Abstract
Blood-brain barrier (BBB) integrity is critical for proper function of the central nervous system (CNS). Here, we show that the endothelial Unc5B receptor controls BBB integrity by maintaining Wnt/β-catenin signaling. Inducible endothelial-specific deletion of Unc5B in adult mice leads to BBB leak from brain capillaries that convert to a barrier-incompetent state with reduced Claudin-5 and increased PLVAP expression. Loss of Unc5B decreases BBB Wnt/β-catenin signaling, and β-catenin overexpression rescues Unc5B mutant BBB defects. Mechanistically, the Unc5B ligand Netrin-1 enhances Unc5B interaction with the Wnt co-receptor LRP6, induces its phosphorylation and activates Wnt/β-catenin downstream signaling. Intravenous delivery of antibodies blocking Netrin-1 binding to Unc5B causes a transient BBB breakdown and disruption of Wnt signaling, followed by neurovascular barrier resealing. These data identify Netrin-1-Unc5B signaling as a ligand-receptor pathway that regulates BBB integrity, with implications for CNS diseases.
Subject terms: Cell biology, Blood-brain barrier
The authors show that Netrin-1-Unc5B signaling controls blood-brain barrier integrity by maintaining Wnt/b-catenin signaling and that delivery of antibodies blocking Netrin-1 binding to Unc5B causes transient and size-selective BBB breakdown.
Introduction
The BBB protects the brain from toxins and pathogens and maintains homeostasis and proper function of the CNS1,2. To form the BBB, endothelial cells (ECs) lining brain blood vessels acquire a series of features that control the movement of ions, molecules and cells between the blood and the brain3. CNS ECs express specialized tight junctions that prevent paracellular exchange of small molecules4,5. They lack fenestrae and exhibit a low rate of transcytosis that limits transcellular exchange of large molecules6,7, and they express transporters that shuttle essential nutrients into and out of the brain8–10. ECs acquire BBB properties through their interactions with mural cells and glial cells in the CNS microenvironment and are modulated by neuronal activity11–14.
The canonical Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway is a key regulator of BBB development and maintenance. CNS specific Wnt7a,7b and Norrin ligands produced by glial cells bind to multiprotein receptor complexes including Frizzled4 and LRP6 on brain ECs15–21. Receptor activation causes β-catenin stabilization and nuclear translocation to induce activation of TCF and LEF1 transcription factors, which control expression of a BBB-specific gene expression repertoire by inducing tight junction, solute transporter and efflux transporter expression, and by repressing expression of the permeability protein PLVAP that forms the diaphragm in EC fenestrae, caveolae and transcytotic vesicles15,22–24. Whether Wnt/β-catenin signaling could be modulated to open the BBB “on-demand” or to restore its integrity when damaged, is unknown.
Unc5 was initially discovered in a C. elegans screen for motor dysfunctions, and controls axon guidance in all species examined25,26. Among the four vertebrate Unc5 family members, only Unc5B is expressed in ECs in mice and humans27. Unc5B binds Netrin-126,28, Robo429,30 and Flrt231,32 via its extracellular domain (ECD). Unc5B signaling is mediated by its intracellular domain (ICD), which encompasses a membrane-proximal ZU5 domain (named for its homology to ZO1), followed by a UPA domain (named for its conservation in Unc5B, PIDD and Ankyrin33) and a death domain (DD) that mediates apoptosis in the absence of ligand33,34. These domains form a supramodule in which ZU5 binds to both UPA and DD suppressing Unc5B biological function, while ligand binding to Unc5B triggers a conformational change such that ZU5 loses its interaction with DD and exposes the UPA domain to activate Unc5B signaling33. Global homozygous Unc5B knockout in mice is embryonically lethal due to placental vascular defects27,31, demonstrating that Unc5B has important functions in vascular development. To address biological roles of this receptor during postnatal and adult life, we generated mice with temporally inducible, endothelial-specific Unc5B deletions.
Here, we identify the endothelial transmembrane Unc5B receptor and its ligand Netrin-1 as regulators of the BBB integrity. Inducible endothelial-specific Unc5B deletions in adult mice leads to reduced Wnt/β-catenin signaling and BBB leak for tracers up to 40 kDa. Unc5B and β-catenin genetically interact in ECs to maintain BBB integrity and overexpressing an activated form of β-catenin rescues BBB defects induced by loss of Unc5B. We show that intravenous delivery of monoclonal antibodies blocking Netrin-1 binding to Unc5B induce transient BBB opening to bioactive molecules, which could be useful for drug delivery in various neurological diseases.
Results
Endothelial Unc5B controls BBB development and maintenance
We generated Unc5Bfl/fl mice (Supplementary Fig. 1a) that were intercrossed with Cdh5CreERT2 mice (hereafter Unc5BiECko), which produces EC-specific deletion35. Gene deletion was induced by Tamoxifen (TAM) injection in neonates between postnatal day (P)0-P2, and qPCR revealed efficient Unc5B deletion (Supplementary Fig. 1b, c). Interestingly, neonatal TAM injection-induced seizures and lethality of Unc5BiECko mice around P12 (Supplementary Fig. 1d, Supplementary movie), indicating a possible BBB failure2. Intraperitoneal injection of a fluorescent tracer cadaverine (MW 950 Da) into P5 mice and analysis of tracer leak 2 h later revealed widespread tracer extravasation into the brain of P5 Unc5BiECko mice, confirming that Unc5B deletion impaired BBB development (Supplementary Fig. 1e).
To determine if Unc5B also controlled BBB integrity in adults, we induced gene deletion in two months old mice and probed BBB integrity 7 days later by intravenous (i.v.) cadaverine injection (Fig. 1a). Mice were sacrificed 30 min after dye injection and brain sections were immunolabeled with an antibody against podocalyxin, which labels the luminal EC membrane36. Cadaverine remained inside the vasculature of TAM-injected Cre-negative littermate controls but leaked into the Unc5BiECko brain (Fig. 1b). Quantification of cadaverine extravasation (see methods) revealed significantly increased leak across the BBB in Unc5BiECko brains when compared to controls, while the vascular permeability to cadaverine in other Unc5BiECko organs was similar to controls (Fig. 1c), indicating that Unc5B has a CNS-selective BBB-protective function in adult mice.
Staining of adult brain sections with a commercial antibody recognizing Unc5B showed labeling of endothelium in various brain regions and revealed that adult Unc5B deletion had no effect on vascular density over the period observed (Fig. 1d, e) Widespread but non-uniform cadaverine leakage was observed in several brain regions of Unc5BiECko mice, including the retrosplenial and piriform cortex, hippocampus, hypothalamus, thalamus, striatum and cerebellum, while other cortical areas such as the posterior parietal association areas and the primary somatosensory cortex displayed less cadaverine leak (Fig. 1f). Unc5B expression in cortical ECs of wildtype mice was similar between areas that displayed more or less cadaverine leak in Unc5BiECko brains (Fig. 1g), hence Unc5B expression alone was not sufficient to predict severity of BBB breakdown.
Unc5B expression was also detected in some CD13+ pericytes (Fig. 1h). Because pericytes contribute to BBB integrity11,12, we determined whether pericyte-derived Unc5B affected the BBB by crossing the Unc5Bfl/fl mice with PdgfrβCreERT2 mice37 (Unc5BiPCko), to delete Unc5B in mural cells. Neither TAM-treated Cre-negative littermate controls, nor Unc5BiPCko mice showed cadaverine leakage across the BBB (Fig. 1i, j). Hence, endothelial, but not pericyte, Unc5B controls adult BBB integrity.
Endothelial Unc5B controls Claudin-5 and PLVAP expression
To determine the cause of the BBB defect, we examined the expression levels of proteins relevant for BBB function in ECs, pericytes and astrocytes by western blot and immunolabeling5,11–13,38. Compared to TAM-treated Cre-negative littermate controls, Unc5BiECko brains had similar expression of EC BBB regulators such as Caveolin-1, ZO1, and Occludin (Fig. 2a–c). In addition, vessel coverage by PDGFRβ+ pericytes, and GFAP and Aquaporin-4 expression in astrocytes and astrocyte endfeet were also similar between genotypes (Fig. 2a–e). By contrast, Unc5BiECko mice showed significantly reduced expression of Claudin-5, along with increased expression of PLVAP in Western blot analysis of brain lysates (Fig. 2f, g). Immunolabeling of adult brain sections showed decreased Claudin-5 and increased PLVAP expression in areas with cadaverine leakage in Unc5BiECko brains (Fig. 2h), suggesting that BBB leakage may be due to changes in expression of Claudin-5 and PLVAP. Conversion of ECs to a Claudin-5-negative, PLVAP-positive state occurred in Unc5BiECko capillaries but not in larger vessels (>10 um in diameter, Fig. 2h, Supplementary Fig. 2a), suggesting that BBB leakage in Unc5BiECko brains originates from capillaries. To validate Unc5B deletion effects on Claudin-5 and PLVAP in an independent knockout mouse strain, we tested global Unc5B KO embryos at E12.527, which confirmed decreased CLDN5 mRNA and protein levels as well as increased PLVAP protein expression in homozygous mutant brain ECs when compared to wildtype control littermate brains (Supplementary Fig. 2b–e).
Unc5B regulates Wnt/β-catenin signaling
Because Claudin-5 and PLVAP are two known targets of CNS Wnt/β-catenin signaling22–24, we determined if Unc5B affected Wnt signaling at the BBB. qPCR on adult brain lysates revealed decreased mRNA levels of LEF1 and CLDN5 as well as increased PLVAP mRNA levels in Unc5BiECko brains compared to Cre-negative littermate controls (Fig. 3a). Next, we crossed Unc5BiECko mice with TCF/LEF:H2B-GFP mice39 which express a GFP reporter of β-catenin transcriptional activity. Compared to TAM-treated Cre-negative controls, Unc5BiECko;TCF/LEF:H2B-GFP brains revealed decreased GFP expression in ECs nuclei labeled with the endothelial transcription factor ERG40, attesting to decreased endothelial β-catenin transcriptional activity upon loss of Unc5B function (Supplementary Fig. 3a–c). Western-blot analysis on brain lysates revealed a significant decrease of β-catenin and LEF1 protein in Unc5BiECko brains compared to Cre-negative littermate controls (Fig. 3b, c). Moreover, phosphorylation of LRP6 at S1490, a hallmark of Wnt/β-catenin pathway activation41, was dramatically downregulated upon Unc5B gene deletion (Fig. 3b, c). This phosphorylation provides a docking site for the adapter protein Axin1, resulting in inhibition of the β-catenin destruction complex and thereby promoting β-catenin nuclear translocation and activation41,42. Immunostaining confirmed decreased LEF1 expression in brain ECs of Unc5BiECko mice (Fig. 3d, e).
Immunoprecipitation of Unc5B from primary microvascular mouse brain ECs pulled down LRP6, pLRP6, Frizzled4 and the Wnt co-receptor GPR124 (Fig. 3f), demonstrating a physical interaction between Unc5B and Wnt receptors. To determine which Unc5B domain mediated this interaction, we infected Unc5B siRNA-treated human ECs with GFP-tagged siRNA resistant rat adenoviral constructs encoding Unc5B full-length (FL) or a cytoplasmic domain deletion (ΔCD) (Fig. 3g). LRP6 co-IP was rescued by Unc5B FL but not by ΔCD, identifying the Unc5B cytoplasmic domain as the main LRP6 interacting domain. Additional cytoplasmic domain deletions revealed that the Unc5B death domain was dispensable for LRP6 interaction, whereas deletion of the UPA domain abolished LRP6 co-IP. A construct encoding only the cytoplasmic UPA domain was sufficient to rescue LRP6 co-IP (Fig. 3h, i), indicating that Unc5B interacts with LRP6 via its UPA domain.
To test genetic interaction of Unc5B with Wnt/β-catenin signaling, we generated a TAM-inducible endothelial-specific β-catenin deletion by crossing Ctnnb1fl/fl mice43 with CDH5CreERT2 mice (Fig. 3j, Supp. Figure 3d–f). Heterozygous Unc5Bfl/wt-CDH5CreERT2 or Ctnnb1fl/wt-CDH5CreERT2 mice displayed no BBB cadaverine leakage, but BBB cadaverine leakage increased in double heterozygous Unc5Bfl/wt;Ctnnb1fl/wt-CDH5CreERT2 brains compared to TAM-treated Cre-negative controls (Fig. 3j, k), demonstrating that Unc5B and β−catenin genetically interact in ECs to maintain BBB integrity.
Next, we crossed Unc5BiECko with mice overexpressing a TAM-inducible activated form of β-catenin (Ctnnb1flex/3 mice44), thereby enhancing endothelial Wnt/β-catenin signaling22,24,45 (Fig. 3l, Supplementary Fig. 3g–i). The resulting offspring (Unc5BiECko; Ctnnb1flex/3) displayed decreased PLVAP protein expression, along with increased LEF1 and Claudin-5 protein expression compared to Unc5BiECko mice (Fig. 3m, n). Cadaverine injection into Unc5BiECko;Ctnnb1flex/3 mice showed that BBB leakage was reduced by β-catenin overexpression in Unc5BiECko mice (Fig. 3o). Western-blot on brain lysates from adult TAM-injected Ctnnb1fl/fl;CDH5CreERT2 and Ctnnb1flex/3;CDH5CreERT2 mice showed that loss or gain of endothelial β-catenin did not significantly change Unc5B or Netrin-1 expression (Supplementary Fig. 3d–i), suggesting that Unc5B acted upstream of Wnt signaling.
Claudin-5 but not Vegfr2 is required for Unc5B BBB regulation
To test if reduced Claudin-5 expression in Unc5BiECko brains was functionally involved in the Unc5BiECko BBB defect, we crossed Unc5BiECko mice with eGFP::Claudin-5 mice that express 2-fold higher Claudin-5 levels compared to wildtype littermates and thereby display enhanced CNS EC paracellular barrier properties46. BBB leakage of cadaverine into the brains of Unc5BiECko; eGFP::Claudin-5 mice was reduced compared to Unc5BiECko mice (Fig. 4a, b), demonstrating that increasing Claudin-5 levels rescued leakage of small MW tracers in Unc5B mutant brain ECs.
We considered other signaling pathways that could contribute to BBB leakage in Unc5BiECko mice. Unc5B inhibits Vegfr2-mediated permeability signaling in ECs in vitro by reducing phosphorylation of the Y949 residue30. Y949 phosphorylation is known to trigger disassembly of adherens junctions by activating VE-cadherin phosphorylation, which then downregulates Claudin-529,30,47. Therefore, increased brain Vegfr2-Y949 permeability signaling in the absence of Unc5B could contribute to BBB opening. Western blotting of brain lysates revealed increased Vegfr2-Y949 phosphorylation in Unc5BiECko compared to Cre-negative littermate controls, while Vegfr2-Y1173 phosphorylation, which is critical for VEGF-induced proliferation, was unaffected (Fig. 4c, d). To test Vegfr2-Y949 function, we crossed Unc5BiECko mice with Vegfr2-Y949F mutant mice, which carry an inactivating substitution of tyrosine to phenylalanine and are resistant to VEGF-induced permeability48. Injection of fluorescent cadaverine revealed increased dye leakage into the brain of Unc5BiECko; Y949F mice compared to Cre-negative littermate controls (Fig. 4e, f), demonstrating that Vegfr2-Y949F failed to rescue BBB integrity in Unc5B mutant mice. Moreover, similar VE-cadherin expression and junctional coverage were observed in CTRL and Unc5BiECko brains, further attesting that Unc5B regulation of BBB integrity is independent of the Vegfr2 VE-cadherin pathways (Fig. 4g–j).
Netrin-1 controls BBB integrity
We determined whether Unc5B ligands Netrin-1 and Robo4 regulated BBB integrity and Wnt/β-catenin pathway activation in CNS ECs. Since Netrin-1 mRNA is produced by several cell types in the adult brain49, we generated temporally inducible Netrin-1 global KO mice by crossing Ntn1fl/fl mice50 with RosaCreERT2 mice (hereafter Ntn1iko), to induce ubiquitous gene deletion upon TAM injection. Compared to TAM-treated Cre-negative littermate controls, i.v. injection of cadaverine in adult Ntn1iko mice revealed increased cadaverine leakage across the BBB (Fig. 5a), while Robo4 KO mice29 did not exhibit any BBB leakage (Fig. 5b). Further analysis of adult Ntn1iko mouse brain lysates revealed efficient Ntn1 gene deletion along with decreased pLRP6, Claudin-5 and LEF1 protein expression, while PLVAP expression was increased (Fig. 5c, d). Moreover, treating serum-starved mouse primary brain ECs with Netrin-1 increased LRP6 phosphorylation with a peak at 30 min to 8 h after stimulation (Fig. 5e, f). This effect was abolished by Unc5B siRNA treatment (Fig. 5e, f). Unc5B immunoprecipitation from mouse brain lysates revealed reduced LRP6 co-IP in the Ntn1iko mice when compared to controls (Fig. 5g, h), suggesting that Netrin-1 binding to Unc5B regulated LRP6 phosphorylation and Wnt/β-catenin activation in CNS ECs. We reasoned that Netrin-1 could modulate LRP6 phosphorylation via FAK, a kinase that regulates β-catenin in pluripotent embryonic stem cells51. Netrin-1-treated mouse brain ECs showed increased FAK phosphorylation from 1 to 8 h after stimulation (Fig. 5i, j). Nevertheless, cells treated with a FAK inhibitor (FAKi) that effectively abolished FAK phosphorylation could still induce LRP6 phosphorylation upon Netrin-1 stimulation (Fig. 5k, l) demonstrating that Netrin-1 regulates LRP6 activation in brain ECs independently of FAK.
Netrin-1 binding to Unc5B mediates BBB integrity
To specifically interrogate whether blocking Netrin-1-Unc5B interactions disrupted the BBB in vivo, we used monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) that we had previously generated against the Unc5B IgG-like domains29. Anti-Unc5B-1 recognizes human but not mouse Unc5B, while anti-Unc5B-2 recognizes both human and mouse Unc5B and internalizes Unc5B29. Anti-Unc5B-2 treatment induced Unc5B internalization in brain ECs in vitro (Supplementary Fig. 4a) and i.v. injection of anti-Unc5B-2 for 1 h at 10 mg/kg in mice reduced brain Unc5B expression compared to anti-Unc5B-1 CTRL Ab-treated animals (Supplementary Fig. 4b, c). Internalization from the plasma membrane using this antibody is expected to prevent binding of all Unc5B ligands in vivo.
To generate a mAb that specifically blocked Netrin-1 binding without Unc5B internalization, we screened a human phage-derived library against the entire rat Unc5B ECD and identified anti-Unc5B-3, a mAb that bound both human and rat Unc5B with high affinity (Fig. 6a–c) but did not induce Unc5B internalization nor its degradation in vivo (Supplementary Fig. 4d–f). I.v. injection of anti-Unc5B-3 for 15 min at 10 mg/kg followed by cardiac perfusion and immunolabelling using an anti-human IgG antibody revealed anti-Unc5B-3 binding to brain arteries and capillaries of Unc5Bfl/fl, but no binding in the Unc5BiECko mice (Fig. 6d, e, Supplementary Fig. 5a), demonstrating specific binding of anti-Unc5B-3 to endothelial Unc5B. Anti-Unc5B-3 blocked Netrin-1-induced Src phosphorylation in brain ECs in vitro (Fig. 6f, g). To test effects on ligand binding in vivo, we injected control anti-Unc5B-1 or anti-Unc5B-3 i.v (10 mg/kg for 1 h), followed by Unc5B immunoprecipitation from brain lysates using a commercial antibody recognizing the Unc5B ECD. Western blotting revealed that anti-Unc5B-3 blocked Netrin-1 binding to Unc5B in vivo, while Robo4 and Flrt2 could still interact with Unc5B (Fig. 6h, i).
To test if antibody-mediated Unc5B blockade could induce BBB leak, we injected i.v. CTRL or anti-Unc5B antibodies for 1 h in adult WT C57BL/6J mice, followed by i.v. injection of cadaverine 30 min before sacrifice and analysis (Fig. 6j). In mice treated with CTRL anti-Unc5B-1 or IgG Ab, there were no signs of BBB disruption and injected cadaverine remained confined inside brain vessels (Fig. 6k, l). In contrast, mice treated with anti-Unc5B-3 or anti-Unc5B-2 for 1 h showed a significant leakage of injected cadaverine into the brain parenchyma (Fig. 6k, l), demonstrating that blocking Netrin-1 binding to Unc5B is sufficient to open the BBB. Interestingly, i.v. injection of CTRL anti-Unc5B-1, anti-Unc5B-2 and -3 for 8 h prior to cadaverine injection for 30 min did not induce any BBB leakage (Fig. 6m, n). Western blot against human IgG confirmed presence of all antibodies in the serum 1 h and 8 h after i.v. injection (Supplementary Fig. 4g), suggesting a transient BBB disrupting effect of anti-Unc5B-3 and -2 antibodies. The vascular barrier disrupting effect of anti-Unc5B-2 and -3 was specific to the brain, as tracer leakage in other organs 1 h after i.v. injection was similar between controls and anti-Unc5B-2 or -3 treated mice (Fig. 6o–q).
Anti-Unc5B induced transient Wnt signaling inhibition
To assess anti-Unc5B bioavailability and vascular clearance, we i.v. injected anti-Unc5B-3 antibodies (10 mg/kg) for 1 h, 8 h or 24 h followed by immunolabeling with anti-human IgG antibodies (Fig. 7a). Anti-Unc5B-3 was detectable in the brain vasculature 1 h after injection, declined to low levels after 8 h and was undetectable 24 h after injection (Fig. 7a–c), demonstrating that the antibody was unstable and rapidly cleared from the brain vasculature.
Interestingly, the expression of Wnt/β-catenin downstream targets varied in a similar time-dependent fashion. Claudin-5 immunostaining was downregulated 1 h after anti-Unc5B-3 injection and returned to basal levels after 8 h, whereas PLVAP immunostaining was upregulated at 1 and 8 h after anti-Unc5B-3 injection and returned to low baseline levels after 24 h (Fig. 7a). Claudin-5 and PLVAP expression changes occurred in brain capillaries but not in larger vessels (>10 um, Fig. 7a, Supplementary Fig. 5b). Two-photon live imaging through cranial windows confirmed BBB leak from brain capillaries 1 h after anti-Unc5B-3 i.v. injection (Supplementary Fig. 5c, d).
Unc5B immunoprecipitation showed that anti-Unc5B-3 treatment transiently disrupted the Unc5B/LRP6 interaction 1 h after injection (Fig. 7b, c). Western blot on brain protein lysates from mice treated with CTRL IgG or anti-Unc5B-3 confirmed transient downregulation of Claudin-5 at 1 h, and upregulation of PLVAP at 1–8 h, and also showed transiently decreased LRP6 phosphorylation and decreased β-catenin protein levels 1–8 h after anti-Unc5B-3 injection that returned to baseline levels after 24 h (Fig. 7b, c).
Size-selectivity of Unc5B mediated BBB opening
To characterize the size selectivity of BBB opening induced by genetic or antibody-mediated Unc5B inhibition, we injected fluorescent dextrans of increasing molecular weights into mice. We observed that both 10 kDa and 40 kDa dextrans had a higher permeability across the BBB in Unc5BiECko brains and anti-Unc5B-2 and -3 treated animals compared to controls (Fig. 8a, b). By contrast, 70 kDa dextran, IgG and fibrinogen did not cross the BBB (Fig. 8c, Supplementary Fig. 6a, b), indicating a size-selective defect of BBB leakage for proteins greater than 40 kDa. As observed for cadaverine, leakage of dextrans in peripheral organs was similar between groups (Fig. 8d–f). Interestingly, leakage of 40 kDa dextran also remained increased in brains of Unc5BiECko;eGFP::Claudin-5 mice compared to Unc5BiECko mice (Supplementary Fig. 6c). Besides dextrans, anti-Unc5B-3 treatment also enhanced delivery of single-chain nanobodies across the BBB when compared to CTRL IgG (Fig. 8g), while nanobody extravasation in other organs such as lung, heart, kidney or skin remained similar (Supplementary Fig. 6d). Moreover, injection of anti-Unc5B-3 enhanced brain delivery of BDNF and induced phosphorylation and activation of its neuronal receptor Trk-B, while plasma BDNF levels remained similar to CTRL IgG injected mice (Fig. 8h–j), indicating that bioactive molecules up to 40 kDa can be delivered into the brain by this approach.
Discussion
Our data reveal endothelial Unc5B as a critical regulator of BBB integrity. We showed that adult mice deficient in endothelial Unc5B expression exhibited widespread BBB leakage from brain capillary ECs, which converted from a Claudin-5+/PLVAP− BBB competent state to a leaky Claudin-5−/PLVAP+ state and displayed reduced expression of β-catenin and LEF1 (Supplementary Fig. 7). Combined heterozygous deletions of both Unc5B and β-catenin induced BBB leak of cadaverine, while mice carrying single heterozygous deletions in either Unc5B or β-catenin displayed an intact BBB; and endothelial-specific β-catenin overexpression in Unc5BiECko mice increased Claudin-5 and LEF1 expression, while suppressing PLVAP and cadaverine leak, together supporting that Unc5B maintains BBB integrity by functionally interacting with Wnt signaling.
Loss of endothelial Unc5B induced cadaverine leakage across the BBB in a widespread but non-uniform manner, in that caudal and ventral brain regions were more affected by loss of Unc5B than anterior and dorsal ones. This pattern of BBB disruption is roughly similar to the one observed in mice carrying inducible endothelial deletions of β-catenin21,24. We note that BBB leakage did not strictly correlate with Unc5B expression levels. Firstly, all cortical areas expressed endothelial Unc5B, but not all cortical areas were leaky in its absence. Secondly, Unc5B was detected in arteries and in capillaries, but only capillaries converted to a Claudin-5 negative, PLVAP-positive state in Unc5BiECko brains. The reasons for these region- and vessel segment-specific differences remain to be further investigated, but they may relate to β−catenin levels.
The specific Wnt ligands and receptors that maintain the BBB differ in a region-specific manner in the CNS, with cerebellum BBB utilizing Norrin signaling through LRP5, Fzd4 and TSPAN12, while cortex relies on Wnt7a/b signaling through LRP5/6, Fzd4, GPR124 and RECK16,18–21,24. Intercross between Ndp (Norrin) and Wnt7a mutants revealed that, with loss of additional Wnt7a alleles in the Ndp KO background, there was a stepwise increase in the conversion of cerebellar ECs to a permeable state21. These and other genetic interaction studies between Wnt signaling components have suggested that a critical β-catenin threshold is required to maintain BBB ECs in a Claudin-5+/PLVAP− state16,18,20,21,24. Remarkably, blockade of Unc5B function affected both the cortex, cerebellum and other brain regions, suggesting that Unc5B may be an upstream regulator of both Wnt and Norrin signaling complexes at the BBB.
Mechanistically, we identify Netrin-1 as an Unc5B activating ligand required for BBB maintenance. Mice carrying global inducible deletions of the Unc5B ligand Netrin-1, and i.v. delivery of Unc5B mAbs that specifically block Netrin-1 binding to Unc5B (anti-Unc5B-3), or that induce receptor internalization (anti-Unc5B-2), all led to BBB breakdown and reduced Wnt/β-catenin signaling, while Robo4−/− mice displayed an intact BBB. These data support that Netrin-1 binding to Unc5B maintains BBB integrity and Wnt signaling activation in CNS ECs. They confirm previous observations of Netrin’s BBB-protective effects52,53 and extend them in several ways. Podjaski et al.52 showed that BBB junctional integrity was compromised in neonatal global Ntn1 ko mice, however the neonatal lethality of these mice precluded analysis of the BBB at later developmental stages, and the relevant Netrin-1 receptor was not identified in that study. We extend these findings by showing that global inducible deletion of Ntn1 in P60 mice induced BBB cadaverine leak, demonstrating that maintenance of adult BBB integrity requires Netrin-1. Furthermore, we identify the Unc5B receptor as the signal transducer on ECs, and we reveal canonical Wnt signaling as an effector pathway. Further experiments are required to determine the source of Netrin-1 mediating EC Unc5B signaling. Single cell RNA sequencing studies indicate that Netrin-1 is expressed in adult brain pericytes, fibroblasts, astrocytes and in ECs49. Conditional Ntn1 deletion in astrocytes affects the BBB53, and Netrin-1 is upregulated in ECs upon inflammatory signaling52, therefore multiple cellular sources and environmental modulations of Netrin-1 expression could contribute to BBB integrity. Interestingly, serum Netrin-1 levels increased in patients with neuroinflammatory multiple sclerosis or type 2 diabetes52,54. Therefore, circulating Netrin-1 levels could be an important gatekeeper of BBB integrity, protecting the CNS and limiting BBB disruption during inflammatory conditions.
Mechanistically, the data show that Netrin-1 binding to Unc5B promotes LRP6 phosphorylation, and that the Unc5B intracellular UPA domain is required for complex formation between Unc5B and LRP6. Based on the crystal structure of the Unc5B ICD33, we speculate that ligand-induced conformational changes in the Unc5B ICD expose the UPA domain and enable its interaction with LRP6. One possibility is that the UPA domain may induce LRP6 phosphorylation through recruitment of kinases. Recent studies in naïve pluripotent embryonic stem cells showed that Netrin-1 binding to Unc5B induced FAK-mediated phosphorylation of GSK3α/β, a kinase implicated in LRP6 activation51, however our data show that Netrin-1 regulates LRP6 phosphorylation in brain ECs independently of FAK.
I.v. injected anti-Unc5B antibodies bound to the EC lumen in controls but not in Unc5BiECko brains, demonstrating Unc5B expression at the luminal side of brain ECs, which could be activated by Netrin-1 in the bloodstream. A critical question to be addressed in future work is how luminal Unc5B activates CNS Wnt signaling, which is believed to occur mainly at the abluminal side of CNS capillaries driven by neural progenitors or glia-derived WNTs and Norrin. Netrin-1-binding to luminal Unc5B could enhance Wnt/β-catenin signaling in endosomes or at cell-cell junctions, thereby facilitating subthreshold abluminal WNT BBB signaling effects.
Previous studies had speculated that transient Wnt signaling inhibition could be used to open the BBB “on-demand” for drug delivery into the diseased CNS20,24, but the means to inhibit Wnt signaling in a CNS specific manner were not available. We demonstrated that antibody-mediated Unc5B blockade caused a transient loss of Wnt/β-catenin signaling and BBB breakdown for 1 h to 8 h followed by neurovascular barrier resealing, and allowed delivery of tracers up to 40 kDa into the adult CNS. The size selectivity of BBB opening is compatible with delivery of chemotherapeutics and of bioactive molecules such as nanobodies and growth factors in the specific regions of the brain where Unc5B regulates BBB integrity. Anti-Unc5B mAbs could therefore synergize with existing therapies such as focused ultrasound/microbubble approaches55–58 and offer a therapeutic perspective for treatment of various human neurological disorders. Conversely, our data also raise the possibility that intravenous injection of Netrin-1 could increase Wnt/β-catenin signaling at the BBB and repair CNS endothelial barrier breakdown in conditions such as multiple sclerosis or ischemic stroke where Netrin-1, Unc5B and several Wnt/β-catenin target genes are downregulated59.
Methods
Mouse models
All protocols and experimental procedures were approved by the Yale University Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC). Animals were housed at 20–24 °C, with 30–70% humidity under a 12 h light-dark cycle. Generation of the targeted Unc5b allele was performed by homologous recombination in R1 ES cells. Correctly targeted cells were identified by Southern blot hybridization and injected into B6J blastocysts to generate Unc5bneo/+ mice. To remove the neo cassette, Unc5bneo/+ mice were mated to B6.129S4-Gt(ROSA)26Sortm1(FLP1)Dym/RainJ mice (The Jackson Laboratory, stock #009086). Mice were backcrossed to B6J mice for ten generations. Unc5Bfl/fl (B6-Unc5b < tm1(flox)Slac/Slac) mice were then bred with Cdh5CreERT2 mice35 or PDGFRβCreERT237. TCF/LEF:H2B-GFP mice, eGFP::Claudin-5 mice, Y949F mice, βcatenin GOF Ctnnb1flex/3 mice, Ctnnb1fl/fl mice, Robo4−/− mice and Ntn1fl/fl mice were described previously29,39,43,44,46,48,50. Gene deletion was induced by injection of tamoxifen (Sigma T5648) diluted in corn oil (Sigma C8267). Postnatal gene deletion was induced by 3 injections of 100ug of tamoxifen at P0, P1 and P2; whereas adult gene deletion was induced by 5 injections of 2 mg of tamoxifen from P60 to P64. Animals from both sexes were used.
Cell culture
C57BL/6 Mouse Primary Brain Microvascular Endothelial Cells were purchased from Cell Biologics (C57-6023). Cells were cultured in Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle’s Medium (DMEM) high glucose (Thermo Fisher Scientific, 11965092) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) and 1% Penicillin Streptomycin at 37 °C and 5% CO2 and split when confluent using Trypsin-EDTA (0.05%) (Life Technologies, 25300054). When indicated, cells were treated with recombinant Mouse Netrin-1 Protein (R&D, 1109-N1-025) at 500 ng/ml, or with 5uM of FAK inhibitor (GSK2256098, Selleckem S8523).
Western-blot
Brains were dissected and frozen in liquid nitrogen. They were lysed in RIPA buffer (Research products, R26200-250.0) supplemented with protease and phosphatase inhibitor cocktails (Roche, 11836170001 and 4906845001) using a Tissue-Lyser (5 times 5 min at 30 shakes/second). For western blot on cell culture, cells were washed with PBS and lysed in RIPA buffer with protease and phosphatase inhibitors cocktails. All protein lysates were then centrifuged 15 min at 16,100 × g at 4 °C and supernatants were isolated. Protein concentrations were quantified by BCA assay (Thermo Scientific, 23225) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. 30 ug of protein were diluted in Laemmli buffer (Bio-Rad, 1610747) boiled at 95 °C for 5 min and loaded in 4–15% acrylamide gels (Bio-Rad, 5678084). After electrophoresis, proteins were transferred on a polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF) membrane and incubated in TBS 0.1% Tween supplemented with 5% BSA for 1 h to block non-specific binding. The following antibodies were incubated overnight at 4 °C: Unc5B (Cell Signaling, 13851S, dilution: 1/1000), Robo4 (Invitrogen, 20221-1-AP, dilution: 1/300), Flrt2 (Novus bio, NBP2-43653, dilution: 1/500), Netrin-1 (R&D, AF1109, dilution: 1/500), Claudin-5 (Invitrogen, 35-2500, dilution: 1/1000), PLVAP (BD biosciences, 550563, dilution: 1/200), PDGFRβ (Cell Signaling, 3169S, dilution: 1/1000), GFAP (Millipore, MAB360, dilution: 1/1000), VEGFR2 Y949 (Cell Signaling, 4991S, dilution: 1/500), VEGFR2 Y1173 (Cell Signaling, 2478S, dilution: 1/500), pLRP6 (Cell Signaling, 2568S, dilution: 1/300), LRP6 (Cell Signaling, 3395S, dilution: 1/500), βcatenin (Cell Signaling, 8480S, dilution: 1/2000), LEF1 (Cell Signaling, 2230S, dilution: 1/1000), ZO1 (Invitrogen, 61-7300, dilution: 1/2000), Occludin (Invitrogen, 33-1500, dilution: 1/1000), Caveolin-1 (Cell Signaling, 3238S, dilution: 1/2000), VE-cadherin (BD Pharmingen, 555289, dilution: 1/500) and βactin (Sigma, A1978, dilution: 1/5000). Then, membranes were washed 4x 10 min in TBS 0.1% Tween and incubated with one of the following peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibodies diluted 1/5000 in TBS 0.1% Tween supplemented with 5%BSA for 2 h at room temperature: horse anti-mouse IgG(H+L) (Vector laboratories, PI-2000), goat anti-rabbit IgG(H+L) (Vector laboratories, PI-1000), goat anti-rat IgG(H+L) (Vector laboratories, PI-9400), horse anti-goat IgG(H+L) (Vector laboratories, PI-9500). After 4x 10 min wash, western blot bands were acquired using ECL western blotting system (Thermo Scientific, 32106) or west femto maximum sensitivity substrate (Thermo Scientific, 34095) on a Biorad Gel Doc EQ System with Universal Hood II imaging system equipped with Image Lab software. See Supplementary Figs. 8–11 for the uncropped immunoblots.
Immunoprecipitation
Pierce™ protein A/G magnetic beads (Thermo fischer, 88802) were washed 5 times 10 min with RIPA buffer. 300 ug of protein lysate were diluted in 1 ml of RIPA buffer containing protease and phosphatase inhibitors and were incubated with 30 ul of A/G magnetic beads for 1 h at 4 °C under gentle rotation. Protein lysates were harvested using a magnetic separator (Invitrogen) and were incubated overnight at 4 °C under gentle rotation with 10 ug of Unc5B antibody (R&D, AF1006) or control IgG. The next day, 40 ul of protein A/G magnetic beads were added to each protein lysate for 2 h at 4 °C under gentle rotation. Beads were then isolated using a magnetic separator and washed 5 times with RIPA buffer. After the last wash, supernatants were removed and beads were resuspended in 40ul of Laemmli buffer (Bio-Rad, 1610747), boiled at 95 °C for 5 min and loaded onto 4–15% gradient acrylamide gels. Western blotting was performed as described above.
Immunostaining
Brains were collected and placed in 3.7% formaldehyde overnight at 4 °C. Brains were then washed 3 times 10 min with TNT buffer (for 100 ml: 10 ml Tris 1 M pH7,4, 3 ml NaCl 5 M, 500 ul Triton X-100) and embedded in 2% agarose. 100 um sections were prepared using a Leica VT 1000S vibratome and placed in TNTB buffer (TNT buffer supplemented with 5% donkey serum) for 24 h at 4 °C. Primary antibodies were diluted in TNTB and placed for 48 h at 4 °C under gentle agitation. Then, sections were washed 5 times 30 min with TNT buffer and incubated for 24 h at 4 °C with secondary antibodies diluted in TNTB buffer. After 5x 30 min wash with TNT, sections were mounted using DAKO mounting medium (Agilent, S302380-2).
For mouse brain endothelial cell immunostaining, cells were seeded on 18 mm glass coverslips (Fischer Scientific, 12542A). When confluent, cells were washed with PBS and fixed with 3.7% formaldehyde for 10 min. Cells were washed 3x 5 min with PBS and were incubated with 0.2% TritonX100 diluted in PBS for an additional 10 min, washed 3 times and incubated with blocking solution (2%BSA, 3%Donkey serum diluted in PBS) for 1 h at room temperature. Primary antibodies were then diluted in blocking solution and incubated on coverslips overnight at 4 °C. After 3x 5 min washes, secondary antibodies diluted in blocking buffer were incubated on coverslips for 2 h at room temperature. Coverslips were then washed 3x 5 min with PBS and mounted using DAKO mounting medium.
The following antibodies were used: Podocalyxin (RD, AF1556, dilution: 1/400), Unc5B (Cell signaling, 13851S, dilution: 1/200), Claudin-5-GFP (Invitrogen, 352588, dilution: 1/200), PLVAP (BD biosciences, 550563, dilution: 1/100), LEF1 (Cell Signaling, 2230S, dilution: 1/200), GFAP (Millipore, MAB360, dilution: 1/400), Aquaporin-4 (Millipore, AB3068, dilution: 1/400), PDGFRβ (Cell Signaling, 3169S, dilution: 1/400), Endomucin (Hycult biotech, HM1108, dilution: 1/400), fibrinogen (DAKO, A0080, dilution: 1/400), CD13 (BD Biosciences, 558744, dilution: 1/200), VE-cadherin (BD Pharmingen, 555289, dilution: 1/200), DAPI (Thermo Fischer, 62248, dilution: 1/2000). All corresponding secondary antibodies were purchased from Invitrogen as donkey anti-primary antibody coupled with either Alexa Fluor 488, 568 or 647 and were diluted 1/200.
Small interfering RNA knockdown experiments
Cells were transiently transfected with siRNA (Dharmacon). ON-TARGETplus Mouse Unc5b siRNAs (SMARTpool, L-050737-01-0005) were used for Unc5B gene deletion. Transfection was performed using lipofectamine RNAi max (Invitrogen, 13778-075) according to the manufacturer’s instruction with siRNA at a final concentration of 25pmol in OptiMem for 8 h. After transfection, cells were washed with PBS and fresh complete media was added for 48 h.
Mouse lung endothelial cell isolation
Mouse lungs were collected and minced into small pieces. Lungs were incubated in digestion buffer (5 ml of DMEM supplemented with 5 mg of collagenase I (Worthington LS004196), 10ul of 1 M Ca2+ and 10ul of 1 M Mg2+) for 1 h at 37 °C with shaking every 10 min. Once fully lysed, lung lysates were filtered through a 40um cell strainer (Falcon, 352340) into a solution of 3 ml FBS. Samples were centrifuged for 10 min at 200 g, and pellets were resuspended in PBS 0.1%BSA. In the meantime, rat anti-mouse CD31 (BD Pharmingen, 553370) was incubated with sheep anti-rat IgG magnetic dynabeads (Invitrogen, 11035) in a solution of sterile PBS 0.1%BSA (120ul of beads, 24 ul of antibodies in 12 ml PBS 0.1%BSA). Solutions were place under gentle rotation at room temperature for 2 h to allow proper coupling of antibodies and beads. Coupled beads were next isolated using a magnetic separator and incubated in the resuspended lung lysate for 30 min. After 5 washes with PBS 0.1%BSA, beads were separated using magnetic separator and seeded in 60 mm dishes containing mouse lung endothelial cell media (DMEM high glucose, 20%FBS, 1% Penicillin Streptomycin, 2% mitogen (Alta Aesar BT203). Purified endothelial cells were cultured at 37 °C and 5% CO2 until confluence was reached, and then harvested.
Quantitative real-time PCR analysis
mRNA was isolated using Trizol reagent (Life Technologies, 15596018) according to the manufacturer’s instructions and quantified RNA concentrations using nanodrop 2000 (Thermo Scientific). 300 ng of RNA were reverse transcribed into cDNA using iScript cDNA synthesis kit (Bio-rad, 170-8891). Real-time qPCR was then performed in duplicates using CFX-96 real-time PCR device (Bio-rad). Mouse GAPDH (QT01658692) was used as housekeeping gene for all reactions.
Unc5B function-blocking antibody generation
We performed a Phage-Fab (antigen-binding fragment) selection using a naïve Fab library (libF60) on a recombinant rat Unc5B-ECD Fc fusion protein (R&D systems) previously immobilized directly to Nunc Maxisorp plates starting at 5 ug/ml and dropping by 1 ug/ml per round. Phage titers from both input and output were monitored daily to ensure daily inputs were prepared correctly (minimum input of >1x 10E10) and output titers were at least 100-fold below input titers (day 1 output ~1x 10E3, day 2 output ~1x 10E4, day 3 output ~1x 10E5, days 4 and 5 output ~1x 10E7). Phage particles fused with Fabs were incubated with an unrelated protein (e.g., streptavidin) immobilized on a solid surface and allowed to bind in a step termed counterselection to remove unwanted phage-Fabs prior to incubation against target. After washing away unbound phage-Fab, phages were eluted from the target and amplified overnight for subsequent rounds. After 5 rounds of this process individual clones from rounds 3-5 were grown in 96-well format and tested by ELISA for their ability to bind antigen specifically. We selected several unique and different positive Fab over 5 rounds of selection, which were subcloned before antibody production (Proteogenix, Schiltigheim, France).
Surface plasmon resonance
Binding of anti-Unc5B antibodies to Human or Rat Unc5B was performed using a BiacoreTM 8K (Proteogenix, Schiltigheim, France). Human or Rat Unc5B-ECD-Fc (R&D Systems) were immobilized on a CM5 sensor chip. Each antibody was diluted to gradient concentrations (50 nM, 25 nM, 12.5 nM, 6.25 nM, 3.125 nM) and flow through CM5 chip. The kinetic parameter was calculated using Bia-evaluation analysis software.
Intravenous injection of antibodies, fluorescent tracer and nanobodies
CTRL IgG, CTRL anti-Unc5B-1, anti-Unc5B-2 and -3 were injected intravenously into the lateral tail-vein of 8 weeks old adult mice at a concentration of 10 mg of antibodies/kg of mice and left to circulate from 1 h to 24 h depending on the experiment. All fluorescent tracers were injected intravenously into the lateral tail vein of 8 weeks old adult mice and left to circulate for 30 min. Lysine-fixable Cadaverine conjugated to Alexa Fluor-555 (Invitrogen) was injected at a concentration of 100 ug Cadaverine/20 g of mice. Lysine-fixable 10, 40 or 70 kDa dextran conjugated to tetramethylrhodamine (Invitrogen) were injected at a concentration of 250 ug dextran/20 g of mice. Nanobodies (Alexa Fluor-488 coupled anti-mouse nanobodies, Abnova) were injected at a concentration of 60 ug nanobodies/20 g of mice. For postnatal experiments, cadaverine was injected intraperitoneally into P5 neonates at a concentration of 250 ug cadaverine/20 g of pups and left to circulate for 2 h.
Fluorescent tracer and nanobody quantification
To assess tracer and nanobody leak, animals were perfused in the left ventricle with PBS. Brains (and other organs) were then collected, and their weight measured. Next, brains (and other organs) were incubated in formamide (Sigma-Aldrich, F7503) at 56 °C for 48 h. Dye fluorescence was then measured using a spectrophotometer at the appropriate emission and excitation wavelength. Dye extravasation from Unc5Bfl/fl, Unc5BiECko, WT treated with CTRL anti-Unc5B-1 and anti-Unc5B-2 were performed at the Yale Cardiovascular Research Center (New Haven, CT, USA) on a BioTek synergy2 spectrophotometer. Dye extravasation from WT treated with CTRL IgG2b and anti-Unc5B-3 were performed at the Paris Cardiovascular Research Center (Paris, France) on a Flexstation3 spectrophotometer. All results were normalized to the corresponding brain weight and reported to a standard made of known concentrations of dye diluted in formamide. Results are shown as ng of dye per mg of corresponding organ or tissue.
BDNF extravasation quantification
To assess BDNF leak, 1 h after antibody injection, 50 μg of Human BDNF diluted in saline was injected intravenously into the lateral tail vein in adult mice and left to circulate for 30 min. After sampling whole blood in EDTA-coated tubes, animals were perfused in the left ventricle with saline. Brains were then collected, and their weight measured. Blood was centrifuged at 1000 × g for 15 min at 4 °C, and plasma was then stored at −20 °C until use. Dissected brains were frozen in liquid nitrogen. They were lysed in RIPA buffer (Thermo Fisher) supplemented with protease and phosphatase inhibitor cocktails (Roche, 11836170001 and 4906845001) with increasing needle gauges and sonicated (3 times of 3 min each). All protein lysates were then centrifuged for 15 min at 14,000 × g at 4 °C and supernatants were isolated.
BDNF concentration in the plasma and brain lysates was quantified using a DuoSet BDNF ELISA Kit (R&D Systems, DY248) according to manufacturer instructions. Results were normalized to the corresponding brain weight. Results are shown as ng of nanobodies per mg of brain tissue.
Two-photon live imaging
Craniotomy was performed by drilling a 5-mm circle between lambdoid, sagittal, and coronal sutures of the skull on ketamine/xylazine anesthetized WT mice. After skull removal, the cortex was sealed with a glass coverslip cemented on top of the mouse skull. Live imaging was done 2 weeks later. For multiphoton excitation of endogenous fluorophores and injected dyes, we used a Leica SP8 DIVE in vivo imaging system equipped with 4tune spectral external hybrid detectors and an InSightX3 laser (SpectraPhysics). The microscope was equipped with in house designed mouse holding platform for intravital imaging (stereotactic frame, Narishige; gas anesthesia and body temperature monitoring/control, Minerve). Mice were injected intravenously with 10 mg/kg of CTRL IgG or anti-Unc5B-3 for 1 h followed by i.v injection of 10 kDa dextran for 1 h and image acquisition.
Confocal microscopy and image analysis
Confocal images were acquired on a laser scanning fluorescence microscope (Leica SP8 and Zeiss LSM800) using the appropriate software (LASX or ZEN system). 10X, 20X and 63X oil immersion objectives were used for acquisition using selective laser excitation (405, 488, 547, or 647 nm). Vascular density was quantified with the software Angiotool by quantifying the vascular surface area normalized to the total surface area. Quantification of pixel intensity was performed using the software ImageJ. VE-cadherin coverage analysis was performed on ImageJ by quantifying the VE-cadherin+ area normalized to the podocalyxin+ area. Vessel diameter was calculated on Leica LASX software.
Statistical analysis
All in vivo experiments were done on littermates with similar body weight per condition. Statistical analysis was performed using GraphPad Prism 8 software. Two-sided Mann–Whitney U test was performed for statistical analysis of two groups. ANOVA followed by Bonferroni’s multiple comparisons test was performed for statistical analysis between 3 or more groups. Mantel-cox test was performed for survival curve statistical analysis.
Reporting summary
Further information on research design is available in the Nature Research Reporting Summary linked to this article.
Supplementary information
Acknowledgements
This project has received funding from the NIH (1R01HL149343-01 to A.E., 5R01NS35900 to S.L.A.), the Leducq Foundation (TNE ATTRACT, AE, LCW) and the European Research Council (ERC) (grant agreement No. 834161 to A.E.). K.B. was supported by a fellowship from the AHA (18POST34070109). We thank Max Thomas for technical assistance. S.L.A. is an investigator of the Howard Hughes Medical Institute.
Source data
Author contributions
K.B., L.H.G., J.F., L.P.F., M.P., Y.X., L.J. and N.M. performed experiment. K.B. and A.E. designed experiments and analyzed data. A.E. and K.B. wrote the manuscript. D.K, B.N., D.A, L.C.W. and S.L.A., generated and provided essential reagents/mice.
Peer review
Peer review information
Nature Communications thanks Elisabetta Dejana and the other anonymous reviewers for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Peer reviewer reports are available.
Data availability
All data generated are included in this article (main or supplementary information files) and are provided in the Source Data file. Additional information can be obtained from the corresponding author. Source data are provided with this paper.
Competing interests
A.E., K.B., L.G. and L.P-F. are inventors on patent applications that cover the generation of Unc5B blocking antibodies, and their application. The remaining authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41467-022-28785-9.
References
- 1.Zhao Z, Nelson AR, Betsholtz C, Zlokovic BV. Establishment and dysfunction of the blood-brain barrier. Cell. 2015;163:1064–1078. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2015.10.067. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Obermeier B, Daneman R, Ransohoff RM. Development, maintenance and disruption of the blood-brain barrier. Nat. Med. 2013;19:1584–1596. doi: 10.1038/nm.3407. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Daneman R, Prat A. The blood-brain barrier. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2015;7:a020412. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a020412. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Nitta T, et al. Size-selective loosening of the blood-brain barrier in claudin-5-deficient mice. J. Cell Biol. 2003;161:653–660. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200302070. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Luissint AC, Artus C, Glacial F, Ganeshamoorthy K, Couraud PO. Tight junctions at the blood brain barrier: physiological architecture and disease-associated dysregulation. Fluids Barriers CNS. 2012;9:23. doi: 10.1186/2045-8118-9-23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Andreone BJ, et al. Blood-brain barrier permeability is regulated by lipid transport-dependent suppression of caveolae-mediated transcytosis. Neuron. 2017;94:581–594 e585. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2017.03.043. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Ben-Zvi A, et al. Mfsd2a is critical for the formation and function of the blood-brain barrier. Nature. 2014;509:507–511. doi: 10.1038/nature13324. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Simpson IA, Carruthers A, Vannucci SJ. Supply and demand in cerebral energy metabolism: the role of nutrient transporters. J. Cereb. Blood Flow. Metab. 2007;27:1766–1791. doi: 10.1038/sj.jcbfm.9600521. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Loscher W, Potschka H. Blood-brain barrier active efflux transporters: ATP-binding cassette gene family. NeuroRx. 2005;2:86–98. doi: 10.1602/neurorx.2.1.86. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.De Vivo DC, et al. Defective glucose transport across the blood-brain barrier as a cause of persistent hypoglycorrhachia, seizures, and developmental delay. N. Engl. J. Med. 1991;325:703–709. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199109053251006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Armulik A, et al. Pericytes regulate the blood-brain barrier. Nature. 2010;468:557–561. doi: 10.1038/nature09522. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Daneman R, Zhou L, Kebede AA, Barres BA. Pericytes are required for blood-brain barrier integrity during embryogenesis. Nature. 2010;468:562–566. doi: 10.1038/nature09513. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Zonta M, et al. Neuron-to-astrocyte signaling is central to the dynamic control of brain microcirculation. Nat. Neurosci. 2003;6:43–50. doi: 10.1038/nn980. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Pulido RS, et al. Neuronal activity regulates blood-brain barrier efflux transport through endothelial circadian genes. Neuron. 2020;108:937–952 e937. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2020.09.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Clevers H. Wnt/beta-catenin signaling in development and disease. Cell. 2006;127:469–480. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2006.10.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Zhou Y, Nathans J. Gpr124 controls CNS angiogenesis and blood-brain barrier integrity by promoting ligand-specific canonical wnt signaling. Dev. Cell. 2014;31:248–256. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2014.08.018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Eubelen, M. et al. A molecular mechanism for Wnt ligand-specific signaling. Science36110.1126/science.aat1178 (2018). [DOI] [PubMed]
