Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Clin Neurophysiol. 2022 Mar 1;39(3):176. doi: 10.1097/WNP.0000000000000741

Decoding the Spectrogram Rainbow

Marcus C Ng *, M Brandon Westover
PMCID: PMC8901547  NIHMSID: NIHMS1753260  PMID: 34510094

Invented almost a century ago, electroencephalography (EEG) has evolved over time into a trusted technique widely used around the world.1 In the current digital age, computerized techniques have replaced simple pen and paper plots of voltage against time with sophisticated quantitative measures of EEG activity. These transformations can collapse long stretches of data into manageable summaries for more efficient EEG review.2 Compact summaries of the EEG allow one to observe trends in the EEG otherwise not possible with conventional 10-second page-by-page analysis; hence, quantitative EEG (QEEG) measures are often called “trends.”3

In recent years, a multitude of QEEG measures have become widely available. These developments have led to misconceptions of QEEG that range from a kneejerk dismissal of the unknown to naïve overestimations of utility. Despite the proliferation and growing complexity of available QEEG measures, the most standard one, spectral estimation, is based on a classical mathematical method invented in the 1820s,4 the Fourier Transform. As typically applied, this technique decomposes a short (2–4 second long) time-based segment of an EEG signal into a frequency-based signal or spectrum. Applying this transformation repeatedly to consecutive EEG segments and plotting the spectra as a function of time produces the spectrogram. The spectrogram is often plotted using colors to represent spectral power. Hence, the spectrogram is sometimes called a “color spectral array” or “color density spectral array.”5 To the uninitiated, spectrograms may seem intimidating. However, embedded within this polychromatic madness is a treasure trove of useful clinical information.

In this special topical issue of the Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology, we aim to decode the spectrogram rainbow. First, we review the basics of QEEG with a strong focus on spectrograms in an easily digestible, need-to-know, nononsense guide for clinicians. Then, we review evidence-based indications for the clinical application of QEEG spectrograms in 2020. At present, the best evidence lies in using QEEG for seizure detection and monitoring for ischemia in the adult, pediatric, and subarachnoid hemorrhage settings, respectively. Armed with information from the reviews in this special topical issue, we hope that the reader will come away with a firm grasp of QEEG spectrogram basics and understand how to best deploy (and not deploy) the present-day capabilities of QEEG spectrograms in clinical practice to improve delivery of patient care.

Footnotes

The authors have no funding or conflicts of interest to disclose.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Berger H Uber das Elektrenkephalogramm des Menschen. Arch Psychiatr Nervenkr 1929;87:527–570. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Haider HA, Esteller R, Hahn CD, et al. Sensitivity of quantitative EEG for seizure identification in the intensive care unit. Neurology 2016;87:935–944. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Swisher CB, Sinha SR. Utilization of quantitative EEG trends for critical care continuous EEG monitoring. J Clin Neurophysiol 2016;33:538–544. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Fourier JB. Théorie Analytique De La Chaleur. Firmin Didot, père et fils. Paris, Île de France, France; 1822. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Ng MC, Jing J, Westover MB. Atlas of intensive care quantitative EEG. New York, NY: Demos Medical, Springer; 2020. [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES