Abstract
Objective:
To investigate hospitalizations up to 8 years after livebirth among women who utilized ART or who were subfertile, compared to women who conceived naturally.
Design:
Retrospective cohort
Setting:
Massachusetts deliveries among privately insured women ≥18 years old between 2004–2017 from state vital records were linked to the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinic Outcome Reporting System (SART CORS), and hospital observational/inpatient stays.
Patients:
We compared patients with ART, medically assisted reproduction, and unassisted subfertile delivery to fertile delivery.
Intervention:
NA
Main Outcome Measured:
Post-delivery hospitalization information was derived from ICD codes for discharges and were combined by type. The relative risks (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) of hospitalization for up to the first 8 years post-delivery were modeled.
Results:
Among 492,515 deliveries, 5.6% used ART, 1.6% used medically assisted reproduction, and 1.8% were unassisted subfertile. Compared to fertile deliveries, deliveries that utilized ART, medically assisted reproduction or were unassisted subfertile were more likely to have hospital utilization (inpatient or observational stay) for any reason for up to 8 years of follow-up (unassisted subfertile aRR:1.18 (1.12–1.25); medically assisted reproduction:1.20 (1.13–1.27); ART aRR:1.29 (1.25–1.34)). ART deliveries had an increased risk of hospitalization for conditions of the cardiovascular system(aRR: 1.31 (1.20–1.41)), overweight/obesity(aRR:1.30 (1.17–1.44)), diabetes(aRR:1.25 (1.05–1.49)), reproductive tract(aRR:1.62 (1.47–1.79)), digestive tract(aRR:1.39 (1.30–1.49), thyroid(aRR:2.02 (1.80–2.26)), respiratory system(aRR: 1.13 (1.03–1.24)), and cancer(aRR:1.40 (1.18–1.65)) up to 8 years after delivery. Deliveries with medically assisted reproduction and subfertility had similar patterns of hospitalization as ART deliveries.
Conclusion:
Women who conceived through fertility treatment or who experienced subfertility were at an increased risk for subsequent hospitalization resulting from a variety of chronic and acute conditions.
Funding:
NIH R01HD067270
Keywords: ART, Infertility, Subfertility, cancer, cardiovascular disease, diabetes, chronic diseases
Capsule:
Women who used fertility treatment or experienced subfertility were at increased risk for subsequent hospitalization up to 8 years after delivery resulting from a variety of chronic and acute conditions.
Introduction:
Infertility is estimated to affect over 1.5 million couples each year in the United States (1, 2) and utilization of fertility treatments including Assisted Reproductive Technology (ART) is common (3). Prior research has shown that deliveries to women who utilized fertility treatment and to women with underlying infertility are at greater risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes (4–6). There is increasing interest in understanding women’s long-term health outcomes following ART delivery and infertility, given the exogenous hormonal exposures associated with fertility treatment and physiology associated with infertility itself (7).
It can be challenging to study the relationship between infertility, fertility treatment, and maternal health outcomes because of the need for detailed information on both the exposures: fertility treatment and infertility history, and the outcomes of interest: the incident diseases under study. Moreover, given the timescale of chronic disease development, a sufficient duration of follow-up is needed between fertility treatment utilization/subfertility and incident chronic disease diagnosis. Indeed, prior research from our team found a similar level of non-delivery hospitalizations for women who did and did not utilize ART, however follow-up was limited to within one year after delivery (8). Prior research from other investigators has suggested that women with infertility and who utilized infertility treatment may have a greater risk of cardiovascular disease (9), type II diabetes (10), and breast cancer (11), however these findings have not been replicated across all studies (12). An additional complexity in this research area is that characteristics related to parity, which are inherently linked to infertility, are known to be associated with risk of certain chronic diseases (13). For example, later age at first birth and nulliparity are associated with greater risk of ovarian cancer and breast cancer (14, 15). Understanding the intersection between fertility treatment utilization as well as underlying infertility and risk of adverse health outcomes among the mothers may have important implications for patient counseling, as well as possibly disease screening recommendations. Therefore, the objective of this study was to investigate the risk of non-delivery hospitalizations during eight years of follow-up comparing ART-deliveries, deliveries conceived using non-ART medically assisted reproduction, and deliveries to women with indicators of subfertility but no assistance for conception compared to women with fertile deliveries. We hypothesized that parous women who utilized fertility treatment or who were subfertile would have greater risk of non-delivery hospitalization during follow-up for specific conditions compared to fertile women.
Study Design:
Cycles of ART reported in the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinic Outcome Reporting System (SART CORS) that were performed in the state of Massachusetts to privately-insured women ≥ 18 years old between 2004 and 2017 were linked to delivery records (birth certificates and fetal death records) and delivery hospital discharge records linked in the Pregnancy to Early Life Longitudinal (PELL) data system to create the Massachusetts Outcome Study of Assisted Reproductive Technology (MOSART) database. A detailed description of the linkage methodology and development of MOSART has been described previously (16). Briefly, in-state resident deliveries between July 1, 2004, and December 31, 2017, were linked to SART CORS cycles using mother’s first and last name, father’s last name, mother’s date of birth, and date of delivery. When in doubt, we further validated baby’s sex, birthweight, and mother’s zip code to adjudicate potential links. For 2004–2017, the linkage rates were 91.5% overall and 94.9% for deliveries in which both ART cycle patient zip code and treatment clinic were located in MA. Deliveries were excluded if they were to mothers <18 years of age (n=13,716), were paid by public insurance, self-pay, or uninsured (n=426,793), or were on or after July 1, 2017 (n=17,461) leaving 492,515 deliveries to women ≥18 years in Massachusetts between July 1, 2004 until June 30, 2017. A Memorandum of Understanding was executed among SART, the Principal Investigators on the grant that funds the research, and the entities that participate in the PELL project. The study had IRB approvals from the Massachusetts Department of Public Health, Boston University, and Dartmouth-Hitchcock Health.
SART CORS data are collected by SART to provide national-level data on ART under the Fertility Clinic Success Rate and Certification Act of 1992 (Public Law 102–493) and to report these data to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). SART CORS data are annually validated with some clinics having on-site visits for chart review based on an algorithm for clinic selection. During each visit, data reported by the clinic are compared with information recorded in patients’ charts. In 2017, the 10 data fields selected for validation were found to have discrepancy rates of ≤5% (17).
Deliveries in our study were classified into four mutually exclusive groups based on fertility treatment history and utilization for the index delivery which have been described previously (18). Women could contribute multiple deliveries to the analysis and each delivery was classified individually. Deliveries were defined as having used ART, if the index delivery was linked with SART CORS. Deliveries were considered “non-ART medically assisted reproduction” (MAR) if the birth certificate for the index delivery indicated having used fertility treatment but the delivery was not linked to SART CORS. Deliveries were categorized as “unassisted subfertile” (USF) if the woman had a prior ICD code for infertility, prior ART, or prior other fertility treatment. Lastly, a delivery was classified as “fertile” if the woman did not fall into any of the above categories. Women could contribute person-time following each delivery until the minimum of the following events: follow-up ceased, eight years of follow-up, or a new delivery was reported.
Information on live birth was based on MA birth certificate data. Hospitalizations were identified via ICD-9 and ICD-10 codes, as has been done by our group previously (8). For up to eight years of follow-up, the non-delivery discharge codes that were most-frequently reported 6 months following index delivery in our data were categorized into groups based on organ system influenced (Supplemental Table 1). Categories for inpatient or observational hospitalizations included: Cardiovascular including hypertension, Infection, Overweight/Obesity, Anemia, Reproductive tract, Digestive tract, Thyroid, Respiratory including asthma, Breast (excluding breast cancer), Diabetes, Cancer, Psychiatric, Substance use disorder, and Other.
Analyses were conducted on the delivery-level, and a woman could contribute multiple deliveries to the analysis. Generalized estimating equations with a log link, Poisson distribution, and exchangeable correlation structure were used to take into account multiple deliveries per woman and estimate the relative risk of hospitalization overall and for specific conditions with the 95% confidence interval. To take into account varying lengths of follow-up, person-months of follow-up was used as the offset term in Poisson models. We modeled follow-up durations of 1 year, 3 years, 5 years, and 8 years. Not all participants were followed for 8 years, therefore, women contributed data to the follow-up duration which they fulfilled. Models were a priori adjusted for maternal age, parity, year of delivery, plurality, chronic hypertension prior to pregnancy, and chronic diabetes prior to pregnancy.
Results:
In total, there were 492,515 deliveries (506,346 infants) to privately-insured women between July 1, 2004 and December 31, 2017 in the state of Massachusetts; the majority of deliveries were to fertile women (91.0%) with 27,802 (5.6%) deliveries utilizing ART, 7,811 (1.6%) deliveries that utilized MAR, and 8,675 (1.8%) deliveries to unassisted subfertile women (Table 1). Women were followed for up to 8 years with a median follow-up time of 50 months. Compared to fertile deliveries, deliveries to women with subfertility or who utilized fertility treatment, the mothers were older and more likely to be non-Hispanic white, college graduates, married, and have preexisting hypertension and diabetes. Deliveries to women with subfertility or who utilized fertility treatment were also more likely to be twins or higher order multiples and to have lower birth weight compared to fertile deliveries.
Table 1.
ALL | Fertile | Unassisted Subfertile | Non-ART Medically Assisted Reproduction | ART | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
n | % | n | % | n | % | n | % | n | % | |
Total deliveries | 492,515 | 100.0 | 448,227 | 91.01 | 8,675 | 1.8 | 7,811 | 1.6 | 27,802 | 5.6 |
Maternal age at delivery | ||||||||||
Mean (SD) | 32.13 (4.72) | 31.81 (4.62) | 34.01 (4.38) | 35.40 (3.87) | 35.83 (4.50) | |||||
Maternal race/ethnicity | ||||||||||
Hispanic | 26,173 | 5.31 | 24,457 | 5.46 | 328 | 3.78 | 280 | 3.58 | 1,108 | 3.99 |
Non-Hispanic White | 389,260 | 79.04 | 352,391 | 78.62 | 7,421 | 85.54 | 6,505 | 83.28 | 22,943 | 82.52 |
Non-Hispanic Black | 21,461 | 4.36 | 20,221 | 4.51 | 232 | 2.67 | 178 | 2.28 | 830 | 2.99 |
Non-Hispanic Asian | 48,638 | 9.88 | 44,770 | 9.99 | 575 | 6.63 | 764 | 9.78 | 2,529 | 9.10 |
Other | 6,983 | 1.42 | 6,388 | 1.43 | 119 | 1.37 | 84 | 1.08 | 392 | 1.41 |
Maternal highest level of education | ||||||||||
< HS/HS graduate | 84,592 | 17.18 | 80,453 | 17.95 | 948 | 10.93 | 641 | 8.21 | 2,550 | 9.17 |
Some college | 67,269 | 13.66 | 62,269 | 13.89 | 1,050 | 12.10 | 886 | 11.34 | 3,064 | 11.02 |
College graduate | 337,568 | 68.54 | 302,775 | 67.55 | 6,608 | 76.17 | 6,246 | 79.96 | 21,939 | 78.91 |
Missing | 3,086 | 0.63 | 2,730 | 0.61 | 69 | 0.80 | 38 | 0.49 | 249 | 0.90 |
Marital Status | ||||||||||
Married | 438,037 | 88.94 | 395,603 | 88.26 | 8,442 | 97.31 | 7,394 | 94.66 | 26,598 | 95.67 |
Parity | ||||||||||
1 | 234,090 | 47.53 | 212,060 | 47.31 | 1,280 | 14.76 | 4,794 | 61.37 | 15,956 | 57.39 |
2 | 179,074 | 36.36 | 163,064 | 36.38 | 4,524 | 52.15 | 2,290 | 29.32 | 9,196 | 33.08 |
3–16 | 77,664 | 15.77 | 71,576 | 15.97 | 2,819 | 32.50 | 708 | 9.06 | 2,561 | 9.21 |
Missing | 1,687 | 0.34 | 1,527 | 0.34 | 52 | 0.60 | 19 | 0.24 | 89 | 0.32 |
Plurality | ||||||||||
Singleton | 479,031 | 97.26 | 442,098 | 98.63 | 8,410 | 96.95 | 6,742 | 86.31 | 21,781 | 78.34 |
Twin or High Order Multiples | 13,484 | 2.74 | 6,129 | 1.37 | 265 | 3.05 | 1,069 | 13.69 | 6,021 | 21.66 |
History of chronic conditions | ||||||||||
Hypertension | 11,903 | 2.42 | 10,287 | 2.30 | 241 | 2.78 | 283 | 3.62 | 1,092 | 3.93 |
Diabetes | 30,825 | 6.26 | 26,876 | 6.00 | 678 | 7.82 | 761 | 9.74 | 2,510 | 9.03 |
Year of Delivery | ||||||||||
2004–2007 | 155,747 | 31.62 | 144,669 | 32.28 | 2,258 | 26.03 | 1,999 | 25.59 | 6,821 | 24.53 |
2008–2010 | 119,909 | 24.35 | 110,269 | 24.60 | 2,064 | 23.79 | 1,110 | 14.21 | 6,466 | 23.26 |
2011–2013 | 99,260 | 20.15 | 89,340 | 19.93 | 1,717 | 19.79 | 1,965 | 25.16 | 6,238 | 22.44 |
2014–2017 | 117,599 | 23.88 | 103,949 | 23.19 | 2,636 | 30.39 | 2,737 | 35.04 | 8,277 | 29.77 |
Number of deliveries per women analyzed | ||||||||||
Range | 1–10 | 1–10 | 1–6 | 1–6 | 1–6 | |||||
Mean (SD) | 1.80 (0.78) | 1.81 (0.79) | 2.08 (0.76) | 1.62 (0.70) | 1.60 (0.67) | |||||
1 | 192,549 | 39.10 | 173,130 | 38.63 | 1,755 | 20.23 | 3,847 | 49.25 | 13,817 | 49.70 |
2 | 222,778 | 45.23 | 203,079 | 45.31 | 4,820 | 55.56 | 3,216 | 41.17 | 11,663 | 41.95 |
3–10 | 77,188 | 15.67 | 72,018 | 16.07 | 2,100 | 24.21 | 748 | 9.58 | 2,322 | 8.35 |
Birth weight1 | ||||||||||
< 1500 gms | 5,364 | 1.06 | 3,476 | 0.76 | 94 | 1.05 | 343 | 3.82 | 1,451 | 4.27 |
1500–2499 gms | 29,344 | 5.80 | 20,895 | 4.60 | 514 | 5.75 | 1,322 | 14.74 | 6,613 | 19.45 |
>=2500 gms | 470,155 | 92.85 | 428,751 | 94.35 | 8,288 | 92.66 | 7,278 | 81.14 | 25,838 | 75.98 |
Missing | 1,483 | 0.29 | 1,301 | 0.29 | 49 | 0.55 | 27 | 0.30 | 106 | 0.31 |
Birth weight (singletons only) | ||||||||||
< 1500 gms | 3,014 | 0.63 | 294 | 1.35 | 74 | 1.10 | 41 | 0.49 | 2,605 | 0.59 |
1500–2499 gms | 17,674 | 3.69 | 1,351 | 6.20 | 344 | 5.10 | 283 | 3.37 | 15,696 | 3.55 |
>=2500 gms | 456,956 | 95.39 | 20,075 | 92.17 | 6,299 | 93.43 | 8,041 | 95.61 | 422,541 | 95.58 |
Missing | 1,387 | 0.29 | 61 | 0.28 | 25 | 0.37 | 45 | 0.54 | 1,256 | 0.28 |
Total number of infants= 506,346
Compared to fertile women at up to 8 years post follow up, women whose delivery utilized ART (aRR:1.29, 95% CI: 1.25–1.34), or MAR (aRR: 1.20, (1.13–1.27), and who were subfertile (aRR: 1.18, 95% CI: 1.12–1.25) were at greater risk of hospitalization for any condition. However, when investigating hospitalization for specific conditions and time since delivery, some variability was observed. Compared to deliveries to fertile women, deliveries to women who used ART were more likely to have inpatient or observational hospitalizations for a variety of conditions at up to 8 years of follow-up including conditions of the cardiovascular system (aRR:1.31 95% CI: 1.20–1.41), infection (aRR: 1.36 95% CI: 1.18–1.56), overweight/obesity (aRR:1.30 95% CI: 1.17–1.44), anemia (RR:1.24 95% CI: 1.09–1.41), reproductive tract (aRR:1.62 95% CI: 1.47–1.79), digestive tract (aRR:1.39 95% CI:1.30–1.49), thyroid (aRR:2.02 95% CI:1.80–2.26), respiratory including asthma (aRR:1.13 95% CI:1.03–1.24), diseases of the breast (aRR:1.39 95% CI:1.14–1.69), diabetes (aRR:1.25 95% CI:1.05–1.49), and cancer (aRR: 1.40 95% CI: 1.18–1.65) (Table 2).
Table 2.
Fertile | Unassisted Subfertile | Non-ART Medically Assisted Reproduction | ART | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
n | % | Reference | aRR (95% CI)1,2 | aRR (95% CI)1,2 | aRR (95% CI)1,2 | |
Hospitalization for any Condition | ||||||
1st year | 16,613 | 3.71 | 1.00 (ref) | 1.18 (1.07–1.31) | 1.15 (1.03–1.28) | 1.23 (1.15–1.30) |
3rd year | 37,814 | 8.44 | 1.00 (ref) | 1.23 (1.15–1.32) | 1.19 (1.11–1.28) | 1.33 (1.28–1.39) |
5th year | 48,522 | 10.83 | 1.00 (ref) | 1.19 (1.12–1.26) | 1.19 (1.12–1.27) | 1.31 (1.27–1.36) |
8th year | 56,277 | 12.56 | 1.00 (ref) | 1.18 (1.12–1.25) | 1.20 (1.13–1.27) | 1.29 (1.25–1.34) |
Cardiovascular disease including hypertension | ||||||
1st year | 2,954 | 0.66 | 1.00 (ref) | 1.11 (0.88–1.35) | 1.29 (1.04–1.60) | 1.14 (1.00–1.30) |
3rd year | 5,358 | 1.20 | 1.00 (ref) | 1.15 (0.96–1.37) | 1.31 (1.10–1.55) | 1.32 (1.20–1.46) |
5th year | 7,091 | 1.58 | 1.00 (ref) | 1.12 (0.96–1.31) | 1.24 (1.07–1.45) | 1.31 (1.20–1.43) |
8th year | 8,950 | 2.00 | 1.00 (ref) | 1.15 (1.01–1.31) | 1.23 (1.07–1.42) | 1.31 (1.20–1.41) |
Infection (not reproductive) | ||||||
1st year | 1,801 | 0.40 | 1.00 (ref) | 1.34 (0.98–1.82) | 1.17 (0.85–1.62) | 1.27 (1.06–1.53) |
3rd year | 2,707 | 0.60 | 1.00 (ref) | 1.33 (1.03–1.73) | 1.19 (0.90–1.57) | 1.34 (1.15–1.58) |
5th year | 3,300 | 0.74 | 1.00 (ref) | 1.21 (0.95–1.55) | 1.21 (0.93–1.56) | 1.41 (1.22–1.63) |
8th year | 3,870 | 0.86 | 1.00 (ref) | 1.17 (0.93–1.47) | 1.19 (0.93–1.52) | 1.36 (1.18–1.56) |
Overweight/Obesity | ||||||
1st year | 991 | 0.22 | 1.00 (ref) | 1.65 (1.18–2.32) | 1.48 (1.00–2.19) | 1.16 (0.90–1.50) |
3rd year | 3,075 | 0.69 | 1.00 (ref) | 1.64 (1.36–1.98) | 1.37 (1.08–1.74) | 1.45 (1.26–1.67) |
5th year | 4,675 | 1.04 | 1.00 (ref) | 1.50 (1.28–1.75) | 1.37 (1.13–1.65) | 1.32 (1.18–1.49) |
8th year | 6,436 | 1.44 | 1.00 (ref) | 1.42 (1.23–1.63) | 1.41 (1.19–1.66) | 1.30 (1.17–1.44) |
Anemia | ||||||
1st year | 1,123 | 0.25 | 1.00 (ref) | 1.25 (0.85–1.82) | 1.12 (0.74–1.69) | 1.48 (1.19–1.84) |
3rd year | 2,390 | 0.53 | 1.00 (ref) | 1.18 (0.90–1.53) | 0.97 (0.70–1.33) | 1.44 (1.22–1.69) |
5th year | 3,388 | 0.76 | 1.00 (ref) | 1.13 (0.91–1.41) | 1.06 (0.81–1.38) | 1.33 (1.16–1.54) |
8th year | 4,445 | 0.99 | 1.00 (ref) | 1.03 (0.85–1.26) | 0.93 (0.73–1.20) | 1.24 (1.09–1.41) |
Reproductive tract | ||||||
1st year | 1,241 | 0.28 | 1.00 (ref) | 1.34 (0.93–1.93) | 1.54 (1.08–2.21) | 1.50 (1.21–1.86) |
3rd year | 3,451 | 0.77 | 1.00 (ref) | 1.32 (1.06–1.65) | 1.64 (1.32–2.04) | 1.79 (1.58–2.04) |
5th year | 4,932 | 1.10 | 1.00 (ref) | 1.33 (1.10–1.60) | 1.62 (1.35–1.96) | 1.68 (1.50–1.87) |
8th year | 6,287 | 1.40 | 1.00 (ref) | 1.24 (1.05–1.46) | 1.52 (1.28–1.81) | 1.62 (1.47–1.79) |
Digestive tract | ||||||
1st year | 3,860 | 0.86 | 1.00 (ref) | 1.40 (1.14–1.72) | 1.33 (1.07–1.66) | 1.48 (1.31–1.68) |
3rd year | 8,633 | 1.93 | 1.00 (ref) | 1.42 (1.24–1.62) | 1.15 (0.98–1.35) | 1.41 (1.29–1.54) |
5th year | 11,527 | 2.57 | 1.00 (ref) | 1.34 (1.20–1.51) | 1.20 (1.05–1.38) | 1.39 (1.29–1.50) |
8th year | 14,457 | 3.23 | 1.00 (ref) | 1.31 (1.18–1.45) | 1.24 (1.10–1.40) | 1.39 (1.30–1.49) |
Thyroid | ||||||
1st year | 756 | 0.17 | 1.00 (ref) | 1.50 (1.01–2.22) | 2.41 (1.73–3.34) | 1.95 (1.57–2.42) |
3rd year | 1,791 | 0.40 | 1.00 (ref) | 1.75 (1.36–2.24) | 2.37 (1.89–2.97) | 2.06 (1.77–2.39) |
5th year | 2,511 | 0.56 | 1.00 (ref) | 1.62 (1.31–2.02) | 2.18 (1.77–2.68) | 2.09 (1.84–2.38) |
8th year | 3,202 | 0.71 | 1.00 (ref) | 1.62 (1.34–1.96) | 1.98 (1.63–2.41) | 2.02 (1.80–2.26) |
Respiratory including asthma | ||||||
1st year | 1,560 | 0.35 | 1.00 (ref) | 1.20 (0.87–1.66) | 0.81 (0.53–1.24) | 0.93 (0.74–1.16) |
3rd year | 4,080 | 0.91 | 1.00 (ref) | 1.41 (1.17–1.69) | 1.07 (0.84–1.36) | 1.10 (0.96–1.27) |
5th year | 6,022 | 1.34 | 1.00 (ref) | 1.27 (1.09–1.48) | 1.21 (1.01–1.47) | 1.18 (1.05–1.31) |
8th year | 8,027 | 1.79 | 1.00 (ref) | 1.23 (1.08–1.41) | 1.18 (1.00–1.40) | 1.13 (1.03–1.24) |
Breast | ||||||
1st year | 772 | 0.17 | 1.00 (ref) | 1.07 (0.65–1.75)3 | 1.05 (0.62–1.78)3 | 1.13 (0.85–1.50)3 |
3rd year | 1,056 | 0.24 | 1.00 (ref) | 1.78 (1.27–2.49) | 1.06 (0.67–1.68) | 1.43 (1.13–1.81) |
5th year | 1,306 | 0.29 | 1.00 (ref) | 1.57 (1.15–2.15) | 1.18 (0.79–1.75) | 1.36 (1.10–1.68) |
8th year | 1,573 | 0.35 | 1.00 (ref) | 1.41 (1.05–1.89) | 1.41 (1.01–1.97) | 1.39 (1.14–1.69) |
Diabetes | ||||||
1st year | 399 | 0.09 | 1.00 (ref) | 1.36 (0.78–2.38) | 1.32 (0.78–2.24) | 0.90 (0.62–1.32) |
3rd year | 1,139 | 0.25 | 1.00 (ref) | 1.55 (1.07–2.24) | 1.70 (1.22–2.35) | 1.27 (1.01–1.59) |
5th year | 1,603 | 0.36 | 1.00 (ref) | 1.54 (1.12–2.11) | 1.60 (1.20–2.14) | 1.25 (1.03–1.52) |
8th year | 2,024 | 0.45 | 1.00 (ref) | 1.35 (1.00–1.82) | 1.70 (1.32–2.19) | 1.25 (1.05–1.49) |
Cancer4 | ||||||
1st year | 350 | 0.08 | 1.00 (ref) | 1.69 (1.30–2.19)3 | 1.30 (0.96–1.77)3 | 1.66 (1.42–1.93)3 |
3rd year | 865 | 0.19 | 1.00 (ref) | 1.20 (0.82–1.76) | 1.17 (0.73–1.87) | 1.54 (1.22–1.94) |
5th year | 1,321 | 0.29 | 1.00 (ref) | 1.12 (0.82–1.54) | 1.39 (0.97–1.98) | 1.42 (1.17–1.72) |
8th year | 1,810 | 0.40 | 1.00 (ref) | 1.18 (0.90–1.53) | 1.38 (1.01–1.89) | 1.40 (1.18–1.65) |
Psychiatric conditions | ||||||
1st year | 1,834 | 0.41 | 1.00 (ref) | 0.95 (0.68–1.32) | 1.08 (0.77–1.51) | 1.11 (0.91–1.35) |
3rd year | 4,776 | 1.07 | 1.00 (ref) | 1.23 (1.03–1.48) | 1.18 (0.96–1.46) | 1.19 (1.05–1.35) |
5th year | 7,170 | 1.60 | 1.00 (ref) | 1.29 (1.11–1.49) | 1.19 (0.99–1.41) | 1.24 (1.12–1.37) |
8th year | 9,622 | 2.15 | 1.00 (ref) | 1.28 (1.13–1.45) | 1.16 (0.99–1.36) | 1.26 (1.15–1.37) |
Substance use disorder | ||||||
1st year | 672 | 0.15 | 1.00 (ref) | 0.62 (0.28–1.38) | 0.40 (0.13–1.24) | 0.64 (0.37–1.10) |
3rd year | 2,085 | 0.47 | 1.00 (ref) | 0.88 (0.61–1.28) | 0.69 (0.43–1.12) | 0.78 (0.59–1.03) |
5th year | 3,233 | 0.72 | 1.00 (ref) | 1.11 (0.85–1.44) | 0.72 (0.49–1.06) | 0.92 (0.75–1.14) |
8th year | 4,479 | 1.00 | 1.00 (ref) | 1.05 (0.84–1.32) | 0.70 (0.50–0.98) | 1.01 (0.86–1.20) |
Other (Chronic Disease) | ||||||
1st year | 5,114 | 1.14 | 1.00 (ref) | 1.19 (0.99–1.43) | 1.21 (0.99–1.47) | 1.34 (1.20–1.50) |
3rd year | 12,687 | 2.83 | 1.00 (ref) | 1.29 (1.15–1.45) | 1.21 (1.06–1.38) | 1.40 (1.30–1.51) |
5th year | 17,409 | 3.88 | 1.00 (ref) | 1.26 (1.14–1.39) | 1.26 (1.12–1.41) | 1.36 (1.28–1.45) |
8th year | 21,704 | 4.84 | 1.00 (ref) | 1.22 (1.12–1.33) | 1.24 (1.12–1.37) | 1.36 (1.28–1.43) |
GEE with Poisson distribution, exchangeable correlation structure, logarithm person-month as offset term
Adjusted for maternal age (continuous 18–57), parity (1,2,3–16,missing), year of delivery (4–7, 8–10, 11–13, 14–17), plurality (Singleton,multiples), chronic hypertension (yes/no), chronic diabetes (yes/no). aRR=adjusted relative risk, CI=confidence interval
Multivariable models did not converge, crude estimates presented
Determined from inpatient ICD codes and not from the Massachusetts cancer registry
Compared to deliveries to fertile women, deliveries to women with a history of MAR and subfertility had similar patterns of hospitalization as ART deliveries and were found to be at an increased risk of infection, overweight/obesity, conditions of the reproductive tract, conditions of the digestive tract, conditions of the thyroid, and diabetes (Table 2). Across all time points, a greater risk of hospitalization for conditions of the cardiovascular system was consistently observed among ART and MAR-treated women. Whereas a greater risk of psychiatric conditions was only observed among ART and subfertile women. A greater risk of cancer and anemia across all time points was only observed among women who had utilized ART for an index pregnancy compared to fertile women. Risk of hospitalization was greatest including up to 8 years of follow-up for diabetes, respiratory conditions, and psychiatric conditions, but there was no statistically significant risk for these conditions after one year of follow-up.
Discussion:
Overall, deliveries to women who utilized fertility treatment to conceive or who had experienced subfertility prior to conception were at greater risk of inpatient and observational hospitalization for any reason after up to eight years of follow-up compared to those with fertile deliveries. Specifically, deliveries to women who utilized ART to conceive or who had experienced subfertility prior to conception were at risk for a greater number of inpatient or observational hospitalizations for cardiometabolic conditions (i.e., cardiovascular system, diabetes), cancer and non-malignant pre-cancerous conditions, conditions of the thyroid, digestive tract, respiratory tract, and reproductive tract, and psychiatric conditions. These observed associations may be due to causal as well as non-causal mechanisms. Heterogeneity was observed across fertility treatment utilization and time contributing to follow-up.
We observed that women who conceived via ART, other fertility treatment (MAR), or who were subfertile but did not receive fertility treatment to conceive, were at greater risk of inpatient or observational hospitalization for cardiometabolic conditions including, cardiovascular disease, hypertension, and diabetes, or overweight/obesity after 8 years. Among women who utilized ART, the risk of hospitalization for cardiovascular conditions, including hypertension, was modest or not statistically significant after one year of follow-up (RR:1.14) however the relative risk of hospitalization for cardiovascular conditions increased with increasing duration of follow-up compared to fertile women (RR 8 years: 1.31). These findings are supported by prior research on infertility and risk of cardiovascular conditions (9, 10, 19, 20). Within the Swedish Medical Birth Register, women with subfertility ≥5 years were found to have 20% greater risk of cardiovascular disease compared to women without a history of infertility (median follow-up=12 years) (9). However, these authors were unable to account for fertility treatment in their analysis. The Framingham Heart Study also supports this overall trend and reported that pre-menopausal women with a history of infertility (n=282) may have greater risk of type 2 diabetes (odds ratio:1.96 (95% CI:0.86–4.49)), but they had limited statistical power and therefore their findings were not statistically significant (10).
There are several potential mechanisms to support the observed associations of an increased risk of cardiometabolic diseases among women with infertility. Certain infertility diagnoses (i.e., polycystic ovary syndrome, endometriosis) and associated phenotypes, such as menstrual irregularity and excess adiposity, have been found to be associated with an adverse cardiometabolic profile (21–25). However, we were unable to separate those specific gynecologic conditions in this analysis. While information on body mass index (BMI) was not available for most years in our data sources, all analyses were adjusted for prevalent maternal hypertension and diabetes at delivery. Moreover, our research group and others have reported pregnancy-induced hypertension, preeclampsia, and gestational diabetes is more common in ART-treated deliveries (26). These conditions of pregnancy are known to increase risk of cardiovascular disease as well as diabetes later in life (27, 28), and therefore may mediate the association between fertility treatment and risk of adverse cardiometabolic health (29). However, we observed that risk of hospitalization for cardiometabolic conditions was greater among both deliveries to women who utilized fertility treatment and deliveries to women with subfertility.
We observed that deliveries to women who utilized ART and unassisted subfertile women were at greater risk of inpatient or observational hospitalization for cancer compared to fertile women. This risk was greatest after 1 year of follow-up (ART RR:1.66; Unassisted Subfertile RR:1.69) and attenuated over the remaining follow up periods (ART RR 8 years:1.40; Unassisted Subfertile RR 8 years:1.18). Research into the relationship between infertility, fertility treatment, and risk of cancer has been mixed (12, 15, 30–39). Research from Norway registry data observed a 30% higher risk of breast cancer among women treated with ART (11). However, a recent study of national data from the SART CORS found that after 4.9 years of follow-up, women who utilized IVF treatments had a lower risk of breast cancer (Standardized Incidence Rate:0.83 (95% CI:0.75–0.91))(12). A meta-analysis on ovarian cancer observed an elevated risk of ovarian cancer among women who underwent ART compared to the general population controls, but not when compared to other infertile women, suggesting that both treatment and underlying fertility may influence risk (40). Moreover, later age at first pregnancy and number of pregnancies are known to be associated with some types of breast cancer (14, 41, 42) and ovarian cancer (15) and age at first pregnancy and number of pregnancies are associated with infertility and fertility treatment utilization. Additionally, pregnancy contributes to greater acute risk of breast cancer and this elevated risk of breast cancer following pregnancy has been suggested to peak approximately 5 years after delivery (43). Unfortunately, our analyses could not differentiate inpatient or observational hospitalization by cancer type. Women who experience subfertility or who utilize fertility treatment may also be better connected with the medical system compared to the fertile women and therefore may be more likely to be regularly screened and subsequently diagnosed with in-situ cancer. Indeed, we observed that women with subfertility or who utilized fertility treatment for delivery were at a greater risk of diseases of breast compared to fertile women. Diseases of the breast included infections as well as other benign disorders of the breast which may be more likely to be identified through regular screening and connection with the medical system.
Deliveries to women who utilized fertility treatment or with subfertility were more likely to have inpatient or observational hospitalization for conditions of the thyroid and reproductive tract. These conditions included hypothyroidism, thyroiditis, uterine leiomyoma, amenorrhea, and pain associated with the female reproductive tract. There has been limited prior research on these conditions as long-term health outcomes associated with infertility; these associations may be influenced by reverse causation given that the temporality of these conditions in relation to infertility/fertility treatment is not known due to the structure of the study. Therefore, it is possible that less severe phenotypes of these conditions were present prior to conception and led to women experiencing subfertility and/or utilizing fertility treatment. Indeed, women who utilized fertility treatment or who experienced subfertility were at a similar magnitude of risk for conditions of the thyroid and reproductive tract starting after 1 year of follow-up and continuing through 8 years of follow-up, suggesting that risk for these conditions does not increase with longer duration of follow-up. Additionally, diagnosis of these conditions may be influence by connection with medical system and education level which may be higher among women who accessed care and who received a diagnosis of infertility (44).
We observed that women with a history subfertility or who utilized fertility treatments were at a modest risk of inpatient or observational hospitalization for psychiatric conditions and conditions of the respiratory and digestive tracts. In our study, common psychiatric conditions included depressive disorders, anxiety disorders, and episodic mood disorders. Respiratory conditions included asthma, and digestive disorders included appendicitis, disease of the esophagus and gallbladder, diverticulitis, obstructions, and other non-specified digestive disorders. There has been limited prior research on these associations and they could be attributed to a variety of causal and non-causal mechanisms. Women who experience infertility may have other underlying risk-factors and/or health conditions that could influence both their fertility status and their risk of other chronic conditions later in life. All models were adjusted for prevalent maternal hypertension and diabetes, however there may be other unmeasured conditions which influence infertility and disease risk. Additionally, women who have access to fertility treatment or who receive a diagnosis of infertility may have better access to the medical system (44) and therefore may be more likely to receive a diagnosis for other health conditions later in life; thus, these findings may be an artifact of detection bias. Indeed, there have been no clear data supporting strong mechanisms of association for these conditions, therefore future research should focus on these associations and on disentangling possible pathways of associations.
Despite this study’s large sample size, longitudinal follow-up, and breadth of subfertility diagnoses and chronic conditions assessed, there are also important limitations that should be considered. In this analysis, we are not able to infer whether the observed associations were causal. The analysis was unable to determine whether the indication for inpatient or observational hospitalization was from a condition that developed prior to subfertility or following delivery. Therefore, there may be chronic conditions or conditions that are hard to diagnose that influenced fertility status that are prevalent after delivery and are captured in this study design. We lacked information on specific infertility diagnoses in the non-ART groups, such as endometriosis and polycystic ovary syndrome, which have been associated with long-term health outcomes in prior research (45–48), and may be contributing to observed associations. Our analysis focused on the most common conditions associated with inpatient or observational hospitalization and therefore, may not be representative of the entire spectrum of diseases, especially those conditions that do not require hospitalization. Additionally, while we were able to follow some participants for up to eight years (Median follow-up: 50 months), that duration of time may be an insufficient time window for development of some conditions, especially those that develop or that are more prevalent later in life such as cardiovascular disease. Our analyses were restricted to deliveries to women in Massachusetts with private insurance and therefore, we may have excluded women with the most severe infertility phenotypes who were unable to conceive or who lacked access to fertility care. This population does reduce confounding by parity as all women included in our analysis have experienced a delivery. Moreover, Massachusetts has state-mandated fertility treatment coverage by private insurance. Given that information on MAR was defined by birth certificate data, there may be misclassification of this information (49), however we would expect any misclassification of infertility history to be non-differential with respect to our outcomes of interest. Our analyses adjusted for maternal age, parity, year of delivery, plurality, chronic hypertension, and chronic diabetes. We were unable to adjust for BMI which may be a confounder of the association as it is positively associated with both infertility and hospitalization (50, 51). Given the directionality of the confounding, we would expect that residual confounding by BMI would overestimate the association between infertility and hospitalization, however we were able to adjust for cardiometabolic conditions associated with BMI that may also serve as potential confounders (hypertension and diabetes). While our analyses were restricted to women who utilized private insurance for the index delivery, we could not account for other socioeconomic factors which may act as confounders of our association. We would expect that uncontrolled confounding of socioeconomic factors may lead to an underestimate of associations. Women who give birth to twins and higher order multiples have been shown to be at increased risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes (52), possibly leading to an elevated risk of long-term health outcomes, including cardiovascular disease (53). While we adjusted for plurality in multivariable adjusted regression models, multiple births may also mediate (29) or modify (51) the associations of interest. However, in sensitivity analyses we observed no statistically significant effect modification by plurality. Future research with larger samples of multiple gestations should try to disentangle these complex associations.
In summary, Massachusetts women who utilized fertility treatment, including ART, to conceive and women who delivered with a history of subfertility were observed to be at greater risk of any inpatient or observational hospitalization for up to eight years of follow-up compared to fertile women. Specifically, these women were more likely to have inpatient or observational hospitalizations for cardiometabolic conditions (i.e., cardiovascular system, diabetes), cancer and non-malignant conditions of the breast, conditions of the thyroid, digestive tract, respiratory tract, and reproductive tract, and psychiatric conditions. Future research should extend longitudinal follow-up and investigate incident disease diagnoses, possible pathways of association, and informative heterogeneity in chronic condition type and severity.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgements:
SART wishes to thank all of its members for providing clinical information to the SART CORS database for use by patients and researchers. Without the efforts of our members, this research would not have been possible. Funding was obtained from NIH: R01HD67270.
Footnotes
Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
References
- 1.Chandra A, Copen CE, Stephen EH. Infertility service use in the United States: data from the National Survey of Family Growth, 1982–2010. Natl Health Stat Report 2014:1–21. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Thoma ME, McLain AC, Louis JF, King RB, Trumble AC, Sundaram R et al. Prevalence of infertility in the United States as estimated by the current duration approach and a traditional constructed approach. Fertil Steril 2013;99:1324–31 e1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Toner JP, Coddington CC, Doody K, Van Voorhis B, Seifer DB, Ball GD et al. Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology and assisted reproductive technology in the United States: a 2016 update. Fertil Steril 2016;106:541–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Luke B, Stern JE, Kotelchuck M, Declercq ER, Cohen B, Diop H. Birth Outcomes by Infertility Diagnosis Analyses of the Massachusetts Outcomes Study of Assisted Reproductive Technologies (MOSART). J Reprod Med 2015;60:480–90. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Stern JE, Liu CL, Cabral HJ, Richards EG, Coddington CC, Hwang S et al. Birth outcomes of singleton vaginal deliveries to ART-treated, subfertile, and fertile primiparous women. Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics 2018;35:1585–93. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Stern JE, Luke B, Tobias M, Gopal D, Hornstein MD, Diop H. Adverse pregnancy and birth outcomes associated with underlying diagnosis with and without assisted reproductive technology treatment. Fertil Steril 2015;103:1438–45. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Luke B, Stern JE, Hornstein MD, Kotelchuck M, Diop H, Cabral H et al. Is the wrong question being asked in infertility research? Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics 2016;33:3–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Stern JE, Gopal D, Diop H, Missmer SA, Coddington CC, Luke B. Inpatient hospitalizations in women with and without assisted reproductive technology live birth. Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics 2017;34:1043–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Parikh NI, Cnattingius S, Mittleman MA, Ludvigsson JF, Ingelsson E. Subfertility and risk of later life maternal cardiovascular disease. Human reproduction (Oxford, England) 2012;27:568–75. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Mahalingaiah S, Sun F, Cheng JJ, Chow ET, Lunetta KL, Murabito JM. Cardiovascular risk factors among women with self-reported infertility. Fertility research and practice 2017;3:7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Reigstad MM, Larsen IK, Myklebust TA, Robsahm TE, Oldereid NB, Omland AK et al. Risk of breast cancer following fertility treatment--a registry based cohort study of parous women in Norway. Int J Cancer 2015;136:1140–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Luke B, Brown MB, Spector LG, Missmer SA, Leach RE, Williams M et al. Cancer in women after assisted reproductive technology. Fertil Steril 2015;104:1218–26. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Parikh NI, Cnattingius S, Dickman PW, Mittleman MA, Ludvigsson JF, Ingelsson E. Parity and risk of later-life maternal cardiovascular disease. American heart journal 2010;159:215–21.e6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Ewertz M, Duffy SW, Adami HO, Kvale G, Lund E, Meirik O et al. Age at first birth, parity and risk of breast cancer: a meta-analysis of 8 studies from the Nordic countries. Int J Cancer 1990;46:597–603. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Adami HO, Hsieh CC, Lambe M, Trichopoulos D, Leon D, Persson I et al. Parity, age at first childbirth, and risk of ovarian cancer. Lancet 1994;344:1250–4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Kotelchuck M, Hoang L, Stern JE, Diop H, Belanoff C, Declercq E. The MOSART database: linking the SART CORS clinical database to the population-based Massachusetts PELL reproductive public health data system. Maternal and child health journal 2014;18:2167–78. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.CDC. 2017 Assisted Reproductive Technology Fertility Clinic Success Rates Report. In. Atlanta (GA): US Dept of Health and Human Services, 2019. [Google Scholar]
- 18.Stern JE, Liu CL, Cabral HJ, Richards EG, Coddington CC, Missmer SA et al. Factors associated with increased odds of cesarean delivery in ART pregnancies. Fertil Steril 2018;110:429–36. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Farland LV, Grodstein F, Srouji SS, Forman JP, Rich-Edwards J, Chavarro JE et al. Infertility, fertility treatment, and risk of hypertension. Fertil Steril 2015;104:391–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Parikh NI, Jeppson RP, Berger JS, Eaton CB, Kroenke CH, LeBlanc ES et al. Reproductive Risk Factors and Coronary Heart Disease in the Women’s Health Initiative Observational Study. Circulation 2016;133:2149–58. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Solomon CG, Hu FB, Dunaif A, Rich-Edwards J, Willett WC, Hunter DJ et al. Long or highly irregular menstrual cycles as a marker for risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus. JAMA : the journal of the American Medical Association 2001;286:2421–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Solomon CG, Hu FB, Dunaif A, Rich-Edwards JE, Stampfer MJ, Willett WC et al. Menstrual cycle irregularity and risk for future cardiovascular disease. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2002;87:2013–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Anderson SA, Barry JA, Hardiman PJ. Risk of coronary heart disease and risk of stroke in women with polycystic ovary syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Cardiol 2014;176:486–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Mu F, Rich-Edwards J, Rimm EB, Spiegelman D, Forman JP, Missmer SA. Association Between Endometriosis and Hypercholesterolemia or Hypertension. Hypertension 2017;70:59–65. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Mu F, Rich-Edwards J, Rimm EB, Spiegelman D, Missmer SA. Endometriosis and Risk of Coronary Heart Disease. Circulation Cardiovascular quality and outcomes 2016;9:257–64. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Luke B, Gopal D, Cabral H, Stern JE, Diop H. Pregnancy, birth, and infant outcomes by maternal fertility status: the Massachusetts Outcomes Study of Assisted Reproductive Technology. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2017;217:327.e1–.e14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Stuart JJ, Tanz LJ, Missmer SA, Rimm EB, Spiegelman D, James-Todd TM et al. Hypertensive Disorders of Pregnancy and Maternal Cardiovascular Disease Risk Factor Development: An Observational Cohort Study. Annals of internal medicine 2018;169:224–32. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Tobias DK, Stuart JJ, Li S, Chavarro J, Rimm EB, Rich-Edwards J et al. Association of History of Gestational Diabetes With Long-term Cardiovascular Disease Risk in a Large Prospective Cohort of US Women. JAMA internal medicine 2017;177:1735–42. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Farland LV, Correia KFB, Dodge LE, Modest AM, Williams PL, Smith LH et al. The importance of mediation in reproductive health studies. Human reproduction (Oxford, England) 2020;35:1262–6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Hanson B, Johnstone E, Dorais J, Silver B, Peterson CM, Hotaling J. Female infertility, infertility-associated diagnoses, and comorbidities: a review. Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics 2017;34:167–77. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Reigstad MM, Storeng R, Myklebust TA, Oldereid NB, Omland AK, Robsahm TE et al. Cancer Risk in Women Treated with Fertility Drugs According to Parity Status-A Registry-based Cohort Study. Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology 2017;26:953–62. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Reigstad MM, Larsen IK, Myklebust TA, Robsahm TE, Oldereid NB, Omland AK et al. Cancer risk among parous women following assisted reproductive technology. Hum Reprod 2015;30:1952–63. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Venn A, Watson L, Bruinsma F, Giles G, Healy D. Risk of cancer after use of fertility drugs with in-vitro fertilisation. Lancet 1999;354:1586–90. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Kallen B, Finnstrom O, Lindam A, Nilsson E, Nygren KG, Olausson PO. Malignancies among women who gave birth after in vitro fertilization. Hum Reprod 2011;26:253–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Brinton LA, Lamb EJ, Moghissi KS, Scoccia B, Althuis MD, Mabie JE et al. Ovarian cancer risk after the use of ovulation-stimulating drugs. Obstet Gynecol 2004;103:1194–203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Althuis MD, Scoccia B, Lamb EJ, Moghissi KS, Westhoff CL, Mabie JE et al. Melanoma, thyroid, cervical, and colon cancer risk after use of fertility drugs. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005;193:668–74. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Brinton LA, Westhoff CL, Scoccia B, Lamb EJ, Althuis MD, Mabie JE et al. Causes of infertility as predictors of subsequent cancer risk. Epidemiology 2005;16:500–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Fei C, Deroo LA, Sandler DP, Weinberg CR. Fertility drugs and young-onset breast cancer: results from the Two Sister Study. J Natl Cancer Inst 2012;104:1021–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Moseson M, Koenig KL, Shore RE, Pasternack BS. The influence of medical conditions associated with hormones on the risk of breast cancer. Int J Epidemiol 1993;22:1000–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Kashyap S, Moher D, Fung MFK, Rosenwaks Z. Assisted Reproductive Technology and the Incidence of Ovarian Cancer: A Meta-Analysis. Obstetrics & Gynecology 2004;103:785–94. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Lambertini M, Santoro L, Del Mastro L, Nguyen B, Livraghi L, Ugolini D et al. Reproductive behaviors and risk of developing breast cancer according to tumor subtype: A systematic review and meta-analysis of epidemiological studies. Cancer Treatment Reviews 2016;49:65–76. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Fortner RT, Sisti J, Chai B, Collins LC, Rosner B, Hankinson SE et al. Parity, breastfeeding, and breast cancer risk by hormone receptor status and molecular phenotype: results from the Nurses’ Health Studies. Breast Cancer Research 2019;21:40. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Nichols HB, Schoemaker MJ, Cai J, Xu J, Wright LB, Brook MN et al. Breast Cancer Risk After Recent Childbirth: A Pooled Analysis of 15 Prospective Studies. Annals of internal medicine 2019;170:22–30. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Farland LV, Collier AR, Correia KF, Grodstein F, Chavarro JE, Rich-Edwards J et al. Who receives a medical evaluation for infertility in the United States? Fertil Steril 2016;105:1274–80. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Farland LV, Harris HR. Long-Term Health Consequences of Endometriosis—Pathways and Mediation by Treatment. Current Obstetrics and Gynecology Reports 2020;9:79–88. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Kvaskoff M, Mahamat-Saleh Y, Farland LV, Shigesi N, Terry KL, Harris HR et al. Endometriosis and cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod 2020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Farland LV, Degnan WJ, Harris HR, Tobias DK, Missmer SA. A prospective study of endometriosis and risk of type 2 diabetes. Diabetologia 2021;64:552–60. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Lo JC, Feigenbaum SL, Yang J, Pressman AR, Selby JV, Go AS. Epidemiology and adverse cardiovascular risk profile of diagnosed polycystic ovary syndrome. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2006;91:1357–63. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Cohen B, Bernson D, Sappenfield W, Kirby RS, Kissin D, Zhang Y et al. Accuracy of assisted reproductive technology information on birth certificates: Florida and Massachusetts, 2004–06. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 2014;28:181–90. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Goldman RH, Farland LV, Thomas AM, Zera CA, Ginsburg ES. The combined impact of maternal age and body mass index on cumulative live birth following in vitro fertilization. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2019;221:617.e1–e13. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Correia KF, Dodge LE, Farland LV, Hacker MR, Ginsburg E, Whitcomb BW et al. Confounding and effect measure modification in reproductive medicine research. Human reproduction (Oxford, England) 2020;35:1013–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Chauhan SP, Scardo JA, Hayes E, Abuhamad AZ, Berghella V. Twins: prevalence, problems, and preterm births. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2010;203:305–15. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Savitz DA, Danilack VA, Elston B, Lipkind HS. Pregnancy-Induced Hypertension and Diabetes and the Risk of Cardiovascular Disease, Stroke, and Diabetes Hospitalization in the Year Following Delivery. American Journal of Epidemiology 2014;180:41–4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.