- 18.Cho C, Smallwood PM, Nathans J. Reck and Gpr124 Are Essential Receptor Cofactors for Wnt7a/Wnt7b-Specific Signaling in Mammalian CNS Angiogenesis and Blood-Brain Barrier Regulation. Neuron. 2017;95:1221–1225. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2017.08.032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Chang J, et al. Gpr124 is essential for blood-brain barrier integrity in central nervous system disease. Nat. Med. 2017;23:450–460. doi: 10.1038/nm.4309. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Wang Y, et al. Norrin/Frizzled4 signaling in retinal vascular development and blood brain barrier plasticity. Cell. 2012;151:1332–1344. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2012.10.042. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Wang Y, et al. Interplay of the Norrin and Wnt7a/Wnt7b signaling systems in blood-brain barrier and blood-retina barrier development and maintenance. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2018;115:E11827–E11836. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1813217115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Liebner S, et al. Wnt/beta-catenin signaling controls development of the blood-brain barrier. J. Cell Biol. 2008;183:409–417. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200806024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Daneman R, et al. Wnt/beta-catenin signaling is required for CNS, but not non-CNS, angiogenesis. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2009;106:641–646. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0805165106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Zhou Y, et al. Canonical WNT signaling components in vascular development and barrier formation. J. Clin. Invest. 2014;124:3825–3846. doi: 10.1172/JCI76431. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Leung-Hagesteijn C, et al. UNC-5, a transmembrane protein with immunoglobulin and thrombospondin type 1 domains, guides cell and pioneer axon migrations in C. elegans. Cell. 1992;71:289–299. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(92)90357-i. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Leonardo ED, et al. Vertebrate homologues of C. elegans UNC-5 are candidate netrin receptors. Nature. 1997;386:833–838. doi: 10.1038/386833a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Lu X, et al. The netrin receptor UNC5B mediates guidance events controlling morphogenesis of the vascular system. Nature. 2004;432:179–186. doi: 10.1038/nature03080. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Larrivee B, et al. Activation of the UNC5B receptor by Netrin-1 inhibits sprouting angiogenesis. Genes Dev. 2007;21:2433–2447. doi: 10.1101/gad.437807. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Koch AW, et al. Robo4 maintains vessel integrity and inhibits angiogenesis by interacting with UNC5B. Dev. Cell. 2011;20:33–46. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2010.12.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Zhang F, et al. The Robo4 cytoplasmic domain is dispensable for vascular permeability and neovascularization. Nat. Commun. 2016;7:13517. doi: 10.1038/ncomms13517. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Tai-Nagara I, et al. Placental labyrinth formation in mice requires endothelial FLRT2/UNC5B signaling. Development. 2017;144:2392–2401. doi: 10.1242/dev.149757. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Yamagishi S, et al. FLRT2 and FLRT3 act as repulsive guidance cues for Unc5-positive neurons. EMBO J. 2011;30:2920–2933. doi: 10.1038/emboj.2011.189. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Wang R, et al. Autoinhibition of UNC5b revealed by the cytoplasmic domain structure of the receptor. Mol. Cell. 2009;33:692–703. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2009.02.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Llambi F, Causeret F, Bloch-Gallego E, Mehlen P. Netrin-1 acts as a survival factor via its receptors UNC5H and DCC. EMBO J. 2001;20:2715–2722. doi: 10.1093/emboj/20.11.2715. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Wang Y, et al. Ephrin-B2 controls VEGF-induced angiogenesis and lymphangiogenesis. Nature. 2010;465:483–486. doi: 10.1038/nature09002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Horvat R, Hovorka A, Dekan G, Poczewski H, Kerjaschki D. Endothelial cell membranes contain podocalyxin-the major sialoprotein of visceral glomerular epithelial cells. J. Cell Biol. 1986;102:484–491. doi: 10.1083/jcb.102.2.484. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Cuervo H, et al. PDGFRbeta-P2A-CreER(T2) mice: a genetic tool to target pericytes in. Angiogenesis. Angiogenesis. 2017;20:655–662. doi: 10.1007/s10456-017-9570-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Bauer H, Traweger A. Tight junctions of the blood-brain barrier - a molecular gatekeeper. CNS Neurol. Disord. Drug Targets. 2016;15:1016–1029. doi: 10.2174/1871527315666160915142244. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Ferrer-Vaquer A, et al. A sensitive and bright single-cell resolution live imaging reporter of Wnt/ss-catenin signaling in the mouse. BMC Dev. Biol. 2010;10:121. doi: 10.1186/1471-213X-10-121. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Birdsey GM, et al. Transcription factor Erg regulates angiogenesis and endothelial apoptosis through VE-cadherin. Blood. 2008;111:3498–3506. doi: 10.1182/blood-2007-08-105346. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Niehrs C, Shen J. Regulation of Lrp6 phosphorylation. Cell Mol. Life Sci. 2010;67:2551–2562. doi: 10.1007/s00018-010-0329-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Mao B, et al. LDL-receptor-related protein 6 is a receptor for Dickkopf proteins. Nature. 2001;411:321–325. doi: 10.1038/35077108. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Brault V, et al. Inactivation of the beta-catenin gene by Wnt1-Cre-mediated deletion results in dramatic brain malformation and failure of craniofacial development. Development. 2001;128:1253–1264. doi: 10.1242/dev.128.8.1253. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Harada N, et al. Intestinal polyposis in mice with a dominant stable mutation of the beta-catenin gene. EMBO J. 1999;18:5931–5942. doi: 10.1093/emboj/18.21.5931. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Wang, Y. et al. Beta-catenin signaling regulates barrier-specific gene expression in circumventricular organ and ocular vasculatures. Elife810.7554/eLife.43257 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 46.Knowland D, et al. Stepwise recruitment of transcellular and paracellular pathways underlies blood-brain barrier breakdown in stroke. Neuron. 2014;82:603–617. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2014.03.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Taddei A, et al. Endothelial adherens junctions control tight junctions by VE-cadherin-mediated upregulation of claudin-5. Nat. Cell Biol. 2008;10:923–934. doi: 10.1038/ncb1752. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Li X, et al. VEGFR2 pY949 signalling regulates adherens junction integrity and metastatic spread. Nat. Commun. 2016;7:11017. doi: 10.1038/ncomms11017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Vanlandewijck M, et al. A molecular atlas of cell types and zonation in the brain vasculature. Nature. 2018;554:475–480. doi: 10.1038/nature25739. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Brunet I, et al. Netrin-1 controls sympathetic arterial innervation. J. Clin. Invest. 2014;124:3230–3240. doi: 10.1172/JCI75181. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Huyghe A, et al. Netrin-1 promotes naive pluripotency through Neo1 and Unc5b co-regulation of Wnt and MAPK signalling. Nat. Cell Biol. 2020;22:389–400. doi: 10.1038/s41556-020-0483-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Podjaski C, et al. Netrin 1 regulates blood-brain barrier function and neuroinflammation. Brain. 2015;138:1598–1612. doi: 10.1093/brain/awv092. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Yao LL, et al. Astrocytic neogenin/netrin-1 pathway promotes blood vessel homeostasis and function in mouse cortex. J. Clin. Invest. 2020;130:6490–6509. doi: 10.1172/JCI132372. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Nedeva, I. et al. Relationship between circulating netrin-1 levels, obesity, prediabetes and newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes. Arch Physiol. Biochem., 1–6 10.1080/13813455.2020.1780453 (2020). [DOI] [PubMed]
- 55.Idbaih A, et al. Safety and feasibility of repeated and transient blood-brain barrier disruption by pulsed ultrasound in patients with recurrent glioblastoma. Clin. Cancer Res. 2019;25:3793–3801. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-18-3643. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Carpentier A, et al. Clinical trial of blood-brain barrier disruption by pulsed ultrasound. Sci. Transl. Med. 2016;8:343re342. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aaf6086. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Sheikov N, McDannold N, Vykhodtseva N, Jolesz F, Hynynen K. Cellular mechanisms of the blood-brain barrier opening induced by ultrasound in presence of microbubbles. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 2004;30:979–989. doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2004.04.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Aryal M, Arvanitis CD, Alexander PM, McDannold N. Ultrasound-mediated blood-brain barrier disruption for targeted drug delivery in the central nervous system. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2014;72:94–109. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2014.01.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Munji RN, et al. Profiling the mouse brain endothelial transcriptome in health and disease models reveals a core blood-brain barrier dysfunction module. Nat. Neurosci. 2019;22:1892–1902. doi: 10.1038/s41593-019-0497-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Persson H, et al. CDR-H3 diversity is not required for antigen recognition by synthetic antibodies. J. Mol. Biol. 2013;425:803–811. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2012.11.037. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
All data generated are included in this article (main or supplementary information files) and are provided in the Source Data file. Additional information can be obtained from the corresponding author. Source data are provided with this paper.