Skip to main content
BMC Neuroscience logoLink to BMC Neuroscience
. 2022 Feb 21;23:9. doi: 10.1186/s12868-022-00694-z

Rifaximin modulates TRH and TRH-like peptide expression throughout the brain and peripheral tissues of male rats

Albert Eugene Pekary 1,3,6,, Albert Sattin 1,2,4,5
PMCID: PMC8862550  PMID: 35189807

Abstract

Background

The TRH/TRH-R1 receptor signaling pathway within the neurons of the dorsal vagal complex is an important mediator of the brain-gut axis. Mental health and protection from a variety of neuropathologies, such as autism, Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder, Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s disease, major depression, migraine and epilepsy are influenced by the gut microbiome and is mediated by the vagus nerve. The antibiotic rifaximin (RF) does not cross the gut-blood barrier. It changes the composition of the gut microbiome resulting in therapeutic benefits for traveler’s diarrhea, hepatic encephalopathy, and prostatitis. TRH and TRH-like peptides, with the structure pGlu-X-Pro-NH2, where “X” can be any amino acid residue, have reproduction-enhancing, caloric-restriction-like, anti-aging, pancreatic-β cell-, cardiovascular-, and neuroprotective effects. TRH and TRH-like peptides occur not only throughout the CNS but also in peripheral tissues. To elucidate the involvement of TRH-like peptides in brain-gut-reproductive system interactions 16 male Sprague–Dawley rats, 203 ± 6 g, were divided into 4 groups (n = 4/group): the control (CON) group remained on ad libitum Purina rodent chow and water for 10 days until decapitation, acute (AC) group receiving 150 mg RF/kg powdered rodent chow for 24 h providing 150 mg RF/kg body weight for 200 g rats, chronic (CHR) animals receiving RF for 10 days; withdrawal (WD) rats receiving RF for 8 days and then normal chow for 2 days.

Results

Significant changes in the levels of TRH and TRH-like peptides occurred throughout the brain and peripheral tissues in response to RF. The number of significant changes in TRH and TRH-like peptide levels in brain resulting from RF treatment, in descending order were: medulla (16), piriform cortex (8), nucleus accumbens (7), frontal cortex (5), striatum (3), amygdala (3), entorhinal cortex (3), anterior (2), and posterior cingulate (2), hippocampus (1), hypothalamus (0) and cerebellum (0). The corresponding ranking for peripheral tissues were: prostate (6), adrenals (4), pancreas (3), liver (2), testis (1), heart (0).

Conclusions

The sensitivity of TRH and TRH-like peptide expression to RF treatment, particularly in the medulla oblongata and prostate, is consistent with the participation of these peptides in the therapeutic effects of RF.

Keywords: TRH, Rifaximin, Medulla, Cortex, Prostate, Adrenal

Background

Mental health and protection from a variety of aging-related neurodegenerative disorders, such as autism, Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder, Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s disease, major depression, migraine and epilepsy, involve the gut microbiome and is mediated by the vagus nerve [14]. This is most evident in the behavioral abnormalities and GI symptoms of germ-free (GF) rodents [4, 5]. The mechanisms underlying these effects include reduced levels of brain-derived neurotrophic factors in the cortex, hippocampus, and amygdala, and altered expression of genes encoding subunits of the glutamate and dopamine receptors [1]. Glutamatergic neurons are the most abundant excitatory class of nerves in the mammalian nervous system which requires co-release  of the neuromodulatory thyrotropin releasing hormone (TRH) and TRH-like peptides to protect postsynaptic cells from the excitotoxic effects of excessive glutamate release [69]. The TRH/TRH-R1 receptor signaling pathway is an important mediator of brain-gut axis communication via the brain medulla oblongata and its associated TRH synthesizing neurons within the raphe pallidus, raphe obscura, and parapyramidal regions [10]. TRH and TRH-like peptides, with the structure pGlu-X-Pro-NH2 where “X” can be any amino acid residue, have reproductive, antidepressant, anxiolytic, analeptic, anorexic, and anti-aging effects [11].

TRH and TRH-like peptides occur not only throughout the CNS but also peripheral tissues, with very high levels in the rat and human prostate [11]. This is particularly noteworthy given the vulnerability of humans to prostatitis and prostate cancer [12]. Recent studies have implicated bacterial infections as potential causes of prostate diseases. The antibiotic rifaximin (RF), which does not cross the gut-blood barrier, is a standard treatment for traveler’s diarrhea and hepatic encephalopathy. Its therapeutic potential in the treatment of other brain and urogenital disorders is currently being evaluated [12].

RF has anti-depressant and anxiolytic effects in both humans and rodents which are mediated, at least in part, by its ability to modify the composition of the gut microbiota [1318]. Inadequate and/or irregulate sleep and poor nutrition contribute to obesity, alterations in the microbiome and the expression of gut hormones, including leptin and ghrelin, which have a profound effect on both appetite [1923] and TRH and TRH-like peptide release [24, 25]. Leptin and ghrelin also have mood altering effects [24, 25].

The present studies examine the effects of oral RF on TRH and TRH-like peptide levels in those brain regions, for example the medulla oblongata, and peripheral tissues which may play a role in the therapeutic effects of this gut-limited antibiotic [12].

Methods

Animals

“Young adult male Sprague–Dawley rats (n = 16, SPF, Envigo, Indianapolis, IN) were used for all experiments. These animals were group housed (2 animals per cage) on wood shavings with a red plastic tube for play and shelter. Standard Purina rodent chow #5001 and water were provided ad libitum during a standard one-week initial quarantine with 22 ± 2 °C and 50 ± 10% relative humidity; lights on: 6 am–6 pm. Cages, water and bedding were changed every 3 days. All animals were weighed on the day of receipt and on the morning of each experiment. Initial body weights did not differ between experimental groups. Animals were randomized prior to the start of rifaximin treatment. Research was approved by the VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC Protocol #030090-10) and conducted in compliance with the Animal Welfare Act and the federal statutes and regulations related to animals and experiments involving animals and adheres to principles stated in the Guide for the Care and use of Laboratory Animals, Eighth Edition, NRC Publication, 2011. All efforts have been made to minimize the number of animals used and their suffering. Animal was handled for 10 min per day for one month and then transferred from the Veterinary Medical Unit to the laboratory 12 h before the start of experiments to minimize the stress of a novel environment” [11]. “The American Veterinary Medical Association has concluded that decapitation without prior sedation ‘is conditionally acceptable if performed correctly, and it should be used in research settings when its use is required by the experimental design and approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee’” [26]. This study is reported in accordance with ARRIVE guidelines (Animal Research: Reporting of In Vivo Experiments) (https://arriveguidelines.org).

“Because of the 10- to 100-fold changes in TRH and TRH-like peptide levels in response to the estrus cycle. female rats were not included in the present study” [27].

Effect of acute, chronic and withdrawal treatment with rifaximin in normal rat chow on levels of TRH and TRH-like peptides in rat brain and peripheral tissues

Sixteen young adult male Sprague–Dawley rats, body weight (mean ± SD) 203 ± 6 g, 3.0% CV, were divided into 4 groups (n = 4/group). The control (CON) group remained on ad libitum standard Purina powdered rodent chow and water for 10 days until decapitation. The acute (AC) group received ad libitum powdered rodent chow and water for 9 days and then 1 g rifaximin (Sigma, St. Louis, MO)/500 g powdered rat chow for 24 h. Assuming 16.7 g chow consumption/day, this would provide 150 mg rifaximin/kg body weight for 200 g rats. The chronic (CHR) animals received RF in powdered chow for 10 days. The withdrawal (WD) rats received RF chow for 8 days and then normal chow for 2 days. The effect of RF withdrawal on TRH and TRH-like peptide levels when compared to the corresponding acute effects can reveal the relative contribution of changes in peptide biosynthesis (hours) to changes in peptide release (minutes) [28].

Dissection of rat brain and peripheral tissues

All rats were decapitated without anesthesia to avoid rapid, anesthetic-induced, blockade of peptide release [29]. Nucleus accumbens (NA), amygdala (AY), frontal cortex (FCX), cerebellum (CBL), medulla oblongata (MED), anterior cingulate (ACNG), posterior cingulate (PCNG), striatum (STR), piriform cortex (PIR), hippocampus (HC), entorhinal cortex (ENT), adrenals (AD), pancreas (PAN), prostate (PR), epididymis (EP), testis (T), heart (H) and liver (L) were hand dissected, weighed rapidly, and then extracted as previously described in detail [30].

Serum hormone assays

Serum rat leptin, rat insulin, testosterone, free T4, total T3 and glucose were measured (assay range, intra-assay CV%) with the following commercial RIA kits: rat leptin (0.801–200 ng/ml, 3.2) and rat insulin (0.0329–2.0 ng/ml, 4.8) (Linco Research, Inc., St. Charles, MO), testosterone (0.05–40 ng/ml, 6.7), free T4 (0.045–60 ng/DL, 4.6) and total T3 (0.06–80 pg/ml, 4.8) (MP Biomedical, Solon, OH). Serum glucose was measured with the Contour Next EZ Blood Glucose Monitoring System (Ascensia Diabetes Care US, Inc., Parsippany, NJ).

HPLC and RIA procedures, HPLC peak identification and quantitation

HPLC and RIA procedures, peak identification, and quantitation by co-chromatography with synthetic TRH and TRH-like peptides, relative potency analysis of multiple antibodies to TRH and TRH-like peptides, and mass spectrometry and have been previously reported in detail [11, 28, 3133].

Briefly, after boiling, tissues were dried, re-extracted with methanol, dried and defatted by water—ethyl ether partitioning. Dried samples were dissolved in 0.1%trifluroacetic acid (TFA) and loaded onto reverse phaseC18 Sep-Pak cartridges (Water, Milford, MA). TRH and TRH-like peptides were eluted with 50% methanol. Dried peptides were again dissolved in TFA, filtered and then fractionated by HPLC using a 4.6–150 mm Econosphere, 3 mm C18 reverse phase column (Dr. Maisch GmbH, Ammerbuch, Germany) and a 0.2%/min gradient of acetonitrile. The 0.5 ml fractions collected were dried completely and reconstituted with 0.10 ml of 0.02% NaN3 just before RIA (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Representative profiles of TRH and TRH-like peptide responses in male rats to RF treatment. The response patterns in A and D are consistent with rapid and sustained increase in peptide release (reduced peptide level). The profile in B suggests rapid and sustained decrease in peptide release during and after RF exposure. C could be explained by RF stimulation of sustained peptide release which is compensated by increased peptide synthesis. Withdrawal of RF reduced peptide release but the compensatory increase in peptide synthesis results in a rebound increase in peptide content. The persistence of changes in TRH and TRH-like peptide levels in the WD group after RF has completely cleared from the GI tract is consistent with lingering effects of an altered microbiome

The antiserum used (8B9) cross-reacts with TRH and nine TRH-like peptides with a relative potency of displacement ranging from 2.31 (Lys-TRH) to 0.288 (Ser-TRH) relative to Tyr-TRH (Table 2), (see [28]). Two of the regularly observed peaks (2a, b) consist of a mixture of unidentified TRH-like peptides. Of the eight observed peptides three have so far been confirmed by mass spectrometry: TRH, Glu-TRH and Tyr-TRH [31]. Tissue samples from the 4 rats within each treatment group were pooled prior to HPLC to provide the minimum amount of immunoreactivity needed for reliable RIA measurements.

Table 2.

Effect of acute (AC), chronic (CHR) and withdrawal (WD) treatments with oral rifaximin on TRH and TRH-like peptide levels in brain regions of male rats (pg)

Frontal cortex Glu-TRH Peak 2 TRH Val-TRH Tyr-TRH Leu-TRH Phe-TRH Trp-TRH
CON 80 ± 16 815 ± 156 1954 ± 207 1496 ± 307 3556 ± 580 1857 ± 696 1924 ± 327 736 ± 161
AC 494 ± 101** 945 ± 180 1598 ± 169 876 ± 180 1577 ± 257* 868 ± 326 1132 ± 192 521 ± 114
CHR 188 ± 39 1143 ± 218 1867 ± 198 1485 ± 304 4283 ± 698 1761 ± 660 1487 ± 253 837 ± 183
WD 395 ± 81* 874 ± 167 1310 ± 139 285 ± 59* 1515 ± 247* 904 ± 339 1087 ± 185 369 ± 81
Hypothalamus
 CON 657 ± 217 1771 ± 638 38,509 ± 12,323 0 0 1706 ± 699 999 ± 430 616 ± 172
 AC 638 ± 211 1690 ± 608 34,863 ± 11,156 0 0 1368 ± 561 1138 ± 489 436 ± 122
 CHR 644 ± 213 1914 ± 689 41,487 ± 13,276 0 0 1811 ± 743 943 ± 405 371 ± 104
 WD 841 ± 278 3983 ± 1434 28,634 ± 9163 0 0 1549 ± 635 1104 ± 475 915 ± 256
Amygdala
 CON 597 ± 169 1347 ± 180 513 ± 23 1312 ± 125 1543 ± 262 8408 ± 2262 1591 ± 248 1344 ± 285
 AC 324 ± 92 575 ± 77 1055 ± 47 980 ± 93 830 ± 141 7736 ± 2081 896 ± 140 378 ± 80*
 CHR 782 ± 221 467 ± 63 1580 ± 71* 1234 ± 117 685 ± 116 9188 ± 2472 1961 ± 306 1131 ± 240
 WD 410 ± 116 284 ± 38* 1012 ± 46 757 ± 72 1245 ± 212 5476 ± 1473 632 ± 99 973 ± 206
Hippocampus
 CON 183 ± 34 1959 ± 402 2561 ± 597 1248 ± 124 3691 ± 993 957 ± 257 2457 ± 383 1251 ± 133
 AC 562 ± 103* 1097 ± 225 1349 ± 314 808 ± 80 4410 ± 1186 1536 ± 413 1188 ± 185 690 ± 73
 CHR 266 ± 49 1545 ± 317 2023 ± 471 1821 ± 180 4980 ± 1340 1930 ± 519 1343 ± 210 1167 ± 124
 WD 103 ± 19 1033 ± 212 1842 ± 429 1761 ± 174 8267 ± 2224 2000 ± 538 1516 ± 236 1379 ± 146
Piriform cortex
 CON 609 ± 121 860 ± 127 1324 ± 207 1100 ± 155 4284 ± 878 1576 ± 345 1856 ± 380 1203 ± 383
 AC 360 ± 71 1464 ± 217 0 2872 ± 405* 1055 ± 216* 822 ± 180 592 ± 121* 256 ± 81*
 CHR 131 ± 26* 515 ± 76 1104 ± 172 584 ± 82 2821 ± 578 824 ± 180 865 ± 177 359 ± 114*
 WD 235 ± 47 176 ± 26 1268 ± 198 888 ± 125 2921 ± 599 967 ± 212 610 ± 125* 203 ± 65*
Nucleus accumbens
 CON 787 ± 83 3731 ± 302 17,232 ± 2188 0 0 1385 ± 392 1437 ± 162 583 ± 111
 AC 506 ± 54 1673 ± 136 12,653 ± 1607 0 0 948 ± 268 768 ± 87 300 ± 57
 CHR 394 ± 42 1304 ± 106* 5570 ± 707* 0 0 861 ± 244 627 ± 71 445 ± 85
 WD 88 ± 9** 486 ± 39* 3792 ± 482* 0 0 162 ± 46 207 ± 23* 95 ± 18*
Entorhinal cortex
 CON 63 ± 13 436 ± 38 903 ± 121 652 ± 83 3511 ± 572 1497 ± 222 1461 ± 346 581 ± 86
 AC 214 ± 45 657 ± 58 749 ± 100 803 ± 102 1770 ± 289 816 ± 121 656 ± 155 397 ± 59
 CHR 244 ± 52 1275 ± 112* 2017 ± 270 1052 ± 134 3271 ± 533 1913 ± 283 1052 ± 249 1005 ± 149
 WD 312 ± 66* 1269 ± 112* 1613 ± 216 1661 ± 211 6523 ± 1063 1763 ± 261 1424 ± 337 940 ± 139
Striatum
 CON 1724 ± 207 1992 ± 294 667 ± 66 1448 ± 226 983 ± 153 9623 ± 1155 2316 ± 113 2363 ± 250
 AC 534 ± 64 1565 ± 232 1522 ± 151 1280 ± 200 2642 ± 412 9292 ± 1115 1071 ± 52 1373 ± 145
 CHR 2718 ± 326 401 ± 59* 1781 ± 176 764 ± 119 2205 ± 344 14,840 ± 1781 2720 ± 133 1459 ± 155
 WD 2091 ± 251 717 ± 106* 2916 ± 289* 1983 ± 309 1227 ± 191 14,663 ± 1760 2086 ± 102 2154 ± 228
Medulla oblongata
 CON 2187 ± 372 492 ± 45 5377 ± 645 28,807 ± 3860 1555 ± 308 1908 ± 500 12,443 ± 2551 2087 ± 399
 AC 3269 ± 556 347 ± 32 2263 ± 272* 1709 ± 229*** 58,005 ± 11,485* 2335 ± 612 2087 ± 428** 915 ± 175*
 CHR 4269 ± 726 1562 ± 144* 1293 ± 155** 1938 ± 260*** 47,265 ± 9359* 2390 ± 626 2133 ± 437** 715 ± 137*
 WD 1916 ± 326 172 ± 16 1550 ± 186** 1967 ± 264*** 38,788 ± 7680* 1147 ± 301 1312 ± 269** 355 ± 68**
Cerebellum
 CON 1636 ± 128 332 ± 24 3747 ± 502 2328 ± 247 11,040 ± 1557 3041 ± 988 2845 ± 321 2064 ± 584
 AC 1539 ± 120 559 ± 40 2461 ± 330 2118 ± 225 10,117 ± 1426 2070 ± 673 1881 ± 213 1004 ± 284
 CHR
 WD 2200 ± 172 1020 ± 72 4710 ± 631 2070 ± 219 10,320 ± 1455 2220 ± 722 5660 ± 640 1480 ± 419
Anterior Cingulate
CON 313 ± 31 2352 ± 315 684 ± 150 579 ± 115 1769 ± 276 993 ± 337 997 ± 254 385 ± 76
AC 178 ± 18 545 ± 73* 895 ± 196 1055 ± 209 1945 ± 303 666 ± 226 544 ± 139 240 ± 48
CHR 202 ± 20 776 ± 104 1076 ± 236 750 ± 149 2009 ± 313 722 ± 245 934 ± 238 586 ± 116
WD 207 ± 20 398 ± 53** 700 ± 153 536 ± 106 1387 ± 216 200 ± 68 663 ± 169 223 ± 44
Posterior Cingulate
CON 27 ± 6 521 ± 100 1967 ± 209 912 ± 187 4697 ± 766 1676 ± 629 1217 ± 207 353 ± 77
AC 138 ± 28* 944 ± 180 1319 ± 140 885 ± 181 3286 ± 536 976 ± 366 950 ± 162 943 ± 207
CHR 197 ± 40* 1486 ± 284 1659 ± 176 1093 ± 224 4470 ± 729 1465 ± 549 1151 ± 196 753 ± 165
WD 116 ± 24 1403 ± 268 1616 ± 172 1818 ± 373 13,661 ± 2227 1776 ± 666 1870 ± 318 676 ± 148

