Abstract
The IL-2 family of cytokines act via receptor complexes that share the interleukin-2 receptor gamma common (IL-2Rγc) chain to play key roles in lymphopoiesis. Inactivating IL-2Rγc mutations results in severe combined immunodeficiency (SCID) in humans and other species. This study sought to generate an equivalent zebrafish SCID model. The zebrafish il2rga gene was targeted for genome editing using TALENs and presumed loss-of-function alleles analyzed with respect to immune cell development and impacts on intestinal microbiota and tumor immunity. Knockout of zebrafish Il-2rγc.a resulted in a SCID phenotype, including a significant reduction in T cells, with NK cells also impacted. This resulted in dysregulated intestinal microbiota and defective immunity to tumor xenotransplants. Collectively, this establishes a useful zebrafish SCID model.
Keywords: IL-2Rγc, immunodeficiency, zebrafish, microbiota, xenotransplantation
1. Introduction
The interleukin 2 receptor gamma common (IL-2Rγc) chain is the shared signal transduction component of the IL-2R family, including IL-2R, IL-4R, IL-7R, IL-9R, IL-15R, and IL-21R, which each regulate aspects of immune development and function [1,2,3]. Inactivating mutations in human IL-2Rγc cause X-linked severe combined immunodeficiency (SCID), characterized by decreased numbers of T and NK cells and dysfunctional B cells, resulting in a significantly diminished immune response [4]. Mice lacking a functional IL-2Rγc display a broader form of X-linked SCID, with reduced T, NK, and B cells [5].
The zebrafish represents an important vertebrate model, with particular relevance to immunity [6,7]. Zebrafish undergo similar waves of hematopoiesis to mammals [8] and show broad conservation of cytokine receptor signaling components [9,10], particularly those known to facilitate the development of blood and immune cells [11,12,13,14,15]. We have previously identified two paralogs of the IL-2Rγc gene in zebrafish [9], and demonstrated that one of these, Il-2rγc.a, was involved in embryonic T-lymphopoiesis [16], and so potentially amenable to the generation of a zebrafish SCID model. Moreover, since zebrafish lack specific sex chromosomes [17], it was anticipated that this model would be sex-independent.
This research aimed to generate zebrafish il2rga mutants and characterize their lymphoid cells throughout the life-course, as well as investigate their microbiome and tumor immunity to confirm them as robust model of SCID.
2. Results
2.1. Generation of Il-2rγc.a Mutants
The extracellular region of zebrafish Il-2rgc.a (Figure 1A) was targeted with TALENs designed to exon 3 of the il2rga gene as described [16]. Embryos injected with the TALENS were raised and then crossed with wild-type adults with multiple independent mutant alleles identified amongst their progeny using high-resolution melt analysis and verified by sequencing (Figure S1). Founder fish harboring these mutations were again outcrossed and then in-crossed to yield homozygous mutants, which were sequenced to fully characterize the respective mutations (Figure S1). This identified three mutant alleles, il2rgamdu1 (2 bp deletion), il2rgamdu2 (6 bp deletion + 1 bp insertion), and il2rgamdu3 (11 bp deletion) that resulted in frameshifts leading to premature stops similar to a known human SCID mutation [18], and il2rgamdu4 (21 bp deletion) that led to a 7 amino acid deletion in the extracellular domain of the Il-2rγc.a protein, which overlapped with residues affected in other human SCID mutations [18] (Figure 1B).
2.2. Impact on Embryonic Lymphopoiesis
Lymphocyte progenitors populate the zebrafish thymus from approximately 2.5 dpf to initiate T lymphopoiesis, which is well established by 5 dpf [19]. Therefore, heterozygote carriers of each il2rga allele were in-crossed and subjected to WISH with the T cell marker rag1 [20] at 5 dpf. This identified a reduced area of expression in around 25% of the embryos in each case (Figure 1C), consistent with the expected Mendelian ratio for homozygous mutants. To confirm this, individual embryos were genotyped, which revealed no difference in rag1 expression between heterozygous and wild-type embryos, but a significant decrease in expression in homozygous mutant embryos compared to the other genotypes (Figure 1D and data not shown), with a 100% correlation between low rag1 expression and homozygosity for all mutant alleles (Figure 1E–L and data not shown). This analysis was extended to markers of mature T cells, tcra [21] and lck [22], for il2rgamdu2, as a representative of the frame shift mutants, and the deletion mutant il2rgamdu4. Substantially decreased expression of both markers was observed in homozygous mutants compared to wild-type siblings in each case (Figure 1M–T).
2.3. Impact on Later Lymphopoiesis
Zebrafish B lymphocytes develop from around three weeks post fertilization [23], with NK-related cells also readily detectable at this time [24]. Therefore, larvae from heterozygote in-crosses were individually collected at 28 dpf and both gDNA and RNA extracted. This allowed simultaneous genotyping and analysis of T cell receptor β (tcrb) and immunoglobulin M heavy chain (ighm) gene rearrangement, as markers of T and B cell maturation, respectively [25,26]. Wild-type and heterozygous mutant larvae derived from il2rgamdu2 showed equivalent tcrb rearrangement, but this was drastically reduced in homozygous mutants (Figure 2A), which was confirmed for other alleles (data not shown). In contrast, equivalent rearrangement of ighm was observed in wild-type, heterozygote, and homozygote siblings derived from il2rgamdu2 and other alleles (Figure 2A and data not shown).
To investigate in further detail, the adult kidney, which serves a similar function to mammalian bone marrow with respect to hematopoiesis [27], was analyzed for the expression of genes specific for T cells (cd4, tcra), B cells (ighm, cd79a), NK cells (nklb), granulocytes (mpo), and monocyte/macrophages (mpeg1.1) [24]. Significantly decreased expression of all T cell markers was observed in homozygous mutants compared to wild-type siblings for both il2rgamdu2 and other alleles (Figure 2B and data not shown). In contrast, B cell marker expression was equivalent or indeed slightly increased in homozygous mutants compared to wild-type siblings, whereas the NK cell marker was also decreased in homozygous mutants (Figure 2B and data not shown). There was similar expression of both leucocytic markers between wild-type and homozygote mutant siblings (Figure 2B and data not shown). Histological analysis of fish harboring the il2rgamdu2 allele confirmed a significant decrease in lymphocytes overall in the kidney (Figure 2C,D,G) and particularly the blood (Figure 2E,F,H) of homozygous mutants compared to wild-type controls, with mutants showing significant elevation of precursors in the kidney (Figure 2C,D,G) and neutrophils in the blood (Figure 2E,F,H).
2.4. Impact on Intestinal Microbiota
Strong reciprocal interaction exists between the microbiota and the immune system [28], with the microbiota known to be disrupted in immune compromised individuals [29], including those with SCID [30]. Therefore, we investigated the intestinal microbiota in wild-type (WT, il2rgawt/wt) and knock-out (KO, il2rgamdu2/mdu2) zebrafish. The majority of bacterial Amplicon sequence variants (ASVs) in the intestinal microbiome from fish of both genotypes were represented by the phyla Proteobacteria, although this was higher in WT (87.4%) compared to KO (64.0%) zebrafish. In contrast the relative abundance of the phylum, Firmicutes was greater in KO (30.2%) compared to WT (6.3%) zebrafish (Figure 3A). Differences were similarly noted at the family level, with the relative abundance of Aeromonadaceae substantially greater in WT (75.7%) compared to KO (45.4%) zebrafish (Figure 3B). Analysis of differential abundance of individual ASVs identified several that were significantly different between WT and KO zebrafish. Specific members of the Aeromonadaceae, Legionellacea, Moraxellaceae, and Pirellulaceae families were present at significantly lower abundance in KO compared to WT, while members of the Peptosteptococcacea and Enterobacteriaceae families were found to be present at a significantly higher abundance in KO compared to WT zebrafish (Figure 3C).
Analysis of alpha diversity indices, which describe ecological diversity within microbial community samples, revealed a significant reduction in KO compared to WT zebrafish, which reached significance using the Fisher index (Figure 3D). Analysis of beta diversity revealed significant differences between the microbial communities of WT and KO zebrafish, with genotype accounting for 31.9% (Jensen-Shannon divergence; p = 0.001), 15.8% (Bray-Curtis dissimilarity; p = 0.002), 18.7% (Weighted Unifrac distance; p = 0.012), and 14.6% (Unifrac distance; p = 0.014) of variance (Figure 3E).
2.5. Impact on Anti-Tumor Immunity
The large changes in lymphocyte populations and altered microbiome were consistent with significant compromise of the immune system. This was directly tested by examining the growth of xenotransplanted human tumor cells. To facilitate these studies, the ilrgamdu2 allele was crossed onto the casper mutant, which lacks pigmented melanophores and iridophores greatly enhancing transparency [31] (Figure S2). Groups of il2rgawt/wt and il2rgamdu2/mdu2 embryos on the casper background were injected with fluorescently-labeled human HCT116 colorectal cancer cells and monitored at regular intervals. This revealed the extent of the fluorescence was greater and more sustained in il2rgamdu2/mdu2 compared to il2rgawt/wt juveniles (Figure 4A–H), with tumors clearly evident in 18 dpi il2rgamdu2/mdu2 individuals (Figure 4I,J). Quantification of fluorescence confirmed that the tumor burden was significantly higher across all timepoints (Figure 4K), with survival of transplanted il2rgamdu2/mdu2 fish significantly reduced (Figure 4L).
3. Discussion
Multiple mutant alleles of zebrafish il-2rγc.a were successfully generated using TALEN-based genome editing, three of which resulted in frameshifts leading to premature stops in a similar position to the known human A156fs SCID mutation [18], while the fourth led to a 7 amino acid deletion that overlapped with those impacted in other human SCID mutations [18]. Both classes of mutations impacted T and NK lymphopoiesis, demonstrating a conservation of receptor structure/function. Homozygous knockout embryos showed severely decreased expression of multiple T cell markers at 5 dpf compared to heterozygous mutants and wild-type embryos. Analysis at 28 dpf revealed abrogation of TCRβ, but not IgM rearrangement in knockouts, while adult knockouts displayed lymphopenia in the blood and kidney, with reduced expression of T and NK cell markers, but strong expression of B cell markers. As expected, no differences were observed between male and female fish (data not shown). Collectively, this indicates the Il-2rγc.a mutants present with an autosomal T-B + NK-SCID.
The impact of IL-2Rγc ablation has now been studied in multiple species, which has revealed phenotypic differences. Mice and rabbits lacking functional IL-2Rγc have a more severe phenotype than humans, with B cells also severely reduced [5,32]. However, pigs in which IL-2Rγc is ablated are more similar to humans with T and NK cells affected [33], similar to what we have observed in the zebrafish il2rga mutants.
Alternate zebrafish SCID models have been described. Homozygote rag1 mutants lacked mature T and B cells, but showed comparable expression of NK cell markers to wild-types indicative of a T-B-NK + SCID phenotype, consistent with their human equivalent [26]. Homozygote prkdc mutants showed a similarly severe phenotype [34]. However, homozygote rag2 mutants exhibited a less severe immunodeficiency, with a strong decrease in mature T cells, but with B cells only moderately affected [35]. In contrast, homozygote cmyb mutants showed severely reduced numbers of T, B, NK, and myeloid cells, and unlike the other mutants failed to survive to adulthood [36].
Human SCID is associated with opportunistic infection and chronic diarrhea [37], with SCID patients showing reduced microbial diversity [30]. This has also been observed in animal models, with SCID (and NOD/SCID) mice showing reduced alpha diversity, with a concomitant increase in SCFA-producing bacteria [38]. The main butyrate producing-bacteria in the human gut belong to the phylum Firmicutes, which was also substantially increased in the zebrafish il2rga mutants. This indicates that our zebrafish model faithfully reproduces this aspect of SCID biology. Further analysis of the microbiome and its interaction with the immune system of zebrafish il2rga mutants could provide new insights.
Zebrafish have proven to be a useful model for transplantation studies, due to their relative ease of manipulation and visual clarity compared to traditional rodent models. Many of these studies have used wild-type embryos prior to the onset of adaptive immunity [36]. However, immunocompromised lines are becoming more widely used. For example, rag2 knockout zebrafish have been used to visualize tumor neovascularization [24] while prkdc knockouts have supported long-term engraftment of xenotransplanted gastrointestinal cancer cells [34]. The zebrafish il2rga mutants on the casper background showed reduced tumor immunity, allowing successful tumor engraftment in 86.4% of embryos at 14 dpi, compared to 8.6% in wild-type controls.
This paper describes the generation and characterization of zebrafish il2rga mutants. They exhibited a robust SCID phenotype, including a reduction in T and NK cells but not B cells, as well as an altered microbiome and defective tumor immunity. It is anticipated that this model will prove applicable to patient-derived xenografts, which has been demonstrated to be an effective platform for the evaluation of cancer therapy in a patient-specific manner [39], with additional application to the further exploration of SCID-microbiome interactions.
4. Materials and Methods
4.1. Zebrafish Husbandry and Manipulation
Wild-type and casper [31] zebrafish were maintained using standard husbandry practices [40]. This included feeding thrice daily with a mixture of live feed (artemia and rotifers) and a dry granulated foodstuff (Otohime Hirame Japan). Embryos were injected with 100 pg/nL mRNA encoding transcription activator-like effector nucleases (TALENs) [41] targeting an NdeI site exon 3 of il2rga, as described [16] and raised to adulthood. Progeny were screened for the presence of mutations by PCR of genomic DNA derived from fin-clips with primers flanking the target site (5′-CGAAGACTGTCCTGAATATGAGAC; 5′-TCTGGTCAGTCCTGTAACGAAC) followed by high resolution melting (HRM) analysis using Precision Melt Suremix and Analysis Software (BioRad, Hercules, CA, USA) [42] and confirmed by restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis with NdeI as well as Sanger sequencing (Australian Genome Research Facility, Melbourne, Australia). Confirmed mutants were out-crossed with wild-type fish for two generations with heterozygote progeny ultimately in-crossed to generate homozygous mutants or crossed onto the casper background.
4.2. Reverse-Transcription Polymerase Chain Reaction
Total RNA was extracted from zebrafish embryos, larvae, and pooled adult zebrafish tissues with RNeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen Pty Ltd Australia, Clayton, Australia) according to the manufacturer’s protocol for animal tissues. This was subjected to semi-quantitative reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) with primers for T-cell receptor beta (TCRβ) chains vb1.5/17.5 (5′-AATGGACAGCTTGATAGAACTGAAC, 5′-TGCTTATTCAACCGAACAGAAACATTC), vb12 (5′-CAGACACCGTGCTTCAGTCGAG, 5′-ACGTTTCATGGCAGTGTTACCTG) and vb14.5 (5′-GAATCCAATGTGACGTTAACATGC, 5′-CATGATCATAAGGACCACTACAG) and immunoglobulin M heavy chains vh1 (5′-GATGGACGTGTTACAATTTGG, 5′-CCTCCTCAGACTCTGTGGTGA) and vh4 (5′-CAAGATGAAGAATGCTCTCTG, 5′-TGTCAAAGTATGGAGTCGA) or quantitative real-time RT-PCR (qRT2-PCR) with actb (5′-TGGCATCACACCTTCTAC, 5′-AGACCATCACCAGAGTCC), cd4 (5′-TCTTGCTTGTTGCATTCGCC, 5′-TCCCTTTGGCTGTTTGTTATTGT), tcra (5′-ACTGAAGTGAAGCCGAAT, 5′-CGTTAGCTCATCCACGCT), ighm (5′-CCGAATACAGTGCCACAAGC, 5′-TCTCCCTGCTATCTTTCCGC), cd79a (5′-GCGAGGGTGTGAAAAACAGT, 5′-CCCTTTCTGTCTTCCTGTCCA), nklb (5′-TGCTGCGCGGTATCGTC, 5′-GCACACATGGAGATGAGAACAG), mpo (5′-CTGCGGGACCTTACTAATGATG, 5′- CCTGGATATGGTCCAAGGTGTC) and mpeg1.1 (5′-CACCTGCTGATGCTCTGCTG, 5′-CCAGACCTCCCAACACCAAC). Data were normalized to actb and fold change was calculated using the ΔΔCt method.
4.3. Whole-Mount in Situ Hybridization (WISH)
Embryos were dechorionated and fixed in 4% (w/v) paraformaldehyde (PFA) at 4oC prior to WISH with DIG-labeled anti-sense probes, as described [43]. Quantitation was achieved by measuring the area of staining relative to eye diameter as determined using CellSens Dimension 1.6 software (Olympus) on approximately 30 embryos in a blinded fashion.
4.4. Ex Vivo Analysis
Cytospin preparations were prepared from adult blood and kidney and stained with Giemsa (Sigma-Aldrich, North Ryde, Australia), and differential counts performed. Alternatively, adult zebrafish kidney cells were prepared in ice-cold phosphate-buffered saline supplemented with 2 mM EDTA and 2% (v/v) fetal calf serum and passaged through a 40 μm sieve and analyzed using a FACSCantoII with cell populations identified in a side-scatter (SSC)/forward-scatter (FSC) plot.
4.5. Tumor Xenotransplantation
Human colorectal cancer cells HCT116 were fluorescently labelled with Vybrant Dil cell labelling solution (cat#V22885, Invitrogen, Thermofischer Scientific, Scoresby, Australia) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Labelled cells were washed twice in PBS and resuspended in DMEM media at a concentration of 3–4 × 105 cells/μL, and approximately 1–2 × 103 cells microinjected into the perivitelline space of anesthetized 48 hpf zebrafish embryos using borosilicate glass micro capillary needles. Embryos with adequate transplanted cells and normal morphology were transferred to fresh E3 medium to recover and held at 33.5 °C, with fluorescent microscopy used to visualize tumor cells, with engraftment and survival monitored. At 18 dpi, the fish were euthanized and fixed overnight in 4%PFA/PBS before embedding in paraffin for sectioning (3 μm), with the sections stained with Hematoxylin and Eosin.
4.6. Imaging
Imaging of was performed using Olympus MVX10 fluorescence microscope and DP72 camera using Cellsens Dimension 1.6 software, except for histological sections that were imaged using a Zeiss Axio Imager 2 microscope. ImageJ was used for quantification analysis, with analyze particles plugin used for determining the total number of tumor cells and the total tumor area.
4.7. Statistical Analysis
Statistical analysis were performed using Graph Pad Prism software, version 8. Student’s t-tests were performed for statistical analysis of the data, with Welch’s correction done where necessary. Survival was plotted as a Kaplan–Meier curve, with statistical significance determined using a log-rank (Mantel–Cox) test.
4.8. Microbiome Analysis
Dissected zebrafish intestines were cut finely before isolation of genomic DNA using a DNeasy blood and tissue kit (Qiagen Pty Ltd Australia, Clayton, Australia). 16S library preparation and sequencing were performed at Deakin Genomics Centre (Victoria, Australia). All primary PCRs were performed in triplicate with 5 μL NEB Q5 hi-fidelity hot start 2× mastermix, 1.25 μL of each primer (1 μM), and 2.5 μL DNA (2 ng/μL) or water. PCR conditions were 98 °C for 3 min, then 25 cycles of 98 °C for 30 s, 55 °C for 30s, and 73 °C for 45 s. A final extension at 72 °C for 5 min performed. A total of 2 μL of each sample was run on a 1.5% TAE agarose gel to confirm amplification. The triplicates were pooled and cleaned with 1 volume of Ampure beads and resuspended in 20 μL ultrapure water. Indexing was performed with 5 μL NEB Q5 hi-fidelity hot start 2× mastermix, 1.25 μL each index primer (5 μM), and 2.5 uL of DNA or water. PCR conditions were 98 °C for 3 min, then 6 cycles of 98 °C for 30 s, 57 °C for 30 s, and 73 °C for 45 s, with a final extension at 72 °C for 5 min. The indexed PCR products were visualized on a 1.5% agarose TAE gel. A 5 μL aliquot of each library was pooled and 25 μL cleaned with 1 volume of Ampure beads, with the concentration checked with a Quibit HS assay and size confirmed with Tapestation HS D1000 tape. The indexed library pool was diluted to 4 nM with ultra-pure water. The 4 nM pool concentration was checked by qubit HS DNA assay to verify accurate dilution. A total of 5 μL of the 4 nM pool was denatured for 5 min with 5 μL fresh, 0.2N NaOH. A total of 990 μL of HT1 buffer was added to create 1 mL of 20 pM library. A 10% volume of 20 pM phiX was added to add diversity. The pool was further diluted to 6 pM with HT1 buffer. Sequencing was performed on 600 μL of this with a MiSeq sequencer using V3 (3 × 300 bp) chemistry.
Statistical analysis on the bacterial microbiome was performed in R. Relative abundance of bacteria was visualized in different sample types, classified to the phylum and family levels. To identify differences in the bacterial microbiome between WT and KO groups, permutated multivariate analysis of variance (PERMANOVA) was conducted. The R package DESeQ2 [44] was used to identify taxonomic units that were differentially abundant within groups. Results for statistical tests were considered to be significant, where p values < 0.05. For DESeQ2 results, the threshold for statistical significance was a false detection ratio (FDR) < 0.05. Alpha diversity using Observed, Shannon, InvSimpson, and Fisher’s diversity indices were computed using the richness function in the package phyloseq [45] and visualized using boxplots with the phyloseq and ggplot2 packages. Differences were tested with the Welch two-sample t-test for the Shannon, Observed and Fisher indices, and Wilcoxon rank sum exact test for the InvSimpson index. The final Amplicon sequence variant (ASV) dataset was filtered using the Callahan workflow [46]. Beta-diversity was evaluated with Bray-Curtis, Jensen-Shannon, and UniFrac and were visualized using Principal Coordinate analysis (PCoA) plots with phyloseq.
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank the Deakin University Animal House staff for superb aquarium management.
Supplementary Materials
The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ijms23042385/s1.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, A.C.W. and C.L.; Methodology, R.S., R.J., F.B., L.R., S.D., S.L., S.H. and C.L.; Validation, F.B., L.R. and A.C.W.; Formal analysis, R.S., F.B., L.R., S.D. and A.C.W.; Investigation, R.S., R.J., F.B., L.R., S.D., S.L. and S.H.; Resources, A.C.W.; Data curation, R.S., F.B., L.R. and A.C.W.; Writing—original draft preparation, R.S., R.J., F.B., L.R. and A.C.W.; Writing—review and editing, A.C.W.; Supervision, A.D., C.L. and A.C.W.; Project administration, A.C.W.; Funding acquisition, A.D. and A.C.W. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
This research was funded by Deakin University with respect to research stipends and direct project costs.
Institutional Review Board Statement
This study was approved by the Deakin University Animal Ethics Committee under projects G28-2013 (31 October 2013), G23-2016 (31 October 2016), G22-2019 (15 June 2020) and G24-2019 (20 January 2020), and the Deakin University Biosafety Committee under projects LBC03-2011 (8 August 2011), LBC09-2016 (27 June 2016), and LBC02-2021 (22 June 2021).
Data Availability Statement
All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article (and its Supplementary Materials).
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.
Footnotes
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
- 1.Alves N.L., Arosa F.A., van Lier R.A. Common gamma chain cytokines: Dissidence in the details. Immunol. Lett. 2007;108:113–120. doi: 10.1016/j.imlet.2006.11.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Meazza R., Azzarone B., Orengo A.M., Ferrini S. Role of common-gamma chain cytokines in NK cell development and function: Perspectives for immunotherapy. J. Biomed. Biotechnol. 2011;2011:861920. doi: 10.1155/2011/861920. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Rochman Y., Spolski R., Leonard W.J. New insights into the regulation of T cells by gamma(c) family cytokines. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2009;9:480–490. doi: 10.1038/nri2580. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Noguchi M., Yi H., Rosenblatt H.M., Filipovich A.H., Adelstein S., Modi W.S., McBride O.W., Leonard W.J. Interleukin-2 receptor γ chain mutation results in X-linked severe combined immunodeficiency in humans. Cell. 1993;73:147–157. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(93)90167-O. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Bosma G.C., Custer R.P., Bosma M.J. A severe combined immunodeficiency mutation in the mouse. Nature. 1983;301:527–530. doi: 10.1038/301527a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Yoder J.A., Nielsen M.E., Amemiya C.T., Litman G.W. Zebrafish as an immunological model system. Microbes Infect. 2002;4:1469–1478. doi: 10.1016/S1286-4579(02)00029-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Traver D., Herbomel P., Patton E.E., Murphey R.D., Yoder J.A., Litman G.W., Catic A., Amemiya C.T., Zon L.I., Trede N.S. The zebrafish as a model organism to study development of the immune system. Adv. Immunol. 2003;81:253–330. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Chen A.T., Zon L.I. Zebrafish blood stem cells. J. Cell. Biochem. 2009;108:35–42. doi: 10.1002/jcb.22251. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Liongue C., Ward A.C. Evolution of class I cytokine receptors. BMC Evol. Biol. 2007;7:120. doi: 10.1186/1471-2148-7-120. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Liongue C., O’Sullivan L.A., Trengove M.C., Ward A.C. Evolution of JAK-STAT pathway components: Mechanisms and role in immune system development. PLoS ONE. 2012;7:e32777. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0032777. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Liongue C., Hall C., O’Connell B., Crozier P., Ward A.C. Zebrafish granulocyte colony-stimulating factor receptor signalling promotes myelopoiesis and myeloid cell migration. Blood. 2009;113:2535–2546. doi: 10.1182/blood-2008-07-171967. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Iwanami N., Mateos F., Hess I., Riffel N., Soza-Ried C., Schorpp M., Boehm T. Genetic evidence for an evolutionarily conserved role of IL-7 signaling in T cell development of zebrafish. J. Immunol. 2011;186:7060–7066. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1003907. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Zhu L.Y., Pan P.P., Fang W., Shao J.Z., Xiang L.X. Essential role of IL-4 and IL-4Ralpha interaction in adaptive immunity of zebrafish: Insight into the origin of Th2-like regulatory mechanism in ancient vertebrates. J. Immunol. 2012;188:5571–5584. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1102259. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Paffett-Lugassy N., Hsia N., Fraenkel P.G., Paw B., Leshinsky I., Barut B., Bahary N., Caro J., Handin R., Zon L.I. Functional conservation of erythropoietin signaling in zebrafish. Blood. 2007;110:2718–2726. doi: 10.1182/blood-2006-04-016535. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Aggad D., Stein C., Sieger D., Mazel M., Boudinot P., Herbomel P., Levraud J.P., Lutfalla G., Leptin M. In vivo analysis of Ifn-γ1 and Ifn-γ2 signaling in zebrafish. J. Immunol. 2010;185:6774–6782. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1000549. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Sertori R., Liongue C., Basheer F., Lewis K.L., Rasighaemi P., de Coninck D., Traver D., Ward A.C. Conserved IL-2Rγc signaling mediates lymphopoiesis in zebrafish. J. Immunol. 2016;196:135–143. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1403060. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Kossack M.E., Draper B.W. Genetic regulation of sex determination and maintenance in zebrafish (Danio rerio) Curr. Top. Dev. Biol. 2019;134:119–149. doi: 10.1016/bs.ctdb.2019.02.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Niemela J.E., Puck J.M., Fischer R.E., Fleisher T.A., Hsu A.P. Efficient detection of thirty-seven new IL2RG mutations in human X-linked severe combined immunodeficiency. Clin. Immunol. 2000;95:33–38. doi: 10.1006/clim.2000.4846. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Langenau D.M., Zon L.I. The zebrafish: A new model of T-cell and thymic development. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2005;5:307–317. doi: 10.1038/nri1590. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Willett C.E., Cherry J.J., Steiner L. Characterization and expression of the recombination activating genes (rag1 and rag2) of zebrafish. Immunogenetics. 1997;45:394–404. doi: 10.1007/s002510050221. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Danilova N., Hohman V.S., Sacher F., Ota T., Willett C.E., Steiner L.A. T cells and the thymus in developing zebrafish. Dev. Comp. Immunol. 2004;28:755–767. doi: 10.1016/j.dci.2003.12.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Langenau D.M., Ferrando A.A., Traver D., Kutok J.L., Hezel J.P., Kanki J.P., Zon L.I., Look A.T., Trede N.S. In vivo tracking of T cell development, ablation, and engraftment in transgenic zebrafish. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2004;101:7369–7374. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0402248101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Page D.M., Wittamer V., Bertrand J.Y., Lewis K.L., Pratt D.N., Delgado N., Schale S.E., McGue C., Jacobsen B.H., Doty A., et al. An evolutionarily conserved program of B-cell development and activation in zebrafish. Blood. 2013;122:e1–e11. doi: 10.1182/blood-2012-12-471029. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Moore F.E., Garcia E.G., Lobbardi R., Jain E., Tang Q., Moore J.C., Cortes M., Molodtsov A., Kasheta M., Luo C.C., et al. Single-cell transcriptional analysis of normal, aberrant, and malignant hematopoiesis in zebrafish. J. Exp. Med. 2016;213:979–992. doi: 10.1084/jem.20152013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Schorpp M., Bialecki M., Diekhoff D., Walderich B., Odenthal J., Maischein H.M., Zapata A.G., Boehm T. Conserved functions of Ikaros in vertebrate development: Genetic evidence for distinct larval and adult phases of T cell development and two lineages of B cells in zebrafish. J. Immunol. 2006;177:2463–2476. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.177.4.2463. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Petrie-Hanson L., Hohn C., Hanson L. Characterization of rag1 mutant zebrafish leukocytes. BMC Immunol. 2009;10:8. doi: 10.1186/1471-2172-10-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Bertrand J.Y., Kim A.D., Teng S., Traver D. CD41+ cmyb+ precursors colonize the zebrafish pronephros by a novel migration route to initiate adult hematopoiesis. Development. 2008;135:1853–1862. doi: 10.1242/dev.015297. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Berbers R.M., Franken I.A., Leavis H.L. Immunoglobulin A and microbiota in primary immunodeficiency diseases. Curr. Opin. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2019;19:563–570. doi: 10.1097/ACI.0000000000000581. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Gereige J.D., Maglione P.J. Current understanding and recent developments in common variable immunodeficiency associated autoimmunity. Front. Immunol. 2019;10:2753. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.02753. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Lane J.P., Stewart C.J., Cummings S.P., Gennery A.R. Gut microbiome variations during hematopoietic stem cell transplant in severe combined immunodeficiency. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2015;135:1654–1656. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2015.01.