Skip to main content
Journal of Diabetes Investigation logoLink to Journal of Diabetes Investigation
. 2021 Dec 7;13(3):432–434. doi: 10.1111/jdi.13711

Updates in diabetic neuropathy: A call for new diagnostic and treatment approaches

Yoshimasa Aso 1,
PMCID: PMC8902406  PMID: 34779155

Abstract

graphic file with name JDI-13-432-g002.jpg


Diabetic polyneuropathy (DPN) is a serious complication of both type 1 and type 2 diabetes. The major clinical manifestations of DPN are neuropathic pain, diabetic foot (which is associated with ulcers, gangrene and amputation) and autonomic neuropathy. Diabetic sensorimotor peripheral neuropathy (DSPN) is the most common form of DPN and affects approximately 50% of people with type 1 or 2 diabetes during their lifetime 1 . Despite its major clinical impact, DPN remains underdiagnosed and undertreated. To reduce the burdens of DPN, there is an urgent need to develop both novel diagnostic procedures that enable improvement in the early detection of the disease and new treatments that address multiple mechanistic pathways (Figure 1) 2 .

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Mechanisms of diabetic neuropathy. Chronic hyperglycemia induces an excessive activation of the polyol, protein kinase C and hexosamine pathways. In addition, chronic hyperglycemia leads to an increased production of advanced glycation end‐products (AGEs), which induces functional and structural neuronal damage through interaction with the AGE‐specific receptors. Hyperglycemia, insulin resistance and dyslipidemia contribute synergistically to mitochondrial dysfunction, overproduction of reactive oxygen species, inflammation, endoplasmic reticulum stress and deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) damage, leading to neuronal cell damage. Both neuronal damage (demyelination and axonal loss) and endoneurial microvascular damage cause diabetic neuropathy in people with diabetes. AGE‐RAGE, advanced glycation end‐product–specific receptors; ER, endoplasmic reticulum; ROS, reactive oxygen species.

Nerve conduction studies are the current gold standard for diagnosing DSPN, but they are labor intensive, time‐consuming, costly and impractical to implement in routine clinical care 3 . Therefore, DSPN is primarily diagnosed by a clinical examination that uses simple evaluation tests. They consist of assessing both small and large nerve fiber function, including temperature and pinprick perception (small fiber function); vibration sensation (with a 128‐Hz tuning fork) and Achilles tendon reflexes (large fiber function); and protective sensation (with a 10‐g monofilament; large fiber function) 4 .

Recently, some new diagnostic point‐of‐care devices that enable early detection of DPN have been developed 5 . DPNCheck is a handheld point‐of‐care device that measures sural nerve amplitude and conduction velocity without the need for physiologist expertise or expensive equipment. DPNCheck measurements of sural nerve amplitude show strong agreement with standard nerve conduction studies 5 . Kamiya et al. 6 , 7 showed that parameters of the sural nerve obtained by DPNCheck were significantly associated with the severity of DSPN categorized by the Baba classification, suggesting that DPNCheck could provide comprehensive management of DSPN 6 . However, further research is required to determine whether routine use can be used as a reliable assessment for DSPN, and whether it can prevent clinical outcomes, such as foot ulcers, amputation and cardiovascular disease.

I anticipate that future research will establish novel biomarkers for DSPN, painful neuropathy and autonomic neuropathy 8 . Novel biomarkers derived from the current pathogenic concepts show promise in the early detection of DPN, and in predicting its development and progression, with biomarkers of oxidative stress and inflammation being very promising candidates 8 . Other biomarkers, such as serum bilirubin, platelet size and complement C1q tumor necrosis factor‐related protein 9, are promising candidates for diagnosing DSPN and cardiovascular autonomic neuropathy (CAN) 9 , 10 , 11 . However, large prospective studies are required to further validate whether these biomarkers can predict the unwanted outcomes of diabetic neuropathy, such as neuropathic pain, ulcers, amputations or even death.

Diabetic autonomic neuropathy affects the autonomic neurons (parasympathetic and/or sympathetic) and is associated with a variety of organ‐specific symptoms. Clinical manifestations of autonomic neuropathy include hypoglycemia unawareness, resting tachycardia, orthostatic hypotension, gastroparesis, constipation, diarrhea and fecal incontinence, erectile dysfunction, neurogenic bladder, and sudomotor dysfunction 3 .

CAN is associated with the development of cardiovascular disease, and has a high risk of lethal arrhythmias and sudden death 3 . A post‐hoc analysis of the Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes trial showed beneficial effects of intensive glycemic or blood pressure control on the development of CAN in high‐risk patients with type 2 diabetes 12 . Identifying CAN by assessing heart rate variability as early as possible is important and clinically relevant, because it allows physicians to decide when and how to implement optimal strategies for risk factor management 13 .

A review article mentioned the possibility that continuous glucose monitoring could help improve hypoglycemia awareness, because it is effective in reducing hypoglycemia and severe hypoglycemic episodes in patients with type 1 diabetes and hypoglycemia unawareness 14 .

Management of DSPN consists of three major principles: (i) causal treatment, including lifestyle modification, intensive glucose control and multifactorial cardiovascular risk intervention; (ii) pathogenesis‐based therapy; and (iii) relief of pain 15 . A better understanding of the underlying pathophysiology is required to enable new diagnostic and treatment approaches to be developed.

Some drugs derived from research on the pathogenetic concepts of DSPN are being used in several countries around the world. Aldose reductase is a key enzyme of the polyol pathway, which has been shown to be enhanced and a possible factor in DSPN (Figure 1). Aldose reductase inhibitors aim to inhibit the activation of the polyol pathway induced by chronic hyperglycemia. In a 3‐year randomized study, the aldose reductase inhibitor, epalrestat, was well tolerated, and hindered the deterioration in median motor nerve conduction velocity, minimum F‐wave latency and vibration sensation seen in an untreated group of patients with DSPN 16 . A growing body of evidence suggests that oxidative stress resulting from enhanced free‐radical formation and/or defects in anti‐oxidant defense is implicated in the pathogenesis of DSPN (Figure 1). Several meta‐analyses suggested that anti‐oxidative therapy with α‐lipoic acid might be effective in treating DSPN 15 , and it has been used to treat symptomatic DSPN for a couple of decades.

For the initial symptomatic treatment of neuropathic pain, α2δ ligands for voltage‐dependent Ca2+ channels, such as pregabalin, and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors, such as duloxetine, are the two classes of analgesic drugs recommended, and they can also be used in combination 15 . In a study of Asian patients with diabetic neuropathy, mirogabalin, a new α2δ ligand, relieved neuropathic pain in a dose‐dependent manner and showed statistically significant pain relief (vs placebo) at a dose of 30 mg/day 17 . However, the efficacy of symptomatic treatments for neuropathic pain is limited, so there is a continuing need for novel drugs to be developed for painful neuropathy that target the pathogenesis.

The current management strategy for diabetic neuropathy is focused on its early diagnosis, and prevention of diabetic foot and cardiovascular disease. In future, novel diagnostic techniques and criteria for classifying the severity of diabetic neuropathy might be developed, and their usefulness in evaluating the prognosis of diabetic neuropathy might be examined in large‐scale clinical studies. I also expect that basic research will lead to the development of new, more efficacious compounds (drugs) that ideally address multiple mechanistic pathways.

DISCLOSURE

The author declares no conflict of interest.

Approval of the research protocol: N/A.

Informed consent: N/A.

Approval date of registry and the registration no. of the study/trial: N/A.

Animal Studies: N/A.

REFERENCES

  • 1. Feldman EL, Callaghan BC, Pop‐Busui R, et al. Diabetic neuropathy. Nat Rev Dis Primers 2019; 5: 42. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Sloan G, Selvarajah D, Tesfaye S. Pathogenesis, diagnosis and clinical management of diabetic sensorimotor peripheral neuropathy. Nat Rev Endocrinol 2021; 17: 400–420. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Sasaki H, Kishimoto S. Diagnostic strategy for diabetic polyneuropathy: Focus on nerve fiber type and magnetic resonance neurography. J Diabetes Investig 2021; 12: 140–142. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Pop‐Busui R, Boulton AJM, Feldman EL, et al. Diabetic neuropathy: a position statement by the American Diabetes Association. Diabetes Care 2017; 40: 136–154. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Selvarajah D, Kar D, Khunti K, et al. Diabetic peripheral neuropathy: advances in diagnosis and strategies for screening and early intervention. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 2019; 7: 938–948. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Kamiya H, Shibata Y, Himeno T, et al. Point‐of‐care nerve conduction device predicts the severity of diabetic polyneuropathy: a quantitative, but easy‐to‐use, prediction model. J Diabetes Investig 2021; 12: 583–591. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Himeno T, Kamiya H, Nakamura J. Diabetic polyneuropathy: progress in diagnostic strategy and novel target discovery, but stagnation in drug development. J Diabetes Investig 2020; 11: 25–27. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Bönhof GJ, Herder C, Strom A, et al. Emerging biomarkers, tools, and treatments for diabetic polyneuropathy. Endocr Rev 2019; 40: 153–192. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Abe K, Maeda Y, Matsuzaki C, et al. Bilirubin is inversely related to diabetic peripheral neuropathy assessed by sural nerve conduction study. J Diabetes Investig 2021; 12: 2028–2035. 10.1111/jdi.13568 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Qian Y, Zeng Y, Lin Q, et al. Association of platelet count and plateletcrit with nerve conduction function and peripheral neuropathy in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. J Diabetes Investig 2021; 12: 1835–1844. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Yang J, Zhao D, Chen YI, et al. Association of serum CTRP9 levels with cardiac autonomic neuropathy in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. J Diabetes Investig 2021; 12: 1442–1451. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Aso Y. Intensive risk factor management and cardiovascular autonomic neuropathy in type 2 diabetes in the action to control cardiovascular risk in diabetes trial: a post‐hoc analysis. J Diabetes Investig 2021; 12: 1316–1318. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Pop‐Busui R, Backlund JC, Bebu I, et al. DCCT/EDIC Research Group. Utility of using electrocardiogram measures of heart rate variability as a measure of cardiovascular autonomic neuropathy in type 1 diabetes patients. J Diabetes Investig 2021. 10.1111/jdi.13635 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Lin YK, Fisher SJ, Pop‐Busui R. Hypoglycemia unawareness and autonomic dysfunction in diabetes: lessons learned and roles of diabetes technologies. J Diabetes Investig 2020; 11: 1388–1402. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Ziegler D, Papanas N, Schnell O, et al. Current concepts in the management of diabetic polyneuropathy. J Diabetes Investig 2021; 12: 464–475. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Hotta N, Akanuma Y, Kawamori R, et al. Long‐term clinical effects of epalrestat, an aldose reductase inhibitor, on diabetic peripheral neuropathy: the 3‐year, multicenter, comparative aldose reductase inhibitor‐diabetes complications trial. Diabetes Care 2006; 29: 1538–1544. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Baba M, Matsui N, Kuroha M, et al. Mirogabalin for the treatment of diabetic peripheral neuropathic pain: a randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled phase III study in Asian patients. J Diabetes Investig 2019; 10: 1299–1306. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Diabetes Investigation are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES