Abstract
Temporomandibular joint ankyloses (TMJA) may manifest in patients with several predisposing systemic conditions. A case of extraarticular TMJA is presented in a patient diagnosed with fibrodysplasia ossificans progressive (FOP) is presented. The features, diagnosis, and management of TMJA superimposed on this condition are presented through a qualitative systematic review of literature.
Keywords: extraarticular TMJ ankylosis, fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva, myositis ossificans progressiva, TMJ ankylosis
Fibrodysplasia ossificans progressive (FOP) is a rare cause of temporomandibular joint ankylosis (TMJA). Temporomandibular joint ankylosis in FOP is an absolute contraindication for surgery since surgery (including routine dental procedures) may lead to recurrence and exacerbation of the condition. Atraumatic dental treatment, preventive dentistry, and genetic counseling must be included in the management protocol.

1. INTRODUCTION
Temporomandibular joint ankylosis (TMJA) irrespective of the etiology or type leads to a significant compromise in the quality of life in terms of function, nutrition, and aesthetics. 1 The management of TMJA is essentially surgical. 2 Early diagnosis, prompt surgery (often multi‐stage), and long‐term follow‐up with a multispecialty team ensure effective comprehensive management of this condition. Several systemic conditions like ankylosing spondylitis and rheumatoid arthritis predispose a patient to developing TMJA and that the management of TMJA in these patients is essentially like those without pre‐existing systemic conditions. We report a case of TMJA as a manifestation of a rare systemic condition, specifically to emphasize one of the most important dictums of medical ethics, “primum non nocere.”
2. CASE PRESENTATION
A 60‐year‐old female patient was referred to our center by a general practitioner with pain in her left lower back tooth region of 15 days duration. The diagnosis by the GP was acute apical periodontitis of tooth 38 but only symptomatic treatment could be instituted due to the restricted mouth opening. On elucidation of relevant history, the patient developed restriction in the mouth opening 30 years ago after sustaining trauma to her back after slip and fall‐off stairs. She concurrently started developing gradual restriction in the movement of neck, shoulders, legs, and back leading to difficult daily activities. She experienced intermittent pain in relation to her left lower III molar, which was managed symptomatically over a period of 5 years. She was diagnosed with bilateral knee osteoarthritis and was on conservative symptomatic management for the same; no other contributory medical, surgical, dental, treatment or personal history was evident. She was not a product of a consanguineous marriage, and there was no family history of the disease.
3. EXAMINATION
All systems were normal on routine examination. Vital signs were within normal limits. She had a kypho‐scoliotic appearance with complete restriction in the neck and back movements in all three dimensions (Figure 1). Neck was tilted and fixed to the left side and forward (Figures 2 and 3). Bilateral shoulder movements were restricted. Bilateral hips, knees, and ankles showed normal but painful movement in all three dimensions. On maxillofacial examination, she had a mouth opening of 4 mm with minimal protrusive and laterotrusive movements (Figure 4). The oral hygiene was poor; tooth 38 was grossly decayed and 45 was a decayed root.
FIGURE 1.

Appearance of the patient
FIGURE 2.

Appearance of the tilted and fixed neck
FIGURE 3.

Appearance of the tilted and fixed neck
FIGURE 4.

Restricted mouth opening of 4 mm
4. INVESTIGATIONS
All routine hematological and serum biochemical investigations were within normal limits, especially erythrocyte sedimentation rate, C‐reactive protein, and serum alkaline phosphatase were unremarkable. Radiographic examination with non‐contrast computed tomography revealed multifocal heterotopic soft tissue ossification and pseudo exostosis predominantly involving the posterolateral aspects of bilateral chest wall (right > left), extending caudally as a plaque‐like ossification in the dorsolumbar region. Synostosis were seen between multiple ribs, vertebral bodies and posterior elements and bilateral scapula (Figures 5 and 6). Degenerative osteoarthritic changes were seen in bilateral knee joints (Figure 7). Hand wrist radiographs were unremarkable (Figure 8). Foot radiographs revealed degenerative changes with reduced first metatarsophalangeal joint with adjacent osteophytic changes (Figure 9). Soft tissue ossification was seen lateral to the cuboid bone and cortical whiskering along the medial malleolus.
FIGURE 5.

3D Reconstruction of the NCCT chest—Posterior view showing the extent of heterotopic ossification (NCCT—non‐contrast computed tomography)
FIGURE 6.

Lateral projection of the neck depicting the fusion of several vertebral bodies
FIGURE 7.

Bilateral Anterior posterior projection of knees
FIGURE 8.

Bilateral hand‐wrist radiographs
FIGURE 9.

Anterior posterior projection of feet
Orthopantomogram revealed flattening and notching of condylar head on the left side (Figure 10). NCCT (non‐contrast computed tomography)/MRI (magnetic resonance imaging) did not reveal any evidence of bony/ fibrous TMJ articular ankylotic changes. However, ossified bony bridge was visualized on the left side from the infratemporal fossa to the medial surface of the ramus with intervening radiolucency suggestive of extraarticular ankylosis (Figure 11).
FIGURE 10.

Orthopantogram depicting condylar flattening and bifid tendency on left side
FIGURE 11.

Coronal section of NCCT face. Arrow shows the bony bridge with intervening radiolucent band between the greater wing of sphenoid bone and the medial surface of ramus on the left side. (NCCT—non‐contrast computed tomography)
5. DIAGNOSIS AND TREATMENT PLAN
Correlating the history and clinical findings overlapped on the radiological picture of extraarticular ankylosis, the patient was diagnosed of having fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva (FOP). The patient was counseled for palliative management and was taken up under general anesthesia for the extraction of teeth 38 and 45 through the buccal approach. Post‐operative period was uneventful. No worsening of her existing mouth opening was seen after a follow‐up of 1 year. The patient and her daughter were counseled for genetic testing, but both denied the same.
6. LITERATURE REVIEW
Systematic review of literature was conducted to review the characteristics of maxillofacial involvement and treatment strategies for the restricted mandibular movements (RMM) in patients with FOP. The study was exempted from Institutional ethical committee approval.
7. INCLUSION CRITERIA
Case reports, case studies, case series, retrospective studies, prospective studies, observational studies, randomized control trials, and non‐randomized control trials with specific information on the involvement of maxillofacial region and RMM were included in the review. Articles in English or with English translation were preferred. No publication date or publication status limits were applied.
8. EXCLUSION CRITERIA
Studies on FOP patients with no specific details on maxillofacial involvement or RMM were excluded.
9. LITERATURE SEARCH
A systematic electronic search of PubMed, Medline‐Ovid, Springer Link, Embase, Scopus, Science Direct, and Cochrane Database was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‐Analyses (PRISMA) statement on November 16, 2021 for articles in English (Figure 12). A manual search of the oral and maxillofacial surgery related journals including Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Journal of Craniomaxillofacial Surgery, Journal of Craniofacial Surgery, Journal of Maxillofacial Oral Surgery, Journal of Oral Surgery, Medicine and Pathology, Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral radiology, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery and Journal of Craniomaxillofacial Trauma and Reconstruction. The search string used was ((Fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva) OR (Stoneman syndrome) OR (Stoneman disease) OR (Munch Meyer disease) OR (Myositis ossificans progressive)) AND ((Temporomandibular Joint) OR (TMJ) OR (Jaw) OR (extraarticular)) AND ((Ankylosis) OR (Restriction)). The literature search was carried out by the first and the second authors separately and confirmed for uniformity.
FIGURE 12.

PRISMA flowchart (RMM—Restricted mandibular movements; FOP—Fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva)
10. RESULTS
62 articles were scanned after removing duplicates for relevance and availability of specific information related to restriction of mandibular movement (RMM) in FOP. 32 articles were excluded due to insufficient information, language other than English or due to the irrelevance to the topic. The 30 articles included in the review are presented in Table 1. Statistical analysis of the findings of the cases in the literature review was not possible due to the non‐uniformity of the reported findings. The review was confined to being a qualitative systematic review.
TABLE 1.
Literature review of fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva cases with restricted mandibular movements in literature.
| S No | Author and year | Type of article | Sex | Age1* | Age2** | Contributory history for jaw involvement | Maxillofacial findings | Dental findings | Specific cause for reduced MIO | Treatment history | Other findings |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Van Der Meij, 2006 6 | Case report | F | 9 | 2 weeks before reporting | Fall from stairs 4 weeks earlier |
MIO – 2 cm Deviation to Lt on MO |
NA | Bony apposition on Medial side of Lt ZA | NA |
|
| 2 | Aslan, 1999 4 | Case Report | F | NA | 3 years before reporting | NA | Restricted jaw movement | Bad odor, Multiple carious teeth | B/L Bony TMJ Ankylosis |
|
|
| 3 | Young, 2007 11 | Case report | F | 24 | NA | Spontaneous and overnight restriction of mouth opening |
|
Multiple caries Gingivitis Impacted teeth |
|
Extraction of molars under GA |
|
| 4 | Mortazavi, 2012 13 | Case report | M | 28 | NA | NA |
MIO – 5 mm Lateral jaw movements – 0 mm |
|
HO trapezius, complete fusion of spine |
|
Limitation of movement of knees, jaws, spine, shoulders, hips, and distortion of neck, incomplete extension of elbow, shortened first phalanx of thumb, Paraspinal muscle calcification |
| 5 | Wadenya, 2010 10 | Case report | M | 20 | 9 | Hit in the face with a baseball | Near complete mouth opening restriction | Multiple carious teeth | Complete fusion of condylar head to temporal bone |
|
DM type I, hypothyroidism, immobilization of every joint at 30 years, 90 degrees bent at waist, neck fixed to the Lt, Cane assisted ambulation |
| 6 | Herford, 2003 15 | Case report | M | 24 | 14 | NA | Complete mandibular restriction | Rampant decay and multiple abscessed teeth | Fusion of hypertrophic coronoid process with medial surface of zygoma |
|
Multiple affected muscles and joints |
| 7 | Chichareon, 1999 14 | Case report | M | 3 | NA | NA |
MIO <2 cm on presentation |
Calcified mass of 1 X 2 cm at lower border of Rt Mandible diagnosed histologically as osteochondroma
|
I surgery ‐ Removal of bony mass (osteochondroma) which led to a MIO of 1 mm and 2mm lateral excursion II Surgery ‐ Combined intraoral and extraoral approach to remove the calcified mass and Rt coronoid excision led to a MIO of 5 mm III Surgery – Intraoral resection of calcification at the tip of coronoid process and body of the mandible |
|
|
| 8 | Kriegbaum, 2013 7 | Case report | M | 26 | 23 | NA |
MIO – 12 mm on presentation MIO – 8 mm post management |
Multiple carious lesions |
|
Under GA; submandibular incision to separate sigmoid notch and ZA. Repeat surgical procedures to remove HO with adjunctive medical management (Salazopyrine, methylprednisolone bisphosphonates, and interposition with Goretex membrane) |
|
| 9 | Sendur, 2006 5 | Case report | F | 20 | NA | NA |
MIO – 5 mm Trend to ankylosis MIO – 10 mm after conservative therapy |
NA | Trend to ankylosis; unspecified | Superficial and deep heating; analgesic currents; range of motion and stretching exercises |
|
| 10 | Fernandes, 2014 20 | Case report | F | 26 | NA | NA | NA | Multiple caries | NA | Conservative dental procedures, oral hygiene instructions, recurrent topical fluoride applications, endodontic and restorative treatments. | NA |
| 11 | Orhan, 2012 3 | Case report | F | 20 | NA | NA | Restricted mouth opening | Lt Mandibular II molar pathology |
|
NA |
|
| 12 | Peter Renton, 1982 12 | Case series | M | 5 | 7 (on prospective review) | NA | Normal mandibular movements till 5 yrs | NA | Gross abnormality of condyles with B/L short broad neck, heads wide and flat and marked spur formation | NA |
|
| M | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
|
NA |
|
|||
| 13 | Connor, 1982 17 |
Retrospective survey‐based study 44 cases surveyed; 34 examined; 3 died; 7 not traced |
14F 9 M |
Current average – 33.6 (SD=13.9) | 5–26 (17.6±6.76) |
3/34 – H/o trauma 3/34 – H/o dental therapy |
Many had complete inability to mouth opening; Reddening of overlying skin leads to inability to mandibular movements in a few days | NA | NA | 1/34 underwent ectopic bone excision but recurred |
|
| 14 | Cramer, 1981 16 | Case report | F | 3 months | 3 mo | NA |
3 mo ‐Cyst like lesion in lower lip, corner of the mouth and buccal mucosa with reduced MIO 15 mo – Biopsy revealed bone 8 years – bony mass leading to TMJ Ankylosis 9 years – lesion recurrence 13 years – Lt cheek rock hard; lacked soft tissue nasal involvement, nodule in scalp, base of big toes |
Dental decay and abscess | Bony mass in the region of lip and cheek |
|
|
| 15 | Debeney, 1998 18 |
Case report Of familial involvement |
F | 21 | 15 days earlier | Trauma to Rt mandibular angle 3 months before |
|
|
NA |
|
|
| 16 | Roberts, 2011 19 | Case report | F | 44 | NA | Toothache posterior region both upper and lower |
|
Tooth ache upper and lower posterior region | NA | Dental extraction carried out under GA |
|
| M | 44 | NA | NA | Mouth opening – 3 mm |
|
NA | Refused treatment | NA | |||
| F | 07 | NA | NA | Hypoplastic mandible | 8 carious deciduous teeth | No features of ankylosis |
|
|
|||
| F | Died at 52 years; surveyed later | NA | NA | MIO – 12 mm | NA | NA |
|
|
|||
| F | 2 | NA | NA | Only mandibular hypoplasia | NA | NA | NA |
|
|||
| 18 | Carvalho, 2011 21 | Case report | M | 13 | 7 | Trauma to Rt cheek at 7 years |
|
NA | Pterygoid muscle ossification Rt side extending to mandible | NA | NA |
| F | 21 | 10 | Mandibular nerve blocks and stretching during treatment |
Extraarticular ankylosis
|
NA | B/L Pterygoid muscle ossification Rt side extending to mandible | NA | NA | |||
| M | 22 | 9 | Submandibular and posterior neck swelling resection |
|
NA | Pterygoid muscle ossification Rt side extending to mandible | NA | NA | |||
| 19 | Nunnelly, 1986 22 | Case series | F | 40 | 5 | Neck injury |
|
NA |
|
NA |
‐All joints involved ‐ Rigid neck |
| F | 26 | 1 | Posterior neck mass biopsy |
|
NA |
|
NA | All joints involved; Rigid neck | |||
| M | 19 | 1 | NA |
|
NA | Bone continuous from Zygoma in direct apposition to lateral aspect of body of the mandible | NA |
|
|||
| 20 | Mori, 2000 23 | Case report | M | 18 | NA | NA |
|
‐Rt upper II molar in scissors bite with caries ‐ B/L Lower II molar distal tipping ‐ B/L lower III molars horizontal ‐B/L Upper III molar poor hygiene |
|
|
|
| 21 | Duan, 2010 24 | Case report | M | 17 | 4 | NA |
|
|
|
|
|
| 22 | Leavitt, 2009 25 | Case report | M | 50 | At birth | NA |
|
|
|
NA | Wheel chair bound |
| 23 | Geddis‐Regan, 2018 26 | Case report | M | 45 | NA | Local anesthesia administration as a child |
|
Gross carious teeth |
|
|
|
| 24 | Crofford, 1990 27 | Case series | M | NA | NA | NA | MIO ‐ Nil | NA | Solid ossified bridge Lt side anterior ZA to Lt coronoid process |
|
|
| M | NA | 15.5 | NA | MIO – 5 mm | NA |
|
|
|
|||
| 25 | Okuno, 2017 28 | Case series | F | 29 | 13 | NA | MIO ‐ 5 mm |
|
|
|
|
| M | 39 | 02 |
Trauma after bumping against a table and losing 02 incisors |
MIO−2 mm | Multiple decayed teeth |
|
|
||||
| F | 62 | 39 | ‐ | MIO−10 mm | ‐ | HO Medial Pterygoid muscle B/L | ‐ |
|
|||
| 26 | Susami, 2012 29 | Case report | M | 8 | NA | NA |
|
|
|
|
|
| 27 | Pachajoa, 2015 30 | Case series | M | 17 | NA | NA |
|
|
|
|
|
| M | 11 | NA | NA |
|
NA | NA | NA |
|
|||
| 28 | Braga, 2011 31 | Case series | F | 23 | NA | NA | MIO‐ 3 mm | Anterior open bite | No evidence of frank ankylosis | Mouth opening exercises resulted at MIO 17 mm |
|
| 29 | Vashisht, 2006 32 | Case report | F | NA | 12 | Swelling of lower jaw Lt side with toothache 10 days before reporting. Submandibular induration and sublingual swelling with inability to protrude tongue | MIO less than 1 cm | NA | NA |
|
|
| 30 | Sellami, 2015 33 | Case report | F | 24 | NA | NA | MIO−15 mm | NA |
|
NA |
|
Abbreviations: B/L, Bilateral; F, Female; GA, General anesthesia; HO, Heterotopic ossification; LA, Local anesthesia; LPM, Lateral pterygoid muscle; LPP, Lateral pterygoid process; Lt, Left; M, Male; MIO, Maximal interincisal opening; MO, Mouth opening; MPM, Medial pterygoid muscle; NA, Not applicable; PDL, Periodontal ligament; Rt, Right; SCM, Sternocleidomastoid; SHL, Stylohyoid ligament; TMJ, Temporomandibular Joint; ZA, Zygomatic arch.
The following are the important observations from the literature review: In patients with FOP, the age of onset of RMM is variable, some manifesting even congenitally. However, most of the patients manifest RMM during the second decade of their life. There is a very slight female preponderance of FOP patients with RMM (30 males and 34 females). Most of the patients have been pre‐diagnosed with FOP when they report with RMM, but delayed diagnosis or previous misdiagnosis is a common feature. The onset of RMM may be spontaneous or post‐trauma (including iatrogenic causes like surgery/biopsy in previously undiagnosed patients, nerve blocks, or jaw stretching during dental therapy). The most common dental manifestation includes multiple decayed teeth with or without abscess formation. The most common cause of RMM in FOP is extraarticular ankylosis but classic TMJ Bony ankylosis is also evident in some cases. Extraarticular ankylosis also present with condylar flattening and tendency to bifid condyle on radiographic examination. Mandibular retrognathia has been reported in some cases but the same fails to be mentioned in most of the reported cases possibly due to the later onset of TMJA. Great toe malformation (GTM) is found in a large majority of patients, but the phenotypical expression is variable and therefore is not pathognomonic of the disease. FOP patients with RMM always had other joint involvements with restricted movements except in a familial cluster of patients with exclusive maxillofacial involvement. Majority of the patients were deferred surgical management while in those patients in whom surgery was attempted, recurrence of TMJA was inevitable, fast, and more debilitating. Most of the patients underwent palliative treatment with dental extractions, restorations, or endodontic treatment under general anesthesia (GA). Preventive measures like topical fluoride application, oral hygiene instructions, and oral prophylaxis have also been instituted.
11. DISCUSSION
Temporomandibular joint ankyloses is a debilitating condition, the diagnosis of which is a prompt indication for absolute surgical management. FOP is a recognized cause of TMJA, but the awareness of the condition appears to be low among clinicians due to its rarity. Studies reveal that 90% patients of FOP have a history of misdiagnosis and 67% undergo unwarranted diagnostic procedures resulting in flare ups. 3 Our patient was not diagnosed of FOP but was being managed for osteoarthritis for 25 years. The exact events leading to the diagnosis of FOP in the cases presented in the review are not exactly known but instances of misdiagnosis and delayed diagnosis exist.
FOP is an extremely rare catastrophic genetic disorder affecting 1 in 1.7 million 4 (Range: 0.6 to 2 per million) with a current approximate estimate of 3900 cases worldwide. It may occur sporadically or inherited in an autosomal dominant (AD) pattern with variable expressivity but complete penetrance. 5 The rarity of the disease precludes large single‐center cohorts for review. However, existence of worldwide associations like International FOP association(IFOPA) has enabled availability of larger cohorts for review.
FOP results in heterotopic ossification(HO) of ligaments, tendons, and skeletal muscles 6 progressing similar to embryonic skeletal formation 6 leading to ectopic skeletenogenesis. 7 The etiology is controversial but overexpression of BMP‐4, by an altered inhibitory mechanism (altered NOG polypeptide coded by NOG; NOG deactivates BMP 4), is the most accepted mechanism and the locus has been mapped to 17q21‐22. 8 ACVR1 gene mutation has also been found in a majority of patients with FOP. 9 Gene analysis for confirmation may not be available or possible in all patients due to consent and affordability reasons.
The average age of onset of ossification is 5 years. 5 Trauma is the most common trigger, although spontaneous onset is also reported. 6 Unresolving erythematous painful nodules occur in the subcutaneous and muscular tissues that lead to progressive ossification. 10 The diagnostic triad for this disorder is GTM, usually microdactyly of great toes, progressive HO in an endochondral manner, and HO in characteristic anatomical patterns progressing from cranial, proximal, axial, and dorsal regions to caudal, distal, appendicular, and ventral regions. 11 Extraocular muscles, diaphragm, muscles of deglutition, heart, tongue, abdominal wall, perineum, and viscera are spared. 11 , 12 However, GTM is variable, occurs in only 75–95% of the cases, and therefore is not pathognomonic of the disease. 5 , 12 Biochemical investigations are generally normal but discrete increase in erythrocyte sedimentation rate 13 and alkaline phosphatase 14 has been reported during flare‐up episodes.
Diagnosis is mainly clinical and radiological, although genetic linkage analysis is confirmatory. 15 Ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging may be useful in confirming early cases due to their ability to detect edema and neovascularization. Bone scintigraphy helps detecting active areas of bone formation. 14 Non‐contrast computed tomography will help identify the anatomical extent of the bone formation. 3 However, in clinically well‐established cases, conventional whole‐body radiographs are sufficient for diagnosis. 6 , 16 The phenotypic expression and longevity are variable in this condition depending on the areas affected. Death if occurs due to FOP is generally due to spine and rib cage ankylosis. 6
The most debilitating manifestation of FOP is the ossification of masticatory muscles TMJA. 3 TMJ is one of the last joints to be involved, 3 , 16 but 71% of the patients with FOP are affected with TMJA 15 and 68% of them have been found to be extraarticular in nature. 17 Restriction of mandibular opening occurs at an average age of 18 years and that the average age with no jaw involvement is 12.1 years. 17 On analysis of literature, release of ankylosis have always resulted in short‐lived improvement and a guaranteed recurrence with exaggerated bone formation. 6 Several treatment options have been explored but no effective treatment exists for this disorder till date. 13
The reasons for presenting this fairly straight forward case report with review of literature are manifold: Firstly, FOP is rare but nevertheless an important cause of TMJA and has to be considered in every patient presenting with TMJA. Some patients may manifest isolated TMJA prior to developing other lesions and the maxillofacial surgeon/dental surgeon happens to be the first consultant. Though not confirmatory, examination of the entire skeletal system especially GTM, hallux valgus should be eliminated in these patients. Absence of GTM does not eliminate the possibility of FOP as seen in our case but its presence mandates further evaluation. Secondly, considering the literature, TMJA in FOP happens to be an absolute contraindication for surgery. Any surgery for release of ankylosis will lead to recurrence and worsening of the condition. 18 Perhaps, surgery is not the solution to all TMJA. Thirdly, identification of this condition is important to institute preventive dentistry to prevent secondary manifestations of TMJA. 6 Fourthly, routine dental treatment, for example, inferior alveolar nerve block (IANB) may precipitate HO in FOP patients. 19 Therefore, GTM should be a part of examination of normal young patients to prevent iatrogenic precipitation of this condition due to routine oral procedures. Fifthly, many patients may report with dental complications of long‐standing TMJA in FOP. In such patients, any intramuscular administration of local anesthesia, for example, IANB is contraindicated for reasons of intramuscular HO. 20 Such cases must be treated under GA administered with a fiberoptic bronchoscope. Overzealous manipulation of the neck and overstretching of the jaw should be avoided. 11 Dental extractions should be carried as atraumatic as possible through the buccal approach. 10 , 11 Sixthly, the lifespan of these patients seems to be increasing, and the individuals are fertile. 16 Known AD pattern of inheritance makes prompt diagnosis and genetic counseling mandatory. 18 Lastly, the awareness of the existence of this disorder is lacking among clinicians leading to unnecessary invasive diagnostic procedures (like biopsy) leading to worsening of the condition. 20 Especially, in developing countries like India, the data on the patients with FOP are lacking but the patients with TMJA are high. In short, awareness of FOP among the maxillofacial fraternity will prevent precipitation in susceptible normal patients, exacerbation in the existing ones, and consideration palliative procedures for dental ailments in patients with FOP.
CONFLICTS OF INTEREST
None declared.
AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS
Kavish Kapoor was a major contributor in working up the case and arriving at the final diagnosis. Arunkumar Shadamarshan Rengasayee contributed by providing the clinical material and working up the case for management; involved in revising the manuscript critically for important intellectual content; agreed to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved. Rohit Sharma contributed in part by working up the case and arriving at the final diagnosis and gave the final approval of the version to be published. Nitesh Agrawal contributed to drafting the manuscript, appropriate literature review and interpretation to be included in the manuscript.
ETHICAL APPROVAL
Necessary ethics committee approval and informed patient consent have been obtained for the case study. The systematic review has been exempted from ethical committee approval.
CONSENT
Informed patient consent has been duly obtained during the procedure and for the publication of the photographs.
Kapoor K, Shadamarshan Rengasayee A, Sharma R, Agrawal N. Temporomandibular joint ankylosis—“Knowing when not to operate”: Case report and qualitative systematic review of literature. Clin Case Rep. 2022;10:e05556. doi: 10.1002/ccr3.5556
Kavish Kapoor and Arunkumar Shadamarshan Rengasayee may be considered joint first authors.
Funding information
None
DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT
The data that support the findings of this study are available on request from the corresponding author. The data are not publicly available due to privacy or ethical restrictions.
REFERENCES
- 1. Sales S, Silva M, Lehman L, Castro W, Campos F. Management of temporomandibular joint ankylosis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2019;48:284. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2019.03.868 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Dimitroulis G. Temporomandibular joint surgery: what does it mean to india in the 21st century? J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2012;11(3):249‐257. doi: 10.1007/s12663-012-0419-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Orhan K, Uyanık LO, Erkmen E, Kilinc Y. Unusually severe limitation of the jaw attributable to fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva: a case report with cone‐beam computed tomography findings. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2012;113(3):404‐409. doi: 10.1016/J.TRIPLEO.2011.03.011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Aslan G, Celik F, Gorgu M. Unusual ankylosis of the jaw due to fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva. Ann Plast Surg. 1999;43(5):576‐578. doi: 10.1097/00000637-199911000-00028 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Sendur OF, Gurer G. Severe limitation in jaw movement in a patient with fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva: a case report. Oral Surgery, Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endodontology. 2006;102(3):312‐317. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2005.09.020 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Meij EH, Becking AG, Waal I. Fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva. An unusual cause of restricted mandibular movement. Oral Dis. 2006;12(2):204‐207. doi: 10.1111/J.1601-0825.2005.01171.X [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Kriegbaum RK, Hillerup S. Fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva (FOP): report of a case with extra‐articular ankylosis of the mandible. J Cranio‐Maxillofacial Surg. 2013;41(8):856‐860. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2013.01.044 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Luchetti W, Cohen RB, Hahn GV, et al. Severe restriction in jaw movement after routine injection of local anesthetic in patients who have fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 1996;81(1):21‐25. doi: 10.1016/S1079-2104(96)80141-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Lucotte G, Houzet A, Hubans C, Lagarde JP, Lenoir G. Mutations of the noggin (NOG) and of the activin A type I receptor (ACVR1) genes in a series of twenty‐seven French fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva (FOP) patients. Genet Couns. 2009;20(1):53‐62. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Wadenya R, Fulcher M, Grunwald T, Nussbaum B, Grunwald Z. A description of two surgical and anesthetic management techniques used for a patient with fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva. Spec Care Dent. 2010;30(3):106‐109. doi: 10.1111/j.1754-4505.2010.00133.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Young JM, Diecidue RJ, Nussbaum BL. Oral management in a patient with fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva. Spec Care Dent. 2007;27(3):101‐104. doi: 10.1111/j.1754-4505.2007.tb01748.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Renton P, Parkin SF, Stamp TCB. Abnormal temporomandibular joints in fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva. Br J Oral Surg. 1982;20(1):31‐38. doi: 10.1016/0007-117X(82)90004-X [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Mortazavi H, Eshghpour M, Niknami M, Saeedi M. Stone man: a case report. Iran J Radiol. 2012;10(1):37‐40. doi: 10.5812/iranjradiol.10302 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Chichareon V, Arpornmaeklong P, Donsakul N. Fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva and associated osteochondroma of the coronoid process in a child. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1999;103(4):1238‐1243. doi: 10.1097/00006534-199904040-00020 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Herford AS, Boyne PJ. Ankylosis of the jaw in a patient with fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2003;96(6):680‐684. doi: 10.1016/J.TRIPLEO.2003.08.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Cramer SF, Ruehl A, Mandel MA. Fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva: a distinctive bone‐forming lesion of the soft tissue. Cancer. 1981;48(4):1016‐1021. doi: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Connor JM, Evans DAP. Extra‐articular ankylosis in fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva. Br J Oral Surg. 1982;20(2):117‐121. doi: 10.1016/0007-117X(82)90018-X [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Debeney‐Bruyerre C, Chikhani L, Lockhart R, et al. Myositis ossificans progressiva: five generations where the disease was exclusively limited to the maxillofacial region: a case report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1998;27(4):299‐302. doi: 10.1016/S0901-5027(05)80619-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Roberts T, Stephen L, Scott C, Urban M, Sudi S, Beighton P. Fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva (FOP) in South Africa: dental implications in 5 cases. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endodontol. 2011;112(1):11‐18. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2011.03.015 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Fernandes CP, Oliveira FAF, Freitas e silva MR, et al. Clinical aspects and conservative dental management of a patient with fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2014;117(2):e148. doi: 10.1016/j.oooo.2013.11.082 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Carvalho DR, Farage L, Martins BJAF, Speck‐Martins CE. Craniofacial findings in fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva: computerized tomography evaluation. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endodontol. 2011;111(4):499‐502. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2010.12.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Nunnelly JF, Yussen PS. Computed tomographic findings in patients with limited jaw movement due to myositis ossificans progressiva. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1986;44(10):818‐821. doi: 10.1016/0278-2391(86)90162-X [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Mori Y, Susami T, Haga N, et al. Extraction of 6 molars under general anesthesia in patient with fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011;69(7):1905‐1910. doi: 10.1016/J.JOMS.2010.12.011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Duan Y, Zhang H, Bu R. Intraoral approach technique for treating trismus caused by fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2010;68(6):1408‐1410. doi: 10.1016/J.JOMS.2009.11.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Leavitt BD, Teeples TJ, Viozzi CF. Submandibular space swelling in a patient with fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva: a diagnostic dilemma. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009;67(3):668‐673. doi: 10.1016/J.JOMS.2008.07.011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Geddis‐Regan A. Severe trismus and contraindicated exodontia in a patient with fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva: case report. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2018;56(5):427‐429. doi: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2018.03.021 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Crofford LJ, Brahim JS, Zasloff MA, Marini JC. Failure of surgery and isotretinoin to relieve jaw immobilization in fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva: report of two cases. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1990;48(2):204‐208. doi: 10.1016/S0278-2391(10)80212-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Okuno T, Suzuki H, Inoue A, Kusukawa J. Restricted mandibular movement attributed to ossification of mandibular depressors and medial pterygoid muscles in patients with fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva: a report of 3 cases. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2017;75(9):1891‐1898. doi: 10.1016/J.JOMS.2017.03.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Susami T, Mori Y, Tamura K, et al. Facial morphology and occlusion of a patient with fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva (FOP): a case report. Spec Care Dent. 2012;32(4):165‐170. doi: 10.1111/j.1754-4505.2012.00260.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Pachajoa H, Botero AFR. Clinical and molecular characterisation of two siblings with fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva, from the Colombian Pacific coast (South America). BMJ Case Rep. 2015;2015:bcr2015209804. doi: 10.1136/bcr-2015-209804 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Braga JM, Silva MFAM, Silva LCPd, Seraidarian PI, Cruz RdA. Improvement of mouth opening for a patient with fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva: a case report. Spec Care Dent. 2011;31(6):220‐225. doi: 10.1111/j.1754-4505.2011.00216.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Vashisht R, Prosser D. Anesthesia in a child with fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva. Paediatr Anaesth. 2006;16(6):684‐688. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9592.2005.01837.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Sellami M, Kallel S, Kessentini A, Charfeddine I, Hammami B, Ghorbel A. Fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva presenting as a painful swelling of the sternocleidomastoid muscle. J Oral Maxillofac Surgery, Med Pathol. 2015;27(5):690‐692. doi: 10.1016/j.ajoms.2015.01.008 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
The data that support the findings of this study are available on request from the corresponding author. The data are not publicly available due to privacy or ethical restrictions.
