Abstract
Antibiotic-resistant strains of Streptococcus pneumoniae are becoming more prevalent throughout the world; this has resulted in modifications of treatment approaches. Management of bacterial meningitis has the greatest consensus. Strategies for treating other systemic infections such as pneumonia, bacteremia, and musculoskeletal infections are evolving, in part related to the availability of new antibiotics which are active in vitro against isolates resistant to penicillin and the extended-spectrum cephalosporins. However, there are currently very limited data related to the clinical efficacy of these new agents. The studies upon which current recommendations are based are reviewed. Otitis media represents the single most common infection due to S. pneumoniae. Recommendations for treatment of acute otitis media due to drug-resistant strains and the rationale for these recommendations are discussed.
Streptococcus pneumoniae is one of the most common organisms causing upper respiratory, lower respiratory, and invasive infections in children and adults. Management of pneumococcal infections used to be relatively straightforward, and penicillin generally was the antibiotic of choice. However, the worldwide emergence of antibiotic resistance among S. pneumoniae isolates has changed this approach (7, 83). The rapid development and spread of penicillin resistance and multiple-antibiotic resistance have occurred as a result of multiple factors, but prior antibiotic use, young age, and day care attendance are the most commonly identified risk features (7, 78). The mechanisms and prevalence of antibiotic resistance for S. pneumoniae have been the subject of numerous reviews (7, 28, 83) and will not be discussed further. The management of infections due to antibiotic-resistant S. pneumoniae is the focus of this article. Since the degree of antibiotic resistance continues to change and increase, the approach to managing these infections must be modified in response to these changes. Furthermore, there is no general agreement among experts how to best treat all pneumococcal infections due to resistant strains, especially those outside the central nervous system.
In vitro susceptibility studies of the activity of antibiotics against resistant S. pneumoniae, animal models, case reports, and series of cases are the primary sources of data upon which treatment strategies are based. However, the interpretation of treatment failures may be complicated. For example, in patients with an underlying illness and thus predisposed to pneumococcal infection, is a poor clinical outcome related to treatment failure when repeat cultures are negative for S. pneumoniae, or is this the natural history of the infection? Unfortunately, no large clinical trials have been able to address this question. In addition, since two or more agents that are active against penicillin- and cephalosporin-resistant S. pneumoniae are often included in the initial empirical antibiotic regimen for a patient, the efficacy of a single agent, especially penicillin alone, cannot be assessed. Keeping all of these factors in mind, we have summarized what is known about the management and outcome of infections due to antibiotic-resistant S. pneumoniae. In this review, the 1997 MIC interpretive standards from the National Committee on Clinical Laboratory Standards are used to categorize pneumococcal isolates as susceptible, intermediate, or resistant to the antibiotics under discussion (102). These breakpoints for the parenteral beta-lactam agents are based primarily on clinical outcome data for pneumococcal meningitis. Higher breakpoints are appropriate for non-central nervous system infections, and revised breakpoints are being proposed based on the site of infection as well as pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic considerations.
BACTERIAL MENINGITIS
Several reports of treatment failures related to pneumococcal isolates with decreased susceptibility to penicillin were published in the 1970s (2, 59, 90, 101, 112). In these cases, pneumococci with penicillin MICs between 0.1 and 1.0 μg/ml were associated with microbiologic and/or clinical treatment failures in patients with bacterial meningitis being administered penicillin. These cases led to the conclusion that penicillin at routine doses did not result in high enough levels in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) of patients with bacterial meningitis (peak, about 1.0 μg/ml) (6, 73) to reliably treat meningitis due to pneumococcal strains “relatively resistant” to penicillin. At that time, ampicillin and chloramphenicol were the standard empirical agents for suspected bacterial meningitis in children. Chloramphenicol was considered an acceptable alternative agent to complete therapy if a penicillin-resistant S. pneumoniae isolate was recovered, which at that time was still an infrequent occurrence.
By the mid 1980s, ceftriaxone or cefotaxime were typically recommended for empirical treatment of children with suspected bacterial meningitis (94). S. pneumoniae isolates were uniformly susceptible to these extended-spectrum cephalosporins. However, by the early 1990s, as penicillin-resistant pneumococcal isolates became more common throughout the world, treatment failures associated with cefotaxime or ceftriaxone administration for pneumococcal meningitis were reported (Table 1). In such cases, the cefotaxime or ceftriaxone MICs for the pneumococcal isolates were generally ≥2.0 μg/ml. These infected children did not improve on therapy, and repeat CSF culture remained positive after one or more days of treatment. Other investigators reported successful treatment with cefotaxime or ceftriaxone when the agents had MICs of 1.0 μg/ml for these isolates, a value now considered intermediate susceptibility (137). (Therapy failed in one adult infected with an S. pneumoniae isolate for which the cefotaxime MIC was 1.0 μg/ml [32].) There also was one case of a 12-month-old child with pneumococcal meningitis whose initial isolate had penicillin and ceftriaxone MICs of 0.12 and 0.06 μg/ml, respectively. After 10 days of treatment with both penicillin and cefotaxime, fever reappeared while the patient was still on therapy; a repeat CSF culture again grew S. pneumoniae, now with penicillin and cefotaxime MICs of >1.0 and 1.0 μg/ml, respectively. Thus, resistance to β-lactam antibiotics increased during treatment of this child (100). It is also possible that a resistant subpopulation was selected by antimicrobial therapy.
TABLE 1.
Failure of broad-spectrum cephalosporins to treat pneumococcal meningitisb
Location | Age | Therapy (mg/kg/day) | MIC (μg/ml) of:
|
Reference | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Penicillin | Cefotaxime | Ceftriaxone | ||||
United States | ||||||
San Diego | 2.5 yr | Ceftriaxone (100)a | 0.5 | 2 | 2 | 24 |
Memphis | 13 mo | Cefotaxime (200)a | 0.25 | 32 | 16 | 133 |
13 mo | Cefuroxime (150) | 4 | 8 | 8 | 133 | |
4 mo | Cefotaxime (200) | 0.5 | 8 | 4 | 133 | |
11 mo | Cefotaxime | 2 | 16 | 8 | 85 | |
Dallas | 9 mo | Ceftriaxone (80) | 2 | 4 | 4 | 55 |
Indianapolis | 28 mo | Ceftriaxone (90)a | 4 | 2 | 2 | 81 |
Ann Arbor | 6 mo | Cefotaxime (200)a | 2 | >2 | >2 | 76 |
Providence | 33 yr | Ceftriaxone (4 g)a | 1.4 | 1.4 | 1.0 | 88 |
Rochester | 53 yr | Cefotaxime (12 g) | 4 | 2 | NDc | 107 |
Spain | 6 yr | Cefotaxime (200) and chloramphenicol | 2 | 2 | ND | 3 |
19 mo | Penicillin (500,000 U) and cefotaxime (150) and chloramphenicol (100) | 1 | 2 | ND | 12 | |
18 mo | Penicillin (500,000 U) and cefotaxime (200 and 300) | 1 | 0.5 | 0.05 | 11 | |
29 yr | Cefotaxime (240) | 1 | 1 | ND | 32 | |
France | 8.5 mo | Cefotaxime (200) and aminoglycoside | 2 | 2 | ND | 69 |
11 mo | Cefotaxime (200)a or amoxicillin (250) and netilmicin | 4 | 2 | ND | 69 |
Dexamethasone adjunctive therapy administered.
Repeat CSF cultures positive for S. pneumoniae on treatment.
ND, not determined.
Friedland and Klugman (52) reported that children with pneumococcal meningitis due to penicillin-nonsusceptible isolates (most intermediate susceptibility) treated with chloramphenicol had serious neurologic deficits more frequently than did children with penicillin-susceptible strains who received benzylpenicillin. The penicillin-nonsusceptible isolates had increased chloramphenicol MBCs compared with the penicillin-susceptible isolates; this was probably associated with decreased bactericidal activity in the CSF. The authors recommended that chloramphenicol no longer be regarded as an alternative agent in treating meningitis due to S. pneumoniae nonsusceptible to penicillin.
Various management strategies for treating pneumococcal meningitis due to antibiotic-resistant strains have been evaluated in a rabbit model. Following inoculation of an S. pneumoniae strain resistant to ceftriaxone (MIC, 2 to 4 μg/ml), high doses of ceftriaxone did not lead to adequate killing and bactericidal activity in CSF (54). However, the combination of vancomycin plus ceftriaxone was synergistic and superior to vancomycin therapy alone. In contrast, meropenem, a new carbapenem approved for treatment of bacterial meningitis in children as well as adults, was not particularly active despite achieving peak concentrations in CSF that were eightfold greater than the MIC. When dexamethasone was administered initially just before antibiotic treatment, lower levels of vancomycin and ceftriaxone were achieved in CSF, which was associated with delayed clearance of bacteria (29, 114). In contrast, dexamethasone did not affect the penetration of rifampin into the CSF. From these studies, it was concluded that ceftriaxone and rifampin should be used together for bacterial meningitis if dexamethasone is administered for the first 2 to 4 days of therapy.
Many patients with pneumococcal meningitis due to strains resistant to the extended-spectrum cephalosporins have been treated successfully with vancomycin alone or in combination with other antibiotics. Nevertheless, the efficacy of vancomycin in treating pneumococcal meningitis has been questioned by some investigators. Viladrich et al. (144) considered that four adults with pneumococcal meningitis treated with standard doses of vancomycin (7.5 mg/kg every 6 h) and with “recrudescence” of symptoms of meningitis had failed to respond to therapy; all the patients had an immediate clinical response after the antibiotic therapy was changed. Two of these patients had positive CSF cultures after 4 or 8 days of vancomycin treatment. The patients also received dexamethasone, 0.25 mg/kg, every 6 h for 4 days. One of the concerns was that dexamethasone may have altered penetration of the vancomycin into the CSF. However, in children, dexamethasone may not interfere with the penetration of vancomycin into CSF (82). In nine children with bacterial meningitis, the mean vancomycin level in CSF was 3.3 ± 1.1 μg/ml (range, 2 to 5.9 μg/ml) 2 to 3 h after a 15-mg/kg dose administered every 6 h for 24 to 48 h. They also were receiving dexamethasone at 0.6 mg/kg/day in four doses for 4 days. Although there was no control group not receiving dexamethasone, the penetration of vancomycin into the CSF was thought to be reliable. Similarly, ceftriaxone levels in CSF were not affected by dexamethasone therapy (57).
Based on these studies, some experts believe that if adjunctive dexamethasone is used, cefotaxime or ceftriaxone plus vancomycin remains suitable for children but rifampin plus ceftriaxone is the preferred regimen in adults, in whom dexamethasone administration may alter the penetration of vancomycin into the CSF (122). However, there are no human studies confirming these recommendations for adults.
Another approach to overcoming resistance is to increase the dose of certain antibiotics to achieve higher concentrations in the sera and subsequently in the CSF. Viladrich et al. (143) treated six patients with pneumococcal meningitis (seven episodes) caused by isolates with decreased susceptibility to cefotaxime (MIC = 1.0 μg/ml in five episodes and 2.0 μg/ml in two episodes). Cefotaxime was administered at a dose of 300 mg/kg/day with a maximum daily dose of 24 g. All patients experienced prompt clinical improvement.
The Committee on Infectious Diseases of the American Academy of Pediatrics has established guidelines for children with serious infections possibly caused by S. pneumoniae (34). For infants and children older than 1 month with suspected bacterial meningitis, the combination of cefotaxime or ceftriaxone and vancomycin should be administered initially. The recommended doses are as follows: cefotaxime, 225 to 300 mg/kg/day in three or four divided doses; ceftriaxone, 100 mg/kg/day in one or two divided doses; vancomycin, 60 mg/kg/day in four divided doses. Modification of therapy is based upon the isolate’s susceptibility to penicillin and cefotaxime or ceftriaxone, and our recommendations are outlined in Table 2.
TABLE 2.
Treatment of pneumococcal meningitis: modifications based on antibiotic susceptibilities
Penicillin MIC (μg/ml) | Cefotaxime/ ceftriaxone MIC (μg/ml) | Therapy | Dosage
|
|
---|---|---|---|---|
Childrena | Adults | |||
<0.1 | ≤0.5 | Penicillin | 300,000–400,000 U every 4 or 6 h | 300,000 Ua every 4 or 6 h up to 24 × 106 U |
≥0.1 | ≤0.5 | Cefotaxime or | 200–225 mg every 6 or 8 h | 2 g every 6 h |
ceftriaxone | 100 mg every 12 or 24 h | 2 g every 12 h | ||
1.0 | Cefotaxime or ceftriaxone plus vancomycin | 300 mg every 6 or 8 h | 300 mga (up to 24 g total) | |
100 mg every 12 or 24 h | 2 g every 12 h | |||
60 mg every 6 h | 60 mga every 6 h (up to 2 g total) | |||
≥2.0 | Same as for 1.0 μg/ml plus rifampin | 20 mg every 12 h | 300 mg every 12 h |
Doses are given as amounts per kilogram per day.
In addition to the clinical data by Viladrich et al. (143), two groups have measured the bactericidal activity of CSF following high-dose (300-mg/kg/day) cefotaxime therapy in children with bacterial meningitis. Friedland and Klugman (53) collected CSF at 2, 4, 6, or 8 h after a 100-mg/kg/dose administered every 8 h for 24 to 48 h. All the children also received dexamethasone (0.3 mg/kg every 12 h) intravenously. The bactericidal activity in CSF was measured against pneumococcal strains that were either susceptible, intermediate, or resistant (MIC = 4 μg/ml) to cefotaxime. Bactericidal activity was defined as greater than 99.9% killing of the inoculum. In 18 CSF specimens, bactericidal activity was detected in 17 (94%), 13 (72%), and 8 (44%) for the cefotaxime-susceptible, -intermediate, and -resistant strains, respectively. Only three of nine specimens obtained 6 to 8 h after infusion had bactericidal activity. Curiously, there was no correlation between the concentrations of cefotaxime or its metabolite, desacetyl-cefotaxime, in CSF and bactericidal activity. The authors concluded that in some patients the higher doses of cefotaxime still may not lead to sufficient bactericidal activity in CSF against pneumococcal strains intermediate to cefotaxime.
Doit et al. (42) conducted a similar study, except that children with bacterial meningitis were treated with cefotaxime (300 mg/kg/day in four divided doses) and vancomycin (60 mg/kg/day in four divided doses) without adjunctive dexamethasone. Bactericidal activity was defined as the highest dilution that killed 99.9% of the initial inoculum. The MIC of cefotaxime for the test pneumococcal strain was 1.0 μg/ml. CSF was obtained 2 h after at least the fifth infusion. The bactericidal titers in CSF were 1:16, 1:8, 1:4, 1:2, and <1:2 for one, four, seven, five, and two patients, respectively. The median concentration of cefotaxime or vancomycin in the CSF was 4.4 and 1.7 μg/ml, respectively. Again, there was no clear correlation between the concentrations of antibiotics in the CSF and the bactericidal titer; in many cases, much greater bactericidal activity was noted than would be predicted from the concentrations measured. This finding is consistent with at least additive activity between cefotaxime and vancomycin in vivo against S. pneumoniae (54).
The outcome of pneumococcal meningitis in children or adults has not been carefully assessed in the era of antibiotic-resistant strains and since the general recommendations for adding vancomycin routinely to extended-spectrum cephalosporins for initial empirical therapy have become routine. Arditi et al. (9) retrospectively evaluated 180 episodes of pneumococcal meningitis in children over a 3-year period in eight children’s hospitals. Of the isolates, 13% were intermediate and 7% were resistant to penicillin; 7% were nonsusceptible to ceftriaxone (2.8% were resistant). There were no bacteriologic treatment failures among the patients with isolates nonsusceptible to ceftriaxone. Fourteen patients died; none of the deaths were associated with documented bacteriological failure. The incidence of neurologic sequelae was no different for the patients with isolates nonsusceptible to ceftriaxone compared with those whose isolates were susceptible. Only five patients with isolates nonsusceptible to ceftriaxone received primary vancomycin therapy (two received meropenem).
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention reported on the therapy and outcome of pneumococcal meningitis in three U.S. cities (Atlanta, Baltimore, and San Antonio) from November 1994 through April 1996 (99). A total of 110 cases were identified; 40% of the isolates were nonsusceptible to penicillin, and 15% were resistant. However, penicillin-nonsusceptible strains were not associated with excess mortality or a longer duration of hospitalization.
Newer Agents for Treating Meningitis due to Antibiotic-Resistant S. pneumoniae
Both cefepime, a broad-spectrum cephalosporin, and meropenem, a carbapenem antibiotic, have been evaluated in clinical trials for the treatment of bacterial meningitis. Cefepime has activity equivalent to cefotaxime or ceftriaxone against penicillin-resistant S. pneumoniae. Sáez-Llorens et al. (124) compared cefepime with cefotaxime in 90 children with bacterial meningitis. The mean concentrations of cefepime in CSF ranged from 3.3 to 5.7 μg/ml 0.5 to 8 h after a dose. Sequelae were equivalent between the two groups. However, no penicillin-resistant pneumococci were identified in the study, and so the effectiveness of cefepime for treating pneumococcal meningitis due to resistant strains could not be assessed and thus remains unknown.
Meropenem is approved for treating bacterial meningitis in infants, children, and adults. The in vitro activity of meropenem for penicillin-resistant S. pneumoniae is 1 to 2 dilutions higher than that of imipenem; the MIC at which 90% of the isolates are inhibited (MIC90) is 0.5 μg/ml for penicillin-resistant strains. The activity against strains resistant to cefotaxime and ceftriaxone has not been well defined (118). Meropenem concentrations in CSF during meningitis range between 0.3 and 6.5 μg/ml after a 40-mg/kg dose, generally above the MIC90 for strains resistant to penicillin, suggesting that meropenem may be effective therapy (38). In vitro, the killing activity of meropenem at 3 μg/ml against 26 S. pneumoniae isolates was equivalent to that of ceftriaxone plus vancomycin at 8.8 μg/ml and 2.0 μg/ml, respectively. These are mean concentrations of the antibiotics in CSF after two doses (48). In one large multicenter trial involving 190 children with bacterial meningitis, 21 pneumococcal isolates were recovered; the cefotaxime MICs for 3 of the isolates were ≥0.5 μg/ml (84). Only one of these patients received meropenem. In ongoing studies of meningitis, a handful of other children with strains nonsusceptible to cefotaxime have received meropenem (25). Although meropenem is an alternative to extended-spectrum cephalosporins, much more experience with the drug is required before it can be recommended as an effective antibiotic for the treatment of antibiotic-resistant pneumococcal meningitis.
Trovafloxacin is one of the fluoroquinolones active in vitro against S. pneumoniae, including strains resistant to cefotaxime and ceftriaxone (17). Two studies of experimental meningitis in rabbits indicated that administration of trovafloxacin results in effective bactericidal activity in the CSF against penicillin- or cephalosporin-resistant pneumococci (80, 113). In children without meningeal inflammation, 22 to 30% of a concomitant level in serum is achieved in the CSF of children after treatment with alatrovafloxacin, the intravenous form of trovafloxacin (8). These levels are in excess of the concentrations of trovafloxacin needed to inhibit S. pneumoniae in vitro. Clinical studies may prove that trovafloxacin is an appropriate alternative agent for pneumococcal meningitis.
Dexamethasone
The use of adjunctive dexamethasone in addition to antibiotics for the treatment of pneumococcal meningitis remains somewhat controversial (127). The number of patients with pneumococcal meningitis enrolled in randomized trials of dexamethasone versus placebo was relatively small, and the timing of dexamethasone administration was not standardized in these studies. In two studies conducted in Turkey and Egypt, dexamethasone was associated with decreased hearing loss (66, 77). For the largest number of children with pneumococcal meningitis (n = 33) enrolled in a single study in the United States, bilateral hearing loss (3 of 11 children) was no different in the dexamethasone-treated children than in those receiving placebo (2 of 20) (147). However, this study has been criticized because dexamethasone was not given routinely just before or concomitant with the first dose of parenteral antibiotics. Nevertheless, in this study, dexamethasone was associated with a significant reduction in hearing loss for children with meningitis due to Haemophilus influenzae type b. In addition, inflammatory parameters were diminished to an equivalent degree in experimental pneumococcal meningitis when dexamethasone was administered 30 min before or 60 min after ampicillin treatment (89). In a retrospective analysis of children with pneumococcal meningitis, Arditi et al. (9) found no benefit with respect to hearing loss for children receiving dexamethasone either before or up to 1 h after the first dose of parenteral antibiotics compared with children never receiving any dexamethasone. A recent meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials of dexamethasone as adjunctive therapy in bacterial meningitis has concluded that “if commenced with or before parenteral antibiotics, (available evidence) suggests benefit for pneumococcal meningitis in childhood” (95).
The Committee on Infectious Diseases of the American Academy of Pediatrics recommends that dexamethasone should be considered for the treatment of infants and children with pneumococcal meningitis (5). There are also uncertainties about the value of dexamethasone use in adults, and even fewer studies have been performed with adults than with children. Some experts recommend dexamethasone for adults with meningitis with a positive Gram stain of CSF (suggestive of a high concentration of bacteria in the CSF) and evidence of increased intracranial pressure (122).
Repeat Lumbar Puncture
For any patient who is not improving as expected or who has a pneumococcal isolate for which the cefotaxime or ceftriaxone MIC is ≥2.0 μg/ml, a repeat lumbar puncture 36 to 48 h after initiation of therapy is recommended to document sterility of the CSF. This is particularly crucial for patients who are receiving adjunctive dexamethasone therapy, since they may appear to be responding to antibiotic therapy with a decrease in fever despite the CSF remaining culture positive (44).
BACTEREMIA
The management of pneumococcal bacteremia due to antibiotic-resistant isolates is not as well formulated as it is for meningitis. Although pneumococcal bacteremia without a source is a relatively common invasive bacterial infection in children, only a few studies focusing on treatment outcome of infections due to isolates intermediate or resistant to penicillin or to cefotaxime and ceftriaxone have been performed. Table 3 compiles those cases from various reports that provide enough detail regarding treatment and outcome. For the majority of reported patients, resistance to penicillin is of the intermediate variety and the outcome of therapy certainly does not predict outcomes for patients whose isolates have greater resistance. Rarely have treatment failures been reported or documented for penicillin-nonsusceptible pneumococcal isolates. Breakthrough pneumococcal bacteremia and meningitis were documented in a normal 18-month-old child after receiving cefotaxime (180 mg/kg/day) for 2 days and subsequently receiving cefuroxime (200 mg/kg/day) for 4 days (27). The MICs of cefotaxime and cefuroxime for the isolated pneumococcus were 2.0 and 8.0 μg/ml, respectively.
TABLE 3.
Pneumococcal bacteremia due to antibiotic-resistant isolates: therapy and outcome
Reference | Date of study | Age of patient | Underlying disorder | MIC (μg/ml) of:
|
Therapyb | Outcome | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Penicillin | Ceftriaxone | ||||||
Jackson et al. (75) | 1984 | 12 mo | Otitis media | 0.13–0.5 | Penicillin G | Developed meningitis | |
10 mo | Otitis media | 0.13–0.5 | Erythromycin-sulfisoxazole | Good | |||
Schwartz et al. (129) | 1991 | 9 mo | Otitis media | 1.25 | Ceftriaxone (2 doses), amox/clavc | Improved | |
22 mo | Otitis media | 0.125 | Cefotaxime | Improved | |||
Tan et al. (136) | 1992 | 6 mo | Periorbital cellulitis | 0.13 | Cefuroxime (3) | Goodd | |
11 mo | Periorbital cellulitis | 0.13 | Cefuroxime (3), penicillin VK (7) | Goodd | |||
11 mo | None | 0.25 | Amox/clav (10) | Good | |||
6 mo | None | 0.25 | Ceftriaxone (1 dose), amox/clav (10) | Goodd | |||
6 mo | Buccal cellulitis | 0.13 | Ceftriaxone (1 dose), amox/clav (10) | Goodd | |||
85 mo | HIV infection, premature | 0.13 | Cefuroxime (7) then oral cefuroxime (14) | Goodd | |||
18 mo | Otitis media | 0.25 | Penicillin G (3), amox/clav (10) | Goodd | |||
14 mo | None | 0.25 | Amox/clav (10) | Good | |||
18 mo | None | 0.13 | Ceftriaxone (1 dose), amoxicillin (10) | Goodd | |||
Leggiadro et al. (85) | 1994 | 14 mo | NSa | 8 | 4 | Vancomycin | Curative |
14 mo | Cellulitis | 4 | 1 | Cefotaxime | Curative | ||
13 mo | Otitis media, sinusitis | 4 | 4 | Cefotaxime, oral erythromycin | Curative | ||
Pikis et al. (117) | 1995 | 16 mo | NS | 0.13 | Ceftriaxone (1 dose) | Goodd | |
15 mo | Otitis media | 0.19 | Amoxicillin (10) | Goodd | |||
14 mo | NS | 0.5 | Ceftriaxone (2 doses) | Goodd | |||
5 mo | Otitis media | 2.0 | Cefuroxime (7) | Good | |||
Chesney et al. (33) | 1995 | 16 mo | Sickle cell anemia | 2.0 | 1 | Ceftriaxone, vancomycin | Died 36 h later; blood culture negative at 8 h |
30 mo | Sickle cell anemia | 0.12 | NS | Good | |||
15 yr | Sickle cell anemia, renal transplant | 0.12 | 0.25 | NS | Good |
NS, not stated.
Days of treatment given in parentheses.
Amox/clav, amoxicillin-clavulanate.
Repeat blood culture negative.
In other studies, the outcome of bacteremia has been noted but details of therapy have not been provided. Oppenheim et al. (106) reported 16 children with penicillin-nonsusceptible pneumococcal bacteremia in 1983 from South Africa. The mortality in 35 children with bacteremia due to penicillin-susceptible S. pneumoniae was 28%, in contrast to 40% in the children infected with strains intermediate or resistant to penicillin; three of six patients with strains not susceptible to penicillin died when they received only penicillin or ampicillin. Welby et al. (148) reported seven children with pneumococcal bacteremia due to strains nonsusceptible to penicillin and at least one isolate for which the cefotaxime MIC was up to 1.0 μg/ml. All were treated with intravenous cefotaxime or ceftriaxone for at least 3 days and responded well. Friedland (51) also described five children with pneumococcal bacteremia due to penicillin-intermediate isolates, all of whom had predisposing conditions and were initially treated with ampicillin. Two children died (one preterm infant died shortly after admission, and the second child had biliary atresia). In contrast, only 1 of 16 children (9 with predisposing conditions) with bacteremia due to penicillin-susceptible pneumococci died. None of these three studies mention the results of repeat blood cultures after antibiotics had been initiated.
One large study has examined the implications of penicillin resistance for pneumococcal bacteremia in adults (120). Of the patients in 10 adult care hospitals between January 1991 and April 1994, 590 had pneumococcal bacteremia. How many patients also may have had pneumonia was not stated. The mortality rate was similar for patients with infections due to penicillin-susceptible (19%) and penicillin-nonsusceptible (21%) isolates. However, among survivors, the duration of hospitalization was longer for the patients with nonsusceptible isolates (15.8 days; range, 1 to 46 days) than for those with susceptible isolates (12.1 days; range, 1 to 57 days) (P = 0.05). In another study of 184 adults with pneumococcal bacteremia, the risk of mortality also was not increased when an isolate was nonsusceptible to penicillin (79). In a study of invasive pneumococcal disease in patients with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection, antibiotic susceptibility did not influence the outcome (49).
In eight children’s hospitals over 36 months, more than 700 episodes of bacteremia without focus occurred in children (78). Management of patients was quite heterogeneous, but a single dose of ceftriaxone followed by an oral antibiotic was administered frequently as outpatient treatment. No patient was treated with penicillin only. Morbidity and mortality were not related to antibiotic susceptibility, and no microbiological treatment failures were encountered. Several children with an underlying illness had pneumococcal bacteremia due to penicillin-resistant isolates. These patients also were treated with a variety of regimens, none containing penicillin. Unfortunately, it is not possible to assess single-agent treatment in this group of patients who have predisposing conditions from this study. In a preliminary study, Silverstein et al. (131) at Children’s Hospital in Boston reviewed the clinical presentation and outcome of children with pneumococcal bacteremia with respect to antimicrobial therapy. More than 700 children were included; 52 (7.2%) isolates were nonsusceptible to penicillin and 20 (2.8%) were nonsusceptible to ceftriaxone. Children with pneumococcal bacteremia due to isolates nonsusceptible to ceftriaxone were less likely than children with isolates susceptible to ceftriaxone to be described as improved by their families at follow-up (54.5 and 83.6%, respectively; P = 0.03) and experienced longer hospital stays (8.0 and 3.1 days, respectively; P < 0.001). Susceptibility to penicillin did not affect these parameters. Treatment failures were not addressed.
The magnitude of the peak level in serum and the duration of concentration higher than the MIC in serum that are required for an antibiotic to successfully treat pneumococcal bacteremia are not clear. Penicillin, cefuroxime, and cefotaxime or ceftriaxone achieve levels in the serum considerably greater than 2.0 μg/ml for several hours following standard doses; this level is considered resistant for these agents. Thus, even in the face of resistance, these antibiotics administered intravenously would be expected to result in clearance of pneumococcal bacteremia in a normal host. Whether this is also true for immunocompromised patients will have to be further documented as more clinical data are gathered. As clinical experience is gained with treating pneumococcal bacteremia due to antibiotic-resistant isolates, more solid recommendations can be made.
PNEUMONIA
As with bacteremia, it is difficult to determine the effect of antibiotic resistance on the outcome of pneumococcal pneumonia. Mortality can be compared, but this is an insensitive measure. Duration of hospitalization, oxygen administration, fever, and development of complications are other measures that can be compared. Eradication of bacteria from the bloodstream or pleural space is an objective microbiologic measure. However, for all of these factors, a number of confounding variables may influence the outcome measures. These include age, underlying disease, and duration and extent of illness at the start of treatment.
In early studies, investigators found that decreased penicillin susceptibility was associated with poorer responses to therapy. Jackson et al. (75) described two pediatric patients (6 weeks and 26 months old) who did not respond as expected to a beta-lactam antibiotic. Both had isolates (one from blood, one from the trachea) with intermediate susceptibility to penicillin, and they did not have a satisfactory response until erythromycin or vancomycin therapy was initiated. Feldman et al. (46) described three adults with community-acquired pneumococcal pneumonia due to strains intermediate (MIC = 0.5 μg/ml) or resistant (MIC = 2 or 4 μg/ml) to penicillin. All were initially treated with penicillin G (2 × 106 units every 4 to 6 h) and tobramycin. All the patients deteriorated, and two died, one within 24 h (24-year-old patients with systemic lupus erythematosus) and one within 72 h (36-year-old patient who was previously healthy). The third patient was a previously healthy 52-year-old individual, whose condition initially improved but who then died after 18 days despite treatment with vancomycin (500 mg every 6 h) and rifampin starting on the second hospital day. Repeat blood culture results were not mentioned.
Pallares et al. (108) reviewed the experience with bacteremic pneumococcal pneumonia in adult patients in Barcelona, Spain, from January 1981 to September 1986. Twenty-four patients had penicillin-nonsusceptible isolates (14 intermediate and 10 resistant, with penicillin MICs up to 8 μg/ml). Two control patients with bacteremic pneumonia due to penicillin-susceptible strains were matched to each pneumonia patient according to the nearest date of positive blood cultures. Thirteen patients (54%) and 12 controls (25%) died, most by the first 72 h of therapy (P = 0.03). The duration of fever in the survivors was equivalent. Of the 19 patients whose isolates had a penicillin MIC between 0.12 and 2.0 μg/ml, 11 recovered; all 9 not initially critically ill survived. Of 10 patients who received penicillin G and who had isolates for which the penicillin MICs were between 0.12 and 2.0 μg/ml, 6 survived. In addition, two patients with isolates for which the penicillin MICs were 4.0 or 8.0 μg/ml did not respond to penicillin therapy. The authors concluded that pneumonia due to pneumococcal strains for which the penicillin MICs were ≤2.0 μg/ml may be treated successfully with intravenous high-dose penicillin.
The same investigators reported an expanded experience with antibiotic-resistant pneumococcal pneumonia for the years 1984 through 1993 (109). Of the 504 adults with severe pneumococcal pneumonia (about 80% were bacteremic), 145 (29%) had penicillin-nonsusceptible strains and 31 (6%) had strains nonsusceptible to the extended-spectrum cephalosporins. Overall, the mortality rate for patients with penicillin-nonsusceptible strains was 38%, with respect to 24% for those with penicillin-susceptible strains (P = 0.001). However, when predictors of mortality (age 70 years or older, serious underlying disease, heart failure, shock, multilobar pneumonia, leukopenia, nosocomial pneumonia and polymicrobial pneumonia) were taken into account, there was no significant difference in mortality between the groups. Similar results were found in 392 patients with monomicrobial bacteremic pneumococcal pneumonia. Among the patients treated with cefotaxime or ceftriaxone, mortality rates were similar for those infected with cephalosporin-susceptible (24%, n = 168) and those with cephalosporin-nonsusceptible (22%, n = 18) strains. No mention was made of repeat blood culture results. The authors again concluded that high-dose intravenous penicillin G (150,000 to 200,000 U/kg/day) “may be” effective for patients with pneumococcal pneumonia caused by strains nonsusceptible to penicillin (for which the penicillin MIC was <2.0 μg/ml). In addition, they proposed that ceftriaxone or cefotaxime may be a good alternative for strains for which the penicillin MICs exceeded 2.0 μg/ml but for which the cefotaxime or ceftriaxone MICs were <2.0 μg/ml.
A small number of children with pneumococcal pneumonia due to strains nonsusceptible to penicillin have been reported by several different investigators (117, 136, 148). In most cases, cefuroxime or an extended-spectrum cephalosporin was administered and was initially successful. When stated, repeat-blood cultures were negative and therapy was completed with an oral antibiotic. Most isolates showed intermediate susceptibility to penicillin.
Friedland (51) compared 25 children (16 with underlying diseases) having pneumonia due to S. pneumoniae with intermediate susceptibility to penicillin with 53 children (19 with underlying diseases) having pneumococcal pneumonia due to susceptible isolates. There were no significant differences between the groups in the duration of fever, respiratory distress, oxygen requirements, rates of improvement, or mortality (overall case fatality rate, 12%). A number of treatment regimens were used for the children with nonsusceptible strains. Four children were successfully treated only with amoxicillin orally. Fifteen children were treated initially with intravenous ampicillin (n = 10), penicillin (n = 2), or cefuroxime (n = 3). Twelve responded satisfactorily, and by day 2 or 4 of therapy they were switched to oral amoxicillin. Two patients died; both had HIV infection. Eight other children received an extended-spectrum cephalosporin with or without vancomycin; two of these children died. The author concluded that for non-central nervous system infections, pneumococcal isolates with intermediate susceptibility to penicillin have little clinical significance in pediatric patients.
In another report from Spain, Garcia-Leoni et al. (58) reviewed 139 patients of all ages with pneumococcal infection from January 1988 through October 1989. Pneumonia occurred in 89 patients; 53 (60%) were bacteremic, and 30 (11 had serious underlying illnesses) episodes were due to strains not susceptible to penicillin. Overall, there was no increase in mortality in patients infected with nonsusceptible strains. Fifteen patients with pneumococcal pneumonia died; four had strains with intermediate susceptibility, and one had a resistant isolate (penicillin MIC = 2.0 μg/ml). Four patients with nonsusceptible isolates received an extended-spectrum cephalosporin, and one received cloxacillin. For adults in Spain with cancer and neutropenia, the mortality related to pneumococcal pneumonia and bacteremia was not influenced by antibiotic susceptibility (31). Almost all of these patients were treated with ceftazidime or imipenem plus amikacin.
Sixteen episodes of pneumococcal pneumonia in HIV-infected inpatients were reported by Baril et al. (14) in France; 10 isolates were intermediate and 2 were resistant to penicillin. For the patients with strains with intermediate susceptibility to penicillin, five were treated with amoxicillin, one was treated with amoxicillin plus a fluoroquinolone, and four were treated with cefotaxime. Two treatment failures occurred; one in a patient given amoxicillin and the other in a patient given cefotaxime (100 mg/kg/day). Both patients with strains resistant to penicillin were treated successfully with cefotaxime or with vancomycin and amikacin.
Children with complicated parapneumonic effusions were compared for demographic and clinical features by Hardie et al. (70). Six children with infection due to S. pneumoniae not susceptible to penicillin were compared with 17 children whose isolates were susceptible to penicillin. The patients with nonsusceptible isolates were significantly younger (2.1 ± 0.6 and 7.9 ± 1.1 years, respectively; P < 0.01) and were more likely to have positive blood cultures (100 and 29%, respectively; P < 0.05). Five children in the nonsusceptible group underwent thoracoscopy or urokinase treatment, with respect to five in the susceptible group, but other features of the hospital course and outcome were no different between the groups.
Tan et al. (138) retrospectively evaluated more than 170 episodes of pneumococcal pneumonia in children seen at eight children’s hospitals in the United States. A total of 75% of the children were hospitalized. Twenty-two patients (including 15 inpatients) had strains nonsusceptible to penicillin. The outcome was the same for those with strains nonsusceptible to penicillin as for those with penicillin-susceptible isolates. No conclusions could be drawn about specific therapy, since the antibiotic regimens used were so variable.
Trovafloxacin has excellent in vitro activity against S. pneumoniae isolates not susceptible to penicillin or extended-spectrum cephalosporins. In six separate clinical trials in adults with community-acquired pneumonia, 26 patients treated with oral or oral plus intravenous trovafloxacin had blood or sputum pneumococcal isolates nonsusceptible to penicillin; the clinical efficacy of this treatment for these patients was 96% (91). Thus, trovafloxacin also appears to be effective in treating community-acquired pneumonia due to S. pneumoniae isolates nonsusceptible to penicillin.
Levofloxacin, the active isomer of ofloxacin, has excellent in vitro activity against penicillin-nonsusceptible S. pneumoniae and is approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for treatment of community-acquired pneumonia. In one study, levofloxacin was successful in eradicating S. pneumoniae with intermediate susceptibility to penicillin in six patients with pneumonia (47). Grepafloxacin has in vitro activity against antibiotic-resistant S. pneumoniae, but there are insufficient clinical data upon which to base any recommendations for its use for pneumonia due to penicillin-nonsusceptible S. pneumoniae (142).
Implications
Based on the above clinical studies in normal hosts, it appears that penicillin, ampicillin, or cefuroxime should be adequate to treat patients hospitalized with pneumonia due to pneumococcal isolates for which the penicillin MICs are ≤2.0 μg/ml. Oral therapy with amoxicillin, amoxicillin-clavulanate, or cefuroxime axetil also should be efficacious for initial outpatient management or when completing therapy once the patient has resolution of signs and symptoms following parenteral treatment. Although there are no specific studies, azithromycin should be efficacious for treating pneumonia due to susceptible isolates. For isolates for which the penicillin MICs are ≥4.0 μg/ml, alternate agents, including cefuroxime, cefotaxime, ceftriaxone, and clindamycin, if the isolates are susceptible, are suggested. For adults, trovafloxacin and possibly levofloxacin appear to be a reasonable choice in the inpatient or outpatient setting as well.
The Infectious Diseases Society of America has developed guidelines for the management of community-acquired pneumonia in adults (20). The panel endorsed the use of parenteral penicillin G or oral amoxicillin as preferred agents for pneumococcal isolates susceptible to penicillin. Alternative agents such as vancomycin or fluoroquinolones or other agents active in vitro were preferred for strains resistant to penicillin (MIC ≥ 2.0 μg/ml). For strains with intermediate susceptibility to penicillin, parenteral penicillin or amoxicillin or the alternative agents were preferred.
The MICs of extended-spectrum cephalosporins above which treatment failure would be expected is not clear. Concentrations of cefotaxime and ceftriaxone in pleural fluid have been determined following doses of 1 g every 12 h and 1 g once daily, respectively, in adults with chest tubes placed for drainage of empyemas (126). The concentrations of cefotaxime or ceftriaxone reached approximately 10 μg/ml and exceeded 5.0 μg/ml for more than 5 h after the initial doses. One could expect to adequately treat pneumococcal pneumonia with cefotaxime or ceftriaxime when the extended-spectrum cephalosporins have an MIC of up to 4.0 μg/ml for the isolate, on the basis of this type of information. When the MICs are higher, alternate agents such as vancomycin, clindamycin, or a carbapenem may be needed. Additional studies are required before more specific recommendations can be made.
For critically ill patients or patients with an immunocompromising condition, consideration should be given to including vancomycin in the initial treatment regimen when S. pneumoniae is among the organisms requiring empirical coverage. Trovafloxacin is an alternative choice in adults. Modifications of therapy are then made based on antimicrobial susceptibility data as outlined above.
Animal models of pneumococcal pneumonia have been used to evaluate the efficacy of penicillin, extended-spectrum cephalosporins, carbapenems, vancomycin, and selected fluoroquinolones in the treatment of infection due to penicillin-resistant strains. Different conditions such as induction of leukopenia, use of a bacterial inoculum in agar, or infection of different species of rodents were used in these studies (13, 60, 97, 121, 125, 139). In general, higher doses of penicillin are superior to lower doses in clearing bacteria from the lungs and in decreasing the mortality. Cefotaxime and ceftriaxone typically are effective for strains susceptible or intermediate to these agents, although ceftriaxone appeared superior to cefotaxime in treating isolates resistant to extended-spectrum cephalosporin (MICs of 4 or 8 μg/ml) (125). Vancomycin and imipenem were the most active agents in one study. Sparfloxacin was more effective than ciprofloxacin or amoxicillin in decreasing mortality in a leukopenic-mouse model. These results also demonstrated that the time for which the antibiotic concentration in serum was above the MIC for the infecting strain of pneumococcus correlated with the outcome. These models help to confirm that the present approach to treatment of pneumococcal pneumonia due to antibiotic-resistant strains is reasonable and allow comparisons among new antibiotics for isolates with greater resistance to the traditional agents such as cefuroxime or the extended-spectrum cephalosporins.
MISCELLANEOUS INFECTIONS
Except for bacteremia and pneumonia, a limited number of other systemic non-central nervous system infections due to antibiotic-resistant S. pneumoniae have been reported, and most of these have occurred in children (Table 4). Infective endocarditis, aortitis, and endophthalmitis are other infections documented in single-case reports. Since a variety of antimicrobial regimens were used in these patients, it is very difficult to draw any conclusions regarding single-agent therapy. However, most of the antibiotics administered to these patients were shown to achieve concentrations in synovial fluid, peritoneal fluid, or bone in excess of their MICs for penicillin-resistant isolates (21, 26, 72, 98, 104, 123). In synovial fluid, ceftriaxone reaches a level of up to 66 to 100% of the concomitant levels in serum. Cefotaxime and ceftriaxone penetrate into peritoneal fluid at levels between 2 to 59 μg/ml, depending when the specimens are obtained after administration of a dose (50). The average vancomycin concentration in synovial fluid was 5.7 μg/ml (80% of the concomitant level in serum) in one study. In ascitic fluid, the average vancomycin level was 8.7 μg/ml (40% of the concomitant level in serum) (96) after multiple doses. Clindamycin reached levels of 2 to 3 μg/ml in either ascitic or synovial fluid, levels severalfold higher than the MICs for susceptible pneumococci (40). Thus, with standard doses of the extended-spectrum cephalosporins or clindamycin, successful treatment of peritonitis or septic arthritis due to penicillin-resistant S. pneumoniae would be anticipated. Vancomycin may be required for infections due to isolates with high-level resistance to these antibiotics. Some authors recommend adopting empirical therapy for pneumococcal endocarditis that parallels the therapy suggested for pneumococcal meningitis (extended-spectrum cephalosporin plus vancomycin) (10).
TABLE 4.
Miscellaneous infections reported due to S. pneumoniae nonsusceptible to penicillin
Reference | Age of patient | Underlying illness | Infection syndrome | Penicillin MIC (μg/ml) | Therapyb | Outcome |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jackson et al. (75) | 8 mo | NSa | Septic arthritis | Intermediate | Cefamandole and aminocillin; completed with oral chloramphenicol | Good |
Tan et al. (136) | 43 mo | Nephrotic syndrome | Peritonitis | 0.125 | Ampicillin i.v.c for 7 days | Good, afebrile within 24 h |
19 mo | Varicella | Septic arthritis | 1.0 | Nafcillin (4), penicillin (7) | Good | |
Cefotaxime (9), amoxicillin-clavulanate (10) | Afebrile after 8 days | |||||
Leggiadro et al. (85) | 24 mo | NS | Orbital cellulitis and sinusitis | 8.0 | Vancomycin and cefotaxime; oral clindamycin and rifampin | Curative |
Pikis et al. (117) | 10 mo | NS | Septic arthritis | 4.0 | Oxacillin (3), cefotaxime (3), vancomycin (21) | Good |
3 mo | NS | Osteomyelitis | 0.5 | Oxacillin (3), cefotaxime (3), cefuroxime (8), cephalexin (21) | Good | |
Gelfand and Cleveland (64) | 71 yr | None | Vertebral osteomyelitis | 0.25 | Ceftriaxone (28) | Good |
Daum et al. (39) | 4 yr | Choroid plexus carcinoma, bone marrow transplant | Epiglottitis | 2.0 | Vancomycin, ceftazidime | Good |
Abbasi et al. (1) | 20 mo | None | Septic arthritis and osteomyelitis | 0.38 | Nafcillin (4), vancomycin (2) | Good, afebrile after 24 h |
Cefotaxime (2), penicillin G (10) | ||||||
14 mo | None | Septic arthritis | 1.5 | Nafcillin (7), ceftriaxone (31) | Good, afebrile after 72 h | |
Vancomycin (28) | ||||||
24 mo | None | Septic arthritis | 8.0 | Cefotaxime (6), nafcillin (3), vancomycin (19), rifampin (19), clindamycin (6) | Febrile for 21 days |
NS, not stated.
Days of treatment given in parentheses.
i.v., intravenous.
UPPER RESPIRATORY INFECTIONS
Of all the infections caused by S. pneumoniae, the most common are upper respiratory infections, especially otitis media and sinusitis. Since virtually all studies dealing with antibiotic-resistant S. pneumoniae have focused on acute otitis media, this section deals primarily with what has been described for middle ear infections. Presumably these data are also relevant for sinusitis.
Craig and Andes (35) have proposed that 80 to 85% efficacy in treating acute otitis media is achieved by commonly prescribed oral antibiotics when the concentrations of the drug in the middle ear exceed the MIC for the infecting bacteria for 40 to 50% of the dosing interval. By using these criteria, it is possible to predict which antibiotics are likely to be efficacious or poorly effective in the treatment of acute otitis media due to S. pneumoniae with decreased susceptibility to penicillin and other antibiotics. A comparison of recent MICs of common oral antibiotics (for more than 4,400 pneumococcal isolates from 92 laboratories across the United States in 1996 to 1997) and reported “peak” levels of antibiotic achieved in middle ear fluid is shown in Table 5 (93). Overall, 64% of the isolates were susceptible, 23% were intermediate, and 13% were resistant to penicillin. Since the levels in the middle ear are often achieved in patients with chronic otitis media undergoing pressure equalization tube placement, they may not reflect the levels achieved in patients with acute otitis media. Nevertheless, it is apparent that certain antibiotics would be expected to be more efficacious than others when treating pneumococcal otitis media due to resistant strains.
TABLE 5.
Comparison of in vitro activity of oral antibiotics for S. pneumoniae isolates based on penicillin susceptibility and concentrations achieved in the middle ear
Antibiotic (reference) | Penicillin susceptible (μg/ml)
|
Penicillin intermediate (μg/ml)
|
Penicillin resistant (μg/ml)
|
Dose | Concn in middle ear (μg/ml) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MIC50 | MIC90 | MIC50 | MIC90 | MIC50 | MIC90 | |||
Amoxicillin (130) | 0.13 | 0.13 | 0.25 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 4.0 | 15 mg/kg | 5.6 |
1 g | 6.2 | |||||||
45 mg/kg | 2–8 | |||||||
Cefaclor (103) | 1.0 | 2.0 | 8.0 | 64 | 64 | 64 | 15–20 mg/kg | 0.5–5.1 |
Cefixime (71) | 0.25 | 0.5 | 4.0 | 16 | 32 | 64 | 8 mg/kg | 1.3–1.5 |
Cefpodoxime (43) | 0.13 | 0.13 | 0.5 | 2.0 | 4 | 8 | 4 mg/kg | 0.9 |
Cefprozil (103) | 0.25 | 0.25 | 1.0 | 8.0 | 16 | 32 | 15 mg/kg | 2.0 |
Cefuroxime (144) | 0.13 | 0.13 | 0.5 | 4.0 | 4.0 | 8.0 | 15 mg/kg | 1.4 |
Loracarbef (103) | 1.0 | 2.0 | 8.0 | 64 | 64 | 64 | 15 mg/kg | 3.9 |
Azithromycin (103) | 0.13 | 0.13 | 0.13 | 8.0 | 1 | 64 | 10 mg/kg | 8.6 |
10 mg/kg then 5 mg/kg | 9.4 | |||||||
Erythromycin (103, 140) | 0.12 | 0.12 | 0.12 | 16 | 0.12 | >16 | 15 mg/kg | 4.5 |
Clarithromycin (103) | 0.13 | 0.13 | 0.13 | 2.0 | 0.5 | 64 | 7.5 mg/kg | 2.5 |
Ceftriaxone (68, 78) | 0.06 | 1.0 | 2.0 | 50 mg/kg | 35 | |||
Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (103, 140) | 0.25 | >4.0 | >4.0 | >4.0 | 4.0 | 4.0 | 4 mg/kg | 1.4–2.0 |
Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole does not penetrate into middle ear effusions adequately to predict efficacy for penicillin-intermediate isolates, since there is such considerable cross-resistance for this combination and penicillin. For clindamycin, the mean level in the middle ear mucosa is 3.6 μg/g. Whether this level correlates with those in middle ear effusion is not clear. Clindamycin remains quite active for most pneumococcal isolates resistant to penicillin and would be considered an alternative agent for treating otitis media caused by such strains (103). In most areas, pneumococcal isolates resistant to macrolides generally remain susceptible to clindamycin.
Several studies have now reported the outcome of treating acute or persistent otitis media due to pneumococci that are nonsusceptible to penicillin (Table 6). As is generally the case, otoscopic evaluation of the tympanic membrane and clinical condition define the outcome measures. Thus, the results are somewhat subjective, especially in nonrandomized, investigator-unblinded studies. All the studies included an initial tympanocentesis for culture of middle ear fluid. Cefuroxime, cefprozil, and amoxicillin-clavulanate were found to be efficacious in most of the children evaluated in these studies; cefaclor and cefixime have not been as effective as some of these other agents. Although only a small number of children were treated in one study, cefpodoxime did not appear to be particularly effective despite having reasonable in vitro activity against S. pneumoniae isolates that are nonsusceptible to penicillin (43). This lack of effectiveness might possibly be related to the relatively low concentrations achieved in the middle ear. In a second study of cefpodoxime for otitis media, the outcome in all four children with penicillin-nonsusceptible strains (mainly intermediate) was satisfactory (61).
TABLE 6.
Outcome of treatment for otitis media due to S. pneumoniae: effect of penicillin susceptibility
Location (reference) | Antibiotics | Dose mg/kg/day | No. of patients with successful clinical outcome/total no. infected
|
||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Penicillin susceptible | Penicillin intermediate | Penicillin resistant | |||
France (63) | Cefuroxime axetil | 30 | 39/42 | 9/10 | 24/32 |
Kentucky (23) | Ceftriaxone | 3/5 | 5/6 | ||
Amoxicillin-clavulanate | 8/10 | 2/2 | |||
Clindamycin | 2/3 | 2/4 | |||
Cefixime | 1/5 | 0/3 | |||
Cefpodoxime | 1/3 | 2/5 | |||
Cefaclor | 1/2 | 1/4 | |||
United States (multicenter) (74) | Amoxicillin-clavulanate | 40 and 10 | 56/63 | 7/8 | 7/9 |
Israel (36, 37)a | Cefuroxime axetil | 30 | 20/22 | 15/19 | |
Cefaclor | 40 | 24/25 | 5/12 | ||
Amoxicillin | 50 | 10/10 | 10/14 | ||
Cefaclor | 40 | 13/16 | 6/17 | ||
United States (multicenter) (115) | Cefprozil | 40 | 39/50 | 11/12 | 21/31 |
Bacteriological cure on day 4 to 5 of therapy by second tympanocentesis culture.
In several studies, a single intramuscular dose of ceftriaxone was comparable to a standard 10-day course of amoxicillin or trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole for treatment of acute otitis media (15, 67). However, efficacy for antibiotic-resistant pneumococci was not assessed. In the gerbil model, a single 100-mg/kg dose of ceftriaxone was effective in treating otitis media due to S. pneumoniae strains resistant to penicillin and ceftriaxone (MIC of both antibiotics = 8.0 μg/ml) (18). Block et al. (23) found that 8 of 11 children with persistent otitis media responded to ceftriaxone (25 to 50 mg/kg/dose) administered once daily for 4 to 7 days. In a preliminary study, Leibovitz et al. (86) administered ceftriaxone (50 mg/kg once daily for 3 days) to children with acute otitis media that was nonresponsive to standard oral antibiotics. Tympanocentesis for middle ear cultures was performed on the day of enrollment and on days 4 to 10 and if clinical relapse occurred. Bacteriological eradication occurred in 9 of 9 patients with penicillin-susceptible pneumococcal isolates and in 27 of 31 patients (87%) with penicillin-intermediate isolates. Bacteriological relapse occurred in two children with isolates intermediate to penicillin. No pneumococcal isolates resistant to penicillin (MIC ≥ 2.0 μg/ml) were encountered. In a similar study, Gehanno et al. (62) recruited children who were considered clinical treatment failures for acute otitis media. Middle ear cultures were obtained, and treatment with ceftriaxone (50 mg/kg) once daily for 3 days was administered. Thirty-six children had S. pneumoniae isolates for which the penicillin MICs were ≥1 μg/ml. One day after ceftriaxone therapy was completed, 24 of 27 had negative repeat cultures of the middle ear. Clinical successes were found for 88% of the patient on days 10 to 12 after enrollment and for 64% on days 28 to 42. Together, these two studies establish ceftriaxone as an important alternative agent for the treatment of acute otitis media unresponsive to first-line agents. However, three intramuscular doses probably are required, and the treatment is expensive.
Clindamycin and azithromycin have not been evaluated adequately to assess their role in the treatment of pneumococcal otitis media. Block et al. (23) reported anecdotal experience for seven children. In studies conducted in Israel, azithromycin was effective if the middle ear pneumococcal isolate was susceptible to azithromycin (eradicated in 12 of 12 patients) but totally ineffective when the isolate was azithromycin resistant (eradicated in 0 of 6 patients) (37). In a chinchilla model of acute otitis media, penicillin-resistant pneumococci remaining susceptible to clarithromycin were eradicated from middle ear cultures following clarithromycin treatment (4). Taken together, data from these studies suggest that the macrolides may provide effective therapy for treatment of acute otitis media due to penicillin-nonsusceptible strains remaining susceptible to the macrolides. However, since more than half of the pneumococcal isolates nonsusceptible to penicillin will be nonsusceptible to macrolides, it is not likely that azithromycin or clarithromycin will be highly effective in treating acute otitis media due to such strains (140).
Another approach has been to increase the dose of amoxicillin for the treatment of acute otitis media in order to increase the concentration of amoxicillin in serum and thus the level in the middle ear fluid. In the chinchilla model, an amoxicillin dose 10-fold greater than that necessary to eradicate penicillin-susceptible strains was effective in clearing penicillin-resistant S. pneumoniae from the middle ear (19). In children with acute otitis media, levels of amoxicillin in middle ear fluid exceeded 1.0 μg/ml in most and exceeded 4.0 μg/ml in some after a single 45-mg/kg dose (130). In another study of acute otitis media in children, middle ear fluid was obtained after the children had received amoxicillin at 40 mg/kg/day every 8 h for 48 to 72 h and then a single 25-mg/kg oral dose of amoxicillin (30). The estimated mean peak concentration in middle ear fluid occurred 3.0 h after this oral dose and was ∼9.5 μg/ml. About 60% of the levels were ≥2.0 μg/ml between 2.3 and 4.7 hours after the 25-mg/kg oral dose. The authors concluded that about 90% of episodes of pneumococcal acute otitis media could be treated effectively with an amoxicillin dosing regimen of 75 mg/kg/day in three divided doses. Using double the recommended dose of amoxicillin (80 mg/kg/day), Block et al. (23) successfully treated two patients with otitis media due to penicillin-resistant pneumococci. If the MIC90 of amoxicillin is 4.0 μg/ml for penicillin-resistant S. pneumoniae, levels exceeding this concentration can be achieved in middle ear fluid in many patients with the double dose of amoxicillin.
Implications
It is unclear if treatment failures for acute otitis media are occurring more frequently now than 10 years ago in association with the rise in the incidence of antibiotic-resistant S. pneumoniae. Pichichero and Pichichero (116) estimated that approximately 10% of visits for acute otitis media by children seen in one large private practice in Rochester, N.Y., were for persistent acute otitis media (i.e., infection that had failed one or two consecutive courses of antibiotics) for the period October 1989 through September 1992. Most of these children were 6 to 36 months old. Tympanocentesis was performed in 137 children whose acute otitis media had not responded after one or two empirical antimicrobial treatment courses. No pathogen was isolated from almost 50% of children, and S. pneumoniae was recovered from 24%. Only one-third of the isolates were tested for penicillin susceptibility; 2 of 11 were nonsusceptible to penicillin. Thus, at least during this period, treatment failures of acute otitis media were not often a result of S. pneumoniae isolates resistant to commonly prescribed antibiotics. However, similar data from 1997 to 1998 are not available, and these presumably would show higher rates of antimicrobial resistance among S. pneumoniae isolates, especially for isolates recovered from the upper respiratory tract, to determine if penicillin-resistant S. pneumoniae are now more commonly associated with treatment failures of acute otitis media.
Amoxicillin is still considered the agent of choice in treating acute otitis media. Certain risk factors have been identified as associated with an increased likelihood of treatment failure: a history of recurrent otitis media and treatment during the winter months are two of the strongest (23). Younger age and day care attendance might be considered additional risk features. Modifying this initial approach would be reasonable when faced with a younger child with these risk factors. One suggestion is to use an increased dose of amoxicillin (60 to 80 mg/kg/day) for routine first-line therapy in children who are not toxic with moderately severe acute otitis media. This higher dose does not appear to be associated with any greater adverse effect than does the standard 40-mg/kg/day dose. If a child is nonresponsive to this higher dosing level of amoxicillin, alternative agents to consider include amoxicillin-clavulanate, cefuroxime axetil, and cefprozil. Parenteral administration of ceftriaxone for at least three consecutive days is another option (23, 62, 86).
ANTIBIOTICS IN DEVELOPMENT
After a period when relatively few new antibiotics were introduced, the emergence of strains of antibiotic-resistant bacteria has spurred research into new antimicrobial compounds. Some of the preparations belong to unique antimicrobial classes, while others represent refinements of older antibiotics. Those that are being tested and appear useful against S. pneumoniae, especially penicillin- and macrolide/azolide-resistant strains, are discussed below, and the in vitro activities of the compounds are presented in Table 7.
TABLE 7.
In vitro activity of new antibiotics against S. pneumoniae
Antibiotic (no. of strains tested) | MIC50 (μg/ml) | MIC90 (μg/ml) | MIC range (μg/ml) | Reference |
---|---|---|---|---|
Streptogramins | ||||
RP59500 (Quinupristin/Dalfopristin) (Synercid) | 110 | |||
Penicillin susceptible (4) | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 | |
Penicillin intermediate (2) | 0.25 | 0.5 | 0.25–0.5 | |
Penicillin resistant (4) | 0.5 | 1.0 | 0.5–1.0 | |
RPR 106972 | 135 | |||
Penicillin susceptible (75) | 0.03 | 0.125 | 0.016–0.5 | |
Penicillin intermediate (55) | 0.125 | 0.5 | 0.016–0.5 | |
Penicillin resistant (73) | 0.25 | 0.5 | 0.016–0.5 | |
RPR 106972 | 135 | |||
Erythromycin resistant, clindamycin susceptible (143) | 0.125 | 0.5 | 0.016–0.5 | |
Erythromycin resistant, clindamycin resistant (60) | 0.125 | 0.25 | 0.016–0.5 | |
RP 7293 | 110 | |||
Penicillin susceptible (4) | 0.125 | 0.25 | 0.125–0.25 | |
Penicillin intermediate (2) | 0.125 | 0.125 | 0.125 | |
Penicillin resistant (4) | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.125–0.25 | |
Cephalosporin | ||||
Cefditoren | 135 | |||
Penicillin susceptible (75) | ≤0.06 | ≤0.06 | <0.06 | |
Trimen | ||||
GV104325 (Sanfetrinem) | 41 | |||
Penicillin susceptible (1167) | 0.015 | 0.015 | 0.004–0.25 | |
Penicillin intermediate (216) | ≤0.06 | 0.5 | 0.008–1.0 | |
Penicillin resistant (145) | 0.5 | 1.0 | 0.12–2.0 | |
Glycopeptide | ||||
LY333328 | 45 | |||
Penicillin susceptible (51) | 0.002 | 0.008 | 0.002–0.06 | |
Penicillin intermediate (75) | 0.002 | 0.008 | 0.002–0.06 | |
Penicillin resistant (76) | 0.005 | 0.03 | 0.002–0.125 | |
Fluoroquinolone | ||||
Levofloxacin | 119 | |||
Penicillin susceptible (460) | 1.0 | 2.0 | 0.05–4.0 | |
Penicillin intermediate (34) | 1.0 | 2.0 | 0.05–4.0 | |
Penicillin resistant (5) | 1.0 | 2.0 | 0.05–4.0 | |
Levofloxacin | 145 | |||
Penicillin susceptible (3) | 1.0 | 2.0 | 1.0–2.0 | |
Penicillin intermediate (3) | 1.0 | 2.0 | 1.0–2.0 | |
Penicillin resistant (3) | 1.0 | 4.0 | 1.0–4.0 | |
Sparfloxacin | 16 | |||
Erythromycin, >256 μg/ml (21) | 0.5 | 1.0 | 0.25–1.0 | |
Erythromycin, 4–64 μg/ml (29) | 0.5 | 1.0 | 0.25–1.0 | |
Sparfloxacin | 145 | |||
Penicillin susceptible (3) | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.25 | |
Penicillin intermediate (3) | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.25 | |
Penicillin resistant (3) | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.25–0.5 | |
Grepafloxacin | 111 | |||
Penicillin intermediate (71) | 0.25 | 0.5 | 0.125–1.0 | |
Penicillin resistant (58) | 0.25 | 0.5 | 0.125–1.0 | |
DU-6859a | 145 | |||
Penicillin susceptible (3) | 0.064 | 0.064 | 0.064 | |
Penicillin intermediate (3) | 0.064 | 0.064 | 0.064 | |
Penicillin resistant (3) | 0.064 | 0.064 | 0.064 | |
Bay 12-8039 | 146 | |||
Penicillin susceptible (53) | 0.125 | 0.25 | ||
Penicillin intermediate (45) | 0.125 | 0.25 | ||
Penicillin resistant (45) | 0.125 | 0.25 | ||
Sparfloxacin | 105 | |||
Penicillin nonsusceptible (28) | 0.06 | 0.12 | 0.03–0.25 | |
Oxazolidinones | ||||
Linezolid | 92 | |||
Penicillin intermediate (162) | 0.5 | 1.0 | 0.06–2.0 | |
Penicillin resistant (68) | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.25–4.0 | |
Eperezolid | 92 | |||
Penicillin intermediate (162) | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.06–1.0 | |
Penicillin resistant (68) | 0.25 | 0.5 | 0.125–1.0 | |
Rifamycins | 56 | |||
Penicillin susceptibility unknown (20) | 0.0039 | 0.0313 | 0.0005–0.25 |
Streptogramins
The streptogramins are inhibitors of cell wall synthesis at the ribosomal level and have been used in Europe since 1955. They are active against most gram-positive bacteria, including all pneumococcal strains, regardless of penicillin or macrolide susceptibility. RP 59500 (Synercid) is a 30:70 semisynthetic injectable combination of quinupristin and dalfopristin. Separately, these agents are active but bacteristatic for pneumococci, while the combination has synergistic activity and is rapidly bactericidal for all pneumococci (22, 110). RPR 106972 is a combination of two streptogramins (RPR 112808 and RPR 106950) and represents an oral preparation similar to Synercid. RP 7293 (Pyostacine), a single oral streptogramin that has been licensed in France and Belgium for more than 20 years, is very active against strains of S. pneumoniae (110).
Cephalosporins
Cefditoren is a pivaloyloxymethyl ester of the parent cephalosporin molecule and is intended for oral treatment (134). This antimicrobial agent is inhibitory and bactericidal at concentrations between 0.008 and 1.0 μg/ml and showed no inoculum effect when studies were repeated with higher inocula.
Trinems
Sanfetrinem (GV104326) is a tricyclic β-lactam (trinem) structurally similar to the carbapenems (132). Pharmacokinetic studies in human volunteers found maximum levels of sanfetrinem in serum of 2.5 μg/ml. Based on these findings, predicted levels in serum would exceed the MIC90 for between 20 and 40% of a 12-h dosing interval. Preliminary studies in children with acute otitis media following 10 mg/kg doses of sanfetrinem cilexetil twice a day have found about 40% (range, 13 to 81%) penetration into middle ear fluid (87). These levels suggest this agent should be effective in treating acute otitis media in pediatric patients.
Glycopeptides
LY 333328 is a semisynthetic glycopeptide that is active against vancomycin-resistant enterococci and other gram-positive bacteria, including S. pneumoniae (45). It is highly protein bound but rapidly bactericidal against both pneumococci and enterococci.
Fluoroquinolones
Sparfloxacin has a structure similar to clinafloxacin (65). Trovafloxacin is a novel fluoroquinolone with enhanced activity for gram-positive bacteria over the earlier quinolones (105). Trovafloxacin may be the first quinolone actually studied in children for possible licensure. Experiments involving a rabbit model of meningitis showed that pretreatment of pneumococci with trovafloxacin delayed the release of the cytokines tumor necrosis factor and interleukin-1β compared to ceftriaxone. DU-6859a is probably the most active of the newer fluoroquinolones in vitro (111). Nine strains of pneumococci, for which the MICs of cefotaxime were 2 μg/ml or greater, were associated with uniform DU-6859a MICs of 0.064 μg/ml (145). BAY 12-8039 is an experimental oral broad-spectrum 8-methoxyquinolone (146). With a dosage of 400 mg/day, levels of 3.2 μg/ml in serum, with a half life of 12 h, were obtained in adults.
Oxazolidinones
The oxazolidinones, represented by Linezolid (U-100766) and Eperezolid (U-100592), are a new class of antimicrobial agent with a unique structure and good activity against gram-positive bacteria (92). Studies with penicillin and ceftriaxone non susceptible S. pneumoniae found that Eperezolid was more active in vitro; however, Linezolid is now in phase II and phase III trials. Both compounds inhibit bacterial protein synthesis and are bactericidal for pneumococci but not for other gram-positive organisms.
Rifabutin
Rifabutin is a lipophilic antibacterial that inhibits DNA-dependent RNA polymerase and is rapidly bactericidal for many bacteria, including S. pneumoniae (56). Penicillin-intermediate strains were inhibited by concentrations between 0.008 and 0.015 μg/ml. In a rabbit model of meningitis, rifabutin at 5 mg/kg/h was as effective as ceftriaxone at 10 mg/kg/h and rifabutin inhibited the release of tumor necrosis factor alpha (128).
CONCLUSIONS
The management of infection due to antibiotic-resistant S. pneumoniae is in flux, and it is likely that approaches to antimicrobial treatment will be modified as susceptibility patterns change. Unless there is a dramatic change in the antibiotic-prescribing habits of physicians and other health care workers, it is unlikely that the upward trend in antibiotic resistance will be halted. A number of organizations, especially the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, are initiating efforts to educate health care workers and the public about the proper and wise use of antibiotics. Different dosing schemes of available agents and discovery of newer agents with different mechanisms of action remain important approaches to the development of new strategies for treating these infections. Perhaps the development of conjugate pneumococcal vaccines provides the greatest promise for controlling antibiotic-resistant S. pneumoniae by preventing this infection to a great degree.
REFERENCES
- 1.Abbasi S, Orlicek S L, Almohsen I, Luedtke G, English B K. Septic arthritis and osteomyelitis caused by penicillin and cephalosporin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae in a children’s hospital. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1996;15:78–83. doi: 10.1097/00006454-199601000-00017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Ahronheim G A, Reich B, Marks M I. Penicillin-insensitive pneumococci. Case report and review. Am J Dis Child. 1979;133:187–191. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.1979.02130020079017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Alonso J, Madrigal V, Garcia-Fuentes M. Recurrent meningitis from a multiply resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae strain treated with erythromycin. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1991;10:256. doi: 10.1097/00006454-199103000-00022. . (Letter.) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Alper C M, Doyle W J, Seroky J T, Bluestone C D. Efficacy of clarithromycin treatment of acute otitis media caused by infection with penicillin-susceptible, -intermediate, and -resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae in the chinchilla. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1996;40:1889–1892. doi: 10.1128/aac.40.8.1889. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.American Academy of Pediatrics. Dexamethasone therapy for bacterial meningitis. In: Peter G, editor. Red book: Report of the Committee on Infectious Diseases. 24th ed. Elk Grove Village, Ill: American Academy of Pediatrics; 1997. pp. 620–622. [Google Scholar]
- 6.Amsden G W, Schentag J J. Tables of antimicrobial agent pharmacology. In: Mandell D L, Bennett J E, Dolin R, editors. Principles and practice of infectious diseases. 4th ed. New York, N.Y: Churchill Livingstone, Inc.; 1995. pp. 492–528. [Google Scholar]
- 7.Applebaum P C. Epidemiology and in vitro susceptibility of drug-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1996;15:932–939. doi: 10.1097/00006454-199610000-00030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Arguedas-Mohs A, Vargas S L, Bradley J S, Loaiza C, Rivera R, Vincent J, Teng R, Walterspiel J N for the Chile PID-CRC Network Physicians. Program and Abstracts of the 37th Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy. Washington, D.C: American Society for Microbiology; 1997. Trovafloxacin CSF penetration and pharmacokinetics (PK) in children, abstr. A-105. [Google Scholar]
- 9.Arditi, M., E. O. Mason, Jr., J. S. Bradley, T. Q. Tan, W. J. Barson, G. E. Schutze, E. R. Wald, L. B. Givner, K. S. Kim, R. Yogev, and S. L. Kaplan. 1988. Three-year multicenter surveillance of pneumococcal meningitis in children: clinical characteristics and outcome related to penicillin susceptibility and dexamethasone use. Pediatrics (in press). [DOI] [PubMed]
- 10.Aronin, S. I., S. K. Mukherjee, J. C. West, and E. L. Cooney. Review of pneumococcal endocarditis in adults in the penicillin era. Clin. Infect. Dis. 26:165–171. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 11.Arsensi F, Otero M C, Perez-Tamarit D, Rodriguez-Escribano I, Cabedo J L, Gresa S, Canton E. Risk/benefit in the treatment of children with imipenem-cilastatin for meningitis caused by penicillin-resistant pneumococcus. J Chemother. 1993;5:133–134. doi: 10.1080/1120009x.1993.11739221. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Arsensi F, Perez-Tamarit D, Otero M C, Gallego M, Llanes S, Abadia C, Cantó E. Imipenem-cilastatin therapy in a child with meningitis caused by a multiply resistant pneumococcus. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1989;8:895. doi: 10.1097/00006454-198912000-00019. . (Letter.) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Azoulay-Dupuis E, Vallee E, Veber B, Bedos J P, Bauchet J, Pocidalo J-J. In vivo efficacy of a new fluoroquinolone, sparfloxacin, against penicillin-susceptible, and -resistant and multiresistant strains of Streptococcus pneumoniae in a mouse model of pneumonia. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1992;36:2698–2703. doi: 10.1128/aac.36.12.2698. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Baril L, Astagneau P, Nguyen J, Similowski T, Mengual X, Beigelman C, Caumes E, Katlama C, Bricaire F. Pyogenic bacterial pneumonia in human immunodeficiency virus-infected inpatients: a clinical radiological, microbiological, and epidemiological study. Clin Infect Dis. 1998;26:964–971. doi: 10.1086/513944. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Barnett E D, Teele D W, Klein J O, Cabral H J, Kharasch S J the Greater Boston Otitis Media Study Group. Comparison of ceftriaxone and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole for acute otitis media. Pediatrics. 1997;99:23–28. doi: 10.1542/peds.99.1.23. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Barrett M S, Jones R N. Antimicrobial activity and spectrum of sparfloxacillin tested against erythromycin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae isolates. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 1996;24:113–116. doi: 10.1016/0732-8893(96)00014-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Barry A L, Fuchs P C, Brown S D. In vitro activities of five fluoroquinolone compounds against strains of Streptococcus pneumoniae with resistance to other antimicrobial agents. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1996;40:2431–2433. doi: 10.1128/aac.40.10.2431. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Barry B, Muffat-Joly M, Bauchet J, Faurisson F, Gehanno P, Pocidalo J-J, Carbon C. Efficacy of single-dose ceftriaxone in experimental otitis media induced by penicillin- and cephalosporin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1996;40:1977–1982. doi: 10.1128/aac.40.9.1977. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Barry B, Muffat-Joly M, Gehanno P, Pocidalo J-J, Carbon C. Effect of increased dosage of amoxicillin in the treatment of experimental middle ear otitis due to penicillin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1993;37:1599–1603. doi: 10.1128/aac.37.8.1599. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Bartlett J G, Breiman R F, Mandell L A, File T M., Jr Community-acquired pneumonia in adults: guidelines for management. Clin Infect Dis. 1998;26:811–838. doi: 10.1086/513953. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Berges S A, Dan M, Serour F, Gorea A, Levenberg A, Krispin M. Penetration of third-generation cephalosporins into human peritoneal tissue. Chemotherapy. 1989;35:326–329. doi: 10.1159/000238689. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Biedenbach D, Wanger A, Jones R N. Comparative in-vitro activity of quinupristin/dalfopristin (RP 59500) tested against penicillin- and macrolide-resistant pneumococci by the Etest. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1996;38:553–555. doi: 10.1093/jac/38.3.553. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Block S L, Harrison C J, Hedrick J A, Tyler R D, Smith R A, Keegan E, Chartrand S A. Penicillin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae in acute otitis media: risk factors, susceptibility patterns and antimicrobial management. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1995;14:751–759. doi: 10.1097/00006454-199509000-00005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Bradley J S, Connor J D. Ceftriaxone failure in meningitis caused by Streptococcus pneumoniae with reduced susceptibility to beta-lactam antibiotics. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1991;10:871–873. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Bradley, J. S., and W. M. Scheld. 1997. The challenge of penicillin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae meningitis: current antibiotic therapy in the 1990’s. Clin. Infect. Dis. 24(Suppl. 2):S213–S221. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 26.Bradsher R W. Ceftriaxone (Ro 13-9904) therapy of serious infections. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1982;22:36–42. doi: 10.1128/aac.22.1.36. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Buckingham S C, Brown S P, San Joaquin V H. Breakthrough bacteremia and meningitis during treatment with cephalosporins parenterally for pneumococcal pneumonia. J Pediatr. 1998;132:174–176. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(98)70510-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Butler J C, Hofman J, Cetron M S, Elliott J A, Facklam R R, Breiman R F the Pneumococcal Sentinel Surveillance Working Group. The continued emergence of drug-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae in the United States: an update from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Pneumococcal Sentinel Surveillance System. J Infect Dis. 1996;74:986–993. doi: 10.1093/infdis/174.5.986. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Cabellos C, Martinez-Lacasa J, Martos A, Tubau F, Fernández A, Viladrich P F, Gudiol F. Influence of dexamethasone on efficacy of ceftriaxone and vancomycin therapy in experimental pneumococcal meningitis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1995;39:2158–2160. doi: 10.1128/aac.39.9.2158. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Canafax D M, Yuan Z, Chonmaitree T, Deka K, Russlie H Q, Giebink G S. Amoxicillin middle ear fluid penetration and pharmacokinetics in children with acute otitis media. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1998;17:149–156. doi: 10.1097/00006454-199802000-00014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Carratalá J, Marron A, Fernández-Sevilla A, Liñares J, Gudiol F. Treatment of penicillin-resistant pneumococcal bacteremia in neutropenic patients with cancer. Clin Infect Dis. 1997;24:148–152. doi: 10.1093/clinids/24.2.148. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Catalán M J, Fernandez J M, Vazquez A, Seijas E V, Suárez A, Quirós J C L B. Failure of cefotaxime in the treatment of meningitis due to relatively resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae. Clin Infect Dis. 1994;18:766–769. doi: 10.1093/clinids/18.5.766. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Chesney P J, Wilimas J A, Presbury C, Abbasi S, Leggiadro R J, Davis Y, Day S W, Schutze G E, Wang W C. Penicillin- and cephalosporin-resistant strains of Streptococcus pneumoniae causing sepsis and meningitis in children with sickle cell disease. J Pediatr. 1995;127:526–532. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(95)70107-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Committee on Infectious Diseases of the American Academy of Pediatrics. Therapy for children with invasive pneumococcal infections. Pediatrics. 1997;99:289–299. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Craig W A, Andes D. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of antibiotics in otitis media. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1996;15:944–948. doi: 10.1097/00006454-199603000-00015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Dagan R, Abramson O, Leibovitz E, Lang R, Goshen S, Greenberg D, Yagupsky P, Leiberman A, Fliss D M. Impaired bacteriologic response to oral cephalosporins in acute otitis media caused by pneumococci with intermediate resistance to penicillin. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1996;15:980–985. doi: 10.1097/00006454-199611000-00010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Dagan R, Piglansky L, Yagupsky P, Fliss D M, Leiberman A, Leibovitz E. Program and Abstracts of the 37th Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy. Washington, D.C: American Society for Microbiology; 1997. Bacteriologic response in acute otitis media: comparison between azithromycin, cefaclor and amoxicillin, abstr. K-103. [Google Scholar]
- 38.Dagan R, Velghe L, Rodda J L, Klugman K P. Penetration of meropenem into the cerebrospinal fluid of patients with inflamed meninges. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1994;34:175–179. doi: 10.1093/jac/34.1.175. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Daum R S, Nachman J P, Leitch C D, Tenover F C. Nosocomial epiglottitis associated with penicillin- and cephalosporin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae bacteremia. J Clin Microbiol. 1994;32:246–248. doi: 10.1128/jcm.32.1.246-248.1994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Dhawan V K. Clindamycin: a review of fifteen years of experience. Rev Infect Dis. 1982;4:1133–1153. doi: 10.1093/clinids/4.6.1133. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Doern G V, Pierce G, Brueggemann A B. In vitro activity of sanfetrinem ( GV104326), a new trinem antimicrobial agent, versus Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae, and Moraxella catarrhalis. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 1996;26:39–42. doi: 10.1016/s0732-8893(96)00173-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Doit C, Barre J, Cohen R, Bonacorsi S, Bourrillon A, Bingen E H. Bactericidal activity against intermediately cephalosporin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae in cerebrospinal fluid of children with bacterial meningitis treated with high doses of cefotaxime and vancomycin. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1997;41:2050–2052. doi: 10.1128/aac.41.9.2050. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Dyk J C, Terespolsky S A, Meyer C S, van Niekerk C H, Klugman K P. Penetration of cefpodoxime into middle ear fluid in pediatric patients with acute otitis media. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1997;16:79–81. doi: 10.1097/00006454-199701000-00020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Esterle T M, Edwards K M. Concerns of secondary fever in Streptococcus pneumoniae meningitis in an era of increasing antibiotic resistance. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1996;150:552–554. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.1996.02170300106023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Fasola E, Spangler S K, Ednie L M, Jacobs M R, Bajaksouzian S, Appelbaum P C. Comparative activities of LY 333328, a new glycopeptide, against penicillin-susceptible and -resistant pneumococci. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1996;40:2661–2663. doi: 10.1128/aac.40.11.2661. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Feldman C, Kallenbach J, Miller S D, Thorburn J R, Kornhof H J. Community-acquired pneumonia due to penicillin-resistant pneumococci. N Engl J Med. 1985;313:615–617. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198509053131006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.File T M, Jr, Segreti J, Dunbar L, Player R, Kohler R, Williams R R, Kojak C, Rubin A. A multicenter, randomized study comparing the efficacy and safety of intravenous and/or oral levofloxacin versus ceftriaxone and/or cefuroxime axetil in treatment of adults with community-acquired pneumonia. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1997;41:1965–1972. doi: 10.1128/aac.41.9.1965. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Fitoussi F, Doit C, Benali K, Bonacorsi S, Geslin P, Bingen E. Comparative in vitro killing activities of meropenem, imipenem, ceftriaxone, and ceftriaxone plus vancomycin at clinically achievable cerebrospinal fluid concentrations against penicillin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae isolates from children with meningitis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1998;42:942–944. doi: 10.1128/aac.42.4.942. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Frankel R E, Virata M, Hardalo C, Altice F L, Friedland G. Invasive pneumococcal disease: clinical features, serotypes, and antimicrobial resistance patterns in cases involving patients with and without human immunodeficiency virus infection. Clin Infect Dis. 1996;23:577–584. doi: 10.1093/clinids/23.3.577. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Fraschini F, Braga P C, Scarpazza G, Scaglione F, Pignataro O, Sambataro G, Mariani C, Roviaro G C, Varoli F, Esposti G. Human pharmacokinetics and distribution in various tissues of ceftriaxone. Chemotherapy. 1986;32:192–199. doi: 10.1159/000238415. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Friedland I R. Comparison of the response to antimicrobial therapy of penicillin-resistant and penicillin-susceptible pneumococcal disease. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1995;14:885–890. doi: 10.1097/00006454-199510000-00013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Friedland I R, Klugman K P. Failure of chloramphenicol therapy in penicillin-resistant pneumococcal meningitis. Lancet. 1992;339:405–408. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(92)90087-j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Friedland I R, Klugman K P. Cerebrospinal fluid bactericidal activity against cephalosporin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae in children with meningitis treated with high-dose cefotaxime. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1997;41:1888–1891. doi: 10.1128/aac.41.9.1888. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Friedland I R, Paris M, Ehrett S, Hickey S, Olsen K, McCracken G H., Jr Evaluation of antimicrobial regimens for treatment of experimental penicillin- and cephalosporin-resistant pneumococcal meningitis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1993;37:1630–1636. doi: 10.1128/aac.37.8.1630. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Friedland I R, Shelton S, Paris M, Rinderknecht S, Ehrett S, Krisher K, McCracken G H., Jr Dilemmas in diagnosis and management of cephalosporin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae meningitis. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1993;12:196–200. doi: 10.1097/00006454-199303000-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Fugii K, Tsuji A, Miyazake S, Yamaguchi K, Goto S. In vitro antibacterial activities of KRM-1648 and KRM-1657, new rifamycin derivatives. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1994;38:1118–1122. doi: 10.1128/aac.38.5.1118. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Gaillard J L, Abadie V, Cheron G, Lasaille F, Mahut B, Silly C, Matha V, Coustere C, Lokiec F. Concentrations of ceftriaxone in cerebrospinal fluid of children with meningitis receiving dexamethasone therapy. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1994;38:1209–1210. doi: 10.1128/aac.38.5.1209. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Garcia-Leoni M E, Cerenado E, Rodeño P, Quirós J C L B, Martinéz-Hernandéz D, Bouza E. Susceptibility of Streptococcus pneumoniae to penicillin: a prospective microbiological and clinical study. Clin Infect Dis. 1992;14:427–435. doi: 10.1093/clinids/14.2.427. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Gartner J C, Michaels R H. Meningitis from a pneumococcus moderately resistant to penicillin. JAMA. 1979;241:1707–1709. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Gavalda J, Capdevila J A, Almirante B, Otero J, Ruiz I, Laguarda M, Allende H, Crespo E, Pigrau C, Pahissa A. Treatment of experimental pneumonia due to penicillin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae in immunocompetent rats. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1997;41:795–801. doi: 10.1128/aac.41.4.795. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Gehanno P, Barry B, Bobin S, Safran C. Twice daily cefpodoxime proxetil compared with thrice daily amoxicillin/clavulanic acid for treatment of acute otitis media in children. Scand J Infect Dis. 1994;26:577–584. doi: 10.3109/00365549409011816. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Gehanno P, Berche P, N’Gyen L, Derriennic M, Pichon F, Goehrs J M. Program and Abstracts of the 37th Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy. Washington, D.C: American Society for Microbiology; 1997. Resolution of clinical failure in acute otitis media confirmed by in vivo bacterial eradication—efficacy and safety of ceftriaxone injected once daily, for 3 days, abstr. LM-45. [Google Scholar]
- 63.Gehanno P, Lenoir G, Berche P. In vivo correlates for Streptococcus pneumoniae penicillin resistance in acute otitis media. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1995;39:271–272. doi: 10.1128/aac.39.1.271. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Gelfand M S, Cleveland K O. Penicillin-resistant pneumococcal vertebral osteomyelitis. Clin Infect Dis. 1992;15:746–747. doi: 10.1093/clind/15.4.746. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.George J, Morrissey I. The bactericidal activity of levofloxacin compared with ofloxacin, d-ofloxacin, ciprofloxacin, sparfloxacin and cefotaxime against Streptococcus pneumoniae. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1997;39:719–723. doi: 10.1093/jac/39.6.719. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Girgis N I, Farid Z, Mikhail I A, Farrag I, Sultan Y, Kilpatrick M E. Dexamethasone treatment for bacterial meningitis in children and adults. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1989;8:848–851. doi: 10.1097/00006454-198912000-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Green S M, Rothrock S G. Single-dose intramuscular ceftriaxone for acute otitis media in children. Pediatrics. 1993;91:23–30. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Gudnason T, Gudbrandsson F, Barsanti F, Kristinsson K G. Penetration of ceftriaxone into the middle ear fluid of children. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1998;17:258–260. doi: 10.1097/00006454-199803000-00022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Guibert M, Chahime H, Petit J, Odiévre M, Labrune P. Failure of cefotaxime treatment in two children with meningitis caused by highly penicillin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae. Acta Paediatr. 1995;84:831–833. doi: 10.1111/j.1651-2227.1995.tb13771.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Hardie W D, Roberts N E, Reising S F, Christie C D C. Complicated parapneumoniac effusions in children caused by penicillin-nonsusceptible Streptococcus pneumoniae. Pediatrics. 1998;101:388–392. doi: 10.1542/peds.101.3.388. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Harrison C J, Chartrand S A, Rodriguez W, Schwartz R, Pollack J, Thedinger B, Block S L, Hedrick J A. Middle ear effusion concentrations of cefixime during acute otitis media with effusion and otitis media with effusion. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1997;16:816–817. doi: 10.1097/00006454-199708000-00016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Harrison C J, Welch D, Marks M I. Ceftriaxone therapy in pediatric patients. Am J Dis Child. 1983;137:1048–1051. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.1983.02140370010004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Hieber J P, Nelson J D. A pharmacologic evaluation of penicillin in children with purulent meningitis. N Engl J Med. 1977;297:410–413. doi: 10.1056/NEJM197708252970802. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Hoberman A, Paradise J L, Block S, Burch D J, Jacobs M R, Balanescu M I. Efficacy of amoxicillin/clavulanate for acute otitis media: relation to Streptococcus pneumoniae susceptibility. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1996;15:955–962. doi: 10.1097/00006454-199610000-00034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Jackson M A, Shelton S, Nelson J D, McCracken G H., Jr Relatively penicillin-resistant pneumococcal infections in pediatric patients. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1984;3:129–132. doi: 10.1097/00006454-198403000-00010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.John C C. Treatment failure with use of a third-generation cephalosporin for penicillin-resistant pneumococcal meningitis: case report and review. Clin Infect Dis. 1994;18:188–193. doi: 10.1093/clinids/18.2.188. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Kanra G Y, Ozen H, Secmeer G, Ceyhan M, Ecevit Z, Belgin E. Beneficial effects of dexamethasone in children with pneumococcal meningitis. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1995;14:490–494. doi: 10.1097/00006454-199506000-00005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Kaplan, S. L., E. O. Mason, Jr., W. J. Barson, E. R. Wald, M. Arditi, T. Q. Tan, G. E. Schutze, J. S. Bradley, L. B. Givner, K. S. Kim, and R. Yogev. Three year multicenter surveillance of systemic pneumococcal infections in children. Pediatrics, in press. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 79.Kaykova Y, Santos M, Desiderio D, Simberkoff M, Holzman R S. Abstracts of the 35th Annual Meeting of the Infectious Diseases Society of America. 1997. Risk factors for mortality from pneumococcal bacteremia, abstr. 671. [Google Scholar]
- 80.Kim Y S, Liu Q, Chow L L, Täuber M G. Trovafloxacin in treatment of rabbits with experimental meningitis caused by high-level penicillin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1997;41:1186–1189. doi: 10.1128/aac.41.5.1186. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Kleiman M B, Weinberg G A, Reynolds J K, Allen S D. Meningitis with beta-lactam resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae: the need for early repeat lumbar puncture. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1993;12:782–784. doi: 10.1097/00006454-199309000-00019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Klugman K, Friedland I R, Bradley J S. Bactericidal activity against cephalosporin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae in cerebrospinal fluid of children with acute bacterial meningitis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1995;39:1988–1992. doi: 10.1128/aac.39.9.1988. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Klugman K P. Pneumococcal resistance to antibiotics. Clin Microbial Rev. 1990;3:171–196. doi: 10.1128/cmr.3.2.171. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Klugman K P, Dagan R the Meropenem Meningitis Study Group. Randomized comparison of meropenem with cefotaxime for treatment of bacterial meningitis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1995;39:1140–1146. doi: 10.1128/aac.39.5.1140. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Leggiadro R J, Barrett F F, Chesney P J, Davis Y, Tenover F C. Invasive pneumococci with high level penicillin and cephalosporin resistance at a mid-South children’s hospital. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1994;13:320–322. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Leibovitz E, Piglansky L, Raiz S, Greenberg D, Yagupsky P, Press J, Fliss D M, Leiberman A, Dagan R. Program and Abstracts of the 37th Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy. Washington, D.C: American Society for Microbiology; 1997. Bacteriologic efficacy of 3-day intramuscular ceftriaxone in non-responsive acute otitis media, abstr. K-105. [Google Scholar]
- 87.Leibovitz E, Piglansky L, Scandola M, Daros L, French P, Capriati A, Dagan R. Program and Abstracts of the 37th Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy. Washington, D.C: American Society for Microbiology; 1997. Sanfretrinem pharmacokinetics (plasma and middle ear fluid) in pediatric patients with acute otitis media, abstr. F-204. [Google Scholar]
- 88.Lonks J R, Durkin M R, Meyerhoff A N, Medeiros A A. Meningitis due to ceftriaxone-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae. N Engl J Med. 1995;332:893–894. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199503303321317. . (Letter.) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Lutsar I, Friedland I R, Wubbel L, Ahmed A, Trujillo M, Jafri H, McCoig C C, McCracken G H., Jr . Abstracts of the 35th Annual Meeting of the Infectious Diseases Society of America. 1997. Timing of dexamethasone therapy in experimental pneumococcal meningitis, abstr. 272. [Google Scholar]
- 90.Mace J W, Janik D S, Sauer R L, Quilligan J J., Jr Penicillin-resistant pneumococcal meningitis in an immunocompromised infant. J Pediatr. 1977;91:506–507. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(77)81339-5. . (Letter.) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Mandell L, Hopkins D W, Hopkins S. Program and Abstracts of the 37th Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy. Washington, D.C: American Society for Microbiology; 1997. Efficacy of trovafloxacin in patients with community acquired pneumonia due to penicillin susceptible and resistant S. pneumoniae, abstr. LM-71. [Google Scholar]
- 92.Mason E O, Jr, Lamberth L B, Kaplan S L. In vitro activities of oxazolidinones U-100592 and U-100766 against penicillin-resistant and cephalosporin-resistant strains of Streptococcus pneumoniae. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1996;40:1039–1040. doi: 10.1128/aac.40.4.1039. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Mason E O, Jr, Lamberth L B, Kershaw N L, Prosser B L T. Program and Abstracts of the 37th Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy. Washington, D.C: American Society for Microbiology; 1997. S. pneumoniae antibiotic susceptibility in the United States: 1996–1997, abstr. E48. [Google Scholar]
- 94.McCracken G H, Jr, Nelson J D, Kaplan S L, Overturf G D, Rodriguez W J, Steele R W. Consensus Report: antimicrobial therapy for bacterial meningitis in infants and children. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1987;6:501–505. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.McIntyre P B, Berkey C S, King S M, Schaad U B, Kilpi T, Kanra G Y, Perez C M O. Dexamethasone as adjunctive therapy in bacterial meningitis. A meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials since 1988. JAMA. 1997;278:925–931. doi: 10.1001/jama.278.11.925. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96.Moellering R C, Jr, Krogstad D J, Greenblatt D J. Pharmacokinetics of vancomycin in normal subjects and in patients with reduced renal function. Rev Infect Dis. 1981;3:S230–S235. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97.Moine J M, Vallée E, Azoulay-Dupuis E, Bourget P, Bédos J-P, Bauchert J, Pocidalo J-J. In vivo efficacy of a broad-spectrum cephalosporin, ceftriaxone, against penicillin-susceptible and -resistant strains of Streptococcus pneumoniae in a mouse pneumonia model. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1994;38:1953–1958. doi: 10.1128/aac.38.9.1953. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98.Morgan J R, Paull A, O’Sullivan M, Williams B D. The penetration of ceftriaxone into synovial fluid of the inflamed joint. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1985;16:367–371. doi: 10.1093/jac/16.3.367. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99.Moroney J, Fiore A, Farley M, Harrison L, Patterson J, Cetron M, Schuchat A. Abstracts of the 35th Annual Meeting of the Infectious Diseases Society of America. 1997. Therapy and outcome of meningitis caused by drug-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae in three US cities 1994–1996, abstr. 48. [Google Scholar]
- 100.Munoz M, Valderrabanos E S, Diaz E, Silva J J, Souet J A, Infante P, Lopez J D, Garcia-Curiel A. Appearance of resistance to beta-lactam antibiotics during therapy for Streptococcus pneumoniae meningitis. J Pediatr. 1995;127:98–99. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(95)70264-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101.Naraqi S, Kirkpatrick G P, Kabins S. Relapsing pneumococcal meningitis: isolation of an organism with decreased susceptibility to penicillin G. J Pediatr. 1974;85:671–673. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(74)80513-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102.National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) interpretive standards (μg/ml) for Streptococcus spp. 17, no. 2. M100-S7. Villanova, Pa: National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards; 1997. [Google Scholar]
- 103.Nelson C T, Mason E O, Jr, Kaplan S L. Activity of oral antibiotics in middle ear and sinus infections caused by penicillin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae: implications for treatment. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1994;13:585–589. doi: 10.1097/00006454-199407000-00001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104.Novick W J., Jr Levels of cefotaxime in body fluids and tissues: a review. Rev Infect Dis. 1982;4:S346–S353. doi: 10.1093/clinids/4.supplement_2.s346. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105.Olsson-Liljequist B, Hoffman B M, Hedlund J. Activity of trovafloxacin against blood isolates of Streptococcus pneumoniae in Sweden. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1996;15:671–675. doi: 10.1007/BF01691157. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 106.Oppenheim B, Koornhof H J, Austrian R. Antibiotic-resistant pneumococcal disease in children at Baragwanath Hospital, Johannesburg. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1986;5:520–524. doi: 10.1097/00006454-198609000-00006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 107.Pacheco T R, Cooper C K, Hardy D J, Betts R F, Bennez W. Failure of cefotaxime treatment in an adult with Streptococcus pneumoniae meningitis. Am J Med. 1997;102:303–305. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9343(99)80271-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 108.Pallares R, Guidiol F, Liñares J, Ariza J, Rufi G, Murgui L, Dorca J, Viladrich P F. Risk factors and response to antibiotic therapy in adults with bacteremic pneumonia caused by penicillin-resistant pneumococci. N Engl J Med. 1987;317:18–22. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198707023170104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 109.Pallares R, Liñares J, Vadillo M, Cabellos C, Manresa F, Viladrich P F, Martin R, Guidiol F. Resistance to penicillin and cephalosporin and mortality from severe pneumococcal pneumonia in Barcelona, Spain. N Engl J Med. 1995;333:474–480. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199508243330802. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 110.Pankuch G A, Jacobs M R, Appelbaum P C. MIC and timekill study of antipneumococcal activities of RPR 106972 (a new oral streptogramin), RP 59500 (quinupristin-dalfopristin), pyostacine (RP 7293), penicillin G, cefotaxime, erythromycin, and clarithromycin against 10 penicillin-susceptible and -resistant pneumococci. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1996;40:2071–2074. doi: 10.1128/aac.40.9.2071. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 111.Pankuch G A, Jacobs M R, Appelbaum P C. Activity of C99,219 compared with DU-6859A, ciprofloxacin, ofloxacin, levofloxacin, lomefloxacin, tosufloxacin, sparfoxacin, and grepafloxacin against penicillin-susceptible and -resistant pneumococci. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1995;35:230–232. doi: 10.1093/jac/35.1.230. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 112.Parades A, Taber L H, Yow M D, Clark D, Nathan W. Prolonged pneumococcal meningitis due to an organism with increased resistance to penicillin. Pediatrics. 1976;85:671–673. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 113.Paris M M, Hickey S M, Trujillo M, Shelton S, McCracken G H., Jr Evaluation of CP-99, 219, a new fluoroquinolone, for treatment of experimental penicillin- and cephalosporin-resistant pneumococcal meningitis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1995;39:1243–1246. doi: 10.1128/aac.39.6.1243. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 114.Paris M M, Hickey S M, Uscher M I, Shelton S, Olsen K D, McCracken G H., Jr Effect of dexamethasone on therapy of experimental penicillin- and cephalosporin-resistant pneumococcal meningitis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1994;38:1320–1324. doi: 10.1128/aac.38.6.1320. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 115.Pichichero M E, Mclinn S, Aronovitz G, Fiddes R, Blumer J, Nelson K, Dashefsky B. Cefprozil treatment of persistent and recurrent acute otitis media. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1997;16:471–478. doi: 10.1097/00006454-199705000-00003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 116.Pichichero M E, Pichichero C L. Persistent acute otitis media. I. Causative pathogens. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1995;14:178–183. doi: 10.1097/00006454-199503000-00002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 117.Pikis A, Akram S, Donkersloot J A, Campos J M, Rodriguez W J. Penicillin-resistant pneumococci from pediatric patients in the Washington, D.C. area. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1995;149:30–35. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.1995.02170130032007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 118.Pikis A, Donkersloot J A, Akram S, Keith J M, Campos J M, Rodriguez W J. Decreased susceptibility to imipenem among penicillin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1997;40:105–108. doi: 10.1093/jac/40.1.105. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 119.Plouffe J F, Baird I, Barnishan J, Porterfield-Baxa J, Best M, Dalieh S, Emerick J, Fass R J, Gianakopoulos G, Hackman B A, Hadley S, Herbert M, Koletar S L, Maher W, Minor J A, Oglevee B A, Para M F, Parsons J, Rogers T, Scott-Tibbs G, Tumbleson C S. Levofloxacin in vitro activity against bacteremic isolates of Streptococcus pneumoniae. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 1996;25:43–45. doi: 10.1016/0732-8893(96)00068-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 120.Plouffe J F, Breiman R F, Facklam R R for the Franklin County Pneumonia Study Group. Bacteremia with Streptococcus pneumoniae: implications for therapy and prevention. JAMA. 1996;275:194–198. doi: 10.1001/jama.275.3.194. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 121.Ponte C, Parra A, Nieto E, Soriano F. Development of experimental pneumonia by infection with penicillin-insensitive Streptococcus pneumoniae in guinea pigs and their treatment with amoxicillin, cefotaxime, and meropenem. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1996;40:2698–2702. doi: 10.1128/aac.40.12.2698. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 122.Quagliarello V J, Scheld W M. Treatment of bacterial meningitis. N Engl J Med. 1997;336:708–716. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199703063361007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 123.Regamey C. Pharmacokinetics of ceftriaxone and its relation to concentrations in extracellular compartments. Chemotherapy. 1985;31:85–94. doi: 10.1159/000238319. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 124.Sáez-Llorens X, Costaño E, García R, Báez C, Pérez M, Tejeira F, McCracken G J., Jr Prospective randomized comparison of cefepime and cefotaxime for the treatment of bacterial meningitis in infants and children. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1995;39:937–940. doi: 10.1128/aac.39.4.937. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 125.Sauve C, Azoulay-Dupuis E, Moine P, Darras-Joly C, Rieux V, Carbon C, Bédos J-P. Efficacies of cefotaxime and ceftriaxone in a mouse model of pneumonia induced by two penicillin- and cephalosporin-resistant strains of Streptococcus pneumoniae. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1996;40:2829–2834. doi: 10.1128/aac.40.12.2829. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 126.Scaglione, F., M. Raichi, and F. Fraschini. 1990. Serum protein binding and extravascular diffusion of methoxyimino cephalosporins. Time courses of free and total concentrations of cefotaxime and ceftriaxone in serum and pleural exudate. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 26(Suppl. A):1–10. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 127.Schaad U B, Kaplan S L, McCracken G H., Jr Steroid therapy for bacterial meningitis. Clin Infect Dis. 1995;20:685–690. doi: 10.1093/clinids/20.3.685. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 128.Schmidt H, Zysk G, Reinert R R, Brück W, Stringaris A, Chen V, Stuertz K, Fischer F, Bartels R, Schaper K J, Weinig S, Nau R. Rifabutin for experimental pneumococcal meningitis. Chemotherapy. 1997;43:264–271. doi: 10.1159/000239577. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 129.Schwartz R H, Khan W N, Akram S. Penicillin and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole-resistant pneumococci isolated from blood cultures of three infants in metropolitan Washington, D.C.: a harbinger of serious future problems? Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1991;10:782–783. doi: 10.1097/00006454-199110000-00012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 130.Seikel K, Shelton S, McCracken G H., Jr Middle ear fluid concentrations of amoxicillin after large dosages in children with acute otitis media. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1997;16:710–711. doi: 10.1097/00006454-199707000-00014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 131.Silverstein M, Chumpa A, Bachur R, Harper M B. Program and Abstracts of the 37th Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy. Washington, D.C: American Society for Microbiology; 1997. Clinical implications of penicillin and ceftriaxone resistance among children with pneumococcal bacteremia, abstr. K-90. [Google Scholar]
- 132.Singh K V, Coque T M, Murray B E. In vitro activity of the trinem sanfetrinem ( GV104326) against gram-positive organisms. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1996;40:2142–2146. doi: 10.1128/aac.40.9.2142. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 133.Sloas M M, Barrett F F, Chesney P J, English B K, Hill B C, Tenover F C, Leggiadro R J. Cephalosporin treatment failure in penicillin- and cephalosporin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae meningitis. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1992;11:662–666. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 134.Soriano R, Coronel P, Gimeno M, Jiménez M, García-Corbeira P, Fernández-Roblas R. Inoculum effect and bactericidal activity of cefditoren and other antibiotics against Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae, and Neisseria meningitidis. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1996;15:761–763. doi: 10.1007/BF01691969. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 135.Spangler S K, Jacobs M R, Appelbaum P C. Activities of RPR 106972 (a new oral streptogramin), cefditoren (a new oral cephalosporin), two new oxazolidinones (U-100592 and U-100766), and other oral and parenteral agents against 203 penicillin-susceptible and -resistant pneumococci. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1996;40:481–484. doi: 10.1128/aac.40.2.481. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 136.Tan T Q, Mason E O, Jr, Kaplan S L. Systemic infections due to Streptococcus pneumoniae relatively resistant to penicillin in a children’s hospital: clinical management and outcome. Pediatrics. 1992;90:928–933. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 137.Tan T Q, Schutze G E, Mason E O, Jr, Kaplan S L. Antibiotic therapy and acute outcome of meningitis due to Streptococcus pneumoniae considered intermediately susceptible to broad-spectrum cephalosporins. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1994;38:918–923. doi: 10.1128/aac.38.5.918. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 138.Tan, T. Q., E. O. Mason, Jr., W. J. Barson, E. R. Wald, G. E. Schutze, J. S. Bradley, M. Arditi, L. B. Givner, R. Yogev, K. S. Kim, and S. L. Kaplan. Clinical characteristics and outcome of children with pneumonia due to penicillin-susceptible and non-susceptible Streptococcus pneumoniae. Pediatrics, in press. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 139.Tateda K, Takashima K, Miyazaki H, Matsumoto T, Hatori T, Yamaguchi K. Noncompromised penicillin-resistant pneumococcal pneumonia CBA/J mouse model and comparative efficacy of antibiotics in this model. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1996;40:1520–1525. doi: 10.1128/aac.40.6.1520. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 140.Thomson K S, Chartrand S A, Sanders C C, Block S L. Trovafloxacin, a new fluoroquinolone with potent activity against Streptococcus pneumoniae. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1997;41:478–480. doi: 10.1128/aac.41.2.478. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 141.Thoroddsen E, Marr C, Efthymiopoulos C, Thorarinsson H. Concentration of cefuroxime in middle ear effusion of children with acute otitis media. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1997;16:959–962. doi: 10.1097/00006454-199710000-00011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 142.Topkis S, Swarz H, Breisch S A, Maroli A N. Efficacy and safety of grepafloxacin 600 mg daily for 10 days in patients with community-acquired pneumonia. Clin Ther. 1997;19:975–988. doi: 10.1016/s0149-2918(97)80050-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 143.Viladrich P F, Cabellos C, Pallares R, Tubau F, Martínez-Lacasa J, Liñares J, Gudiol F. High doses of cefotaxime in treatment of adult meningitis due to Streptococcus pneumoniae with decreased susceptibilities to broad-spectrum cephalosporins. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1996;40:218–220. doi: 10.1128/aac.40.1.218. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 144.Viladrich P F, Gudiol F, Liñares J, Pallarés R, Sabaté I, Rufí G, Ariza J. Evaluation of vancomycin for therapy of adult pneumococcal meningitis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1991;35:2467–2472. doi: 10.1128/aac.35.12.2467. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 145.Visalli M A, Jacobs M R, Appelbaum P C. MIC and time-kill study of activities of DU-6859a, ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, sparfloxacin, cefotaxime, imipenem, and vancomycin against nine penicillin-susceptible and -resistant pneumococci. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1996;40:362–366. doi: 10.1128/aac.40.2.362. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 146.Visalli M A, Jacobs M R, Appelbaum P C. Program and Abstracts of the 36th Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy. Washington, D.C: American Society for Microbiology; 1996. Antipneumococcal activity of Bay 12-8039, a new quinolone compared to 3 other quinolones and 5 β-lactams, abstr. F6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 147.Wald E R, Kaplan S L, Mason E O, Jr, Sabo D, Ross L, Arditi M, Wiedermann B L, Barson W, Kim K S, Yogev R, Hofkosh D Meningitis Study Group. Dexamethasone therapy for children with bacterial meningitis. Pediatrics. 1995;95:21–28. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 148.Welby P L, Keller D S, Cromien J L, Tebas P, Storch G A. Resistance to penicillin and non-beta-lactam antibiotics of Streptococcus pneumoniae at a children’s hospital. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1994;13:281–287. doi: 10.1097/00006454-199404000-00007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]