Abstract
TIGIT (T-cell immunoglobulin and ITIM domain) has emerged as a promising target in cancer immunotherapy. It is an immune “checkpoint” inhibitor primarily expressed on activated T cells, NK cells and Tregs. Engagement of TIGIT to its ligands PVR and PVR-L2 leads to inhibitory signaling in T cells, promoting functional exhaustion of tumor-infiltrating T lymphocytes. Here, we described the pre-clinical characterization of Ociperlimab (BGB-A1217), a novel humanized IgG1 anti-TIGIT antibody (mAb), and systemically evaluated the contribution of Fc functions in the TIGIT mAb-mediated anti-tumor activities. BGB-A1217 binds to the extracellular domain of human TIGIT with high affinity (KD = 0.135 nM) and specificity, and efficiently blocks the interaction between TIGIT and its ligands PVR or PVR-L2. Cell-based assays show that BGB-A1217 significantly enhances T-cell functions. In addition, BGB-A1217 induces antibody dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC) against Treg cells, activates NK cells and monocytes, and removes TIGIT from T cell surfaces in an Fc-dependent manner, In vivo, BGB-A1217, either alone or in combination with an anti-PD-1 mAb elicits strong immune responses and potent anti-tumor efficacy in pre-clinical models. Moreover, the Fc effector function is critical for the anti-tumor activity of BGB-A1217 in a syngeneic human TIGIT-knock-in mouse model. The observed anti-tumor efficacy is associated with a pharmacodynamic change of TIGIT down-regulation and Treg reduction. These data support the selection of BGB-A1217 with an effector function competent Fc region for clinical development for the treatment of human cancers.
Keywords: TIGIT, antibody, Fc effector function, cancer immunotherapy, immune checkpoint, ociperlimab, BGB-A1217
Introduction
TIGIT (also known as VSIG9, VSTM3, WUCAM) is a member of the Ig superfamily receptors. It is expressed on activated CD8+ and CD4+ T cells, NK cells and Treg cells in both mouse and human. It binds to PVR/CD155 with high affinity and shows relatively weaker binding to PVRL2/CD112 (1–3). TIGIT can inhibit T-cell and NK-cell functions through multiple mechanisms, including delivering direct inhibitory signals (2, 4, 5), out-competing with DNAM-1/CD226 for PVR and PVRL2 binding (1, 2, 5), augmenting Treg immunosuppressive functions and stability (6, 7), and promoting tolerogenic dendritic cells (DCs) through the interaction with PVR on DCs (1).
TIGIT expression is upregulated in the tumor microenvironment in multiple malignancies (8–12) and its expression on tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) has been associated with poor survival (13, 14). It is often co-expressed with PD-1 and other inhibitory receptors, such as TIM-3 and LAG-3, on exhausted CD8+ T cells and Tregs in tumors (9, 12, 15, 16). In addition, higher TIGIT expression was observed on tumor infiltrating Tregs than on other T-cell subtypes in TILs (15, 17) and some evidence has shown that TIGIT relies on Tregs to regulate the anti-tumor immune response in pre-clinical models (15). In patients, high TIGIT/DNAM-1 ratio on tumor-infiltrating Tregs has been found to be associated with poor clinical outcomes in melanoma following anti-PD-1 or anti-CTLA-4 therapies (8). Taken together, all evidences indicate that targeting TIGIT, and further in combination with other immune checkpoint blockade therapies, may augment immune responses and achieve optimal anti-tumor efficacy.
Currently, several anti-TIGIT mAbs have entered clinical stage. To be noted, different Fc formats are utilized. Tiragolumab from Genentech/Roche, vibostolimab from Merck, BGB-A1217 from BeiGene, and EOS-448 from iTeos (18) adopt wild type (wt) human IgG1, an Fc format with full effector functions, while COM902 from Compugen (19) and ASP8374 from Astellas/Potenza (20) utilize IgG4, an IgG type with weak effector functions; BMS-986207 from BMS and AB154 from Arcus were engineered with effector function-disabled Fc. In addition, SGN-TGT from Seattle Genetics harbors enhanced Fc functions via afucosylation. Those discrepancies raise an intriguing and critical question: is effector function-competent Fc format necessary for a TIGIT blockade antibody to achieve optimal anti-tumor efficacies?
BGB-A1217, is a humanized TIGIT antibody currently under clinical development (ClinicalTrials.gov numbers: NCT04047862, etc.). In this report, we systemically characterized and studied the functional activities of BGB-A1217 both in vitro and in vivo. To explore the role of Fc functions in its anti-tumor effects, we generated a pair of anti-TIGIT antibodies with the same variable regions, but with different Fc forms: BGB-A1217 (with wild-type IgG1 Fc), and BGB-A1217MF (with an Fc lacking FcγR binding capacities). Comparative characterizations of those two mAbs indicate that effector function-competent Fc is necessary for BGB-A1217 to elicit optimal anti-tumor efficacy in pre-clinical models, through mechanisms such as Treg reduction, NK cell and monocytes activation, as well as trogocytosis. In addition, BGB-A1217 and anti-PD-1 antibody treatment synergistically activate T cells in vitro and inhibit tumor growth in mouse models.
Materials and Methods
Mice
BALB/c mice were purchased from Beijing Vital River Laboratory Animal Technology Co., Ltd. BALB/c-hTIGIT and C57BL/6-hTIGIT human TIGIT knock-in mice were purchased from Jiangsu GemPharmatech Co.,Ltd. All experiments were conducted according to the protocols approved by BeiGene’s Animal Care and Use Committee.
Cell Lines and Culture Media
BW5147.3, HEK293, HCT116, A549, NK92MI, SK-BR-3, Jurkat, CT26.WT, and Renca cells were purchased from ATCC. MC38 cell line was purchased from Kerafast, Inc., Boston. HEK293/PVR, HEK293/PVR-L2, A549/PD-L1, A549/OS8-PD-L1, Jurkat/TIGIT/DNAM-1, Jurkat/NFAT Luciferase Reporter/TIGIT, BW5147.3/TIGIT, NK92MI/CD16a-V158, HEK293/FcγRs were generated by retroviral infection using standard protocols. NK92MI/CD16a-V158 cells were generated from NK92MI cells by stable transfection of expression constructs containing CD16a (FcγRIIIA, V158 allele) and Fc Receptor γ chain. For the generation of A549/OS8-PD-L1 cell line, a T cell engager (named OS8) was constructed by fusing the single chain variable fragment (scFv) of an anti-human CD3 mAb OKT3 (21) to the C-terminal domain (113-220) of mouse CD8α. All cell lines were grown in ATCC recommended culture media and conditions.
Antibody Generation
BGB-A1217 is a humanized mAb, which is derived from a murine clone (mu1217) generated by hybridoma fusion, targeting human TIGIT extracellular domain (ECD). The variable regions of heavy and light chains of mu1217 were sequenced and the murine framework regions were replaced by closely homologous human germline IgG sequences. The final form of humanized anti-TIGIT monoclonal antibody was selected as the clinical candidate, referred to as BGB-A1217.
Binding Kinetics Analysis by SPR Assay
Binding kinetics of anti-TIGIT antibodies to TIGIT were characterized by surface plasmon resonance (SPR) assay using BIAcore™ T-200 (GE Life Sciences). Anti-human Fc antibody was coupled to activated CM5 biosensor chips (GE Life Sciences, catalog no. BR100530), followed by blockade of un-reacted groups with 1M of ethanolamine. 10 nM of anti-TIGIT antibodies was flown over the chip and captured by immobilized anti-human Fc antibody. Then a serial dilution (0.078 nM to 20 nM) of human TIGIT with His tag (Sino Biological Inc, China, catalog no. 10917-H08H) were injected in the SPR running buffer (10 mM HEPES, 150 mM NaCl, 3 mM EDTA, 0.05% Tween20, pH7.4) at 30μL/minute. Changes in SPR signal (response unit, RU) caused by interaction between captured anti-TIGIT mAbs and human TIGIT-his were detected and plotted against the time as sensorgrams. The association rates (K on) and dissociation rates (K off) were calculated using the one-to-one Langmuir binding model in BIA Evaluation Software (GE Life Sciences). The equilibrium dissociation constant (KD) was calculated as the ratio of K off/K on.
Cell Binding and TIGIT Ligand (PVR and PVR-L2) Competition Assays
For TIGIT binding assay, TIGIT-over-expressing BW5147.3/TIGIT cells were first stained with anti-TIGIT antibodies or controls (human IgG or placebo), followed by staining with a secondary Ab (Alexa Fluor® 488 F(ab’)₂ fragment goat anti-human IgG [F(ab’)₂ fragment specific, Jackson ImmunoResearch, catalog no. 109-546-097]. For FcγRs binding assay, FcγR-over-expressing HEK293 cells were first incubated with anti-TIGIT mAbs, followed by staining with secondary Ab (the same as in TIGIT binding assay). In the ligand competition assay, serially diluted anti-TIGIT or control mAbs were mixed with TIGIT-mIgG2a (0.15 μg) in a 50 μL volume and incubated at room temperature for at least 10 minutes. HEK293/PVR or HEK293/PVR-L2 cells were then suspended in the protein mixture to a final volume of 100 μL and incubated at 4°C for 1 hour, followed by cell wash and staining with AF647 Goat anti-mouse IgG (Biolegend, catalog no. 405322). Cell samples were washed and fixed with 1% paraformaldehyde in DPBS. Immunofluorescence was detected using Guava easyCyte 6HT (Merck-Millipore, USA) and analyzed using Guava Soft 3.1.1 software.
Cytomegalovirus (CMV) Specific T Cell Activation Assay
Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) from HLA-A2.1+ healthy donors were simulated with CMV pp65 peptide (NLVPMVATV, 495-503, HLA-A2.1-restricted, >98% purity, synthesized by GL Biochem, Shanghai, China) with 100U/mL recombinant human IL-2 (Novoprotein, China, catalog no. C013) for seven days. CMV pp65-sensitized PBMCs were used as effector cells. HCT116 cells (HLA-A2.1+, ATCC) were used as target cells. Prior to the co-culture, HCT116 cells were treated with mitomycin-c (100 μg/mL, Selleck Chemicals GmbH) and pp65 peptide (10 μg/mL) for 30 minutes, followed by two washes with DPBS. Then the pp65 peptide-primed PBMCs (105 cells/well) were cultured with pp65-pulsed HCT116 cells (4x104 cells/well) in the presence of BGB-A1217 at indicated concentrations in complete RPMI1640 media overnight. Co-culture was set up in 96-well plates in 37°C incubator with 5% CO2. Human IgG (HuIgG) and placebo were used as negative controls. IFN-γ in the culture supernatants was determined by ELISA.
Anti-TIGIT and Anti-PD-1 Combination in T-Cell Activation Assay
Isolated PBMCs were stimulated with OKT3 (40 ng/mL, eBioscience) at a concentration of 106 cells/mL for 3 days. Then pre-stimulated PBMCs (104 cells/well) were co-cultured with a mixture of A549/OS8-PD-L1 (5x103 cells/well) and A549/PD-L1 (3.5x104 cells/well) in the presence of BGB-A1217 alone or in combination with BGB-A317 at the indicated concentrations in 96-well plates for 18 hours. IFN-γ in the culture supernatants was determined by ELISA.
Intracellular Cytokine Staining Assay
PBMCs from healthy donors (HLA-A2.1+) were stimulated by 1 μg/mL CMV pp65 peptide, in the presence of 2 ng/mL recombinant human IL-2 and 10 ng/mL recombinant human IL-7 (PeproTech, catalog no. 200-07) for 8 days. The cells were then washed and rested in 100 IU/mL IL-2 for 3 days. HCT116 cells were pulsed with 0.01 μg/mL CMV pp65 peptide at 37°C for 1 hour and washed with DPBS. Then the PBMCs (104 cells/well) were co-cultured with CMV pp65 pulsed HCT116 (104 cells/well) in the presence of 5 μg/mL PD-1 antibody BGB-A317 and/or 10 μg/mL TIGIT antibody (BGB-A1217 or BGB-A1217MF) overnight. In the last 5 hours of the co-culture, Monensin (Biolegend, catalog no. 420701) and brefeldin A (Biolegend, catalog no. 420601) were added to the culture medium (10 μg/ml). Intracellular cytokine staining was performed using the eBiosciences intracellular fixation permeabilization buffer set (Invitrogen, catalog no. 88-8824-00) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.
In Vitro Antibody-Dependent Cellular Cytotoxicity (ADCC) Assays
In the cell line-based ADCC assay, NK92MI/CD16a-V158 cells were used as effector cells. BW5147.3/TIGIT cells were used as target cells. NK92MI/CD16a-V158 cells (3x104 cells/well) were co-cultured with BW5147.3/TIGIT cells (6x104 cells/well) for 5 hours in the presence of BGB-A1217 or BGB-A1217MF at indicated concentrations in 96-well plates. HuIgG was used as a negative control. Cytotoxicity of NK92MI/CD16a-V158 cells against BW/TIGIT cells was determined by lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) release assay using the CytoTox 96 Non-Radioactive Cytotoxicity Assay kit (Promega, Madison, WI, catalog no. G1780). CD107a and Perforin expression on NK cells was determined by FACS. In the primary cell based ADCC assay, PBMCs from lung cancer patients were used as target cells. NK cells isolated from PBMCs from healthy donors were used as effector cells. Anti-TIGIT antibodies BGB-A1217 or BGB-A1217MF, were incubated with target cells (5x104 cells/well) and NK effector cells (5x104 cells/well, purified using NK Cell isolation kit, Miltenyi Biotec, catalog no. 130-092-657) in 96-well plates overnight. Cell samples were subjected to flow cytometry analysis.
NK Cell Activation Assay
In a co-culture assay, anti-TIGIT mAb BGB-A1217 or BGB-A1217MF, was added to the co-culture of a human breast cancer cell line SK-BR-3 (5x104 cells/well) with primary NK cells isolated from healthy donor-derived PBMCs (5x104 cells/well) in 96-well plates overnight. NK cells were pre-stimulated with 25 U/mL recombinant human IL-2 (Novoprotein, China, catalog no. C013) overnight before the co-culture assay. CD107a expression on NK cells was determined by FACS.
Monocytes and DCs Activation Assay
Human PBMCs (2x105 cells/well) from healthy donors were incubated with anti-TIGIT antibodies BGB-A1217 or BGB-A1217MF at the concentration of 10 μg/mL in a 96-well plate overnight and analyzed by FACS. Anti-HIV-1 mAb Suvizumab (22) was used as negative control. CD86 mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) fold change on CD14+ monocytes and HLA-DR+CD11c+ DCs was calculated.
Trogocytosis Assay
In the cell line-based proof-of-concept experiment, Jurkat/TIGIT/DNAM-1 (2x104 cells/well) were used as donor cells, and CFSE (Invitrogen, catalog no. C34554) labeled HEK293 cells expressing different FcγRs (4x104 cells/well) were used as acceptor cells. In the primary cell-based experiment, T cells (4x104 cells/well) were used as donor cells. Monocytes or DCs (8x104 cells/well) isolated from the same donors were used as acceptor cells. T cells and monocytes were purified from human PBMCs using Pan T cell isolation kit (Miltenyibiotec, catalog no. 130-096-535) or monocytes isolation kit (Miltenyibiotec, catalog no. 130-096-537) respectively. DCs were induced by culturing CD14+ monocytes in complete RPMI-1640 containing 100 ng/mL GM-CSF (Sino Biological Inc, China, catalog no. GMP-10015-HNAH) and 100 ng/mL IL-4 (Sino Biological Inc, China, GMP-11846-HNAE) for 6 days. Anti-TIGIT mAbs were labeled using CF633 labeling kit (Sigma, catalog no. MX633S100). Donor cells were pre-incubated with 10 μg/mL CF633-labeled BGB-A1217 or CF633-labeled BGB-A1217MF for 30 min and washed. The donor cells were then incubated with acceptor cells in 96-well plates overnight. The roles of FcγRs in trogocytosis were determined using human serum (GEMINI, catalog no. 100-512) blockade or FcγR blocking antibodies (10 μg/mL). Changes of TIGIT (CF633) MFI on T cells were measured by FACS. Blockade antibodies used include anti-human CD16 (Biolegend, catalog no. 302050), anti-human CD64 (Biolegend, 305048), anti-human CD32 (Invitrogen, catalog no. 16-0329-85, specific for FcγRIIA and FcγRIIB), anti-Human CD32 (StemCell, catalog no. 60012, binds most strongly to FcγRIIA).
Flow Cytometry
Human Samples Analysis
Cell suspensions were pre-incubated with LIVE/DEAD™ Fixable Dead Cell Stain Kit (Invitrogen) and Fc receptor blocking solution (100 μg/mL HuIgG in FACS buffer), before staining with fluorochrome-conjugated anti-human antibodies. For extra-cellular staining analysis, cells were washed and fixed with 1% paraformaldehyde (PFA) in DPBS before FACS analysis. For Foxp3 staining, cells were washed following extra-cellular staining and fixed for 30 minutes at 4°C with intracellular fixation and permeabilization buffer (eBioscience, catalog no. 00-5523-00). Anti-Foxp3 staining was then performed in the permeabilization buffer for 1 hour at 4°C. Cells were washed and resuspended in DPBS before FACS analysis. All flow cytometry data was acquired using Guava easyCyte 6HT-2L (Merck-Millipore, USA) or NovoCyte flow cytometer (ACEA Biosciences, Inc.) and data was analyzed using guavaSoft 3.1.1 and NovoExpress software, respectively. The following antibodies were used in flow cytometric analyses: PE.Cy7 anti-human CD45 (Biolegend, catalog no. 368532), Brilliant Violet 711™ anti-human CD25 (Biolegend, catalog no. 302636), APC anti-human Foxp3 (eBiosciences, catalog no. 17-4777-42), BV605 anti-human CD3 (BD Horizon, catalog no. 563219), APC anti-human CD3 (Biolegend, catalog no. 300458), PE anti-human CD3 (Biolegend, catalog no. 300308), FITC anti-human CD4 (eBiosciences, catalog no. 11-0048-42), FITC anti-human CD8 (Biolegend, catalog no. 344704), Brilliant Violet 421™ anti-human CD56 (Biolegend, catalog no. 318328), PE anti-TIGIT (eBiosciences, catalog no. 12-9500-42), APC anti-human CD86 (Biolegend, catalog no. 374208), PE anti-human CD14 (Biolegend, catalog no. 325606), PE anti-human CD107a (Biolegend, catalog no. 328608), BV421 anti-human Perforin (Biolegend, catalog no. 308122), PE.Cy7 anti-human IFN-γ (eBioscience, catalog no. 25-7319-82), PE anti-human TNF-α (Biolegend, catalog no. 502909), PE anti-human HLA-DR (Biolegend, catalog no. 307606), and FITC anti-human CD11c (Biolegend, catalog no. 337214).
Mouse Samples Analysis
Tumors and blood were collected from CT26.WT tumor bearing mice. Tumors were dissociated into single cell suspensions using Tumor Dissociation Kit (Miltenyi, catalog no. 130-096-730) and filtered through 70-mm nylon filters. Red blood cells were lysed using ACK (Ammonium-Chloride-Potassium) lysing buffer. Prior to antibody labeling, cell suspensions were preincubated with Live/Dead fixable Dead Cell Stain Kit (Invitrogen, catalog no. 65-0866-14) at room temperature for 20 minutes, Fc receptor blocking solution (BD, catalog no. 553141) at 4°C for 10 minutes, and 10μg/mL BGB-A1217 at 4°C for 30 minutes. Antibody labeling process was the same as with human samples described above. All flow cytometry data was acquired using Cytek Aurora cytometer and data were analyzed using SpectroFlo software. The following antibodies were used in flow cytometric analyses: AF700 anti-mouse CD45 (BioLegend, catalog no. 103128), AF532 anti-mouse CD3 (eBioscience, catalog no. 58-4031-80), eFluor450 anti-mouse TCRγ/δ (eBioscience, catalog no. 48-5711-82), PE/Cy7 anti-mouse CD335 (NKp46) (eBioscience, catalog no. 25-3351-82), AF660 anti-mouse CD4 (BioLegend, catalog no. 100506), Pacific Orange anti-mouse CD8a (eBioscience, catalog no. MCD0830), PE/Cy5 anti-mouse Foxp3 (eBioscience, catalog no. 15-5773-82), APC anti-mouse CD226 (BioLegend, catalog no. 128810) and FITC goat anti-human IgG(H+L) (Beyotime, catalog no. A0556).
In Vivo Efficacy Study
In a single agent study, murine colon cancer CT26.WT model in human TIGIT knock-in mice was used. In brief, mice were implanted subcutaneously (s.c.) with 105 CT26.WT cells (ATCC) in the right flank of mice on day 0 and were then randomized into 5 groups when the mean tumor volume reached 100 mm3. TIGIT mAbs (BGB-A1217 or BGB-A1217MF) were administrated intraperitoneally (i.p.) at 10 mg/kg every five days (Q5D). When the tumor volume reached 2000 mm3, mice were euthanized.
In the combination studies with BGB-A1217 and anti-mouse PD-1 antibody, MC38 (colon cancer) and Renca (kidney cancer) syngeneic models were tested. In the MC38 model, human TIGIT knock-in mice were implanted s.c. with 106 MC38 tumor cells. Seven days after implantation, mice were randomly allocated into 4 groups and treated with vehicle (DPBS), anti-mouse PD-1 antibody Ch15mt (i.p., 1 mg/kg, Q5D), BGB-A1217 (i.p., 3 mg/kg, Q5D) or the combination as indicated. Tumor volume was measured twice weekly. Mice were euthanized once their tumor volume reached 2000 mm3. In the Renca model, BALB/c mice were injected s.c. with 2x105 Renca cells. Mice were treated with murine TIGIT blockade antibody mu10A7 (5 mg/kg, i.p., QW), Ch15mt (i.p. 3 mg/kg, QW), or the combination from day 8.
Statistical Analyses
Statistical significances were determined using unpaired t-test, ANOVA (performed in GraphPad Prism 8), Tobit model or mixed-effect model (performed in SAS Enterprise Guide, version: 7.15 HF3 (7.100.5.6132)) with proper multiplicity adjustment.
Results
Characterization of TIGIT Ligand Blockade and FcγR Binding of BGB-A1217
Anti-human TIGIT mAb, BGB-A1217 (being tested in multiple clinical trials, ClinicalTrials. gov numbers: NCT04047862 etc.), was generated by hybridoma fusion and humanized by CDR grafting. As shown in Figures 1A, B , it binds to human TIGIT with high affinity in SPR assay (KD = 0.135 nM) and cell binding assay (EC50 = 0.54 nM). BGB-A1217 completely blocks the interaction of TIGIT to its ligands PVR (IC50 = 4.53 nM) and PVRL2 (IC50 = 1.69 nM) in a cell-based ligand competition assay ( Figure 1C ). Fcγ receptor binding is an important functional attribute for immune checkpoint antibodies in cancer immunotherapy (23). To investigate whether the Fc effector function is critical for anti-TIGIT antibody’s function, we generated two versions of anti-TIGIT antibodies: BGB-A1217, with wild-type IgG1 Fc; BGB-A1217MF, with mutant IgG1 Fc (ELLGG 233-237->PAAG-, P329A), abrogating its binding to FcγRs. Binding kinetics analysis by cell-based assay showed that both BGB-A1217 and BGB-A1217MF bind to TIGIT equally well ( Figure 1A ). In addition, the two variants equally blocked the interaction of TIGIT with its ligands PVR and PVR-L2 ( Figure 1C ). Human IgG (HuIgG) and Placebo had no inhibition activity (data not shown).
In terms of the binding capacities to FcγRs, BGBA1217 binds to FcγRI with high affinity, and also has significant binding to FcγRIIA, FcγRIIB, and FcγRIIIA. In contrast, BGB-A1217MF completely loses binding to these FcγRs based on cell-binding and SPR ( Figure 1D and Table 1 ).
Table 1.
Sample | FcγRIKD b (M) | FcγRIIA KD a (M) | FcγRIIBkD a (M) | FcγRIIIA KD a (M) | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
H131 | R131 | F158 | V158 | |||
BGB-A1217 | 4.06E-11 | 9.65E-07 | 1.02E-06 | 2.84E-06 | 2.18E-06 | 5.55E-07 |
Human IgG | 3.67E-11 | 9.83E-07 | 1.04E-06 | 2.47E-06 | 2.03E-06 | 4.67E-07 |
BGB-A1217MF | ND c | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND |
FcγR, gamma Fc receptor; huIgG, human immunoglobulin G; BGB-A1217MF, the BGB-A1217 Fc variant with “silent Fc” mutations; kD, equilibrium dissociation constant; koff, dissociation rate; kon, association rate.
Placebo: Placebo contains no antibody but has the same formulation as BGB-A1217. Placebo is the negative control. Note that human IgG is a mixture of human IgGs.
KD values are determined by the analyte concentration at which half of the ligands are occupied at equilibrium.
KD values are calculated from the ratio of the kinetic constants as KD = koff/kon.
ND, Not detectable, the binding signals are too weak for exact determination.
BGB-A1217 Enhances IFN-γ Secretion by CMV-Specific T Cells
To further assess the functional activity of BGB-A1217 on T cells through the blockade of TIGIT and ligands interaction, naturally derived T cells that recognize human cytomegalovirus (CMV) pp65 peptide were co-cultured with pp65-pulsed HCT116 cells (positive for the TIGIT ligands PVR and PVR-L2), in the presence of antibodies. IFN-γ secretion was used as the readout for T-cell activation ( Figure 2A ). As shown in Figure 2B , BGB-A1217 enhanced the ability of CMV-specific T cells to produce IFN-γ in a dose- dependent manner. As expected, the Fc-silent antibody BGB-A1217MF equally stimulated the T cell response as compared to BGB-A1217, indicating that TIGIT blockade antibodies can stimulate T cell responses through the inhibition of TIGIT/ligand interaction, in an Fc-independent manner ( Figure 2B ).
BGB-A1217 Augments T Cell Response in Combination With Anti-PD-1 mAb BGB-A317
To determine whether BGB-A1217 in combination with BGB-A317 can enhance primary human immune cell activation as compared to either monotherapy, PBMCs from healthy donors were pre-stimulated to up-regulate TIGIT expression and used as effector cells. PD-L1 and T-cell engager (OS8) positive cells (A549/OS8-PD-L1), and PD-L1 positive A549/PD-L1 cells were used as target cells. IFN-γ release was used as the readout for T-cell activation ( Figure 2C ). The results showed that treatment of PBMCs with BGB-A1217 induced IFN-γ production in a dose-dependent manner. Combination of BGB-A1217 and BGB-A317 significantly enhanced IFN-γ release compared to BGB-A1217 or BGB-A317 treatment alone, indicating that the combined blockade of TIGIT and PD-1 can mitigate effector cell exhaustion following activation ( Figure 2D ), which was further validated with an intracellular IFN-γ staining assay using CMV pp65 specific CD8+ T cells ( Supplementary Figure 1 ).
BGB-A1217 Treatment Reduces Tregs in Human PBMCs From Cancer Patients In Vitro
An antibody can induce a variety of effector functions by binding to FcγRs. IgG1 subtype has high affinity to FcγRs, leading to significant effector functions. One of the important Fc receptors is gamma Fc receptor IIIA (FcγRIIIA), which mediates antibody dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC) (23). To assess whether BGB-A1217 can induce ADCC against TIGIT positive cells, we performed two cell-based ADCC assays.
First, we evaluated BGB-A1217-induced ADCC activity with an NK cell line (NK92MI/CD16a-V158) and a TIGIT-over-expressing cell line, BW5147.3/TIGIT ( Figure 3A ). As shown in Figure 3B , BGB-A1217 induced NK92MI/CD16a-V158 cells to exert potent ADCC against BW5147.3/TIGIT cells death in a dose-dependent manner. In contrast, BGB-A1217MF and human IgG showed no ADCC ( Figure 3B ), which was further confirmed by the activation status of NK92MI/CD16a-V158 cells, using the phenotypic NK activation markers CD107a and perforin as readout ( Supplementary Figure 2 ).
Since T cells express TIGIT, it is reasonable to reckon that Fc function-competent TIGIT mAb BGB-A1217 may induce ADCC in TIGIT+ T cells. Using PBMC samples from lung cancer patients, we performed flow cytometric analysis of TIGIT expression among different T cell subtypes. As shown in Figure 3C , effector CD4+ and CD8+ T cells express low to medium levels of TIGIT, whereas Treg cells express significantly higher level of TIGIT. In the ADCC assay, cancer patient derived PBMCs were used as target cells and NK cells from healthy donors were used as effector cells. After overnight co-culture of target PBMCs with NK effector cells, the percentages of non-Treg CD4+, CD8+ and Treg cell subsets in CD3+ T cells were quantified by flow cytometry. As shown in Figure 3D , Treg frequencies in CD3+ T cells were significantly reduced in a dose-dependent manner upon BGB-A1217 treatment, whereas the percentage remained largely unchanged in the BGB-A1217MF-treated group. In contrast, neither BGB-A1217 nor BGB-A1217MF treatment altered the frequencies of effector CD4+ T cells or CD8+ T cells ( Figures 3E, F and Supplementary Figure 3 ). The results clearly indicate that the BGB-A1217 is able to induce ADCC against Treg cells in cancer patient derived PBMCs. Fc function is required for the ADCC function and may augment TIGIT antibody’s activity in the anti-tumor immune response through Treg reduction.
BGB-A1217 Activates NK and Monocytes In Vitro
Both TIGIT and FcγRIIIA can be expressed on NK cells. To determine whether BGB-A1217 can activate NK cells, purified NK cells co-cultured with a human breast cancer cell line SK-BR-3 (expressing high level of PVR) in the presence of TIGIT mAbs, and NK cell activation was determined by measuring an NK cell degranulation marker CD107a by flow cytometry ( Figure 4A ). The % of CD107a+ cells in total NK cells increased in a dose-dependent manner upon BGB-A1217 treatment. Interestingly, Fc- silent BGB-A1217MF triggered significantly lower CD107a upregulation compared to BGB-A1217, suggesting that the competent Fc plays a vital role in the optimal NK activation ( Figure 4B ).
Next, we evaluated whether BGB-A1217 could induce the activation of other FcγR expressing immune cells, such as monocytes and DCs (HLA-DR+ CD11c+ cells). PBMCs from healthy donors were cultured in the presence of BGB-A1217 or BGB-A1217MF. As shown in Figure 4C , BGB-A1217 treatment significantly increased the expression of CD86, a co-stimulatory ligand typically found on the surface of antigen-presenting cells (APC) and up-regulated during APC activation (24), while BGB-A1217MF showed no effect. We also observed similar effects on DCs ( Supplementary Figure 4 ). The results suggest TIGIT mAbs can induce an activation of APC via FcγRs.
BGB-A1217 Removes TIGIT From T Cell Surface Through Fc-Dependent Trogocytosis In Vitro
Target molecules can be removed from the cell surface through the FcγR-binding induced endocytosis (trogocytosis), thus impacting mAb-based therapies (25). To investigate whether BGB-A1217 can remove TIGIT from cell surface, we carried out an in vitro trogocytosis assay.
In the cell line-based proof-of-concept experiment, Jurkat/TIGIT/DNAM-1 were used as donor cells, and HEK293 cells expressing different FcγRs were used as acceptor cells ( Figure 5A ). Compared to BGB-A1217MF, BGB-A1217 dramatically removed TIGIT from the surface of Jurkat/TIGIT/DNAM-1 cells, in the presence of HEK293/FcγRs. Among all the receptors, FcγRI showed the highest potential to mediate trogocytosis, consistent with its highest affinity to human IgG1, followed by FcγRIIA, FcγRIIB and FcγRIIIA-V158, the FcγRIIIA isoform with higher affinity to human IgG1. FcγRIIIA-F158, the FcγRIIIA isoform with lower affinity to human IgG1, exhibited lower potency to mediated trogocytosis ( Figure 5B ). Considering that in humans, binding of BGB-A1217 to FcγRs, particularly to FcγR1 can be blocked by endogenous IgG, we evaluated the impact of serum in the trogocytosis assay. When human AB serum added to achieve 20% human serum in the culture system, the trogocytosis via FcγRI was significantly inhibited. However, other FcγRs were less affected ( Supplementary Figure 5 ). It is possible that the trogocytosis through FcγR1 in human can be largely blocked by endogenous IgG, however, immune complex formation upon BGB-A1217 binding to TIGIT will significantly increase its affinity to low affinity receptors (FcγRIIA, IIB, IIIA), leading to relevant Fc-mediated effector functions, including trogocytosis.
To determine whether BGB-A1217 can induce trogocytosis in primary cells, purified human T cells (CD4+ or CD8+ T cells from healthy donors) were co-cultured with monocytes or in vitro differentiated DCs in the presence of TIGIT mAbs. As shown in Figures 5C–H , BGB-A1217, rather than BGB-A1217MF, induced the Fc-dependent trogocytosis, either when monocytes ( Figure 5D ) or DCs ( Figure 5G ) were used as FcγR+ acceptor cells. Blockade of FcγRI on monocytes ( Figure 5E ) significantly inhibited the trogocytosis. Similar effects were observed when either FcγRI or FcγRIIA on DCs was blocked ( Figure 5H ). The differential capability of BGB-A1217 and BGB-A1217MF to induce trogocytosis is highly unlikely from variation in mAb labeling since we have confirmed that the labeling efficiency of BGB-A1217 and BGB-A1217MF are comparable ( Supplementary Figure 6 ).
BGB-A1217 Elicits Anti-Tumor Efficacy in an Fc-Dependent Manner and Shows Combination Activity With PD-1 Antibody In Vivo
To explore the in vivo anti-tumor activity of TIGIT blockade antibodies and evaluate the relative contribution of Fc functions in anti-tumor efficacy, we performed mouse efficacy studies using CT26.WT tumor model in BALB/c mice (for surrogate TIGIT mAb study) or human TIGIT knock-in mice (for humanized TIGIT mAb study). As shown in Figure 6A , weekly dosing of surrogate TIGIT antibody mu10A7 at 5 mg/kg induced significant tumor growth inhibition. In contrast, mu10A7 with silent Fc displayed no significant activity. Similar results were achieved using humanized antibodies. As shown in Figure 6B , BGB-A1217 or BGB-A1217MF was administrated in human TIGIT knock-in mice at 10 mg/kg every 5 days. On day 19 of treatment, BGB-A1217 exhibited significant anti-tumor activity relative to the vehicle group. In contrast, BGB-A1217MF showed no activity. The results indicate that Fc effector functions play critical role in the anti-tumor function of TIGIT antibody in vivo.
We next evaluated whether the combination treatment with anti-TIGIT and anti-PD-1 mAbs could further inhibit tumor growth in vivo. As shown in Figures 6C, D , in MC38 ( Figure 6C ) or Renca ( Figure 6D ) syngeneic tumor model, the combination of BGB-A1217 or mu10A7 with Ch15mt (a surrogate anti-mouse PD-1 antibody) induced significantly stronger tumor growth inhibition compared to the single agent treatment groups.
BGB-A1217 Reduces Tregs, Down-Regulates TIGIT and Up-Regulates DNAM-1 on the Tumor Infiltrating T Cells
To further explore the pharmacodynamic association with the Fc-related in vivo efficacy, we examined the changes of different immune cell populations in tumors and blood after TIGIT mAb treatment. In CT26.WT tumor model, at 48 hours after BGB-A1217 treatment, the intra-tumor Treg frequencies in TILs were significantly decreased, while CD4+ effector T cell and CD8+ T cell populations remained unchanged. In contrast, BGB-A1217MF treatment failed to reduce Tregs ( Figure 7A ). Besides, we also observed an intriguing phenotype that BGB-A1217 treatment decreased the overall TIGIT expression ( Figure 7B ) and increased the DNAM-1 expression ( Figure 7C ) on intra-tumoral T cells and NK cells more significantly than BGB-A1217MF treatment, suggesting that FcγR trogocytosis may occur in vivo and contribute to the surface removal of TIGIT molecules. Another possibility is that the TIGIThiDNAM-1low cells were depleted, thus rendering the surface levels of TIGIT to drop, and DNAM-1 to increase.
Discussion
In this report, we have shown that BGB-A1217, a clinical stage anti-human TIGIT mAb, could elicit strong immune responses and potent anti-tumor efficacies in vitro and in vivo. In particular, via a systemic comparative study using the pair of anti-TIGIT mAb with effector function-competent or -silent Fc domain, we clearly demonstrated the pivotal role of the FcγR-binding properties in anti-TIGIT antibody’s functions based on multiple mechanisms of action (MOAs). Our results support the clinical development of BGB-A1217 and demonstrates its competitive advantage over Fc-function-attenuated anti-TIGIT mAbs.
Pre-clinical studies have demonstrated that certain immunomodulatory antibodies, such as those targeting GITR (26), OX40 (27), and CTLA-4 (28, 29), relied on Fc-dependent depletion of intra-tumoral Tregs for optimal anti-tumor activity. Although the extent of contribution of ADCC/ADCP to the clinical outcomes of ipilimumab (an IgG1-form mAb targeting CTLA-4) has not been fully understood, it has been documented that human FcγR polymorphisms impact responses to ipilimumab in patients with advanced melanoma (30).
Here, through in vitro and in vivo studies, we have demonstrated anti-TIGIT mAb BGB-A1217 functions, at least in part, through depletion of intra-tumoral Tregs. It has been well-known that target density plays a critical role in regulating ADCC (31, 32). Preferential depletion of tumor infiltrating Tregs depends on both a higher density of the target molecules on Tregs relative to other T cell subsets in the tumor microenvironment (TME), and the presence of ADCC/ADCP mediating cells. The highest expression of TIGIT on tumor infiltrating Tregs relative to other T cell subsets and the presence of NK and macrophages in the TME likely explains the preferential depletion of Tregs in tumors by BGB-A1217. TIGIT+ Tregs represent a functionally distinct Treg subsets which are highly immunosuppressive (6). Higher expression of TIGIT on intra-tumoral Tregs renders them the most susceptible target for ADCC/ADCP, whereas sparing effector T cells from cell killing, thus making it desirable to take full advantage of the Fc function of TIGIT mAbs. However, the polymorphisms of FcγRs added the complexity of the dependence of ADCC/ADCP of anti-TIGIT mAb activities in humans, suggesting a need for appropriate stratification of patients based on polymorphism status.
As an important part of innate immunity, NK cells play critical role in immunosurveillance against tumor cells. In this report, we clearly showed that both Fc-silent and -competent BGB-A1217 could elicit NK cell activation in the presence of PVR+ tumor cells. However, the extent of NK activation by BGB-A1217MF (Fc-silent) is significantly lower than that by Fc-competent BGB-A1217, suggesting that besides TIGIT ligand blockade functions, the capability of FcγR co-engagement is also required for optimal NK activation by TIGIT mAbs. The dominant FcγRs expressed on NK cells are FcγRIIIA (CD16a). Two isoforms exist and both are stimulatory: FcγRIIIA-V158 with higher affinity to IgG1, while FcγRIIIA-F158 with lower affinity (23). Additive and/or synergistic effects after co-engagement of TIGIT and FcγRIIIA in NK cells with tumor cells suggest that several NK activatory pathways (such as DANM-1 and FcγRIIIA) may converge downstream, leading to stronger signals. In this case, it is also important to assure that FcγR crosslinking do not trigger NK fratricide (which means NK cell self-killing in the absence of target cells). Notably, in the absence of tumor cells, BGB-A1217 was not able to elicit significant NK activation or induce obvious NK fratricide ( Supplementary Figure 7 ), suggesting good safety profile of BGB-A1217.
Besides the activation effects on lymphoid arm, we also observed the Fc-dependent stimulatory role of BGB-A1217 on myeloid cells, which is consistent with the findings by Han et al. (33). Considering that TIGIT expression is higher in TME than in periphery, and abundant myeloid cells that express FcγRs infiltrate into tumors to create a highly suppressive microenvironment, it is reasonable to hypothesize that the high density of TIGIT and FcγR expression in TME creates an ideal scenario for FcγR-mediated myeloid cell activation, relieving its immune-suppressive activity and leading to better immune stimulation. It is well established that engagement of ITAM-bearing type I FcγRs by IgG complexes leads to cellular activation and subsequent induction of effector functions, which include phagocytosis, dendritic cell maturation, antigen presentation, and macrophage polarization (34). Further studies are needed to delineate to what extent BGB-A1217 modulate myeloid cells and which FcγRs are involved in the modulation.
To the best of our knowledge, this study is the first one to show that anti-TIGIT mAb can induce trogocytosis of TIGIT though binding to FcγR+ cells. It has been well documented that binding of anti-CD38 mAb Daratumumab, anti-CD20 mAb rituximab, anti-HER2 mAb trastuzumab, anti-EGFR mAb cetuximab etc. to cancer cells promotes trogocytosis mediated by monocytes and other FcγR+ cells (25, 35, 36). However, no reports documented whether anti-TIGIT mAbs can induce FcγR-mediated trogocytosis. We clearly demonstrated the removal of TIGIT from human T cell surface by monocytes and DCs in the presence of BGB-A1217, but not BGB-A1217MF (Fc-silent). The high affinity FcγRI played a critical role on monocytes while both FcγRI and FcγRIIA are essential on DCs to mediate the trogocytosis. The finding is in line with our cell line-based studies and is consistent with the expression pattens of FcγRs on monocytes and DCs (37). Johnston et al. showed that TIGIT impaired CD226 function by directly disrupting homodimerization of the stimulatory molecule DNAM-1 (9). The removal of TIGIT from T cell and NK cell surface may not only “remove” the downstream inhibitory signaling of TIGIT, but may also prevent the disruption of DNAM-1 homodimerization by TIGIT, thus rejuvenating the effector cells. It is possible that trogocytosis induced removal of TIGIT from Tregs may compromise the ADCC/ADCP effects due to reduced molecular density. However, on the other hand, it may help spare effector T cells from ADCC/ADCP while retaining the Treg depletion through delicate modulations of the surface expression of TIGIT.
In vivo efficacy-wise, our results from mouse models have clearly demonstrated the anti-tumor efficacy of BGB-A1217 either as a single agent or in combination with anti-PD-1 mAb. In addition, competent Fc function is indispensable for eliciting its anti-tumor activity and there is correlation between efficacy and pharmacodynamic changes (such as Treg depletion). Intriguingly, there was a dramatic up-regulation of TIGIT, and down-regulation of DNAM-1 on T cells and NK cells after treatment by BGB-A1217, which may be due to the depletion of TIGIThighDNAM-1low cells by BGB-A1217, or possibly due to TIGIT removal via trogocytosis.
In summary, our study demonstrated the immune activation and anti-tumor activity of an anti-TIGIT mAb BGB-A1217 in pre-clinical models. The distinct MOAs between anti-TIGIT antibodies ( Figures 8A–E ) and anti-PD-1/PD-L1 antibodies highlighted the potential of BGB-A1217 to be used in combination therapy with PD-1/PD-L1 blocking mAbs in cancer treatment and provided strong rationale for using wild-type IgG1 Fc as the optimal format. We have proposed and validated multiple MOAs for the desirable Fc engagement, including Treg depletion via ADCC/ADCP, NK and myeloid cell activation, and trogocytosis in pre-clinical models. Further clinical studies are needed to shed light on those mechanisms and provide answers to whether those mechanisms can be translated from bench to clinical development.
Data Availability Statement
The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/ Supplementary Material . Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding authors.
Ethics Statement
The studies involving human participants were reviewed and approved by Institutional Review Board (IRB) at BeiGene. The patients/participants provided their written informed consent to participate in this study. The animal study was reviewed and approved by BeiGene’s Animal Care and Use Committee, BeiGene.
Author Contributions
TZ, LW, KL, XL, ZS, WJ, MW, JS and XS were involved in the study conceptualization and supervision. XC, LX, XD, JZ, LJ, SL, HH, QZ, BBJ, LZ, LC, XZ, JM, QL, YL, BJ and ZR were involved in acquisition, analysis, and interpretation of data. XC and TZ drafted the manuscript, and all authors were involved in critical revision of the manuscript. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.
Funding
This work was supported by internal company fundings.
Conflict of Interest
All authors have ownership interest in BeiGene. TZ, LX, QL, MW and KL are inventors on a patent covering BGBA1217 described in this study.
The authors declare that this study received funding from BeiGene Co. Ltd. The funder had the following involvement with the study: generic guidance for drug discovery activities and legal review.
Publisher’s Note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Acknowledgments
Authors would like to thank Dr. Xiaolei Xun for her assistance in the statistical analyses.
Supplementary Material
The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fimmu.2022.828319/full#supplementary-material
References
- 1. Yu X, Harden K, Gonzalez LC, Francesco M, Chiang E, Irving B, et al. The Surface Protein TIGIT Suppresses T Cell Activation by Promoting the Generation of Mature Immunoregulatory Dendritic Cells. Nat Immunol (2009) 10:48–57. doi: 10.1038/ni.1674 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Stanietsky N, Simic H, Arapovic J, Toporik A, Levy O, Novik A, et al. The Interaction of TIGIT With PVR and PVRL2 Inhibits Human NK Cell Cytotoxicity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA (2009) 106:17858–63. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0903474106 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Boles KS, Vermi W, Facchetti F, Fuchs A, Wilson TJ, Diacovo TG, et al. A Novel Molecular Interaction for the Adhesion of Follicular CD4 T Cells to Follicular DC. Eur J Immunol (2009) 39:695–703. doi: 10.1002/eji.200839116 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Liu S, Zhang H, Li M, Hu D, Li C, Ge B, et al. Recruitment of Grb2 and SHIP1 by the ITT-Like Motif of TIGIT Suppresses Granule Polarization and Cytotoxicity of NK Cells. Cell Death Differ (2013) 20:456–64. doi: 10.1038/cdd.2012.141 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Lozano E, Dominguez-Villar M, Kuchroo V, Hafler DA. The TIGIT/CD226 Axis Regulates Human T Cell Function. J Immunol (2012) 188:3869–75. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1103627 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Joller N, Lozano E, Burkett PR, Patel B, Xiao S, Zhu C, et al. Treg Cells Expressing the Coinhibitory Molecule TIGIT Selectively Inhibit Proinflammatory Th1 and Th17 Cell Responses. Immunity (2014) 40:569–81. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2014.02.012 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Fuhrman CA, Yeh WI, Seay HR, Saikumar Lakshmi P, Chopra G, Zhang L, et al. Divergent Phenotypes of Human Regulatory T Cells Expressing the Receptors TIGIT and CD226. J Immunol (2015) 195:145–55. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1402381 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Fourcade J, Sun Z, Chauvin JM, Ka M, Davar D, Pagliano O, et al. CD226 Opposes TIGIT to Disrupt Tregs in Melanoma. JCI Insight (2018) 3(14):e121157. doi: 10.1172/jci.insight.121157 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Johnston RJ, Comps-Agrar L, Hackney J, Yu X, Huseni M, Yang Y, et al. The Immunoreceptor TIGIT Regulates Antitumor and Antiviral CD8(+) T Cell Effector Function. Cancer Cell (2014) 26:923–37. doi: 10.1016/j.ccell.2014.10.018 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Kong Y, Zhu L, Schell TD, Zhang J, Claxton DF, Ehmann WC, et al. Zheng H. T-Cell Immunoglobulin and ITIM Domain (TIGIT) Associates With CD8+ T-Cell Exhaustion and Poor Clinical Outcome in AML Patients. Clin Cancer Res (2016) 22:3057–66. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-15-2626 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. He W, Zhang H, Han F, Chen X, Lin R, Wang W, et al. CD155T/TIGIT Signaling Regulates CD8(+) T-Cell Metabolism and Promotes Tumor Progression in Human Gastric Cancer. Cancer Res (2017) 77:6375–88. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-17-0381 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Josefsson SE, Huse K, Kolstad A, Beiske K, Pende D, Steen CB, et al. Myklebust JH. T Cells Expressing Checkpoint Receptor TIGIT Are Enriched in Follicular Lymphoma Tumors and Characterized by Reversible Suppression of T-Cell Receptor Signaling. Clin Cancer Res (2018) 24:870–81. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-17-2337 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Stalhammar G, Seregard S, Grossniklaus HE. Expression of Immune Checkpoint Receptors Indoleamine 2,3-Dioxygenase and T Cell Ig and ITIM Domain in Metastatic Versus Nonmetastatic Choroidal Melanoma. Cancer Med (2019) 8:2784–92. doi: 10.1002/cam4.2167 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Lee WJ, Lee YJ, Choi ME, Yun KA, Won CH, Lee MW, et al. Expression of Lymphocyte-Activating Gene 3 and T-Cell Immunoreceptor With Immunoglobulin and ITIM Domains in Cutaneous Melanoma and Their Correlation With Programmed Cell Death 1 Expression in Tumor-Infiltrating Lymphocytes. J Am Acad Dermatol (2019) 81:219–27. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2019.03.012 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Kurtulus S, Sakuishi K, Ngiow SF, Joller N, Tan DJ, Teng MW, et al. TIGIT Predominantly Regulates the Immune Response via Regulatory T Cells. J Clin Invest (2015) 125:4053–62. doi: 10.1172/JCI81187 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] [Retracted]
- 16. Chauvin JM, Pagliano O, Fourcade J, Sun Z, Wang H, Sander C, et al. TIGIT and PD-1 Impair Tumor Antigen-Specific CD8(+) T Cells in Melanoma Patients. J Clin Invest (2015) 125:2046–58. doi: 10.1172/JCI80445 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Wald N, Mercier M, Cuende J, Nyawouame F, Prasad S, Brouwer M, et al. TIGIT Pathway Phenotyping Sheds Light on Promising Strategies to Restore Anti-Tumor Immunity. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2019; 2019 Mar 29-Apr 3; Atlanta, GA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res (2019). 79(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 4969. [Google Scholar]
- 18. Preillon J, Cuende J, Rabolli V, Garnero L, Mercier M, Wald N, et al. Restoration of T-Cell Effector Function, Depletion of Tregs, and Direct Killing of Tumor Cells: The Multiple Mechanisms of Action of a-TIGIT Antagonist Antibodies. Mol Cancer Ther (2021) 20:121–31. doi: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-20-0464 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Hansen K, Kumar S, Logronio K, Whelan S, Qurashi S, Cheng HY, et al. COM902, a Novel Therapeutic Antibody Targeting TIGIT Augments Anti-Tumor T Cell Function in Combination With PVRIG or PD-1 Pathway Blockade. Cancer Immunol Immunother (2021) 70:3525–40. doi: 10.1007/s00262-021-02921-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Shirasuna K, Koelsch G, Seidel-Dugan C, Salmeron A, Steiner P, Winston WM, et al. Characterization of ASP8374, a Fully-Human, Antagonistic Anti-TIGIT Monoclonal Antibody. Cancer Treat Res Commun (2021) 28:100433. doi: 10.1016/j.ctarc.2021.100433 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Kipriyanov SM, Moldenhauer G, Martin AC, Kupriyanova OA, Little M. Two Amino Acid Mutations in an Anti-Human CD3 Single Chain Fv Antibody Fragment That Affect the Yield on Bacterial Secretion But Not the Affinity. Protein Eng (1997) 10:445–53. doi: 10.1093/protein/10.4.445 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Matsushita S, Takahama S, Shibata J, Kimura T, Shiozaki K, Eda Y, et al. Ex Vivo Neutralization of HIV-1 Quasi-Species by a Broadly Reactive Humanized Monoclonal Antibody KD-247. Hum Antibodies (2005) 14:81–8. doi: 10.3233/HAB-2005-143-405 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Chen X, Song X, Li K, Zhang T. FcgammaR-Binding Is an Important Functional Attribute for Immune Checkpoint Antibodies in Cancer Immunotherapy. Front Immunol (2019) 10:292. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.00292 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Chen L, Flies DB. Molecular Mechanisms of T Cell Co-Stimulation and Co-Inhibition. Nat Rev Immunol (2013) 13:227–42. doi: 10.1038/nri3405 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Taylor RP, Lindorfer MA. Fcgamma-Receptor-Mediated Trogocytosis Impacts mAb-Based Therapies: Historical Precedence and Recent Developments. Blood (2015) 125:762–6. doi: 10.1182/blood-2014-10-569244 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Bulliard Y, Jolicoeur R, Windman M, Rue SM, Ettenberg S, Knee DA, et al. Activating Fc Gamma Receptors Contribute to the Antitumor Activities of Immunoregulatory Receptor-Targeting Antibodies. J Exp Med (2013) 210:1685–93. doi: 10.1084/jem.20130573 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Bulliard Y, Jolicoeur R, Zhang J, Dranoff G, Wilson NS, Brogdon JL. OX40 Engagement Depletes Intratumoral Tregs via Activating FcgammaRs, Leading to Antitumor Efficacy. Immunol Cell Biol (2014) 92:475–80. doi: 10.1038/icb.2014.26 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Simpson TR, Li F, Montalvo-Ortiz W, Sepulveda MA, Bergerhoff K, Arce F, et al. Fc-Dependent Depletion of Tumor-Infiltrating Regulatory T Cells Co-Defines the Efficacy of Anti-CTLA-4 Therapy Against Melanoma. J Exp Med (2013) 210:1695–710. doi: 10.1084/jem.20130579 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Selby MJ, Engelhardt JJ, Quigley M, Henning KA, Chen T, Srinivasan M, et al. Anti-CTLA-4 Antibodies of IgG2a Isotype Enhance Antitumor Activity Through Reduction of Intratumoral Regulatory T Cells. Cancer Immunol Res (2013) 1:32–42. doi: 10.1158/2326-6066.CIR-13-0013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Arce Vargas F, Furness AJS, Litchfield K, Joshi K, Rosenthal R, Ghorani E, et al. Fc Effector Function Contributes to the Activity of Human Anti-CTLA-4 Antibodies. Cancer Cell (2018) 33:649–63.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.ccell.2018.02.010 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. van Meerten T, van Rijn RS, Hol S, Hagenbeek A, Ebeling SB. Complement-Induced Cell Death by Rituximab Depends on CD20 Expression Level and Acts Complementary to Antibody-Dependent Cellular Cytotoxicity. Clin Cancer Res (2006) 12:4027–35. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-06-0066 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Nijhof IS, Casneuf T, van Velzen J, van Kessel B, Axel AE, Syed K, et al. CD38 Expression and Complement Inhibitors Affect Response and Resistance to Daratumumab Therapy in Myeloma. Blood (2016) 128:959–70. doi: 10.1182/blood-2016-03-703439 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Han JH, Cai M, Grein J, Perera S, Wang H, Bigler M, et al. Effective Anti-Tumor Response by TIGIT Blockade Associated With FcgammaR Engagement and Myeloid Cell Activation. Front Immunol (2020) 11:573405. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.573405 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Bournazos S, Wang TT, Ravetch JV. The Role and Function of Fcgamma Receptors on Myeloid Cells. Microbiol Spectr (2016) 4(6):MCHD-0045-2016. doi: 10.1128/microbiolspec.MCHD-0045-2016 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Beum PV, Mack DA, Pawluczkowycz AW, Lindorfer MA, Taylor RP. Binding of Rituximab, Trastuzumab, Cetuximab, or mAb T101 to Cancer Cells Promotes Trogocytosis Mediated by THP-1 Cells and Monocytes. J Immunol (2008) 181:8120–32. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.181.11.8120 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Krejcik J, Frerichs KA, Nijhof IS, van Kessel B, van Velzen JF, Bloem AC, et al. Monocytes and Granulocytes Reduce CD38 Expression Levels on Myeloma Cells in Patients Treated With Daratumumab. Clin Cancer Res (2017) 23:7498–511. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-17-2027 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Guilliams M, Bruhns P, Saeys Y, Hammad H, Lambrecht BN. The Function of Fcgamma Receptors in Dendritic Cells and Macrophages. Nat Rev Immunol (2014) 14:94–108. doi: 10.1038/nri3582 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/ Supplementary Material . Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding authors.