Abstract
Dandy-Walker malformation (DWM) is a common prenatally diagnosed cerebellar malformation, characterized by cystic dilatation of the fourth ventricle, upward rotation of the hypoplastic vermis, and posterior fossa enlargement with torcular elevation. DWM is associated with a broad spectrum of neurodevelopmental abnormalities such as cognitive, motor, and behavioral impairments, which cannot be explained solely by cerebellar malformations. Notably, the pathogenesis of these symptoms remains poorly understood. This study investigated whether fetal structural developmental abnormalities in DWM extended beyond the posterior fossa to the cerebrum even in fetuses without apparent cerebral anomalies. Post-acquisition volumetric fetal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) analysis was performed in 12 fetuses with DWM and 14 control fetuses. Growth trajectories of the volumes of the cortical plate, subcortical parenchyma, cerebellar hemispheres, and vermis between 18 and 33 weeks of gestation were compared. The median (interquartile range) gestational ages at the time of MRI were 22.4 (19.4–24.0) and 23.9 (20.6–29.2) weeks in the DWM and control groups, respectively (p = 0.269). Eight of the 12 fetuses with DWM presented with associated cerebral anomalies, including hydrocephalus (n = 3), cerebral ventriculomegaly (n = 3), and complete (n = 2) and partial (n = 2) agenesis of the corpus callosum (ACC); 7 presented with extracerebral abnormalities. Chromosomal abnormalities were detected by microarray analysis in 4 of 11 fetuses with DWM, using amniocentesis. Volumetric analysis revealed that the cortical plate was significantly larger in fetuses with DWM than in controls (p = 0.040). Even without ACC, the subcortical parenchyma, whole cerebrum, cerebellar hemispheres, and whole brain were significantly larger in fetuses with DWM (n = 8) than in controls (p = 0.004, 0.025, 0.033, and 0.026, respectively). In conclusion, volumetric fetal MRI analysis demonstrated that the development of DWM extends throughout the brain during the fetal period, even without apparent cerebral anomalies.
Introduction
Dandy-Walker malformation (DWM) is a well-known congenital anomaly of the cerebellum and posterior fossa. The prevalence of DWM at birth is reported to be 6.79 per 100,000 births [1]. DWM is diagnosed based on several characteristic imaging features, including cystic dilatation of the fourth ventricle, upward rotation of the hypoplastic vermis, and enlargement of the posterior fossa with elevated torcular herophili and tentorium [2–4]. Although not included in the diagnostic criteria, hydrocephalus ultimately occurs in approximately 90% of cases with DWM [1,5,6]. As hydrocephalus typically develops during early infancy, an increase in head circumference is a common clinical presentation in infants with DWM [5,7]. Advances in imaging technology during pregnancy have enabled more cases with DWM to be detected prenatally, using ultrasound examinations or fetal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) [1,8]. In particular, fetal MRI provides a detailed anatomical assessment of the posterior fossa and supratentorial structure, thereby facilitating investigation of associated brain anomalies [9]. Although a hypoplastic vermis and fourth ventricular cyst constitute core structural abnormalities in DWM, coexisting cerebral abnormalities are presenting features in up to 67% of cases [5,10]. These include agenesis of the corpus callosum (ACC), gray matter heterotopia, and cerebral gyral anomalies [5,11–13]. Notably, fetuses with associated cerebral malformations, extracerebral malformations, or chromosomal abnormalities generally have poorer neurodevelopmental outcomes compared to those without such anomalies [2,10]. Therefore, investigation of associated cerebral anomalies is critical for predicting prognosis when a fetus is diagnosed with DWM. However, prenatal counseling remains challenging due to the variability in neurodevelopmental outcomes in cases with DWM [10,11,14]. Indeed, even fetuses without apparent associated cerebral anomalies may have significant neurodevelopmental impairments [14]. Prior studies focusing on the association between the degree of vermian hypoplasia and neurodevelopmental outcomes have suggested that dysplastic vermian fissures may be associated with poor neurodevelopmental outcomes in patients with DWM [12,15]. A previous study scored vermian lobulation with fetal MRI to subcategorize cystic posterior fossa malformations [16]. However, cerebellar and posterior fossa anomalies cannot fully explain the broad spectrum of developmental abnormalities in DWM. Fetuses with DWM may share the feature of diffuse cerebral pathology, which is a common cause of cerebral functional impairments such as cognitive, motor, and behavioral neurodevelopmental abnormalities. To date, no study has evaluated whole-brain development in fetuses with DWM. Accordingly, there is a need to comprehensively examine the development of the fetal brain in patients with DWM.
We have previously compared volumetric analysis findings on fetal brain MRI in Down syndrome and controls; volumetric analysis enabled quantification of the volume of each brain structure and revealed subtle developmental abnormalities that could not be identified using conventional qualitative visual assessment [17]. In this volumetric fetal MRI study, we assessed whether the neuropathology of DWM extended beyond the posterior fossa, even in fetuses without apparent cerebral anomalies.
Materials and methods
Ethics statement
The Institutional Review Boards of the Tufts Medical Center (TMC) and Boston Children’s Hospital (BCH) approved this study.
Participants
At TMC, written informed consent was obtained from pregnant women whose fetuses were diagnosed with DWM at their visit to the center. At BCH, the need for informed consent from the parents of fetuses with DWM was waived because the images were identified retrospectively from archived data. The MRI diagnostic criteria for DWM were as follows: (1) cystic dilatation of the fourth ventricle, (2) hypoplasia or agenesis of the cerebellar vermis with upward rotation, and (3) enlargement of the posterior fossa with elevated torcular herophili and tentorium. Fetuses with DWM were identified retrospectively at BCH between January 2011 and December 2018 from an archived radiology database (n = 12). Fetuses diagnosed with DWM by fetal MRI between October 2012 and July 2018 were prospectively recruited at TMC (n = 3). The inclusion criteria for pregnant women with DWM were as follows: maternal age of 18–45 years, singleton pregnancy, and gestational age of 18–36 weeks. Associated cerebral or extracerebral malformations diagnosed using ultrasound and fetal MRI were recorded. We also reviewed whether the pregnant women underwent amniocentesis for chromosomal analysis (e.g., chromosomal microarray analysis) and recorded the genetic test results. The exclusion criteria for quantitative fetal MRI analysis were as follows: (1) poor-quality raw MR images, and (2) associated cerebral anomalies that were considered to be the primary pathology (e.g., encephalocele or schizencephaly). Callosal anomalies were not excluded, as they are frequently (5–55%) associated with DWM [2,13,18–21].
A total of 14 fetal brain MR images of controls were used for comparison. Healthy pregnant women with uncomplicated pregnancies were recruited at the obstetric clinic at TMC; they provided written informed consent. The inclusion criteria for pregnant women in the control group were the same as those in the DWM group. Fetuses with dysmorphic features on sonographic examination or known congenital infections were excluded. Participants were also excluded from the control group if fetal MRI identified any abnormalities. Among 14 control participants, 12 had participated in our previous study [17,22]. A pediatric neuroradiologist (N.M.) and a pediatric neurologist (T.T.) reviewed all MR images.
MRI acquisition
Fetal MRI studies were performed using T2-weighted fast spin-echo sequences: half-Fourier acquisition single-shot turbo spin-echo (HASTE, Siemens) at BCH and single-shot turbo spin-echo (SSTSE, Philips) at TMC. The following MRI sequence was used in the Siemens 3 T scanner: repetition time (TR) = 1.6 s, echo time (TE) = 120 ms, field of view (FOV) = 300–330 mm, in-plane resolution = 1.15–1.29 mm2, slice thickness = 2–4 mm. The following MRI sequence was used in the Phillips 1.5 T scanner: TR = 12.5 s, TE = 180 ms, FOV = 256 mm, in-plane resolution = 1 mm, slice thickness = 3 mm. HASTE acquisition was performed in three orthogonal axes (axial, coronal, and sagittal). At the initial review, MRI studies without severe motion or other artifacts in the brain were included in this study.
Post-acquisition processing for quantitative fetal MRI analysis
For detailed quantitative fetal MRI analysis, we employed the pipeline for fetal MR image processing used in our previous studies [17,22,23]. This fetal MR image processing pipeline includes brain masking, bias field correction, and fetal head motion correction and alignment.
Raw MR images contained motion artifacts and were not aligned, reflecting fetal head motion, position, maternal breathing, and arterial pulsation at the time of scanning (Fig 1A). To correct for motion between slices, multiple 2D slices of fetal brain MR images were combined using a slice-to-volume registration technique [24]. However, rigid registration does not consider changes in fetal head position relative to the mother. Therefore, to decrease alignment errors in the rigid registration, we first created masks containing the fetal brain to delimit the region of interest using FreeView (surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu) and extracted brain regions. Additionally, to improve reconstruction quality, we corrected the intensity inhomogeneity. In the original MR images, the intensity changed smoothly across a slice due to a biased magnetic field, which was affected by fetal motion and/or MRI acquisition settings. Thus, we performed bias field correction on the extracted brain regions using ANTs N4BiasFieldCorrection [25]. After brain extraction and bias field correction, motion correction was performed using volumetric rigid registration implemented in IRTK software (www.doc.ic.ac.uk/~dr/software). Following reconstruction of the first estimated volume, the rigid slice-to-volume registration and super-resolution reconstruction of the volume were repeated eight times. This algorithm ultimately created a motion-corrected 3D volume with an isotropic resolution of 0.75 mm.
Fetal heads were subsequently aligned in the same direction along the anterior and posterior commissures (Fig 1B) using AFNI software (afni.nimh.nih.gov/afni) [26]. When motion correction resulted in volume images of poor quality due to insufficient quality or misalignment in multiple planes, volumetric analyses were performed on selected high-quality raw MR images in coronal or axial views with minimum motion artifacts.
Fetal brain tissue segmentation and volumetric analysis
The following substructures were manually segmented in the aligned 3D fetal brain volume using FreeView: the cortical plate, subcortical parenchyma, cerebellar hemispheres, vermis, brainstem, and lateral, third, and fourth ventricles (Fig 1C and 1D). Manual segmentation was performed according to the intensity value ranges in each coronal slice and was confirmed on orthogonal axial and sagittal views. Although automatic segmentation for fetal brain MRI has been performed in previous studies [27], we did not employ it in this study owing to the challenges involved. First, shapes and appearance of fetal brain substructures vary owing to rapid fetal brain development [27]. Second, the immature brain has lower tissue differentiation due to higher water content compared to that in the adult brain [28]. For the same reasons, we segmented developing white matter and subcortical gray matter as a single structure (subcortical parenchyma). After completion of segmentation, the regional brain structures were reconstructed three-dimensionally. The volume of each brain region was measured using a Slicer (4.10.2, slicer.org). The volume of each of the following regions was calculated as the sum of the whole cerebrum (cortical plate and subcortical parenchyma), whole cerebellum (cerebellar hemispheres and vermis), and whole brain (whole cerebrum and whole cerebellum). Brainstem volume was excluded due to the difficulty in identifying the boundary between the brainstem and spinal cord.
Assessment of vermian lobulation
To explore the association between the presence of additional brain malformations (e.g., callosal anomalies) and degree of vermian dysplasia, the development of vermian lobules was scored according to previous studies [16,29]. High-resolution midsagittal T2-weighted images of the fetal brain were used for scoring. Fetuses at less than 22 weeks’ gestation were excluded from this analysis, due to the difficulty in identifying the small vermian lobules beyond the resolution of fetal MRI, as reported previously [29]. The number of differentiable lobules was identified and quantified to assess the anatomical development of the vermis. Three raters (S.A., T.T., and N.M.) independently scored the vermian lobulation.
Statistical analysis
The gestational ages of fetuses in the MRI studies are presented as medians (interquartile ranges) and were compared using the two-tailed Wilcoxon rank-sum test. Maternal ages are presented as means ± SD and were compared using the two-tailed Welch t-test. Fetal sex ratio was compared between groups using a two-tailed Fisher’s exact test.
During the fetal period, regional structural volume increases as gestational age progresses [17,30,31]. During volumetric analysis, we did not perform pairwise comparison due to differences in the gestational age distribution of each group. Instead, we created scatter diagrams, whereby the volumes of the segmented structures were expressed as a function of gestational age to maximize the availability of the data. Previous volumetric fetal MRI studies have demonstrated that the volumes of brain substructures increase exponentially [17,32]. Additionally, as the SD of brain substructures increases with advancing gestational age, prior studies have used natural log-transformed volume data to achieve a normal distribution [31,32]. In this study, we observed that the linear regression model with a natural logarithmic transformation of the volume data was the best fit for both DWM and control groups. The quality of fit in these models was assessed by calculating the adjusted coefficient of determination (R2a). Differences in the slopes and y-intercepts were compared between the DWM and control groups using analysis of covariance (ANCOVA). We first tested for differences between slopes; if no significant differences between slopes were identified, we tested for differences between y-intercepts.
To assess the quality of manual segmentation, the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) was computed to test the inter-rater reliability of MR image segmentation by two raters. Based on the kappa statistic, DSC > 0.75 was considered excellent agreement [33]. Additionally, to ensure the reliability of segmentation using raw MR images in small structures such as the vermis and cerebellar hemispheres, measured volumes on both reconstructed volume images and raw MR images in the same brain were compared using the two-tailed Wilcoxon signed-rank test. During vermian lobulation analysis, the mean value of the three raters was used as the vermian lobulation score. Intergroup comparisons of the number of lobules were performed using ANCOVA.
Statistical analysis was performed using JMP Pro version 14.0 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA) and GraphPad Prism version 8 (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA, USA). Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05.
Results
Participants
This study used MR images from 15 fetuses with DWM (Table 1, S1 Fig) and 14 control fetuses (Table 2). Two fetuses were excluded from the DWM group due to the presence of other significant primary brain malformations (encephalocele and schizencephaly). In addition, one fetus was excluded due to poor-quality raw MR images. Among the remaining 12 fetuses with DWM, motion correction and volume reconstruction were performed successfully for 10 fetuses. For the other two fetuses for whom volume reconstruction failed, high-quality raw MR images with minimal motion artifacts in axial planes were still eligible for volumetric analysis. Consequently, brain MR images of 12 fetuses with DWM and 14 control fetuses were subjected to volumetric analysis.
Table 1. Demographics of fetuses with Dandy-Walker malformation.
Participant | Volumetric analysis | Maternal age | Fetal sex | Chromosomal abnormalities | GA of MRI [weeks] | Associated cerebral anomalies | Extracerebral anomalies | Number of vermian lobules |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BCH_CM01 | Y | 24 | M | Negative | 19.29 | Hydrocephalus | Cystic kidneys | N/A |
BCH_CM02 | Y | 19 | F | Negative | 23.43 | None | None | 3.67 |
BCH_CM03 | Ya | 37 | F | 46,XX,add(6)(p25) | 23.29 | Hydrocephalus partial ACC |
Hypertelorism CoA |
1.00 |
BCH_CM05 | Y | 38 | F | Negative | 19.00 | None | None | N/A |
BCH_CM06 | Y | 30 | F | Negative | 24.14 | Hydrocephalus | None | 4.00 |
BCH_CM07 | Y | 24 | M | Negative | 19.86 | Ventriculomegaly | None | N/A |
BCH_CM08 | Y | 31 | M | Negative | 22.14 | None | TOF | 1.00 |
BCH_CM09 | Ya | 20 | F | 46,XX,del(3)(q21q25) | 33.14 | Ventriculomegaly partial ACC | CDH VSD hypoplastic LV Hydronephrosis FGR |
1.00 |
BCH_CM10 | Y | 23 | M | absence of heterozygosity in 6q and 14q | 28.00 | Ventriculomegaly | Craniofacial disproportion Hydronephrosis |
3.67 |
BM69 | Ya | 42 | M* | N/A | 20.14 | ACC | AVCD PA |
N/A |
BM83 | Y | 37 | M | Negative | 19.14 | None | None | N/A |
BM84 | Ya | 32 | M | 47,XY,+9 | 22.57 | ACC | Skeletal anomalies DORV FGR |
1.33 |
BCH_CM04 | N | 33 | M | Negative | 20.00 | None | None | N/A |
BCH_CM11 | N | 23 | N/A | N/A | 27.71 | Encephalocele ACC | None | N/A |
BCH_CM12 | N | 39 | Unknown | Negative | 19.29 | Schizencephaly Nodular heterotopia | None | N/A |
Three participants (rows highlighted in grey) were excluded from volumetric analysis and assessment of vermian lobulation due to associated central nervous system anomalies or poor imaging quality. The maximum number of differentiable vermian lobules was defined as seven. The number of vermian lobules represents the mean value among the three raters.
Y, eligible for volumetrics; Ya, eligible for volumetrics but excluded from the subgroup analysis due to callosal anomalies; N, ineligible for volumetric analysis; M*, male external genitalia on fetal MRI; ACC, agenesis of the corpus callosum; AVCD, atrioventricular canal defect; CoA, coarctation of the aorta; CDH, congenital diaphragmatic hernia; DORV, double outlet right ventricle; FGR, fetal growth restriction; GA, gestational age; LV, left ventricle; PA, pulmonary atresia; TOF, tetralogy of Fallot; VSD, ventricular septal defect.
Table 2. Demographics of control fetuses.
Participant | Maternal age | Fetal sex | CVS/AC/postnatal karyotype | GA of MRI [weeks] | MRI review | Other anomalies | Number of vermian lobules |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BM-10 | 23 | M | N/A | 20.00 | Unremarkable | None | N/A |
BM-18 | 30 | M | N/A | 29.57 | Unremarkable | None | 7.00 |
BM-26 | 31 | M | N/A | 18.57 | Unremarkable | None | N/A |
BM-28 | 32 | F | N/A | 22.86 | Unremarkable | None | 5.67 |
BM-37 | 22 | F | N/A | 29.14 | Unremarkable | None | 5.67 |
BM-38 | 33 | F | N/A | 25.57 | Unremarkable | None | 6.00 |
BM-39 | 34 | M | N/A | 32.00 | Unremarkable | None | 7.00 |
BM-42 | 30 | F | N/A | 33.29 | Unremarkable | None | 6.67 |
BM-47 | 34 | M | N/A | 24.71 | Unremarkable | None | 6.00 |
BM-54 | 27 | M | N/A | 19.71 | Unremarkable | None | N/A |
BM-92 | 22 | F | N/A | 20.86 | Unremarkable | None | N/A |
BM-97 | 31 | M | N/A | 25.71 | Unremarkable | None | N/A |
BM-142 | 34 | M | 46, XY | 23.00 | Unremarkable | None | 5.67 |
BM-143 | 35 | F | N/A | 20.86 | Unremarkable | None | N/A |
No dysmorphic features were detected on obstetric sonography or fetal MRI. The maximum number of differentiable vermian lobules was defined as seven. The number of vermian lobules represents the mean value for the three raters. CVS, chorionic villi sampling; AC, amniocentesis; GA, gestational age.
The median (interquartile range) gestational ages of the 12 fetuses with DWM and 14 control fetuses were 22.4 (19.4–24.0) and 23.9 (20.6–29.2) weeks, respectively (z-score = -1.106, p = 0.269, Wilcoxon rank-sum test). The mean (± SD) maternal ages in the DWM and control groups were 29.8 ± 7.7 and 29.9 ± 4.6 years, respectively (t-value = -0.042, degrees of freedom = 17.355, p = 0.967, Welch t-test).
The sex of 11 fetuses with DWM was determined using karyotyping. The sex of one fetus that did not undergo karyotyping was determined based on the observation of male external genitalia on MRI. Among 12 fetuses in the DWM group, 7 (58%) were male. No significant difference was observed in the proportion of male fetuses between the DWM and control groups (male: n = 8, 57%; p = 1.0, Fisher’s exact test).
Eight of the 12 fetuses with DWM presented with abnormal MRI findings, that were considered to be secondary pathology to DWM: these included hydrocephalus (n = 3), cerebral ventriculomegaly (n = 3), complete ACC (n = 2), and partial ACC (n = 2). Ultrasound examination detected extracerebral abnormalities in seven fetuses, including congenital heart disease (n = 4), congenital anomalies of the kidney and urinary tract (n = 3), skeletal anomalies (n = 2), and congenital diaphragmatic hernia (n = 1). Chromosomal microarray analysis using amniocentesis revealed chromosomal abnormalities in 4 of the 11 fetuses, including trisomy 9 (n = 1), additional material on chromosome 6q25 (n = 1), an interstitial deletion of 3q21-25 (n = 1), and absence of heterozygosity in 6q and 14q (n = 1). Three of the 12 fetuses with DWM had isolated DWM (Table 1).
Volumetric analysis
In this study, we performed both whole-group and subgroup analyses, which included all 12 fetuses in the DWM group and excluded 4 fetuses with callosal anomalies from the DWM group, respectively. Subgroup analysis was performed to eliminate the effects of associated callosal anomalies, that may have affected cortical plate development.
On whole-group analysis, a logarithmic transformation of regional brain structural volume revealed a linear increase between 18 and 33 weeks of gestation in both the DWM and control groups (R2a = 0.32–0.84 and 0.80–0.94, respectively) (Fig 2). We confirmed vermian hypoplasia as decreased vermian volume (p-value for the y-intercept = 0.001) (Fig 2A), which is a key feature of DWM. Fetuses with DWM exhibited reduced growth trajectories in the cerebellar hemispheres and whole cerebellum compared to control fetuses (p = 0.031 and 0.036, respectively) (Fig 2B and 2C). Furthermore, fetuses with DWM exhibited an accelerated growth pattern of the whole cortical plate compared to control fetuses (p = 0.040) (Fig 2F). Assessment of the cortical plate separately in the right and left hemispheres revealed that the left hemispheric cortical plate was larger in fetuses with DWM than in control fetuses (p-value for the y-intercept = 0.028) (Fig 2E), although no significant difference was observed for the right hemispheric cortical plate (p-value for the y-intercept = 0.061) (Fig 2D). No significant differences were observed in the growth patterns of the subcortical parenchyma, whole cerebrum, and whole brain (p-values for the slope = 0.207, 0.239, and 0.220; p-value for the y-intercept = 0.667, 0.454, and 0.490, respectively) (Fig 2G–2I).
In the subgroup analysis that excluded 4 fetuses with callosal anomalies from the DWM group, we also excluded 2 fetuses with a gestational age > 30 weeks from the control group to match the distribution of gestational age between groups. Subgroup analysis revealed a stronger correlation between logarithmic-transformed regional structural volume and gestational age in the DWM group (R2a = 0.63–0.98) (Fig 3) compared to that in the whole-group analysis. Similar to the results of the whole-group analysis, fetuses with DWM had a smaller vermis compared to control fetuses (p-value for the y-intercept = 0.002) (Fig 3A). Between 18 and 30 weeks of gestation, fetuses with DWM had a significantly larger cortical plate in the whole hemisphere and in both the right and left hemispheres (p-value for the y-intercept = 0.012, 0.014, and 0.011, respectively), compared to control fetuses (Fig 3D–3F). Notably, after excluding fetuses with callosal anomalies, the analysis revealed that fetuses with DWM had larger subcortical parenchyma, whole cerebrum, cerebellar hemispheres, and whole brain (p = 0.004, 0.025, 0.033, and 0.026, respectively) compared to control fetuses (Fig 3B and 3G–3I). On subgroup analysis, no significant differences were observed between groups in terms of the whole cerebellum (p-value for the slope = 0.654; p-value for the y-intercept = 0.210) (Fig 3C). The full results of the linear regression analysis are provided in the supplementary tables (S1 and S2 Tables).
To test inter-rater reliability, we calculated the DSC for the substructure segmentation in the brains of two fetuses (BM-42 and BM-92). DSCs for the substructures were 0.935–0.951, 0.985–0.989, and 0.956–0.984 in the cortical plate, subcortical parenchyma, and cerebellar hemispheres, respectively. These results were similar to those reported in our previous study [17], and were considered to be in excellent agreement. To assess the reliability of segmentation using raw MR images in small structures, the volumes of vermis and cerebellar hemispheres on both reconstructed volume images (3D images) and raw MR images (2D images) in the same brain were compared among five participants (BM84, BCH_CM01, BCH_CM02, BCH_CM06, and BCH_CM09) using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. There were no significant differences between the 3D images and 2D images in the volumes of vermis and cerebellar hemispheres (p = 1.0 and 1.0, respectively). The axial T2-weighted images of the fetal brain MRI with the overlapping segmentation map in the DWM group are provided in the supplementary figure (S2 Fig).
Assessment of vermian lobulation
For assessment of vermian lobulation, we excluded 5 fetuses with DWM and 6 control fetuses due to poor-quality mid-sagittal images (2 in the control group) or earlier gestational age, i.e., < 22 weeks of gestation (4 in the control group and 5 in the DWM group); this was because the vermian lobules were almost unidentifiable on visual inspection. As a result, the number of vermian lobules was quantified in 8 of 14 control fetuses and 7 of 12 fetuses with DWM. Although the cerebellar vermis consists of nine separable lobules [34], we counted up to seven lobules as the maximum number of differentiable lobules, in accordance with previous reports [16,29]. Three posterior lobules (declive, folium, and tuber) were counted as a single structure, because they could not be well-differentiated on 1.5 T or 3 T T2-weighted fetal brain MRI.
The findings on quantification of vermian lobules in fetuses with DWM and control fetuses are presented in Table 3. Vermian lobulation scores were classified into the following three groups in accordance with a previous study [16]: (1) three or fewer lobules, (2) four or five lobules, and (3) six or more lobules. In the DWM group, 6 of 7 fetuses (85.7%) had 3 or fewer differentiable lobules, and the remaining 1 (14.3%) had more than 4 differentiable lobules. In contrast, in the control group, 5 of 8 fetuses (62.5%) had 6 or more differentiable lobules, and 3 of 8 fetuses (37.5%) had 4 to 5 differentiable lobules. After adjusting for gestational age, fetuses with DWM had significantly fewer differentiable lobules compared to controls (ANCOVA, F-value = 24.699, degrees of freedom = 2, 12, p < 0.001). A previous study that analyzed vermian lobulation in DWM and other cystic posterior fossa malformations reported that there was no significant intra-group difference between individuals with and without additional body and brain malformations [16]. Thus, we compared intra-group differences between patients with and without callosal anomalies. No significant intragroup differences were observed in lobulation scores between fetuses with and without callosal anomalies (p = 1.0, Fisher’s exact test).
Table 3. Distribution of the number of vermian lobules in the DWM (n = 7) and control groups (n = 8).
1–3 lobules | 4–5 lobules | 6–7 lobules | LS mean ± SE | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Control (n = 8) | 0 (0%) | 3 (37.5%) | 5 (62.5%) | 6.15 ± 0.40 | p < 0.001* |
DWM (n = 7) | 6 (85.7%) | 1 (14.3%) | 0 (0%) | 2.30 ± 0.42 |
The number of vermian lobules in each fetus was calculated as the mean value of the 3 raters, and was divided into 3 categories: 1–3 lobules, 4–5 lobules, and 6–7 lobules. The values indicate the number of fetuses in each category. The numbers in parentheses represent the proportion of fetuses in each category within the DWM or control groups. The mean number of vermian lobules adjusted for gestational age differed significantly between the DWM and control groups.
LS mean, least-squares mean; SE, standard error.
Discussion
In this study, volumetric analysis of fetal MRI revealed that regardless of heterogeneous etiologies, fetuses with DWM had a larger cortical plate volume compared to control fetuses. Moreover, after excluding fetuses with ACC, our analysis revealed that fetuses with DWM had larger subcortical parenchyma, whole cerebrum, and cerebellar hemispheres compared to control fetuses. These results suggest that even without apparent cerebral abnormalities, fetuses with DWM have altered development that extends throughout the brain, and these subtle alterations in brain development can be detected using quantitative fetal MRI analysis.
Demographics of fetuses with DWM
The clinical demographics of 15 fetuses with DWM in this study confirmed heterogeneous etiologies and variable cerebral/extracerebral anomalies of the disorder. Hydrocephalus is the most common complication (90%) in DWM [5]. In our study, only 3 of 15 fetuses presented with hydrocephalus in the second trimester; this is consistent with previous observations that hydrocephalus may develop later in pregnancy or early infancy [5–8]. We observed callosal anomalies, nodular heterotopia, schizencephaly, and occipital encephalocele as coexisting conditions, in agreement with previous reports [12,15,35–37]. We were unable to fully assess cerebral gyral anomalies, such as focal cortical dysplasia or polymicrogyria, which are more accurately identified later in gestation. In this regard, prominent gyral development occurs after 25 weeks [38] while the gestational ages of fetuses with DWM at the time of MRI were mostly less than 25 weeks in this study. We also observed associated extracerebral anomalies, including congenital heart diseases, urinary tract malformations, and craniofacial abnormalities, as previously reported [39,40]. Fetuses with chromosomal abnormalities tend to have multiple anomalies; the results from this study indicate that fetuses presented with typical clinical demographics that are observed in children with DWM.
To date, only a few genes and loci associated with DWM have been identified, including FOXC1 on 6p25 and ZIC1 and ZIC4 on 3q24 [41]. In this study, three of four fetuses had previously reported chromosomal abnormalities associated with DWM [39,41–44], i.e., trisomy 9, additional material on 6p25, and 3q24 deletion. The fetus with additional material on 6p25 presented with a similar phenotype to that previously reported for 6p25 deletions [42,45]. Thus, we speculate that copy number variations in this locus are associated with DWM.
Cerebral development in DWM
To date, cerebral developmental features in DWM have remained obscure. DWM is thought to involve defects in the development of the rhombencephalic roof and vermis, and its primary pathology is limited to the posterior fossa [5,46]. Associated cerebral malformations, such as callosal anomalies or malformations of cortical development have also been identified [5,11–13]. Associated cerebral malformations may share the same developmental timing and/or regulatory genes with cerebellar development. The timing of primitive corpus callosum connectivity (approximately 9–12 weeks postconception) [47–49] and start of cortical plate formation (approximately 7–16 weeks postconception) [50,51] overlap with the evolution of the rhombencephalic roof and vermis at 6–12 weeks postconception [5,52,53]. This coincidental timing may at least partly explain the commonly observed association of callosal dysgenesis and malformations of cortical development with DWM. In addition, mutations in certain genes may result in both, DWM and cerebral anomalies. Mice with a Foxc1 hypomorphic mutation exhibit cerebellar vermis hypoplasia [42] and cortical abnormalities that resemble cobblestone cortical malformation [54]. This may partly explain the abnormal cerebral development in individuals with DWM. Recently, a large exome sequencing study of children and adults with DWM and cerebellar hypoplasia expanded the list of genes associated with DWM to include TUBA1A, BRAF, SETD2, FOXP1, PUS3, ARMC9, and PIBF1 [55]. Some of these genes play critical roles in cerebral development [56,57]. These findings may reveal novel genotype-phenotype correlations and mechanistic explanations of cerebral pathology in DWM.
To date, one case-control study has reported altered cerebral volume in children with isolated cerebellar malformations [58]. However, only 1 of 20 children who participated in the study were diagnosed with DWM, and individual data were unavailable. Therefore, to the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to quantify cerebral volume in a series of fetuses with DWM. Our volumetric analysis revealed that between 18 and 33 weeks of gestation, fetuses with DWM had a larger cortical plate compared to control fetuses. Moreover, growth trajectories of the subcortical parenchyma and whole cerebrum were larger in fetuses without apparent cerebral anomalies (i.e., when fetuses with ACC were excluded) than in control fetuses. These results suggest that DWM is associated with diffuse cerebral overgrowth in the fetal period, even when apparent coexisting cerebral anomalies are not observed. The developmental disorders that exhibit cerebral and cerebellar overgrowth include megalencephaly, ventriculomegaly, and autism [32,59,60]. Although we have no confirmatory histopathological data, the possible pathology of overgrowth includes increased proliferation or decreased apoptosis of neuron and/or glia, as is believed to occur in megalencephaly [51,60]. The dysregulation of the AKT-mTOR pathway, which plays a critical role in the regulation of cell proliferation during development, has been associated with megalencephaly, hemimegalencephaly, and focal cortical dysplasia [61]. A lack of normal developmental apoptosis in the developing brain also could lead to brain overgrowth. The entire brain was found to be larger and hyperplastic in caspace-3- [62], caspace-9- [63], and Apaf1- [64] deficient mice due to reduced apoptosis of progenitor cells. This dysregulation of neuronal proliferation and apoptosis could have an impact on cerebral function. Therefore, a larger cerebrum in fetuses with DWM may be associated with a variety of postnatal neurodevelopmental abnormalities, including cognitive, motor, and behavioral impairments, which may be underpinned by cerebral dysfunction.
Cerebellar development in DWM
DWM involves variable degrees of cerebellar hemispheric hypoplasia [5,65,66]. Our study did not identify hemispheric cerebellar hypoplasia as a common feature of DWM. Whole-group volumetric analysis revealed a reduced growth pattern in the cerebellar hemispheres of fetuses with DWM compared to that in control fetuses. However, this result may have been affected by syndromic cases (i.e., BCH_CM03, BCH_CM09, and BM 84). After excluding fetuses with ACC, the analysis revealed that fetuses with DWM had larger cerebellar hemispheres compared to controls. These results suggest that hemispheric hypoplasia may exist in syndromic cases. Moreover, apparent non-syndromic DWM may exhibit overgrowth in the cerebellar hemispheres as well as in the cerebrum, suggesting a widespread pathology of DWM in the developing brain.
This study identified lower vermian lobulation scores in fetuses with DWM than in control fetuses. Our results are in accordance with those of a study, which demonstrated that fetuses with DWM had the lowest number of vermian lobules compared to control or cystic posterior fossa malformation groups [16]. In this regard, a semi-quantitative analysis of vermian lobulation enabled assessment of the severity of vermian hypoplasia. However, we did not identify a significant difference in lobulation scores between the groups with and without callosal anomalies. This result is in agreement with that of a previous report, which did not find a significant difference in the number of lobules between groups with and without additional body and brain malformations [16].
Previous studies have reported that the degree of vermian hypodysplasia is associated with neurodevelopmental outcomes in children with DWM [12,15] and cerebellar malformations [67]. In particular, Boddaert et al. [12] and Klein et al. [15] reported that the majority of cases with DWM having two major vermian fissures and three lobes had normal intelligence quotients, whereas all cases with one or no vermian fissures had low intelligence quotients. However, in these case series, all cases with poor vermian lobulation also had associated cerebral anomalies, whereas those with normal vermian lobulation did not have any associated cerebral anomalies. Thus, coexisting supratentorial anomalies may be confounding factors for outcomes related to intellectual capabilities. We previously reported that patients with isolated inferior vermian hypoplasia generally exhibited favorable long-term neurodevelopmental outcomes during school age [68]. Therefore, vermian hypoplasia per se is not associated with poor neurodevelopmental outcomes. Prospective fetal-to-childhood cohort studies are warranted to elucidate the association between comprehensive measures of fetal brain development and neurodevelopmental outcomes in DWM.
Limitations
This study had several limitations. First, we were unable to exclude the potential effects of chromosomal abnormalities, associated anomalies, fetal sex, or scanner differences due to the small number of subjects. Second, we were unable to evaluate whether the cortical volume increase was due to a thicker cortical plate or larger surface area. We are conducting cerebral surface analysis including surface area analysis and 3D cortical thickness measurement to elucidate the precise cerebral developmental features in DWM. A recent fetal MRI study reported that fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) sequences improved visualization of the subplate compared with T2-weighted sequences [69]. Analysis of the subplate may provide additional information on cerebral development and the role of the subplate in cortical development [70–72]. Further, we were unable to evaluate the association between fetal brain growth and neurodevelopmental outcomes because almost all pregnancies were terminated. Large-scale prospective and retrospective studies are needed to overcome these limitations. Nevertheless, our volumetric analysis can be applied to fetal MR images scanned using a standard clinical protocol, thus enabling widespread application in clinical settings.
Conclusion
In this study, we observed that fetuses with DWM commonly exhibited altered brain development, even in the absence of coexisting cerebral malformations, as early as the second trimester. These subtle brain developmental alterations may contribute to cognitive, motor, and/or behavioral impairments in DWM that cannot be explained by cerebellar malformations. Our findings can be applied to improve prenatal diagnosis and prognosis counseling for parents expecting a baby with DWM.
Supporting information
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank Michael Stanley, Annie Felhofer, Jiyeon Janice Jang, and Esther Muradov for their help with the post-acquisition segmentation of fetal brain MRI, and Drs. Ada Taymoori and Vidya Iyer for helping with participant identification and recruitment. The authors would also like to thank Editage (www.editage.com) for English language editing.
Data Availability
All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting information files.
Funding Statement
This work was supported by National Institutes of Health K23HD079605 (TT), R21HD094130 (KI), and the Susan Saltonstall Foundation (TT). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
References
- 1.Santoro M, Coi A, Barisic I, Garne E, Addor MC, Bergman JEH, et al. Epidemiology of Dandy-Walker Malformation in Europe: A EUROCAT Population-Based Registry Study. Neuroepidemiology. 2019;53(3–4):169–79. Epub 2019/07/16. doi: 10.1159/000501238 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Has R, Ermis H, Yuksel A, Ibrahimoglu L, Yildirim A, Sezer HD, et al. Dandy-Walker malformation: a review of 78 cases diagnosed by prenatal sonography. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2004;19(4):342–7. Epub 2004/06/12. doi: 10.1159/000077963 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Stambolliu E, Ioakeim-Ioannidou M, Kontokostas K, Dakoutrou M, Kousoulis AA. The Most Common Comorbidities in Dandy-Walker Syndrome Patients: A Systematic Review of Case Reports. J Child Neurol. 2017;32(10):886–902. Epub 2017/06/22. doi: 10.1177/0883073817712589 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Yousem DM, Grossman RI. Congenital Anomalies of the Central Nervous System. In: Nadgir R, Yousem DM, editors. Neuroradiology: the requisites. third ed. Philadelphia, PA: Mosby/Elsevier; 2010. p. 263–310. [Google Scholar]
- 5.du Plessis AJ, Limperopoulos C, Volpe JJ. Cerebellar Development. In: Volpe JJ, editor. Volpe’s neurology of the newborn. Sixth ed. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier; 2018. p. 73–99. [Google Scholar]
- 6.Teksam M, Ozyer U, McKinney A, Kirbas I, Cakir B. Fetal MRI of a severe Dandy-Walker malformation with an enlarged posterior fossa cyst causing severe hydrocephalus. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2005;20(6):524–7. Epub 2005/11/02. doi: 10.1159/000088044 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Hirsch JF, Pierre-Kahn A, Renier D, Sainte-Rose C, Hoppe-Hirsch E. The Dandy-Walker malformation. A review of 40 cases. J Neurosurg. 1984;61(3):515–22. Epub 1984/09/01. doi: 10.3171/jns.1984.61.3.0515 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Ulm B, Ulm MR, Deutinger J, Bernaschek G. Dandy-Walker malformation diagnosed before 21 weeks of gestation: associated malformations and chromosomal abnormalities. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1997;10(3):167–70. Epub 1997/10/27. doi: 10.1046/j.1469-0705.1997.10030167.x . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Manganaro L, Bernardo S, Antonelli A, Vinci V, Saldari M, Catalano C. Fetal MRI of the central nervous system: State-of-the-art. Eur J Radiol. 2017;93:273–83. Epub 2017/07/03. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2017.06.004 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Bolduc ME, Limperopoulos C. Neurodevelopmental outcomes in children with cerebellar malformations: a systematic review. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2009;51(4):256–67. Epub 2009/02/05. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8749.2008.03224.x . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Parisi MA, Dobyns WB. Human malformations of the midbrain and hindbrain: review and proposed classification scheme. Molecular Genetics and Metabolism. 2003;80(1–2):36–53. doi: 10.1016/j.ymgme.2003.08.010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Boddaert N, Klein O, Ferguson N, Sonigo P, Parisot D, Hertz-Pannier L, et al. Intellectual prognosis of the Dandy-Walker malformation in children: the importance of vermian lobulation. Neuroradiology. 2003;45(5):320–4. Epub 2003/04/19. doi: 10.1007/s00234-003-0980-6 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Kolble N, Wisser J, Kurmanavicius J, Bolthauser E, Stallmach T, Huch A, et al. Dandy-walker malformation: prenatal diagnosis and outcome. Prenat Diagn. 2000;20(4):318–27. Epub 2000/03/31. doi: . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.D’Antonio F, Khalil A, Garel C, Pilu G, Rizzo G, Lerman-Sagie T, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of isolated posterior fossa malformations on prenatal imaging (part 2): neurodevelopmental outcome. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2016;48(1):28–37. Epub 2015/09/24. doi: 10.1002/uog.15755 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Klein O, Pierre-Kahn A, Boddaert N, Parisot D, Brunelle F. Dandy-Walker malformation: prenatal diagnosis and prognosis. Childs Nerv Syst. 2003;19(7–8):484–9. Epub 2003/07/25. doi: 10.1007/s00381-003-0782-5 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Dovjak GO, Diogo MC, Brugger PC, Gruber GM, Weber M, Glatter S, et al. Quantitative fetal MRI assessment of cystic posterior fossa malformations. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2019. Epub 2019/10/09. doi: 10.1002/uog.21890 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Tarui T, Im K, Madan N, Madankumar R, Skotko BG, Schwartz A, et al. Quantitative MRI Analyses of Regional Brain Growth in Living Fetuses with Down Syndrome. Cereb Cortex. 2020;30(1):382–90. Epub 2019/07/03. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhz094 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Ghali R, Reidy K, Fink AM, Palma-Dias R. Perinatal and short-term neonatal outcomes of posterior fossa anomalies. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2014;35(2):108–17. Epub 2013/11/13. doi: 10.1159/000355401 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Asai A, Hoffman HJ, Hendrick EB, Humphreys RP. Dandy-Walker syndrome: experience at the Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto. Pediatr Neurosci. 1989;15(2):66–73. Epub 1989/01/01. doi: 10.1159/000120445 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Patel S, Barkovich AJ. Analysis and classification of cerebellar malformations. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2002;23(7):1074–87. Epub 2002/08/10. . [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Forzano F, Mansour S, Ierullo A, Homfray T, Thilaganathan B. Posterior fossa malformation in fetuses: a report of 56 further cases and a review of the literature. Prenat Diagn. 2007;27(6):495–501. Epub 2007/03/21. doi: 10.1002/pd.1722 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Tarui T, Madan N, Farhat N, Kitano R, Ceren Tanritanir A, Graham G, et al. Disorganized Patterns of Sulcal Position in Fetal Brains with Agenesis of Corpus Callosum. Cereb Cortex. 2018;28(9):3192–203. Epub 2018/08/21. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhx191 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Yun HJ, Perez JDR, Sosa P, Valdes JA, Madan N, Kitano R, et al. Regional Alterations in Cortical Sulcal Depth in Living Fetuses with Down Syndrome. Cereb Cortex. 2021;31(2):757–67. Epub 2020/09/18. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhaa255 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Kuklisova-Murgasova M, Quaghebeur G, Rutherford MA, Hajnal JV, Schnabel JA. Reconstruction of fetal brain MRI with intensity matching and complete outlier removal. Med Image Anal. 2012;16(8):1550–64. Epub 2012/09/04. doi: 10.1016/j.media.2012.07.004 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Tustison NJ, Avants BB, Cook PA, Zheng Y, Egan A, Yushkevich PA, et al. N4ITK: improved N3 bias correction. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2010;29(6):1310–20. Epub 2010/04/10. doi: 10.1109/TMI.2010.2046908 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Cox RW. AFNI: what a long strange trip it’s been. Neuroimage. 2012;62(2):743–7. Epub 2011/09/06. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.08.056 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Makropoulos A, Counsell SJ, Rueckert D. A review on automatic fetal and neonatal brain MRI segmentation. Neuroimage. 2018;170:231–48. Epub 2017/07/02. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.06.074 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Clouchoux C, Limperopoulos C. Novel applications of quantitative MRI for the fetal brain. Pediatr Radiol. 2012;42 Suppl 1:S24–32. Epub 2012/03/14. doi: 10.1007/s00247-011-2178-0 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Dovjak GO, Brugger PC, Gruber GM, Song JW, Weber M, Langs G, et al. Prenatal assessment of cerebellar vermian lobulation: fetal MRI with 3-Tesla postmortem validation. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2018;52(5):623–30. Epub 2017/08/07. doi: 10.1002/uog.18826 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Clouchoux C, Guizard N, Evans AC, du Plessis AJ, Limperopoulos C. Normative fetal brain growth by quantitative in vivo magnetic resonance imaging. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012;206(2):173 e1–8. Epub 2011/11/08. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2011.10.002 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Hatab MR, Kamourieh SW, Twickler DM. MR volume of the fetal cerebellum in relation to growth. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2008;27(4):840–5. Epub 2008/02/28. doi: 10.1002/jmri.21290 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Kyriakopoulou V, Vatansever D, Elkommos S, Dawson S, McGuinness A, Allsop J, et al. Cortical overgrowth in fetuses with isolated ventriculomegaly. Cereb Cortex. 2014;24(8):2141–50. Epub 2013/03/20. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bht062 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Fleiss JL, Levin B, Paik MC. The Measurement of Interrater Agreement. Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions third ed 2003. [Google Scholar]
- 34.Courchesne E, Press GA, Murakami J, Berthoty D, Grafe M, Wiley CA, et al. The cerebellum in sagittal plane—anatomic-MR correlation: 1. The vermis. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1989;153(4):829–35. Epub 1989/10/01. doi: 10.2214/ajr.153.4.829 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.McNiven V, Ito YA, Hartley T, Kernohan K, Miller E, Care4Rare C, et al. NID1 variant associated with occipital cephaloceles in a family expressing a spectrum of phenotypes. Am J Med Genet A. 2019;179(5):837–41. Epub 2019/02/19. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.61095 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Notaridis G, Ebbing K, Giannakopoulos P, Bouras C, Kovari E. Neuropathological analysis of an asymptomatic adult case with Dandy-Walker variant. Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol. 2006;32(3):344–50. Epub 2006/04/28. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2990.2006.00719.x . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Talamonti G, Picano M, Debernardi A, Bolzon M, Teruzzi M, D’Aliberti G. Giant occipital meningocele in an 8-year-old child with Dandy-Walker malformation. Childs Nerv Syst. 2011;27(1):167–74. Epub 2010/05/22. doi: 10.1007/s00381-010-1154-6 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Clouchoux C, Kudelski D, Gholipour A, Warfield SK, Viseur S, Bouyssi-Kobar M, et al. Quantitative in vivo MRI measurement of cortical development in the fetus. Brain Struct Funct. 2012;217(1):127–39. Epub 2011/05/13. doi: 10.1007/s00429-011-0325-x . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Bianchi DW, Crombleholme TM, D’Alton ME. Dandy-Walker Malformation and Variants. In: Fried A, Davis K, editors. Fetology: diagnosis and management of the fetal patient. 2nd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill Medical Pub. Division; 2010. p. 102–9. [Google Scholar]
- 40.Yuceer N, Mertol T, Arda N. Surgical treatment of 13 pediatric patients with Dandy-Walker syndrome. Pediatr Neurosurg. 2007;43(5):358–63. Epub 2007/09/06. doi: 10.1159/000106383 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Aldinger KA, Doherty D. The genetics of cerebellar malformations. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2016;21(5):321–32. Epub 2016/05/11. doi: 10.1016/j.siny.2016.04.008 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Aldinger KA, Lehmann OJ, Hudgins L, Chizhikov VV, Bassuk AG, Ades LC, et al. FOXC1 is required for normal cerebellar development and is a major contributor to chromosome 6p25.3 Dandy-Walker malformation. Nat Genet. 2009;41(9):1037–42. Epub 2009/08/12. doi: 10.1038/ng.422 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Grinberg I, Northrup H, Ardinger H, Prasad C, Dobyns WB, Millen KJ. Heterozygous deletion of the linked genes ZIC1 and ZIC4 is involved in Dandy-Walker malformation. Nat Genet. 2004;36(10):1053–5. Epub 2004/09/01. doi: 10.1038/ng1420 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Tonni G, Lituania M, Chitayat D, Bonasoni MP, Keating S, Thompson M, et al. Complete trisomy 9 with unusual phenotypic associations: Dandy-Walker malformation, cleft lip and cleft palate, cardiovascular abnormalities. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2014;53(4):592–7. Epub 2014/12/17. doi: 10.1016/j.tjog.2014.01.005 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Delahaye A, Khung-Savatovsky S, Aboura A, Guimiot F, Drunat S, Alessandri JL, et al. Pre- and postnatal phenotype of 6p25 deletions involving the FOXC1 gene. Am J Med Genet A. 2012;158A(10):2430–8. Epub 2012/08/21. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.35548 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Blaas HG, Eik-Nes SH. Sonoembryology and early prenatal diagnosis of neural anomalies. Prenat Diagn. 2009;29(4):312–25. Epub 2009/02/06. doi: 10.1002/pd.2170 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Blaauw J, Meiners LC. The splenium of the corpus callosum: embryology, anatomy, function and imaging with pathophysiological hypothesis. Neuroradiology. 2020;62(5):563–85. Epub 2020/02/18. doi: 10.1007/s00234-019-02357-z . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.du Plessis AJ, Volpe JJ. Prosencephalic Development. In: Volpe JJ, editor. Volpe’s neurology of the newborn. Sixth ed. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier; 2018. p. 34–57. [Google Scholar]
- 49.Raybaud C. The corpus callosum, the other great forebrain commissures, and the septum pellucidum: anatomy, development, and malformation. Neuroradiology. 2010;52(6):447–77. Epub 2010/04/28. doi: 10.1007/s00234-010-0696-3 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Bystron I, Rakic P, Molnar Z, Blakemore C. The first neurons of the human cerebral cortex. Nat Neurosci. 2006;9(7):880–6. Epub 2006/06/20. doi: 10.1038/nn1726 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.ten Donkelaar HJ, Yamada S, Shiota K, van der Vliet T. Overview of the Development of the Human Brain and Spinal Cord. Clinical Neuroembryology. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg; 2014. p. 1–52. [Google Scholar]
- 52.Raybaud C, Levrier O, Brunel H, Girard N, Farnarier P. MR imaging of fetal brain malformations. Childs Nerv Syst. 2003;19(7–8):455–70. Epub 2003/07/25. doi: 10.1007/s00381-003-0769-2 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Ten Donkelaar HJ, Lammens M, Wesseling P, Hori A. Development and Developmental Disorders of the Human Cerebellum. In: Ten Donkelaar HJ, Lammens M, Hori A, editors. Clinical neuroembryology: development and developmental disorders of the human central nervous system. Second ed. New York: Springer; 2014. p. 371–420. [Google Scholar]
- 54.Zarbalis K, Siegenthaler JA, Choe Y, May SR, Peterson AS, Pleasure SJ. Cortical dysplasia and skull defects in mice with a Foxc1 allele reveal the role of meningeal differentiation in regulating cortical development. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007;104(35):14002–7. Epub 2007/08/24. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0702618104 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Aldinger KA, Timms AE, Thomson Z, Mirzaa GM, Bennett JT, Rosenberg AB, et al. Redefining the Etiologic Landscape of Cerebellar Malformations. Am J Hum Genet. 2019;105(3):606–15. Epub 2019/09/03. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2019.07.019 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Morris-Rosendahl DJ, Najm J, Lachmeijer AM, Sztriha L, Martins M, Kuechler A, et al. Refining the phenotype of alpha-1a Tubulin (TUBA1A) mutation in patients with classical lissencephaly. Clin Genet. 2008;74(5):425–33. Epub 2008/10/29. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-0004.2008.01093.x . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Pearson CA, Moore DM, Tucker HO, Dekker JD, Hu H, Miquelajauregui A, et al. Foxp1 Regulates Neural Stem Cell Self-Renewal and Bias Toward Deep Layer Cortical Fates. Cell Rep. 2020;30(6):1964–81 e3. Epub 2020/02/13. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2020.01.034 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Bolduc ME, Du Plessis AJ, Evans A, Guizard N, Zhang X, Robertson RL, et al. Cerebellar malformations alter regional cerebral development. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2011;53(12):1128–34. Epub 2011/11/10. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8749.2011.04090.x . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Brossard-Racine M, Murnick J, Bouyssi-Kobar M, Coulombe J, Chang T, Limperopoulos C. Altered Cerebellar Biochemical Profiles in Infants Born Prematurely. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):8143. Epub 2017/08/16. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-08195-4 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Poduri A, Volpe JJ. Neuronal Proliferation. In: Volpe JJ, editor. Volpe’s Neurology of the Newborn. sixth ed. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier; 2018. p. 100–19.e6. [Google Scholar]
- 61.Winden KD, Yuskaitis CJ, Poduri A. Megalencephaly and Macrocephaly. Semin Neurol. 2015;35(3):277–87. Epub 2015/06/11. doi: 10.1055/s-0035-1552622 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Kuida K, Zheng TS, Na S, Kuan C, Yang D, Karasuyama H, et al. Decreased apoptosis in the brain and premature lethality in CPP32-deficient mice. Nature. 1996;384(6607):368–72. Epub 1996/11/28. doi: 10.1038/384368a0 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Kuida K, Haydar TF, Kuan CY, Gu Y, Taya C, Karasuyama H, et al. Reduced apoptosis and cytochrome c-mediated caspase activation in mice lacking caspase 9. Cell. 1998;94(3):325–37. Epub 1998/08/26. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81476-2 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Yoshida H, Kong YY, Yoshida R, Elia AJ, Hakem A, Hakem R, et al. Apaf1 is required for mitochondrial pathways of apoptosis and brain development. Cell. 1998;94(6):739–50. Epub 1998/09/30. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81733-x . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Patek KJ, Kline-Fath BM, Hopkin RJ, Pilipenko VV, Crombleholme TM, Spaeth CG. Posterior fossa anomalies diagnosed with fetal MRI: associated anomalies and neurodevelopmental outcomes. Prenat Diagn. 2012;32(1):75–82. Epub 2012/03/01. doi: 10.1002/pd.2911 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Poretti A, Boltshauser E, Doherty D. Cerebellar hypoplasia: differential diagnosis and diagnostic approach. Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet. 2014;166C(2):211–26. Epub 2014/05/20. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.c.31398 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Bolduc ME, du Plessis AJ, Sullivan N, Guizard N, Zhang X, Robertson RL, et al. Regional cerebellar volumes predict functional outcome in children with cerebellar malformations. Cerebellum. 2012;11(2):531–42. Epub 2011/09/09. doi: 10.1007/s12311-011-0312-z . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Tarui T, Limperopoulos C, Sullivan NR, Robertson RL, du Plessis AJ. Long-term developmental outcome of children with a fetal diagnosis of isolated inferior vermian hypoplasia. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2014;99(1):F54–8. Epub 2013/08/22. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2013-304054 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Diogo MC, Prayer D, Gruber GM, Brugger PC, Stuhr F, Weber M, et al. Echo-planar FLAIR Sequence Improves Subplate Visualization in Fetal MRI of the Brain. Radiology. 2019;292(1):159–69. Epub 2019/05/16. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2019181976 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Kanold PO, Luhmann HJ. The subplate and early cortical circuits. Annu Rev Neurosci. 2010;33:23–48. Epub 2010/03/06. doi: 10.1146/annurev-neuro-060909-153244 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Kostovic I, Sedmak G, Vuksic M, Judas M. The relevance of human fetal subplate zone for developmental neuropathology of neuronal migration disorders and cortical dysplasia. CNS Neurosci Ther. 2015;21(2):74–82. Epub 2014/10/15. doi: 10.1111/cns.12333 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Wang WZ, Hoerder-Suabedissen A, Oeschger FM, Bayatti N, Ip BK, Lindsay S, et al. Subplate in the developing cortex of mouse and human. J Anat. 2010;217(4):368–80. Epub 2010/08/24. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7580.2010.01274.x . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting information files.