Skip to main content
eBioMedicine logoLink to eBioMedicine
. 2022 Mar 3;77:103913. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2022.103913

Corrigendum to “comparative exome sequencing reveals novel candidate genes for retinitis pigmentosa” [EBioMedicine 56(2020)102792] DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ebiom.2020.102792

Zhen Yi 1,1, Jiamin Ouyang 1,1, Wenmin Sun 1,1, Shiqiang Li 1, Xueshan Xiao 1, Qingjiong Zhang 1,
PMCID: PMC8897575  PMID: 35248995

The authors wish to correct the transcript numbering of CCDC188. The outdated transcript NM_001243537 was incorrectly used in the published paper. This should have been NM_001365892. The authors therefore update the description of the CCDC188 mutation to c.937C>T (p.Arg313*).

The corrected Table 1, Figure 1, Supplementary Materials Table S7 and Fig. S2 are presented as below. Allele frequency in gnomAD was also updated according to NM_001365892 in Table 1 and Supplementary Materials Table S7. The revision does not change the conclusions of this paper.

Table 1.

Five homozygous rare variants in five novel candidate genes identified in four RP probands.

Genes Chromosome Reference Patient Variant Nucleotide Amino acid Expression & interaction§
Allele frequency in gnomAD
Allele frequency of other LoF variants
position transcript ID number change Change Retina IRD genes All EA control gnomAD
ENSA chr01: 150599935 NM_207168 ZOCRP0009 M1 c.191delG p.Gly64Alafs*2 Ninth OFD1 1/251460 1/18394 2/9456 22/282912
DACT2 chr06: 168710973 NM_214462 ZOCRP0156 M2 c.533C>A p.Ser178* Second NA NA NA 4/9456 144/282912
EXTL2 chr01: 101343065 NM_001439 ZOCRP0156 M3 c.400C>T p.Arg134* Highest NA 3/247450 3/18342 2/9456 37/282912
DDR1 chr06: 30864446 NM_001202523 ZOCRP0830 M4 c.1616dupT p.Pro540Alafs*15 Fifth CCT2, BBS10 NA NA 0/9456 178/282912
CCDC188 chr22: 20136745 NM_001365892 ZOCRP0559 M5 c.937C>T p.Arg313* NA NA 16/118792 0/10622 0/9456 62/282912

Notes: EA, East Asian; gnomAD, genome aggregation database; IRD, inherited retinal degeneration; LoF, loss-of-function; M, mutation; NA, not available.

§Information based on GeneCards where expression in retina ranked by SAGE.

All these variants were not present in Exome Variant Server and 1000 Genomes.

No homozygous LoF variants in these five genes were found in 1000 Genomes.

Figure 1.

Fig 1

Pedigrees and sequences of the five homozygous loss-of-function variants in ENSA, DACT2, EXTL2, DDR1, and CCDC188. The genotypes of all probands and available family members are shown below each individual. The blackened symbols represent affected individuals. Mx, mutant alleles; +, wild-type allele.

The authors would like to apologise for any inconvenience caused.

Footnotes

Supplementary material associated with this article can be found, in the online version, at doi:10.1016/j.ebiom.2022.103913.

Appendix. Supplementary materials

mmc1.pdf (2MB, pdf)

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

mmc1.pdf (2MB, pdf)

Articles from EBioMedicine are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES