Skip to main content
PMC home page
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2022 Mar 9;12:4161. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-08181-5

Molecular investigation of possible relationships concerning bovine leukemia virus and breast cancer

Zanib Khan 1, Muhammad Abubakar 2, Muhammad Javed Arshed 2, Roohi Aslam 3, Sadia Sattar 1, Naseer Ali Shah 1, Sundus Javed 1, Aamira Tariq 1, Nazish Bostan 1,✉, Shumaila Manzoor 2
PMCID: PMC8907172  PMID: 35264739

Abstract

Worldwide, breast cancer has an eminent morbidity and mortality rate, as it is a neoplastic disease among females. The query of the prospective danger of bovine leukemia virus (BLV) to humans is an old but exceedingly topical focus of scientific debate. The objective of the current study was to determine the possible relationship between BLV and breast cancer. A total of 2710 formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) breast cancer samples were selected regardless of the age, ethnicity, or municipality origin of the subjects. The presence of BLV in human breast cancer was determined through nested PCR by amplifying tax and gag genes followed by partial sequencing. Homology was confirmed by using the online BLAST Tool. BLV genes were found to be positive in 26.8% (728/2710) of the samples from breast cancer patients and 10% (10/80) of the samples without cancer (negative control). The results indicated a correlation between the presence of the BLV gene and breast cancer (odds ratio = 0.3889; confidence interval = 1,18; p = 0.0029). The current findings suggest a possible link between BLV and human breast carcinoma. Therefore, screening cattle herds and milk products is suggested to reduce the viral transmission risk to humans.

Subject terms: Cancer, Microbiology

Introduction

Can a virus be able to cause breast carcinoma? Various researchers have attempted to address this issue for the last 40 years, even a long time since the development of mammary malignant growth in mice through milk-borne infection. Certainly, breast cancer is a complex sickness with various threat factors adding to the ultimate onset of the disease1,2. Bovine Leukimia Virus has probable risk to animals and human health. The contradiction about the zoonotic potential of the BLV had not been yet cleared3 and there is need to explore its relationship with humans and in order to decipher this anonymity there are several studies to establish relationship of breast cancer and the BLV4. Moreover genome fragment of the BLV from the breast cancer patients had been identified but the exact etiology has not been properly declared up till now5. There are some of the studies showing the capability of the BLV to infect the mammary cells of the human in-vitro6,7 and the antibodies of the BLV had been detected from the human blood4,8,9 suggesting that the threat related to BLV accusation and propagation in human is not a matter of negligence4,10,11. In 2014, BLV DNA was detected from the breast tissue of humans11 and a case–control study in an association of BLV with healthy and cancerous breast tissue was reported10. Moreover, one of the recent studies in Panama showed 59% of the cancerous samples and 38% of the precancerous samples by identifying the gag gene12. Thus, these initial findings are important to explore the zoonosis of BLV. However, there are some controversial results from different countries, as the linkage of breast cancer and BLV was not found in malignant and benign cancer samples insilico13,14 and in China, the researcher could not find the BLV gene segment from the breast cancer samples, nor was any positive serological test found15. Furthermore, the study of Gillet et al. also failed to recover the gene segments of the virus through whole-genome sequencing16.

