Skip to main content
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy logoLink to Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
. 1999 Jan;43(1):172–174. doi: 10.1128/aac.43.1.172

Experimental Evaluation of Second-Line Oral Treatments of Visceral Leishmaniasis Caused by Leishmania infantum

Jean-Pierre Gangneux 1,*, Michael Dullin 1, Annie Sulahian 1, Yves Jean-Francois Garin 1, Francis Derouin 1
PMCID: PMC89042  PMID: 9869587

Abstract

In a murine model of Leishmania infantum visceral leishmaniasis, metronidazole, ketoconazole, fluconazole, itraconazole, and terbinafine were less effective than antimonial agents in reducing hepatic parasite load. Ketoconazole potentiated the effect of meglumine antimoniate reference therapy through its marked activity against spleen infection.


Visceral leishmaniasis (VL) caused by Leishmania infantum remains difficult to treat in patients with AIDS because of parasite resistance and high rates of relapse (1, 4, 13). There is a need for alternatives to antimonial agents and amphotericin B, especially for drugs that are effective by the oral route. Metronidazole and sterol biosynthesis inhibitors (ketoconazole, fluconazole, itraconazole, and terbinafine) are well-tolerated drugs that are potentially active against Leishmania when given by mouth. However, their use in the treatment of cutaneous and visceral leishmaniasis caused by different Leishmania species has produced conflicting results (2, 3, 79, 2128). Mbongo et al. (23) recently showed that Leishmania donovani experimentally resistant to amphotericin B was highly susceptible to ketoconazole. Although it is now agreed that the therapeutic response varies with the parasite species (6), few data are available on L. infantum sensitivity. Before these compounds are used again for the treatment of VL in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) patients, it seems judicious to evaluate their specific anti-L. infantum activity in order to better define the rationale for their prescription.

(This work was presented in part at the 37th Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, 28 September to 1 October 1997.)

In an experimental mouse model previously used to test the efficacy of amphotericin B, lipid formulations of amphotericin B, and aminosidine (1012), we compared the efficacies of metronidazole and antifungal agents against L. infantum VL. Control groups included untreated mice and mice treated with meglumine antimoniate. Adult female BALB/c mice (Iffa Credo, Lyon, France) were infected on day 0 by intravenous injection of 107 stationary-phase promastigotes of L. infantum MON-1 after zymodeme analysis (MHOM/FR/91/LEM2259V), isolated from a patient with AIDS.

The first experiment consisted of drug screening. To evaluate drug activity, parasite loads in the liver and spleen of mice treated from day 7 to day 17 were determined on day 20, by use of a culture microtitration method (5). Parasite load was expressed as the log10 number of parasites per gram of tissue, and the mean (±standard error) parasite load for four mice was calculated. Drug administration was daily, by mouth, for treatments with metronidazole (70 and 140 mg/kg; Specia Rhône-Poulenc Rorer, Paris, France), ketoconazole (50 and 100 mg/kg; Janssen-Cilag, Boulogne-Billancourt, France), fluconazole (50 and 100 mg/kg; Pfizer, Orsay, France), itraconazole (50 and 100 mg/kg; Janssen-Cilag), and terbinafine (100 mg/kg; Novartis, Rueil-Malmaison, France) and daily, by intraperitoneal injection, for treatment with meglumine antimoniate (200 mg/kg; Specia Rhône-Poulenc Rorer). None of the test compounds administered alone from day 7 to day 17 significantly reduced the parasite load in the liver by day 20, in comparison to that in infected untreated control mice (Table 1). By contrast, the parasite load in the spleen of treated mice fell by 1 to 4 log10 parasites/g relative to the parasite load in the controls. Ketoconazole was the most effective of the drugs tested, since the parasite loads were markedly reduced at a dose of 50 mg/kg/day and were undetectable in mice treated with 100 mg/kg/day (P < 0.01, compared to results with untreated mice; Newman Keuls test). Treatments with metronidazole, and treatment with fluconazole at a dose of 50 mg/kg/day, also significantly reduced the parasite load in the spleen, in comparison to that in infected untreated control mice. Surprisingly, treatment with fluconazole at 50 mg/kg/day seemed slightly more effective in the spleen infection than that at 100 mg/kg/day. However, this effect is limited and individual variations between mice may partially explain such a difference.

TABLE 1.

Parasite load on day 20 in the liver and spleen of L. infantum-infected mice treated from days 7 to 17

Expt 1 treatment Dose (mg/kg/day) Day Log10 parasites/g of tissuea
Liver Spleen
None (control) 7  4.66 ± 0.18 1.83 ± 2.14
20 4.99 ± 0.31 3.82 ± 0.30
Ketoconazole 50 20 4.66 ± 0.21 0.86 ± 1.76
100 20 4.90 ± 0.13 0*
Fluconazole 50 20 4.94 ± 0.28 0.85 ± 1.70*
100 20 5.04 ± 0.16 1.74 ± 2.01
Itraconazole 50 20 4.72 ± 0.30 2.51 ± 2.19
100 20 4.48 ± 0.60 1.14 ± 1.98
Terbinafine 100 20 4.57 ± 0.49 2.29 ± 1.10
Metronidazole 70 20 4.55 ± 0.23 1.13 ± 2.26*
140 20 4.67 ± 0.53 1.03 ± 2.06*
a

Values are means ± standard deviations for four mice. *, significantly different from value for untreated mice at P < 0.01 (by Newman Keuls test). 

A second experiment (Table 2) was designed to identify possible synergistic activity between meglumine antimoniate, which is highly effective in the liver but less effective in the spleen (1012), and drugs with significant activity against spleen infection. We thus examined the efficacies of ketoconazole and metronidazole alone and in combination with meglumine antimoniate and compared the results with those in untreated mice and in mice treated with meglumine antimoniate alone. Each group comprised 12 mice. Meglumine antimoniate was highly effective in the liver, and treatment with ketoconazole resulted in the lowest spleen load. Interestingly, no parasites were detected on day 20 in the liver or spleen of mice treated with meglumine antimoniate plus ketoconazole or metronidazole. However, relapses were observed with both combinations at day 60, with parasite counts in the spleen comparable to those in mice treated with meglumine antimoniate alone.

TABLE 2.

Parasite loads on days 20 and 60 in the liver and spleen of L. infantum-infected mice treated from days 7 to 17

Expt 2 treatment Day Log10 parasites/g of tissuea
Liver Spleen
None (control) 7  3.87 ± 0.07 1.45 ± 1.74
20 4.77 ± 0.35 3.56 ± 0.29
60 4.57 ± 0.27 4.79 ± 0.51
Glucantime (200 mg/kg/day) 20 0* 1.25 ± 1.95*
60 0* 3.87 ± 0.29
Ketoconazole (50 mg/kg/day) 20 4.69 ± 0.26 0.68 ± 1.66*
60 3.94 ± 0.35 4.72 ± 0.14
Metronidazole (70 mg/kg/day) 20 4.89 ± 0.32 2.13 ± 1.56
60 4.50 ± 0.45 4.96 ± 0.35
Meglumine antimoniate (200 mg/kg/day) + ketoconazole (50 mg/kg/day) 20 0* 0*
60 0* 4.25 ± 0.54
Meglumine antimoniate (200 mg/kg/day) + metronidazole (70 mg/kg/day) 20 0* 0*
60 0* 3.17 ± 1.62
a

Values are means ± standard deviations for six mice. *, significantly different from value for untreated mice at P < 0.01 (by Newman Keuls test). 

With our model, we can assess drug efficacy in several organs, particularly in the liver and spleen. The threshold of detection of our microtitration method is 50- to 100-fold lower than that of microscopic examination of stained organs and is estimated to be 103 parasites per g (6). In the present study, we confirm that pentavalent derivatives of antimony are highly effective, since parasite burdens were at an undetectable level in the liver. However, parasite foci persisted in the spleen, and this probably explains the occurrences of relapses. Our results with itraconazole and terbinafine alone argue against their therapeutic use in cases of VL due to L. infantum. Although fluconazole showed good activity in the spleen, its current use for the treatment of oral candidiasis in HIV-infected patients and the risk of selecting for resistant Candida strains limit its use in AIDS patients with VL. Despite being less effective than meglumine antimoniate in monotherapy, ketoconazole and metronidazole were the most effective second-line treatments in this study. Furthermore, their combination with meglumine antimoniate resulted in marked decreases in parasite loads in both the liver and spleen. However, the relapses that were observed in susceptible BALB/c mice treated with these combinations indicate the inefficacy of the host immune functions in clearing parasites when anti-Leishmania drug concentrations decreased and/or when the drug did not reach the parasitophorous vacuole. This was previously described for treatment with free antimony in monotherapy and for amphotericin B deoxycholate treatment, whereas drug delivery systems allowed sustained higher levels of drug and/or drug targeting to the infected site, potentiating the parasite suppression (3, 7, 8, 14). Although drug levels in tissues were not determined in this work, the pharmacokinetic characteristics of ketoconazole and metronidazole are also probably responsible for such relapses. With regard to the use of marketed drug carrier systems with meglumine antimoniate, ketoconazole, or metronidazole in order to reach sustained drug levels and to target the drugs toward infected tissues, our results stress the need for multidrug therapy and maintenance therapy in the treatment of L. infantum VL with these drugs.

In conclusion, this study confirms the marked variability in the susceptibility of Leishmania species to drugs. In this experimental model of VL due to L. infantum, none of the oral treatments administered alone was more effective than therapy with meglumine antimoniate. Meglumine antimoniate combined with ketoconazole may warrant clinical trials in immunosuppressed hosts, since it clears the parasite from multiple target organs.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported in parts by grants from SIDACTION and Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris to J. P. Gangneux.

We thank C. Lubino for expert animal care.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Alvar J, Canavate C, Gutierrez-Solar B, Jimenez M, Laguna F, Lopez-Velez R, Molina R, Moreno J. Leishmania and human immunodeficiency virus coinfection: the first 10 years. Clin Microbiol Rev. 1997;10:298–319. doi: 10.1128/cmr.10.2.298. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Arranz-Caso J A, Albarran-Hernandez F, Cuadrado-Gomez L M, Gonzalez-Palacios R. Metronidazole treatment in a patient with AIDS and visceral leishmaniasis. AIDS. 1995;9:1377–1378. doi: 10.1097/00002030-199512000-00012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Baillie A J, Dolan T F, Alexander J, Carter K C. Visceral leishmaniasis in the Balb/c mouse: sodium stibogluconate treatment during acute and chronic stages of infection. Int J Pharm. 1989;57:23–28. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Baum K F, Berens R L. Successful treatment of cutaneous leishmaniasis with allopurinol after failure of treatment with ketoconazole. Clin Infect Dis. 1994;18:813–815. doi: 10.1093/clinids/18.5.813. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Berman J D. Human leishmaniasis: clinical, diagnostic and chemotherapeutic developments in the last 10 years. Clin Infect Dis. 1997;24:684–703. doi: 10.1093/clind/24.4.684. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Buffet P A, Sulahian A, Garin Y J F, Nassar N, Derouin F. Culture microtitration: a sensitive method for quantifying Leishmania infantum in tissues of infected mice. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1995;39:2167–2168. doi: 10.1128/aac.39.9.2167. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Carter K C, Dolan T F, Alexander J, Baillie A J, McColgan C. Visceral leishmaniasis: drug carrier system characteristics and the ability to clear parasites from the liver, spleen and bone marrow in Leishmania donovani infected Balb/c mice. J Pharm Pharmacol. 1989;41:87–91. doi: 10.1111/j.2042-7158.1989.tb06399.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Collins M, Carter K C, Baillie A J. Visceral leishmaniasis in the Balb/c mouse: antimony tissue disposition and parasite suppression after the administration of free stibogluconate. Ann Trop Med Parasitol. 1992;86:35–40. doi: 10.1080/00034983.1992.11812628. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Cook G C. Leishmaniasis: some recent developments in chemotherapy. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1993;31:327–330. doi: 10.1093/jac/31.3.327. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Dan M, Verner E, El-On J, Zuckerman F, Michaeli D. Failure of oral ketoconazole to cure cutaneous ulcers caused by Leishmania braziliensis. Cutis. 1986;38:198–199. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Dedet J P, Jamet P, Esterre P, Ghipponi P M, Genin C, Lalande G. Failure to cure Leishmania braziliensis guyanensis cutaneous leishmaniasis with oral ketokonazole. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 1986;80:296. doi: 10.1016/0035-9203(86)90239-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Dogra J, Saxena V N. Itraconazole and leishmaniasis: a randomised double-blind trial in cutaneous disease. Int J Parasitol. 1996;26:1413–1415. doi: 10.1016/s0020-7519(96)00128-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Gangneux J P, Sulahian A, Garin Y J F, Derouin F. Efficacy of aminosidine administered alone or in combination with meglumine antimoniate for the treatment of experimental visceral leishmaniasis caused by Leishmania infantum. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1997;40:287–289. doi: 10.1093/jac/40.2.287. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Gangneux J P, Sulahian A, Garin Y J F, Derouin F. Therapy of visceral leishmaniasis due to Leishmania infantum: experimental assessment of the efficacy of AmBisome. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1996;40:1214–1218. doi: 10.1128/aac.40.5.1214. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Gangneux J P, Sulahian A, Garin Y J F, Derouin F. Lipid formulations of amphotericin B in the treatment of experimental visceral leishmaniasis due to Leishmania infantum. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 1996;90:574–577. doi: 10.1016/s0035-9203(96)90330-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Gradoni L, Bryceson A, Desjeux P. Treatment of Mediterranean visceral leishmaniasis. Bull W H O. 1995;73:191–197. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Halim M A, Alfurayh O, Kalin M E, Dammas S, Al-Eisa A, Damanhouri G. Successful treatment of visceral leishmaniasis with allopurinol plus ketoconazole in a renal transplant recipient after the occurrence of pancreatitis due to stibogluconate. Clin Infect Dis. 1993;16:397–399. doi: 10.1093/clind/16.3.397. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Jollife D S. Cutaneous leishmaniasis from Belize—treatment with ketoconazole. Clin Exp Dermatol. 1986;11:62–68. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2230.1986.tb00425.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Keithly J S, Langreth S G. Inefficacy of metronidazole in experimental infections of Leishmania donovani, L. mexicana and Trypanosoma brucei brucei. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1983;32:485–496. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.1983.32.485. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Khalil E A G, Nur N M, Zijlstra E E, El Hassan A M, Davidson R N. Failure of a combination of two antifungal drugs, terbinafine plus itraconazole, in Sudanese post-kala-azar dermal leishmaniasis. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 1996;90:187–188. doi: 10.1016/s0035-9203(96)90134-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Lafeuillade A, Chaffanjon P, Delbeke E, Quilichi R. Maintenance itraconazole for visceral leishmaniasis in HIV infection. Am J Med. 1992;92:449. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(92)90281-f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Laguna del Estral P, Moya M S, Martin T, Lucero M J, Salgado R. Metronidazole therapy for visceral leishmaniasis. Clin Infect Dis. 1994;19:1161–1162. doi: 10.1093/clinids/19.6.1161. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Mbongo N, Loiseau P M, Billion M A, Robert-Gero M. Mechanism of amphotericin B resistance in Leishmania donovani promastigotes. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1998;42:352–357. doi: 10.1128/aac.42.2.352. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Mishra M, Thakur B D, Choudhary M. Metronidazole and Indian kala-azar: results of a clinical trial. Br Med J Clin Res Ed. 1985;291:1611. doi: 10.1136/bmj.291.6509.1611. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Navin T R, Arana A B A, Arana F E, Berman J D, Chajon J F. Placebo-controlled clinical trial of sodium stibogluconate (Pentostam) versus ketoconazole for treating cutaneous leishmaniasis in Guatemala. J Infect Dis. 1992;165:528–534. doi: 10.1093/infdis/165.3.528. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Raffi F, Merrien D, Le Pape P, Reliquet V. Use of itraconazole/allopurinol combination for the treatment of visceral leishmaniasis in a patient with AIDS. Clin Infect Dis. 1995;21:1338–1339. doi: 10.1093/clinids/21.5.1338. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Saenz R E, Paz H. Efficacy of ketoconazole against Leishmania braziliensis cutaneous leishmaniasis. Am J Med. 1990;89:147–155. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(90)90292-l. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Thakur C P, Sinha P K. Inefficacy of ethambutol, ethambutol plus isoniazid, INH plus rifampicin, co-trimoxazole and metronidazole in the treatment of kala-azar. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1989;92:383–385. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Torrus D, Boix V, Massa B, Portilla J, Perez-Mateo M. Fluconazole plus allopurinol in the treatment of visceral leishmaniasis. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1996;37:1042–1043. doi: 10.1093/jac/37.5.1042. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Wali J P, Aggarwal P, Gupta U, Saluja S, Singh S. Ketoconazole in the treatment of antimony- and pentamidine-resistant kala-azar. J Infect Dis. 1992;166:215–216. doi: 10.1093/infdis/166.1.215. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Weinrauch L, Livishin R, El-On J. Ketoconazole in cutaneous leishmaniasis. Br J Dermatol. 1987;117:666–667. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.1987.tb07504.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES