Skip to main content
Age and Ageing logoLink to Age and Ageing
. 2022 Feb 25;51(2):afab243. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afab243

Improving delirium screening and recognition in UK hospitals: results of a multi-centre quality improvement project

Geriatric Medicine Research Collaborative1,b,
PMCID: PMC8876302  PMID: 35212730

Abstract

Background

delirium is an acute severe neuropsychiatric condition associated with adverse outcomes, particularly in older adults. However, it is frequently under-recognised.

Methods

this multi-centre quality improvement project utilised a collaborative approach to implementation of changes at sites, with the aim to improve delirium screening, recognition and documentation on discharge summaries. Resources, including delirium guidelines and presentations, were shared between sites, and broad details of local interventions were collected. Three timepoints of data collection (14 March 2018, 14 September 2018 and 13 March 2019) were conducted to assess screening, recognition and documentation of delirium in unscheduled admissions of adults aged ≥65 years old. The impact of local interventions and site-specific factors was assessed using logistic regression analysis, adjusting for patient factors.

Results

a total of 3,013 patients (mean age 80.2, 53.8% females) were recruited across the three timepoints. Screening for delirium was associated with increased odds of recognition (aOR 4.75, CI 2.98–7.56; P < 0.001); this was not affected by grade/profession of screener. Rates of screening, recognition and discharge documentation improved across the three timepoints of data collection. The presence of a local delirium specialist team was associated with increased rates of screening for delirium (aOR 1.75, CI 1.41–2.18; P < 0.001), and the presence of a geriatric medicine team embedded into the admissions unit was associated with increased recognition rates (aOR 1.78, CI 1.09–2.92; P = 0.022).

Conclusion

delirium screening is associated with improved recognition. Interventions that strive to improve screening within a culture of delirium awareness are encouraged.

Keywords: delirium, quality improvement, collaborative, education, older people

Key Points

  • A multi-centre ‘crowdsourcing’ approach to quality improvement is feasible.

  • Delirium screening, recognition and discharge documentation improved across each round of data collection.

  • Screening for delirium increases the odds of recognition, and drives to improve screening are recommended.

Background

Delirium is an acute neuropsychiatric state defined by cognitive change and altered consciousness that occurs secondary to physical precipitants, particularly in older adults during hospitalisation [1]. Delirium is associated with adverse outcomes, but is frequently under-recognised [2]. Our previous research demonstrated that delirium screening increases recognition [1]. However, delirium screening was inconsistent. Screening and recognition were particularly reduced in surgical specialties [1]. Although delirium is reversible, it is associated with increased risk of later life dementia diagnosis [3]. Follow-up of patients who have experienced delirium is, therefore, vital. Unfortunately, delirium documentation on discharge summaries is infrequently performed [4]. In the UK, National Institute for Health and Care Excellence guidelines recommend that all adults aged ≥65 years old are screened for delirium on admission to hospital [5], and that delirium diagnoses are communicated to General Practitioners (GPs) on hospital discharge [6].

Aims

  • To improve screening and recognition of delirium in older adults admitted to acute care hospitals as unscheduled admissions.

  • To improve documentation of delirium diagnoses on discharge summaries.

Methods

This study presents results of a multi-centre quality improvement project, utilising a collaborative approach. Resources and knowledge were shared between sites, and sites were able to implement interventions locally according to service needs. Three timepoints of data collection were utilised (14 March 2018, 14 September 2018 and 13 March 2019). All timepoints of data collection included newly admitted (unscheduled) patients aged ≥65 years old to acute care trusts (all specialties, excluding critical care). We assessed for statistical significance of differences in likelihood of screening, recognition and discharge documentation across timepoints using multivariable logistic regression analysis. Full methodology is Supplementary data (Figure S1, Figure S2) are available in Age and Ageing online.

Results

Timepoint 1 included 1,507 patients from 44 sites, Timepoint 2 included 656 patients from 26 sites and Timepoint 3 included 850 patients from 48 sites. Eighty-two sites contributed data to at least one timepoint (Table S1, Supplementary data are available in Age and Ageing online). Overall prevalence of delirium across all timepoints was 16.3% (491/2,522). Characteristics of patients at each timepoint are shown in Table 1. Interventions implemented at sites between timepoints are shown in Table S2, Supplementary data (Figure S1, Figure S2) are available in Age and Ageing online.

Table 1.

