Abstract
We investigated the in vitro activity of voriconazole compared to those of fluconazole and itraconazole against 566 clinical isolates of Cryptococcus neoformans from Africa (164) and the United States (402). Isolates were obtained from cerebrospinal fluid (362), blood (139), and miscellaneous sites (65). Voriconazole (MIC at which 90% of the isolates are inhibited [MIC90], 0.12 to 0.25 μg/ml) was more active than either itraconazole (MIC90, 0.5 μg/ml) or fluconazole (MIC90, 8.0 to 16 μg/ml) against both African and U.S. isolates. Isolates inhibited by ≥16 μg of fluconazole per ml were almost all (99%) inhibited by ≤1 μg of voriconazole per ml. These results suggest that voriconazole may be useful in the treatment of cryptococcosis.
Among the community-acquired opportunistic fungal pathogens, perhaps the most important and certainly the single most common agent of serious infection is Cryptococcus neoformans (8). A rare disease prior to the onset of the AIDS epidemic, cryptococcosis is a leading mycological cause of morbidity and mortality among AIDS patients (8, 13). Although precise estimates of the incidence of cryptococcal disease are not available, it is thought to affect 6 to 10% of patients with AIDS in the United States and 15 to 30% in sub-Saharan Africa (13, 17). Recent data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) suggested that, in metropolitan areas with a high concentration of human immunodeficiency virus-infected persons, the incidence may be as high as five cases per 100,000 population (8). C. neoformans var. neoformans is now the most common cause of meningitis at many large hospitals caring for AIDS patients (6, 8). A recent prospective study in Zimbabwe found that C. neoformans var. neoformans accounted for 45% of all laboratory-proven cases of meningitis in adults (9).
Current treatment regimens for cryptococcal meningitis have remained focused on amphotericin B, with or without flucytosine (6, 13, 17, 18, 22, 24). The toxicity of this regimen is well known. Although fluconazole is better tolerated, it is used primarily as maintenance therapy in AIDS patients, and concerns regarding the development of fluconazole-resistant strains of C. neoformans have been raised (3, 5, 13, 16, 18, 24). Among the available alternative therapeutic agents, itraconazole has been found to be less effective than either amphotericin B or fluconazole in the treatment of cryptococcal meningitis in HIV-infected patients (22). Given these limitations, investigation of the activity of newer antifungal agents against C. neoformans is indicated.
Voriconazole is a new monotriazole antifungal agent with potent in vitro activity against several fungal pathogens including Candida spp., C. neoformans, and Aspergillus spp. (1, 2, 7, 11, 12, 15, 20). Although the activity of voriconazole against C. neoformans looks promising (7, 15), the number of clinical isolates included in the previous studies is limited and there is a lack of comparative data for isolates from countries other than the United States.
In this study, we evaluated the in vitro activities of voriconazole, fluconazole, and itraconazole against 566 clinical isolates of C. neoformans including 402 isolates from the United States and 164 isolates from Africa. The in vitro susceptibility testing method employed was a microdilution method performed according to the guidelines set forth by the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards (NCCLS) (14, 23).
A total of 566 recent clinical isolates of C. neoformans var. neoformans from the United States (402 isolates) and from Africa (164 isolates) were selected for this study. The collection included 362 isolates from cerebrospinal fluid cultures, 139 from blood cultures and 65 isolates from miscellaneous clinical sources (pleural fluid, tissue, urine, etc.). The U.S. isolates were obtained from AIDS patients located in California, Iowa, Texas, and Georgia. Approximately 300 of these isolates were collected as part of a population-based survey of cryptococcal disease conducted by the CDC, and the epidemiologic characteristics of some of these isolates have been described previously (4, 5). The African isolates were obtained from AIDS patients with cryptococcal meningitis who were seen in a clinic in Kampala, Uganda. Identification was confirmed by standard methods (4, 10). All isolates were of the neoformans variety, as determined by growing cells on canavanine-glycine-bromthymol blue agar (10). Isolates were stored frozen at −20°C in 20% glycerol until the study was performed. Prior to testing, each isolate was subcultured at least twice on potato dextrose agar plates (Remel, Lenexa, Kans.) to ensure purity and optimal growth.
