Store-operated Ca2+ signals are generated by STIM proteins which are ER luminal Ca2+ sensors that couple across ER-PM junctions to activate Ca2+ entry through PM Orai channels [1]. These Ca2+ signals control a spectrum of cellular responses including transcription, secretion and cell growth. Intriguing has been the extraordinarily dynamic operation of STIM proteins which undergo a series of elaborate unfolding, translocation, and channel-coupling events. Recent single-molecule Förster resonance energy transfer (smFRET) and biochemical cross-linking approaches from van Dorp et al. [2] reveal some critical new information on the molecular architecture of STIM1 and its unfolding to span across ER-PM junctions and trigger Orai channel gating [3].
Much has been learned about STIM1 structure and function, but uncertainty has remained on how the C-terminal cytoplasmic domain is able to unfold and extend across the approximately 15 nm gap in ER-PM junctions in order to tether and activate Orai channels [3]. STIM1 has a tightly coiled ER luminal N-terminus including EF-hands which sense luminal Ca2+ changes (Fig. 1A,B). A single transmembrane helix joins this domain to a large cytoplasmic region comprising several helical domains (CC1, CC2, and CC3) followed by a long flexible tail ending in a lysine-rich (KR) sequence (Fig. 1A). STIM1 is always dimeric. In its resting state (ER stores replete with Ca2+), the two N-terminal domains within the dimer are unattached giving distance between the two transmembrane helices (Fig. 1B). The resting C-terminal domain is folded such that there is complete occlusion of the critical, active domain known as SOAR (STIM-Orai activating region) or CAD (channel activating domain) [1]. SOAR comprises a tight intertwined cluster of the CC2 and CC3 helices from each of the two STIM1 monomers. Cytoplasmic expression of just the 100-amino acid SOAR sequence is sufficient to give full constitutive activation of Orai1 channels [1, 3].
Through clever fluorophore-labeling of discrete amino acids within the STIM1 cytoplasmic domain, van Dorp et al. [2] were able to measure distances between key residues in the purified STIM1 dimer. Distance measurements within the SOAR domain are consistent with an earlier crystal structure [4] showing tightly-associated CC2 helices in a dimeric, parallel configuration. The results militate against an NMR-derived antiparallel configuration derived from isolated nonfunctional CC2-containing fragments [5]. Interestingly, the smFRET measurements reveal the “apical” region of SOAR has quite some flexibility not revealed in the static crystal structure [2], in keeping with the crucial ability of this region to conformationally couple with Orai [3].
The studies provide important new understanding on how the folding-up of resting STIM1 occludes SOAR [2]. They support findings [6, 7] that the CC1α1 helix is closely associated with the CC3 helix within SOAR. Unexpectedly, this interaction occurs in a “domain-s-wapping” configuration, wherein the CC1α1 helix from one monomer interacts with the CC3 helix from the other monomer (Fig. 1B). This intriguing intertwining of helices within STIM1 explains much about the “clamping” of the SOAR entity and its subsequent release during activation. The CC1α1/CC3 smFRET results also reveal that SOAR is inverted relative to the configuration needed for Orai-activation, with the SOAR apices close to the ER membrane (Fig. 1B). Further smFRET distance measurements revealed that the two parallel CC1α3 helices are closely apposed with their N-termini oriented away from SOAR. The CC1α2 and CC1α3 helices are folded antiparallel above SOAR (Fig. 1B). Interestingly, molecular modeling of the SOAR/CC1α1 helices suggests the hydrophobic residues shown earlier to hold SOAR in the clamped configuration [6, 7] are indeed mediating SOAR/CC1α1 docking. A series of elegant cysteine cross-linking studies [2] now reveal that all three CC1 helices undergo homologous inter-dimer parallel pairing to mediate the full extension of STIM1 in its activated state, to span the ER-PM junction (Fig. 1E).
The interesting results from van Dorp et al. [2] provide a critical new understanding of the extraordinary activation and extension of STIM1. The unfolding and interactions build upon those suggested earlier [8, 9] with the SOAR domain occluded within the CC1α1 helices. It contrasts with a recent model suggesting CC1α1/CC1α2/CCα3 helices form a compact domain, but this was based on NMR of detergent-induced monomeric CC1 [10].
How does the actual unfolding and exposure of SOAR proceed? The earlier NMR-derived model that SOAR itself might unfold in order to interact with Orai [5], seems intrinsically unlikely given the fundamental stability of SOAR in the new studies [2] and earlier studies [3]. Instead, a new SOAR “flip-out” model appears to be the most likely (Fig. 1C–E). In this model, we envisage the initial driving force for STIM1 activation as pairing of the luminal N-termini driven by Ca2+ dissociation from EF-hands. The resulting close-approach of TMs and CC1α1 helices may have the effect of “squeezing” SOAR from its resting niche between the CC1α1 coils, causing it to start flipping out. Thereafter, the STIM1 CC1 helices begin to zip together from the ER surface. This allows the flexible C-termini to reach and tether STIM1 to the membrane, assisting SOAR to dock with and activate the Orai channel. Thus, STIM1 is a multipurpose signal transducer – it creates SOAR as a highly specific key to unlock Orai channels, but keeps the key safely hidden until Ca2+ store-depletion triggers STIM1 to release it and to assure its safe delivery to the PM. Moreover, it has the capacity to reverse – to rapidly retrieve and sequester SOAR back toward the ER surface as the luminal Ca2+ tide returns and Ca2+ stores become replete.
Glossary
- STIM
stromal interaction molecule
References
- [1].Soboloff J, et al. , STIM proteins: dynamic calcium signal transducers, Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol 13 (9) (2012) 549–565. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [2].van Dorp S, et al. , Conformational dynamics of auto-inhibition in the ER calcium sensor STIM1. Elife, 2021. 10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [3].Zhou Y, et al. , The remote allosteric control of Orai channel gating, PLoS Biol. 17 (8) (2019), e3000413. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [4].Yang X, et al. , Structural and mechanistic insights into the activation of Stromal interaction molecule 1 (STIM1), Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 109 (15) (2012) 5657–5662. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [5].Stathopulos PB, et al. , STIM1/Orai1 coiled-coil interplay in the regulation of store-operated calcium entry, Nat. Commun 4 (2013) 2963. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [6].Fahrner M, et al. , A coiled-coil clamp controls both conformation and clustering of stromal interaction molecule 1 (STIM1), J. Biol. Chem 289 (48) (2014) 33231–33244. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [7].Ma G, et al. , Inside-out Ca2+ signalling prompted by STIM1 conformational switch, Nat. Commun 6 (2015) 7826. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [8].Hirve N, et al. , Coiled-coil formation conveys a STIM1 signal from ER lumen to cytoplasm, Cell Rep. 22 (1) (2018) 72–83. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [9].Fahrner M, et al. , A dual mechanism promotes switching of the Stormorken STIM1 R304W mutant into the activated state, Nat. Commun 9 (1) (2018) 825. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [10].Rathner P, et al. , Interhelical interactions within the STIM1 CC1 domain modulate CRAC channel activation, Nat. Chem. Biol 17 (2) (2021) 196–204. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]