Abstract
Steinernema hermaphroditum entomopathogenic nematodes (EPN) and their Xenorhabdus griffiniae symbiotic bacteria have recently been shown to be a genetically tractable system for the study of both parasitic and mutualistic symbiosis. In their infective juvenile (IJ) stage, EPNs search for insect hosts to invade and quickly kill them with the help of the symbiotic bacteria they contain. The mechanisms behind these behaviors have not been well characterized, including how the nematodes sense their insect hosts. In the well-studied free‑living soil nematode Caenorhabditis elegans, ciliated amphid neurons enable the worms to sense their environment, including chemosensation. Some of these neurons have also been shown to control the decision to develop as a stress-resistant dauer larva, analogous to the infective juveniles of EPNs, or to exit from dauer and resume larval development. In C. elegans and other nematodes, dye-filling with DiI is an easy and efficient method to label these neurons. We developed a protocol for DiI staining of S. hermaphroditum sensory neurons. Using this method, we could identify neurons positionally analogous to the C. elegans amphid neurons ASI, ADL, ASK, ASJ, as well as inner labial neurons IL1 and IL2. Similar to findings in other EPNs, we also found that the IJs of S. hermaphroditum are dye-filling resistant.
Figure 1. Optimized DiI staining labels amphid and inner labial neuron analogs of S. hermaphroditum.
(A) Optimization of DiI head sensory neuron staining in S. hermaphroditum. The procedure was optimized for dye concentration (top 3 rows), buffers (middle 3 rows), and staining duration (bottom 4 rows) Living worms with at least one stained neuron and associated dendrite were scored as positive. P values are from the Fisher exact test. *: statistically significant. #: 0.5% Triton X-100 in M9. (B, C) Dye filling in the head neurons of C. elegans. Arrows indicate identified neurons. The anterior of the worm is to the left and in (B) dorsal is up and in (C) ventral is up. Scale bar, 20µm. (D, F) Dye filling in the head region of S. hermaphroditum, arrows indicate neurons identified (in parentheses) based on positional analogy to C. elegans counterparts. Scale bar, 20µm. (E, G) DIC (differential interference contrast) images of (D) and (F), respectively. Scale bar, 20µm. In (D, E) the anterior of the worm is to the top-left and the dorsal is bottom-left. Worm is lying in a twisted position on the agar pad. (F, G) the anterior of the worm is to the left and the dorsal is up. (H) Adult worm with dye filling (arrow) in the gut. The anterior of the worm is to the top-right and the dorsal is top-left. The dye filled gut is partly obscured by the gonad. Scale bar, 200µm. (I) DiI reliably fills the excretory pore (arrow). The anterior of the worm is to the left and dorsal is up. Scale bar, 20µm. (J) Infective juveniles (IJs) are dye-filling resistant. The staining seen at the posterior end of the animal is a shed cuticle from molting. Scale bar, 50µm. (H-J) Images were merged from DIC and DiI images. “V” Ventral, “D” Dorsal, “P” Posterior, “A” Anterior.
Description
Entomopathogenic nematodes (EPNs) form species-specific mutualistic symbiotic relationships with their gut bacteria; on the other hand, they are parasitic to insects, which they infect and rapidly kill with the assistance of their symbiotic bacteria (Dillman and Sternberg, 2012). Studies of EPNs can therefore provide useful insight into parasitism and mutualistic symbiosis. Research in this field has been so far limited by the lack of a genetically tractable system on the host side (Cao et al., 2021). S. hermaphroditum was first isolated in Indonesia (Griffin et al., 2001); that isolate was subsequently lost, but the species was recently rediscovered in India (Bhat et al., 2019). It is consistently hermaphroditic, and techniques and methods developed to study hermaphroditic Caenorhabditis elegans are largely applicable (Cao et al., 2021). Together with its bacterial symbiote Xenorhabdus griffiniae it provides a genetically tractable system for the study of symbiosis.
Nematode development consists of four larval/juvenile stages, known as either L1, L2, L3, and L4 (as in C. elegans), or as J1, J2, J3, and J4 (as in S. hermaphroditum). As an alternative to the third larval stage, nematodes can become a stress-resistant form known as dauers in C. elegans and infective juveniles (IJs) in EPNs in response to environmental conditions including limited food. As a crucial part of their life cycle, IJs search, invade, colonize, and subsequently feed on their insect host. Chemosensation is thought to play a major role in EPNs’ host-seeking behavior, and molecules including CO2 have been identified as attractants for EPNs (Dillman et al., 2012; Gang and Hallem, 2016; Hallem et al., 2011).
The nervous system of the nematodes is highly conserved across species. For example, the tiny (~1mm) free-living nematode C. elegans has a neuroanatomy highly similar to that of the much larger (up to 40cm), evolutionary distant, and parasitic Ascaris (Schafer, 2016; Stretton et al., 1992; White et al., 1986). The functionality of nematode neurons are at least partially conserved. For example, ablation of the BAG neurons of both Steinernema and Heterorhabditis EPNs, identified by their conserved anatomy as corresponding to the C. elegans neuron responsible for sensing CO2 eliminated the EPNs’ CO2‑dependent attraction by insect hosts and the jumping response of Steinernema carpocapsae to CO2 (Hallem et al., 2011). In C. elegans, amphid neurons are known to be important for chemosensation (Bargmann and Horvitz, 1991a), which is required for the decision-making process of entering and exiting the dauer larval state (Bargmann and Horvitz, 1991b). In C. elegans and other nematodes, including Steinernema carpocapsae, a dye-filling assay has been shown to be an efficient assay to label some of the amphid neurons (Han et al., 2015; Hedgecock et al., 1985; Perkins et al., 1986; Srinivasan et al., 2008; Tong and Burglin, 2010). In this study, we have developed a protocol for the efficient DiI (1,1′-Dioctadecyl-3,3,3′,3′-Tetramethylindocarbocyanine Perchlorate, Invitrogen) staining of S. hermaphroditum head sensory neurons.
We adapted the protocol described by Tong and Burglin (2010) for DiI staining, which has been utilized for the staining of the closely related nematode S. carpocapsae (Han et al., 2015). We optimized the staining protocol by altering the concentration of the DiI dye (Fig. 1A, top), buffer solution, (Fig. 1A middle) and staining duration (Fig. 1A bottom). We found that a 20µg/ml DiI concentration with 0.5% Triton X-100 in M9 for 5 hours gave us the best results when considering both the staining effectiveness (Fig. 1A) and the health of the worm. In C. elegans, head sensory neurons, including amphids- ASI, ADL, ASK, AWB, ASH, ASJ, and inner labials- IL1 and IL2 are known to fill with DiI (Burket et al., 2006; Shaham, 2006; Starich et al., 1995; Tong and Burglin, 2010) (Fig. 1B, C). In S. hermaphroditum, we found that neurons identifiable by position as analogs of the amphid neurons ASI, ADL, ASK, ASJ and the inner labial neurons IL1, and IL2 could be labeled using DiI filling (Fig. 1D-G). While amphid neurons are generally labeled in DiI dye-filling assays in C. elegans (Tong and Burglin, 2010), they were only intermittently stained in S. hermaphroditum (at least 1 putative amphid neuron is stained in roughly 20% of the treated animals). On the other hand, the inner labial neurons are much more accessible (approximately 90% of the treated animals have at least 2 putative IL neurons stained), including the IL1 neuron that is not commonly filled in C. elegans (IL1 staining in C. elegans is possible as shown in https://www.wormatlas.org/). Our observations are consistent with what has been observed in S. carpocapsae, in which putative IL2 neuron is dye accessible, and amphid neurons are stained only occasionally (Han et al., 2015). While our observation focused on the head neurons, it is known that in the tail phasmid neurons, PHAs and PHBs can also be labeled using dye-filling in C. elegans (Hedgecock et al., 1985; Tong and Burglin, 2010). However, we did not look for phasmid neurons in S. hermaphroditum hermaphrodites and it is unclear whether they were stained. As in S. carpocapsae (Han et al., 2015), no dye-filling was observed in the stress-resistant IJ animals (Fig. 1J). By contrast, staining is observed in C. elegans dauers (Peckol et al., 2001). The mechanism of dye-filling is not well understood, but the difference among species in uptake is likely caused by structural divergences in the cilia opening. Similarly, Heterorhabditis bacteriophora, another EPN, despite that it is evolutionarily much closer to C. elegans than that of S. hermaphroditum, is reported to have a similar staining pattern: their putative amphid neurons are not stained consistently, and their IJs are not stained (Han et al., 2015). Besides dye filling in the head neurons of non-IJ animals, we also observed dye uptake by the excretory pore on the ventral surface of the animal near the head and in the gut of nearly every worm observed (Fig. 1H, I). Overall, we showed that dye-filling assays could be applied in S. hermaphroditum, and theanatomic characterization based on the staining suggests that it has a neuroanatomy similar to that of other characterized nematodes.
Methods
Nematode maintenance
The handling of C. elegans and S. hermaphroditum was done as described in Brenner (1974) and Cao et al. (2021), respectively. Briefly, the wild‑type C. elegans strain N2 (Bristol) was cultured on Nematode Growth Medium (NGM) agar in 6 cm Petri dishes with a lawn of E. coli strain OP50 at 20°C; the wild‑type S. hermaphroditum strain PS9179 was cultured on NGM agar in 10 cm Petri dishes with a lawn of Xenorhabdus griffiniae strain HGB2511 at 25°C. OP50 and HGB2511 were cultured at 37°C and 30°C, respectively, before seeding lawns on NGM agar. Infective juveniles were obtained by water trap as previously described (Cao et al., 2021).
Dye filling assay
Dye filling assay was adapted from a previously described method (Tong and Burglin, 2010) with modifications as described in the main text and as described below. Briefly, well-fed S. hermaphroditum was washed three times with 0.5% Triton X-100 in M9 and incubated on a shaker with DiI solution with a final concentration of 20µg/ml in M9 containing 0.5% Triton X-100 by volume, unless indicated otherwise. The DiI (1,1′-Dioctadecyl-3,3,3′,3′-Tetramethylindocarbocyanine Perchlorate, Invitrogen D282) was dissolved in dimethylformamide and stored in -20°C as a stock solution at 20 mg/ml. After 5 hours at 25°C, worms were again washed three times with 0.5% Triton X-100 in M9. Worms were then mounted on a 5% agarose pad with a drop of M9 buffer containing 20 mM sodium azide for observation.
Dye filling assay optimization
The staining protocol was optimized in 3 stages. First, we tested the effectiveness of the staining in 3 different buffers (0.5% Triton X-100 in M9, H2O, M9) at 10µg/ml dye concentration and an incubation time of 10 hours. The staining was best with 0.5% Triton X-100 in M9 and thus was used in subsequent experiments. We then tested the dye concentration using the same condition but with the same buffer (0.5% Triton X-100 in M9), in which we found 20 µg/ml to be the most suitable. Finally, we tested the staining duration (15 hours, 10 hours, 5 hours, 2 hours) using the condition mentioned above (0.5% Triton X-100 in M9 and 20 µg/ml dye) and concluded that a 5-10 hr incubation time would be optimal. The experiment presented in figure 1A was done later with the optimized condition except for one of the parameters.
Image acquisition
Photomicrographs were acquired with a Zeiss Imager Z2 microscope equipped with Apotome 2 and Axiocam 506 mono using Zen 2 Blue software.
Acknowledgments
Acknowledgments
We thank Mengyi Cao for the original idea and valuable discussions, Hillel T. Schwartz for helpful input, and for critically reading the manuscript. We also thank all members of the Sternberg lab for their technical and experimental support. Finally, we thank the Student Faculty Program office at Caltech for organizing the Summer Undergraduate Research Fellowship program, which partially supported PG. This research was supported by NSF EDGE grant 2128267 to PWS.
Funding
NSF EDGE grant 2128267 to PWS
References
- Bargmann CI, Horvitz HR. Chemosensory neurons with overlapping functions direct chemotaxis to multiple chemicals in C. elegans. Neuron. 1991 Nov 01;7(5):729–742. doi: 10.1016/0896-6273(91)90276-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bargmann CI, Horvitz HR. Control of larval development by chemosensory neurons in Caenorhabditis elegans. Science. 1991 Mar 01;251(4998):1243–1246. doi: 10.1126/science.2006412. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bhat AH, Chaubey AK, Shokoohi E, William Mashela P. Study of Steinernema hermaphroditum (Nematoda, Rhabditida), from the West Uttar Pradesh, India. Acta Parasitol. 2019 May 10;64(4):720–737. doi: 10.2478/s11686-019-00061-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Brenner S. The genetics of Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics. 1974 May 01;77(1):71–94. doi: 10.1093/genetics/77.1.71. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Burket CT, Higgins CE, Hull LC, Berninsone PM, Ryder EF. The C. elegans gene dig-1 encodes a giant member of the immunoglobulin superfamily that promotes fasciculation of neuronal processes. Dev Biol. 2006 Jul 25;299(1):193–205. doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2006.07.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cao M, Schwartz HT, Tan CH, Sternberg PW. The entomopathogenic nematode Steinernema hermaphroditum is a self-fertilizing hermaphrodite and a genetically tractable system for the study of parasitic and mutualistic symbiosis. Genetics. 2022 Jan 01;220(1) doi: 10.1093/genetics/iyab170. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dillman AR, Guillermin ML, Lee JH, Kim B, Sternberg PW, Hallem EA. Olfaction shapes host-parasite interactions in parasitic nematodes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 Jul 31;109(35):E2324–E2333. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1211436109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dillman AR, Sternberg PW. Entomopathogenic nematodes. Curr Biol. 2012 Jun 01;22(11):R430–R431. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2012.03.047. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gang SS, Hallem EA. Mechanisms of host seeking by parasitic nematodes. Mol Biochem Parasitol. 2016 May 17;208(1):23–32. doi: 10.1016/j.molbiopara.2016.05.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Griffin CT, O'Callaghan KM, Dix I. A self-fertile species of Steinernema from Indonesia: further evidence of convergent evolution amongst entomopathogenic nematodes? Parasitology. 2001 Feb 01;122(Pt 2):181–186. doi: 10.1017/s003118200100717x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hallem EA, Dillman AR, Hong AV, Zhang Y, Yano JM, DeMarco SF, Sternberg PW. A sensory code for host seeking in parasitic nematodes. Curr Biol. 2011 Feb 25;21(5):377–383. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2011.01.048. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Han Z, Boas S, Schroeder NE. Unexpected Variation in Neuroanatomy among Diverse Nematode Species. Front Neuroanat. 2016 Jan 01;9:162–162. doi: 10.3389/fnana.2015.00162. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hedgecock EM, Culotti JG, Thomson JN, Perkins LA. Axonal guidance mutants of Caenorhabditis elegans identified by filling sensory neurons with fluorescein dyes. Dev Biol. 1985 Sep 01;111(1):158–170. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(85)90443-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Peckol EL, Troemel ER, Bargmann CI. Sensory experience and sensory activity regulate chemosensory receptor gene expression in Caenorhabditis elegans. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001 Sep 25;98(20):11032–11038. doi: 10.1073/pnas.191352498. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Perkins LA, Hedgecock EM, Thomson JN, Culotti JG. Mutant sensory cilia in the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. Dev Biol. 1986 Oct 01;117(2):456–487. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(86)90314-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Schafer W. Nematode nervous systems. Curr Biol. 2016 Oct 24;26(20):R955–R959. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2016.07.044. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Shaham S. 2006. WormBook: Methods in cell biology. WormBook, ed. The <i>C. elegans</i> Research Community.
- Srinivasan J, Durak O, Sternberg PW. Evolution of a polymodal sensory response network. BMC Biol. 2008 Dec 15;6:52–52. doi: 10.1186/1741-7007-6-52. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Starich TA, Herman RK, Kari CK, Yeh WH, Schackwitz WS, Schuyler MW, Collet J, Thomas JH, Riddle DL. Mutations affecting the chemosensory neurons of Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics. 1995 Jan 01;139(1):171–188. doi: 10.1093/genetics/139.1.171. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Stretton A, Donmoyer J, Davis R, Meade J, Cowden C, Sithigorngul P. Motor behavior and motor nervous system function in the nematode Ascaris suum. J Parasitol. 1992 Apr 01;78(2):206–214. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tong YG, Bürglin TR. Conditions for dye-filling of sensory neurons in Caenorhabditis elegans. J Neurosci Methods. 2010 Feb 10;188(1):58–61. doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2010.02.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- White JG, Southgate E, Thomson JN, Brenner S. The structure of the nervous system of the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1986 Nov 12;314(1165):1–340. doi: 10.1098/rstb.1986.0056. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Altun ZF, Herndon LA, Wolkow CA, Crocker C, Lints R, Hall DH. (ed.s) 2002-2021. WormAtlas. http://wormatlas.org.

