Correction to: Scientific Reports https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-00232-7, published online 29 October 2021
The original version of this Article contained errors.
In Figure 2e (left graph, “Day 14 Collagen type 1”), a grey data point located above the error bar in the “Control” bar was omitted. Additionally, in Figure 2f (middle graph, “Day 14 Collagen type 2”), a grey data point located above the error bar in the “Co-cultured with M2-like” bar was omitted.
Furthermore, in Figure 3C (a) (middle graph, “Day7 CD206+”) the y-axis label “0” and the grey data point located above the bar “Co-cultured with M1” were duplicated.
The original Figure 2e and 2f, and Figure 3C(a) and accompanying figure legends appears below.
Figure 2.
(e) Quantitative evaluation based on the DAB-positive cell count in immunohistochemical staining (on day 14 of co-culture). Left: Collagen type 1, Middle: Collagen type 2, Right: Aggrecan. **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.0001. NS: Not significant. The data are presented as the mean ± SEM (n = 3). (f) Gene expression analysis using RT-PCR (on day 14 of co-culture). Left: Collagen type 1, Middle: Collagen type 2, Right: Aggrecan. The data are presented as the mean ± SEM (n = 4).
Figure 3.
C(a) Quantitative evaluation based on the CD80+ , CD206+ , and CD80+CD206+ cell count in double immunofluorescence staining (on day 7 of co-culture). Left: CD80+ cells, Middle: CD206+ cells, Right: CD80+CD206+ cells. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01. NS: Not significant. The data are presented as the mean ± SEM (n = 3).
The original Article has been corrected.