All results are mean ± SD

*p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.002 by one way ANOVA using post hoc Scheffe contrasts versus the control group

The mean recovery of TRH and TRH-like peptide immunoreactivity from all tissues studied was 84 ± 15% (mean ± SD). The within-assay and between-assay coefficient of variation for measuring 333 pg/ml TRH was 4.8% and 16.9%, respectively. All HPLC fractions obtained from a given brain region or peripheral tissue were analyzed in the same RIA. The minimum detectable dose for TRH was 5 pg/ml. The specific binding of [125I]TRH (Bo/T) was 25%.

Statistical analysis

“Statistical methods for comparing peak areas were made with the aid of Statview (Abacus Concepts, Inc., Berkeley, CA), a statistical software package for the Macintosh computer. All multi-group comparisons were carried out by one way analysis of variance using post hoc Scheffe contrast with the control group” [30].

“The mean within-group coefficient of variation (CV) (SD/mean, CV-within group) for each tissue and TRH/TRH-like peptide combination, across four photoperiod intervals, has been previously reported (circadian rhythm experiment) for untreated Sprague–Dawley male rats” [30]. Mean within-group CVs in brain ranged from 4.5% for TRH levels in AY to 43% for Phe-TRH in HY, and from 12% for Val-TRH in testis to 41% for Trp-TRH in EP for peripheral tissues. These CVs were then used to estimate the level of significance, by on way ANOVA, of changes in the pooled mean values (see [34]) of TRH and TRH-like peptide levels following acute (AC), chronic (CHR) and withdrawal (WD) ingestion of RF” [30]. Pooling of at least 4 tissue extracts was required to provide sufficient signal-to-noise in the RIA for many brain regions and to keep the total number of HPLC fractions to be analyzed reasonable: 4 treatment groups × 19 tissues × 100 HPLC fractions/tissue pool = 7600 RIA samples for the present study. Without pooling the total number of HPLC fractions would have been 4 × 7600 = 30,400.

Results

Body weights

Mean body weights for all animals at the time of decapitation (9 weeks) was 269 ± 12 g, 4.5% CV. Mean animal weights for each RF treatment group did not differ significantly with the untreated controls by one way ANOVA.

Serum hormone levels following oral rifaximin

Serum glucose levels for the CHR group were significantly lowers than the WD group (p < 0.05). All other serum hormone levels did not differ significantly between experimental groups by one way ANOVA (Table 1).

Table 1.

Effect of oral rifaximin on serum hormone levels of male rats

Testosterone nmol/L fT3 pg/ml fT4 ng/dl Leptin ng/ml Rat insulin ng/ml Glucose mg/dl
CON 16.8 ± 9.1 2.61 ± 0.30 2.94 ± 0.24 3.97 ± 1.27 0.15 ± 0.04 130 ± 8
AC 12.3 ± 4.8 1.90 ± 0.35 2.69 ± 0.49 3.69 ± 1.88 0.15 ± 0.09 128 ± 19
CHR 15.5 ± 4.2 2.43 ± 0.45 2.72 ± 0.19 4.43 ± 1.06 0.21 ± 0.04 123 ± 4*
WD 14.8 ± 8.0 2.54 ± 0.46 3.14 ± 0.37 2.95 ± 0.51 0.30 ± 0.18 145 ± 16

There were no significant changes by one way ANOVA versus the corresponding control group. All results are mean ± SD

*p < 0.05 by one-way ANOVA versus the WD group

Overview of TRH and TRH-like peptide data selection and presentation

Our combined HPLC-RIA methodology can resolve 10 TRH and TRH-like peptides: Glu-TRH, Peaks 2a, b (partially resolved mixture of TRH-like peptides), TRH, Val-TRH, Thr-TRH, Tyr-TRH, Leu-TRH, Phe-TRH and Trp-TRH [35]. The present study evaluated 12 brain regions and 7 peripheral tissues. This represents 10 × 19 = 190 peptide mean values.

HPLC results in brain and peripheral tissues

Significant, 25- to 37-fold, increases in Tyr-TRH and 93–94% decreases in Val-TRH levels in medulla oblongata (all treatment groups, Table 2) and increases in TRH (13-fold, WD group) and Val-TRH (fivefold, WD group) and 99% decreases in Tyr-TRH concentrations in ventral prostate and a 36-fold increase in liver Tyr-TRH (WD group) (Table 3) were observed following rifaximin administration.

Table 3.

Effect of acute (AC), chronic (CHR) and withdrawal (WD) treatments with rifaximin on TRH and TRH-like peptide levels in peripheral tissues (pg)

Prostate Glu-TRH Peak 2 TRH Val-TRH Tyr-TRH Leu-TRH Phe-TRH Trp-TRH
CON 1898 ± 645 48,829 ± 15,625 2068 ± 765 12,830 ± 3464 71,618 ± 22,202 9626 ± 3562 9435 ± 2925 4285 ± 1328
AC 1993 ± 678 39,195 ± 12,542 800 ± 296 8922 ± 2409 3748 ± 1162* 13,415 ± 4964 47,016 ± 14,575* 2981 ± 924
CHR 1827 ± 621 33,166 ± 10,613 9192 ± 3401 41,357 ± 11,166 8858 ± 2746* 4079 ± 1509 8103 ± 2512 3971 ± 1231
WD 3215 ± 1093 54,959 ± 17,587 25,935 ± 9596* 64,372 ± 17,380* 1640 ± 508* 4200 ± 1554 10,188 ± 3158 4346 ± 1347
Liver
 CON 277 ± 66 216 ± 41 584 ± 228 361 ± 105 58 ± 17 765 ± 245 452 ± 145 327 ± 75
 AC 426 ± 102 313 ± 59 954 ± 372 394 ± 114 36 ± 11 1390 ± 445 930 ± 298 708 ± 163
 CHR 586 ± 141 385 ± 73 1919 ± 748 2050 ± 595* 230 ± 69 537 ± 172 923 ± 295 360 ± 83
 WD 626 ± 150 224 ± 43 1427 ± 557 738 ± 214 2073 ± 622* 571 ± 183 1167 ± 373 451 ± 104
Testis
 CON 43 ± 10 260 ± 99 714 ± 150 448 ± 54 2228 ± 646 656 ± 190 610 ± 140 174 ± 52
 AC 93 ± 21 68 ± 26 370 ± 78 515 ± 62 2343 ± 679 807 ± 234 623 ± 143 448 ± 134
 CHR 275 ± 63* 218 ± 83 693 ± 146 716 ± 86 3005 ± 871 957 ± 278 1190 ± 274 521 ± 156
 WD 83 ± 19 160 ± 61 392 ± 82 460 ± 55 961 ± 279 516 ± 150 577 ± 133 442 ± 133
Heart
 CON 181 ± 54 134 ± 24 427 ± 51 408 ± 126 104 ± 31 533 ± 139 575 ± 196 271 ± 98
 AC 170 ± 51 86 ± 15 242 ± 29 114 ± 35 159 ± 48 233 ± 61 247 ± 84 195 ± 70
 CHR 123 ± 37 102 ± 18 271 ± 33 344 ± 107 73 ± 22 304 ± 79 776 ± 264 415 ± 149
 WD 381 ± 114 203 ± 37 312 ± 37 137 ± 42 283 ± 85 227 ± 59 422 ± 143 307 ± 111
Pancreas
 CON 234 ± 82 279 ± 95 139 ± 58 206 ± 47 214 ± 45 870 ± 200 464 ± 97 531 ± 117
 AC 191 ± 67 243 ± 83 115 ± 48 175 ± 40 165 ± 35 503 ± 116 419 ± 88 319 ± 70
 CHR 101 ± 35 313 ± 106 173 ± 73 168 ± 39 114 ± 24 508 ± 117 1085 ± 228* 620 ± 136
 WD 344 ± 120 238 ± 81 64 ± 27 75 ± 17 80 ± 17* 241 ± 55* 398 ± 84 523 ± 115
Adrenals
 CON 588 ± 188 1905 ± 286 1577 ± 315 1169 ± 339 2109 ± 970 1432 ± 473 1877 ± 507 1101 ± 374
 AC 484 ± 155 1194 ± 179 856 ± 171 934 ± 271 1641 ± 755 535 ± 177 1288 ± 348 1145 ± 389
 CHR 403 ± 129 835 ± 125* 871 ± 174 564 ± 164 1646 ± 757 616 ± 203 701 ± 189 216 ± 73
 WD 74 ± 24 124 ± 19** 692 ± 138* 523 ± 152 631 ± 290 198 ± 65* 448 ± 121 124 ± 42

All results are mean ± SD

*p < 0.05; **p < 0.01 by one way ANOVA using post hoc Scheffe contrasts versus the control group

The number of significant changes in TRH and TRH-like peptide levels in brain resulting from RF treatment (In parentheses), in descending order were: MED (16), PIR (8), NA (7), FCX (5), STR (3), AY (3), ENT (3), ACNG (2), PCNG (2), HC (1), HY (0) and CBL (0) as seen in Table 2. The corresponding ranking for peripheral tissues were: PR (6), AD (4), PAN (3), L (2), T (1), H (0), (see Table 3). The pooled EP controls were lost during extraction so results for this tissue could not be analyzed.

Discussion

Acute, chronic and withdrawal treatment with RF resulted in significant decreases in TRH, Val-TRH, Phe-TRH and Trp-TRH and marked increases in Tyr-TRH levels in the MED (Table 2). These changes result from alterations in the biosynthesis and release of these tripeptides. The rapidity of these responses is consistent with increased TRH, Val-TRH, Phe-TRH and Trp-TRH and decreased Tyr-TRH release, respectively [32]. These remarkable changes in peptide levels within the MED is consistent with current knowledge regarding the role of TRH (and TRH-like peptides) as mediators of brain-gut communication via the vagus nerve [10, 36]. The antidepressant activity of Tyr-TRH [31] and analeptic effect of Val-TRH [37] correspond with actions of TRH [11]. TRH and TRH-like peptide biosynthesis occurs within large dense core vesicles (LDCV) of glutamatergic neurons [32, 33]. They are co-released with glutamate and act to moderate the effects of this excitotoxic neurotransmitter [7, 8]. Neuropeptides, such as TRH, which are co-released with classical neurotransmitters are now considered primary mediators of brain circuit connectivity with a longer duration of action [38].

Dysbiosis of the microbiome has been implicated in prostatitis and prostate cancer [12, 39]. Rifaximin, an antibiotic which does not cross the blood-gut barrier, is currently being evaluated as a treatment for these pathologies [40]. It is noteworthy that among the peripheral tissues analyzed, PR had the highest number of significant changes in TRH and TRH-like peptide levels (Table 3) in response to RF treatment. PR has very high levels of TRH and TRH-like peptides which are subject to marked circadian rhythmicity [11]. TRH stimulates the adenylyl cyclase in basal cell membranes of the rat ventral prostate [41].

Withdrawal of RF increased TRH and Val-TRH levels in prostate (Table 3), which is consistent with RF stimulation of both biosynthesis and release of these peptides. Because the reduction in the peptide release rate is rapid but the changes in RF-stimulated peptide synthesis is slow with RF withdrawal, a rebound in the levels of these peptides is observed. Acute RF treatment increased Phe-TRH levels consistent with a rapid inhibition of release for this peptide in response to RF followed by a compensatory decrease in biosynthesis returning CHR Phe-TRH levels to CON values. AC, CHR and WD treatment with RF all decreased Tyr-TRH levels significantly in prostate (Table 3). These observations may reveal a rapid and sustained increase in Tyr-TRH release in response to RF treatment which is not accompanied by marked changes in the processing of Tyr-TRH progenitor peptides.

Withdrawal of RF resulted in significant decreases in the levels of all TRH and TRH-like peptides measured in the adrenals (Table 3). This is consistent with an acute decrease in biosynthesis and/or increase in release of these peptides [32]. RF has modest, transient, and beneficial effects on stress-related changes in the gut microbiome, inflammation, permeability and hyperalgesia as well as central responses to social stress [15, 17, 18, 42]. Manipulation of the gut microbiome can have significant effects on cortisol levels in urine [1]. The influence of the microbiota on the function of the HPA axis which regulates corticosterone levels was first demonstrated by Sudo et al. [43]. Germ-free mice have reduced levels of brain-derived neurotrophic factors in the cortex, hippocampus, and amygdala, and altered expression of glutamate and dopamine receptors in specific regions of the brain [44].

Administration of the probiotic bacterium Lactobacillus rhamnosus strain JB-1™ to mice significantly altered the expression of the gene coding for a GABA receptor in multiple regions of the brain, including the amygdala, hippocampus, and cortex. This effect was abolished by vagotomy [45].

The vagus nerve is the principal neuronal link between internal organs and the brain and has now been shown to be integral to the regulation of an array of autonomic functions, such as breathing, heart functions, pancreatic and liver regulation of metabolism, modulation of immune and inflammatory responses via the spleen, mood, and even consciousness [46, 47].

The TRH-degrading serum enzyme is a product of liver [48]. It rapidly metabolizes TRH and most TRH-like peptides in the circulation except Glu-TRH [49]. Rifaximin is used for the prevention of recurrent overt hepatic encephalopathy [50]. Significant increases in Val-TRH and Tyr-TRH levels were observed in liver in response to RF treatment (Table 3). Functional brain MRI studies of the responses of patients with cirrhosis to rifaximin treatment reveal higher activation in various brain regions including the frontal cortex, hippocampus, anterior and posterior cingulate [51]. RF is also utilized for the treatment of irritable bowel disease, diverticular disease, and small bowel bacterial overgrowth [16, 17, 50]. RF modulates inflammatory cytokines and intestinal permeability [52]. Medullary TRH and gastric vagal efferent and afferent circuits play a crucial role in the modulation of gastric integrity [53].

Conclusions

The marked responsivity of TRH and TRH-like peptide expression to RF-induced alterations in gut microbiota of normal rats is consistent with the participation of these peptides in vagally-mediated brain-gut signaling. The observed effects persist after RF, which does not cross the blood-gut barrier, has cleared the GI tract. We expect future studies will extend this concept to antidepressant, anxiolytic, anti-obesity, GI-, liver- and prostate-protective effects of rifaximin [54].

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the VAGLAHS Research Service for the provision of laboratory and office space and equipment for the performance of the present studies.

Authors’ contributions

AEP: developed the HPLC and RIA methodology, conceived the current study, performed the daily handling of rats, prepared the powdered diet, with and without added rifaximin, dissected peripheral tissues and hypothalamus, carried out the extraction and analysis of TRH and TRH-like peptide levels by a combination of HPLC and RIA, integrated peptide peak areas, statistically analyzed results, and wrote manuscript. AS performed the rat brain dissections and edited the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Funding

This research did not receive any specific Grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Availability of data and materials

All statistically summarized data are included in this published article. Primary data available from AEP upon reasonable request.

Declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The present studies were approved by the VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System (VAGLAHS) Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) under Protocol No. 030090-10 on June 21, 2018. Experiments were conducted according to the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals, 2011. The ARRIVE guidelines have been followed in the design, execution, analysis and presentation of the results.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

There are no competing interests, financial or nonfinancial, to declare.

Footnotes

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  • 1.Douglas AE. Fundamentals of microbiome science. How microbes shape animal biology. Princeton University Press: Princeton; 2018. Chapter 5. Microbial drivers of animal behavior; pp. 93–120. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Hill-Yardin EL, Grabrucker AM, Franks AE, Luna RA, Monif M. Editorial: interactions of the nervous system with bacteria. Front Neurosci. 2021 doi: 10.3389/fnins.2021.682744. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Lach G, Schellekens H, Dinan TG, Cryan JF. Anxiety, depression, and the microbiome: a role for gut peptides. Neurotherapeutics. 2018;15:36–59. doi: 10.1007/s13311-017-0585-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Martin CR, Osadchiy V, Kalani A, Mayer EA. The brain-gut-microbiome axis. Cell Mol Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018;6:133–148. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmgh.2018.04.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Sarkar A, Harty S, Johnson KVA, Moeller AH, Carmody RN, Lehto SM, Erdman SE, Dunbar RIM, Burnet WJ. The role of the microbiome in the neurobiology of social behaviour. Biol Rev. 2020 doi: 10.1111/brv.12603. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Jones S. A new villain in neuronal death. A newly discovered partnership for glutamate triggers brain toxicity. Science. 2020;370:168–9. doi: 10.1126/science.abe2791. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Koenig ML, Sgarlat CM, Yourick DL, Long JB, Meyerhoff JL. In vitro neuroprotection against glutamate-induced toxicity by pGlu-Glu-Pro-NH2 (EEP) Peptides. 2001;22:2091–2097. doi: 10.1016/s0196-9781(01)00544-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Koenig ML, Yourick DL, Meyerhoff JL. Thyrotropin-releasing hormone (TRH) attenuates glutamate-stimulated increases in calcium in primary neuronal cultures. Brain Res. 1996;730:143–149. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(96)00433-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Yan J, Bengtson P, Buchthal B, Hageston AM, Bading H. Coupling of NMDA receptors and TRPM4 guides discovery of unconventional neuroprotectants. Science. 2020;370:191. doi: 10.1126/science.aay3302. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Tache Y, Adelson D, Yang H. TRH/TRH-R1 receptor signaling in the brain medulla as a pathway of vagally mediated gut responses during the cephalic phase. Curr Pharm Des. 2014;20:2725–2730. doi: 10.2174/13816128113199990578. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Pekary AE, Sattin A. TRH and TRH-like peptide levels co-vary with reproductive and metabolic rhythms. Horm Metab Res. 2017;49:86–94. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-111012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Porter CM, Shrestha E, Peiffer LB, Sfanos KS. The microbiome in prostate inflammation and prostate cancer. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2018;21:345–354. doi: 10.1038/s41391-018-0041-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Li H, Xiang Y, Zhu Z, Wang W, Jiang Z, Zhao M, et al. Rifaximin-mediaated gut microbiota regulation modulates the function of microglia and protects against CUMS-induced depression-like behavviors in adolescent rat. J Neuroinflammation. 2021;18:254. doi: 10.1186/s12974-021-02303-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Tamaoki S, Suzuki H, Okada M, Fukui N, Isobe M, Saito T. Development of an experimental rat model of hyperammonemic encephalopathy and evaluation of the effects of rifaximin. Eur J Pharmacol. 2016;779:168–176. doi: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2016.03.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Wang H, Braun C, Enck P. Effects of rifaximin on central responses to social stress-a pilot experiment. Neurotherapeutics. 2018;15:807–818. doi: 10.1007/s13311-018-0627-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Xu D, Gao J, Gilliland M, 3rd, Wu X, Song I, Kao JY, et al. Rifaximin alters intestinal bacteria and prevents stress-induced gut inflammation and visceral hyperlgesia in rats. Gastroenterology. 2014;146:484–496. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2013.10.026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Jin Y, Ren X, Li G, Li Y, Zhang L, Wang H, Qian W, Hou X. Beneficial effects of rifaximin in post-infectious irritable bowel syndrome mouse model beyond gut microbiota. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018;33:443–452. doi: 10.1111/jgh.13841. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Fodor AA, Pimentel M, Chey WD, Lembo A, Golden PL, Israel RJ, Carroll IM. Rifaximin is associated with modest, transient decreases in multiple taxa in the gut microbiota of patients with diarrhoea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome. Gut Microbes. 2019;10:22–33. doi: 10.1080/19490976.2018.1460013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Barnes MJ, Rogers RD, Van Meter MJ, Hermann GE. Co-localization of TRHR1 and LepRb receptors on neurons in the hindbrain of the rat. Brain Res. 2010;1355:70–85. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2010.07.094. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Lang UE, Beglinger C, Schweinfurth N, Walter M, Borgwardt S. Nutritional aspects of depression. Cell Physiol Biochem. 2015;37:1029–1043. doi: 10.1159/000430229. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Michael DR, Jack AA, Masetti G, Davies TS, Loxley KE, Kerry-Smith J, et al. A randomized controlled study shows supplementation of overweight and obese adults with lactobacilli and bifidobacterial reduces bodyweight and improves well-being. Sci Rep. 2020;10:4183. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-60991-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Racz B, Duskova M, Starka L, Hainer V, Kunesova M. Link between the circadian rhythm, obesity and the microbiome. Physiol Res. 2018;67(Suppl 3):S409–S420. doi: 10.33549/physiolres.934020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Tomiyama AJ. Stress and obesity. Annu Rev Psychol. 2019;70:703–718. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-010418-102936. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Pekary AE, Sattin A, Blood JD. Rapid modulation of TRH and TRH-like peptide release in rat brain and peripheral tissues by leptin. Brain Res. 2010;1345:9–18. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2010.05.039. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Pekary AE, Sattin A. Rapid modulation of TRH and TRH-like peptide release in rat brain and peripheral tissues by ghrelin and 3-Trp-ghrelin. Peptides. 2012;36:157–167. doi: 10.1016/j.peptides.2012.04.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.MacLusky NJ. Euthanasia in endocrinology: the choices get more complex. Endocrinology. 2009;150:2505–2506. doi: 10.1210/en.2009-0430. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Pekary AE, Sattin A. Increased TRH and TRH-like peptide release in rat brain and peripheral tissues during proestrus/estrus. Peptides. 2014;52:1–10. doi: 10.1016/j.peptides.2013.11.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Pekary AE, Sattin A, Meyerhoff JL, Chilingar M. Valproate modulates TRH receptor, TRH and TRH-like peptide levels in rat brain. Peptides. 2004;25:647–658. doi: 10.1016/j.peptides.2004.01.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Mannisto PT. Central regulation of thyrotropin secretion in rats: methodological aspects, problems and some progress. Med Biol. 1983;61:92–100. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Pekary AE, Stevens SA, Sattin A. Circadian rhythms of TRH-like peptide levels in rat brain. Brain Res. 2006;1125:67–76. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2006.10.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Pekary AE, Faull KF, Paulson M, Lloyd RL, Sattin A. TRH-like antidepressant peptide, pyroglutamyltyrosylprolineaminde, occurs in rat brain. J Mass Spectrom. 2005;40:1232–1236. doi: 10.1002/jms.904. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Pekary AE, Steven SA, Blood JD, Sattin A. Rapid modulation of TRH and TRH-like peptide release in rat brain, pancreas, and testis by a GSK-3β inhibitor. Peptides. 2010;31:1083–1093. doi: 10.1016/j.peptides.2010.03.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Pekary AE, Stevens SA, Sattin A. Valproate and copper accelerate TRH-like peptide synthesis in male rat pancreas and reproductive tissues. Peptides. 2006;27:2901–2911. doi: 10.1016/j.peptides.2006.07.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Bowker AH, Lieberman GJ. Engineering statistics. Chapter VII. Tests of the hypothesis that the means of two normal distributions are equal when both standard deviations are known. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall Inc.; 1959. pp. 156–210. [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Pekary AE, Sattin A, Lloyd RL. Ketamine modulates TRH and TRH-like peptide turnover in brain and peripheral tissues of male rats. Peptides. 2015;69:66–67. doi: 10.1016/j.peptides.2015.04.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Ishikawa T, Yang H, Tache Y. Medullary sites of action of the TRH analogue, RX 77368, for stimulation of gastric acid secretion in the rat. Gastroenterology. 1988;95:1470–1476. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5085(88)80065-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Hinkle PM, Pekary AE, Senanayaki S, Sattin A. Role of TRH receptors as possible mediators of analeptic actions of TRH-like peptides. Brain Res. 2002;935:59–64. doi: 10.1016/s0006-8993(02)02454-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Guillaumin MCC, Burdakov D. Neuropeptides as primary mediators of brain circuit connectivity. Front Neurosci. 2021 doi: 10.3389/fnins.2021.644313. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.McCulloch JA, Trinchieri G. Gut bacteria enable prostate cancer growth. Testosterone-synthetizing gut bacteria drive resistance to therapy. Science. 2021;374:154–155. doi: 10.1126/science.abl7070. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Vicari E, Salemi M, Sidoti G, Malaguarnera M, Castiglione R. Symptom severity following rifaximin and the probiotic VSL#3 in patients with chronic pelvic pain syndrome (due to inflammatory prostatitis) plus irritable bowel syndrome. Nutrients. 2017;9:1208. doi: 10.3390/nu9111208. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Purvis K, Brekke I, Attramadal A, Gordeladze JO. Thyrotropin-releasing hormone (TRH) activates the adenylyl cyclase of nonsecretory cells in the rat ventral prostate. Prostate. 1984;5:613–619. doi: 10.1002/pros.2990050607. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Kuti D, Winkler Z, Horvath K, Juhasz B, Paholcsek M, Stagel A, et al. Gastrointestinal (non-systemic) antibiotic rifaximin differentially affects chronic stress-induced changes in colon microbiome and gut permeability without effect on behavior. Brain Behav Immun. 2020;84:218–228. doi: 10.1016/j.bbi.2019.12.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Sudo N, Chida Y, Aiba Y, Sonoda J, Oyama N, Yu XN, et al. Postnatal microbial colonization programs the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal system for stress response in mice. J Physiol. 2004;558:263–275. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2004.063388. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Luczynski P, McVey Neufeld KA, Oriach CS, Clarke G, Dinan TG, Cryan JF. Growing up in a bubble: using germ-free animals to assess the influence of the gut microbiota on brain and behavior. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. 2016;19:pyw020. doi: 10.1093/ijnp/pyw020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Bravo JA, Forsythe P, Chew MV, Escaravage E, Savignac HM, Dinan TG, et al. Ingestion of Lactobacillus strain regulates emotional behavior and central GABA receptor expression in a mouse via the vagus nerve. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2011;108:16050–16055. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1102999108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Fitchett A, Mastitskaya S, Aristovich K. Selective neuromodulation of the vagus nerve. Front Neurosci. 2021 doi: 10.3389/fnins.2021.685872. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Underwood E. A sense of self: communication between the brain and other organs shapes how we think, remember, and feel. Science. 2021;372:1142–1145. doi: 10.1126/science.372.6547.1142. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Schmitmeier S, Thole H, Bader A, Bauer K. Purification and characterization of the thyrotropin-releasing hormone (TRH)-degrading serum enzyme and its identification as a product of liver origin. Eur J Biochem. 2002;269:1278–1286. doi: 10.1046/j.1432-1033.2002.02768.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Charli J-L, Rodriguez-Rodriguez A, Ortega KH, Cote-Velez A, Uribe RM, Jaimes-Hoy L, et al. The thyrotropin-releasing hormone-degrading ectoenzyme, a therapeutic target? Front Pharmacol. 2020;11:640. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2020.00640.eCollection. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Shayto RH, Mrad RA, Sharara AI. Use of rifaximin in gastrointestinal and liver diseases. World J Gastroenterol. 2016;22:6638–6651. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i29.6638. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Ahluwalia V, Wade JB, Heuman DM, Hammeke TA, Sanyal AJ, Sterling RK, et al. Enhancement of functional connectivity, working memory and inhibitory control on multi-modal brain MR imaging with rifaximin in cirrhosis: implications for the gut-liver-brain axis. Metab Brain Dis. 2014;29:1017–1025. doi: 10.1007/s11011-014-9507-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Chey WD, Shah ED, Dupont HL. Mechanism of action and therapeutic benefit of rifaximin in patients with irritable bowel syndrome: a narrative review. Therap Adv Gastroenterol. 2020;23(13):1756284819897531. doi: 10.1177/1756284819897531. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Kaneko H, Tache Y, Kusugami K. Importance of medullary thyrotropin-releasing hormone in brain-gut circuits regulating gastric integrity: preclinical studies. J Gastroenterol Suppl. 2002;14:128–132. doi: 10.1007/BF03326431. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Strandwitz P. Neurotransmitter modulation by the gut microbiota. Brain Res. 2018;1693(Pt B):128–133. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2018.03.015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

All statistically summarized data are included in this published article. Primary data available from AEP upon reasonable request.


Articles from BMC Neuroscience are provided here courtesy of BMC

RESOURCES