There are various types of breast cancer and which cells in the breast become cancerous determines the type of breast cancer. Breast cancer can begin in several locations in the breast17. Breast cancer is usually categorized into two types by WHO i.e., noninvasive (in situ) and invasive cancer. Growth within the ducts without penetration of the basement membrane, and hence without the ducts engaging the stroma, is known as in situ carcinoma18,19. The most frequent type of non-invasive breast cancer (90%) is ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), which is limited to the ducts of the breast. Lobular carcinoma in situ (LCIS) is a less common type of breast cancer that is thought to be a risk factor for the disease. LCIS (lobular neoplasia, lobular carcinoma in situ) is a rapid rise in the number of cells in the milk glands (lobules) of the breast. Breast cancers caused by ILC account for 10% to 15% of all cases20. Infiltrating ductal carcinoma (IDC) is a kind of breast cancer that began in a milk duct and has migrated to fibrous or fatty tissue outside of the duct. The most common kind of breast cancer, IDC, accounts for more than 80% of all diagnoses. ILC, also known as infiltrating lobular carcinoma, is the second most frequent type of breast cancer diagnosed in the United States, accounting for 10–15% of all detected invasive breast cancers. Invasive mammary carcinoma is a tumor that has both ductal and lobular carcinoma characteristics. It's not two different malignancies, but rather one with characteristics of both major forms of breast cancer21,22. Fibroadenomas are benign breast tumor that is composed of glandular and stromal (connective) tissue. Fibroadenomas are most frequent in women in their twenties and thirties, but they can occur at any age after a woman has gone through menopause, they tend to shrink1. The tissue in fibrocystic breasts is lumpy or ropelike in texture and referred to as nodular or glandular breast tissues23. Granulomatous mastitis (GM) is a benign chronic inflammatory breast illness that affects only a small percentage of women and is a diverse disorder with a wide range of clinical manifestations24.

Unfortunately, due to the high cost of processed milk, the majority of the Pakistani population utilizes raw milk in comparison to treated milk. According to the literature, nations with maximum milk utilization have the maximum breast cancer rate25,26. The most important purpose of the present study is to determine the existence of BLV in human breast tissues, which is an exogenous B-lymphotropic Delta retrovirus, an oncogenic member of the Retroviridae family and is responsible for enzootic bovine leukosis in cattle27–40.

Materials and methods

Archived and fresh sample selection

The preserved breast cancer samples from 2015 to 2018 were selected from the biobank of Pakistan Institute of Medical Sciences (PIMS) Islamabad and Ayub Medical Complex Abbottabad, Pakistan along with the pathological details. The samples of 2019 were freshly prepared. A total of 3000 samples were collected initially, out of which 2710 samples were selected for further processing. The 290 samples were excluded based on patient consent and improper/missing pathological data. The 80 biopsy samples which have been declared as non cancerous were taken as a negative control from the patients having benign (noncancerous) lumps in their breast.

Sample collection

A total of 2710 formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) breast samples were collected under the ethical approval of PIMS Islamabad and Ayub Medical Complex Abbottabad, Pakistan, and consent was obtained from patients before surgery for breast cancer. Written informed consent was taken from the guardians of the patients before including the samples in the present study. The FFPE breast cancer samples were selected regardless of the age, ethnicity, or municipality origin of the subjects. The human subject protocol was approved by the Ethics Review Board of (CUI) COMSATS University, Islamabad vide letter # CUI/Bio/ERB/2021/41. All methods were carried out by following relevant guidelines and regulations approve by COMSATS University Islamabad. The details of the sample types are presented in Table 1.

Table 1.

Types of breast cancer considered for the current study.

S.no Types of breast cancer No of samples
1 Fibroadenoma 1527
2 Fibrocystic disease 114
3 Granulamatous mastitis 83
4 Invasive mammary carcinoma 45
5 Invasive ductal carcinoma 872
6 Invasive lobular carcinoma 22
7 Phyllodes tumor 17
8 Total 2710
9 Negative breast cancer 80
Open in a new tab

DNA extraction

The extraction of DNA from the FFPE breast tissue specimens was performed by following the phenol/chloroform method as described by Pikor41 with a few modifications. DNA yield and quality were analyzed by using a NanoDrop 2000/2000c (Thermo Scientific) spectrophotometer absorbance at 260/280 ratio and the ratio of 1.8 was used as an indicator of purity of all extracted DNA samples.

Qualitative analysis of DNA

The extracted DNA was run on a 1.5% agarose gel (Merck, CAT#NO:101236), and DNA bands were visualized by using ALPHA-INNOTECT-GEL DOCUMENTATION SYSTEM, as shown in Fig. 1. The house keeping gene Beta-Actin was amplified firstly to ensure the purity of extracted DNA by using Forward 5′-TGGCATCCACGAAACTACCT-3′ and Reverse 5′-TCTCCTTCTGCATCCTGTCG-3′ primers. Briefly 20 ng of template DNA, 50 pmol of forward and reverse primers, 2 × master mix and 10 μl of RNase free water in a final volume of 30 μl reaction mixture was run by initial denaturation at 95 °C for ten minutes, followed by 35 cycles as 95 °C, 59 °C, and 72 °C for 45 s with a final extension at 72 °C for 5 min. Then the PCR product of 134 bp was analysed by using 2% agarose gel. After amplification by the house keeping gene DNA was then amplified by nested PCR for BLV detection.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

The figure is showing extracted DNA. The lane (L) is the 100 bp DNA ladder and the lanes from 2 to 19 are the bands of the extracted whole-genome DNA of size greater than 2000 bp.

Amplification of DNA

A gag and a tax gene were amplified through nested PCR (BIO-RAD DNA ENGINE) by using the following set of primers previously used by Buehring11 :Gag Outer F: 5ʹ-AACACTACGACTTGCAATCC-3ʹ R: 5ʹ-GGTTCCTTAGGACTCCGTCG-3ʹ Gag Inner F: 5ʹ-ACCCTACTCCGGCTGACCTA-3ʹ R: 5ʹ-CTTGGACGATGGTGGACCAA-3ʹ and Tax Outer F: 5ʹ-TATTCCACCTCGGCAC-3ʹ R: 5ʹ-ATTGGCATTGGTAGGGCT-3ʹ Tax Inner F: 5ʹ-CTTCGGGATCCATTACCTGA-3ʹ R: 5ʹ-GCTCGAAGGGGGAAAGTGAA-3ʹ. The PCR composition and thermocycler optimized conditions are presented in Supplementary Table 1. Following PCR, the fragments were analyzed by using 2% agarose gel electrophoresis. DNA from enzootic bovine leukosis-positive cattle from the Livestock & Dairy Development Department of Peshawar Khyber PakhtunKhwawas used as a positive control.

DNA sequencing

The resulting PCR products of only two samples amplified by the gag gene were sent to the MACROGEN laboratory (Korea) for sequencing. The sequences were compared with those in the GenBank databases (www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/blast) by using the BLAST program.

Statistical analysis

The statistical analyses were performed by using GraphPad Prism software7. The relationship between the presence of the BLV gene and breast cancer was analyzed by Fisher's exact test and chi-square tests using GraphPad Prism software.

Results

Association of breast cancer with BLV

The association between BLV and breast cancer was analyzed by Fisher's exact test and chi-square tests. BLV genes were found to be positive in 26.8% (728/2710) of the samples from breast cancer patients and 10% (10/80) of the samples without cancer. The current findings indicated a correlation between the presence of the BLV gene and breast cancer (odds ratio = 0.3889; confidence interval = 1,18; p = 0.0029). BLV-positive animal DNA was used as a positive control. Out of 2710 FFPE breast cancer tissue samples, 728 (26.8%) were BLV positive by the amplification of 272 bp and 113 bp fragments of the gag and tax genes (Figs. 2, 3). Out of eighty (n = 80) negative breast cancer samples, 10 (12.5%) were BLV positive. The incidence of BLV post- chemo-subject was 3.5%, while the incidence was found to be almost equal in left- and right-side breast cancer cases, i.e., 50% each.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

This figure shows the occurrence of BLV in breast cancer. out of the 2710,728 breast cancer samples were found to be positive for BLV, and 1982 were BLV-negative samples.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Open in a new tab

The figure shows the amplified gene fragments of the gag outer (385 bp) and gags inner genes (272) by nested PCR. Lanes 10, and 11 were the positive controls, while lane 18 was the negative control. Samples 1, 6 and 9 were considered negative, while samples 2, 3, 4, 5, and 7 were positive for both outer and inner gag gene amplification.

Association of BLV with different types of breast cancer

Invasive ductal carcinoma showed the highest prevalence (64%) of the BLV gene, 11.7% Phyllodes Tumor, 10% Fibroadenoma, 9.6% Fibrocystic Disease, and 9% Invasive Lobular Carcinoma. Cancer samples were BLV positive, as shown in the Supplementary Table 2. Ten percent (155) of the fibroadenoma, 9.6% (11) fibrocystic disease, 64% (559) invasive ductal carcinoma, 9% (2) invasive lobular carcinoma, and 11.7% (2) phyllodes tumor cancer samples were BLV positive. All the samples from granulomatous mastitis and invasive mammary carcinoma were negative for the BLV gag and tax genes (Fig. 4).

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Open in a new tab

The figure shows the percentage of the prevalence of BLV in different types of breast cancer.

Grade of cancer

In the current study, invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) showed the highest prevalence (64%) of the BLV genes. The IDC has generally three grades I, II, and III. The prevalence of BLV genes was mostly found in breast cancer with IDC grade II. Out of 872 positive IDC samples, 500 (57%) belonged to grade II (Fig. 5).

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Open in a new tab

The figure shows the high prevalence of the BLV gene in grade II invasive ductal carcinoma (57%). In contrast, 59/872 (6.7%) of the BLV-positive IDC samples were IDC grade I.

Statistical analysis

The relationship between the presence of the BLV gene and breast cancer was analyzed by chi-square tests, as shown in Supplementary Table 3. The chi-square statistic was 8.241, and the p-value was < 0.00001. The result is significant at p < 0.05.

Sequencing identity comparison by BLAST

The BLV gag gene nucleotide sequences amplified in the current study showed 99.56% similarity to the sequences found in GenBank as follows:Bovine leukemia virus isolate G235 gag protein gene, partial cds Sequence ID: MG800837.1, Bovine leukemia virus isolate G225 gag protein gene, partial cds Sequence ID: MG800836.1, MG800834.1, strain: pvAJ029 Sequence ID: AP019593.1, pvAJ028 Sequence ID: AP019592.1, strain: pvAJ027 Sequence ID: AP019591.1, strain: pvAJ026 Sequence ID: AP019590.1, strain: pvAJ025 Sequence ID: AP019589.1, strain pvAJ024 Sequence ID: AP019588.1, strain: pvAJ023 Sequence ID: AP019587.1, strain: pvAJ021 Sequence ID: AP019585.1, strain: pvAJ020 Sequence ID: AP019584.1with a maximum score of 425 out of total scores 425, 99.56% identity with 97% query coverage. Moreover, there were no similarities with other related organisms, such as HTLV-I and II (human T-cell lymphotropic viruses), PTLV (primary T-cell lymphotropic viruses), and HERV-K K (human endogenous retrovirus).

Phylogenetic analysis based on gag Gene

The phylogenetic analysis involved 41 nucleotide sequences. There was a total of 245 positions in the final dataset. Evolutionary analyses were conducted in MEGA X42. The evolutionary history was inferred by using the Maximum Likelihood method and Tamura-Nei model43. The tree with the highest log likelihood (− 714.63) is shown in Fig. 6. The phylogenetic trees showed corresponding topologies, supported by high bootstrap values. The analysis of the tree showed six sequence clusters, designated as 1,2, 4, 6, 9, and 10 Genotypes. The gag 4 and gag 5 samples of the current study were assigned to genotype 1.

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Open in a new tab

The phylogenetic tree of gag 4 and gag 5 is indicated by red dots. Next to the branches is the proportion of trees in which the related taxa clustered together. The initial tree(s) for the heuristic search were automatically generated by applying the Neighbor-Join and BioNJ algorithms to a matrix of pairwise distances computed using the Tamura-Nei model and then picking the topology with the highest log-likelihood value. The branch lengths are measured in the number of substitutions per site, and the tree is depicted to scale. Each descending clade’s proportion of sites with at least one unambiguous base in at least one sequence is shown next to each internal node in the tree.

Discussion

There are several well-recognized risk factors for breast cancer, but the main causes are still unidentified. According to recent findings, some viruses are involved in breast cancer and have oncogenic potential, such as MMTV (mouse mammary tumor virus), HPVs (human papilloma viruses), EBV (Epstein–Barr virus), and bovine leukemia virus (BLV)44. The relationship between breast cancer and BLV has inadequate evidence. However, recent findings from different countries showed varying percentages of BLV prevalence in breast cancer,i.e.,74% in Berkeley California9, 40.5%in Colombia6, 44% in Birmingham, Alabama, Pennsylvania, Ohio, Oakland, California11, 59% in California10, 80% in Australian women45, 34% in women in Texas46, 38% in California4, and 30.5% in South Brazil47, and the highest percentage of BLV prevalence was found at 95.9% in Minas Gerais, Brazil48. The association of BLV with breast cancer is still controversial, but the recent studies discussed above strongly suggest the significance of the relationship between breast cancer and BLV. Although even stronger findings are required to remark on this declaration, i.e., the presence of BLV, its association with breast cancer with larger sample size, and its route of transmission. If any relationship existed, it would have a momentous consequence on the global communal, financial, political sector and reveal the risk of BLV in Pakistan.

In the current study, we found that BLV was associated with breast cancer, with a 26.8% BLV prevalence. A 10% prevalence has been found in samples without cancer. These current findings indicated a correlation between the presence of the BLV genes and breast cancer (odds ratio = 0.3889; confidence interval = 1,18; p = 0.0029). To obtain reliable results, special precautions were taken to avoid cross-contamination of DNA, and nested-PCR was used for accurate, sensitive, and reliable tax and gag gene amplification. The resultant sequencing results with a high similarity index with the GenBank sequences show the accuracy of the results of the current study.

All the studies from different countries have variable percentages of BLV and breast cancer relationship, possibly due to the different lifestyle, diet, nutrition, exercise, environment, exposure to radiation, breastfeeding, age, genetic background, history, number of the sample size used, techniques applied for detection of the prevalence of BLV. Whatever the percentage of BLV detected by any study reveals the need to consider BLV as one of the risk factors for breast cancer. Consequently, along with the other risk factors for breast cancer, BLV requires special consent from all scientists globally. Animal diseases are more common than ever infecting people, resulting in a minimum of 2.5 billion diseases and 2.7 million annual fatalities.

Worldwide, breast cancer has an eminent morbidity and mortality rate, as it is a neoplastic disease among females. The query of the prospective danger of BLV for humans is an old but exceedingly topical focus of scientific debate. The possible risk of BLV to humans and the association of milk utilization with breast cancer have been studied earlier49. It is thought that approximately twelve percent of human cancers are due to viruses50. BLV surface glycoprotein (gp51) of the viral envelope was identified by immunohistochemistry in human breast cancer51 according to studies in Colombia. Californian scientists first noticed the regulatory gene (tax) of BLV in human breast cancer in 201411. In American women's breast tissue, BLV DNA was discovered11 and was associated with breast cancer10. Moreover, one of the recent studies in Panama showed fifty-nine percent of the cancerous samples and thirty-eight percent of the precancerous samples by identifying the gag gene12.

The results from the current study confirm the presence of the BLV genome in the breast tissues of women in Pakistan and show a statistically significant positive association between the virus and breast cancer in this population. This association could be due to the high raw milk consumption in Pakistan. In comparison to treated milk, the requirement for untreated milk is high. Consequently, unprocessed milk and its product are commonly consumed in Pakistan, i.e., almost more than 97% in Pakistan. The first report on the presence of BIV and BLV was based on a cattle population of Pakistan. Seroassays indicated p26 anti-BIV positivity in zero livestock cattle, and three Bubalus buballis were found to be positive for anti-BLV antibodies52. In addition, OIE in 2009 reported the absence of BLV from Pakistan53. Another study in 2019 reported that the prevalence of BLV in northwestern Pakistan was 20%54 and recently in 2021 the seropositivity of BLV was reported as 24.25% from Punjab (Pakistan)55. However, there is a need to reveal the route of BLV transmission in humans. Milk and meat consumption from BLV-infected animals could be a possible transmission route. Thus, there is a need for further exploration of BLV association with humans and its transmission route.

Conclusion

The motivation behind the present study was to determine the relationship between breast cancer and the bovine leukemia virus within Pakistan, and the association of BLV with breast cancer in Pakistani women was found to be 26.8%. This significant association is not negligible. Thus, there is a need to control BLV, and further investigation about its risk related to public health is highly required.

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Information. (265.2KB, docx)

Acknowledgements

The current study was supported by the national veterinary laboratory (NVL) Pakistan.

Author contributions

N.B. designed and supervised the project. M.J.A. and M.A.B. helped in designing and facilitated and funded this project. Z.K. carried out all the experiments and wrote the paper. S.S., R.A., S.J., A.T., N.A.S. and S.M. analyzed the data, helped in its writeup and incorporated valuable suggestions for its improvement. All the authors discussed the results and provided input in the manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41598-022-08181-5.

References

  • 1.American Cancer Society . American Cancer Society Recommendations for the Early Detection of Breast Cancer. CancerOrg; 2019. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.American Cancer Society . American Cancer Society: Cancer Facts and Figures 2021. American Cancer Society; 2021. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Rosewick N, Momont M, Durkin K, Takeda H, Caiment F, Cleuter Y, et al. Deep sequencing reveals abundant noncanonical retroviral microRNAs in B-cell leukemia/lymphoma. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2013 doi: 10.1073/pnas.1213842110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Buehring GC, Delaney A, Shen H, Chu DL, Razavian N, Schwartz DA, et al. Bovine leukemia virus discovered in human blood. BMC Infect. Dis. 2019 doi: 10.1186/s12879-019-3891-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Baltzell K, Shen H, Buehring G. Oncogenic viruses in nipple aspirate fluid: Biomarkers for breast cancer risk assessment? BMC Proc. 2009 doi: 10.1186/1753-6561-3-s5-s4. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Giovanna M, Carlos UJ, María UA, Gutierrez MF. Bovine leukemia virus gene segment detected in human breast tissue. Open J. Med. Microbiol. 2013 doi: 10.4236/ojmm.2013.31013. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Brujeni GN, Poorbazargani TT, Nadin-Davis S, Tolooie M, Barjesteh N. Bovine immunodeficiency virus and bovine leukemia virus and their mixed infection in Iranian holstein cattle. J. Infect. Dev. Ctries. 2010 doi: 10.3855/jidc.711. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.نیکبخت بروجنی غ, Rabani, M., Emam, M. & Reza tofighi, E. Serological and genomic detection of bovine leukemia virus in human and cattle samples. Iran J. Vet. Med.10.22059/ijvm.2010.22101 (2010).
  • 9.Buehring GC, Philpott SM, Choi KY. Humans have antibodies reactive with bovine leukemia virus. AIDS Res. Hum. Retrovir. 2003 doi: 10.1089/088922203771881202. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Buehring GC, Shen HM, Jensen HM, Jin DL, Hudes M, Block G. Exposure to bovine leukemia virus is associated with breast cancer: A case-control study. PLoS ONE. 2015 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0134304. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Buehring GC, Shen HM, Jensen HM, Yeon Choi K, Sun D, Nuovo G. Bovine leukemia virus DNA in human breast tissue. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2014 doi: 10.3201/eid2005.131298. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Axel V-C. Enzootic bovine leukosis and the risk to human health. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 2017 doi: 10.5897/ajb2016.15736. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Tang KW, Alaei-Mahabadi B, Samuelsson T, Lindh M, Larsson E. The landscape of viral expression and host gene fusion and adaptation in human cancer. Nat Commun. 2013 doi: 10.1038/ncomms3513. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Kohara J, Konnai S, Onuma M. Experimental transmission of Bovine leukemia virus in cattle via rectal palpation. Jpn. J. Vet. Res. 2006;54:25–30. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Zhang R, Jiang J, Sun W, Zhang J, Huang K, Gu X, et al. Lack of association between bovine leukemia virus and breast cancer in Chinese patients. Breast Cancer Res. 2016 doi: 10.1186/s13058-016-0763-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Gillet NA, Willems L. Whole genome sequencing of 51 breast cancers reveals that tumors are devoid of bovine leukemia virus DNA. Retrovirology. 2016 doi: 10.1186/s12977-016-0308-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.CDC. CDC—What Is Breast Cancer? Div. Cancer Prev. Control. Centers Dis. Control Prev. 2017.
  • 18.Deshpande TM, Pandey A, Shyama S. Review: Breast cancer and etiology. Trends Med. 2017 doi: 10.15761/tim.1000110. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention . An Update on Cancer Deaths in the United States. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2020. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Sharma GN, Dave R, Sanadya J, Sharma P, Sharma KK. Various types and management of breast cancer: An overview. J. Adv. Pharm. Technol. Res. 2010;1:109. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Li Z, Wu Y, Yates ME, Tasdemir N, Bahreini A, Chen J, et al. Hotspot ESR1 mutations are multimodal and contextual drivers of breast cancer metastasis. bioRxiv. 2021 doi: 10.1101/2021.02.10.430701. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Modi ND, Sorich MJ, Rowland A, Logan JM, McKinnon RA, Kichenadasse G, et al. A literature review of treatment-specific clinical prediction models in patients with breast cancer. Crit. Rev. Oncol. Hematol. 2020 doi: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2020.102908. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Scott, L. Mayo Clinic books. In Mayo Clinic Family Health Book (2018).
  • 24.Chalmers R, McClellan P, Silva V, Shutt N, Restini C. Red flags for the differential diagnosis of granulomatous mastitis: A case report. J. Med. Case Rep. 2020 doi: 10.1186/s13256-020-02563-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Iarc. IA for R on CWHO Estimated cancer incidence, mortality and prevalence worldwide in 2012. Globocan. 2012 doi: 10.1002/ijc.27711. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.FAO . The Global Dairy Sector: Facts. Food Agric Organ United Nations; 2016. [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Gillet N, Florins A, Boxus M, Burteau C, Nigro A, Vandermeers F, et al. Mechanisms of leukemogenesis induced by bovine leukemia virus: Prospects for novel anti-retroviral therapies in human. Retrovirology. 2007 doi: 10.1186/1742-4690-4-18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Rodriguez SM, Golemba MD, Campos RH, Trono K, Jones LR. Bovine leukemia virus can be classified into seven genotypes: Evidence for the existence of two novel clades. J. Gen. Virol. 2009 doi: 10.1099/vir.0.011791-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Nekouei O, VanLeeuwen J, Stryhn H, Kelton D, Keefe G. Lifetime effects of infection with bovine leukemia virus on longevity and milk production of dairy cows. Prev. Vet. Med. 2016 doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2016.09.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Nekouei O, VanLeeuwen J, Sanchez J, Kelton D, Tiwari A, Keefe G. Herd-level risk factors for infection with bovine leukemia virus in Canadian dairy herds. Prev. Vet. Med. 2015 doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2015.02.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Polat M, Takeshima SN, Aida Y. Epidemiology and genetic diversity of bovine leukemia virus. Virol. J. 2017 doi: 10.1186/s12985-017-0876-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Polat M, Moe HH, Shimogiri T, Moe KK, Nosuke Takeshima S, Aida Y. The molecular epidemiological study of bovine leukemia virus infection in Myanmar cattle. Arch. Virol. 2017 doi: 10.1007/s00705-016-3118-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.MacLachlan NJ, Dubovi EJ, Barthold SW, Swayne DE, Winton JR. Chapter 14: Retroviridae. Fenner’s Vet. Virol. 2017 doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-800946-8.00014-3. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.MacLachlan NJ, Dubovi EJ, Barthold SW, Swayne DE, Winton JR. Chapter 29: Flaviviridae. Fenner’s Vet. Virol. 2017 doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-800946-8.00029-5. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Murakami K, Kobayashi S, Konishi M, Ichiro Kameyama K, Yamamoto T, Tsutsui T. The recent prevalence of bovine leukemia virus (BLV) infection among Japanese cattle. Vet. Microbiol. 2011 doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2010.08.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Juliarena MA, Lendez PA, Gutierrez SE, Forletti A, Rensetti DE, Ceriani MC. Partial molecular characterization of different proviral strains of bovine leukemia virus. Arch. Virol. 2013 doi: 10.1007/s00705-012-1459-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Bartlett PC, Norby B, Byrem TM, Parmelee A, Ledergerber JT, Erskine RJ. Bovine leukemia virus and cow longevity in Michigan dairy herds. J. Dairy Sci. 2013 doi: 10.3168/jds.2012-5930. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Barbeau, B., et al.Conference Highlights of the 16th International Conference on Human Retrovirology: HTLV and Related Retroviruses 26–30 June 2013, Montreal, Canada. Retrovirology. 10.1186/1742-4690-11-19 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 39.Gutiérrez G, Alvarez I, Merlini R, Rondelli F, Trono K. Dynamics of perinatal bovine leukemia virus infection. BMC Vet. Res. 2014 doi: 10.1186/1746-6148-10-82. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Nekouei O, Stryhn H, VanLeeuwen J, Kelton D, Hanna P, Keefe G. Predicting within-herd prevalence of infection with bovine leukemia virus using bulk-tank milk antibody levels. Prev. Vet. Med. 2015 doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2015.10.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Pikor LA, Enfield KSS, Cameron H, Lam WL. DNA extraction from paraffin embedded material for genetic and epigenetic analyses. J. Vis. Exp. 2011 doi: 10.3791/2763. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Kumar S, Stecher G, Li M, Knyaz C, Tamura K. MEGA X: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis across computing platforms. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2018;35:1547–1549. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msy096. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Tamura K, Nei M. Estimation of the number of nucleotide substitutions in the control region of mitochondrial DNA in humans and chimpanzees. Mol. Biol. Evol. 1993 doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Lawson JS, Salmons B, Glenn WK. Oncogenic viruses and breast cancer: Mouse mammary tumor virus (MMTV), bovine leukemia virus (BLV), human papilloma virus (HPV), and Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) Front. Oncol. 2018 doi: 10.3389/fonc.2018.00001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Buehring GC, Shen HM, Schwartz DA, Lawson JS. Bovine leukemia virus linked to breast cancer in Australian women and identified before breast cancer development. PLoS ONE. 2017 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0179367. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Baltzell KA, Shen HM, Krishnamurthy S, Sison JD, Nuovo GJ, Buehring GC. Bovine leukemia virus linked to breast cancer but not coinfection with human papillomavirus: Case-control study of women in Texas. Cancer. 2018 doi: 10.1002/cncr.31169. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Schwingel D, Andreolla AP, Erpen LMS, Frandoloso R, Kreutz LC. Bovine leukemia virus DNA associated with breast cancer in women from South Brazil. Sci. Rep. 2019 doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-39834-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Delarmelina E, Buzelin MA, de Souza BS, Souto FM, Bicalho JM, Falcão Câmara RJ, et al. High positivity values for bovine leukemia virus in human breast cancer cases from Minas Gerais, Brazil. PLoS ONE. 2020 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0239745. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Ursin G, Bjelke E, Heuch I, Vollset SE. Milk consumption and cancer incidence: A norwegian prospective study. Br. J. Cancer. 1990 doi: 10.1038/bjc.1990.100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Parkin DM. The global health burden of infection-associated cancers in the year 2002. Int. J. Cancer. 2006 doi: 10.1002/ijc.21731. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Estudio DEL Potencial Zoonótico Del Virus De La Leucosis Bovina y SU Presencia EN Casos de Cáncer de Seno. Univ Sci 2006.
  • 52.Meas S, Seto J, Sugimoto C, Bakhsh M, Riaz M, Sato T, et al. Infection of bovine immunodeficiency virus and bovine leukemia virus in water buffalo and cattle populations in Pakistan. J. Vet. Med. Sci. 2000 doi: 10.1292/jvms.62.329. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.OIE . Enzootic Bovine Leukosis (EBL) OIE; 2018. [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Khan MF, Siddique U, Shah AA, Khan I, Anwar F, Ahmad I, et al. Seroprevalence of bovine leukemia virus (BLV) in cattle from the North West of Pakistan. Pak. Vet. J. 2020 doi: 10.29261/pakvetj/2019.103. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Ramiz RM, Ahmad A, Ghafoor A, Avais M, Iqbal MZ. Genotype detection and sero-prevalence of bovine leukemia virus along with associated risk factors in exotic and local breeds of cattle in and around Lahore, Punjab. Pak. J. Zool. 2021 doi: 10.17582/JOURNAL.PJZ/20190822070849. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Information. (265.2KB, docx)

Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES