Skip to main content
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2022 Mar 2;12:3460. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-07474-z

Interaction of thin polyethyleneimine layer with the iron surface and its effect on the electrochemical behavior

Radka Gorejová 1, Natália Podrojková 1, Katarína Sisáková 1, Jana Shepa 1, Ivan Shepa 2, Alexandra Kovalčíková 2, Ivana Šišoláková 1, František Kaľavský 1, Renáta Oriňaková 1,
PMCID: PMC8891304  PMID: 35236912

Abstract

Polymer-coated metals may act as biodegradable orthopedic implants with adjustable corrosion rates. Metallic surfaces represent a dynamic system with specific interactions occurring after the material is implanted into the human body. An additional layer, in the form of polymeric thin film, changes the nature of this metal-body fluids interface. Moreover, the interaction between polymer and metal itself can differ for various systems. Iron-based material modified with a thin layer of polyethyleneimine (PEI) coating was prepared and studied as potential absorbable implant. Computational methods were employed to study the interaction between the metallic surface and polymer functional monomer units at atomic levels. Various spectroscopical and optical methods (SEM, AFM, Confocal, and Raman spectroscopy) were also used to characterize prepared material. Electrochemical measurements have been chosen to study the polymer adsorption process onto the iron surface and corrosion behavior which is greatly influenced by the PEI presence. The adsorption mechanism of PEI onto iron was proposed alongside the evaluation of Fe and Fe-PEI degradation behavior studied using the impedance method. Bonding via amino -NH2 group of PEI onto Fe and enhanced corrosion rate of coated samples were observed and confirmed.

Subject terms: Implants, Corrosion, Biosurfaces

Introduction

Iron-based materials gained a noticeable amount of attention during the last years as a potential biodegradable orthopedic scaffolds16. Absorbable metallic implants can provide temporary support to the damaged tissue until their complete resorption. Different fabrication approaches have been established including casting, molding, powder metallurgy methods, arc melting, or additive manufacturing e.g.715. Emphasis is put on the preparation of biocompatible, mechanically stable load-bearing materials with appropriate degradation properties and corrosion rates matching these of human bones. Material degradation speed is a key parameter in a biodegradable implant design. The too slow corrosion rate of materials made of pure iron, therefore, represents a lively scientific issue that is being solved12,1620. Several different methods used to accelerate the degradation of pure iron were introduced. Alloying with different biocompatible elements such as magnesium (Mg) or zinc (Zn)17,2124, or controllable changes in material porosity were already studied22,25,26. The desired acceleration of corrosion can be achieved by using these methods, however, the use of elements that are non-toxic and choosing a degree of porosity that does not negatively affect the resulting mechanical properties of the material is still challenging. Another way to achieve enhanced corrosion speed of iron is to apply a thin polymeric layer on its surface. Several studies dealing with this problem, where poly(lactic-co-glycolic) acid (PLGA)27 or polyethyleneglycol (PEG)2830 has successfully proven the positive effect of the polymer used not only in the terms of degradation acceleration but also in enhancing biological and mechanical properties. In our previous studies31,32, polyethyleneimine (PEI) has been chosen due to its non-harmful biological properties and corrosion-enhancing potential. PEI is a polycationic polymer that can serve as a drug or gene carrier and has been also used in cell attachment, DNA isolation, or wastewater problem studies3336. We have found that PEI can affect the corrosion speed of pure iron in a positive way (to accelerate it) and a corrosion mechanism of degradation of Fe-PEI material in simulated body fluids was proposed32. Since this polymer seems to be a very promising candidate in a biodegradable scaffold design, there is a need to examine its interaction with a metallic substrate in detail. Not only the interaction of the metal–polymer system but also its influence on the corrosion process were studied in this paper by molecular modeling and electrochemical methods. Gained information can bring a broader knowledge about the system which is crucial for the design of safe biomaterial intended for long-term use in the human body. PEI-coated materials represent an original concept with a high chance to play an important role in biodegradable implant development. Moreover, the flexibility of coating procedures with the possibility to easily scale the coating parameters and therefore to model ideal corrosion properties can adapt to the needs of medical practice.

Experimental

Sample preparation

The spherical iron powder obtained from Alfa Aesar (Germany) was used to fabricate iron pellets (Ø 10 mm, h = 2 mm). Powder with a purity of 99.5% was cold pressed into cylinders at the pressure of 600 MPa and subsequently sintered in a tube furnace in the reductive atmosphere composed of 10% H2 and 90% N2. Sintering was performed for 1 h at 1120 °C. Polyethyleneimine (PEI, branched, 60–100 kDa, 50% (w/v) in H2O, Sigma Aldrich, USA) was diluted to the concentration of 5 wt% in 96 vol.% ethanol (Centralchem, Slovakia). Iron pellets were ground with SiC papers (240, 800, and 1500 grits) and UV-cleaned in acetone and ethanol, each for 10 min before the polymer coating application. The coating was applied by the dip-coating technique. The ground and cleaned pellets were immersed in the PEI solution for 90 min and dried at 37 °C for 12 h in the drying chamber to evaporate the solvent and obtain a thin PEI layer.

Sample surface characterization

The scanning electron microscope (SEM) (JEOL JSM-7000F, Japan with EDX INCA and ZEISS AURIGA COMPACT) was employed to examine the surface morphology of pure Fe and PEI coated iron samples.

Atomic force microscopy (AFM) measurements were performed by the Veeco/Bruker Dimension Icon microscope in the tapping mode. This method allowed to obtain high-definition data of surface topology in both height and phase contrast modes. Images were processed in NanoScope Analysis and Gwyddion software.

Macroscopic photos were made by Carl Zeiss Stemi 2000-C stereomicroscope equipped with Zeiss AxioCam ICc 5 cameras.

Confocal microscopy was performed by the Plu Neox 3D optical surface profiler by SENSOFAR with 20 × objective. The size of the single image was 637 × 478 µm (approx. 637 × 478 µm). Raman spectra were recorded by XploRA ONE Raman microscope from Horiba Jobin Yvon with laser wavelength of 532 nm and magnification objective—10 × in range of 100–4000 cm-1.

Computational methods

All DFT calculations were performed using Grid-Based Projector-Augmented Wave GPAW code in Atomic Simulation Environment (ASE) software package37. To describe electronic interactions of the modes revised Perdew-Burke-Erzerhof (rPBE) which uses double numerical plus polarization (dnp) was applied with Generalized Gradient Approximation (GGA) and FD modes. The adsorption of ethylamine on the iron surface was studied considering the long-range dispersion forces, to correctly describe the interaction between the ethylamine molecule and the iron surface, therefore Tkatchenko-Scheffler correction for long-range interactions was applied. The surface of Fe(110) was built from the Fe unit cell according to the crystallographic data of pure Fe applied in experimentalresearch (not presented in this manuscript) and optimized for further computational studies of Fe and ethylamine interactions. The energy minimization of the unit cell was accomplished when the unit cell achieved full relaxation and the forces were smaller than 0.05 eV/Å. The Fe bcc (110) surface was built from an optimized unit cell and consisted of 36 Fe atoms, which were arranged in 4 layers (3 × 3 × 4). To ensure the complete disappearance of the wave function at the edges of the cell, the vacuum was set to 10 Å on both sides. The lower 2 atomic layers were fixed which allowed the relaxation of the two atomic layers on the top. When optimizing the structure, the symmetry constraints were turned off so that the iron atoms could move in all directions, reorient, and thus find their structure with minimal adsorption energy. For the interactions between adsorbed ethylamine molecule and Fe surface, the two layers of the iron surface were allowed to relax indefinitely until the residual forces at all atoms reached less than 0.05 eV/Å. The adsorption energy of adsorbed structures on the Fe surface was calculated according to Eq. 1

Eads=ES+M-(ES+EM) 1

where Eads is the adsorption energy of ethylamine on Fe surface, ES+M is the total energy of the adsorbate–substrate system; ES is the energy of an uncovered surface, and EM is the energy of the isolated ethylamine molecule.

Electrochemical testing

Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) measurements were carried out in the frequency range from 10 MHz to 100 kHz with an AC perturbation amplitude of 10 mV and DC potential equal to the open circuit potential (OCP) determined for 60 s before the measurements. The electrochemical tests were conducted using Multichannel Autolab M204 potentiostat (Metrohm AG, Herisau, Switzerland) in 5 wt.% PEI solution for polymer adsorption kinetic study (for 90 min) and in Hanks´ solution for the study of corrosion behavior (before and after 60 min of immersion). A three-electrode system with Ag/AgCl/KCl (3 mol/l) as a reference electrode, platinum counter electrode, and uncoated or PEI coated iron sample as the working electrode was used.

Results

Adsorption energy determined by DFT calculations

The ethylamine molecule was selected as a monomer unit of polyethyleneimine (PEI) to study the method of PEI bonding to the Fe(110) surface. To determine the most stable adsorbed ethylamine molecule on the Fe(110) surface and adsorption energy of such system, several structures of ethylamine differently oriented towards Fe surface have been included for optimization. Figure 1 displays optimized structures of C2H5NH2 and Fe(110). Four possible rotations of the ethylamine molecule to the surface were considered. In the first case, the ethylamine molecule was placed with a carbon chain linearly towards Fe(110) surface (Fig. 1a). In the second case, ethylamine was turned vertically with a carbon chain oriented towards Fe(110) (see Fig. 1b). Figure 1c shows that the whole ethylamine molecule was placed linearly to the surface and Fig. 1d presents the position of the ethylamine molecule vertically towards the Fe(110) surface, with the terminal -NH2 group facing the surface (Fig. 1d). As it can be seen, ethylamine molecule prefers to bond to Fe(110) surface through -NH2 group.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Optimization of an ethylamine molecule turned in different directions towards the surface of Fe (110): linear positioning of CH3CH2- towards Fe(110) (a), vertical positioning of CH3CH2-towards Fe(110) (b), linear positioning of CH3CH2NH2 molecule towards Fe(110) (c) and vertical positioning of ethylamine molecule with -NH2 end adsorbed to Fe(110) (d).

When the most stable and most probable bonding of C2H5NH2 with Fe(110) was found, different locations of ethylamine molecules adsorbed on the Fe surface through the -NH2 group were computationally examined. To determine the site of adsorption on the bcc Fe(110) surface, the ethylamine molecule was placed at three sites. Figure 2 shows sites on the surface of bcc Fe(110), where the adsorption of the ethylamine molecule on the surface most probably occurred: (1) the top position (T), where the ethylamine molecule was placed on the surface of the iron atom (Fig. 2—marked as a T position), (2) the bridge position (B), where the ethylamine molecule was in the space between two iron atoms (Fig. 2—marked as a B position) and (3), the hollow position (H), where the ethylamine molecule was in the interatomic gap formed between the four iron atoms and Fe atom located below these atoms covering the gap from beneath (Fig. 2—marked as an H position).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Locations on the Fe(110) bcc surface of the presumed adsorption of the ethylamine molecule on which the molecule was placed before optimization: at the top of the Fe-top atom (T), in the gap between the Fe-hollow (H) atoms, and at the bridge between the Fe-bridge atoms (B).

The results of adsorption energy showed that adsorption of ethylamine molecules is possible on all sites. Table 1 summarizes the adsorption energies achieved by each system during optimization and Fig. 3 presents optimized adsorbed C2H5NH2 structures on different sites of Fe(110) surface. C2H5NH2 adsorbed on T site resulted in adsorption energy − 1.38 eV, the adsorption energy of C2H5NH2 adsorbed on H site was − 1.21 eV and C2H5NH2 adsorbed on B site resulted in adsorption energy − 1.25 eV (Table 1). The adsorption energies show that in all cases the binding of ethylamine molecule to Fe(110) is stable and the adsorption energy is not varying highly.

Table 1.

Summary of adsorption energies in eV and kJ/mol, bond lengths, and angle sizes of optimized adsorbed ethylamine molecules in the top, hollow, and bridge positions of the Fe (110) surface.

Site Adsorption energy (eV) Adsorption energy (kJ/mol) Bond lengths (Å) Angle sizes (°)
Top (T) − 1.38 − 133.15 d(Fe–N) = 2.11 (Fe–N–C1) = 122.9
d(N–C1) = 1.48 (N–C1–C2) = 113.0
d(C1–C2) = 1.52
Hollow (H) − 1.21 − 116.81 d(Fe–N) = 2.14 (Fe–N–C1) = 117.0
d(N–C1) = 1.49 (N–C1–C2) = 112.0
d(C1–C2) = 1.52
Bridge (B) − 1.25 − 120.73 d(Fe–N) = 2.14 (Fe–N–C1) = 119.1
d(N–C1) = 1.48 (N–C1–C2) = 111.2
d(C1–C2) = 1.52

Figure 3.

Figure 3

The adsorption of ethylamine molecule on the surface of Fe(110) displayed from the front top (a), hollow (b), bridge (c) and from the above top (d), hollow (e), bridge (f).

Figure 3 displays how the ethylamine molecule binds to the surface of Fe(110) when placed on different sites. The nitrogen (N) atom prefers the adsorption on the T site since the optimized structures show the movement of the N atom from H (Fig. 3b, e) and B position (Fig. 3c, f) towards the T site, although the reposition is not complete. The atom bonds and angles also change slightly providing very similar structures in all cases. Therefore, the results demonstrate that the most possible adsorption of C2H5NH2 on the Fe(110) surface occurs on the T site with an adsorption energy of − 1.38 eV and with a Fe–N bond of 2.11 Å.

Surface morphology before corrosion

To record the topology changes after coating of bare metals and after corrosion occurred, confocal and optical microscopy were used along with the SEM and AFM (which were used for detailed scans). The surface morphology of pure iron and PEI coated samples were studied and compared. Figure 4 depicts the macroscopic and microscopic photos of the analyzed samples. The surface of the bare iron pellets and polymer-coated samples were studied using the SEM method to visualize and evaluate polymer distribution on the specimen surface. A comparison of the surface of pure iron and PEI coated samples is depicted in Fig. 4. In the case of pure iron, an uneven, bumpy surface can be observed (Fig. 4a, b) which is characterized by irregular protrusions of various sizes. Scratches present on the surface were caused by the mechanical treatment of the samples. After the coating, small irregularities were filled with a thin layer of polyethyleneimine (Fig. 4d, e), while the higher-height protrusions remained uncovered (Fig. 4e, i). Confocal microscopy micrographs of non-corroded samples are depicted in Fig. 4c, f with only slight differences for coated and uncoated samples, which are more evident from the results of SEM and AFM analyses.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

The differences between the surface morphology of pure iron (ac, g,h) and polymer (PEI) coated samples (df, i, j) Macroscopic photos (a,b) along with SEM (b,e), confocal microscopy (c,f) and AFM (gj) were taken to compare the effect of the thin layer application.

To study the microscopic structure of prepared material, which is outside the imaging capability of previous methods, the AFM method has been chosen. This method allows the detection of the sub-grain structure of the sintered material. Only samples of pure iron before and after corrosion and Fe-PEI sample before corrosion were scanned due to the too high roughness of the Fe-PEI sample after corrosion. Scans obtained from AFM measurements are depicted in Fig. 4g–j. The structure of pure iron (Fig. 4g, h) before corrosion with typical globular clusters was identified. The average size of spherical iron subgrains was ranging around 50 nm. On the other hand, the microstructure of polymer-coated samples significantly differed from the samples of pure iron. PEI covered spherical iron particles and formed longitudinally arranged polymer waves (Fig. 4i, j) which were concentrated mainly in the material valleys. White spots on the sample surface (Fig. 4i, white arrows) represent uncoated iron bumps.

Impedance measurements

Polymer adsorption

Polymer adsorption to iron surface during 90 min of the dip-coating process was studied by the electrochemical impedance spectroscopy method. EIS spectra were measured at various time points during the coating process (Fig. 5) and were fitted using the equivalent circuit shown in the same figure.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Impedance spectra for Fe sample immersed in the 5 wt.% PEI solution for 100 min to simulate the dip-coating process.

The equivalent circuit is formed from the next electrical elements: Rs is solution resistance, Qdl is constant phase element corresponding to double layer, Rct is charge transfer resistance, Qdl-p is constant phase element corresponding to the polymer film, and Rp represents polymer film resistance. Qdl was calculated via the following equation (Eq. 2)

Qdl=2πfmaxRct-1 2

where fmax is the frequency corresponding to the maximum of the imaginary impedance component.

It was expected that the Fe-PEI bond formation influences the values of electrical elements. After only 3 min, one flattened semicircle could be observed, which diameter decreases. After 10 min, an indication of a second semicircle could be observed. According to literature, high-frequency semicircle corresponds to the properties of the organic film in the organic/metal system. On the other hand, low-frequency semicircle provides information about the reaction of the metal component38. So, the formation of the second semicircle in the high-frequency region could exactly confirm the organic film formation on the Fe surface. Moreover, PEI is a favorable molecule for complexing heavy metal ions based on the literature36.

Electrochemical corrosion behavior

The EIS measurement was performed with the pure iron pellet and PEI-coated pellet immersed in Hanks’ solution. The EIS spectra of all samples were fitted using the same equivalent circuit as in the previous case.

The Bode diagrams (Fig. 6c, d) exhibits two peaks of phase lag at high and low frequencies for both samples with and without PEI. So, the time constant observed in the high- and low-frequency region is related to corrosion product film or PEI film and the charge transfer process of the corrosion reaction, respectively.

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Nyquist (a,b) and Bode (c,d) plots of samples (Fe, Fe-PEI) before and after 60 min of corrosion.

Degradation behavior and products

The degradation process takes place during 60 min of immersion in Hanks’ solution. Raman spectra recorded for both PEI modified and pure Fe sample series are shown in Fig. 7. Spectra for Fe shows the presence of a thin oxide layer on the surface, which partially acts like the passivation layer. As can be seen from the spectra, there is no evidence of the deposits on the corrosion products for the pure Fe series. Peaks visible for the Fe sample after corrosion mostly refer to the components of the Hanks´ solution. Regarding the series of Fe-PEI: on the first spectrum characteristic for PEI, nice and sharp peaks at 1456, 2847 and 2957 cm−1 are visible. Other spectra show the presence of corrosion reaction deposits and similarly to the pure Fe samples—components of the Hank solution on the surface. The absence of the PEI on the treated surfaces refers to the dissolution of the layer involved in the corrosion process.

Figure 7.

Figure 7

Raman spectra of Fe (a) and Fe-PEI (b) samples series before and after 60 min of corrosion in simulated body fluids.

Discussion

Optical, confocal, SEM, and AFM methods confirmed the successful coating of PEI on the surface of the iron pellets. DFT calculations and EIS measurements were further employed to study the adsorption process mechanism in detail. From the adsorption energies and calculations, the ethylamine molecule was adsorbed solely by turning the terminal -NH2 group towards the iron surface. Since the ethylamine is a simple aliphatic amine with a free electron pair on the nitrogen, it can act as a nucleophilic agent and at the same time form a coordination bond. PEI chelating ability is well known and different polymer structures (linear vs. branched) and parameters (pH, viscosity e.g.) were studied and compared39,40. Since linear PEI has only secondary amino groups in the main chain, branched PEI has primary, secondary, and tertiary amino groups accessible thus stronger metal-binding properties41. Kislenko et al.39 studied and confirmed complex formation between PEI molecule and metal (copper, nickel, cobalt) ions. They found the reaction of complex formation to be controlled by the metal ions diffusion into the polymer globule in solution which may also apply to iron studied in our work. Also, alkali or alkaline earth metals (present in the Hanks´ solution) are not chelated by PEI at any pH41 which favors the Fe-PEI chelation over others and may contribute to the more rapid degradation rate. We propose the following mechanism of degradation of Fe-PEI samples along with the Fe-PEI complexation reactions, where R refers to the H(NHCH2CH2)nNH2 (n differs regarding the molecular weight (Mw) of branched PEI. For example, for PEI of Mw = 1800; Mw = 70,000 or Mw 750,000 is n ~ 42, ~ 1628 and ~ 17,442 respectively42):

Fe+R-NH2FeR-NHad+H++e- 3
Fe+R-NH-FeR-NHad+e- 4
FeR-NHadFeR-NH++e- 5
FeR-NH++H+Fe2++R-NH2 6

It is important to note that due to the complex structure of the branched polymer, this model is simplified.

Also, primary, secondary, and tertiary amines oxidation occurs. Generally, branched PEI (BPEI) is more prone to oxidation than linear PEI (LPEI)43. Primary amines will react first due to their higher reactivity. Typical oxidation products of primary, secondary and tertiary amines are amphoteric hydroxylamines (–NH–OH)/nitroso species (–N = O)/nitro species (–NO2), secondary hydroxylamines (RR′–N–OH), and tertiary N-oxide [R3N(+)–O(–)], respectively. A decrease in the number of PEI reactive primary amines may also significantly lower the material toxicity44.

Despite the different rotation of the molecule and its location at different surface sites, the molecule bound in each case directly to the iron atom via the -NH2 group, which is consistent with previous experimental FT-IR results31 which also indicated the binding of the molecule to the iron surface via the -NH2 group. In the case of placing the ethylamine molecule in hollow or bridge positions, the molecule draws away from the iron surface. The lowest value of adsorption energy was achieved with a surface in which the molecule was placed directly above the Fe(110) atom with a value of -1.38 eV. The Fe–N bond length, in this case, was d(Fe–N) = 2.11 Å. Schneider et al. studied iron complexes45 and found, that in the case of high-spin (HS) FeII, the average Fe–N bond distances were d(Fe–N) = 2.19 Å, while in the low-spin (LS) FeII state the average d(Fe–N) = 1.97 Å. Since the modeled data dealt only with the ideal atomic iron surface due to the real system complexity, oxidized iron species are expected to be present on the real specimen. Zheng et al.46 focused on how the spin state affects the iron-binding sites in macromolecular structures. They discerned two populations of FeII binding sites which corresponded to Fe–N R0 parameters of 1.57 Å for LS iron and 1.76 Å for HS iron. A similar distribution was observed for FeIII as well. Based on results from computational modeling of monomer unit of PEI, the potential structure of branched polymer layer adsorbed on Fe(110) surface was designed (Fig. 8).

Figure 8.

Figure 8

Conceptual representation of polyethyleneimine (PEI) bound to the iron surface through -NH2 group.

The fitted Nyquist plots of samples before and after corrosion are shown in Fig. 6. The equivalent circuit was chosen because of agreement with experimental results for all samples. To characterize the solid/solution interface, the Rct and Qdl were studied. The Rct value increase after the corrosion for all samples. The resistance increase relates to the formation of corrosion products. In the case of Fe-PEI, the double-layer capacitance decreases which indicated the enhanced formation of degradation products. According to the results for the Fe-PEI sample, also the capacitance decreased because of the formation of corrosion products and surface degradation could be expected. Both semi-circles in the high and low frequencies correspond to the capacitive behavior. Nyquist diagrams for Fe samples display two semicircles, which correspond to the contact resistance of metal at high-frequency and the corrosion reaction of the iron sample at low-frequency region. In the case of metal-polymer samples, interpretation of EIS spectra was discussed above. Impedance spectra were fitted by using ZView software and the values appropriate for all samples before and after the corrosion process are listed in Table 2. In both cases (before and after corrosion), samples coated with PEI display almost two times lower values of resistance. The charge transfer resistance decreases from 13.9 to 8.25 Ω and from 19.04 to 10.13 Ω for samples before and after corrosion, respectively. The diameter of both semicircles is lower in the case of Fe-PEI samples in comparison with Fe samples. This behavior indicates easier charge transfer, which insinuates lower stability of Fe-PEI samples, therefore their easier corrosion. Moreover, the constant phase element values increase in both cases before and after corrosion. The value increment was higher for samples before corrosion (from 0.70 to 2.82 µF).

Table 2.

Values of impedance parameters for Fe and Fe-PEI samples before and after corrosion.

Impedance parameter Fe Fe-PEI
Before corrosion After corrosion Before corrosion After corrosion
Rct (Ω) 13.9 19.04 8.25 10.13
Qdl (µF) 0.70 1.28 2.82 1.44

Higher degradation speed resulting in more rapid corrosion product formation represented by the higher resistance value in EIS measurements was observed for Fe-PEI samples indicating their higher corrosion speed when compared to the pure iron. The size and steric effect of the used coating units may also influence their performance either as corrosion inhibitors or catalysts. If the nanosized coatings are used, the particles are blocking the corrosive elements from diffusing into the surface of the substrate47. Due to their size and high density on the material surface, these may act as a good corrosion inhibitor. On the other hand, homogeneous access of corrosive species from the solution to the fresh metallic surface needs to be ensured if corrosion enhancement is wanted. Therefore, no steric hindrance should appear either during corrosion products formation or the penetration of corrosive solution to the surface.

Raman spectroscopy studies were employed to evaluate the composition of sample surface before and after corrosion occurred. Visible peaks corresponding to the polyethyleneimine coating were present for Fe-PEI samples before corrosion which confirms the successful coating process. Moreover, the intensity of peaks corresponding to pure PEI decreased after corrosion suggesting that polymer dissolution in simulated body fluids occurred as soon as after 60 min. This finding is of great importance for designing the implant with the non-toxic polymer concentration which may be released over a very short period after implantation. On the other hand, quick release of the drugs incorporated into such a layer may be beneficial in the acute phase after surgery with the higher risk of adjacent tissue inflammation. The composition of deposited degradation products did not significantly differ for Fe and Fe-PEI samples, however, their morphology did. General iron corrosion mechanism starts with material oxidation reactions (Eqs. 7 and 8)

FeFe2++2e-Anodic 7
O2+2H2O+4e-4OH-Cathodic 8

followed by the creation of iron (Fe2+ and Fe3+) hydroxides (Eqs. 911) and magnetite (Eq. 12)48,49.

Fe2++2OH-Fe(OH)2 9
Fe2+Fe3++e-Inalkalinesolutionsandpresenceofoxygen 10
Fe3++3OH-Fe(OH)3 11
Fe(OH)2+2FeO(OH)Fe3O4+H2OInpresenceofoxygenandCl-ions 12

During immersion in Hanks´ solution, the following reactions (Eqs. 1320) take place according to Zhang50:

Fe(OH)2+Cl-FeClOH+OH- 13
FeClOH+H+Fe2++Cl-+H2O 14
Fe(OH)3+2Cl-FeCl2OH+2OH- 15
FeCl2OH+H+Fe3++2Cl-+H2O 16
2PO43-+3Ca2+Ca3(PO4)2 17
2PO43-+3Mg2+Mg3(PO4)2 18
2PO43-+3Fe2++8H2OFe3(PO4)2.8H2O 19
PO43-+Fe3+FePO4 20

In the case of pure iron, intensive cracking of surface along with the typical pitting and rather spherical corrosion products were present while in the case of Fe-PEI, more crystal-like products were found (Fig. 9), composed of different chemical components described in Eqs. 1017. This is due to the different corrosion mechanisms of these samples, which were described in detail by Oriňaková et al.32.

Figure 9.

Figure 9

Scheme of degradation process ongoing on the surface of pure Fe pellet (a) compared to process ongoing on the PEI-coated material (b).

The iron-based material corrosion usually starts with the oxohydroxide ferrihydrite (Fe(III)) precipitation during the hydrolysis. However, this form is thermodynamically unstable and the creation of more crystalline oxohydrides is favored. Ferrihydrite is subsequently turned into lepidocrocite, goethite, and magnetite51,52. Secondary mineral transformation rates are determined by the uptake of electrons from solution (via dissolved Fe(II)) and also, chloride ions influence the formation of flaked rust53. Lepidocrocite production will be highest at relatively low surface-associated Fe(II) concentrations, with these conditions more likely at lower pH53. Based on the results obtained from the SEM analysis, we assume that the production of lepidocrocite is favored on the Fe-PEI surface while the goethite represents the prevailing form in the case of pure iron. The polycationic character of the polymeric layer (which attracts negatively charged chloride ions) along with the changes in pH during its dissolution in simulated body fluids may be responsible for the favored lepidocrocite production on Fe-PEI samples.

Conclusions

Iron-based biomaterials represent a promising candidate as biodegradable orthopedic scaffolds. Coating with polymeric layers is an effective way of treating the problem of their insufficient corrosion speed. Knowledge of the polymer and metal interaction is therefore crucial for a complex understanding of their behavior in the human body. Iron pellets were prepared by powder metallurgy and coated with a thin polyethyleneimine layer which has already proven its beneficial effect on enhancing corrosion speed. The polymer adsorption process on the metallic surface was studied in detail using molecular calculations. The results of DFT simulations clearly showed that the ethylamine molecule is adsorbed on the surface of bcc Fe (110). Despite the different rotation of the molecule and its location at different surface sites, the molecule is bound in each case directly to the iron atom via the NH2 group, which is consistent with experimental results which also indicated the binding of the molecule to the iron surface via the -NH2 group. In the case of placing the ethylamine molecule in hollow or bridge positions, the molecule moved away from the Fe surface. The lowest value of adsorption energy and the most stable system was achieved with a surface in which the molecule was placed directly above the Fe(110) atom with a value of adsorption energy -1.38 eV. The coordination character of the iron-organic coating layer is expected to take a place. Electrochemical measurements confirmed the successful polymer adsorption and enhanced corrosion speed of PEI-coated iron samples. The double-layer capacitance of Fe-PEI samples decreased after corrosion, which indicated the enhanced formation of degradation products, while an increase was detected for pure Fe. Detailed characterization of the Fe-PEI system therefore should help in the understanding of various polymer-coated degradable metals behavior. However, the biological performance of such material remains the most crucial and needs to be addressed soon.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Slovak Research and Development Agency [APVV-16-0029, APVV-20-0278] and by the Internal research grant system of Faculty of Science of P. J. Šafárik University [vvgs-pf-2021-1783]. Authors would like to acknowledge CeZIS—Knowledge and Information Systems Center of Pavol Jozef Šafárik University in Košice, Slovakia for providing computational resources.

Author contributions

R. G.—Conceptualization, investigation, formal analysis, writing—original draft. N. P.—Investigation, writing—original draft. K. S.– Investigation, writing—original draft. J. S.—Formal analysis, Writing—original draft. I. S.—investigation, writing—original draft. A. K.—Investigation, data curation. I.Š.—Investigation, data curation F. K.—Investigation, data curation. R. O.—conceptualization, project administration, funding acquisition, supervision, writing—review and editing.

Data availability

Data available on request from the author.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  • 1.Huafang L, Zheng Y, Qin L, Li H, Zheng Y, Qin L. Progress of biodegradable metals. Prog. Nat. Sci. Mater. Int. 2014;24:414–422. doi: 10.1016/j.pnsc.2014.08.014. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Hermawan H, Dubé D, Mantovani D. Degradable metallic biomaterials: Design and development of Fe–Mn alloys for stents. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A. 2010;93:1–11. doi: 10.1002/jbm.a.32224. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Zheng YF, Gu XN, Witte F. Biodegradable metals. Mater. Sci. Eng. R Rep. 2014;77:1–34. doi: 10.1016/j.mser.2014.01.001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Yun Y, Dong Z, Lee N, Liu Y, Xue D, Guo X, Kuhlmann J, Doepke A, Halsall HB, Heineman W, Sundaramurthy S, Schulz MJ, Yin Z, Shanov V, Hurd D, Nagy P, Li W, Fox C. Revolutionizing biodegradable metals. Mater. Today. 2009 doi: 10.1016/S1369-7021(09)70273-1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Shuai C, Li S, Peng S, Feng P, Lai Y, Gao C. Biodegradable metallic bone implants. Mater. Chem. Front. 2019;3:544–562. doi: 10.1039/c8qm00507a. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Zhang J, Shang Z, Jiang Y, Zhang K, Li X, Ma M, Li Y, Ma B. Biodegradable metals for bone fracture repair in animal models: a systematic review. Regen. Biomater. 2021;8:1–17. doi: 10.1093/rb/rbaa047. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Wang X, Xu S, Zhou S, Xu W, Leary M, Choong P, Qian M, Brandt M, Xie YM. Topological design and additive manufacturing of porous metals for bone scaffolds and orthopaedic implants: A review. Biomaterials. 2016;83:127–141. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.01.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Li Y, Jahr H, Pavanram P, Bobbert FSL, Puggi U, Zhang XY, Pouran B, Leeflang MA, Weinans H, Zhou J, Zadpoor AA. Additively manufactured functionally graded biodegradable porous iron. Acta Biomater. 2019;96:646–661. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2019.07.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Li Y, Zhou J, Pavanram P, Leeflang MA, Fockaert LI, Pouran B, Tümer N, Schröder KU, Mol JMC, Weinans H, Jahr H, Zadpoor AA, Lietaert K, Pavanram P, Yilmaz A, Gonzalez-Garcia Y, Weinans H, Zhou J. Additively manufactured biodegradable porous iron. Acta Biomater. 2018;77:380–393. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2018.07.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Alavi R, Trenggono A, Champagne S, Hermawan H. Investigation on mechanical behavior of biodegradable iron foams under different compression test conditions. Metals. 2017;7:202. doi: 10.3390/met7060202. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Čapek J, Stehlíková K, Michalcová A, Msallamová Š, Vojtěch D. Microstructure, mechanical and corrosion properties of biodegradable powder metallurgical Fe-2 wt% X (X = Pd, Ag and C) alloys. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2016;181:501–511. doi: 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2016.06.087. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Schinhammer M, Hänzi AC, Löffler JF, Uggowitzer PJ. Design strategy for biodegradable Fe-based alloys for medical applications. Acta Biomater. 2010;6:1705–1713. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2009.07.039. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Wang H, Zheng Y, Liu J, Jiang C, Li Y. In vitro corrosion properties and cytocompatibility of Fe-Ga alloys as potential biodegradable metallic materials. Mater. Sci. Eng. C. Mater. Biol. Appl. 2017;71:60–66. doi: 10.1016/j.msec.2016.09.086. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Wegener B, Sievers B, Utzschneider S, Müller P, Jansson V, Rößler S, Nies B, Stephani G, Kieback B, Quadbeck P. Microstructure, cytotoxicity and corrosion of powder-metallurgical iron alloys for biodegradable bone replacement materials. Mater. Sci. Eng. B Solid-State Mater. Adv. Technol. 2011;176:1789–1796. doi: 10.1016/j.mseb.2011.04.017. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Reindl A, Borowsky R, Hein SB, Geis-Gerstorfer J, Imgrund P, Petzoldt F. Degradation behavior of novel Fe/ß-TCP composites produced by powder injection molding for cortical bone replacement. J. Mater. Sci. 2014 doi: 10.1007/s10853-014-8532-5. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Zhou J, Yang Y, Alonso Frank M, Detsch R, Boccaccini AR, Virtanen S. Accelerated degradation behavior and cytocompatibility of pure iron treated with sandblasting. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2016;8:26482–26492. doi: 10.1021/acsami.6b07068. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Schinhammer M, Steiger P, Moszner F, Löffler JF, Uggowitzer PJ. Degradation performance of biodegradable FeMnC(Pd) alloys. Mater. Sci. Eng. C. 2013 doi: 10.1016/j.msec.2012.10.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Heiden M, Kustas A, Chaput K, Nauman E, Johnson D, Stanciu L. Effect of microstructure and strain on the degradation behavior of novel bioresorbable iron-manganese alloy implants. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A. 2015 doi: 10.1002/jbm.a.35220. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Wang S, Xu Y, Zhou J, Li H, Chang J, Huan Z. In vitro degradation and surface bioactivity of iron-matrix composites containing silicate-based bioceramic. Bioact. Mater. 2017;2:10–18. doi: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2016.12.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Liu B, Zheng YF. STENT11NOTED - Effects of alloying elements (Mn Co, Al, W, Sn, B, C and S) on biodegradability and in vitro biocompatibility of pure iron. Acta Biomater. 2011 doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2010.11.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Hermawan H, Alamdari H, Mantovani D, Dubé D. Iron–manganese: new class of metallic degradable biomaterials prepared by powder metallurgy. Powder Metall. 2008;51:38–45. doi: 10.1179/174329008X284868. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Chou DT, Wells D, Hong D, Lee B, Kuhn H, Kumta PN. Novel processing of iron-manganese alloy-based biomaterials by inkjet 3-D printing. Acta Biomater. 2013;9:8593–8603. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2013.04.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Kafri A, Ovadia S, Yosafovich-Doitch G, Aghion E. In vivo performances of pure Zn and Zn–Fe alloy as biodegradable implants. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med. 2018 doi: 10.1007/s10856-018-6096-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Kafri A, Ovadia S, Yosafovich-Doitch G, Aghion E. The effects of 4%Fe on the performance of pure zinc as biodegradable implant material. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 2019;47:1400–1408. doi: 10.1007/s10439-019-02245-w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Heiden M, Huang S, Nauman E, Johnson D, Stanciu L. Nanoporous metals for biodegradable implants: Initial bone mesenchymal stem cell adhesion and degradation behavior. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A. 2016;104:1747–1758. doi: 10.1002/jbm.a.35707. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Zhang Q, Cao P. Degradable porous Fe-35 wt.%Mn produced via powder sintering from NH4HCO3 porogen. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2015;163:394–401. doi: 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2015.07.056. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Yusop AHM, Daud NM, Nur H, Kadir MRA, Hermawan H, Hakim A, Yusop M, Daud NM, Nur H, Rafiq M, Kadir A, Hermawan H. Controlling the degradation kinetics of porous iron by poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) infiltration for use as temporary medical implants. Sci. Rep. 2015;5:1–17. doi: 10.1038/srep11194. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Oriňaková R, Gorejová R, Macko J, Oriňak A, Kupková M, Hrubovčáková M, Ševc J, Smith RM. Evaluation of in vitro biocompatibility of open cell iron structures with PEG coating. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2019;475:515–518. doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2019.01.010. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Haverová L, Oriňaková R, Oriňak A, Gorejová R, Baláž M, Vanýsek P, Kupková M, Hrubovčáková M, Mudroň P, Radoňák J, Králová ZOO, Turoňová AMM, Oriňaková R, Gorejová R, Orságová Králová Z, Baláž M, Hrubovčáková M, Oriňak A, Vanýsek P, Morovská Turoňová A, Kupková M, Mudroň P, Haverová L. An in vitro corrosion study of open cell iron structures with PEG coating for bone replacement applications. Metals (Basel) 2018;8:1–21. doi: 10.3390/met8070499. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Oriňaková R, Gorejová R, Petráková M, Králová ZO, Oriňak A, Kupková M, Hrubovčáková M, Podobová M, Baláž M, Smith RM. Degradation performance of open-cell biomaterials from phosphated carbonyl iron powder with PEG coating. Materials (Basel). 2020;13:10–13. doi: 10.3390/ma13184134. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Gorejová R, Oriňaková R, Králová ZO, Baláž M, Kupková M, Hrubovčáková M, Haverová L, Džupon M, Oriňak A, Kal’avskỳ F, Koval K. In vitro corrosion behavior of biodegradable iron foams with polymeric coating. Materials (Basel). 2020;13:184. doi: 10.3390/ma13010184. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Oriňaková R, Gorejová R, Králová ZO, Oriňak A, Shepa I, Hovancová J, Kovalčíková A, Bujňáková ZL, Király N, Kaňuchová M, Baláž M, Strečková M, Kupková M, Hrubovčáková M, Kal’avský F, Oriňak M. Influence of albumin interaction on corrosion resistance of sintered iron biomaterials with polyethyleneimine coating. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2020;509:145379. doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2020.145379. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Zhong D, Jiao Y, Zhang Y, Zhang W, Li N, Zuo Q, Wang Q, Xue W, Liu Z. Effects of the gene carrier polyethyleneimines on structure and function of blood components. Biomaterials. 2013;34:294–305. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.09.060. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Danthanarayana AN, Manatunga DC, De Silva RM, Chandrasekharan NV, De Silva KMN. Magnetofection and isolation of DNA using polyethyleneimine functionalized magnetic iron oxide nanoparticles. R. Soc. Open Sci. 2018;5:181369. doi: 10.1098/rsos.181369. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Vancha AR, Govindaraju S, Parsa KVL, Jasti M, González-García M, Ballestero RP. Use of polyethyleneimine polymer in cell culture as attachment factor and lipofection enhancer. BMC Biotechnol. 2004;4:1–12. doi: 10.1186/1472-6750-4-23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Liu Z, Liu Y, Ho C-H, Liu Y, Jing X, Cheng A. Synthesis of nano-Fe0/PEI composite and its reduction and chelation mechanisms for Cr(VI) from aqueous solution. J. Environ. Eng. 2018;144:04018004. doi: 10.1061/(asce)ee.1943-7870.0001346. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Hjorth Larsen A, JØrgen Mortensen J, Blomqvist J, Castelli IE, Christensen R, Dułak M, Friis J, Groves MN, Hammer B, Hargus C, Hermes ED, Jennings PC, Bjerre Jensen P, Kermode J, Kitchin JR, Leonhard Kolsbjerg E, Kubal J, Kaasbjerg K, Lysgaard S, Bergmann Maronsson J, Maxson T, Olsen T, Pastewka L, Peterson A, Rostgaard C, SchiØtz J, Schütt O, Strange M, Thygesen KS, Vegge T, Vilhelmsen L, Walter M, Zeng Z, Jacobsen KW. The atomic simulation environment—A Python library for working with atoms. J. Phys. Condens. Matter. 2017;29:273002. doi: 10.1088/1361-648X/aa680e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Jianguo L, Gaoping G, Chuanwei Y. EIS study of corrosion behaviour of organic coating/Dacromet composite systems. Electrochim. Acta. 2005;50:3320–3332. doi: 10.1016/j.electacta.2004.12.010. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Kislenko VN, Oliynyk LP. Complex formation of polyethyleneimine with copper(II), nickel(II), and cobalt(II) ions. J. Polym. Sci. A Polym. Chem. 2002;40:914–922. doi: 10.1002/pola.10157. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Kobayashi S, Hiroishi K, Tokunoh M, Saegusa T. Chelating properties of linear and branched poly(ethylenimines) Macromolecules. 1987;20:1496–1500. doi: 10.1021/ma00173a009. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Lindén JB, Larsson M, Kaur S, Skinner WM, Miklavcic SJ, Nann T, Kempson IM, Nydén M. Polyethyleneimine for copper absorption II: Kinetics, selectivity and efficiency from seawater. RSC Adv. 2015;5:51883–51890. doi: 10.1039/c5ra08029k. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Avadiar L, Leong YK, Fourie A. Effects of polyethylenimine dosages and molecular weights on flocculation, rheology and consolidation behaviors of kaolin slurries. Powder Technol. 2014;254:364–372. doi: 10.1016/j.powtec.2014.01.035. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Ahmadalinezhad A, Sayari A. Oxidative degradation of silica-supported polyethylenimine for CO2 adsorption: Insights into the nature of deactivated species. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2014;16:1529–1535. doi: 10.1039/c3cp53928h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Israel LL, Lellouche E, Ostrovsky S, Yarmiayev V, Bechor M, Michaeli S, Lellouche JP. Acute in vivo toxicity mitigation of PEI-coated maghemite nanoparticles using controlled oxidation and surface modifications toward siRNA delivery. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2015;7:15240–15255. doi: 10.1021/acsami.5b02743. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Schneider B, Demeshko S, Neudeck S, Dechert S, Meyer F. Mixed-spin [2 × 2] Fe4 grid complex optimized for quantum cellular automata. Inorg. Chem. 2013;52:13230–13237. doi: 10.1021/ic4021838. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Zheng H, Langner KM, Shields GP, Hou J, Kowiel M, Allen FH, Murshudov G, Minor W. Data mining of iron(II) and iron(III) bond-valence parameters, and their relevance for macromolecular crystallography. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. D Struct. Biol. 2017;73:316–325. doi: 10.1107/S2059798317000584. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Abdeen DH, El Hachach M, Koc M, Atieh MA. A review on the corrosion behaviour of nanocoatings on metallic substrates. Materials (Basel). 2019;12:210. doi: 10.3390/ma12020210. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Zhu S, Huang N, Xu L, Zhang Y, Liu H, Sun H, Leng Y. Biocompatibility of pure iron: In vitro assessment of degradation kinetics and cytotoxicity on endothelial cells. Mater. Sci. Eng. C. 2008;29:1589–1592. doi: 10.1016/j.msec.2008.12.019. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Moravej M, Purnama A, Fiset M, Couet J, Mantovani D. Electroformed pure iron as a new biomaterial for degradable stents: In vitro degradation and preliminary cell viability studies q. Acta Biomater. 2010;6:1843–1851. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2010.01.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Zhang E, Chen H, Shen F. Biocorrosion properties and blood and cell compatibility of pure iron as a biodegradable biomaterial. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med. 2010;21:2151–2163. doi: 10.1007/s10856-010-4070-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Benali O, Abdelmoula M, Refait P, Génin JMR. Effect of orthophosphate on the oxidation products of Fe(II)–Fe(III) hydroxycarbonate: The transformation of green rust to ferrihydrite. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta. 2001;65:1715–1726. doi: 10.1016/S0016-7037(01)00556-7. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Dhaiveegan P, Elangovan N, Nishimura T, Rajendran N. Weathering steel in industrial-marine-urban environment: Field study. Mater. Trans. 2016;57:148–155. doi: 10.2320/matertrans.M2015345. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Boland DD, Collins RN, Miller CJ, Glover CJ, Waite TD. Effect of solution and solid-phase conditions on the Fe(II)-accelerated transformation of ferrihydrite to lepidocrocite and goethite. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2014;48:5477–5485. doi: 10.1021/es4043275. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

Data available on request from the author.


Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES