Skip to main content
Cureus logoLink to Cureus
. 2022 Feb 2;14(2):e21853. doi: 10.7759/cureus.21853

Thrombotic Thrombocytopenic Purpura: A Tale of Two Cases

Prakash R Ghogale 1,, Ashutosh Kumar Pandey 2, Edavan Pulikkanath Praveen 3, Prabhakar Yadav 4, Saurabh Pathak 4
Editors: Alexander Muacevic, John R Adler
PMCID: PMC8897657  PMID: 35291531

Abstract

Microangiopathic hemolytic anaemia, thrombocytopenia, renal failure, neurologic abnormalities, and fever form the pentad of thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP). Early diagnosis is crucial because TTP responds well to plasmapheresis therapy but is associated with substantial mortality if left untreated. A substantial percentage of patients with TTP used to die from systemic microvascular thrombosis in the brain and the heart. However, since plasma exchange therapy became a mainstay in the treatment of TTP, mortality has reduced considerably. Diagnosing TTP can be difficult due to the vast range of symptoms and the absence of clearly defined diagnostic criteria. Hemolytic uremic syndrome and disseminated intravascular coagulation are a close differential of TTP. Here we report two patients with TTP who achieved remission when treated with steroids, plasmapheresis and were free of disease relapse till about two months during follow-up in the outpatient department.

Keywords: thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura, red-cell fragmentation, microangiopathic haemolytic anaemia, steroids, plasmapheresis, ttp

Introduction

Thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP) is one of the entities in thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA). Eli Moschcowitz first defined TTP in 1924, and it is characterised by a pentad of symptoms, including microangiopathic haemolytic anaemia, thrombocytopenia, renal failure, neurologic abnormalities, and fever. TTP affects around 4-6 million people per year [1]. TTP has a 90% death rate if left untreated. The mortality rate is lowered to 10-20% with plasma exchange therapy. Another entity in TMA syndrome is haemolytic-uremic syndrome (HUS), which is defined by the triad of microangiopathic haemolytic anaemia, microvascular occlusion, and thrombocytopenia [1]; in the past, they were considered one disease due to the comparable clinical features [2]. TTP is also linked to fever and neurological symptoms, however, TTP and HUS are clinically indistinguishable. The appearance of neurological abnormalities or acute kidney injury, respectively, raises clinical suspicion of TTP or HUS. Disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) is also one of the differential diagnoses [3]. Proof of steroid efficacy in the treatment of TTP is still low. Here we report two cases of TTP admitted to a rural hospital. Their clinical and blood profiles, disease course, follow up after hospitalization and treatment modalities are described. The efficacy in sustaining the remission of TTP by the use of corticosteroids, once plasmapheresis is stopped and also at the follow up is being described. The other aim is to provide insight into TTP management.

Case presentation

Patient 1

A 38-year-old man presented to our hospital with chief complaints of fever for six days and altered sensorium for two days. He was treated elsewhere for the past four days and then shifted to our hospital. On examination he was febrile - 104oF, haemodynamically stable, and general examination revealed no abnormality, Glasgow coma scale (GCS) was E4M5V3. He was evaluated accordingly, his reports done were: blood urea- 63.9 mg/dL, serum creatinine- 1.97 mg/dL, sodium- 141 mEq/L, potassium- 3.22 mEq/L, chloride- 103.2 mEq/L, hemoglobin- 14.6 g/dL, platelet count- 42000/cumm, tropical fever workup came negative, serology was negative, blood and urine cultures were sterile, Chest X-ray (CXR) was normal, procalcitonin (PCT) was 50 ng/ml, prothrombin time (PT) and activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) were normal, direct and indirect Coombs test was negative, urine routine; protein +++, glucose ++, pus cell 3-/HPF, red blood cell (RBC) 25-30/HPF, ultrasound abdomen- right kidney (RK)- 11.7 x 5.8cm, left kidney (LK)- 10.7 x 6.1 cm, raised bilateral echogenicity, cortico-medullary differentiation (CMD) maintained. Liver function test (LFT)- bilirubin (direct/Indirect) 1.17/0.9 mg/dL, aspartate transaminase (AST or SGOT) and alanine transaminase (ALT or SGPT) were normal, HbA1c was 9.2%. MRI Brain showed no significant brain parenchymal abnormality. After sending cultures, the patient was empirically started on intravenous antibiotics: injection piperacillin tazobactam + teicoplanin, injection artesunate with other supportive treatment. On day 1 evening, he became violent with the inability to control by restraint, was sedated and intubated, in view of the prolonged need of sedation and risk of respiratory depression, put on a mechanical ventilator. Lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) was 90 U/L on day 1. Repeat LDH on day 2 was 589 U/L which increased to 987 U/L on day 3. On day 3, renal function test (RFT) showed blood urea 191 mg/dl, creatinine 5.15 mg/dl and since morning his urine output had decreased, so the patient was haemodialysed. Direct and indirect Coombs tests were negative and peripheral smear for schistocytes was reported as negative. In view of fever persisting over 102 - 106oF despite broad-spectrum antibiotics and antimalarial drugs, the elevation of LDH within three days, fall in hemoglobin, deranged RFTs, altered sensorium, and thrombocytopenia with normal coagulation parameters; a diagnosis of thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura was made. His mean corpuscular volume (MCV) was 78.7 fl and the PLASMIC score was 6 points (high risk) denoting 72% risk of severe ADAMTS13 deficiency (defined as ADAMTS13 activity level <15%). Injection methylprednisolone 1 gm was started post hemodialysis on day 3. On day 4, LDH was 1443 U/L and the first session of plasmapheresis with an exchange of 2.5 litres followed by haemodialysis (HD) was done. The patient dramatically became afebrile after the first session of plasmapheresis, while prior to plasmapheresis he had a fever of 102 - 104oF. A second dose of injection methylprednisolone was given post HD. Improvement in LDH level and platelet count was seen on day 5 and the second session of plasmapheresis with an exchange of 2.5 litres of plasma and the third dose of injection methylprednisolone 1 gm was given. Improvement in LDH and platelet count was seen on day 6 and day 7 and the third and fourth session of plasmapheresis with an exchange of 2.5 litres was done and oral prednisolone 1 mg/kg was started on day 6. By day 8 his sensorium had improved, and he was oriented, he was extubated, and his blood reports were urea- 137 mg/dL, creatinine- 2.08 mg/dL, sodium- 139 mEq/L, potassium- 3.41 mEq/L, chloride- 98 mEq/L, hemoglobin- 11.3 g/dL, platelet count- 208000 per cumm, LDH- 705 U/L. In view of urine output of 2550 mL, plasmapheresis was withheld even though LDH was >500 U/L as his plasmapheresis filter was not reusable and it was decided to wait and see the trend of the platelet count and LDH to decide about the further need for plasmapheresis. His blood pressure started increasing, he needed Injection nitroglycerin infusion and later started on oral antihypertensive drugs. From day 9, serial RFT and platelet count showed improvement and no further plasmapheresis or hemodialysis was needed till discharge. He was shifted to ward on day 11 and after his blood sugar level was also controlled (initial days after methylprednisolone pulses he needed insulin infusion and then shifted on to regular insulin with oral hypoglycaemic drug). After it was ascertained that his RFT, platelet count, and LDH were stable he was discharged on day 14 on antihypertensive drugs, mixture insulin and oral hypoglycaemic, and prednisolone 1 mg/kg with a plan to continue the same dose for a total of one month and then taper and omit. His daily lab reports and events are shown in Table 1.

Table 1. Day-wise investigation chart of patient 1.

*Plasmapheresis was done as follows; 2.5L of plasma exchange per cycle (50 mL/kg) blood flow 150 mL/min, heparin anticoagulation and 2.5L fresh frozen plasma as replacement fluid.

LDH: Lactate dehydrogenase; HD: haemodialysis

Day of admission Serum Urea (mg/dL) Serum Creatinine (mg/dL) Serum Sodium (mEq/L) Serum Potassium (mEq/L) Blood Hemoglobin (g/dL) Total Leukocyte Count (per cumm) Platelet Count (per cumm) Serum LDH (U/L) Daily Urine Output (mL) Procedure
1 63.9 1.97 141 3.22 14.6 8700 42000 90 450  
2         12 10400 36000 589 950  
3 191 5.15 146 4.46 10.3 5000 30000 987 100 HD
5 220 5.02 147 4.75 11.9 8200 63000 1443 700 Plasmapheresis* + HD
6 205 3.39 149 4.42 10.4 6200 79000 929 2120 Plasmapheresis* + HD
7 166 2.81 152 3.17 11.1 10700 195000 586 2800 Plasmapheresis*
8 153 2.5 140 2.82 11.3 11600 223000 607 2400 Plasmapheresis*
9 137 2.08 139 3.41 11.3 9900 208000 705 2550 Extubated
10 140 2 137 4.37 9.8 9900 328000 498 2880  
11 122 1.89 141 3.08 9.7 11400 361000 558 >2500 Shifted to ward
12 99 1.7 141 3.36 10.5 19200 450000 656 >2500  
13 99 1.68 140 3.55       734 >2500  
14 72 1.57 140 3.72 10.8 16400 516000 669 >2500 Discharged
Follow-up day after discharge On follow-up in OPD
3 38 1.24 142 4.42 9.6 12400 343000 550    
8 36 1.14     10.4 13300 306000 444    
13 26 0.96     11.7 11700 237000 357    
21 31 0.85     12.1 17100 348000 395    
28 21 0.76     11.2 13000 322000 373    
53 16 0.66     11.2 10000 370000      

Patient 2

A 27-year-old man presented to our ICU with fever, alteration in sensorium, and decreased urine output. On examination and investigation, he was found to have fever, disorientation, thrombocytopenia, renal dysfunction, and microangiopathic haemolytic anaemia. A diagnosis of TTP was made. His mean corpuscular volume (MCV) was 86 fl and the PLASMIC score was 6 points (high risk) denoting 72% risk of severe ADAMTS13 deficiency (defined as ADAMTS13 activity level <15%). He was initiated on three pulses of injection methylprednisolone followed by oral prednisolone 1 mg/kg for one month and then taper and omit. Alternate day haemodialysis was done till his urine output improved and daily plasmapheresis was done till his platelet count increased above 150000 per cumm. Tropical fever workup investigation was negative, HIV, hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg), and hepatitis C virus (HCV) were also negative, blood and urine cultures were sterile, CXR was normal, PCT was 0.42 ng/mL, PT and aPTT were normal, direct and indirect Coombs test was negative. Urine routine showed protein +++, RBC >50/HPF, pus cells 4-5/HPF, urine protein creatinine ratio (UPCR) 2651 mg/g creatinine. Ultrasound abdomen showed RK- 11.7 x 5.8cm, LK- 10.7 x 6.1 cm, raised bilateral echogenicity and CMD maintained. LFT- bilirubin was normal. Serum SGOT (1082 U/L) and SGPT (220 U/L) were raised on admission but later normalized. HbA1c was 6%. His daily lab reports and events are shown in Table 2.

Table 2. Day-wise investigation chart of patient 2.

*Plasmapheresis was done as follows: 3.5L of plasma exchange per cycle (50 mL/kg) blood flow 150 mL/min, heparin anticoagulation and 3.5L fresh frozen plasma as replacement fluid.

LDH: Lactate dehydrogenase; HD: haemodialysis

Day of admission Serum Urea (mg/dL) Serum Creatinine (mg/dL) Serum Sodium (mEq/L) Serum Potassium (mEq/L) Blood Hemoglobin (g/dL) Total Leukocyte Count (per cumm) Platelet Count (per cumm) Serum LDH (U/L) Daily Urine Output (mL) Procedure
1 146 6.8 155 4.14 12.7 7900 42000 9485 100 HD
2 118 5 152 4.4 9.8 4200 27000   <50 Plasmapheresis*
3 176 8.4 148 4.8 9.6 5400 32000 2978     <50 Plasmapheresis* + HD
4 132 4.82 146 4.4 11.4 6800 57000 1645     <50 Plasmapheresis*
5         9.3 6800 58000 669     <50 Plasmapheresis* + HD
6 249 3.2 144 4.5 9.2 6000 60000 857 50 Plasmapheresis*
7 163 5.4 147 4.1 8.9 7600 105000 769 50 Plasmapheresis* +HD
8 72 2.8 146 3.3 8.1 8100 81000 877 40 Plasmapheresis*
9 232 7.25 148 3.7 7.7 8800 150000 891 190 Plasmapheresis* +HD
10 144 4.3 145 4 6.8 10200 150000 837 150 Plasmapheresis*
11 109 3.72 143 3.5 5.9 9900 165000 1002 230 Plasmapheresis* +HD
12         8.4 13800 211000 1075 1055  
13 221 8.4 139 3.9 7.1 11900 202000 1055   HD
14     138 4.2 8.6 11600 195000 1056 1400  
15 207 8.56 138 4.2 8.4 12200 193000   1500 HD
16 112 4.76 141 4 9 11800 246000   1350  
17 177 7.61 141 3.08 9.5 14000 186000 920  1950 HD
18 85 3.45               Discharged
Follow up Day After Discharge On follow-up in OPD
2 171 4.85     8.2 12300 196000  720 2400  
5 142 3             3100 HD canula removed
10 49 1.27 136 4.2 9.7 16100 176000      
19 38 1.27 130 2.9 10.2 12500 183000      
26 28 1.15 128 3 10.4 11000 282000      

Discussion

In adults, thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura is idiopathic in around a third of instances, meaning it develops suddenly and without any known underlying cause. Women are more likely to be affected. The median age at the time of diagnosis is around 40 years old [4]. About two-thirds of cases of TTP are found in a variety of clinical situations, triggering an acute episode. Bacterial or viral infections, pregnancy (especially during the last trimester and the postpartum period), autoimmune disorders (mainly systemic lupus erythematosus and antiphospholipid syndrome) [5], disseminated malignancy, and bone marrow transplantation and ingestion of drugs could trigger TTP. The drugs may mediate TTP through acute immune-mediated toxicity (quinine, ticlopidine, clopidogrel) [6], insidious dose-related toxicity (mitomycin C, alpha-interferon, cyclosporine, tacrolimus). Other immunosuppressive and chemotherapeutic agents may also trigger TTP. These should be considered as an additional criterion to suspect TTP.

Laboratory data should be obtained in patients who come with new thrombocytopenia, with or without evidence of renal insufficiency and other aspects of classic TTP, to rule out DIC and evaluate for signs of microangiopathic hemolytic anemia. Increased lactate dehydrogenase and indirect bilirubin, decreased haptoglobin, and increased reticulocyte count, along with a negative direct antiglobulin test, all support the TTP diagnosis. Schistocytes should be looked for in the peripheral smear. The diagnosis of TTP in both cases was made on clinical grounds. According to the newer classification, both the cases fit mostly into primary TMA acquired - TTP due to ADAMTS13 (a disintegrin and metalloproteinase with a thrombospondin type 1 motif, member 13) antibodies triggered due to infection, as the elevated procalcitonin levels suggested in both cases.

Because plasmapheresis eliminates von Willebrand factor multimers, ADAMTS13 anti-metalloproteinase antibodies [3], and endothelial cytokines, plasma exchange remains the basis of TTP treatment [4]. Fresh frozen plasma (FFP) transfusion recovers ADAMTS13 deficiency [3]. Plasma exchange is continued for at least two days post the platelet count is normal and indications of haemolysis have disappeared. Breckenridge et al. used steroids alone, steroids with an antiplatelet drug, and plasmapheresis to treat 10 patients [7]. He came to the conclusion that the plasmapheresis arm had a higher survival rate. Glucocorticoids did not improve survival rates against plasmapheresis, according to William et al. [8]. Given the autoimmune nature of acquired TTP, there is a legitimate justification for the use of steroids in its treatment. The level of proof for steroid efficacy in the treatment of TTP, however, is still rather low. The use of glucocorticoids appears to be a viable method, despite the fact that it has never been examined in a big clinical trial. Other immunomodulatory treatments, such as rituximab, vincristine, cyclophosphamide, and splenectomy, have also been shown to be effective in refractory or relapsing TTP. Relapses are prevalent as well. 

The literature does not provide a treatment time, however, therapy should be continued until the platelet count reaches 100,000/mm3 and the LDH levels fall below 400 U/l, as these are the most sensitive markers for assessing therapeutic response [9]. In both of our cases, platelet counts increased to above 150,000/mm3 for two days after which plasmapheresis was halted, although LDH levels showed an increasing trend immediately after plasmapheresis was stopped and later showed a downward trend. Thus corticosteroid therapy plays a role in maintaining complete disease remission, in both of our cases following the initial rise in LDH seen after halting plasmapheresis, later on, there was a downward trend in LDH. Outpatient follow-up is essential to monitor remission or detect recurrent chronic form with a mortality rate of roughly 15% [10] and we have follow-up data of two months in the first patient and one month in the second patient, both patients stayed in remission. Both our cases show that the addition of corticosteroid therapy helps in maintaining complete disease remission when plasmapheresis is stopped and also at follow-up. The drawback in our case report is that in both the cases the diagnosis was made on clinical grounds and the ADAMTS13 activity assay, ADAMTS13 functional inhibitor assay and anti-ADAMTS13 antibody assay and complement factor gene assay and antibodies were not done for availability and financial reasons. Our hospital and patients were from a rural setup. This also highlights the limitation in some country areas where patients are unable to bear the financial burden of expensive testing.

Conclusions

Primary TTP is triggered by conditions such as pregnancy, infections, cancers, HIV, lupus, surgical stress, chemotherapy, or medications such as clopidogrel and ticlopidine. TTP is a serious condition and a keen eye is to be kept for diagnosing it when conditions which trigger it are present. Plasmapheresis is the cornerstone of therapy and has improved patient outcome considerably, and addition of corticosteroid therapy helps in maintaining complete disease remission when plasmapheresis is stopped and also at follow-up.

The content published in Cureus is the result of clinical experience and/or research by independent individuals or organizations. Cureus is not responsible for the scientific accuracy or reliability of data or conclusions published herein. All content published within Cureus is intended only for educational, research and reference purposes. Additionally, articles published within Cureus should not be deemed a suitable substitute for the advice of a qualified health care professional. Do not disregard or avoid professional medical advice due to content published within Cureus.

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Human Ethics

Consent was obtained or waived by all participants in this study

References

  • 1.Thrombotic microangiopathies. Moake JL. N Engl J Med. 2002;347:589–600. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra020528. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Haemolytic-uraemic syndrome in practice. Neild GH. Lancet. 1994;343:398–401. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(94)91228-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Clinical practice. Thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura. George JN. N Engl J Med. 2006;354:1927–1935. doi: 10.1056/NEJMcp053024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Recent advances in thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura. Sadler JE, Moake JL, Miyata T, George JN. Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program. 2004:407–423. doi: 10.1182/asheducation-2004.1.407. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura and autoimmunity: a tale of shadows and suspects. Porta C, Caporali R, Montecucco C. http:////pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10189393/#article-details. Haematologica. 1999;84:260–269. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura associated with clopidogrel. Bennett CL, Connors JM, Carwile JM, et al. N Engl J Med. 2000;342:1773–1777. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200006153422402. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Improved survival in thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura-hemolytic uremic syndrome. Clinical experience in 108 patients. Bell WR, Braine HG, Ness PM, Kickler TS. N Engl J Med. 1991;325:398–403. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199108083250605. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Treatment of thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura with plasma exchange, antiplatelet agents, corticosteroid, and plasma infusion: Mayo Clinic experience. Breckenridge RL Jr, Solberg LA, Pineda AA, Petitt RM, Dharkar DD. J Clin Apher. 1982;1:6–13. doi: 10.1002/jca.2920010104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura: a case report. Drumond JP, Abou-Arabi RM, Figueiredo RP, et al. J Bras Patol Med Lab. 2018;54:255–259. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.The thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura and hemolytic uremic syndromes: evaluation, management, and long-term outcomes experience of the Oklahoma TTP-HUS Registry, 1989-2007. George JN. Kidney Int Suppl. 2009:0–4. doi: 10.1038/ki.2008.622. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Cureus are provided here courtesy of Cureus Inc.

RESOURCES