Skip to main content
Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde logoLink to Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde
. 2022 Mar 3;82(3):326–332. doi: 10.1055/a-1577-3249

The Association of Serum Electrolytes with Disease Severity and Obstetric Complications in Pregnant Women with COVID-19: a Prospective Cohort Study from a Tertiary Reference Center

Korrelation zwischen Elektrolytspiegel und Schweregrad der Erkrankung sowie geburtshilflichen Komplikationen bei schwangeren Frauen mit COVID-19: eine prospektive Kohortenstudie in einem Tertiärzentrum

Atakan Tanacan 1,, Seyit Ahmet Erol 1, Ali Taner Anuk 1, Fatma Didem Yucel Yetiskin 1, Eda Ozden Tokalioglu 1, Selin Sahin 1, Serpil Unlu 2, Huseyin Levent Keskin 3, Aziz Ahmet Surel 4, Ozlem Moraloglu Tekin 3, Dilek Sahin 3
PMCID: PMC8893987  PMID: 35250381

Abstract

Introduction To evaluate the association of serum electrolytes with disease severity and obstetric complications in pregnant women with Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19).

Materials and Methods This prospective cohort study was conducted on pregnant women with confirmed COVID-19. Study population was divided into two groups: 1) Mild COVID-19 group (n = 811) and 2) Moderate/severe COVID-19 group (n = 52). Demographic features, clinical characteristics, obstetric complications, and serum electrolytes were compared between the groups. Afterward, a correlation analysis was performed to investigate the association between serum electrolyte disturbances with COVID-19 severity and obstetric complications.

Results Highest serum sodium, hypernatremia, potassium replacement, hypopotassemia, hyperchloremia, initial serum magnesium, hypermagnesemia, and hypocalcemia were significantly higher in the moderate/severe COVID-19 group. The lowest serum sodium, lowest serum potassium, and initial serum calcium were significantly higher in the mild COVID-19 group (p < 0.05). Statistically significant positive weak correlations were found between hypernatremia, hypopotassemia, hyperchloremia, hypermagnesemia, hypocalcemia and COVID-19 severity (r values were 0.27, 0.20, 0.12, 0.18 and 0.12, p values were < 0.001, < 0.001, 0.02, 0.03 and 0.03, respectively). Furthermore, statistically significant positive weak correlations were found between hypopotassemia, hypochloremia, hypermagnesemia, and obstetric complications (r values were 0.10, 0.10, and 0.28, p values were 0.004, 0.03, and 0.001, respectively). A statistically significant negative weak correlation was found between hypomagnesemia and obstetric complications (r = − 0.23 and p = 0.01, respectively).

Conclusion Electrolyte disturbances in pregnant women with COVID-19 seem to be associated with disease severity and obstetric complications.

Key words: COVID-19, disease severity, electrolytes, obstetric complications, pregnancy

Introduction

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is an emerging and rapidly evolving health problem. It has caused a global crisis since the beginning of the pandemic and it has forced states to take extraordinary measures 1 . Special attention should be given to pregnant women as pregnancy worsens the clinical course of COVID-19 2 ,  3 . Although most of the cases recover without the need for hospitalization, deterioration of the disease may be rapid in pregnant women 2 ,  3 . Moreover, COVID-19 may cause various obstetric complications like preterm delivery, prelabour rupture of membranes, fetal distress, and increased cesarean delivery rates 2 ,  3 ,  4 ,  5 . Although advanced age, presence of comorbidities, genetic predisposition, viral load, and particular laboratory features were reported to be associated with more severe disease, our knowledge is still limited about the course of COVID-19 in pregnant women 6 . On the other hand according to the current literature pregnant women with chronic pre-existing comorbidites like cardiac/pulmonary disease or type 1 diabetes mellitus seem to be affected more seriously 7 ,  8 .

Electrolyte imbalance was also reported to be related to severe COVID-19. Hyponatremia, hypopotassemia, hypochloremia, and hypocalcemia were the most common electrolyte abnormalities in the current literature 9 ,  10 ,  11 ,  12 . As severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) mainly attaches to the angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE 2) receptors, it may be involved in electrolyte imbalance and impaired electrolyte homeostasis may lead to immune dysregulation 9 ,  10 ,  11 ,  12 . Pregnancy is characterized by a variety of physiological changes including increased glomerular filtration rate and renal plasma flow leading to alterations in serum electrolytes 13 ,  14 . Thus, the detection, interpretation, and management of electrolyte disturbances during pregnancy may be challenging for physicians. Therefore, the experiences of tertiary reference centers are valuable to establish appropriate management protocols.

The present study aims to evaluate the association of serum electrolytes with disease severity and obstetric complications in pregnant women with COVID-19.

Materials and Methods

Study design and enrollment of patients

This prospective cohort study was conducted on pregnant women with confirmed COVID-19 who were followed-up at the Turkish Ministry of Health Ankara City Hospital between 11.03.2020–30.10.2020. All consecutive cases that gave the required informed consent for participating in the study were included. The study protocol was approved by both the Turkish Ministry of Health and the institutional ethics committee (E2-20-23).

Turkish Ministry of Health Ankara City Hospital is the largest pandemic center in Turkey and it has played an active role from the beginning of the pandemic. It has served as the main reference center in the region mostly dealing with high-risk pregnancies with approximately 1100 deliveries per month 15 ,  16 . COVID-19 was confirmed by SARS-CoV-2 positivity on real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) assays of nasopharyngeal and oropharyngeal specimens 15 ,  16 . During the study period, only pregnant women with suspected symptoms for COVID-19 were screened in our institution, and universal screening was not performed.

Study groups

The study population was divided into two groups based on COVID-19 severity:

  1. mild COVID-19 group and

  2. moderate/severe COVID-19 group.

COVID-19 severity was determined according to current guidelines 17 ,  18 .

Study parameters

Maternal age, pre-pregnancy body mass index (BMI), gravidity, parity, comorbid conditions, gestational age at diagnosis, pregnancy trimester at diagnosis, oxygen support rate, admission to intensive care unit (ICU), radiologic findings consistent with COVID-19 19 , COVID-19 specific medications, antenatal corticosteroid prophylaxis rate, maternal mortality rate, obstetric complications (miscarriage, preterm labor, gestational hypertension, gestational diabetes mellitus, preeclampsia, fetal growth restriction, preterm premature rupture of membranes and intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy), and serum electrolyte values were compared between the groups. Obesity was defined as pre-pregnancy BMI ≥ 30 kg/m 2 20 . Initial (electrolyte values at admission to hospital), highest, and lowest serum values for sodium, potassium, chloride, magnesium, and calcium were recorded and compared between the groups. Additionally, electrolyte disturbance rates were determined based on pregnancy trimesters and compared between the groups. Corrected calcium values were used for the statistical analysis (measured total calcium [mg/dl] + 0.8 × [4.0 – serum albumin {g/dl}]) 13 . Afterward, a correlation analysis was performed to investigate the association between serum electrolyte disturbances with COVID-19 infection severity and obstetric complications.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analyses were performed by Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS 22, IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 22.0 Armonk, NY: IBM Corp.). Medians and interquartile range values were used for the non-normally distributed descriptive parameters. Mann-Whitney U test was performed for comparing the median values between the groups. Categorical variables were presented with numbers and percentages. χ 2 test was used to compare categorical variables. Correlation analysis was performed by Spearmanʼs rho test. A two-tailed p value < 0.05 was regarded as statistically significant.

Results

Main outcomes

There were 811, 40, and 12 pregnancies with mild, moderate, and severe COVID-19 during the study period. Comparison of demographic features and clinical characteristics between mild and moderate/severe COVID-19 groups was shown in Table 1 . Rates of oxygen support, ICU admission, positive radiologic findings, COVID-19 medication use, antenatal corticosteroid prophylaxis rate, maternal mortality, and obstetric complications were significantly higher in the moderate/severe COVID-19 group (p < 0.05).

Table 1  Comparison of demographic features and clinical characteristics between mild COVID-19 group and moderate/severe COVID-19 group.

Variables Mild infection group (n = 811) Moderate/severe infection group (n = 52) p value
BMI: Body mass index, COVID-19: Coronavirus disease 2019, DM: Diabetes mellitus, FGR: Fetal growth restriction, GDM: Gestational diabetes mellitus, GHT: Gestational hypertension, ICU: Intensive care unit, IHCP: Intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy, IQR: Inter-quartile range, PPROM: Preterm premature rupture of membranes
a Statistical analysis was performed by Mann-Whitney U test.
b Statistical analysis was performed by χ 2 test.
Statistically significant p values were highlighted in bold.
Maternal age (years) (median, IQR) a 28 (8) 29 (12) 0.08
BMI (kg/m 2 ) (median, IQR) a 25.9 (6) 23.9 (8) 0.11
Gravidity (median, IQR) a 2 (2) 2 (2) 0.62
Parity (median, IQR) a 1 (2) 1 (2) 0.83
Maternal comorbidity (n, %) b 185 (22.8%) 15 (28.8%) 0.41
  • Obesity (n, %) (BMI ≥ 30 kg/m 2 ) b

73 (9%) 3 (5.7%)
  • Hypothyroidism (n, %)

37 (4.5%) 1 (1.9%)
  • Hypertension (n, %)

34 (4.2%) 2 (3.8%)
  • DM (n, %)

15 (1.8%) 5 (9.6%)
  • Asthma (n, %)

10 (1.2%) 2 (3.8%)
  • Renal disease (n, %)

3 (0.3%) 1 (1.9%)
  • Other (n, %)

13 (1.6%) 1 (1.9%)
Gestational age at diagnosis (weeks) (median, IQR) a 27 (19) 26 (18.25) 0.32
Pregnancy trimester at diagnosis (n, %) b 0.87
  • First

193 (23.8%) 13 (25%)
  • Second

261 (32.1%) 18 (34.6%)
  • Third

357 (44.1%) 21 (40.4%)
Oxygen support (n, %) b 12 (1.5%) 35 (67.3%) < 0.001
ICU admission (n, %) b 0 (0%) 12 (23.1%) < 0.001
Radiologic findings (n, %) b 42 (5.2%) 19 (36.5%) < 0.001
Hydroxychloroquine (n, %) b 70 (8.6%) 16 (30.7%) < 0.001
Lopinavir-ritonavir (n, %) b 34 (4.2%) 21 (40.4%) < 0.001
Azithromycin (n, %) b 16 (1.9%) 4 (7.7%) 0.008
Systemic corticosteroid (n, %) b 21 (2.6%) 26 (50%) < 0.001
Low-molecular weight heparin (n, %) b 337 (41.5%) 42 (80.7%) < 0.001
Anakinra (n, %) b 3 (0.3%) 10 (19.2%) < 0.001
Convalescent plasma (n, %) b 11 (1.3%) 15 (28.8%) < 0.001
Antenatal corticosteroid therapy (n, %) b 7 (0.8%) 5 (9.6%) < 0.001
Maternal mortality (n, %) b 0 (0%) 3 (5.7%) < 0.001
Obstetric complications (n, %) b 79 (9.7%) 14 (26.9%) < 0.001
  • Miscarriage (n, %)

12 (1.4%) 2 (3.8%)
  • Preterm labor (n, %)

25 (3%) 4 (7.7%)
  • GDM (n, %)

6 (0.7%) 2 (3.8%)
  • GHT (n, %)

7 (0.8%) 2 (3.8%)
  • Preeclampsia (n, %)

6 (0.7%) 1 (1.9%)
  • FGR (n, %)

7 (0.8%) 1 (1.9%)
  • PPROM (n, %)

8 (0.9%) 1 (1.9%)
  • IHCP (n, %)

8 (0.9%) 1 (1.9%)

Comparison of serum electrolytes between the study groups

Comparison of serum electrolyte values between mild and moderate/severe COVID-19 groups was shown in Table 2 . While serum sodium and potassium values were available for all patients, serum chloride analysis was performed for 365 patients in the mild COVID-19 group and 47 patients in the moderate/severe COVID-19 group. Serum magnesium analysis was performed for 115 and 18 patients for mild and moderate/severe COVID-19 infection groups, respectively. Serum calcium analysis was performed for 343 patients in the mild COVID-19 group and 47 patients in the moderate/severe COVID-19 group. The median highest serum sodium was significantly higher in the moderate/severe infection group (p < 0.001). The median lowest serum sodium was significantly higher in the mild infection group (p = 0.02). Hypernatremia rate was significantly higher in the moderate/severe infection group (p < 0.001). The lowest serum potassium was significantly lower in the moderate/severe infection group (p < 0.001). Potassium replacement rate was significantly higher in the moderate/severe infection group (p < 0.001). Hypopotassemia rate was significantly higher in the moderate/severe infection group (p < 0.001). Hyperchloremia rate and median initial serum magnesium rate were higher in the moderate/severe infection group (p values were 0.02 and 0.04, respectively). Hypermagnesemia and hypocalcemia rates were significantly higher in the moderate/severe infection group (p = 0.03 for both). Median initial serum calcium was significantly higher in the mild infection group (p = 0.009).

Table 2  Comparison of serum electrolyte values between mild COVID-19 and moderate/severe COVID-19 group.

Variables Mild infection group (n = 811) Moderate/severe infection group (n = 52) p value
COVID-19: Coronavirus disease 2019, IQR: Inter-quartile range
a Statistical analysis was performed by Mann-Whitney U test.
b Statistical analysis was performed by χ 2 test.
* Serum chloride analysis was performed for 365 patients in the mild COVID-19 group and 47 patients in the moderate/severe COVID-19 group. Serum magnesium analysis was performed for 115 and 18 patients for mild and moderate/severe COVID-19 groups, respectively. Serum calcium analysis was performed for 343 patients in the mild COVID-19 group and 47 patients in the moderate/severe COVID-19 group. Corrected calcium values were used for the statistical analysis (measured total calcium [mg/dl] + 0.8 × [4.0 – serum albumin {g/dl}]). Pregnancy trimester based reference ranges were used.
Initial serum sodium (mEq/l) (median, IQR) a 138 (3) 138 (4) 0.79
Highest serum sodium (mEq/l) (median, IQR) a 139 (3) 141 (3) < 0.001
Lowest serum sodium (mEq/l) (median, IQR) a 138 (3) 137 (3) 0.02
Sodium replacement (n, %) b 0 (0%) 1 (1.9%) 0.07
Hypernatremia (n, %) b 0 (0%) 4 (7.7%) < 0.001
Hyponatremia (n, %) b 69 (8.5%) 6 (11.5%) 0.63
Initial serum potassium (mEq/l) (median, IQR) a 4 (0.5) 3.9 (0.6) 0.11
Highest serum potassium (mEq/l) (median, IQR) a 3.8 (0.75) 3.7 (0.75) 0.53
Lowest serum potassium (mEq/l) (median, IQR) a 3.8 (0.4) 3.6 (0.6) < 0.001
Potassium replacement (n, %) b 18 (2.2%) 8 (15.3%) < 0.001
Hyperpotassemia (n, %) b 0 (0%) 1 (1.9%) 0.16
Hypopotassemia (n, %) b 99 (12.2%) 21 (40.4%) < 0.001
Initial serum chloride (mEq/l) (median, IQR) a * 107 (2) 108 (3) 0.06
Hypochloremia (n, %) b 1/365 (0.2%) 0/47 (0%) 0.72
Hyperchloremia (n, %) b 17/365 (4.6%) 6/47 (12.7%) 0.02
Initial serum magnessium (mg/dl) (median, IQR) a * 1.7 (0.3) 1.8 (0.3) 0.04
Hypomagnesemia (n, %) b 61/115 (53.1%) 6/18 (33.3%) 0.12
Hypermagnesemia (n, %) b 2/115 (1.7%) 2/18 (11.1%) 0.03
Initial serum calcium (mg/dl) (median, IQR) a * 8.8 (0.7) 8.7 (0.6) 0.009
Hypocalcemia (n, %) b 200/343 (58.3%) 36/47 (76.6%) 0.03
Hypercalcemia (n, %) b 2/343 (0.6%) 0/47 (0%) 0.59

Correlation of serum electrolyte disturbances with COVID-19 severity and obstetric complications

Correlation of serum electrolyte disturbances with COVID-19 severity and obstetric complications was shown in Table 3 . Statistically significant positive weak correlations were found between hypernatremia, hypopotassemia, hyperchloremia, hypermagnesemia, hypocalcemia and COVID-19 severity (r values were 0.27, 0.20, 0.12, 0.18 and 0.12, p values were < 0.001, < 0.001, 0.02, 0.03 and 0.03, respectively). Furthermore, statistically significant positive weak correlations were found between hypopotassemia, hypochloremia, hypermagnesemia, and obstetric complications (r values were 0.10, 0.10, and 0.28, p values were 0.004, 0.03, and 0.001, respectively). A statistically significant negative weak correlation was found between hypomagnesemia and obstetric complications (r = − 0.23 and p = 0.01, respectively).

Table 3  Correlation of serum electrolyte disturbances with COVID-19 severity and obstetric complications.

Parameter COVID-19 severity Obstetric complications
r value a p value a r value a p value a
COVID-19: Coronavirus disease 2019
a Correlation analysis was performed by Spearman test.
Hyponatremia 0.02 0.46 0.04 0.24
Hypernatremia 0.27 < 0.001 0.03 0.35
Hypopotassemia 0.20 < 0.001 0.10 0.004
Hyperpotassemia 0.27 0.17 0.25 0.21
Hypochloremia − 0.02 0.72 0.10 0.03
Hyperchloremia 0.12 0.02 − 0.03 0.56
Hypomagnesemia − 0.13 0.12 − 0.23 0.01
Hypermagnesemia 0.18 0.03 0.28 0.001
Hypocalcemia 0.12 0.03 − 0.04 0.41
Hypercalcemia − 0.03 0.59 0.05 0.27

Discussion

The results of the present study indicated that pregnant women with moderate/severe COVID-19 infection had significantly higher electrolyte disturbance rates compared to pregnant women with mild disease. Moreover, altered levels of electrolytes in the study population were associated with COVID-19 severity and obstetric complications.

The major pathophysiological pathways behind the hazardous effect of COVID-19 against the human body have not been completely revealed, yet. Destruction of the respiratory epithelium, fatal arrhythmias, myocardial injury, thromboembolic complications, neuronal involvement, excessive inflammatory response, and predisposition to secondary infections all contribute to disease-related morbidity and mortality 21 ,  22 . SARS-CoV-2 enters the host cells via ACE 2 receptors and these receptors are mostly present in respiratory, gastrointestinal, and urinary systems. Binding of SARS-CoV-2 to ACE 2 receptor reduces ACE 2 expression resulting in increased levels of angiotensin 2 9 ,  10 ,  11 ,  12 . As the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system is a major factor in the electrolyte balance, severe COVID-19 may go together with electrolyte disturbances. Furthermore, disease-related nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea may also alter electrolyte balance leading to systemic complications 9  –  12 . Kidney involvement and inappropriate anti-diuretic hormone syndrome were the other common reasons behind impaired electrolyte balance in infected individuals 9  –  12 . Thus, electrolyte disturbances may accompany COVID-19 and physicians should be cautious in the management of these complications. Hyponatremia, hypopotassemia, hypochloremia, and hypocalcemia were the most common complications reported in the literature associated with increased rates of hospitalization, ICU admission, and mortality 9 ,  10 ,  11 ,  12 . Serum electrolytes have various functions in the host immunity like activation of lymphocytes, modulation of cytokines, immunoglobulin synthesis, and cell to cell interactions. However, it is unclear whether these electrolyte disturbances lead to disease progression or COVID-19 itself leads to impaired electrolyte imbalance 9 ,  10 ,  11 ,  12 . The situation is even more complicated in pregnant patients as serum electrolyte levels are affected by pregnancy-related adaptive changes 13 ,  23 . Generalized vasodilation, increased arterial compliance, decreased systemic vascular resistance, increased cardiac output, including increased renal perfusion and glomerular filtration rate all affect serum levels of electrolytes in pregnant women depending on pregnancy trimesters 24 . For this reason, physicians should be more attentive in the management of electrolyte disturbances in pregnant women with COVID-19.

Hyponatremia was the most common electrolyte imbalance reported in the literature and the majority of the cases were associated with the syndrome of inappropriate antidiuresis 9 ,  10 ,  11 ,  12 . Lower levels of serum sodium were observed in patients with pneumonia and sodium deficiency was found to be associated with more severe COVID-19 9 ,  10 ,  11 ,  12 . Both altered renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system and induction of excessive vasopressin release by interleukin 6 are thought to take part in the pathogenesis of lower sodium levels in infected cases 9 ,  10 ,  11 ,  12 . However, hyponatremia and sodium replacement rates were similar between the groups in the present study. Yet, extreme values were more prominent in the moderate/severe infection group and hypernatremia rate was significantly higher in the mentioned group. Contrary to the literature only hypernatremia was found to be positively correlated with disease severity 9 ,  10 ,  11 ,  12 .

Increased rates of urinary potassium extraction were shown in patients with COVID-19 9 ,  10 ,  11 ,  12 . Hypopotassemia was a common condition in infected individuals especially in cases with severe COVID-19. Low potassium level was more significant in patients admitted to ICU and hypopotassemia was considered as a risk factor for cardiac complications 9  –  12 . Consistent with the literature both hypopotassemia and potassium replacement rates were higher in moderate/severe cases and hypopotassemia was found to be positively correlated with disease severity and obstetric complications in the present study.

Hypochloremia was reported to be associated with unfavorable outcomes in patients with COVID-19 9 ,  10 ,  11 ,  12 . Proximal tubule injury, renal hypoxia, impaired coagulation system, and altered renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system are thought to play a role in the disturbances of serum chloride in infected patients 9 ,  10 ,  11 ,  12 . However, differently from the literature hyperchloremia was more frequent in pregnancies with severe infection and hyperchloremia was positively correlated with COVID-19 severity in the present study. On the other hand, hypochloremia was found to be positively correlated with obstetric complications.

Magnesium was reported to take part in vital processes like immune cell adherence, antibody-dependent cytolysis, and immunoglobulin M lymphocyte binding 9 ,  10 ,  11 ,  12 . Decreased levels of magnesium in infected cases are thought to be involved in devastating events like cytokine storm and supplementation of magnesium is considered as protective against severe COVID-19 9 ,  10 ,  11 ,  12 ,  25 . However, contrary to the literature initial serum magnesium and hypermagnesemia rates were significantly higher in cases with moderate/severe COVID-19. Hypermagnesemia was found to be positively correlated with both disease severity and obstetric complications. Furthermore, a negative correlation was observed between hypomagnesemia and obstetric complications.

Calcium was shown to take part in the entrance of SARS-CoV-2 into the host cell 9 ,  10 ,  11 ,  12 . Moreover, hypocalcemia was reported to be related to increased rates of ICU admission, need for mechanical ventilation, and mortality 9 ,  10 ,  11 ,  12 . Similar to the literature lower serum calcium levels and higher hypocalcemia rates were observed in patients with moderate/severe disease. Additionally, hypocalcemia was found to be positively correlated with disease severity.

Physicians should keep in mind that serum electrolyte levels in pregnant women with COVID-19 may be affected by various factors like maternal physiologic adaptive changes, medications, disease severity, and pregnancy trimesters. Thus, further studies on larger populations with more study parameters are necessary to reach more conclusive results. On the other hand, considering the limited knowledge in the pregnant population, the present study may enlighten the development of future studies focusing on the establishment of more appropriate management protocols and alternative treatment options. To the best of our knowledge, this is the most comprehensive study evaluating the association of serum electrolytes with disease severity and obstetric complications in pregnant women with COVID-19.

The main strengths of the present study were the large number of cases, the high number of study parameters, and its unique design. On the other hand, lack of information related to the long term outcomes was the main limitation.

Conclusion

In conclusion, electrolyte disturbances in pregnant women with COVID-19 seem to be associated with disease severity and obstetric complications.

Funding

No funding was used for this study.

Acknowledgements

Special thanks to all the health-care professionals in our country who work devotedly for the community at the pandemic period.

Footnotes

Conflict of Interest The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  • 1.Fenwick M, McCahery J A, Vermeulen E PM. Will the World Ever Be the Same After COVID-19? Two Lessons from the First Global Crisis of a Digital Age. Eur Bus Org Law Rev. 2021;22:125–145. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.CDC COVID-19 Response Pregnancy and Infant Linked Outcomes Team . Zambrano L D, Ellington S, Strid P. Update: Characteristics of Symptomatic Women of Reproductive Age with Laboratory-Confirmed SARS-CoV-2 Infection by Pregnancy Status – United States, January 22-October 3, 2020. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2020;69:1641–1647. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6944e3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.for PregCOV-19 Living Systematic Review Consortium . Allotey J, Stallings E, Bonet M. Clinical manifestations, risk factors, and maternal and perinatal outcomes of coronavirus disease 2019 in pregnancy: living systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ. 2020;370:m3320. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m3320. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Bein B, Bachmann M, Huggett S. SARS-CoV-2/COVID-19: Evidence-Based Recommendations on Diagnosis and Therapy. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 2020;80:491–498. doi: 10.1055/a-1156-3991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Singh S, Nair V G, Singh V V.Pregnancy-Specific Concerns and Psychological Impact of COVID-19 on Antenatal Women GORM 20211–6.[online ahead of print] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Jordan R E, Adab P, Cheng K K. Covid-19: risk factors for severe disease and death. BMJ. 2020;368:m1198. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m1198. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.board of the OEGGG . Klaritsch P, Ciresa-König A, Pristauz-Telsnigg G. COVID-19 During Pregnancy and Puerperium – A Review by the Austrian Society of Gynaecology and Obstetrics (OEGGG) Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 2020;80:813–819. doi: 10.1055/a-1207-0702. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Stumpfe F M, Titzmann A, Schneider M O. SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Pregnancy – a Review of the Current Literature and Possible Impact on Maternal and Neonatal Outcome. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 2020;80:380–390. doi: 10.1055/a-1134-5951. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Lippi G, South A M, Henry B M. Electrolyte imbalances in patients with severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) Ann Clin Biochem. 2020;57:262–265. doi: 10.1177/0004563220922255. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Tezcan M E, Dogan Gokce G, Sen N. Baseline electrolyte abnormalities would be related to poor prognosis in hospitalized coronavirus disease 2019 patients. New Microbes New Infect. 2020;37:100753. doi: 10.1016/j.nmni.2020.100753. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Sarvazad H, Cahngaripour S H, Eskandari Roozbahani N. Evaluation of electrolyte status of sodium, potassium and magnesium, and fasting blood sugar at the initial admission of individuals with COVID-19 without underlying disease in Golestan Hospital, Kermanshah. New Microbes New Infect. 2020;38:100807. doi: 10.1016/j.nmni.2020.100807. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Taheri M, Bahrami A, Habibi P. A Review on the Serum Electrolytes and Trace Elements Role in the Pathophysiology of COVID-19. Biol Trace Elem Res. 2021;199:2475–2481. doi: 10.1007/s12011-020-02377-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Abbassi-Ghanavati M, Greer L G, Cunningham F G. Pregnancy and laboratory studies: a reference table for clinicians. Obstet Gynecol. 2009;114:1326–1331. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181c2bde8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Turğal M, Yazıcıoğlu A, Beksaç K. Pregnancy Outcome of Renal Transplant Recipients: Analysis of Nine Patients. GORM. 2016;19:162–164. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Sahin D, Tanacan A, Erol S A. Updated experience of a tertiary pandemic center on 533 pregnant women with COVID-19 infection: A prospective cohort study from Turkey. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2021;152:328–334. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.13460. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Tanacan A, Erol S A, Turgay B. The rate of SARS-CoV-2 positivity in asymptomatic pregnant women admitted to hospital for delivery: Experience of a pandemic center in Turkey. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2020;253:31–34. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2020.07.051. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Turkish Ministry of Health General Directorate of Public Health COVİD-19 (SARS-CoV-2 infection) Guideline, Scientific Committee ReportAccessed May 01, 2021 at:https://covid19bilgi.saglik.gov.tr/depo/rehberler/COVID-19_Rehberi.pdf?type=file
  • 18.Rasmussen S A, Smulian J C, Lednicky J A. Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) and pregnancy: what obstetricians need to know. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020;222:415–426. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2020.02.017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Recker F, Weber E, Strizek B. Lung Sonography in Obstetrics during COVID-19. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 2020;80:1026–1032. doi: 10.1055/a-1228-4242. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Yurtcu E, Mutlu S, Ozkaya E. The Effects of Pre-Pregnancy Body Mass Index and Weight Gain During Pregnancy on Perinatal Outcomes: A Retrospective Cohort Study. GORM. 2021 doi: 10.21613/GORM.2021.1149. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Wiersinga W J, Rhodes A, Cheng A C. Pathophysiology, Transmission, Diagnosis, and Treatment of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19): A Review. JAMA. 2020;324:782–793. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.12839. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Cavalcante M B, Cavalcante C TMB, Braga A CS. COVID-19 Treatment: Drug Safety Prior to Conception and During Pregnancy and Breastfeeding. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 2021;81:46–60. doi: 10.1055/a-1247-5271. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Karasu Y, Dilbaz B, Ülker K. Renal Failure in Pregnancy: Case Reports and Review of the Literature. GORM. 2016;21:161–166. [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Kohlhepp L M, Hollerich G, Vo L. [Physiological changes during pregnancy] Anaesthesist. 2018;67:383–396. doi: 10.1007/s00101-018-0437-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Anuk A T, Polat N, Akdas S. The Relation Between Trace Element Status (Zinc, Copper, Magnesium) and Clinical Outcomes in COVID-19 Infection During Pregnancy. Biol Trace Elem Res. 2020 doi: 10.1007/s12011-020-02496-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde are provided here courtesy of Thieme Medical Publishers

RESOURCES