Abstract
The present study evaluated the effects of feed supplemented with two dietary sources of n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs; fish oil and extruded flaxseed) on the gut microbiota, caecal fermentations, gastrointestinal histology, and histochemistry in rabbits. Fifteen male New Zealand White rabbits were divided into three groups (n = 5/group) and fed with different diets from weaning (35 days of age) until slaughtering (90 days of age): C group, fed with a commercial diet; F group, supplemented with 10% of extruded flaxseed; and O group, supplemented with 3.5% of fish oil. At slaughter, the content of the stomach, duodenum, jejunum, ileum, caecum, and colon was collected and analyzed by Next Generation 16S rRNA gene sequencing. Tissue samples of the same tracts were evaluated with histological and histochemical analysis. Ammonia and lactic acid in the caecum were also quantified. Twenty-nine operational taxonomic units (OTUs) were significantly different between groups. Groups receiving n-3 PUFAs supplementation showed an increase in Bacteroidetes and Lachnospiraceae in several gastrointestinal tracts, while Bacilli abundance, as well as Firmicutes/Bacteroidetes ratio, were reduced compared to the control group (for all p < 0.05). Caecal ammonia was lower in the F than C group (p < 0.032), whereas no difference was found for lactic acid. Finally, histological evaluations revealed a mild hemorrhagic infiltration and vessels ectasia in the stomach mucosa of both F and O groups, but no effect of nutritional treatment was evidenced by the histochemical analyses. In conclusion, n-3 PUFAs supplementation could modify the rabbit gut microbiota and fermentation. The increase in beneficial bacterial populations may, at least partially, explain the positive effects of n-3 PUFAs diet supplementation on human and animals’ health, although the appropriate dosage should be established.
Keywords: Firmicutes/Bacteroidetes ratio, flax seed, fish oil, polyunsaturated fatty acids, omega 3, caecal fermentation, α-linolenic acid, eicosapentaenoic acid, docosahexaenoic acid, stomach mucosa
1. Introduction
The microbial community that colonizes a particular district of the body and lives in a symbiotic relationship with the host is defined as microbiota [1]. The digestive system is normally colonized by a wide range of bacteria, fungi, and viruses [2]. The gut microbiota composition has a strong impact on the general health and digestive functions of the host [3]. The maintenance of a normal microbial community requires a homeostatic equilibrium among the microbes as well as between the microbiota and the host [4]. Generally, the gut microbiota shows a high grade of resilience and resistance to changes, as it is quite stable against different perturbations. Common factors that can lead to a perturbation of the intestinal homeostasis could depend on both environment and host such as the species [5], age [6], genetic factor [7], farm management [8], drug treatment [9], exposure to pathogens [10], and diet [11,12,13]. The disruption of the normal microflora composition and its metabolic activities could alter the microbiota homeostasis resulting in “dysbiosis” and consequently in different diseases, not only localized to the gastrointestinal tract but also at a systemic level [14,15,16].
The rabbit is very sensitive to gastrointestinal diseases, not only when kept as a livestock species but also as a companion animal [17,18]. Diseases of the digestive system are therefore not only a cause of compromising well-being and mortality but also of economic losses. In this context, the gut microbiota assumes considerable importance, as dysbiosis is associated with several disorders such as diarrhea, enterotoxaemia, and gastrointestinal stasis [19]. Rabbits are monogastric, herbivores, and small hindgut-fermenters that use cecotrophy to obtain maximum energy from the digestion and absorption of the nutrients included in plant-based diets. The large intestine represents the fermentation chamber and hosts the highest richness and diversity in commensal bacterial populations compared to other tracts of the digestive system [5]. The bacterial populations that inhabit the different gastrointestinal tracts of rabbits have recently been described [5]. Upcoming challenges include clarifying the regulation mechanisms of the intestinal microbiota that can modulate gastrointestinal functionality, the maturation and activity of the immune system, resistance to diseases, and productive performance [20,21,22]. In this context, particular attention is paid to critical moments of the rabbit’s production cycle such as the post-weaning period and the role that the gut microbiota could play in reducing the enteric disorders, and as a consequence, the use of antibiotics [23,24]. For this reason, new strategies should be found to reduce the incidence of gastrointestinal pathologies that quite often reduce the profitability of rabbit breeding and therefore could have implications for animal welfare and livestock sustainability. Rabbit, finally, is not only a livestock species and a pet but also an animal model to study several physiological processes including digestion as well as productive performance [25,26], reproduction [27,28,29], and immunity [30,31,32]. Recently, the effects of the dietary integration of various natural substances on the reproductive and productive performance of rabbits have been investigated [33,34,35,36,37]. Despite the critical importance of the gut microbiota in rabbit health, only a few studies have investigated the impact of specific diets on the modifications of gut microbial population in this species to date [12,38].
In recent decades, great attention has been paid to evaluate the role of dietary polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs) on the health status as well as on the prevention and treatment of several humans and animals’ diseases [22,39]. Mammals cannot de novo synthesize some n-6 and n-3 PUFAs, in particular, long-chain PUFAs (>20 C). They result from elongations and desaturation of two essential fatty acids: linoleic acid (LA; 18:2n-6) and α-linolenic acid (ALA; 18:3n-3), whose concentrations in the organism only depend on dietary intake [22,39,40]. n-3 PUFAs resulting from eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA, 20: 5n-3) and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA, 22: 6n-3) have anti-inflammatory, antiproliferative, and anti-atherosclerotic activities [41,42,43]. Several studies showed that diets supplemented with nutrient rich in n-3 PUFAs such as flaxseed (source of ALA), fish, and fish oil (source of EPA and DHA) positively influence the immune function, blood pressure, cholesterol and triglycerides levels, as well as cardiovascular function in different animals’ species, including humans [36,44,45,46]. Moreover, there is growing evidence revealing the effects that n-3 PUFAs exert on productive performance, gut physiology, homeostasis, immune tolerance, and gut microbiota establishment and maintenance [47,48,49]. In particular, n-3 PUFAs can influence the gut microbiota in three principal ways: (1) modulating the type and abundance of the microbial community of the intestine [22,39]; (2) reducing the levels of proinflammatory mediators, such as endotoxins (i.e., lipopolysaccharide) and cytokines or promoting the secretion of anti-inflammatory factors [50,51]; and (3) regulating the growth of butyric acid-producing bacteria [20,48]. Butyrate is considered an important source of energy for the intestinal epithelium, maintains intestinal homeostasis, and controls the gene expression, proliferation, differentiation, and apoptosis of the intestinal cells, as well as the inflammatory response [20,52]. However, knowledge of the correlations between n-3 PUFAs and the intestinal microbiota in livestock animals and particularly in rabbits is limited [47,52].
In this study, we hypothesize that n-3 PUFAs-enriched diets influence bacterial richness and diversity of rabbits’ digestive system. The aim was to evaluate the effect of flaxseed and fish oil supplemented diets on the gut microbiota composition in stomach, duodenum, jejunum, ileum, caecum, and colon of rabbits using next-generation 16S rRNA gene sequencing. In addition, histology and histochemistry were performed on the same sections of the digestive system. Finally, lactic acid and ammonia produced by the cecal bacterial fermentations were also quantified.
2. Results
2.1. Sequencing Results
The microbiota structure of the gastrointestinal tract of Control (C), Flaxseed (F), and Fish oil (O) groups was characterized by a total of 3,230,834, 3,056,689, and 3,201,736 high quality reads (after filtering), respectively, with a mean of about 130,000 ± 55,000 reads per group. The average reads loss due to filtering was 27%.
