Skip to main content
Journal of Parasitic Diseases: Official Organ of the Indian Society for Parasitology logoLink to Journal of Parasitic Diseases: Official Organ of the Indian Society for Parasitology
. 2021 Sep 2;46(1):272–279. doi: 10.1007/s12639-021-01446-2

Detecting Schistosoma haematobium infection by microscopy and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) in school children in three senatorial districts of Cross River State, Nigeria

Rosemary Kaiso Esiere 1, Emmanuel Onyekachukwu Ibeneme 2,3, Emmanuel Offiong Effanga 4, Edema Enogiomwan Imalele 4,, Miracle Kaiso Esiere 2, Paul Columba Inyang-Etoh 2, Ambrose Andrew Anyanwu Alaribe 2
PMCID: PMC8901918  PMID: 35299919

Abstract

As a result of the poor sensitivity and specificity of the standard parasitological diagnostic methods currently being used, this study was conducted to compare the standard parasitological diagnostic methods and Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) in determining the prevalence of urinary schistosomiasis in Cross River State (CRS). The study was conducted between April 2015 and March 2016. Seven hundred and seventy seven (777) urine samples were randomly collected from selected school-age children. The urine samples were subjected to standard parasitological and molecular examinations. Chi-square test was used to test the differences between the data on subgroups and the results from specimen examinations. An overall prevalence of 1.7% was recorded using microscopy and 34.7% recorded using PCR. The highest prevalence of infection by microscopy occurred in the Southern Senatorial District (2.3%), while the Northern Senatorial District recorded the highest prevalence of infection by PCR (53.2%) (p < 0.05). Males were more infected (2.4%) than females (0.6%) using microscopy. With PCR, males were also more infected (35.7%) compared to females (33.3%) (p < 0.05). The highest prevalence of infection using microscopy and PCR both occurred in school-age children aged 5–8 years (3.6% and 47.8% respectively), while the lowest prevalence for both methods occurred in participants aged 17 – 20 years (0% for both methods) (p < 0.05). This study has shown PCR to be effective in detecting schistosomiasis infection and also re-affirms the endemicity of urinary schistosomiasis in the three Senatorial Districts of CRS.

Keywords: Schistosomiasis, Microscopy, PCR, School-age children, Nigeria, Cross River State

Introduction

Schistosomiasis is a worldwide problem afflicting about 249 million persons and 97% of the infected persons reside in Africa (Anazaku et al. 2017). Approximately 779 million people are at risk of being infected in 76 endemic countries globally, 85% of these reside on the African continent (Utzinger et al. 2009). Every year schistosomiasis is responsible for about 1.7 million disability adjusted life years (DALYs) (Chitsulo et al. 2000). Schistosoma mansoni and S. haematobium cause intestinal and urinary schistosomiases respectively in many African countries where they may occur concurrently. Schistosomiasis causes health, labour loss, hypertension and significant reduction in socioeconomic benefits, particularly, late complications such as irreversible urinary tract obstruction and risk of renal failure are often associated with urinary schistosomiasis (King 2009).

Control programmes for schistosomiasis are mainly founded on treating of infected people, hence adequate-case finding is essential. Hitherto, the existing protocols for the diagnosis of schistosomiasis are search for ova of the schistosomes in urine or stool samples and detection of ova or adult worm antigens in sera and urine of infected persons. Detecting antigens of ova or adult worm in sera/urine of diseased persons can distinguish current infections from past ones with almost 100% specificity. Egg counts and haematuria are the only parameters presently employed in surveillance. However, Poggensee et al. (1998) reported the presence of morbidity of the urinary tract in some women who were schistosomiasis-infected in Tanzania who had scanty or no egg output and no haematuria. This implies that there is need for methods of detection with more specificity and sensitivity of the disease in humans.

Several studies have looked at the prevalence and intensity of S. haematobium in communities in Nigeria using methods like the detection of haematuria and ova in urine (Okon et al. 2009, 2010; Adie et al. 2013). Though they are useful in the detection of heavy infections, their low sensitivity in detecting light/early infections is a drawback that cannot be overlooked. As a result of the poor specificity and sensitivity of the standard parasitological diagnostic methods currently being used, the real estimate of the prevalence of schistosomiasis in sub-Saharan endemic areas of Africa is not clear (Hotez and Fenwick, 2009). Earlier studies have shown that detection of schistosomal parasite-specific DNA can be done in urine of persons who are infected (Lodh et al. 2013). Adult schistosome worms are the source of DNA because they shed teguments at regular intervals. Therefore, if parasite-specific DNA is detected in urine it confirms the parasites’ presence (Ibironke et al. 2012). In recent years, multiple authors have demonstrated Schistosome parasite-specific DNA in urine (Lodh et al. 2013). This study, therefore, sought to compare microscopy and PCR in the characterization of S. haematobium in Cross River State (CRS), Nigeria.

Materials and methods

Study area and population

This study was carried out in Cross River State with Calabar as the capital. The state is divided into three Senatorial Districts (North, South and Central) with 18 Local Government Areas (LGAs). Samples were collected from Central, Southern and Northern Senatorial Districts and were analysed at the University of Calabar Teaching Hospital (UCTH), Calabar and Molecular Biology Laboratory, Niger Delta University, Bayelsa State. The study population consisted of children/adolescents aged 5–20 years attending primary and secondary schools in the study area.

Ethical consideration

Subjects for this study were enrolled after approval was sought and obtained from Ministry of Health Ethical Committee, Cross River State (REC No.: RP/REC/2016/423). The village heads were informed of the study through advocacy visits to their palaces and local school authorities. Written informed consent was obtained from parents/guardians of participants.

Sampling and sample size determination

Seven hundred and seventy seven (777) samples were randomly obtained from children/adolescents in secondary/primary schools in the study area. Selection of children from schools in the study area was done randomly by picking one out of every four pupil within the range of the study.

Sample collection

The study was conducted between April 2015 and March 2016. Seven hundred and seventy seven (777) clean appropriately labelled universal containers were issued to the randomly selected children for collection of urine samples. The urine samples from these individuals were used for parasitological/molecular examinations. Subjects were instructed to ensure the last drops of urine were collected in the universal containers (Cheesbrough, 2005). The samples were collected between 10.00am and 2.00 pm, on each collection day to ensure maximum yield of schistosome eggs (Cheesbrough, 2005). All samples collected were preserved with 2 drops of 10% formalin in 25 mL capacity (WHO, 2003) and transported to the parasitology laboratory, University of Calabar Teaching Hospital.

Parasitological examination

A modified filtration system adopted by Useh and Ejezie (1999) was used. Briefly a funnel holding a What-man No. 1 filter paper was suspended on a conical flask to act as the filtration system. 10 mL of the urine sample was filtered for the eggs of Schistosoma. The thoroughly agitated sample was allowed to pass through the filtration system. Using a blunt-ended forceps, the filter paper was removed with great care and placed on a slide. The filter paper was placed upwards (eggs on surface) on the slide using × 10 objective, with the condenser iris closed adequately to give a good contrast. A systematic examination of the entire filter paper was conducted for S. haematobium ova. Any urine sample with ova was recorded as positive. The number of eggs counted was recorded per 10 ml of urine samples collected.

Molecular examination for schistosome infection

Urine cell pellet preparation

The urine sample was spun at 5,000 rpm for 10 min, the supernatant decanted and cell pellets washed thrice with 25 mL phosphate buffer saline (0.8% NaCl, 2.7 mM KCl, 1.8 mM KH2P04, 8.mM Na2HP04 pH 7.4). These were immediately stored at − 80 °C until used.

Genomic DNA extraction from urine cell pellet

The urine cell-pellets were re-suspended using 150µL of DNA elution buffer, then transferred into individual Eppendorf tubes, followed by 200µL bio-fluid—cell buffer solution (red) and 20µL proteinase K enzyme to digest the sample. Vortexing was done to have a thorough mix, and then incubated at 55 °C for 10 min on a heating block. Exactly 420 µL of genomic binding buffer was added to the digested sample and mixed thoroughly. The mixture was then transferred to a Zymo-Spin IIC—XL column in a collection tube and centrifuged at 14,000 rpm for one minute. The columns were then placed in new collection tubes, where 400µL DNA of pre-wash buffer was added and spun for one minute at 14,000 rpm and the collection tubes emptied. Seven hundred (700µL) g-DNA wash buffer was then added and spun at 14,000 rpm for one minute, and the collection tube emptied again. Furthermore, 200µL of g-DNA wash buffer was added and centrifuged again at 14,000 rpm for one minute and the collection tube discarded with the flow through. The columns were transferred to clean micro-centrifuge tubes and 50µL of DNA elution buffer was added, incubated at room temperature for 5 min, and then spun at 14,000 rpm for one minute to elute the DNA. Finally, the columns were discarded and the g-DNA, already extracted in the micro-centrifuge tubes, stored at − 20 °C until further use for PCR reactions.

DNA quantification

NanoDrop ND-1000 spectrophotometer (NanoDrop Technologies, California, USA) was used to determine the quantity and purity of DNA. The equipment was initialized and blanked before readings. DNA concentrations of the samples were recorded, in ng/µL while the absorbance 260/280 was used to determine the purity. Samples with absorbance ranging from 1.70 to 2.10 were selected for amplification by PCR.

Amplification of Schistosoma haematobium DNA repeat fragment from urine samples

Polymerase chain reaction was carried out on all the 13 positive samples and 108 negative samples, respectively, by microscopy, using 0.4µL of species-specific primers ShDra1 F (forward: 5′-GATCTCACCTATCAGACGAAAC-3′ and ShDra1 R (reverse: 5′-T CACAACGATACGACCAAC-3′), which were previously designed by Hamburger et al., (2001) for specific amplification of 121 bp Dra1 tandem repeats of S. haematobium. Amplification reactions were carried out in 20 µL volume. Two microlitre (2 µL) of DNA (concentration: 4–6 ng/µL) served as PCR template in the reaction volume, 10 µL of 2X Quick-Load Master-mix containing 200 µM of dNTPs, 1.5 µM of Taq polymerase (Inqaba Biotech, Johannesburg, South Africa) and 1.5 µM of MgCl. The PCR conditions were as follows: initial denaturation at 95 °C for 5 min, followed by 30 cycles of denaturation at 95 °C for one minute, annealing at 55 °C for 90 s and extension at one minute at 72 °C for 5 min.

Agarose gel electrophoreses

One gram and half (1.5 g) of agarose powder was measured and poured in 100 mL of 1X TBE buffer (Tris Boric Ethylene diamine Tetra-acetic acid.) then heated in a microwave for 5 min to allow the agarose powder dissolve and make a clear solution. It was allowed to cool and 4 µL of ethidium bromide was added. The solution was poured in an electrophoretic casting tray, the comb was placed and then the solution was allowed to cool and solidified for about 30 min then placed in an electrophoresis tank. Exactly 10µL of PCR product was pipetted, already mixed with DNA loading dye, and then loaded in the agarose gel lane after removing the comb. DNA ladder and negative control were also loaded and the gel was subjected to an electric field at 120 V for 25 min. The gel was visualized on a UV trans-illuminator for band detection.

Data analysis

All analyses were performed using the SPSS package (version 22). Descriptive statistical analysis was used to calculate the prevalence and intensity of infections. Chi-square test was used to test the differences between the data on subgroups and the results from specimen examinations. Differences were considered significant at a p-value less than 0.05 (p < 0.05).

Results

Seven hundred and seventy seven (777) school children/adolescents randomly selected from eight schools in the three Senatorial Districts of Cross River State were screened to determine the current status of urinary schistosomiasis in these districts. The Northern Senatorial District had the highest number of participants 348 (48%) followed by the Southern Senatorial District 220 (28.6%) and the Central Senatorial District 209 (26.9%). The school children/adolescents also comprised of 450 (57.9%) males and 327 (42.1%) females. The age distribution of the participants in the study was 5–8 years 248 (31.9%), 9–12 years 339 (43.6%), 13–16 years 116 (14.9%) and 17–20 years 74 (9.5%).

Table 1 shows the prevalence of S. haematobium infection by microscopy and PCR in the Senatorial Districts. The highest prevalence of infection by microscopy occurred in the Southern Senatorial Districts (2.3%), while the Northern Senatorial District recorded the highest prevalence of infection by PCR (53.2%); there was a statistically significant difference (p < 0.05) in the prevalence of infection in the Senatorial Districts using microscopy and PCR.

Table 1.

Prevalence of Schistosoma haematobium infection by microscopy and PCR by Senatorial Districts

Senatorial District No
Examined by microscopy
No. (%) positive by microscopy Number examined by PCR Number(%) positive by PCR χ2 p-value
South 220 5 (2.3) 31 5 (16.1) 11.082 0.004
Central 209 1 (0.5) 46 14 (30.4)
North 348 7 (2.0) 44 23 (52.3)
Total 777 13 (1.7) 121 42 (34.7)

Table 2 shows the prevalence of S. haematobium infection by microscopy and PCR with respect to gender. Males were more infected than females using microscopy (2.4% for males and 0.6% for females) and PCR (35.7% for males and 33.3% for females); there was a statistically significant difference in prevalence of infection by gender, using microscopy and PCR (p < 0.05).

Table 2.

Prevalence of Schistosoma haematobium infection by microscopy and PCR by gender

Gender No. examined
by microscopy
No. (%) positive by microscopy No. examined by PCR No. (%) positive by PCR χ2 p-value
Males 450 11 (2.4) 70 25 (35.7) 0.257 0.012
Females 327 2 (0.6) 51 17 (33.3)
Total 777 13 (1.7) 121 42 (34.7)

Table 3 shows the prevalence of S. haematobium infection by microscopy and PCR in participants with respect to age. The highest prevalence of infection using PCR occurred in participants aged 5–8 years (47.8%), while the lowest prevalence occurred in participants aged 17–20 years (0%). Using microscopy, the highest and lowest prevalence occurred in age groups 5–8 years (3.6%) and 17–20 years (0%). There was a statistically significant difference (p < 0.05) in the prevalence of infection among the different age-groups using microscopy and PCR.

Table 3.

Prevalence of S. haematobium infection by microscopy and PCR of subjects examined by age

Age group (years) No. Examined by microscopy No. (%) positive by microscopy No. Examined by PCR No. (%) positive by PCR χ2 p-value
5–8 248 9 (3.6) 46 22 (47.8) 8.106 0.044
9–12 339 3 (0.9) 58 18 (31.0)
13–16 116 1 (0.9) 13 2 (15.4)
17–20 74 0 (0.0) 4 0 (0.0)
Total 777 13 (1.7) 121 42 (34.7)

Figure 1 shows an agarose gel electrophoresis of the amplified repeats of Schistosoma haematobium from positive samples by microscopy. Lane 1, 2, and 10 are negative samples, Lanes 39, 11–13 represents positive samples with 1 to 3 repeats. M is a 100 bp ladder. Lane 14 represents the negative control.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Agarose gel electrophoresis showing the amplified repeats of the Schistosoma haematobium from the positive samples by microscopy. Lane 1, 2 and 10 are negative samples. Lanes 11–13 represents positive samples with 1 to 3 repeats. M is a 100 bp ladder. Lane 14 represents the negative control

Figure 2 shows an agarose gel electrophoresis showing the amplified repeats of the Schistosoma haematobium from selected samples negative by microscopy. Lanes showing 1 band or more represent positive samples for S. haematobium while lanes with no bands represent negative samples. L is 100 bp ladder.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Agarose gel electrophoresis showing the amplified repeats of the Schistosoma haematobium from selected samples negative by microscopy. Lanes showing 1 band or more represent positive samples for S. haematobium while lanes with no bands represent negative samples. L is a 100 bp ladder

Discussion

Studies have compared different diagnostic procedures used to detect schistosomiasis. These include tests for specific antibody, circulating antigens, haematuria, egg detection and ultrasound scans of the urinary tract. Nonetheless, it is difficult to find a “gold” standard because of the variability of the diagnostic performance of these techniques especially in areas with variable prevalence of S. haematobium infection (Koukounari et al. 2009; Effiong et al. 2017). However, assays based on polymerase chain reaction (PCR) have recently begun to show potentials as effective methods in detecting DNA of parasites in urine and saliva (Mharakurwa et al. 2006).

In this study, the 121 bp Dra1 tandem repeat PCR developed by Hamburger and colleagues (Hamburger et al. 2001) was adapted to detect S. haematobium DNA in urine. The Dra1 fragments were detected in samples from both children and adolescents when ova of schistosome were detected, and also in specimens where no ova were detected. However, these fragments were not detected in some of the samples. Out of the 777 urine samples, 13 (1.7%) were positive by microscopy, but PCR showed that 42 (34.7%) out of 121 randomly selected samples showed parasite-specific DNA for S. haematobium. This speaks volume of the sensitivity of PCR over microscopy. This agrees with results reported by Gasmelseed et al. (2014).

The overall prevalence (1.7%) recorded from parasitological examination of urine sample is lower than the reports of Ejezie et al. 1991; Ekanem et al. 1995, Useh and Ejezie, 1996 Adie et al. 2013 and Opara et al. 2021 in Cross River State (CRS). Ejezie et al. (1991) established a schistosomiasis prevalence value of 43.5% in Adim, CRS, while Useh and Ejezie (1996) recorded a prevalence of 53.8% in the same study area. Ekanem et al. (1995) recorded a prevalence of 44% in Ijiman, Yakurr Local Government Area (LGA), a community close to Adim. Recent studies have shown that the urinary schistosomiasis prevalence in Adim community increased from 53.8% reported by Useh and Ejezie (1996) to 57.4% (Okon et al. 2009). In Adim, Etim et al. (2012) reported a 42.2% prevalence of urinary schistosomiasis, while Okon et al. (2007, 2009) reported 35% and 45.3% prevalence rates respectively from parasitological examination of urine samples. The present study has re-affirmed the endemicity of S. haematobium in the three Senatorial Districts; Southern (Biase LGA), Central (Yakurr LGA) and Northern (Bekwarra LGA). According to Useh (2013), the extensive, unrestrained and unchecked increase in irrigation, water impoundment schemes, and widespread ignorance of schistosomiasis in the majority of the endemic areas have elevated the disease to a very serious health predicament in the sub-Saharan part of the continent, including Nigeria. This disease is also considered as one of the most frequently occurring parasitic infections globally (Okon et al. 2007). In CRS, the agrarian population and suitable conditions that enable the snail intermediate host to thrive has added to the prevalence of schistosomiasis (Ejezie et al. 1991; Opara et al. 2021).

It is likely that the reduction in prevalence and intensity of urinary schistosomiasis recorded in these communities, is as a result of treatments carried out by previous researchers; Okon et al. (2010), evaluated the status of urinary schistosomiasis in Ogoja LGA, where he went ahead to treat infected persons with Artesunate and found 64% cure rate while Inyang-Etoh et al. (2004) had a 70% cure rate in their work in Adim, CRS, using Artesunate. Another work, in Adim, recorded a cure rate of 88% after utilizing Artesunate and Praziquantel combination (Inyang-Etoh et al. 2009). This reduction in morbidity of urinary schistosomiasis could also be as a result of the integrated health interventions introduced about eight years ago by the Neglected Tropical Diseases Control Unit in collaboration with the schistosomiasis/soil transmitted helminths unit of the Federal Ministry of Health, CRS, in November 2012 (Adie et al. 2015). Integrated control measures put in place included chemotherapy of infected individuals with Praziquantel and health education on the predisposing factors responsible for the transmission of urinary schistosomiasis (Adie et al. 2015).

Infection pattern varied according to gender with more male participants 22(2.4%) being infected than females 2(0.6%). This difference varied significantly at (p < 0.05). Similar findings were reported in other studies (Inyang-Etoh et al. 2004; Ugbomoiko et al. 2010; Senghor et al. 2014; Boye et al. 2016; Opara et al. 2021). This difference may be explained by the fact that males are more involved in water contact activities than females due to social inhibitions like being restricted from activities such as fishing, public bathing and swimming (Etim et al. 2012; Anto et al. 2013). However, this deviates from other studies that reported no significant difference in gender-related prevalence. Okon et al. (2007), Bala et al. (2012) Morenikeji et al. (2014) and Mazigo et al. (2021) all reported both genders to be equally at risk.

Prevalence of S. haematobium varied significantly across age groups with the least (0% for both microscopy and PCR methods) and highest (3.6% for microscopy and 47.8% for PCR) recorded in age group 17–20 and 5–8 years, respectively (p < 0.05). This is similar to previous result reported in Biase and Yakurr LGAs by Adie et al. (2015) and in Mauritania by Gbalegba et al. (2010), but disagrees with other findings which recorded highest infection rates occurring in age brackets 12–15 (Morenikeji et al. 2014), 11–13 (Opara et al. 2021) and 10–14 (Ugbomoiko et al. 2010 and Deribe et al. 2011). The prevalence of urinary schistosomiasis varied with age in this study which is in contrast to findings reported by Ekwunife et al. (2009), while it was supported by Sam-Wobo et al. (2009) and Uwazuoke et al. (2009).

Conclusion

This study has re-affirmed the endemicity of urinary schistosomiasis in the three Senatorial Districts of CRS. The prevalence of 34.7% recorded in this study is still within the WHO recommended threshold of ≥ 20%, for mass drug administration (MDA). This study has shown that PCR is more sensitive than standard parasitological methods for the diagnosis of S. haematobium infection.

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank the staff of the University of Calabar Teaching Hospital (UCTH), Calabar and Molecular Biology Laboratory, Niger Delta University, Bayelsa State, for their assistance during the course of this study.

Authors’ contributions

Esiere, Rosemary Kaiso: Conceptualization, Data curation, Investigation, Methodology, Writing—original drafting. Ibeneme, Emmanuel Onyekachukwu: Investigation, Methodology, Writing – review and editing. Imalele, Edema Enogiomwan: Methodology, Writing – review and editing. Effanga, Emmanuel Offiong: Data curation, Methodology. Esiere, Miracle Kaiso: Investigation, Data curation. Inyang-Etoh, Paul Columba: Formal analysis, Project administration, Validation. Alaribe, Ambrose Andrew Anyanwu: Conceptualization, Validation, Supervision.

Funding

The authors did not receive support from any organization for the submitted work.

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.

Code availability

Not applicable.

Declarations

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest exist.

Consent to participate

The village heads were informed of the study through advocacy visits to their palaces and local school authorities. Written informed consent was obtained from parents/guardians of participants.

Ethics approval

Subjects for this study were enrolled after approval was sought and obtained from Ministry of Health Ethical Committee, Cross River State.

Footnotes

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  1. Adie HA, Oyo-Ita A, Okon OE, Arong GA, Ating IA, Braide EI, Nebe O, Emanghe UE, Otu AA. Evaluation intensity of urinary schistosomiasis in Biase and Yakurr Local Government Area of Cross River State, Nigeria, after two years of Integrated Control Measures. Res J Parasitol. 2015;10:58–65. [Google Scholar]
  2. Adie HA, Okon OE, Arong GA, Braide EI, Ekpo UF. Spatial distribution of urinary schistosomiasis in Cross River State, Nigeria, using geographical information system and school based questionnaire. Pakistan J Bio Sci. 2013;16:1166–1172. doi: 10.3923/pjbs.2013.1166.1172. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Anto F, Asoala V, Adjuik M, Anyorigiya T, Oduro A, Akazili J, Akweongo P, Ayivor P, Bimi L, Hodgson A. Water contact activities and prevalence of schistosomiasis infection among school-age children in communities along an irrigation scheme in rural Northern Ghana. J Bacteriol Parasitol. 2013;4(4):177. [Google Scholar]
  4. Anzaku AA, Oche OD, Ishaku A, Ishaku A. Prevalence of urinary schistosomiasis and water contact activities as risk factor in Wowyen community. J Ann Toxicol Appl. 2017;1(1):7–10. [Google Scholar]
  5. Bala AY, Ladan MU, Mainasara M. Prevalence and intensity of urinary Schistosomiasis in Abarma village, Gusau, Nigeria: a preliminary investigation. Sci World J. 2012;7(2):1–4. [Google Scholar]
  6. Boye A, Agbemator VK, Mate-Siakwa P, Essein-Baidoo S. Schistosoma haematobium co-infection with soil-transmitted helminthes: prevalence and risk factors from two communities in the central region of Ghana. Int J Med Biomed Res. 2016;5(2):86–100. [Google Scholar]
  7. Cheesbrough M. District laboratory practice in Tropical countries. 2. London: Tropical Health Technology; 2005. [Google Scholar]
  8. Chitsulo L, Engels D, Montresor A, Savioli L. The global status of schistosomiasis and its control. Acta Trop. 2000;77:41–51. doi: 10.1016/s0001-706x(00)00122-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Deribe K, Eldaw A, Hadziabduli S, Kailie E, Omer MD, Mohammed AE, Jamshed T, Mohammed EA, Mergani A, Ali GA, Babikir K, Adem A, Hashim F. High prevalence of urinary schistosomiasis in two communities in South Darfur: implication for interventions. Parasit Vectors. 2011;4(14):1–5. doi: 10.1186/1756-3305-4-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Effiong EJ, Spencer THI, Mohammed K, Useh MF, Ndodo ND, Umahi FPN. Evaluation of the efficacy of microscopy and PCR in the diagnosis of urinary schistosomiasis among primary school children in Wamakko Local Government Area of Sokoto State – Nigeria. Int J Trop Dis Health. 2017;26(1):1–8. [Google Scholar]
  11. Ejezie GC, Uko IE, Braide EI. Schistosomiasis in Cross River State, Nigeria: Prevalence and intensity of infection in Adim, Akamkpa Local Government Area. J Hyg Epidemiol Microbiol Immunol. 1991;35:141–147. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Ekanem EE, Ejezie GC, Asindi AA, Antia-Obong OE. Urinary symptoms and blood pressure of children with Schistosoma haematobium infection in South-Eastern Nigeria. East Afr Med J. 1995;72:486–489. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Ekwunife CA, Agbor VO, Ozumba AN, Eneanya CI, Ukaga CN. Prevalence of urinary schistosomiasis in Iyede-Ame community and environ in Ndokwa East Local Government Area, Delta State, Nigeria. Nig J Parasitol. 2009;30:27–31. [Google Scholar]
  14. Etim SE, Okon OE, Oku EE, Ukpong GI, Ohioma ME, Uttah CE. Urinary schistosomiasis in a rice-farming community in Biase Area of Cross River State. Nig J Parasitol. 2012;33:197–201. [Google Scholar]
  15. Gasmelseed N, Karamino NE, Abdelwahed MO, Hamdoun AO, Elmadani AE. Genetic diversity of Schistosoma haematobium parasite IS NOT associated with severity of disease in epidemic area in Sudan. Bio Med Central Infect Dis. 2014;14:469. doi: 10.1186/1471-2334-14-469. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Gbalegba NGC, Silue KD, Ba O, Ba H, Tian-Bi NTY, Yapi GY, Kaba A, Kone B, Utzinger J, Koudou BG. Prevalence and seasonal transmission of Schistosoma haematobium infection among school-aged children in Kaedi town. South Mauritania Paras Vectors. 2017;10:353. doi: 10.1186/s13071-017-2284-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Hamburger J, He N, Abbasi I, Ramzy RM, Jourdane J, Ruppel A. Polymerase chain reaction assay based on a highly repeated sequence of Schistosoma haematobium: A potential tool for monitoring Schistosome-infested water. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2001;65:907–911. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.2001.65.907. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Hotez PJ, Fenwick A. Schistosomiasis in Africa: an emerging tragedy in our new global health decade. Plos Negl Trop Dis. 2009;3(9):485. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0000485. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Ibironke O, Koukounari A, Asaolu S, Moustaki I, Shiff C. Validation of a new test for Schistosoma haematobium based on detection of Dra1 DNA fragments in urine: evaluation through latent class analysis. Pub Lib Sci Negl Trop Dis. 2012;6:e1464. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0001464. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. InyangEtoh PC, Essien UC, Amama M, Useh F. Prevalence of urinary schistosomiasis among school in Ukwolo—Obudu and Abini communities in Cross River State, Nigeria. Port-Harcourt Med J. 2004;3:13. [Google Scholar]
  21. Inyang-Etoh PC, Ejezie GC, Useh MF, Inyang-Etoh EC. Efficacy of a combination of Praziquantel and Artesunate in the treatment of urinary schistosomiasis in Nigeria. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2009;103:38–44. doi: 10.1016/j.trstmh.2008.08.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. King CH. Toward the elimination of schistosomiasis. New Engl J Med. 2009;360(2):106–109. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp0808041. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Koukounari A, Webster JP, Donnelly CA, Bray BC, Naples J, Bosompem K, Shiff C. Sensitivities and Specificities of diagnostic tests and infection prevalence of Schistosoma haematobium estimated from data on adults in villages Northwest of Accra, Ghana. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2009;80:435–441. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Lodh N, Mwansa JCL, Mutengo MM, Shiff CJ. Diagnosis of schistosoma mansoni without the stool: comparison of three diagnostic tests to detect Schistosoma mansoni infection from filtered urine in Zambia. Am Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2013;89:46–50. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.13-0104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Mazigo HD, Uisso C, Kazyoba P, Nshala A, Mwingira UJ. Prevalence, infection intensity and geographical distribution of schistosomiasis among pre-school and school aged children in villages surrounding Lake Nyasa. Tanzania Sci Rep. 2021;11:295. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-80317-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Mharakurwa S, Simoloka C, Thuma PE, Shiff CJ, Sullivan DJ. PCR detection of Plasmodium falciparum in human urine and saliva samples. Malaria J. 2006;5:103. doi: 10.1186/1475-2875-5-103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Morenikejji O, Quazim J, Omoregie C, Hassan A, Nwuba R, Anumudu C, Adejuwon S, Salawu O, Jegede A, Odaibo A. A Cross sectorial study on urogenital schistosomiasis in children, haematuria in an endemic rural area of Nigeria. Afr Health Sci. 2014;14(2):390–396. doi: 10.4314/ahs.v14i2.15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Okon OE, Udoutun MF, Oku EE, Nta AI, Etim SE, Abraham JJ, Akpan PA. Prevalence of urinary schistosomiasis in Abini community, Biase local government area, Cross river State, Nigeria. Nig J Parasitol. 2007;28(1):28–31. [Google Scholar]
  29. Okon OE, Ememayom A, Opara K (2009) Reliability of self-reported blood in urine for diagnosis of Schistosoma haematobium in a community in South-Eastern Nigeria. Internet J Epidemiol 7(2).
  30. Okon OE, Obi A, Opara K (2010) The efficacy of Artesunate in the treatment of urinary schistosomiasis in Ogoja, Cross River State, Nigeria. Internet J Trop Med 6(2)
  31. Opara KN, Wilson EU, Yaro CA, Alkazmi L, Udoidung NI, Chikezie FM, Bassey BE, Batiha GE. Prevamence, risk factor and coinfection of urogenital schistosomiasis and soil-transmitted helminthiasis among primary school children in Biase, Southern Nigeria. J Parasit Res. 2021;2021:12. doi: 10.1155/2021/6618394. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Poggensee G, Kiwelu I, Saria M, Richter J, Krantz I, Feldmeir H. Schistosomiasis of the lower reproductive tract without egg excretion in urine. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1998;59:782–783. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.1998.59.782. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Sam-Wobo SO, Ekpo UF, Ameh IG, Osileye OT. Continued high endemicity of urinary schistosomiasis in Ogun State, Nigeria. Nig J Parasitol. 2009;30(1):48–52. [Google Scholar]
  34. Senghor B, Diallo A, Sylla SN, Doucoure S, Ndiath MO, Gaayeb L, Djuikwo-Teukeng FF, Ba CT, Sokhna C. Prevalence and intensity of urinary schistosomiasis among school children in the district of Niakhar, region of Fatick. Senegal Parasites Vectors. 2014;7(1):5. doi: 10.1186/1756-3305-7-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Ugbomoiko US, Ofoezie IE, Okoye IC, Heukelbach J. Factors associated with uriinary schistosomiasis in two Peri-urban communities in South-Western Nigeria. Ann Trop Med Parasitol. 2010;104(5):409–419. doi: 10.1179/136485910X12743554760469. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Useh MF, Ejezie GC. Prevalence and morbidity of S. haematobium infection in Adim community of Nigeria. Jmedical Lab Sci. 1996;5:10–15. [Google Scholar]
  37. Useh MF, Ejezie GC. Modification of behaviour and attitude in the control of schistosomiasis. 1. Observations on water-contact patterns and perceptions of infection. Ann Trop Med Parasitol. 1999;93(7):711–720. doi: 10.1080/00034989957961. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Useh MF. Parasitic diseases-schistosomiasis. Geneva: Creative Commons Attribution License; 2013. pp. 82–83. [Google Scholar]
  39. Utzinger J, Raso G, Brooker S, De Savigny D, Tanner M, Ornbjerg N, Singer BH, N’goran EK. Schistosomiasis and neglected tropical diseases: towards integrated and sustainable control and a word of caution. Parasitology. 2009;136:1859–1874. doi: 10.1017/S0031182009991600. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Uwaezuoke JC, Anosike JC, Udujih OS. Endemicity of urinary schistosomiasis in Mbaitoli Local Government Area of Imo State, Nigeria. Nig J Parasitol. 2009;30:18–22. [Google Scholar]
  41. World Health Organization (2003) Determination of sample size for researches, pp 1–24

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Not applicable.


Articles from Journal of Parasitic Diseases: Official Organ of the Indian Society for Parasitology are provided here courtesy of Springer

RESOURCES