Skip to main content
International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology logoLink to International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology
. 2022 Jan 27;72(1):005153. doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.005153

Turicibacter bilis sp. nov., a novel bacterium isolated from the chicken eggshell and swine ileum

Joel J Maki 1,2,3, Torey Looft 1,*
PMCID: PMC8895650  PMID: 35084297

Abstract

Three novel, anaerobic, Gram-positive bacteria were isolated from the eggshell of two separate white leghorn chicken flocks and the ileum of a healthy pig, and designated MMM721T, ISU324 and PIG517 respectively. Cells were pleomorphic and capable of forming long chains of rods or coccoid clusters. Phylogenetic analysis of the 16S rRNA gene sequences identified these strains to be within the genus Turicibacter , of which only one species, Turicibacter sanguinis , has been formally described. However, whole genome sequencing of novel isolates returned a digital DNA–DNA hybridization value of 22.5 % and average nucleotide identity (ANI) values of 76.4 % (ANIb) and 86.0 % (ANIm), indicating divergence between the type strain MMM721T and T. sanguinis , suggesting the strains represented a novel species. The major fatty acid methyl esters of strain MMM721T were C16 : 0, C18 : 1 ω7c and C18 : 0. The strains mainly produced the volatile fatty acid lactate, along with smaller amounts of acetate and butyrate. Together, these data indicate that MMM721T, along with ISU324 and PIG517, represent a novel species within the genus Turicibacter . We propose the name Turicibacter bilis sp. nov. for the species. The type strain is MMM721T (=ATCC TSD-238T=CCUG 74757T).

Keywords: anaerobe, poultry, swine, turicibacter

Introduction

The genus Turicibacter comprises obligately anaerobic, Gram-positive bacteria belonging to the phylum Firmicutes , class Erysipelotrichia , order Erysipelotrichales and family Turicibacteraceae (formerly considered a member of the family Erysipelotrichaceae ) [1]. Currently, there is only one designated species within the genus Turicibacter , Turicibacter sanguinis , which was isolated from a blood culture of a febrile adult human [2]. Strains of T. sanguinis have been isolated from other animals, and T. sanguinis DNA sequences have been identified in culture-independent studies in many species, including turkeys, swine and even termites [3–7]. However, few strains within the genus have been isolated. Here, we describe novel Turicibacter strains MMM721T, ISU324 and PIG517, which were isolated from the eggshell surface of two distinct flocks of chickens and the ileum of a healthy pig, respectively. We propose that these strains represent a novel species within the genus and propose the name Turicibacter bilis sp. nov., with strain MMM721T as the type strain.

Chicken egg washes in 1×PBS and ileal contents were treated 1 : 1 with 70 % ethanol and incubated overnight to enrich for spores by killing vegetative cells, as described previously [8]. Spore preparations were plated on brain–heart infusion (BHI) agar (Difco), supplemented with 0.1 % (v/v) whole bile isolated from healthy white leghorn chickens, 0.05 % (w/v) l-cysteine hydrochloride and 0.0001 % resazurin, and incubated at 42 °C under anaerobic conditions (chamber inflated with 85 % N2, 5 % CO2, 10 % H2) in a Coy anaerobic chamber to isolate spore-forming anaerobes. Bacterial colonies were randomly selected for 16S rRNA gene amplification PCR and Sanger sequencing after 72 h with the previously described bacterial primers 27F-YM and 1492R, using previously described methods [9, 10]. A total of 192 chicken isolates and 32 pig isolates were screened. The generated 16S rRNA gene fragments were 1392, 1397 and 1393 bp long for MMM721T, ISU324, and PIG517, respectively (accession numbers MT500785, MT500789 and MT500788). These sequences were nearly identical (>99 %) to one another. When these sequences were assigned taxonomic identification using the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) Basic Local Alignment Search Tool (blast), they all grouped closely (99 % 16S rRNA gene identity) to T. sanguinis MOL361T, the type strain and only described species within the genus Turicibacter [2, 11]. A 16S rRNA gene phylogeny was reconstructed with sequences from publicly available Turicibacter isolates downloaded from the Ribosomal Database Project (http://rdp.cme.msu.edu/). The resulting phylogenetic tree showed the three T. bilis isolates forming a clade separate from the T. sanguinis strains (Fig. S1, available in the online version of this article). All three strains were maintained on a modified BHI medium (BHIGL) supplemented with 1.0 % (v/v) glycerol, 1.1 % (w/v) sodium dl-lactate, 0.05 % (w/v) l-cysteine hydrochloride and 0.0001 % resazurin throughout the course of the study.

Turicibacter sanguinis MOL361T was obtained from DSMZ for use as a reference strain for comparison purposes. Turicibacter sanguinis MOL361T was capable of growth on BHIGL at 37 °C, so this medium was used for strain maintenance throughout the course of this study.

Growth conditions were determined for MMM721T on BHIGL agar plates (Table 1). Determinations of growth rate and terminal OD600 were determined in BHIGL broth inoculated with an agar plug of a single colony of MMM721T grown for 48 h on BHIGL. Cellular motility, catalase activity and sporulation activity were determined as described previously [8, 12–14]. Strain MMM721T was strictly anaerobic, as exemplified by the absence of growth on aerobically incubated plates after 72 h. Strain MMM721T was capable of growth between 30 and 45 °C, with optimal growth achieved at 42 °C (Table 1). The pH range of MMM721T growth was between pH 6.5–8.5, with an optimal pH of 7.5 (Table 1). Resistance to 70 % ethanol and survival under aerobic conditions suggested all strains were capable of forming spores. Strain MMM721T was negative for catalase activity (Table 1). The doubling time of MMM721T was estimated to be approximately 30 min. The terminal OD600 was 0.600, corresponding to 3.75×106 c.f.u. ml−1.

Table 1.

Comparison of strain MMM721T and Turicibacter sanguinis MOL361T

+, Positive; −, negative; w, weak; ±, variable; R, resistant; S, susceptible. Characteristics for T. sanguinis MOL361T were taken from Bosshard et al. [2]. SCFAs: Ac, acetic acid; But, butyric acid; Cap, caproic acid; Lac, lactic acid; Phen, phenylacetic acid; Val, valeric acid.

Characteristic

T. sanguinis MOL361T

T. bilis MMM721T

Morphology

Gram+ bacilli chains

Variable: Gram+ bacilli chains and Gram+ coccoid clusters

Cell size (µm)

0.5–2.0×0.7–7.0

Rods: 0.8–8.2×0.5–2.0Cocci: 1.0–2.3

Temperature range for growth (°C)

25–46

30–45

pH range for growth (pH)

6.5–8.0

6.5–8.5

Motility

Catalase

Biochemical reactivity:

 α-d-Glucoside

+

 α-d-Galactoside

+

 Glycine

+

 Arginine

+

 Serine

+

 Gelatin

+

+

 Aesculin

±

±

 maltose

+

 Potassium 5-ketogluconate

w

Susceptibility to (50 μg ml−1):

 Penicillin

S

S

 Kanamycin

S

S

 Vancomycin

S

S

 Colistin

R

R

SCFAs

Ac, Lac

Ac, But, Lac, Val, Cap, Phen

DNA G+C content (mol%)

34.2

34.4

Strain MMM721T was grown for 3 days on BHIGL and BHIGL agar +0.1 % whole chicken bile to determine colony and cellular morphology. On BHIGL, colonies appeared as small to medium-sized irregularly shaped, umbonate colonies with undulating edges. The raised centre of the colony was an opaque white that transitioned to a translucent tan or grey when moving toward the colony’s outer edge. On BHIGL +0.1 % whole chicken bile, colonies appeared larger, with an opaque white, almost-filamentous interior that was raised with translucent, mucoid margins that were undulating to lobate in nature. Cells stained Gram-positive (Table 1). Cellular morphology was assessed with both transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). For TEM, the bacteriological samples were fixed in 2.5 % glutaraldehyde in 0.1 M cacodylate buffer. They were post-fixed with 2 % osmium and placed in 2 % agar. Then the samples were processed through graded alcohols, propylene oxide and Eponate 12 resin followed by a 48 h polymerization. An uranyl acetate and Reynold’s lead stain were performed on the thin section before being examined with a ThermoFisher FEI Tecnai G2 BioTWIN electron microscope (FEI) and images were taken with Nanosprint12 camera (AMT) [15]. For SEM, bacterial cells were put through a 0.22 µm Swinney filter and the filters were fixed in 2.5 % glutaraldehyde in 0.1 M cacodylate buffer. The samples were further processed through sequential exposure to osmium and thiocarbohydrazide [16]. Samples were dehydrated through graded alcohols and chemically dried with hexamethyldisilizane [17]. Samples were decorated with a thin coating of gold–palladium mixture and viewed on a TM3030Plus scanning electron microscope (Hitachi). Under magnification, strain MMM721T was pleomorphic in presentation, composed of long chains of rods (0.8–8.2×0.5–2.0 μm) as well as clusters of coccoid-like cells (1.0–2.3 μm) after 24 h of incubation (Fig. 1a, b, Table 1). Despite the appearance of multiple cellular morphologies, 16S rRNA gene sequencing of cells from the broth cultures pre- and post-microscopy sample collection confirmed the culture was free from contamination. Similar cellular pleomorphy was previously observed within the order Erysipelotrichales , most notably the animal pathogen Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae [18].

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

(a) Transmission electron microscope image of MMM721T cells. Bar, 1 μm. (b) Scanning electron microscope image of MMM721T cells. Bar, 2 μm. Cells were cultured in BHIGL for 24 h at 42 °C prior to fixation and visualization.

The cellular fatty acid profile of strain MMM721T was compared to T. sanguinis MOL361T to assess the relatedness between the species. Both isolates were grown in BHIGL broth inoculated with an agar plug of a single colony and pelleted via centrifugation prior to submission to Microbial ID for cellular fatty acids analysis, using the midi Sherlock Microbial Identification System [19]. Abundant cellular fatty acids for MMM721T were similar to T. sanguinis MOL361T, though the proportions of those cellular fatty acids varied between the two species. The main cellular fatty acids were C16 : 0, C18 : 1ω7c and C18 : 0 (Table 2).

Table 2.

Fatty acid methyl esters of MMM721T and Turicibacter sanguinis MOL361T, grown on BHIGL media

Peak

T. bilis MMM721T

T. sanguinis MOL361T

10:0

0.29

0.12

11:0

0.07

12:0

1.08

0.56

13:0

0.11

14:0

2.84

1.88

15:0

0.86

2.65

C16:1 ω9c

1.35

1.66

C16:1 ω7c

1.41

1.33

C16:1 ω5c

1.16

16:0

54.1

42.39

C17:1 ω8c

0.75

C17:1 ω6c

0.41

1.52

17:0

1.8

3.8

C16:0 3OH

0.15

C18:2 ω6,9c

0.15

C18:1 ω9c

5.78

5.78

C18:1 ω7c

16.28

23.46

C18:1 ω5c

1

1.65

18:0

11.76

8.92

19 cycloprop. 11,12

0.66

C20:1 ω10c

1.04

0.75

20:0

0.47

Summed features:*

C17:1 ω8c and/or C17:2 at 16.801

0.75

C18:1 ω7c and/or unknown 17.834†

23.46

*Summed features are fatty acids that cannot be resolved reliably from another fatty acid using the chromatographic conditions chosen. The midi system groups these fatty acids together as one feature with a single percentage of the total.

†Unknown fatty acids are not listed in the midi system library; values are the equivalent chain lengths.

The biochemical characteristic of the novel isolates MMM721T, ISU324 and PIG517 were assessed using the RapID Ana II (Remel), API 20A (bioMérieux) and API 50CHL (bioMérieux) systems according to the manufactures’ instructions (Tables 1 and S1). All tests were conducted in duplicate. The RapID Ana II system and the API 20A systems are used for the identification of anaerobic bacteria while the API50 CHL system is used for the identification of Lactobacillus and other related genera. Strain MMM721T was only positive for arginine and gelatin biochemical reactivity, with variable aesculin hydrolysis activity (Table 1). Strain ISU324 was positive for gelatin and aesculin biochemical reactivity while strain PIG517 was capable of biochemical reactivity to α-glucoside, arginine, gelatin and aesculin, with weak reactivity to serine, methyl β-d-xylopyranoside, d-glucose, arbutin, salicin, cellobiose and maltose (Table S1). Together, the novel strains presented biochemical reactivity profiles that differentiated them from T. sanguinis MOL361T (Tables 1 and S1).

Next, short chain fatty acid (SCFA) production was determined for MMM721T, ISU324 and PIG517 in response to the substrates to which the isolates exhibited strong biochemical reactivity. Isolates were grown in BHIGL broth supplemented with 10 mM of substrate, or 0.1 % (w/v) in the case of gelatin, and inoculated with an agar plug of a single colony. Broth cultures were incubated for 48 h at 42 °C, at which point cells were pelleted by centrifugation and 1.0 ml supernatant was collected for SCFA analysis via gas chromatography (GC) using previously described methods [20, 21]. Samples for GC analysis were prepared in duplicate. The major products of fermentation were acetate, butyrate, and lactate (Tables 1, S1 and S2).

Antibiotic susceptibility was measured using BHIGL agar plates supplemented with 50 µg ml−1 of either kanamycin, colistin, vancomycin or penicillin G, as these antibiotics were previously assessed for T. sanguinis MOL361T [2]. Strain MMM721T was streaked on plates containing each of the four antibiotics in duplicate and was incubated for 48 h at 42 °C, with lack of growth being interpreted as susceptibility. After 48 h, only plates supplemented with colistin displayed growth, suggesting MMM721T was resistant or insenstive to colistin but susceptible to kanamycin, vancomycin, and penicillin G (Table 1).

Genomic DNA was extracted from MMM721T, ISU324 and PIG517 using the Purelink genomic DNA extraction minikit (Invitrogen) according to the manufacturer’s instructions, and DNA quality was determined using a NanoDrop (Thermo Fisher Scientific), Qubit fluorimeter (dsDNA Broad Range kit; Life Technologies) and gel electrophoresis. A Nextera Flex barcoding kit (Illumina) was used to prepare 2×250 bp paired-end read genomic libraries for sequencing on an Illumina MiSeq instrument according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Each isolate was sequenced twice on separate MiSeq runs. The raw Illumina reads are available on NCBI’s sequence read archive (accession numbers: SRR11784102, SRR11784103, SRR11825064, SRR11825065, SRR11825066 and SRR11825067). Raw Illumina reads were uploaded to the PathoSystems Resource Integration Centre (patric) web resource [22, 23]. For each strain, the raw reads for the two MiSeq runs were pooled and assembled using patric’s online genome assembly tool, selecting the ‘SPAdes’ assembly strategy and using default settings [24]. Draft assemblies were annotated through patric’s RASTtk-enabled Genome Annotation Service [22, 25]. The MMM721T draft assembly was composed of 94 contigs, with an assembly length of 2 717 947 bp and a G+C content of 34.4 mol%. The draft assembly for ISU324 had 118 contigs, with an assembly length of 2 751 587 bp and 34.2 mol% G+C content. The PIG517 draft assembly had contigs and totalled 2 585 443 bp in size, with a G+C content of 34.3 mol%. The three isolate assemblies had similar G+C content to the draft assembly of T. sanguinis MOL361T available through the patric genome database, though the genome length for MOL361T was 2 946 097 bp, nearly 200 kb higher than ISU324, which possessed the longest genome length of the three isolates (Table S1).

To determine divergence of the three Turicibacter isolates to other Turicibacter genomes, pairwise average nucleotide identity (ANI) and digital DNA–DNA hybridization (dDDH) calculations were conducted with MMM721T, ISU324, PIG517 and all publicly available Turicibacter species genomes on the patric genome database (Tables 3, S3 and S4). Both ANI and dDDH provide an in silico method to delineate boundaries between species [26–28]. Pairwise ANI calculations were conducted using both blastn+ (ANIb) and MUMmer (ANIm) algorithms through the JSpecies Web Server (http://jspecies.ribohost.com/jspeciesws/) [29]. The dDDH calculations were made through the Genome-to-Genome Distance Calculator (version 2.1) using the recommended settings (http://ggdc.dsmz.de/) [28]. Typically, ANI values >95 % and dDDH values >70 % are considered to be the same species. Comparisons between MMM721T, ISU324 and PIG517 produced ANI values >97 % (both ANIb/ANIm) and dDDH values >84 %, suggesting all strains belonged to the same species. Compared to T. sanguinis MOL361T, MMM721T, ISU324 and PIG517 had ANIb values of 76.43, 76.44 and 76.14 %, and ANIm values of 85.97, 86.04 and 85.79 %, respectively, suggesting these isolates represent a distinct species from T. sanguinis (Tables 3 and S3). The ANI results were corroborated by the dDDH results, with values of 22.5, 22.5 and 22.1 % obtained for MMM721T, ISU324 and PIG517 when compared to T. sanguinis MOL361T (Table S4). Interestingly, the ANI and dDDH results provided additional taxonomical information for several of the previously isolated and sequenced Turicibacter strains. Strains H121 and T. sanguinis MGYG-HGUT-00037 belong to the newly proposed species, along with MMM721T, ISU324 and PIG517 (Tables 3, S3 and S4). Strains UBA1159, UBA7094, Lab288P1bin27 and Nc150P1bin9 fell below the species threshold by ANIb, ANIm and dDDH metrics for both T. sanguinis MOL361T and MMM721T, suggesting that these strains could be divergent species within Turicibacter (Tables 3, S3 and S4).

Table 3.

Pairwise comparison of ANIb values between MMM721T, ISU324, PIG517 and all publicly available genomes on the patric genome database

Strains: 1, T. sanguinis MGYG-HGUT-00143; 2, Turicibacter sp. H121; 3, T. sanguinis PC909; 4, Turicibacter sp. UBA1159; 5, T. sanguinis am_0171; 6, Turicibacter sp. HGF1; 7, Turicibacter sp. UBA7094; 8, T. sanguinis MGYG-HGUT-00037; 9, T. sanguinis MOL361T; 10, Turicibacter sp. Lab288P1bin27; 11, Turicibacter sp. Nc150P1bin9; 12, T. bilis ISU324; 13, T. bilis PIG517; 14, T. bilis MMM721T. Bolded values exceed the 95–96% threshold for species assignment. The * indicates 100% similarity when genomes were compared against themselves.

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

1

*

76.15

99.43

73.73

99.38

99.4

73.96

76.36

99.38

65.87

67.07

76.34

76.27

76.45

2

76.96

*

76.59

76.5

76.66

76.15

76.87

98.34

76.62

66.06

67.2

98.11

98.66

98.1

3

99.55

76.15

*

73.8

99.58

99.36

74.03

76.36

99.73

65.93

67.07

76.45

76.24

76.4

4

73.89

76.35

73.86

*

73.85

73.89

81.88

76.4

73.81

65.96

67.02

76.4

76.36

76.35

5

99.44

76.02

99.58

73.55

*

99.4

73.83

76.2

99.51

65.86

67.19

76.12

76.05

76.21

6

99.31

75.86

99.25

73.72

99.26

*

73.89

76.02

99.2

65.86

66.78

76.08

75.98

75.99

7

74.33

77.18

74.33

82.13

74.25

74.36

*

77.3

74.3

66.06

67.04

77.18

77.29

77.21

8

76.46

98.04

76.25

76.38

76.3

76.2

77.22

*

76.3

66.29

67.62

98.14

98.04

98.04

9

99.46

76.18

99.68

73.83

99.47

99.33

74.04

76.42

*

65.89

67.22

76.57

76.24

76.6

10

66

66.25

66.08

66.03

65.96

65.99

65.86

66.18

66.06

*

65.4

66.31

66.25

66.31

11

67.02

67.18

67.02

67.04

67.06

67.02

66.89

67.27

67.03

65.49

*

67.22

67.24

67.18

12

76.39

97.79

76.44

76.23

76.23

76.21

76.72

98.04

76.44

66.14

67.55

*

97.97

98.76

13

76.36

98.5

76.177

76.54

76.06

76.06

76.84

98.25

76.14

66.08

67.31

98.17

*

97.93

14

76.51

97.77

76.45

76.27

76.17

76.23

76.92

97.98

76.43

65.92

67.32

98.76

97.71

*

To further compare the genomic features of the three Turicibacter isolates and T. sanguinis MOL361T, open reading frames (ORFs) from all four genomes were uploaded to eggNOG-mapper (http://eggnog-mapper.embl.de) for functional annotation and classification [30, 31]. A quadruple venn diagram of shared and unique ORFs was constructed using the ‘venn()’ function in the statistical computing software R [32]. The four genomes shared a set of 1511 ‘core’ ORFs (Fig. S2). An additional 235 ORFs were shared between MMM721T, ISU324 and PIG517 while being absent from T. sanguinis MOL361T. Turicibacter sanguinis MOL361T possessed 748 unique ORFs. These large differences in conserved and unique ORFs between the three Turicibacter isolates and T. sanguinis MOL361T further suggest these strains represent a new species within Turicibacter .

A phylogenetic tree of publicly available Turicibacter genomes was reconstructed by using patric’s Phylogenetic Tree Building Service using the ‘Codon Tree’ method on 100 single-copy genes allowing for up to five deletions/duplications (Fig. 2) [33]. This programme utilizes both DNA and amino acid sequences to build both gene and protein alignments, generating a phylogenetic tree from those alignments. Eggerthia catenaformis OT569 was used as an outgroup. Similar to the ANI and dDDH results, the codon tree had MMM721T, ISU324 and PIG517 together in a clade (including strains H121 and T. sanguinis MGYG-HGUT-00037), distinct from the clade containing T. sanguinis MOL361T, further evidencing these three strains constitute a novel species within the genus Turicibacter (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

Whole genome sequence phylogeny of MMM721T, ISU324, PIG517 and all publicly available genomes on the patric genome database as of November 2020. The tree is rooted by Eggerthia catenaformis OT569. Only bootstrap values >50 % are noted for branch nodes. The patric genome IDs are noted in parentheses after the strain name.

Description of Turicibacter bilis sp. nov.

Turicibacter bilis (bi'lis. L. gen. n. bilis of bile).

Strictly anaerobic, Gram-positive, catalase-negative, non-motile, spore-forming, pleomorphic micro-organisms. Supplementation of media with 0.1 % (v/v) chicken bile induces spore germination. Growth is poor in broth alone, but improves significantly in biphasic media or broth with an agar plug. Cells primarily exist as long chains of irregular rods (0.8–8.2×0.5–2.0 μm) or as individual or clusters of coccoid cells (1.0–2.3 μm). The organism is capable of growth between 30–45 °C and at pH 6.5–8.5, with optimums of 42 °C and pH 7.5, respectively. Colonies are visible on BHIGL agar after 1–2 days and appear as small to medium-sized irregularly shaped, umbonate colonies with undulating margins, with the raised centre an opaque white that transitions to a translucent tan or grey at the margins. Colonies are 2.5–5.0 mm after 3 days at 42 °C. The primary fermentation end products are acetate, butyrate and lactate. The organism is positive for arginine and gelatin biochemical reactivity.

The type strain is MMM721T and was isolated from the surface of a chicken eggshell (=ATCC TSD-238T=CCUG 74757T). The genome is 2.7 Mb with a G+C content of 34.4 mol%.

Supplementary Data

Supplementary material 1

Funding information

Funding for this research was provided by the U. S. Department of Agriculture under project 5030-31320-004-00D. Mention of trade names or commercial products in this publication is solely for the purpose of providing specific information and does not imply recommendation or endorsement by the USDA. USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. This research was supported by an appointment to the Agricultural Research Service (ARS) Research Participation Program administered by the Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education (ORISE) through an interagency agreement between the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) and the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA). ORISE is managed by ORAU under DOE contract number DE- SC0014664. All opinions expressed in this paper are the authors’ and do not necessarily reflect the policies and views of USDA, ARS, DOE, or ORAU/ORISE. This research used resources provided by the SCINet project of the USDA Agricultural Research Service, ARS project number 0500-00093-001-00-D.

Acknowledgements

The authors thank David Alt for sequencing support and Judi Stasko for electron microscopy service. The authors would also like to thank the ISU Poultry Research and Teaching Farm for collecting the eggs used to isolate Turicibacter bilis ISU324 and Crystal Loving for providing the pig ileal sample from which Turicibacter bilis PIG517 was isolated. All animals were raised in accordance with National Animal Disease Center Animal Care and Use Committee guidelines. The mention of trade names or commercial products in this publication are solely for the purpose of providing specific information and does not imply recommendation or endorsement by the U.S. Department of Agriculture.

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.

Footnotes

Abbreviations: ANI, average nucleotide identity; BHI, brain heart infusion; dDDH, digital DNA–DNA hybridization; SCFA, short chain fatty acid.

Four supplementary tables and two supplementary figures are available with the online version of this article.

References

  • 1.Verbarg S, Göker M, Scheuner C, Schumann P, Stackebrandt E. In: The Prokaryotes: Firmicutes and Tenericutes. Rosenberg E, DeLong EF, Lory S, Stackebrandt E, Thompson F, editors. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg; 2014. The Families Erysipelotrichaceae emend., Coprobacillaceae fam. nov., and Turicibacteraceae fam. nov; pp. 79–105. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Bosshard PP, Zbinden R, Altwegg M. Turicibacter sanguinis gen. nov., sp. nov., a novel anaerobic, Gram-positive bacterium. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2002;52:1263–1266. doi: 10.1099/00207713-52-4-1263. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Auchtung TA, Holder ME, Gesell JR, Ajami NJ, Duarte RTD, et al. Complete genome sequence of Turicibacter sp. strain H121, isolated from the feces of a contaminated germ-free mouse. Genome Announc. 2016;4:e00114-16. doi: 10.1128/genomeA.00114-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Cuív PÓ, Klaassens ES, Durkin AS, Harkins DM, Foster L, et al. Draft genome sequence of Turicibacter sanguinis PC909, isolated from human feces. J Bacteriol. 2011;193:1288–1289. doi: 10.1128/JB.01328-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Johnson TA, Sylte MJ, Looft T. In-feed bacitracin methylene disalicylate modulates the turkey microbiota and metabolome in a dose-dependent manner. Sci Rep. 2019;9:8212. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-44338-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Looft T, Allen HK, Cantarel BL, Levine UY, Bayles DO, et al. Bacteria, phages and pigs: the effects of in-feed antibiotics on the microbiome at different gut locations. ISME J. 2014;8:1566–1576. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2014.12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Köhler T, Dietrich C, Scheffrahn RH, Brune A. High-resolution analysis of gut environment and bacterial microbiota reveals functional compartmentation of the gut in wood-feeding higher termites (Nasutitermes spp.) Appl Environ Microbiol. 2012;78:4691–4701. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00683-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Browne HP, Forster SC, Anonye BO, Kumar N, Neville BA, et al. Culturing of “unculturable” human microbiota reveals novel taxa and extensive sporulation. Nature. 2016;533:543–546. doi: 10.1038/nature17645. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Schulze-Schweifing K, Banerjee A, Wade WG. Comparison of bacterial culture and 16S rRNA community profiling by clonal analysis and pyrosequencing for the characterization of the dentine caries-associated microbiome. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2014;4:164. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2014.00164. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Maki JJ, Looft T. Megasphaera stantonii sp. nov., a butyrate-producing bacterium isolated from the cecum of a healthy chicken. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2018;68:3409–3415. doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.002991. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Altschul SF, Gish W, Miller W, Myers EW, Lipman DJ. Basic Local Alignment Search Tool. J Mol Biol. 1990;215:403–410. doi: 10.1016/S0022-2836(05)80360-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Greene RA, Blum EF, DeCoro CT, Fairchild RB, Kaplan MT, et al. Rapid methods for the detection of motility. J Bacteriol. 1951;62:347. doi: 10.1128/jb.62.3.347-347.1951. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Whittenbury R. Hydrogen peroxide formation and catalase activity in the lactic acid bacteria. J Gen Microbiol. 1964;35:13–26. doi: 10.1099/00221287-35-1-13. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Koransky JR, Allen SD, Dowell VR. Use of ethanol for selective isolation of sporeforming microorganisms. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1978;35:762–765. doi: 10.1128/aem.35.4.762-765.1978. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Bozzola JJ, Russell LD. Electron Microscopy Principles and Techniques for Biomicroscopy principles and techniques for biologists. Boston, MA: Jones & Bartlett Pub; 1999. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Malick L, Wilson R. Evaluation of a modified technique for SEM examination of vertebrate specimens without evaporated metal layers. Scan Electron Microsc. 1975;1:259–266. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Nation JL. A new method using hexamethyldisilazane for preparation of soft insect tissues for scanning electron microscopy. Stain Technol. 1983;58:347–351. doi: 10.3109/10520298309066811. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Dunbar SA, Clarridge JE. Potential errors in recognition of Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae . J Clin Microbiol. 2000;38:1302–1304. doi: 10.1128/JCM.38.3.1302-1304.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Miller LT. Single derivatization method for routine analysis of bacterial whole-cell fatty acid methyl esters, including hydroxy acids. J Clin Microbiol. 1982;16:584–586. doi: 10.1128/jcm.16.3.584-586.1982. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Salanitro JP, Muirhead PA. Quantitative method for the gas chromatographic analysis of short-chain monocarboxylic and dicarboxylic acids in fermentation media. Appl Microbiol. 1975;29:374–381. doi: 10.1128/am.29.3.374-381.1975. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Trachsel J, Briggs C, Gabler NK, Allen HK, Loving CL. Dietary resistant potato starch alters intestinal microbial communities and their metabolites, and markers of immune regulation and barrier function in swine. Front Immunol. 2019;10:1381. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.01381. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Wattam AR, Davis JJ, Assaf R, Boisvert S, Brettin T, et al. Improvements to PATRIC, the all-bacterial Bioinformatics Database and Analysis Resource Center. Nucleic Acids Res. 2017;45:D535–D542. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkw1017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Wattam AR, Brettin T, Davis JJ, Gerdes S, Kenyon R, et al. In: Comparative Genomics: Methods and Protocols. Setubal JC, Stoye J, Stadler PF, editors. New York, NY: Springer New York; 2018. Assembly, annotation, and comparative genomics in PATRIC, the All Bacterial Bioinformatics Resource Center; pp. 79–101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Bankevich A, Nurk S, Antipov D, Gurevich AA, Dvorkin M, et al. SPAdes: a new genome assembly algorithm and its applications to single-cell sequencing. J Comput Biol. 2012;19:455–477. doi: 10.1089/cmb.2012.0021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Brettin T, Davis JJ, Disz T, Edwards RA, Gerdes S, et al. RASTtk: A modular and extensible implementation of the RAST algorithm for building custom annotation pipelines and annotating batches of genomes. Sci Rep. 2015;5:8365. doi: 10.1038/srep08365. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Rodriguez-R LM, Konstantinidis KT. The enveomics collection: a toolbox for specialized analyses of microbial genomes and metagenomes. PeerJ Preprints. 2016;4:e1900v1 [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Goris J, Konstantinidis KT, Klappenbach JA, Coenye T, Vandamme P, et al. DNA-DNA hybridization values and their relationship to whole-genome sequence similarities. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2007;57:81–91. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.64483-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Meier-Kolthoff JP, Auch AF, Klenk H-P, Göker M. Genome sequence-based species delimitation with confidence intervals and improved distance functions. BMC Bioinformatics. 2013;14:60. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-14-60. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Richter M, Rosselló-Móra R, Oliver Glöckner F, Peplies J. JSpeciesWS: a web server for prokaryotic species circumscription based on pairwise genome comparison. Bioinformatics. 2016;32:929–931. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv681. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Huerta-Cepas J, Forslund K, Coelho LP, Szklarczyk D, Jensen LJ, et al. Fast genome-wide functional annotation through orthology assignment by eggNOG-Mapper. Mol Biol Evol. 2017;34:2115–2122. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msx148. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Huerta-Cepas J, Szklarczyk D, Heller D, Hernández-Plaza A, Forslund SK, et al. eggNOG 5.0: a hierarchical, functionally and phylogenetically annotated orthology resource based on 5090 organisms and 2502 viruses. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019;47:D309–D314. doi: 10.1093/nar/gky1085. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Team RC R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2006. http://www.R-project.org [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Davis JJ, Wattam AR, Aziz RK, Brettin T, Butler R, et al. The PATRIC Bioinformatics Resource Center: expanding data and analysis capabilities. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019;48:D606–D612. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkz943. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary material 1

Articles from International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology are provided here courtesy of Society for General Microbiology and the International Union of Microbiological Societies

RESOURCES