

Primers used for tick species confirmation and detection of pathogens in ticks

Target gene	Reaction	Sequence (5′–3′)	Amplicon size (base pairs)	Annealing	Reference
Tick species identification
COX1	PCR	cox1F: GGAACAATATATTTAATTTTTGG cox1R: ATCTATCCCTACTGTAAATATATGa	849	55 °C	[51]
Babesia/Theileria spp.
18S rRNA	PCR	BJ1: GTCTTGTAATTGGAATGATGG BN2: TAGTTTATGGTTAGGACTACGa	411–452	55 °C	[52]
Rickettsia spp.
gltA	PCR	Rsfg877: GGGGGCCTGCTCACGGCGG Rfsg1258: ATTGCAAAAAGTACAGTGAACAa	381	56 °C	[53]
ompA	PCR	Rr190.70p: ATGGCGAATATTTCTCCAAAA Rr190.701n: GTTCCGTTAATGGCAGCATCTa	631	46 °C	[54]
ompB	Nested PCR	PCR1: ompB-OF: GTAACCGGAAGTAATCGTTTCGTAA ompB-OR: CTTTATAACCAGCTAAACCACC Nested PCR: ompB SFG-IF: GTTTAATACGTGCTGCTAACCAAa ompB SFG/TG-IR: GGTTTGGCCCATATACCATAAGa	489 425	54 °C 56 °C	[55]
Borrelia spp.
16S-23S rRNA	Nested PCR	PCR1: Bospp-IGS-F: GTATGTTTAGTGAGGGGGGTG Bospp-IGS-R: GGATCATAGCTCAGGTGGTTAG Nested PCR: Bospp-IGS-Fi: AGGGGGGTGAAGTCGTAACAAG Bospp-IGS-Ri: GTCTGATAAACCTGAGGTCGGAa	1007 388–685	56 °C 58 °C	[56]
Anaplasma phagocytophilum
Major surface protein 2 ( Msp2)	qPCR	ApMSP2f: TGGAAGGTAGTGTTGGTTATGGTATT ApMSP2r: TTGGTCTTGAAGCGCTCGTA ApMSP2p: TGGTGCCAGGGTTGAGCTTGAGATTG	77	60 °C	[57]
Tick-borne encephalitis virus
3′non-coding region	RT-qPCR	F_TBE_1: GGGCGGTTCTTGTTCTCC R_TBE_1: ACACATCACCTCCTTGTCAGACT TBE-probe-WT: TGAGCCACCATCACCCAGACACA	67	60 °C	[58]

^aPrimers used in sequencing PCR

qPCR for Anaplasma phagocytophilum

Tick samples were screened for the A. phagocytophilum msp2 gene using specific primers and probe (Table 1). The fluorogenic probe included a 6-carboxyfluorescein (FAM) reporter attached to the 5′ end and a Black Hole Quencher 1 (BHQ1) at the 3′ end. The reaction was performed using iTaq™ universal probes supermix (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc., Munich, Germany) and CFX-96 Real-Time system (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc., Munich, Germany). The reaction mix included 10 µL of DNA, 12.5 µL of iTaq supermix (2×), 900 nM of each primer, 120 nM probe and 1.75 µL of nuclease-free water in a total volume of 25 µL. The initial denaturation step at 95 °C for 5 min was followed by 40 cycles of denaturation at 95 °C for 5 s and annealing/elongation at 60 °C for 30 s. Each reaction included positive (DNA of positive ticks) and negative (molecular grade water) controls.

RT-qPCR for detection of tick-borne encephalitis virus

Tick RNA samples were screened for TBEV by RT-qPCR targeting the 3′ non-coding region of the TBEV genome with specific primers and probe (Table 1). The reactions were done in a final volume of 20 μl using the iTaq™ Universal Probes One-Step Kit (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc., Munich, Germany). Each assay contained 5 μl of RNA, 10 μl iTaq universal probes reaction mix (2×), 400 nM for each forward and reverse primers and 200 nM probe, 0.5 μl iScript advanced reverse transcriptase and 2 μl of water. Each run included RNA extracted from TBEV Neudoerfl viral stock as positive control and water as negative control. Thermal cycling conditions were as follows: 50 °C for 10 min, 95 °C for 5 min, 45 cycles at 95 °C for 15 s then 60 °C for 1 min.

Sequencing the PCR products

The sequencing strategy included the samples that tested positive for more than one pathogen after the molecular analysis. In addition to those, 13 D. reticulatus samples were also sequenced based on the gltA gene to identify the Rickettsia species after testing positive only for this pathogen. In the attempt to clearly determine the Rickettsia species, the 13 samples that were sequenced for Rickettsia spp. gltA and 30 additional D. reticulatus samples were further sequenced based on the ompA and ompB genes. Two H. concinna samples positive only for Babesia/Theileria spp. were also sequenced.

The PCR products were purified with NucleoSEQ^® kit (Macherey–Nagel, Düren, Germany), following manufacturer’s instructions. After purification, samples were included in a PCR assay, in a 10 µL reaction mix: 1 µL of 5× Sequence buffer, 2 µL BigDye Ready Reaction Mix (Thermo Fischer, Darmstadt, Germany), 1 µL of the reverse primer (10 µM), 5 µL of molecular-grade water and 1 µL of the purified PCR product. The thermal conditions included a denaturation step at 96 °C for 1 min, then 25 cycles of denaturation at 96 °C for 10 s, annealing at the specific temperature for each primer for 5 s (Table 1), elongation at 60 °C (duration depending on the size of the product). The obtained products were again purified with NucleoSEQ kit (Macherey-Nagel, Düren, Germany) and 15 µL of each purified product were mixed with 15 µL of highly deionized (Hi-Di) formamide in a 1.5 ml tube and sequenced at the Institute of Diagnostic Virology, Friedrich-Loeffler-Institut, Germany.

The obtained sequences were viewed and edited in Geneious Prime 2021.0.1 (https://www.geneious.com) and compared with available sequences from GenBank database using BLASTn (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov.library.vu.edu.au/BLAST/.).

Phylogenetic analysis

All sequences obtained for the genetic identification of D. reticulatus and H. concinna based on a part of the COX1 gene were used for the construction of phylogenetic trees together with sequences retrieved from GenBank. The alignment of the sequences was conducted in MEGA X using ClustalW [26, 27]. Model test was then run in MEGA X for the selection of the suitable model prior to building the phylogenetic trees.

Statistical analysis

Statistical differences and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated with GraphPad Prism version 9.0.0 for Windows (GraphPad Software, La Jolla, CA, USA, www.graphpad.com). Ordinary one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey’s multiple comparison tests were performed on adult tick infection rates for different geographic groups, tick species and pathogens. The unpaired t-test with Welch’s correction was used to compare the infection levels between two different groups. The results for pathogens detected in pooled samples are expressed as the minimum infection rates (MIR), representing the ratio of the number of positive pools to the total number of analysed ticks, assuming that only one tick from a pool was positive. Differences were considered statistically significant when P < 0.05.

Results

Identified tick species and their seasonality

A total of 1174 questing ticks were collected from May to November 2020 at five different locations from Western Pomerania, Germany. The morphological identification revealed three different tick species. Ixodes ricinus was the most frequently encountered species, with 760 ticks collected (524 adults and 236 nymphs) from all five locations. Dermacentor reticulatus was found in three locations (TG, HD and PZ), with 325 adult ticks and one nymph collected. In addition to the above-mentioned tick species, 88 H. concinna specimens (15 adults, 62 nymphs and 11 larvae) were found at three collection sites (TG, HN and UM) (Table 2).

Table 2.

Questing ticks collected at five locations in Western Pomerania in 2020

Tick species	Stage	Collection Sites					Total
		HD	TG	HN	UM	PZ
Ixodes ricinus	A	306	159	3	55	1	524
	N	24	204	1	6	1	236
Dermacentor reticulatus	A	116	3	0	0	206	325
	N	0	0	0	0	1	1
Haemaphysalis concinna	A	0	8	6	1	0	15
	N	0	61	0	1	0	62
	L	0	11	0	0	0	11

A adults, N nymphs, L larvae, HD Hohe Düne, TG Torgelow, HN Holländerei, UM Ueckermünde, PZ Putzar

The monthly distribution of collected ticks was recorded for I. ricinus from four locations (TG, UM, HN and HD), for D. reticulatus only from the HD site, and for H. concinna from three locations (TG, UM and HN) (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2.

Monthly distribution of collected ticks. a Ixodes ricinus monthly collected at four different locations: UM, Ueckermünde; HN, Holländerei; HD, Hohe Düne; TG, Torgelow. b Monthly records for Haemaphysalis concinna at three different locations (UM, HN and TG). c Dermacentor reticulatus monthly distribution from HD

As shown in Fig. 2, Ixodes ricinus were mostly found in May and June (77.2% of the total monthly collected ticks) while for D. reticulatus the highest number of flagged ticks was in May (49.1% of the monthly collected D. reticulatus) followed by a second peak in October (26.7%). Haemaphysalis concinna were mostly found in June (71.6%) without registering a second peak of occurrence.

BLAST analysis for the valid sequences of I. ricinus (38/40) confirmed the morphological identification of this tick species and had 99.6–100% identity with reference I. ricinus sequences from GenBank (AY945440 and KF197122). Molecular identification of selected D. reticulatus ticks was successful for all samples (n = 11) and BLAST analysis showed that the sequences from this study are 100% identical to D. reticulatus reference sequences (AF132829). The molecular confirmation was done also for H. concinna samples and the sequences (n = 8) matched 96.6–99.2% with H. concinna sequences from GenBank (KR108858).

The phylogenetic analysis based on the COX1 gene confirmed the morphological and molecular identification of D. reticulatus and H. concinna, the isolates from this study positioned within the same clades with the reference sequences retrieved from GenBank for the corresponding species (Figs. 3, 4).

Fig. 3.

Phylogenetic tree based on a part of the COX1 gene of Haemaphysalis concinna. The tree was constructed using the maximum likelihood method and Tamura–Nei model [50] with bootstrap support of 1000 replicates. The bootstrap values lower than 50 were omitted from the tree. Argas persicus sequence (GenBank access. no.: LC209196.1) served as outgroup. Entries preceded by a red triangle represent the sequences from the current study: samples from site UM: U6-50 and U6-51; samples from site HN: TH6-4, TH6-5 and TH6-6; samples from site TG: T5-1, T5-5 and T6-82. Low bootstrap values (usually < 50) should be omitted from the tree.

Fig. 4.

Phylogenetic tree based on a part of the COX1 gene of Dermacentor reticulatus. The tree was constructed using the maximum likelihood method and Tamura–Nei model [50] with bootstrap support of 1000 replicates. The bootstrap values lower than 50 were omitted from the tree. Argas persicus sequence (GenBank access. no.: LC209196.1) was used as outgroup. Entries marked with a red triangle represent the sequences from the current study: ticks from site TG: T9-9 and T9-10; ticks from site PZ: P10-1 and P11-38 and sample H5-161 from site HD. Low bootstrap values (usually <50) should be omitted from the tree.

Molecular screening of tick-borne pathogens

Out of the total number of collected ticks, 964 were screened for the selected pathogens: 714 I. ricinus (479 adults and 235 nymphs), 162 D. reticulatus (161 adults and one nymph) and 88 H. concinna (15 adults, 62 nymphs and 11 larvae). The RNA samples of all ticks tested negative for the specific RNA of TBEV. Table 3 includes detailed data regarding the prevalence rates for each pathogen identified in different tick species and developmental stages.

Table 3.

Number of positive ticks and prevalence rates by pathogen, tick species and collection site

Location	Tick species	Stage	Total tested (n)	Babesia/Theileria spp.			Rickettsia spp.			Borrelia spp.			A. phagocytophilum
				Positive (n)	%	95% CI	Positive (n)	%	95% CI	Positive (n)	%	95% CI	Positive (n)	%	95% CI
HD	I. ricinus	A	262	69	26.3	21.4–32.0	28	10.7	7.5–15.0	152	58.0	52.0–63.8	1	0.4	0.02–2.1
		Na	24	2	8.3	1.5–25.8	2	8.3	1.5–25.8	6	25.0	12.0–44.9	0	0	0
	D. reticulatus	A	73	0	0	0	63	86.3	76.6–92.4	0	0	0	1	1.4	0.1–7.4
TG	I. ricinus	A	159	10	6.3	3.5–11.2	34	21.4	15.7–28.4	55	34.6	27.6–42.3	5	3.1	1.4–7.1
		Na	204	3	1.5	0.4–4.2	16	7.8	4.9–12.4	20	9.8	6.4–14.7	3	1.5	0.4–4.2
	D. reticulatus	A	3	0	0	0	3	100	43.9–100	0	0	0	0	0	0
	H. concinna	A	8	2	25.0	4.4–59.1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
		Na	61	6	9.8	4.6–19.8	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
		La	11	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
UM	I. ricinus	A	55	8	14.5	7.6–26.2	5	9.1	3.9–19.6	28	50.9	38.1–63.6	1	1.8	0.1–9.6
		Na	6	0	0	0	2	33.3	5.9–70.0	1	16.7	0.9–56.4	0	0	0
	H. concinna	A	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
		Na	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
HN	I. ricinus	A	3	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
		Na	1	0	0	0	1	100	5.1–100	1	100	5.1–100	0	0	0
	H. concinna	A	6	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
PZ	D. reticulatus	A	85	0	0	0	66	77.6	67.7–85.2	0	0	0	0	0	0
		Na	1	0	0	0	1	100	5.1–100	0	0	0	0	0	0
Total	I. ricinus	A	479	87	18.2	15.0–21.9	67	14.0	11.2–17.4	235	49.1	44.6–53.5	7	1.5	0.7–3.0
		Na	235	5	2.1	0.9–4.9	21	8.9	5.9–13.3	28	11.9	8.4–16.7	3	1.3	0.3–3.7
	D. reticulatus	A	161	0	0	0	132	82.0	75.3–87.2	0	0	0	1	0.6	0.03–3.4
		Na	1	0	0	0	1	100	5.1–100	0	0	0	0	0	0
	H. concinna	A	15	2	13.3	2.4–37.9	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
		Na	62	6	9.7	4.5–19.5	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
		La	11	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0

HD Hohe Düne, TG Torgelow, HN Holländerei, UM Ueckermünde, PZ Putzar, A adults, N nymphs, L larvae

^aThe results are calculated as minimum infection rate (MIR); %, prevalence registered in ticks

Ixodes ricinus ticks tested positive for all other selected pathogens. Borrelia spp. was the most encountered pathogen in I. ricinus adults (49.1%), showing a significant difference when compared to the infection levels of Rickettsia spp. (14.0%), Babesia/Theileria spp. (18.2%) or A. phagocytophilum (1.5%) (P < 0.001). No significant difference was observed between the prevalence rates of Rickettsia spp. and Babesia/Theileria spp. (P = 0.267) but both pathogens had a significantly higher prevalence compared to A. phagocytophilum (P < 0.001).

From a total of 92 I. ricinus samples positive for Babesia/Theileria after PCR, 70 samples were positive for more than one pathogen and were sequenced. BLASTn analysis identified 62 sequences similar to Babesia microti (MW554613) (57 showed 99.1–100% similarity and five matched 96.3 to 98.7%) while eight samples matched 100% to Babesia sp. (MW554616).

Out of 263 I. ricinus tick samples positive for Borrelia, 114 were sequenced, resulting in a total of 92 valid sequences. The BLASTn search determined 71 sequences as Borrelia afzelii (MK945792) (98.4–100% identity), 18 sequences matched 99.3–100% to both B. afzelii (MK945782) and Babesia spielmanii (JX448323), without a clear distinction between the two genospecies, while the remaining three samples matched 99.9% to B. burgdorferi sensu stricto (s.s.) (CP077727), 100% to Borrelia miyamotoi (LC540659) and 99.6% to Borrelia valaisiana (MK945840), respectively.

Confirmation of Rickettsia species was attempted for 57 samples that showed double or triple infection, out of the total 88 positive I. ricinus ticks. In total, 51 valid gltA sequences were obtained. No clear identification of Rickettsia species was possible, 44 samples had 99.4–100% identity to R. helvetica (GenBank accession number: MH618386) and uncultured Rickettsia sp. (KX051405), three sequences showed 99.4 and 100% identity to R. raoultii (MT293352) or Rickettsia sp. (MT424977), two samples had 99.4 and 100% identity to R. monacensis (MH618388) and uncultured Rickettsia (LC060719), and two sequences matched 100% to Candidatus Rickettsia mendelii (KJ882309) and uncultured Rickettsia sp. (AB911109).

Rickettsia ompB sequencing was successful for 49 samples, out of which 44 matched 100% to R. helvetica (KY951985) and one had 99.7% similarity to R. helvetica (LC461080). For the remaining four samples, clear identification was not possible. Detailed data regarding the results retrieved after BLAST analysis of Rickettsia sequences are available in Additional file 1.

The second most commonly encountered tick species, D. reticulatus, tested positive for Rickettsia spp. and A. phagocytophilum. The infection rate of Rickettsia spp. in adults (82.0%; 133/162) was significantly higher compared to A. phagocytophilum (0.6%) (P < 0.001). Due to the high prevalence of Rickettsia spp. in D. reticulatus, 13 samples positive only for Rickettsia spp. were initially sequenced based on gltA gene. Sequencing results for gltA gene did not result in a clear identification of Rickettsia species, 2 samples had 100% identity to Rickettsia helvetica (GenBank accession number: MH618386) and uncultured Rickettsia sp. (KX051405), while 11 samples had 99.6–100% identity to R. raoultii (MN388798) or uncultured Rickettsia sp. (MN431836). Species confirmation was attempted for the 13 samples and 30 additional ones based on ompA and ompB genes. The results retrieved 40 valid sequences of Rickettsia ompA that showed 99.5–100% (n = 32 isolates), 98–99.4% (n = 7 isolates) and 97.6% (n = 1 isolate) similarity to several R. raoultii sequences (MF166732, KX506737, JN398480) and one entry identified as Rickettsia sp. (AH009131). A distinction between these entries was impossible. In total, 42 Rickettsia ompB sequences were obtained and all showed 100% identity to different R. raoultii isolates from GenBank (HQ232278, DQ365797, KU310593) and to one entry, Candidatus Rickettsia rioja (GQ404431) (Additional file 1).

One D. reticulatus tick that showed co-infection with A. phagocytophilum and Rickettsia spp. was sequenced based on the gltA and ompB genes to determine the Rickettsia species. The gltA sequence showed 100% identity to R. raoultii (MT293352), Rickettsia sp. (MT424977) or uncultured Rickettsia sp. (MN431836). Based on a part of the ompB gene, the obtained sequence had 100% similarity to R. raoultii (HQ232278) and C. Rickettsia rioja (GQ404431). The PCR reaction for Borrelia spp. and Babesia/Theileria spp. showed unspecific amplification and the samples were considered negative.

Haemaphysalis concinna ticks tested positive for Babesia/Theileria spp., adults showing a prevalence of 13.3%. From the two samples that were sequenced, one matched 100% to Theileria sp. (MG214907) and Theileria capreoli (MW531681) while the second sample had 99.74% identity to Babesia sp. (KU550694).

Prevalence of pathogens in ticks from different sites

The PCR for Babesia/Theileria spp. retrieved positive ticks from all locations except the samples collected from HN (Holländerei) (Table 3). When comparing the Babesia/Theileria spp. infection rates of I. ricinus adults according to location, there was a significant difference between ticks from HD and TG (26.3% versus 6.3%; P < 0.001) but no statistical difference to samples from UM (P = 0.089). Babesia/Theileria spp. were detected in H. concinna ticks collected only from TG (Table 3).

Rickettsia was detected in I. ricinus from all locations where this tick species was found. After comparing the infection rates of adult ticks, I. ricinus from TG (21.4%) showed a significant difference compared to the samples from HD (10.7%) (P = 0.006). The molecular screening detected high infection rates of D. reticulatus for Rickettsia spp. There was no statistical difference between the infection rates in ticks from sites HD and PZ (P = 0.261) while all the three D. reticulatus adults found at the TG site tested positive for this pathogen (Table 3).

Borrelia was the most encountered pathogen in I. ricinus ticks, the statistical analysis in adults indicated a significantly higher prevalence for samples from HD compared to TG (58% vs 34.6%; P < 0.001) but no significance when compared to UM site (50.9%) (P = 0.591) (Table 3).

Anaplasma phagocytophilum was identified in I. ricinus ticks from sites HD, TG and UM, with no statistically significant differences among adults from different collection sites (P = 0.072) (Table 3). Concerning D. reticulatus, only the ticks collected in the HD site were positive for this pathogen, with a 1.4% prevalence of infection. Overall, all the H. concinna ticks tested negative for the presence of A. phagocyophilum DNA.

Infection rates of pathogens in different tick species

There was no significant difference of Babesia/Theileria spp. overall prevalence in I. ricinus adults (18.2%) compared to H. concinna ticks (13.3%) (P = 0.609) while the prevalence in H. concinna at site TG (25%) was higher compared to I. ricinus (6.3%) without a statistical significance (P = 0.292) (Table 3).

Co-detection of pathogens

From the total number of I. ricinus ticks that tested positive for at least one putative pathogen, 26.6% of adults (78/293) and 54.8% of nymph pools (17/31) showed an association with two or three different pathogens.

In total, 17 different associations were observed in I. ricinus: 11 different co-detections of two pathogens and six different associations with three pathogens (Table 4). The most common co-infection in adults was with B. microti and B. afzelii (12.3% of positive ticks), showing a statistically higher infection rate compared to all other co-infections (P < 0.001). No significant difference was observed when comparing the co-infection levels with B. microti and B. afzelii in I. ricinus adults from sites HD, TG or UM. The second most common co-infection in adults was with B. afzelii and R. helvetica (4.4% of positive ticks).

Table 4.

Co-detection rates observed in positive ticks for at least one pathogen by location, tick species and developmental stage

	HD			TG					UM		HN		PZ		Total
	IR		DR	IR		DR	HC		IR	HC	IR	HC	DR		IR		DR		HC
	A	N	A	A	N	A	A	N	A	N	N	A	A	N	A	N	A	N	A	N
Total positive ticks	185	6	63	75	21	3	6	8	33	3	1	5	66	1	293	31	132	1	11	8
B. microti + B. afzelii	13.0	0	0	8.0	4.8	0	0	0	18.2	0	0	0	0	0	12.3	3.2	0	0	0	0
B. microti + Borrelia sp.	5.4	33.3	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	3.4	6.5	0	0	0	0
Babesia sp. + B. afzelii	0.5	0	0	0	4.8	0	0	0	6.1	0	0	0	0	0	1.0	3.2	0	0	0	0
Babesia sp. + Borrelia sp.	1.1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.7	0	0	0	0	0
B. microti + R. helvetica	1.1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.7	0	0	0	0	0
Babesia sp. + R. helvetica	0.5	0	0	0	4.8	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.7	0	0	0	0	0
Babesia sp. + Rickettsia sp.	0.5	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.3	0	0	0	0	0
B. afzelii + R. helvetica	3.8	0	0	8	33.3	0	0	0	0	0	100	0	0	0	4.4	25.8	0	0	0	0
B. valaisiana + R. helvetica	0.5	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.3	0	0	0	0	0
Borrelia spp. + R. helvetica	0.5	16.7	0	0	4.8	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.3	6.5	0	0	0	0
A. phagocytophilum + R. helvetica	0	0	0	2.7	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.7	0	0	0	0	0
A. phagocytophilum + Rickettsia sp.	0	0	1.6	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.8	0	0	0
B. microti + B. afzelii + R. helvetica	0.5	0	0	1.3	4.8	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.7	3.2	0	0	0	0
B. microti + B. afzelii + R. monacensis	0.5	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.3	0	0	0	0	0
B. microti + B. afzelii + Rickettsia sp.	0	0	0	1.3	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.3	0	0	0	0	0
B. microti + Borrelia sp. + R. helvetica	0.5	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.3	0	0	0	0	0
B. microti + Borrelia sp. + Rickettsia sp.	0.5	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.3	0	0	0	0	0
Babesia sp. + B. afzelii + R. helvetica	0	0	0	0	4.8	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	3.2	0	0	0	0
Total co-infections	29.2	50	1.6	21.3	61.9	0	0	0	24.2	0	100	0	0	0	26.6	54.8	0.8	0	0	0

HD Hohe Düne, TG Torgelow, HN Holländerei, UM Ueckermünde, PZ Putzar, IR Ixodes ricinus, DR Dermacentor reticulatus, HC Haemaphysalis concinna, A adults, N nymphs

In nymphs, co-detection of B. afzelii and R. helvetica was observed in 25.8% positive samples followed by the co-detection of B. microti and Borrelia sp. (6.5%) and Borrelia sp. and R. helvetica (6.5%).

Co-infection with A. phagocytophilum and Rickettsia spp. was detected in 0.8% of positive D. reticulatus adults (1/132) and it was the only co-infection observed in ticks other than I. ricinus. Table 4 contains detailed information on the dual and triple associations of pathogens observed in ticks.

Discussion

In this study, we conducted a follow-up analysis on the tick population near the Baltic Sea coast to determine the tick species composition and the prevalence rates for some of the most relevant tick-borne pathogens. The results of our previous study, which focused on screening pathogens in I. ricinus only, indicated that questing ticks from Mecklenburg-Western Pomerania can harbour several Borrelia species and that B. miyamotoi infection levels in ticks are at similar levels to other regions in Europe [25]. Considering the current expansion D. reticulatus is undergoing alongside other tick species in Germany and other European countries, we aimed to investigate the presence of this species and the potential sympatric occurrence with other ticks at different sites near the coast in north-east Germany.

Overall, we collected and identified three tick species from the assessed areas. As expected, I. ricinus was the most frequently encountered tick, previously reported as the species with the widest geographic distribution in Germany [1]. Previous reports indicated the sympatric distribution of I. ricinus with Ixodes inopinatus in southern and northern Germany [28, 29]. Ixodes inopinatus was described in 2014 as a new species closely related to I. ricinus [30]. Due to the similar morphological features of I. ricinus and I. inopinatus, we conducted molecular identification for a representative batch of the collected I. ricinus ticks and all sequences belonged to this tick species, confirming the initial morphological identification. Further extensive tick collection campaigns should determine whether I. inopinatus is present in Western Pomerania.

Dermacentor reticulatus was found at three collection sites which confirms the presence of this species in north-east Germany. In recent years this species continuously expanded its geographic range in several European countries, Germany included, and it is the second most widespread questing tick on the continent after I. ricinus [31]. Climate change has been incriminated as the dominant factor for the range expansion of D. reticulatus, nevertheless, the importance of other contributing factors like changes in land use, availability of wildlife hosts, and intense travel of humans and their pets should not be neglected [13].

Collecting D. reticulatus from the environment in HD site, very close to the German Baltic coast (Fig. 1), confirms the northward expansion of this species in Germany and the previous documentation of this tick in the port of Rostock (12.14°E∕54.15°N) [11]. A recent publication reported the presence of D. reticulatus further north, on the island of Sylt. The observation was made during a citizen science, still, further research is needed to confirm this finding [12].

Haemaphysalis concinna was the third most prevalent questing tick species collected in this study. The observation of H. concinna at site UM (Fig. 1) further expands the reported northern distribution limit of this species in Europe. The previously known limit from Germany was reported in 2016 at the Seedorf military training area (9.26° E/53.30° N) [18]. In this study, H. concinna was collected from sites near the Mecklenburg lake plateau, an area that was described as suitable to maintain H. concinna tick populations, and where this tick is considered the third most common species after I. ricinus and D. reticulatus [17]. Information regarding the circulation of H. concinna near the German Baltic coast is available since 1960, with published data indicating several specimens collected in 1958 from Capreolus capreolus (L.) deer at several locations near Greifswald [32]. Our observations confirm the presence of the H. concinna population in the north-east of Germany by providing the exact geographical locations where this species occurs.

Ixodes ricinus showed a main peak of occurrence in May–June while D. reticulatus was most active in May, followed by a second lower peak in September for I. ricinus and September–October for D. reticulatus. The occurrence of H. concinna suggested only one peak of activity in June. The monthly distribution of occurrence is in line with the known seasonal activity of all three species and could be of use in predicting the seasonality of tick-transmitted diseases [33].

The morphological identification of D. reticulatus and H. concinna was molecularly confirmed based on the COX1 gene that proved to be suitable in identifying ticks at species level. The phylogenetic analysis further supported the morphological and genetic species identification, the sequences from this work clustered within the same clade with reference sequences corresponding to D. reticulatus and H. concinna, respectively, having also good bootstrap support (Figs. 3, 4).

Using molecular methods, ticks were screened to determine the infection rates for some of the most common tick-borne pathogens, using species-specific and generic primers. All samples tested negative for TBEV. Even though there have been recent reports of TBEV RNA detection in ticks [34] and anti-TBEV antibodies in animals [35, 36] from Mecklenburg-Western Pomerania, the results of this study confirm the low risk classification of this region for TBEV. Nevertheless, the northward expansion of ticks, the land use changes that facilitate movement of virus reservoir hosts, and climate change are factors that could facilitate the range expansion of TBEV towards the northern regions of Germany.

Ixodes ricinus adults and nymphs were positive for all other analysed pathogens: Babesia/Theileria spp., Rickettsia spp., Borrelia spp. and A. phagocytophilum. These results highlight the involvement of this tick species in causing health problems of public and veterinary concern.

The Babesia/Theileria spp. prevalence in questing I. ricinus adults in our study (18.2%) was higher compared to the observed infection levels in I. ricinus from different geographical areas in Germany that ranged between 0.4% and 10.7% [10]. In addition, 70 out of 92 total Babesia positive samples were sequenced and most of the isolates (n = 62) matched B. microti, the protozoan blood parasite responsible for human babesiosis [37]. These results indicate that there is a significant risk of acquiring this protozoan after a tick bite at the sites selected for this work. Ixodes ricinus ticks collected at site HD near Rostock showed the highest infection rate for Babesia spp. (26.3% in adults and MIR of 8.3% in nymphs), and the transmission of the pathogen can be facilitated also by the high human activity in the vicinity of this collection site.

The observed Rickettsia spp. infection rate in I. ricinus adults in our study (14%) is higher when compared to data available from questing ticks collected near the German Baltic coast (8.5%) [38], which can suggest an increase over time of the tick infection rates with Rickettsia spp. Ticks simultaneously act as vectors and reservoir hosts for Rickettsia, and the efficient transovarial transmission in I. ricinus ticks observed under laboratory settings might contribute to the maintenance of the microorganism in tick populations [39]. In the sequenced samples, R. helvetica was the dominant species (in 45 out of 49 valid sequences). This species belongs to the spotted fever group (SFG) rickettsiae and it is reported as a pathogenic agent in humans transmitted mainly by Ixodes ticks [40]. The current study confirms the presence of this pathogen in questing ticks from north-east Germany, yet further analyses are required to provide a clear estimation of R. helvetica prevalence in tick populations from this region.

Borrelia was the most common pathogen detected in the assessed ticks (49.1% of adult ticks and MIR of 11.9% in nymphs) showing a higher prevalence compared to our previous study (12.1% in adults and MIR of 3.3% in nymphs) [25]. The infection levels of I. ricinus ticks for Borrelia spp. are also high when compared to other studies in questing ticks from Germany. High infection rates with B. burgdorferi s.l. were also reported from southern Germany (up to 36.2%) [41]. The primer pairs used in this study to detect Borrelia spp. are also amplifying the 16S–23S rRNA IGS sequence of B. miyamotoi relapsing fever agent, and since not all samples were sequenced, the herein results regarding the prevalence of B. burgdorferi s.l. should be interpreted with caution. On the other hand, based on the B. miyamotoi infection rates found in I. ricinus ticks from Europe, ranging from 0.4% in Estonia to 3.5% in France and Germany [42–44], we can expect a high prevalence of B. burgdorferi s.l. in I. ricinus ticks from this study. Borrelia spp. showed high prevalence in I. ricinus ticks from sites HD (58% in adults and MIR of 25% in nymphs) and UM (50.9% in adults and MIR of 16.7% in nymphs) (Table 3). These sites are located in peri-urban areas that represent high-risk locations for public health due to increased tick-human contact.

The observed prevalence of A. phagocytophilum in I. ricinus ticks from this study (1.5% in adults and MIR of 1.3% in nymphs) is comparable to other published data from northern Germany: 1% near the German Baltic Coast [38], 3.6% in Hamburg [45], and 3.8% overall prevalence for a 10-year interval in Hanover [39]. Supplementary research on a larger scale is needed to determine the prevalence of this pathogen in tick populations and furthermore to identify the circulating A. phagocytophilum variants which will facilitate the proper evaluation of the risk posed by this tick-borne pathogen to human and animal health.

Molecular screening of D. reticulatus ticks for tick-borne pathogens enabled the detection of high infection levels with Rickettsia spp. Overall, 82% (132/161) of the adults tested positive with a homogenous distribution of the prevalence among different collection sites. In addition, approximately one third of the positive samples were sequenced for ompB gene (42/132) and matched to R. raoultii and C. Rickettsia rioja. Both of these bacteria are described as causative agents of Dermacentor-borne necrosis erythema and lymphadenopathy (DEBONEL) or tick-borne lymphadenopathy (TIBOLA) in humans [13, 46]. According to these results, the sites at which D. reticulatus ticks were observed are locations where people could potentially acquire SFG Rickettsia following a tick bite.

From the range of screened tick-borne pathogens, H. concinna ticks tested positive only for Babesia/Theileria spp., with sequences that matched Theileria sp. or T. capreoli and Babesia sp. Previous studies have reported detection of piroplasmids of the genus Theileria in questing H. concinna from Austria [47] or Hungary [48], and Babesia in H. concinna larvae collected from rodents in Slovakia [49], to which the isolate from our study was closely related. These results suggest a potential role of this tick species as vector for Theileria and Babesia in Central Europe. Vector competence studies would be valuable in understanding the role of H. concinna as vector for pathogenic Theileria and Babesia species.

Co-detection of pathogens was mostly observed in I. ricinus ticks; from the adults and nymph pools positive for at least one agent, 26.6% and 54.8% of the respective adults and nymph pools registered association of two or three different pathogens. The results from the pools of nymphs need to be treated with care since they can express an overestimated association of pathogens. Nevertheless, the high number of I. ricinus ticks positive for several pathogens confirms the ability of this species to carry a broad range of pathogens, and exhaustive work is needed to fill the gap on the knowledge in regard to the relationship between pathogens (positive or negative interactions) within the same tick.

Conclusions

In conclusion, the results of our study represent new data that confirm an expansion of the northern distribution limit of D. reticulatus and H. concinna. We also confirm the existence of suitable habitats for the sympatric occurrence of I. ricinus, D. reticulatus, and H. concinna near the German Baltic coast, by providing exact geographic locations where these ticks were encountered. The high infection levels of I. ricinus with Babesia/Theileria spp., Rickettsia spp. and Borrelia spp., and of D. reticulatus with Rickettsia spp. at peri-urban areas suggest a high risk for public health that is facilitated also by a potentially increased tick-human contact. We have also confirmed the ability of I. ricinus to carry several pathogens and provided detailed data of the infection levels at each location, data that could be useful in assessing the risk of acquiring a pathogen following a tick bite.

Abbreviations

MIR

Minimum infection rate

HD

Hohe Düne

UM

Ueckermünde

HN

Holländerei

TG

Torgelow

PZ

Putzar

COX1

Cytochrome c oxidase subunit I

18S rRNA

18 Svedberg ribosomal ribonucleic acid

gltA

Citrate synthase gene

ompA

Outer membrane protein A

ompB

Outer membrane protein B

IGS

Intergenic spacer

msp2

Major surface protein 2

BLAST

Basic local alignment search tool

CI

Confidence interval

Authors’ contributions

CS and CR organized and designed the study. CR and OT organized and performed the fieldwork. CR and OT performed the analysis of ticks in the laboratory. CR and CS analysed the data and drafted the manuscript. CS critically reviewed the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Funding

Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL. Not applicable.

Availability of data and materials

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article. Newly generated sequences were submitted to the GenBank database and received the following accession numbers: Babesia spp.: OL549321-OL549398; Rickettsia spp.: OL549399-OL549443; Borrelia spp.: OL701405-OL701478; tick species: OL639104-OL639118.

Declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.