Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Feb 24.
Published in final edited form as: Curr Diab Rep. 2021 Jul 7;21(8):27. doi: 10.1007/s11892-021-01394-4

The Role of Hexokinase Domain Containing Protein-1 in Glucose Regulation During Pregnancy

Joseph L Zapater 1, Kristen R Lednovich 1, Brian T Layden 1,*
PMCID: PMC8867521  NIHMSID: NIHMS1780046  PMID: 34232412

Abstract

Purpose of Review:

Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is a common pregnancy complication conferring an increased risk to the individual of developing type 2 diabetes. As such, a thorough understanding of the pathophysiology of GDM is warranted. Hexokinase domain containing protein-1 (HKDC1) is a recently discovered protein containing hexokinase activity which has been shown to be associated with glucose metabolism during pregnancy. Here, we discuss recent evidence suggesting roles for the novel HKDC1 in gestational glucose homeostasis and the development of GDM and overt diabetes.

Recent Findings:

Genome wide association studies identified variants of the HKDC1 gene associated with maternal glucose metabolism. Studies modulating HKDC1 protein expression in pregnant mice demonstrate that HKDC1 has roles in whole-body glucose utilization and nutrient balance, with liver-specific HKDC1 influencing insulin sensitivity, glucose tolerance, gluconeogenesis, and ketone production.

Summary:

HKDC1 has important roles in maintaining maternal glucose homeostasis extending beyond traditional hexokinase functions, and may serve as a potential therapeutic target.

Keywords: Hexokinase, HKDC1, glucose metabolism, gestational diabetes

Introduction

Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is defined as glucose intolerance that is first discovered during pregnancy in an individual with no known history of overt diabetes previously [1]. It represents one of the most common metabolic disturbances during pregnancy [2], with an estimated prevalence of 9% to 26% (average of 18%) per the Hyperglycemia and Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes study [3], and as of 2017, GDM is estimated to affect one in seven births worldwide [4]. Hyperinsulinemic clamp studies performed on healthy lean women indicated that during pregnancy insulin sensitivity is reduced by 56% and basal endogenous glucose production increases by 30% [5,6]; hence, the ability for pancreatic beta cells to adapt to these conditions is critical for maintaining euglycemic homeostasis. GDM results, at least in part, from the inability of pancreatic beta cells to respond adequately to increasing insulin requirements during pregnancy, resulting in varying degrees of hyperglycemia [1]. Risk factors for the development of GDM include obesity [7], excessive gestational weight gain [8], ethnicity [9], advanced maternal age [10], consumption of a western diet [11], family or personal history of GDM [12], and specific genetic variations [1315].

The development of GDM can have adverse consequences to both mother and child. In the setting of GDM, the fetus is subjected to increased transport of glucose, amino acids, and fatty acids which greatly stimulates insulin production within the baby, promoting fetal overgrowth and macrosomia leading to shoulder dystocia during childbirth [16,17], but may also lead to fetal beta cell dysfunction [18]. Toward the mother, GDM presents both short- and long-term consequences. Perinatally, GDM increases the risk for preeclampsia, preterm birth, and Cesarean section [19]. In the long-term, GDM increases the probability of developing chronic hyperglycemia, with 60% of women with GDM developing type 2 diabetes (T2DM) in their lifetime [20], with a 2–3% yearly risk of conversion, [20] and each subsequent pregnancy conferring a three-fold risk of developing T2DM [16]. It has also been reported that women with GDM have a 63% increased risk of cardiovascular disease [21]. It is therefore critical that GDM is effectively diagnosed and treated accordingly. Furthermore, a thorough understanding of the pathophysiology and genetic risk for developing GDM is warranted.

Given the high prevalence of GDM in the maternal population, genome wide association studies (GWAS) are critical for identifying genetic loci associated with increased susceptibility to developing GDM. However, the number of GWAS studies performed remains small and further research is needed. Thus far, it has been found that genetic variations in IGFBP2, CDKAL1, GLIS3, CDKN2A/2B, HHEX/IDE, TCF7L2, MTNR1B, HNF1A, GCK, and HKDC1 are associated with GDM in multiple population analyses [1415, 2227]. A specific genetic variant of glucokinase (GCK), one of the well-characterized hexokinases, was found to increase the odds of developing GDM in European and Thai cohorts within the HAPO study (GCK rs1799884) [25], suggesting a link between the HK family of enzymes and GDM for the first time.

A hexokinase (HK) is an enzyme that phosphorylates hexose sugars, primarily glucose, trapping the sugar intracellularly and committing it to use in a variety of metabolic processes based on cellular needs [28]. Four HKs have been extensively classified – HK1-3 primarily mediate the phosphorylation of glucose for cellular metabolism, while GCK has a higher Km value and functions more so as a glucose sensor [29]. Interestingly, in the mid-2000s, phylogenetic analyses were conducted in an effort to better understand the evolution of GCK and the diversification of the HKs [30]. Within these analyses, a novel HK-like gene called hexokinase domain containing protein-1 (HKDC1) was uncovered. HKDC1 is located on chromosome 10 adjacent to HK1, and encodes a 100 kDa protein product sharing 70% sequence identity to HK1 [30,31]. Review of the human EST database indicated that HKDC1 is widely expressed, and given that HKs are critical for glucose metabolism and homeostasis, these initial findings suggested that HKDC1 may be an additional HK.

Since its recent discovery, HKDC1 has continued to gain interest from a clinical standpoint, with studies linking this novel HK to glucose metabolism [3133] and cancer progression, metastasis, and poor disease prognosis [3446], which suggests that HKDC1 may serve as a potential therapeutic target. In this review, we discuss recent GWAS analyses and biological studies that have collectively led to our present understanding of HKDC1’s roles in glucose utilization and homeostasis during pregnancy, and that further suggest a role for HKDC1 in the development of GDM and possibly T2DM.

HKDC1 contains hexokinase activity

Comparison of the amino acid sequences of HKDC1 and the other HKs indicates the presence of conserved amino acid residues in the N- and C-terminal domains, which are the predicted areas of glucose and ATP binding, respectively [30]. Since HKs traditionally transfer a phosphate group from ATP to glucose, the presence of conserved glucose and ATP binding sites on HKDC1 suggests that HKDC1 has hexokinase activity. To test this hypothesis, Guo et al [47] performed hexokinase activity assays utilizing lysates from INS-1 rat pancreatic β-cells transduced with adenovirus containing HKDC1 from a human cytomegalovirus promoter. At baseline, INS-1 cells contain minimal hexokinase activity. Utilizing different amounts of glucose, INS-1 cell lysates both transduced with and containing high levels of HKDC1 protein demonstrated enhanced hexokinase activity across the range of glucose concentrations while exhibiting expression levels of the other HKs that were unaffected by HKDC1 expression. Furthermore, this study showed that HKDC1 has a lower Km than GCK. Overall, these findings suggest that HKDC1 contributes to overall cellular HK activity through either direct HK activity and/or modulation of the activity levels of the other HKs. To more directly test if HKDC1 has intrinsic HK activity, Guo et al [47] then utilized hexokinase activity assays in vitro using purified HKDC1 and found that HKDC1 contained 20% of the specific activity as HK1. Taken together, these studies indicate that HKDC1 contains intrinsic HK activity and therefore is a fifth known HK.

HKDC1 is widely expressed in human tissues

In Irwin et al [30], the authors utilized a human EST database to suggest that HKDC1 is widely expressed in many tissues, with the highest levels of gene expression within the pharynx, thymus, colon, esophagus, and eyes. Following this, Ludvik et al [31] next assessed HKDC1 mRNA levels in human tissue samples from the Genotype-Tissue Expression Consortium. Similarly, HKDC1 expression was found to be widely and differentially expressed in many human tissues, confirming these prior data. Collectively, HKDC1 expression levels were highest in the colon, small intestine and kidney, as well as in several endocrine organs including the pituitary, testis and thyroid. Further assessment of localization within tissues using immunohistochemistry demonstrated that HKDC1 protein expression was restricted to the intestinal epithelial cells in the colon, hepatocytes in the liver, and the renal tubule within the kidney. Interestingly, HKDC1 gene expression was absent in adipose tissue and skeletal muscle. Additionally, a comparison of HKDC1 expression in humans as compared to mouse tissues suggested a similar pattern of expression.

In a further study, Khan et al [48] utilized surgical specimen samples to assess HKDC1 protein expression broadly across many human tissues. They found that similar to the colon, HKDC1 was highly expressed in the small intestine and in particular, this expression was localized to the brush border. Strong protein expression was also notable in the exocrine pancreas, myenteric plexus, thyroid, and within alveolar macrophages. Overall, a large number of other tissues also demonstrated HKDC1 protein expression, albeit at low to moderate levels compared to the aforementioned tissues. Correlating with mRNA assessment, HKDC1 protein was absent in adipose tissue and skeletal muscle. Collectively, these studies demonstrate that HKDC1 is widespread in human tissues.

Genetic variation in HKDC1 and maternal glucose metabolism

HKDC1 was originally identified as a putative fifth human hexokinase in 2007, however, its functional role was initially unknown [30]. In the years since its discovery, genetic studies have played a pivotal role in uncovering the physiological functions of HKDC1, including its involvement in regulating maternal glucose metabolism during pregnancy.

An association between gene variants in HKDC1 and maternal glucose metabolism was first identified by Hayes et al [27] through analysis of select participants (mothers and offspring) within a large-scale genome-wide association study (GWAS) investigating the genetic architecture underlying glycemic traits during pregnancy. This GWAS—the Hyperglycemia and Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes (HAPO) Study—included DNA and phenotypic data from 25,505 pregnant women in 15 centers across nine countries and assessed cohort-specific and meta-analyses of genome-wide single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) data to identify common genetic variants associated with glycemic traits during pregnancy [49]. The authors here [27] analyzed a subset of HAPO participants, including 7,463 DNA samples from pregnant women from Afro-Caribbean, Hispanic, Northern European, and Thai ethnic backgrounds. Glycemic traits were measured at approximately 28 weeks of gestation and included one- and two-hour plasma glucose levels collected during an oral glucose test, as well as maternal fasting plasma glucose and C-peptide levels. After all statistical adjustments, the strongest association in this GWAS was revealed to be 2-hour plasma glucose (2HPG) with HKDC1 – a finding that ignited interest in its characterization.

