Skip to main content
Cancers logoLink to Cancers
. 2022 Feb 9;14(4):866. doi: 10.3390/cancers14040866

Circular RNAs and Drug Resistance in Genitourinary Cancers: A Literature Review

Gongwei Long 1,2,, Siquan Ma 1,2,, Runlin Shi 3, Yi Sun 1,2, Zhiquan Hu 1,2,*, Ke Chen 1,2,*
Editor: Margarete Odenthal
PMCID: PMC8869870  PMID: 35205613

Abstract

Simple Summary

Drug resistance to systematic treatment in genitourinary tumors severely aggravated the burden on patients and society. Multiple mechanisms were involved in drug resistance. As typical non-coding RNAs, circRNAs play a critical role in the onset and development of cancers and several studies implied their function in the regulation of drug resistance. Here, we reviewed the investigations of circRNAs’ behavior in drug resistance of genitourinary cancers and summarized the underlying mechanisms. This review emphasized the essential role of circRNAs in drug resistance development and also pointed out the potential topics that need further investigations in the future.

Abstract

In recent years, systematic treatment has made great progress in genitourinary tumors. However, some patients develop resistance to the treatments, resulting in an increase in mortality. Circular RNAs (circRNAs) form a class of non-coding RNAs with high stability and significant clinical relevance. Accumulating evidence indicates that circRNAs play a vital role in cancer development and tumor chemotherapy resistance. This review summarizes the molecular and cellular mechanisms of drug resistance mediated by circRNAs to common drugs used in the treatment of genitourinary tumors. Several circRNAs were identified to regulate the responsiveness to systemic treatments in genitourinary tumors, including chemotherapies such as cisplatin and targeted therapies such as enzalutamide. Canonically, cicrRNAs participate in the competing endogenous RNA (ceRNA) network, or in some cases directly interact with proteins, regulate downstream pathways, and even some circRNAs have the potential to produce proteins or polypeptides. Several cellular mechanisms were involved in circRNA-dependent drug resistance, including autophagy, cancer stem cells, epithelial-mesenchymal transition, and exosomes. The potential clinical prospect of circRNAs in regulating tumor drug resistance was also discussed.

Keywords: circular RNA, drug resistance, renal cell carcinoma, bladder cancer, prostate cancer

1. Introduction

Genitourinary cancers, including renal cell carcinoma (RCC), bladder cancer (BCa), prostate cancer (PCa), and other less common cancers, were estimated to have 362,860 newly diagnosed cases and lead to 68,030 deaths in the United States in 2020 [1]; especially since PCa has the greatest number of new cases and the 2nd greatest number of deaths in men, and BCa ranked 4th in new cases and 8th in deaths in men. Radical treatments with curative purposes were recommended for early-stage cancers, such as radical and partial nephrectomy for RCC [2], transurethral resection of bladder tumors and radical cystectomy for BCa [3,4], as well as radical prostatectomy (RP) and radical radiation therapy (RT) for PCa [5], but when the cancers progressed to advanced or even metastatic stages, the cancers are no longer curable by surgical treatments and systemic therapy would be the primary choice that could effectively extend survival [6,7,8]. Nevertheless, systemic therapy resistance is inevitable for some patients, which is a serious obstacle in cancer management, and behind it is a complex process involving multiple mechanisms.

Circular RNA (circRNA) is a typical class of non-coding RNAs that were produced in the back-splicing process between the 5′ splice donor and 3′ splice acceptor site of precursor messenger RNA (mRNA), which forms a closed circular structure (Figure 1) [9]. Due to different splicing processes, three main types of circRNAs were generated, including exonic circRNAs (ecircRNAs), exon-intron circRNAs (EIciRNAs), and circular intronic RNAs (ciRNAs) [10]. The back-splicing is less efficient than canonical splicing, therefore both cis-elements and trans-factors are required. Studies have reported that the circRNAs generation can be facilitated by either RNA pairing of reversely complementary sequences across their flanking introns [11] or proteins binding to pre-mRNAs to bridge flanking introns together [12]. In cancers, the more frequent chromosomal translocations induce the formation of cancer-specific fusion circRNAs [13], while aberrantly expressed splicing factor also regulates the biogenesis of circRNAs in cancer [14].

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Biogenesis and function of circRNAs. CircRNAs were generated by back splicing of precursor mRNAs, and they can be classified as exonic circRNAs (ecircRNAs), exon-intron circRNAs (EIciRNAs), and circular intronic RNAs (ciRNAs) based on the introns or exons it contains. Typically, circRNAs sponge micro RNAs and rescue their repression of downstream mRNAs. RISC: RNA-induced silencing complex.

With the rapid development of high-throughput sequencing technologies and novel approaches of functional characterization, the identification and relevant mechanisms of circRNAs have been widely explored [15]. RNA-sequencing (with or without RNase R) could identify novel circRNAs and well-designed microarrays, which are also efficient tools for circRNA profiling [16]. For already known circRNAs, experimental approaches, including PCR [17], northern blotting [18], and RNA fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) [19], are feasible for the validation and quantification of circRNAs. The best-studied mechanism of circRNA function is the competing endogenous RNA (ceRNA) network, in which circRNAs sponge micro RNAs (miRNAs) and regulate the downstream messenger RNA (mRNA) level (Figure 1). Other mechanisms, including interacting with RNA binding proteins (RBPs) [20], regulating transcription or splicing [12,19], and translating proteins [21], were also increasingly studied.

Evidence suggested that circRNAs were involved in the onset and development of several diseases, such as cardiovascular [22], endocrinous [23], and neurological diseases [24]. They also play important roles in the progression of genitourinary cancers [25,26,27]. However, the exploration of circRNAs’ involvement in drug resistance of genitourinary cancers was limited. Here, we summarized the recent progress in the understanding of the functions and mechanisms of circRNAs in drug resistance of genitourinary cancers. A graphical illustration is provided in Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Functional circRNAs and their mechanisms in the development of chemotherapy and radiotherapy resistance in genitourinary. Mostly, circRNAs bind the miRNAs, thus preventing the latter from regulating their mRNA targets. Rarely, circRNAs directly interact with proteins to perform their functions. The blue/red arrow presents the effect on drug sensitivity if the circRNAs are overexpressed. Circ_CCNB2 and hsa_circ_0035483 are identical and share the same color. EMT: epithelial–mesenchymal transition.

2. CircRNAs and Drug Resistance in RCC

RCC is the most common type of kidney malignancy and the incidence of RCC is increasing, with an incidence of 4.4 per 100,000 for both sexes [27,28,29,30]. Most patients with RCC have local tumors without distant metastasis, the gold standard of treatment for this subset of patients is nephrectomy [31]. In contrast, there are still some patients who have had tumor metastasis at the time of diagnosis or recurrence after nephrectomy and systemic treatment should be applied for them [32]. Since renal cancers are not sensitive to radiotherapy and chemotherapy, targeted therapy and immunotherapy have been developed [33,34]. The initial first-generation immunotherapy targeting cytokines presented poor outcomes, while the tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) greatly improved the prognosis and became the first-line therapy for advanced and metastatic RCC [35].

2.1. Gemcitabine Resistance in RCC

Gemcitabine, an analog of cytosine arabinoside, is an anti-tumor drug combating a wide range of diseases [36]. Gemcitabine has been used as a combination chemotherapy regimen for pancreatic cancer [37], BCa [38], non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) [39], biliary tract cancer [40], and cervical cancer [41]. As a single agent, gemcitabine could give an effective response rate of up to 31% in advanced RCC [42]. About a quarter of sarcomatoid and poor-risk RCC patients responded to the combination of gemcitabine and sunitinib [43]. Unfortunately, gemcitabineresistance occurs after use for a period of time [44,45].

Yan et al. found that upregulation of hsa_circ_0035483 promotes the drug resistance of renal cancer cells to gemcitabine, mainly hsa_circ_0035483 sponging hsa-miR-335, resulting in upregulated expression of Cyclin B1 (CCNB1) and thus promoting tumor growth and autophagy induced by gemcitabine in renal cancer cells [46]. Moreover, Cai et al. demonstrated that knockdown of Circ_CCNB2 (circBase ID: hsa_circ_0035483) can increase the radiosensitivity of PCa through repressing autophagy by the miR-30b-5p/Kinesin Family Member 18A (KIF18A) axis [47].

2.2. Sunitinib Resistance in RCC

Sunitinib, with strong anti-angiogenesis and direct anti-tumor activity, is a multi-target TKI. Its anti-tumor effect is mainly competitive with Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF) to bind tyrosine kinase receptors, thus reducing angiogenesis—as angiogenesis is necessary for tumor growth [48]. Renal cell carcinoma is a highly vascularized tumor. The inactivation of the Von Hippel–Lindau Tumor Suppressor (VHL) gene and the activation of Hypoxia-Inducible Factor (HIF) promote the production of VEGF, while sunitinib blocks this process and plays an anti-tumor role [49]. Benefitting from the sunitinib, the overall survival of metastatic RCC has improved from 13 months in the cytokine era to 30 months [50]. For favorable-risk metastatic RCC patients, sunitinib is still the first-line systemic therapy [2].

Huang et al. found that the expression of cicrSNX6 (hsa_circ_0031607) was up-regulated in sunitinib-resistant renal cancer cell lines by RNA-seq, and verified that circSNX6 can sponge miR-1184 and inhibit Glycerophosphocholine Phosphodiesterase 1 (GPCPD1), and then increased the content of Lysophosphatidic Acid (LPA) in cells, which eventually led to the enhancement of drug resistance of renal cancer cells to sunitinib [51]. The expression of circSNX6 was also significantly upregulated in hepatocellular carcinoma and its function in hepatocellular carcinoma has not been determined [52].

3. CircRNAs and Drug Resistance in BCa

BCa ranks fourth among male malignant tumors and is more common in female malignancies. According to statistics, there are about 81,400 new cases and 17,980 deaths from BCa in the United States in 2020 [1]. Based on the depth of BCa invasion, BCa could be divided into non-muscular invasive BCa (NMIBC) and muscular invasive BCa (MIBC) and more than two-thirds of BCa belong to NMIBC [53]. The main treatment of NMIBC is transurethral resection of the bladder tumor plus intravesical chemotherapy, such as gemcitabine and doxorubicin, while MIBC patients are usually treated with radical cystectomy and neoadjuvant chemotherapy [54]. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy has also evolved over the past few decades. Methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin (MVAC) were used in the treatment of BCa since 1985, but, in recent years, patients with gemcitabine plus cisplatin (GC) neoadjuvant chemotherapy showed better tolerance than the former [55]. The new combination of cisplatin adjuvant chemotherapy improves the overall survival of patients. Combination chemotherapy based on cisplatin is currently the first-line therapy option for advanced and metastatic BCa [4].

3.1. Gemcitabine and Doxorubicin Resistance in BCa

Gemcitabine plus cisplatin has become one of the neoadjuvant chemotherapy regimens before radical cystectomy and has improved the survival rate of patients with BCa [56]. Gemcitabine is also used for some moderate-risk superficial NMIBC [57]. Huang et al. found that the high expression of circRNA hsa_circ_103809 in BCa increased tumor resistance to gemcitabine. Hsa_circ_103809 acts as the sponge of miR-516a-5p, resulting in the upregulation of F-box and Leucine-rich Repeat Protein 18 (FBXL18) expression, thus promoting tumor drug resistance [58]. The expression of hsa_circ_103809 is also increased in gastric cancer [59] and breast cancer [60], which regulates cell migration and invasion by binding to miR-101-3p and PI3K/Akt, respectively. However, in hepatocellular carcinoma and colorectal cancer (CRC), the expression of hsa_circ_103809 is downregulated and its overexpression can inhibit the progression of cancer cells [61,62].

Unlike the elevated expression of hsa_circ_103809 in BCa, circHIPK3 (hsa_circ_0000284) is downregulated in BCa and its expression can promote the sensitivity to gemcitabine [63]. The expression of circHIPK3 also negatively correlates with pathological grade and lymph node metastatic status. Moreover, circHIPK3 expression could serve as an independent prognostic biomarker for disease-free survival of BCa patients. In other tumors, circHIPK3 can also manipulate drug sensitivity. In pancreatic cancer, circHIPK3 sponging miR-330-5p promotes the expression of the Ras-associated Domain Family 1 (RASSF1), which leads to resistance to gemcitabine [64]. In addition, circHIPK3 also regulates the drug resistance of breast cancer cells to paclitaxel through the circHIPK3/miR-1286/Hexokinase 2 (HK2) axis [65]. Circ-HIPK3 is highly expressed in temozolomide-resistant glioma cells and promotes tumor growth and drug resistance [66]. At the same time, circHIPK3 can also regulate the resistance of CRC to oxaliplatin through the autophagy pathway [67].

Circ_VANGL1 (hsa_circ_0002623) can promote the growth of BCa and doxorubicin resistance, the mechanism is that circ_VANGL1 reduces miR-145 and promotes the expression of SRY-box Transcription Factor 4 (SOX4), and knockout of circ_VANGL1 can have the opposite effect [68]. In addition to the above axis, circ_VANGL1 can also sponge miR-605-3p, promote the expression of VANGL Planar Cell Polarity Protein 1 (VANGL1), and facilitate the progression of BCa [69]. Circ_VANGL1 also regulates the progression of non-tumor diseases, and its expression is downregulated in osteoporosis, when compared with non-osteoporosis patients. Mechanically, Circ_VANGL1 can absorb miRNA-217, which can target the 3’-UTR region of RUNX Family Transcription Factor 2 (RUNX2), thus promoting osteogenic differentiation [70].

3.2. Cisplatin Resistance in BCa

Cisplatin is a recognized antineoplastic drug, and its mechanism is generally believed to be that it binds to genomic DNA and then interferes with normal transcription or DNA replication, resulting in cancer cell death [71]. For advanced and metastatic BCa, cisplatin-based chemotherapy is currently the first-line therapy for advanced and metastatic BCa [4]. For MIBC, neoadjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy might bring a downgrade of disease and improved prognosis [72,73]. A meta-analysis of adjuvant treatment trials has shown a 25% reduction in risk of death with cisplatin-based adjuvant treatment [74]. However, almost half of the patients would experience progression under the GC or dose-dense MVAC regimen within 3 years [75]. Cisplatin resistance prevents these patients from having satisfying outcomes.

Circ_0008399 (hsa_circ_0008399), a newly found circRNA in BCa, binds to the Wilms’ Tumor 1-Associating Protein (WATP) and promotes the expression of TNF α-inducible Protein 3 (TNFAIP3) by increasing its mRNA stability in an m6A-dependent manner, resulting in cisplatin resistance [76]. TNFAIP3 is described as an anti-apoptotic protein that inhibits TNF-induced apoptosis, and knockdown of it could also promote apoptosis in cisplatin-resistant BCa cells upon cisplatin treatment [77]. Su et al. verified that CircELP3 (hsa_circ_0001785) may promote cisplatin resistance in BCa by targeting tumor stem-like cells [78]. Not only that, but hsa_circ_102336 can also promote cisplatin resistance through the sponging of miR-515-5p [79], and another circRNA, circFNTA (hsa_circ_0084171), has a similar function by regulating the miR-370-3p/Farnesyltransferase Subunit Alpha (FNTA)/KRAS axis [80]. In addition, miRNA-451a is downregulated by circ-FNTA, and the effect of miRNA-451a is to reduce the level of Sphingosine-1-phosphate Receptor 3 (S1PR3). The increase of circ-FNTA promotes the progression and chemo-resistance of BCa [81].

Conversely, circLIFR (hsa_circ_0072309) augmented the interaction between MutSα and ATM, ultimately contributing to stabilizing the p73 protein level [82]. Vascular smooth muscle (VSMCs) dysfunction is the key to the occurrence and development of intracranial aneurysms. CircLIFR regulates the function of VSMCs through the miR-1299/Kinase Insert Domain Receptor (KDR) axis, including migration, invasion, and apoptosis [83].

Cerebellar Degeneration-associated Protein 1 Antisense RNA (CDR1as, also known as ciRS-7, circBase ID: hsa_circ_0001946), as one of the most widespread circRNA, plays an important role in the occurrence and development of many kinds of tumors [84]. CDR1as regulates the resistance of BCa to cisplatin by regulating the miR-1270/Apoptotic Protease-Activating Factor 1 (APAF1) axis [85,86]. CDR1as also promotes the resistance of NSCLC to cisplatin through miR-641/Homeobox Protein Hox-A9 (HOXA9) pathway [87], while in ovarian cancer it shows the opposite effect through the miR-1270/Suppressor of Cancer Cell Invasion (SCAI) signal pathway [88]. In addition to cisplatin, CDR1as contributes to drug resistance to other chemotherapies. In lung adenocarcinoma cells, the expression of CDR1as is positively correlated with resistance to pemetrexed and cisplatin, and the mechanism of drug resistance is mainly through the EGFR/PI3K signal pathway [89]. Yang et al. verified that CDR1as is upregulated in 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)-resistant breast cancer cells. It can bind to miR-7 to further regulate Cyclin E1 (CCNE1). Inhibition of CDR1as can increase the chemosensitivity of breast cancer cells to 5-FU [90].

Chi et al. measured the expression of hsa_circ_0000285 by quantitative PCR and found that it was significantly reduced in BCa tissues and serum compared to adjacent tissues and healthy controls [91]. It was further lowered in cisplatin-resistant BCa patients than cisplatin-sensitive and it can be an independent prognostic factor for the outcomes of BCa patients [91].

4. CircRNAs and Drug Resistance in PCa

Localized PCa could be curatively managed by RP or RT. Unfortunately, about 20–40% of post-RP patients [92,93] and 30–50% of post-RT patients [94] will experience biochemical recurrence within 10 years. Meanwhile, approximately 4% of PCa patients have metastatic disease at the time of diagnosis in western countries [95], and the incidence would be much higher in China [96]. For relapsing and de novo metastatic patients, androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) is the recommended therapy, and it could significantly reduce serum testosterone and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels [97]. However, most patients would progress from a hormone-sensitive state (HSPC) to castration-resistant PCa (CRPC) within 2–3 years [98]. The taxanes, such as docetaxel and novel androgen receptor signaling inhibitors (ARSi) including abiraterone, enzalutamide, and apalutamide, could extend the survival of CRPC [99,100], and this indication was further expanded to high-risk metastatic HSPC patients [101,102,103,104].

4.1. ADT Resistance in PCa

The transition from HSPC to CRPC is the critical milestone of PCa development and the two stages present different genomic landscapes [105,106]. Using a high throughput micro-array assay on a panel of prostate cell lines, Greene et al. identified several circRNAs that are associated with androgen independence [107]. Luo et al. found an androgen receptor (AR) circular RNA, called circAR3, that is widely expressed in PCa and reduced when tumors progressed to CRPC [108]. Interestingly, circAR3 correlates with clinical parameters such as Gleasons score and treatments but does not affect AR signaling, PCa cell proliferation, and invasion. Furthermore, Cao et al. identified 13 upregulated circRNAs generated from the AR in CRPC, and their expression correlated strongly with that of the linear AR transcripts [109]. These studies revealed the different circRNA profiles in CRPC and HSPC, but the roles of these circRNAs in the progression to CRPC need further investigation.

4.2. Docetaxel Resistance in PCa

Docetaxel has been applied to CRPC since the 1990s and the mechanism behind its resistance is the most well-studied [110]. Hsa_circ_0000735 was upregulated in docetaxel-resistant PCa and knockdown of it boosted docetaxel sensitivity, constrained viability and progression, and fostered apoptosis of docetaxel-resistant PCa cells [111]. Mechanistically, miR-7 is sponged by hsa_circ_0000735, and downstream targets including Multidrug Resistance Protein 1 (MDR1), CyclinD1, and B Cell Lymphoma 2 (BCL-2) were reduced after hsa_circ_0000735 interference. Additionally, hsa_circ_0000735 was found to be involved in docetaxel-resistance in ovarian cancer via the hsa_circ_0000735/miR-546b/Dickkopf-related protein 4 (DKK4)/P-glycoprotein (p-GP) axis [112]. It can also enhance proliferation, migration, invasion, and glycolysis of NSCLC cells by targeting the miR-940/Bone Morphogenetic Protein Binding Endothelial Cell Precursor-Derived Regulator (BMPER) axis [113].

Similarly, circ_0057558 (has_ circ_0057558) could sponge miR-206, thereby regulating the Ubiquitin Specific Peptidase 33 (USP33)/c-Myc axis in PCa. Knockdown of it repressed cell proliferation and colony formation, and resulted in docetaxel resistance [114]. It was also reported that circ_0057558 promotes non-alcoholic fatty liver disease by regulating miR-206/Rho-kinase 1 (ROCK1)/AMPK signaling [115].

Circ-XIAP (has_circ_0005276) was upregulated in not only docetaxel-resistant PCa tissue specimens and cell lines but also exosomes from docetaxel-resistant cells [116]. Experiments validated that it promotes docetaxel resistance of PCa by regulating the miR-1182/Tumor Protein D52 (TPD52) axis. Alternatively, it can interact with FUS binding protein (FUS) so as to activate the transcription of the X-linked Inhibitor of Apoptosis Protein (XIAP), thereby promoting cell proliferation, migration, and epithelial–mesenchymal transition (EMT) [117].

In contrast to these resistance-promoting circRNAs, circFoxo3 (has_circis_0006404) could repress Forkhead Box O3 (FOXO3) protein expression and EMT, leading to enhanced chemosensitivity to docetaxel [118]. CircFoxo3 is composed of the second exon of the FOXO3 gene containing 1435 nucleotides and it displays high conservation levels between humans and mice [119]. It is also involved in the progression of cancers including glioblastoma [120], gastric carcinoma [121], oral and esophageal squamous cell carcinoma [122,123], and BCa [124,125]. Particularly, circFoxo3 expression was increased in adriamycin-resistant hepatocellular carcinoma tissues and cell lines, and its overexpression enhances hepatocellular carcinoma invasion and growth via the miR-199a-5p/ATP Binding Cassette Subfamily C Member 1 (ABCC1) axis [126]. Moreover, the role of circFoxo3 in cardiac and neurologic diseases has also been well-explored [127,128,129,130].

4.3. ARSi Resistance in PCa

Another fundamental therapy for PCa is the novel hormone therapy (NHT) that targets AR signaling. Compared with docetaxel chemotherapy, ARSi could offer non-inferior cancer control and improved quality of life [131]. However, primary and acquired resistance to these agents limited the population that could benefit from them. Many hypotheses about the mechanism have been proposed, including intratumoral androgen biosynthesis, neuroendocrine differentiation, and AR alterations [132]. AR-V7 is a splice variant of AR and its expression infers resistance to ADT and NHT [133,134,135]. Wu et al. found that suppressing circRNA17 (hsa_circ_0001427) in PCa cells could increase AR-V7 expression that might then lead to enzalutamide resistance [136]. Interestingly, circRNA17 functions as a reservoir, not a sponge, to increase the expression of miR-181c-5p, which could directly bind to the 3’UTR of AR-V7. Wu et al. also verified that adding circRNA17 or miRNA-181c-5p could suppress the growth of the enzalutamide-resistant cells using the in vivo mouse model [136].

Several other studies also explored the circRNA profiles of enzalutamide-resistant PCa. Greene et al. screened the circRNA expression of two enzalutamide-resistant LNCaP clones against the control cell line and found 111 commonly altered circRNAs [137]. Yu et al. further analyzedGreene et al.’s data and constructed a ceRNA regulatory network [138]. They chose hsa_circ_0047641 and further validated its effect on the proliferation of enzalutamide-sensitive and resistant PCa cells. Xiang et al. detected low expression of circUCK2 (hsa_circ_001357) in enzalutamide-resistant cells, and knocking down circUCK2 increased cell invasion and proliferation via the miR-767-5p/Tet Methylcytosine Dioxygenase 1 (TET1) axis [139]. CircUCK2 is also essential in ischemic stroke, and overexpression of it improved neurological deficits via the circUCK2/miR-125b-5p/Growth Differentiation Factor 11 (GDF11) axis [140].

5. Mechanisms

The studies described above thoroughly explored the function of circRNAs in drug resistance. The mechanisms of circRNAs are quite varied and some circRNAs could function via a combination of several mechanisms. In Figure 3, we listed the most recognized mechanisms in circRNA-related drug resistance.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

The mechanisms via which circRNAs regulate the sensitivity to systematic treatments in genitourinary cancers. CSCs: cancer stem cells, EMT: epithelial–mesenchymal transition.

5.1. CeRNA Network

The ceRNA network is a typical example of the post-transcription regulation of gene expression. Transcripts can regulate each other by competing for shared miRNAs. The ceRNA network comprises protein-coding mRNAs as well as non-coding RNAs, including long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs), circRNAs, and pseudogene RNAs. Via the ceRNA network, non-coding RNAs could contribute to anti-cancer drug resistance [141]. In recent years, the studies on the mechanism of action of circRNA in drug resistance are mostly based on the ceRNA network. As shown in Figure 2, the ceRNA network is still the main approach to drug resistance in genitourinary cancers.

Both circRNAs and mRNAs contain the binding sites (also termed miRNA response elements (MREs)) for miRNAs, and they can competitively bind to the shared miRNA. In general, circRNAs could bind to miRNAs, consequently interrupting the binding between mRNAs and miRNAs and affecting the downstream mRNAs’ levels. The binding affinity of miRNA and its targets is mainly influenced by the matching between MREs and the miRNA seed regions [142]. Intuitively, RNA base alterations including single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) and RNA editing could affect the binding affinity and even change the target spectrum [143,144]. Also, RBPs could regulate the ceRNA network. RBPs could occupy the MREs and hamper the miRNA-target binding [145,146]. On the other hand, RBPs could promote miRNA-target binding via recruiting miRNAs to the target [147].

Mostly, circRNAs function as a sponge of miRNAs, but, in some cases, circRNAs could also be a miRNA reservoir. In the regulatory network of ciRS-7, miR-7, and miR-671, miR-671-directed cleavage of ciRS-7 could release miR-7 and result in prompt and efficient repression of miR-7 targets [148]. Similarly, circ-HIAT1 (has_circ_001013) protects three of its targets from the inhibition of the AR and suppresses the downstream Cell Division Cycle 42 (CDC42) level [149]. In enzalutamide-resistant PCa, circRNA17 functions as a reservoir to increase the expression of miR-181c-5p and decrease the expression of AR-V7, which is a fundamental driver for ARSi-resistance [136].

5.2. Binding Proteins

Besides sponging miRNAs, circRNAs could also directly bind to proteins to perform their functions. This mechanism has also been investigated in the development of drug resistance. In acute myeloid leukemia (AML), the circMYBL2 (hsa_circ_0006332) could directly bind to Polypyrimidine Tract Binding Protein 1 (PTBP1), leading to AML progression and quizartinib resistance [150]. In breast cancer, circMTO1 (hsa-circ-007874) interacts with TNF Receptor Associated Factor 4 (TRAF4), consequently inhibiting the mitotic kinesin Eg5 protein level and reversing monastrol resistance [151].

In BCa, hsa_circ_0008399 could bind to WATP and promote cisplatin resistance by targeting the circ0008399/WTAP/TNFAIP3 axis [76]. Also, circLIFR can interact with MutS Homolog 2 (MSH2) and augment the interaction between MutSα (formed by MSH2 and MSH6) and ATM [82], which attenuated BCa cisplatin resistance.

5.3. Autophagy

Autophagy is a process in which the cell self-digests its own components through the delivery of cytoplasmic cargo to the lysosome [152]. Autophagy could be induced by a wide range of cancer therapies. The mechanism of autophagy in cancer chemoresistance has been investigated by many studies and it has been shown to promote cancer cell survival and drug resistance [153]. Additionally, autophagy inhibition could sensitize the tumor cells to therapies, which makes autophagy a promising therapeutic target [154,155].

In the mechanism of circRNAs in drug resistance, the crucial involvement of autophagy has been identified in several cancers. In NSCLC, high hsa_circ_0085131 levels activated the hsa_circ_0085131/miR-654-5p/Autophagy Related 7 (ATG7) axis and cell autophagy to enhance cancer cell cisplatin resistance [156]. The circMTO1 sponges miR-6893 to promote S100 Calcium Binding Protein A1 (S100A1) expression and eventually contributes to chemoresistance enhancement in cervical cancer, while autophagy inhibitor 3-Methyladenine could reverse the effect [157]. In papillary thyroid carcinoma, circEIF6 (hsa_circ_0060060) could promote autophagy induced by cisplatin, enhancing the cisplatin resistance [158]. In AML and chronic myeloid leukemia, circPAN3 (hsa_circ_0100181) and hsa_circ_0009910 could induce autophagy to augment resistance to doxorubicin and imatinib, respectively [159,160].

In RCC, hsa_circ_0035483 could facilitate gemcitabine-induced autophagy and enhance the resistance of RCC to gemcitabine by regulating the hsa-miR-335/CCNB1 axis [46]. In PCa, knockdown of circ_CCNB2 (hsa_circ_0035483) can amplify radiosensitivity through inhibiting autophagy by targeting the miR-30b-5p/KIF18A axis [47].

5.4. Cancer Stem Cell (CSC)

Cancer stem cells constitute subpopulations of cancer cells with an increased renewal capacity and the ability to recapitulate the heterogeneity in primary tumors [161]. Dormant CSCs are capable of escaping from harmful stress, such as radiotherapy and chemotherapy.

CircRNAs such as hsa_circ_001680 and circ-NOTCH1 (hsa_circ_0089547) have been found to promote CSC populations in cancer [162,163]. More importantly, hsa_circ_001680 could enhance stemness in CRC and induce irinotecan therapeutic resistance [162]. In BCa, lower circELP3-expressing cancer cells displayed lower sphere formation ability and stem cell marker expression, and repressed progression and drug resistance [78].

5.5. EMT

EMT is a transdifferentiation process driven by transcriptional regulations and epigenetic modifications, through which the cells lose epithelial characteristics and transit to mesenchymal phenotypes. The role of EMT in tumor drug resistance has been gradually recognized and explored, and repression of EMT could render cancer cells more chemosensitive [164].

The circBMPR2 (hsa_circRNA_0003218) could relieve the tamoxifen resistance of breast cancer [165]. During the process, western blot showed that knockdown of circBMPR2 could decrease the levels of epithelial markers and increase the levels of mesenchymal markers. In breast cancer, circKDM4C (has_circ_0001839) suppresses tumor EMT and attenuates doxorubicin resistance by sponging miR-548p [166]. Circular RNA cESRP1 (hsa_circ_0084927) binds to miR-93-5p to regulate Transforming Growth Factor-β (TGF-β)-mediated EMT in small cell lung cancer and silencing it causes chemoresistance [167]. Similarly, circRNAs were found to alter drug sensitivity by affecting EMT in other cancers, including lung adenocarcinoma [168], nasopharyngeal carcinoma [169], and esophageal cancer [170,171]. In PCa, the circFoxo3 could repress FOXO3 level and EMT, leading to cancer cell survival, migration, invasion, and chemoresistance to docetaxel [118].

5.6. Exosome

Exosomes are vesicles of endocytic origin and are important mediators of intercellular communication, containing mRNAs, miRNAs, lncRNAs, circRNAs, proteins, lipids, and transcription factors. The circRNAs are enriched and stable in exosomes, and exosomal circRNAs can be tumor biomarkers as well as therapeutic targets in cancers [172]. Moreover, exosomal circRNAs are involved in the development of drug resistance. For example, in small cell lung cancer, serum exosomal FLI1 exonic circular RNA 1 (FECR1) was associated with poor survival and clinical response to chemotherapy [173]. Hon et al. found that exosomes could transfer chemoresistance from FOLFOX (fluorouracil plus oxaliplatin)-resistant CRC cells to parental CRC cells, and hsa_circ_0000338 may play a pro-carcinogenic role in exosomes and enhance drug resistance of recipient cells [174]. Exosomal ciRS-122 (hsa_circ_0005963) could also induce oxaliplatin resistance in CRC cells, while exosomal transfer of circ-FBXW7 enhanced oxaliplatin sensitivity [175,176]. Similar functions of exosomal circRNAs have also been identified in NSCLC [177], glioma [178], hepatocellular carcinoma [179], multiple myeloma [180], epithelial ovarian cancer [181], osteosarcoma [182], and pancreatic cancer [183]. In PCa, the exosomal circ-XIAP could promote docetaxel resistance by regulating the miR-1182/TPD52 axis [116].

Furthermore, Chen et al. revealed that cancer cell-derived exosomal circUSP7 (hsa_circ_0005152) could induce CD8 + T cell dysfunction and anti-PD1 resistance in NSCLC [184]. Zhang et al. also found that cancer cell-derived exosomal circUHRF1 (hsa_circ_0048677) could cause resistance to anti-PD1 therapy in hepatocellular carcinoma by natural killer cell exhaustion [185]. These studies suggested that the exosomal circRNAs might alter the responsiveness of the immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI) therapies.

6. Limitations and Perspectives

Several mechanisms for circRNA-related drug resistance have been discovered and these studies were important for interpreting drug resistance. Nevertheless, some aspects need reinforcement to help us better understand the role of circRNAs in resistance development.

In the above-mentioned studies, investigators explored the circRNAs’ function in RCC, BCa, and PCa. However, little is known about the role of circRNAs in other genitourinary cancers, such as testicular cancer and penile cancer. Further studies on these cancers could provide more information about the circRNAs molecular mechanisms and clinical utility.

As listed in Table 1, several studies unveiled the different circRNA patterns in drug-resistant cancers. These works supported the association between circRNAs and the drug resistance status. They could serve as prognostic biomarkers in cancers [91,108]. Some studies, Luo et al. [108] and Yu et al. [138] for example, further illustrated the functions of these circRNAs in cancer invasion and proliferation. However, it should be noted that the effect of these circRNAs on drug resistance was not all experimentally validated, which is mandatory for ascertaining the causal–effect relationship. Future studies to confirm the functions of these differently expressed circRNAs are warranted.

Table 1.

Summary of studies that investigated the circRNAs profile after drug resistance.

Study Cancer Comparison Differently Expressed circRNA Expression Alteration Further Investigation
[91] Bladder cancer T vs. N and cisplatin-resistant vs. naive hsa_circ_0000285 Prognosis
[108] Prostate cancer CRPC vs. HSPC circAR3 Invasion, proliferation, downstream pathways
[109] Prostate cancer CRPC vs. HSPC 13 circARs Association with linear AR transcript
[137] Prostate cancer EnzR vs. naive 111 circRNAs NA NA
[139] Prostate cancer EnzR vs. naive circUCK2 Invasion, proliferation
[138] Prostate cancer EnzR vs. naive 4 circRNAs
9 circRNAs
hsa_circ_0047641 Invasion, proliferation

T = tumor, N = normal, CRPC = castration-resistant prostate cancer, HSPC = hormone sensitive prostate cancer, EnzR = enzalutamide-resistant, NA = not available. The arrows present if the expression of circRNAs elevated (↑) or decreased (↓) in drug-resistant cancers.

As discussed above, several mechanisms behind circRNA-related drug resistance have been identified. The ceRNA network is the central route for resistance, and most studies focused on downstream molecular signaling and the consequent phenotype. Cellular and organelle mechanisms, including autophagy [46,47], cancer stem-like cell [78], exosome [116], and EMT [118], are also involved during drug resistance and they could be explored in future studies as possible resistance drivers and therapeutic targets.

Previous studies focused on chemotherapy (e.g., gemcitabine, cisplatin, and docetaxel) and ARSi resistance, and presented the contribution of circRNAs well, especially the cisplatin resistance of BCa. Due to insensitivity to chemotherapy and radiation, the drug resistance in RCC is relatively less studied. As a promising strategy, ICI therapies that block PD-1 or T-lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 (CTLA-4) signaling are being rapidly developed for cancer treatment and showed superior efficacy for intermediate- and poor-risk RCC [186]. A combination of ICI and anti-angiogenic therapy also displayed a better prognosis for RCC [187]. In BCa, pembrolizumab (PD-1 inhibitor) and atezolizumab (PD-L1 inhibitor) have been tested on cisplatin-ineligible patients in phase 2 trials [188,189]. They have been approved for patients who progressed during or after platinum-based combination chemotherapy and could also be considered as first-line treatment in patients unfit for platinum-based chemotherapy [4]. Unfortunately, except for some cancers that are sensitive to immunotherapy such as melanoma, the response rate to single-agent PD-1 blockade in most approved diseases is limited to 10–25% [190]. In other cancers such as NSCLC and hepatocellular carcinoma, circRNA function in ICI resistance has been explored [184,185,191,192]. ICI immunotherapy, or combination with other anticancer drugs, has shown promising efficacy in urological cancers, and are likely to reshape the therapeutic scenario of urological cancers [193]. Understanding the mechanisms of de novo and acquired resistance to ICI immunotherapy is an essential topic in the future and the circRNA’s role in it needs to be clarified.

Based on the double-edged role of circRNAs in drug resistance, different strategies could be applied to ameliorate drug responsiveness. For tumor-suppressive circRNAs, introducing exogenous purified or engineered circRNAs might lead to new and efficient approaches for cancer therapy [194,195]. The stability and long half-life of circRNAs allow a long-term anticancer effect. RNA interference specifically targeting oncogenic circRNAs can also effectively inhibit cancer development. Both the circRNA-targeting antisense oligonucleotide (ASO) and cholesterol-conjugated small interfering RNAs (siRNAs) injection could induce cancer repression in patient-derived xenograft models [196,197,198]. These preclinical investigations confirmed circRNAs aspromising therapeutic targets, and their clinical utility warrants further validations.

7. Conclusions

In this review, we summarized the recent investigations on the role of circRNAs in drug resistance of genitourinary cancers. The circRNA profiles differed after drug resistance and the mis-regulation of circRNA could greatly contribute to cancer progression and drug resistance. These findings emphasized the essential participation of circRNAs and provided a better understanding of drug resistance. Further studies should focus on the resistance to updated therapies, such as immunotherapy, as well as verifying circRNAs as promising therapeutic targets.

Acknowledgments

Part of the illustrations were adapted from Servier Medical Art (https://smart.servier.com/, last accessed at 31 October 2021) under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. We would like to thank them for the free access vector images.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, K.C. and G.L.; writing—original draft preparation, G.L. and S.M.; writing—review and editing, R.S., Y.S., Z.H. and K.C.; supervision, K.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by National Natural Science Foundation of China, grant number 81802542.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Footnotes

Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  • 1.Siegel R.L., Miller K.D., Goding Sauer A., Fedewa S.A., Butterly L.F., Anderson J.C., Cercek A., Smith R.A., Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2020. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2020;70:145–164. doi: 10.3322/caac.21601. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Ljungberg B., Albiges L., Abu-Ghanem Y., Bensalah K., Dabestani S., Fernández-Pello S., Giles R.H., Hofmann F., Hora M., Kuczyk M.A., et al. European Association of Urology Guidelines on Renal Cell Carcinoma: The 2019 Update. Eur. Urol. 2019;75:799–810. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2019.02.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Babjuk M., Burger M., Compérat E.M., Gontero P., Mostafid A.H., Palou J., van Rhijn B.W.G., Rouprêt M., Shariat S.F., Sylvester R., et al. European Association of Urology Guidelines on Non-muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer (TaT1 and Carcinoma In Situ)—2019 Update. Eur. Urol. 2019;76:639–657. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2019.08.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Witjes J.A., Bruins H.M., Cathomas R., Compérat E.M., Cowan N.C., Gakis G., Hernández V., Linares Espinós E., Lorch A., Neuzillet Y., et al. European Association of Urology Guidelines on Muscle-invasive and Metastatic Bladder Cancer: Summary of the 2020 Guidelines. Eur. Urol. 2021;79:82–104. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2020.03.055. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Lam T.B.L., MacLennan S., Willemse P.M., Mason M.D., Plass K., Shepherd R., Baanders R., Bangma C.H., Bjartell A., Bossi A., et al. EAU-EANM-ESTRO-ESUR-SIOG Prostate Cancer Guideline Panel Consensus Statements for Deferred Treatment with Curative Intent for Localised Prostate Cancer from an International Collaborative Study (DETECTIVE Study) Eur. Urol. 2019;76:790–813. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2019.09.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Sánchez-Gastaldo A., Kempf E., González Del Alba A., Duran I. Systemic treatment of renal cell cancer: A comprehensive review. Cancer Treat Rev. 2017;60:77–89. doi: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2017.08.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Teo M.Y., Rathkopf D.E., Kantoff P. Treatment of Advanced Prostate Cancer. Annu. Rev. Med. 2019;70:479–499. doi: 10.1146/annurev-med-051517-011947. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Patel V.G., Oh W.K., Galsky M.D. Treatment of muscle-invasive and advanced bladder cancer in 2020. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2020;70:404–423. doi: 10.3322/caac.21631. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Chen L.L., Yang L. Regulation of circRNA biogenesis. RNA Biol. 2015;12:381–388. doi: 10.1080/15476286.2015.1020271. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Li R., Jiang J., Shi H., Qian H., Zhang X., Xu W. CircRNA: A rising star in gastric cancer. Cell Mol. Life Sci. 2020;77:1661–1680. doi: 10.1007/s00018-019-03345-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Ivanov A., Memczak S., Wyler E., Torti F., Porath H.T., Orejuela M.R., Piechotta M., Levanon E.Y., Landthaler M., Dieterich C., et al. Analysis of intron sequences reveals hallmarks of circular RNA biogenesis in animals. Cell Rep. 2015;10:170–177. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2014.12.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Ashwal-Fluss R., Meyer M., Pamudurti N.R., Ivanov A., Bartok O., Hanan M., Evantal N., Memczak S., Rajewsky N., Kadener S. circRNA biogenesis competes with pre-mRNA splicing. Mol. Cell. 2014;56:55–66. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2014.08.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Guarnerio J., Bezzi M., Jeong J.C., Paffenholz S.V., Berry K., Naldini M.M., Lo-Coco F., Tay Y., Beck A.H., Pandolfi P.P. Oncogenic Role of Fusion-circRNAs Derived from Cancer-Associated Chromosomal Translocations. Cell. 2016;165:289–302. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2016.03.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Fei T., Chen Y., Xiao T., Li W., Cato L., Zhang P., Cotter M.B., Bowden M., Lis R.T., Zhao S.G., et al. Genome-wide CRISPR screen identifies HNRNPL as a prostate cancer dependency regulating RNA splicing. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2017;114:E5207–E5215. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1617467114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Xia S., Feng J., Chen K., Ma Y., Gong J., Cai F., Jin Y., Gao Y., Xia L., Chang H., et al. CSCD: A database for cancer-specific circular RNAs. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018;46:D925–D929. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkx863. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Li S., Teng S., Xu J., Su G., Zhang Y., Zhao J., Zhang S., Wang H., Qin W., Lu Z.J., et al. Microarray is an efficient tool for circRNA profiling. Brief. Bioinform. 2019;20:1420–1433. doi: 10.1093/bib/bby006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Panda A.C., Gorospe M. Detection and Analysis of Circular RNAs by RT-PCR. Bio Protoc. 2018;8:e2775. doi: 10.21769/BioProtoc.2775. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Jeck W.R., Sharpless N.E. Detecting and characterizing circular RNAs. Nat. Biotechnol. 2014;32:453–461. doi: 10.1038/nbt.2890. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Li Z., Huang C., Bao C., Chen L., Lin M., Wang X., Zhong G., Yu B., Hu W., Dai L., et al. Exon-intron circular RNAs regulate transcription in the nucleus. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2015;22:256–264. doi: 10.1038/nsmb.2959. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Conn S.J., Pillman K.A., Toubia J., Conn V.M., Salmanidis M., Phillips C.A., Roslan S., Schreiber A.W., Gregory P.A., Goodall G.J. The RNA binding protein quaking regulates formation of circRNAs. Cell. 2015;160:1125–1134. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2015.02.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Legnini I., Di Timoteo G., Rossi F., Morlando M., Briganti F., Sthandier O., Fatica A., Santini T., Andronache A., Wade M., et al. Circ-ZNF609 Is a Circular RNA that Can Be Translated and Functions in Myogenesis. Mol. Cell. 2017;66:22–37.e29. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2017.02.017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Wang K., Long B., Liu F., Wang J.X., Liu C.Y., Zhao B., Zhou L.Y., Sun T., Wang M., Yu T., et al. A circular RNA protects the heart from pathological hypertrophy and heart failure by targeting miR-223. Eur. Heart J. 2016;37:2602–2611. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehv713. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Stoll L., Sobel J., Rodriguez-Trejo A., Guay C., Lee K., Venø M.T., Kjems J., Laybutt D.R., Regazzi R. Circular RNAs as novel regulators of β-cell functions in normal and disease conditions. Mol. Metab. 2018;9:69–83. doi: 10.1016/j.molmet.2018.01.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Huang J.L., Su M., Wu D.P. Functional roles of circular RNAs in Alzheimer’s disease. Ageing Res. Rev. 2020;60:101058. doi: 10.1016/j.arr.2020.101058. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Yang X., Ye T., Liu H., Lv P., Duan C., Wu X., Jiang K., Lu H., Xia D., Peng E., et al. Expression profiles, biological functions and clinical significance of circRNAs in bladder cancer. Mol. Cancer. 2021;20:4. doi: 10.1186/s12943-020-01300-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Zhang C., Yang Q., Li W., Kang Y., Zhou F., Chang D. Roles of circRNAs in prostate cancer: Expression, mechanism, application and potential. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 2021;134:105968. doi: 10.1016/j.biocel.2021.105968. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Wang Y., Zhang Y., Wang P., Fu X., Lin W. Circular RNAs in renal cell carcinoma: Implications for tumorigenesis, diagnosis, and therapy. Mol. Cancer. 2020;19:149. doi: 10.1186/s12943-020-01266-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Barata P.C., Rini B.I. Treatment of renal cell carcinoma: Current status and future directions. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2017;67:507–524. doi: 10.3322/caac.21411. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Capitanio U., Montorsi F. Renal cancer. Lancet. 2016;387:894–906. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00046-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Capitanio U., Bensalah K., Bex A., Boorjian S.A., Bray F., Coleman J., Gore J.L., Sun M., Wood C., Russo P. Epidemiology of Renal Cell Carcinoma. Eur. Urol. 2019;75:74–84. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2018.08.036. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Hsieh J.J., Purdue M.P., Signoretti S., Swanton C., Albiges L., Schmidinger M., Heng D.Y., Larkin J., Ficarra V. Renal cell carcinoma. Nat. Rev. Dis. Primers. 2017;3:17009. doi: 10.1038/nrdp.2017.9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Makhov P., Joshi S., Ghatalia P., Kutikov A., Uzzo R.G., Kolenko V.M. Resistance to Systemic Therapies in Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma: Mechanisms and Management Strategies. Mol. Cancer Ther. 2018;17:1355–1364. doi: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-17-1299. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Posadas E.M., Limvorasak S., Figlin R.A. Targeted therapies for renal cell carcinoma. Nat. Rev. Nephrol. 2017;13:496–511. doi: 10.1038/nrneph.2017.82. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Braun D.A., Bakouny Z., Hirsch L., Flippot R., Van Allen E.M., Wu C.J., Choueiri T.K. Beyond conventional immune-checkpoint inhibition—Novel immunotherapies for renal cell carcinoma. Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. 2021;18:199–214. doi: 10.1038/s41571-020-00455-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Deleuze A., Saout J., Dugay F., Peyronnet B., Mathieu R., Verhoest G., Bensalah K., Crouzet L., Laguerre B., Belaud-Rotureau M.A., et al. Immunotherapy in Renal Cell Carcinoma: The Future Is Now. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020;21:2532. doi: 10.3390/ijms21072532. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Pereira M., Vale N. Two Possible Strategies for Drug Modification of Gemcitabine and Future Contributions to Personalized Medicine. Molecules. 2022;27:291. doi: 10.3390/molecules27010291. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Kamisawa T., Wood L.D., Itoi T., Takaori K. Pancreatic cancer. Lancet. 2016;388:73–85. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00141-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Funt S.A., Rosenberg J.E. Systemic, perioperative management of muscle-invasive bladder cancer and future horizons. Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. 2017;14:221–234. doi: 10.1038/nrclinonc.2016.188. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Corrales L., Nogueira A., Passiglia F., Listi A., Caglevic C., Giallombardo M., Raez L., Santos E., Rolfo C. Second-Line Treatment of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Clinical, Pathological, and Molecular Aspects of Nintedanib. Front. Med. 2017;4:13. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2017.00013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Tella S.H., Kommalapati A., Borad M.J., Mahipal A. Second-line therapies in advanced biliary tract cancers. Lancet Oncol. 2020;21:e29–e41. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(19)30733-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Boussios S., Seraj E., Zarkavelis G., Petrakis D., Kollas A., Kafantari A., Assi A., Tatsi K., Pavlidis N., Pentheroudakis G. Management of patients with recurrent/advanced cervical cancer beyond first line platinum regimens: Where do we stand? A literature review. Crit. Rev. Oncol. Hematol. 2016;108:164–174. doi: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2016.11.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Casali M., Marcellini M., Casali A., Giuntini T., Galante E., Ferrone C. Gemcitabine in pre-treated advanced renal carcinoma: A feasibility study. J. Exp. Clin. Cancer Res. 2001;20:195–198. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Michaelson M.D., McKay R.R., Werner L., Atkins M.B., Van Allen E.M., Olivier K.M., Song J., Signoretti S., McDermott D.F., Choueiri T.K. Phase 2 trial of sunitinib and gemcitabine in patients with sarcomatoid and/or poor-risk metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Cancer. 2015;121:3435–3443. doi: 10.1002/cncr.29503. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Binenbaum Y., Na’ara S., Gil Z. Gemcitabine resistance in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Drug Resist. Updat. 2015;23:55–68. doi: 10.1016/j.drup.2015.10.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Hu J., Guan W., Liu P., Dai J., Tang K., Xiao H., Qian Y., Sharrow A.C., Ye Z., Wu L., et al. Endoglin Is Essential for the Maintenance of Self-Renewal and Chemoresistance in Renal Cancer Stem Cells. Stem. Cell Rep. 2017;9:464–477. doi: 10.1016/j.stemcr.2017.07.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Yan L., Liu G., Cao H., Zhang H., Shao F. Hsa_circ_0035483 sponges hsa-miR-335 to promote the gemcitabine-resistance of human renal cancer cells by autophagy regulation. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2019;519:172–178. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2019.08.093. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Cai F., Li J., Zhang J., Huang S. Knockdown of Circ_CCNB2 Sensitizes Prostate Cancer to Radiation Through Repressing Autophagy by the miR-30b-5p/KIF18A Axis. Cancer Biother Radiopharm. 2020. Ahead of Print. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 48.Bæk Møller N., Budolfsen C., Grimm D., Krüger M., Infanger M., Wehland M., Magnusson N.E. Drug-Induced Hypertension Caused by Multikinase Inhibitors (Sorafenib, Sunitinib, Lenvatinib and Axitinib) in Renal Cell Carcinoma Treatment. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019;20:4712. doi: 10.3390/ijms20194712. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Escudier B., Szczylik C., Porta C., Gore M. Treatment selection in metastatic renal cell carcinoma: Expert consensus. Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. 2012;9:327–337. doi: 10.1038/nrclinonc.2012.59. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Nassif E., Thibault C., Vano Y., Fournier L., Mauge L., Verkarre V., Timsit M.O., Mejean A., Tartour E., Oudard S. Sunitinib in kidney cancer: 10 years of experience and development. Expert Rev. Anticancer Ther. 2017;17:129–142. doi: 10.1080/14737140.2017.1272415. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Huang K.B., Pan Y.H., Shu G.N., Yao H.H., Liu X., Zhou M., Wei J.H., Chen Z.H., Lu J., Feng Z.H., et al. Circular RNA circSNX6 promotes sunitinib resistance in renal cell carcinoma through the miR-1184/GPCPD1/lysophosphatidic acid axis. Cancer Lett. 2021;523:121–134. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2021.10.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Zeng X., Tan C., Mo M., Qin X., Ma X., Huang K., Wang X., Liang W., Yang L. CircRNA profiling identifies circRNF180 as a tumor suppressor in hepatocellular carcinoma. Epigenomics. 2021;13:513–530. doi: 10.2217/epi-2020-0385. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Cumberbatch M.G.K., Jubber I., Black P.C., Esperto F., Figueroa J.D., Kamat A.M., Kiemeney L., Lotan Y., Pang K., Silverman D.T., et al. Epidemiology of Bladder Cancer: A Systematic Review and Contemporary Update of Risk Factors in 2018. Eur. Urol. 2018;74:784–795. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2018.09.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.DeGeorge K.C., Holt H.R., Hodges S.C. Bladder Cancer: Diagnosis and Treatment. Am. Fam. Physician. 2017;96:507–514. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Lobo N., Mount C., Omar K., Nair R., Thurairaja R., Khan M.S. Landmarks in the treatment of muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Nat. Rev. Urol. 2017;14:565–574. doi: 10.1038/nrurol.2017.82. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Peyton C.C., Tang D., Reich R.R., Azizi M., Chipollini J., Pow-Sang J.M., Manley B., Spiess P.E., Poch M.A., Sexton W.J., et al. Downstaging and Survival Outcomes Associated With Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Regimens Among Patients Treated With Cystectomy for Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer. JAMA Oncol. 2018;4:1535–1542. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2018.3542. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Peyton C.C., Chipollini J., Azizi M., Kamat A.M., Gilbert S.M., Spiess P.E. Updates on the use of intravesical therapies for non-muscle invasive bladder cancer: How, when and what. World J. Urol. 2019;37:2017–2029. doi: 10.1007/s00345-018-2591-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Huang W., Lu Y., Wang F., Huang X., Yu Z. Circular RNA circRNA_103809 Accelerates Bladder Cancer Progression and Enhances Chemo-Resistance by Activation of miR-516a-5p/FBXL18 Axis. Cancer Manag. Res. 2020;12:7561–7568. doi: 10.2147/CMAR.S263083. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Huang S.S., Guo W.X., Ren M.S. Circular RNA hsa_circ_103809 promotes cell migration and invasion of gastric cancer cells by binding to microRNA-101-3p. Eur. Rev. Med. Pharmacol. Sci. 2020;24:6064–6071. doi: 10.26355/eurrev_202006_21501. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Qiu X., Wang Q., Song H., Shao D., Xue J. circ_103809 promotes breast cancer progression by regulating the PI3K/AKT signaling pathway. Oncol. Lett. 2020;19:3725–3730. doi: 10.3892/ol.2020.11507. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Li X., Shen M. Circular RNA hsa_circ_103809 suppresses hepatocellular carcinoma proliferation and invasion by sponging miR-620. Eur. Rev. Med. Pharmacol. Sci. 2019;23:555–566. doi: 10.26355/eurrev_201902_16868. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Bian L., Zhi X., Ma L., Zhang J., Chen P., Sun S., Li J., Sun Y., Qin J. Hsa_circRNA_103809 regulated the cell proliferation and migration in colorectal cancer via miR-532-3p / FOXO4 axis. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2018;505:346–352. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2018.09.073. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Xie F., Zhao N., Zhang H., Xie D. Circular RNA CircHIPK3 Promotes Gemcitabine Sensitivity in Bladder Cancer. J. Cancer. 2020;11:1907–1912. doi: 10.7150/jca.39722. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Liu Y., Xia L., Dong L., Wang J., Xiao Q., Yu X., Zhu H. CircHIPK3 Promotes Gemcitabine (GEM) Resistance in Pancreatic Cancer Cells by Sponging miR-330-5p and Targets RASSF1. Cancer Manag. Res. 2020;12:921–929. doi: 10.2147/CMAR.S239326. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Ni J., Xi X., Xiao S., Xiao X. Silencing of circHIPK3 Sensitizes Paclitaxel-Resistant Breast Cancer Cells to Chemotherapy by Regulating HK2 Through Targeting miR-1286. Cancer Manag. Res. 2021;13:5573–5585. doi: 10.2147/CMAR.S307595. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Han C., Wang S., Wang H., Zhang J. Exosomal circ-HIPK3 Facilitates Tumor Progression and Temozolomide Resistance by Regulating miR-421/ZIC5 Axis in Glioma. Cancer Biother. Radiopharm. 2021;36:537–548. doi: 10.1089/cbr.2019.3492. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Zhang Y., Li C., Liu X., Wang Y., Zhao R., Yang Y., Zheng X., Zhang Y., Zhang X. circHIPK3 promotes oxaliplatin-resistance in colorectal cancer through autophagy by sponging miR-637. EBioMedicine. 2019;48:277–288. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2019.09.051. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Zhu J., Zhang F. Circular RNA VANGL1 knockdown suppressed viability, promoted apoptosis, and increased doxorubicin sensitivity through targeting miR-145-5p to regulate SOX4 in bladder cancer cells. Open Med. 2021;16:1010–1021. doi: 10.1515/med-2021-0299. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Zeng Z., Zhou W., Duan L., Zhang J., Lu X., Jin L., Yu Y. Circular RNA circ-VANGL1 as a competing endogenous RNA contributes to bladder cancer progression by regulating miR-605-3p/VANGL1 pathway. J. Cell Physiol. 2019;234:3887–3896. doi: 10.1002/jcp.27162. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Yang L., Zeng Z., Kang N., Yang J.C., Wei X., Hai Y. Circ-VANGL1 promotes the progression of osteoporosis by absorbing miRNA-217 to regulate RUNX2 expression. Eur. Rev. Med. Pharmacol. Sci. 2019;23:949–957. doi: 10.26355/eurrev_201902_16981. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Ghosh S. Cisplatin: The first metal based anticancer drug. Bioorg. Chem. 2019;88:102925. doi: 10.1016/j.bioorg.2019.102925. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Herr H., Soloway M. Cisplatin, Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy and Bladder Cancer. Urology. 2022;159:2–5. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2021.10.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Iacovino M.L., Miceli C.C., De Felice M., Barone B., Pompella L., Chiancone F., Di Zazzo E., Tirino G., Della Corte C.M., Imbimbo C., et al. Novel Therapeutic Opportunities in Neoadjuvant Setting in Urothelial Cancers: A New Horizon Opened by Molecular Classification and Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022;23:1133. doi: 10.3390/ijms23031133. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Leow J.J., Martin-Doyle W., Rajagopal P.S., Patel C.G., Anderson E.M., Rothman A.T., Cote R.J., Urun Y., Chang S.L., Choueiri T.K., et al. Adjuvant chemotherapy for invasive bladder cancer: A 2013 updated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials. Eur. Urol. 2014;66:42–54. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.08.033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Pfister C., Gravis G., Flechon A., Chevreau C., Mahammedi H., Laguerre B., Guillot A., Joly F., Soulie M., Allory Y. 652O Dose-dense methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin and cisplatin (dd-MVAC) or gemcitabine and cisplatin (GC) as perioperative chemotherapy for patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC): Results of the GETUG/AFU VESPER V05 phase III trial. Ann. Oncol. 2021;32:S678. doi: 10.1016/j.annonc.2021.08.048. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Wei W., Sun J., Zhang H., Xiao X., Huang C., Wang L., Zhong H., Jiang Y., Zhang X., Jiang G. Circ0008399 interaction with WTAP promotes assembly and activity of the m6A methyltransferase complex and promotes cisplatin resistance in bladder cancer. Cancer Res. 2021;81:6142–6156. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-21-1518. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Priem D., Devos M., Druwé S., Martens A., Slowicka K., Ting A.T., Pasparakis M., Declercq W., Vandenabeele P., van Loo G., et al. A20 protects cells from TNF-induced apoptosis through linear ubiquitin-dependent and -independent mechanisms. Cell Death Dis. 2019;10:692. doi: 10.1038/s41419-019-1937-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Su Y., Yang W., Jiang N., Shi J., Chen L., Zhong G., Bi J., Dong W., Wang Q., Wang C., et al. Hypoxia-elevated circELP3 contributes to bladder cancer progression and cisplatin resistance. Int. J. Biol. Sci. 2019;15:441–452. doi: 10.7150/ijbs.26826. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Gong P., Xu R., Zhuang Q., He X. A novel circular RNA (hsa_circRNA_102336), a plausible biomarker, promotes the tumorigenesis by sponging miR-515-5p in human bladder cancer. Biomed. Pharm. 2020;126:110059. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2020.110059. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Chen J., Sun Y., Ou Z., Yeh S., Huang C.P., You B., Tsai Y.C., Sheu T.J., Zu X., Chang C. Androgen receptor-regulated circFNTA activates KRAS signaling to promote bladder cancer invasion. EMBO Rep. 2020;21:e48467. doi: 10.15252/embr.201948467. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Tian J., Fan J., Xu J., Ren T., Guo H., Zhou L. circ-FNTA accelerates proliferation and invasion of bladder cancer. Oncol. Lett. 2020;19:1017–1023. doi: 10.3892/ol.2019.11150. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Zhang H., Xiao X., Wei W., Huang C., Wang M., Wang L., He Y., Sun J., Jiang Y., Jiang G., et al. CircLIFR synergizes with MSH2 to attenuate chemoresistance via MutSα/ATM-p73 axis in bladder cancer. Mol. Cancer. 2021;20:70. doi: 10.1186/s12943-021-01360-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Zhang H., Zhang B., Chen C., Chen J. Circular RNA circLIFR regulates the proliferation, migration, invasion and apoptosis of human vascular smooth muscle cells via the miR-1299/KDR axis. Metab. Brain Dis. 2021;37:253–263. doi: 10.1007/s11011-021-00853-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Jiang C., Zeng X., Shan R., Wen W., Li J., Tan J., Li L., Wan R. The Emerging Picture of the Roles of CircRNA-CDR1as in Cancer. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 2020;8:590478. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2020.590478. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Yuan W., Zhou R., Wang J., Han J., Yang X., Yu H., Lu H., Zhang X., Li P., Tao J., et al. Circular RNA Cdr1as sensitizes bladder cancer to cisplatin by upregulating APAF1 expression through miR-1270 inhibition. Mol. Oncol. 2019;13:1559–1576. doi: 10.1002/1878-0261.12523. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Li P., Yang X., Yuan W., Yang C., Zhang X., Han J., Wang J., Deng X., Yang H., Li P., et al. CircRNA-Cdr1as Exerts Anti-Oncogenic Functions in Bladder Cancer by Sponging MicroRNA-135a. Cell Physiol. Biochem. 2018;46:1606–1616. doi: 10.1159/000489208. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Zhao Y., Zheng R., Chen J., Ning D. CircRNA CDR1as/miR-641/HOXA9 pathway regulated stemness contributes to cisplatin resistance in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) Cancer Cell Int. 2020;20:289. doi: 10.1186/s12935-020-01390-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Zhao Z., Ji M., Wang Q., He N., Li Y. Circular RNA Cdr1as Upregulates SCAI to Suppress Cisplatin Resistance in Ovarian Cancer via miR-1270 Suppression. Mol. Ther. Nucleic Acids. 2019;18:24–33. doi: 10.1016/j.omtn.2019.07.012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] [Retracted]
  • 89.Mao Y., Xu R. Circular RNA CDR1-AS contributes to pemetrexed and cisplatin chemoresistance through EGFR/PI3K signaling pathway in lung adenocarcinoma. Biomed. Pharm. 2020;123:109771. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2019.109771. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Yang W., Gu J., Wang X., Wang Y., Feng M., Zhou D., Guo J., Zhou M. Inhibition of circular RNA CDR1as increases chemosensitivity of 5-FU-resistant BC cells through up-regulating miR-7. J. Cell Mol. Med. 2019;23:3166–3177. doi: 10.1111/jcmm.14171. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Chi B.J., Zhao D.M., Liu L., Yin X.Z., Wang F.F., Bi S., Gui S.L., Zhou S.B., Qin W.B., Wu D.M., et al. Downregulation of hsa_circ_0000285 serves as a prognostic biomarker for bladder cancer and is involved in cisplatin resistance. Neoplasma. 2019;66:197–202. doi: 10.4149/neo_2018_180318N185. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Roehl K.A., Han M., Ramos C.G., Antenor J.A., Catalona W.J. Cancer progression and survival rates following anatomical radical retropubic prostatectomy in 3,478 consecutive patients: Long-term results. J. Urol. 2004;172:910–914. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000134888.22332.bb. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Freedland S.J., Humphreys E.B., Mangold L.A., Eisenberger M., Dorey F.J., Walsh P.C., Partin A.W. Risk of prostate cancer-specific mortality following biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy. JAMA. 2005;294:433–439. doi: 10.1001/jama.294.4.433. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Kupelian P.A., Mahadevan A., Reddy C.A., Reuther A.M., Klein E.A. Use of different definitions of biochemical failure after external beam radiotherapy changes conclusions about relative treatment efficacy for localized prostate cancer. Urology. 2006;68:593–598. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2006.03.075. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Mosillo C., Iacovelli R., Ciccarese C., Fantinel E., Bimbatti D., Brunelli M., Bisogno I., Kinspergher S., Buttigliero C., Tucci M., et al. De novo metastatic castration sensitive prostate cancer: State of art and future perspectives. Cancer Treat. Rev. 2018;70:67–74. doi: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2018.08.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Zhang L., Wu S., Guo L.R., Zhao X.J. Diagnostic strategies and the incidence of prostate cancer: Reasons for the low reported incidence of prostate cancer in China. Asian J. Androl. 2009;11:9–13. doi: 10.1038/aja.2008.21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Heidenreich A., Bastian P.J., Bellmunt J., Bolla M., Joniau S., van der Kwast T., Mason M., Matveev V., Wiegel T., Zattoni F., et al. EAU guidelines on prostate cancer. Part II: Treatment of advanced, relapsing, and castration-resistant prostate cancer. Eur. Urol. 2014;65:467–479. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.11.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Yap T.A., Smith A.D., Ferraldeschi R., Al-Lazikani B., Workman P., de Bono J.S. Drug discovery in advanced prostate cancer: Translating biology into therapy. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2016;15:699–718. doi: 10.1038/nrd.2016.120. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Litwin M.S., Tan H.J. The Diagnosis and Treatment of Prostate Cancer: A Review. JAMA. 2017;317:2532–2542. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.7248. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Nuhn P., De Bono J.S., Fizazi K., Freedland S.J., Grilli M., Kantoff P.W., Sonpavde G., Sternberg C.N., Yegnasubramanian S., Antonarakis E.S. Update on Systemic Prostate Cancer Therapies: Management of Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer in the Era of Precision Oncology. Eur. Urol. 2019;75:88–99. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2018.03.028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Clarke N.W., Ali A., Ingleby F.C., Hoyle A., Amos C.L., Attard G., Brawley C.D., Calvert J., Chowdhury S., Cook A., et al. Addition of docetaxel to hormonal therapy in low—And high-burden metastatic hormone sensitive prostate cancer: Long-term survival results from the STAMPEDE trial. Ann. Oncol. 2019;30:1992–2003. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdz396. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Fizazi K., Tran N., Fein L., Matsubara N., Rodriguez-Antolin A., Alekseev B.Y., Özgüroğlu M., Ye D., Feyerabend S., Protheroe A., et al. Abiraterone acetate plus prednisone in patients with newly diagnosed high-risk metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (LATITUDE): Final overall survival analysis of a randomised, double-blind, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2019;20:686–700. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(19)30082-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Armstrong A.J., Szmulewitz R.Z., Petrylak D.P., Holzbeierlein J., Villers A., Azad A., Alcaraz A., Alekseev B., Iguchi T., Shore N.D., et al. ARCHES: A Randomized, Phase III Study of Androgen Deprivation Therapy With Enzalutamide or Placebo in Men With Metastatic Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer. J. Clin. Oncol. 2019;37:2974–2986. doi: 10.1200/JCO.19.00799. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Chi K.N., Agarwal N., Bjartell A., Chung B.H., Pereira de Santana Gomes A.J., Given R., Juárez Soto Á., Merseburger A.S., Özgüroğlu M., Uemura H., et al. Apalutamide for Metastatic, Castration-Sensitive Prostate Cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 2019;381:13–24. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1903307. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Grasso C.S., Wu Y.M., Robinson D.R., Cao X., Dhanasekaran S.M., Khan A.P., Quist M.J., Jing X., Lonigro R.J., Brenner J.C., et al. The mutational landscape of lethal castration-resistant prostate cancer. Nature. 2012;487:239–243. doi: 10.1038/nature11125. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Robinson D., Van Allen E.M., Wu Y.M., Schultz N., Lonigro R.J., Mosquera J.M., Montgomery B., Taplin M.E., Pritchard C.C., Attard G., et al. Integrative clinical genomics of advanced prostate cancer. Cell. 2015;161:1215–1228. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2015.05.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Greene J., Baird A.M., Lim M., Flynn J., McNevin C., Brady L., Sheils O., Gray S.G., McDermott R., Finn S.P. Differential CircRNA Expression Signatures May Serve as Potential Novel Biomarkers in Prostate Cancer. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 2021;9:605686. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2021.605686. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Luo J., Li Y., Zheng W., Xie N., Shi Y., Long Z., Xie L., Fazli L., Zhang D., Gleave M., et al. Characterization of a Prostate- and Prostate Cancer-Specific Circular RNA Encoded by the Androgen Receptor Gene. Mol. Ther. Nucleic Acids. 2019;18:916–926. doi: 10.1016/j.omtn.2019.10.015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Cao S., Ma T., Ungerleider N., Roberts C., Kobelski M., Jin L., Concha M., Wang X., Baddoo M., Nguyen H.M., et al. Circular RNAs add diversity to androgen receptor isoform repertoire in castration-resistant prostate cancer. Oncogene. 2019;38:7060–7072. doi: 10.1038/s41388-019-0947-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110.Petrylak D.P., Macarthur R.B., O’Connor J., Shelton G., Judge T., Balog J., Pfaff C., Bagiella E., Heitjan D., Fine R., et al. Phase I trial of docetaxel with estramustine in androgen-independent prostate cancer. J. Clin. Oncol. 1999;17:958–967. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1999.17.3.958. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111.Gao Y., Liu J., Huan J., Che F. Downregulation of circular RNA hsa_circ_0000735 boosts prostate cancer sensitivity to docetaxel via sponging miR-7. Cancer Cell Int. 2020;20:334. doi: 10.1186/s12935-020-01421-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112.Chen Y.Y., Tai Y.C. Hsa_circ_0006404 and hsa_circ_0000735 Regulated Ovarian Cancer Response to Docetaxel Treatment via Regulating p-GP Expression. Biochem Genet. 2021;60:395–414. doi: 10.1007/s10528-021-10080-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113.Huang W., Xu X., Liu M., Cui W., Peng G. Downregulation of Hsa_circ_0000735 Inhibits the Proliferation, Migration, Invasion, and Glycolysis in Non-small-cell Lung Cancer by Targeting miR-940/BMPER Axis. Oncol. Targets Ther. 2020;13:8427–8439. doi: 10.2147/OTT.S253474. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114.Ding T., Zhu Y., Jin H., Zhang P., Guo J., Zheng J. Circular RNA circ_0057558 Controls Prostate Cancer Cell Proliferation Through Regulating miR-206/USP33/c-Myc Axis. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 2021;9:644397. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2021.644397. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115.Chen X., Tan Q.Q., Tan X.R., Li S.J., Zhang X.X. Circ_0057558 promotes nonalcoholic fatty liver disease by regulating ROCK1/AMPK signaling through targeting miR-206. Cell Death Dis. 2021;12:809. doi: 10.1038/s41419-021-04090-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116.Zhang H., Li M., Zhang J., Shen Y., Gui Q. Exosomal Circ-XIAP Promotes Docetaxel Resistance in Prostate Cancer by Regulating miR-1182/TPD52 Axis. Drug Des. Devel Ther. 2021;15:1835–1849. doi: 10.2147/DDDT.S300376. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 117.Feng Y., Yang Y., Zhao X., Fan Y., Zhou L., Rong J., Yu Y. Circular RNA circ0005276 promotes the proliferation and migration of prostate cancer cells by interacting with FUS to transcriptionally activate XIAP. Cell Death Dis. 2019;10:792. doi: 10.1038/s41419-019-2028-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 118.Shen Z., Zhou L., Zhang C., Xu J. Reduction of circular RNA Foxo3 promotes prostate cancer progression and chemoresistance to docetaxel. Cancer Lett. 2020;468:88–101. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2019.10.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 119.Drula R., Pirlog R., Trif M., Slaby O., Braicu C., Berindan-Neagoe I. circFOXO3: Going around the mechanistic networks in cancer by interfering with miRNAs regulatory networks. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Mol. Basis Dis. 2021;1867:166045. doi: 10.1016/j.bbadis.2020.166045. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 120.Zhang S., Liao K., Miao Z., Wang Q., Miao Y., Guo Z., Qiu Y., Chen B., Ren L., Wei Z., et al. CircFOXO3 promotes glioblastoma progression by acting as a competing endogenous RNA for NFAT5. Neuro Oncol. 2019;21:1284–1296. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/noz128. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 121.Xiang T., Jiang H.S., Zhang B.T., Liu G. CircFOXO3 functions as a molecular sponge for miR-143-3p to promote the progression of gastric carcinoma via upregulating USP44. Gene. 2020;753:144798. doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2020.144798. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 122.Ai Y., Wu S., Zou C., Wei H. Circular RNA circFOXO3 regulates KDM2A by targeting miR-214 to promote tumor growth and metastasis in oral squamous cell carcinoma. J. Cell Mol. Med. 2021. Ahead of Print. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 123.Xing Y., Zha W.J., Li X.M., Li H., Gao F., Ye T., Du W.Q., Liu Y.C. Circular RNA circ-Foxo3 inhibits esophageal squamous cell cancer progression via the miR-23a/PTEN axis. J. Cell Biochem. 2020;121:2595–2605. doi: 10.1002/jcb.29481. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 124.Li Y., Qiao L., Zang Y., Ni W., Xu Z. Circular RNA FOXO3 Suppresses Bladder Cancer Progression and Metastasis by Regulating MiR-9-5p/TGFBR2. Cancer Manag. Res. 2020;12:5049–5056. doi: 10.2147/CMAR.S253412. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 125.Wang C., Tao W., Ni S., Chen Q. Circular RNA circ-Foxo3 induced cell apoptosis in urothelial carcinoma via interaction with miR-191-5p. Onco Targets Ther. 2019;12:8085–8094. doi: 10.2147/OTT.S215823. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] [Retracted]
  • 126.Huang W., Huang F., Feng C. CircFoxo3 Promotes Adriamycin Resistance through Regulation of miR-199a-5p/ATP Binding Cassette Subfamily C Member 1 Axis in Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Onco Targets Ther. 2020;13:5113–5122. doi: 10.2147/OTT.S243571. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 127.Du W.W., Yang W., Chen Y., Wu Z.K., Foster F.S., Yang Z., Li X., Yang B.B. Foxo3 circular RNA promotes cardiac senescence by modulating multiple factors associated with stress and senescence responses. Eur. Heart J. 2017;38:1402–1412. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehw001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 128.Su Y., Zhu C., Wang B., Zheng H., McAlister V., Lacefield J.C., Quan D., Mele T., Greasley A., Liu K., et al. Circular RNA Foxo3 in cardiac ischemia-reperfusion injury in heart transplantation: A new regulator and target. Am. J. Transplant. 2021;21:2992–3004. doi: 10.1111/ajt.16475. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 129.Yang Z., Huang C., Wen X., Liu W., Huang X., Li Y., Zang J., Weng Z., Lu D., Tsang C.K., et al. Circular RNA circ-FoxO3 attenuates blood-brain barrier damage by inducing autophagy during ischemia/reperfusion. Mol. Ther. 2021. Ahead of Print. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 130.Lin S.P., Hu J., Wei J.X., Ye S., Bu J., Xu W., Chen S., Wu Y., Wu G., Zhu L., et al. Silencing of circFoxO3 Protects HT22 Cells from Glutamate-Induced Oxidative Injury via Regulating the Mitochondrial Apoptosis Pathway. Cell Mol. Neurobiol. 2020;40:1231–1242. doi: 10.1007/s10571-020-00817-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 131.Feyerabend S., Saad F., Li T., Ito T., Diels J., Van Sanden S., De Porre P., Roiz J., Abogunrin S., Koufopoulou M., et al. Survival benefit, disease progression and quality-of-life outcomes of abiraterone acetate plus prednisone versus docetaxel in metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer: A network meta-analysis. Eur. J. Cancer. 2018;103:78–87. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2018.08.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 132.Buttigliero C., Tucci M., Bertaglia V., Vignani F., Bironzo P., Di Maio M., Scagliotti G.V. Understanding and overcoming the mechanisms of primary and acquired resistance to abiraterone and enzalutamide in castration resistant prostate cancer. Cancer Treat. Rev. 2015;41:884–892. doi: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2015.08.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 133.Li H., Zhang Y., Li D., Ma X., Xu K., Ding B., Li H., Wang Z., Ouyang W., Long G., et al. Androgen Receptor Splice Variant 7 Predicts Shorter Response in Patients with Metastatic Hormone-sensitive Prostate Cancer Receiving Androgen Deprivation Therapy. Eur. Urol. 2021;79:879–886. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2021.01.037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 134.Li H., Wang Z., Xiao W., Yan L., Guan W., Hu Z., Wu L., Huang Q., Wang J., Xu H., et al. Androgen-receptor splice variant-7-positive prostate cancer: A novel molecular subtype with markedly worse androgen-deprivation therapy outcomes in newly diagnosed patients. Mod. Pathol. 2018;31:198–208. doi: 10.1038/modpathol.2017.74. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 135.Antonarakis E.S., Lu C., Wang H., Luber B., Nakazawa M., Roeser J.C., Chen Y., Mohammad T.A., Chen Y., Fedor H.L., et al. AR-V7 and resistance to enzalutamide and abiraterone in prostate cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 2014;371:1028–1038. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1315815. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 136.Wu G., Sun Y., Xiang Z., Wang K., Liu B., Xiao G., Niu Y., Wu D., Chang C. Preclinical study using circular RNA 17 and micro RNA 181c-5p to suppress the enzalutamide-resistant prostate cancer progression. Cell Death Dis. 2019;10:37. doi: 10.1038/s41419-018-1048-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 137.Greene J., Baird A.M., Casey O., Brady L., Blackshields G., Lim M., O’Brien O., Gray S.G., McDermott R., Finn S.P. Circular RNAs are differentially expressed in prostate cancer and are potentially associated with resistance to enzalutamide. Sci. Rep. 2019;9:10739. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-47189-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 138.Yu J., Sun S., Mao W., Xu B., Chen M. Identification of Enzalutamide Resistance-Related circRNA-miRNA-mRNA Regulatory Networks in Patients with Prostate Cancer. Onco Targets Ther. 2021;14:3833–3848. doi: 10.2147/OTT.S309917. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] [Retracted]
  • 139.Xiang Z., Xu C., Wu G., Liu B., Wu D. CircRNA-UCK2 Increased TET1 Inhibits Proliferation and Invasion of Prostate Cancer Cells via Sponge MiRNA-767-5p. Open Med. 2019;14:833–842. doi: 10.1515/med-2019-0097. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 140.Chen W., Wang H., Feng J., Chen L. Overexpression of circRNA circUCK2 Attenuates Cell Apoptosis in Cerebral Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury via miR-125b-5p/GDF11 Signaling. Mol. Ther. Nucleic Acids. 2020;22:673–683. doi: 10.1016/j.omtn.2020.09.032. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] [Retracted]
  • 141.Liu B., Zhou X., Wu D., Zhang X., Shen X., Mi K., Qu Z., Jiang Y., Shang D. Comprehensive characterization of a drug-resistance-related ceRNA network across 15 anti-cancer drug categories. Mol. Ther. Nucleic Acids. 2021;24:11–24. doi: 10.1016/j.omtn.2021.02.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 142.Bartel D.P. MicroRNAs: Target recognition and regulatory functions. Cell. 2009;136:215–233. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2009.01.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 143.Qiu F., Yang L., Ling X., Yang R., Yang X., Zhang L., Fang W., Xie C., Huang D., Zhou Y., et al. Sequence Variation in Mature MicroRNA-499 Confers Unfavorable Prognosis of Lung Cancer Patients Treated with Platinum-Based Chemotherapy. Clin. Cancer Res. 2015;21:1602–1613. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-14-1174. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 144.Kawahara Y., Zinshteyn B., Sethupathy P., Iizasa H., Hatzigeorgiou A.G., Nishikura K. Redirection of silencing targets by adenosine-to-inosine editing of miRNAs. Science. 2007;315:1137–1140. doi: 10.1126/science.1138050. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 145.Epis M.R., Barker A., Giles K.M., Beveridge D.J., Leedman P.J. The RNA-binding protein HuR opposes the repression of ERBB-2 gene expression by microRNA miR-331-3p in prostate cancer cells. J. Biol. Chem. 2011;286:41442–41454. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M111.301481. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 146.Young L.E., Moore A.E., Sokol L., Meisner-Kober N., Dixon D.A. The mRNA stability factor HuR inhibits microRNA-16 targeting of COX-2. Mol. Cancer Res. 2012;10:167–180. doi: 10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-11-0337. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 147.Kim H.H., Kuwano Y., Srikantan S., Lee E.K., Martindale J.L., Gorospe M. HuR recruits let-7/RISC to repress c-Myc expression. Genes Dev. 2009;23:1743–1748. doi: 10.1101/gad.1812509. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 148.Hansen T.B., Kjems J., Damgaard C.K. Circular RNA and miR-7 in cancer. Cancer Res. 2013;73:5609–5612. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-13-1568. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 149.Wang K., Sun Y., Tao W., Fei X., Chang C. Androgen receptor (AR) promotes clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) migration and invasion via altering the circHIAT1/miR-195-5p/29a-3p/29c-3p/CDC42 signals. Cancer Lett. 2017;394:1–12. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2016.12.036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 150.Sun Y.M., Wang W.T., Zeng Z.C., Chen T.Q., Han C., Pan Q., Huang W., Fang K., Sun L.Y., Zhou Y.F., et al. circMYBL2, a circRNA from MYBL2, regulates FLT3 translation by recruiting PTBP1 to promote FLT3-ITD AML progression. Blood. 2019;134:1533–1546. doi: 10.1182/blood.2019000802. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 151.Liu Y., Dong Y., Zhao L., Su L., Luo J. Circular RNA-MTO1 suppresses breast cancer cell viability and reverses monastrol resistance through regulating the TRAF4/Eg5 axis. Int. J. Oncol. 2018;53:1752–1762. doi: 10.3892/ijo.2018.4485. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 152.Kim K.H., Lee M.S. Autophagy—A key player in cellular and body metabolism. Nat. Rev. Endocrinol. 2014;10:322–337. doi: 10.1038/nrendo.2014.35. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 153.Levy J.M.M., Towers C.G., Thorburn A. Targeting autophagy in cancer. Nat. Rev. Cancer. 2017;17:528–542. doi: 10.1038/nrc.2017.53. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 154.Qadir M.A., Kwok B., Dragowska W.H., To K.H., Le D., Bally M.B., Gorski S.M. Macroautophagy inhibition sensitizes tamoxifen-resistant breast cancer cells and enhances mitochondrial depolarization. Breast Cancer Res. Treat. 2008;112:389–403. doi: 10.1007/s10549-007-9873-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 155.Nguyen H.G., Yang J.C., Kung H.J., Shi X.B., Tilki D., Lara P.N., Jr., DeVere White R.W., Gao A.C., Evans C.P. Targeting autophagy overcomes Enzalutamide resistance in castration-resistant prostate cancer cells and improves therapeutic response in a xenograft model. Oncogene. 2014;33:4521–4530. doi: 10.1038/onc.2014.25. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 156.Kong R. Circular RNA hsa_circ_0085131 is involved in cisplatin-resistance of non-small-cell lung cancer cells by regulating autophagy. Cell Biol. Int. 2020;44:1945–1956. doi: 10.1002/cbin.11401. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 157.Chen M., Ai G., Zhou J., Mao W., Li H., Guo J. circMTO1 promotes tumorigenesis and chemoresistance of cervical cancer via regulating miR-6893. Biomed. Pharm. 2019;117:109064. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2019.109064. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 158.Liu F., Zhang J., Qin L., Yang Z., Xiong J., Zhang Y., Li R., Li S., Wang H., Yu B., et al. Circular RNA EIF6 (Hsa_circ_0060060) sponges miR-144-3p to promote the cisplatin-resistance of human thyroid carcinoma cells by autophagy regulation. Aging. 2018;10:3806–3820. doi: 10.18632/aging.101674. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 159.Shang J., Chen W.M., Liu S., Wang Z.H., Wei T.N., Chen Z.Z., Wu W.B. CircPAN3 contributes to drug resistance in acute myeloid leukemia through regulation of autophagy. Leuk. Res. 2019;85:106198. doi: 10.1016/j.leukres.2019.106198. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 160.Cao H.X., Miao C.F., Sang L.N., Huang Y.M., Zhang R., Sun L., Jiang Z.X. Circ_0009910 promotes imatinib resistance through ULK1-induced autophagy by sponging miR-34a-5p in chronic myeloid leukemia. Life Sci. 2020;243:117255. doi: 10.1016/j.lfs.2020.117255. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 161.Nassar D., Blanpain C. Cancer Stem Cells: Basic Concepts and Therapeutic Implications. Annu. Rev. Pathol. 2016;11:47–76. doi: 10.1146/annurev-pathol-012615-044438. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 162.Jian X., He H., Zhu J., Zhang Q., Zheng Z., Liang X., Chen L., Yang M., Peng K., Zhang Z., et al. Hsa_circ_001680 affects the proliferation and migration of CRC and mediates its chemoresistance by regulating BMI1 through miR-340. Mol. Cancer. 2020;19:20. doi: 10.1186/s12943-020-1134-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 163.Zhao X., Zhong Q., Cheng X., Wang S., Wu R., Leng X., Shao L. miR-449c-5p availability is antagonized by circ-NOTCH1 for MYC-induced NOTCH1 upregulation as well as tumor metastasis and stemness in gastric cancer. J. Cell Biochem. 2020;121:4052–4063. doi: 10.1002/jcb.29575. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 164.Saxena M., Stephens M.A., Pathak H., Rangarajan A. Transcription factors that mediate epithelial-mesenchymal transition lead to multidrug resistance by upregulating ABC transporters. Cell Death Dis. 2011;2:e179. doi: 10.1038/cddis.2011.61. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 165.Liang Y., Song X., Li Y., Ma T., Su P., Guo R., Chen B., Zhang H., Sang Y., Liu Y., et al. Targeting the circBMPR2/miR-553/USP4 Axis as a Potent Therapeutic Approach for Breast Cancer. Mol. Ther. Nucleic Acids. 2019;17:347–361. doi: 10.1016/j.omtn.2019.05.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 166.Liang Y., Song X., Li Y., Su P., Han D., Ma T., Guo R., Chen B., Zhao W., Sang Y., et al. circKDM4C suppresses tumor progression and attenuates doxorubicin resistance by regulating miR-548p/PBLD axis in breast cancer. Oncogene. 2019;38:6850–6866. doi: 10.1038/s41388-019-0926-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 167.Huang W., Yang Y., Wu J., Niu Y., Yao Y., Zhang J., Huang X., Liang S., Chen R., Chen S., et al. Circular RNA cESRP1 sensitises small cell lung cancer cells to chemotherapy by sponging miR-93-5p to inhibit TGF-β signalling. Cell Death Differ. 2020;27:1709–1727. doi: 10.1038/s41418-019-0455-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 168.Joseph N.A., Chiou S.H., Lung Z., Yang C.L., Lin T.Y., Chang H.W., Sun H.S., Gupta S.K., Yen L., Wang S.D., et al. The role of HGF-MET pathway and CCDC66 cirRNA expression in EGFR resistance and epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition of lung adenocarcinoma cells. J. Hematol. Oncol. 2018;11:74. doi: 10.1186/s13045-018-0557-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 169.Hong X., Liu N., Liang Y., He Q., Yang X., Lei Y., Zhang P., Zhao Y., He S., Wang Y., et al. Circular RNA CRIM1 functions as a ceRNA to promote nasopharyngeal carcinoma metastasis and docetaxel chemoresistance through upregulating FOXQ1. Mol. Cancer. 2020;19:33. doi: 10.1186/s12943-020-01149-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 170.Liu J., Xue N., Guo Y., Niu K., Gao L., Zhang S., Gu H., Wang X., Zhao D., Fan R. CircRNA_100367 regulated the radiation sensitivity of esophageal squamous cell carcinomas through miR-217/Wnt3 pathway. Aging. 2019;11:12412–12427. doi: 10.18632/aging.102580. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 171.He Y., Mingyan E., Wang C., Liu G., Shi M., Liu S. CircVRK1 regulates tumor progression and radioresistance in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma by regulating miR-624-3p/PTEN/PI3K/AKT signaling pathway. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2019;125:116–123. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.11.273. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 172.Xu Y., Kong S., Qin S., Shen X., Ju S. Exosomal circRN.NAs: Sorting Mechanisms, Roles and Clinical Applications in Tumors. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 2020;8:581558. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2020.581558. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 173.Li L., Li W., Chen N., Zhao H., Xu G., Zhao Y., Pan X., Zhang X., Zhou L., Yu D., et al. FLI1 Exonic Circular RNAs as a Novel Oncogenic Driver to Promote Tumor Metastasis in Small Cell Lung Cancer. Clin. Cancer Res. 2019;25:1302–1317. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-18-1447. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 174.Hon K.W., Ab-Mutalib N.S., Abdullah N.M.A., Jamal R., Abu N. Extracellular Vesicle-derived circular RNAs confers chemoresistance in Colorectal cancer. Sci. Rep. 2019;9:16497. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-53063-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 175.Wang X., Zhang H., Yang H., Bai M., Ning T., Deng T., Liu R., Fan Q., Zhu K., Li J., et al. Exosome-delivered circRNA promotes glycolysis to induce chemoresistance through the miR-122-PKM2 axis in colorectal cancer. Mol. Oncol. 2020;14:539–555. doi: 10.1002/1878-0261.12629. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 176.Xu Y., Qiu A., Peng F., Tan X., Wang J., Gong X. Exosomal transfer of circular RNA FBXW7 ameliorates the chemoresistance to oxaliplatin in colorectal cancer by sponging miR-18b-5p. Neoplasma. 2021;68:108–118. doi: 10.4149/neo_2020_200417N414. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 177.Yang B., Teng F., Chang L., Wang J., Liu D.L., Cui Y.S., Li G.H. Tumor-derived exosomal circRNA_102481 contributes to EGFR-TKIs resistance via the miR-30a-5p/ROR1 axis in non-small cell lung cancer. Aging. 2021;13:13264–13286. doi: 10.18632/aging.203011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 178.Ding C., Yi X., Wu X., Bu X., Wang D., Wu Z., Zhang G., Gu J., Kang D. Exosome-mediated transfer of circRNA CircNFIX enhances temozolomide resistance in glioma. Cancer Lett. 2020;479:1–12. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2020.03.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 179.Xu J., Ji L., Liang Y., Wan Z., Zheng W., Song X., Gorshkov K., Sun Q., Lin H., Zheng X., et al. CircRNA-SORE mediates sorafenib resistance in hepatocellular carcinoma by stabilizing YBX1. Signal. Transduct. Target. Ther. 2020;5:298. doi: 10.1038/s41392-020-00375-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 180.Luo Y., Gui R. Circulating Exosomal CircMYC Is Associated with Recurrence and Bortezomib Resistance in Patients with Multiple Myeloma. Turk. J. Haematol. 2020;37:248–262. doi: 10.4274/tjh.galenos.2020.2020.0243. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 181.Luo Y., Gui R. Circulating exosomal circFoxp1 confers cisplatin resistance in epithelial ovarian cancer cells. J. Gynecol. Oncol. 2020;31:e75. doi: 10.3802/jgo.2020.31.e75. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 182.Pan Y., Lin Y., Mi C. Cisplatin-resistant osteosarcoma cell-derived exosomes confer cisplatin resistance to recipient cells in an exosomal circ_103801-dependent manner. Cell Biol. Int. 2021;45:858–868. doi: 10.1002/cbin.11532. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 183.Zeng Z., Zhao Y., Chen Q., Zhu S., Niu Y., Ye Z., Hu P., Chen D., Xu P., Chen J., et al. Hypoxic exosomal HIF-1α-stabilizing circZNF91 promotes chemoresistance of normoxic pancreatic cancer cells via enhancing glycolysis. Oncogene. 2021;40:5505–5517. doi: 10.1038/s41388-021-01960-w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 184.Chen S.W., Zhu S.Q., Pei X., Qiu B.Q., Xiong D., Long X., Lin K., Lu F., Xu J.J., Wu Y.B. Cancer cell-derived exosomal circUSP7 induces CD8(+) T cell dysfunction and anti-PD1 resistance by regulating the miR-934/SHP2 axis in NSCLC. Mol. Cancer. 2021;20:144. doi: 10.1186/s12943-021-01448-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 185.Zhang P.F., Gao C., Huang X.Y., Lu J.C., Guo X.J., Shi G.M., Cai J.B., Ke A.W. Cancer cell-derived exosomal circUHRF1 induces natural killer cell exhaustion and may cause resistance to anti-PD1 therapy in hepatocellular carcinoma. Mol. Cancer. 2020;19:110. doi: 10.1186/s12943-020-01222-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 186.Motzer R.J., Tannir N.M., McDermott D.F., Arén Frontera O., Melichar B., Choueiri T.K., Plimack E.R., Barthélémy P., Porta C., George S., et al. Nivolumab plus Ipilimumab versus Sunitinib in Advanced Renal-Cell Carcinoma. N. Engl. J. Med. 2018;378:1277–1290. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1712126. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 187.Thana M., Wood L. Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Genitourinary Malignancies. Curr. Oncol. 2020;27:69–77. doi: 10.3747/co.27.5121. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 188.Balar A.V., Castellano D., O’Donnell P.H., Grivas P., Vuky J., Powles T., Plimack E.R., Hahn N.M., de Wit R., Pang L., et al. First-line pembrolizumab in cisplatin-ineligible patients with locally advanced and unresectable or metastatic urothelial cancer (KEYNOTE-052): A multicentre, single-arm, phase 2 study. Lancet Oncol. 2017;18:1483–1492. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(17)30616-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 189.Balar A.V., Galsky M.D., Rosenberg J.E., Powles T., Petrylak D.P., Bellmunt J., Loriot Y., Necchi A., Hoffman-Censits J., Perez-Gracia J.L., et al. Atezolizumab as first-line treatment in cisplatin-ineligible patients with locally advanced and metastatic urothelial carcinoma: A single-arm, multicentre, phase 2 trial. Lancet. 2017;389:67–76. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)32455-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 190.Schoenfeld A.J., Hellmann M.D. Acquired Resistance to Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors. Cancer Cell. 2020;37:443–455. doi: 10.1016/j.ccell.2020.03.017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 191.Ge W., Chi H., Tang H., Xu J., Wang J., Cai W., Ma H. Circular RNA CELF1 drives immunosuppression and anti-PD1 therapy resistance in non-small cell lung cancer via the miR-491-5p/EGFR axis. Aging. 2021;13:24560–24579. doi: 10.18632/aging.203576. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 192.Huang X.Y., Zhang P.F., Wei C.Y., Peng R., Lu J.C., Gao C., Cai J.B., Yang X., Fan J., Ke A.W., et al. Circular RNA circMET drives immunosuppression and anti-PD1 therapy resistance in hepatocellular carcinoma via the miR-30-5p/snail/DPP4 axis. Mol. Cancer. 2020;19:92. doi: 10.1186/s12943-020-01213-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 193.Crocetto F., Buonerba C., Caputo V., Ferro M., Persico F., Trama F., Iliano E., Rapisarda S., Bada M., Facchini G., et al. Urologic malignancies: Advances in the analysis and interpretation of clinical findings. Future Sci. OA. 2021;7:FSO674. doi: 10.2144/fsoa-2020-0210. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 194.Liu X., Abraham J.M., Cheng Y., Wang Z., Wang Z., Zhang G., Ashktorab H., Smoot D.T., Cole R.N., Boronina T.N., et al. Synthetic Circular RNA Functions as a miR-21 Sponge to Suppress Gastric Carcinoma Cell Proliferation. Mol. Ther. Nucleic Acids. 2018;13:312–321. doi: 10.1016/j.omtn.2018.09.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 195.Ebert M.S., Sharp P.A. MicroRNA sponges: Progress and possibilities. RNA. 2010;16:2043–2050. doi: 10.1261/rna.2414110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 196.Han K., Wang F.W., Cao C.H., Ling H., Chen J.W., Chen R.X., Feng Z.H., Luo J., Jin X.H., Duan J.L., et al. CircLONP2 enhances colorectal carcinoma invasion and metastasis through modulating the maturation and exosomal dissemination of microRNA-17. Mol. Cancer. 2020;19:60. doi: 10.1186/s12943-020-01184-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 197.Qiu M., Xia W., Chen R., Wang S., Xu Y., Ma Z., Xu W., Zhang E., Wang J., Fang T., et al. The Circular RNA circPRKCI Promotes Tumor Growth in Lung Adenocarcinoma. Cancer Res. 2018;78:2839–2851. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-17-2808. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 198.Zhang X., Wang S., Wang H., Cao J., Huang X., Chen Z., Xu P., Sun G., Xu J., Lv J., et al. Circular RNA circNRIP1 acts as a microRNA-149-5p sponge to promote gastric cancer progression via the AKT1/mTOR pathway. Mol. Cancer. 2019;18:20. doi: 10.1186/s12943-018-0935-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.


Articles from Cancers are provided here courtesy of Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)

RESOURCES