2.2. Taxa Composition of Gastrointestinal Microbiota in Rabbit of Control (C), Flaxseed (F) and Fish Oil (O) Groups
Phylum relative abundance distributions in the different gastrointestinal tracts of C, F, and O groups are shown in Figure 1. The main taxa (relative abundance > 1%) detected in the rabbit’s gut microbiota are presented in Figure 2 (and Tables S1 and S2). Without major differences between groups, the most abundant phyla were Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes. Both phyla tended to increase moving from the stomach to the colon; O group showed higher Bacteroidetes levels in the jejunum (16.9%), ileum (19.9%), and colon (19.4%) compared to C group. Bacilli, Bacteroidia, and Clostridia were the most abundant classes, with Bacilli less abundant in the O and, especially, F groups compared to C, in the early portion of the digestive tract (stomach: 8.6%, 1.5%, and 5.8%; duodenum: 7.3%, 2.8%, and 3.9%; jejunum: 5.6%, 2.7%, 2.9% in C, F, and O groups, respectively). The same pattern is reflected in orders: the prevailing orders are Bacillales, Bacteroidales, and Clostridiales, with Bacillales more abundant in C than treated groups (stomach: 8.4%, 1.2%, and 4.9%; duodenum: 5.7%, 1.8%, and 3.3%; jejunum: 4.6%, 1.8%, and 2.7% in C, F, and O groups, respectively). As for families, Ruminococcaceae is the most abundant (between 33% and 42%), followed by Lachnospiraceae (11%–20%), Clostridiales vadinBB60 group, Muribaculaceae, Bacteroidaceae, and Bacillaceae (this latter in C, but not in treated groups). Lachnospiraceae were higher in F (from 15.7% to 20.3%, depending on the tissue) and more or less similar in O (from 13.7% to 20.1%) and C (from 11.0% to 20.5%). At the genus level, relative abundances are clearly more spread across genera, with significant differences between treatments in 13 genera, among which Lachnospiraceae UCG-001 (p < 0.001), Acidovorax (p < 0.01), Campylobacter (p < 0.05), and Brevibacillus (p < 0.05). In total, 29 operational taxonomic units (OTUs) were significantly different between groups: these are reported in Figure 3 and Table S1, together with their relative abundances in addition to the gastrointestinal tract of rabbits. In addition, Tables S2 and S3 show the abundance of the significantly different taxa according with group and gastrointestinal tract.
2.3. Firmicutes/Bacteroidetes (F/B) Ratio
Regardless of the gastrointestinal tracts, the F/B ratio in the rabbit gut microbiota was consistently higher in the C group compared to F and O groups (in this order; p = 0.0014), but with a large individual variation (Figure 4). When correcting for the digestive tract section (Figure 4 and Table S4), the F/B ratio differences between dietary treatments from a linear model that included both tissue and treatments terms were not significant (p > 0.05).
2.4. Alpha Diversity
Table 1 shows the values for the alpha diversity indices calculated from the OTU table in the three experimental groups along the rabbit’s digestive system. As highlighted in Figure 5 and Figure S1, the F group is significantly different from the C group in the stomach, while the O group is significantly different from C further down in the gastrointestinal tract, in the ileum and colon.
Table 1.
Group | Gastrointestinal Tract | Chao1 | Ace | Fisher Alpha |
Observed OTUS | Shannon | Simpson | Equitability | Simpson e |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Control | Stomach | 233.250 | 233.250 | 101.578 | 233.25 | 7.646 | 0.994 | 0.980 | 0.797 |
Control | Duodenum | 344.533 | 334.476 | 147.037 | 316.00 | 8.043 | 0.996 | 0.973 | 0.737 |
Control | Jejunum | 258.000 | 258.000 | 112.640 | 258.00 | 7.772 | 0.995 | 0.971 | 0.725 |
Control | Ileum | 325.317 | 312.777 | 132.726 | 293.25 | 7.941 | 0.995 | 0.971 | 0.729 |
Control | Caecum | 814.740 | 787.556 | 328.752 | 638.75 | 8.970 | 0.998 | 0.963 | 0.649 |
Control | Colon | 781.027 | 779.864 | 329.898 | 661.00 | 9.033 | 0.998 | 0.964 | 0.661 |
Flaxseed | Stomach | 654.676 | 644.354 | 274.021 | 545.00 | 8.755 | 0.997 | 0.964 | 0.665 |
Flaxseed | Duodenum | 415.105 | 404.532 | 173.917 | 367.25 | 8.214 | 0.996 | 0.967 | 0.687 |
Flaxseed | Jejunum | 465.343 | 456.567 | 203.200 | 431.50 | 8.500 | 0.997 | 0.972 | 0.713 |
Flaxseed | Ileum | 366.754 | 357.585 | 154.462 | 335.00 | 8.141 | 0.996 | 0.972 | 0.727 |
Flaxseed | Caecum | 759.350 | 761.723 | 316.750 | 609.25 | 8.874 | 0.997 | 0.961 | 0.640 |
Flaxseed | Colon | 693.944 | 713.153 | 310.682 | 613.75 | 8.937 | 0.998 | 0.965 | 0.667 |
Fish oil | Stomach | 470.384 | 463.068 | 193.549 | 388.25 | 8.127 | 0.995 | 0.971 | 0.718 |
Fish oil | Duodenum | 326.839 | 311.604 | 134.043 | 294.00 | 7.873 | 0.995 | 0.970 | 0.712 |
Fish oil | Jejunum | 534.375 | 541.931 | 230.253 | 461.50 | 8.336 | 0.996 | 0.969 | 0.694 |
Fish oil | Ileum | 515.576 | 502.106 | 225.529 | 438.00 | 8.442 | 0.996 | 0.966 | 0.672 |
Fish oil | Caecum | 865.822 | 844.204 | 350.033 | 677.25 | 9.030 | 0.998 | 0.962 | 0.642 |
Fish oil | Colon | 658.432 | 686.182 | 300.589 | 593.25 | 8.890 | 0.997 | 0.965 | 0.665 |
2.5. Beta Diversity
As for Bray–Curtis distances, from the first two dimensions of the MDS plot, there appears to be some clustering of samples by treatment in the stomach, ileum, and caecum (Figure 6).
Based on PERMANOVA results, only the differences in the stomach turned out to be significant (p = 0.010; Table S5), which may well be a consequence of the limited sample size (11–12 samples per section of the digestive tract).
2.6. Lactic Acid and Ammonia Quantification in Cecal Content
Lactic acid quantification showed no statistically significant differences among groups, while there was a significant difference among C and F groups for the ammonia concentration (p = 0.032), as reported in Table 2.
Table 2.
Group | Lactate (mmol/kg) |
Ammonia (mmol/kg) |
---|---|---|
Control | 7.92 ± 3.43 | 8.03 ± 2.34 |
Flaxseed | 4.74 ± 1.66 | 5.01 * ± 1.42 |
Fish Oil | 5.26 ± 2.48 | 8.98 ± 2.44 |
2.7. Histology and Histochemistry
The structure of the intestinal tracts was always anatomically normal and comparable in all the experimental groups, except for the fundic mucosa of the stomach. Fundic mucosa of the control group showed a normal organization with properly called gastric glands immersed in the lamina propria (Figure 7a, arrows). As the control group, F group revealed a structurally normal mucosa of the secreting lining epithelium and the gastric glands, although it was possible to notice dilated vessels in the lamina propria towards the lumen (Figure 7b, arrow). At higher magnification (rectangular box), it was possible to observe apical ectatic vessels of the lamina propria (Figure 7e, asterisk) and a small quantity of hemorrhagic infiltrate in the connective tissue lamina propria (Figure 7d, arrow). Finally, the O group showed a normal mucosa, and in this case, dilated vessels were also observed in the lamina propria towards the lumen compared to control (Figure 7c). At higher magnification, it was possible to observe a small quantity of hemorrhagic infiltrate in the lamina propria (rectangular box, Figure 7f, arrow) and basal ectatic vessels (circular box, Figure 7g, asterisk).
Alcian blue-periodic acid–Schiff (AB-PAS) histochemical staining showed that intestinal goblet cells contained both neutral (pink color) and acid glycoconjugates (blue color). Acid glycoconjugates appeared to be predominant especially in the treated groups (Figure 8a–c for control, F, and O groups, respectively, with arrows showing acid glycoconjugates).
3. Discussion
This study showed, for the first time, that n-3 PUFAs-enriched diets influence bacterial richness and diversity of the rabbit’s gut microbiota. Changes in microbial community composition and diversity, involving Firmicutes/Bacteroidetes ratio and Lachnospiraceae taxa, may contribute to the beneficial effects of n-3 PUFAs. Some differences were also found at the histological level, mainly affecting the stomach mucosa, suggesting that the supplementation dose should be optimized.
Regardless of the nutritional treatment, the main taxa detected were in accordance with previous studies evaluating the gut microbiota of both domesticated and wild rabbits [5,53,54]. The most abundant phyla were Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes. Firmicutes were, however, unaffected by nutritional treatment. Previous studies have evaluated the effects of fish oil supplementation on the fecal microbiota of mice, finding contrasting results. Cui et al. [13] showed that fish oil supplementation for 12 weeks reduced the relative abundance of Firmicutes, while Yu et al. [55] found a significant increase in this phylum after 15 days of supplementation in fecal samples of mice. A higher relative abundance of Bacteroidetes was instead found in fish oil-supplemented rabbits compared to the control group. This result was expected, as the association between dietary n-3 PUFA intake and Bacteroidetes increase has already been demonstrated in humans and mice [13,42,56]. This is extremely interesting, considering the Bacteroidetes’ positive role in modulating health status, in particular, in the context of diseases such as obesity [57]. In addition, the n-3 PUFAs supplementation changed the Epsilonbacteraeota at phylum, class, order, family, and genus level (i.e., Campylobacteria, Campylobacterales, Campylobacteraceae and Campylobacter). Their proportions within the microbial population were, however, negligible.
Regardless of nutritional groups, the prevailing classes were Bacilli, Bacteroidia, and Clostridia, and the same pattern was followed at the level of order. Interestingly, Bacilli (and also Bacillales) were more abundant in control than in treated groups. The same result was found in other studies conducted on mice fecal microbiota, where diets enriched with n-3 PUFA significantly lowered the Bacilli relative abundance [13,48,58]. In humans, this reduction has been associated with the consumption of a Mediterranean diet, rich in fish and seafood [42].
The dominant families were representative of the dominant orders and classes, with Ruminococcaceae and Lachnospiraceae as the main families. This partially confirms previous reports on rabbit gastrointestinal microbiota [5,53]. Importantly, the Lachnospiraceae family was higher in rabbits receiving n-3 PUFA supplementation in all gastrointestinal tracts. Moreover, at the genus level, a member of the family Lachnospiraceae showed significantly higher relative abundance in F and O groups than the C group, especially at the foregut level. These findings are in full agreement with previous studies highlighting the positive correlation between n-3 PUFAs intake, including both fish oil and flaxseed supplementations, and Lachnospiraceae abundance [39,42,44,49]. Lachnospiraceae is associated with increased production of short-chain fatty acid (SCFA) butyrate, which has beneficial effects thanks to its anti-inflammatory and antiatherosclerotic properties [39,42].
The importance of F/B ratio on several metabolic syndromes has been widely demonstrated both in humans and experimental animals [22,42,48]. It is a useful indicator of the homeostasis of the gastrointestinal microbiota and, in particular, high levels of this ratio have been associated with obesity [48]. Regardless of the gastrointestinal tract, the F/B ratio decreased in the PUFA supplemented groups. These findings fully agreed with previous studies carried out both in humans and laboratory animals [13,39,42]. It also suggests that changes in F/B ratio could mediate the beneficial effects of foods rich in n-3 PUFA [39,48]. In our study, this difference was not statistically significant when stratifying for the digestive tract. This could be probably ascribed to the high individual variability and limited sample size.
As expected, the alpha diversity results showed a higher richness and diversity in bacterial composition in the hindgut compared to the foregut, independently from the group. These results are in agreement with another study performed in rabbits [5], and can be explained by the physiological fermentative activity typical of colon and cecum tracts, which increases the microbial densities and also diversity at this level [21]. Flaxseed supplementation caused higher microbial diversity in the stomach compared with the C group; these findings can be related to the high protein contents of these seeds (10–30%), which can induce proliferation of the proteolytic bacterial population [45]. The O group, instead, showed higher microbial richness in the ileum compared to the C group. In general, the increase in the alpha diversity has beneficial effects by reducing the risk of dysbiosis, guaranteeing the complexity of the microbial ecosystem, which is fundamental for gut health [59]. These positive results are in agreement with what already shown in other studies examining the effect of both fish oil and flaxseed supplemented diets on caecal content and feces’ alpha diversity in mice [13,60]. Conversely, a reduction in alpha diversity was found in the colon of the O group. These results also seemed contradictory because not all indices were significant and one of them showed higher values than the C group. Similarly, the beta diversity results stratified by gastrointestinal tract seem inconsistent, as only a cluster at the stomach level was found. We can speculate that the small sample size could lead to a bias for these results. Microbiota composition in mice indeed showed well-defined clusters after fish oil and flaxseed supplementation [13,60].
Results about cecal bacterial fermentations indicate that both n-3 PUFA-enriched diets did not affect lactic acid production, whereas flaxseed supplementation decreased ammonia fermentation. Ammonia is one of the microbial products that is known to have negative health effects in animals, which is excreted in large quantities, especially in intensive production [61,62]. Results regarding the F group indicated a good state of health of the animals, in accordance with Fraga [63], which indicated a range of 4.5–6.0 mmol/kg as adequate for protein microbial synthesis in the rabbit.
Surprisingly, the results concerning the histological analysis of the samples of the stomach collected by both F and O groups showed mild signs of hemorrhagic infiltration and vascular ectasia in the deepest part of the gastric mucosa compared to the control group. The same samples presented, however, a normal structural organization of the organ and no damage in the epithelium. Moreover, the samples obtained from the intestinal tracts did not show any kind of lesions in all the experimental groups. To date, there are no studies that report the same histological signs in the stomach of rabbits; there is indeed evidence that n-3 PUFA contained in fish oil does not induce negative effects on the histological structure of the liver and kidney [64]. At common dosage, n-3 fatty acids exert a plethora of physiological effects including lipid blood lowering, reduction in inflammatory indices, immunomodulation, and anti-thrombotic effects [65]. Despite their widespread use and beneficial actions, fish oil and flaxseed could determine some side effects at high dosage such hyperglycemia [66], bleeding [67], reduced blood pressure [68], diarrhea [69,70], acid reflux, and heartburn [71] in humans. The hemorrhagic infiltration of the lamina propria of the stomach mucosa could be due to the anti-thrombotic effect of n-3 PUFAs included in flaxseed and fish oil. It was reported that the consumption of large amounts of fish oil can inhibit blood clotting, increasing the risk of bleeding in humans. McEwen et al. [67] found that daily supplementation with 640 mg of fish oil for four weeks strongly reduced blood clotting in healthy adults. Additionally, another study reported that a high dose of fish oil consumption can increase the risk of nosebleeds as a side effect in adolescents [72]. Moreover, the apical ectatic vessels of the lamina propria found in the gastric samples collected from rabbits belonging to groups F and O could be explained by the effects of n-3 PUFAs on the endothelial function and vascular tone [73]. There is evidence that PUFAs are involved in the signaling pathways that both directly and indirectly induce vasodilation by the production of several mediators such as eicosanoids, cycloxygenase, and cytochrome P450 epoxygenase metabolites [74,75]. In the absence of other data of rabbit, it could be speculated that the hemorrhagic infiltrate and vascular ectasia found in the gastric samples is probably due to the high dosage of n-3 fatty acids included in the diets. Another possible explanation of the presence of the lesions in the stomach and not in the intestine could be that, in the latter, the n-3 PUFAs concentrations are lower as a consequence of the lipidic digestion and absorption as well as to their dilution with bile, pancreatic, and intestinal secretions. However, it must be highlighted that gastric lesions did not influence the health status as well as the growing rate of the rabbits fed with flaxseed and fish oil.
To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study that shows the effect of dietary supplementation with flaxseed and fish oil on the gut microbiota composition of rabbits, albeit on a limited number of animals. These preliminary results could represent the starting point for future research to evaluate whether these changes in bacterial populations may also modify the cecal fermentative production of volatile fatty acids. The relationship and the connection pathways between the changes in the gut microbiota and the efficiency of the immune system of the host could be investigated. Moreover, bioactive components of flaxseed and fish oil other than PUFAs could intervene in this relationship, and further research should focus on their role in gut microbiota changes. For example, flaxseed contains phytochemicals, such as isoflavones and lignans [34,76], which could influence the microbial flora as well as the reproductive sphere and the health of the rabbit. It is also important to note that extruded flaxseeds were used in the present study in order to decrease anti-nutritional factors such as tannins. Research should be addressed to study the adequate dosage usable to avoid the onset of possible side effects in rabbits. The supplementation of the diet with nutraceutical substances (flaxseed and fish oil) and the consequent changes in the gut microbiota may represent an innovative strategy to prevent and treat several gastrointestinal disorders as well as to increase the productive performance and welfare of the rabbit.
4. Materials and Methods
4.1. Animals and Samples Collection
The rabbits were reared in the experimental facility of the Department of Molecular and Developmental Medicine of University of Siena. At weaning, fifteen New Zealand White male rabbits were divided into three groups (n = 5/group) and fed three different diets (Table 3) until slaughter (90 days of age): control group (C), fed with a standard diet, flaxseed group (F), fed standard diet supplemented with 10% of extruded flaxseed, and fish oil group (O), fed standard diet supplemented with 3.5% of fish oil (Nordic Naturals Omega-3®, Watsonville, CA, USA). These diets have previously been used [33] and their fatty acid profile is shown in Table S6. For the entire trial, all diets and water were provided ad libitum.
Table 3.
Ingredients (g/kg) | Control | Flaxseed | Fish Oil |
---|---|---|---|
Dehydrated alfalfa meal | 300 | 380 | 380 |
Soybean meal 44% | 150 | 110 | 150 |
Barley meal | 410 | 310 | 335 |
Wheat bran | 52 | 52 | 52 |
Soybean oil | 30 | - | - |
Extruded flaxseed | - | 100 | - |
Fish oil * | - | - | 35 |
Beet molasses | 20 | 10 | 10 |
Calcium carbonate | 7 | 7 | 7 |
Calcium diphosphate | 13.5 | 13.5 | 13.5 |
Salt | 7 | 7 | 7 |
DL-methionine | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 |
Vitamin-mineral premix ** | 10 | 10 | 10 |
Crude protein | 175 | 174 | 175 |
Ether extract | 480 | 472 | 425 |
Crude Fiber | 124 | 137 | 130 |
Ash | 89 | 84 | 90 |
∗ Nordic Naturals Omega-3® = purified deep sea fish oil (from anchovies and sardines) containing EPA—330 mg/100 g, DHA—220 mg/100 g, and other n-3 LC PUFA—140 mg/100 g + α-tocopherol for preservation. Per kg diet: vitamin A—11.000 IU; vitamin D3—2000 IU; vitamin B1—2.5 mg; vitamin B2—4 mg; vitamin B6—1.25 mg; vitamin B12—0.01 mg; alpha-tocopheryl acetate—200 mg; biotine—0.06 mg; vitamin K—2.5 mg; niacin—15 mg; folic acid—0.30 mg; D-pantothenic acid—10 mg; choline—600 mg; Mn—60 mg; Fe—50 mg; Zn—15 mg; I—0.5 mg; Co—0.5 mg. ** Per kg diet: vitamin A 11,000 IU; vitamin D3 2000 IU; vitamin B1 2.5 mg; vitamin B2 4 mg; vitamin B6 1.25 mg; vitamin B12 0.01 mg; alpha-tocopherol acetate 50 mg; biotine 0.06 mg; vitamin K 2.5 mg; niacin 15 mg; folic acid 0.30 mg; D-pantothenic acid 10 mg; choline 600 mg; Mn 60 mg; Fe 50 mg; Zn 15 mg; I 0.5 mg; Co 0.5 mg.
The rabbits were kept in a controlled environment for temperature (18–21 °C), relative humidity (60%), and light (16 h of day) in compliance with Directive 2010/63/EU related to the protection of animals kept for breeding purposes.
At the end of the trial, the animals were slaughtered in an authorized slaughterhouse, and the stunning (electrical), bleeding, and skinning of the animals followed the European Union regulations, specifically the Council Regulation No 1099/2009 on the protection of animals at the time of the slaughter. The average body weights (± standard error) at weaning were 857 ± 105 g, 879 ± 115 g, and 898 ± 125, whereas at slaughtering, they were 2310 ± 82 g, 2410 ± 120 g, and 2375 ± 55 g in C, F, and O groups, respectively.
The gastrointestinal tract was immediately removed from each animal. The luminal contents of the stomach, duodenum, jejunum, ileum, caecum, and colon were individually collected in a sterile 15 mL tube and stored in sterile tubes at −80 °C until analysis.
4.2. Microbiota Evaluation
4.2.1. DNA Extraction
DNA was extracted from each fecal sample while using a QIAamp PowerFecal Pro DNA Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany), according to the manufacturer’s protocol. DNA quality and quantity were assessed using a NanoDrop ND-1000 spectrophotometer (NanoDrop Technologies, Wilmington, DE, USA). The isolated DNA was then stored at −20 °C until use.
4.2.2. Next Generation 16S rRNA Gene Sequencing
Bacterial DNA was amplified using the primers that were described in literature [77], which target the V3-V4 hypervariable regions of the 16S rRNA gene. All the PCR amplifications were performed in 25 µL volumes per sample. A total of 12.5 µL of KAPA HIFI Master Mix 2× (Kapa Biosystems, Inc., Wilmington, MA, USA) and 0.2 µL of each primer (100 µM) were added to 2 µL of genomic DNA (5 ng/µL). The blank controls (no DNA template added to the reaction) were also performed. A first amplification step was performed in an Applied Biosystem 2700 thermal cycler (ThermoFisher Scientific, Waltham, MA USA). The samples were denatured at 95 °C for 3 min, followed by 25 cycles with a denaturing step at 98 °C for 30 s, annealing at 56 °C for 1 min, and extension at 72 °C for 1 min, with a final extension at 72 °C for 7 min. The amplicons were then cleaned with Agencourt AMPure XP (Beckman, Coulter Brea, CA, USA), and libraries were prepared following the 16S Metagenomic Sequencing Library Preparation Protocol (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA). The libraries obtained were quantified using real-time PCR with KAPA Library Quantification Kits (Kapa Biosystems, Inc., Wilmington, MA, USA), pooled in equimolar proportion and then sequenced in one MiSeq (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA) run with 2 × 250-base paired-end reads.
4.2.3. Sequence Analysis
Demultiplexed paired-end reads from 16S rRNA-gene sequencing were first checked for quality while using FastQC [78] for an initial assessment. The forward and reverse paired-end reads were joined into single reads while using the C++ program SeqPrep [79].
After joining, the reads were filtered for quality based on: (i) maximum three consecutive low-quality base calls (Phred <19) allowed; (ii) the fraction of consecutive high-quality base calls (Phred >19) in a read over total read length ≥0.75; and (iii) no “N”-labeled bases (missing/uncalled) allowed. Reads that did not match all the above criteria were filtered out. All the remaining reads were combined in a single FASTA file for the identification and quantification of OTUs (operational taxonomic units). The reads were aligned against the SILVA closed reference sequence collection release 132, with 97% cluster identity [80,81] applying the Cd-hit clustering algorithm [82]. A pre-defined taxonomy map of reference sequences was then used for taxonomic identification along the main taxa ranks down to the genus level (domain, phylum, class, order, family, genus). By counting the abundance of each OTU, the OTU table was created and then grouped at each phylogenetic level. OTUs with total counts lower than 50 in fewer than 5 samples were filtered out. All of the above steps, except the FastQC reads quality check, were performed with the QIIME 1.9 open-source bioinformatics pipeline for microbiome analysis [83]. The command lines and parameters that were used to process 16S rRNA gene sequence data are detailed in Biscarini et al. [84].
4.2.4. Alfa and Beta Diversity Indices
The microbial diversity of the different niches of the rabbit gastrointestinal tract was assessed within-(alpha diversity) and across-(beta diversity) samples. All the indices (alpha and beta diversity) were estimated from the OTU table (at the OTU level), filtered for OTUs with more than 50 total counts distributed in at least five samples. Besides the number of observed OTUs directly counted from the OTU table, within-sample microbial richness, diversity, and evenness were estimated using the following indices: Chao1 and ACE (abundance-based coverage estimator) for richness, Shannon, Simpson, and Fisher’s alpha for diversity [85,86], and Simpson E and Pielou’s J (Shannon’s evenness) for evenness [87]. The across-sample microbiota diversity was quantified by calculating Bray-Curtis dissimilarities [88]. Prior to the calculation of alpha and beta diversity metrics, the OTU counts were normalized for uneven sequencing depth by cumulative sum scaling CSS [89]. Details on the calculation of the mentioned alpha- and beta-diversity indices can be found in Biscarini et al. [84].
4.2.5. Lactic Acid and Ammonia Quantification
For the analysis of bacterial metabolites (lactic acid and ammonia), 1 g of cecal content was diluted in 1 mL of 1 M perchloric acid and 8 mL of distilled water. After homogenization, tubes were centrifuged for 10 min at 5000 rpm, and the supernatant was transferred to 2 mL eppendorf and frozen at −20 °C until metabolites quantification.
The spectrophotometric method for biological fluids was used for lactic acid determination according to Pryce et al. [90]. Ammonia concentration was detected in accordance with Patton et al. [91]. The spectrophotometer (Shimadzu Corporation UV-2550, Kyoto, Japan) was set at 565 nm and 660 nm respectively. All chemicals were purchased from Sigma Chemical Co (St Louis, MO, USA).
4.2.6. Histology and Histochemistry
Samples of stomach body (fundic mucosa), proximal duodenum, jejunum, and ileum of 5 animals for each experimental group were collected, fixed in 10% formaldehyde in 0.01 M phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) pH 7.4 for 24 h at 4 °C, dehydrated, cleared with xylene, and embedded in paraffin. Microtome sections (4 µm thick) were stained with a) Hematoxylin–Eosin (HE) staining to establish structural details and b) Alcian blue 8GX- pH 2.5-periodic acid-Schiff (AB-PAS), which revealed neutral (PAS-reactive, purple stained) and acid (AB-reactive, azure stained) glycoconjugates. This histochemical reaction selectively evidenced both the intestinal mucous cells and the adherent mucous gel, which is synthesized by the mucous cells and lies upon the mucosal epithelial layer.
5. Conclusions
This study provides novel evidence that the dietary supplementation of flaxseed and fish oil can have a beneficial impact on the composition of gut microbiota and cecal fermentation in rabbits. In particular, n-3 PUFAs supplementation increased some beneficial populations such as Bacteroidetes and Lachnospiraceae while reducing Bacilli and the Firmicutes/Bacteroidetes ratio, usually associated with metabolic disease, opening interesting scenarios about the reduction in the use of antibiotics in rabbit farms. Further studies are warranted to investigate the mechanism of action of n-3 PUFAs and other bioactive components included in flaxseed and fish oil, which favor the modification of the gut microbiota. Targeting the gut microbiota populations composition and its metabolic activity with the diet could be a promising strategy, not only to maintain intestinal homeostasis, but also to control the immune as well as inflammatory response, and consequently, the incidence of gastrointestinal disorders of the rabbit. The appropriate quantity of flaxseed and fish oil to introduce with the diet to favor the right prebiotic action should be, however, optimized.
Acknowledgments
The authors gratefully acknowledge the collaboration and support of Giovanni Migni.
Supplementary Materials
The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/antibiotics11020227/s1, Table S1: Significantly different taxa at the OTU level, Table S2: Abundance of the significantly different taxa according with group and gastrointestinal tract, Table S3: Between-treatment differences along the rabbit’s gastrointestinal tract, Table S4: Coefficient estimates and p-values for the F/B ratio in treatments vs. control (benchmark), from a linear model, which included the effects of tissue and treatment. Table S5: Significance of differences between treatments in terms of Bray–Curtis distances for each section of the rabbit’s digestive tract. Table S6. Fatty acids profile as of control and n-3 enriched diets. Figure S1: Boxplot of the alpha diversity indices in the three groups in the digestive system of rabbits.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, E.C., L.M., A.D.B., C.C., and G.B.; Data curation, F.B., L.M., S.A., S.M., and A.C.M.; Formal analysis, F.B., L.M., S.A., and S.M.; Funding acquisition, A.D.B., F.R., B.C., C.C., and G.B.; Investigation, G.C. (Giulio Curone), F.B., E.C., F.R., P.C., S.M., B.C., A.D.G., A.C.M., S.D., G.C. (Giulia Collodel), S.C.M., and G.B.; Methodology, G.C. (Giulio Curone), E.C., F.R., P.C., S.A., A.D.G., C.C., and G.B.; Project administration, L.M., A.D.B., P.C., S.A., S.C.M., C.C., and G.B.; Resources, A.D.B., B.C., A.D.G., G.C. (Giulia Collodel), S.C.M., C.C., and G.B.; Software, F.B., L.M., S.M., and S.D.; Supervision, L.M., A.D.B., and S.A.; Validation, G.C. (Giulio Curone), B.C., A.Q., G.C. (Giulia Collodel), and S.C.M.; Visualization, F.B., F.R., P.C., A.C.M., S.D., C.C., and G.B.; Writing–original draft, G.C.(Giulio Curone), F.B., E.C., L.M., P.C., S.A., A.D.G., A.Q., and G.B.; Writing–review and editing, E.C., L.M., A.D.B., F.R., S.A., S.M., B.C., A.D.G., A.C.M., S.D., A.Q., and G.B. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
This research received no external funding.
Institutional Review Board Statement
This study was conducted in accordance with the Guiding Principles in the Use of Animals and approved by the Animal Ethics Monitoring Committee of the University of Siena (CEL AOUS; authorization no. 265/2018-PR, ISOPRO 7DF19.23).
Informed Consent Statement
Not applicable.
Data Availability Statement
The data presented in this study are available in the article and Supplementary Materials. Further information is available upon request from the corresponding author.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Footnotes
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
- 1.Kataoka K. The intestinal microbiota and its role in human health and disease. J. Med. Investig. 2016;63:27–37. doi: 10.2152/jmi.63.27. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Flint H.J., Scott K.P., Louis P., Duncan S.H. The role of the gut microbiota in nutrition and health. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2012;9:577–589. doi: 10.1038/nrgastro.2012.156. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Requena T., Martínez-Cuesta M.C., Peláez C. Diet and microbiota linked in health and disease. Food Funct. 2018;9:688–704. doi: 10.1039/C7FO01820G. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Sommer F., Anderson J.M., Bharti R., Raes J., Rosenstiel P. The resilience of the intestinal microbiota influences health and disease. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2017;15:630–638. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro.2017.58. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Cotozzolo E., Cremonesi P., Curone G., Menchetti L., Riva F., Biscarini F., Marongiu M.L., Castrica M., Castiglioni B., Miraglia D., et al. Characterization of bacterial microbiota composition along the gastrointestinal tract in rabbits. Animals. 2020;11:31. doi: 10.3390/ani11010031. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Gouet P., Fonty G. Changes in the digestive microflora of holoxenic rabbits from birth until adulthood. Ann. Biol. Anim. Biochim. Biophys. 1979;19:553–566. doi: 10.1051/rnd:19790501. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Ye X., Zhou L., Zhang Y., Xue S., Gan Q.F., Fang S. Effect of host breeds on gut microbiome and serum metabolome in meat rabbits. BMC Vet. Res. 2021;17:24. doi: 10.1186/s12917-020-02732-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Velasco-Galilea M., Guivernau M., Piles M., Viñas M., Rafel O., Sánchez A., Ramayo-Caldas Y., González-Rodríguez O., Sánchez J.P. Breeding farm, level of feeding and presence of antibiotics in the feed influence rabbit cecal microbiota. Anim. Microbiome. 2020;2:40. doi: 10.1186/s42523-020-00059-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Abecia L., Fondevila M., Balcells J., Lobley G.E., McEwan N.R. The effect of medicated diets and level of feeding on caecal microbiota of lactating rabbit does. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2007;103:787–793. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2007.03309.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Borton M.A., Sabag-Daigle A., Wu J., Solden L.M., O’Banion B.S., Daly R.A., Wolfe R.A., Gonzalez J.F., Wysocki V.H., Ahmer B.M.M., et al. Chemical and pathogen-induced inflammation disrupt the murine intestinal microbiome. Microbiome. 2017;5:47. doi: 10.1186/s40168-017-0264-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Arrazuria R., Pérez V., Molina E., Juste R.A., Khafipour E., Elguezabal N. Diet induced changes in the microbiota and cell composition of rabbit gut associated lymphoid tissue (GALT) Sci. Rep. 2018;8:14103. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-32484-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Mattioli S., Dal Bosco A., Combes S., Moscati L., Crotti S., Mancinelli A.C., Cotozzolo E., Castellini C. Dehydrated alfalfa and fresh grass supply in young rabbits: Effect on performance and caecal microbiota biodiversity. Animals. 2019;9:341. doi: 10.3390/ani9060341. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Cui C., Li Y., Gao H., Zhang H., Han J., Zhang D., Li Y., Zhou J., Lu C., Su X. Modulation of the gut microbiota by the mixture of fish oil and krill oil in high-fat diet-induced obesity mice. PLoS ONE. 2017;12:1–18. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0186216. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Lin L., Zhang J. Role of intestinal microbiota and metabolites on gut homeostasis and human diseases. BMC Immunol. 2017;18:2. doi: 10.1186/s12865-016-0187-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Chan Y.K., Estaki M., Gibson D.L. Clinical consequences of diet-induced dysbiosis. Ann. Nutr. Metab. 2013;63:28–40. doi: 10.1159/000354902. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Ali A., Ponnampalam E.N., Pushpakumara G., Cottrell J.J., Suleria H.A.R., Dunshea F.R. Cinnamon: A natural feed additive for poultry health and production—A review. Animals. 2021;11:2026. doi: 10.3390/ani11072026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Rosell J.M., De La Fuente L.F., Badiola J.I., De Fernandez L.D., Casal J., Saco M. Study of urgent visits to commercial rabbit farms in spain and portugal during 1997-2007. World Rabbit Sci. 2009;17:127–136. doi: 10.4995/wrs.2009.652. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Oneill D.G., Craven H.C., Brodbelt D.C., Church D.B., Hedley J. Morbidity and mortality of domestic rabbits (Oryctolagus cuniculus) under primary veterinary care in England. Vet. Rec. 2020;186:451. doi: 10.1136/vr.105592. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Oglesbee B.L., Lord B. Gastrointestinal diseases of rabbits. In: Carpenter J.W., editor. Ferrets, Rabbits, and Rodents, Clinical Medicine and Surgery. Elsevier-Health Sciences Division; St. Louis, MO, USA: 2020. pp. 174–187. [Google Scholar]
- 20.Fang S., Chen X., Ye X., Zhou L., Xue S., Gan Q. Effects of Gut Microbiome and Short-Chain Fatty Acids (SCFAs) on Finishing Weight of Meat Rabbits. Front. Microbiol. 2020;11:1835. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.01835. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Yeoman C.J., White B.A. Gastrointestinal tract microbiota and probiotics in production animals. Annu. Rev. Anim. Biosci. 2014;2:469–486. doi: 10.1146/annurev-animal-022513-114149. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Fu Y., Wang Y., Gao H., Li D., Jiang R., Ge L., Tong C., Xu K. Associations among Dietary Omega-3 Polyunsaturated Fatty Acids, the Gut Microbiota, and Intestinal Immunity. Mediat. Inflamm. 2021;2021:8879227. doi: 10.1155/2021/8879227. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Bivolarski B.L., Vachkova E.G. Morphological and functional events associated to weaning in rabbits. J. Anim. Physiol. Anim. Nutr. (Berl.) 2014;98:209–221. doi: 10.1111/jpn.12058. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.El-Ashram S., Aboelhadid S.M., Abdel-Kafy E.S.M., Hashem S.A., Mahrous L.N., Farghly E.M., Kamel A.A. Investigation of pre- and post-weaning mortalities in rabbits bred in egypt, with reference to parasitic and bacterial causes. Animals. 2020;10:537. doi: 10.3390/ani10030537. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Rommers J.M., Boiti C., Brecchia G., Meijerhof R., Noordhuizen J.P.T.M., Decuypere E., Kemp B. Metabolic adaptation and hormonal regulation in young rabbit does during long-term caloric restriction and subsequent compensatory growth. Anim. Sci. 2004;79:255–264. doi: 10.1017/S1357729800090111. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Martínez-Paredes E., Ródenas L., Martínez-Vallespín B., Cervera C., Blas E., Brecchia G., Boiti C., Pascual J.J. Effects of feeding programme on the performance and energy balance of nulliparous rabbit does. Animal. 2012;6:1086–1095. doi: 10.1017/S1751731111002643. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Brecchia G., Menchetti L., Cardinali R., Castellini C., Polisca A., Zerani M., Maranesi M., Boiti C. Effects of a bacterial lipopolysaccharide on the reproductive functions of rabbit does. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 2014;147:128–134. doi: 10.1016/j.anireprosci.2014.04.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Boiti C., Canali C., Brecchia G., Zanon F., Facchin E. Effects of induced endometritis on the life-span of corpora lutea in pseudopregnant rabbits and incidence of spontaneous uterine infections related to fertility of breeding does. Theriogenology. 1999;52:1123–1132. doi: 10.1016/S0093-691X(99)00204-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Parillo F., Zerani M., Maranesi M., Dall’Aglio C., Galeati G., Brecchia G., Boiti C., González-Mariscal G. Ovarian hormones and fasting differentially regulate pituitary receptors for estrogen and gonadotropin-releasing hormone in rabbit female. Microsc. Res. Tech. 2014;77:201–210. doi: 10.1002/jemt.22328. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Boiti C., Guelfi G., Zerani M., Zampini D., Brecchia G., Gobbetti A. Expression patterns of cytokines, p53 and nitric oxide synthase isoenzymes in corpora lutea of pseudopregnant rabbits during spontaneous luteolysis. Reproduction. 2004;127:229–238. doi: 10.1530/rep.1.00083. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Collodel G., Moretti E., Brecchia G., Kuželová L., Arruda J., Mourvaki E., Castellini C. Cytokines release and oxidative status in semen samples from rabbits treated with bacterial lipopolysaccharide. Theriogenology. 2015;83:1233–1240. doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2015.01.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Brecchia G., Sulce M., Curone G., Barbato O., Canali C., Troisi A., Munga A., Polisca A., Agradi S., Ceccarini M.R., et al. Goji Berry (Lycium barbarum) Supplementation during Pregnancy Influences Insulin Sensitivity in Rabbit Does but Not in Their Offspring. Animals. 2022;12:39. doi: 10.3390/ani12010039. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Castellini C., Mattioli S., Signorini C., Cotozzolo E., Noto D., Moretti E., Brecchia G., Dal Bosco A., Belmonte G., Durand T., et al. Effect of Dietary n-3 Source on Rabbit Male Reproduction. Oxidative Med. Cell. Longev. 2019;2019:3279670. doi: 10.1155/2019/3279670. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Menchetti L., Barbato O., Sforna M., Vigo D., Mattioli S., Curone G., Tecilla M., Riva F., Brecchia G. Effects of Diets Enriched in Linseed and Fish Oil on the Expression Pattern of Toll-Like Receptors 4 and Proinflammatory Cytokines on Gonadal Axis and Reproductive Organs in Rabbit Buck. Oxidative Med. Cell. Longev. 2020;2020:4327470. doi: 10.1155/2020/4327470. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Andoni E., Curone G., Agradi S., Barbato O., Menchetti L., Vigo D., Zelli R., Cotozzolo E., Ceccarini M.R., Faustini M., et al. Effect of Goji Berry (Lycium barbarum) Supplementation on Reproductive Performance of Rabbit Does. Animals. 2021;11:1672. doi: 10.3390/ani11061672. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Menchetti L., Canali C., Castellini C., Boiti C., Brecchia G. The different effects of linseed and fish oil supplemented diets on insulin sensitivity of rabbit does during pregnancy. Res. Vet. Sci. 2018;118:126–133. doi: 10.1016/j.rvsc.2018.01.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Menchetti L., Vecchione L., Filipescu I., Petrescu V.F., Fioretti B., Beccari T., Ceccarini M.R., Codini M., Quattrone A., Trabalza-Marinucci M., et al. Effects of Goji berries supplementation on the productive performance of rabbit. Livest. Sci. 2019;220:123–128. doi: 10.1016/j.livsci.2018.12.016. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Alagawany M., Abd El-Hack M.E., Al-Sagheer A.A., Naiel M.A., Saadeldin I.M., Swelum A.A. Dietary cold pressed watercress and coconut oil mixture enhances growth performance, intestinal microbiota, antioxidant status, and immunity of growing rabbits. Animals. 2018;8:212. doi: 10.3390/ani8110212. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Costantini L., Molinari R., Farinon B., Merendino N. Impact of omega-3 fatty acids on the gut microbiota. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2017;18:2645. doi: 10.3390/ijms18122645. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Rodríguez M., Rebollar P.G., Mattioli S., Castellini C. n-3 PUFA sources (precursor/products): A review of current knowledge on rabbit. Animals. 2019;9:806. doi: 10.3390/ani9100806. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Robertson R.C., Kaliannan K., Strain C.R., Ross R.P., Stanton C., Kang J.X. Maternal omega-3 fatty acids regulate offspring obesity through persistent modulation of gut microbiota. Microbiome. 2018;6:95. doi: 10.1186/s40168-018-0476-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Parolini C. Effects of fish n-3 PUFAs on intestinal microbiota and immune system. Mar. Drugs. 2019;17:374. doi: 10.3390/md17060374. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.De Mello A.H., Uberti M.F., De Farias B.X., De Souza N.A.R., Rezin G.T. N-3 PUFA and obesity: From peripheral tissues to the central nervous system. Br. J. Nutr. 2018;119:1312–1323. doi: 10.1017/S0007114518000429. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.He Z., Hao W., Kwek E., Lei L., Liu J., Zhu H., Ma K.Y., Zhao Y., Ho H.M., He W.S., et al. Fish Oil Is More Potent than Flaxseed Oil in Modulating Gut Microbiota and Reducing Trimethylamine- N-oxide-Exacerbated Atherogenesis. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2019;67:13635–13647. doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.9b06753. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Cichońska P., Pudło E., Wojtczak A., Ziarno M. Effect of the addition of whole and milled flaxseed on the quality characteristics of yogurt. Foods. 2021;10:2140. doi: 10.3390/foods10092140. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Mattioli S., Castellini C., Mancini S., Roscini V., Cartoni Mancinelli A., Cotozzolo E., Pauselli M., Dal Bosco A. Effect of trub and/or linseed dietary supplementation on in vivo oxidative status and some quality traits of rabbit meat. Meat Sci. 2020;163:108061. doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2020.108061. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Lauridsen C. Effects of dietary fatty acids on gut health and function of pigs pre- And post-weaning. J. Anim. Sci. 2020;98:skaa086. doi: 10.1093/jas/skaa086. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Machate D.J., Figueiredo P.S., Marcelino G., Guimarães R.d.C.A., Hiane P.A., Bogo D., Pinheiro V.A.Z., de Oliveira L.C.S., Pott A. Fatty acid diets: Regulation of gut microbiota composition and obesity and its related metabolic dysbiosis. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020;21:4093. doi: 10.3390/ijms21114093. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Noriega B.S., Sanchez-Gonzalez M.A., Salyakina D., Coffman J. Understanding the Impact of Omega-3 Rich Diet on the Gut Microbiota. Case Rep. Med. 2016;2016:3089303. doi: 10.1155/2016/3089303. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Zeyda M., Staffler G., Hořejší V., Waldhäusl W., Stulnig T.M. LAT displacement from lipid rafts as a molecular mechanism for the inhibition of T cell signaling by polyunsaturated fatty acids. J. Biol. Chem. 2002;277:28418–28423. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M203343200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Husson M.O., Ley D., Portal C., Gottrand M., Hueso T., Desseyn J.L., Gottrand F. Modulation of host defence against bacterial and viral infections by omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids. J. Infect. 2016;73:523–535. doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2016.10.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Liao X., Shao Y., Sun G., Yang Y., Zhang L., Guo Y., Luo X., Lu L. The relationship among gut microbiota, short-chain fatty acids, and intestinal morphology of growing and healthy broilers. Poult. Sci. 2020;99:5883–5895. doi: 10.1016/j.psj.2020.08.033. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Fu X., Zeng B., Wang P., Wang L., Wen B., Li Y., Liu H., Bai S., Jia G. Microbiome of total versus live bacteria in the gut of Rex rabbits. Front. Microbiol. 2018;9:733. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.00733. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Crowley E.J., King J.M., Wilkinson T., Worgan H.J., Huson K.M., Rose M.T., McEwan N.R. Comparison of the microbial population in rabbits and guinea pigs by next generation sequencing. PLoS ONE. 2017;12:e0165779. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0165779. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Yu H.-N., Zhu J., Pan W.-s., Shen S.-R., Shan W.-G., Das U.N. Effects of Fish Oil with a High Content of n-3 Polyunsaturated Fatty Acids on Mouse Gut Microbiota. Arch. Med. Res. 2014;45:195–202. doi: 10.1016/j.arcmed.2014.03.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Yang Q., Xing Y., Qiao C., Liu W., Jiang H., Fu Q., Zhou Y., Yang B., Zhang Z., Chen R. Semen quality improvement in boars fed with supplemental wolfberry (Lycium barbarum) Anim. Sci. J. 2019;90:1517–1522. doi: 10.1111/asj.13295. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Gibiino G., Lopetuso L.R., Scaldaferri F., Rizzatti G., Binda C., Gasbarrini A. Exploring Bacteroidetes: Metabolic key points and immunological tricks of our gut commensals. Dig. Liver Dis. 2018;50:635–639. doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2018.03.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Wit N.D., Derrien M., Bosch-vermeulen H., Oosterink E., Keshtkar S., Duval C., Bosch J.D.V.D., Kleerebezem M., Müller M., Van Der Meer R., et al. Saturated fat stimulates obesity and hepatic steatosis and affects gut microbiota composition by an enhanced overflow of dietary fat to the distal intestine. Am. J. Physiol. Liver. 2012;303:589–599. doi: 10.1152/ajpgi.00488.2011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Fassarella M., Blaak E.E., Penders J., Nauta A., Smidt H., Zoetendal E.G. Gut microbiome stability and resilience: Elucidating the response to perturbations in order to modulate gut health. Gut. 2021;70:595–605. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2020-321747. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Taibi A., Ku M., Lin Z., Gargari G., Kubant A., Lepp D., Power K.A., Guglielmetti S., Thompson L.U., Comelli E.M. Discriminatory and cooperative effects within the mouse gut microbiota in response to flaxseed and its oil and lignan components. J. Nutr. Biochem. 2021;98:1–9. doi: 10.1016/j.jnutbio.2021.108818. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Colina J.J., Lewis A.J., Miller P.S., Fischer R.L. Dietary manipulation to reduce aerial ammonia concentrations in nursery pig facilities. J. Anim. Sci. 2001;79:3096–3103. doi: 10.2527/2001.79123096x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Aarnink A.J.A., Sutton A.L., Canh T.T., Verstegen M.W., Langhouth D.J. Dietary factors affecting ammonia and odour release from pig manure. In: Lyons T.P., editor. Proceedings of the Alltech’s 14th Annual Symposium. Nottingham University Press; Nottingham, UK: 1998. p. 45. [Google Scholar]
- 63.Fraga M.J. Protein digestion. In: De Blas C., Wiseman J., editors. The Nutrition of the Rabbit. CABI Publishing; Wallingford, UK: 1998. pp. 39–53. [Google Scholar]
- 64.El-Moghazy M., Zedan N.S., El-Atrsh A.M., El-Gogary M., Tousson E. The possible effect of diets containing fish oil (omega-3) on hematological, biochemical and histopathogical alterations of rabbit liver and kidney. Biomed. Prev. Nutr. 2014;4:371–377. doi: 10.1016/j.bionut.2014.03.005. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Kapoor B., Kapoor D., Gautam S., Singh R., Bhardwaj S. Dietary Polyunsaturated Fatty Acids (PUFAs): Uses and Potential Health Benefits. Curr. Nutr. Rep. 2021;10:232–242. doi: 10.1007/s13668-021-00363-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Friday K.E., Childs M.T., Tsunehara C.H., Fujimoto W.Y., Bierman E.L., Ensinck J.W. Elevated plasma glucose and lowered triglyceride levels from omega-3 fatty acid supplementation in type II diabetes. Diabetes Care. 1989;12:276–281. doi: 10.2337/diacare.12.4.276. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.McEwen B.J., Morel-Kopp M.C., Chen W., Tofler G.H., Ward C.M. Effects of omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids on platelet function in healthy subjects and subjects with cardiovascular disease. Semin. Thromb. Hemost. 2013;39:25–32. doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1333309. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Morris M.C., Sacks F., Rosner B. Does fish oil lower blood pressure? A meta-analysis of controlled trials. Circulation. 1993;88:523–533. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.88.2.523. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Ramos C.I., Andrade de Lima A.F., Grilli D.G., Cuppari L. The Short-Term Effects of Olive Oil and Flaxseed Oil for the Treatment of Constipation in Hemodialysis Patients. J. Ren. Nutr. 2015;25:50–56. doi: 10.1053/j.jrn.2014.07.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Chris Bradberry J., Hilleman D.E. Overview of omega-3 fatty acid therapies. Pharm. Ther. 2013;38:681–691. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Iwakiri K., Kobayashi M., Kotoyori M., Yamada H., Sugiura T., Nakagawa Y. Relationship between postprandial esophageal acid exposure and meal volume and fat content. Dig. Dis. Sci. 1996;41:926–930. doi: 10.1007/BF02091532. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Clarke J.T.R., Cullen-Dean G., Regelink E., Chan L., Rose V. Increased incidence of epistaxis in adolescents with familial hypercholesterolemia treated with fish oil. J. Pediatr. 1990;116:139–141. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3476(05)81666-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Khan F., Elherik K., Bolton-Smith C., Barr R., Hill A., Murrie I., Belch J.J.F. The effects of dietary fatty acid supplementation on endothelial function and vascular tone in healthy subjects. Cardiovasc. Res. 2003;59:955–962. doi: 10.1016/S0008-6363(03)00395-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Engler M.B., Engler M.M. Docosahexaenoic Acid-Induced Vasorelaxation in Hypertensive Rats: Mechanisms of Action. Biol. Res. Nurs. 2000;2:85–95. doi: 10.1177/109980040000200202. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Limbu R., Cottrell G.S., McNeish A.J. Characterisation of the vasodilation effects of DHA and EPA, n-3 PUFAs (fish oils), in rat aorta and mesenteric resistance arteries. PLoS ONE. 2018;13:e0192484. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0192484. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Dal Bosco A., Castellini C., Martino M., Mattioli S., Marconi O., Sileoni V., Ruggeri S., Tei F., Benincasa P. The effect of dietary alfalfa and flax sprouts on rabbit meat antioxidant content, lipid oxidation and fatty acid composition. Meat Sci. 2015;106:31–37. doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2015.03.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Caporaso J.G., Lauber C.L., Walters W.A., Berg-Lyons D., Lozupone C.A., Turnbaugh P.J., Fierer N., Knight R. Global patterns of 16S rRNA diversity at a depth of millions of sequences per sample. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2011;108:4516–4522. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1000080107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Andrews S. FastQC—A Quality Control Tool for High Throughput Sequence Data. [(accessed on 20 November 2020)]. Available online: http://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/fastqc/
- 79.John J.S. SeqPrep: Tool for Stripping Adaptors and/or Merging Paired Reads with Overlap into Single Reads. [(accessed on 20 November 2020)]. Available online: https://githubcom/jstjohn/SeqPrep.
- 80.Yilmaz P., Parfrey L.W., Yarza P., Gerken J., Pruesse E., Quast C., Schweer T., Peplies J., Ludwig W., Glöckner F.O. The SILVA and “all-species Living Tree Project (LTP)” taxonomic frameworks. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014;42:D643–D648. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkt1209. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Quast C., Pruesse E., Yilmaz P., Gerken J., Schweer T., Yarza P., Peplies J., Glöckner F.O. The SILVA ribosomal RNA gene database project: Improved data processing and web-based tools. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013;41:D590–D596. doi: 10.1093/nar/gks1219. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Weizhong L., Godzik A. Cd-hit: A fast program for clustering and comparing large sets of protein or nucleotide sequences. Bioinformatics. 2006;22:1658–1659. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btl158. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Caporaso J.G., Kuczynski J., Stombaugh J., Bittinger K., Bushman F.D., Costello E.K., Fierer N., Pẽa A.G., Goodrich J.K., Gordon J.I., et al. QIIME allows analysis of high-throughput community sequencing data. Nat. Methods. 2010;7:335–336. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.f.303. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Biscarini F., Palazzo F., Castellani F., Masetti G., Grotta L., Cichelli A., Martino G. Rumen microbiome in dairy calves fed copper and grape-pomace dietary supplementations: Composition and predicted functional profile. PLoS ONE. 2018;13:e0205670. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0205670. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Fisher R.A., Corbet A.S., Williams C.B. The Relation Between the Number of Species and the Number of Individuals in a Random Sample of an Animal Population. J. Anim. Ecol. 1943;12:42. doi: 10.2307/1411. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Chao A. Nonparametric estimation of the number of classes in a population. Scand. J. Stat. 1984;11:265–270. doi: 10.2307/4615964. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Smith B., Wilson J.B. A Consumer’s Guide to Evenness Indices. Oikos. 1996;76:70. doi: 10.2307/3545749. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Bray J.R., Curtis J.T. An Ordination of the Upland Forest Communities of Southern Wisconsin. Ecol. Monogr. 1957;27:325–349. doi: 10.2307/1942268. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Paulson J.N., Colin Stine O., Bravo H.C., Pop M. Differential abundance analysis for microbial marker-gene surveys. Nat. Methods. 2013;10:1200–1202. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2658. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Pryce J.D. A modification of the Barker-Summerson method for the determination of lactic acid. Analyst. 1969;94:1151–1152. doi: 10.1039/an9699401151. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Patton C.J., Crouch S.R. Spectrophotometric and Kinetics Investigation of the Berthelot Reaction for the Determination of Ammonia. Anal. Chem. 1977;49:469. doi: 10.1021/ac50011a034. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The data presented in this study are available in the article and Supplementary Materials. Further information is available upon request from the corresponding author.