The HAPO GWAS identified 2HGP as significantly associated with genetic variants in locus of 10q22.1, a small 400-kb region spanning several genes, including HKDC1, which is comprised of a 3,653 base pair region adjacent to the highly similar hexokinase HK1 [http://useast.ensembl.org/Homo_sapiens/Gene/Summary?db=core]. At this location, HKDC1 SNP rs4746822 reached genome-wide significance in a meta-analysis combining the four ancestry groups as well in several replication cohorts (Table 1). Analysis from this study also identified several other 2HPG-associated variants with locations both within and proximal to this region, including histones H3K27ac and H3K27me. This data indicates the presence of active regulatory elements contributing to HKDC1’s expression [50]. These results linked HKDC1 to a potential physiological function during gestation for the first time, and the authors concluded that HKDC1 may play an important role in regulating glycemic control during pregnancy [51].

Table 1:

Genetic variants in HKDC1 and their associations

Reference SNP Variant Related trait P value Ethnicity Participants Trait description
Hayes et al. [27] rs5030937 gravid 2HPG 1.02E-22 Hispanic (n=817), Afro-Caribbean (n=1075), Northern European (n=4393*), Thai (n=1,178) 7,463 pregnant women 2-h plasma glucose collected after OGTT at ~28 weeks gestation
rs4746822 gravid 2HPG 6.30E-16
Guo et al. [47] rs4746822 gravid 2HPG 4.41E-13 Africa, Americas, Asia, Europe 4,437 pregnant women from Hayes et al. cohort 2-h plasma glucose collected after OGTT at ~28 weeks gestation
rs10762264 3.75E-12
rs2394529 1.88E-12
rs9645501 8.61E-06
Kanthimathi et al. [56] rs4746822 GDM 0.004 South Indian 500 pregnant women with GDM, 510 non-GDM Following OGTT during pregnancy, plasma glucose values exceed:
  • Fasting ≥ 5.1 mmol/L

  • 1-h ≥ 10.0 mmol/L

  • 2-h ≥ 8.5 mmol/L

rs10762264 0.002
rs2394529 0.020
rs9645501 0.059
Tan et al. [55] rs4746822 gravid 2HPG 0.016 Han Chinese 334 pregnant women, 367 controls Following OGTT during 24–28 weeks gestation, plasma glucose values exceed:
  • Fasting ≥5.1 mmol/L

  • 1-h ≥ 10.0 mmol/L

  • 2-h ≥ 8.5 mmol/L

*

Includes external replication analysis

Findings from the HAPO GWAS study were utilized in addition to several other genetic databases in order to further elucidate the genetic mechanisms underlying HKDC1 during a follow-up analysis, which identified four common SNPs in HKDC1 predicted to impact the expression of the protein, namely, rs4746822, rs10762264, rs2394529, and rs9645501 (Table 1) [47,52,53]. All four genetic variants were located proximal to the coding region of HKDC1, providing further evidence of a model in which genetic variations in multiple regulatory elements alters the regulation of HKDC1 expression. Functional studies revealed that the four SNPs are regulatory variants in four separate enhancers that have a cooperative effect of reducing HKDC1 expression in women with higher gestational glucose levels [47].

Following these discoveries, several smaller GWAS studies have been conducted in order to verify the association between HKDC1 and 2HPG in additional ancestry groups. Because elevated gestational 2-hour plasma glucose levels are indicative of an inadequate response to a pregnancy-induced increase in insulin resistance, several studies sought to evaluate the association of the four previously described genetic variants in HKDC1 with GDM [54]. One small GWAS seeking to replicate the results of the HAPO study in a Han Chinese population, an ancestry not included in the original HAPO cohort, found a significant association between HKDC1 gene variant rs4746822 and GDM (Table 1) [55]. Another study used a cohort entirely comprised of pregnant women within a Southern Indian population. The authors found a strong association between HKDC1 and GDM in variants rs4746822 and rs10762264 in addition to a modest association in variant rs2394529 (Table 1) [56]. While statistical power limitations prevented any evidence of a coordinated effect between the variants, the study calculated the GDM risk of each individual variant to be 1.95 (1.24–3.16, 95% CI), 1.71 (1.12–2.61, 95% CI), and 1.64 (1.05–2.57, 95% CI) times higher, respectively.

In summary, known variants in the HKDC1 gene, have been linked to changes in glycemic control during pregnancy and GDM. In addition to identifying HKDC1 in the context of maternal glucose metabolism, these genetic studies have served as a foundation for elucidating the underlying mechanisms of HKDC1 in GDM.

Assessment of HKDC1 function in glucose homeostasis during pregnancy

Global HKDC1 knockdown

As the first study to utilize a mouse model to investigate the role of HKDC1 in glucose metabolism during pregnancy, Ludvik et al [31] generated an HKDC1 global knockout mouse with a gene trap system using embryonic stem cells obtained from the Knockout Mouse Repository (www.komp.org). Utilizing a breeding approach between mice that were heterozygous for HKDC1 (HKDC1+/−), no offspring that were homozygous for HKDC1 knockout (HKDC1−/−) were identified in any of the litters, whereas the remaining offspring occurred at the expected 2-to-1 Mendelian ratio of heterozygous (HKDC1+/−) to wild type (HKDC1+/+) mice. Heterozygous HKDC1+/− exhibited an approximately 50% reduction in total HKDC1 protein expression and these mice were utilized for further analyses [31].

To assess the effect of HKDC1 knockdown on glucose metabolism during pregnancy, 8- to 12-week-old pregnant mice were utilized during pregnancy, at day 15 of gestation, which is the peak of insulin resistance during mouse pregnancy [57]. Compared to wild-type littermate controls, pregnant HKDC1+/− mice exhibited significantly increased glucose excursion at multiple time points during an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT). However, non-pregnant female and male HKDC1+/− mice at 8- to 12-weeks of age did not exhibit a difference in glucose tolerance compared to age-matched controls. In a further study, similar to pregnant mice, aged HKDC1+/− mice at 28-weeks of age also demonstrated impaired glucose tolerance during an OGTT. These results, summarized in Table 2, suggest that HKDC1 is important for maintaining glucose homeostasis under conditions of metabolic stress, such as in pregnancy and aging.

Table 2:

Effects of modulation of HKDC1 protein expression during pregnancy on glucose homeostasis

Reference Experiment Location Method of Analysis Timing of Analysis Effects on glucose homeostasis
Ludvik et al. [31] 50% HKDC1 knockdown All tissues Oral glucose load Day 15 of gestation ↓ glucose tolerance
↓ tissue glucose uptake
↔ insulin sensitivity
↔ gluconeogenesis
Khan et al. [32] HKDC1 knockout Liver Intraperitoneal glucose load Day 17–18 of gestation ↓ glucose tolerance
↑ hepatic gluconeogenesis
↔ insulin sensitivity
↔ Akt phosphorylation
HKDC1 overexpression Liver Intraperitoneal glucose load Day 17–18 of gestation ↑ glucose tolerance
↑ insulin sensitivity
↑ Akt phosphorylation
↑ ketone body production
↓ hepatic gluconeogenesis

Akt phosphorylation assessed in the liver, adipose tissue, and skeletal muscle of pregnant mice

Ketones assessed in pregnant mice during fasting

What precise function does HKDC1 have in glucose regulation during pregnancy? HKDC1+/− mice did not display any differences in baseline phenotype, random blood glucose, fasting glucose and insulin, insulin action or gluconeogenesis as compared to wild-type controls. Additionally, these mice did have liver glycogen levels that trended lower than littermate controls. To shed light on this question, Ludvik et al [31] utilized an oral bolus of [U-13C]glucose in the OGTT, and the overall quantity of radiolabeled glucose in various tissues was analyzed. Following the OGTT, HKDC1+/− mice were found to have significantly lower tissue uptake of glucose compared to wild type mice. This finding correlates with increased blood glucose excursion seen during an OGTT. Though these radiolabeled glucose experiments were not conducted in pregnant mice, the authors suggest that HKDC1 may be important for whole-body glucose utilization and energy storage, particularly under conditions of enhanced metabolic stress, which includes pregnancy [58,59]. These data also support the GWAS-derived observation that variants in HKDC1 are associated with maternal 2-hour glucose levels after an OGTT at 28 weeks’ gestational age in humans.

Modulation of hepatic HKDC1 protein expression

Utilizing an adult-onset hepatocyte-specific HKDC1 gain/loss mouse model, Khan et al [32] (Table 2) assessed the importance of liver HKDC1 on glucose metabolism during pregnancy. Here, HKDC1 was knocked out of the adult mouse liver using AAV-Cre constructs in HKDC1fl/fl mice (www.komp.org). Overexpression of HKDC1 in the mouse liver was achieved by injecting mice with a human HKDC1 adenoviral construct. Mice were examined both pre-pregnancy and at day 17–18 of gestation. Pregnant mice exhibit insulin resistance that peaks toward the latter half of gestation, however the authors showed that overexpression of liver-specific HKDC1 during gestation reverses this phenomenon. In contrast, knockout of hepatic HKDC1 in pregnant mice significantly impairs glucose tolerance. In agreement with these findings, pregnant mice overexpressing hepatic HKDC1 produced significantly less glucose during a pyruvate challenge, whereas hepatic HKDC1 knockdown mice had more pronounced hepatic gluconeogenesis. Complementing this observation, expression of genes involved in de novo gluconeogenesis negatively correlated with the level of hepatic HKDC1 expression. At a molecular level, the authors further found that with enhanced HKDC1 expression during pregnancy, there was enhanced phosphorylation and subsequent activation of protein kinase B (Akt) in response to insulin as compared with wild-type mice. Additionally, these mice overexpressing liver HKDC1 exhibited significantly greater plasma levels of nonesterified fatty acids and ketones in the fasting state, suggesting enhanced β-oxidation. Taken together, this study demonstrates that liver-specific HKDC1 has roles in influencing whole-body nutrient balance during pregnancy through modulation of insulin sensitivity, glucose tolerance, hepatic gluconeogenesis, and ketone production.

Potential roles for HKDC1 in glucose homeostasis

From the mouse studies described, we have gathered that HKDC1 is critical for glucose homeostasis predominately under conditions of enhanced metabolic stress, which includes pregnancy. Does HKDC1’s roles in glucose homeostasis extend beyond the traditional functions of HKs? HKDC1’s localization to the outer mitochondrial membrane may be important, as overexpression of liver-specific HKDC1 significantly modulates mitochondrial tasks including reducing glycolytic capacity, maximal respiration, glucose oxidation, and mitochondrial membrane potential [33]. Hence, excess HKDC1 expression induces alterations in mitochondrial dynamics within hepatocytes. Whether liver-specific HKDC1 protein expression levels are altered during pregnancy in relation to specific genetic variants of HKDC1 is not yet known.

A common trend in these described mouse models is the role of HKDC1 in glucose metabolism during pregnancy, which is a time of increased cellular stress. Prior work by Evstafieva et al [60] found that HKDC1 gene transcription is greatly upregulated under cellular stress due to the upregulation of Activating Transcription Factor 4 (ATF4). ATF4 is a central factor in modulating the cellular integrated stress response to allow for cells to adapt to and endure stressors [6163]. Inhibition of the mitochondrial respiration chain or endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress causes an upregulation of HKDC1, however, in the presence of the same stress along with inhibition of ATF4 by RNA interference, HKDC1 gene expression is attenuated. Examination of whether specific HKDC1 gene variants modulate mitochondrial function to different extents during pregnancy, and hence regulate the extent to which glucose homeostasis is maintained, has not been performed.

HKDC1 association with hemoglobin A1c

The Accelerating Medicines Partnership Type 2 Diabetes Knowledge Portal project (AMP-T2DKP) analyzes human genetic data from T2DM patients for the purpose of identifying novel targets for therapeutic development. Here, a GWAS using a multi-parent advanced generation inter-cross (MAGIC) plus population of T2DM suggests a genetic link between at least 45 HKDC1 variants and hemoglobin A1c [https://t2d.hugeamp.org/region.html] (p values from 1.35e−62 for variant rs4745982 to 0.009705 for variant rs10998736; sample size of 82,442 individuals with T2DM). A majority of these identified variants are suggested to alter transcription factor binding motifs, thus altering gene transcription of HKDC1. Amongst the T2DM population studied above, the variants of HKDC1 identified differ from those discussed that are associated with 2-hour plasma glucose levels during pregnancy. Along with the aforementioned data from GWAS analyses of certain population cohorts detailing associations of HKDC1 with 2-hour plasma glucose levels during an OGTT, these studies collectively indicate a potential role for HKDC1 in overall glucose metabolism and homeostasis, possibly linking distinct variants of HKDC1 to GDM and T2DM.

Conclusion

Novel hexokinase HKDC1 phosphorylates glucose and is widely expressed in many human tissues, similarly to the family of HKs. However, the published data suggests that HKDC1 has functions extending beyond the traditional role of an HK and is important for regulating glucose homeostasis during pregnancy. GWAS analyses have pinpointed specific genetic variations that are connected with 2-hour plasma glucose levels post-glucose load. Closer analyses of these nucleotide polymorphisms demonstrated that they may affect regulation of HKDC1 gene expression, leading to reductions in HKDC1 expression in women found to have higher gestational glucose levels. The finding that lower levels of HKDC1 may result in gestational hyperglycemia is congruent with mouse model studies showing that in times of cellular stress such as pregnancy, reducing HKDC1 protein expression is associated with worsened insulin resistance, reduced glucose utilization and tolerance, and increased gluconeogenesis – which are reversed with increasing HKDC1 levels. It may be possible that genetic variations in HKDC1 may prevent adequate HKDC1 protein expression or function during pregnancy, which may cause individuals with these variants to become more susceptible to the development of GDM.

The precise mechanisms by which HKDC1 affects gestational glucose metabolism are still not fully understood. Do genetic variants which alter HKDC1 gene expression also translate into significantly different HKDC1 protein levels? Furthermore, why precisely does HKDC1’s roles in glucose metabolism occur only in times of cellular stress? Therefore, more work aimed at identifying the pathways and precise molecules affected by HKDC1 expression is needed. Presently, it is clear that HKDC1 is involved in modulation of glucose homeostasis during pregnancy, and given the multitude of complications that GDM poses for mother and child, a thorough understanding of the mechanisms of action of HKDC1 deserves to the elucidated for the benefit of human health and potentially seeking therapeutics targeting HKDC1 action.

Footnotes

Conflict of Interest. Joseph L. Zapater, Kristen R. Lednovich, and Brian T. Layden declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent. This article does not contain any studies with human subjects performed by any of the authors. All reported studies/experiments with animal subjects performed by the authors have been previously published and complied with all applicable ethical standards.

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as:

• Of importance

•• Of major importance

  • 1.Johns EC, Denison FC, Norman JE, Reynolds RM. Gestational diabetes mellitus: mechanisms, treatment, and complications. Trends Endocrin Met. 2018;29(11):743–754. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.American Diabetes Association. Classification and Diagnosis of Diabetes: Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes—2018. Diabetes Care. 2018;41:S13–S27. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Sacks DA, Hadden DR, Maresh M, Deerochanawong C, Dyer AR, Metzger BE, et al. Frequency of gestational diabetes mellitus at collaborating centers based on IADPSG consensus panel—recommended criteria: the Hyperglycemia and Adverse Pregnancy Outcome (HAPO) Study. Diabetes Care. 2012;35:526–528. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.International Diabetes Federation. IDF Diabetes Atlas 2017. 8th edition. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Catalano PM, Tyzbir ED, Roman NM, Amini SB, Sims EAH. Longitudinal changes in insulin release and insulin resistance in nonobese pregnant women. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1991;165:1667–1672. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Catalano PM, Tyzbir ED, Wolfe RR, Roman NM, Amini SB, Sims EAH. Longitudinal changes in basal hepatic glucose production and suppression during insulin infusion in normal pregnant women. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1992;167:913–919. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Okosun IS, Chandra KMD, Boev A, Boltri JM, Choi ST, Parish DC, et al. Abdominal adiposity in U.S. adults: prevalence and trends, 1960–2000. Prev Med. 2004;39:197–206. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Durnwald C Gestational diabetes: Linking epidemiology, excessive gestational weight gain, adverse pregnancy outcomes, and future metabolic syndrome. Semin Perinatol. 2015;39:254–258. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Jenum AK, Morkrid K, Sletner L, Vange S, Torper JL, Nakstad B, et al. Impact of ethnicity on gestational diabetes identified with the WHO and the modified International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups criteria: A population-based cohort study. Eur J Endocrinol. 2012;166:317–324. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Lao TT, Ho L-F, Chan BCP, Leung W-C. Maternal age and prevalence of gestational diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care. 2006;29:948–949. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Zhang C, Tobias DK, Chavarro JE, Bao W, Wang D, Ley SH, et al. Adherence to healthy lifestyle and risk of gestational diabetes mellitus: prospective cohort study. BMJ. 2014;349:g5450. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Levy A, Wiznitzer A, Holcberg G, Mazor M, Sheiner E. Family history of diabetes mellitus as an independent risk factor for macrosomia and cesarean delivery. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2010;23:148–152. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Anghebem-Oliveira MI, Martins BR, Alberton D, de Ramos EAS, Picheth G, de Rego FGM. Type 2 diabetes-associated genetic variants of FTO, LEPR, PPARg, and TCF7L2 in gestational diabetes in a Brazilian population. Arch Endocrinol MeTable. 2017;61:238–248. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Lauenborg J, Grarup N, Damm P, Borch-Johnsen K, Jorgensen T, Pederson O, et al. Common type 2 diabetes risk gene variants associate with gestational diabetes. 2009;94(1):145–150. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Huopio H, Cederberg H, Vangipurapu J, Hakkarainen H, Paakkonen M, Kuulasmaa T, et al. Association of risk variants for type 2 diabetes and hyperglycemia with gestational diabetes. Eur J Endocrinol. 2013;169(3):291–297. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Plows JF, Stanley JL, Baker PN, Reynolds CM, Vickers MH. The pathophysiology of gestational diabetes mellitus. Int J Mol Sci. 2018;19:3342. Doi: 10.3390/ijms19113342. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Schwartz R, Gruppuso PA, Petzold K, Brambilla D, Hiilesmaa V, Teramo KA. Hyperinsulinemia and macrosomia in the fetus of the diabetic mother. Diabetes Care. 1994;17:640–648. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Fetita L-S, Sobngwi E, Serradas P, Calvo F, Gautier J-F. Consequences of fetal exposure to maternal diabetes in offspring. J Clin Endocrinol MeTable. 2006;91:3718–3724. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Tan PC, Ling LP, Omar SZ. The 50-g glucose challenge test and pregnancy outcome in a multiethnic Asian population at high risk for gestational diabetes. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2009;105:50–55. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Peters RK, Kjos SL, Xiang A, Buchanan TA. Long-term diabetogenic effect of single pregnancy in women with previous gestational diabetes mellitus. Lancet Lond Engl. 1996;347:227–230. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Shostrom DCV, Sun Y, Oleson JJ, Snetselaar LG, Bao W. History of gestational diabetes mellitus in relation to cardiovascular disease and cardiovascular risk factors in US women. Front Endocrinol. 2017;8:144. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Omori S, Tanaka Y, Takahashi A, Hirose H, Kashiwagi A, Kaku K, et al. Association of CDKAL1, IGF2BP2, CDKN2A/B, HHEX, SLC30A8, and KCNJ11 with susceptibility to type 2 diabetes in a Japanese population. Diabetes. 2008;57:791–795. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Gudmundsson J, Sulem P, Stefansson K. Two variants on chromosome 17 confer prostate cancer risk, and the one in TCF2 protects against type 2 diabetes. Nat Genet. 2007;39:977–983. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Zhang X, Qiao H, Zhao Y, Wang X, Sun H, Liu A, et al. Association of single nucleotide polymorphisms in TCF2 with type 2 diabetes susceptibility in a Han Chinese population. PLoS One. 2012;7:e52938. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Freathy RM, Hayes MG, Urbanek M, Lowe LP, Lee H, Ackerman C, et al. Hyperglycemia and Adverse Pregnancy Outcome (HAPO) study: common genetic variants in GCK and TCF7L2 are associated with fasting and postchallenge glucose levels in pregnancy and with the new consensus definition of gestational diabetes mellitus from the International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy study groups. Diabetes. 2010;59:2682–2689. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Kwak SH, Kim S-H, Cho YM, Go MJ, Cho YS, Choi SH, et al. A genome-wide association study of gestational diabetes mellitus in Korean women. Diabetes. 2012;61:531–541. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Hayes MG, Urbanek M, Hivert M-F, Armstrong LL, Morrison J, Guo C. Identification of HKDC1 and BACE2 as genes influencing glycemic traits during pregnancy through genome-wide association studies. Diabetes. 2013;62(9):3282–3291. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Wilson JE. Isozymes of mammalian hexokinase: structure, subcellular localization and metabolic function. J Exp Biol. 2003;206:2049–2057. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Matschinsky FM. Glucokinase, glucose homeostasis, and diabetes mellitus. Curr. Diab. Rep 2005:5:171–176. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Irwin DM, Tan H. Molecular evolution of the vertebrate hexokinase gene family: Identification of a conserved fifth vertebrate hexokinase gene. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. Part D Genomics Proteomics 2007;3(1): 96–107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Ludvik AE, Pusec CM, Priyadarshini M, Angueira AR, Guo C, Lo A, et al. HKDC1 is a novel hexokinase involved in whole-body glucose use. Endocrinology. 2016;157(9):3452–3461. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. ••.Khan MW, Priyadarshini M, Cordoba-Chacon J, Becker TC, Layden BT. Hepatic hexokinase domain containing 1 (HKDC1) improves whole body glucose tolerance and insulin sensitivity in pregnant mice. Biochim Biophys Acta Mol Basis Dis. 2018;1865(3):678–687. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; This article was the first to detail the significance of hepatic HKDC1 on glucose homeostasis during pregnancy, demonstrating that hepatic HKDC1 has roles in whole body glucose disposal, insulin sensitivity, and gestational nutrient balance.
  • 33. •.Pusec CM, De Jesus A, Khan MW, Terry AR, Ludvik AE, Xu K, et al. Hepatic HKDC1 expression contributes to liver metabolism. Endocrinology. 2019;160(2):313–330. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; This article provides evidence of a possible method by which HKDC1 functions during pregnancy, demonstrating that HKDC1 is associated with the mitochondrial outer membrane and its expression level can alter mitochondrial glycolytic capacity and maximum respiration.
  • 34.Li J, Wang J, Chen Y, Yang L, Chen S. A prognostic 4-gene expression signature for squamous cell lung carcinoma. J Cell Physiol. 2017;232:3702–3713. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Zhu Y, Xing P, Li J. Treatment of advanced squamous cell lung cancer. Chinese Journal of Lung Cancer. 2016;19(10):687–691. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Bong IPN, Ng CC, Baharuddin P, Zakaria Z. MicroRNA expression patterns and target prediction in multiple myeloma development and malignancy. Genes Genom. 2017;39:533–540. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Bi C, Chng WJ. MicroRNA: important player in the pathobiology of multiple myeloma. Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:521–586. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Lian H, Wang A, Shen Y, Wang Q, Zhou Z, et al. Identification of novel alternative splicing isoform biomarkers and their association with overall survival in colorectal cancer. BMC Gastroenterology. 2020;20:171. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Torre LA, Bray F, Siegel RL, Ferlay J, Lortet-Tieulent J, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics, 2012. Ca A Cancer Journal for Clinicians. 2015;65(2):87–108. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Anders S, Reyes A, Huber W. Detecting differential usage of exons from RNA-seq data. Genome Res. 2012;22(10):2008–2017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Fuhr L, El-Athman R, Scrima R, Cela O, Carbone A, Knoop H, et al. The circadian clock regulates metabolic phenotype rewiring via HKDC1 and modulates tumor progression and drug response in colorectal cancer. EBioMedicine. 2018;22:105–121. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Zhang Z, Huang S, Wang H, Wu J, Chen D, Peng B, et al. High expression of hexokinase domain containing 1 is associated with poor prognosis and aggressive phenotype in hepatocarcinoma. Biochem Bioph Res Co. 2016;474:673–679. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Wang X, Shi B, Zhao Y, Lu Q, Fei X, Lu C, et al. HKDC1 promotes the tumorigenesis and glycolysis in lung adenocarcinoma via regulating AMPK/mTOR signaling pathway. Cancer Cell Int. 2020;20:450. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Chen X, Lv Y, Sun Y, Zhang H, Xie W, Zhong L, et al. PGC1β regulates breast tumor growth and metastasis by SREBP1-mediated HKDC1 expression. Front Oncol. 2019;9:290. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Chen Q, Feng J, Wu J, Yu Z, Zhang W, Chen Y, et al. HKDC1 C-terminal based peptides inhibit extranodal natural killer/T-cell lymphoma by modulation of mitochondrial function and EBV suppression. Leukemia. 2020;34:2736–2748. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Li G-H, Huang J-F. Inferring therapeutic targets from heterogeneous data: HKDC1 is a novel potential therapeutic target for cancer. Bioinformatics. 2014;30(6):748–752. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Guo C, Ludvik AE, Arlotto ME, Hayes MG, Armstrong LL, Scholtens DM, et al. Coordinated regulatory variation associated with gestational hyperglycaemia regulates expression of the novel hexokinase HKDC1. Nat Commun. 2015;6:6069. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Khan MW, Ding X, Cotler SJ, Clarke M, Layden BT. Studies on the tissue localization of HKDC1, a putative novel fifth hexokinase, in humans. J Histochem Cytochem. 2018;66(5):385–392. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.The HAPO Study Cooperative Research Group. Hyperglycemia and Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes. N Engl J Med. 2008;358:1991–2002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Gerstein MB, Kundaje A, Hariharan M, Landt SG, Yan K-K, Cheng C, et al. Architecture of the human regulatory network derived from ENCODE data. Nature. 2012;489(7414):91–100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Scott RA, Lagou V, Welch RP, Wheeler E, Montasser ME, Luan J, et al. Large-scale association analyses identify new loci influencing glycemic traits and provide insight into the underlying biological pathways. Nat Genet. 2012;44:991–1005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Choi Y, Sims GE, Murphy S, Miller JR, Chan AP. Predicting the functional effect of amino acid substitutions and indels. PloS One. 2012;7(10):e46688. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Ng PC, Henikoff S. Predicting deleterious amino acid substitutions. Genome research. 2001;11:863–874. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.DeSousa RAL. Animal models of gestational diabetes: characteristics and consequences to the brain and behavior of the offspring. Metab Brain Dis. 2021;36(2):199–204. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Tan YX, Hu S-M, You Y-P, Yang G-L, Wang W. Replication of previous genome-wide association studies of HKDC1, BACE2, SLC16A11 and TMEM163 SNPs in a gestational diabetes mellitus case-control sample from Han Chinese population. Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes. 2019;12:983–989. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Kanthimathi S, Liju S, Laasya D, Anjana RM, Mohan V, Radha V. Hexokinase domain containing 1 gene variants and their association with gestational diabetes mellitus in a South Indian population. Ann Hum Genet. 2016;80(4):241–245. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Fuller M, Priyadarshini M, Gibbons SM, Angueira AR, Brodsky M, Hayes MG, et al. The short chain fatty acid receptor, FFA2, contributes to gestational glucose homeostasis. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2015;309(10):E840–E851. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Wang Q, Wurtz P, Auro K, Makinen V-P, Kangas AJ, Soininen P, et al. Metabolic profiling of pregnancy: cross-sectional and longitudinal evidence. BMC Medicine. 2016;14:205. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Wang M, Xia W, Li H, Liu F, Li Y, Sun X, et al. Normal pregnancy induced glucose metabolic stress in a longitudinal cohort of healthy women: novel insights generated from a urine metabolomics study. Medicine. 2018;97:40. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Evstafieva AG, Kovaleva IE, Shoshinova MS, Budanov AV, Chumakov PM. Implication of KRT16, FAM129A and HKDC1 genes as ATF4 regulated components of the integrated stress response. PLoS One. 2018;13(2):e0191107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Harding MS, Zhang Y, Zeng H, Novoa I, Lu PD, Calfon M, et al. An integrated stress response regulates amino acid metabolism and resistance to oxidative stress. Mol Cell. 2003;11(3):619–633. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Kilberg MS, Shan J, Su N. ATF4-dependent transcription mediates signaling of amino acid limitation. Trends Endocrinol Metab. 2009;20(9):436–443. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Han J, Back SH, Hur J, Lin Y-H, Gildersleeve R, Shan J, et al. ER-stress-induced transcriptional regulation increases protein synthesis leading to cell death. Nat Cell Biol. 2013;15(5):481–490. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES