Significance
It has been suggested for more than 50 y that the fastest myosin in the biological world with a velocity of 70 μm s−1 exists in the alga Chara, because cytoplasmic streaming with a velocity of 70 μm s−1 occurs in Chara cells. However, a myosin with that velocity has not yet been identified. In this work, we succeeded in cloning a myosin XI with a velocity of 60 μm s−1, which was measured using a chimeric myosin. We also successfully crystallized myosin XI. Structural comparison of various myosins and mutation experiments of actin-binding regions suggests that the central regions that define the fast movement of Chara myosin XI are the actin-binding sites.
Keywords: molecular motor, cytoplasmic streaming, myosin, actin, crystal structure
Abstract
Cytoplasmic streaming with extremely high velocity (∼70 μm s−1) occurs in cells of the characean algae (Chara). Because cytoplasmic streaming is caused by myosin XI, it has been suggested that a myosin XI with a velocity of 70 μm s−1, the fastest myosin measured so far, exists in Chara cells. However, the velocity of the previously cloned Chara corallina myosin XI (CcXI) was about 20 μm s−1, one-third of the cytoplasmic streaming velocity in Chara. Recently, the genome sequence of Chara braunii has been published, revealing that this alga has four myosin XI genes. We cloned these four myosin XI (CbXI-1, 2, 3, and 4) and measured their velocities. While the velocities of CbXI-3 and CbXI-4 motor domains (MDs) were similar to that of CcXI MD, the velocities of CbXI-1 and CbXI-2 MDs were 3.2 times and 2.8 times faster than that of CcXI MD, respectively. The velocity of chimeric CbXI-1, a functional, full-length CbXI-1 construct, was 60 μm s−1. These results suggest that CbXI-1 and CbXI-2 would be the main contributors to cytoplasmic streaming in Chara cells and show that these myosins are ultrafast myosins with a velocity 10 times faster than fast skeletal muscle myosins in animals. We also report an atomic structure (2.8-Å resolution) of myosin XI using X-ray crystallography. Based on this crystal structure and the recently published cryo-electron microscopy structure of acto-myosin XI at low resolution (4.3-Å), it appears that the actin-binding region contributes to the fast movement of Chara myosin XI. Mutation experiments of actin-binding surface loops support this hypothesis.
Myosins are motor proteins that convert chemical energy, ATP, to physical force to move actin filaments. Phylogenetic analyses of myosin motor domain (MD) sequences have shown that there are at least 79 myosin classes, with several subclasses under each class (1). Myosins of different classes and subclasses differ significantly in properties such as velocity, ATPase activity, and duty ratio (the proportion of the ATPase cycle in which the MD remains strongly bound to actin) and perform different intracellular functions (2). The diversity of properties of these classes and subclasses arise from differences in the rates of the binding and dissociation of ATP, ADP, and actin filaments (3).
Plants have two plant-specific myosin classes, myosin VIII and myosin XI. Myosin VIII moves actin filaments at very slow velocities (4) and is involved in endocytosis, cell plate formation, and plasmodesmatal functioning in plants (5–7). Myosin XI produces an intracellular flow known as cytoplasmic streaming in plant cells by moving on actin filaments while binding organelles via its tail domain. Cytoplasmic streaming facilitates the distribution of molecules and vesicles throughout large plant cells (8–12). The velocities of myosin XI are generally high, and the molecule specializes in cytoplasmic streaming. Some cells of characean algae (Chara) are very large, being up to 10 cm long and 0.1 cm in diameter. Very fast cytoplasmic streaming, of up to 70 μm s−1, is required for the dispersal of molecules and vesicles into the giant Chara cells (13).
Based on the velocity of cytoplasmic streaming in Chara cells, it has long been suggested that Chara has a myosin moving on actin filaments at 70 µm s−1 (13–17). This velocity is 10 times faster than the velocity of fast skeletal muscle myosin and the fastest of all myosins measured. A motor protein isolated from Chara cells moved actin filaments at 60 μm s−1 (18). The development of approaches for cloning this ultrafast myosin is urgently needed. Details of the sequence of the protein and the ability to work with cloned myosin constructs will allow the investigation of the mechanisms that control the myosin velocity and facilitate investigation of the detailed chemical–mechanical conversion mechanism of myosin (19). Kashiyama et al. cloned the complementary DNA (cDNA) of Chara myosin from a Chara corallina cDNA library by immunoscreening using antibodies against purified C. corallina myosin (20). Morimatsu et al. also cloned the cDNA of Chara myosin using the same method as that used by Kashiyama et al. (21). The sequences of the MD of myosins cloned by the two groups were identical, and there was a 15 amino acid indel variation in the tail domain, a finding that indicates potential alternative splicing in the tail domain. The C. corallina myosin XI (CcXI) contains six isoleucine–glutamine (IQ) motifs, which are light chain–binding sites. It was not possible to express the protein and measure its velocity using the cloned CcXI, because the myosin light chains that bind to the six IQ motifs of CcXI have not been identified. Therefore, the functional expression of CcXI has been carried out using either a CcXI MD construct that did not have the myosin light chain–binding sites (IQ motifs) or chimeric full-length CcXI constructs in which IQ motifs and myosin light chains of CcXI were replaced with those of other myosins. The velocity of CcXI was then estimated from the velocity measured using these constructs. The estimated velocity of CcXI was about 20 µm/s−1 or less at 25 °C (10, 22–26), which is less than about one-third of the velocity of cytoplasmic streaming observed in Chara cells. Three possibilities have been suggested as to why the velocities of CcXI obtained using the recombinant constructs were different from that expected from cytoplasmic streaming (1). The recombinant CcXI constructs do not have the same IQ motifs and myosin light chains as native CcXI, and this substitution may have affected the velocity (2). CcXI may undergo a posttranslational modification in Chara cells, which may increase the velocity of CcXI in cells (3). A myosin XI gene other than CcXI may be present in Chara cells, and this myosin XI may be responsible for cytoplasmic streaming with a velocity of 70 µm s−1.
Recently, a genome project (Chara braunii genome sequencing project, National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) Bio Project ID: PRJDB3348) has been conducted for C. braunii (27). C. braunii is phylogenetically close to C. corallina (28–30), and both species have the same cytoplasmic streaming velocity, 70 µm s−1. The Chara genome project revealed that the C. braunii genome contains four myosin XI genes.
In this study, we cloned the four C. braunii myosin XIs and named them CbXI-1, CbXI-2, CbXI-3, and CbXI-4. Phylogenetic analyses indicated that the myosin XIs in Chara form a clade in streptophyte myosin XIs, expanded independently from seed plant myosin XIs, and gave rise to the four members in C. braunii. CbXI-4 may be an ortholog of CcXI. We show that the velocity of CbXI-1 (60 µm s−1) is almost the same as the velocity of cytoplasmic streaming in Chara cells, the fastest currently known in the biological world. We also succeeded in crystallizing Arabidopsis myosin XI-2 (AtXI-2), an atomic structure of myosin XI and a valuable comparator for the Chara myosin. Structural analyses and mutation experiments suggest that the central regions that define Chara myosin XI's fast movement are the actin-binding sites.
Results
Phylogenetic Relationships of the Four CbXIs.
Until 2018, the only known myosin sequence in the genus Chara was that of CcXI, which was cloned by Kashiyama (20) and Morimatsu (21) independently in 2000. Their results suggested that Chara has only one myosin XI gene. However, the C. braunii genome project, published in 2018, revealed four myosin XI genes having intact MD: g50407, g48390, g24025, and g48658 (27). We named g50407, g48390, g24025, and g48658 as CbXI-1, CbXI-2, CbXI-3, and CbXI-4, respectively. The originally annotated g48658 (CbXI-4) was truncated at the N-terminal 743 amino acids. The rest of the messenger RNA (mRNA) sequence of CbXI-4 was identified on another scaffold, based on transcriptome assemblies (SI Appendix, Materials and Methods and accession nos: BR001749 and BR001750 for two isoforms). CbXI-1 differed in the cloned MD sequence (LC641776) from the prediction and the full-length sequence (BR001757) was reconstructed based on the cloned MD sequence. The full-length amino acid sequences of CbXI-1, CbXI-2, CbXI-3, and CbXI-4 are shown in SI Appendix, Supplementary Text. A schematic diagram of the CbXIs deduced from the amino acid sequences is shown in Fig. 1. CbXIs have typical domain structures of myosin XI: a MD, a neck domain with six IQ motifs to which six myosin light chains bind, a coiled-coil domain for dimer formation, and a globular tail domain (GTD).
We examined the phylogenetic relationships among the myosin XIs from Chara and representative green plants (Fig. 2). The phylogenetic tree indicated that streptophyte myosin XIs formed a well-supported clade including genes from Klebsormidium nitens and the Phragmoplastophyta, which includes Chara, Spirogloea, and the land plants. However, the basal relationship within Phragmoplastophyta was not clearly resolved. The four CbXI genes and a CcXI gene formed a well-supported clade (Fig. 2, light-yellow box; Charales myosin XI). Within the Charales myosin XI clade, CbXI-1 and CbXI-2 formed a clade (subgroup 1) sister to the remaining three genes (subgroup 2). CbXI-4 and CcXI formed a clade, and CbXI-3 diverged earlier. The subgroup 1 has notably longer branches compared with subgroup 2 or other green plant myosin XIs. The proteins encoded by these two subgroups 1 genes are apparently larger than the subgroup 2 genes, and especially long are the regions between coiled-coil and GTD domains (Fig. 1B).
Recombinant Constructs of CbXIs.
To clarify the biochemical properties of the four CbXIs, it was necessary to isolate and purify each CbXI. However, it is very difficult to purify active myosins from Chara cells, because most of the cell volume of Chara cells is occupied by the vacuole, which is rich in proteolytic enzymes, and the cytoplasm is only a small volume (31). Furthermore, it is virtually impossible to purify each of the four myosin XIs with similar molecular properties from C. braunii cells. The only way to obtain each of four CbXIs is to express and purify them using a recombinant construct. Using baculovirus expression systems for the functional expression of myosins with IQ motifs, coexpression with myosin light chains that bind to the IQ motifs is required. Calmodulin binds IQ motifs in the myosin neck region and functions as myosin light chains for many animal unconventional myosins, such as myosin I, myosin V, and myosin VI. Analysis of the IQ motif sequences of the animal unconventional myosins, in which calmodulin acts as a light chain, using Pfam database (http://pfam.xfam.org) (32) shows that most of the sequences fall into the typical calmodulin-binding IQ motif (33), especially the first IQ motif (SI Appendix, Table S1). On the other hand, the IQ motif sequences of some plant myosin XIs, such as CcXI, AtXI-A, AtXI-D, AtXI-I, and AtXI-J, are far from the typical calmodulin-binding motif (SI Appendix, Table S1). Coexpression of these myosin XIs with calmodulin in insect cells did not yield functional myosin (23, 34). We coexpressed a CbXI-1 construct containing the native IQ motifs with calmodulin in insect cells and tried to purify the construct, but it did not work as predicted from the IQ motifs. It is likely that calmodulin failed to bind to the native IQ motifs of CbXI-1, exposing the hydrophobic region of the IQ motifs and causing the CbXI-1 to aggregate in the cells.
We, therefore, expressed CbXIs using approaches that did not include the sequences of the IQ motifs of Chara myosins. We used two types of constructs: CbXI MD and chimeric CbXI (SI Appendix, Fig. S1). CbXI MD consists of only the MD of CbXI. Chimeric CbXI consists of the MD of CbXI and six IQ motifs and coiled-coil of Arabidopsis XI-F (AtXI-F). Because calmodulin binds to the six IQ motifs of AtXI-F as light chains (34) (SI Appendix, Table S1), coexpression of the chimeric CbXI and calmodulin would yield functional CbXIs with the same lever arm length as native CbXIs. These constructs were expressed in a baculovirus system and purified by nickel-affinity and FLAG-affinity resins (SI Appendix, Materials and Methods). The purity and homogeneity were confirmed by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) (SI Appendix, Figs. S2 and S3). It was also confirmed by SDS-PAGE that calmodulin bound to the purified chimeric CbXI (SI Appendix, Fig. S3).
Velocities of CbXIs.
The sliding velocities of actin filaments by CbXI MD were measured using an antibody-based version of the in vitro motility assay at 25 °C. CbXI-3 MD and CbXI-4 MD, belonging to the subgroup 2, moved actin filaments at velocities of 3.0 ± 0.2 and 3.1 ± 0.3 μm s−1, respectively, which were similar to that of CcXI MD (23, 24). The velocities of CbXI-1 MD and CbXI-2 MD, belonging to the subgroup 1, were 15 ± 0.7 μm s−1 and 13 ± 0.6 μm s−1, respectively, which were about threefold faster than that of CcXI MD (23, 24) (Table 1). Actin velocities generated by myosins are approximately proportional to the lever arm length of myosin if the motor region is the same (35, 36). We have previously shown that this relationship between lever arm length and actin velocities by myosin generally holds for myosin XIs. Based on the crystal structure of myosin V with IQ motifs (37) (Protein Data Bank [PDB]: 2IX7), an ortholog of myosin XI, it is estimated that the lever arm length of myosin XI MD is 3.5 nm, which is 1/6.6 that of full-length myosin XI (native myosin XI) containing six IQ motifs (23 nm). The velocity of myosin XI MD was one-fifth that of full-length myosin XI (34). Therefore, multiplying the velocity of myosin XI MD by a factor of 5 gives the velocity of native (full-length) myosin XI. The estimated velocities of native (full-length) CbXI-1 and CbXI-2 were 73 µm s−1 (14.5 μm/s−1 × 5) and 66 µm s−1 (13.2 μm s−1 × 5), respectively (Fig. 3 and Table 1). The estimated velocities of CbXI-1 and CbXI-2 are therefore almost the same as the cytoplasmic streaming velocity in members of the genus Chara (C. corallina and C. braunii), 70 µm s−1 (13, 17).
Table 1.
CbXI-1 | CbXI-2 | CbXI-3 | CbXI-4 | CcXI† | |
Vmax (Pi/s−1/head−1) | 410 | 200 | 260 | 230 | 580 |
Kapp (µM) | 46 | 45 | 15 | 8.7 | 23 |
Velocity of MD (μm/s−1)‡ | 15 ± 0.7 | 13 ± 0.6 | 3.0 ± 0.2 | 3.1 ± 0.3 | 4.7 ± 0.3 |
Estimated velocity of full-length myosin§ (μm/s−1) | 73 | 66 | 15 | 16 | 24 |
Velocity of chimeric full-length myosin (μm/s−1) | 60 ± 4.1¶ | ND | ND | ND | 16 ± 0.9# |
Duty ratio‖ (%) | 9.6 | 5.4 | 30 | 26 | 43 |
*Measured at 25 °C.
‡mean ± SD; n = 30.
§Estimated values from the velocity of the MD constructs, which are calculated by the method described in ref. 34.
¶Value of the chimeric CbXI-1, mean ± SD, and n = 30.
#Value of the chimeric CcXI (10), mean ± SD, and n = 30.
‖Calculated by the Vmax values of the actin-activated ATPase activities and the velocities of MD as described in ref. 34.
To examine the velocity of CbXI-1 using a construct that is structurally similar to the native CbXI-1, we used chimeric CbXI-1 (SI Appendix, Fig. S1). The velocity of chimeric CbXI-1 was 60 ± 4.1 μm s−1 (Table 1, and Movie S1). While this velocity was somewhat less than the velocity estimated from the velocity of CbXI-1 MD and the cytoplasmic streaming velocity of the Chara cells (70 μm s−1), the values are almost the same as the reported myosin velocity purified from Chara cells (60 μm s−1) (18). The lower velocity of the chimeric CbXI-1 may be due to improper linkage between CbXI-1MD and the IQ motifs of AtXI-F. Another possible reason for the lower velocity of the chimeric CbXI-1 may be due to the difference in the environment between Chara cells and in vitro motility assay. In the in vitro motility assay, actin filaments move on myosins coated randomly on flat surfaces. In contrast, in Chara cells, vesicle-associated myosins move on polarized actin filaments (38). Because myosins moving on polarized actin filaments have been reported to be faster (39), the chimeric CbXI-1 may also have a velocity of 70 μm s−1 if it moves in Chara cells. The results in this study suggest that CbXI-1 and CbXI-2 would be the myosins causing cytoplasmic streaming in C.braunii and demonstrate that CbXI-1 with a velocity of 60 µm s−1 is the fastest myosin yet measured among all organisms (Fig. 3).
ATPase Activities.
The ATPase activities of CbXI-1, CbXI-2, CbXI-3, and CbXI-4 MDs were plotted as a function of actin concentration and fit to the Michaels–Menten equation to determine the maximum rate of ATP turnover (Vmax) and the actin concentration at which the ATPase rates were one-half of the maximal rate (Kapp). The Vmax and Kapp values of CbXI-1 MD were 410 Pi s−1head−1 and 46 μM, respectively (Table 1). This Vmax value is similar to that of CcXI MD (22, 23), although the actin velocity of CbXI-1 MD is three times faster than that of CcXI MD. The Vmax of actin-activated ATPase activities was not correlated with actin velocity among the four CbXIs. This discrepancy may arise because the rate-limiting step of Vmax of actin-activated ATPase activities (phosphate dissociation from actin–myosin–ADP·Pi complex) and the rate-limiting step of actin velocity (ADP dissociation from actin–myosin–ADP complex) are different (23).
Crystal Structure of the Myosin XI MD.
To investigate the molecular mechanism of the ultrafast movement of CbXI-1, we tried to crystallize CbXI-1 MD. However, we were unsuccessful, probably because CbXI-1 MD is unstable and prone to semi-denaturation. ATPase activity of CbXI-1 tends to drop in a relatively short time compared with other myosins, which makes it difficult to obtain the crystal structure. Such instability of ATPase activity was observed for all Chara myosins. Although class XI myosin is the fastest myosin class in the myosin superfamily (Fig. 3), the atomic structure of the class XI myosin MD has yet to be solved. Therefore, in this study, we decided to clarify the structural features responsible for the high velocity of class XI myosins by crystallographic analysis of other class XI myosins. We chose Arabidopsis myosin MYA2 (AtXI-2) as the crystallization target, because AtXI-2 has a standard velocity among class XI myosins, it is faster than most animal myosins (Fig. 3) (34), and its ATPase activity is more stable than those of Chara myosins. AtXI-2 has an amino acid sequence relatively similar to that of CbXI-1 MD, having 63% identity and 87% similarity.
We succeeded in solving the crystal structure of AtXI-2 MD bound with ADP and AlF4− at 2.8-Å resolution, which is the first atomic structure of the class XI myosin MD (Fig. 4 A and B, and SI Appendix, Table S2). Fig. 4 C and D show comparisons of the structure of ADP·AlF4−–bound AtXI-2 with the structures of other ADP·AlF4−–bound classes of myosins. Although there are some deviations in the position of the main chain, the nucleotide interaction region including switch I and switch II is almost identical (Fig. 4C). The backdoor size for phosphate dissociation of AtXI-2 was also very similar to those of myosins of other classes (Fig. 4D). Thus, the structure near the nucleotide-binding region of myosin XI was not markedly different from those of myosins of other classes (myosin II, myosin VI, and myosin XIV).
Myosins of different classes have significantly different motor properties, such as velocity, ATPase activity, and duty ratio. Even within the same class, the motor properties are different for each myosin. The differences in the properties of each myosin motor are due to differences in the MD's amino acid sequence. Therefore, we investigated the structural regions in the MD with large variations in amino acid sequence among various myosin classes (Fig. 5). A comparison of the amino acids of different myosins showed that the central part of the MD is highly conserved, and these regions are responsible for basic chemical–mechanical energy conversion. In addition to the Src homology 3 region of the N-terminal subdomain, the actin-binding regions of the upper 50k and lower 50k subdomains have high amino acid diversity among various myosin classes (Fig. 5B, various classes and SI Appendix, Fig. S4). The same tendency was observed among myosin XIs, although weaker than among various myosin classes (Fig. 5B, XIs). These regions would be responsible for the diversity of motor properties among myosins.
The amino acid sequences of CbXI-1 MD and CcXI MD are similar (identity and similarity are 65% and 89%, respectively). Thus, we built a homology model of acto-CbXI-1 rigor structure based on the recently reported acto-CcXI rigor structure (PDB: 7KCH) (26). We then compared the actin-binding modes of six myosins (CbXI-1, CcXI, NM2c, Myosin VI, Myosin 1b, and Pf MyoA) using acto-myosin rigor structures (SI Appendix, Fig. S4). Footprint analyses of loop 4 and CM loop of six myosins show that the amino acid residues of actin and myosin in the binding region differed in different classes of myosin but also between CcXI and CbXI-1 in the same class (SI Appendix, Table S3). These results indicate that actin-binding modes differ depending on myosins, even for the same class of myosins. Differences in the actin-binding modes may give rise to the diversity in myosin properties such as velocity and ATP activity.
Velocities of Actin-Binding Surface Loop Mutants of CcXI.
The actin-binding region of myosin consists mainly of four actin-binding surface loops of variable length and composition (loop 2, loop 3, loop 4, and CM loop) and a relatively conserved helix-turn-helix of the Lower 50k subdomain (40–43). Many studies have been conducted on the effects of these actin-binding surface loops on the motor activities using various myosins and have shown that these loops affect the actin-activated ATPase and the velocity (24, 44–51). To investigate the relationship between the diversity of actin-binding regions of myosin and the diversity of myosin velocities among Chara myosins, we changed loop 2, loop 3, loop 4, and CM loop of CcXI (subgroup 2) MD to those of CbXI-1 (subgroup 1) and examined whether the velocities of CcXI MD with the loops of CbXI-1 would increase. When the sequences of these four loops were compared among Chara myosins, loop 3 sequences were the same except for the amino acid at the C terminus, but loop 2, loop 4, and the CM loop differed variously in length and composition among Chara myosins (Table 2). The velocity of CcXI MD with loop 3 of CbXI-1, in which loop 3 of CcXI was replaced with loop 3 of CbXI-1, was almost the same as that of CcXI MD. On the other hand, the velocities of CcXI MD with loop 2 of CbXI-1, CcXI MD with loop 4 of CbXI-1, and CcXI MD with CM loop of CbXI-1 were 1.3, 1.1, and 1.3 times higher than that of CcXI MD, respectively. Furthermore, CcXI MD with double mutation of loop 2 and CM loop showed an even-more-significant increase in velocity (1.4-fold) (Table 3). These results indicate that half of the difference in velocity between CcXI and CbXI-1 (about threefold) was due to the differences in the actin-binding surface loops between CcXI and CbXI-1 and that the diversity of the actin-binding region accounts for the diversity of the myosin velocity.
Table 2.
Myosin (subgroup) | Loops | Length | Net charge | Amino acid sequence |
CbXI-1 (Subgroup 1) | Loop 2 | 23 | 1 | YPPPEEPKQGGKGGGKSSFSSIG |
Loop 3 | 6 | 5 | KHKFKK | |
Loop 4 | 15 | −2 | DFKPGKEADSSQLAD | |
CM loop | 15 | 2 | QRIMVTRGEAITKLL | |
CbXI-2 (Subgroup 1) | Loop 2 | 25 | 1 | YPPPPEEPKQGGGKGGSKSSFSSIG |
Loop 3 | 6 | 5 | KHKFKK | |
Loop 4 | 15 | −2 | EFAPGKDADSSKIAD | |
CM loop | 15 | 3 | QRVMMTGTEKIKKLL | |
CbXI-3 (Subgroup 2) | Loop 2 | 17 | 0 | FPPDEGTKAPSKFASIG |
Loop 3 | 6 | 4 | RPKFKR | |
Loop 4 | 14 | −3 | EFSTGASEASEVSS | |
CM loop | 16 | 3 | TRIMRASRTESITKIL | |
CbXI-4 (Subgroup 2) | Loop 2 | 17 | 0 | FPLDEGAKAPSKFMSIG |
Loop 3 | 6 | 5 | KHKFKR | |
Loop 4 | 14 | −4 | EFNSGESEASEVST | |
CM loop | 16 | 3 | TRIMKATRTESITKIL | |
CcXI (Subgroup 2) | Loop 2 | 17 | 0 | FPADEGTKAPSKFMSIG |
Loop 3 | 6 | 5 | KHKFKR | |
Loop 4 | 14 | −5 | EFDSGESDASEVST | |
CM loop | 16 | 3 | TRIMKATRTESITKIL |
Acidic and basic residues are highlighted in bold and italic, respectively.
Table 3.
Myosin | Loops | Length | Net charge | Amino acid sequence | Velocity(µm/s−1) |
CcXI MD (wild type) | Loop 2 | 17 | 0 | FPADEGTKAPSKFMSIG | 4.3 ± 0.6 |
Loop 3 | 6 | 5 | KHKFKR‡ | ||
Loop 4 | 14 | −5 | EFDSGESDASEVST | ||
CM loop | 16 | 3 | TRIMKATRTESITKIL | ||
CcXI MD with Loop 2 of CbXI-1 | Loop 2 | 23 | 1 | YPPPEEPKQGGKGGGKSSFSSIG | 5.5 ± 0.5* |
Loop 3 | (same as CcXI) | ||||
Loop 4 | (same as CcXI) | ||||
CM loop | (same as CcXI) | ||||
CcXI MD with Loop 3 of CbXI-1 | Loop 2 | (same as CcXI) | 4.1 ± 0.4 | ||
Loop 3 | 6 | 5 | KHKFKK2 | ||
Loop 4 | (same as CcXI) | ||||
CM loop | (same as CcXI) | ||||
CcXI MD with Loop 4 of CbXI-1 | Loop 2 | (same as CcXI) | 4.9 ± 0.3* | ||
Loop 3 | (same as CcXI) | ||||
Loop 4 | 15 | −2 | DFKPGKEADSSQLAD | ||
CM loop | (same as CcXI) | ||||
CcXI MD with CM loop of CbXI-1 | Loop 2 | (same as CcXI) | 5.4 ± 0.3* | ||
Loop 3 | (same as CcXI) | ||||
Loop 4 | (same as CcXI) | ||||
CM loop | 15 | 2 | QRIMVTRGEAITKLL | ||
CcXI MD with Loop 2 and CM loop of CbXI-1 | Loop 2 | 23 | 1 | YPPPEEPKQGGKGGGKSSFSSIG | 6.1 ± 0.2* |
Loop 3 | (same as CcXI) | ||||
Loop 4 | (same as CcXI) | ||||
CM loop | 15 | 2 | QRIMVTRGEAITKLL |
Acidic and basic residues are highlighted in bold and italic, respectively. *P < 0.001 by Student’s t test compared with CcXI MD.
†Measured at 25 °C, mean ± SD, and n = 30.
‡Loop 3 sequences of CcXI and CbXI-1 are almost identical, so the only different amino acid residue of loop 3 is underlined.
Discussion
In this work, we successfully cloned the fastest myosin currently known in the biological world, CbXI-1 with an expected velocity of 60 µm s−1. We also succeeded in solving the atomic crystal structure of the MD of class XI myosin. The amino acid sequence features of CbXI-1, mutation experiments, and the crystal structure of class XI myosin indicate that the actin-binding sites are crucial for defining the myosin velocity.
The myosin superfamily currently has 79 classes, each containing several subclasses (1). Of the 79 myosin classes, 17 classes are found in animals and two are found in green plants. Other myosin classes are found in fungi and Protista. The velocities and ATPase activities of most of the 19 myosin classes present in vertebrates and plants have been measured. The velocities of myosins differ greatly depending on the class and subclass. Although skeletal muscle myosin II is exceptionally fast, most animal myosin has a velocity of less than 1 μm s−1. In contrast, plant-specific class XI myosins have velocities of 5 µm s−1 or higher (Fig. 3). The high velocity of class XI myosins is thought to be related to the plant-specific role; the main role of class XI myosins is to drive cytoplasmic streaming, whereas the role of most animal myosins is the generation of force. The force generated by class XI myosin is smaller than that produced by animal myosins (52). Because plant cytoplasmic streaming is caused by myosin XI-bound organelle movement along actin filaments, the velocity of cytoplasmic streaming in plants is thought to be approximately equal to the velocity of the class XI myosin of that plant. Based on the cytoplasmic streaming velocity in the aquatic genus Chara, it has long been proposed that Chara possesses a myosin with a velocity of 70 μm s−1 (13–18), but the myosin responsible for this had not been identified. This work revealed that CbXI-1 and CbXI-2 are the sought-after fast myosins.
The Chara myosin XIs have expanded independently of the expansion of the land plants (53), resulting in four genes. CbXI-1 and CbXI-2, the members of subgroup 1, form a clade having a longer branch than that of a clade formed by CbXI-3, CbXI-4, and CcXI, which are in subgroup 2 (Fig. 2). Because CbXI-4 and CcXI form a clade, they are putative orthologs. The longer branch lengths in the CbXI-1 and CbXI-2 clade imply the action of adaptive evolution to increase the velocity, as they have fastest movement and do not seem to have lost any functionality. The genome project found that CbXI-1 is the most-highly expressed myosin XI in the whole plant (SI Appendix, Table S4) (27). Thus, CbXI-1 appears to be the main contributor to cytoplasmic streaming in C. braunii. CbXI-2, which has almost the same velocity as CbXI-1, would provide redundancy of the function of CbXI-1.
We estimated the duty ratio of CbXI myosins from the Vmax values of the actin-activated ATPase activities and the velocities of MD (Table 1). The duty ratios of subgroup 2 myosins are much higher than those of subgroup 1. In order for a myosin-bound vesicle to remain associated with actin filaments and to move continuously along the actin filaments, at least one of the myosin MDs on the vesicle must always be strongly bound to the actin filaments. Therefore, the reciprocal of the duty ratio is the lowest number of MDs on a vesicle required for continuous movements of the myosin-bound vesicle on the actin filaments. Subgroup 2 myosins, which have a high duty ratio, can transport vesicles with fewer myosin MDs than can subgroup 1 myosins. Subgroup 2 myosins may function in small vesicle transport, in which the number of bound myosins is limited.
We have obtained a crystal structure of class XI myosin at 2.8-Å resolution, which is the fastest of all the measured myosin classes. The structure of class XI myosin, AtXI-2, near the nucleotide-binding region was similar to those of other classes of myosins: Dictyostelium myosin II, pig myosin VI, and Toxoplasma myosin XIV (Fig. 4 C and D). This finding is consistent with a previous report that the central part of the myosin structure is similar among different classes of myosins, even though their velocities and ATPases are very different (54). On the other hand, there is considerable diversity among the amino acids in the actin-binding sites of myosins, both among the myosin classes and among myosin XIs (Fig. 5). Most recently, the rigor structure (postpower stroke and nonnucleotide state) of acto-CcXI MD determined by cryo-electron microscopy at 4.3-Å resolution was reported (26). Because the amino acid sequences of CcXI MD and CbXI-1 MD are similar, we created a homology model of acto-CbXI-1 MD based on the reported structure of the acto-CcXI MD. Comparing acto-CcXI and acto-CbXI-1, the binding modes of CcXI and CbXI-1 to actin was different (SI Appendix, Fig. S4). Footprint analyses showed that the amino acids in the actin-binding sites of loop 4 and CM loop differed between CcXI and CbXI. In addition, the amino acids of actin to which these loops bind are also different between CcXI and CbXI (SI Appendix, Table S3). In order to investigate the relationship between the differences in the actin-binding regions and the differences in the myosin velocity, we made CcXI MD with loop 4 of CbXI-1 and CcXI MD with CM loop of CbXI-1. The velocities of CcXI MD with loop 4 of CbXI-1 and CcXI MD with CM loop of CbXI-1 were higher than that of CcXI MD (Table 3).
The velocity of CcXI with loop 2 of CbXI-1 was also higher than that of CcXI (Table 3). It is not possible to determine from the acto-MD structure whether the actin-binding mode of CcXI loop 2 is different from that of CbXI-1 loop 2, because loop 2 was not visible in the reported acto-CcXI structure (26). Loop 2 of CbXI-1 (subgroup 1) is characterized by three consecutive proline and five glycine clusters (Table 2), which are not present in loop 2 of subgroup 2 of Chara myosins, such as CcXI. Proline and glycine clusters are known to disrupt the secondary structure (55, 56), so loop 2 of CbXI-1 with this feature would be a completely free loop structure, resulting in increased flexibility. The increased flexibility of loop 2 may allow for fast ADP dissociation from acto-myosin, which increases the myosin velocity.
The difference in velocity between CcXI and CbXI-1 was about threefold (Table 1). About half of this difference was accounted for by the difference in the amino acid sequence of the actin-binding surface loops between CcXI and CbXI-1, because the velocity of CcXI with loop 2 and CM loop of CbXI-1 was 1.4-fold higher than that of CcXI (Table 3). Actin-binding sites other than loops may also be involved in the variation of actin velocity. The L50k subdomain, one of the most-important actin-binding sites and constituting the tertiary structure, shows diversity among myosin classes (Fig. 5). This region may be responsible for the diversity of myosin properties among myosin classes. However, because mutations in the tertiary structure can disrupt the overall structure, mutation experiments on the L50k subdomain may be difficult. A recent paper also reported that the amino acids of actin and myosin in the acto-myosin binding regions vary depending on the type of myosins, similar to our present work (42). Kinetic data from various myosin classes also suggest that actin-binding sites are crucial for the diversity of velocities among the classes and subclasses of myosins. The ADP dissociation rate from the myosin–ADP complex in the absence of actin is nearly identical among myosins with different velocities. In contrast, the ADP dissociation rate from the actin–myosin–ADP complex, the rate-limiting step in myosin velocity, differs depending on the classes and subclasses of myosins (23). Different classes and subclasses of myosins bind to actin in somewhat different ways, which probably cause different changes in the nucleotide-binding site through communication between the actin- and the nucleotide-binging sites within the MD, resulting in different kinetics.
AtXI-2 MD and CcXI MD are similar in the structures and the amino acid sequences (identity and similarity are 63% and 91%, respectively). Therefore, we estimated the angular change of the converter domain during the power stroke of CcXI using AtXI-2·ADP (prepower stroke) and CcXI (rigor) structures. The estimated angular angle of CcXI is 85 degrees, which is similar to those of pig myosin VI, Scallop myosin II, and Plasmodium myosin XIV (SI Appendix, Fig. S5). This result suggests that the magnitude of the angular change in the converter domain is not related to the fast velocity of class XI myosin.
Detailed kinetics analyses and single-molecule assays using the fastest myosin, CbXI-1, would provide further insights into the detailed chemical–mechanical conversion mechanism of myosin. The gene for CcXI, the fast myosin, has contributed to the development of nanomachines (25, 26) and the enhancement of plant growth (10, 57). The gene for CbXI-1, the ultrafast myosin, will greatly contribute to a variety of research and development.
Materials and Methods
RNA Extraction.
Thalli of strain S276 were harvested in soil-water medium for the Charales (SWC-3) (27). Further details are described in SI Appendix, Materials and Methods.
Cloning of MD of C. braunii Myosins.
cDNA of CbXI-1 (g50407), CbXI-2 (g48390), CbXI-3 (g24025), and CbXI-4 (g48658) MDs were amplified from total RNA of C.braunii. Further details are described in SI Appendix, Materials and Methods.
Identification of Full-Length Sequence of CbXI-4.
Detailed information is described in SI Appendix, Materials and Methods.
Protein Engineering, Expression, and Purification.
Myosins were expressed using a baculovirus expression system and purified using Ni-affinity and FLAG-affinity resins as previously described (4, 23, 24). Further details are described in SI Appendix, Materials and Methods.
ATPase Activity.
ATPase activities were determined by measuring released phosphate as previously described (22). The reaction mixtures for the assay of actin-activated Mg2+-ATPase activity contained were done in 25 mM KCl, 4 mM MgCl2, 25 mM Hepes-KOH (pH 7.4), 2 mM ATP, 1 mM dithiothreitol (DTT), and 1 mg/mL bovine serum albumin and at 25 °C and 0.125 to 4 mg/mL F-actin. Values of ATPase activities are averages of two measurements on two independent preparations.
In Vitro Motility Assay.
The velocity was measured using an anti-Myc antibody-based version of the in vitro actin filament-gliding assay as previously described (23). The velocity of actin filaments was measured in 150 mM KCl, 4 mM MgCl2, 25 mM Hepes-KOH (pH 7.4), 2 mM ATP, 10 mM DTT, and oxygen scavenger system (120 µg/mL glucose oxidase, 12.8 mM glucose, and 20 µg/mL catalase) at 25 °C. Average sliding velocities are determined by measuring the displacements of actin filaments. Values of actin velocities are averages of 30 measurements from two independent preparations.
Crystallization and Data Collection.
Detailed information is described in SI Appendix, Materials and Methods.
The Phylogenetic Tree of Chara Myosin XIs and the Whole of Myosin XIs.
Detailed information is described in SI Appendix, Materials and Methods.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
The synchrotron radiation experiments were performed at Photon Factory (Proposals 2016G048 and 2016R-19). We thank the beamline staff at BL1A and BL17A of Photon Factory (Tsukuba, Japan) for help during data collection. We also thank Ms. Mari Udo for the color coordinate of Fig. 1 and Enago (https://www.enago.jp) for the English language review. This work was supported by Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research (Grant Nos. JP 20001009 to M. Tominaga, JP 25221103 to M. Tominaga, JP 15K07185 to H.S., JP 16H05764 to H.S., JP 18K06382 to H.S., 15H04413 to T.N, JP 18H05425 to T.M., JP 20K06583 to K.I., JP 17K07436 to K.I., JP 17K07436 to K.I., and 15H01309 to K.I.) from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science, by Advanced Low Carbon Technology Research and Development Program (ALCA) (Grant Number JPMJAL1401 to M. Tominaga. and K.I.) from the Japan Science and Technology Agency, and by Basis for Supporting Innovative Drug Discovery and Life Science Research (Grant Number JP20am0101083 to T.M.) from the Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development.
Footnotes
The authors declare no competing interest.
This article is a PNAS Direct Submission. V.F. is a guest editor invited by the Editorial Board.
This article contains supporting information online at https://www.pnas.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.1073/pnas.2120962119/-/DCSupplemental.
Data Availability
Full-length nucleotide sequence, atomic coordinate, and structure factor data have been deposited in DNA Data Bank of Japan (DDBJ) and the Protein Data Bank (DDBJ: LC641776, BR001757, BR001749, and BR001750; Protein Data Bank: https://dx.doi.org/10.2210/pdb7dhw/pdb). All other study data are included in the article and/or supporting information.
References
- 1.Kollmar M., Mühlhausen S., Myosin repertoire expansion coincides with eukaryotic diversification in the Mesoproterozoic era. BMC Evol. Biol. 17, 211 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Hartman M. A., Spudich J. A., The myosin superfamily at a glance. J. Cell Sci. 125, 1627–1632 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Walklate J., Ujfalusi Z., Geeves M. A., Myosin isoforms and the mechanochemical cross-bridge cycle. J. Exp. Biol. 219, 168–174 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Haraguchi T., et al. , Molecular characterization and subcellular localization of Arabidopsis class VIII myosin, ATM1. J. Biol. Chem. 289, 12343–12355 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Golomb L., Abu-Abied M., Belausov E., Sadot E., Different subcellular localizations and functions of Arabidopsis myosin VIII. BMC Plant Biol. 8, 3 (2008). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Van Damme D., Bouget F. Y., Van Poucke K., Inzé D., Geelen D., Molecular dissection of plant cytokinesis and phragmoplast structure: A survey of GFP-tagged proteins. Plant J. 40, 386–398 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Sattarzadeh A., Franzen R., Schmelzer E., The Arabidopsis class VIII myosin ATM2 is involved in endocytosis. Cell Motil. Cytoskeleton 65, 457–468 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Shimmen T., Yokota E., Cytoplasmic streaming in plants. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 16, 68–72 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Avisar D., Abu-Abied M., Belausov E., Sadot E., Myosin XIK is a major player in cytoplasm dynamics and is regulated by two amino acids in its tail. J. Exp. Bot. 63, 241–249 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Tominaga M., et al. , Cytoplasmic streaming velocity as a plant size determinant. Dev. Cell 27, 345–352 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Peremyslov V. V., Cole R. A., Fowler J. E., Dolja V. V., Myosin-powered membrane compartment drives cytoplasmic streaming, cell expansion and plant development. PLoS One 10, e0139331 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Verchot-Lubicz J., Goldstein R. E., Cytoplasmic streaming enables the distribution of molecules and vesicles in large plant cells. Protoplasma 240, 99–107 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Yamamoto K., et al. , Chara myosin and the energy of cytoplasmic streaming. Plant Cell Physiol. 47, 1427–1431 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Kamiya N., Kuroda K., Velocity distribution of the protoplasmic streaming in Nitella cells. Bot. Mag. Tokyo 69, 544–554 (1956). [Google Scholar]
- 15.Kamiya N., “Protoplasmic streaming” in Handbuch der Planzenphysiologie, Ruhland F., Ed. (Springer, Berlin, 1962) pp. 979–1035. [Google Scholar]
- 16.Williamson R. E., Actin in the alga, Chara corallina. Nature 248, 801–802 (1974). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Yamamoto K., Hamada S., Kashiyama T., Myosins from plants. CMLS Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 56 227–232 (1999). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Higashi-Fujime S., et al. , The fastest actin-based motor protein from the green algae, Chara, and its distinct mode of interaction with actin. FEBS Lett. 375, 151–154 (1995). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Uyeda T. Q., Ultra-fast chra myosin: A test case for the swinging lever arm model for force production by myosin. J. Plant Res. 109, 231–239 (1996). [Google Scholar]
- 20.Kashiyama T., Kimura N., Mimura T., Yamamoto K., Cloning and characterization of a myosin from characean alga, the fastest motor protein in the world. J. Biochem. 127, 1065–1070 (2000). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Morimatsu M., et al. , The molecular structure of the fastest myosin from green algae, Chara. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 270, 147–152 (2000). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Ito K., et al. , Recombinant motor domain constructs of Chara corallina myosin display fast motility and high ATPase activity. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 312, 958–964 (2003). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Ito K., et al. , Kinetic mechanism of the fastest motor protein, Chara myosin. J. Biol. Chem. 282, 19534–19545 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Ito K., Yamaguchi Y., Yanase K., Ichikawa Y., Yamamoto K., Unique charge distribution in surface loops confers high velocity on the fast motor protein Chara myosin. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 106, 21585–21590 (2009). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Schindler T. D., Chen L., Lebel P., Nakamura M., Bryant Z., Engineering myosins for long-range transport on actin filaments. Nat. Nanotechnol. 9, 33–38 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Ruijgrok P. V., et al. , Optical control of fast and processive engineered myosins in vitro and in living cells. Nat. Chem. Biol. 17, 540–548 10.1038/s41589-021-00740-7. (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Nishiyama T., et al. , The Chara genome: Secondary complexity and implications for plant terrestrialization. Cell 174, 448–464 (2018). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Kato S., et al. , Morphology and molecular phylogeny of Chara altaica (Charales, Charophyceae), a monoecious species of the section Desvauxia. Cytologia (Tokyo) 75, 211–220 (2010). [Google Scholar]
- 29.Kato S., et al. , New distributional records, taxonomy, morphology, and genetic variations of the endangered brackish-water species Lamprothamnium succinctum (Charales: Charophyceae) in Japan. J. Asia-Pac. Biodivers. 14, 15–22 (2021). [Google Scholar]
- 30.Casanova M. T., Karol K. G., A revision of Chara sect. Protochara, comb. et stat. nov (Characeae: Charophyceae). Australian Systematic Botany 27, 23–27 (2014). [Google Scholar]
- 31.Yamamoto K., Kikuyama M., Sutoh-Yamamoto N., Kamitsubo E., Purification of actin based motor protein from Chara corallina. Proc. Jpn. Acad. 70, 175–180 (1994). [Google Scholar]
- 32.Bateman A., et al. , The Pfam protein families database. Nucleic Acids Res. 32, D138–D141 (2004). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Bähler M., Rhoads A., Calmodulin signaling via the IQ motif. FEBS Lett. 513, 107–113 (2002). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Haraguchi T., et al. , Functional diversity of class XI myosins in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell Physiol. 59, 2268–2277 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Uyeda T. Q. P., Abramson P. D., Spudich J. A., The neck region of the myosin motor domain acts as a lever arm to generate movement. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 93, 4459–4464 (1996). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Holmes K. C., The swinging lever-arm hypothesis of muscle contraction. Curr. Biol. 7, R112–R118 (1997). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Houdusse A., et al. , Crystal structure of apo-calmodulin bound to the first two IQ motifs of myosin V reveals essential recognition features. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 103, 19326–19331 (2006). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Kersey Y. M., Hepler P. K., Palevitz B. A., Wessells N. K., Polarity of actin filaments in Characean algae. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 73, 165–167 (1976). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Sellers J. R., Kachar B., Polarity and velocity of sliding filaments: Control of direction by actin and of speed by myosin. Science 249, 406–408 (1990). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Fujii T., Namba K., Structure of actomyosin rigour complex at 5.2 Å resolution and insights into the ATPase cycle mechanism. Nat. Commun. 8, 1–11 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Gurel P. S., et al. , Cryo-EM structures reveal specialization at the myosin VI-actin interface and a mechanism of force sensitivity. eLife 6, e31125 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Robert-Paganin J., et al. , The actomyosin interface contains an evolutionary conserved core and an ancillary interface involved in specificity. Nat. Commun. 12, 1–11 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Pospich S., Sweeney H. L., Houdusse A., Raunser S., High-resolution structures of the actomyosin-V complex in three nucleotide states provide insights into the force generation mechanism. eLife 10, e73724 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Uyeda T. Q., Ruppel K. M., Spudich J. A., Enzymatic activities correlate with chimaeric substitutions at the actin-binding face of myosin. Nature 368, 567–569 (1994). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Murphy C. T., Spudich J. A., The sequence of the myosin 50-20K loop affects Myosin’s affinity for actin throughout the actin-myosin ATPase cycle and its maximum ATPase activity. Biochemistry 38, 3785–3792 (1999). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Joel P. B., Sweeney H. L., Trybus K. M., Addition of lysines to the 50/20 kDa junction of myosin strengthens weak binding to actin without affecting the maximum ATPase activity. Biochemistry 42, 9160–9166 (2003). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Yengo C. M., Sweeney H. L., Functional role of loop 2 in myosin V. Biochemistry 43, 2605–2612 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Ajtai K., Garamszegi S. P., Watanabe S., Ikebe M., Burghardt T. P., The myosin cardiac loop participates functionally in the actomyosin interaction. J. Biol. Chem. 279, 23415–23421 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Liu X., Shu S., Kovács M., Korn E. D., Biological, biochemical, and kinetic effects of mutations of the cardiomyopathy loop of Dictyostelium myosin II: Importance of ALA400. J. Biol. Chem. 280, 26974–26983 (2005). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Onishi H., Mikhailenko S. V., Morales M. F., Toward understanding actin activation of myosin ATPase: The role of myosin surface loops. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 103, 6136–6141 (2006). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Struchholz S., et al. , Functional role of the extended loop 2 in the myosin 9b head for binding F-actin. J. Biol. Chem. 284, 3663–3671 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Tominaga M., et al. , Higher plant myosin XI moves processively on actin with 35 nm steps at high velocity. EMBO J. 22, 1263–1272 (2003). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Mühlhausen S., Kollmar M., Whole genome duplication events in plant evolution reconstructed and predicted using myosin motor proteins. BMC Evol. Biol. 13, 202 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Kollmar M., Dürrwang U., Kliche W., Manstein D. J., Kull F. J., Crystal structure of the motor domain of a class-I myosin. EMBO J. 21, 2517–2525 (2002). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Levitt M., Conformational preferences of amino acids in globular proteins. Biochemistry 17, 4277–4285 (1978). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Imai K., Mitaku S., Mechanisms of secondary structure breakers in soluble proteins. Biophysics (Nagoya-shi) 1, 55–65 (2005). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Duan Z., Ito K., Tominaga M., Heterologous transformation of Camelina sativa with high-speed chimeric myosin XI-2 promotes plant growth and leads to increased seed yield. Plant Biotechnol (Tokyo) 37, 253–259 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Lupas A., Van Dyke M., Stock J., Predicting coiled coils from protein sequences. Science 252, 1162–1164 (1991). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Collins K., Sellers J. R., Matsudaira P., Calmodulin dissociation regulates brush border myosin I (110-kD-calmodulin) mechanochemical activity in vitro. J. Cell Biol. 110, 1137–1147 (1990). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Lin T., Tang N., Ostap E. M., Biochemical and motile properties of Myo1b splice isoforms. J. Biol. Chem. 280, 41562–41567 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Uyeda T. Q., Kron S. J., Spudich J. A., Myosin step size. Estimation from slow sliding movement of actin over low densities of heavy meromyosin. J. Mol. Biol. 214, 699–710 (1990). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Ito K., Uyeda T. Q., Suzuki Y., Sutoh K., Yamamoto K., Requirement of domain-domain interaction for conformational change and functional ATP hydrolysis in myosin. J. Biol. Chem. 278, 31049–31057 (2003). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Sweeney H. L., et al. , Kinetic tuning of myosin via a flexible loop adjacent to the nucleotide binding pocket. J. Biol. Chem. 273, 6262–6270 (1998). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Wang F., Harvey E. V., Conti M. A., Wei D., Sellers J. R., A conserved negatively charged amino acid modulates function in human nonmuscle myosin IIA. Biochemistry 39, 5555–5560 (2000). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Golomb E., et al. , Identification and characterization of nonmuscle myosin II-C, a new member of the myosin II family. J. Biol. Chem. 279, 2800–2808 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Komaba S., Inoue A., Maruta S., Hosoya H., Ikebe M., Determination of human myosin III as a motor protein having a protein kinase activity. J. Biol. Chem. 278, 21352–21360 (2003). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Sakamoto T., Amitani I., Yokota E., Ando T., Direct observation of processive movement by individual myosin V molecules. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 272, 586–590 (2000). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Watanabe S., Mabuchi K., Ikebe R., Ikebe M., Mechanoenzymatic characterization of human myosin Vb. Biochemistry 45, 2729–2738 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Rock R. S., et al. , Myosin VI is a processive motor with a large step size. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 98, 13655–13659 (2001). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Udovichenko I. P., Gibbs D., Williams D. S., Actin-based motor properties of native myosin VIIa. J. Cell Sci. 115, 445–450 (2002). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Post P. L., Bokoch G. M., Mooseker M. S., Human myosin-IXb is a mechanochemically active motor and a GAP for rho. J. Cell Sci. 111, 941–950 (1998). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Homma K., Saito J., Ikebe R., Ikebe M., Motor function and regulation of myosin X. J. Biol. Chem. 276, 34348–34354 (2001). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Herm_Gotz A., et al. , Toxoplasma gondii myosin A and its light chain: A fast, single-headed, plus-end-directed motor. Embo J. 21, 2149–2158 (2002). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
Full-length nucleotide sequence, atomic coordinate, and structure factor data have been deposited in DNA Data Bank of Japan (DDBJ) and the Protein Data Bank (DDBJ: LC641776, BR001757, BR001749, and BR001750; Protein Data Bank: https://dx.doi.org/10.2210/pdb7dhw/pdb). All other study data are included in the article and/or supporting information.