Standard powders of voriconazole and fluconazole were supplied by Pfizer Pharmaceuticals Group, Central Research Division (Groton, Conn.). Itraconazole was obtained from the Janssen Research Foundation (Beerse, Belgium). Stock solutions were prepared in water (fluconazole) or dimethyl sulfoxide (voriconazole and itraconazole). Antifungal agents were diluted as described in NCCLS document M27-A (14) with RPMI 1640 medium (Sigma, St. Louis, Mo.) which had been buffered to pH 7.0 with 0.165 M morpholinepropanesulfonic acid (MOPS) buffer (Sigma), and the mixtures were dispensed into 96-well microdilution trays. Trays containing an aliquot of 0.1 ml in each well were sealed and frozen at −70°C until they were used in the study.
Broth microdilution MICs were determined by the NCCLS method (14, 23). The final concentrations of the antifungal agents ranged from 0.007 to 8 μg/ml for voriconazole and itraconazole and 0.125 to 128 μg/ml for fluconazole. The yeast inoculum was adjusted to a concentration of 0.5 × 103 to 2.5 × 103 CFU/ml in RPMI 1640 medium, and an aliquot of 0.1 ml was added to each well of the microdilution tray. In each case, the inoculum size was verified by colony counting. The microdilution trays were incubated at 35°C. The MIC endpoints were read visually following 48 and 72 h of incubation and were defined for the three azoles as the lowest concentration that produced an 80% reduction in growth (prominent decrease in turbidity) compared with that of the drug-free growth control (5, 11, 14, 23). All isolates grew in the test system, and MIC results read at 48 and 72 h were in complete agreement. Thus, the 48-h MIC data is reported herein.
C. parapsilosis ATCC 22019 and C. krusei ATCC 6258 were used as quality control organisms and were included each time that a set of isolates was tested (11, 14).
The isolates were generally susceptible to all three triazoles, and only minor differences were observed between the African and the U.S. isolates (Table 1). Overall, voriconazole was the most active agent (MIC at which 90% of the isolates are inhibited [MIC90], 0.12 μg/ml), followed by itraconazole (MIC90, 0.5 μg/ml) and fluconazole (MIC90, 16 μg/ml). Fluconazole had MICs of ≤8 μg/ml for 84% (475 of 566) of the C. neoformans isolates tested (94% of the African isolates and 80% of the U.S. isolates), 16 to 32 μg/ml for 15.5% (88 of 566) of these isolates (6% of the African isolates and 19% of the U.S. isolates), and ≥64 μg/ml for 0.5% (3 of 566) of these isolates (0% of the African isolates and 0.7% of the U.S. isolates).
TABLE 1.
In vitro susceptibilities of 566 clinical isolates of C. neoformans to voriconazole and itraconazole stratified by fluconazole susceptibility category
Fluconazole susceptibility category (μg/ml)a | Isolate source | No. of isolates tested | MIC (μg/ml)
|
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Itraconazole
|
Voriconazole
|
|||||||
Range | MIC50 | MIC90 | Range | MIC50 | MIC90 | |||
≤8.0 | Africa | 154 | 0.06–0.5 | 0.25 | 0.5 | 0.015–0.25 | 0.12 | 0.12 |
United States | 321 | ≤0.007–0.5 | 0.25 | 0.5 | ≤0.007–0.12 | 0.06 | 0.06 | |
All | 475 | ≤0.007–0.5 | 0.25 | 0.5 | ≤0.007–0.25 | 0.06 | 0.12 | |
16–32 | Africa | 10 | 0.25–1.0 | 0.5 | 1.0 | 0.25–0.5 | 0.25 | 0.25 |
United States | 78 | 0.25–1.0 | 0.5 | 1.0 | 0.03–0.5 | 0.12 | 0.25 | |
All | 88 | 0.25–1.0 | 0.5 | 1.0 | 0.03–0.5 | 0.12 | 0.25 | |
≥64 | Africa | |||||||
United States | 3 | 0.5–1.0 | 0.5 | 0.25–2.0 | 1.0 | |||
All | 3 | 0.5–1.0 | 0.5 | 0.25–2.0 | 1.0 | |||
Total | Africa | 164 | 0.06–1.0 | 0.25 | 0.5 | 0.015–0.5 | 0.12 | 0.25 |
United States | 402 | ≤0.007–1.0 | 0.25 | 0.5 | ≤0.007–2.0 | 0.06 | 0.12 | |
All | 566 | ≤0.007–1.0 | 0.25 | 0.5 | ≤0.007–2.0 | 0.06 | 0.12 |
Fluconazole MICs ranged from 0.12 to >128 μg/ml with a MIC50 of 8.0 μg/ml (both United States and Africa) and a MIC90 of 16 μg/ml (United States, 16 μg/ml; Africa, 8.0 μg/ml).
Among the isolates inhibited by ≤8 μg of fluconazole per ml, voriconazole was more potent than itraconazole against both U.S. (MIC90, 0.06 versus 0.5 μg/ml, respectively) and African (MIC90, 0.12 versus 0.5 μg/ml, respectively) strains. All 475 of these isolates were inhibited by ≤0.25 μg of voriconazole per ml, and 73% (71% of African isolates and 74% of U.S. isolates) were inhibited by ≤0.25 μg of itraconazole per ml.
Voriconazole (MIC90, 0.25 μg/ml) was also more active than itraconazole (MIC90, 1.0 μg/ml) against the 88 isolates inhibited by 16 to 32 μg of fluconazole per ml. All of these isolates were inhibited by ≤0.5 μg of voriconazole per ml, and 75% (80% of African isolates and 74% of U.S. isolates) were inhibited by ≤0.5 μg of itraconazole per ml.
Only three isolates, all from the United States, required ≥64 μg of fluconazole per ml to inhibit growth in vitro. For these isolates, the voriconazole MICs were 0.25, 1, and 2 μg/ml and the itraconazole MICs were 0.5, 0.5, and 1 μg/ml.
These results support and extend findings reported previously (7, 15). Like Nguyen and Yu (15), we found voriconazole to be more active than either itraconazole or fluconazole against C. neoformans isolates. It is notable that 82% of the isolates tested were inhibited by ≤0.12 μg of voriconazole per ml and 99.6% were inhibited by ≤0.5 μg/ml. By comparison, 18% were inhibited by ≤0.12 μg and 96% were inhibited by ≤0.5 μg of itraconazole per ml. Both voriconazole and itraconazole appeared most active against isolates exhibiting the greatest susceptibility to fluconazole (MIC of fluconazole, ≤8 μg/ml). As the fluconazole MICs increased, so did the MICs of voriconazole and itraconazole; however, a greater percentage of isolates inhibited by 16 to 32 μg of fluconazole per ml remained highly susceptible (MIC, ≤0.12 μg/ml) to voriconazole (65%) than to itraconazole (0%).
In addition to providing comparative in vitro susceptibility data for three triazole antifungal agents against a large number of clinical isolates of C. neoformans, this study also provides for the first time a comparison of in vitro susceptibilities of U.S. versus African C. neoformans isolates. Importantly, isolates from both the United States and Africa appear to be quite susceptible to fluconazole and the other triazoles. There was no evidence of increased resistance to fluconazole among the African isolates, and over 99% of all isolates were inhibited by concentrations of fluconazole (≤32 μg/ml) that are readily achieved by standard dosing regimens (21).
In summary, we have found voriconazole to be more potent than either itraconazole or fluconazole against clinical isolates of C. neoformans from Africa and the United States. This improved potency plus favorable pharmacokinetics suggests that voriconazole may be useful in the treatment of cryptococcosis among other invasive fungal infections. Appropriate clinical trials are encouraged. Although the majority of isolates of C. neoformans in this study appear to be susceptible to fluconazole and other triazoles, continued surveillance for emerging resistance is warranted on a national and international basis given the broad utilization of fluconazole as primary prophylaxis in patients with AIDS (3, 19).
Acknowledgments
We thank Kay Meyer for secretarial assistance in the preparation of the manuscript and the members of the CDC Fungal Active Surveillance Group, who contributed isolates to this study. Members include David Stephens, Monica Farley, David Rimland, Wendy Baughman, Chris Lao, Jody Otte, and Christopher Harvey (Atlanta, Ga.); Richard Hamill and Edward A. Graviss (Houston, Tex.); Peter Pappas and Carolynn Thomas (Alabama); and Arthur L. Reingold, Gretchen Rothrock, Pam Daily, and Bharat Pattni (San Francisco, Calif.).
This study was partially supported by a grant from Pfizer Pharmaceuticals Group.
REFERENCES
- 1.Barry A L, Brown S D. In vitro studies of two triazole antifungal agents (voriconazole [UK-109,246] and fluconazole) against Candida species. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1996;40:1948–1949. doi: 10.1128/aac.40.8.1948. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Belanger P, Nast C C, Fratti R, Sanati H, Ghannoum M. Voriconazole (UK-109,496) inhibits the growth and alters the morphology of fluconazole-susceptible and -resistant Candida species. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1997;41:1840–1842. doi: 10.1128/aac.41.8.1840. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Berg J, Clancy C J, Nguyen M H. The hidden danger of primary fluconazole prophylaxis for patients with AIDS. Clin Infect Dis. 1998;26:186–187. doi: 10.1086/517056. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Brandt M E, Hutwagner L C, Klug L A, Baughman W S, Rimland D, Graviss E A, Hamill R J, Thomas C, Pappas P G, Reingold A L, Pinner R W the Cryptococcal Disease Active Surveillance Group. Molecular subtype distribution of Cryptococcus neoformans in four areas of the United States. J Clin Microbiol. 1996;34:912–917. doi: 10.1128/jcm.34.4.912-917.1996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Brandt M E, Pfaller M A, Hajjeh R A, Graviss E A, Rees J, Spitzer E D, Pinner R W, Mayer L W the Cryptococcal Disease Active Surveillance Group. Molecular subtypes and antifungal susceptibilities of serial Cryptococcus neoformans isolates in human immunodeficiency virus-associated cryptococcosis. J Infect Dis. 1996;174:812–820. doi: 10.1093/infdis/174.4.812. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Dismukes W E. Cryptococcal meningitis in patients with AIDS. J Infect Dis. 1988;157:624–628. doi: 10.1093/infdis/157.4.624. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Espinel-Ingroff A. In vitro activity of the new triazole voriconazole (UK-109,496) against opportunistic and dimorphic fungi and common and emerging yeast pathogens. J Clin Microbiol. 1998;36:198–202. doi: 10.1128/jcm.36.1.198-202.1998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Hajjeh R A, Brandt M E, Pinner R W. Emergence of cryptococcal disease: epidemiologic perspectives 100 years after its discovery. Epidemiol Rev. 1995;17:303–320. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.epirev.a036195. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Heyderman R S, Gangaidzo I T, Hakim J G, Mielke J, Taziwa A, Musvaire P, Robertson V J, Mason P R. Cryptococcal meningitis in human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients in Harare, Zimbabwe. Clin Infect Dis. 1998;26:284–289. doi: 10.1086/516298. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Kwon-Chung K J, Bennett J E. Medical mycology. Malvern, Pa: Lea & Febiger; 1992. [Google Scholar]
- 11.Marco F, Pfaller M A, Messer S, Jones R N. In vitro activities of voriconazole (UK-109,496) and four other antifungal agents against 394 clinical isolates of Candida spp. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1998;42:161–163. doi: 10.1128/aac.42.1.161. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.McGinnis M R, Pasarell L, Sutton D A, Fothergill A W, Cooper C R, Jr, Rinaldi M G. In vitro evaluation of voriconazole against some clinically important fungi. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1997;41:1832–1834. doi: 10.1128/aac.41.8.1832. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Mitchell T G, Perfect J R. Cryptococcosis in the era of AIDS—100 years after the discovery of Cryptococcus neoformans. Clin Microbiol Rev. 1995;8:515–548. doi: 10.1128/cmr.8.4.515. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. Reference method for broth dilution antifungal susceptibility testing of yeasts. Approved standard M27-A. Wayne, Pa: National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards; 1997. [Google Scholar]
- 15.Nguyen M H, Yu C Y. In vitro comparative efficacy of voriconazole and itraconazole against fluconazole-susceptible and -resistant Cryptococcus neoformans isolates. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1998;42:471–472. doi: 10.1128/aac.42.2.471. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Paugam A, Dupouy-Camet J, Blanche P, Gangnenux J P, Tourte-Schaefer C, Sicard D. Increased fluconazole resistance of Cryptococcus neoformans isolated from a patient with AIDS and recurrent meningitis. Clin Infect Dis. 1994;19:975–976. doi: 10.1093/clinids/19.5.975-a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Powderly W G. Cryptococcal meningitis and AIDS. Clin Infect Dis. 1993;17:837–842. doi: 10.1093/clinids/17.5.837. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Powderly W G, Saag M S, Cloud G A, Robinson P, Meyer R D, Jacobson J M, Graybill J R, Sugar A M, McAuliffe V J, Follansbee S E, Tuazon C U, Stern J J, Feinberg J, Hafner R, Dismukes W E NIAID AIDS Clinical Trials Group; NIAID Mycoses Study Group. A controlled trial of fluconazole or amphotericin B to prevent relapse of cryptococcal meningitis in patients with the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome. N Engl J Med. 1992;326:793–798. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199203193261203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Powderly W G, Finkelstein D M, Feinberg J, Frame P T, He W, van der Horst C M, Koletar S L, Eyster M E, Carey J, Waskin H A, Hooton T M, Hyslop N E, Spector S A, Bozzette S A. A randomized trial comparing fluconazole with clotrimazole troches for the prevention of fungal infections in patients with advanced human immunodeficiency virus infection. N Engl J Med. 1995;332:700–705. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199503163321102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Radford S A, Johnson E M, Warnock D W. In vitro studies of activity of voriconazole (UK-109,496), a new triazole antifungal agent against emerging and less-common mold pathogens. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1997;41:841–843. doi: 10.1128/aac.41.4.841. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Rex J H, Pfaller M A, Galgiani J N, Bartlett M S, Espinel-Ingroff A, Ghannoum M A, Lancaster M, Odds F C, Rinaldi M G, Walsh T J, Barry A L. Development of interpretive breakpoints for antifungal susceptibility testing: conceptual framework and analysis of in vitro-in vivo correlation data for fluconazole, itraconazole, and Candida infections. Clin Infect Dis. 1997;24:235–247. doi: 10.1093/clinids/24.2.235. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Saag M S, Cloud G C, Graybill J R, Sobel J, Tuazon C, Wiesinger B, Riser L, Moskovitz B L, Dismukes W E the NIAID Mycoses Study Group. Abstracts of the 35th Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy. Washington, D.C: American Society for Microbiology; 1995. Comparison of fluconazole (FLU) versus itraconazole (ITRA) as maintenance therapy of AIDS-associated cryptococcal meningitis (CM), abstr. I218; p. 244. [Google Scholar]
- 23.Sanati H, Messer S A, Pfaller M, Witt M, Larsen R, Espinel-Ingroff A, Ghannoum M. Multicenter evaluation of broth microdilution method for susceptibility testing of Cryptococcus neoformans against fluconazole. J Clin Microbiol. 1996;34:1280–1282. doi: 10.1128/jcm.34.5.1280-1282.1996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.van der Horst C M, Saag M S, Cloud G A, Hamill R J, Graybill J R, Sobel J D, Johnson P C, Tuazon C U, Kerkering T, Moskovitz B L, Powderly W G, Dismukes W E the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Mycoses Study Group and AIDS Clinical Trials Group. Treatment of cryptococcal meningitis associated with the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome. N Engl J Med. 1997;337:15–21. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199707033370103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]