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.White R.M., Sessa A., Burke C., Bowman T., LeBlanc J., Ceol C., Bourque C., Dovey M., Goessling W., Burns C.E. Transparent adult zebrafish as a tool for in vivo transplantation analysis. Cell Stem Cell. 2008;2:183–189. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2007.11.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Hashikawa Y., Hayashi R., Tajima M., Okubo T., Azuma S., Kuwamura M., Takai N., Osada Y., Kunihiro Y., Mashimo T., et al. Generation of knockout rabbits with X-linked severe combined immunodeficiency (X-SCID) using CRISPR/Cas9. Sci. Rep. 2020;10:9957. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-66780-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Suzuki S., Iwamoto M., Saito Y., Fuchimoto D., Sembon S., Suzuki M., Mikawa S., Hashimoto M., Aoki Y., Najima Y., et al. Il2rg gene-targeted severe combined immunodeficiency pigs. Cell Stem Cell. 2012;10:753–758. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2012.04.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Jung I.H., Chung Y.Y., Jung D.E., Kim Y.J., Kim D.H., Kim K.S., Park S.W. Impaired lymphocytes development and xenotransplantation of gastrointestinal tumor cells in prkdc-null SCID zebrafish model. Neoplasia. 2016;18:468–479. doi: 10.1016/j.neo.2016.06.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Tang Q., Abdelfattah N.S., Blackburn J.S., Moore J.C., Martinez S.A., Moore F.E., Lobbardi R., Tenente I.M., Ignatius M.S., Berman J.N., et al. Optimized cell transplantation using adult rag2 mutant zebrafish. Nat. Methods. 2014;11:821–824. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.3031. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Hess I., Iwanami N., Schorpp M., Boehm T. Zebrafish model for allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation not requiring preconditioning. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2013;110:4327–4332. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1219847110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Fischer A., Notarangelo L.D., Neven B., Cavazzana M., Puck J.M. Severe combined immunodeficiencies and related disorders. Nat. Rev. Dis. Primers. 2015;1:15061. doi: 10.1038/nrdp.2015.61. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Zheng S., Zhao T., Yuan S., Yang L., Ding J., Cui L., Xu M. Immunodeficiency promotes adaptive alterations of host gut microbiome: An observational metagenomic study in mice. Front. Microbiol. 2019;10:2415. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.02415. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Rebelo de Almeida C., Mendes R.V., Pezzarossa A., Gago J., Carvalho C., Alves A., Nunes V., Brito M.J., Cardoso M.J., Ribeiro J., et al. Zebrafish xenografts as a fast screening platform for bevacizumab cancer therapy. Commun. Biol. 2020;3:299. doi: 10.1038/s42003-020-1015-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Lawrence C. The husbandry of zebrafish (Danio rerio): A review. Aquaculture. 2007;269:1–20. doi: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2007.04.077. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Dahlem T.J., Hoshijima K., Jurynec M.J., Gunther D., Starker C.G., Locke A.S., Weis A.M., Voytas D.F., Grunwald D.J. Simple methods for generating and detecting locus-specific mutations induced with TALENs in the zebrafish genome. PLoS Genet. 2012;8:e1002861. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1002861. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Garritano S., Gemignani F., Voegele C., Nguyen-Dumont T., Le Calvez-Kelm F., De Silva D., Lesueur F., Landi S., Tavtigian S.V. Determining the effectiveness of high resolution melting analysis for SNP genotyping and mutation scanning at the TP53 locus. BMC Genet. 2009;10:5. doi: 10.1186/1471-2156-10-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Thisse C., Thisse B. High-resolution in situ hybridization to whole-mount zebrafish embryos. Nat. Protoc. 2008;3:59–69. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2007.514. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Love M.I., Huber W., Anders S. Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol. 2014;15:550. doi: 10.1186/s13059-014-0550-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.McMurdie P.J., Holmes S. phyloseq: An R package for reproducible interactive analysis and graphics of microbiome census data. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:e61217. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0061217. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Callahan B.J., Sankaran K., Fukuyama J.A., McMurdie P.J., Holmes S.P. Bioconductor workflow for microbiome data analysis: From raw reads to community analyses. F1000Research. 2016;5:1492. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.8986.1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article (and its Supplementary Materials).