Skip to main content
Therapeutic Advances in Chronic Disease logoLink to Therapeutic Advances in Chronic Disease
. 2022 Feb 25;13:20406223221079246. doi: 10.1177/20406223221079246

Multiple endocrine neoplasia 2: an overview

B Saravana-Bawan 1, JD Pasternak 2,
PMCID: PMC8882936  PMID: 35237400

Abstract

This review article discusses the diagnosis and treatment of patients with multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2 (MEN2). The most common tumors associated with MEN2 are those of the parathyroid, thyroid, and adrenal glands. Additional manifestations include characteristic clinical phenotypes or features as described in the article. This review provides an overview of clinical manifestations, screening, diagnosis, treatment, and surveillance of patients with MEN2.

Keywords: hyperparathyroidism, medullary thyroid cancer, MEN2, multiple endocrine neoplasia, pheochromocytoma

Introduction

Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2 (MEN2) is an autosomal dominant familial disorder causing tumors within various endocrine glands. Classically, the disease was characterized by two distinct phenotypes: MEN2A and MEN2B; however, more recently, disease characteristics have been linked to its exact pathogenic variant within the rearranged during transfection (RET) gene. 1 The RET proto-oncogene is located on chromosome 10q11.2 and encodes a tyrosine kinase receptor which is primarily expressed in neuroendocrine and neural cells. 2 This receptor has a crucial role in cell growth and differentiation. 3

MEN2 is characterized by activating or ‘gain in function’ pathogenic variants RET proto-oncogene. While there are many associated tumors found in these patients, the classic entity is the development of medullary thyroid cancer (MTC), a rare thyroid malignancy of neuroectodermal origin. There is a spectrum of possible pathogenic variants in the RET proto-oncogene, either familial or sporadic in nature, which results in a spectrum of disease both in location and severity.4,5

MEN2 is a relatively rare disease with a prevalence of 1–10 per 100,000. 6 Of the subtypes of MEN2, the most common is MEN2A, accounting for over 80% of cases of MEN2. 4 Of MEN2A cases, the most common pathogenic variant observed is cysteine amino acid substitutions at codon 634. 7

In 1961, Dr. John H. Sipple first noted the occurrence of thyroid cancer, parathyroid adenoma, and pheochromocytoma in a patient he saw and since then the disease describing this phenotype, MEN2A, has been referred to as Sipple’s syndrome. 8 This entity is characterized by MTC, primary hyperparathyroidism (PHPT), and pheochromocytoma. Over 90% of patients develop MTC, with up to 50% of patients developing pheochromocytomas and 30% developing PHPT.9,10 The likelihood of developing pheochromocytomas or PHPT is dependent on the RET proto-oncogene pathogenic variant. 11 The majority of MEN2A pathogenic variants are inherited in an autosomal dominant pattern and are located in the RET proto-oncogene’s extracellular cysteine-rich domain of exon 10 (codons 609, 611, 618, or 620) or exon 11 (codon 634) with codon 634 pathogenic variants accounting for at least 50% of cases.9,12,13 There is a specific subset of MEN2A, familial medullary thyroid carcinoma (FMTC), which is characterized by the development of MTC alone and often related to pathogenic variants in non-cysteine rich domains.

MEN2B is the most aggressive variant of the MEN2 subtypes. Over 95% of MEN2B cases result from a pathogenic variant in codon 918 at exon 16 of the RET proto-oncogene. 9 In contrast to MEN2A, MEN2B cases are more often the result of de novo germline pathogenic variants, which often leads to delayed diagnosis.14,15 This syndrome is characterized by the development of MTC in all patients, pheochromocytomas in up to 50% of patients, and a characteristic clinical phenotype of a marfanoid body habitus and neuromas. 11

Recognition of MEN2 syndromes is key, as early diagnosis and genetic testing allow for screening and preventive surgery which results in a significant reduction in associated morbidity and mortality. The aim of this review is to provide a summary of tumors associated with MEN2 to aid in early recognition and management.

Medullary thyroid carcinoma

MTC is a rare thyroid malignancy originating from the parafollicular C-cells, a small volume of neuroectodermal originating cells found within the thyroid follicular tissue mass. Familial MTC is preceded by the development of C-cell hyperplasia with subsequent MTC progression. C-cells produce calcitonin and accordingly, elevated calcitonin levels can be present in the disease course and used as a measure of disease progression after ablative surgery. Levels of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) can also be elevated in MTC and used as a tumor marker in surveillance. 16 As MTCs arise from C-cells which do not take up iodine, it is not classified as a differentiated form of thyroid cancer and is not responsive to radioactive iodine adjuvant treatment (RAI). MTC is also chemotherapy insensitive and accordingly, management is primarily surgical in nature. 2 Fortunately, new targeted therapies such as tyrosine kinase inhibitors have shown promise in advanced and progressive MTC disease.

Overall, while MTC accounts for only 5% of all thyroid cancer cases, it makes up 15% of all thyroid cancer–related mortality due to its aggressive nature and increased likelihood of lymphatic and hematogenous spread. 17 Metastasis initially occurs to cervical and mediastinal lymph nodes with advanced disease spreading to the lungs, liver, and bones. 16 MEN2 accounts for 20% of all MTC, but MTC in this population is more aggressive, with bilateral and multifocal disease, and occurs earlier in life in comparison with sporadic MTC. Because of this increased risk of morbidity and mortality, it is recommended that all patients with MTC be screened for pathogenic variants in the RET proto-oncogene. 18

The American Thyroid Association (ATA) has stratified patients with MEN2 from low- to high-risk groups based on the identified pathogenic variant in RET proto-oncogene and the severity of the associated clinical course of MTC. As established by the 2015 ATA guidelines, the highest risk pathogenic variant includes MEN2B patients with RET codon p.Met918Thr pathogenic variant. High-risk MEN2 pathogenic variants are RET codon p.Cys634 and p.Ala883Phe pathogenic variants. Moderate risk pathogenic variants include identified RET codon pathogenic variants other than those noted to be high or highest risk such as p.Cys609, p.Cys611, p.Cys618, and p.Cys620. 19 RET pathogenic variants and outcomes are further outlined in Table 1.

Table 1.

RET pathogenic variants and MTC outcomes.

ATA risk level Exon RET pathogenic variant
Moderate 8 p.Gly533Cys
10 p.Cys609Phe/Gly/Arg/Ser/Tyr, p.Cys611Phe/Gly/Ser/Tyr/Trp, p.Cys618Phe/Arg/Ser
11 p.Cys630Arg/Tyr, p.Asp631Tyr, p.Lys666Glu
13 p.Glu768Asp, p.Leu790Phe
14 p.Val804Leu/Met
15 p.Ser891Ala
16 p.Arg912Pro
High 11 p.Cys634Phe/Gly/Arg/Ser/Trp/Tyr
15 p.Ala883Phe
Highest 16 p.Met918Thr

ATA, American Thyroid Association.

The prevalence of pathogenic variants varies by geographic and ethnic distribution. Studies have highlighted the varying prevalence of different genotypes and phenotypes which must be considered by clinicians if targeted testing is being employed. While the codon 634 in exon 11 are the most prevalent pathogenic variants for MEN2A, regional predominance can vary due to founder effect and common ancestry in different regions. 20 In China, the most frequent pathogenic variant is localized to codon 634 in exon 11. 21 In Italy, the genetic variations are more diverse with common exon mutations being identified at exon 11, 14, and 15. The exon 15 pathogenic variant is clustered predominantly in the north of the country. Within Denmark and Portugal the p.Cys611Tyr in exon 10 pathogenic variant, which rarely arises de novo, has a relatively high prevalence.22,23 In Spain the pathogenic variant of p.Cys634Tyr in exon 11 is predominant; whereas in Germany, variants within codon 790 and 791 in exon 13 have been identified as more common. 23 In Greece. the most prevalent pathogenic variant among the familial cases of MTC is p.Gly533Cys in exon 8. 20 Interestingly, the pathogenic variant of p.Cys618Arg in exon 10 is mostly found in neighboring Cyprus. 24

There is complexity of management and risk stratification for these patients as several RET pathogenic variants of unknown significance exist. In these patients, risk of MTC and penetrance of disease are not well established. This uncertainty leads to difficult clinical decision making and the benefits of surveillance compared to prophylactic surgical intervention must be carefully considered by the clinicians, patients, and their families. 25 It should also be noted that evidence suggests that the ATA risk categories for MTC apply to clinical onset and progression of disease but do not relate to survival outcomes once MTC is clinically present. Once MTC has developed, cure rate and survival rates seem to depend on the disease stage rather than the pathogenic variant. 26

Once a RET pathogenic variant of known significance is identified, the clinical team may recommend upfront intervention or surveillance. As the age of onset of MTC and penetrance of MTC in MEN2 varies by subtype, prophylactic thyroidectomy may be an initial treatment.2,15 For patients with the highest risk pathogenic variants, prophylactic thyroidectomy is recommended by age 1, and by age 5 for other high-risk patients. For those classified as moderate risk, a decision can be made for surveillance with cervical neck ultrasounds and calcitonin levels annually with deferral of surgery until clinical disease is evident. These children can be offered prophylactic thyroidectomy after age 5. Decision on the timing of surgery can be made in context of preference and availability for serial screening and based on pathogenic variant specific penetrance and age of anticipated MTC onset. 15 Given the high morbidity of thyroidectomy in young patients and the lack of availability of high-volume pediatric thyroid surgeons, monitoring is often chosen by practitioners. Early intervention is critical as delayed diagnosis and treatment results in metastatic disease at time of diagnosis, significantly affecting outcomes including morbidity. 27 Studies demonstrate that patients with hereditary MTC who are diagnosed and treated with screening have survival similar to that of the general population. This is contrasted with worse survival in patients with regional or distant metastasis. This highlights the importance of screening and intervention prior to the development of advanced disease. 28

Although MEN2 is often associated with a germline RET pathogenic variant, up to 50%, of cases arise de novo. 27 Accordingly, these patients who lack a family history are not screened, leading to diagnosis later in life. Unfortunately, for these patients, diagnosis is often made in the setting of metastatic disease leading to significantly worse outcomes. 29

Evidence of local invasion or lymph node metastasis is the main determinant for the extent of surgery. Patients with early disease should undergo total thyroidectomy with prophylactic central neck dissection to remove lymph nodes which may harbor subclinical disease. 18 Before treatment, we suggest patients have cross-sectional imaging of the neck and chest to determine the extent of disease especially in cases where calcitonin levels are elevated. Marked elevations in serum calcitonin, particularly over 500 pg/ml may suggest metastatic disease outside of the neck, particularly in the lungs or liver. There is no consensus on the indications for prophylactic lateral neck dissection. The presence of lateral neck disease however does necessitate therapeutic lateral neck dissection of levels II, III, IV, and V on the ipsilateral side. Patients with metastatic disease may benefit from less aggressive resections based on disease extent for palliation.6,15,18 Due to the association of inherited MTC with pheochromocytomas and PHPT, all patients should undergo testing with plasma metanephrines and subsequent abdominal cross-sectional imaging to ensure safe anesthetic. We also suggest serum calcium and PTH to determine whether concurrent hyperparathyroidism exists prior to thyroidectomy.

MEN2A has the most associated RET pathogenic variants and therefore the broadest spectrum of clinical disease. For this reason, Oncologists have shifted to classifying patients based on RET pathogenic variant rather than MEN classification which better describes clinical manifestations but imprecisely describes penetrance, outcomes, and thereby treatment and surveillance requirements.

FMTC is a variant of MEN2A, characterized by MTC without or decreased penetrance for other associated endocrinopathies such as pheochromocytoma or PHPT. Pathogenic variants of RET proto-oncogene associated with low risk of other endocrinopathies but persistent risk of MTC include pathogenic variants of codons 609, 611, 630, 768, 790, 804, and 891. 15 FMTC is the least aggressive variant of inherited MTC. Disease onset is usually from the third to the fifth decade of life.3,17

MEN2B is characterized by the more aggressive forms of MTC, with higher risk pathogenic variants of ATA risk level and disease onset in the first decade of life. Reports of malignancy shortly after birth, notably with M918T pathogenic variants cause treatment difficulties in many health settings. The course of MTC in this population is primarily responsible for increased mortality in patients with MEN2B, although it is unclear if advanced tumor stage at presentation or more aggressive pathology is the key factor.16,30 Accordingly, prophylactic thyroidectomy is strongly recommended within the first year of life without delay. Prior to the implementation of standard prophylactic thyroidectomy, the mean age of death for patients with MEN2B was 21. 31 In contrast, patients who receive prophylactic thyroidectomy have almost 100% 10-year survival. 32 The consequences of surgery must always be considered in decision making, with higher rates of complications noted for pediatric in comparison to adult thyroidectomy. Long-term complications include recurrent laryngeal nerve injury and permanent hypoparathyroidism, the latter having double the rates compared to those in adult surgical patients (5% versus 2%).33,34 The risks of surgery do increase with disease burden, highlighting the importance of observant screening in patients whose pathogenic variant risk does not warrant prophylactic thyroidectomy and elect for screening. 35

Survival for patients with MEN2 related MTC treated surgically is dependent upon disease stage and burden. Stage-dependent outcomes appear similar between patients with both sporadic and hereditary MTC.36,37 Post-resection, all patients with MEN2 should be followed with surveillance for recurrent disease. In addition, any patients with MTC, or a constellation of two MEN2 tumors, should undergo RET genetic testing and children of MEN2 patients should have genetic testing performed within the first 6 months of life. 18 The most common sites of RET pathogenic variants are on exon 5, 10, 11, 13, 14, 15, and 16 and these should be assessed with genetic testing. 19 Surveillance should consist of baseline calcitonin and CEA levels, 3 months post resection and then continued every 6 months for a year and then annually. Cervical ultrasound should be performed 6 months after resection and then again as indicated by elevated calcitonin levels. C-cell production of calcitonin and subsequent concentration levels are directly related to C-cell mass making it a useful tumor marker for MTC. Calcitonin can be used to assess initial disease burden and followed post resection to assess disease progression in patients with metastatic MTC. A serum calcitonin level over 500 pg/ml is associated with the presence of metastatic disease and should prompt more extensive staging workup with a CT neck, hepatic phase CT or MRI, axial MRI, and bone scintigraphy. Discordant calcitonin levels compared to structural disease burden can also be concerning. Low or normal levels of calcitonin in the setting of metastatic disease is a poor prognostic marker which may indicate dedifferentiation into poorly differentiated disease, an entity characteristically more aggressive and associated with worse outcomes. 19

Treatment of metastatic MTC depends on disease burden. Patients with persistent disease or locoregional recurrence within the neck can be treated with compartment-based neck dissection. Distant metastatic disease is usually not curable but treatment options to control disease and provide symptom relief are available. To understand a specific patient disease course, calcitonin doubling time represents the rate of tumor burden over a period of time. For patients with calcitonin doubling times over 2 years, usually representing stable disease, initiation of systemic treatment may not be recommended in favor of close surveillance.38,39

There are no widely used radiolabeled molecules or cytotoxic chemotherapeutic options for MTC. First-line systemic treatment consists of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) which target and inhibit RET kinase and vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) signaling and are indicated in metastatic patients with progressive disease or those with high disease burden.4044 Multitargeted kinase inhibitors such as vandetanib are approved for the treatment of MTC. 45 The response of these multitargeted kinase inhibitors for MTC is varied from 12% to 65% and utilization can be limited by adverse effects mainly thought to be due to simultaneous inhibition of non-RET kinases such as VEGF. Accordingly, the current research assessing the utilization of selective RET inhibitors, such as selpercatinib, in the treatment of RET-altered malignancies such as MTC demonstrates the efficacy and reduced adverse effects in initial studies. 45

Specific sites of metastatic disease may be considered for treatment, especially in settings of oligometastatic disease. Isolated brain metastases can be offered surgical resection or external beam radiation therapy (EBRT). Bone metastasis causing fracture or with likely progression to fracture should be treated surgically, with ablation or cement injection. Spinal compression requires treatment with urgent surgical decompression. Other bone metastases which are symptomatic should be treated with denosumab, bisphosphonates, or EBRT. Solitary lung metastasis can be considered for surgical resection or local therapies dependent on size and location. Isolated hepatic metastasis can be considered for surgical resection or chemoembolization. 19 Multidisciplinary collaboration is paramount to determine the best treatments for these complex patients.

PHPT

PHPT is present in 30% of patients with MEN2A and is not in those with MEN2B or FMTC.2,18 Similar to other neoplastic entities of MEN2A, more aggressive pathogenic variants will cause PHPT to manifest at a younger age. Pathogenic variants of codon 634 are most commonly associated with MEN2A-related PHPT. 46 The phenotype of PHPT can vary with a given pathogenic variant due to the differences in penetrance which is different than the more predictable rates of MTC in patients with MEN2A pathogenic variants. 47 PHPT is very rarely the initial presentation for MEN2A. It generally is found later, in the fourth or fifth decade of life, although it has been diagnosed in select patients with codon 634 pathogenic variants as early as 5 years of age.18,48 Screening of patients with MEN2A for PHPT should begin at age 8 for those with aggressive pathogenic variants of codon 630 and 634 and at age 20 for those with other pathogenic variants. Screening includes annual PTH and calcium levels. 18 Patients with MEN2A and PHPT are rarely symptomatic. If present, symptoms are identical to those observed in sporadic PHPT, such as nephrolithiasis osteoporosis and fatigue. 10

Parathyroid disease in patients with MEN2 is clinically different than MEN1 as the disease is milder and mostly causes single adenomas compared to multigland progressive hyperplastic disease in the latter. Furthermore, many patients with MEN2A have had thyroidectomy and neck dissection for MTC and there is a high likelihood of incidental parathyroidectomy after neck dissection thereby potentially falsely decreasing the incidence of observed parathyroid disease. The incidence of incidental parathyroidectomy during total thyroidectomy is 16.2% with malignancy and neck dissection bother being independent risk factors for increased incidence. 49 In fact, many patients with MEN2 after surgical treatment of thyroid cancer develop hypoparathyroidism. High-volume surgeons are best positioned to address the complex endocrine surgical disease of these patients.

Pheochromocytomas

Pheochromocytomas are present in up to 50% of MEN2A and 2B patients. Pheochromocytomas associated with MEN2 tend to have a higher incidence of bilateral (synchronous or metachronous), multifocal and extra-adrenal disease. 18 Pheochromocytomas typically present in the second to fourth decades of life in patients with MEN2. This is at least 10–20 years earlier than the age of presentation in patients with sporadic tumors. 16 The most commonly identified RET proto-oncogene codon pathogenic variants are codon 634 and 918 and within these kindreds, bilateral disease often present.2,10

Symptoms are similar to those of sporadic disease with hypertension, palpitations, headaches, and diaphoresis being common. 50 It has been noted that pheochromocytomas in patients with MEN2 have a tendency to secRETe higher amounts of epinephrine than norepinephrine and accordingly, this patient population is more prone particularly to palpitations, anxiety, and paroxysmal hypertension. 51

Pheochromocytomas are rarely the presenting disease of MEN2. However, they must always be considered and ruled out prior to the treatment of any associated conditions as well as those planning a pregnancy due to the risk of hypertensive crisis. If a pheochromocytoma is identified, it should be addressed as a priority. Screening should be performed for patients with MEN2 with plasma metanephrines or 24-h urinary catecholamines if the former is not available given higher sensitivity. Elevated biochemical testing necessitates further workup with cross-sectional adrenal imaging. The authors do not recommend functional imaging (Iodine 123 MIBG or the preferred Gallium 68 Dotatate PET scan) for diagnostic purposes. The majority of tumors in MEN2 are found within the adrenal, whereas extra-adrenal paragangliomas account for less than 10%. 52 Initiation of annual screening should start at age 20 in patients with MEN2A and age 8 in patients with MEN2B specifically those with RET 918 pathogenic variant. 18

Surgery for pheochromocytomas requires pre-operative optimization with alpha blockade and potential subsequent beta blockade for tachycardia due to the risk of hypertensive crisis. The surgical approach has changed considerably in recent times. Bilateral adrenalectomy was considered a classic standard given the risk of recurrent disease. Given the high morbidity of living without adrenal tissue, this approach evolved to unilateral adrenal resection for the involved gland, recognizing that up to 50% of patients with MEN2 did not develop bilateral disease in follow up. 53 To avoid difficulties of living with full steroid hormone replacement, management of pheochromocytomas in patients with MEN2 has shifted toward staged and cortical-sparing or partial adrenal-sparing resection. 18 The potential benefit of partial adrenalectomy must be weighed by the high risk of recurrent disease given the high likelihood of leaving medullary tissue behind with the normal cortical tissue. Some studies in high-volume centers have shown a low risk of recurrence noted to be 3–13% after adrenal resection.5456 The authors would suggest only considering cortical-sparing adrenalectomy after previous unilateral adrenal resection, in less aggressive MEN2 variants and in a high-volume endocrine oncology center.

Mucosal neuromas and other tumors

Patients with MEN2B have a set of features which creates a characteristic appearance including marfanoid habitus, narrow facies, pes cavus, pectus excavatum, scoliosis, mucosal neuromas, thickened, and everted eyelids with other mesodermal abnormalities. 50

Additional features of patients with MEN2B which are not physically apparent include medullated corneal nerve fibers, ganglioneuromatosis. 50 Mucosal neuromas are observed in almost 100% of patients with MEN2B. Once again, there is no predilection toward these tumors in patients with MEN2A or FMTC. 18 These neuromas are found in any organs which have a submucosa ranging from the entire gastrointestinal tract to bronchi and urinary system with the gut being the most common site of manifestation. 16 Symptomology related to mucosal neuromas can range from cosmetic with oral neuromas to more significant pathology with ganglioneuromatosis of the gastrointestinal tract having the potential to cause constipation, diarrhea, and even a pseudo-Hirschsprung’s disease with megacolon.16,57

Manifestations of MEN2 outside of the thyroid, parathyroid, and adrenal glands can be traced back to their RET proto-oncogene pathogenic variants. Table 2 includes a list of identified RET codon pathogenic variants associated with manifestations of MEN2 other than thyroid, parathyroid, and adrenal disease. This list represents a summary of what has been identified in the literature to date, note that the penetrance of manifestations is variable with some associations being noted in a few case series or studies. Regardless, awareness of associated non-classical features or diseases of MEN2 can initiate further testing resulting in potentially lifesaving detection and intervention in proband patients which is why these other manifestations are highlighted.

Table 2.31,5860.

List of identified RET codon pathogenic variants associated with manifestations of MEN2.

Manifestation Exon RET Codon
CLA 11 634
14 804*
Corneal nerve thickening 15 804*
16 918*
HD 10 609, 611, 618, 620
Intestinal ganglioneuromatosis 15 883
16 918
Marfanoid habitus 16 918
Renal agenesis 10 618*, 620*
11 634*

CLA, cutaneous lichen amyloidosis; HD, Hirschsprung disease.

*

Noted in case reports or series.

Conclusion

MEN2 is a variable and complex disease syndrome with a spectrum of disease severity and features. Regardless of the identified pathogenic variant and known or unknown penetrance and phenotype, the key to management is close monitoring and early intervention. Due to the complexity of the disease, it is best managed through multidisciplinary care teams with the inclusion of genetic counselors, endocrine oncology, endocrine surgeons, radiologists, and primary care physicians.

Acknowledgments

J.D.P. and B.S.-B. conceived and drafted the manuscript. Both authors commented on the drafts of the manuscript. Both authors have approved the final draft of the manuscript.

Footnotes

Author contributions: B Saravana-Bawan: Writing – original draft; Writing – review & editing.

JD Pasternak: Conceptualization; Writing – review & editing.

Funding: The authors received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Conflict of interest statement: The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Contributor Information

B Saravana-Bawan, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.

JD Pasternak, Section Head, Endocrine Surgery and Oncology, Division of General Surgery, Sprott Department of Surgery, Toronto General Hospital, University Health Network, 200 Elizabeth Street, Toronto, ON M5G 2C4, Canada.

References

  • 1. Pilgrim J, Schub T, Hanson D. Multiple endocrine neoplasia syndrome type 2: an overview. Ipswich, MA: CINAHL Nursing Guide EBSCO Publishing, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Yip L, Cote GJ, Shapiro SE, et al. Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2: evaluation of the genotype-phenotype relationship. Arch Surg 2003; 138: 409–416; discussion 416. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Seshadri MS. Endocrine tumor syndromes and their genetics. Indian J Med Res 2015; 142: 630–631. [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Znaczko A, Donnelly DE, Morrison PJ. Epidemiology, clinical features, and genetics of multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2b in a complete population. Oncologist 2014; 19: 1284–1286. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Takahashi M, Kawai K, Asai N. Roles of the RET proto-oncogene in cancer and development. JMA J 2020; 3: 175–181. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Gardner DG. Multiple endocrine neoplasia. In: Gardner DG, Shoback D. (eds) Greenspan’s basic & clinical endocrinology. New York: McGraw-Hill Education, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Moore SW, Zaahl M. The Hirschsprung’s–multiple endocrine neoplasia connection. Clinics 2012; 67(Suppl. 1): 63–67. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Hughes JM, Sipple JH, Dougald C, et al. The Sipple syndrome: from clinical description genetic analysis in the index family. Endocrinologist 1996; 6: 427–430. [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Eng C, Clayton D, Schuffenecker I, et al. The relationship between specific RET proto-oncogene mutations and disease phenotype in multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2. International RET mutation consortium analysis. JAMA 1996; 276: 1575–1579. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Brandi ML, Gagel RF, Angeli A, et al. Guidelines for diagnosis and therapy of MEN type 1 and type 2. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2001; 86: 5658–5671. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Sperling M. Pediatric endocrinology. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Machens A, Lorenz K, Dralle H. Constitutive RET tyrosine kinase activation in hereditary medullary thyroid cancer: clinical opportunities. J Intern Med 2009; 266: 114–125. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Zbuk KM, Eng C. Cancer phenomics: RET and PTEN as illustrative models. Nat Rev Cancer 2007; 7: 35–45. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Wray CJ, Rich TA, Waguespack SG, et al. Failure to recognize multiple endocrine neoplasia 2B: more common than we think? Ann Surg Oncol 2008; 15: 293–301. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Kloos RT, Eng C, Evans DB, et al. Medullary thyroid cancer: management guidelines of the American Thyroid Association. Thyroid 2009; 19: 565–612. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Miller CA, Ellison EC. Chapter 83. In: Clark OH, Duh Q-Y, Kebebew E, et al. (eds) Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2B. Philadelphia, PA: W. B. Saunders, 2005, pp. 757–763. [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Nosé V. Familial thyroid cancer: a review. Mod Pathol 2011; 24: S19–S33. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Brewer JJ. Multiple endocrine neoplasia (MEN) syndromes. In: Chu QD, Gibbs JF, Zibari GB. (eds) Surgical oncology: a practical and comprehensive approach. New York: Springer, 2015, pp. 573–584. [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Wells SA, Jr, Asa SL, Dralle H, et al. Revised American Thyroid Association guidelines for the management of medullary thyroid carcinoma. Thyroid 2015; 25: 567–610. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Sarika HL, Papathoma A, Garofalaki M, et al. Genetic screening of patients with medullary thyroid cancer in a referral center in Greece during the past two decades. Eur J Endocrinol 2015; 172: 501–509. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Wang J, Zhang B, Liu W, et al. Screening of RET gene mutations in Chinese patients with medullary thyroid carcinoma and their relatives. Fam Cancer 2015; 15: 99–104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Mathiesen JS, Kroustrup JP, Vestergaard P, et al. Founder effect of the RETC611Y mutation in multiple endocrine neoplasia 2A in Denmark: a nationwide study. Thyroid 2017; 27: 1505–1510. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Prazeres HJ, Rodrigues F, Figueiredo P, et al. Occurrence of the Cys611Tyr mutation and a novel Arg886Trp substitution in the RET proto-oncogene in multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2 families and sporadic medullary thyroid carcinoma cases originating from the central region of Portugal. Clin Endocrinol 2006; 64: 659–666. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Fanis P, Skordis N, Frangos S, et al. Multiple endocrine neoplasia 2 in Cyprus: evidence for a founder effect. J Endocrinol Invest 2018; 41: 1149–1157. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Elisei R, Tacito A, Ramone T, et al. Twenty-five years experience on RET genetic screening on hereditary MTC: an update on the prevalence of germline RET mutations. Genes 2019; 10: 698. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Valiveru RC, Agarwal G, Agrawal V, et al. Hereditary medullary thyroid carcinoma: genotype, phenotype and outcomes in a North Indian cohort. World J Surg 2021; 45: 1785–1793. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Waguespack SG, Rich TA, Perrier ND, et al. Management of medullary thyroid carcinoma and MEN2 syndromes in childhood. Nat Rev Endocrinol 2011; 7: 596–607. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Mathiesen JS, Kroustrup JP, Vestergaard P, et al. Survival and long-term biochemical cure in medullary thyroid carcinoma in Denmark 1997–2014: a nationwide study. Thyroid 2019; 29: 368–377. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Zedenius J, Wallin G, Hamberger B, et al. Somatic and MEN2A de novo mutations identified in the RET proto-oncogene by screening of sporadic MTC:s. Hum Mol Genet 1994; 3: 1259–1262. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Szinnai G, Sarnacki S, Polak M. Hereditary medullary thyroid carcinoma: how molecular genetics made multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2 a paediatric disease. Endocr Dev 2007; 10: 173–187. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Moline J, Eng C. Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2: an overview. Genet Med 2011; 13: 755–764. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Skinner MA, Moley JA, Dilley WG, et al. Prophylactic thyroidectomy in multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2A. N Engl J Med 2005; 353: 1105–1113. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Scholz S, Smith JR, Chaignaud B, et al. Thyroid surgery at Children’s Hospital Boston: a 35-year single-institution experience. J Pediatr Surg 2011; 46: 437–442. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Ritter K, Elfenbein D, Schneider DF, et al. Hypoparathyroidism after total thyroidectomy: incidence and resolution. J Surg Res 2015; 197: 348–353. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Prete FP, Abdel-Aziz T, Morkane C, et al. Prophylactic thyroidectomy in children with multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2. Br J Surg 2018; 105: 1319–1327. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Kotwal A, Erickson D, Geske JR, et al. Predicting outcomes in sporadic and hereditary medullary thyroid carcinoma over two decades. Thyroid 2021; 31: 616–626. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Raue F, Bruckner T, Frank-Raue K. Similar stage-dependent survival and outcome in sporadic and hereditary medullary thyroid carcinoma. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2021; 106: e3582–e3591. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Rendl G, Manzl M, Hitzl W, et al. Long-term prognosis of medullary thyroid carcinoma. Clin Endocrinol 2008; 69: 497–505. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Cupisti K, Wolf A, Raffel A, et al. Long-term clinical and biochemical follow-up in medullary thyroid carcinoma: a single institution’s experience over 20 years. Ann Surg 2007; 246: 815–821. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Matrone A, Gambale C, Prete A, et al. Systemic treatment of advanced, metastatic, medullary thyroid carcinoma. J Cancer Metastasis Treat 2021; 7: 23. [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Priya SR, Dravid CS, Digumarti R, et al. Targeted therapy for medullary thyroid cancer: a review. Front Oncol 2017; 7: 238. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Kim BH, Kim IJ. Recent updates on the management of medullary thyroid carcinoma. Endocrinol Metab 2016; 31: 392–399. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Wells SA, Jr, Robinson BG, Gagel RF, et al. Vandetanib in patients with locally advanced or metastatic medullary thyroid cancer: a randomized, double-blind phase III trial. J Clin Oncol 2012; 30: 134–141. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Elisei R, Schlumberger MJ, Müller SP, et al. Cabozantinib in progressive medullary thyroid cancer. J Clin Oncol 2013; 31: 3639–3646. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Wirth LJ, Sherman E, Robinson B, et al. Efficacy of selpercatinib in RET -altered thyroid cancers. N Engl J Med 2020; 383: 825–835. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46. Carling T, Udelsman R. Parathyroid surgery in familial hyperparathyroid disorders. J Intern Med 2005; 257: 27–37. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47. Ball DW. Clinical manifestations of multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2 BT. In: Nelkin BD. (ed.) Genetic mechanisms in multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2. Berlin; Heidelberg: Springer, pp. 1–20. [Google Scholar]
  • 48. Magalhães PK, Antonini SR, De Paula FJ, et al. Primary hyperparathyroidism as the first clinical manifestation of multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2A in a 5-year-old child. Thyroid 2011; 21: 547–550. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49. Applewhite MK, White MG, Xiong M, et al. Incidence, risk factors, and clinical outcomes of incidental parathyroidectomy during thyroid surgery. Ann Surg Oncol 2016; 23: 4310–4315. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50. Landry CS, Rich T, Jimenez C, et al. Multiple endocrine neoplasia BT. In: Yao JC, Hoff PM, Hoff AO. (eds) Neuroendocrine tumors. Totowa, NJ: Humana Press, 2011, pp. 29–49. [Google Scholar]
  • 51. Eisenhofer G, Walther MM, Huynh TT, et al. Pheochromocytomas in von Hippel-Lindau syndrome and multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2 display distinct biochemical and clinical phenotypes. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2001; 86: 1999–2008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52. Tischler AS, DeLellis RA. The adrenal medulla in MEN2 BT. In: Nelkin BD. (ed.) Genetic mechanisms in multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2. Berlin; Heidelberg: Springer, 1996, pp. 119–136. [Google Scholar]
  • 53. Lairmore TC, Ball DW, Baylin SB, et al. Management of pheochromocytomas in patients with multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2 syndromes. Ann Surg 1993; 217: 595–601; discussion 601–603. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54. Machens A, Elwerr M, Lorenz K, et al. 100-year evolution of precision medicine and surgery for multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2A. Endocrine 2020; 68: 368–376. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55. Asari R, Scheuba C, Kaczirek K, et al. Estimated risk of pheochromocytoma recurrence after adrenal-sparing surgery in patients with multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2A. Arch Surg 2006; 141: 1199–1205; discussion 1205. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56. Neumann HPH, Young WF, Eng C. Pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma. N Engl J Med 2019; 381: 552–565. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57. Smith VV, Eng C, Milla PJ. Intestinal ganglioneuromatosis and multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2B: implications for treatment. Gut 1999; 45: 143–146. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58. Hibi Y, Ohye T, Ogawa K, et al. A MEN2A family with two asymptomatic carriers affected by unilateral renal agenesis. Endocr J 2014; 61: 19–23. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59. Ong DS, Lakhani V, Oates JA, Jr, et al. Kindred with prominent corneal nerves associated with a mutation in codon 804 of RET on chromosome 10q11. Arch Ophthalmol 2010; 128: 247–249. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60. Eter N, Klingmüller D, Höppner W, et al. Typical ocular findings in a patient with multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2b syndrome. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2001; 239: 391–394. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Therapeutic Advances in Chronic Disease are provided here courtesy of SAGE Publications

RESOURCES