Skip to main content
Frontiers in Microbiology logoLink to Frontiers in Microbiology
. 2022 Feb 24;13:843415. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.843415

Plant-Mycorrhizal Fungi Interactions in Phytoremediation of Geogenic Contaminated Soils

Ying Ma 1,*,, Ankit 2,, Jaya Tiwari 3,, Kuldeep Bauddh 2,*
PMCID: PMC8908265  PMID: 35283821

Abstract

Soil contamination by geogenic contaminants (GCs) represents an imperative environmental problem. Various soil remediation methods have been successfully employed to ameliorate the health risks associated with GCs. Phytoremediation is considered as an eco-friendly and economical approach to revegetate GC-contaminated soils. However, it is a very slow process, as plants take a considerable amount of time to gain biomass. Also, the process is limited only to the depth and surface area of the root. Inoculation of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) with remediating plants has been found to accelerate the phytoremediation process by enhancing plant biomass and their metal accumulation potential while improving the soil physicochemical and biological characteristics. Progress in the field application is hindered by a lack of understanding of complex interactions between host plant and AMF that contribute to metal detoxification/(im)mobilization/accumulation/translocation. Thus, this review is an attempt to reveal the underlying mechanisms of plant-AMF interactions in phytoremediation.

Keywords: phytoremediation, arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi, metal contaminated soils, metal transporters, genes

Introduction

As a result of rampant industrial activities, geogenic contaminants (GCs) have intruded in almost all spheres of the environment, including soil, water, air, and plants (Sandeep et al., 2019). Globally, the soils of >20 million hectares of land in 10 million sites are contaminated, and more than 50% of them are polluted with GCs (He et al., 2015). The root cause of this recurring problem of GC pollution seems to be the increased rate of industrialization, urbanization, mining, milling, fossil fuel burning, agrochemicals that release a wide range of GCs, and metalloids into the environment (Sandeep et al., 2019; Zhang et al., 2019). Leachates of municipal solid waste landfills in poor waste disposal systems contain elevated concentrations of GCs and metalloids, which are also responsible for contaminating soil soil-crop systems (Vongdala et al., 2019). The concentrations of GCs in soils may also be enhanced by applying inorganic and organic fertilizers, organic manure, pesticides, and herbicides (Dharma-Wardana, 2018; Reboredo et al., 2019). Several studies reported toxic metals accumulations in plant food samples harvested from contaminated soils, indicating that contaminated soils become the pathway of GCs to crops (Emurotu and Onianwa, 2017; Chaou et al., 2019; Kibet et al., 2019; Liang et al., 2019; Afonne and Ifediba, 2020). These released GCs are biomagnified in living beings of the higher trophic levels once they enter the food chain via the ingestion of food and vegetable.

Removal of GCs from the contaminated sites may be attained by various traditional techniques, such as detonation, incineration, soil excavation, soil washing, chemical precipitation, etc., which are very costly and adversely affect ecosystem functioning (Dermont et al., 2008). Recently, a widely used phytoremediation technique, the use of plants to extract, sequester, and detoxify pollutants, has been reported to be effective, non-intrusive, inexpensive, aesthetically pleasing, and socially accepted technology to remediate polluted soils (Kachout et al., 2009; Pandey and Bauddh, 2018). Soil amendment by using microorganisms, especially arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) are efficient in accelerating the phytoremediation process (Ma et al., 2016). AMF inoculation is regarded as a promising tool in biotechnology for the sustainable remediation of hazardous contaminants (Schneider et al., 2017). Certain aspects in AMF associated phytoremediation, such as the response of plant and AMF species, the role of different soil parameters on their association, etc., needs to be well explored. Providing an in-depth literature review on the mechanisms responsible for plant-mycorrhizal fungi interactions in a lucid manner separates it from previous related work. Therefore, this paper expounds on the feasibility of a cost-effective and green method of AMF-assisted GC phytoremediation. Further, the mechanisms of action involved in plant-mycorrhizal fungi association for GC remediation from the contaminated sites have also been discussed.

Methodology

The literature cited in this review ranged from 1904 to 2021. However, the majority of the articles targeted were from journal articles, book chapters, and books published between 2011 and 2021. The relevant literature surveyed were studied employing Google, Google Scholar, Web of Science, Research Gate, and Scopus using various keywords such as phytoremediation, arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi, metal contaminated soils, metal transporters, genes. Further, especially focused journals were Annual review of plant biology, Frontiers in Microbiology, Current Opinion in Toxicology, Journal of Plant Physiology, Plant Physiology, etc., were browsed for digging deeper into the relevant literature until 2021. Subsequently, we have examined the publication individually and eliminated the quotative and duplicate papers. Out of the total literature documents yielded, we have selected and referred to 168 articles. Out of which, total journal articles were 161 followed by six book chapters and one book. Around 51% of the cited documents were of the years 2011–2021. To the best of our knowledge, this article is an updated review article that focused and covered all dimensions of plant-mycorrhizal fungi interactions in metal phytoremediation.

Establishment of Mutualistic Symbiosis

Soil can facilitate a conducive environment for interaction among diverse and highly complex microbial communities and is considered as a “safe haven” for them. Hiltner (1904) was the first soil biologist who defined the rhizosphere as a hyperactive “zone of contact” around the plant root system in the soil where microbes live and contribute to plant health. The findings of various studies suggested that rhizosphere processes are affected by exudates of plant roots and rhizosphere microorganisms (Kamilova et al., 2006; Kumar et al., 2007). Root exudates are involved in important functions, such as inducing plant defense response against pathogenic microorganisms (Abbott and Murphy, 2003) and providing a basis for chemotaxis to attract and repel microbial species and populations (Kumar et al., 2007), keeping the soil wet and moist, altering the chemical properties of the soils, mobilizing the nutrients, inhibiting the growth of competitor plants, and stabilizing soil aggregates around the roots. Root exudates mainly consist of carbon-based compounds (Bais et al., 2006), including low molecular weight compounds (e.g., amino acids, organic acids, sugars, phenolic, and several secondary metabolites), and high molecular weight compounds (e.g., mucilaginous substances and proteins; Badri and Vivanco, 2009).

The fungus-plant association fosters plant growth and boosts root development (Janeeshma and Puthur, 2020; Tiwari et al., 2020). Based on the basis of morphological characteristics, mycorrhiza is classified into five groups such as ecto-, ericoid, arbutoid, arbuscular, orchid, and monotropoid (Wang and Qiu, 2006). Among them, AMF is considered as most effective in promoting plant growth and development in the ecosystem by speeding up the processes of nutrient absorption. AMF starts symbiosis before they reach the host plant roots. During this pre-infection stage, plant roots release signal molecules (e.g., branching factors), which are responsible for the fast growth and branching of hyphae, followed by the differentiation of fungal adhesion structures. In reciprocation of branching factors, AMF may release signal molecules (e.g., Myc factors) that can induce both molecular and cellular responses and thus ensure successful AMF root colonization (Maillet et al., 2011). Positive results of this symbiosis are attributed to physiological changes of host plants, including hormonal equilibrium, transcriptional profile, primary, and secondary metabolism (López-Ráez et al., 2010).

Performance of Mutualistic Symbiosis

Amongst several mutualistic symbioses, the arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis is considered as one of the significant determinants for plant health and soil fertility in terrestrial ecosystems (Jeffries et al., 2003). The fine hyphae that spread into the soil and absorb minerals more effectively than plant roots alone, and the presence of the fungi constantly decreases soil-borne fungi and nematode root attacks (Smith and Read, 2008). AMF may play important role in plant growth in metal contaminated soils (Hildebrandt et al., 2007) by acting as bioalleviator and/or biofertilizer (Figure 1). In addition, the large and dense mycelial network established by AMF improves the stability of soil particles through the excretion of glomalin (an insoluble and hydrophobic protein material) and soil proteins associated with glomalin, thus inhibiting disaggregation of soil organic carbon and water (Bedini et al., 2009; Hallett et al., 2009). AMF colonization can affect vegetative (Miller et al., 1987) and sexual reproduction of plants by influencing the number of inflorescences, production of seeds and fruits, and offspring vigor (Nuortila et al., 2004). These different attributes of AMF may contribute to protect endangered plants (Bothe et al., 2010). Following are some of the attributes that have been briefly discussed.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Plant-arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) mutualistic performance in the rhizosphere.

Bioalleviator

The reactive oxygen species (ROS) formation accelerates under biotic and abiotic stresses (Hasanuzzaman et al., 2013; Bauddh and Singh, 2015; Jajic et al., 2015; Sachdev et al., 2021). ROS generation in plants has been reported as long-distance signals in response to various stresses (Mittler, 2017). To minimize the toxic effects of ROS, plants possess effective ROS-scavenging systems involving both enzymatic (e.g., ascorbate peroxidase and superoxide dismutase) and non-enzymatic (e.g., glutathione and ascorbic acid) ROS actions (Hasanuzzaman et al., 2013; Sachdev et al., 2021). Few researchers have reported that ROS generation occurs during early symbiotic interactions between AMF and host plant roots (Fester and Hause, 2005; Kiirika et al., 2014). To mitigate its potentially toxic effects, there must be a balance between ROS generation and scavenging. In plants, redox homeostasis, antioxidant signaling, and continuous production or removal of ROS at the cellular level are considered as stress signals (Jajic et al., 2015).

The plant-microbe symbiotic associations play a crucial role in alleviating biotic and abiotic stresses such as heat, salinity, drought, metals, and extreme temperatures (Goh et al., 2013; Schouteden et al., 2015). Studies on AMF mediated stress tolerance and increased growth of host plants have been the pivotal research on plant stress responses (Tahat and Sijam, 2012). Plant-AMF interactions can improve plant growth and health by controlling the generation and scavenging of ROS (e.g., H2O2, superoxide radicals, alkoxy radicals, singlet oxygen, perhydroxyl radicals, etc.) under biotic and abiotic stresses (Goh et al., 2013; Nath et al., 2016). For instance, a significantly higher amount of ROS is generated due to GC stress, therefore causing oxidative damage to the cellular structures of plants (Yang et al., 2015b). In response to such oxidative stress, plant-AMF associations can activate numerous antioxidant enzymes (e.g., thioredoxin, superoxide dismutase, glutathione peroxidases, and catalase) for scavenging the generated ROS to protect against cell damage (Hashem et al., 2018).

Biofertilizer

AMF are considered natural biofertilizers, because they help the host plants to develop their root system for absorption of water and essential nutrients in exchange for photosynthetic products and to protect plants against harmful pathogens (Berruti et al., 2016; Gao et al., 2020; Basiru et al., 2021). It is well documented that, the AMF-pant association has countless benefits in terms of healthy soil conditions and increased crop productivity (Berruti et al., 2016). Therefore, AMF are considered as the most important biotic soil components, the impoverished or missing AMF can lead to a less efficient ecosystem functioning (Berruti et al., 2016). The roles of AMF as biofertilizer in several biochemical and physiological processes are as follows:

Phosphorus Acquisition

The phosphorus (P) absorption in the mutualistic relationship formed between the host plant and AMF offers significant advantages, such as, providing an efficient pathway through which P is retrieved from the soils and directly transferred to the roots. The exchange of nutrients between host plants and microorganisms is a regulated process facilitated by membrane transporting proteins such as, phosphate transport and the P-type H+-ATPase (Bucher, 2007; Basu et al., 2018).

Nitrogen Acquisition

Plant growth is often hampered by the loss of nitrogen from the soils. The mycorrhiza can facilitate nitrogen absorption from the soils to plants, and increase various types of nitrogen (Smith and Read, 2008; Veresoglou et al., 2011; Makarov, 2019). For instance, many studies demonstrated that plants associated with AMF have five times more affinity for NH4+ uptake from the soils (Pérez-Tienda et al., 2012). In addition, many mycorrhizal plants can facilitate nitrogen uptake from the rhizosphere soil through nitrate and ammonium transporters (Breuillin-Sessoms et al., 2015). Recently, few studies have also reported the increased content of 15N in host plants grown on AMF inoculated organic patches of soil (Hodge and Fitter, 2010; Tian et al., 2010; Nath et al., 2018). When the hyphae are supplied with nitrate and ammonium ions, the nitrates are absorbed by active transport coupled with a protonated-symport system, whereas, NH4+ is taken up through an antiport mechanism with an H+ efflux. If ammonium is the only source of N, its assimilation can lead to a deficient supply of carbon for the fungus because of its enhanced consumption in the roots (Basu et al., 2018).

Phytohormones

The fungal colonization develops in the host plant through a complex process that includes well-structured alterations at the morphological and genetic level, thus eventually leading to changes in series of signals (Morrison et al., 2015). Several studies have reported that AMF can produce phytohormones, e.g., auxins, cytokinins, and abscisic acid (ABA), which accelerated plant growth and development. Just as other plants, mycorrhizal fungi also follow the mevalonate pathway and use different precursors of ABA for their production (Nambara and Marion-Poll, 2005; Morrison et al., 2015). The role of ABA in the production and growth of mycelium has been documented in the literature (Ludwig-Müller, 2010; Spence and Bais, 2015; Xu et al., 2018). For instance, the exogenous application of ABA showed an insignificant increase in the growth of Ceratocystis fimbriata, while in Magnaporthe oryzae, ABA stimulated the production of appressoria and increased germination (Chanclud and Morel, 2016).

Mechanisms Underlying Plant-AMF Interactions in Phytoremediation

Phytoremediation has been considered a more sustainable, cost-effective, and eco-friendly approach for the remediation of contaminated soils, due to its less expenditure and no unfavorable impact on soil fertility or structure (Jadia and Fulekar, 2009). However, phytoremediation cannot be performed alone by the plant itself, because plants and microorganisms in the rhizosphere always interact very closely so that ultimately leads to an enhanced activity associated with soil remediation (Compant et al., 2010). Use of hyperaccumulators associated with efficient endophytic or rhizosphere microbial communities has been proposed as a promising low-cost cleaning technique for the removal of metals from several contaminated sites (Karimi et al., 2011). In this context, AMF may be a good candidate because they reside inside the roots of a large number (approximately 80%) of terrestrial plants from bryophytes and tracheophytes (Smith and Read, 2008). AMF can form a mutual symbiotic association with most terrestrial plants establishing a direct physical link between plant roots and soils (Bothe et al., 2010).

AMF may promote plant metal extraction when metal concentrations are low in soils and also help plants to accumulate a major chunk of toxic metals in plant roots to prevent their transport to aerial parts when there is a high concentration of metals in soils. Singh et al. (2019) studied the impact of the inoculation of four species of AMF (e.g., Rhizophagus fasciculatus, R. intraradices, Funneliformis mosseae, and Glomus aggregatum) with Zea mays on the removal of Cr, Cd, Ni, and Pb from the tannery sludge. They discovered that all four AMF species enhanced metal accumulation in the roots but decreased shoot metal accumulation. The metal translocation factor was significantly lower as compared to the non-inoculated control plants. These discoveries are important evidence of the capability of AMF to enhance metal phytostabilization. Similarly, Yang et al. (2015a) evaluated the impact of two AMF F. mosseae and R. intraradices on plant growth-related parameters, Pb accumulation, photosynthesis, and antioxidant enzymatic activity in Robinia pseudoacacia. The increased biomass, photosynthetic pigment, gas exchange capacity, and various enzymatic activities in inoculated plants suggests that both AMF species were capable of protecting plants against cellular damage by eliminating ROS under Pb stress. The decreased Pb concentration in the leaves of AMF-inoculated R. pseudoacica indicates that these two AMF species have the potential to increase metal phytostabilization.

AMF root colonization helps in increasing the volume and surface area of available soil that in turn helps in better metal translocation from roots to shoots. Similarly, Zimmer et al. (2009) studied the impact of dual inoculation of ectomycorrhiza-associated bacteria (EMAB; Sphingomonas sp. and Micrococcus luteus) and ectomycorrhizal fungi (Laccaria laccata and Hebeloma crustuliniforme) on the growth and metal accumulation in Salix viminalis cultivated in metal contaminated soils. Total Zn and Cd accumulations in shoots were increased up to 53% post-inoculation with H. crustuliniforme in association with M. luteus, whereas up to 62% for Sphingomonas sp. They found that EMAB enhanced ectomycorrhiza formation, plant growth, and accumulation of Zn and Cd. The findings indicate that the bacterial community facilitates root colonization of plant growth-promoting ectomycorrhizal fungi, which may serve as a potential approach to increase the efficiency of phytoextraction. Moreover, a field study conducted by Wu et al. (2011) assessed the effect of AMF on Zn and Pb accumulation in C. zizanioides grown in mine tailings. They found that the P and N concentrations in plant aerial parts were remarkably higher in mycorrhizal plants as compared to non-AMF treatments. The inoculation of AMF also resulted in a decrease in Zn and Pb concentrations in roots.

The majority of studies available in the literature on AMF-assisted phytoremediation were performed in pot experiments using artificial GCs-polluted soils. Aged-contaminated soils are more complex than spiked soils, as they frequently contain different nature and concentrations of pollutants and their availability is generally lower than that in spiked soils. However, some studies have directly been performed at the contaminated site. It is a well-known fact that the nature of spiked soil used for pot experiments is different from those of naturally contaminated sites. Knowing about the behavior of plant species associated with AMF and the capability of such plants to grow in GC soils is imperative to phytoremediation (Schneider et al., 2016). It can thus be inferred that field studies depict the situation more closely. Therefore, there is a need to perform more and more field-based studies.

For instance, in a field study, a total of 23 species belonging to the genus Acaulospora, Scutellospora, Racocetra, Glomus, Gigaspora, and Paraglomus were identified in As contaminated areas in Brazil. The most frequently occurring species in all areas were Paraglomus occultum, Acaulospora morrowiae, and Glomus clarum. The relatively high presence of these species demonstrates their tolerance to excess As. In spite of the fact that contamination owing to As decreased AMF species richness, the presence of host plants has the tendency to make up for the reduction (Schneider et al., 2013a). In another field study, 39 species of AMF belonging to 10 genera were identified in Pb contaminated sites in Brazil. The Acaulospora and Glomus genera had a high occurrence in the rhizosphere and bulk soil. The highest concentration of Pb was found in root and shoot. AMF diversity seems to be correlated with the heterogeneity of area; AMF structure community was related to Pb concentration in soils, and the diversity of plants was significantly related to the diversity of AMF in soils with high Pb concentration. A clearer understanding of AMF communities in the presence of Pb stress may throw some more light on metal-fungal interactions in contaminated sites (Schneider et al., 2016). In a different field study, a total of six species of AMF belonging to two genera Glomus and Scutellospora were studied. The richness of AMF species was more in the non-contaminated site as compared to sites with contamination of metals. Results are suggestive of the fact that continuously exposing the plant and AMF to GC may result in the tolerant species that may be used for the purpose of phytoremediation (Khade and Adholeya, 2009). Metal transport followed by its distribution is imperative. Metal translocation from below ground to aerial parts is contingent upon the involved metals and plant species (Sarwar et al., 2017). The mobility of different metals differs even inside a plant. For instance, the mobility of Zn and Cd is higher than Pb and Cu. During transportation via plant, metals are largely bound to the root cell wall, which leads to enhanced metal concentration in the plant roots. Chelation of metals with the ligands (e.g., thiols, amino acids, and organic acids) facilitates the metals to transport from roots to shoots (Zacchini et al., 2009). Because of the high cation exchange capacity of xylem cells, the movement of metal is significantly retarded when metals are not chelated by ligands. There is an involvement of organic acids for Cd translocation in Brassica juncea (Salt et al., 1995), while histidine is involved in long-distance translocation of Ni in hyperaccumulator Alyssum lesbiacum (Solanki and Dhankhar, 2011). Since a larger number of GCs may be transported by forming organic compounds-metal complexes (Maser et al., 2001), various types of organic ligands secreted by AMF may alter the existing forms of metal distribution by combining with different metals present in plants, thereby assisting metal translocation from subsurface to aerial parts and hence improving the phytoextraction efficiency (Sheng et al., 2008). According to Ma et al. (2013), the inoculation of metal resistant plant growth-promoting bacterium P. myrsinacearum RC6b may effectively mobilize metals such as Pb, Cd, and Zn in soils and notably increased Cd and Zn accumulation in the shoots of Sedum plumbizincicola. De Maria et al. (2011) also observed that after inoculating rhizobacteria Agromyces sp. and Streptomyces sp., and fungus Cadophora finlandica with Salix caprea, the shoot concentration of Cd and Zn increased, denoting increased translocation of metals from roots to shoots.

There are a number of mechanisms through which plant-AMF interacts during the process of phytoremediation; some of them have been discussed below.

AMF-Induced GC Detoxification

Accumulation of GCs in the plants is a critical problem in the environment, high mobility of GCs has made them an extended component of food chain that affects the health of humans. Vesicles present in mycorrhizal fungi are comparable to fungal vacuoles and they accumulate huge amount of GC in them (Dhalaria et al., 2020). Immobilization of GC occurs in the fungal hyphae residing in symbiotic association with plants that decrease their availability to plants by retaining the GCs in the cytoplasm or vacuole, cell wall by chelation, thereby reducing metal toxicity in the plants (Punamiya et al., 2010). Metal detoxification induced by AMF has been considered as the key mechanism to help plants to alleviate metal toxicity (Table 1). By using scanning electron microscope equipped with energy dispersive spectroscopy (SEM-EDS), extended X-ray absorption fine structure (EXAFS), linear combination fitting results of X-ray absorption near-edge spectroscopy (LC-XANES), it has been demonstrated that Cr may be immobilized by AMF via reduction of Cr (VI) to Cr (III), forming analogues of Cr (III)-phosphate, probably on the surface of fungi. Apart from this, it has also been unraveled that extra radical mycelium may take up Cr actively and transport it to mycorrhizal roots, but the majority of Cr is immobilized in fungal structures (Wu et al., 2015). Ultra-structural changes were observed in roots and leaves of Leucaena leucocephala through a scanning electron microscope (SEM), transmission electron microscope (TEM), and light microscopy (LS). Results revealed that plant tissues were colonized by AMF and damage was observed in all treatments of As (Schneider et al., 2013b).

Table 1.

GC detoxification induced by AMF.

Possible mechanisms References
Immobilizing geogenic contaminants (GCs) by secreting chelating substances, such as, siderophores (ferrichrome and ferricrocin) into the soil. Ernst et al., 1992; Manoj et al., 2020
Metal-binding to several biopolymers present in cell walls such as glomalin and chitin. Glomalins are amphiphilic peptides that act as a surfactant. Gonzalez-Chavez et al., 2004; Rillig and Mummey, 2006
Superficial immobilization of GCs in the plasma membrane upon crossing the cell wall. Ernst et al., 1992
Intracellular chelation by metallothionein, organic acids, and amino acids. Clemens, 2001
Arresting metals inside the vacuoles. Gonzalez-Guerrero et al., 2008; Dhalaria et al., 2020
An exclusive mechanism of AMF involves metal transport with the help of fungal coenocytic hyphe. Gonzalez-Chavez et al., 2002; Gupta et al., 2019
Membrane transporters present in arbuscules of AMF may transport metals to interfacial matrix and their incorporation in the plant. Ebbs and Kochian, 1998
There is also a possibility that fungi may store metals in some assigned structures (such as vesicles, hyphe, etc.). Ferrol et al., 2009

GCs may be immobilized in the fungal hyphae (Ouziad et al., 2004) that can fix GCs in the cell wall and store them in the vacuole or make a complex with other substances like glycoprotein-metal complex (Dhalaria et al., 2020) in the cytoplasm to decrease plants metal toxicity (Punamiya et al., 2010). AMF can enhance plant biomass by changing plant physiological and morphological properties (e.g., enhanced secondary metabolite levels, increased leaf area, increased seedling weight, etc.) under severely stressful conditions and uptake of important immovable nutrients (such as phosphorus, copper, and zinc; Miransari, 2017).

Increased plant biomass in rhizosphere soil is the primary cause of metal dilution in plant tissues (Audet, 2014). AMF may restrict Zn and Cd uptake in the cell wall of mental hyphae and cortical cells, thereby improving plant yield and health (Garg and Chandel, 2012). Metal detoxification mediated by Rhizophagus phaseolina in Glycine max was studied by Spagnoletti et al. (2016), where AMF boosted a defensive response by decreasing oxidative damage even in the presence of M. phaseolina and As.

Mycorrhizae may influence plant metal uptake from the rhizosphere and their translocation from the root zone to aerial parts (Li et al., 2015). The mycelium of several AMF has a high cation exchange capacity, and it helps in metal uptake (Takács and Vörös, 2003). For instance, Hammer et al. (2011) found an increase in the uptake of silicon in the hyphae and spores of Rhizophagus irregularis and its subsequent translocation to host roots. Cd toxicity and mobility can also be alleviated through AMF by enhancing the soil pH (Shen et al., 2006). AMF can restore Cd in the extraradical mycelium and bind Cd to glomalin (Janouškova and Pavlíková, 2010).

AMF colonization has been shown to reduce metal stress in a convincing way (Hall, 2002). For instance, AMF colonization considerably increased the glutamine synthetase activity, therefore enhancing Ni tolerance in Berkheya coddii (Sessitsch et al., 2013). To reduce metal toxicity, AMF resort to processes such as adsorption of GCs to the cell wall, immobilization of metallic compounds, chelation of GCs inside fungus, and precipitation of polyphosphate granules in soils (Meier et al., 2012; Wu et al., 2015). Janousková et al. (2006) reported that inoculation of Glomus intraradices with Nicotiana tabacum cultivated in Cd contaminated soil decreased Cd toxicity to the plants due to Cd immobilization in soil. A study conducted by Wu et al. (2015) investigated the mechanisms involved in Cr immobilization in Daucus carota inoculated with AMF and found that AMF can immobilize Cr via reduction of Cr(VI) to Cr(III) by forming Cr(III)–phosphate analogs.

Molecular Regulation of Genes

Molecular regulation of genes plays a crucial role in accumulating GCs and fungal cell detoxification, subsequently leading to the prevention of translocation of these GCs toward the host plant (Emamverdian et al., 2015). Efflux of GCs is a strategy used by AMF to protect plants from metal toxicity (Latef et al., 2016; Shi et al., 2019). Several transcriptional genes take part in the efflux of GCs and the involved genes get activated by metal exposure (Dhalaria et al., 2020). To provide plant tolerance against Cd and Cu, GmarMT1 that is a cDNA-encoding metallothionein-like functional polypeptide has been discovered from germinated Gigaspora margarita spores (Lanfranco et al., 2002). Also, GC exposure upregulates GmarMT1 expression in the symbiotic mycelium (Lanfranco et al., 2002). GintABC1 identified as a putative ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporter from extra radical mycelium of Glomus intraradices is believed to be involved in Cd and Cu mitigation (González-Guerrero et al., 2010). A number of genes are responsible for maintaining cellular homeostasis against GCs, such as GintABC1, GmarMT1, RintZn, and GrosMT1 (Azcón et al., 2013). To maintain the redox potential and safeguard the fungus from oxidative stress, GmarMT1 codes for metallothioneins have been found in G. margarita BEG 34 (González-Guerrero et al., 2007). GintABC1 assists in detoxifying Zn and Cu (González-Guerrero et al., 2007; Table 2). RintZnT1 isolated from Rhizophagus intraradices, helps in vacuolar sequestration of Zn (Gonzalez-Guerrero et al., 2005). GintGRX1, the first characterized glomeromycotan glutaredoxin, is a multifunctional enzyme that expresses in response to oxidative stress (Benabdellah et al., 2009).

Table 2.

The function of some receptor genes.

Receptor gene with their signaling component Function References
BEG34/GintZnT1 Enhanced transcription levels of putative Zn transporter gene and protection against Zn stress. Gonzalez-Guerrero et al., 2005
Sy167 Alleviation of oxidative stress due to GCs. Hildebrandt et al., 2007
GintABC1 Cd and Cu detoxification in the extra radical mycelium of Glomus intraradices. Gonzalez-Guerrero et al., 2005
MtCbf1 and MtCbf2 Root tissue reprogramming during the establishment of AM symbiosis. Hogekamp et al., 2011
Kinase SymRK Involved in transduction of signals to the cytoplasm after perception of signals from Nod and Myc factors. Gherbi et al., 2008; Genre and Russo, 2016
NUP 85/NUP133 Involved in transporting macromolecules through nuclear envelope. Parniske, 2008
CYCLOPS Serves as phosphorylation target of calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase (CCaMK) gene and is supposed to be the diverging point of common symbiosis (SYM) pathway. Kistner et al., 2005
CASTOR/POLLUX Specific channel of cations important for perinuclear Ca spiking right after reception of Myc or Nod factors. Kistner et al., 2005
CCaMK Calmodulin and Ca dependent protein kinase, which acts as a sensor of Ca and is supposed to be involved in phosphorylation of CYCLOPS. Kistner et al., 2005

AMF resorts to several molecular mechanisms to protect them from GC stress. One of mechanisms is the upregulation of several transcriptional factors that activate glutathione-S-transferase and Zn transporter in intra- and extra- mycelia of AMF Glomus intraradices against metal stress (Hildebrandt et al., 2007). GC stress also leads to expression of numerous genes. These genes encoding proteins are involved in detoxification/tolerance against GCs (Rivera-Becerril et al., 2005).

Based on molecular understanding, scientists have reported an upregulation in metallothionein gene expression of Gigaspora margarita BEG34 in the symbiotic mycelia due to Cu (Lanfranco et al., 2002) and also an enhanced level of transcription of a putative transporter gene for Zn (GintZnT1) that belongs to cation diffusion facilitator family. These genes have been found in the G. intraradices mycelium under short and long-term Zn exposure indicating that this enzyme protects plants against Zn stress (Gonzalez-Guerrero et al., 2005). The role of some AMF in phytoremediation of some GCs (Bundschuh et al., 2017) has been discussed in Table 3.

Table 3.

Role of AMF in phytoremediation of geogenic contaminated soils.

Plant Types of mycorrhizae GCs Remarks References
Helianthus annus Claroideoglomus claroideum (BEG210) Ni AMF Claroideoglomus claroideum (BEG210) enhanced Ni accumulation in H. annus by 38%. Ma et al., 2019
Solanum nigrum Rhizophagus irregularis Cd Rhizophagus irregularis increased Cd accumulation in roots. Wang et al., 2020
Zea mays Glomus aggregatum Pb, Cd, and Zn AMF along with moderate amount of phosphorous may decrease GC uptake and increase plant growth. Nafady and Elgharably, 2018
Medicago sativa Rhizophagus irregularis Cd and Ni AMF inoculation enhanced the uptake of both metals. Mnasri et al., 2017
Taraxacum platypecidum Rhizophagus irregularis Cr Immobilized Cr in roots and prevents Cr phytotoxicity. Wu et al., 2016
Zea mays Funneliformis mosseae and Diversispora spurcum Cd, Zn, Pb, and As The transfer of GC was restricted by both fungi. Zhan et al., 2018
Solanum nigrum Glomus intraradices Cd Inoculation with AMF resulted in decreased Cd uptake in roots and shoots, thereby facilitating metal phytostabilization. Khan et al., 2017
Triticum aestivum Rhizoglomus intraradices As AMF inoculation assisted the host plant to ameliorate As-induced phosphorous deficiency and also strengthened thiol metabolism and antioxidant defence mechanism. Sharma et al., 2017
Cynodon dactylon Funneliformis mosseae Sb AMF inoculation inhibited Sb (V) to Sb (III) reduction, thereby decreasing Sb toxicity. Wei et al., 2016
Oryza sativa Rhizophagus intraradices Cd AMF decreased Cd uptake in O. sativa by altering the expression of Cd transporters. Chen et al., 2019
Zea mays Glomus intraradices Hg AMF increased Hg uptake in roots. Debeljak et al., 2018
Lactuca sativa Funneliformis mosseae and Rhizophagus intraradices Zn AMF inoculation at increased Zn concentrations AMF has the capability of decreasing Zn uptake. Konieczny and Kowalska, 2017
Cynodon dactylon Diversispora spurcum Pb, Zn AMF inoculation increased the uptake of Pb and Zn. Zhan et al., 2019
Sorghum bicolor Claroideoglomus etunicat Mo AMF inoculated plants accumulated up to four times higher Mo than non-mycorrhizal plants. Shi et al., 2020

Metal-binding proteins called metallothioneins are generated in a diverse range of organisms when they are exposed to toxic metals (e.g., Cd, Zn, and Cu). Cu predominantly induces the production of metallothionein in non-AMF (Kumar et al., 2005). Cu-induced stress distinctly upregulates the metallothionein gene BI451899 in extraradical mycelium of G. intraradices. However, a certain concentration of Zn can also upregulate the metallothionein gene, but such a response is not observed due to Cd. This upregulation establishes and supports the primary function of fungal metallothioneins in detoxifying Cu (Lanfranco et al., 2002).

Metal Mobilization

Strong binding of metals to soil particles or precipitation results in insolubilization of the significant fraction of metals in soils ultimately causing their unavailability for plant uptake. Metal solubilization and mobility have been considered as critical factors that affect phytoextraction efficiency (Ma et al., 2013). In this regard, microbes that can mobilize metals may be used to amend the habitat of rhizosphere in soils affecting metal element speciation as well as mobility inside soil by way of biogeochemical cycling processes of GCs that primarily include protonation, chelation, and acidification (Ma et al., 2011; Rajkumar et al., 2012; Sessitsch et al., 2013).

Protonation

AMF may also acidify their environment through exporting protons to replace GC cations at the site of sorption (Rajkumar et al., 2012). Extensive studies have been performed to characterize them using attenuated total reflection-Fourier transforms infrared (ATR-FTIR) spectroscopy and thereafter to understand the interaction between fungal cells, protons, and metal ions. Results suggest that the carboxylate moieties present on the bacterial surface play a vital role in the extracellular biosorption of Ni2+, which establishes a comparatively weaker bond with the metal ion.

Chelation

Natural organic chelators are metal-binding compounds that comprise siderophores, organic acid anions, metallophores, and biosurfactants (Sessitsch et al., 2013). Both fungi and plants can release these compounds that scavenge metal ions from sorption sites (Gadd, 2004) and ROS (Leitenmaier and Küpper, 2013). Metal chelation through metal-binding peptides such as metallothioneins and phytochelatins (PC) may eliminate the harmful effect of free metallic ions, thereby facilitating metal uptake and their sequestration, followed by compartmentation, loading in xylem tissues, and finally their transport (Cai and Ma, 2002). Phytochelatins are the GC binding peptides that are produced by tripeptide glutathione and/or by an enzyme-catalyzed reaction through PC synthase (Solanki and Dhankhar, 2011). Metallothioneins may also be found in AMF and genes that encode numerous enzymes for PC synthesis may be activated in the root of mycorrhiza. These enzymes assist in enhancing photosynthesis in mycorrhizal plants subjected to stress caused by metals (Rivera-Becerril et al., 2005).

Acidification

Soil pH is one of the most important factors that affect metal content and its bioavailability. For several metals (e.g., Cu and Zn), a rise in soil pH caused a fall in their mobility (Richards et al., 2000). Generally, soil pH is affected by the action of both microorganisms and plants. Rhizosphere gets acidified due to H+ ions excreted by roots that may displace GC cations adsorbed on soil particles. Root exudates may decrease the pH of the rhizosphere (Sheoran et al., 2011), causing increased metal mobility and bioavailability in soil solution (Kim et al., 2010).

Metal Immobilization

Phytostabilization is GC immobilization in the plant root system by precipitation, reduction, and absorption without its accumulation in the shoot (Radziemska et al., 2017). There is an extensive root system for immobilizing metals in hyperaccumulators (Mendez and Maier, 2008). In addition to some common mechanisms of tolerance, increase biosynthesis of the cell wall, metal inactivation in the rhizosphere and its accumulation in roots are very specific to phytostabilizers (Janeeshma and Puthur, 2020). An association with AMF increases the properties of metal stabilization of plants (Zhang et al., 2019). For instance, the association of Trifolium pratense with mycorrhizae enhanced Zn retention in the roots, thereby preventing its translocation in the aerial plant parts (Chen et al., 2003).

The glomalins released by AMF enhance toxic metal immobilization. Metallothionein protein, released by some AMF, is also known to reduce the toxicity caused by GCs. Besides, the synthesis of a 90 kD heat shock protein and glutathione-S-transferase as a response to GC stress suggest that these proteins are involved in immobilizing GCs in the rhizosphere of Lycopersicon esculentum plant (Bano and Ashfaq, 2013). Glomalins are known to sequester several metals such as Zn, Pb, Fe, Cd, Cr, and Cu and decrease their bioavailability (Gil-Cardeza et al., 2014). Glomalins may extract Pb, Cd, and Cu from polluted soil.

Several GCs get immobilized because of the binding capacity of fungal hyphae to metals. As a result of this binding capacity, there is a decreased translocation of GCs to plant tissues (Wasserman et al., 1987). A slight increase in the mycorrhizosphere pH may also cause immobilization of some GCs (e.g., Zn) due to mycorrhizal association (Bano and Ashfaq, 2013). Inoculation of Glomus species resulted in reduced mobility of metals in Zea mays (Kaldorf et al., 1999). Other studies demonstrated a notable absorption of Zn in the mycelium of AMF by using different glomus species in association with Lolium perenne or Trifolium sp. (Joner et al., 2000).

Metal immobilized in fungal hyphae that are symbiotically associated with the plants decreases their availability to host plants by holding the metals in the cytoplasm, vacuole, or cell wall, thereby reducing metal toxicity in plants (Punamiya et al., 2010). They also immobilize the GCs in the root cortical region by binding with them and prevent the translocation of metals to shoot, thus preventing leaf tissue damage (Schubler, 2001). Some AMF may decrease plant metal uptake or its translocation factor by reducing metal bioavailability in soils through several processes such as alkalinization, precipitation, and complexation (Ma et al., 2016).

Alkalinization

A few AMF exhibit the capability to adsorb metals by substratum alkalinization activity, hence affecting the stability of metals in soils (Büdel et al., 2004). The effect of alkalinization induced by AMF via release of OH, may result in active uptake of nitrate by microbes and reduction in metal bioavailability in the rhizosphere by secreting glomalin (Giasson et al., 2008). AMF may act as a sink of metals to reduce the available and mobile metal cations in soils, resulting in the creation of a more conducive environment for plants growing in metal contaminated soils (Gohre and Paszkowski, 2006). Inoculation of G. mosseae and G. caledonium with Lolium perenne and Sedum alfredi notably reduced soil DTPA-extractable Cd by 21%–38% through the alkalinization process, hence facilitating in stabilization and extraction of Cd in-situ from Cd infected soils (Hu et al., 2013).

Precipitation

Some plant-associated microorganisms can promote enzyme-catalyzed precipitation of toxic metals [e.g., chromium (Cr) and selenium] and radionuclides (e.g., technetium and uranium) via microbial reduction process, which is promising for phytoremediation of metal-polluted soils (Payne and DiChristina, 2006). Some studies suggest that fungi can protect the host plant from the inhibitory effects of an excess concentration of Cr6+ by reducing toxic and mobile Cr6+ to immobile and non-toxic Cr3+ in soils. Besides, some insoluble forms of minerals, metals, and radionuclides may also be immobilized either indirectly through bacterial oxidation of Fe (Zhou et al., 2013) or directly via enzymatic actions (such as microbial reduction process; Pagnanelli et al., 2010).

Complexation

Extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) excreted by AMF are of immense importance, making a protective hindrance against the adverse effects of metal biosorption (Hou et al., 2013). The mechanisms involved in metal biosorption onto EPS include the complexation with negatively charged functional groups, precipitation, metal ion exchange, and adsorption (Zhang et al., 2006). In this regard, AMF may produce insoluble metal-absorbing glycoprotein named glomalin that decreases the metal mobility or sequesters them, which may be taken into account for metal stabilization in soils (Vodnik et al., 2008). In an in-situ field experiment, the glomalin-related soil protein was used to estimate AMF derived from glomalin in soils in sequestrating Pb and Cd (Wu et al., 2014).

Conclusion

In this review, the interactions between plant and mycorrhizal fungi in metal phytoremediation were unraveled through (1) an in-depth establishment of mutualistic symbiosis; (2) gaining insight into the role of AMF in phytoremediation; and (3) understanding the mechanisms including alleviation of metal toxicity by AMF, plant-AMF signaling and perception, metal bioaccumulation of plant-AMF association, metal mobilization and immobilization, metal transport, and distribution, which could add to the existing application knowledge of phytoremediation technologies. Associations with mycorrhiza increase the available surface area for absorption beyond the zone of root hair that in turn increases the uptake of water and minerals. It results in the high production of biomass that is imperative for successful phytoremediation. This review combined all the existing information available on AMF in a coherent way for better understanding. The primary focus of upcoming research should be on (1) identification of new genes as well as gene products that are crucial in plant-mycorrhizae fungal interactions and (2) optimizing applied theory, including mobilization, immobilization, and perfecting the gene control mechanisms. The application of mycorrhizal techniques has fewer disadvantages and more advantages. Various factors such as redox potential, pH, inorganic and organic ligands (e.g., root exudates, fulvic acid, and humic acid) can regulate metal sorption or desorption and its bioavailability. The impact of the dynamics of these factors on phytostabilization, phytotransformation, or phytoextraction in association with AMF are still unclear and require more attention and detailed studies for additional application of phytoremediation processes. The review also advocates more and more field-based studies for further exploring the potential of AMF. Furthermore, applying it to practice, to enhance the utility and efficiency of mycorrhizal remediation of GCs are some practical problems that needs to be solved on an urgent basis.

Author Contributions

All authors listed have made a substantial, direct, and intellectual contribution to the work and approved it for publication.

Funding

This work is carried out at the College of Resources and Environment, Southwest University, supported by the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (no. SWU 020010), the Natural Science Foundation of Chongqing (no. cstc2021jcyj-msxmX0827) and Chongqing Returned Overseas Students’ Entrepreneurship and Innovation Support Program (no. cx2021001).

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Acknowledgments

A. is thankful to UGC, New Delhi, for the award and financial assistance in form of SRF.

References

  1. Abbott L., Murphy D. (2003). Soil Biology Fertility: A Key to Sustainable Land Use in Agriculture. Springer, Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 187–203. [Google Scholar]
  2. Afonne O. J., Ifediba E. C. (2020). Heavy metals risks in plant foods–need to step up precautionary measures. Curr. Opin. Toxicol. 22, 1–6. doi: 10.1016/j.cotox.2019.12.006 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  3. Audet P. (2014). “Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and metal phytoremediation: ecophysiological complementarity in relation to environmental stress,” in Emerging Technologies and Management of Crop Stress Tolerance. eds. Ahmad P., Rasool S. (San Diego: Academic Press; ), 133–160. [Google Scholar]
  4. Azcón R., Medina A., Aroca R., Ruiz-Lozano J. M. (2013). “Abiotic stress remediation by the arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis and rhizosphere bacteria/yeast interactions,” in Molecular Microbial Ecology of the Rhizosphere. Vol. 1. ed. de Bruijn F. J. (John Wiley and Sons; ), 991–1002. [Google Scholar]
  5. Badri D. V., Vivanco J. M. (2009). Regulation and function of root exudates. Plant Cell Environ. 32, 666–681. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2008.01926.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Bais H. P., Weir T. L., Perry L. G., Vivanco G. S., J. M. (2006). The role of root exudates in rhizosphere interactions with plants and other organisms. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 57, 233–266. doi: 10.1146/annurev.arplant.57.032905.105159, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Bano S. A., Ashfaq D. (2013). Role of mycorrhiza to reduce heavy metal stress. Nat. Sci. 5, 16–20. doi: 10.4236/ns.2013.512A003 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  8. Basiru S., Mwanza H. P., Hijri M. (2021). Analysis of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal inoculant benchmarks. Microorganisms 9:81. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms9010081 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Basu S., Rabara R. C., Negi S. (2018). AMF: the future prospect for sustainable agriculture. Physiol. Mol. Plant Pathol. 102, 36–45. doi: 10.1016/j.pmpp.2017.11.007 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  10. Bauddh K., Singh R. P. (2015). A study on the effect of cadmium on the antioxidative defense system and alteration in different functional groups in castor bean and Indian mustard. Arch. Agron. Soil Sci. 62, 877–891. doi: 10.1080/03650340.2015.1083554 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  11. Bedini S., Pellegrino E., Avio L., Pellegrino S., Bazoffi P., Argese E., et al. (2009). Changes in soil aggregation and glomalin related soil protein content as affected by the arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal species Glomus mosseae and Glomus intraradices. Soil Biol. Biochem. 41, 1491–1496. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2009.04.005 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  12. Benabdellah K., Merlos M. Á., Azcón-Aguilar C., Ferrol N. (2009). GintGRX1, the first characterized glomeromycotan glutaredoxin, is a multifunctional enzyme that responds to oxidative stress. Fungal Genet. Biol. 46, 94–103. doi: 10.1016/j.fgb.2008.09.013, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Berruti A., Lumini E., Balestrini R., Bianciotto V. (2016). Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi as natural biofertilizers: let's benefit from past successes. Front. Microbiol. 6:1559. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2015.01559 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Bothe H., Turnau K., Regvar M. (2010). The potential role of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in protecting endangered plants and habitats. Mycorrhiza 20, 445–457. doi: 10.1007/s00572-010-0332-4, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Breuillin-Sessoms F., Floss D. S., Gomez S. K., Pumplin N., Ding Y., Levesque-Tremblay V., et al. (2015). Suppression of arbuscule degeneration in Medicago truncatula phosphate transporter4 mutants is dependent on the ammonium transporter 2 family protein AMT2; 3. Plant Cell 27, 1352–1366. doi: 10.1105/tpc.114.131144, PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Bucher M. (2007). Functional biology of plant phosphate uptake at root and mycorrhiza interfaces. New Phytol. 173, 11–26. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2006.01935.x, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Büdel B., Weber B., Kuhl M., Pfanz H., Sultemeyer D., Wessels D. (2004). Reshaping of sandstone surfaces by cryptoendolithic cyanobacteria: bioalkalization causes chemical weathering in arid landscapes. Geobiology 2, 261–268. doi: 10.1111/j.1472-4677.2004.00040.x [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  18. Bundschuh J., Maity J. P., Mushtaq S., Vithanage M., Seneweera S., Schneider J., et al. (2017). Medical geology in the framework of the sustainable development goals. Sci. Total Environ. 581, 87–104. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.11.208, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Cai Y., Ma L. Q. (2002). “Metal tolerance, accumulation, and detoxification in plants with emphasis on arsenic in terrestrial plants,” in Biogeochemistry of Environmentally Important Trace Elements. eds. Cai Y., Braids O. C. (Washington, DC: American Chemical Society; ), 95–114. [Google Scholar]
  20. Chanclud E., Morel J. B. (2016). Plant hormones: a fungal point of view. Mol. Plant Pathol. 17, 1289–1297. doi: 10.1111/mpp.12393, PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Chaou S. B., Gharmali A. E., Boumezzough A. (2019). Impact of irrigation with wastewater on accumulation of heavy metals in soil and crops in the region of Marrakech in Morocco. J. Saudi Soc. Agric. Sci. 18, 429–436. doi: 10.1016/j.jssas.2018.02.003 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  22. Chen B. D., Li X. L., Tao H. Q., Christie P., Wong M. H. (2003). The role of arbuscular mycorrhiza in zinc uptake by red clover growing in a calcareous soil spiked with various quantities of zinc. Chemosphere 50, 839–846. doi: 10.1016/S0045-6535(02)00228-X, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Chen X. W., Wu L., Luo N., Mo C. H., Wong M. H., Li H. (2019). Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and the associated bacterial community influence the uptake of cadmium in rice. Geoderma 1, 749–757. doi: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2018.10.029 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  24. Clemens S. (2001). Molecular mechanisms of plant tolerance and homeostasis. Planta 212, 475–486. doi: 10.1007/s004250000458, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Compant S., Clément B., Sessitsch A. (2010). Plant growth-promoting bacteria in the rhizo- and endosphere of plants: their role, colonization, mechanisms involved and prospects for utilization. Soil Biol. Biochem. 42, 669–678. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2009.11.024 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  26. Debeljak M., Van Elteren J. T., Špruk A., Izmer A., Vanhaecke F., Vogel-Mikuš K. (2018). The role of arbuscular mycorrhiza in mercury and mineral nutrient uptake in maize. Chemosphere 1, 1076–1084. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.08.147, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. De Maria S., Rivelli A. R., Kuffner M., Sessitsch A., Wenzel W. W., Gorfer M., et al. (2011). Interactions between accumulation of trace elements and macronutrients in Salix caprea after inoculation with rhizosphere microorganisms. Chemosphere 84, 1256–1261. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2011.05.002, PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Dermont G., Bergeron M., Mercier G., Richer-Laflèche M. (2008). Soil washing for metal removal: a review of physical/chemical technologies and field applications. J. Hazard. Mater. 152, 1–31. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.10.043, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Dhalaria R., Kumar D., Kumar H., Nepovimova E., Kuča K., Torequl Islam M., et al. (2020). Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi as potential agents in ameliorating heavy metal stress in plants. Agronomy 10:815. doi: 10.3390/agronomy10060815 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  30. Dharma-wardana M. W. C. (2018). Fertilizer usage and cadmium in soils, crops and food. Environ. Geochem. Health 40, 2739–2759. doi: 10.1007/s10653-018-0140-x, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Ebbs S., Kochian L. (1998). Phytoextraction of zinc by oat (Avena sativa), barley (Hordeum vulgare) and Indian mustard (Brassica juncea). Environ. Sci. Technol. 32, 802–806. doi: 10.1021/es970698p [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  32. Emamverdian A., Ding Y., Mokhberdoran F., Xie Y. (2015). Heavy metal stress and some mechanisms of plant defense response. Sci. World J. 2015:756120. doi: 10.1155/2015/756120, PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Emurotu J. E., Onianwa P. C. (2017). Bioaccumulation of heavy metals in soil and selected food crops cultivated in Kogi state, north Central Nigeria. Environ. Syst. Res. 6:21. doi: 10.1186/s40068-017-0098-1 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  34. Ernst W., Verkleij J., Schat H. (1992). Metal tolerance in plants. Acta Bot. Neerl. 41, 229–248. doi: 10.1111/j.1438-8677.1992.tb01332.x [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  35. Ferrol N., Gonzalez Guerrero M., Valderas A., Benabdellah K., Azcόn-Aguilar C. (2009). Survival strategies of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in cu-polluted environments. Phytochem. Rev. 8, 551–559. doi: 10.1007/s11101-009-9133-9 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  36. Fester T., Hause G. (2005). Accumulation of reactive oxygen species in arbuscular mycorrhizal roots. Mycorrhiza 15, 373–379. doi: 10.1007/s00572-005-0363-4, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Gadd G. M. (2004). Microbial influence on metal mobility and application for bioremediation. Geoderma 122, 109–119. doi: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2004.01.002 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  38. Gao X., Guo H., Zhang Q. (2020). Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) enhanced the growth, yield, fiber quality and phosphorus regulation in upland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). Sci. Rep. 10:2084. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-59180-3, PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Garg N., Chandel S. (2012). Role of arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi on growth, cadmium uptake, osmolyte, and phytochelatin synthesis in Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp. Under NaCl and cd stresses. J. Plant Growth Regul. 31, 292–308. doi: 10.1007/s00344-011-9239-3 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  40. Genre A., Russo G. (2016). Does a common pathway transduce symbiotic signals in plant–microbe interactions? Front. Plant Sci. 7:96. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2016.00096, PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Gherbi H., Markmann K., Svistoonoff S., Estevan J., Autran D., Giczeu G., et al. (2008). SymRK defines a common genetic basis for plant root endosymbioses with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi, rhizobia, and Frankia bacteria. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 105, 4928–4932. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0710618105, PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Giasson P., Karam A., Jaouich A. (2008). “Arbuscular mycorrhizae and alleviation of soil stresses on plant growth,” in Mycorrhizae: Sustainable Agriculture and Forestry. eds. Siddiqui Z. A., Akhtar M. S., Futai K. (Dordrecht: Springer; ), 99–134. [Google Scholar]
  43. Gil-Cardeza M. L., Ferri A., Cornejo P., Gomez E. (2014). Distribution of chromium species in a Cr-polluted soil: presence of Cr (III) in glomalin related protein fraction. Sci. Total Environ. 493, 828–833. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.06.080, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Goh C. H., Vallejos D. F. V., Nicotra A. B., Mathesius U. (2013). The impact of beneficial plant-associated microbes on plant phenotypic plasticity. J. Chem. Ecol. 39, 826–839. doi: 10.1007/s10886-013-0326-8, PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Gohre V., Paszkowski U. (2006). Contribution of arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis to heavy metal phytoremediation. Planta 223, 1115–1122. doi: 10.1007/s10886-013-0326-8, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Gonzalez-Chavez M. C., Carrillo-Gonzalez R., Wright S., Nichols K. (2004). The role of glomalin, a protein produced by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi, in sequestering potentially toxic elements. Environ. Pollut. 130, 317–323. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2004.01.004, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Gonzalez-Chavez C., D’Haen J., Vangronsveld J., Dodd J. (2002). Copper sorption and accumulation by the extraradical mycelium of different Glomus spp. (arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi) isolated from the same polluted soil. Plant and Soil 240, 287–297. doi: 10.1023/A:1015794622592 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  48. Gonzalez-Guerrero M., Azcón-Aguilar C., Mooney M., Valderas A., MacDiarmid C. W., Eide D. J., et al. (2005). Characterization of a Glomus intraradices gene encoding a putative Zn transporter of the cation diffusion facilitator family. Fungal Genet. Biol. 42, 130–140. doi: 10.1016/j.fgb.2004.10.007, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. González-Guerrero M., Benabdellah K., Valderas A., Azcón-Aguilar C., Ferrol N. (2010). GintABC1 encodes a putative ABC transporter of the MRP subfamily induced by cu, cd, and oxidative stress in Glomus intraradices. Mycorrhiza 20, 137–146. doi: 10.1007/s00572-009-0273-y, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. González-Guerrero M., Cano C., Azcón-Aguilar C., Ferrol N. (2007). GintMT1 encodes a functional metallothionein in Glomus intraradices that responds to oxidative stress. Mycorrhiza 17, 327–335. doi: 10.1007/s00572-007-0108-7, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Gonzalez-Guerrero M., Melville L., Ferrol N., Lott J., Azcon-Aguilar C., Pe’terson R. (2008). Ultrastructural localization of heavy metals in the extraradical mycelium and spores of the arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus Glomus intraradices. Can. J. Microbiol. 54, 103–110. doi: 10.1139/w07-119, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Gupta M. M., Chourasiya D., Sharma M. P. (2019). “Diversity of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in relation to sustainable plant production systems,” in Microbial Diversity in Ecosystem Sustainability and Biotechnological Applications eds. Satyanarayana T., Narain B., Subrata J., Das K. (Singapore: Springer; ), 167–186. [Google Scholar]
  53. Hall J. L. (2002). Cellular mechanisms for heavy metal detoxification and tolerance. J. Exp. Bot. 53, 1–11. doi: 10.1093/jexbot/53.366.1, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Hallett P. D., Feeney D. S., Bengough A. G., Rillig M. C., Scrimgeour C. M., Young I. M. (2009). Disentangling the impact of AM fungi versus root on soil structure and water transport. Plant and Soil 314, 183–196. doi: 10.1007/s11104-008-9717-y [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  55. Hammer E. C., Nasr H., Pallon J., Olsson P. A., Wallander H. (2011). Elemental composition of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi at high salinity. Mycorrhiza 21, 117–129. doi: 10.1007/s00572-010-0316-4, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Hasanuzzaman M., Gill S. S., Fujita M. (2013). “Physiological role of nitric oxide in plants grown under adverse environmental conditions,” in Plant Acclimation to Environmental Stress. eds. Tuteja N., Gill S. S. (NY: Springer Science+Business Media; ), 269–322. [Google Scholar]
  57. Hashem A., Alqarawi A. A., Radhakrishnan R., Al-Arjani A. B. F., Aldehaish H. A., Egamberdieva D., et al. (2018). Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi regulate the oxidative system, hormones and ionic equilibrium to trigger salt stress tolerance in Cucumis sativus L. Saudi J. Biol. Sci. 25, 1102–1114. doi: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2018.03.009, PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. He Z., Shentu J., Yang X., Baligar V. C., Zhang T., Stoffella P. J. (2015). Heavy metal contamination of soils: sources, indicators, and assessment. J. Environ. Indicators 9, 17–18. [Google Scholar]
  59. Hildebrandt U., Regvar M., Bothe H. (2007). Arbuscular mycorrhiza and heavy metal tolerance. Phytochemistry 68, 139–146. doi: 10.1016/j.phytochem.2006.09.023, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Hiltner L. (1904). Über neue Erfarungen und Probleme auf dem Gebiete der Bodenbakteriologie. Arbeiten der Deutschen landwirtschaftl. Gesellschaft 98, 59–78. [Google Scholar]
  61. Hodge A., Fitter A. H. (2010). Substantial nitrogen acquisition by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi from organic material has implications for N cycling. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 107, 13754–13759. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1005874107, PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Hogekamp C. D., Arndt P. A., Pereira J. D., Becker N., Hohnjec K., H. (2011). Laser microdissection unravels cell-type-specific transcription in arbuscular mycorrhizal roots, including CAAT-box transcription factor gene expression correlating with fungal contact and spread. Plant Physiol. 157, 2023–2043. doi: 10.1104/pp.111.186635, PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Hou W., Ma Z., Sun L., Han M., Lu J., Li Z., et al. (2013). Extracellular polymeric substances from copper-tolerance Sinorhizobium meliloti immobilize Cu2+. J. Hazard. Mater. 261, 614–620. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2013.06.043, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Hu J. L., Wu S. C., Wu F. Y., Leung H. M., Lin X. G., Wong M. H. (2013). Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi enhance both absorption and stabilization of Cd by Alfred stonecrop (Sedum alfredii Hance) and perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.) in a cd-contaminated acidic soil. Chemosphere 93, 1359–1365. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2013.07.089, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Jadia C. D., Fulekar M. (2009). Phytoremediation of heavy metals: recent techniques. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 8, 921–928. [Google Scholar]
  66. Jajic I., Sarna T., Strzalka K. (2015). Senescence, stress, and reactive oxygen species. Plan. Theory 4, 393–411. doi: 10.3390/plants4030393, PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Janeeshma E., Puthur J. T. (2020). Direct and indirect influence of arbuscular mycorrhizae on enhancing metal tolerance of plants. Arch. Microbiol. 202, 1–16. doi: 10.1007/s00203-019-01730-z, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Janouškova M., Pavlíková D. (2010). Cadmium immobilization in the rhizosphere of arbuscular mycorrhizal plants by the fungal extraradical mycelium. Plant and Soil 332, 511–520. doi: 10.1007/s11104-010-0317-2 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  69. Janousková M., Pavlíková D., Vosátka M. (2006). Potential contribution of arbuscular mycorrhiza to cadmium immobilisation in soil. Chemosphere 65, 1959–1965. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2006.07.007, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. Jeffries P., Gianinazzi S., Perotto S., Turnau K., Barea J. M. (2003). The contribution of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in sustainable maintenance of plant health and soil fertility. Biol. Fertil. Soils 37, 1–16. doi: 10.1007/s00374-002-0546-5 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  71. Joner E. J., Briones R., Leyval C. (2000). Metal-binding capacity of arbuscular mycorrhizal mycelium. Plant and Soil 226, 227–234. doi: 10.1023/A:1026565701391 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  72. Kachout S. S., Mansoura A., Leclerc J. C., Mechergui R., Rejeb M. N., Ouerghi Z. (2009). Effects of heavy metals on antioxidant activities of Atriplex hortensis and A. rosea. J. Food Agric. Environ. 7, 938–945. [Google Scholar]
  73. Kaldorf M., Kuhn A. J., Schroder W. H., Hildebrandt U., Bothe H. (1999). Selective element deposits in maize colonized by a heavy metal tolerance conferring arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus. J. Plant Physiol. 154, 718–728. [Google Scholar]
  74. Kamilova F., Kravchenko L. V., Shaposhinkov A. I., Azarova T., Makarova N., Lugtenberg B. (2006). Organic acids, sugars and L tryptophan in exudates of vegetables growing on stonewool and their effects on activities of rhizospere bacteria. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 19, 250–256. doi: 10.1094/mpmi-19-0250, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  75. Karimi A., Khodaverdiloo H., Sepehri M., Sadaghiani M. R. (2011). Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and heavy metal contaminated soils. Afr. J. Microbiol. Res. 5, 1571–1576. doi: 10.5897/AJMR11.465 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  76. Khade S. W., Adholeya A. (2009). Arbuscular mycorrhizal association in plants growing on metal-contaminated and noncontaminated soils adjoining Kanpur tanneries, Uttar Pradesh, India. Water Air Soil Pollut. 202, 45–56. doi: 10.1007/s11270-008-9957-8 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  77. Khan A. R., Ullah I., Waqas M., Park G. S., Khan A. L., Hong S. J., et al. (2017). Host plant growth promotion and cadmium detoxification in Solanum nigrum, mediated by endophytic fungi. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 1, 180–188. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2016.03.014, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  78. Kibet B. J., Jackson C. K., Cheruiyot M. Y., Munyendo W. L. L., Ambrose K., Oindo A. G. (2019). Assessment of fluoride and selected heavy metals in food chain around fluorspar mining plant, Kenya. Greener J. Environ. Manag. Public Saf. 8, 15–24. doi: 10.15580/GJEMPS.2019.1.020919029 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  79. Kiirika L. M., Schmitz U., Colditz F. (2014). The alternative Medicago truncatula defense proteome of ROS-defective transgenic roots during early microbial infection. Front. Plant Sci. 5:341. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2014.00341, PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  80. Kim S., Lim H., Lee I. (2010). Enhanced heavy metal phytoextraction by Echinochloa crusgalli using root exudates. J. Biosci. Bioeng. 109, 47–50. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiosc.2009.06.018, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  81. Kistner C., Winzer T., Pitzchke A., Mulder I., Sato S., Kaneko T., et al. (2005). Seven Lotus japonicus genes required for transcriptional reprogramming of the root during fungal and bacterial symbiosis. Plant Cell 17, 2217–2229. doi: 10.1105/tpc.105.032714, PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  82. Konieczny A., Kowalska I. (2017). Effect of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on the content of zinc in lettuce grown at two phosphorus levels and an elevated zinc level in a nutrient solution. J. Elem. 2, 761–772. doi: 10.5601/jelem.2016.21.4.1335 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  83. Kumar R., Bhatia R., Kukreja K., Behl R. K., Dudeja S. S., Narula N. (2007). Establishment of Azotobacter on plant roots: chemotactic response, development and analysis of root exudates of cotton (G. hirusitum L.) and wheat (T. aestivum L.). J. Basic Microbiol. 47, 436–439. doi: 10.1002/jobm.200610285, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  84. Kumar K. S., Dayananda S., Subramanyam C. (2005). Copper alone, but not oxidative stress, induces copper-metallothionein gene in Neurospora crassa. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 242, 45–50. doi: 10.1016/j.femsle.2004.10.040, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  85. Lanfranco L., Bolchi A., Ros E. C., Ottonello S., Bonfante P. (2002). Differential expression of a metallothionein gene during the presymbiotic versus the symbiotic phase of an arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus. Plant Physiol. 130, 58–67. doi: 10.1104/pp.003525, PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  86. Latef A. A. H. A., Hashem A., Rasool S., Abd Allah E. F., Alqarawi A. A., Egamberdieva D., et al. (2016). Arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis and abiotic stress in plants: a review. J. Plant Biol. 59, 407–426. doi: 10.1007/s12374-016-0237-7 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  87. Leitenmaier B., Küpper H. (2013). Compartmentation and complexation of metals in hyperaccumulator plants. Front. Plant Sci. 4:374. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2013.00374, PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  88. Li H., Chen X. W., Wong M. H. (2015). Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi reduced the ratios of inorganic/organic arsenic in rice grains. Chemosphere 145, 224–230. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2015.10.067, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  89. Liang G., Gong W., Li B., Zuo J., Pan L., Liu X. (2019). Analysis of heavy metals in foodstuffs and an assessment of the health risks to the general public via consumption in Beijing, China. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 16:909. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16060909, PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  90. López-Ráez J. A., Verhage A., Fernández I., García J. M., Azcón-Aguilar C., Flors V., et al. (2010). Hormonal and transcriptional profiles highlight common and differential host responses to arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and the regulation of the oxylipin pathway. J. Exp. Bot. 61, 2589–2601. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erq089, PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  91. Ludwig-Müller J. (2010). “Hormonal responses in host plants triggered by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi,” in Arbuscular Mycorrhizas: Physiology and Function. eds. Koltai H., Kapulnik Y. (Dordrecht: Springer; ), 169–190. [Google Scholar]
  92. Ma Y., Oliveira R. S., Freitas H., Zhang C. (2016). Biochemical and molecular mechanisms of plant-microbe-metal interactions: relevance for phytoremediation. Front. Plant Sci. 7:918. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2016.00918, PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  93. Ma Y., Prasad M. N. V., Rajkumar M., Freitas H. (2011). Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria and endophytes accelerate phytoremediation of metalliferous soils. Biotechnol. Adv. 29, 248–258. doi: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2010.12.001, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  94. Ma Y., Rajkumar M., Oliveira R. S., Zhang C., Freitas H. (2019). Potential of plant beneficial bacteria and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in phytoremediation of metal-contaminated saline soils. J. Hazard. Mater. 379:120813. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2019.120813, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  95. Ma Y., Rajkumar M., Rocha I., Oliveira R. S., Freitas H. (2013). Phytoextraction of heavy metal polluted soils using sedum plumbizincicola inoculated with metal mobilizing Phyllobacterium myrsinacearum RC6b. Chemosphere 93, 1386–1392. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2013.06.077, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  96. Maillet F., Poinsot V., André O., Puech-Pagès V., Haouy A., Gueunier M., et al. (2011). Fungal lipochitooligosaccharide symbiotic signals in arbuscular mycorrhiza. Nature 469, 58–63. doi: 10.1038/nature09622, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  97. Makarov M. (2019). The role of mycorrhiza in transformation of nitrogen compounds in soil and nitrogen nutrition of plants: a review. Eurasian Soil Sci. 52, 193–205. doi: 10.1134/S1064229319020108 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  98. Manoj S. R., Karthik C., Kadirvelu K., Arulselvi P. I., Shanmugasundaram T., Bruno B., et al. (2020). Understanding the molecular mechanisms for the enhanced phytoremediation of heavy metals through plant growth promoting rhizobacteria: a review. J. Environ. Manage. 254:109779. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.109779, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  99. Maser P., Thomine S., Schroeder J. I., Ward J. M., Hirschi K., Sze H., et al. (2001). Phylogenetic relationships within cation transporter families of Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 126, 1646–1667. doi: 10.1104/pp.126.4.1646, PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  100. Meier S., Borie F., Bolan N. (2012). Phytoremediation of metal-polluted soils by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Crit. Rev. Environ. Sci. Technol. 42, 741–775. doi: 10.1080/10643389.2010.528518 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  101. Mendez M. O., Maier R. M. (2008). Phytoremediation of mine tailings in temperate and arid environments. Rev. Environ. Sci. Biotechnol. 7, 47–59. doi: 10.1007/s11157-007-9125-4 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  102. Miller R. M., Jarstfer A. G., Pillai J. K. (1987). Biomass allocation in an Agropyron smithii–Glomus symbiosis. Am. J. Bot. 74, 114–122. doi: 10.2307/2444337 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  103. Miransari M. (2017). “Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and heavy metal tolerance in plants,” in Arbuscular Mycorrhizas and Stress Tolerance of Plants. ed. Wu Q. S. (Singapore: Springer Nature; ), 174–161. [Google Scholar]
  104. Mittler R. (2017). ROS are good. Trends Plant Sci. 22, 11–19. doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2016.08.002, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  105. Mnasri M., Janoušková M., Rydlová J., Abdelly C., Ghnaya T. (2017). Comparison of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal effects on the heavy metal uptake of a host and a non-host plant species in contact with extraradical mycelial network. Chemosphere 171, 476–484. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2016.12.093, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  106. Morrison E. N., Knowles S., Hayward A., Thorn R. G., Saville B. J., Emery R. J. N. (2015). Detection of phytohormones in temperate forest fungi predicts consistent abscisic acid production and a common pathway for cytokinin biosynthesis. Mycologia 107, 245–257. doi: 10.3852/14-157, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  107. Nafady N. A., Elgharably A. (2018). Mycorrhizal symbiosis and phosphorus fertilization effects on Zea mays growth and heavy metals uptake. Int. J. Phytoremediation 20, 869–875. doi: 10.1080/15226514.2018.1438358, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  108. Nambara E., Marion-Poll A. (2005). Abscisic acid biosynthesis and catabolism. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 56, 165–185. doi: 10.1146/annurev.arplant.56.032604.144046, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  109. Nath M., Bhatt D., Bhatt M. D., Prasad R., Tuteja N. (2018). “Microbe-mediated enhancement of nitrogen and phosphorus content for crop improvement,” in Crop Improvement Through Microbial Biotechnology. ed. Prasad R. (Elsevier; ), 293–304. [Google Scholar]
  110. Nath M., Bhatt D., Prasad R., Gill S. S., Naser A. A., Tuteja N. (2016). Reactive oxygen species generation-scavenging and signaling during plant-arbuscular mycorrhizal and Piriformospora indica interaction under stress condition. Front. Plant Sci. 7:1574. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2016.01574, PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  111. Nuortila C., Kytöviita M. M., Tuomi J. (2004). Mycorrhizal symbiosis has contrasting effects on fitness components in Campanula rotundifolia. New Phytol. 164, 543–553. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2004.01195.x [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  112. Ouziad F., Hildebrandt U., Schmelzer E., Bothe H. (2004). Differential gene expressions in arbuscular mycorrhizal-colonized tomato grown under heavy metal stress. J. Plant Physiol. 162, 634–649. doi: 10.1016/j.jplph.2004.09.014, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  113. Pagnanelli F., Viggi C., Toro L. (2010). Development of new composite biosorbents from olive pomace wastes. Appl. Surf. Sci. 256, 5492–5497. doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2009.12.146 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  114. Pandey V. C., Bauddh K. (eds.) (2018). Phytomanagement of Polluted Sites: Market Opportunities in Sustainable Phytoremediation. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier. [Google Scholar]
  115. Parniske M. (2008). Arbuscular mycorrhiza: the mother of plant root endosymbioses. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 6, 763–775. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro1987, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  116. Payne A. N., DiChristina T. J. (2006). A rapid mutant screening technique for detection of technetium [Tc (VII)] reduction-deficient mutants of Shewanella oneidensis MR-1. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 259, 282–287. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2006.00278.x, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  117. Pérez-Tienda J., Valderas A., Camañes G., García-Agustín P., Ferrol N. (2012). Kinetics of NH4+ uptake by the arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus Rhizophagus irregularis. Mycorrhiza 22, 485–491. doi: 10.1007/s00572-012-0452-0, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  118. Punamiya P., Datta R., Sarkar D., Barber S., Patel M., Da P. (2010). Symbiotic role of Glomus mosseae in phytoextraction of lead in vetiver grass Chrysopogon zizanioides L. J. Hazard. Mater. 177, 465–474. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.12.056, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  119. Radziemska M., Vaverková M. D., Baryła A. (2017). Phytostabilization-management strategy for stabilizing trace elements in contaminated soils. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 14:958. doi: 10.3390/ijerph14090958, PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  120. Rajkumar M., Sandhya S., Prasad M. N. V., Freitas H. (2012). Perspectives of plant-associated microbes in heavy metal phytoremediation. Biotechnol. Adv. 30, 1562–1574. doi: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2012.04.011, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  121. Reboredo F., Simões M., Jorge C., Mancuso M., Martinez J., Guerra M., et al. (2019). Metal content in edible crops and agricultural soils due to intensive use of fertilizers and pesticides in Terras da Costa de Caparica (Portugal). Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 26, 2512–2522. doi: 10.1007/s11356-018-3625-3, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  122. Richards B. K., Steenhuis T. S., Peverly J. H., McBride M. B. (2000). Effect of sludge-processing mode, soil texture and soil pH on metal mobility in undisturbed soil columns under accelerated loading. Environ. Pollut. 109, 327–346. doi: 10.1016/S0269-7491(99)00249-3, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  123. Rillig M. C., Mummey D. L. (2006). Mycorrhizas and soil structure. New Phytol. 177, 41–53. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2006.01750.x, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  124. Rivera-Becerril F., van Tuinen D., Martin-Laurent F., Metwally A., Dietz K. J., Gianinazzi S., et al. (2005). Molecular changes in Pisum sativum L. roots during arbuscular mycorrhiza buffering of cadmium stress. Mycorrhiza 16, 51–60. doi: 10.1007/s00572-005-0016-7, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  125. Sachdev S., Ansari S. A., Ansari M. I., Fujita M., Hasanuzzaman M. (2021). Abiotic stress and reactive oxygen species: generation, signaling and defense mechanisms. Antioxidants 10, 1–37. doi: 10.3390/antiox10020277, PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  126. Salt D. E., Prince R. C., Pickering I. J., Raskin I. (1995). Mechanisms of cadmium mobility and accumulation in Indian mustard. Plant Physiol. 109, 1427–1433. doi: 10.1104/pp.109.4.1427, PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  127. Sandeep S. P., Yadav K. K., Shrivastava M., Gupta N., Nagar S., Bach Q.-V. (2019). Hazardous heavy metals contamination of vegetables and food chain: role of sustainable remediation approaches-A review. Environ. Res. 179:108792. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2019.108792, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  128. Sarwar N., Imran M., Shaheen M. R., Ishaque W., Kamran M. A., Matloob A., et al. (2017). Phytoremediation strategies for soils contaminated with heavy metals: modifications and future perspectives. Chemosphere 171, 710–721. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2016.12.116, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  129. Schneider J., Bundschuh J., de Melo Rangel W., Guilherme L. R. G. (2017). Potential of different AM fungi (native from as-contaminated and uncontaminated soils) for supporting Leucaena leucocephala growth in as-contaminated soil. Environ. Pollut. 224, 125–135. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2017.01.071, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  130. Schneider J., Bundschuh J., do Nascimento C. W. A. (2016). Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi-assisted phytoremediation of a lead-contaminated site. Sci. Total Environ. 572, 86–97. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.07.185, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  131. Schneider J., Labory C. R. G., Rangel W. M., Alves E., Guilherme L. R. G. (2013a). Anatomy and ultrastructure alterations of Leucaena leucocephala (lam.) inoculated with mycorrhizal fungi in response to arsenic-contaminated soil. J. Hazard. Mater. 262, 1245–1258. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2012.05.091, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  132. Schneider J., Stürmer S. L., Guilherme L. R. G., de Souza Moreira F. M., de Sousa Soares C. R. F. (2013b). Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in arsenic-contaminated areas in Brazil. J. Hazard. Mater. 262, 1105–1115. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2012.09.063, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  133. Schouteden N., De W. D., Panis B., Vos C. M. (2015). Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi for the biocontrol of plant-parasitic nematodes: a review of the mechanisms involved. Front. Microbiol. 6:1280. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2015.01280, PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  134. Schubler A. (2001). Molecular phylogeny, taxonomy, and evolution of Geosiphon pyriformis and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Plant and Soil 244, 75–83. doi: 10.1023/A:1020238728910 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  135. Sessitsch A., Kuffner M., Kidd P., Vangronsveld J., Wenzel W. W., Fallmann K., et al. (2013). The role of plant-associated bacteria in the mobilization and phytoextraction of trace elements in contaminated soils. Soil Biol. Biochem. 60, 182–194. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2013.01.012, PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  136. Sharma S., Anand G. S., N. Kapoor R. (2017). Arbuscular mycorrhiza augments arsenic tolerance in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) by strengthening antioxidant defense system and thiol metabolism. Front. Plant Sci. 8:906. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2017.00906, PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  137. Shen H., Christie P., Li X. (2006). Uptake of zinc, cadmium and phosphorus by arbuscular mycorrhizal maize (Zea mays L.) from a low available phosphorus calcareous soil spiked with zinc and cadmium. Environ. Geochem. Health 28, 111–119. doi: 10.1007/s10653-005-9020-2, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  138. Sheng X. F., He L. Y., Wang Q. Y., Ye H. S., Jiang C. (2008). Effects of inoculation of biosurfactant producing Bacillus sp. J119 on plant growth and cadmium uptake in a cadmium amended soil. J. Hazard. Mater. 155, 17–22. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.10.107, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  139. Sheoran V., Sheoran A. S., Poonia P. (2011). Role of hyperaccumulators in phytoextraction of metals from contaminated mining sites: a review. Crit. Rev. Environ. Sci. Technol. 41, 168–214. doi: 10.1080/10643380902718418 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  140. Shi W., Zhang Y., Chen S., Polle A., Rennenberg H., Luo Z. B. (2019). Physiological and molecular mechanisms of heavy metal accumulation in non-mycorrhizal versus mycorrhizal plants. Plant Cell Environ. 42, 1087–1103. doi: 10.1111/pce.13471, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  141. Shi Z., Zhang J., Lu S., Li Y., Fayuan W. (2020). Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi improve the performance of sweet sorghum grown in a mo-contaminated soil. J. Fungi 6:44. doi: 10.3390/jof6020044, PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  142. Singh G., Pankaj U., Chand S., Verma R. K. (2019). Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi-assisted phytoextraction of toxic metals by Zea mays L. from tannery sludge. Soil Sediment Contam. 8, 729–746. doi: 10.1080/15320383.2019.1657381 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  143. Smith S. E., Read D. J. (2008). Mycorrhizal Symbiosis. 3rd Edn. San Diego: Academic. [Google Scholar]
  144. Solanki R., Dhankhar R. (2011). Biochemical changes and adaptive strategies of plants under heavy metal stress. Biologia 66, 195–204. doi: 10.2478/s11756-011-0005-6 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  145. Spagnoletti F. N., Balestrasse K., Lavado R. S., Giacometti R. (2016). Arbuscular mycorrhiza detoxifying response against arsenic and pathogenic fungus in soybean. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 133, 47–56. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2016.06.012, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  146. Spence C., Bais H. (2015). Role of plant growth regulators as chemical signals in plant–microbe interactions: a double-edged sword. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 27, 52–58. doi: 10.1016/j.pbi.2015.05.028, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  147. Tahat M. M., Sijam K. (2012). Mycorrhizal fungi and abiotic environmental conditions relationship. Res. J. Environ. Sci. 6, 125–133. doi: 10.3923/rjes.2012.125.133 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  148. Takács T., Vörös I. (2003). Effect of metal non-adapted arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on cd, Ni and Zn uptake by ryegrass. Acta Agron. Hung. 51, 347–354. doi: 10.1556/AAgr.51.2003.3.13 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  149. Tian C., Kasiborski B., Koul R., Lammers P. J., Bücking H., Shachar-Hill Y. (2010). Regulation of the nitrogen transfer pathway in the arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis: gene characterization and the coordination of expression with nitrogen flux. Plant Physiol. 153, 1175–1187. doi: 10.1104/pp.110.156430, PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  150. Tiwari J., Ma Y., Bauddh K. (2020). Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi: an ecological accelerator of phytoremediation of metal contaminated soils. Arch. Agron. Soil Sci. 68, 1–14. doi: 10.1080/03650340.2020.1829599 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  151. Veresoglou S. D., Shaw L. J., Sen R. (2011). Glomus intraradices and Gigaspora margarita arbuscular mycorrhizal associations differentially affect nitrogen and potassium nutrition of Plantago lanceolata in a low fertility dune soil. Plant and Soil 340, 481–490. doi: 10.1007/s11104-010-0619-4 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  152. Vodnik D., Grčman H., Maček I., van Elteren J. T., Kovačevič M. (2008). The contribution of glomalin-related soil protein to Pb and Zn sequestration in polluted soil. Sci. Total Environ. 392, 130–136. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2007.11.016, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  153. Vongdala N., Tran H. D., Xuan T. D., Teschke R., Khanh T. D. (2019). Heavy metal accumulation in water, soil, and plants of municipal solid waste landfill in Vientiane, Laos. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 16:22. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16010022, PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  154. Wang B., Qiu Y. L. (2006). Phylogenetic distribution and evolution of mycorrhizas in land plants. Mycorrhiza 16, 299–363. doi: 10.1007/s00572-005-0033-6, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  155. Wang G., Wang L., Ma F., You Y., Wang Y., Yang D. (2020). Integration of earthworms and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi into phytoremediation of cadmium-contaminated soil by Solanum nigrum L. J. Hazard. Mater. 389:121873. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2019.121873, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  156. Wasserman J. L., Mineo L., Majumdar S. K., Vantyne C. (1987). Detection of heavy metals in oak mycorrhizae of north eastern Pennsylvania forests, using X-ray microanalysis. Can. J. Bot. 65, 2622–2627. doi: 10.1139/b87-353 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  157. Wei Y., Su Q., Sun Z., Shen Y., Li J., Zhu X., et al. (2016). The role of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in plant uptake, fractions, and speciation of antimony. Appl. Soil Ecol. 107, 244–250. doi: 10.1016/j.apsoil.2016.04.021 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  158. Wu Z. P., McGrouther K., Huang J. D., Wu P. B., Wu W. D., Wang H. L. (2014). Decomposition and the contribution of glomalin-related soil protein (GRSP) in heavy metal sequestration: field experiment. Soil Biol. Biochem. 68, 283–290. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2013.10.010 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  159. Wu S. C., Wong C. C., Shu W. S., Khan A. G., Wong M. H. (2011). Mycorrhizo-remediation of lead/zinc mine tailings using Vetiver: a field study. Int. J. Phytoremediation 13, 61–74. doi: 10.1080/15226511003671353, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  160. Wu S., Zhang X., Chen B., Wu Z., Li T., Hu Y., et al. (2016). Chromium immobilization by extraradical mycelium of arbuscular mycorrhiza contributes to plant chromium tolerance. Environ. Exp. Bot. 1, 10–18. doi: 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2015.08.006, PMID: 27209517 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  161. Wu S., Zhang X., Sun Y. (2015). Transformation and immobilization of chromium by Arbuscular Mycorrhizal fungi as revealed by SEM–EDS, TEM–EDS, and XAFS. Environ. Sci. Technol. 49, 14036–14047. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.5b03659, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  162. Xu G., Yang S., Meng L. (2018). The plant hormone abscisic acid regulates the growth and metabolism of endophytic fungus Aspergillus nidulans. Sci. Rep. 8:6504. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-24770-9, PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  163. Yang Y., Han X., Liang Y., Ghosh A., Chen J., Tang M. (2015b). The combined effects of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) and lead (Pb) stress on Pb accumulation, plant growth parameters, photosynthesis, and antioxidant enzymes in Robinia pseudoacacia L. PLoS One 10:e0145726. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0145726, PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  164. Yang H., Zhang Q., Dai Y., Liu Q., Tang J., Bian X., et al. (2015a). Effects of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on plant growth depend on root system: a meta-analysis. Plant and Soil 389, 361–374. doi: 10.1007/s11104-014-2370-8 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  165. Zacchini M., Pietrini F., Mugnozza G. S., Iori V., Pietrosanti L., Massacci A. (2009). Metal tolerance, accumulation and translocation in poplar and willow clones treated with cadmium in hydroponics. Water Air Soil Pollut. 197, 23–34. doi: 10.1007/s11270-008-9788-7 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  166. Zhan F., Li B., Jiang M., Li T., He Y., Li Y., et al. (2019). Effects of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on the growth and heavy metal accumulation of bermudagrass Cynodon dactylon (L.) Pers. grown in a lead–zinc mine wasteland. Int. J. Phytoremediation 29, 849–856. doi: 10.1080/15226514.2019.1577353, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  167. Zhan F., Li B., Jiang M., Yue X., He Y., Xia Y., et al. (2018). Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi enhance antioxidant defense in the leaves and the retention of heavy metals in the roots of maize. Environ. Sci. Pollut. R. 25, 24338–24347. doi: 10.1007/s11356-018-2487-z, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  168. Zhang X. F., Hu Z. H., Yan T. X., Lu R. R., Peng C. L., Li S. S., et al. (2019). Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi alleviate cd phytotoxicity by altering cd subcellular distribution and chemical forms in Zea mays. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 171, 352–360. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2018.12.097, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  169. Zhang D. Y., Wang J. L., Pan X. L. (2006). Cadmium sorption by EPSs produced by anaerobic sludge under sulfate-reducing conditions. J. Hazard. Mater. 138, 589–593. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2006.05.092, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  170. Zhou Q., Chen Y., Yang M., Li W., Deng L. (2013). Enhanced bioremediation of heavy metal from effluent by sulfate-reducing bacteria with copper-iron bimetallic particles support. Bioresour. Technol. 136, 413–417. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2013.03.047, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  171. Zimmer D., Baum C., Leinweber P., Hrynkiewicz K., Meissner R. (2009). Associated bacteria increase the phytoextraction of cadmium and zinc from a metal-contaminated soil by mycorrhizal willows. Int. J. Phytoremediation 11, 200–213. doi: 10.1080/15226510802378483, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Frontiers in Microbiology are provided here courtesy of Frontiers Media SA

RESOURCES