Characteristics of study population across all timepoints

Timepoint 1 Timepoint 2 Timepoint 3
Delirium (N = 222) No delirium (N = 1,285) Delirium (N = 133) No delirium (N = 523) Delirium (N = 136) No delirium (N = 714)
Age—mean (SD) 84.0 (7.4) 79.3 (8.3) 82.8 (8.1) 79.6 (8.2) 83.3 (7.9) 80.0 (8.5)
Gender—% females (N) 60.8 (135) 51.6 (663) 50.4 (67) 55.3 (289) 60.3 (82) 53.8 (384)
Dementia—% (N) 35.1 (78) 12.9 (166) 41.4 (55) 14.0 (73) 54.4 (74) 16.2 (116)
Clinical Frailty Scale 1 0.5 (1) 4.3 (55) 1.5 (2) 4.1 (21) 0 5.4 (39)
2 2.7 (6) 11.3 (145) 1.5 (2) 10.9 (57) 2.2 (3) 9.7 (69)
3 3.6 (8) 19.7 (253) 6.8 (9) 21.0 (110) 2.2 (3) 17.8 (127)
4 10.8 (24) 18.1 (232) 15.0 (20) 19.5 (102) 8.1 (11) 16.0 (114)
5 21.2 (47) 15.9 (204) 10.5 (14) 15.1 (79) 19.1 (26) 17.9 (128)
6 28.4 (63) 17.6 (226) 30.8 (41) 15.9 (83) 29.4 (40) 17.4 (124)
7 25.7 (57) 9.3 (119) 26.3 (35) 10.5 (55) 32.4 (44) 9.7 (69)
8 4.5 (10) 0.9 (12) 6.0 (8) 1.5 (8) 5.1 (7) 1.3 (9)
9 0 (0) 0.2 (3) 1.5 (2) 1.3 (7) 0 (0) 0.6 (4)
Specialty Acute medicine 47.7 (106) 42.2 (542) 21.8 (29) 21.2 (111) 27.2 (37) 18.5 (132)
Geriatric medicine 26.6 (59) 16.0 (206) 45.1 (60) 20.3 (106) 37.5 (51) 18.8 (134)
Stroke 1.8 (4) 4.0 (52) 0.8 (1) 5.0 (26) 1.5 (2) 3.9 (28)
Other medicine 14.0 (31) 22.1 (284) 21.1 (28) 27.9 (146) 19.1 (26) 35.9 (256)
Orthopaedic surgery 6.8 (15) 6.2 (80) 6.0 (8) 9.0 (47) 8.1 (11) 9.0 (64)
General surgery 3.2 (7) 6.5 (83) 4.5 (6) 8.0 (42) 4.4 (6) 9.1 (65)
Other surgery 1.8 (4) 3.0 (38) 0.8 (1) 8.6 (45) 2.2 (3) 4.3 (31)

Delirium screening

Delirium screening increased across timepoints (27.3% versus 29.6% versus 37.1%; P < 0.001). Odds of screening increased between Timepoints 1 and 3 (aOR 1.33, CI 1.08–1.65; P = 0.001; Table 2). Delirium screening was associated with increasing age, mild–moderate (but not severe) frailty and dementia. Odds of delirium screening were increased with presence of specialist delirium teams (aOR 1.75, CI 1.41–2.18; P < 0.001; Table S3, Supplementary data are available in Age and Ageing online).

Table 2.

Logistic regression analysis for odds of screening, recognition and discharge documentation between timepoints

Timepoint 2 versus Timepoint 1 Timepoint 3 versus Timepoint 1
OR (CI) P value OR (CI) P value
Delirium screening
 Unadjusted 1.18 (0.95–1.46) 0.142 1.45 (1.18–1.78) <0.001
 Adjusted¥ 1.07 (0.85–1.34) 0.570 1.33 (1.08–1.65) 0.001
Delirium recognition
 Unadjusted 2.60 (1.62–4.16) <0.001 2.31 (1.41–3.77) 0.001
 Adjustedǂ 1.93 (1.11–3.35) 0.019 2.33 (1.31–4.15) 0.004
Discharge documentation
 Unadjusted 2.34 (1.23–4.46) 0.009 1.78 (1.02–3.11) 0.042
 Adjusted¥ 2.27 (1.10–4.68) 0.026 1.73 (0.93–3.24) 0.085

¥Adjusted for Clinical Frailty Scale, age, gender, dementia status, specialty and site-specific factors.

ǂAdjusted for screening, subtype, Clinical Frailty Scale, age, gender, dementia status, specialty and site-specific factors.

Delirium recognition

Delirium recognition increased across timepoints (34.2% versus 57.1% versus 63.2%; P < 0.001). Odds of recognition increased between Timepoints 1 and 2 (aOR 1.93, CI 1.11–3.35; P = 0.019), and 1 and 3 (aOR 2.33, CI 1.31–4.15; P = 0.004; Table 2). Screening for delirium was associated with delirium recognition (aOR 4.75, CI 2.98–7.56; P < 0.001); this was not affected by grade/profession of screener. Recognition odds were increased in patients with dementia (aOR 1.73, CI 1.06–2.84; P = 0.029), and presence of geriatric teams embedded into admissions units (aOR 1.78, CI 1.09–2.92; P = 0.022). Admissions under general (aOR 0.11, CI 0.02–0.58; P = 0.009) or orthopaedic (aOR 0.27, CI 0.09–0.79; P = 0.017) surgery were associated with reduced delirium recognition (Table S4, Supplementary data are available in Age and Ageing online).

Discharge documentation

Discharge documentation increased across timepoints (28.6% versus 48.4% versus 46.6%; P = 0.002) (Table 2). Odds of discharge documentation increased from Timepoint 1 to 2 (aOR 2.34, CI 1.23–4.46; P = 0.009). Odds of delirium documentation were increased in patients with dementia (aOR 2.01, CI 1.16–3.48; P = 0.012), but not affected by site-specific factors (Table S5, Supplementary data are available in Age and Ageing online).

Discussion

Delirium screening, recognition and discharge documentation all improved overall, demonstrating that rates of these are not fixed/inalterable. Importantly, screening is associated with increased odds of recognition; efforts to increase screening should be encouraged. Notably, grade and profession of screener did not affect recognition. Therefore, interventions to improve recognition may utilise trained multiprofessional screeners and junior staff. The 4AT has been validated for use by all healthcare professionals with minimal training [7, 8].

Discharge documentation was more likely in patients with pre-existing dementia. Reasons for this are unclear, but may relate to greater awareness of importance of delirium in dementia, in a similar manner to increased recognition rates. There may be a general misunderstanding as to why communication of delirium diagnoses to GPs is important, in terms of highlighting risk of future cognitive decline [3, 9]. Encouragingly, documentation improved across timepoints. Previous studies have shown that discharge documentation is often inadequate across many settings [10].

External validity

Overall delirium prevalence was 16.3%. This is lower than a previous single-site point prevalence study (19.6%) [11]. Differences are accounted for by inclusion of incident delirium in the latter study; only prevalent cases at admission were included at Timepoints 1 and 3. A higher prevalence rate (22.9%) was reported in a study considering positive screen with 4AT alone and not reference-standard delirium diagnosis [12]. Previous single centre quality improvement projects have demonstrated similar improvements in delirium screening and recognition with local interventions. A previous study involving implementation of a local delirium pathway and multidisciplinary teaching programme demonstrated improvement in delirium recognition rates from 5.7 to 35% over 11 weeks [13]. Similarly, implementation of dedicated teaching sessions within an acute medical unit, and management bundle with checklists, resulted in improved delirium screening rates from 40 to 61% [14].

Internal validity

Patient characteristics were similar across timepoints with regards to age, gender and specialties. Most patients were within acute and geriatric medicine specialties, which is consistent with recognised pathways of care within the UK [15]. However, at later timepoints higher dementia rates were recorded. Our results demonstrated that delirium was more likely to be recognised in patients with dementia. However, effects persisted in multivariable models adjusting for dementia.

We recognise that a significant limitation is that not all the same sites participated at each timepoint. Analyses and interpretation were performed for sites overall rather than at site level; site level analysis was not possible due to individually small numbers. Nevertheless, improvement in screening, recognition and documentation across timepoints demonstrates that such improvements are possible. We acknowledge that methodology differed between timepoints; data was collected prospectively at Timepoints 1 and 3 but retrospectively at Timepoint 2. We consider this variation unlikely to have significantly impacted upon results. Validated methodology for retrospective delirium ascertainment was used at Timepoint 2 [16, 17]. In addition, although this may have led to differences in recognition rates, this should not have affected screening rates. Documentation of screening was extracted from clinical records across all timepoints.

We cannot be certain specific interventions led to improvements, or if these relate to external factors. It is conceivable that improvements across timepoints related to improved culture of embedding delirium screening and assessment into clinical practice. This may have occurred due to leadership of collaborators at sites. However, many doctors rotated sites during this project, and collaborators at sites differed between timepoints. This suggests that changes can be sustained, even where leadership is rotated. Improved delirium screening and recognition rates may also be related to external factors. The International Federation of Delirium Studies (iDelirium) is an international collaboration of societies, which seeks to educate patients, caregivers, professionals and policy makers about delirium [18]. The society constantly aims to increase awareness of delirium, however, national campaigns peek around the time of WDAD (i.e. first and last timepoints) [18].

Recommendations

Our approach of sharing guidelines, resources and a central data collection point is feasible in involving multiple centres across multiple timepoints. Methodology was sufficiently simple to enable healthcare professionals of any grade or profession to be involved with screening and data collection. This is a model that may be replicated in future collaborative quality improvement projects.

Despite the focus on screening and recognition, it is important to recognise that assessment is only part of management. If delirium is present and recognised this should prompt healthcare professionals to take action by identifying and treating underlying causes [19]. Education should focus on rationale behind actions, such as the need to ensure delirium is communicated to primary care to enable appropriate follow-up of cognitive trajectories. Delirium may take some time to fully resolve [20], and communication to primary care is of utmost importance.

Although it was not possible to analyse site level data for effectiveness of individual interventions at site, we were able to identify site factors that were predictive of screening and recognition. Specialist delirium teams were associated with improved screening rates, and geriatric medicine teams embedded into admissions units were associated with improved recognition rates. Where sites are seeking to improve screening and recognition rates locally, we suggest that these findings are considered in service development. There was a very strong association (nearly fivefold) between delirium screening and likelihood of delirium recognition. Thus, drivers towards increased delirium screening are likely to prove beneficial.

Conclusions

A collaborative approach to multi-centre quality improvement is feasible; including multiple data collection timepoints, and sharing of guidelines/resources and knowledge across sites. Importantly, screening, recognition and delirium documentation rates are not fixed/unalterable; improved rates across timepoints suggest potential for responsiveness to interventions. Screening for delirium is associated with increased likelihood of delirium recognition. We encourage implementation of interventions to improve recognition through way of increased screening, alongside sustainable culture changes.

Supplementary Material

aa-21-0029-File002_afab243

Declaration of Conflicts of Interest

None.

Declaration of Sources of Funding

The research was sponsored by the University of Birmingham. This study received support for project delivery and coordination from the Birmingham Surgical Trials Consortium via core funding from the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Clinical Research Network West Midlands allocated to help support new research collaboratives. The sponsor was not involved in design, methods, subject recruitment, data collections, analysis or preparation of the manuscript. The views expressed in this manuscript are those of the authors are not the NIHR, National Health Service or Department of Health.

Acknowledgements

Collaborators to be cited within the Geriatric Medicine Research Collaborative:

Members of the Geriatric Medicine Research Collaborative

Manuscript preparation
First name Middle initial Last name Affiliation
Julian Lin Torbay and South Devon NHS Foundation Trust
Sindhoora Dama South Warwickshire Foundation Trust
Carly Welch University of Birmingham
Steering group
Thomas A. Jackson University of Birmingham
Laura Magill
Lauren McCluskey
Rita Perry
Daisy Wilson
Advisory group
Claire Copeland NHS Forth Valley
Emma Cunningham Queen’s University Belfast
Daniel Davis University College London
Jonathan Treml University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust
Thomas Pinkney University of Birmingham
Terrence Quinn University of Glasgow
Data analysis advisor
Peter Nightingale University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust
Regional leads
Benjamin Jelley Cardiff and Vale University Health Board
Victoria Gaunt Gloucestershire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
Mary Ni Lochlainn King’s College London
Kumudhini Giridharan Maidstone & Tunbridge Wells NHS Trust
Sarah Richardson Newcastle University
Mustafa Alsahab Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
Stephen Makin University of Aberdeen
Kelli Torsney University of Cambridge
Jane Masoli University of Exeter
Lindsay Ronan University of Exeter
Jenni K. Burton University of Glasgow
Oliver Todd University of Leeds
Joanne Taylor University of Manchester
Ruth Willott University of Nottingham
Natalie Cox University of Southampton
Roisin Healy Western Health and Social Care Trust
Other collaborators
Nedaa Haddad Anuerin Bevan University Health Board
Sharan Ramakrishna
Zahid Subhan
Antonella Mazzoleni Barnet, Enfield and Haringey Mental Health Liaison Service
Olga Nynaes
Jodie Crofts Barnsley District General Hospital
Emily McNicholas
Hannah J. Robinson
Thyn Thyn
Jonathan Baillie Belfast Health and Social Care Trust
William McKeown
Caroline Rice
Gerrard W. Sloan
Katherine Williamson
Yasmeen Hayat Bolton NHS Foundation Trust
Vee Han Lim
Katie Millichamp
Amr Bazaraa Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
Angharad Chilton
Alexander Harbinson
John Headlam
Elisabeth Hunter
Zainab Hussain
Al Wakkass Mahmood
Liji Ng
Srividya Sundara
Felicia Tan
Alice Wheeler
Sophie Wright
Jack B.G. Baldwin Brighton and Sussex University Hospitals NHS Trust
Kate O'shea
Ghazal Hodhody Buckinghamshire Healthcare NHS Trust
Kara Mayor
Riana Patel
Shiv Bhakta Cambridge University Hospitals
Marie Goujon
Adriana Jakupaj
James Dove Camden & Islington NHS Foundation Trust
Matthew Kearney County Durham and Darlington NHS Foundation Trust
Vincent McCormack
Kirsty Moore
Leo Pope
Hussun-Ara Shah
Megan E. Shaw
Gemma M. Smith
Ryan Love East and North Hertfordshire NHS Trust
Maya Mukundan
Muhammad Shahid
Ahmad Alareed
Clementine Anderson
Karen Beharry
Ganapathy Bhat
Sanojan Bremakumar
Laurence Caines
Sandra Darko
Nisha Rai
David Saliu
Pedro Vila De Mucha
Phillipa Adams Gateshead Health NHS Foundation Trust
Helen McDonald Gloucestershire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
Sam Mills
Frances Parry
Frances Rickard
Stuart Winearls
Rinata Farah Great Western Hospitals NHS Trust
Robert Grange
Fiona Herbert
Elizabeth Lonsdale-Eccles
Qurrat Ul Ain
Hannah Watson
Celine Bultynck Guy’s & St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust
Chiara Cavaliere
Cal Doherty
Sarah Evans
Daniel Furmedge
Annabel Hentall MacCuish
Esther Hindley
Caitlin Meyer
Emma Mullarkey
Rosamund Pullen
Aidan Ryan
Dhruv Sarma
Elaine Seymour
Katharine Stambollouian
Darmiga Thayabaran
Chenxian Wu
George Peck Imperial College London Healthcare Trust
Mahrukh Raza
Kapil Sahnan
Amber Dhillon Keele University
Oluwatosin O. Abiola King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
Catherine Bryant
Rachael Bygate
John Frewen
Isabel Greaves
Olivia Morrow
Simon Tetlow
Guy Tinson
Aayenah Yunus
Simran Bedi King's College London
Olivia Evans Lewisham & Greenwich NHS Trust
Leeying Giet
Taran Nandra
Abolfazl Behbahani Liverpool University
Saurav Bhattacharya Maidstone and Tunbridge Wells NHS Trust
Clare Hunt
Rajeev Mishra
Louise Connor Newcastle University
Jack Poynton
Elizabeth Deacon Newcastle Upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
Rory Durcan
Emma Fisken
Susan A. Hall
Jane Noble
Emma L. Prendergast
Ajay Macharouthu NHS Ayrshire and Arran
Victoria Macrae
Emily Murphy-Ackroyd
Emily C. Rose
Nicola Watt
Mairi Blair NHS Forth Valley
Eilidh R. Mackenzie
Roisin McCormack
Sophie J. Irwin NHS Gateshead
Alice Einarsson NHS Grampian
Ming Khor
Baraa Alhadadi NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde
Ewen Cameron
Angela Campbell
Eileen Capek
Lorna Christie
Laura Connell
Alan Cook
Jordanna Deosaran
Marianne Elliott
Elizabeth Evans
Sarah Fancourt
Sarah Henderson
Ambreen Hussain
Karen Jones
Dominic Kelly
Catherine Mary McErlean
Hazel Miller
Fariha Naeem
Caroline Ostrowski
Megan Parkinson
Fadi Sami
Alison Shepherd
Lindsay Whyte
Emily Wright
Eilidh E.C. Ferguson NHS Lanarkshire
Michael Gallagher
Heather J. McCluskey
Louise Beveridge NHS Tayside
Hollie A. Clements
Jasmine Hart
Neil Henderson
Su Kwan Lim
James E. Lucocq
Alison McCulloch
Adam A. Murray
Esther E.Y. Ngan
Philippa K. Traill
Amy Walter
Michael S.J. Wilson
Abigail Wrathall
Zhi Jiun Yap
Hashem Abu-Arafeh North Middlesex University Hospital NHS Trust
Ilan Gluck
Oliver Mitchell
Richard Robson
Elizabeth L. Sampson
Arunkumar Annamalai North Tees and Hartlepool NHS Foundation Trust
Jamal Bhatti
Laura Briggs
Debbie Fraser
Jonathan Gui
Eleanor Leah
Natasha Matthews
Pryankaran Mithrakumar
Mohammad Moad
Michael Sen
Jacqui Straughan
Roxana Taranu
Kasim Usmani
Ayesha Aamir North West Anglia NHS Foundation Trust
Amaka Achara
Olugbenro Akintade
Elizabeth J. Ellis
Sneha Gurung
Chioma Iwu
Abdullah B. Khalid
Sejlo Koshedo
Shonit Nagumantry
Nader Nashed
Philip Nwabufor
Ijeoma T. Obi
Parrthiepan Visvaratnam
Edward Wu
Marc Bertagne Northern Devon Healthcare NHS Trust
Peter Jackson
James Allen Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
Harriet Brown
Jennifer Champion
Natasha Christodoulides
Olivia Handley Poole Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
Fiona E. Macdonald
Laura J. Beeley Royal Cornwall Hospitals NHS Trust
Victoria Clayton
Aaron Kay
John Marshall
Hannah Morgan
George Naish
Sarah L. Cleaver Royal Devon & Exeter Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
Jenny Evans
Abbie Morrow
Raj Amarnani Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust
Khai L. Cheah
Claire Cushen
Amy Enfield-Bance
Martin Glasser
Suriti Govindji
Shama Mani
Jemma Gregory Sandwell and West Birmingham NHS Trust
Puja Jatti
Asma Khan
Helena Lee
Helen Millner
Huma Naqvi
Emily Williamson
Teresa Harkin Sherwood Forest Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
Bushra Khizar
Anna Lewis
Hannah Pendleton
Steve Rutter
Rohan Ahmed Shrewsbury and Telford Hospital Trust
Farah Coffey
Waleed Faheem
Beth Hackett
Elizabeth A.M. Holmes
Ali Khan
Zeeshan Mustafa
Mark A. Bowman South Eastern Health and Social Care Trust
James Irvine
Katherine Patterson
Sarah Horner South Tees Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
Ting W. Wong
Christopher Cairns South Tyneside and Sunderland NHS Foundation Trust
Kate Foster
Alex Hornsby
Robbie Horton
Laura Jones
Rachel King
Emily Lyon
Ani Tencheva
Faye Wilson
Lesley J. Young
Eleanor Giblin South Warwickshire Foundation Trust
Lleika Kunaselan
Olivia Lowes
Reema Menezes
Abigail Taylor
Alex Timperley
Rachel Batho
Charlotte Bell
Sammy Carter
Paul Croft
Eliza Griffiths
Giles Hall
William Hunt
Holly Jacques
Felicity Leishman
Seema Murthy
Sinead Quinn
James Reid
Amy Walker
Stephanie A. Matthews Southend University Hospital Trust
Ayoub Behbahani Southport and Ormskirk Hospital NHS Trust
Martin Glasser St George's University Hospital NHS Trust
Ana Silva Ferreira Surrey and Sussex Healthcare NHS Trust
Caroline Ashton The Princess Alexandra Hospital NHS Trust
Swetha Byravan The Royal Wolverhampton NHS Trust
Laura Cummings
Sana Faruq
Sarah Jagdeo
Philip Thomas
Karen Broadhurst Torbay and South Devon NHS Foundation Trust
Joseph B. Wilson
Helen Bowden University College London
Katrin Hoffman
Howell T. Jones
Charles Katz-Summercorn
Ethan Khambay
Lucy Porter
James Speed
Keziah Austin University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
Farrah Bahsoon
Rose Laud
Jawad Ali University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Trust (Birmingham Heartlands Hospital)
Niall Fergusson
Claire Wilkes
Laura Babb University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Trust (Good Hope Hospital) University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Trust (Good Hope Hospital)
James Gaywood
Jessica Green
Ada Kantczak
Katy F. Madden
Sasha Porter-Bent
Moe Su Su San
Laxmi Babar University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Trust (Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham)
Helen Chamberlain
Tamsin Cricklow
Alexis Giles
Abhishek Gupta
Clare Hughes
Tammy Lee
Anum Cheema University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Trust (Solihull Hospital)
Yathu Matheswaran
Asiodu Nneamaka
Anekea Ross
Tarunya Vedutla
Theresa J. Allain University Hospitals Bristol NHS Trust
Emily Bowen
Julie Dovey
Natalie Gaskell
Deborah Scott
Emma Stratton
Miriam Thake
Stuart Bullock University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust
Siobhan McKay
Stephanie Radoja
Sherif Abdelbadiee University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust
Samuel Cohen
Jane Giddings
Christopher J. Miller
Emma Mumtaz
Minal D. Patel
Vishnu Prasad
Lahiru Satharasinghe
Mark Studley
Marylin Browne University Hospitals of North Midlands NHS Trust
Sabrina K. Durrant
Emma Jay
Alex McQuillan
Megan Offer
Jessel Varghese
Alexander Baron University Hospitals Plymouth NHS Trust
Christian Chourot
Peter Jackson
Kimberley Kirrane
Helen Rayner
Kate Tantam
Ebrahiem Tumi
Shabnam Venkat
Nisha Aggarwal University of Birmingham
Emma Astaire
Karthik Basker
L Berwick
Edward Bilton
Aimee-Louise Chamboult
George Chapman
Jasmine Chevolleau
Grace Fenneley
Shannelle House
Nathan Ingamells
Emilia Jewell
Vickneswaran Kalyaani
Mahum Kiani
Nagarjun Konda
Anusha Kumar
Jo Lai
Jamie Large
Joanna Livesey
Zeinab Majid
Jack McCready
Hannah Moorey
Bethan Morgan
Kirty Morrison
Alice Mosley
Adam Pailing
Sophie Pettler
Shayan Rashid
Lucy Rimmer
Danielle Scarlett
Gurpreet Sehmi
Abigail Smith
Nina Smith
Charles Sprosen
Emily Taylor
Jemima Taylor
Connie Tse
Sophie Turton
Henry Vardon
Jasmine Virk
Sarah Warwicker
Hannah Woodman
Beth L. Woodward
Luke Wynne
Leah Yule
Asim Ahmad University of Bristol
Paapa Appiah-Odame
Ciaran Barlow
Dorothy Kuek
Isabelle Nicholls
Emma Norman
Wioletta Pyc
Ashish Vasudev
Lawrence A.T. Adams University of Dundee
Emma Box
Chung Sien Chai
Darcy S. Wilson
Bogna Drozdowska University of Glasgow
Emma Elliott
Adam Stirling
Martin Taylor-Rowan
Hannah Webb
Li Wong
Ahmed Abras Walsall Healthcare NHS Trust
Muhammad Adam
Zarah Amin
Olivia Cooper
Rhianna Davies
Wan Idoracaera C. Ikhwan
Georgia R. Layton
Awolkhier Mohammedseid-Nurhussien
Sohail Shakeel
Hana Waraich
Jabed Ahmed West Hertfordshire Hospitals NHS Trust
Katie Ball
Kwasi Debrah
Valerie Page
Zhao Xiao Bei
Hannah McCauley Western Health and Social Care Trust
David McShane
Freya Cooper Weston Area Health NHS Trust
Natalie Grundmann
Michael Haley
Andre Le Poideven
Sarah B. McClelland
Emily Moore
Norman Pang
Hannah Currie Wye Valley NHS Trust
Jayne Davies-Morris
Sarah Edwards
Sureena Janagal
Rodric Jenkin
Polly Jones
Gary Kumbun
Sarah Parry
Bhav Tyagi
Janine Valentine Yeovil District Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
Saad Abdullah York Teaching Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
Emmy Abu
Sarah Ahmad
Bilquis Ahmed
Hamza Ahmed
Ana Andrusca
Matthew Ansell
Thomas Arkle
Imola Bargaoanu
Charlotte Chuter
Katie Houldershaw
Jacqueline Ibanichuka
Shoaib Iqbal
Angela Kabia
Ismail Kadir
Anjli Krishan
Adam McClean
Gerry McGonigal
Pranav Mishra
Gladys Ofoche
Anna Reay
Simon M. Stapley
Adam Swietoslawski
Nihaad Syed
Karthika Velusamy
Afnan Wahballa
James Wilcockson

References

  • 1. Geriatric Medicine Research Collaborative . Delirium is prevalent in older hospital inpatients and associated with adverse outcomes: results of a prospective multi-centre study on world delirium awareness day. BMC Med 2019; 17: 229. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Shrestha P, Fick DM. Family caregiver's experience of caring for an older adult with delirium: a systematic review. Int J Older People Nurs 2020; 15: e12321. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Davis DH, Muniz Terrera G, Keage Het al. Delirium is a strong risk factor for dementia in the oldest-old: a population-based cohort study. Brain 2012; 135: 2809–16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Welch C, Jackson TA. Can delirium research activity impact on routine delirium recognition? A prospective cohort study. BMJ Open 2018; 8: e023386. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence . Delirium: Prevention, Diagnosis and Management 2019. Available from: https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg103 (15 November 2021, date last accessed).
  • 6. National Insitute for Health and Care Excellence . Delirium in Adults 2014. Available from: https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/qs63/chapter/Quality-statement-5-Communication-of-diagnosis-to-GPs (15 November 2021, date last accessed).
  • 7. Bellelli G, Morandi A, Davis DHet al. Validation of the 4AT, a new instrument for rapid delirium screening: a study in 234 hospitalised older people. Age Ageing 2014; 43: 496–502. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Tieges Z, Maclullich AMJ, Anand Aet al. Diagnostic accuracy of the 4AT for delirium detection in older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis. Age Ageing 2020; 50: 733–43. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Richardson SJ, Davis DHJ, Stephan BCMet al. Recurrent delirium over 12 months predicts dementia: results of the delirium and cognitive impact in dementia (DECIDE) study. Age Ageing 2020; 50: 914–20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Kripalani S, LeFevre F, Phillips CO, Williams MV, Basaviah P, Baker DW. Deficits in communication and information transfer between hospital-based and primary care physicians: implications for patient safety and continuity of care. JAMA 2007; 297: 831–41. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Ryan DJ, O'Regan NA, Caoimh RÓet al. Delirium in an adult acute hospital population: predictors, prevalence and detection. BMJ Open 2013; 3: e001772. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Bellelli G, Morandi A, Di Santo SGet al. "Delirium Day": a nationwide point prevalence study of delirium in older hospitalized patients using an easy standardized diagnostic tool. BMC Med 2016; 14: 106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Tauro R. Delirium awareness – improving recognition and management through education and use of a care pathway. BMJ Qual Improv Rep 2014; 2: u203195.w1451. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Bauernfreund Y, Butler M, Ragavan S, Sampson EL. TIME to think about delirium: improving detection and management on the acute medical unit. BMJ Open Quality 2018; 7: e000200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. NHS Digital. Hospital Admitted Patient Care Activity 2019–20, 2020. https://digital.nhs.uk/data-and-information/publications/statistical/hospital-admitted-patient-care-activity/2019-20 (15 November 2021, date last accessed).
  • 16. Kuhn E, Du X, McGrath Ket al. Validation of a consensus method for identifying delirium from hospital records. PLoS One 2014; 9: e111823. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Geriatric Medicine Research Collaborative . Retrospective delirium ascertainment from case notes: a retrospective cohort study. BMJ Open 2021; 11: e042440. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Mcleod A, Sampson L, MacLullich A, Squires C, Vardy E . World Delirium Awareness Day Four Years On: Where has it taken us? British Geriatrics Society (Blog) 2021. https://www.bgs.org.uk/blog/world-delirium-awareness-day-four-years-on-where-has-it-taken-us (15 November 2021, date last accessed).
  • 19. Socttish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network . Risk Reducation and Management of Delirium: Health Improvement Scotland; 2019. Available from: https://www.sign.ac.uk/media/1423/sign157.pdf (15 November 2021, date last accessed).
  • 20. Jackson TA, Mac Lullich AMJ, Gladman JRF, Lord JM, Sheehan B. Undiagnosed long-term cognitive impairment in acutely hospitalised older medical patients with delirium: a prospective cohort study. Age Ageing 2016; 45: 493–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

aa-21-0029-File002_afab243

Articles from Age and Ageing are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES