Skip to main content
Diagnostics logoLink to Diagnostics
. 2022 Feb 9;12(2):443. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12020443

Factors Affecting Patients with Concurrent Deep Neck Infection and Cervical Necrotizing Fasciitis

Shih-Lung Chen 1,2,*, Shy-Chyi Chin 2,3, Yu-Chien Wang 1,2,4, Chia-Ying Ho 2,5
Editors: Javier Fernández, Laurent Bélec
PMCID: PMC8870768  PMID: 35204533

Abstract

Deep neck infection (DNI) is a severe disease of the deep neck spaces, which has the potential for airway obstruction. Cervical necrotizing fasciitis (CNF) is a fatal infection of the diffuse soft tissues and fascia with a high mortality rate. This study investigated risk factors in patients with concurrent DNI and CNF. A total of 556 patients with DNI were included in this study between August 2016 and December 2021. Among these patients, 31 had concurrent DNI and CNF. The relevant clinical variables were assessed. In univariate analysis, age (> 60 years, odds ratio (OR) = 2.491, p = 0.014), C-reactive protein (CRP, OR = 1.007, p < 0.001), blood sugar (OR = 1.007, p < 0.001), and diabetes mellitus (DM, OR = 4.017, p < 0.001) were significant risk factors for concurrent DNI and CNF. In multivariate analysis, CRP (OR = 1.006, p < 0.001) and blood sugar (OR = 1.006, p = 0.002) were independent risk factors in patients with concurrent DNI and CNF. There were significant differences in the length of hospital stay and therapeutic management (intubation, tracheostomy, incision and drainage) between DNI patients with and without CNF (all p < 0.05). While there were no differences in pathogens between the DNI alone and concurrent DNI and CNF groups (all p > 0.05), the rate of specific pathogen non-growth from blood cultures was 16.95% (89/525) in the DNI alone group, in contrast to 0% (0/31) in the concurrent DNI and CNF group (p = 0.008). Higher CRP and blood sugar levels were independent risk factors for the concurrence of DNI and CNF. With regard to prognosis, there were significant differences in the length of hospital stay and therapeutic management between the groups with and without CNF. While there were no significant differences in pathogens (all p > 0.05), no cases in the concurrent DNI and CNF group showed specific pathogen non-growth, in contrast to 89/525 patients in the group with DNI alone.

Keywords: blood sugar, concurrent, cervical necrotizing fasciitis, C-reactive protein, deep neck infection, diabetes mellitus

1. Introduction

Deep neck infection (DNI) is a life-threatening bacterial infection within the potential spaces of the deep cervical fascia [1,2]. It can lead to airway obstruction and cause severe morbidity, including severe cervical necrotizing fasciitis (CNF), severe sepsis, esophageal perforation, and descending necrotizing mediastinitis, and mortality [3,4,5,6,7,8]. CNF is a fulminant infection of the soft and connective tissues that spreads along the neck fascial planes and results in posterior venous and arterial thrombosis, followed by necrosis of the skin and other adjacent tissues [9,10].

Clinically, DNI is first suspected in patients with shortness of breath, localized heat, redness, and swelling in the neck. CNF presents as a rapid extensive infection with cervical erythema, tenderness, crepitus, respiratory distress, and sepsis [11]. Previous studies have shown that some patients may present with concurrent DNI and CNF [12,13]. Therapeutic management in patients with the coexistence of these two lethal diseases is complicated. This study was performed to investigate risk factors and prognostic variables for concurrent DNI and CNF.

2. Materials and Methods

We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 556 patients diagnosed with DNI who were admitted to the Chang Gung Memorial Hospital in Linkou, a tertiary medical center in Taiwan, between August 2016 and December 2021. The diagnoses were performed by clinical presentation, ultrasonography (US) [12], and computed tomography (CT) (Figure 1A,B) [14]. Treatment included antibiotics, US-guided needle drainage, and open surgical incision and drainage. The empirical antibiotics used were ceftriaxone 1 gm Q12h and metronidazole 500 mg Q8h based on previous reports, in order to cover aerobic and anaerobic bacteria before the culture results were available [15,16,17].

Figure 1.

Figure 1

(A) Axial and (B) coronal view of a patient with concurrent deep neck infection and cervical necrotizing fasciitis on CT. Arrowhead: cervical necrotizing fasciitis; asterisk: maxillary sinus; P: parapharyngeal space; R: retropharyngeal space; M: masticator space; S: submandibular space.

2.1. Exclusion Criteria

Patients with severe cardiopulmonary diseases, previous head and neck tumor surgery, previous radiotherapy over the head and neck region, and mis-swallowing of a foreign body were excluded. A total of 556 patients with DNI were included in the study, among whom 31 had concurrent CNF.

2.2. Data Collection

To investigate the risk factors associated with concurrent DNI and CNF, we collected data on the patients’ sex, age, C-reactive protein (CRP) level, blood sugar level, and diabetes mellitus (DM) status, number of spaces involved in DNI, level of deep neck space involvement, presence of mediastinitis, length of hospital stay, intubation, tracheostomy, performance of incision and drainage (I&D) open surgery, and species of pathogens involved.

2.3. Ethics Statement

This study was approved on 10 January 2022 by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) of the Chang Gung Medical Foundation (IRB No.202200003B0). The data were collected retrospectively, and the patients were anonymized before data analysis. The IRB waived the need for informed consent.

2.4. Statistical Analysis

All data were analyzed using MedCalc software (ver. 18.6; MedCalc, Ostend, Belgium). As the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test showed that the data were not normally distributed, the chi-square test was used for categorical variables, the Mann–Whitney U test was used for comparison of continuous variables, and logistic regression analysis was used for the univariate and multivariate analyses. A multivariate forward stepwise selection procedure was implemented, and all of the variables included in the univariate analysis were entered into the final multivariate model. In all analyses, p < 0.05 was taken to indicate statistical significance.

3. Results

Demographic and clinical data are shown in Table 1. A total of 556 patients with DNI, consisting of 352 men (63.31%) and 204 women (36.69%), with a mean age of 52.66 ± 19.05 years, were included in the study. With regard to laboratory data, the mean CRP level was 155.76 ± 109.49 mg/L, and the mean blood sugar level was 149.50 ± 75.96 mg/dL. A total of 242 (43.52%) patients had DM.

Table 1.

Clinical characteristics of the 556 patients with DNI.

Characteristics N (%)
Gender 556 (100.00)
Male 352 (63.31)
Female 204 (36.69)
Age, years (SD) 52.66 ± 19.05
CRP, mg/L (SD) 155.76 ± 109.49
Blood sugar, mg/dL (SD) 149.50 ± 75.96
Diabetes mellitus 242 (43.52)
Number of deep neck spaces involved
Single space 195 (35.07)
Two spaces 169 (30.40)
Multiple spaces, ≥3 192 (34.53)
Deep neck space involvement
Parapharyngeal space 332 (59.71)
Submandibular space 251 (45.14)
Retropharyngeal space 204 (36.69)
Masticator space 115 (20.68)
Parotid space 87 (15.64)
Anterior cervical space 52 (9.35)
Visceral space 47 (8.45)
Carotid space 38 (6.83)
Perivertebral space 25 (4.49)
Posterior cervical space 13 (2.33)
Mediastinitis 77 (13.84)
Length of hospital stay, days (SD) 10.35 ± 8.43
Intubation 278 (50.00)
Tracheostomy 102 (18.34)
Incision and drainage open surgery 270 (48.56)
Pathogens
Streptococcus constellatus 108 (19.42)
Parvimonas micra 67 (12.05)
Prevotella intermedia 67 (12.05)
Klebsiella pneumonia 63 (11.33)
Streptococcus anginosus 61 (10.97)
Prevotella buccae 58 (10.43)
Staphylococcus aureus 34 (6.11)
Streptococcus salivarius 23 (4.13)
Staphylococcus epidemidis 21 (3.77)
Streptococcus oralis 18 (3.23)
Gemella morbillorum 17 (3.05)
Eikenella corrodens 16 (2.87)
Salmonella enterica 14 (2.51)
Slackia exigua 11 (1.97)
Pseudomonas aeruginosa 7 (1.25)
No growth 89 (16.00)
Cervical necrotizing fasciitis 31 (5.57)

DNI = deep neck infection; N = numbers; SD = standard deviation; CRP = C-reactive protein (normal range < 5 mg/L); blood sugar (normal range: 70–100 mg/dL).

A total of 195 (35.07%) patients exhibited the involvement of a single deep neck space, 169 (30.40%) exhibited the involvement of two spaces, and 192 (34.53%) exhibited the involvement of more than three spaces. Of those with deep neck space involvement, it involved the parapharyngeal space in 332 (59.71%) patients, the submandibular space in 251 (45.14%), the retropharyngeal space in 204 (36.69%), the masticator space in 115 (20.68%), the parotid space in 87 (15.64%), the anterior cervical space in 52 (9.35%), the visceral space in 47 (8.45%), the carotid space in 38 (6.83%), the perivertebral space in 25 (4.49%), and the posterior cervical space in 13 (2.33%). Mediastinitis was found in 77 (13.84%) patients. The mean length of hospital stay was 10.35 ± 8.43 days. Intubation was performed on 278 (50.00%) patients, and tracheostomy was performed on 102 (18.34%) patients. A total of 270 (48.56%) patients underwent I&D open surgery for DNI.

Table 1 lists the pathogens cultured from these patients. The overall rate of specific pathogen non-growth was 16.00% (89/556). Concurrent CNF was found in 31 (5.57%) patients.

Table 2 shows the results of the univariate analysis of variables for the 556 patients with DNI. The results show that age (>60 years, OR = 2.491, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.184–5.241, p = 0.014), CRP (OR = 1.007, 95% CI: 1.004–1.010, p < 0.001), blood sugar (OR = 1.007, 95% CI: 1.004–1.011, p < 0.001), and DM (OR = 4.017, 95% CI: 1.764–9.148, p < 0.001) were significant risk factors for CNF. In Table 2, all factors were entered into a forward stepwise multivariate logistic regression model. CRP (OR = 1.006, 95% CI: 1.003–1.010, p < 0.001) and blood sugar (OR = 1.006, 95% CI: 1.002–1.010, p = 0.002) were significant independent risk factors for concurrent CNF in patients with DNI.

Table 2.

Univariate and multivariate analyses of 525 patients with DNI alone compared to 31 patients with concurrent DNI and CNF.

Variable CNF Univariate Analysis Multivariate Analysis
Yes No OR 95% CI p Value OR 95% CI p Value
Gender 31 525 0.533
Male 18 334 0.791 0.479–2.085
Female 13 191 1.000
Age, years 0.014 * - - -
>60 19 204 2.491 1.184–5.241
≤60 12 321 1.000
CRP, mg/L (SD) 246.77 ± 67.62 150.38 ± 109.16 1.007 1.004–1.010 <0.001 * 1.006 1.003–1.010 <0.001 *
Blood sugar, mg/dL (SD) 216.41 ± 55.56 145.55 ± 75.19 1.007 1.004–1.011 <0.001 * 1.006 1.002–1.010 0.002 *
Diabetes mellitus <0.001 * - - -
Yes 23 219 4.017 1.764–9.148
No 8 306 1.000
Multiple spaces, ≥3 0.136
Yes 7 185 0.536 0.226–1.267
No 24 340 1.000
Parapharyngeal space 0.082
Yes 23 309 2.009 0.439–2.277
No 8 216 1.000
Submandibular space 0.063
Yes 19 232 1.999 0.951–4.203
No 12 293 1.000
Retropharyngeal space 0.184
Yes 8 196 0.583 0.256–1.330
No 23 329 1.000
Masticator space 0.132
Yes 3 112 0.395 0.117–1.323
No 28 413 1.000
Parotid space 0.164
Yes 2 85 0.357 0.083–1.524
No 29 440 1.000
Anterior cervical space 0.253
Yes 1 51 0.309 0.041–2.319
No 30 474 1.000
Visceral space 0.152
Yes 5 42 2.211 0.807–6.058
No 26 483 1.000
Carotid space 0.930
Yes 2 36 0.936 0.214–4.083
No 29 489 1.000
Perivertebral space 0.591
Yes 2 23 1.505 0.338–6.696
No 29 502 1.000
Posterior cervical space 0.191
Yes 2 11 3.222 0.682–15.21
No 29 514 1.000
Mediastinitis 0.382
Yes 6 71 1.534 0.608–3.872
No 25 454 1.000

DNI = deep neck infection; CNF = cervical necrotizing fasciitis; SD = standard deviation; OR = odds ratio; CI = confidence intervals; CRP = C-reactive protein; *, p < 0.05. Significant differences are shown in bold.

Table 3 shows a comparison of the management and length of hospital stay between the 31 patients with concurrent CNF and DNI and 525 patients with DNI alone. Significant differences were detected between the two groups in length of hospital stay (p = 0.001), intubation (p < 0.001), tracheostomy (p < 0.001), and I&D open surgery (p < 0.001).

Table 3.

Comparison of management and length of hospital stay between 525 patients with DNI alone compared to 31 patients with concurrent DNI and CNF.

Characteristics CNF, N = 31 (%) Non-CNF, N = 525 (%) p Value
Length of hospital stay, days (SD) 12.61 ± 5.79 10.21 ± 8.55 0.001 *
Intubation <0.001 *
Yes 30 (96.77) 248 (47.23)
No 1 (3.23) 277 (52.77)
Tracheostomy <0.001 *
Yes 17 (54.83) 85 (16.19)
No 14 (45.17) 440 (83.81)
I&D open surgery <0.001 *
Yes 30 (96.77) 240 (45.71)
No 1 (3.23) 285 (54.29)

DNI = deep neck infection; CNF = cervical necrotizing fasciitis; N = number; I&D = incision and drainage; *, p < 0.05. Significant differences are shown in bold.

As shown in Table 4, there were no significant differences in pathogens between the groups with and without CNF in DNI (all p > 0.05). However, there was no growth of specific pathogens from blood cultures in 16.95% (89/525) of patients with DNI alone, in contrast to none of the patients with concurrent DNI and CNF (p = 0.008).

Table 4.

Comparison of pathogens between 525 patients with DNI alone compared to 31 patients with concurrent DNI and CNF.

Pathogens CNF, N = 31 (%) Non-CNF, N = 525 (%) p Value
Streptococcus constellatus 6 (19.35) 102 (19.42) 0.992
Parvimonas micra 3 (9.67) 64 (12.19) 1.000
Prevotella intermedia 4 (12.90) 63 (12.00) 0.780
Klebsiella pneumonia 5 (16.12) 58 (11.04) 0.391
Streptococcus anginosus 5 (16.12) 56 (10.66) 0.369
Prevotella buccae 3 (9.67) 55 (10.47) 1.000
Staphylococcus aureus 4 (12.90) 30 (5.71) 0.112
Streptococcus salivarius 3 (9.67) 20 (3.80) 0.130
Staphylococcus epidemidis 3 (9.67) 18 (3.42) 0.105
Streptococcus oralis 3 (9.67) 15 (2.85) 0.072
Gemella morbillorum 1 (3.22) 16 (3.04) 1.000
Eikenella corrodens 2 (6.45) 14 (2.66) 0.222
Salmonella enterica 2 (6.45) 12 (2.28) 0.180
Slackia exigua 2 (6.45) 9 (1.71) 0.120
Pseudomonas aeruginosa 1 (3.22) 6 (1.14) 0.332
No growth 0 (0.00) 89 (16.95) 0.008 *

DNI = deep neck infection; N = number; CNF = cervical necrotizing fasciitis; *, p < 0.05. Significant differences are shown in bold.

4. Discussion

DNI can lead to severe life-threatening complications, while CNF is a potentially fatal emergent infection of the soft and connective tissues that may involve the rapid progression of edema, erythema, crepitus, tachycardia, hypotension, sepsis, and generalized necrosis of the superficial fascial layer and involved cutaneous tissue [10]. Management of concurrent DNI and CNF requires airway protection, including intubation and tracheostomy [11]. Further, broad-spectrum intravenous antibiotics and repeated aggressive debridement with removal of all necrotic tissue are necessary. In the present study, elevated CRP and blood sugar levels were independent risk factors associated with concurrent DNI and CNF. In addition, there were significant differences in the length of hospital stay and therapeutic management between the groups with and without CNF. While there were no differences in pathogens between the DNI alone and concurrent DNI and CNF groups, the rate of specific pathogen non-growth from blood cultures was 16.95% (89/525) in the DNI alone group in contrast to 0% (0/31) in the concurrent DNI and CNF group, and this difference was significant (p = 0.008). As both DNI and CNF can lead to life-threatening emergencies with potential airway compromise, early diagnosis is essential. DNI can be diagnosed by flexible fiberoscopy and CT, while there is no single gold standard for diagnosis of CNF [18]. Some groups consider CNF a surgical diagnosis confirmed by findings such as the presence of grayish necrotic fascia and the presence of foul-smelling pus [19]. However, other groups emphasize the importance of the patient’s clinical presentation as well as imaging findings [20,21]. In fact, the comprehensive diagnosis of concurrent DNI and CNF should be based not only on medical history and clinical symptoms but also on imaging examinations [22,23,24,25,26]. As shown in Table 2, age (>60 years), a higher CPR level, a higher blood sugar level, and DM were risk factors for concurrent DNI and CNF in the univariate analysis. Previous studies have reported that advanced age with CNF and DNI was associated with an increased risk of morbidity [27,28]. Our findings are consistent with those of Khamnuan et al., who reported that an age of >60 years significantly increased the mortality rate [29]. DM was another risk factor in the univariate analysis, while blood sugar was an independent risk factor in both the univariate and multivariate analyses for the concurrence of DNI and CNF. Cheng et al. [30] considered DM patients to have an increased susceptibility to necrotizing fasciitis, and DM has been reported to be a common underlying disease in these patients, present in >40% of cases. They reported that DM patients were significantly older than non-DM patients at the onset of necrotizing fasciitis. The presence of DM significantly affects clinical outcomes and is associated with longer hospital stays and a higher incidence of complications [31]. This is because DM leads to impaired cutaneous wound healing and an increased susceptibility to infection, which may affect the course of soft tissue infections [32]. A high blood sugar level is associated with complications from multiple spaces of DNI, and Zheng et al. [33] reported that >50% of DM patients in their study population had complications, which was significantly higher than the rate for the non-DM group. Sideris et al. reported that CRP and blood sugar levels are highly correlated, and they considered the blood sugar level to be one of the most important clinical variables [18]. Due to the increased incidence of high blood sugar observed in patients with concurrent CNF and DNI, we suggest that the blood sugar level should be monitored initially and controlled after admission. Repeated surgical debridement and drainage are essential in the management of concurrent DNI and CNF. In our cohort, the length of hospital stay and rates of intubation, tracheostomy, and I&D open surgery were higher in the group with concurrent DNI and CNF than the DNI alone group. Tracheostomy was performed in 17 (54.83%) patients with concurrent CNF and DNI. The involvement of multiple deep neck spaces was previously reported to be a risk factor for requiring tracheostomy [27]. For surgery, complete debridement, such as facial-cervical fasciotomy, should be performed with removal of all involved tissue, including the pharyngeal wall, larynx, cranial nerves, and bone. Serial wound debridement is suggested to avoid the development of severe sepsis [34]. However, repeated surgery results in major soft tissue defects. Intensive debridement wound care with wet dressing changes at least 4–6 times a day is recommended. A strategy of watchful waiting would prolong the time to elimination of the disease, which would lead to increased morbidity and a reduced survival rate. Reconstruction should be performed after removal of necrotizing tissue, where healthy granulating tissue is present in the wound bed with complete infection control [11]. Both CNF and DNI are usually polymicrobial in origin and include an admixture of aerobic and anaerobic species [35]. Patients were initially treated with empirical, broad-spectrum, intravenous antibiotics, which were then narrowed according to the results of wound culture. The pathogenesis of CNF begins with the entry of organisms or spores into the soft tissues, and then deeper tissues become infected, larger venules and arterioles are occluded, and necrosis affects all tissue layers [18]. Infections of the second and third molars of the mandible are the most frequent etiologies of odontogenic CNF [36,37]. Similarly, most cases of DNI are of odontogenic origin, and less common causes include peritonsillar abscesses, epiglottitis, and penetrating injuries of the mouth [38]. Odontogenic infections also contribute by indirect spread to adjacent tissue or deep neck spaces [39,40]. Hence, when odontogenic DNI penetrates into the deep neck spaces and spreads toward the skin, these deeper subcutaneous connective tissues are infected, followed by facial plane infection, causing concurrent DNI and CNF. As shown in Table 4, there were no significant differences in pathogens between the patients with concurrent DNI and CNF and the patients with DNI alone. Ferzli et al. reported that Group A Streptococcus was present in the majority of their patients [11]. Some studies have reported that CNF usually involves mixed flora, such as Prevotella and aerobes, mostly Streptococcus and Staphylococcus aureus [35,41]. For DNI, aerobic and anaerobic organisms reflect the oropharyngeal microbial community [42]. In our cohort, Streptococcus constellatus was the most commonly cultivated pathogen in the DNI patients regardless of whether they had concurrent CNF (19.35%) or DNI alone (19.42%). This microorganism is a small catalase-negative coccus belonging to the Anginosus group, along with Streptococcus anginosus and Streptococcus intermedius [43]. In this study, the overall rate of specific pathogen non-growth was 16.00% (89/556). Blood culture is not a highly sensitive method for identifying pathogens, especially when antibiotics have already been administered [44,45]. However, while there were no differences in pathogens between the DNI alone and concurrent DNI and CNF groups, the rate of specific pathogen non-growth from blood cultures was 16.95% (89/525) in the DNI alone group, in contrast to 0% (0/31) in the concurrent DNI and CNF group, suggesting that concurrent DNI and CNF is more serious and more difficult to manage than DNI alone.

Limitations of the Study

This study had some limitations. First, the retrospective nature of the study resulted in a certain attrition rate. In addition, most patients were male, which could have been due to selection bias.

5. Conclusions

Higher CRP and blood sugar levels were independent risk factors associated with concurrent DNI and CNF. We suggest that the blood sugar level should be monitored initially and controlled after admission. For patients >60 years old with concurrent DNI and CNF, physicians should pay more attention to care because both diseases are fatal illnesses. With regard to prognosis, because concurrent DNI and CNF is more serious and more difficult to manage than DNI alone, there were significant differences in the length of hospital stay and therapeutic management between the DNI groups with and without concurrent CNF. While there were no differences in pathogens between the two groups, there were no cases in the concurrent DNI and CNF group with specific pathogen non-growth from blood cultures, in contrast to a rate of 16.95% in the DNI alone group.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank all of the members of the Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou, for their invaluable help. The English in this document has been checked by at least two professional editors, both native speakers of English. For a certificate, please see: http://www.textcheck.com/certificate/00HgiR (accessed on 11 January 2022).

Abbreviations

CNF: cervical necrotizing fasciitis; CT: computed tomography; CRP: C-reactive protein; CI: confidence interval; DNI: deep neck infection; DM: diabetes mellitus; US: ultrasonography; OR: odds ratio.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, C.-Y.H., Y.-C.W., S.-C.C. and S.-L.C.; methodology, C.-Y.H. and S.-L.C.; validation, C.-Y.H. and S.-L.C.; data curation, C.-Y.H. and S.-L.C.; writing—original draft preparation, C.-Y.H. and S.-L.C.; writing—review and editing, S.-L.C.; visualization, C.-Y.H., S.-C.C. and S.-L.C.; supervision, C.-Y.H., Y.-C.W. and S.-L.C.; project administration, C.-Y.H., S.-C.C. and S.-L.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

This study was approved on 10 January 2022 by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) of the Chang Gung Medical Foundation (IRB No.202200003B0). The data were collected retrospectively, and the patients were anonymized before data analysis. The IRB waived the need for informed consent.

Informed Consent Statement

The IRB approved the waiver of the participant’s consent.

Data Availability Statement

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article. The data are available on request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Footnotes

Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  • 1.Velhonoja J., Laaveri M., Soukka T., Irjala H., Kinnunen I. Deep neck space infections: An upward trend and changing characteristics. Eur. Arch. Otorhinolaryngol. 2020;277:863–872. doi: 10.1007/s00405-019-05742-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Chen S.L., Young C.K., Liao C.T., Tsai T.Y., Kang C.J., Huang S.F. Parotid Space, a Different Space from Other Deep Neck Infection Spaces. Microorganisms. 2021;9:2361. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms9112361. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Tapiovaara L., Back L., Aro K. Comparison of intubation and tracheotomy in patients with deep neck infection. Eur. Arch. Otorhinolaryngol. 2017;274:3767–3772. doi: 10.1007/s00405-017-4694-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Rzepakowska A., Rytel A., Krawczyk P., Osuch-Wojcikiewicz E., Widlak I., Deja M., Niemczyk K. The Factors Contributing to Efficiency in Surgical Management of Purulent Infections of Deep Neck Spaces. Ear Nose Throat J. 2021;100:354–359. doi: 10.1177/0145561319877281. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Boscolo-Rizzo P., Marchiori C., Montolli F., Vaglia A., Da Mosto M.C. Deep neck infections: A constant challenge. ORL J. Otorhinolaryngol. Relat. Spec. 2006;68:259–265. doi: 10.1159/000093095. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Prado-Calleros H.M., Jimenez-Fuentes E., Jimenez-Escobar I. Descending necrotizing mediastinitis: Systematic review on its treatment in the last 6 years, 75 years after its description. Head Neck. 2016;38((Suppl. 1)):E2275–E2283. doi: 10.1002/hed.24183. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Aizawa N., Tsuchiya A., Takahashi S. Two cases of deep neck infection with esophageal perforation. J.-STAGE. 2013;26:149–154. doi: 10.14821/stomatopharyngology.26.149. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Ho C.-Y., Wang Y.-C., Chin S.-C., Chen S.-L. Factors Affecting Patients with Concurrent Deep Neck Infection and Acute Epiglottitis. Diagnostics. 2022;12:29. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12010029. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Bahu S.J., Shibuya T.Y., Meleca R.J., Mathog R.H., Yoo G.H., Stachler R.J., Tyburski J.G. Craniocervical necrotizing fasciitis: An 11-year experience. Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg. 2001;125:245–252. doi: 10.1067/mhn.2001.118182. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Cruz Toro P., Callejo Castillo A., Tornero Salto J., Gonzalez Compta X., Farre A., Manos M. Cervical necrotizing fasciitis: Report of 6 cases and review of literature. Eur. Ann. Otorhinolaryngol. Head Neck Dis. 2014;131:357–359. doi: 10.1016/j.anorl.2013.08.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Ferzli G., Sukato D.C., Mourad M., Kadakia S., Gordin E.A., Ducic Y. Aggressive Necrotizing Fasciitis of the Head and Neck Resulting in Massive Defects. Ear Nose Throat J. 2019;98:197–200. doi: 10.1177/0145561319839789. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Kim Y.J., Kim J.D., Ryu H.I., Cho Y.H., Kong J.H., Ohe J.Y., Kwon Y.D., Choi B.J., Kim G.T. Application of radiographic images in diagnosis and treatment of deep neck infections with necrotizing fasciitis: A case report. Imaging Sci. Dent. 2011;41:189–193. doi: 10.5624/isd.2011.41.4.189. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Wang Y., Chen H.C. Necrotizing Fasciitis of the Neck. Ear Nose Throat J. 2021;100:222–223. doi: 10.1177/0145561319874017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Becker M., Zbaren P., Hermans R., Becker C.D., Marchal F., Kurt A.M., Marre S., Rufenacht D.A., Terrier F. Necrotizing fasciitis of the head and neck: Role of CT in diagnosis and management. Radiology. 1997;202:471–476. doi: 10.1148/radiology.202.2.9015076. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Yang S.W., Lee M.H., See L.C., Huang S.H., Chen T.M., Chen T.A. Deep neck abscess: An analysis of microbial etiology and the effectiveness of antibiotics. Infect. Drug Resist. 2008;1:1–8. doi: 10.2147/IDR.S3554. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Chen M.K., Wen Y.S., Chang C.C., Lee H.S., Huang M.T., Hsiao H.C. Deep neck infections in diabetic patients. Am. J. Otolaryngol. 2000;21:169–173. doi: 10.1016/S0196-0709(00)85019-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Lanisnik B., Cizmarevic B. Necrotizing fasciitis of the head and neck: 34 cases of a single institution experience. Eur. Arch. Otorhinolaryngol. 2010;267:415–421. doi: 10.1007/s00405-009-1007-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Sideris G., Sapountzi M., Malamas V., Papadimitriou N., Maragkoudakis P., Delides A. Early detecting cervical necrotizing fasciitis from deep neck infections: A study of 550 patients. Eur. Arch. Otorhinolaryngol. 2021;278:4587–4592. doi: 10.1007/s00405-021-06653-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Stevens D.L., Bryant A.E. Necrotizing Soft-Tissue Infections. N. Engl. J. Med. 2017;377:2253–2265. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1600673. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Tso D.K., Singh A.K. Necrotizing fasciitis of the lower extremity: Imaging pearls and pitfalls. Br. J. Radiol. 2018;91:20180093. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20180093. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.McGurk M. Diagnosis and treatment of necrotizing fasciitis in the head and neck region. Oral Maxillofac Surg. Clin. N. Am. 2003;15:59–67. doi: 10.1016/S1042-3699(02)00083-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Anaya D.A., Dellinger E.P. Necrotizing soft-tissue infection: Diagnosis and management. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2007;44:705–710. doi: 10.1086/511638. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Chou P.Y., Hsieh Y.H., Lin C.H. Necrotizing fasciitis of the entire head and neck: Literature review and case report. Biomed. J. 2020;43:94–98. doi: 10.1016/j.bj.2019.08.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Gunaratne D.A., Tseros E.A., Hasan Z., Kudpaje A.S., Suruliraj A., Smith M.C., Riffat F., Palme C.E. Cervical necrotizing fasciitis: Systematic review and analysis of 1235 reported cases from the literature. Head Neck. 2018;40:2094–2102. doi: 10.1002/hed.25184. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Fisher J.R., Conway M.J., Takeshita R.T., Sandoval M.R. Necrotizing fasciitis. Importance of roentgenographic studies for soft-tissue gas. JAMA. 1979;241:803–806. doi: 10.1001/jama.1979.03290340021019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Wysoki M.G., Santora T.A., Shah R.M., Friedman A.C. Necrotizing fasciitis: CT characteristics. Radiology. 1997;203:859–863. doi: 10.1148/radiology.203.3.9169717. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Chen S.L., Young C.K., Tsai T.Y., Chien H.T., Kang C.J., Liao C.T., Huang S.F. Factors Affecting the Necessity of Tracheostomy in Patients with Deep Neck Infection. Diagnostics. 2021;11:1536. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics11091536. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Dworkin M.S., Westercamp M.D., Park L., McIntyre A. The epidemiology of necrotizing fasciitis including factors associated with death and amputation. Epidemiol. Infect. 2009;137:1609–1614. doi: 10.1017/S0950268809002532. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Khamnuan P., Chongruksut W., Jearwattanakanok K., Patumanond J., Yodluangfun S., Tantraworasin A. Necrotizing fasciitis: Risk factors of mortality. Risk Manag. Healthc. Policy. 2015;8:1–7. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S77691. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Cheng N.C., Tai H.C., Chang S.C., Chang C.H., Lai H.S. Necrotizing fasciitis in patients with diabetes mellitus: Clinical characteristics and risk factors for mortality. BMC Infect. Dis. 2015;15:417. doi: 10.1186/s12879-015-1144-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Golger A., Ching S., Goldsmith C.H., Pennie R.A., Bain J.R. Mortality in patients with necrotizing fasciitis. Plast Reconstr. Surg. 2007;119:1803–1807. doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000259040.71478.27. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Giaccari A., Sorice G., Muscogiuri G. Glucose toxicity: The leading actor in the pathogenesis and clinical history of type 2 diabetes—Mechanisms and potentials for treatment. Nutr. Metab. Cardiovasc. Dis. 2009;19:365–377. doi: 10.1016/j.numecd.2009.03.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Zheng L., Yang C., Zhang W., Cai X., Kim E., Jiang B., Wang B., Pu Y., Wang J., Zhang Z., et al. Is there association between severe multispace infections of the oral maxillofacial region and diabetes mellitus? J. Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012;70:1565–1572. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2011.07.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Taneja V., Walker R.J., Tedla M. Necrotising fasciitis of the neck: Unusual presentation with aggressive management—Case report with review of literature. Acta Oto-Laryngol. Case Rep. 2017;2:11–16. doi: 10.1080/23772484.2016.1266636. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Fihman V., Raskine L., Petitpas F., Mateo J., Kania R., Gravisse J., Resche-Rigon M., Farhat I., Bercot B., Payen D., et al. Cervical necrotizing fasciitis: 8-years’ experience of microbiology. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2008;27:691–695. doi: 10.1007/s10096-008-0491-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Fliss D.M., Tovi F., Zirkin H.J. Necrotizing soft-tissue infections of dental origin. J. Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1990;48:1104–1108. doi: 10.1016/0278-2391(90)90298-G. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Whitesides L., Cotto-Cumba C., Myers R.A. Cervical necrotizing fasciitis of odontogenic origin: A case report and review of 12 cases. J. Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2000;58:144–151; discussion 152. doi: 10.1016/S0278-2391(00)90327-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Vieira F., Allen S.M., Stocks R.M., Thompson J.W. Deep neck infection. Otolaryngol. Clin. N. Am. 2008;41:459–483. doi: 10.1016/j.otc.2008.01.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Brook I. Microbiology and management of peritonsillar, retropharyngeal, and parapharyngeal abscesses. J. Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2004;62:1545–1550. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2003.12.043. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Oh J.H., Kim Y., Kim C.H. Parapharyngeal abscess: Comprehensive management protocol. ORL J. Otorhinolaryngol. Relat. Spec. 2007;69:37–42. doi: 10.1159/000096715. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Ord R., Coletti D. Cervico-facial necrotizing fasciitis. Oral Dis. 2009;15:133–141. doi: 10.1111/j.1601-0825.2008.01496.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Karkas A., Chahine K., Schmerber S., Brichon P.Y., Righini C.A. Optimal treatment of cervical necrotizing fasciitis associated with descending necrotizing mediastinitis. Br. J. Surg. 2010;97:609–615. doi: 10.1002/bjs.6935. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Chrastek D., Hickman S., Sitaranjan D., Vokshi I., Kakisi O., Kadlec J., Bartosik W., Van Tornout F., Kouritas V. Streptococcus constellatus Causing Empyema and Sepsis, Necessitating Early Surgical Decortication. Case Rep. Infect. Dis. 2020;2020:4630809. doi: 10.1155/2020/4630809. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Guardiani E., Bliss M., Harley E. Supraglottitis in the era following widespread immunization against Haemophilus influenzae type B: Evolving principles in diagnosis and management. Laryngoscope. 2010;120:2183–2188. doi: 10.1002/lary.21083. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Islam A., Oko M. Cervical necrotising fasciitis and descending mediastinitis secondary to unilateral tonsillitis: A case report. J. Med. Case Rep. 2008;2:368. doi: 10.1186/1752-1947-2-368. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article. The data are available on request.


Articles from Diagnostics are provided here courtesy of Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)

RESOURCES